Home Blog

Pulte: ‘cartel-like’ bureaus should cut costs, eyes bi-merge



Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte is renewing calls for lower credit reporting costs, calling the bureaus “cartel-like” as he shows new interest in tri-merge alternatives.

Processing Content

“Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion have been overcharging Americans for far too long. This will end soon. We are seriously considering bi-merge, and stronger solutions,” Pulte said in one of his closely-watched social media posts on Thursday night.

In later X posts on Friday, he added that FHFA is “also studying the usage of just one credit report.”

Reactions

The Consumer Data Industry Association has said credit bureaus operate legally, offer discounts and protect mortgage integrity with their traditional trio of reports. The group pointed to past statements when contacted Friday. None of the three bureaus had responded to inquiries at press time. The National Credit Reporting Association declined to immediately respond.

The previous oversight chief for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had considered a bi-merge but reportedly dismissed the idea of a single report.

The current FHFA chief said his approach to the GSE credit reporting requirements and related reform would be “safer and sounder” than past efforts.

Pulte had paused the bi-merge effort to prioritize legally-mandated score modernization. He called for the government-sponsored enterprises to approve VantageScore more broadly on Friday. 

“Effective immediately, I’m instructing Fannie and Freddie to approve all lenders to use VantageScore,” he said in an X post.

The bureaus created VantageScore as an alternative to the traditional FICO metric.

“The extraordinary pace of VantageScore 4.0 adoption signals a new era for the mortgage industry,” said Silvio Tavares, President and CEO of VantageScore, said in a press release.

Advanced scores the GSEs are adopting, including 4.0 and the pending addition of FICO’s newer 10T, are aimed at allowing broader and more advanced consideration that may improve the number and accuracy of borrower scores.

The Community Home Lenders of America said Friday that they welcomed the move after an initial rollout of VantageScore to large lenders.

“This is a decisive action to increase competition and save mortgage borrowers money,” said Rob Zimmer, CHLA’s director of external affairs, said in a press release. CHLA has forecast that FICO could raise prices by 50% for 2027. 

The bureaus and FICO contribute to credit reporting and scoring pricing and have debated which is responsible for hikes.

“FICO supports Director Pulte’s commitment to foster a competitive environment,” the credit scoring provider said in an emailed statement. FICO added that it anticipates there future implementation of the 10T model across the market to compete with VantageScore 4.0.

Meanwhile, the Mortgage Bankers Association has pressed for a single report option used within certain bounds with the aim of limiting risks, and issued a statement welcoming Pulte’s new comments on Friday. 

“We also support ending the tri-merge requirement and moving to a single-file approach for borrowers with strong credit profiles,” MBA President and CEO Bob Broeksmit said in an email press statement.

The CDIA has said that even with limits to 700-plus range credit metrics, analysis of historical data suggests a single report could result in lower scores for up to 27.8 million people.

The Federal Housing Administration, which represents one of the most sizable parts of the government-related mortgage market outside of the GSEs, said earlier this year that it was planning to stick with the tri-merge requirement.

The GSEs have been held in conservatorship since 2008 due to a financial crisis during the period but more recently have had a long, consistent run of profitability.



Forex And Crypto Full Trading Course



🔥Join Our Telegram For Real Time Support:
🔸Free Telegram Channel link –
🔸Free Gold And Crypto Telegram Group –
🔸 Whatsapp – (7985246060)
—————————–
🚀 Top Recommended Brokers:-
Best For Indian Users –
✅ DELTA INDIA (Safe & FIU Registered) –
✅ COINDCX –

For Outside Indian Users-
✅XM – ( Use Partner Code – AKHAND )
✅VANTAGE – ( Use Partner Code – AKHAND )
—————————–

🔥Disclaimer:

As per the FEMA Act, trading non-INR pairs or using brokers not registered in India is illegal. Please research thoroughly and make decisions wisely. I trade Cryptos and Forex in Dubai using EXNESS and XM, which are registered abroad. If you’re in India, explore compliant options. Your decisions are entirely personal.
—————————-
DISCLAIMER: ANY FOREX-RELATED CONTENT SHARED ON THIS CHANNEL IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR NON-RESIDENT INDIANS (NRIs) AND INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCES OUTSIDE THE RELEVANT RESTRICTED JURISDICTIONS. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. AS A DIGITAL PLATFORM, WE DO NOT CONTROL, DIRECT, OR RESTRICT THE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION, ACCESSIBILITY, OR VIEWERSHIP OF OUR CONTENT. VIEWERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THEIR ACCESS TO AND USE OF THIS CONTENT COMPLIES WITH THE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE IN THEIR JURISDICTION.
—————

📢 Connect Me On All Social Media Platforms –
✅Instagram –
—————————-
Forex And Crypto Full Trading Course
#trading #cryptotradingfullcourse #forextradingfullcourse #scalping #tradingtechstreet #tradingtechstreetlive

source

The Bulletproof BRRRR in 2026 (Buying One Tomorrow!)


James:
The BRRRR strategy has always been dependent on getting several moving pieces right, buying at the right basis, managing the rehab, hitting the rent targets, and refinancing the debt without leaving too much cash trapped in the deal. In today’s market, there is less room for any one of those assumptions to miss, but experienced investors are still finding deals today. I’m James Dainard. I’m stepping in for the host seat, David Meyer. And today I’m joined by Zach Kepes, who’s been buying BRRRR properties for the past 20 years, and he’s still active today. We’ll break down Zach’s process, the portfolio he’s built, how his buy box numbers have changed, and what investors need to know before trying this strategy for themselves. This is On the Market, and let’s get into it.
Today, I’m joined by my buddy, Zach Kepes, who has been a BRRRR property investor for the past 20 years. I met Zach two years ago when I moved down to Arizona, and we quickly realized that we were like brothers from another mother. We like buying the same dirty things. We like getting into the trashy houses. We do heavy value add. And I just had a great connection with Zach because he is a real buyer in any type of market from 2008 all the way into the conditions now. And it’s all about creating that value today. So Zach, I’m really excited for you to be here.

Zach:
Great to see you. Appreciate the opportunity to be here with you and your great audience. Thank you so much.

James:
Right now in the current market, I mean, there was an article that just came out on CNBC and it’s talking about the investor appetite. Me and you have been chatting a lot about this, is that investors, they’re a little sour on real estate because it’s not as easy as what it was maybe in 2022. And according to CNBC, real estate investors have purchased 23% fewer homes in the first quarter of 2026 than they did in the first quarter of 2025. So what it’s saying is investors are starting to go, “Hey, I want to wait this out. I want to wait for better pricing.” And as an active investor myself, this has been the time to buy. You can buy deals today and still BRRRR in today’s market. If not, you can actually do it better than you could 24 months ago.

Zach:
For sure. I concur wholeheartedly. I’ve been buying consistent. So I’ve been buying since 2002 through 2026, so 24 years of the same strategy. Nothing’s changed in terms of strategy, but in any market you have to adapt and pivot based on market conditions. In 2018 and 19, you could throw a dart at the wall and you got appreciation behind you. You could make a mistake and pencil something and no matter what, by the time you go to sell it, you’re up an extra 10 or 20%. In today’s market, the myth is it’s almost impossible. Rates are high. Deals are taking longer to sell, but the reality is that’s what we’re talking about really the flippers. I know you do a lot of flipping, I flip, but I also do a lot of buy and holds, hence the BRRRR strategy where we’re retaining the homes. The key comes down to strategic relationships, which you’re amazing at, creating a lot of people that want to do deals with you and intelligent value add and just an amazing investor overall.
I’m the same way. So the key comes down to equity, equity, equity. So many people are fixated on just buying as many as they can or deploying money for not strategically, but the reality is if you can pencil a deal and like you said, the magic number is after you stabilize that deal, you buy it, you put your value add into it and you’re strategic with good economies of scale and you can stabilize it at the end with at least 20 or 25% equity, you can recycle those monies by pledging it to a bank and utilize that asset an infinite amount of times by moving those dollars with a good bank for sure. So you just have to buy deeper in today’s market and understand what’s going on in the macro markets and the micro markets.

James:
So the BRRRR strategy is to buy a property where your purchase price and your renovation costs are below 80%. Typically you want to be 75%, but 80% is kind of that threshold where your purchase price and your rehab combines and then you can refinance and use financing with that. So you were saying that you used bank financing to pledge over.

Zach:
So I use cash right now, but I’ll give you the whole break it down. I’ll use cash from a line of credit, it doesn’t matter where it comes from. It could be private or whatever. So the home is owned free and clear. I pay, let’s use a $300,000 house. I buy $300,000 cash, I rehab it, let’s say put 50,000 into it. 20% equity of that would, let’s call it about 70,000. So the home would be worth 420 to 450 ideally. Now there’s no debt on there. I can go to the bank and say, “Hey, Mr. and Mrs. Banker, can you give me some debt on this property? I want to refinance my, pull out my cash.” They say, “Sure, we could give you 80% of appraised value.” They go out and appraise that asset. It’s 420 and they take 80% of it. What’s that number?
You’re going to get a large majority, sometimes even more than your basis, and then you go on to the next deal. The key is how much is the cost of that debt? So if you’re using hard money to do that, it would never pencil. People that are trying to stabilize deals with 10, 11, 12, 13%, there’s no way that’s going to work because you’re going to be underwater. But if you’ve got good debt and you’re bankable, not enough people talk about being bankable. So many people just think you need hard money and personal relationships, but the key to this game is being bankable, being able to get cheap leverage on your portfolio or one home at a time and then recycling those dollars. So if these homes pencil on these burst strategies, you got to make sure that the rental market supports your carrying costs.
So if I’m getting an eight, nine, 10, 11 or 12% return on that asset, let’s say I rent it out for 25 or 2,600, I can now support the debt at 80% with the bank, borrowing money at 6%, but I’m yielding nine or 10. So you have that spread and you also have your equity. I always like to say, what happens to your net worth, James, when you buy that deal and you’re all in it at 350 and it’s worth 420? Your net worth overnight goes up gross, $70,000 in one deal. How many homes would it take for somebody to flip or wholesale to make 70? Probably six, maybe seven if your average assignment fee is $10,000 or $12,000, that’s five deals. You just stabilize one deal and your net worth, you go to the bank and say, Hey, you only have this deal, for example, I just increased my net worth $70,000 in gross profit.
That is very, very powerful and not enough people are talking about that. That’s huge. So the game is about delayed gratification, being bankable through the bank, arbitraging the interest rate. So again, if you’re borrowing at six or six and a half and you’re getting nine, 10 or 11, that’s a great deal. But most importantly is that equity that you’ve stabilized. You have 20% equity in that asset. That is huge and not enough people focus on that.

