Home Blog

Ocado prepares succession plan for CEO Tim Steiner




Ocado prepares succession plan for CEO Tim Steiner

Appeals court sides with CFPB’s union, blocks job cuts


Russell Vought, acting director of the CFPB, on Capitol Hill in April.

Bloomberg News

Processing Content

  • Key insight: The legal power struggle between the Trump administration and the National Treasury Employees Union has evolved into a major separation-of-powers showdown.
  • What’s at stake: At issue is whether the president has the authority to dismantle an agency created by Congress.
  • Expert quote: “Courts will have a full chance to review Vought’s most recent unlawful plan to sideline the CFPB by firing most of its remaining staff.” — Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee.

A federal appellate court blocked the Trump administration from immediately firing employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in a closely-watched legal battle over presidential power. 

Late Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit sided with the CFPB’s union by upholding a preliminary injunction issued in March 2025. The full court further extended the legal battle between Russell Vought, the CFPB’s acting director, and the National Treasury Employees Union. 

The full appellate court upheld an injunction that has blocked Vought from firing up to 1,400 CFPB employees. The order was a response to a revised plan by Vought to slash two-thirds of the agency’s workforce. 

The appeals court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who will decide whether to modify the injunction and allow the CFPB to issue reductions in force, or RIF notices, to employees represented by the NTEU. The court rejected a request from the Department of Justice, representing Vought, to continue RIFs. The court also did not impose a deadline on the district court that was requested by the DOJ. 

In a statement issued Saturday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, praised the appellate court order.

“Last night the D.C. Circuit rejected the Trump Administration’s latest request to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, refusing to lift the injunction that has prevented Russ Vought from carrying out his plan to eliminate the agency,” said Warren, who created the agency. “Courts will also have a full chance to review Vought’s most recent unlawful plan to sideline the CFPB by firing most of its remaining staff.”

The fight between Vought and the NTEU is being closely watched as a test by the executive branch that claims the president can shut down an agency created by Congress. In December, the D.C. Circuit granted a rare en banc review — a sign of the case’s importance — after the union appealed to the district court claiming the president is limited by both law and Supreme Court precedent from conducting mass firings to reshape the federal government.  

One aspect of the case that Judge Jackson will take into account is the agency’s budget, which Congress slashed in half last year. Vought has claimed that the CFPB must cut staff because the budget supports fewer employees. Under his watch the CFPB no longer conducts any supervision or examinations of nonbanks, and has radically cut enforcement of the largest banks. 

Vought, who is also the Trump administration’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, was a key architect of Project 2025, the Trump administration’s plan to reduce the federal workforce. In the past year, the administration has fired more than 315,000 federal workers

Vought and Mark Paoletta, the CFPB’s chief legal officer, made declarations to the district court that the CFPB needs a staff of only 200 people to perform its legally required functions, down from 1,755 a year ago. When Vought took over the agency last February, he immediately closed the bureau’s headquarters building and ordered staff to stop working. 

Last year, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit lifted the district court’s preliminary injunction and the union appealed. Before that, Judge Jackson held evidentiary hearings and determined that the CFPB’s leadership had tried to shut down the agency. Vought claimed there was no final agency action, or paper trail, showing any decision to eliminate the bureau. The CFPB and Vought have refused to cooperate with a review by the Government Accountability Office of the agency’s actions last year.

In her ruling, Jackson stated: “There is no act of Congress that empowers the president to  shut down the CFPB in his discretion.” 



Digital Payments Adoption Expected To Surge Considerably In Brazil By 2030 : Research


Despite Brazil’s already high level of digital payments maturity, a new assessment from Bain & Company indicates meaningful room for further expansion through the end of the decade. As of the end of 2025, digital payment methods had reached an 85% penetration rate across the country, placing Brazil among the world’s most advanced markets in this region.

Banking inclusion has risen sharply in recent years, climbing from 57% of the adult population in 2017 to 90% by 2023.

Card usage within household consumption (often referred to as PCE) now exceeds 52%, narrowing the gap with established markets such as the United Kingdom (58%) and the United States (46%).

The instant payment system Pix has played a central role in this transformation, accounting for more than 40% of the overall addressable market and driving rapid change with few global parallels in consumer spending.

The combined share of Pix person-to-business transactions and cards in total consumer spending surged from 35% in 2020 to 85% in 2025.

This rapid shift signals broad digitalization of everyday transactions and leaves limited headroom if growth were to rely solely on displacing cash and other traditional methods.

Yet Bain’s analysis shows the market is far from saturated.

In 2024, the addressable market already stood approximately 24% above traditional household consumption levels, pointing to potential expansion of up to 38% by 2030.

The sector’s profit pool, currently around 120 billion reais, is projected to climb to roughly 170 billion reais over the same period.

According to Bain partner André Mello, the outlook remains positive when accounting for rising consumption outside conventional household spending categories, the digitization of additional industry verticals, and the development of still-underutilized payment use cases.

