From sold-out live shows to creator-led events, Dear Media is making the case that the most valuable thing a podcast can build is community.
From sold-out live shows to creator-led events, Dear Media is making the case that the most valuable thing a podcast can build is community.
A conversation with Zach Lemaster, founder and CEO of Rent to Retirement
Most investors decided turnkey rentals were dead the morning mortgage rates crossed 7%. Cash flow evaporated, the math stopped penciling, and the smart money went to the sidelines to wait for a cut that keeps not coming.
That’s the consensus, but it’s looking at the wrong number.
Zach Lemaster runs Rent to Retirement, a turnkey company that sells and finances new-construction rentals for investors across the country, which means he sees what’s actually closing right now rather than what the internet says is closing. I sent him six questions about the deals he’s writing today, the mistakes that wreck first-time out-of-state buyers, and what he’d do with $50K if he had to start over from zero.
His answers are below, unedited. My job is to tell you what to do with them.
With rates remaining at current levels and the market slowing, sellers are willing to negotiate significantly more, creating a scenario where investors can acquire some of the best deals I’ve seen in decades.
For example, some builders are willing to offer up to 15% of the home price as cash back at closing or a price reduction. If you put 20% down on a new-construction SFR (single-family rental) and received 15% back at closing, you would only be into the home for 5% down! This exponentially increases ROI. You could also use this 15% to buy down rates into the 3s, which would dramatically increase cash flow.
The best time to buy at REI is during a buyer’s market. Buyers currently have much more negotiating power and a unique opportunity to structure a deal with positive cash flow by controlling the terms.
This is the whole interview in one answer, so let me do the math he’s pointing at.
Take a new-construction SFR at $300K, and 20% down is $60K. A 15% builder credit is $45K. Apply that credit to your down payment, and you’re in for $15K of real cash, which is 5% of the purchase price. It’s the same house but a quarter of the money in the deal.
Or you don’t pocket it. You spend the 15% to buy down the interest rate. A rate in the 3s on a house that still appraised at full price moves the cash flow line from “barely” to “comfortably,” and you locked it in instead of waiting for the Federal Reserve to do it for you.
The catch, and Zach would say this himself, is that incentives this size show up when builders are sitting on standing inventory. That’s a buyer’s-market signal, not a forever feature. The window is the point.
Next time you talk to a builder or turnkey provider, don’t lead with the price. Ask what they’ll do at closing on standing inventory: cash back, rate buy-down, or price cut. Then run the deal both ways—15% toward the down payment versus 15% toward the rate—and see which one your market actually rewards.
Not going through proper due diligence and buying in low-income areas. Regardless of whether you are buying locally or at a distance, always complete all appropriate due diligence steps. This includes hiring a third-party home inspector, having full title work completed, and having an independent appraisal of the home. Make sure your contract includes contingencies for each of these items to protect you throughout the buying process.
Lastly, there are some investors that are very successful investing in low-income areas, but it’s generally not the best approach for newer investors just getting into the game.
He names two mistakes and treats them as one, because they are. Skipping due diligence and chasing the cheap door in a rough ZIP code stem from the same impulse: trying to win on price rather than on process.
The third-party inspector, independent appraisal, full title work, contingencies written into the contract—none of it is exciting, and all of it is the difference between an asset and a lesson. I’ve bought sight-unseen, and I’ve bought after flying out, and the only deals I regret are the ones where I let the excitement outrun the checklist.
Put your three nonnegotiable contingencies into your offer template right now—inspection, appraisal, and title—so you’re never deciding whether to “save time” by skipping one when you’re emotional about a deal. And shelve the low-income-area question until you’ve got a few boring deals behind you.
I would do exactly the same thing I did when I got started. I would first invest in myself through education to ensure I have a clear understanding of and clear expectations for my goals. Since I built wealth through real estate, I would follow the same path. Buy newer homes in good areas with quality teams.
I would not wait forever to find the perfect deal. So many people waste years trying to find the unicorn deal or trying to time the market. I would outline a clear buy box and make an offer as soon as I find a home that meets my criteria.
