Home Blog

Building a Referral Network With Strategic Partners


Building a Referral Network With Strategic Partners written by Alex McQueen read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode:

Overview

John Jantsch sits down with Jermane Cheathem for a live coaching session. Cheathem built his referral business around a handful of aligned partners instead of a long prospect list, and he uses the conversation to map out a partner strategy for Duct Tape Marketing’s fractional CMO service in real time.

They dig into how a partnership works best when your offer helps the partner sell their own product. Cheathem walks through examples: creative methods ranging from pairing a marketing package with home remodeling franchisors, or teaming up with brand consultants who need execution support to placing free chocolate samples with high-end restaurants to reach wealthy diners.

The conversation also covers why cold outreach rarely pays off and what to do instead: start with the people already in your phone. Anyone weighing referral partnerships, agency growth, or a way out of the cold-calling grind will get a clear playbook here.

Guest Bio

Jermane Cheathem spent 17 years in medical equipment financing before building a referral-based model that has produced more than $50 million in funded deals for hospitals, food truck owners, and construction companies. He is the sales director at Dao Financial Solutions and the founder of Creators Learn, where he teaches sales professionals how to replace cold calling with a small number of high-trust referral partnerships.

Key Takeaways

  • Pick a handful of the right partners and go deep, not wide. Chasing volume wastes time on relationships that were never going to close.
  • A partnership sticks when your product helps your partner sell their own. That turns your offer from optional into necessary.
  • Stop cold calling, cold emailing, and cold ads. Call everyone already in your phone first and ask a simple question: do you know anyone who needs this?
  • Look for partners with a built-in reason to want your offer, like franchisors who need their franchisees to hit revenue targets.
  • Work your own backyard before chasing prospects somewhere else (local relationships build trust faster).

Great Moments

  • [00:01] – Jantsch opens with Cheathem’s $50 million in funded deals, built without a single cold call.
  • [01:20] – Cheathem explains the morning he realized 300 cold calls a day would never get him where he wanted to go.
  • [09:42] – Cheathem builds a live partner strategy for Duct Tape Marketing, pairing the fractional CMO offer with home remodeling franchisors.
  • [11:38] – Cheathem tells the story of a Dubai chocolate maker who won over the city’s top restaurants by giving away free samples first.
  • [19:28] – Cheathem introduces his “MVP” concept: one strong partner who opens the door to a whole network of similar people.

Memorable Quotes

  • “The best friends to have are friends you make money with.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “It never makes sense to me to chase anything in life. The best friendships, the best relationships, and the best business partners are always easy from the very beginning.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “You’d be surprised how much comes from that first domino. Once you have one strong partner sending you solid business, that partner probably knows other people who need the same service or product.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “When your product helps your partner sell their own, it stops being a want and becomes a need. That’s when the relationship lasts a lifetime and the deals get simple.” — Jermane Cheathem
  • “Do less, but do it better, instead of trying to spam everyone.” — John Jantsch

Resources

    • Creators Learn — Jermane Cheathem’s website (creatorslearn.com)
    • The Referral Engine by John Jantsch (2010)

 

Email

Download

New Tab

John Jantsch (00:01.806)

So most people build referral networks by meeting, I don’t know, as many people as they can, as many people as possible. Today’s guest picked five or so and went all in on the trust with each one of them and turned it into a $50 million in funded deals without any cold calling. Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Jermane Cheathem. He is the sales director at Dale Financial Solutions and runs something called Creators Learn.

Where he teaches other sales professionals how to build the same kind of referral-based business. Today he actually pitched me on the idea of doing a building something live here on the show. So I have no idea what I’m doing today. we’re just gonna dive right in and see if he can actually use a duct tape marketing offering as the case study. So, Jermaine, welcome to the show.

Jermane (00:55.296)

Thanks, John. I’m looking forward to it, man. I I I’m just as lost as you in today’s episode, so we’ll figure it out on the fly.

John Jantsch (00:59.47)

Well well let’s get let’s get a little context. In the email you originally sent me, you said you had been making 300 cold calls a day, which sounds absolutely terrible. and that that nothing was really working. So what was the day you realized that that math would never kind of get you to where you wanted to go?

Jermane (01:20.414)

Well, I realized it because I was working twelve hours a day and getting very little results from it. life is short, we all die. So I knew that was not gonna pan out long term. And the way I had the epiphany was I was talking to one of the people that were working on the deal that we were working on together, and he told me, Hey, Jermaine, I’ll have some more deals for you.

John Jantsch (01:27.299)

Yeah.

Jermane (01:46.558)

And I realized, wait, wait, I’ve been going at this the entire wrong way. Instead of me going one-to-one transactions and trying to figure out one-to-one how I can get someone to buy my thing, I should just partner with people that already have my ideal customers in their sphere of influence. And my thing helps them sell their thing. And because you know, I was doing financial services, I just partnered with medical device salespeople because my financing helped them sell their the medical devices to the doctors. So

It became a win win win situation where I did ninety percent less work but got ninety percent more income. So I just turned the entire vehicle on its head.

