Home Blog

how I plan to make millions investing in crypto 2026 (again)



7 day free trial to Kaizen Pro →
the best free crypto newsletter →

Video Outline
0:00 Intro
0:56 Table of Contents
1:26 Market Recap (2026 So Far)
7:27 Bitcoin Price Predictions
18:53 How I’m Investing in 2026 to Make Millions Once again
25:26 The Next 10x Narratives (Pay attention to these)
33:38 Words of Wisdom (Bible Verse of the day)
34:21 Outro

🔗 Socials:

Business Inquiries: partnerships@jungmedia.io

Advertiser Disclosure: This video may contain links through which we are compensated when you click on or are approved for offers.

Disclaimer: Please note, that the information provided in this video is for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are extremely risky and highly speculative, involving significant potential for loss due to market volatility. Do NOT invest more than you are able to lose. I am not a financial advisor, and my views should not be taken as financial guidance. Always do your own research and consult with a professional before making any investment decisions. Remember, your investments are solely your responsibility, and I will not be liable for any losses or damages arising from your decisions based on this content.

source

Data centers are finding a surprising way to deploy batteries



The scramble to find enough power for artificial intelligence has data center operators looking for any solution. An unexpected one taking root pairs batteries — long seen as a key to adding more renewables — with fossil fuels. 

BloombergNEF has tracked 4.9 gigawatts of energy storage announcements that are co-located with on-site fossil fuel generation at data centers. That’s about 32% of announced global on-site data center battery capacity. The sites include some of the largest AI data center complexes under development, such as Elon Musk’s Colossus supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee, and the combo has become so popular that companies such as Caterpillar Inc. and GE Vernova Inc. have announced products or partnerships pairing energy storage with gas generation. 

Batteries are a linchpin for unlocking solar and wind energy’s full potential by soaking up excess green energy and then discharging it when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun isn’t shining. However, the steep drop in battery costs is now allowing energy-storage technology to be deployed in conjunction with natural gas to provide more reliable power for data centers. 

While gas can provide round-the-clock power, not all plants work 24/7. For many behind-the-meter facilities, data centers are choosing gas turbines that run for shorter periods and don’t ramp up quickly enough to meet computing needs. That has hyperscalers turning to batteries, which can rapidly discharge power, to fill these gaps. The batteries also help prevent damage to gas turbines that aren’t designed to be used for frequent  ramping cycles. 

“I assumed batteries would be a tool for decarbonization,” said Michael Thomas, founder of clean energy research firm Cleanview who has also been tracking the rise of energy storage paired with gas. “What we are learning in this new AI era is that they can also be used as a tool for fossil fuel power because their technological advantages make it possible to build and operate an off-grid power plant.”

While data centers now face an average of four years to get power from the grid, they are turning to gas generators paired with energy storage as a bridge source of energy, said Allison Weis, Wood Mackenzie’s global head of energy storage. As long interconnection queues delay requests for utility-connected power, data center developers are finding it faster to bring their own generation. 

Data centers also have sharp demand spikes driven by computing-intensive tasks, such as training models. Batteries paired with gas can help provide power rapidly enough to ensure smooth operations. Energy storage is projected to support 9.8 gigawatt-hours of gas generation at data centers through 2030, according to BNEF.

Some of the largest US data center projects are deploying batteries alongside gas generators.  At xAI’s Colossus facility, rows of Tesla Inc. Megapacks are being installed next to gas turbines as part of a 1.2 gigawatt off-grid power plant that will supply the massive data center. In West Texas, Pacifico Energy’s GW Ranch off-grid data center will have 1.8 gigawatts of battery storage installed next to 7.65 gigawatts of gas-fired power generation. 

Williams Cos., a natural gas pipeline operator, plans to install Tesla batteries along with natural gas-fueled power plants its building for several data center projects. “Batteries really help support the turbines and give us the 99.999% reliability,” said Executive Vice President Rob Wingo at the S&P Global Power Markets Conference in Las Vegas last week. 

Using natural gas will add more planet-warming emissions into the atmosphere while also contributing to local air pollution. The West Texas project recently received the largest air pollution permit ever granted in the US, while Musk’s Memphis project has faced multiple lawsuits arguing the gas turbines are worsening air quality in historically Black communities.

Pacifico Energy and xAI didn’t respond to requests for comment on the environmental impact of their projects. A Williams spokesperson touted the use of “modern, high‑efficiency natural‑gas turbines with advanced emissions controls and continuous monitoring” at its off-grid sites. “Pairing gas generation with batteries improves how those generators operate — smoothing load swings and reducing start‑ups and ramping, which are the most emissions‑intensive conditions,” the spokesperson wrote.