Assuming I already have adequate reserves, I would use the $50K as a down payment on a newer home and negotiate a deal that meets my buying criteria. Having a W-2 provides access to conventional financing, but I would also get quotes on non-conventional loan products like DSCR loans, as those loans are very competitive in today’s lending environment. Then I would simply rinse and repeat and ultimately try to diversify across multiple markets so I don’t have all my investments in one area.
Remember, cash flow creates freedom, but appreciation builds wealth!
Two things to pull out. First, the buy box. He’d “outline a clear buy box and make an offer as soon as I find a home that meets my criteria,” which is the unglamorous opposite of the unicorn hunt.
A buy box is just your written rules: price range, market, rent target, condition, and return threshold. Deals that fit get an offer, while deals that don’t get ignored. That discipline is the whole reason he isn’t one of the people wasting years trying to time the bottom.
Second, he’d get quotes on DSCR loans (debt service coverage ratio loans, which qualify based on the property’s rent rather than your personal W-2 income) even with a salary in hand, because right now they price competitively and don’t burn through your limited number of conventional mortgages. Most W-2 investors don’t think to shop them until they hit the conventional wall years in.
Write your buy box this week: five lines, no more. Then get one DSCR quote alongside your conventional preapproval so you already know both numbers before a deal forces the question.
That’s precisely it: If you are only looking at the numbers, you are not doing enough diligence. Don’t chase unicorn deals. Wealth is built one boring house at a time with modest returns, investing in good locations. If the numbers look too good to be true, they probably are.
This is the contrarian one, and it’s the line that’ll get screenshotted. Everyone teaches you to chase the fattest cap rate (the property’s annual return if you paid all cash). Zach is telling you the pro forma that looks best is often the one hiding the most. Modest returns in a good location will quietly beat gaudy returns in a place where the tenant pool, appreciation, and eventual exit all work against you.
When a deal looks too good, go find out why before you go find the money. Pull the neighborhood’s rent trend, vacancy, and five-year price history. If you can’t explain the great number, the number is explaining you.
Texas (San Antonio and Dallas suburbs). I originally wrote off Texas because of high property taxes, thinking I could not cash flow. What I’ve found is that there are suburbs of metropolitan areas that have seen double-digit growth in both appreciation and rents that still provide significant cash flow, even with higher property taxes.
Supply and demand drive home sales, so go where supply is low and demand is high. Keep it simple and consistent to be successful long term.
The honest answer is more useful than it looks. He wrote off an entire state on a single line item, property taxes, and missed years of double-digit rent and price growth in the suburbs because one scary number got there first.
The takeaway isn’t “buy Texas.” It’s that a market is never one number. Supply and demand at the suburb level beat the state-level talking point every time, and for the long-term-rental core, that means taxes are a line item to underwrite, not a verdict to act on.
Take the one market you’ve dismissed on a single stat, taxes, regulation, or being “too expensive,” and actually pull supply and rent growth at the submarket level. You might be wrong the exact way he was.
There is no such thing as the perfect deal. In today’s market, you have a large opportunity to negotiate and create a deal that makes sense. The old formula of putting 20% down on any investment property with a conventional loan may not work in today’s environment.
That does not mean there are not good deals out there. The most successful investors are the most creative ones. Understand exactly what you need to acquire to meet your goals, and then be creative with all the different levers you can pull to make the deal work. Don’t pass on a deal if it doesn’t pencil out with the typical 20% down conventional mortgage. There are many other options to explore right now that can make or break a deal!
If you haven’t bought your first rental yet, you are not late. The terms just swung back toward the buyer for the first time in years, which means someone starting today has more levers to pull than the person who bought at the top of 2021 ever did.
The old “20% down, conventional loan, hope it cash flows” formula is only one option now, not the only one. Creative isn’t a personality type you either have or don’t. It’s a list of financing tools you simply haven’t priced yet.
Don’t kill a deal because it doesn’t pencil at 20% down conventionally. Before you pass on it, run it three ways: conventional, DSCR, and a seller or builder concession aimed at the rate. The deal that dies one way often lives another.