John Jantsch (02:26.2)

Yeah, I I wrote a book actually called The Referral Engine in twenty ten. and that was one of the premises of that book was you your customers, people who know you, I mean, certainly know how great you are. they can refer you, but they can refer one or two people maybe. whereas, like you said, that right strategic partner might have five hundred people that could send your way. So a hundred percent agree with that. So one of the things I wanted to focus on is I think

I think that you said most of your results came from just a small group of people, five maybe even. how did you pick those instead of the, you know, obviously the others you hundreds you could chase?

Jermane (03:05.6)

Well, because they started sending me business and so there’s no reason to chase more business if you have ample business already. It’s all about quality, never quantity. I’m always looking for leverage and simplicity. And so for me, leverage and simplicity is always about how can I manage the fewest personalities, procedures, protocols, and get the greatest return while deepening my relationship with those individuals. Because you can’t have a a hundred friends.

John Jantsch (03:08.952)

Right.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:32.706)

Yeah.

Jermane (03:33.382)

You can’t be close enough because there’s not enough hours in the day. So you have to really dive deep into who do you want to spend your time with and develop something bigger as long as it’s profitable. I I always have this adage like the best friends to have are friends you make money with.

John Jantsch (03:45.507)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:50.711)

Yeah. Well, and and and that’s a really good point though. I mean, I know you’re you’re kind of being facetious, but not. is that that those five or whoever, whatever the number is, they have the right values, they bring you the right kinds of customers, a deal is easy with them. I mean, it just you know, it’s like there’s a whole bunch of people out there that can make life hard. You know, when you find people that can make life easy, then then like you said, why not focus on deepening that relationship?

Jermane (04:18.622)

Yeah, it never makes sense to me to chase anything in life. Because you’ll notice like the best friendships, the best relationships, the best business partners, they were always very easy at the very beginning. It was never a bunch of convincing or scratching and clawing or following up. Like even to me, following up is almost a waste of time, to be completely honest. Because if you it it because you’ll spend 90% of your day following up people that will never buy from you versus just pay attention to the signals that are already there.

John Jantsch (04:21.388)

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (04:29.272)

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (04:38.914)

Yeah. Yeah.

Jermane (04:48.264)

That are easy.

John Jantsch (04:50.07)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So we provide fractional CMO services, as I told you. And actually we have a whole network of of certified marketing consultants that that license our practice. So I thought you had offered to kind of do this live, you know, break break this thing down live. And so I thought let’s let’s use the duct tape marketing fractional CMO service as you know as kind of the guinea pig for this. you know, we provide this service to

Really small to midsized businesses. We’re not, you know, we’re not going after Fortune 500 companies. These are like two to twenty million dollar businesses, founder led quite often. and what we’re providing them is is marketing strategy, marketing leadership, which they they haven’t had. in many cases we will also execute excuse me, execute on the plan for them with our team. but the primary thing that that we’re bringing to them is a a a strategic outlook on the on their market.

So what what other context would help you kind of do to do today’s goal?

Jermane (05:53.29)

So is there any particular vertical you’re in?

John Jantsch (05:57.268)

y you know, we don’t we haven’t. I just I’ve always enjoyed the variety of of working with different types of businesses. we do a lot of business in the home services industries, you know, remodeling contractors, roofing contractors, that kind of thing. And we do a lot of work in the professional services. So other consultants, you know, architects, accountants, lawyers. Those are probably the two biggest.

Very broad you know, markets, but home services and professional services.

Jermane (06:29.544)

And so which is the most profitable and which do you enjoy working with the most?

John Jantsch (06:36.205)

Well, you know, my team does all the work, so I I couldn’t tell you the I couldn’t tell you this but you know there’s they’re drastically different. I think the reason we went into those two fields is professional services have always relied very much on thought leadership. and that’s really how I built my whole practice was on thought leadership. but then I started moving a lot of that thought leadership towards

Jermane (06:42.644)

What do they say?

John Jantsch (07:04.009)

businesses like remodeling contractors who, you know, we’re like, what do you mean, thought leadership? You know, we we just build this thing that people tell us to, but we’ve actually been in very successful at c almost changing that that industry by having them, you know, think differently about it. So if I were going to pick, you know, my one of my favorites is remodeling contractors. you know, I just I love working with them. We can have great impact, you know, especially ones that we can teach some of the, you know,

the differences that what we bring and what strategy really means, we we can have massive impact on on their business, really transform their businesses.

Jermane (07:39.006)

Okay. And so we’ll just take those two avatars. so with the with the contractors and with the professional services folks, how do you currently acquire those clients?

John Jantsch (07:41.955)

Okay.

John Jantsch (07:53.166)

Well, we ha I’ve been doing this thirty years. I’ve written seven books on marketing. and so we have we you know, we have a little unfair advantage. I I shouldn’t say it’s unfair. I mean we work to build it. but most of the most of that comes to us by way of the fact that that we have a pretty well known brand, you know, nationally.

Jermane (08:11.699)

Got it. So it’s mostly all inbound, I’m assuming.

John Jantsch (08:14.39)

It it really is, yeah.

Jermane (08:16.327)

Okay. Is it mostly from the books or what what’s the main driver?

John Jantsch (08:19.917)

Well, we’ve continued to you know, we do webinars every month. you know, we we put out tons and tons of content. We’re very active in the social channels, so it’s the books are a big part of I would say half the business that that that finds us sites having read or at least been aware of one of my books.