Utilities are also building more energy storage facilities on the grid next to power plants “to help maximize the megawatts” and support data center load growth, said Noah Roberts, executive director of the US Energy Storage Coalition. Large batteries help utilities make the most of power that would otherwise be wasted and also help meet power demand while also lowering costs, he said. 

Roberts pointed to the example of NIPSCO Generation, a utility in northern Indiana that is building two 1.3 gigawatt gas-fired power plants and an energy storage system with 400 megawatts of capacity to serve planned Amazon data centers. 

And in Michigan, utility DTE Electric Co. has plans to build six energy storage systems to complement a 1.4 gigawatt data center for Oracle Corp. Doing so will help the utility boost the capacity of all generating resources by 25%, he said. Roberts called that project “a great example of where energy storage is completely agnostic to the type of energy that is providing electrons to the grid.”  

Michigan regulators recently approved that project despite a challenge from the state’s attorney general over customer cost concerns.

Fluence Energy Inc., a global energy storage provider, is in talks with large natural gas companies to supply batteries that can help get data centers up and running before turbines arrive, said Chief Growth Officer Jeff Monday.

“We are seeing massive demand coming out of the hyperscalers and data center operators,” Monday said, noting that projects pairing batteries with gas generation are part of the fastest-growing part of the company’s energy storage pipeline.

Coupling batteries with natural gas also promises to extend the life and usefulness of fossil fuel plants. That is setting batteries up for a dual role as an enabler to putting more green energy on the grid and delaying the phase-out of fossil fuels.

“There is nothing about batteries that are inherently clean,” said Thomas. “Batteries are just a technology.”

From 75,000 AI tracks hitting Deezer daily to UMG’s copyright lawsuit against Quince… it’s MBW’s weekly round-up


Welcome to Music Business Worldwide’s Weekly Round-up – where we make sure you caught the five biggest stories to hit our headlines over the past seven days. MBW’s Round-up is exclusively supported by BMI, a global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music.


This week, Deezer revealed that 75,000 AI-generated tracks are now flooding the platform every day – representing 44% of all new music uploaded to the streamer daily.

Meanwhile, MBW examined a pair of UMG-linked patent filings that lay out a blueprint for AI-powered copyright enforcement – including a bot that could send its own cease-and-desist letters.

Elsewhere, a Chord Music Partners-linked ABS vehicle is planning a $500 million deal, backed by an $830 million catalog featuring rights from Suicideboys, Morgan Wallen, and Ryan Tedder.

Also this week, Universal Music Group and Concord Music Group sued $10 billion-valued fashion startup Quince over alleged “rampant and brazen” copyright infringement in TikTok posts featuring music from Sabrina Carpenter, Billie Eilish, and more.

Plus, UK-based Bella Figura Music acquired the publishing catalog of Grammy and Academy Award-winning producer Paul Epworth, including his work with Adele, Florence + The Machine, and more.

Here are some of the biggest headlines from the past few days…


1. 75,000 AI-GENERATED TRACKS NOW FLOOD DEEZER DAILY, REPRESENTING 44% OF ALL NEW MUSIC UPLOADED TO THE PLATFORM, SAYS STREAMER

The volume of fully AI-generated music being uploaded to Deezer has surged again – with the Paris-headquartered streaming service now receiving nearly 75,000 synthetic tracks every day.

That’s more than 2 million AI-generated tracks hitting the platform each month, according to the company, and it means AI-made music now accounts for 44% of all new tracks delivered to Deezer daily.

The new figures, revealed by Deezer on Monday (April 20), mark a sharp escalation from the 60,000 tracks per day the company reported in January, when synthetic content represented 39% of daily deliveries.

It also marks a significant jump from the 50,000 AI tracks Deezer was receiving per day in November, 30,000 in September, and just 10,000 when it launched its patent-pending AI detection tool in January 2025… (MBW)


2. HOW WILL THE MAJOR LABELS OVERCOME THE COPYRIGHT THREAT FROM AI MUSIC? BY TURNING TO THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON AVAILABLE: AI ITSELF.

Allow us to make a prediction.

In five years, the major music companies will not only be scouring the web for AI infringement, they will also be issuing legal letters directly to the perpetrators…

Sound far-fetched? It isn’t. It’s sitting inside a pair of patent applications published by the US Patent and Trademark Office on February 12, 2026.