2026.6 Update: The new welcome offer is: earn 3% cashback on dining in the first 6 months (usually 1.5%) on up to $6,000.
2023.6 Update: New card launched. No credit history required.
This is a card designed for people with no credit history by Chase. Although sign up bonus is not great, this card has a decent earning rate as your first credit card. I guess after one year you can also convert it to better cards such as Chase Freedom Flex (CFF) or Chase Freedom Unlimited (CFU).
On June 25, the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) hit the street. During May, consumer prices rose 4.1% compared to the prior-year’s month. This is the largest reported year-over-year increase in over 3 years, suggesting that solving the inflation problem remains a work in progress.
Yes, one key factor driving last month’s reading was rising gasoline prices. With recent geopolitical tensions easing, sending energy prices lower, the inflation rate could ease in the months ahead. Still, even if inflation eases, it’s likely to remain at elevated levels, which explains newly appointed Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh’s hawkish “higher for longer” stance on interest rates.
Nevertheless, even as high inflation persists and could lead to a new wave of stock market volatility, you need not head for the hills. While “inflation-proof investments” is a bit of a misnomer, here are three stocks that stand to thrive in the current environment: Costco Wholesale (COST 0.84%), Visa (V +1.72%), and WM (WM 1.23%).
Image source: Getty Images.
After a strong start earlier in the year, Costco shares have pulled back in the past month. Chalk this up to valuation concerns. At its highs earlier this year, at nearly $1,100 per share, this consumer staples stock traded at nearly 50 times forward earnings.
Yet while valuation has only tempered somewhat, Costco can likely sustain its current forward multiple in the low 40s. Its current valuation not only lines up with what this consumer staples stock has traded for in the past; based on the company’s latest quarterly sales data, the discount retail club operator continues to “crush it,” with net and same-store sales rising 11.6% and 9.8% year over year, respectively.

Today’s Change
(-0.84%) $-8.04
Current Price
$944.50
Market Cap
$422B
Day’s Range
$943.57 – $969.75
52wk Range
$844.06 – $1096.50
Volume
55.7K
Avg Vol
2.2M
Gross Margin
12.88%
Dividend Yield
0.56%
As buying in bulk is one of the most viable ways to adapt to rising prices, it’s no wonder Costco continues to thrive. Better yet, even as its underlying retail business operates on razor-thin margins, the company continues to collect tens of billions each year in membership fees. These fees serve as both an economic moat and a steady revenue stream. Among inflation-resistant stocks, Costco remains a top choice for long-term, buy-and-hold investors.
Selling Visa may have been one of Greg Abel’s first moves as the new CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, but you may not want to follow his lead given this stock’s potential to benefit from further high inflation. As a payment processor, Visa benefits from higher prices, which drive higher transaction volumes, especially as households increasingly use payment cards for everyday transactions.
In turn, this translates into further growth for the company. This dynamic was on full display last quarter when Visa reported $11.2 billion in revenue, a 17% jump from a year ago and Visa’s highest quarterly revenue growth rate since 2022. Adjusted earnings also increased by 17%, while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) increased 20% from the prior-year’s quarter.

Today’s Change
(1.72%) $5.79
Current Price
$342.02
Market Cap
$634B
Day’s Range
$338.01 – $345.81
52wk Range
$293.89 – $359.66
Volume
267.7K
Avg Vol
7.9M
Gross Margin
78.28%
Dividend Yield
0.77%
Over a longer time frame, Visa stands to benefit from another macrotrend: the move toward a “cashless society.” As a greater share of personal transactions worldwide shifts from cash to card or digital payments, Visa’s transaction volumes will likely continue to climb, resulting in further strong growth.
Trading for around 22 times forward earnings (a big drop in valuation compared to a year ago) and surging on earnings growth, shares may be in for a re-rating back to a higher forward multiple.
Irrespective of the economic environment, someone has to take out the trash. For a plurality of Americans, that “someone” is WM, the largest among America’s major waste-hauling companies, with around 31.7% market share.