“It becomes clear that the growth potential of digital payments in Brazil remains significant,” he noted.

Bain partner Antonio Cerqueiro emphasized that future success for payment issuers will hinge on deepening customer relationships rather than simply acquiring new users.

This includes expanding financed portfolios, integrating additional financial products such as personal loans, investments, and insurance, and leveraging transaction data more effectively to deliver personalized offers across the customer lifecycle.

The analysis suggests that strategies focused purely on market-share gains through basic digital substitution are unlikely to deliver the same results in the coming years.

Instead, industry participants are expected to prioritize innovation, revenue diversification, enhanced user experiences, stronger security measures, and value-added services for merchants, such as prepayment options and loyalty programs.

Bain’s assessment challenges any notion of a fully mature market and highlights ongoing opportunities tied to evolving consumption patterns and the broader financial ecosystem.

With a largely digitized consumer base already in place, the next phase of growth will depend on players’ ability to capture value through smarter data use, ecosystem expansion, and tailored solutions that extend beyond core transaction processing. The consultancy sees Brazil’s digital payments sector continuing to evolve and expand meaningfully through 2030, driven by both structural consumption shifts and new service innovations.



2028ಕ್ಕೆ ಸಿಎಂ ಆಗ್ತೀನಿ ಎಂದಿದ್ದ ಶಿವಾನಂದ ನೀಲಣ್ಣವರ ಈಗ ಪೊಲೀಸ್‌ ವಶದಲ್ಲಿ ! I Belagavi Investment Scam



ಅನಧಿಕೃತವಾಗಿ ಬಡ್ಡಿ ವ್ಯವಹಾರ ಮಾಡಿದ ಬೆಳಗಾವಿಯ ಶಿವಂ ಅಸೋಸಿಯೇಟ್ಸ್ ಮಾಲೀಕ ಶಿವಾನಂದ ನೀಲಣ್ಣವರ ಅವರನ್ನು ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ ರಾತ್ರಿ ಬಂಧಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ₹50 ಕೋಟಿಗೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಬಡ್ಡಿ ವ್ಯವಹಾರ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದು ಮೊದಲ ಹಂತದಲ್ಲೇ ಖಾತ್ರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ. 35 ಸಾವಿರಕ್ಕೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಜನ ಇವನ ಬಳಿ ಠೇವಣಿ ಇಟ್ಟಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಇಷ್ಟೂ ಹಣ ಅವನು ಪಡೆದುಕೊಂಡಿರುವುದು ಕೈಸಾಲದ ರೂಪದಲ್ಲಿ. ಹುಬ್ಬಳ್ಳಿಯ ಉಣಕಲ್ ಮೂಲದ ಶಿವಾನಂದ ನೀಲಣ್ಣವರ ಜೀವನ ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಹಿನ್ನೆಲೆಯಿಂದ ಆರಂಭವಾಗಿತ್ತು. ಮೆಡಿಕಲ್ ಕಾಲೇಜಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಜವಾನನಾಗಿ ಕೆಲಸ ಶುರು ಮಾಡಿದ ನೀಲಣ್ಣವರ, ‘ಶಿವಂ ಅಸೋಸಿಯೇಟ್ಸ್‌’ ಹೆಸರಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಸಾವಿರಾರು ಕೋಟಿ ಮೌಲ್ಯದ ಹೂಡಿಕೆ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿಸಿದ್ದೇ ರೋಚಕ.

Belagavi Investment Scam: Shivam Associates Owner Arrested I Illegal Interest Racket Worth ₹50 Crore Unearthed in Belagavi I Shivam Associates Under Scanner; Thousands of Investors Affected I ‘36% Monthly Interest’ Promise Lands Belagavi Financier in Trouble I Massive Deposit Fraud Probe Begins Against Shivam Associates I Karnataka Officials Crack Down on Illegal Investment Network I Shivam Associates Case: FIR Filed Under BUDS and KPID Acts I Social Media Videos Expose Alleged Financial Empire of Shivananad I Thousands Invested Through App; Probe Intensifies in Belagavi I Belagavi Man Arrested for Alleged Multi-Crore Illegal Deposit Scheme

#ಶಿವಂಅಸೋಸಿಯೇಟ್ಸ್ #ಶಿವಾನಂದನೀಲಣ್ಣವರ #ಬೆಳಗಾವಿ #ಅನಧಿಕೃತಬಡ್ಡಿವ್ಯವಹಾರ #ಹೂಡಿಕೆವಂಚನೆ #ಬಡ್ಸ್ಆ್ಯಕ್ಟ್ #ಕೆಪಿಐಡಿ #ಹಣಕಾಸುವಂಚನೆ #ಕರ್ನಾಟಕಸುದ್ದಿ #ಬೆಳಗಾವಿಸುದ್ದಿ #ShivamAssociates #ShivanandNeelannavar #Belagavi #InvestmentScam #IllegalDepositScheme #FinancialFraud #KarnatakaNews #BUDSAct #KPIDAct #FraudCase #InvestorAlert