MBW unearthed the filings while researching our recent story on the patent portfolio being built by Music IP Holdings, the entity formed last year through Universal Music Group‘s partnership with IP asset management firm Liquidax Capital… (MBW)


3. CHORD MUSIC-LINKED ABS VEHICLE PLANS $500M DEAL, BACKED BY $830M CATALOG LED BY SUICIDEBOYS, MORGAN WALLEN, AND RYAN TEDDER RIGHTS

A new issuing vehicle linked to Universal Music Group-backed investment platform Chord Music Partners is set to raise $500 million in debt through an Asset-Backed Securitization (ABS) transaction.

That’s according to a pre-sale report published by Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA) on April 16, which assigns a preliminary A (sf) rating to the $500 million Series 2026-1 Notes to be issued by Canon Music Issuer Trust.

Canon is a newly established vehicle that sits beneath the broader Chord platform, with its collateral pool representing a specific portion of Chord’s assets.

The notes are collateralized by royalties from a catalog of more than 3,750 works from artists and songwriters, including Suicideboys, Morgan Wallen, Ryan Tedder, Diplo, and Twenty One Pilots… (MBW)


4. UMG SUES $10B-VALUED FASHION BRAND QUINCE FOR ‘RAMPANT AND BRAZEN INFRINGEMENT’ IN TIKTOK POSTS

Universal Music Group and Concord Music Group have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Quince, the direct-to-consumer fashion startup that, according to the complaint, has “found its success by eliminating ‘middlemen’ usually used by traditional retailers.”

Starting in fashion, the company has since expanded into luggage, bedding, and other product categories. From its inception, “social media has been Quince’s key advertising and promotional tool,” the complaint states, noting that the company’s growth has been attributed specifically to its presence on platforms including TikTok and Instagram. Quince’s Instagram account alone has 1 million followers.

The company raised a $500 million Series E in March at a $10.1 billion valuation — more than double the $4.5 billion valuation it achieved in its Series D less than a year earlier… (MBW)


5. BELLA FIGURA MUSIC ACQUIRES PAUL EPWORTH PUBLISHING CATALOG, INCLUDING WORK WITH ADELE, FLORENCE + THE MACHINE AND MORE

UK-based music rights company Bella Figura Music has acquired the publishing catalog of Grammy, Academy Award, and Golden Globe-winning producer and songwriter Paul Epworth.

Founded by former BMG UK President Alexi Cory-Smith in 2022, Bella Figura Music says it has more than $200 million in music rights under ownership and management.

The company’s latest acquisition covers Epworth’s publishing catalog and producer income, including some of his co-writes and productions on Adele‘s 21 album, such as Rolling in the Deep, and the Academy Award and Golden Globe-winning Skyfall, which he co-wrote with Adele.

The deal also covers Epworth’s work with Florence + The Machine across Lungs and Ceremonials, and collaborations with Rihanna, Arlo Parks, Glass Animals, Paul McCartney, and many more… (MBW)


Partner message: MBW’s Weekly Round-up is supported by BMI, the global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music. Find out more about BMI hereMusic Business Worldwide

Geopolitical Risk and Portfolio Oversight


We used LCTD for this illustration because it offers:

  • A diversified, developed market equity portfolio
  • Sector weights broadly similar to global ex US benchmarks
  • A modest tilt towards lower carbon and transition ready companies

The five largest weights are HSBC at 1.9% (Banks), AML at 1.7% (Semiconductors), AstraZeneca at 1.7% (Pharma), Iberdrola at 1.4% (Utilities) and Allianz at 1.3% (Insurance). All issuer-level references that follow use these real names and weights, drawn directly from the public holdings file.

Industry Breakdown and Vulnerability

Each security is mapped to one of 12 Fed industries (e.g., machinery, computers, depository institutions). For each industry we compute:

  • Portfolio weight (%)
  • Estimated GPR beta (sensitivity to the GPR factor)
  • Impact score for the June 23 spike, translated into basis points of expected effect on the portfolio’s return for that event

Based on the sign of the impact score and economic reasoning, industries are classified as:

  • Vulnerable (expected to be hurt by the shock), or
  • Resilient (expected to benefit or provide ballast).

For the June 23 spike and the LCTD portfolio, the overlay estimates:

  • Total negative impact: ≈ 33.8 bps
  • Total positive impact: ≈ +15.3 bps
  • Net GPR impact: ≈ 18.4 bps

In other words, conditional on a shock of this severity, the portfolio is tilted modestly toward GPR-sensitive industries, with an expected drag of roughly 18 basis points compared with a GPR-neutral configuration.

