Home Blog

HBO Max’s ‘The Pitt’ and ‘Hacks’ lead among Emmy nominations



HBO Max’s hospital series The Pitt led the Emmy Awards candidates with 25 nominations in the drama category, the Television Academy announced Wednesday.

Hacks, an HBO Max satire about a Las Vegas comedienne, led the comedy category with 24 nominations. That was most ever for a program in that category in a single year. 

Apple TV’s horror-comedy Widow’s Bay finished third with 19 nominations in total, followed by the dystopian drama Pluribus, also on the service.

The 78th annual Emmy Awards will air Sept. 14 on Comcast Corp.’s NBC and its Peacock streaming arm. It will be held at the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles.

Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., which owns HBO Max, is in the process of being acquired by Paramount Skydance Corp.

The Fortune 500 Innovation Forum will convene Fortune 500 executives, U.S. policy officials, top founders, and thought leaders to help define what’s next for the American economy, Nov. 16-17 in Detroit. Apply here.

The Exact Investment “Stack” We’re Using to Retire Early (Not Just Rentals)


Don’t want to wait until 65 to retire? With a combination of rental properties and some of the other investments we’re covering on today’s show, you may not have to. Whether you’re starting from zero or diligently building your nest egg, use these eight steps to build a diversified portfolio and reach financial freedom much faster!

Welcome back to the Real Estate Rookie podcast! Today Ashley and Tony are pulling back the curtain on their actual retirement plans—what they’re doing, why they’re doing it, and what they wish they’d known sooner. They share how they first got into real estate investing and how they’ve adjusted their portfolios over time. They also break down the investment “order of operations,” a sequence of financial moves that will help you build long-term wealth!

Along the way, we’ll get into things like the 401(k) employer match, the triple-tax-advantaged HSA account, and the often-misunderstood 529 college savings plan. Whether you want to gradually step away from your W-2 job or simply have “enough” when you reach traditional retirement age, this episode gives you a clear roadmap for achieving your long-term financial goals!

Ashley:
Most people spend 40 years working so they can stop working, but what if you could build a life where work is optional way before 65?

Tony:
Ashley and I are pulling back the curtain today on our actual retirement plans, what we’re doing, why we’re doing it, and what we wish we would’ve known sooner because no one handed us a roadmap. And if you’re a real estate investor trying to figure this out on your own, well then this episode is for you.

Ashley:
This is the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kehr.

Tony:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson.

Ashley:
So I have actually put together a list of questions for Tony and I to actually go through to share our own journey saving for retirement. And hopefully this will help a lot of you be able to plan for your own retirement. So Tony, the first thing I kind of want to go over is the beginning. When were we first introduced to retirement? And I think for me, it was when I graduated college and I started my first job and I got a 401k with that first job.

Tony:
Yeah, I think same for me. And I’ll just add context for the entire audience that between me and Ashley, Ashley’s definitely the resident retirement expert between the two of us and she educates me on a lot of these things. But yeah, I think it was for me too. When I graduated college, actually my first job after college did not offer a 401k and that job did not last very long, but my first real big boy job after college I think was a few months afterwards. And yeah, I got a 401k and I had to sit there with my other coworkers who were recent college grads and were trying to figure out, okay, how do we put these percentages there and what does this mean? But yeah, it was a first job after college with the 401.

Ashley:
Yeah, my first job only lasted six months, my accounting job before I quit and went into property management. But from that first job, I had very little vested. So a lot of times a 401k, you have to work there for so many years before they’ll actually give you the employer contribution of it. So it was very little. And when I left there, I ended up rolling it over into a Roth IRA. Still really didn’t know a lot about retirement at all. It was actually a friend that told me and helped me go through that. I didn’t really know a lot about it. And I actually had a financial advisor then. So after I had left that job, the new investor I started working for, the property management company had a financial planner. I was like, “This is probably a good idea for me. ” And I went to him and all I had was my little money.
Honestly, it was probably like $500. I don’t remember. But it rolled over into that. And then we just did some financial planning of what to do for the future. And I probably had the financial advisor for maybe five years. One thing he did do for us was set up 529 plans for the kids, which we’ll talk about that more later. But other than that, I really didn’t use the financial planner at all. I think it was like $700 to $1,000 just to meet with him and go over stuff and definitely was not worth the money. And then my second job, I didn’t even get any benefits at first. I worked there for several years. I was part-time. I worked whenever I wanted. And it actually came to a point where I asked for benefits and I got health insurance and then I got 401. And I believe it was a 3% match and I had to contribute 3% for them to give me that match, which is pretty common.
So Tony, do you remember at Tesla at all when you would, did they have a match at all?

Tony:
Yeah. So Tesla was slightly different, but I’ll go back to that first job. I actually worked for Target before working at Tesla and Target did have a match. I don’t remember what it was. It was so many years ago at this point, but I remember I just invested up to that match, whatever the match was, that’s what I invested up to. So I maxed it out there and I can’t remember what it was, but that’s what I did at Target.

Ashley:
So kind of our next investment for retirement, which we really probably didn’t think of it at the time, but was purchasing our rental properties, my long-term properties and your short-term rentals. So Tony, at the time that you were going to ignore your long-term rentals because you sold them, but your short-term rentals, when you were purchasing those, did you have anything in your mind thinking about this, I will use these properties for retirement? In any sense, were you thinking about that down the road?

Tony:
I mean, that was really the main reason that I got into real estate was because my dad growing up always said, “Unless you want to get up and go to a job every single day until you’re much, much older, you’ve got to have some assets that pay you on a regular basis.” And he’s like, “Real estate’s one of the best ways to do that. ” So that was just drilled into me very, very early on. So I don’t know if I thought about it as retirement, but for me, it was just always having that financial freedom, I guess, more so. And that’s what pulled me into real estate to begin with.

