Home Blog

Remember ‘Say No To Suno’? Someone just hired a plane to fly it over an AI investor summit… featuring Mikey Shulman.


Yesterday (June 3), a plane circled high above Santa Monica carrying three words: “SAY NO TO SUNO.”

Its location in the skies was significant – directly over the UBS AI in Entertainment Summit at the Shutters on the Beach hotel, where Suno CEO Mikey Shulman was among the speakers.

The aerial banner appeared alongside a truck on the road, carrying multiple mobile billboards. It too said: “Say NO to Suno!”, as well as “$5 billion for Mikey. Nothing for artists.”

The plane and truck were both sponsored by the Human Artistry Campaign, the artist-rights coalition, according to The Trichordist.

The airborne protest landed on the same day that Suno announced it had raised over $400 million in Series D funding at a $5.4 billion post-money valuation.

The display’s main slogan was not new, of course. “Say No to Suno” first appeared in February, as the title of an open letter online.

Signed by a coalition of artist representatives – including songwriter rep Helienne Lindvall and artist rights advocate David Lowery – the letter described Suno as a “brazen smash and grab” platform built on “unauthorized AI platform machinery trained on human artists’ work”.

This “hijacking of the world’s entire treasure-trove of music floods platforms with AI slop and dilutes the royalty pools of legitimate artists from whose music this slop is derived”, the letter argued.

The Human Artistry Campaign (THAC) has now, quite literally, taken that campaign up a notch.

THAC launched at SXSW in 2023 and now counts more than 70 members.

Among its founding members is the RIAA, which represents over 1,600 recorded music companies – including the three majors, Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group.


The Human Artistry Campaign also made its message clear via a truck-based billboard (Anna Webber/Getty Images for Human Artistry Campaign via The Trichordist)

It was the RIAA that sued Suno on behalf of the three majors in mid-2024, alleging “mass infringement” of copyright.

One of those majors has notably since struck a deal with the AI company.

Warner Music Group settled its copyright lawsuit against Suno in November, announcing what the two called a “first-of-its-kind partnership”.

“This landmark pact with Suno is a victory for the creative community that benefits everyone,” Warner CEO Robert Kyncl said at the time.

At the UBS summit yesterday, Shulman shared the stage with Kyncl.

Suno‘s new $400 million-plus round was led by Bond Capital and more than doubled the $2.45 billion valuation the company reached seven months ago.

In its funding announcement yesterday, Suno’s Shulman said his company would “in the coming months” begin rolling out “our first music model developed in partnership with the music industry”.

Warner Music Group remains Suno‘s only known music biz rights licensing partner to date.

 “In the coming months, we’ll begin rolling out our first music model developed in partnership with the music industry.”

Mikey Shulman, Suno (which is currently being sued for copyright infringement by Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and more)

Suno continues to be sued by various parties in the music biz, including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, independent artists, and performing rights organizations including Denmark‘s Koda and Germany‘s GEMA.

The Human Artistry Campaign framed its flyover as part of a wider backlash against AI infrastructure, connecting the music-copyright fight to community opposition to data centers across the United States.

The original “Say No To Suno” February open letter was not a Human Artistry Campaign initiative.

The two efforts are nonetheless linked: The Trichordist and the Music Technology Policy blog both sit on the membership roster of the Human Artistry Campaign, alongside organizations run by several of the open letter’s signatories.Music Business Worldwide

BofA on the ‘fundamental disconnect’ in the housing market



American homebuyers have found plenty of villains for today’s brutal housing market: the Federal Reserve, Wall Street landlords, even their baby boomer parents who refuse to move. But Bank of America Research argues the real culprit is hiding in plain sight in your own backyard.