The vulnerability composition is summarized as:

  • 39% of portfolio weight in vulnerable industries
  • 61% in non-vulnerable or resilient industries
  • five of 12 industries classified as vulnerable by the model

Exhibit 3: Industry-Level GPR Impact for the June 23, 2025, Spike

Home sellers’ profits slide as rates bite and cash buyers retreat


North Port‑Sarasota fell from 57.9% to 35.5%. In Arizona, Prescott’s margin eased from 69.4% to 47.1%.

At the same time, Flint, MI saw margins climb from 65.5% to 81.8%, Evansville, IN from 40.9% to 53.5%, Lansing, MI from 48% to 57.8%, Canton, OH from 55.5% to 60.2% and Syracuse, NY from 67.6% to 72%.

In major markets, margins stayed widest in San Jose, Hartford, Providence, Rochester and Buffalo, all above 70%. They were thinnest in New Orleans, San Antonio, Houston, Dallas and Austin, where returns ranged from 14% to 27.4%, underscoring the pressure in large Texas metros.

The broader deal mix also shifted. Lender‑owned sales inched up to 1.6% of transactions nationwide, while all‑cash deals fell year‑over‑year to 41.7% of sales, with the highest cash shares in parts of Hawaii, Georgia, Florida and New York.

Institutional investors bought 6.6% of homes, down from a year earlier, and FHA‑backed purchases slid to 7.4%, the lowest in nearly four years.

Earn 15,000 Points with Wyndham’s New Extended Stay Promotion


Wyndham’s New Extended Stay Promotion

Wyndham Rewards has launched a new incentive for extended stays. Travelers who stay 5+ consecutive nights at Hawthorn Extended Stay or WaterWalk properties will earn 15,000 bonus points. Check out the details below.

Offer Details

For a limited time, stay five or more consecutive nights at WaterWalk Extended Stay by Wyndham or Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham hotels and earn 15,000 Wyndham Rewards bonus points.

  • Booking Window: Now through June 30, 2026.

  • Travel Window: Stays completed by September 30, 2026.

  • Brands: Valid at Hawthorn Extended Stay and WaterWalk (Note: ECHO properties are excluded).

  • PROMO PAGE

Guru’s Wrap-up

If you’re planning a stay at one of these properties, then the extra 15,000 should be a nice bonus. You must stay at least five or more consecutive nights.

How to Succeed Like Apple’s Tim Cook


Lessons on leadership and strategic discipline from Tim Cook’s 15-year tenure as Apple’s CEO.

Compound Interest Explained



Start investing with bonuses below ⤵️

► See what I invest in & FREE stock with Public:
► Claim another free stock with Robinhood:
► Up to 12 free stocks with WeBull:

———-

None of this is meant to be construed as investment advice, it’s for entertainment purposes only. Links above include affiliate commission or referrals. I’m part of an affiliate network and I receive compensation from partnering websites. The video is accurate as of the posting date but may not be accurate in the future.

source

Is SoundHound Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold After This New Deal?


SoundHound (SOUN +0.38%) may have just unlocked a much bigger path to scale, but is the market convinced? This is what makes this story so interesting right now, because if execution improves, the upside case could look a lot stronger from here.

Stock prices used were the market prices of April 17, 2026. The video was published on April 21, 2026.

Rick Orford has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends SoundHound AI. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rick Orford is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through their link, they will earn some extra money that supports their channel. Their opinions remain their own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

The Worst Real Estate Investing Advice I’ve Ever Heard


This is the worst real estate investing advice I’ve ever heard—and I KEEP hearing it. If you go on to any “real estate investing” TikTok page, they say the same thing: use other people’s money, wait for the crash, interest rates will go down…and that’s not even the worst of the advice.

This type of real estate advice will make investors broke, put them in riskier positions, and stop them from retiring (early) with rental properties. I should know, I became financially free in just over a decade of real estate investing, and I didn’t follow ANY of the advice I’ll mention in today’s episode.

If you’re about to buy a property with negative cash flow or skip small rentals and go right to the big buildings (multifamily), do not skip this video. Following any of this so-called investing “advice” could push you back ten, twenty, or thirty years from financial freedom, while the rest of the real investors hit their early retirement in just a decade.