Ashley:
Yeah, that was definitely my framing and thinking too, but it was more like now. How can these assets give me the financial freedom now as in retired? But we all know landlording, short-term rental operations, a lot of that isn’t a quiet retirement sailing off into the sunset. There’s still a lot of work to do, but I never thought about what… I knew I wanted to hold properties long-term, but I never actually saw what mortgage pay down appreciation and an increase in rental income every year can actually do to just be a ton of equity by the time I’m 65. Hopefully a ton of equity before that. I have to say that it probably took me about eight years before I actually really started strategizing what properties I was keeping and which ones I was selling to think about later on in life. So I wanted to think about which properties would have a lot of appreciation where I would have options with them.
Where before, when I first started investing, it was a cashflow play. I didn’t care if they appreciated, I just wanted cashflow. Well, some of those properties were like $20,000 duplexes, but they cash flowed a lot, but they were headache properties. They were in areas that saw no appreciation. I was super, super lucky where I bought them at the right time and I sold them just after COVID when prices went crazy. And so I was able to sell them and get rid of them at a good time. But even if I would’ve held onto them for a long time, the appreciation just wouldn’t be what it was for other areas where I went for higher dollar amount properties in better areas, better school districts and things like that. So as I’ve started to weed out my portfolio, I put a lot of thought into down the road in the future.
I want salable assets that I have a easy exit strategy. They’ll have a lot of equity built up into them and I can tap into that at any time that I need to. Tony, what about you? Have you kind of changed or pivoted your strategy at all thinking more about the future when you’re ready to just retire?

Tony:
Not necessarily. I mean, I think we’ve been fortunate enough that I think the long-term prospects of all the markets we’ve invested into, we’ll probably continue to see pretty good appreciation, like a good chunk of our portfolios in California, which typically does pretty well. So I don’t know if we have anything that we’ve purchased where I question it’s the long-term viability in the portfolio. There are some properties that are just like headaches for other reasons, but I truly think if I hold all these properties for 30 years, we’ll probably be in a pretty good position in terms of loan paydown and appreciation.

Ashley:
We’re going to take a short break, but when we come back, we’re actually going to go through the retirement stack. And this is from Scott Trench from BiggerPockets Money. And this is going to tell you multiple options of what you can do for retirement and his recommended order of how to invest in these things. So we’ll be right back. Okay, welcome back. So we got into a little bit about Tony and I’s real estate for retirement, but we also want to talk on other investment vehicles that you can do for retirement because it is important to diversify and there are a lot of advantages to using some of these other retirement vehicles. I was listening to a podcast the other day with Scott Trench and Mindy Jensen on BiggerPockets of Money, and Scott went through and put together his retirement contribution order of operations. So this was for specifically a high-income W-2 household, but really I think this would work for any W-2 income household.
And if you are self-employed, you’re not going to get an employer 401k match, but you could still go through these orders of operations in some sense, but obviously you’re not going to be able to have access to all of them. But also there will be other options for you too because you are self-employed and don’t have a 401 employer option available to you. Okay, so the first one is take your employer 401 match because this is in a sense free money, but I mean technically it’s worked into your compensation package, but you should take it. Don’t leave it on the table because that’s money lost. So sometimes you don’t have to contribute, you just automatically get the match from your employer. So that’s even better. But that is step number one is to take that.

Tony:
Step number two, and this is the one that literally changed my life, but it’s the employee stock purchase program or ESPP where companies allow you to buy stock at a discounted rate. So again, I spent the majority of my W-2 career working at Tesla and I was very fortunate that during that time the company did incredibly well in the stock market. And we were able to purchase from every paycheck that would take out however much you wanted to allocate, but you could buy Tesla shares at a 15% discount. So just imagine the amount of wealth you’re able to build of every single paycheck. I think we were paid biweekly. So it was at 26 times a year I was able to go out and buy Tesla stock at a 15% discount while the stock was also increasing at this pretty rapid pace. And gosh, I want to say I might be confusing the bonuses with the employee stock purchase, but I want to say that there was a fixed price that you would be able to buy it for the quarter.
So even if it went up a little bit, you still even got maybe a bigger discount. But either way, for me, that’s where I put the majority. I think I was just putting in to match at Tesla as well for the 401k. Actually, I don’t even know if Tesla offered a match. I really can’t remember because I know most of my money was going into ESPP because that’s where I saw the biggest opportunity. But guys, when I lost that job, it was all of that stock that I’ve been piling into for years and years at that point that allowed us to have the foundation to build our portfolio and go full-time into real estate. So truly one of the best returns that I’ve ever had on any investment.

Ashley:
Yeah, I’ve never worked anywhere that had that as an option. So the next one, step three is to max out your HSA. So I believe not everyone can actually get an HSA. You usually have to be in a high deductible plan, but with the HSA, you’ve put in pre-tax money and it gross tax-free. And if you use it for medical, it’s tax-free when you pull that money out too. So it’s like a triple tax advantage. So this is great to save as you get older. You may have more medical expenses in your elderly age and you’ll have all this money to pull out tax-free to be able to use. Also, even now as you have medical things that come up, but to pay your deductible for your high deductible plan and other medical bills that you may have that you can use that money for.
But that’s a huge advantage because it’s like a triple savings on taxes right

Tony:
There. And 7.4 is to max out your dependent care FSA. I’ve actually never used this before and I’ve had kids almost my entire life now at this point and I’ve never used this. Are you using a dependent care FSA at all, Ash, or have you used one in the past?