In a new housing symposium report, BofA Global Research says there is a “fundamental disconnect between housing policy and the underlying supply shortage,” and voters are fixated on the wrong enemies like interest rates and institutional investors instead of a faceless villain: time itself. Specifically, the problem is the decades‑long failure to build enough homes. While affordability polls as a top concern, the bank’s policy panel warns the politically painful fixes needed to boost supply remain largely off the table, leaving the market “stuck” even as mortgage rates begin to inch lower.

Blame the zoning board, not just the Fed

According to the BofA panel, most housing decisions still live and die at the local level, where zoning rules and “Not‑In‑My‑Backyard” resistance keep new supply from ever getting permitted.

“Most housing decisions are controlled at the local level, where ‘Not‑In‑My‑Backyard’ (NIMBY) dynamics and political resistance to new development remain strong,” the report notes.

That disconnect plays out in how voters explain their own frustration. While affordability “remains a top public concern,” BofA says “most voters blame interest rates or institutional investors rather than the true issue—insufficient housing supply.” Even federal efforts branded as pro‑housing, like the Road to Housing Act, are likely to have “only incremental impact,” mainly by shaving some regulatory friction or funding niche ideas such as modular housing rather than unleashing large‑scale building.

A market ‘stuck’ by chronic undersupply

The core BofA view is that today’s affordability crisis is the product of both a one‑time shock and a much older failure to build. Post‑2020, remote work and pandemic migration created a structural demand surge the construction industry simply couldn’t meet: One symposium presenter estimates starts would have needed to jump to roughly 6 million annual units—a 300% increase—to absorb it.

Instead, supply proved “much less elastic than demand,” and home prices jumped more than 40% in about 18 months before a sharp rate shock locked would‑be sellers into ultra‑cheap mortgages. Existing‑home sales are now hovering around 4 million a year, which BofA notes is a roughly 40‑year low on a population‑adjusted basis, reflecting a frozen resale market and a “lock‑in effect” that could last six to eight years.

Why your payment still feels impossible

On paper, affordability has improved from the absolute trough in 2023 as incomes have risen and mortgage rates drift down from their peak. BofA’s mortgage strategists expect 30‑year mortgage rates to move only gradually, from about 6.5% toward roughly 6% by 2027, as the spread over the 10‑year Treasury normalizes rather than collapses.

But in practice, the bank says, housing is still “restrictive in a historical context”: Elevated prices, taxes, and insurance continue to squeeze monthly payments even as nominal borrowing costs ease. That helps explain why the bulk of demand is now K‑shaped: Move‑up and luxury buyers are still transacting, often using builder buydowns and cash, while first‑time and lower‑income households are stuck renting and waiting for a reset that never quite comes.

Wall Street and non-bank lenders aren’t the main story

BofA also takes aim at another popular villain: big investors and nonbank mortgage lenders. The bank’s research arm has separately argued “restricting big buyers is unlikely to materially affect housing affordability or availability in the near term,” given their relatively small share of the overall housing stock.

At the symposium, panelists said independent mortgage banks (IMBs) are “likely to retain dominance” in originations because Basel III capital rules and legal risk keep large banks from wading back in in a big way. GSE reform, another perennial talking point in Washington, remains uncertain and distant, making it a poor lever for near‑term affordability relief. In BofA’s view, focusing public anger on Wall Street or IMBs risks distracting from the harder, slower work of loosening land‑use rules and actually building more homes.

Why the fix is so politically hard

The report is blunt the solutions are well understood: Allow more density, speed up approvals, and chip away at local rules that make it expensive or impossible to add housing in high‑demand areas. But these are precisely the kinds of changes that generate the fiercest local backlash, even in cities and states that talk the loudest about affordability.

“Affordability is a key voter issue, but proposals to fix structural supply shortages are politically unpopular and lack short-term payoffs,” the BofA policy panel concludes. That leaves national policymakers reaching for softer tools—modest grants, voluntary zoning pilots, standardized community plan templates—while the core bottleneck in city councils and planning commissions goes largely untouched.

For this story, Fortune journalists used generative AI as a research tool. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.