ತಾಜಾ ಸುದ್ದಿಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ:
ಫೇಸ್‌ಬುಕ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಫಾಲೋ ಮಾಡಿ:
ಇನ್ಸ್ಟಾಗ್ರಾಮ್ ಫಾಲೋ ಮಾಡಿ:
ಟ್ವಿಟರ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಫಾಲೋ ಮಾಡಿ:
ತಾಜಸುದ್ದಿಗಳನ್ನು ಟೆಲಿಗ್ರಾಂ ಚಾನೆಲ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ನೋಡಿ:

source

Dow futures drop and oil jumps as first day of US-Iran talks sees Trump threaten Tehran on Hormuz



U.S. stock futures fell and oil prices rose after peace talks between the U.S. and Iran got off to a rocky start on Sunday, with President Donald Trump wasting no time with threats to renew war.

Futures tied to the Dow Jones industrial average fell 191 points, or 0.37%. S&P 500 futures were down 0.52%, and Nasdaq futures lost 0.74%.

U.S. oil futures rose 2.1% to $78.19 a barrel, while Brent crude climbed 1.2% to $81.53. Gold dropped 1.5% to $4,180.40 per ounce.

Earlier in Switzerland, Vice President JD Vance said both sides had already made “great progress” in talks, saying the U.S. side represented an “outstretched hand” toward the people of Iran.

But after Iran said Saturday that it’s closing the Strait of Hormuz again as Israel continues attacking Hezbollah positions in Lebanon, Trump told Fox News on Sunday he spoke with Iranian officials and warned them, “You close it and you won’t have a country. You won’t even make it back to your f–king country.”

He also said the U.S. may take over the strait, adding “I’ll blow the s–t out of them. If they don’t make a deal, we’ll collect tolls.”

Last weekend, Trump and Iranian officials confirmed they agreed on a memorandum of understanding that reopens the strait, ends the U.S. naval blockade, and begins a 60-day period for both sides to negotiate other issues like Tehran’s nuclear program and relief from U.S. sanctions.

But on Sunday, the president claimed that after the 60-day negotiation window ends, “I can do whatever I want.” 

While Iran halted talks after Trump’s comments, its delegation remained in Switzerland to continue negotiations. But Lebanon will remain a sticking point. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated that he would keep military forces in southern Lebanon “as long as we need to protect our people.” 

Until the situation in Lebanon settles down, talks over Iran’s nuclear program will take a back seat. In addition, the tug-of-war over the Strait of Hormuz will drag on.

After Iran declared it closed, U.S. Central Command insisted safe passage through the strait remained intact and that traffic is up. It added that U.S. forces are still operating in the area to support freedom of navigation and pointed out that the Joint Maritime Information Center issued an advisory on Thursday affirming that a southern route along Oman’s coast is safe. 

While the U.S. ended its naval blockade on Iran as part of the MOU, Central Command also said “U.S. forces remain present and vigilant to ensure all aspects of the agreement with Iran are adhered to, obeyed, and in full force and effect.”

For its part, Tehran’s new Persian Gulf Strait Authority warned that ships must follow a regime-established route that passes along the Iranian coast and that alternatives are prohibited.

And despite its deal with the U.S. banning tolls for 60 days, the PGSA is requiring insurance that will eventually come at a cost.

“At present, this insurance is provided free of charge to the vessel owner, with all expenses covered by the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Iran said. “The PGSA reserves the right to introduce insurance fees in the future, which will be determined by the relevant insurer. Owners will then be required to purchase and renew coverage accordingly.”

Japan passes copyright reform giving performers and record companies royalties when recordings play in public, including overseas


Japan has created a music right that will, for the first time, require performers and record companies to be paid when their recordings are played in public spaces such as cafes, shops, hotels, and gyms.

The country’s parliament enacted a revised Copyright Act on Wednesday (June 17), introducing what the government calls the record performance and communication right.

Until now, only songwriters, composers, and music publishers were paid when commercially released music was played as background music in Japanese venues.

The performers and the labels behind those recordings received nothing for the public plays, at home or overseas.

Japan‘s copyright framework separates authors’ rights, held by songwriters and composers, from neighboring rights, held by performers and record producers.

The new measure adds a payment right for the neighboring-rights holders when a commercial recording is played or transmitted in a public setting.

It runs alongside the authors’ right, whose background music royalties are collected in Japan by JASRAC, the Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers.

Japan‘s 1970 Copyright Act had given performers and labels a fee only when their recordings were used in broadcasting, not when they were played in public venues.

Songwriters and composers, by contrast, have collected background music royalties in Japan since 2002.

The reform is meant to channel money to artists and labels and to support the overseas growth of Japanese music, according to the education and culture ministry.

The ministry said the system had been widely adopted abroad but left undeveloped in Japan, so Japanese artists earned nothing when their songs were used commercially in other countries.