Ashley:
No, I’m not. So it’s like a pre-tax employer sponsored. So again, if you have a W-2 job and your employer has to offer this, but it’s used to pay for childcare expenses.

Tony:
My brother-in-law works for a global tire distribution company and they offer an FSA and that’s how he pays for his babysitters through that account or for his nanny through that account. So just a good way to save on taxes on something you’re going to spend money on anyway.

Ashley:
Okay. So step five is to max your 401 contributions. So as of 2025, if anyone’s still filing those tax returns for 2025, the max contributions you could do is up to 23,500. So this is pre-tax contributions. And I mean that’s a lot of money for a lot of people to be able to put $23,500 after you’ve already contributed to a lot of these other things too. So this would be just maxing out your 401k.

Tony:
Ash, I’ll let you take maybe six and seven just because I feel like I can’t speak confidently to the IRAs.

Ashley:
Okay. Then the next thing is the Roth IRA. But this is if you are a high net come earner, you’re not eligible for an IRA. So for single head of household, you have to be $153,000 or under. You can’t make more than that. If you’re married filing jointly, it has to be under $242,000 to be able to contribute into the Roth IRA. The Roth IRA is where you contribute after tax income and then your money grows tax-free. One thing I really like about the Roth IRA is that really at any time, unless you’re using an employer sponsored plan, they may not allow this, but if you just go to Vanguard, Fidelity, open your own account, what you contribute, you can pull out at any time tax-free and penalty-free because you already paid taxes on that money when you put it in there. So you want a down payment for a property and you have the money that you’ve contributed over the years in a Roth IRA, so you’ve contributed $50,000, maybe it’s grown to 70,000, you could pull out 50,000 of that and use it for a down payment on a rental property.
So that’s what I like about the Roth IRA is you can still access that money without having to pay any penalties or fees. If you do make over that amount of money and aren’t eligible for a Roth IRA, there is something called a backdoor Roth IRA. And first of all, I’m going to urge you to go over and listen to this episode of BiggerPockets Money. It was with Amanda Hahn, who’s a CPA, who talks about the benefits of how you could actually do a Roth IRA. But basically what you do is you’d contribute to a traditional IRA and then convert it immediately into a Roth IRA. And the limitation for 2026 for a Roth IRA is $7,500 that you’re able to contribute to it. Okay, then you can even take it a step further and do a mega to a Roth IRA. And once again, you have to check that your plan administrator allows this, but if you can make after tax contributions to your 401k, so it’s like a Roth 401k, then you can contribute it up to 72,000.
But then remember, this is a combined limit with what you’ve already put in, but then you can go ahead and convert that into a Roth IRA. And Amanda Hahn had said on this episode as to this is all legal, but it’s like the IRS, they always just make you jump through a hoop to get something done. It’s not like you can just easily go ahead and go into a Roth IRA. You have to do these hoops to be able to access this tax benefit. But talk to your CPA, talk to your financial advisor if these are options for you.

Tony:
And then the final step, step number eight here is the 529 college savings plan. And again, I’m 35. My son is 18, so it’s like more than half my life I’ve been a parent, but I didn’t even know about this when he was born. And now that we’ve got younger kids again, this might be something we end up using. But effectively, this allows you to take money after tax money. So you’ve already paid taxes on it. You can put this into this 529 plan and it grows and all of that growth is tax-free as long as it’s used for educational purposes. So sending your kid to college, to trade school, to apprenticeship program, something to that effect. And actually, I don’t know, Ash, do you know if there’s contribution limits on the 529?

Ashley:
It’s basically like a gift tax. So it’s 19,000 but 38,000 for married couples without having to report a gift tax.

Tony:
I mean, that’s a meaningful amount. If you’re doing that, you can send your kid to a very, very expensive school if you continue to do that over the course of their lifetime. So if you’ve got young kids, it is a great tool to allow you to set money aside and let it grow that you can then use for college.

Ashley:
So New York State, you can deduct if you’re individual up to 5,000. And if you’re married, you can deduct up to $10,000. So if that makes a big difference on your income tax return, but that’s another benefit depending on what state you’re in, it could reduce some of your reported income on your taxes for the state tax return. Another benefit of the 529 plan is I believe it’s 36,000 of that can actually convert into a retirement plan. So it actually convert into an IRA. So if the kids don’t use it for school, then you can actually save that money for their retirement and then they can pull it out when they’re at retirement age and they don’t have to use it for school. But there is a limitation, a cap on how much money can be used for that. But also the 529 plan, it can be used for private school, for high school, even I believe elementary too.
So even if you have a kid going to private school right now, you could contribute to it just to get the New York State tax write off, then pay the school out of it to have that deduction. But you can pay for books. I had seen this post before where it was an accountant that posted it on social media where they had said what you should do is put all this money into the 529 plan and then when your kids go to college, you buy a house there and have your kids use the money out of the 529 plan to pay you rent. So it’s guaranteed rental payments. The money that you contributed is coming back to you. One thing that people totally missed in the comments, and I actually started kind of arguing with someone, which I never ever engaged with. And the person who posted it finally responded like, yes, you’re absolutely correct.
Is that just remember that’s not tax-free money. That still rental income coming back to you. So you’re still paying taxes on that, but not as much as you would’ve when you first earned that money from your W-2 job.

Tony:
And then you do something like a cost segregation setting, you get some bonus depreciation and you qualify for rep status and material participation and you can still write off all those earnings, hopefully.

Ashley:
Okay. We’re going to take a short break and we’ll be right back after this to tell you what our plans are for the future for our retirement. Okay, welcome back. Thank you guys so much for watching or listening. If you haven’t already, make sure you are subscribed to our YouTube channel at RealEstateRookie. Okay, so we went over some retirement options that you may have, a recommended order of operations from Scott Trench, but let’s get into what Tony and I are actually doing now with these retirement options that are available and what we see for ourself down the road. So Tony, what is currently happening right now? Are you contributing to any kind of retirement plan that’s available out there?