James:
Well, yeah. And it’s that instant gratification that people are looking for where a lot of times equity in the bank, it’s not that satisfying, right? It’s satisfying when everything’s going well and you have different income coming in, but when the market cools down, like flipping profits have gone down for sure in the last 12 months. Development profits have gone down. It’s hard to find a yield and profit in today’s market. And when you’re in that kind of environment, you create the equity. It doesn’t feel as good though, because it’s there, but you can’t use it. Now when everything’s coming in, you have equity, you feel like you’re Superman. But real estate’s never been about that instant gratification. It’s about the hard work that goes into it to push you through for the long term. And creating a consistent portfolio of 20% equity has a big impact over a one, two, a five-year period.
And to create that equity though, you got to buy nasty houses. You got to buy value add. And so what do you have in your portfolio right now? What is your bread and butter?

Zach:
So my bread and butter, I’m currently sitting on north of 300 single family homes in Arizona. So I’ve been doing this again since 2002. So this is over two plus decades.

James:
I mean, 300 homes, that’s a lot of rental houses. It

Zach:
Sure

James:
Is. What are you buying in today’s market? Because it’s a lot different than what you were buying in 2008. I remember the 2008 days you’re buying house 50 grand, right? They were nasty, they’re gross, 50, 60 grand. They would pencil out. But today they’re not 50 anymore.

Zach:
What’s interesting is I’m buying the same asset class. They’re just a lot more expensive, but guess what? The math still works today. So I’m still buying those same assets in the 250, $300,000 range and still putting in. They’re still nasty as they were then. The prices and inflation has increased the pricing on those assets. I’m still buying those same deals and retaining them. And obviously rents have gone up because back then the rents were by the way, 800, $900. Today those rents, believe it or not, are 22 to 2,500. So the rents went up that no one’s talking about, but so did the pricing. So the math still works today. I’m buying 225,000, putting in 50. And if you’re renting that out for 2,500, you’re getting a 10% gross cap rate. Again, and I’m paying cash, but if I’m pledging it to the bank and I’m putting debt and I’m not getting 100% financing on it, you’re not servicing that full $300,000 of your basis.
You’re only servicing 240 at 6%. So the math is still mass. The key is you just need to buy at a deeper basis because of pricing and cost of capital. Insurance has gone up, taxes have gone up, et cetera. But rents have also gone up almost at the same level to where you’re acquiring these deals today. So it still works.

James:
No, and I think there’s a huge boomerang coming where if you buy now and you don’t worry about the cash flow today and you can get that thing to break even, you create the 20% equity. Rents are climbing. They are going up and especially for single family houses. We’re seeing it in Seattle. We’re seeing, I mean San Francisco wet rents popped over 20%. And there’s these little jolts in the market because people always want to jump back in when the market’s already rebounding, but you want to buy when investor purchasing is down 23% because those are the best opportunities. We’re going to hit pause here for a quick break. More Zach after this. Welcome back to On the Market. I’m James Dainard with Zach Kepes. Let’s jump back in. Tell us a little bit about the most recent deal you bought.

Zach:
So I’m closing one literally tomorrow. It’s in Peoria. It’s a three bed, two bath, two car carport. I don’t like in my buy and whole portfolio, which is really important. When you flip, you can buy anything. You buy a one month condo, you buy based on value and what you can resell for. On the retention stuff, what I call legacy property, stuff that I’m retaining and that I want to own for a long time so that my dogs, one of them behind me and my boys could inherit in the future because they’ll live for thousands of years, God willing. It’s the stuff that I want to have at least three bedroom, two baths. That’s the stuff that rents the best or four bedroom, two baths. Typically, a four bedroom is even better than a three or you can create it because families and affordability is still getting tough.
So there’s families that are aggregating purchasing power and rentability by living together, friends with wives, et cetera, are aggregating their purchase power so that they can save money. So it’s beneficial when you’re looking at retaining assets to have number one parking, enough room for potentially four adults or a couple kids that are working. Ideally, I like cover parking. This one has a carport. And this one is a full gut remodel. I’m buying it for $240,000. It’s worth 360. I’ll probably put in $40,000 or so and I will rent that house out for $2,400. That is a deal that is closing tomorrow in Peoria. It’s a great solid entry level neighborhood. The other thing that I want to allude to that you mentioned before is you talk about breaking even on cash flow or $100. I see so many beginners and so many experienced investors, they’ll pass on a deal because they say that the rents don’t support that long-term hold.
But what they’re negating is, I say this and I’ll ask you the question. If you could buy a deal with $100,000 in equity at 200,000, it’s worth 300, let’s say it just needs $20,000, but you’re going to break even or maybe lose $100 a month in cashflow for a year or two till maybe rents come up, would you pass on that deal because you may have to service it 100 or $200 a month or would you buy it?

James:
No, it’s return on equity. How much cash am I putting in and what kind of equity and wealth? And so if I’m creating $100,000, if I leave 20 in, that’s a four to 5X my multiplier.

Zach:
Bingo. But it doesn’t pencil when they just look at it and say, “Okay, I’m getting hard money to stabilize it and I’m going to go rent it.” And they’re like, “Well, for the first six months I have to service it maybe 100 or 200.” And then I pull back and say, “Good. Now put this on an Excel spreadsheet and run what we call proforma. Let’s evaluate the deal.” If you’re getting an $80,000 increase in your net worth, but you can invest, let’s say your negative cash flow, $200 a month for a year, minus $2,400 to make 80, would you invest 2,400 to make $80,000? And then they say, “Well, of course.” I said, “Well, that’s what you need to think about. You’re hyper-focused on your bank account each month. You’re playing the short game.” I want people’s mindset to transition to, “Wow, if I just slow down, take a deep breath, decompress and realize I just about to make 80,000 stabilized, by the way, in a long-term gain because if you sell that in a year, and let’s say you just didn’t want to hold it for whatever reason, you’re only investing $2,400 more into the deal to make and stabilize 80,000 at a long-term gain.
And that’s why one thing we should talk about is taxation. All these flippers, every deal you make, let’s say you make 500,000, you’re not making 500,000 because you’re paying 40% or whatever in California, these other areas, more in taxes. But the beautiful part about these BRRRR strategies is we’re achieving a long-term capital gain. So instead opposed to you sell for 500, you’re only making 300 net after taxes. But in that 500, if you retain that deal or 10 deals at 50 and you’re making that say 500 and you sell after, you’re only paying roughly 20% in taxes or you 1031 exchange that asset and you’re paying zero in taxes. So that’s a really key strategy of how I’ve acquired a lot more deals in terms of wealth preservation. Instead of giving it to the government, I’ve retained these assets and leveraged them to acquire more deals and buy better assets.
So that’s really important strategy.

James:
It is because it’s money in the bank and when people say, Hey, you’re going to lose a couple hundred dollars, that’s a liability. And for me, we’re in a more expensive market and that’s why Arizona is so attractive to me. I can’t buy a lot of homes for 250 grand in Seattle or it’s going to be three hours out of the city. But the upside and the growth isn’t quite there. It’s a little flatter, right? There’s nothing wrong with that. But if I’m looking for upside, I want to get into markets that are more affordable, but also can grow at a little bit higher appreciation rate. And so like Peoria, that’s a little bit out of town. That’s like 40 minutes out of Phoenix and Scottsdale. 30

Zach:
Minutes, call it. Not too far.

James:
It’s

Zach:
Still within the 101 general circle. It’s not like you’re going out to Queen Creek or Maricopa City or Pinal County. It’s pretty close and it’s very affordable and it’s within my 50 mile buy radius because you want economies of scale.

James:
Yeah. And when you buy that property and you’re losing $100 a month, you can then 1031 exchange it out where I’m going, “Hey, I can now trade this, use this equity, take it tax free, go buy another BRRRR property or two and then double my portfolio and also double that return on equity because you’re now creating 20% equity on two properties at that point.” For sure. That’s a lot of my strategy. If I’m going to eat money on the deal, I’ll do it for a one to two year basis, but knowing that I’m going to trade it into two to four more units at that point, because as investors, we run out of money to put in these deals. We can’t just put 20% in, 20% in because we’re going to run out of bandwidth. And so it’s all about creating that equity in the BRRRR strategy.
And so you mentioned a 50 mile radius. What is Zach’s buy box?

Zach:
I’ll give you a very fundamental kind of a green light, red light, yellow light strategy. I call it my four pillars of acquisitions. My strategy is this. Number one, when you buy the asset, is it something that if the market shifts and you get stuck with it, you’re happy to own it. So no matter what, it takes out all emotionality in these deals. So again, legacy, I buy this, I’m happy to own it. It’s not on some major street. If I get stuck with it, I’m not paying 800,000. I can only rent it for 2000. That would not work in a legacy property. It’s an area that there’s growth. They’re building the Starbucks and nice restaurants. So will there be future appreciation? Am I happy to own this for the next decade? Okay, yes. Next, when I buy this and after I run my numbers from acquisition to stabilization or value add, we’re doing the full surgery, will there be at least 20% equity after stabilization?
Just simple math on this one. There’s no emotionality again. Is there that equity after? Will it increase my net worth? Will my net worth break even or could I potentially lose? If I’m going to break even or lose, it’s immediately, it’s a no. Next is, do I get my yield on the rental in today’s market conditions? Not hoping for future rent growth because Arizona is unlike other markets, we’re kind of stagnant in terms of rents. We’re not going up, maybe a little downward pressure, but if you have a nice product, my rents are kind of stagnant and I’m getting the yields that I’m projecting. So can I get an eight to 10% gross rental yield? Very simple math, again, very predictable. I know the areas because I work in them every single day. It’s in my 50 mile radius. Can I get my 24, 25, 26, 2,700 on this?
And number two, by the way, I like to use this. You want to be proactively marketing it. As soon as I’m done with the rehab, I already want to have earnest money from a tenant before I’m done with the asset. So that’s number three. Does it give me the eight to 10 or ideally more cash on cash return? And my fourth pillar and summation is, can I buy the asset less than replacement cost? So there’s that intangible value. If it costs a builder to build $200 a foot in today’s market plus land value, is the asset that I’m buying cheaper than if I can build it for cheaper, why am I buying anything? I would just build it. But the reality is if the replacement cost is greater than what I’m buying it for by default, that’s another strong green light to say proceed. So in summation, legacy property, I’m happy to own this for multiple years.
Do I get my stabilized equity, the 20, 25%, that magic number for a BRRRR strategy after stabilizing? Do I get my minimum eight to 10% and can I buy this less than replacement cost? That in summation, if you deploy those same pillars and strategy, I don’t think you can go wrong.