HOW TO SET UP AN AI CRYPTO TRADING BOT FOR EASY GAINS 🙌🏼



Looking for gains without much effort? Check out how to set up an AI trading bot in under 2 minutes and be set to make money while you sleep!

🔥New to 𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗚𝗘𝗧?
Use my link & earn up to $8,000 in bonuses!!
👉

source

Using Business Funds For A Down Payment: What Self-Employed Borrowers Need To Know


For self-employed borrowers, access to business funds can be a valuable resource when purchasing or refinancing a home. These funds are often used for down payments, closing costs, or reserve requirements. However, conventional mortgage guidelines require lenders to carefully evaluate whether withdrawing funds from a business could negatively impact its financial stability.

We work closely with self-employed borrowers to ensure that business funds are used properly and in compliance with underwriting standards. One of the most important steps in this process is confirming that the business remains financially solvent after the withdrawal.

Using Business Funds

When a borrower uses business funds for a mortgage transaction, the lender must verify that the withdrawal will not harm the business’s ongoing operations. The business must demonstrate sufficient liquidity to continue meeting its obligations after the funds are removed.

Under conventional loan guidelines, underwriters are required to analyze the business’s financial strength using specific liquidity ratio tests. These tests help determine whether the business can safely absorb the withdrawal without creating financial risk.

If the business cannot demonstrate adequate liquidity, the funds cannot be used for the mortgage transaction, even if they are available in the account.

The Two Required Liquidity Tests

Conventional underwriting guidelines require the use of two key financial ratios:

1. Quick Ratio

Formula:
(Current Assets – Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities

The Quick Ratio measures the business’s ability to cover its short-term liabilities using its most liquid assets, excluding inventory. Inventory is excluded because it cannot always be quickly converted into cash.

This ratio provides a conservative and realistic view of the company’s immediate financial strength.

2. Current Ratio

Formula:
Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities

The Current Ratio evaluates the business’s overall ability to meet its short-term obligations using all available current assets, including inventory.

This ratio gives a broader picture of the company’s short-term financial health.

Minimum Required Ratio: 1.0 or Higher

Both ratios must return a result of 1.0 or greater for the business to be considered solvent.

A ratio of 1.0 means the business has enough current assets to cover all its current liabilities. Ratios above 1.0 indicate stronger financial stability.

If either ratio falls below 1.0, the business is considered to have insufficient liquidity, and the borrower will not be permitted to use business funds for:

Using business funds for a mortgage can be an excellent strategy when done correctly. The key is proper analysis, documentation, and planning.

 

[Live] American Express & Delta To Add Second Checked Bag Free For Cardholders


Update 6/4/26: As rumored this is now live. Shows up on Gold, Platinum & Reserve. 

According to twitter user xJonNYC on June 4, 2026 eligible American Express & Delta will add an additional benefit where eligible cardholders will be able to check a second bag for no additional fees on Delta & Delta connection operated flights. Travel must be within the United States, including the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Currently cardholders get their first checked bag for free.

Delta recently increase baggage fees and a second bag currently costs $55. xJonNYC is extremely reliable so I’d be surprised if this doesn’t end up happening. We have reached out to both American Express & Delta for comment. 



Your Company Needs an Energy Strategy for AI’s Next Phase


At the start of the gen AI boom, the scarcest asset seemed obvious: access to the frontier model. Companies rushed to license models such as GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini, hired prompt engineers, and built proprietary copilots. Then a different constraint emerged: access to GPUs, cloud capacity, and data-center space. Now, beneath all of that, a new constraint is emerging: electricity. The new scarcity is not intelligence but the energy-intensive infrastructure required to produce and deliver it.



Personalis CEO Sells 100,000 Company Shares Worth $1.1 Million. What Does That Mean for Investors?