Tony:
I do have a retirement plan. Yeah. Not a lot is in there because I just started it recently. I’m very overly concentrated in real estate right now. I still do have a Tesla stock for my time working there, but obviously that’s just one entity. So there’s still some risk there. I think that’s part of the reason I love when we talk about this is because you remind me there’s a lot of other options out there, but I think I get so focused on what’s in front of me and like, hey, real estate is a thing that I know so well, but there’s a benefit to having a diversified portfolio. So I think for me, it’s looking into some of these other options and seeing how I can expand those things.

Ashley:
I think too, real estate is so addicting. It’s like, okay, over the course of the year, I could contribute this money to a retirement account or even a brokerage account or whatever, or I could go and buy another property or I can add an upgrade to my short-term rental to increase the revenue there. Think about how many pools you put in. Those could have been money funneled into a retirement account for you, but that is your retirement, these properties too.

Tony:
But I think diversification is good. And I talk with a lot of folks who are coming from the opposite end where all of their retirement is in the stock market and they’re like, “Hey, I just want to diversify and have something that’s a little bit more tangible. And I’ve got so much that’s tangible that I probably need a little bit more that’s in the market.” So got to balance it out a little bit.

Ashley:
Yeah, I’m contributing right now to retirement plans and I maxed out my contributions last year, but this year I’ve been not as much. I’ve definitely slowed down my contributions just because like you said, there’s other things I want to do in real estate right now. So definitely not contributing to the max and I don’t think I’ll max out this year at all. But another thing is the 529 plans I did that financial planner, I guess maybe he was worth the $1,000 because I did contribute to my kids’ 529 plans when they were very little. And I think my oldest was two or three and then the other ones basically have them since they were born. And I’m pretty sure I’ve put, I think it’s like $50 a month I put in each one of them. And when I started them, I probably put in a thousand to fund them or something like that each maybe.
But they each have 12 to $14,000 in them right now at the age of eight, nine, and 12. So that makes a big difference being able to start and then if they decide not to go to college, you can actually change the beneficiary on them too. So I am the owner of the 529 plans, but at any time I could change the beneficiary. So actually my sister, she’s going to school right now to be a PA. And my aunt had money left in a 529 plan and she changed the beneficiary to my sister so she could use the money to finish out school. So that was really awesome. I

Tony:
Didn’t know that that was one of the features of the 529. Yeah. Are you able to use it for, say that you have a kid that wants to go to, they want to become a surgeon, so they’ve got to go to regular undergrad, medical school, residency, all those other things. Can you use it across all those different stages or does it stop at a certain stage? Do you know?

Ashley:
I don’t think it does. I don’t know for sure, but I’m pretty sure you can use it for any education. And that makes me wonder too, if you were a real estate agent, could you use it for your CE classes? Things like that. I’m not sure on the specifics of that. But one thing I like about it too is you can go into your 529 plan and you can print off little vouchers and you give these out to grandparents and say, “Hey, they don’t need another toy to clutter their house. Here’s a voucher. You can mail in a check and this will go into their 529 plan.”

Tony:
That’ll get all the kids excited on Christmas morning.

Ashley:
I mean, not that it’s worked for me yet. I haven’t noticed any increase in any of their accounts. It wasn’t Ruby, but that is an option out there. And I’ve read too a lot of articles about grandparents starting them also for kids and then they’re being the owners of it and then the kids being the beneficiary, the grandkids. So yeah, Tony and I are really interested as to how you are diversifying your retirement, what options you have available. One thing that’s been really important to me this year is financial opportunity and that is having many different ways to access capital. So if I have a medical emergency, I have a Roth IRA I can withdraw from. I have an investment property I can sell. I have a store full of liquor that I can liquidate going out of business sale. So I think that’s the biggest thing for me is I want to have financial options, not only in retirement, but now in life too.
So it’s been intriguing to me to talk about all these different ways to build financial freedom alongside real estate because I do think it is really important to diversify. Well, thank you guys so much for joining us. I’m Ashley and he’s Tony and we’ll see you guys on the next episode of Real Estate Rookie.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

This Wall Street Analyst Sees 30% Upside in Palantir. Is It Time to Buy the Stock?


Palantir Technologies (PLTR 3.24%) is having a down year after a strong multiyear run: So far in 2026, it’s off more than 20%. However, one analyst sees the stock having about 30% upside from here.

Earlier this month, analyst Gil Luria of DA Davidson upgraded the stock from neutral to buy and raised his price target from $165 to $175. Luria argued that Palantir has advantages over other software-as-a-service (SaaS) stocks, saying that more enterprises are realizing they need an AI orchestration layer like the one that Palantir has.

Luria also pointed out that building a solution using an orchestration tool that can switch out AI models is paramount, noting that it would have been disastrous for a company if it built a solution on top of an AI model that later got pulled from the market. This happened to Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 models, which the company pulled from the market after the U.S. government issued an order prohibiting anyone who was not a U.S. citizen from using them.

Today’s Change

(-3.24%) $-4.35

Current Price

$130.02

Is the stock a buy?

Palantir is one of the most interesting stocks in the market. It trades at a high premium, with a forward price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 45.5 and a forward P/E of nearly 93.

However, the company has indeed created an important AI orchestration layer that helps reduce AI hallucinations and makes AI more useful for enterprise applications. It can do this because its solution can gather information from a variety of disparate sources and organize it into an ontology, which it then links to real-world objects and processes. The Palantir AIP (Artificial Intelligence Platform) can help customers across industries tackle a multitude of problems, which is why it has been attracting new customers and growing its sales to existing customers.