James:
I have the same type of strategy. I have to hit 10% if I’m leaving any cash in the deal. And it’s like that is my make or break. If it doesn’t hit there, I’m buying the property for other use. Maybe it’s future development. Maybe it’s a one to two year flip or a buy and hold in a flip. But it kind of narrows your strategy of can I keep this for a long time? Because like you said, you wanted legacy properties. So typically what price point are you buying at? 10% return, at some point you get too expensive, right? Of

Zach:
Course. There’s an inverse relationship between price and yield traditionally, right? You could have these ultra luxury properties at two or three million and I see these people Airbnbing in these short-term strategies. Sure, they’re getting their 12 or 13% or whatever, but that’s a huge exposure and I’m not a huge proponent of that. That only works for 1% of the population. I don’t do in fact any, for clarification, Airbnbs on these or midterm rentals. These are all long-term kind of warm buffet, set it and forget it long-term stabilized strategy. So my stuff is long-term tenancy, yields that are going to pay over the time, that eight to 10. And so the stuff that I’m buying is the cheaper stuff in an average, 250, 200, just like the deal I bought, 240,000. Those deals still pencil and will give me that eight, nine or 10. Maybe I’m more aggressive than you in terms of I’ll take a lesser cap, but I recognize the equity play and they almost give a little more favoritism to the equity that I’m not as hyper-focused on hitting that 10.
I’m happy with an eight. Shoot, I’d be happy honestly with a six if there was a lot more equity after stabilization too, because just like I mentioned earlier, I’m happy to invest to stabilize that equity and make that net worth larger for my portfolio. You know what I’m saying? Of course you’re going to take a lesser yield as long as there’s the equity, larger equity on the backend to support that. So that’s what I want people to hyperfixate at. Equity is the key to every deal. If there’s no equity in my opinion, I would not buy it.

James:
What the house look like, Zach? And what improvements were you doing to that house? When you’re doing these 240, because value add isn’t for everybody. And I always say, Hey, look, if you can’t control your cost, you can always bring on an operator too and partner with that person because if you’re creating 20% equity, there’s nothing wrong with leaving a little bit of cash in the deal or breaking even and taking 10% of the equity, right? It’s better than just buying traditional. So what are you doing when you buy that 240,000? Are you adding bathrooms? Are you adding bedrooms? Or is it kind of inside the walls work?

Zach:
It’s all inside the walls. This one happens. And I like that too, right? If you can avoid major permanent work and delays, I like stuff that I can. I value the time of my money. So if I could turn this project in 30 days, which I know that I can, the work is as such. So I’m already proactive. I’ve already walked it because I got in the asset. It’s very important not to really buy sight unseen. I always encourage people to get in it, video it, tape it, get your contractors in there, get some numbers so you have definity going into the project. You don’t want guesswork. Sometimes it’s hard to see when we’re buying these hoarder houses. Those are some of the best too, but there’s of course risk because if you have all the stuff all over the floor, there could be major foundation that’s hidden.
So you have to pencil that in terms of cushioning and deal. This particular asset, the floors are probably 25 years old. They stink from the cat urine and feces. The cabinets are original to the home. There’s popcorn ceilings and old lighting fixtures. But once you get through that dust, it’s a must to buy that house, right? You got to get in there, clean it up. So we got paint, we got texture, we got floors. We’ll do it. There’s already an existing fireplace. I’ll do cabinets, what I call like for like. We don’t have to do major design. These are not like, “Hey, bring in your Megans and all these people to do your stuff.” This is like for like remodels, upgrade windows, like for like bathrooms, tiles opposed to the plastic surrounds and really just give it what I call a really nice facelift, a full facial surgery, make sure that it’s a clean environment, it’s a safe home, it’s a stabilized asset.
What I believe in is spending the money today to save the money tomorrow. A lot of people have the wrong mentality. They come into, like I said, that bandaid mentality. They just want to maybe put. I see all these people doing LVP over floors or leaving popcorn or leaving old fixtures or fixing some copper on a 20-year-old water heater just to give it an extra six months. The guys and gals are already working on this home. Do it right the first time. Their trip to go back and forth is actually going to cost you more money than getting it right the first time. So come in, do a comprehensive remodel, spend the money to make more money tomorrow. You don’t want to be a slumlord. You want to be a great landlord because if the tenant moves in and they’re constantly calling for service, they’re likely to move out because they’re missing time off of work to let people in.
It’s an inconvenience. So serve a five star product. If you look at Yelp and those things, it’s not just about the food, it’s about the service, communication, all the factors on these bur houses, you want to think about all of them. So many people are hard to focus. I have a nice house, but I don’t give good service. Forget about the tenants. That’s the wrong mentality. If you treat and retain these tenants that are coming in like your family, like your mom or sister or brother or wife, you’re going to treat them well. They’re going to see and feel that and they’re going to refer you to other tenants so that you can rent your houses out faster and continue to get those referrals, less time on the market, less commissions paid to other agents because you’re vertically integrated. So again, in summation on this home, this is going to get all new tile.
And I don’t do LVP, I’m doing tile because again, legacy properties, I plan on owning these for a long time. It’s not like, “Hey, let’s just make this look good, put some lipstick and sell it, and then it’s going to wear off with the little rain.” No, these things are built for durability and time tested. So when the tenants move out, I can simply. I’m not doing carpet, by the way. I’m doing all tile so I can clean the tile, have a faster transition. I’m not spending money on new carpet or anything else and making this thing timeless, durable, beautiful, have that emotional renter appeal and executing. That’s the game

James:
Plan. Yeah. It’s that bulletproof rental, right? Bulletproof

Zach:
Rental.

James:
Because what kills investors is the maintenance and the repairs. And what you touched on is really, really important. When you’re looking at a house, you can’t force the numbers. It either needs the work or it doesn’t need the work. And when people try to make the numbers work and they’re like, “I can squeeze a couple more years out of that roof.” Well, when you have to replace that roof, that’s going to be eight to $12,000, if not more. And all of a sudden that’s eight to $12,000 that just ate up your equity, it ate up your cash flow, and that’s what all of a sudden you have this massive liability that you’re feeding and feeding and feeding for $100 a month in cash flow. And so you got to do an accurate scope of work. I think what you talked about is really important. You meet the contractor there, especially for new investors.
Don’t guess. Don’t go off of the wholesaler’s proforma. Don’t go off of what Zach’s numbers are or what my numbers are. Meet your contractor there because the key to the BRRRR is to make your rental bulletproof so it lasts. Your maintenance cost is paid for, your roofs, your hot water tanks, your furnaces, your appliances. Those are things that last three, five, 10 years. You want those in the deal upfront. And then if you’re making your $100 a month in cash flow, the upside’s actually there because you have equity built, you don’t have a liability you’re feeding, and the upside is only going to go up with rates going down as the market could go up. These are things that you can explode your wealth and that’s where everyone’s sour. 27% of people are buying less houses because real estate doesn’t work anymore, but it works if you underwrite it and look at it correctly.

Zach:
Those 27% of those people, a lot of them were using what I call hope is a strategy. They’re hoping for appreciation. They’re hoping that that roof doesn’t leak. They’re hoping that the AC lasts a couple more years. What we’re talking about is being hyper conservative. We’re not hoping for anything. We’re actually projecting worst case scenario, which is really important to be conservative. I see a lot of investors, they’ll leave an existing tub that looks good in a full remodel versus pulling it to put a new tub in for $150 and scoping the sewer because you know how much more expensive it is when those landlords come in and the tenants are there and you have to pull the floors and pull the tub and excavate and break concrete because they didn’t check for one simple thing and run a camera through the plumbing. That’s crazy.
They’re hoping that the plumbing is good versus knowing definitively that they don’t have to replace the plumbing or they do it before they start laying all the tile and it doesn’t cost them $10,000 in the future and kill them with their capital reserve. So I think that’s a great point of putting a 10% reserve for unknown expenses, being conservative. And guess what? If you come in and you don’t need any of that, that’s additional ammunition for your next project or anything else. You want to be conservative, you hope that the market’s good, but you’re not using hope as a strategy. You’re using fundamentals. What we’re talking about is buying right, having all that equity as liquidity for the future and your profitability. That’s key.

James:
We’re stopping one more time for a quick break. When we return, more from Zach Kepes. Welcome back to the On the Market Podcast. Let’s continue. So this deal you bought, 240,000, you’re putting 50 into the renovation and it’s worth 375 to 400 roughly?

Zach:
360 to 380. I’m conservative, so just say 360, run those numbers.

James:
360,000. So you’re creating $70,000 in equity. And so for your typical investor, you have 300 rental properties, you’re using a little bit more of your cash, your equity, sometimes you use private financing. So your typical investor has to buy that with a construction loan, right? You come in, you buy that property, you take a loan out for 80% or 85% of the total project cost of the 290,000. So you got to come up with roughly $50,000 to do that deal. The lender’s going to finance you back your construction costs, and once you’re done, you’re going to refinance into a conforming rate. Or right now, a lot of investors are using DSCR loans, right? Correct. Where it’s the debt coverage ratio loans, and they can then refinance that back out, get all their cash back, create the $70,000 in wealth. But then the numbers on this, for everyone that says BRRRRs are dead, if you take out a loan at $290,000 with a DSCR at a six and a half percent rate, your payment is 1833 a month.
At 6.75, you’re 18.81. 7%, you’re 2,000. Then you got taxes and insurance, but what are you renting that house out for again?

Zach:
I will get between 2,400 and 2,500 conservatively for this home.

James:
2,500. So after all expenses, you’re going to be making 100 to $200 a month with no cash in the deal.

Zach:
Correct.

James:
That is the definition of a BRRRR. Now, if you were buying that property 18 months ago, would you have bought that property for 240,000 or is that more, right? That’s where the opportunity is right now. We’ve seen a dip, at least in acquisitions where we’re at least 10 to 15% lower on this stinky value add. Now, the turnkey cleaner grandma’s houses, we’re competing against end users, different types of investors that don’t have any value add, so they’re paying more, but for the beat up homes, we’re seeing good discounts in today’s market. We’re buying them cheaper than we were buying them 12 to 18 months ago. And the interest rates are still the same as what they were for us 12 to 18 months ago. So what blows my mind is why are investors not buying when they were buying 12 to 18 months ago?

Zach:
I think a lot of them, that’s a great point. You’re exactly right. That home, if I bought 18 months ago, I probably would’ve paid 265 to 270 for that asset. And now I can buy it 10% cheaper, which is significant. Just because a lot of these investors, they’re only using, and I think it’s important to have a hybrid strategy. We didn’t talk about it, but I don’t just have one strategy. It’s important to have multiple strategies and diversify your investments. So if you can sell and make cash, you’re never going to go broke by having a profit. And a lot of times when you’re flipping, you can take those profits and buy more BRRRRs and retain that or find new opportunities. You constantly want to be moving money, obviously, other than your long-term whole portfolio. So it’s important that you can exit some of those deals.
But the investors that only have one strategy, which is just flipping, their time on market is longer. Interest rates have crept up. So their holding costs are longer and they have no other source of income. They don’t have that income from their BRRRR portfolio or equity that they’ve created that they could tap into for more opportunities. So essentially they’re stuck. They’re not refinancing it. They could look at some of those people should look at potentially BRRRRing that. Does that home that they anticipated flipping, does it work as a rental? Could you just turn around and retain it and have that long mindset, that delayed gratification mentality and then cash it out and go on to new opportunity? Some people need to think about they’re only fixated on one exit. It’s important to every deal, for me at least, to look at every deal and say, “Hey, is there multiple exits?” By the way, even if your intent is not to rent it, but you put it out to flip and you have that rental service say, Hey, someone calls you as a potential buyer like, “Well, I see you’re asking 360.
It’s been on the market now 60 days. It’s delayed. I’m going to offer you 320.” And then you say, because you’re leveraging the fact that you’re a dual exit, “Well, I have a tenant that I have an application that I’m processing.” And I say, “Oh, shoot. Okay. Well, I’ll come up on price because it creates that demand by default by having traction on that asset.” It’s a really important strategy to get people to, one, if you’re going to flip to maximize your value and vice versa. If you have a tenant like, oh, I’m looking at another rental property. Well, I have a potential buyer, so I really need to know. So it forces those decisions and demand on that asset. Even if that’s not your full intent, you should evaluate multiple exits to maximize the yield on that single home.