Under the new framework, a body designated by the Commissioner of the Agency for Cultural Affairs will collect the fees and distribute them to rightsholders.

That body must draw up and publish a schedule of secondary-use fees, and must enter talks with representatives of music users when asked.

If the two sides cannot agree, either can apply to the Commissioner for a ruling.

The level of the new secondary-use fees has not been set.

The right traces back to the Rome Convention of 1961, which provides for a single equitable payment to performers and record producers when commercial recordings are broadcast or communicated to the public.

Japan had not done so; the United States, which has never ratified the convention, similarly provides no such right.

The government says the right has already been introduced in 142 countries, and that among OECD members only Japan and the United States had not adopted it.

The United States remains the other holdout, where terrestrial AM/FM radio still pays nothing to performers and labels for the recordings it broadcasts.

Because countries apply the right reciprocally, nations that grant it have not had to pay Japanese performers and labels when Japanese recordings are played in their bars, shops and restaurants.

Japan is the world’s second-largest recorded music market and its biggest market for physical formats, according to IFPI figures reported by MBW.

Its recorded music revenues returned to growth in 2025, rising 8.9% YoY, as acts including YOASOBI and Fujii Kaze have built audiences outside Japan.

The protection of record performance had also featured in Japan‘s economic partnership agreements with the European Union and the United Kingdom, in which the parties agreed to keep discussing it.

Catherine Lovrics, a partner at intellectual property firm Marks & Clerk, said the change brings Japanese artists “further into the international fold,” in comments to World Trademark Review.

The reform has been years in the making.

Japan‘s Cultural Council had examined the right since 2023, before the Cabinet approved the bill on May 15.

The House of Councillors then passed it on Wednesday (June 17), completing its passage through the Diet.

The revised law will take effect on a date set by government order within three years of its promulgation, giving the designated body and music users time to agree fee levels before collection begins.Music Business Worldwide