Dave Meyer:
Do you want to know why most of the real estate investing advice you hear on the internet will actually lose you money? I’ve analyzed thousands of real estate deals. I’ve bought dozens of properties. Now I’m going to share with you 10 pieces of advice that might sound good on TikTok, but are actually holding you back. More importantly, I’m going to share with you why people keep repeating them, even though they’re wrong. Some of this advice, it actually comes from people who haven’t bought a deal in years, but they keep posting because fear and negativity get clicks. I closed the deal last month, and so in this video, I’m going to break down each piece of bad advice, showing you the actual data and sharing what you should be doing with your portfolio instead. Let’s start with the worst one, and this one might surprise you because some of the so- called experts constantly repeat this.
The number one worst piece of advice that I hear about real estate right now is that it takes too long to reach financial freedom with real estate. Or you may even hear this said as real estate is dead or you can’t make real estate work anymore. And I just got to get out front of this and say that this is absolute nonsense. I have done the math. I’ve actually built financial models. You can go and download them for free on biggerpockets.com/resources. Go check them out. I have a financial freedom calculator there. And what it shows is that if you save 20% of your disposable income and you invest that consistently in real estate for eight to 12 years, you can completely replace your income and that is not doing anything fancy. You can get it down to five years if you’re super aggressive with it.
But even just buying on market regular stuff right now that gets a modest cash on cash return, if you do that consistently for 10 to 12 years, you can achieve financial freedom through real estate. So I don’t want to hear that it’s impossible to achieve financial freedom through real estate. That is complete nonsense. I think what people are really saying here is that real estate is not a get rich quick scheme. And that is true. I 100% agree with that because if you are trying to achieve financial freedom in two years or three years or four years, it might not work. It probably won’t work through real estate, but that is normal. Real estate investing is a long game and financial freedom is a long game. If you think that you can build enduring wealth, sustainable wealth in two or three years, you can’t. Even people who made a ton of money in Bitcoin, that has gone back down.
Real estate is slow for a reason because it is deliberate, because it is predictable, because it is consistent. That is why real estate is such a great way to achieve financial freedom. Even if it does take you that seven, eight to 12 years, depending on how aggressive you want to be. So don’t tell me that you can’t achieve financial freedom through real estate because you can. I’ve done it. I’ve seen plenty of other people do it. And even in this market, it still works. So that’s the number one worst advice. The second piece of advice that I absolutely hate is that you cannot scale with residential real estate. You hear this all the time. I’m even going to call out Grant Cardone. He talks about this all the time, how it’s a waste of time to invest in residential real estate or that your primary residence isn’t an investment and that you have to get to multifamilies.
That’s the only way to scale. And maybe if you’re trying to be a billionaire, that could be true. But I think for most people who listen to this podcast, and certainly for me, what I’m trying to do is live a comfortable life with a relatively small portfolio. To me, the ultimate flex is to reach your financial freedom number with as few units as possible. Let’s just speculate here. Think about this. If you bought 10 single family homes, let’s make this easy. And you paid them off over the next 10, 15 years, right? Average single family rent in the United States right now is about 2,500 bucks. So you buy 10 of those, you’re getting $250,000 in tax advantaged cashflow. When you think about the tax advantages, that’s more than having a $300,000 salary. So don’t tell me you can’t scale with residential real estate. That’s a small example.
That is an achievable goal for people who are aggressive about this. It really comes down to your own goal. It really frustrates me when people say there’s only one way to grow. You have to get into multifamily. You have to get into senior living. You have to get into self-storage. Are those good strategies? Yeah, for certain people they are, but that is not the only way to scale in real estate. A lot of my friends who are highly successful make tons of money, make millions of dollars a year, have done it entirely on residential real estate. The people who are telling you that you can’t scale with residential real estate probably want you to buy something. So I am here to tell you that is bad advice. If you want to just stick with boring old residential real estate because it is safer and is more predictable and it still offers great returns, you can and absolutely should do that.
All right, so that’s bad advice. Number two, moving on to number three. This is one I hear a lot, especially over the last couple of years. The piece of advice I hate is negative cashflow is worth it for the right house. Now I know this is a big debate in real estate. What’s more important? Cash flow or appreciation. I do not buy properties that do not cashflow. Negative cashflow is the one thing that can force you to sell your property before you want to. That’s maybe the worst case scenario that you have as a real estate investor because even the people who bought in 2007, if they held on and they had cashflow, they were still making money from 2007 to 2015 until their property price rebounded. They were still getting tax benefits. They were still getting cash flow. And because they had cashflow, they could pay their bills, they could pay their mortgage, they were never under any immediate stress.