Palantir logo.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

This was evident last quarter, when it grew its U.S. commercial revenue by an incredible 133%. Its customer count climbed by 42% year over year, while its net dollar retention was a remarkable 150%. That is the sign of a company whose products are resonating deeply with its customers, as these customers are rapidly expanding their spending with Palantir. The company also tends to have a rapid sales cycle, as it uses its AIP “boot camps” to help potential customers solve some of their actual problems within seven days, demonstrating the value of the product.

While the stock is not cheap, I think that, given Palantir’s unique position in the AI ecosystem, it has the potential to become one of the largest companies in the world over the next decade. As such, investors can consider buying shares during dips like those we’ve seen this year.

Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Free Mini Cup For National Ice Cream Day


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Dippin Dots is celebrating national ice cream day on July 19, 2026 by giving out a free mini cup at participating stores/shopping center locations

Our Verdict

Not sure if anywhere else is offering a freebie for national ice cream day or not. Free is free. 

Why is Castellum stock sliding today?




Why is Castellum stock sliding today?

How to Start Investing in Stock Market? What is ETF? Where to Invest Money?



🔗Open Free Demat Account on Lemonn:

👉 Use Referral Code: 2ydcwi

*****************************************************************

👉 Open Free Demat Account:

*****************************************************************

👉👉Intraday Algo Trading Softwares:

*****************************************************************

#Investment #ShareMarket #ETF

About Pushkar Raj Thakur :

Pushkar Raj Thakur is India’s Leading Educator & Business Coach. He is a Guinness World Record Holder for the Largest Financial Investment Lesson and largest Social Media Marketing Lesson. With Millions of Followers on all major Social Media Platforms, he is known for his versatile knowledge of Financial Education, the Stock Market, Personal Mastery, Sales, Marketing, Human Psychology and Business Development.

– NISM Certified Research Analyst

– NISM Certified Mutual Fund Distributor

– IRDA Certified

Follow us on:

👉 Telegram:

👉 WhatsApp:

👉 Facebook:

👉 Instagram:

👉 YouTube:

👉 Twitter:

👉 LinkedIn:

👉 Website:

To Join Our Courses Call @ 9873 99 89 89

source

The 38-point framework two VCs use to spot the next unicorn founder



Paige and Leura Craig aren’t looking for product-market fit, a Stanford degree, or a Zuck-evoking hoodie. They’re looking for entrepreneurs with preternatural forward momentum. 

“Basically, we’re looking for these monsters that can make decisions in chaos, constantly getting things off the plate, constantly making decisions and just moving forward,” Paige, founder and managing partner at Outlander VC, told Fortune

Yes, this is an especially colorful way of articulating more or less what all early-stage VCs are looking for—entrepreneurs who can barrel through, adapt, and ultimately thrive. 

The Craigs—who are married and run Outlander VC, backing companies like SpaceX, Scale, Flock, and Gusto—have sought to codify something investors have long sought to understand: How can you tell early that someone has the potential to be a generational entrepreneur? The Craigs have drawn from experience and Paige’s military background—he served in the U.S. Marines and built and sold private intelligence firm Lincoln Group—to create a 38-point framework by which they assess every founder. (Outlander currently has 18 unicorns and one “baby on the way,” as Leura jokes, with drone software maker Havoc at $750 million.)

“It’s not just about adding or subtracting attributes,” said Leura. “It’s also the way the attributes are scored, and the way that the process is run…More than anything, the framework serves as a way for the investment team to have a shared vocabulary around what excellence really means.”

The 38‑point framework has four domains—vision, intelligence, character, and execution—with a heavy emphasis on character and execution. The number of points, or characteristics on the list has waxed or waned over time (at one point there were as many as 43; and they started with 14 in 2014). Their core belief: That who someone is can ultimately determine who survives. 

“We go through a short call, a long call, and a deep dive,” said Paige. “You might spend 15 to 20 hours going through a founder’s entire life, asking about life, church, temple, death, parents, and babies. These calls are therapeutic for some people, maybe painful for others.”

Outlander, which has a six-person team, teaches everyone 21 intelligence-gathering-inspired elicitation tactics—conversational methods like reverse chronology and deliberate rapport‑building—to get past canned answers into how prospective founders actually conduct themselves under stress.

The Craigs are a touch cagey on naming specifics, but I managed to get a few out of them: Characteristics they’re screening for include obsession, fortitude, irrational optimism, and a clear sense of what motivates them, whether it’s mission or money. 

“For me, character’s probably the most deterministic,” said Paige. “Character, for us, is basically summarized as people who have incredible fortitude, who can endure anything, survive and lead others through it. People with weak character give up too early… And that’s probably the number-one killer in the early days.”

The “irrational optimism” they’re looking for is prismatic in what it reveals about entrepreneurship in the 2020s: It’s a tightrope. On one hand, you need to be irrationally optimistic to believe you could, in fact, build a multibillion‑dollar company in a decade or less. But on the other hand, you also have to recognize failure, and know when to alter the plan. Outlander tracks where founders fall, and you can easily be too delusional, or too risk-averse.

“Making the decision to be a founder is like making the decision to wake up and be punched in the face every day,” said Leura. “And just when something starts going well, something else goes badly.”

See you tomorrow,

Allie Garfinkle
X:
@agarfinks
Email: alexandra.garfinkle@fortune.com

Submit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here.

Joey Abrams curated the deals section of today’s newsletter. Subscribe here.