Jermane (08:41.843)

Got it. Okay. interesting. Okay. So the though here’s the problem I see with the current setup. But but I know why you set it up this way, being broad. But strategic partners always work the best when we have a very narrow offering and avatar, obviously. so with that being said, what I would do on the contractor side.

is I would probably partner with franchisors that do those type of franchises because it doesn’t they have to have to have a ROI. They have to have these franchises work. And so what’s the biggest hindrance of growing a franchise? Marketing and sales and getting more revenue, right? So I would include some type of marketing package that you already have, included in the franchisor’s pitch to the franchisee.

John Jantsch (09:25.521)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (09:37.433)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (09:42.9)

That would be an easy now. Obviously, you’d want to even get more niche as far as they only do bathrooms or they only do kitchens or like the more niche the better. But that would be what what my first thought with the with the remodeling situation would be partner with the franchise or now on the professional services. what I would probably do since it’s again very broad and we don’t know what these coaches or consultants are actually doing, but they all

Since they’re thinking about thought leadership, most of them I’ve noticed really place a very high value on branding. They believe brand is like the B’s knees, but real entrepreneurs know branding comes after sales and marketing. It becomes almost a byproduct, but they don’t know that. So I would partner with brand consultants, brand coaches, whatever, offer your package. Say your package is $10,000. You give it to the brand consultant.

John Jantsch (10:28.632)

Yeah.

Jermane (10:40.701)

Or coach and say, listen, this is what I do, X, Y, and Z, it’s $10,000. However, you can offer it to your clients for whatever you want to price it. You can price it at $20. You keep the spread. We make our 10, you make your 10, whatever. But that not only makes the branding person’s offer stronger, but it also is gonna exponentially help their client actually execute on the brand. so everybody wins in that scenario, and also everybody wins in the in the franchisee scenario. So

Those are my two high level thoughts on this live kind of workshop. if you know if we had like more narrow specifics, I could have a lot more leverage. Like, for example, I had a a client that was doing high end gourmet chocolates in Dubai. She couldn’t figure out how to sell them. And so since I I knew where her market was and all the situations, I was like, your best strategic partner is gonna be the top fifty restaurants in Dubai.

John Jantsch (11:13.572)

Yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (11:18.007)

Is it?

John Jantsch (11:26.638)

Nice.

Jermane (11:38.576)

Top high end 50 restaurants in Dubai. And you can either do this wholesale or retail, but you give them the chocolates for free. Everybody loves an awesome surprise at the end of their meal. Especially when they’re high end, they’re wrapped in this beautiful box. And so you can either give them to them for free, obviously. Once they get ingrained and they get the response back from their clients how much they love these chocolates after their meal, after they spend a thousand dollars on lunch, then you can either decide I can do wholesale.

John Jantsch (11:50.04)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (12:05.112)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (12:07.731)

Wholesale and sell these chocolates to the restaurants for 50 bucks each, whatever you decide on the pricing, or even better, retail, where you include your business cards at the bottom of the box, your Instagram handle at the bottom of the box. So then these people that make millions of dollars can reach out to you directly, tell their friends and family about you, and then you have a direct and consumer play. But again, you’re just using strategic partners who are these high-end restaurants to get your foot in the door to these high net worth individuals who want to buy your chocolates versus trying to figure out.

John Jantsch (12:31.108)

Yeah. Sure.

Jermane (12:37.811)

How to do it one to one on your own.

John Jantsch (12:40.452)

Yeah, so I I kind of set you up a little bit in that we’ve been doing this, you know, we’ve been doing strategic partners for fifteen, twenty years. And so like on the remodeling side or the home services side, every every trade has an industry group and every industry group has a local chapter. And those have been so because we can educate on marketing, which is frankly a topic they all are always interested in.

we do a ton of education in those associations and those trade groups and that puts us that has them effectively put us in front of their audience. on the professional services side we’ve had a lot of luck with the all the Martech software solution folks, you know, people like HubSpot put us in front of their audiences because

they know that their folks need strategic marketing and you know, not just a tool. and so we’ve had a lot of luck in those two though both of those areas, you know, probably account for about half of our business you know, in any given year is the fact that we get in f we have people put us in front of their audiences. So that we’re not that you know, they’re not pitching anything or you know, we’re actually not e we we don’t even set up referral relationships with them. We just provide value.

to their users or their clients and and you know, some of those folks decide to hire us.

Jermane (14:01.181)

Yeah, no, that’s that that’s the that’s the only way to that’s the only way to do it. But it’s it becomes even more strong when you can figure out from a strategic lens of how you can make sure that your thing helps your partner sell their thing. Because then they it’s it’s not it’s not a want, it’s a need. I have to have Jermaine’s thing to sell my thing. That’s when those relationships last for a lifetime and the deals just become super simple because

John Jantsch (14:16.205)

Yeah. Yes. Very, very key. Yeah. Yeah.

Jermane (14:28.979)

Your partners doing all the selling on your behalf because they need your thing to sell their thing. Yeah.