James:
Yeah. And that’s that low, I call it the low risk flip because there’s multiple exits. If you’re buying some of the stuff I’m buying right now where I’m paying 800 –

Zach:
You’re not renting that

James:
Out. No, I just paid 2.8 million for a flip. And the only reason I shop there is because that’s where the best deals are. I have no desire to buy a bunch of $2.8 million houses. But if the math works, it works. And if I can build in a bunch of contingencies and still make profit at the end of the day, I will look at that deal. But that is not a low risk flip. That is you got a lot of capital in the deal, you can’t rent that thing out. And that’s the strategy when people get nervous about it, then switch over. That’s why I’m starting to explore Arizona because I want to buy in the Peorias for 240,000. That deal you described, I will buy all day long.

Zach:
Correct. You buy as many as you can of that for sure. It just makes economic sense. It hits the four pillars. You’re sleeping better. The problem is respectfully, like your $2.8 million deal, your Laguna 10 million, you probably could lose a little sleep overnight. I know you’ve been busting your butt for the last year, but you’re probably thinking about the contract or what’s going on, the cost of capital, the per diem expense. For me with a diversified portfolio of lower income stuff, I can immediately get somebody in there and get it rented out if it’s not selling. So I would venture to say, and I’ll ask you the question instead of speculate, would you rather own 20, $400,000 houses in terms of ARV versus one $8 million flip or would you rather just do the eight million?

James:
Of course. But I’m a pressure makes diamonds guy. So I do well when I got a lot of pressure on me. And I just go where the opportunities are because there’s different engines that we always look at, flipping, development, rentals, apartments, lending. I like to have a pie chart of income coming in. So no matter what’s going on with the market, a couple things hit well, some don’t. But what always works is the BRRRR. And that’s why I really wanted to bring you on because I kept hearing like, oh, it’s dead. I hear this. It’s all over social. Turn off social media too. It’s dead. No, it’s not. It actually is the most workable that it’s been because they’re real numbers and you can create real equity on that. So Zach, for someone getting started, how did you find that deal? You’re the Zach Kepes Arizona.
People know you like to buy them down and dirty. How did you find that deal and what’s the best way for people to go find a deal just like that?

Zach:
One, you got to be ready. You got to be knowledgeable. So if someone brings in, I’ll teach you how to cast the net to attract that opportunity, but you also have to be knowledgeable. So if you’re just getting into this, I recommend finding a James or a Zach in your market and trying to emulate what they’re doing. Go out. We’re always open books. People could see our projects and whatnot. And try and understand before you’re putting your hard earned money and 240,000 in a deal, get a full comprehensive basis for that asset. Go drive the home or pull up in tax records, all public record.What’s James buying?What’s Zach buying for this bur portfolio? And understand, okay, he bought it for 240. How does he only put 40 or 50 into it? What are the improvements? It’s a copy and paste. There’s abundance of deals for everybody to win.That’s what’s beautiful about real estate.
It’s not like, oh, there’s only a few opportunities. Everybody can win. There’s a huge seats at our tables anytime and you’re always welcome to join. The point is understand the game so when that opportunity hits you in the face, you’re ready to execute. People want definity. So when it comes, you got to be ready to move fast. So it’s like I say when people go to the casino, you don’t just sit down at the $100 blackjack table and not understand the rules. Understand the rules, watch the fundamentals, learn from James and all these guys online that are doing it. See it firsthand. Do these investor walkthroughs to understand, okay, now when I see that next deal, I’m ready to execute and I’m not going to hesitate because hesitation will cost you the deal. These deals move in seconds, minutes. So what happens is I, number one, project.
I’m always on social media. I’m the same way I am right here, the same way you were on TV, which I love authenticity. Be authentically yourself and say, “Hey, I’m Zach. I’m looking for my next buy and hold in any of these areas. If you’re a wholesaler, if you are an agent, call me. I’m ready to go, cash ready.” People want someone who’s motivated, who’s definitive, knowledgeable and ready to execute. Be that guarantee. So I projected. Title companies are a great resource too. Call the different title companies that are investor friendly and tell them, “Hey, do you have any wholesalers you can introduce me to that have opportunities in any of these areas?” They would love to do it because they want their deals to flow. If they have an escrow and they don’t have a buyer, they’re losing that money. So they’d be happy to connect you.
Do an event where you’re inviting people. It doesn’t have to be a lot of money. I did hikes and said, “Hey, come on out and meet me. I’m going to have other investors there. Let’s collaboration, collaboration over competition.” So do something that’s unique to you. If you’re a bowler, if you like ice skating, if you like racing cars, create a little event to invite the top wholesalers and agents in the areas that you want to buy, aggregate them in a room, shake their hands. People want to do business with people that they know and feel comfortable with. The more hands you shake, the more money you make. It’s a fact. So be authentically yourself, shake those hands and the opportunities will come. And when they come, you got to be ready to pick up your phone, respond quickly. I was working out the other day, this one came, my buddy who a friend of through the title company introduced me to this guy named Ryan.
And he said, “Hey buddy, I got this deal in Peoria.” He sends me over the address and photos. I looked at him literally in the middle of my set working out of the gym and I said, “I like it. I really love it, but I liked it.” I said, “Yeah, I’m very interested. You could send me the assignment because I wanted to lock it up. I signed it on my phone in one minute, but I have one contingency. I needed to walk it because again, I love everybody, but I only trust myself. For a quarter million dollars, I will spend the time to walk the asset. I already had it under assignment with the contingency of a 20 second walkthrough. I walked it, put the earnest money and it’s closing tomorrow.” So that is literally how that deal originated, how it’s executed. Deals aren’t just getting created by sitting in your office all day and hoping for opportunities.
You got to get out in the field, shake the hands, get around the people that are doing the deals and they’ll start coming your way. That’s just the fact.

James:
Title reps are the most underutilized people because they think it’s all title and escrow reach out because they need to know who’s in their market and they see the transactions going down. And it’s a great way to get introduced to wholesalers. So then you get the deal sent to you just like Zach did, but then you have to be prepared. Prepared means you have to be pre-qualified. If you’re Zach and you’re a little bit more experienced, you might have your line of credits, you’re set up with your financing, but you got to be set up with the right lenders.

Zach:
That’s a great point. So when the deal comes, you need to know that you can execute. You’re just like, okay, you tie it up, you put up your $5,000 earnest money and then you’re scrambling to get the money. That’s a great point. Make sure that you are collaborating and have yourself pre-approved, whether it’s a bank, whether you have a HELOC on your house, whether you already have the cash, which would be the best, or you’ve got high net worth individuals that you can use private money from. You should actually have two sources in case one falls apart. And I’ve seen that happen before. So talk to your rich uncle or rich friend or friend of a friend to say, “Hey, I’m doing this and I’d love to partner with you. What type of return are you looking for? How much is your capital?” And then also call hard money lenders in your market so you have two, if not three sources of capital for execution because the last thing you want to do is commit to a deal and then you don’t execute and then you’re going to be SOL for any future opportunities if you can’t perform.
So performance is key.

James:
Yeah. And you got to have that money available. So get pre-qualified with numerous different hard money lenders, not just one. They cold called you and said, “Hey, I can do this for you.” You want to get through the full pre-qualifications. Investors forget and they skip the line. They’re like, “Oh, now I got to go get the money.” No, you got to get the money before you can buy. That’s how this works. But then you have to have the money there for you once you buy and stabilize it. And this is another big thing that people skip, right? When you’re buying these properties, you know that you can get bank financing to pledge that to. You can’t make a quick decision unless you know these things are in place. And so you have lines of credits, that’s usually going to be like a business line. But the other things that investors are using, DSCR loans.
You got to get one to two DSCR lenders pre-qualified. Get qualified for conventional financing. If you’re buying single family, you can own up to 10 single family rentals. And it is your gum powder for growth to get pre-qualified because that’s when you can make that quick decision, right? You know the deal, you’re able to underwrite it, you’re able to walk it, verify your costs. You have the financing so you can commit because you know you can pay for it. But then how do you stress test that deal? Your good buddy sent it to you, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good deal. That people make all theime. Oh, so-and-so sent it to me, so it’s goodbye. No. It

Zach:
Must be good. Yeah. Listen, I love all my buddies and they’re all good buddies and you got to walk the house. At the end of the day, unfortunately, you got to be contingency mindset, which is he sent it, but everyone’s human. By the way, people make mistakes. They walked it quickly. They forgot about that foundational crack or the hole in the roof in the back garage that they didn’t walk. So it’s also a protectionary measure for them because people are human. We make mistakes. So it also covers them. And when they walk it and they’re a good friend of yours, I’m sure they’re going to say, and you can point out, “Hey, you forgot about this.” And then when you go to buy it, even though you locked it up at 240 and they neglected something probably erroneously and say, “Hey, I need another 6,000 off this deal because you didn’t show me this and it wasn’t conveyed.” And they’re going to say, “Well, I’m so sorry.
Yeah, I’ll get this to you at 234.” So it helps you mitigate that additional risk if you didn’t walk it, which would be crazy. I always say this. When you go to Burger King, you don’t walk in the kitchen to go have them make your burger to look and make sure it’s clean because it’s $8. If you take a bite and it’s undercooked, you throw it out. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars. If you’re too lazy to walk or drive the deal, you should not be in the business. I drive all of my deals. I make sure that they’re sound. You want to protect your hard-earned money for sure.

James:
So how do you evaluate that property, right? Especially for new investors out there, if you misvalue that home, your BRR strategy is toast because you can’t get your cash out. If you misevaluate your rents, you could be really bleeding out or your DSCR lender who’s going to finance you based on income isn’t going to give you the money you need. So as your experience, you kind of know the neighborhoods well. I can drive through neighborhoods and be like, “That’s worth about that.” For new investors out there, who are the people that are directing you on your rents and your values?