VENTURE CAPITAL

Oratomic, a Pasadena, Calif.-based developer of fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures for utility-scale systems, raised $300 million in Series A funding. ARCH Venture Partners, Spark Capital, and Khosla Ventures led the round and were joined by Bezos Expeditions, Index Ventures, General Catalyst, and others.

Norm Ai, a New York City-based platform designed to embed law into AI agents, raised $120 million in Series C funding. Khosla Ventures led the round and was joined by Blackstone, Bain Capital Ventures, Craft Ventures, and others.

Tangos, a Tel Aviv, Israel-based developer of investigation intelligence for risk and financial crime, raised $20 million in seed funding. Red Dot Capital Partners led the round and was joined by Leaders Fund, Clarim, Venture Israel, and others.

Luffy AI, an Abingdon, U.K.-based developer of neuroplastic AI for real-time adaptive control of physical machines, raised £8.1 million in Series A funding. BGF led the round and was joined by MIG Capital and existing investors.

Adaptive Insurance, a Hartford, Conn.-based provider of insurance products for climate resilience, raised $5 million in funding from IAG Firemark Ventures, Sunna Ventures, Room & Pillar, and others.

PRIVATE EQUITY

Arlington Capital Partners acquired AMP United, a Dover, N.H.-based provider of naval preservation, structural, and scaffolding services. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Kanawha Scales and Systems, backed by Investcorp, acquired Strack Scale Service, a Cincinnati, Ohio-based industrial scale calibration and maintenance services. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Long Ridge Equity Partners acquired a majority stake in GoCharting, a Middletown, Del. and Tamil Nadu, India-based professional orderflow charting and trading platform. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Unity Partners acquired a majority stake in the advisory services business of Meaden & Moore, a Cleveland, Ohio-based professional services firm. Financial terms were not disclosed.

EXITS

EQT agreed to acquire the biosurgery business of Corza Medical, a Boulder, Colo.-based biosurgery unit focused on surgical sealant products, from GTCR. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Halma acquired Dreampath Diagnostics, a Strasbourg, France-based provider of automated workflow solutions for anatomical pathology laboratories, from Summit Partners. Financial terms were not disclosed.

IPOs

Standard Nuclear, an Oak Ridge, Tenn.-based nuclear fuel company, plans to raise up to $384.3 million in an offering of 18.3 million shares priced between $18 and $21. The company posted $3 million in sales for the year ended March 31. Decisive Point, Larger Cross Partners, Standard Nuclear Trust, Welara Capital Partners, Fundomo, and Washington Harbour Triso back the company.

Syntiant, an Irvine, Calif.-based semiconductor and software company, filed to go public on the Nasdaq. The company posted $270 million in sales for the year ended March 31. Knowles Electronics, Intel Corporation, and Microsoft back the company.

FUNDS + FUNDS OF FUNDS

Arctos, a Dallas, Texas, New York City, and London, U.K.-based private equity firm, raised $6.2 billion for its first Keystone Partners Fund focused on providing funding to asset managers.

Bregal Milestone, a London, U.K.-based private equity firm, raised €915 million ($1 billion) for its third fund focused on European software, AI, and cybersecurity businesses. 

B Capital, a San Francisco-based venture capital firm, raised $500 million for its third Ascent Fund focused on companies developing next-generation technologies across healthcare, enterprise, energy, and other sectors.

PEOPLE

Bridge Growth Partners, a New York City-based private equity firm, promoted Prosper Vignone as Senior Principal. 

7 Tips for Buying and Selling a Home Simultaneously


Buying a new home is exciting. Selling your current home can be exciting, too. Doing both at the same time? That’s where things can start to feel complicated.

Whether you’re moving up to accommodate a growing family, downsizing for retirement, relocating for work, or simply ready for a new chapter, buying and selling a home simultaneously often requires careful planning, clear communication, and the right financing strategy.

New Department of Education Rule Makes Accreditors Prove Degrees Are Worth The Cost


Key Points

  • Private accrediting agencies (not Congress or your state legislature) have quietly raised the degree requirement to enter fields like pharmacy, physical therapy, and occupational therapy, adding years of tuition and debt without clear evidence workers or the public benefit.
  • A new federal rule would bar these agencies from raising credential requirements unless they prove to the Department of Education, with clear and convincing evidence, that the public benefit outweighs the cost.
  • Combined with the new graduate loan caps that took effect July 1, 2026, the rule squeezes degree inflation from both directions: one limits how much education can be required, the other limits how much borrowers can finance.

The job hasn’t changed, but the degree required to get it has. Over the past three decades, one profession after another has raised its educational entry price: a bachelor’s became a master’s…a master’s became a doctorate…a short training course became a year of mandatory classes.

These new requirements are adding years of tuition and borrowing for careers that pay roughly what they paid before the new requirements were added. The labor market simply doesn’t pay more because you got more education.

Economists call it degree inflation, and the most surprising part isn’t the cost. It’s who decides “what’s required”. In many licensed fields, the degree you must “buy” isn’t set by Congress or your state legislature. It’s set by private organizations most Americans have never heard of: accrediting agencies.

And because of how the higher education system is wired, a single change by one of these groups can raise the required degree standards for an entire profession in all 50 states at once, with no election, no hearing in your statehouse, and no vote by anyone you can vote out.

That system is now squarely in Washington’s crosshairs. The Department of Education’s negotiated rulemaking committee reached consensus on May 21, 2026, on new regulations that would put a stop to this practice. The Department had named “credential inflation” as an explicit target when it launched the committee in January.

To understand why that matters for your family’s college costs, you first have to understand a system that almost nobody outside higher education knows exists.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

How The College Accreditation System Works

Here’s the part that surprises most people: the federal government does not accredit colleges. No government agency inspects your university and certifies its quality. That job belongs to private, nonprofit accrediting agencies, which are membership organizations run largely by the colleges and professions they oversee.