John Jantsch (14:33.816)

That’s right. That’s right. Well, they it and and I think that’s a really key, especially when you’re trying to develop a an initial relationship. I mean, let’s face it, you know, people are gonna consider, well, what’s in it for me? and so I I think you’re absolutely right on that. You know, I get pitched every day with people that they call it partnering, but what they really want is for me to sell their stuff. and it you know, it it really that idea of of providing value first in some fashion, you know, you

you hit on and it is like it helps me s it helps them sell their thing. Absolutely a hundred percent key.

Jermane (15:08.851)

Yeah. And and then and this is just kind of something I learned in in my finance space. And then I started to realize like, okay, as I’m getting into coaching and consulting, like how am I gonna find people to coach and consult? Like I’m I’m not I learned learned my lesson. So like it’s all about finding these partners that need your thing to help them sell their thing. And if if more entrepreneurs can think from that lens, it makes life not only easier, but it’s actually funner because you’re doing business with people you like.

John Jantsch (15:22.051)

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Jermane (15:36.945)

And everybody’s winning. So it’s not like a competition or winners and losers. It’s like we’re rowing in the same direction.

John Jantsch (15:37.519)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (15:43.963)

So if you were gonna c again, you obviously would have a lot more context than this, but you know, there’s a ton of people out there. I mean, again, I talked about getting pitch I I tell you the thing I get pitched more than sell my stuff is people that want to generate leads for me by sending out cold, you know, cold email or whatever. so and a lot of people are following, you know, for that. if you were talking to somebody, somebody came to you as a prospect and said, you know, we’re doing this cold outreach and we get one or two percent response and

You know, it seems to be going okay. What would you tell them? What’s kind of one move you would say, here’s what you need to do to find your first real part.

Jermane (16:21.713)

well first stop doing anything cold. Like cold email, cold call, cold ads, like it it doesn’t I mean it works but it’s it’s it’s the the the ROI on your time, your resources, your money, you it it it’s it’s like it doesn’t make sense.

John Jantsch (16:24.206)

Yeah, I agree. Yeah.

John Jantsch (16:37.142)

It it it it’s also abusive to both parties, yourself and and the person you’re sending it to.

Jermane (16:41.488)

Yes.

Yes. I think there’s I think there’s somewhat I think there’s been over the last I don’t know when this developed, but there’s a misconception on how the human psychology works when it comes to sales. people want to put sales or marketing in one box and then put the rest of their life into another box, like as if it doesn’t bleed through. No. Sales and marketing in your normal life are the same. Your wife, your friends, everyone you interact with.

John Jantsch (17:03.203)

Yeah.

Jermane (17:12.847)

You know them because they know, like, and trust you from some situation that you infiltrated and became known at church, in the in the soccer club, and whatever, your local baseball team, whatever it might be, you became part of a community, if you will. That is the only thing that matters in sales and marketing. Is once you’re be part of some community where everyone is winning based on your thing, then you don’t have to sell market or brand.

John Jantsch (17:18.404)

Mm-hmm.

That’s right.

John Jantsch (17:30.137)

Business.

Jermane (17:42.355)

Because they send you ready to sign clients that you don’t have to convince because they trust Tim and Tim trusts Jermaine. So now they inherently trust Germaine. It’s just human nature, it’s not rocket science. So the first thing I would do is say stop anything cold. Second thing to do is

John Jantsch (17:46.992)

That’s right.

Jermane (18:00.53)

Here everyone has a Rolodex of friends, family, previous, co-workers, anybody. I don’t care if it’s 50 people, a thousand people, whatever. Reach out to every single one of those folks. Pri I would hope on a phone call. That’d probably be the best. you can always message them and just say, I’m looking to get into this is exactly what I do. When I first started in the finance space and I was struggling because of all the cold calls, I reached out to my Rolodex and I one lady I talked to, she was in marketing, and I said, I’m looking into get into the healthcare field.

John Jantsch (18:03.641)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (18:30.345)

Do you know anybody? That’s all I said. She said, Great, let’s have let’s have lunch. Went to meet her for lunch. She gave me a couple names. I called those names. I said, she I I I I dropped name dropped her name, like who she referred me. Next thing you know, I’m getting deals from these folks because I’m leveraging the network that’s already in my phone. So first thing is call everybody or contact everybody in your phone currently or on your LinkedIn or whatever that knows you and say, I’m looking to get into this industry or find people on here or whatever.

They’ll start giving you names. They’re gonna start introducing because humans want to help other people. We love to help other people, it’s inherent. So that’s that’s step two is contact everybody on your phone and then reach out to those folks and tell them what you’re trying to do. And then that is the first step. You’d be surprised how much comes from that first domino because then they start referring you to five, six other people. And then once you have like one key, I call them MVPs, most valuable partners.

John Jantsch (19:19.384)

Mm. Yeah.

John Jantsch (19:27.013)

Mm-hmm.

Jermane (19:28.071)

Once you have one MVP that’s sending you business that’s solid that you like, your reserve friends, everyone’s winning, that one MVP knows other people that probably has the same service or product that you could also distribute to to that community. So it becomes a snowball, a domino, you can have different analogies for it, but people forget to leverage their backyard. Like if I live in Phoenix, why am I calling someone in Texas? I should exhaust Phoenix metro area first.

before I go anywhere because it’s just no like and trust. It’s you can talk about common things, the weather, the sports teams, whatever. So we we get I think I think a lot of folks look at, you know, gurus or successful people and they see them in their tenth chapter and they’re trying to copy the tenth chapter where they’re in the first sentence of their first book.