Wall Street is Locking You Out of the Housing Market


Dave:
Expenses are skyrocketing throughout our industry from construction costs to insurance rates to repairs and pretty much everything else, prices are going up and interest rates usually get most of the blame or tariffs or general inflation, but there is actually something else going on. Something Wall Street is doing that no one is really talking about and that is corporate consolidation. And this term, it may sound benign or like something that’s just tangentially related to real estate, but Wall Street is coming for the housing market in ways you probably don’t notice and it is having a big impact on home sales, on construction costs, on everything you pay to maintain your properties and ultimately on your wallet. A few companies are trying their best to control everything in the real estate market from materials to labor to real estate brokerages. And while it may not be making the news right now, less competition means higher prices for homeowners and real estate investors alike.
So today in the show, we’re going to shed some light on this under-reported story in our industry. We’re going to talk about what’s going on behind the scenes, how this impacts you and what you can do about it.
Hey everyone. Welcome to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Thanks so much for being here. Today on the show, we’re talking about something a little bit new. We’re going to talk about one of the reasons costs are going up across our industry and how I believe Wall Street in some hidden ways is making it harder for small to medium size investors like us to succeed. And no, it is not the stuff that makes headlines usually I am not talking about institutional buying. Personally, I actually think that story is a little overblown because institutional buyers only own about two or 3% of the housing stock. Today we are talking about something else. We are talking about corporate consolidation and how just a handful of companies control massive parts of the real estate economy. And this might not sound that important, but I think it’s one of the most important yet under-reported issues in our industry.
Corporate consolidation, as you’ll hear in this episode, is one of the main reasons housing has gotten so unaffordable, which in turn has led to a slowdown in housing. It’s one of the reasons your maintenance costs are going up. It’s one of the reasons cashflow is so much harder to find. It’s a sneaky problem, but it impacts almost everyone’s portfolio. And today on the show, I’m going to explain the issue, why it’s gotten worse in recent years, where it’s likely to head, and most importantly, what you should do about it. Let’s get into it. First up, what is corporate consolidation? Because this is what we’re talking about on today’s episode. I’m going to reference it a lot. And basically what I mean, the big picture here is less competition in a given industry. Corporate consolidation is what happens when industries that used to have a ton of competing players get absorbed into just a handful of large companies through mergers, acquisitions, buyouts, that kind of stuff.
And at the end, only a few really dominant players ultimately control most of the market. So just as an example, instead of a hundred HVAC contractors or companies in your city, maybe now there are only 20. And corporate consolidation has been happening across almost every sector of the American economy for just about, or actually more than 40 years now. Talking groceries, stores, airlines, banking, healthcare, media, and now even the trades and real estate services that directly affect your business. In fact, right now there are 225 different industries where four companies or fewer control more than half the market. That is a lot of corporate consolidation. 225 industries where four or fewer companies control more than half the market. That means there is far less competition than there used to be and competition is crucial, absolutely crucial to capitalism. It’s why we have antitrust laws in the first place to fight monopolies because when there’s less competition customers and vendors, they have nowhere else to go.
So they’re just forced to pay the prices that these few companies set. And for real estate investors, this isn’t some abstract thought. It actually shows up. It shows up in your contractor invoices, in your material cost, in what listings you actually get to see. And corporate consolidation is actually getting more intense right now. It is a long story. I’m not going to get into it in this episode. Let me know if you want me to go into more detail on this on another episode, because I did a ton of research and backstory into this, but I’ll just shorten it for everyone in this episode and tell you that basically a policy decision was made back in 1982 that changed how antitrust laws. Antitrust laws are just what the government uses to ensure competition in the marketplace is fair. They break up monopolies, that sort of thing.
But back in 1982, a policy decision was made about how these antitrust laws would be enforced. And long, long, long story short, it’s made corporate consolidation much easier for these businesses and therefore much more prevalent. So that’s the backstory. That’s what corporate consolidation is and sort of the trend, what it has been over the last 44 years. But let’s talk about how this is actually impacting the real estate industry. And there are three major buckets that I’m going to talk about the trades, material costs, and brokerages. So let’s go through each of these one by one so you can see how this is impacting your specific business. First up is the trades. Now the trades, when I say that I’m talking about real estate services, things like HVAC contractors, electricians, plumbers, that sort of thing. And the trades traditionally for most of American history have been really fragmented.
Basically there’s been thousands, tens of thousands of family owned local businesses. It’s usually your local plumber, your electrician, your HVAC tech. They’re not part of some giant conglomerate corporation, but that is changing fast and it’s not something I think most investors have noticed at least as of yet, but private equity has been rolling up these companies, meaning that they’re taking a bunch of fragmented companies, 10, 20, 30 different HVAC companies in a single market and rolling them up into a single organization. And just in the last couple of years, this has happened hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times all across the country and that’s just for the ones that we know about. Private equity, it’s not public information. So those are just the ones we’re aware of. It’s probably happening tens and thousands of times. And the playbook is basically these companies, these larger organizations, it could be a hedge fund, private equity fund.
It could even be publicly traded companies, but they go out, they buy these local operators, they centralize the operations, they standardize the pricing, they optimize for profit, and then they sell it. They go and sell it to an even bigger company. And the reason I think a lot of people don’t even notice this is that a lot of times the playbook entails keeping the local name so the name of the business doesn’t change, the branding doesn’t change. So you think you’re calling the company that you’ve been calling for decades or years, whatever, but you’re actually calling a national bigger organization that has a call center. They have dynamic pricing software and there is some good things to that. There are efficiencies that come from that. There’s maybe better communication, there’s maybe better organization, but there’s also some trade-offs with that as well because a lot of times what you lose are things like loyalty pricing where if you’ve been working with the same organization for decades, they might know you.
They might prioritize your scheduling. They might give you discounts because you do so much volume with you. You used to work with someone who knows your properties, you have a relationship now and now you’re getting routed through a bigger corporation and some of that personal touch does get dissolved, or at least can. I shouldn’t say every company loses that, but that can happen. You’re probably seeing this, right? Go out and call an HVAC company right now and you see you call for one thing and they try and upsell you to something else or they try and pitch you on a subscription service because these companies love subscription predictable revenue so they’re trying to get you on some subscription service. And although there are trade offs and there are some benefits very often, this does come with increased costs as well. And I’ve tried pretty hard to quantify what this means, how much prices have gone up.
It is very, very difficult to do, but the information that I have found, the quantification is hard. But what I have found is that 84% of HVAC businesses, which is kind of a private equity favorite, have raised prices and we just know sort of bigger picture without a doubt. The research on this is very clear across the entire economy that when these roll-ups happen, when there is less competition, it raises prices. This is the whole reason the government tries to break up monopolies in the first place is because it’s anti-competitive and it can ultimately hurt consumers and ultimately it can also hurt innovation. So while I can’t put a number and say service businesses and real estate have gone up by X amount, we see this anecdotally and we see it in under industry and I feel pretty darn confident that that is happening. And even though this is of course not every single business, there are still independent companies out there.