Zach:
Yeah. I mean, just like you say, you never really want to trust a wholesaler. You want to do your own due diligence and slow it down. You’re putting hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars at risk. And that’s a key question. No matter what the deal is in every neighborhood is finicky and different. You could be a quarter mile away from a comp that they’re showing you that says it’s worth 500,000. So never trust anyone. Slow it down. I literally get on the MLS or Zillow, whatever you have access to, or get a friend that has access to the multiple listing service and do both. I want to call the most recent homes that have rented in that neighborhood. I want to see days on market. So if that home took 342 days to get your 2,500, that’s going to be a problem. By the way, you want to pick up the phone.
Remember that proactive versus reactive mentality. You’re not hoping that you’re going to get this number. I want it quantified and qualified through real conversations from today. So I’m going to look at all the pending homes in that exact subdivision first and say, how much activity did you. There’s a model match. I love starting there. Go in the first quarter mile, same sub. “What type of activity have you had on this asset? What’s the feedback? Have you had multiple offers? Did it fall out of escrow?” And by the way, when you make those calls, ask them for more opportunities. “Hey, I’m an active buyer in this neighborhood. I want to introduce myself. Thanks for taking the time. I’m asking because I’m looking at a home in this neighborhood. Maybe you could even list it or sell it for me. “So create that strategic relationship with them and give them something in return.
But the reality is you’re extracting real value from today, real knowledge. I love calling pendings and UCBs to say,” How strong is your offer? Are you taking a backup? “These are good questions because it really will dictate the reality of what’s happening in that neighborhood. If a home goes under contract in two days over there and you’re going to do a like for like remodel, that’s pretty compelling if the number that you’re projecting, right? Or there’s three sold in the last month for the number that you’re hoping are for more, that’s pretty conforming information of what you need to say,” Okay, that value’s there. “Same thing on the rents. Look at the last rentals in that neighborhood or that zip code. How fast did they move? Were they similar construction? Was it the three two? If the rents are way off, there’s a problem. You have to have real tangible assets that have recently traded or they’re pending or they’re under contract and having the conversations.
Don’t just assume you see a pending for a number and it shows 360 and you think,” Okay, well, there’s a 360 pending because the wholesaler said there’s a pending at 360. “When I pick up the phone and I say,” Hey, how strong is that offer? And they’re like, “Well, they’re getting a divorce. We’re at 290 even though it shows pending at 360. Now I got some solid information. It’s not a 360 because that was their only offer.” So take the extra steps to truly understand your capital at risk and hey, is the value really there? You can’t just judge a book by its cover. It’s the same thing on a pending in real estate. Delve into it, open that book and read into it as much as you can to extrapolate all the critical information to make sure you’re making the best decision for your acquisition.

James:
Got to verify, right? Property managers, if you’re using a property manager, have them tell you what the rents are. Don’t guess, especially for a low risk flip. The broker that could list it for you say, “Hey, what can you sell this for? And if you can get that number, I might sell it instead of keep it.” They’re going to have a vested interest to get you an accurate number. And these people around you can really guide you because the numbers on the papers coming your way typically are to sell the deal, not to put you in the best position. Well, Zach, I want to thank you for coming on. Good to see you, man.

Zach:
Appreciate it. Best of luck. Thank you. Take

James:
Care. That’s it for today’s episode of On the Market. Big thanks to Zach Kepes for walking us through how we still finding deals and executing the BRRRR strategy after 20 years in business and for showing us that you can still do the deals in today’s market. Make sure you follow the On the Market Podcast wherever you get your podcasts. And if you’re already listening, check us out on YouTube for more analysis. I’m James Dainard and I’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Building a Referral Network With Strategic Partners


Building a Referral Network With Strategic Partners written by Alex McQueen read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode:

Overview

John Jantsch sits down with Jermane Cheathem for a live coaching session. Cheathem built his referral business around a handful of aligned partners instead of a long prospect list, and he uses the conversation to map out a partner strategy for Duct Tape Marketing’s fractional CMO service in real time.

They dig into how a partnership works best when your offer helps the partner sell their own product. Cheathem walks through examples: creative methods ranging from pairing a marketing package with home remodeling franchisors, or teaming up with brand consultants who need execution support to placing free chocolate samples with high-end restaurants to reach wealthy diners.

The conversation also covers why cold outreach rarely pays off and what to do instead: start with the people already in your phone. Anyone weighing referral partnerships, agency growth, or a way out of the cold-calling grind will get a clear playbook here.

Guest Bio

Jermane Cheathem spent 17 years in medical equipment financing before building a referral-based model that has produced more than $50 million in funded deals for hospitals, food truck owners, and construction companies. He is the sales director at Dao Financial Solutions and the founder of Creators Learn, where he teaches sales professionals how to replace cold calling with a small number of high-trust referral partnerships.

Key Takeaways

  • Pick a handful of the right partners and go deep, not wide. Chasing volume wastes time on relationships that were never going to close.
  • A partnership sticks when your product helps your partner sell their own. That turns your offer from optional into necessary.
  • Stop cold calling, cold emailing, and cold ads. Call everyone already in your phone first and ask a simple question: do you know anyone who needs this?
  • Look for partners with a built-in reason to want your offer, like franchisors who need their franchisees to hit revenue targets.
  • Work your own backyard before chasing prospects somewhere else (local relationships build trust faster).

Great Moments

  • [00:01] – Jantsch opens with Cheathem’s $50 million in funded deals, built without a single cold call.
  • [01:20] – Cheathem explains the morning he realized 300 cold calls a day would never get him where he wanted to go.
  • [09:42] – Cheathem builds a live partner strategy for Duct Tape Marketing, pairing the fractional CMO offer with home remodeling franchisors.
  • [11:38] – Cheathem tells the story of a Dubai chocolate maker who won over the city’s top restaurants by giving away free samples first.
  • [19:28] – Cheathem introduces his “MVP” concept: one strong partner who opens the door to a whole network of similar people.

Memorable Quotes

  • “The best friends to have are friends you make money with.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “It never makes sense to me to chase anything in life. The best friendships, the best relationships, and the best business partners are always easy from the very beginning.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “You’d be surprised how much comes from that first domino. Once you have one strong partner sending you solid business, that partner probably knows other people who need the same service or product.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “When your product helps your partner sell their own, it stops being a want and becomes a need. That’s when the relationship lasts a lifetime and the deals get simple.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “Do less, but do it better, instead of trying to spam everyone.” — John Jantsch

Resources

    • Creators Learn — Jermane Cheathem’s website (creatorslearn.com)
    • The Referral Engine by John Jantsch (2010)

 

Email

Download

New Tab

John Jantsch (00:01.806)

So most people build referral networks by meeting, I don’t know, as many people as they can, as many people as possible. Today’s guest picked five or so and went all in on the trust with each one of them and turned it into a $50 million in funded deals without any cold calling. Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Jermane Cheathem. He is the sales director at Dale Financial Solutions and runs something called Creators Learn.

Where he teaches other sales professionals how to build the same kind of referral-based business. Today he actually pitched me on the idea of doing a building something live here on the show. So I have no idea what I’m doing today. we’re just gonna dive right in and see if he can actually use a duct tape marketing offering as the case study. So, Jermaine, welcome to the show.

Jermane (00:55.296)

Thanks, John. I’m looking forward to it, man. I I I’m just as lost as you in today’s episode, so we’ll figure it out on the fly.

John Jantsch (00:59.47)

Well well let’s get let’s get a little context. In the email you originally sent me, you said you had been making 300 cold calls a day, which sounds absolutely terrible. and that that nothing was really working. So what was the day you realized that that math would never kind of get you to where you wanted to go?

Jermane (01:20.414)

Well, I realized it because I was working twelve hours a day and getting very little results from it. life is short, we all die. So I knew that was not gonna pan out long term. And the way I had the epiphany was I was talking to one of the people that were working on the deal that we were working on together, and he told me, Hey, Jermaine, I’ll have some more deals for you.

John Jantsch (01:27.299)

Yeah.

Jermane (01:46.558)

And I realized, wait, wait, I’ve been going at this the entire wrong way. Instead of me going one-to-one transactions and trying to figure out one-to-one how I can get someone to buy my thing, I should just partner with people that already have my ideal customers in their sphere of influence. And my thing helps them sell their thing. And because you know, I was doing financial services, I just partnered with medical device salespeople because my financing helped them sell their the medical devices to the doctors. So

It became a win win win situation where I did ninety percent less work but got ninety percent more income. So I just turned the entire vehicle on its head.

John Jantsch (02:26.2)

Yeah, I I wrote a book actually called The Referral Engine in twenty ten. and that was one of the premises of that book was you your customers, people who know you, I mean, certainly know how great you are. they can refer you, but they can refer one or two people maybe. whereas, like you said, that right strategic partner might have five hundred people that could send your way. So a hundred percent agree with that. So one of the things I wanted to focus on is I think

I think that you said most of your results came from just a small group of people, five maybe even. how did you pick those instead of the, you know, obviously the others you hundreds you could chase?

Jermane (03:05.6)

Well, because they started sending me business and so there’s no reason to chase more business if you have ample business already. It’s all about quality, never quantity. I’m always looking for leverage and simplicity. And so for me, leverage and simplicity is always about how can I manage the fewest personalities, procedures, protocols, and get the greatest return while deepening my relationship with those individuals. Because you can’t have a a hundred friends.

John Jantsch (03:08.952)

Right.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:32.706)

Yeah.

Jermane (03:33.382)

You can’t be close enough because there’s not enough hours in the day. So you have to really dive deep into who do you want to spend your time with and develop something bigger as long as it’s profitable. I I always have this adage like the best friends to have are friends you make money with.

John Jantsch (03:45.507)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:50.711)

Yeah. Well, and and and that’s a really good point though. I mean, I know you’re you’re kind of being facetious, but not. is that that those five or whoever, whatever the number is, they have the right values, they bring you the right kinds of customers, a deal is easy with them. I mean, it just you know, it’s like there’s a whole bunch of people out there that can make life hard. You know, when you find people that can make life easy, then then like you said, why not focus on deepening that relationship?

Jermane (04:18.622)

Yeah, it never makes sense to me to chase anything in life. Because you’ll notice like the best friendships, the best relationships, the best business partners, they were always very easy at the very beginning. It was never a bunch of convincing or scratching and clawing or following up. Like even to me, following up is almost a waste of time, to be completely honest. Because if you it it because you’ll spend 90% of your day following up people that will never buy from you versus just pay attention to the signals that are already there.

John Jantsch (04:21.388)

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (04:29.272)

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (04:38.914)

Yeah. Yeah.

Jermane (04:48.264)

That are easy.

John Jantsch (04:50.07)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So we provide fractional CMO services, as I told you. And actually we have a whole network of of certified marketing consultants that that license our practice. So I thought you had offered to kind of do this live, you know, break break this thing down live. And so I thought let’s let’s use the duct tape marketing fractional CMO service as you know as kind of the guinea pig for this. you know, we provide this service to

Really small to midsized businesses. We’re not, you know, we’re not going after Fortune 500 companies. These are like two to twenty million dollar businesses, founder led quite often. and what we’re providing them is is marketing strategy, marketing leadership, which they they haven’t had. in many cases we will also execute excuse me, execute on the plan for them with our team. but the primary thing that that we’re bringing to them is a a a strategic outlook on the on their market.