John Jantsch (19:56.88)

Yeah, yeah.

John Jantsch (20:16.025)

Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Absolutely, a hundred percent. You know, I think that point about reaching out to everybody on your phone, I make that all the time because maybe two of them are prospects, but they all know somebody who needs what you do. And that and I think your point of just letting it out there wide open, do you know anyone who? You know, is one of the best, you know, best opening phrases you can make you know, to to your warm market for sure.

Jermane (20:44.913)

Exactly. Yeah. It’s it’s simple man, but you know, simple’s not always executed on for some reason.

John Jantsch (20:45.072)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (20:49.548)

No, no. Well, that’s you know, there’s the the lure of I can send a thousand emails with the click of a button. you know, that seems a lot easier, right? so but it it you know, do less and but just do it better. you know, as opposed to trying to trying to spam everyone. Well, Jermaine, I I appreciate you reaching out to me and and agreeing to kind of do this fun little episode today. Is there some place you’d have people connect with you or or find out about your work?

Jermane (21:18.995)

Yeah, best place is at my website, creatorslearn.com. They can check out all my socials and then they can also book a call there too with me directly.

John Jantsch (21:27.106)

Awesome. Well again, I appreciate you taking a moment to stop by and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road.

Jermane (21:32.991)

Sounds good, John. Appreciate it, man.

powered by

Geyser Turns Down Cuba Bitcoin Campaign After Sanctions Wallet Check


Geyser, a US-linked Bitcoin crowdfunding site, has refused a campaign from Cuba Bitcoin after an automated review labeled the submitted wallet a sanctions failure.

The grassroots group made the rejection public on September 3, 2026, calling the explanation empty and arguing that origin, not the chain itself, was what shut the door.

Cuba Bitcoin is a community effort focused on education, meetups, and homegrown tools so people on the island can use bitcoin without relying on banks that barely function.

The group applied to Geyser hoping international supporters could fund that work in sats.

After several days, the reply arrived: the wallet did not pass a sanctions screen.

Organizers described the outcome as exclusion that follows Cubans even into Bitcoin.

In a follow-up, they said infrastructure meant for Bitcoin communities has to be open, hard to shut down, and able to survive political pressure.

They argued the existing platform does not meet that standard and that something closer to Bitcoin’s original design is needed.

Geyser co-founder Michele Morucci (posting as Metamick) answered that the company was created to spread access to capital and that it shares Bitcoin’s culture, but that sanctions rules sit outside its control and that every company in its position has to follow them.

He added that he hoped the legal climate would change.

A member of the Cuba Bitcoin circle, Forte11, pushed back on the technical claim.

He said the on-chain address they submitted was unused, with no history and no coins.

The Lightning destination, he wrote, ran on servers outside Cuba, and the project itself was registered in El Salvador.

If the real issue was serving Cubans, he said, the company should say so instead of pointing to a vague wallet check.

In his view, Bitcoin was supposed to make money harder to blockade, not copy the same filters used by banks.

The clash sits inside a larger pattern.

American embargo rules treat many financial services involving Cuba as off-limits.

Card networks and exchanges have already stepped back.

Geyser does not hold users’ bitcoin, yet it still screens projects and lists Cuba among places where the product is not offered.

Non-custodial design therefore did not remove the compliance layer that sits between a Cuban community and a US fundraising page.

Cuban bitcoiners have spent years building around those limits: their own Lightning node, community wallets, Cashu mints, and peer channels that do not depend on a single American company.

Direct donations and informal support already exist.

The Geyser episode is less a surprise than a public demonstration of where platform Bitcoin still stops.

The deeper question the posts raise is whether fundraising for isolated communities can live on corporate sites that must obey OFAC, or whether it has to move onto protocols no single firm can turn off.

Cuba Bitcoin’s public stance is that the second path is the one that matches Bitcoin’s purpose. Geyser’s stance is that wishing for that path does not erase US law for a company that lives under it.



Should You Buy Snowflake Stock After Its Recent Surge? The Answer Might Shock You.


Data is the lifeblood of every artificial intelligence (AI) software application. The more information a business can feed into its AI models, the smarter and more useful its software will be. But since most large organizations host their valuable digital assets across multiple different cloud platforms like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, their AI models often draw information from fragmented data sets.

Snowflake‘s (SNOW -5.41%) Data Cloud solves this problem by bringing data together from across different cloud environments, and it offers an expanding portfolio of tools and services to help businesses turn it into powerful AI software.

The stock is up 67% in 2026 and is closing in on a fresh record high for the first time in five years, but despite the company’s spectacular operating results over the last few quarters, here’s why investors might want to think twice about adding it to their portfolio.

Image source: Getty Images.

At the center of the enterprise AI revolution

Snowflake built a flagship AI platform called Cortex AI, where companies can pair their internal data with leading AI models from third-party developers like Anthropic and Meta Platforms to create AI agents, chatbots, and other software applications. The platform includes a series of ready-made tools to make the process easier, including CoCo (formerly Cortex Code), an AI-powered coding assistant.

Then there is CoWork, a powerful AI assistant that can help every knowledge worker — even those in nontechnical jobs — extract value from an organization’s data. It even plugs into every major email and customer-relationship management platform so employees can use it to accelerate workflows, whether they want to identify sales trends or summarize meeting notes.