Beyond the prospect of “sticky” revenue tied to long-term consumer contracts, WM also has an inflation-based tailwind at play right now. As the company’s pricing can be affected by increases in CPI, inflation can have a positive impact on the top line. Even as WM’s own costs are rising due to inflation, it hasn’t experienced a margin squeeze.

Today’s Change
(-1.23%) $-2.77
Current Price
$222.76
Market Cap
$91B
Day’s Range
$222.12 – $226.29
52wk Range
$194.11 – $248.13
Volume
51.4K
Avg Vol
2.2M
Gross Margin
29.17%
Dividend Yield
1.57%
Instead, as discussed in WM’s most recent quarterly earnings release, margins continue to rise thanks to cost discipline and other measures. During the 2026 first quarter, WM reported a 70 basis point improvement in its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin. For the quarter, revenue was up 3.5% while earnings were up 8.4%.
stock may appear pricey at 27 times forward earnings. But as growth remains consistent and resilient to factors like high inflation, this premium multiple appears sustainable. Even if valuation stays constant, earnings growth could drive further gains over time, with WM’s 1.7% dividend providing an additional boost to long-term total returns.
Consider WM a top inflation-resistant name among industrial stocks.
Australia plans to double potential fines for social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, who fail to prevent Australian children from holding accounts as critics argue the world-first ban on under-16s was failing.
Communications Minister Anika Wells on Monday blamed the platforms’ resistance to the age restrictions for the need to toughen the laws that came into force on Dec. 10.
“We can all agree we would like the scheme to work better than it is currently, but that is on Big Tech taking the Mickey,” Wells told the Australian Broadcasting Corp., using an Australian slang term for deceiving, teasing or mocking.
The government announced Sunday it would introduce draft legislation into Parliament this week that would double the maximum fine to 99 million Australian dollars ($68 million) for platforms that fail to take reasons steps to prevent Australian children from holding accounts.
The amendments would also increase the powers of eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s online safety watchdog, to demand information and documents to ensure platforms were complying with Australian law, a government statement said.
The new powers would also include information from third parties, such as age assurance technology providers, to test claims made by the platforms about how those under 16 continued to circumvent the ban, the statement said.
Senior opposition lawmaker Jane Hume said her party would consider voting for the reforms, saying the “social media ban wasn’t working” because of deficient laws.
“The legislation was clearly undercooked in the first place. The eSafety Commissioner wasn’t given the powers to be able to pursue these Big Tech companies,” Hume said.
Parliament passed the initial legislation with overwhelming support in 2024. The targeted platforms were given more than 12 months to plan to implement the ban.
Many countries who have implemented or are planning similar restrictions have been closely watching progress of Australia’s ban.
The government initially reported more than 5 million children had accounts removed, deactivated or restricted after the ban became law.
But eSafety reported in March that seven in 10 children who held accounts on restricted platforms on Dec. 10 remained on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.
Inman Grant said in April she was considering court action against those platforms and YouTube, alleging they were not taking reasonable steps to exclude children.
She had been satisfied with progress made by the remaining restricted platforms: X, Kick, Reddit, Threads and Twitch.
Wells said she had received monthly updates from eSafety since March and “we are not seeing improvements.”
“These (draft) changes ensure that the eSafety Commissioner has the tools and powers she needs to hold platforms to account and we’re making sure that she can do just that,” Wells said.
Kid on financial aid walks into a Wall Street interview. They don’t think he’s good enough.
His response? “It doesn’t matter if you hire me or not, Jim. I’m going to win.”
I do not own the rights to this video. All credit goes to the original creator. For any copyright-related inquiries, please contact me.
MOVIE CREDIT : The Reluctant Fundamentalist (2013)
#finance #wallstreet #stockmarket #stocks #business #motivation #princeton #wealth #rich #money #job #interview
source
Households could receive no-cost upgrades such as heat pumps, insulation and air sealing under an affordability-focused reboot of Ottawa’s greener homes program.
Amazon is offering a new promotion where you can save $10 instantly when you spend $30 on select pantry and snack items. More than 100 qualifying products are included, featuring brands like Lance, Kettle Brand, Goldfish, Snyder’s of Hanover, Cape Cod, Pepperidge Farm, and more.