Christopher M. Hall, Chief Executive Officer of Personalis (PSNL +14.47%), disclosed the direct exercise and immediate sale of 100,000 shares of Common Stock, valued at approximately $1.10 million, in a transaction reported on May 29, 2026. SEC Form 4 filing

Transaction summary

Metric Value
Shares traded (direct) 100,000
Transaction value $1.1 million
Post-transaction shares (direct) 235,986
Post-transaction value (direct ownership) ~$2.6 million

Transaction and post-transaction values based on SEC Form 4 weighted average reported price ($11.02).

Key questions

  • What does the size of this transaction indicate about Hall’s remaining direct ownership?
    After selling 100,000 shares (29.76% of direct holdings), Hall continues to directly own 235,986 shares of Common Stock, representing a remaining direct equity position valued at approximately $2.6 million as of May 29, 2026.
  • How does the transaction relate to Hall’s available option capacity?
    The shares sold stemmed from an option exercise, and Hall retains 300,000 options outstanding, highlighting substantial remaining capacity to acquire additional Common Stock through future exercises.
  • Was this transaction routine or indicative of a shift in selling cadence?
    Compared to earlier transactions (sell-only trade sizes ranging from 20,459 to 29,612 shares), this exercise and sale is materially larger, but the increase is explained by the option-derived liquidity, rather than a discretionary escalation in disposition pattern.
  • Does Hall retain indirect or other class holdings following this transaction?
    No shares are held indirectly; however, Hall retains 300,000 options, which can be converted into Common Stock, ensuring a meaningful continuing beneficial ownership stake.

Company overview

Metric Value
Price (as of market close May 29, 2026) $11.40
Market capitalization $1.19 billion
Revenue (TTM) $64.52 million

Company snapshot

  • Personalis offers genomic sequencing and data analysis services for cancer research and therapy development, including the NeXT Platform, ImmunoID Next, NeXT Liquid Biopsy, NeXT Personal, and related products.
  • It generates revenue primarily through service contracts with biopharmaceutical companies, research institutions, and government entities for large-scale genetic research and clinical applications.
  • The company serves biopharmaceutical firms, universities, non-profit organizations, and government agencies focused on oncology and precision medicine.

Personalis is a cancer genomics company specializing in advanced sequencing and analytics platforms that support oncology research and the development of targeted therapies.

The company leverages proprietary technologies to deliver comprehensive tumor and immune microenvironment profiling from limited tissue or plasma samples. Strategic partnerships and a focus on precision medicine position Personalis as a key enabler for biopharma and clinical research customers seeking actionable genomic insights.

What this transaction means for investors

The May 28 and May 29 sale of Personalis stock by CEO Christopher Hall came during a period when shares were skyrocketing, reaching $11.85 on May 29, which was a 52-week high at the time. Shares have climbed higher since then.

The timing was fortuitous for Hall, since his sale was prearranged prior to the stock’s rise. The transaction was part of a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, adopted in December of 2025. Such plans are often implemented by insiders to avoid accusations of trading based on insider information. Therefore, investors should not be overly concerned by Hall’s disposition.

Personalis shares rose due to a number of positive news events. The company achieved expanded Medicare coverage for its NeXT Personal product, which can lead to increased sales. It also forecasted 2026 revenue to come in between $78 million to $80 million, up from the prior year’s $69.6 million.

As a result, the stock’s price-to-sales ratio jumped to 16, which is double what it was at the end of the first quarter. This indicates shares have gotten pricey, making now a good time to sell.

Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Renters Insurance for Off-Campus Students: What It Costs and Why It’s Worth It


Moving off campus is a milestone — a real lease, a real apartment, and a real pile of belongings that didn’t come from the dorm-supply aisle. What often gets skipped in the move is renters insurance. Skipping it can turn a routine break-in, kitchen fire, or burst pipe into a financial setback that takes years to recover from.

Here’s how off-campus students (and the parents helping them figure it out) should think about renters insurance, what it actually covers, and why Lemonade has become a popular choice for this specific situation.