Cortex AI also features processing tools to help pull data from unstructured sources like contracts and invoices, which can be useful when training and deploying AI models.

Snowflake had a record 14,554 total customers at the conclusion of its fiscal 2027 second quarter (ended July 31), and 9,100 of them had deployed CoCo, while 5,800 were using CoWork, so there is clear demand for these new AI products.

Accelerating revenue growth

Product revenue was $1.49 billion during the second quarter, a 37% increase from the year-ago period. That growth accelerated from 34% in the first quarter, highlighting the company’s strong momentum. This great result prompted management to lift its product revenue guidance for fiscal 2027 by $230 million to $6.07 billion.

However, the company is spending heavily in areas like marketing and research and development to deliver that top-line growth, making it difficult to achieve profitability on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The company lost $487 million during the first half of fiscal 2027 alone, and while that was an improvement from its year-ago net loss of $727 million, profitability still seems way out of reach for now.

Snowflake Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-5.41%) $-19.29

Current Price

$337.18

On a positive note, Snowflake did generate an adjusted first-half profit of $383 million after excluding one-off and noncash expenses, which included $890 million in stock-based compensation. Although stock-based comp isn’t a cash expense, investors still pay for it by way of dilution; every time Snowflake issues new shares to its employees, every existing share held by investors becomes slightly less valuable, so this cost can’t be dismissed.

In my opinion, Snowflake must find a way to turn the AI tailwind into consistent GAAP profits, because the company’s history suggests it will otherwise wind up with billions of dollars in annual losses once its revenue growth inevitably slows down at some point in the future. That won’t be good for its stock price.

Upside could be limited from here

Following its recent gains, the stock is now trading at a sky-high price-to-sales ratio (P/S) of 23.1, making it almost four times as expensive as the Nasdaq-100 index, which has a P/S of 6.1. In other words, it looks overvalued compared to a basket of America’s largest technology companies.

There aren’t many good comparisons to Snowflake in the public markets because of its unique product portfolio, but its stock is substantially more expensive than other cloud giants like Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, which also offer broad portfolios of AI services.

SNOW PS Ratio Chart

SNOW PS Ratio data by YCharts.

Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet operate many different businesses outside of cloud computing, so they aren’t the perfect companies to compare with Snowflake in terms of valuation. But Amazon Web Services grew its revenue by 37% during its most recent quarter, while Azure’s revenue jumped by 43%, and Google Cloud’s revenue surged by 82%. And they each generated significantly more revenue than Snowflake did, making their growth rates even more impressive.

Therefore, it’s difficult to justify Snowflake’s premium valuation relative to those cloud giants, and I actually think it will limit the potential upside of its stock from current levels. As a result, it probably isn’t a great buy right now.

After 30 years in aerospace, these brothers retired from corporate life and work at Disney


Americans are retiring later and picking up part-time work to cushion their savings, pursue a long-lost passion, or simply fill the extra downtime. After sunsetting their decades-long careers in the aerospace industry, brothers Jerry and Peter Wong decided to add a bit of magic to their lives by working at Disney.

Jerry Wong, 66, is a photographer snapping pictures of park-goers at Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, California. He joined as a photographer four years ago, the same year he wrapped his career as an engineer at aerospace and defense giant Northrop Grumman. He began as a summer intern in 1979, and went on to lead a four-decade career at the $75 billion company. Jerry worked on ground communications for government contracts—picking up people skills he now uses at Disney—and later retired from the profession in 2022. 

But a blank calendar left him restless, and after just four months, he began hunting for another gig. He and his brother, Peter, had been going to the amusement parks since 1967, and wanting to stay busy and reconnect with that childhood nostalgia, he looked into what Disney jobs were available.

Courtesy of the Wong brothers

The baby boomer found a part-time role in photography—a hobby he had picked up from his dad as a freshman studying at UCLA. By October that year he was suited up in photography blues and armed with a professional camera, capturing the magical moments at both Disneyland Park and Disney California Adventure Park. Jerry currently works around 14 hours across two or three days a week during the off-season, and 32 hours on a five-day schedule when the holidays roll around. For the retired engineer, the job is less about the paycheck than the people and the experience.

“I don’t know if I would call it a second career…the term career is something that you’re there because it’s something you need to do to support yourself, or to create a long-term lifestyle,” Jerry tells Fortune. “Working post-retirement, it’s a different perspective. From a personal point of view, there’s no stress. I’m enjoying myself…I’m here because I choose to be here.”

But Jerry might not even be working at the park if it weren’t for his youngest brother, Peter Wong. He had already made the leap years before, showing Jerry the upsides of adding a Disney gig to the leisurely schedule of corporate retirement.

Retiring from desk jobs and working at Disneyland: ‘I’m finished with being married to my laptop’

63-year-old Peter was the first of the Wong brothers to add a Disney job to his retirement schedule. 

The former finance worker wrapped up his own aerospace career back in 2017, winding down from a three-decade career of crunching financial figures. He began working in fixed asset accounting at Hughes Electronics in 1987—an aerospace company that had been purchased by automotive giant General Motors.

