The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC +0.01%) and the Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ 0.26%) both offer exposure to U.S. consumer staples companies, but their approaches and portfolios look quite different. This comparison explores each ETF’s fees, performance, risk, and holdings to help investors decide which may be a better fit for their goals.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | VDC | PBJ |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Vanguard | Invesco |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.61% |
| 1-yr return (as of 4/1/26) | 4.4% | 7.9% |
| Dividend yield | 1.95% | 1.61% |
| Beta | 0.63 | 0.72 |
| AUM | $9.9 billion | $89.7 million |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
VDC is significantly cheaper, with an expense ratio of 0.09%, compared to PBJ’s 0.61%. VDC also offers a higher dividend yield at 1.95%, while PBJ pays 1.61% — a notable gap for income-focused investors.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | VDC | PBJ |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -16.56% | -15.83% |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $1,421 | $1,321 |
What’s inside
PBJ focuses narrowly on 30 or so U.S. food and beverage companies, making it far less diversified than many sector ETFs. Its top holdings — including Corteva (CTVA +0.20%), Kroger (KR +2.68%), and Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM +1.56%) — show a tilt toward agricultural inputs and food distribution.
VDC, by contrast, covers more than 100 stocks spanning the entire consumer defensive sector, with heavy weights in Walmart (WMT +0.23%), Costco Wholesale (COST +1.06%), and Procter & Gamble (PG 0.44%). This broader approach includes not just the food and beverage category, but also household and personal products, offering broader diversification across the consumer staples sector.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investors
Consumer staples — the category covering everyday essentials like food, beverages, and household products — tend to hold up relatively well during economic downturns, which is a big part of their appeal. But not all ETFs are built the same.
The cost gap alone is striking. PBJ’s 0.61% expense ratio is nearly seven times higher than VDC’s 0.09%. For long-term investors, that expense drag compounds quietly over time — and becomes harder to justify when VDC also delivers a higher dividend yield. Income-oriented investors, in particular, will likely find VDC the more rewarding choice.
The trade-off with PBJ is focus. If you have strong conviction that food and agricultural supply chains are poised to outperform broader consumer spending — perhaps due to commodity price trends, food inflation, or structural shifts in how Americans eat — PBJ’s concentrated bet could make sense. Its stronger 1-year return suggests it can outperform in the right environment.
For most investors, though, VDC’s combination of low cost, higher yield, greater diversification, and stronger long-term track record makes it the more sensible option. It captures the defensive characteristics investors seek from the consumer staples sector without doubling down on any single corner of it.
As always, the best ETF is the one that fits your broader portfolio — not just the one with the flashiest recent return.