So what what other context would help you kind of do to do today’s goal?

Jermane (05:53.29)

So is there any particular vertical you’re in?

John Jantsch (05:57.268)

y you know, we don’t we haven’t. I just I’ve always enjoyed the variety of of working with different types of businesses. we do a lot of business in the home services industries, you know, remodeling contractors, roofing contractors, that kind of thing. And we do a lot of work in the professional services. So other consultants, you know, architects, accountants, lawyers. Those are probably the two biggest.

Very broad you know, markets, but home services and professional services.

Jermane (06:29.544)

And so which is the most profitable and which do you enjoy working with the most?

John Jantsch (06:36.205)

Well, you know, my team does all the work, so I I couldn’t tell you the I couldn’t tell you this but you know there’s they’re drastically different. I think the reason we went into those two fields is professional services have always relied very much on thought leadership. and that’s really how I built my whole practice was on thought leadership. but then I started moving a lot of that thought leadership towards

Jermane (06:42.644)

What do they say?

John Jantsch (07:04.009)

businesses like remodeling contractors who, you know, we’re like, what do you mean, thought leadership? You know, we we just build this thing that people tell us to, but we’ve actually been in very successful at c almost changing that that industry by having them, you know, think differently about it. So if I were going to pick, you know, my one of my favorites is remodeling contractors. you know, I just I love working with them. We can have great impact, you know, especially ones that we can teach some of the, you know,

the differences that what we bring and what strategy really means, we we can have massive impact on on their business, really transform their businesses.

Jermane (07:39.006)

Okay. And so we’ll just take those two avatars. so with the with the contractors and with the professional services folks, how do you currently acquire those clients?

John Jantsch (07:41.955)

Okay.

John Jantsch (07:53.166)

Well, we ha I’ve been doing this thirty years. I’ve written seven books on marketing. and so we have we you know, we have a little unfair advantage. I I shouldn’t say it’s unfair. I mean we work to build it. but most of the most of that comes to us by way of the fact that that we have a pretty well known brand, you know, nationally.

Jermane (08:11.699)

Got it. So it’s mostly all inbound, I’m assuming.

John Jantsch (08:14.39)

It it really is, yeah.

Jermane (08:16.327)

Okay. Is it mostly from the books or what what’s the main driver?

John Jantsch (08:19.917)

Well, we’ve continued to you know, we do webinars every month. you know, we we put out tons and tons of content. We’re very active in the social channels, so it’s the books are a big part of I would say half the business that that that finds us sites having read or at least been aware of one of my books.

Jermane (08:41.843)

Got it. Okay. interesting. Okay. So the though here’s the problem I see with the current setup. But but I know why you set it up this way, being broad. But strategic partners always work the best when we have a very narrow offering and avatar, obviously. so with that being said, what I would do on the contractor side.

is I would probably partner with franchisors that do those type of franchises because it doesn’t they have to have to have a ROI. They have to have these franchises work. And so what’s the biggest hindrance of growing a franchise? Marketing and sales and getting more revenue, right? So I would include some type of marketing package that you already have, included in the franchisor’s pitch to the franchisee.

John Jantsch (09:25.521)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (09:37.433)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (09:42.9)

That would be an easy now. Obviously, you’d want to even get more niche as far as they only do bathrooms or they only do kitchens or like the more niche the better. But that would be what what my first thought with the with the remodeling situation would be partner with the franchise or now on the professional services. what I would probably do since it’s again very broad and we don’t know what these coaches or consultants are actually doing, but they all

Since they’re thinking about thought leadership, most of them I’ve noticed really place a very high value on branding. They believe brand is like the B’s knees, but real entrepreneurs know branding comes after sales and marketing. It becomes almost a byproduct, but they don’t know that. So I would partner with brand consultants, brand coaches, whatever, offer your package. Say your package is $10,000. You give it to the brand consultant.

John Jantsch (10:28.632)

Yeah.

Jermane (10:40.701)

Or coach and say, listen, this is what I do, X, Y, and Z, it’s $10,000. However, you can offer it to your clients for whatever you want to price it. You can price it at $20. You keep the spread. We make our 10, you make your 10, whatever. But that not only makes the branding person’s offer stronger, but it also is gonna exponentially help their client actually execute on the brand. so everybody wins in that scenario, and also everybody wins in the in the franchisee scenario. So

Those are my two high level thoughts on this live kind of workshop. if you know if we had like more narrow specifics, I could have a lot more leverage. Like, for example, I had a a client that was doing high end gourmet chocolates in Dubai. She couldn’t figure out how to sell them. And so since I I knew where her market was and all the situations, I was like, your best strategic partner is gonna be the top fifty restaurants in Dubai.

John Jantsch (11:13.572)

Yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (11:18.007)

Is it?

John Jantsch (11:26.638)

Nice.

Jermane (11:38.576)

Top high end 50 restaurants in Dubai. And you can either do this wholesale or retail, but you give them the chocolates for free. Everybody loves an awesome surprise at the end of their meal. Especially when they’re high end, they’re wrapped in this beautiful box. And so you can either give them to them for free, obviously. Once they get ingrained and they get the response back from their clients how much they love these chocolates after their meal, after they spend a thousand dollars on lunch, then you can either decide I can do wholesale.

John Jantsch (11:50.04)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (12:05.112)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (12:07.731)

Wholesale and sell these chocolates to the restaurants for 50 bucks each, whatever you decide on the pricing, or even better, retail, where you include your business cards at the bottom of the box, your Instagram handle at the bottom of the box. So then these people that make millions of dollars can reach out to you directly, tell their friends and family about you, and then you have a direct and consumer play. But again, you’re just using strategic partners who are these high-end restaurants to get your foot in the door to these high net worth individuals who want to buy your chocolates versus trying to figure out.

John Jantsch (12:31.108)

Yeah. Sure.

Jermane (12:37.811)

How to do it one to one on your own.

John Jantsch (12:40.452)

Yeah, so I I kind of set you up a little bit in that we’ve been doing this, you know, we’ve been doing strategic partners for fifteen, twenty years. And so like on the remodeling side or the home services side, every every trade has an industry group and every industry group has a local chapter. And those have been so because we can educate on marketing, which is frankly a topic they all are always interested in.

we do a ton of education in those associations and those trade groups and that puts us that has them effectively put us in front of their audience. on the professional services side we’ve had a lot of luck with the all the Martech software solution folks, you know, people like HubSpot put us in front of their audiences because

they know that their folks need strategic marketing and you know, not just a tool. and so we’ve had a lot of luck in those two though both of those areas, you know, probably account for about half of our business you know, in any given year is the fact that we get in f we have people put us in front of their audiences. So that we’re not that you know, they’re not pitching anything or you know, we’re actually not e we we don’t even set up referral relationships with them. We just provide value.

to their users or their clients and and you know, some of those folks decide to hire us.

Jermane (14:01.181)

Yeah, no, that’s that that’s the that’s the only way to that’s the only way to do it. But it’s it becomes even more strong when you can figure out from a strategic lens of how you can make sure that your thing helps your partner sell their thing. Because then they it’s it’s not it’s not a want, it’s a need. I have to have Jermaine’s thing to sell my thing. That’s when those relationships last for a lifetime and the deals just become super simple because

John Jantsch (14:16.205)

Yeah. Yes. Very, very key. Yeah. Yeah.

Jermane (14:28.979)

Your partners doing all the selling on your behalf because they need your thing to sell their thing. Yeah.

John Jantsch (14:33.816)

That’s right. That’s right. Well, they it and and I think that’s a really key, especially when you’re trying to develop a an initial relationship. I mean, let’s face it, you know, people are gonna consider, well, what’s in it for me? and so I I think you’re absolutely right on that. You know, I get pitched every day with people that they call it partnering, but what they really want is for me to sell their stuff. and it you know, it it really that idea of of providing value first in some fashion, you know, you

you hit on and it is like it helps me s it helps them sell their thing. Absolutely a hundred percent key.

Jermane (15:08.851)

Yeah. And and then and this is just kind of something I learned in in my finance space. And then I started to realize like, okay, as I’m getting into coaching and consulting, like how am I gonna find people to coach and consult? Like I’m I’m not I learned learned my lesson. So like it’s all about finding these partners that need your thing to help them sell their thing. And if if more entrepreneurs can think from that lens, it makes life not only easier, but it’s actually funner because you’re doing business with people you like.

John Jantsch (15:22.051)

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Jermane (15:36.945)

And everybody’s winning. So it’s not like a competition or winners and losers. It’s like we’re rowing in the same direction.

John Jantsch (15:37.519)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (15:43.963)

So if you were gonna c again, you obviously would have a lot more context than this, but you know, there’s a ton of people out there. I mean, again, I talked about getting pitch I I tell you the thing I get pitched more than sell my stuff is people that want to generate leads for me by sending out cold, you know, cold email or whatever. so and a lot of people are following, you know, for that. if you were talking to somebody, somebody came to you as a prospect and said, you know, we’re doing this cold outreach and we get one or two percent response and

You know, it seems to be going okay. What would you tell them? What’s kind of one move you would say, here’s what you need to do to find your first real part.

Jermane (16:21.713)

well first stop doing anything cold. Like cold email, cold call, cold ads, like it it doesn’t I mean it works but it’s it’s it’s the the the ROI on your time, your resources, your money, you it it it’s it’s like it doesn’t make sense.

John Jantsch (16:24.206)

Yeah, I agree. Yeah.

John Jantsch (16:37.142)

It it it it’s also abusive to both parties, yourself and and the person you’re sending it to.

Jermane (16:41.488)

Yes.

Yes. I think there’s I think there’s somewhat I think there’s been over the last I don’t know when this developed, but there’s a misconception on how the human psychology works when it comes to sales. people want to put sales or marketing in one box and then put the rest of their life into another box, like as if it doesn’t bleed through. No. Sales and marketing in your normal life are the same. Your wife, your friends, everyone you interact with.

John Jantsch (17:03.203)

Yeah.

Jermane (17:12.847)

You know them because they know, like, and trust you from some situation that you infiltrated and became known at church, in the in the soccer club, and whatever, your local baseball team, whatever it might be, you became part of a community, if you will. That is the only thing that matters in sales and marketing. Is once you’re be part of some community where everyone is winning based on your thing, then you don’t have to sell market or brand.

John Jantsch (17:18.404)

Mm-hmm.

That’s right.

John Jantsch (17:30.137)

Business.

Jermane (17:42.355)

Because they send you ready to sign clients that you don’t have to convince because they trust Tim and Tim trusts Jermaine. So now they inherently trust Germaine. It’s just human nature, it’s not rocket science. So the first thing I would do is say stop anything cold. Second thing to do is

John Jantsch (17:46.992)

That’s right.