In partnership with Lemonade, let’s break down what families need to know as they transition out of the dorms and into their first apartments. Get a quote here >>

The Coverage Gap Most Families Don’t Realize Exists

When a student lives in a dorm, many families buy specialized dorm room renters insurance policies. These cover the dorm, as well as personal belongings.

Once they’re renting an apartment, townhouse, or room in a shared house, the student needs their own renters insurance policy. This catches a lot of families off guard, especially during sophomore or junior year, when a student moves out of the dorm without changing anything else about how the family’s insurance is structured.

Why Off-Campus Students Actually Need It

The risk isn’t hypothetical. The U.S. Department of Education recorded 6,500 burglaries on college campuses in 2021, and theft and burglary together account for about 44% of campus criminal activity. Off-campus units tend to carry more exposure than dorms, including ground-floor windows, shared entryways, roommate turnover, and less security infrastructure.

Theft isn’t even the most common claim. Among college-student renters, the most reported losses are fire or severe weather (31%), accidental water damage (31%), vandalism (22%), and theft (17%). A clogged sink, an overloaded power strip, or a kitchen towel too close to the stove can wipe out a laptop, a TV, and a year’s worth of textbooks in an afternoon.

Survey data from Insurify shows 36% of college students say they can’t afford to replace their belongings without renters in

What Renters Insurance Covers

A standard policy has three main parts:

  1. Personal property protects the items inside the apartment, such as a laptop, phone, bike, clothes, furniture, gaming setup. Most off-campus students do well with $15,000 to $25,000 in coverage.
  2. Personal liability covers the student if a guest gets hurt in the apartment, or if they accidentally damage someone else’s property. $100,000 to $300,000 is standard.
  3. Loss of use pays for somewhere to live if the apartment becomes uninhabitable after a covered event like a fire or major water damage.

Most policies also include medical payments to others and optional add-ons for high-value items like cameras, instruments, or jewelry.

You can compare Lemonade options here >>

What It Costs

Renters insurance is one of the cheapest pieces of financial protection a young adult can buy. The average for a college student renters insurance policy runs about $21.95 a month, or roughly $263 a year, according to Insurify.

Lemonade starts as low as $5 per month, depending on the state and the student’s situation, and the company says its policies run about 30% less than typical renters insurance. The basic tier includes $10,000 in personal property coverage, with the option to scale up to the $15K–$25K range most off-campus students need.

Put another way: protecting more than $15,000 worth of belongings costs less than a single takeout dinner per month.

Why Lemonade Works For Young Adults

A few reasons Lemonade has caught on with student renters:

You can get a quote in about 90 seconds on your phone, and policies can bind the same day — no agent appointment, no paper forms.

Claims happen in the app. Lemonade says roughly 40% of claims are handled instantly and claims are paid out fast thanks to its AI technology, which matters when a student needs to replace a stolen laptop before midterms, not three weeks after.

It’s purpose-built for off-campus renters. Lemonade does not write dorm policies, so the product is specifically designed for students renting their own place.

Pricing is transparent. Premium, coverage limits, and deductible are all shown before the student commits.

How Students And Parents Should Think About This Decision

The choice usually comes down to two questions:

What would it cost to replace everything in the apartment from scratch? Walk the unit and add up the laptop, phone, bike, TV, clothes, kitchen gear, textbooks, and furniture. The number is almost always over $10,000.

What happens if a guest gets hurt or the student accidentally causes damage to the building? Without liability coverage, the student (or the parents, depending on the lease) could be on the hook for medical bills or repair costs.

For most off-campus students, the math is simple: as little as a $5 monthly premium against a potential five-figure loss. Renters insurance is one of the few financial products where the cost-to-protection ratio sits firmly on the buyer’s side.

Check out Lemonade here and get started >>

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Renters Insurance for Off-Campus Students: What It Costs and Why It’s Worth It appeared first on The College Investor.