They have to compete. They are struggling and they have to spend more money on marketing or whatever because now they’re competing against these bigger organizations that have a lot more resources and it makes it hard for real estate investors to find high quality service providers for our businesses. So that’s the first bucket. We are seeing big corporate consolidation in the trades, but there are two other buckets that are probably impacting your business as well, which are materials and brokerages. We’re going to get to the materials part, but we got to take a quick break. We’ll be right back Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today we’re talking about corporate consolidation and how it’s probably impacting your business more than you realize. Before the break, we talked about the trades and how roll-ups with private equity firms are creating less competition in that industry, which has its pros and cons, but probably does lead to higher costs for you, for your repairs, for renovations, all that kind of stuff.
The second area of corporate consolidation that’s probably touching your business right now is materials because contractors, when you get that bill right now and you see it for repair and your eyes go out of your head and you think, “Oh my God, this is insane.” I mean, this happens to me all the time, right? It’s so shocking to see some of these bills. It’s not just the contractors. That’s just half the problem really, because every job, as you know, it’s contractor and labor, but it also requires materials and material consolidation compounds every cost increase that you are seeing. Just since December 2020, building materials have risen 40%, which we all know there’s been a lot of inflation since 2020, but that is far outpacing general inflation. We’ve seen crazy things, steel prices going up 128% in 2021. We all remember what happened right with lumber during COVID at 300% above normal.
It’s not just those. I mean, those were kind of unique in COVID, but we also have things like gypsum, which goes into drywall. We have concrete, copper, all dramatically higher and haven’t even come close to getting back to pre-pandemic levels. The supply chain disruptions of COVID are a part of that, don’t get me wrong, but materials, the markets for those were already consolidating before COVID hit. A few companies are controlling material prices, whether it’s lumber or steel or drywall, the competitive pressure is less than it used to be. And so those companies have no incentive to bring prices back down. In fact, if there’s only four companies controlling all pricing for an industry, they might not be directly working with each other, but no one really wants prices to go down so they all keep their prices high. When there is less competition, pricing power replaces market pricing and the investor at the end of the chain, us, we absorb it.
Right now, drywall is essentially controlled by five different companies, all the drywall, essentially five companies. Lumber, highly concentrated into about 10 companies. Paint, paint might be the worst of all of them. Three companies control more than 70% of the market for paint. So there is no wonder when you go buy some paint right now, it’s like $80 for a gallon. It’s insane. And if you’re thinking, oh, five, 10 companies, that’s enough for competition, not really. Actually, you really need a lot more competition. I don’t know exactly what the number is, but if you had 20 paint companies controlling 70% of the market, I guarantee you prices would be lower right now. It almost really becomes a cartel where people are almost, even if they’re not directly talking to each other, they are all incentivized together to keep prices higher. You need more competition for prices to come down.
And think about the layered effect. Your concentrated contractor business is paying higher material costs and they are extracting higher margin. So you’re getting hit twice on a single invoice for repair or maintenance or new construction. And that ultimately means for investors that renovation budgets that worked a couple years ago don’t work today, not because you’re doing anything wrong, but because the cost structure of the entire supply chain has shifted against you. And again, I’m not saying these companies are necessarily evil. I’m just saying this is what happening because the change in the way the government enforces antitrust has made this a lot easier and it’s profitable for companies to do it. So they’re going to go out and do it. We all, whether you’re a homeowner or investor, are just unfortunately the people who have to absorb those costs. All right, that’s the second bucket, but there is a third one and this one is happening in real time.
Stuff with the contractors and materials, that’s been happening for years, but brokerages, real estate brokerages are consolidating really, really rapidly. There are about a hundred thousand real estate brokerages in the United States, but the transaction volume is starting to get more and more concentrated really into three big companies, Compas, Anywhere Advisors, and EXP. And you might see them called different names, but they control about almost 20% of the industry’s total sales volume right now or over 570 billion. And if you expand that to just the top 10% of brokerages, you’ve accounted for 42% of total sales volume. There have been three major brokerage deals closed or been announced in just the last 13 months. Compass acquired Anywhere Real Estate, that was them getting 340,000 agents, Rocket acquired Redfin, Reels acquisition of RE/MAX. It’s all consolidating and it’s not as bad as paint, for example, but I just want to call attention to this because the trend is there.
And you might think maybe this doesn’t matter, like these brokerages are competing and they should be able to grow. And I agree with that. There is some truth to that, but it does also just impact you. And I want you to be aware of some of the trade-offs of these situations because it’s not entirely about commissions, although I think you could argue that less competition keeps commission rates higher, which if you’re an agent, you might like. But as an investor, I think where this really gets a little interesting and potentially impacting our businesses more in the short term is this sort of MLS access problem. This is where the real consequences come for real estate investors because the MLS has sort of always been this great, it has problems, do not get me wrong. MLS is not great, but it has always been sort of this great equalizer because it’s the system that gives every buyer and seller and every agent equal access to listing information regardless of which brokerage they use.
That is a great equalizer because everyone got the same information, but corporate consolidation is threatening that because you see this right now, Compass, this is getting more and more in the news, but Compass is giant real estate organization, very aggressive in consolidation and acquiring other brokerages. They have been very public about the fact that they are increasingly trying to keep listings that they have in- house and out of the MLS. So think about that. If this becomes the biggest brokerage in the country and then all of a sudden all the listings that they have, or not all of them, but many of the listings they have don’t go on the MLS where every agent, every real estate investor can see them, right? They will have a private listing networks only showing homes to its own buyers first and collecting both sides of the commission. It totally changes the way real estate works.
And this is just beginning, but I do think that for real estate investors, the impact could be pretty direct and honestly pretty immediate because off market deals and relationship based access to listings have always given an advantage to sophisticated investors. But if consolidated brokerages start routing their listings through internal networks before the MLS, a lot of these advantages disappeared. You might not hear about that pocket listing or you might just not see some MLS deals that you used to. You might have to work with a different agent to get access to all these listings. So this is a really big issue. It is being litigated. There’s all sorts of conversations about this, but this type of consolidation can really impact real estate investors and it’s one we all need to be paying really close attention to. So those are the three buckets, right? I talked about services, I talked about materials and I talked about brokerages, each of them, which could be having impacts on your business today, but you also have to think about the compounding effect and what this means.
And we need to understand where this is going so we can figure out what to do for our own businesses. We’ll get to that right after this quick break, stick with us.
Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today we’re talking about corporate consolidation and before the break, we talked about the three big buckets where you might be seeing this in your business. This is in the trades, basically real estate services. You might see this in material costs. In fact, you almost certainly are and you might be starting to see more and more of this in real estate brokerages and what listings you actually get access to. And you could probably see how this compounds. We talked about how when you get one bill for repairs now, you are experiencing in two ways already. You’re already feeling the impact of higher labor costs and bigger margins for service companies and from higher prices on materials. You also might not see as many listings as you used to. And none of these things in isolation is going to ruin your business, but you can see that all of them together running simultaneously compounding over time is sort of a structural shift in the economics of small real estate investing.