Jermane (18:00.53)

Here everyone has a Rolodex of friends, family, previous, co-workers, anybody. I don’t care if it’s 50 people, a thousand people, whatever. Reach out to every single one of those folks. Pri I would hope on a phone call. That’d probably be the best. you can always message them and just say, I’m looking to get into this is exactly what I do. When I first started in the finance space and I was struggling because of all the cold calls, I reached out to my Rolodex and I one lady I talked to, she was in marketing, and I said, I’m looking into get into the healthcare field.

John Jantsch (18:03.641)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (18:30.345)

Do you know anybody? That’s all I said. She said, Great, let’s have let’s have lunch. Went to meet her for lunch. She gave me a couple names. I called those names. I said, she I I I I dropped name dropped her name, like who she referred me. Next thing you know, I’m getting deals from these folks because I’m leveraging the network that’s already in my phone. So first thing is call everybody or contact everybody in your phone currently or on your LinkedIn or whatever that knows you and say, I’m looking to get into this industry or find people on here or whatever.

They’ll start giving you names. They’re gonna start introducing because humans want to help other people. We love to help other people, it’s inherent. So that’s that’s step two is contact everybody on your phone and then reach out to those folks and tell them what you’re trying to do. And then that is the first step. You’d be surprised how much comes from that first domino because then they start referring you to five, six other people. And then once you have like one key, I call them MVPs, most valuable partners.

John Jantsch (19:19.384)

Mm. Yeah.

John Jantsch (19:27.013)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (19:28.071)

Once you have one MVP that’s sending you business that’s solid that you like, your reserve friends, everyone’s winning, that one MVP knows other people that probably has the same service or product that you could also distribute to to that community. So it becomes a snowball, a domino, you can have different analogies for it, but people forget to leverage their backyard. Like if I live in Phoenix, why am I calling someone in Texas? I should exhaust Phoenix metro area first.

before I go anywhere because it’s just no like and trust. It’s you can talk about common things, the weather, the sports teams, whatever. So we we get I think I think a lot of folks look at, you know, gurus or successful people and they see them in their tenth chapter and they’re trying to copy the tenth chapter where they’re in the first sentence of their first book.

John Jantsch (19:56.88)

Yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (20:16.025)

Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Absolutely, a hundred percent. You know, I think that point about reaching out to everybody on your phone, I make that all the time because maybe two of them are prospects, but they all know somebody who needs what you do. And that and I think your point of just letting it out there wide open, do you know anyone who? You know, is one of the best, you know, best opening phrases you can make you know, to to your warm market for sure.

Jermane (20:44.913)

Exactly. Yeah. It’s it’s simple man, but you know, simple’s not always executed on for some reason.

John Jantsch (20:45.072)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (20:49.548)

No, no. Well, that’s you know, there’s the the lure of I can send a thousand emails with the click of a button. you know, that seems a lot easier, right? so but it it you know, do less and but just do it better. you know, as opposed to trying to trying to spam everyone. Well, Jermaine, I I appreciate you reaching out to me and and agreeing to kind of do this fun little episode today. Is there some place you’d have people connect with you or or find out about your work?

Jermane (21:18.995)

Yeah, best place is at my website, creatorslearn.com. They can check out all my socials and then they can also book a call there too with me directly.

John Jantsch (21:27.106)

Awesome. Well again, I appreciate you taking a moment to stop by and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road.

Jermane (21:32.991)

Sounds good, John. Appreciate it, man.

powered by

Geyser Turns Down Cuba Bitcoin Campaign After Sanctions Wallet Check


Geyser, a US-linked Bitcoin crowdfunding site, has refused a campaign from Cuba Bitcoin after an automated review labeled the submitted wallet a sanctions failure.

The grassroots group made the rejection public on September 3, 2026, calling the explanation empty and arguing that origin, not the chain itself, was what shut the door.

Cuba Bitcoin is a community effort focused on education, meetups, and homegrown tools so people on the island can use bitcoin without relying on banks that barely function.

The group applied to Geyser hoping international supporters could fund that work in sats.

After several days, the reply arrived: the wallet did not pass a sanctions screen.

Organizers described the outcome as exclusion that follows Cubans even into Bitcoin.

In a follow-up, they said infrastructure meant for Bitcoin communities has to be open, hard to shut down, and able to survive political pressure.

They argued the existing platform does not meet that standard and that something closer to Bitcoin’s original design is needed.

Geyser co-founder Michele Morucci (posting as Metamick) answered that the company was created to spread access to capital and that it shares Bitcoin’s culture, but that sanctions rules sit outside its control and that every company in its position has to follow them.

He added that he hoped the legal climate would change.

A member of the Cuba Bitcoin circle, Forte11, pushed back on the technical claim.

He said the on-chain address they submitted was unused, with no history and no coins.

The Lightning destination, he wrote, ran on servers outside Cuba, and the project itself was registered in El Salvador.

If the real issue was serving Cubans, he said, the company should say so instead of pointing to a vague wallet check.

In his view, Bitcoin was supposed to make money harder to blockade, not copy the same filters used by banks.

The clash sits inside a larger pattern.

American embargo rules treat many financial services involving Cuba as off-limits.

Card networks and exchanges have already stepped back.

Geyser does not hold users’ bitcoin, yet it still screens projects and lists Cuba among places where the product is not offered.

Non-custodial design therefore did not remove the compliance layer that sits between a Cuban community and a US fundraising page.

Cuban bitcoiners have spent years building around those limits: their own Lightning node, community wallets, Cashu mints, and peer channels that do not depend on a single American company.

Direct donations and informal support already exist.

The Geyser episode is less a surprise than a public demonstration of where platform Bitcoin still stops.

The deeper question the posts raise is whether fundraising for isolated communities can live on corporate sites that must obey OFAC, or whether it has to move onto protocols no single firm can turn off.

Cuba Bitcoin’s public stance is that the second path is the one that matches Bitcoin’s purpose. Geyser’s stance is that wishing for that path does not erase US law for a company that lives under it.



Should You Buy Snowflake Stock After Its Recent Surge? The Answer Might Shock You.


Data is the lifeblood of every artificial intelligence (AI) software application. The more information a business can feed into its AI models, the smarter and more useful its software will be. But since most large organizations host their valuable digital assets across multiple different cloud platforms like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, their AI models often draw information from fragmented data sets.

Snowflake‘s (SNOW -5.41%) Data Cloud solves this problem by bringing data together from across different cloud environments, and it offers an expanding portfolio of tools and services to help businesses turn it into powerful AI software.

The stock is up 67% in 2026 and is closing in on a fresh record high for the first time in five years, but despite the company’s spectacular operating results over the last few quarters, here’s why investors might want to think twice about adding it to their portfolio.

Image source: Getty Images.

At the center of the enterprise AI revolution

Snowflake built a flagship AI platform called Cortex AI, where companies can pair their internal data with leading AI models from third-party developers like Anthropic and Meta Platforms to create AI agents, chatbots, and other software applications. The platform includes a series of ready-made tools to make the process easier, including CoCo (formerly Cortex Code), an AI-powered coding assistant.

Then there is CoWork, a powerful AI assistant that can help every knowledge worker — even those in nontechnical jobs — extract value from an organization’s data. It even plugs into every major email and customer-relationship management platform so employees can use it to accelerate workflows, whether they want to identify sales trends or summarize meeting notes.

Cortex AI also features processing tools to help pull data from unstructured sources like contracts and invoices, which can be useful when training and deploying AI models.

Snowflake had a record 14,554 total customers at the conclusion of its fiscal 2027 second quarter (ended July 31), and 9,100 of them had deployed CoCo, while 5,800 were using CoWork, so there is clear demand for these new AI products.

Accelerating revenue growth

Product revenue was $1.49 billion during the second quarter, a 37% increase from the year-ago period. That growth accelerated from 34% in the first quarter, highlighting the company’s strong momentum. This great result prompted management to lift its product revenue guidance for fiscal 2027 by $230 million to $6.07 billion.

However, the company is spending heavily in areas like marketing and research and development to deliver that top-line growth, making it difficult to achieve profitability on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company lost $487 million during the first half of fiscal 2027 alone, and while that was an improvement from its year-ago net loss of $727 million, profitability still seems way out of reach for now.

Snowflake Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-5.41%) $-19.29

Current Price

$337.18

On a positive note, Snowflake did generate an adjusted first-half profit of $383 million after excluding one-off and noncash expenses, which included $890 million in stock-based compensation. Although stock-based comp isn’t a cash expense, investors still pay for it by way of dilution; every time Snowflake issues new shares to its employees, every existing share held by investors becomes slightly less valuable, so this cost can’t be dismissed.

In my opinion, Snowflake must find a way to turn the AI tailwind into consistent GAAP profits, because the company’s history suggests it will otherwise wind up with billions of dollars in annual losses once its revenue growth inevitably slows down at some point in the future. That won’t be good for its stock price.

Upside could be limited from here

Following its recent gains, the stock is now trading at a sky-high price-to-sales ratio (P/S) of 23.1, making it almost four times as expensive as the Nasdaq-100 index, which has a P/S of 6.1. In other words, it looks overvalued compared to a basket of America’s largest technology companies.

There aren’t many good comparisons to Snowflake in the public markets because of its unique product portfolio, but its stock is substantially more expensive than other cloud giants like Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, which also offer broad portfolios of AI services.

SNOW PS Ratio Chart

SNOW PS Ratio data by YCharts.

Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet operate many different businesses outside of cloud computing, so they aren’t the perfect companies to compare with Snowflake in terms of valuation. But Amazon Web Services grew its revenue by 37% during its most recent quarter, while Azure’s revenue jumped by 43%, and Google Cloud’s revenue surged by 82%. And they each generated significantly more revenue than Snowflake did, making their growth rates even more impressive.

Therefore, it’s difficult to justify Snowflake’s premium valuation relative to those cloud giants, and I actually think it will limit the potential upside of its stock from current levels. As a result, it probably isn’t a great buy right now.

After 30 years in aerospace, these brothers retired from corporate life and work at Disney


Americans are retiring later and picking up part-time work to cushion their savings, pursue a long-lost passion, or simply fill the extra downtime. After sunsetting their decades-long careers in the aerospace industry, brothers Jerry and Peter Wong decided to add a bit of magic to their lives by working at Disney.

Jerry Wong, 66, is a photographer snapping pictures of park-goers at Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, California. He joined as a photographer four years ago, the same year he wrapped his career as an engineer at aerospace and defense giant Northrop Grumman. He began as a summer intern in 1979, and went on to lead a four-decade career at the $75 billion company. Jerry worked on ground communications for government contracts—picking up people skills he now uses at Disney—and later retired from the profession in 2022. 

But a blank calendar left him restless, and after just four months, he began hunting for another gig. He and his brother, Peter, had been going to the amusement parks since 1967, and wanting to stay busy and reconnect with that childhood nostalgia, he looked into what Disney jobs were available.