And then they got to enjoy those massive gains in property values and appreciation that we got from 2013 to 2023, depending on where you live. I am not saying that cashflow is going to make you wealthy overnight. What I am saying is that it is a requirement to make sure that you are not taking on more risk than is necessary. If you go out and buy something just because it’s going to appreciate, maybe you will appreciate, maybe it doesn’t, but that’s a way that you can absolutely get burned. And I hear people pointing to this saying, “Oh, this market in California or in Texas or in Florida, it’s appreciated on average 7%, 8% per year over the last five years.” Yeah, that was a unique time. I don’t think we’re getting to that appreciation. And even if we do, it’s still speculation. But personally, I think appreciation’s going to be muted for the next couple of years.
And that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t buy real estate, but it does mean you need cashflow to hold on, to buy great assets during this time when appreciate is slow. And then when appreciation picks up, which honestly no one knows when is going to happen. Is it next year? Is it three years? Is it five years? You’re in the game when that appreciation pop happens and that’s how you really build wealth, but you need cash flow to get there. Do not speculate unless you’re already wealthy. So that’s number three. Negative cashflow is not worth it for the right house unless you’re super rich.
The fourth piece of bad advice is people saying that you need to get to 50 doors to achieve financial freedom. Or honestly, really, this is people saying you need to get to any specific number of doors to reach your goals because door count is just a terrible metric. I already talked about scaling with residential real estate. You can build a great portfolio with five units, 10 units, 20 units. Personally, I am reconstructing my portfolio right now because I would love to get to like 15 to 20 to mostly paid off units because that could more than fund my lifestyle. I don’t need more than that, right? Now, could I go out today and buy hundreds of units? Literally I could. I have that financial capability to go out and buy hundreds of units, but I’m not going to do that because that would be optimizing for the wrong metric.
If you say, “I want to go and buy a hundred units,” fine, but why? You want a hundred units that give you a hundred bucks a month in cashflow? That’s 10,000 bucks a month. You want to manage a hundred units for 10,000 bucks a month? I could go out and buy four single family homes for cash and get the same amount of cash flow, maybe even better. Do you know how much less work that is? Do you know how much less maintenance cost that is? Do you know how much less headache it is having four paid off units than a hundred units that only get you a hundred bucks a month in cash flow? Most people don’t say, “Hey, I want to be a real estate investor because I have a dream of owning a hundred units.” They say, “I want time with my family.
I want to work less. I want more flexibility in my life.” And if you are optimizing for door count, there is a very good chance you are not actually optimizing for the things that you want. You are just doing it for vanity. It’s just ego. I’m sorry, just saying that you want a hundred units or you have a hundred units, people do that for ego. Be better than that. Think about what you actually want. What are the reasons you got into real estate and optimize for that? And honestly, nine times out of 10, you’ll probably find out that getting a smaller portfolio with more efficient units, more efficient use of your capital and time, that’s going to go further for you than door count. All right. Number five, terrible advice that people are giving out right now is to wait for the housing market to crash.
If you know anything about me, if you follow me on social media, you see that I spend a lot of my time trying to dispel this crash narrative. I want to just say right here, right now, that crashes in the real estate market are extremely rare. I’ve spent, I don’t even know, thousands of hours looking into this. And I will tell you that there has been exactly one housing market crash since the Great Depression that was in 2007 and 2008. And it is totally understandable that people who lived through that expect that or think that a crash could happen again. And I am not saying that a crash will not happen again. I would never say that. I am an analyst. My whole purpose is to think in probabilities, and there is a chance that the housing market would crash. There are scenarios that I could see happening where the housing market crashes.
But is that a likely scenario right now? No, it is not a likely scenario right now. If you can get into the housing market and just ride normal appreciation, the normal trajectory of the housing market, that’s great. Sometimes you will buy a little high. Other times you will buy a little low, but if you keep buying at regular intervals, by definition, you are going to over time achieve that average and that average is good enough. Now I understand the impulse to say, I’m just only going to buy when it’s low, but no one knows when it’s low, literally since I’ve been a real estate investor, 16 years. Every single year, a very famous, a very prominent, a very reputable person has said the housing market’s going to crash. In 2014, really popular influencers, Robert Kiyosaki was saying that the housing market was going to crash.
I have seen other influencers say this every single year for the last 15 years, no one knows if it’s going to happen or when it’s going to happen. And if you think about all the people who said in 2015, “Oh, prices have been going up for four or five years, there’s going to be a crash.” Think about, you just missed the biggest bull market in the history of the housing market. How much wealth did you lose because of that? If you’re just sitting around waiting, you think you’re going to be spending every day analyzing the housing market and say, “You know what? I’ve figured out when the bottom is. ” Unlike every other housing market analyst who’s spending all of their time on this, I, as a casual observer of real estate who have never bought a home, never bought a real estate property, I know when the bottom is.