This is not some market cycle, right? We talk about how deals are thinner right now and it’s not this part of it. This is not the only reason, right? Interest rates, inflation, all that stuff really does matter. But I’m just talking about this piece of it is not really cyclical, right? This is structural. This is a structural change driven by 40 years of policy that have allowed this to happen and the investors who don’t understand this probably keep blaming interest rates or bad luck or whatever, but the ones who do understand it can start making smarter decisions about where and how they invest. And before we get into that and like what specifically you should do about it, I just want to be honest that I don’t really think this is going to change. When I look at all the things our government has prioritized, this is absolutely not one of them.
I haven’t heard a politician talk about this in quite a long time. So the idea that we’re going to have some policy reform, whether I don’t even know if that’s the right answer, but I’m just going to say, I don’t even think that some sort of policy reform is even on the table and even if it was, it’s going to be slow. So like I personally, with my own investing, I’m going to expect these things to continue. So what then can you do? What can you do as a real estate investor? Because I don’t think the answer is not invest. I don’t think the answer is just get mad and do nothing about it. To me, what real estate investors can do is build stronger relationships. I know that sounds low tech, but that’s exactly the reason I think it will work. To me, the solution really is all about individual relationships.
And I know we say it all the time, but real estate truly is a relationship business and this consolidation that we’re seeing makes it even more so. So just a couple pieces of advice, things that I’m personally going to try and do and I think is worthwhile for you as well. Number one, build and protect your contractor relationships really actively because the independent trades businesses that stick around are going to be worth gold in the future. A good contractor is already worth gold, but I just think fewer and fewer of them are going to exist. And I’m not saying that contractors or individual techs or people who sell to private equity are not good people. I am just saying that they have a different business model that might not be aligned with how your business works, right? You might not want to be on a subscription.
You might not want to be upsold. You might not want to go to the end of a queue where random tech comes out to service your business, which maybe they’ll do and they’ll do a fine job of. But for a lot of investors, myself included, I would prefer to have someone who’s been to my property before, who’s been there for 20 years, who knows me, who gives me good pricing, fair pricing for fair work because we’ve had a relationship over time. And so try and cultivate those relationships as best you have and be proactive about it. This is just everything from obviously paying on time. You should be doing that anyway, but also give them referrals, talk to other investors and recommend people and make sure that they know that you are recommending them as well. Overall, you just have to treat these relationships almost like an asset.
It is an asset in your business and you can’t write them off. When you find contractors, you should already be doing this, but it is more important than ever to treat those relationships like gold. So that’s number one. The second thing is to try and build off market deal finding networks because I don’t know how this brokerage thing is going to play out. We have a lot of agents who listen to this show. I would be very interested to hear what you think about this, like what you believe is going to happen with companies like Compass saying they’re going to try and create their own essentially private listing networks. For me as an investor, that worries me because I like when my agent calls me and tells me they got a pocket listing for me, right? I like that certain MLS deals squander on the market, sit there for a long time and then I can see all of them.
I don’t have to go to Compass’s website, then Zillow’s website, then another website to look for all the listings. So I think it’s more and more important, even if you’re not doing direct to seller marketing to build off market deal finding networks. And this might be relationships with more agents. In fact, I think that is probably a good way to do it because even if you have a buyer’s agent that you rely on, different listing agents might have access to different inventory in the future. I don’t really know how this is all going to settle out, but if it were me and it is me, I’m not going to wait. I want to network. I want to be out in my community working with and talking to as many listing agents as I can, telling them what my buy box is, letting them know what I like to buy, what I don’t like to buy so that if the market consolidates and ultimately comes more fragmented, that’s kind of weird, right?
The brokerages are consolidating, but that could mean fragmentation in what listings you see that I’m still able to see all of them. That is what you should be focusing on. How do you get to see as many potential deals as possible? Because when your funnel dries up, if it gets lower, that just means your probability of finding a great deal is going to go down. So find agents who work with motivated listings, talk to wholesalers who are going to be finding these deals and maybe doesn’t want to list it with Compass, but instead wants to go direct to an investor, build those relationships with agents and wholesalers because I think right now the best way to ensure you get the best deals is through person to person relationships. So that’s advice number two. The third thing I would say, and this is something we’re working on at BiggerPockets, which I’ll explain in a second, but the third thing is collective action through small investors, right?
Because these companies are consolidating that gives them pricing power. And we’re small investors. I’m just a guy who goes out and buys rental properties, does some flips, does some private investing and lending, right? I don’t have pricing power, but if we work together, we can actually create some or replicate at least some of the advantages that these institutions have through networks and communities of independent investors sharing resources, sharing referrals, sharing contractor relationships. So you should be doing this at a local level, right by going to meetups, by meeting with agents, to getting to know other investors, go on BiggerPockets forums and go meet other investors in your area and figure out how you can work together to get better deals, right, to get access to all the MLS listings, to share the best contractors that value relationships with investors. Do that in a localized way.
We are also at BiggerPockets doing our part to try and help do this at a macro level. We have launched something called Pro Perks where if you are a BiggerPockets Pro member, we have essentially collectively bargained for our community to get lower insurance costs through steadily or to get discounts on loans through Kiawi. This works even though we are not technically consolidating to get that purchasing power and collective bargaining power by being a part of the BiggerPockets community and by working together, we can replicate some of the benefits of that. So if you’re interested in that, you can become a BiggerPockets Pro, but you can also do this at a local level and figure out which institutions want to be well known among investors as valuing those relationships because those are going to be super valuable if this corporate consolidation continues, which I really think it’s going to.
So that is my advice on how to deal with this. And just to summarize what we’ve talked about today, this corporate consolidation, it’s decades in the making. A policy decision back in 1982 wound up that it is easier for companies to consolidate and because it is profitable to do that, they are doing that and that is what it is. I personally would like to see an environment where small local businesses can compete fairly, but for right now as real estate investors, what we are likely to see is a lot of consolidation and that means we need to be very deliberate about which service providers we choose to work with and to value those relationships. It means we need to do what we’ve always done, but even more so, which is working together to get that collective pricing power to identify the great individuals, the great agents, the great contractors in their area who want to be the essential part that they are of the real estate investing ecosystem.
If you do that, which you absolutely can, you can figure this out. You can weather this just like everything else in real estate investing. The key is just to know what’s going on and you do now for listening to this episode and adapting your tactics, your strategies and your priorities accordingly. Hopefully this episode has helped you do just that. That’s our show for today. Thank you so much for watching this episode of On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. I’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Woot App Deal: 20% Off Any Order, 25% Off for New Customers