One decade later, U.S. defense contractor Raytheon snapped up Hughes during a major consolidation of aerospace companies. Peter was responsible for the financial planning rates and budgets of seven facilities across America. Around 30 years into his career, a buyout offer pushed him to throw in the towel—the $271 billion contractor offered special golden handshake packages for employees from the legacy Hughes days. Peter took the deal, and phased into retirement.

But just one year later, the retiree was back on his feet working the rides at Disney California Adventure. For Peter, it also meant reconnecting with the special moments in his life, from his memories of going to Disney every year with his Hong Kong relatives, to proposing to his now-wife on the Skyway ride (which closed in 1994). 

“I’m finished with being married to my laptop and phone all day and night,” Peter tells Fortune. “I want to do something to make magic for people.”

Now, Peter is a Disney attractions host bringing the park to life while keeping guests safe on the rides. He works two to three days a week, around 14 hours in total, and during the holidays and busy season, he’ll take up to 28 hours. The job required some adjusting; having worked an office job his entire career, it took time to get used to being on his feet everyday.

He was trained at Redwood Creek Challenge Trail at Disney California Adventure, and still splits his time between working the attraction and flight ride Soarin’ Across America. For hours each workday, Peter suits up in wilderness outfits and Disney vests, greeting guests while getting a peek behind the rides.

“I wanted attractions because of the face-to-face interaction with the guests, and also learning how the attractions work,” Peter explains. “As a guest, you just see the person pushing the button…But you don’t see all the intricacies involved with actually working the attraction.”

Disneyland Resort photographer Jerry Wong (L) and attractions host Peter Wong (R).

Courtesy of the Wong brothers

Due to their differing schedules, the Wong brothers don’t often get the chance to meet up while on the clock. There is the off chance that they’ll spontaneously stumble into each other while working a shift, Peter says, but oftentimes they just go to Disneyland together as annual pass holders.

Having worked there for several years now—and seeing the way things have changed since being kids in the 1960’s—Jerry and Peter are reconnecting with the place that has been part of their lives for nearly six decades. And they’re passing that whimsy onto thousands of visitors around the world every week. 

“I look at the pictures that our parents took of us in ’67…I can remember exactly what ride we had to go on first, which was Pirates [of the Caribbean], because it first just opened up,” Jerry recalls. “As a photographer, it’s the same thing. In that one or two minutes that I get with the guests, I create a lasting memory for them.”

Mortgage Bankers Association sues to block New Jersey’s new disparate-impact rule


For mortgage companies, the association says the practical problem is compliance. The suit claims the rule reaches the everyday tools lenders rely on – credit history, income standards, and other underwriting and pricing measures. State officials, the filing says, have flagged credit history, criminal history, and minimum income requirements as practices the rule covers, and have said its provisions on automated decision-making tools apply to lending. 

The association’s central argument is that New Jersey threw out limits the US Supreme Court set in a 2015 ruling, Inclusive Communities – limits the group says keep disparate impact law from sliding into what it calls unlawful “racial balancing.” Under the rule, the filing claims, someone challenging a lender’s policy can point to broad national, state, or census figures rather than the lender’s own applicants, and does not have to show the gap is large or statistically meaningful. In housing and home lending, the suit says, the rule also makes the business prove there was no less discriminatory way to reach the same goal – a reversal of how the group says federal law works. 

That, the association says, boxes its members in. It argues the surest way to avoid liability under the rule is to make race-conscious choices – which, it says, federal law forbids. The suit points to a line in the rule stating that an “interest in achieving diversity or increasing access for underrepresented or underserved members of a protected class” can, on its own, justify a challenged practice. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, the group says, bar creditors from considering race in a credit decision. 

The MBA represents more than 2,000 members across real estate finance, over 60 of them based in New Jersey. Every member that lends in the state, it says, must now spend money checking whether its underwriting, pricing and servicing produce uneven results across protected groups that could expose it to a claim under the rule – costs the group calls unrecoverable and ongoing. Lenders that also operate elsewhere may have to run a separate New Jersey rulebook, adding more expense. Members that own and manage rental housing face the same review of how they screen tenants. 

The lawsuit makes two claims: that the rule breaks the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection, and that federal law overrides it. The association is asking the court to strike the rule down and block it statewide, or at least to carve out the parts covering housing and home lending. 

Senators Demand ED Account for $1 Billion Student Loan Fund as Defaults Hit 9M


United States Senator Elizabeth Warren (Democrat of Massachusetts), questions Kevin Warsh at a Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing to examine the semiannual monetary policy report to the congress, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC, on Wednesday, July 15, 2026. 
(Photo by Mattie Neretin/Sipa USA)

Key Points

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill Act set aside $1 billion for the Education Department to cover “administrative costs” of the federal student loan program, with no reporting requirement attached.
  • ED’s own FY2027 budget request shows it had spent roughly $216 million of that money by the start of the year and expects more than $450 million to still be unspent when FY2027 begins, without saying where any of it went.
  • Senators want an itemized accounting and a commitment to monthly public reporting by September 16, arguing the money should go toward the nine million borrowers now in default.

Four Senate Democrats want the Department of Education to provide answers on how it spent a $1 billion student loan administration fund created by last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In a September 2 letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon (PDF File), Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) say the agency has already spent roughly $216 million from the fund without explaining what it spent them money on. Meanwhile, the number of borrowers in default has climbed to a record high.