No, you don’t. I don’t even know. So the cost of waiting often exceeds the cost of getting in and maybe buying a little high, even if your property goes down one to 2% per year. This is the same thing with stocks, right? If you talk to any financial planner, they say, “Don’t try to time the market. Just get in the market as long as possible.” The same thing is true in real estate. I am not saying you should go out and buy anything. There is a lot of stuff on the market that is overpriced right now, but if you have a genuine understanding of market value, if you can do the things that we talk about on this channel all the time, like buying below current market comps, doing value add investing, getting cash flow, you can absolutely still make money right now, even if the market goes down next year.
That’s a paper loss. You can absolutely still make this work. Waiting has costs and you’re better off getting in and learning and allowing your investment to compound over time. That’s how you really make money in real estate. The number six piece of terrible advice is you should go out and use other people’s money. The best way to get into real estate is to figure out a way to get your own first deal. Now, if you need to partner on that, that’s a different story. If you can go out and raise some money from friends and family, you can raise a little bit of money, that’s the kind of other people’s money that I do think makes sense. That can really help in the beginning. But I would much rather all of you go out and save money for a couple years and put 3.5% down in house hack, then go out and try and raise money from sophisticated investors, from other people who are doing deals.
It’s just not going to work. I know that people say that this is going to work, but it’s not. Everyone I know who raises money for deals does it primarily from people that they actually know. In the beginning, it is friends and family. And over time, as you become a reliable investor with a track record, then you can expand out and raise money from other people. But getting into real estate, buy raising money from other investors that you do not know is not realistic. I’m sorry. Maybe it happens one out of a hundred times, but this is bad advice. Better advice. Get your financial house in order. Earn more money than you spend. Put that money away. And even if that takes you a year, I would rather you take a year of getting your financial house in order and going out and buying a property than spending all of your time naively trying to raise money from people you don’t know who are probably never going to give you a dime.
So go out and get experience first. Become a great investor. Do that with your own money. Do that with friends and family money. And if you can do that, raising other people’s money will be possible, but you can’t shortcut. You can’t skip the line. You have to build up that credibility before anyone else is going to fund your deals. All right, let’s move on to number seven. Oh, man. I hate this advice. God, this is maybe the worst advice that has popped up over the last couple of years. And I feel vindicated by this. The advice is date the rate, marry the house. I know you all have heard this one. So many people have been saying this for years, and as soon as this started popping up in 2023, as soon as interest rates started going up and people were saying, “Yeah, rates are going to go down and you can refight.” I have to say, I have been right about this.
I’ve been saying for three straight years, this is awful advice because rates might not go down. Yeah, they’ve come down a little bit. They’re not at 8%, but they’re at 6.5%. I promise you, every single person who is out there saying, “Date the rate, marry the house, was promising you that we’d have 5% mortgages right now or 4% mortgages right now.” And that hasn’t happened. And even if it did happen, it’s still bad advice. Going out and buying a house or a property, an investment property, assuming that the rate is going to go down is just, it’s speculation. It’s the same thing that we talked about earlier with negative cash flow. Why would you do that to yourself? You’re better off being patient and disciplined than going out and doing that. If you are analyzing deals based on the numbers you have today and they eventually get better, great.
Cool. But the whole key here is that you have to analyze them based on what you know. What are rents today? What are expenses today? What are rates today? If they get better, great, but you don’t know that’s going to happen. So the only thing you can do as an investor, the best thing you can do to be a good investor is to assume that rates aren’t going to change and be very disciplined in your underwriting, making that assumption that rates are staying what they are and that the rate you get today is the one that you’re going to stick with. That is how you build long-term wealth, right? That’s how you don’t take on extra risk that you don’t have to take and instead build a rock solid portfolio that can withstand any market conditions.
All right, that was number seven. Let’s move on to number eight. Terrible advice. Get into real estate for passive income. This is a hot topic that I hear a lot, but people say, “I own rental properties. It’s passive income.” There is some truth to it. Real estate is probably more passive than a W2 job, but is it truly passive income? No. Real estate takes work. I actually think that real estate investing itself, calling this business that I am in, that you’re trying to get into, that you’re in, real estate investing is a little bit of a misnomer. It is entrepreneurship. You are starting a small business. How involved you need to be in that business is variable. There’s a spectrum, right? Some on one end, you could be in it a lot. You’re flipping houses. That’s a lot of work. You’re wholesaling, that’s a lot of work.