Here’s how it works:
PROMO PAGE
This is a solid pantry-stocking deal, especially if you were already planning to buy some of these items. Just be sure your cart reaches the $30 threshold with qualifying items to trigger the discount.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases made through this article. Using links on the site for Amazon purchases is the best way you can support the site as you normally can’t earn cash back for these purchases. But, you should still check shopping portals such as Rakuten, TopCashback, RebatesMe, ShopBack and others for possible cashback. Your support is always greatly appreciated!
Starting July 1, 2026, the federal government is capping how much graduate students and parents can borrow for college. The Federal Grad PLUS loan is being eliminated, and Federal Parent PLUS loans will carry fixed annual and aggregate limits for the first time. For families who have relied on these programs to cover the full cost of attendance, the way they pay for college is about to change.
When federal borrowing falls short, families turn to private student loans. A new analysis of federal student aid data suggests that shift could be substantial: private student loan volume may increase by as much as 85%, nearly doubling from current levels.
That works out to roughly $11.2 billion in additional borrowing that would have run through federal programs under the old rules.
The increase will not happen all at once. It phases in over three years as current borrowers finish their programs under the old limits, and it affects a relatively small share of people — about 9% of graduate students, 30% of professional students, and 1% of parents.
But for those families, private loans are about to take on a far bigger role in financing a degree.
Starting on July 1, 2026, the federal student loan limits are changing for new borrowers.
The Federal Grad PLUS loan has been repealed and replaced with higher annual and aggregate loan limits for Federal Stafford Loans to graduate and professional students.
Students eligible for the higher professional degree limits include students enrolled in 11 degree programs, including Law (LLB or JD), Medicine (MD), Pharmacy (PharmD), Dentistry (DDS or DMD), Veterinary Medicine (DVM), Clinical Psychology (PsyD or PhD), Chiropractic (DC or DCM), Optometry (OD), Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Podiatry (DPM, DP, or PodD) and Theology (MDiv, or MHL).
The Federal Parent PLUS loan now has fixed annual and aggregate loan limits, instead of being effectively unlimited like before. There is a $20,000 annual limit and $65,000 aggregate limit per dependent student. These limits are per student, not per parent, regardless of how many parents borrow.
The annual and aggregate loan limits for undergraduate students have not changed, except that the annual limits are reduced on a prorate basis for students who are enrolled on less than a full-time basis.
Old borrowers who are enrolled in a program on June 30, 2026 and who previously borrowed federal student loans for that program may continue borrowing under the old loan limits for the remaining time to completion or three years, whichever is sooner.
The new loan limits will lead to lower federal student loan borrowing for some students. Many of these students will shift some borrowing to private student loans.
The best source of data to estimate the impact of the new federal loan limits is the 2019-2020 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS). Calculating the excess of borrowing that year beyond the new loan limits can provide an estimate of new private student loan borrowing.
The actual increase in private student loan borrowing will likely be lower, since some federal student loan borrowers will not be able to qualify for a private student loan and some will enroll in lower-cost colleges, such as in-state public colleges.
There are two ways of calculating the excess. One involves comparing federal student loan borrowing in 2019-2020 with the annual loan limits and the other involves comparing the cumulative federal student loan debt at graduation with the aggregate loan limits. The latter yields a lower figure, since not every student graduates. The annual loan limits are also more restrictive, especially for graduate students.
This table shows the excess borrowing in 2019-2020 beyond the new annual and aggregate loan limits.
|
Federal Student Loan Type |
Annual Limits Excess |
Aggregate Limits Excess |
|---|---|---|
|
Graduate |
$6,246,609,236 |
$3,248,407,344 |
|
Professional |
$2,615,456,047 |
$2,209,340,861 |
|
Parent |
$2,295,224,335 |
$2,210,307,986 |
|
Total |
$11,157,289,638 |
$7,668,056,191 |
So, the maximum total private student loan borrowing will be up to about $11.2 billion.
Based on the NPSAS, the total annual private student loan borrowing was $13.2 billion in 2019-2020. $10.2 billion of the total is from undergraduate students and $3.0 billion is from graduate and professional students.