Woot App Discount

Woot is running a limited-time in-app purchase promotion that offers 20% off any order, with new customers receiving 25% off their first order made through the Woot app.

The discount applies automatically at checkout in the app and is valid today only on June 21, 2026. As usual with Woot deals, inventory is limited and popular items can sell out quickly.

This can be a nice stacking opportunity if you spot a good deal on electronics, home goods, tools, or Amazon devices already listed at discounted prices. Shipping is free for Amazon Prime members. You can just log in with your Amazon credentials.

  • Offer valid for Woot! customers with a mailing address in the contiguous United States.
  • Maximum discount of $40 per order, maximum discount of $50 for new customers.
  • Offer valid from June 21, 2026 at 12:00am CT until June 21, 2026 at 11:59pm CT.
  • The discount is shown on the final order screen that displays the

SHOP NOW

Guru’s Wrap-up

Woot discounts don’t always grab headlines, but an extra 20%-25% off can make some already-discounted items pretty compelling. It’s worth taking a quick look if you haven’t opened the app in a while.

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you take action (i.e. subscribe, make a purchase) after clicking a link, I may earn some beer 🍺🍺🍺 money, which I promise to drink responsibly. When applicable, you should always go through shopping portals to earn cashback. But when that’s not an option, your support for the site is always greatly appreciated. Thank you for reading!

California home prices hit record as supply tightens


Year-to-date, sales are up 1.2% through the first five months of 2026.

Despite the gain, California has now remained below the 300,000-unit benchmark for the 44th consecutive month.

The statewide median reached $930,260, up 3.1% from $902,040 in May 2025 and 2.3% above April’s downwardly revised $909,410.

The monthly gain was more than double the historical April-to-May average over the past 30 years, per C.A.R.

“California’s home sales softened in May as broader economic uncertainty continued to weigh on consumer confidence and homebuying sentiment,” said Tamara Suminski, C.A.R. president and a Southern California broker.

Video Quick Take: How Small Pieces of Code Can Defend an Entire Operating System









Video Quick Take: How Small Pieces of Code Can Defend an Entire Operating System – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM THREATLOCKER




























Skip to content