The Department of Education then “recognizes” accreditors it deems reliable, and that recognition is the master switch for federl money. A college can only offer federal student aid (Pell Grants and federal student loans) if it’s accredited by a recognized agency. No accreditation, no federal aid, and for most schools, no viable business.

This is why accreditors are called gatekeepers: they stand between $100 billion a year in federal student aid and the schools that want it.

There are two layers. Institutional accreditors (names like the Higher Learning Commission or SACSCOC) approve entire colleges. Programmatic accreditors approve individual programs within them: the pharmacy school, the nursing program, the occupational therapy department. These programmatic agencies are typically founded by, and housed next to, the professional associations of the fields they oversee.

Then comes the final link in the chain, and it’s the one that turns a private standard into public law: state licensing boards

When your state licenses pharmacists or physical therapists, it almost never writes its own educational requirements. It simply requires graduation from an accredited program. That one phrase outsources the state’s judgment to the private accreditor.

So when an accreditor decides to raise the entry degree for a profession, every state’s licensing requirement rises with it automatically, with no legislature ever taking a vote.

How accreditation works infographic: the Department of Education recognizes private accreditors that unlock federal student aid and set degree requirements adopted by state licensing boards. Source: The College Investor

Degree Inflation In Action

Here’s a few examples of degree inflation in action:

Physical Therapy

Physical therapy is the cleanest example of the whole machine at work. In January 2016, the field’s accreditor, CAPTE, made the Doctor of Physical Therapy the required degree for every accredited entry-level program. Because states license new PTs only from accredited programs, the bachelor’s and master’s pathways that trained generations of therapists are no longer offered anywhere in the country.

Everyone already licensed was grandfathered, which is why the staff page at a typical clinic still shows “PT,” “MPT,” and “DPT” credentials side by side. Three different degree levels, one license, the same patients, the same work — and essentially the same pay.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a single median wage for the occupation, and industry salary guides are blunt that what moves a PT’s paycheck is experience, specialty, setting, and location — not degree level. That mixed roster is degree inflation made visible: the practitioners themselves are proof the job could be done, and is still done every day, without the degree now required to enter it.

The change didn’t reflect on anyone in the field — it simply made it more expensive to become a PT without moving the paycheck on the other side.

Pharmacy

Pharmacy had the same thing happen. Pharmacists used to enter the field with a five-year bachelor of science, but then the accreditor forced everyone to the Doctor of Pharmacy. 

The Chronicle of Higher Education flagged both fields as “credential creep” back in 2007.

Occupational Therapy

Occupational therapy is facing this crisis right now. 

In August 2017, the field’s accreditor, ACOTE, mandated that every master’s program convert to a doctorate by 2027 (PDF File). The backlash was immediate: practicing therapists, employers, and educators pointed out there was no outcome data showing doctorate-holders got better jobs or pay (PDF File) than master’s graduates doing identical work.

After two years of internal conflict, the mandate was rescinded in 2019 and the master’s path survived. But the reversal came from member revolt (not because of any law) and many universities converted their programs to the pricier doctorate anyway.

Nursing

Nursing is facing the same pressures as other health professionals. However, the main pressure is actually come from states who are making it more expensive to become a nurse.

New York’s “BSN in 10” law, enacted in 2017, requires new nurses to earn a bachelor’s within ten years of licensure. North Dakota once required a BSN outright but repealed it in 2003 amid a nursing shortage.

Accounting 

The accounting profession’s 150-hour rule, which forced CPA candidates into effectively a fifth year of college, was adopted state by state at the urging of the profession’s national association. 

However, it’s now being dismantled, with Ohio first in January 2025 and more than 30 states following with pathways that swap the extra year of school for an extra year of work experience. California’s new law eliminates the 150-unit requirement outright.

Cosmetology

At the certificate level, the numbers get grim. Certificate programs like cosmetology are one of the most impacted degrees on the “low earning degree” list that would ban federal student loans.

And you can see how licensing issues make this degree so expensive:

  • Every state licenses cosmetologists
  • Completing the required classes costs more than $16,000 on average
  • Students borrow over $7,300 to do it on average
  • Cosmetology courses generate the fifth-largest share of student loan borrowers of any program in the country
  • Half of workers in many states earn under $30,000 per year

This is all for a job that many of the workers have been doing themselves since they were teenagers. But here’s the craziest stat: the training to become a cosmetologist averages about a year of coursework, compared with roughly a month for an EMT… the person who responds when you call 911.

Random Employer Requirements

Employers add their own layer. A Harvard Business School analysis of 26 million job postings found that 67% of postings for production supervisors demanded a bachelor’s degree, while only 16% of the people already doing that job had one.

A follow-up FREOPP analysis later found a partial “degree reset,” with requirements dropping from millions of postings in the last several years.

What The New Rule Does

The new regulatory language from the Department of Education’s Accreditation, Innovation, and Modernization (AIM) negotiated rulemaking, goes after the accreditors directly. 

The consensus text (PDF File) says a recognized accrediting agency may not “act to restrict access to employment in a profession, occupation, or vocation” unless it presents clear and convincing evidence to the Secretary of Education that the restriction is necessary to protect the public, that the expected public benefits outweigh the costs of reduced access to the profession, and that no less restrictive alternative would work.

The rule then defines restricting access in exactly the terms that describe the last 30 years of degree inflation: taking steps to increase credentialing standards, and increasing the cost or level of required education or training.

How The Test Would Work Using The Occupational Therapy Example Above

Under this rule, ACOTE’s 2017 doctoral mandate couldn’t have taken effect on a committee vote. The agency would have needed to prove to the Department of Eduction (before acting) that the doctorate was necessary for public safety and that no cheaper option existed.