The ratio of the excess federal student loan borrowing to the annual private student loan borrowing represents a potential 85% surge in private student loan volume. This increase will be effectively phased in over a three-year period as the number of borrowers who are grandfathered in under the old loan limits decreases.
Even though the dollar amount of excess borrowing is significant, only 9% of graduate students, 30% of professional students and 1% of parents will have to shift borrowing from federal to private student loans.
With the expected decrease in the availability of federal student loans, students may need to reduce their reliance on federal student loans and increase their likelihood of qualifying for a private student loan. Here are a few tips on how families can navigate the changing landscape.
The analysis in this article is based on the following variables from the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS): TFEDLN, FEDCUM2, PLUSAMT, PLUSCUM, PRIVLOAN, NFEDCUM1 and PROGSTAT.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
Editor: Robert Farrington
The post New Federal Loan Limits Could Nearly Double Private Student Loan Volume in 2026 appeared first on The College Investor.
Much of the public conversation about AI today focuses on what it can do. New capabilities emerge almost weekly, and with them come understandable questions about safety, trust, and control. But the questions that matter most are: Who controls the infrastructure behind AI? And what values is it designed to protect?
Answering those questions will shape not only how AI works, but whose interests it serves. As governments, businesses, and citizens grapple with the future of AI, we have a critical opportunity today to ensure the building blocks of AI are pro-human by design. The choices we make now will determine whether AI continues to be something owned and directed by a small number of actors — or a resource that can be shaped and governed more broadly in the public interest.
This became even more apparent recently, when the U.S. government’s action to suspend access to Mythos unnerved governments and companies around the world, raising concerns about one government’s ability to unilaterally cut off technology used by others.
Encouragingly, a new path is beginning to emerge, led by middle-power nations. At this year’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney set out a challenge for middle-power nations like his own — nations with the capacity to build a world that “encompasses our values, such as respect for human rights, sustainable development, solidarity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.” Canada has also released its national AI strategy, which prioritizes the development of open-source AI technology.
More recently, the European Union joined Canada in “placing open source at the centre of the EU’s technological sovereignty.” This includes commitments to support open-source alternatives throughout the AI stack, backing startups, and developing new government procurement guidelines that put the EU’s thumb on the scale in favor of open-source innovation. Countries from Germany to Japan are looking at ways to integrate open source into their national strategies, while the UK has announced an Open Source Builder’s Fund, aiming to make Britain the “home of global open source AI talent.”
Open source is emerging as a powerful consensus middle path and the private sector is catching on.
Research has shown that open-source technology has created over $8.8 trillion in demand-side value: firms would have to spend 3.5 times more on software than they currently do if open source didn’t exist. Entrepreneurs and researchers are building and leveraging open-source AI tools, models, and datasets that reflect local needs and perspectives. Developers are gravitating quickly toward open-source AI. A recent a16z and OpenRouter study found that open-source models grew from roughly 1–2% of token volume in late 2024 to nearly 30% by mid-2025 — a clear marker of momentum among builders, and a significant business opportunity.
Unlike AI technology owned and controlled by a few large corporations, open-source AI is available to everyone. That not only means governments and companies can own the infrastructure on which they build — it means anyone can look under the hood. That transparency is what can make AI safe and accountable by design.
At Mozilla, we often talk about building technology that amplifies human agency rather than replacing it. In December 2022, we amended our foundational Manifesto with a Pledge for a Healthy Internet, centered on four commitments: that the internet should include all people; promote civil discourse, human dignity, and individual expression; elevate critical thinking and verifiable facts; and catalyze collaboration across communities working for the common good.
That is the path Canada, the EU, and other middle powers are leading — in collaboration with a private sector hungry for AI alternatives to the closed models that dominate today.
AI has enormous potential, but a growing unease surrounds its direction and who controls it. The antidote is building AI that is open, trustworthy, and reflective of a diversity of voices outside Silicon Valley and China’s AI labs. That future can only be built by a middle-power, open-source coalition determined to ensure AI works for human beings — not the other way around.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.