Courtesy of the Wong brothers

The baby boomer found a part-time role in photography—a hobby he had picked up from his dad as a freshman studying at UCLA. By October that year he was suited up in photography blues and armed with a professional camera, capturing the magical moments at both Disneyland Park and Disney California Adventure Park. Jerry currently works around 14 hours across two or three days a week during the off-season, and 32 hours on a five-day schedule when the holidays roll around. For the retired engineer, the job is less about the paycheck than the people and the experience.

“I don’t know if I would call it a second career…the term career is something that you’re there because it’s something you need to do to support yourself, or to create a long-term lifestyle,” Jerry tells Fortune. “Working post-retirement, it’s a different perspective. From a personal point of view, there’s no stress. I’m enjoying myself…I’m here because I choose to be here.”

But Jerry might not even be working at the park if it weren’t for his youngest brother, Peter Wong. He had already made the leap years before, showing Jerry the upsides of adding a Disney gig to the leisurely schedule of corporate retirement.

Retiring from desk jobs and working at Disneyland: ‘I’m finished with being married to my laptop’

63-year-old Peter was the first of the Wong brothers to add a Disney job to his retirement schedule. 

The former finance worker wrapped up his own aerospace career back in 2017, winding down from a three-decade career of crunching financial figures. He began working in fixed asset accounting at Hughes Electronics in 1987—an aerospace company that had been purchased by automotive giant General Motors.

One decade later, U.S. defense contractor Raytheon snapped up Hughes during a major consolidation of aerospace companies. Peter was responsible for the financial planning rates and budgets of seven facilities across America. Around 30 years into his career, a buyout offer pushed him to throw in the towel—the $271 billion contractor offered special golden handshake packages for employees from the legacy Hughes days. Peter took the deal, and phased into retirement.

But just one year later, the retiree was back on his feet working the rides at Disney California Adventure. For Peter, it also meant reconnecting with the special moments in his life, from his memories of going to Disney every year with his Hong Kong relatives, to proposing to his now-wife on the Skyway ride (which closed in 1994). 

“I’m finished with being married to my laptop and phone all day and night,” Peter tells Fortune. “I want to do something to make magic for people.”

Now, Peter is a Disney attractions host bringing the park to life while keeping guests safe on the rides. He works two to three days a week, around 14 hours in total, and during the holidays and busy season, he’ll take up to 28 hours. The job required some adjusting; having worked an office job his entire career, it took time to get used to being on his feet everyday.

He was trained at Redwood Creek Challenge Trail at Disney California Adventure, and still splits his time between working the attraction and flight ride Soarin’ Across America. For hours each workday, Peter suits up in wilderness outfits and Disney vests, greeting guests while getting a peek behind the rides.

“I wanted attractions because of the face-to-face interaction with the guests, and also learning how the attractions work,” Peter explains. “As a guest, you just see the person pushing the button…But you don’t see all the intricacies involved with actually working the attraction.”

Disneyland Resort photographer Jerry Wong (L) and attractions host Peter Wong (R).

Courtesy of the Wong brothers

Due to their differing schedules, the Wong brothers don’t often get the chance to meet up while on the clock. There is the off chance that they’ll spontaneously stumble into each other while working a shift, Peter says, but oftentimes they just go to Disneyland together as annual pass holders.

Having worked there for several years now—and seeing the way things have changed since being kids in the 1960’s—Jerry and Peter are reconnecting with the place that has been part of their lives for nearly six decades. And they’re passing that whimsy onto thousands of visitors around the world every week. 

“I look at the pictures that our parents took of us in ’67…I can remember exactly what ride we had to go on first, which was Pirates [of the Caribbean], because it first just opened up,” Jerry recalls. “As a photographer, it’s the same thing. In that one or two minutes that I get with the guests, I create a lasting memory for them.”

Mortgage Bankers Association sues to block New Jersey’s new disparate-impact rule


For mortgage companies, the association says the practical problem is compliance. The suit claims the rule reaches the everyday tools lenders rely on – credit history, income standards, and other underwriting and pricing measures. State officials, the filing says, have flagged credit history, criminal history, and minimum income requirements as practices the rule covers, and have said its provisions on automated decision-making tools apply to lending. 

The association’s central argument is that New Jersey threw out limits the US Supreme Court set in a 2015 ruling, Inclusive Communities – limits the group says keep disparate impact law from sliding into what it calls unlawful “racial balancing.” Under the rule, the filing claims, someone challenging a lender’s policy can point to broad national, state, or census figures rather than the lender’s own applicants, and does not have to show the gap is large or statistically meaningful. In housing and home lending, the suit says, the rule also makes the business prove there was no less discriminatory way to reach the same goal – a reversal of how the group says federal law works. 

That, the association says, boxes its members in. It argues the surest way to avoid liability under the rule is to make race-conscious choices – which, it says, federal law forbids. The suit points to a line in the rule stating that an “interest in achieving diversity or increasing access for underrepresented or underserved members of a protected class” can, on its own, justify a challenged practice. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, the group says, bar creditors from considering race in a credit decision. 

The MBA represents more than 2,000 members across real estate finance, over 60 of them based in New Jersey. Every member that lends in the state, it says, must now spend money checking whether its underwriting, pricing and servicing produce uneven results across protected groups that could expose it to a claim under the rule – costs the group calls unrecoverable and ongoing. Lenders that also operate elsewhere may have to run a separate New Jersey rulebook, adding more expense. Members that own and manage rental housing face the same review of how they screen tenants. 

The lawsuit makes two claims: that the rule breaks the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection, and that federal law overrides it. The association is asking the court to strike the rule down and block it statewide, or at least to carve out the parts covering housing and home lending. 

Senators Demand ED Account for $1 Billion Student Loan Fund as Defaults Hit 9M


United States Senator Elizabeth Warren (Democrat of Massachusetts), questions Kevin Warsh at a Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing to examine the semiannual monetary policy report to the congress, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC, on Wednesday, July 15, 2026. 
(Photo by Mattie Neretin/Sipa USA)

Key Points

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill Act set aside $1 billion for the Education Department to cover “administrative costs” of the federal student loan program, with no reporting requirement attached.
  • ED’s own FY2027 budget request shows it had spent roughly $216 million of that money by the start of the year and expects more than $450 million to still be unspent when FY2027 begins, without saying where any of it went.
  • Senators want an itemized accounting and a commitment to monthly public reporting by September 16, arguing the money should go toward the nine million borrowers now in default.

Four Senate Democrats want the Department of Education to provide answers on how it spent a $1 billion student loan administration fund created by last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In a September 2 letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon (PDF File), Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) say the agency has already spent roughly $216 million from the fund without explaining what it spent them money on. Meanwhile, the number of borrowers in default has climbed to a record high.

The $216 million figure comes from the Department of Education’s own Fiscal Year 2027 budget request, which reports that amount obligated as of the start of FY2026 and projects that more than $450 million will still be unspent when FY2027 begins. The senators note that Section 82005 of the OBBBA requires the money to go toward “administrative costs” of the federal student loan program, including servicing, but built in no reporting or oversight requirement.

The Senators want answers by September 16, 2026.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

When the OBBBA was in discussion, this $1 billion fund was designed to help the Department of Education pay for the massive amount of changes required as part of the bill. However, the current request from Senators is two-fold: show us where you’re spending the money, and if you don’t have a good use for it, use it to help borrowers in default.

The senators point to Federal Student Aid portfolio data showing that the number of borrowers in default has nearly doubled to nine million since January 2025. Our own tracking of Education Secretary McMahon’s testimony found roughly one in four borrowers is now delinquent or in default, and New York Fed data showed 3.6 million borrowers defaulted in a single quarter after collections resumed.

This oversight comes at a critical junction for many borrowers. Roughly seven million SAVE plan borrowers are being pushed off the plan, and the senators cite a National Consumer Law Center analysis warning that borrowers who don’t pick a new plan will be auto-enrolled in Standard repayment – which could be the most expensive option.

The senators argue that combination puts millions more at elevated risk of default just as ED sits on hundreds of millions in unspent administrative dollars.

What The Senators Are Asking

The letter poses three sets of questions:

  1. An itemized accounting of the first $216 million. Specifically, how much went to student loan servicers (and for what work), how much supported the ED-Treasury interagency agreement moving loan administration out of ED, how much hired new FSA staff, how much went to FSA’s website, and how much funded outreach to borrowers already in default or at risk of it. They also want the criteria ED used to decide.
  2. The same breakdown for everything spent since FY2026 began, plus whether ED still expects more than $450 million to be left at the start of FY2027, and itemized spending plans for the rest of the money both before and after that date.
  3. A commitment to monthly public reporting on how the fund is used going forward.

The letter notes that ED’s only public statement on the fund so far is a court declaration in the Sweet v. McMahon borrower defense case, which said an unspecified amount would pay for attorneys to adjudicate those claims.

Where The Senators Want The Money To Go

Beyond transparency, the letter tells Education Secretary McMahon what the Senators believe the fund should be spent: on “whatever measures are necessary” to pull borrowers out of default and keep others from entering it.

The senators offer three examples. First, expanded outreach to borrowers who are behind or already defaulted, a group that is now dealing with Treasury as its collector.

Second, better FSA customer service so struggling borrowers can actually get into affordable plans — a sore point since layoffs left dozens of FSA offices with no staff.

Third, rehiring the servicer oversight team the administration cut in early 2025, which a March GAO report tied to gaps in servicer accountability.

It’s important to note that the Senators are not asking for any of the funds to be used to pay off or relieve borrowers of their debts.

How This Connects

This is the latest in a string of oversight demands from the same group of Senators. In June, Warren and Merkley led 62 lawmakers pressing ED to act on what they called the largest default crisis on record.

Last week, they opened an investigation into MOHELA over false delinquency notices sent to borrowers, the kind of servicer error the letter says a restored oversight team would catch. And the GAO finding that FSA halted routine servicer reviews gives the servicer oversight ask a documented basis rather than a political one.

The student loan fund is one of the few places where the July 1, 2026 OBBBA added money instead of removing options. The law eliminated Grad PLUS, capped parent borrowing, collapsed repayment plans into two choices, and ended SAVE. These changes make loan servicing more complicated in the near term and gave ED a plausible reason to spend money on implementation.

What the senators are contesting is whether implementation, the Treasury transfer, or litigation is absorbing dollars that could have gone to borrower outreach.

What’s Next

The Department of Education’s response is due September 16. Watch for whether the department releases any itemized breakdown or simply cites the budget justification again.

A commitment to monthly reporting seems unlikely without a statutory requirement, but the FY2027 appropriations process gives Democrats a chance to attach one.

For borrowers, the more immediate signal is how FSA handles the first wave of SAVE borrowers hitting their 90-day deadlines this month. That’s where any customer service spending from the fund would show up first.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Senators Demand ED Account for $1 Billion Student Loan Fund as Defaults Hit 9M appeared first on The College Investor.