The $216 million figure comes from the Department of Education’s own Fiscal Year 2027 budget request, which reports that amount obligated as of the start of FY2026 and projects that more than $450 million will still be unspent when FY2027 begins. The senators note that Section 82005 of the OBBBA requires the money to go toward “administrative costs” of the federal student loan program, including servicing, but built in no reporting or oversight requirement.

The Senators want answers by September 16, 2026.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

When the OBBBA was in discussion, this $1 billion fund was designed to help the Department of Education pay for the massive amount of changes required as part of the bill. However, the current request from Senators is two-fold: show us where you’re spending the money, and if you don’t have a good use for it, use it to help borrowers in default.

The senators point to Federal Student Aid portfolio data showing that the number of borrowers in default has nearly doubled to nine million since January 2025. Our own tracking of Education Secretary McMahon’s testimony found roughly one in four borrowers is now delinquent or in default, and New York Fed data showed 3.6 million borrowers defaulted in a single quarter after collections resumed.

This oversight comes at a critical junction for many borrowers. Roughly seven million SAVE plan borrowers are being pushed off the plan, and the senators cite a National Consumer Law Center analysis warning that borrowers who don’t pick a new plan will be auto-enrolled in Standard repayment – which could be the most expensive option.

The senators argue that combination puts millions more at elevated risk of default just as ED sits on hundreds of millions in unspent administrative dollars.

What The Senators Are Asking

The letter poses three sets of questions:

  1. An itemized accounting of the first $216 million. Specifically, how much went to student loan servicers (and for what work), how much supported the ED-Treasury interagency agreement moving loan administration out of ED, how much hired new FSA staff, how much went to FSA’s website, and how much funded outreach to borrowers already in default or at risk of it. They also want the criteria ED used to decide.
  2. The same breakdown for everything spent since FY2026 began, plus whether ED still expects more than $450 million to be left at the start of FY2027, and itemized spending plans for the rest of the money both before and after that date.
  3. A commitment to monthly public reporting on how the fund is used going forward.

The letter notes that ED’s only public statement on the fund so far is a court declaration in the Sweet v. McMahon borrower defense case, which said an unspecified amount would pay for attorneys to adjudicate those claims.

Where The Senators Want The Money To Go

Beyond transparency, the letter tells Education Secretary McMahon what the Senators believe the fund should be spent: on “whatever measures are necessary” to pull borrowers out of default and keep others from entering it.

The senators offer three examples. First, expanded outreach to borrowers who are behind or already defaulted, a group that is now dealing with Treasury as its collector.

Second, better FSA customer service so struggling borrowers can actually get into affordable plans — a sore point since layoffs left dozens of FSA offices with no staff.

Third, rehiring the servicer oversight team the administration cut in early 2025, which a March GAO report tied to gaps in servicer accountability.

It’s important to note that the Senators are not asking for any of the funds to be used to pay off or relieve borrowers of their debts.

How This Connects

This is the latest in a string of oversight demands from the same group of Senators. In June, Warren and Merkley led 62 lawmakers pressing ED to act on what they called the largest default crisis on record.

Last week, they opened an investigation into MOHELA over false delinquency notices sent to borrowers, the kind of servicer error the letter says a restored oversight team would catch. And the GAO finding that FSA halted routine servicer reviews gives the servicer oversight ask a documented basis rather than a political one.

The student loan fund is one of the few places where the July 1, 2026 OBBBA added money instead of removing options. The law eliminated Grad PLUS, capped parent borrowing, collapsed repayment plans into two choices, and ended SAVE. These changes make loan servicing more complicated in the near term and gave ED a plausible reason to spend money on implementation.

What the senators are contesting is whether implementation, the Treasury transfer, or litigation is absorbing dollars that could have gone to borrower outreach.

What’s Next

The Department of Education’s response is due September 16. Watch for whether the department releases any itemized breakdown or simply cites the budget justification again.

A commitment to monthly reporting seems unlikely without a statutory requirement, but the FY2027 appropriations process gives Democrats a chance to attach one.

For borrowers, the more immediate signal is how FSA handles the first wave of SAVE borrowers hitting their 90-day deadlines this month. That’s where any customer service spending from the fund would show up first.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Senators Demand ED Account for $1 Billion Student Loan Fund as Defaults Hit 9M appeared first on The College Investor.

Burger King Celebrates National Cheeseburger Day With a Full Week of Food Deals


🛍️ Support DDG

Enjoying the deals and content? When you shop through our Amazon affiliate links, we may earn a small commission — at no extra cost to you. Your support helps keep the deals, bank bonuses, and giveaways coming. Thank you!


Shop Amazon & Support Us

ASEAN can still hedge between America and China on AI. It needs to get its act together first



Boris Babic is an associate professor of data science, philosophy and law at the University of Hong Kong. Brian Wong is an assistant professor of philosophy and a fellow at the Centre on Contemporary China and the World at the University of Hong Kong. Nikola Ilovski is pursuing a Master of Global Affairs and Policy at Yonsei University’s Graduate School of International Studies.

SEC seeks court order forcing ISS to hand over client voting data




SEC seeks court order forcing ISS to hand over client voting data