Given that even OT programs acknowledged there was no evidence the doctorate produced better outcomes (PDF File), that attempt would almost certainly have failed.

The rule also adds “firewalls” to attempt to keep affiliated associations from steering the accreditor’s decisions through the people it appoints and the money it controls — turning a supposedly independent quality check into the profession’s own gatekeeping arm.

Programmatic accreditors must be “separate and independent” from their affiliated professional associations: separately elected decision-makers, separate dues, an independently set budget, public representatives making up at least one-seventh of the decision-making body, mandatory conflict-of-interest controls, public disclosure of all association relationships, and even physically separate offices.

Meeting these requirements would now become conditions of federal recognition. And if an accreditor raises a degree requirement without clearing the evidence bar risks, it risks losing its recognized status – which in turn would stop the federal financial aid pipeline for its schools. 

Because the committee reached consensus, the Department is bound to use this agreed text in its rule, which would take effect July 1, 2027. However, higher education groups expect legal challenges before then.

What These New Rules Won’t Fix

It’s important to note that degree inflation can happen three ways:

  1. Accreditors
  2. State Laws
  3. Employers

These new rules only impact accreditors.

State legislatures and licensing boards remain free to raise requirements on their own. As such, the rule doesn’t touch BSN-in-10 or cosmetology hour mandates.

The rule even mentions it explicitly: accreditors are permitted to align their standards with state licensure requirements, industry standards, and employer hiring practices. So the pressure to raise credentials doesn’t vanish, it simply relocates to state legislatures, where professional associations must now win the fight in public, state by state, instead of once at the accreditor. 

This makes the entire process to increase degree requirements slower and more visible, which is arguably the point.

Employer degree preferences in job postings are also entirely outside the rule’s reach.

And accreditors that never seek federal recognition (such as business education’s AACSB) operate outside this system altogether.

Infographic showing three pipelines that shape degree requirements — accreditors, states, and employers — with the 2026 federal accreditation rule gating only the accreditor pipeline. Source: The College Investor

What This Means For Your Family 

Every time an agency increases the entry-level degree requirement, it has the same impact: more years of tuition, more student loan borrowing, and more years of delayed full earnings, all for the same job at roughly the same pay.

This rule arrives at the same moment as another force pushing in the same direction: the graduate borrowing caps in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which took effect July 1, 2026.

Grad PLUS loans are gone for new borrowers. Graduate students are capped at $20,500 per year and $100,000 total in federal loans, while professional students at $50,000 per year and $200,000 total.

The collision with degree-inflated fields is already measurable. According to a PEER Center analysis we covered in April, 63% of physical therapy borrowers currently take out more than the new limits allow, one of the highest rates of any graduate field.

And the doctorate-holding physical therapists at the center of this story were initially excluded from the higher $200,000 “professional” tier under the Department’s definition, a fight that has already produced a 23-state lawsuit and an injunction temporarily allowing the higher limits.

In other words: the accreditor required the doctorate, and now the federal loan system may not allow students to finance it.

Together, these two policies squeeze degree inflation from both ends:

  1. The accreditation rule limits how much education can be required
  2. The student loan caps limit how much required education can be financed 

A program that stretches to a doctorate now faces students who literally cannot borrow enough federal money to pay for it. And a separate provision in the same rulemaking pushes accreditors to judge programs on their economic returns relative to total cost using federal earnings data.

This means that a long, expensive credential that doesn’t pay off becomes an accreditation liability rather than a revenue strategy.

There’s a flip side families should watch. The new student loan borrowing limits, without cheaper programs could simply push borrowers into private loans. And our analysis of why private lenders can’t fill the gap found that credit requirements alone would exclude over 40% of potential borrowers.

The optimistic scenario (shorter, cheaper pathways into licensed professions) depends on schools and accreditors actually responding to the new incentives rather than shifting costs onto students.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee789″].tcb-post-list #post-76643 [data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee78f”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cosmetology-School-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Low-Earning Degrees Will Soon Lose Access to Federal Student Loans

Low-Earning Degrees Will Soon Lose Access to Federal Student Loans
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee789″].tcb-post-list #post-42380 [data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee78f”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/TheCollegeInvestor_AllSizes_Student_Loan_Borrowing_Limits_1280x720-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Student Loan Borrowing Limits For 2026 And 2027

Student Loan Borrowing Limits For 2026 And 2027
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee789″].tcb-post-list #post-60624 [data-css=”tve-u-19f3f6ee78f”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/TheCollegeInvestor_AllSizes_Graduate_School_Admissions_Guide_02_1280x720-150×150.jpeg”) !important;}}

Graduate Degree vs. Professional Degree For Student Loans

Graduate Degree vs. Professional Degree For Student Loans

Editor: Colin Graves

The post New Department of Education Rule Makes Accreditors Prove Degrees Are Worth The Cost appeared first on The College Investor.

Nike Deal: Get Two Pairs of Giannis Freak 7 Shoes for $69.56


Nike: Two Pairs of Giannis Freak 7 Shoes for $69.56

Nike is offering a great deal on select Giannis Freak 7 basketball shoes. To get the best price, add two pairs to your cart. The 40% discount is applied automatically in the cart, bringing the total to $69.56 for two pairs (about $34.78 per pair).

No promo code is required, just add two eligible pairs to your cart to see the discount. You can see the offer here. Only Light Aqua color is eligible for the discount.

Guru’s Wrap-up

At under $35 per pair, this is an outstanding price for Nike’s latest Giannis signature basketball shoes. If your size is available, this deal is worth grabbing before the discount disappears.