You’re self-managing 10 plus rentals. That’s a lot of work. Still worth it, 100% still worth it. And over time, you can probably get more passive. But for most people, getting into real estate, you’re going to have to hustle in the beginning. And then as you get five, 10, 15 years into your investing career, you could be a lot more passive. Not saying it takes 40 hours a week. For me, it didn’t. Even in the most busy parts of my real estate investing career, 10, 15 hours a week at most, that’s when I was self-managing properties. I still did this when I was in grad school and working a full-time job at the same time. You absolutely can do this. It is not a full-time job unless you want to be a flipper or a wholesaler or developer, but it does take work. So you need to decide if you want to be in this industry, are you willing to put in that effort?
For me, I can tell you from experience, me, my personality, my goals, 100% worth it, absolutely worth every single minute of it, but you have to make that decision for yourself because it’s not truly passive. Let’s move on to terrible advice, number nine, which is X strategy is dead. And by X, I mean, anytime someone says a strategy is dead, they’re wrong. I hear a lot of people say short-term rentals are dead. I hear people say that the Burr is dead. I hear people say that rental properties is dead. This is just not true. If maybe you’re looking for just absolute easy returns, you don’t have to think you don’t have to do anything. Yeah, maybe it’s dead. Can you just go out and do a perfect Burr without putting in a lot of effort right now? No. Does that mean Burr is a bad strategy?
Absolutely not. I personally have been pretty critical of short-term rental investing over the last couple of years. I’ve been saying the last three or four years that I think it’s oversaturated, that returns are going to go down, and that only the best operators are going to do well. And that is the key difference in what I am saying, and I think what you hear a lot out there. Short-term rentals aren’t dead. You just need to be very good at it to make money. And you know what? That is normal for every single business. If you think you can go out and open a mediocre restaurant and you’re going to kill it, why are you an entrepreneur? You have to try and be good at the things that you’re doing. So anytime you hear someone say, “Short-term rentals are dead,” they’re wrong. What they mean is you need to be good at short-term rentals to make money.
And it’s true if you’re not committed to being good at that strategy, don’t do it. It’s not going to make you money. If you’re not committed to be good at Burr or good at flipping, maybe it is dead to you. But every single real estate investing strategy makes money. I see people making money on flips right now. I see people making money. Burrs. I know people making tons of money on short-term rentals right now because they’re good at it. So these blanket statements that any strategy or approach to real estate investing are dead, it’s just bad advice. All right. Number 10, bad advice that I hear. It’s our last one today, and it is quit your job and go all in on real estate. A lot of my friends, full-time real estate investors, that’s great, but the idea that you need to quit your job, and that is a prerequisite for being successful in real estate is just complete nonsense.
I have taken a completely different approach to real estate, and I know a lot of people have. I have worked a W2 job because that provides me stability. It gives me healthcare. It gives me an income that exceeds my living expenses so I can save money and put it into my real estate portfolio. It allows me to be patient in real estate because if I don’t do a deal this month, if I don’t do a deal next month, if I don’t do a deal this year, I’m fine. It doesn’t matter to me because I have an income. It allows me to be opportunistic. I don’t have to take on excessive risk because I’m not that thirsty. If you have a job that you like or have a job that allows you some level of disposable income, that is such an advantage in real estate. You are going to be more lendable.
It is so much easier to get a mortgage if you have a W2 job instead of flipping houses. That’s just true. You’re going to be more lendable. It allows you to take more risks. At the same time, it allows you to be more patient. There are so many advantages to this. So I’m not saying you shouldn’t quit and go all in, but I am saying that it is not a prerequisite and everyone should be thinking about this for themselves. And so don’t get caught up in this bad advice that you have to quit your job to get into real estate. All right. Those are the 10 worst pieces of advice that I hear right now. And just as a recap, number one, takes too long to reach financial freedom with real estate. No. Number two, can’t scale with residential real estate. I’ve seen literally hundreds, if not thousands of examples that are contrary to this.
Don’t listen to this. Number three, negative cash flow is worth it for the right house. Disagree. Do not speculate. It’s not worth it. Number four, you need to get 50 doors to achieve financial freedom. Absolutely nonsense. Optimizing for door count is optimizing for the wrong thing. Don’t scale for scaling’s sake. Number five is waiting for the crash. No one knows when it’s going to happen and there is an opportunity cost for waiting. Do not forget that. Number six, go out and raise money from private investors. Where are these people? I don’t know. If you can raise money from friends and family, go do it, but do not waste your time thinking that you are going to go walk up to a sophisticated investor and pry money away from them before you have experience. Not going to happen. Number seven, date the rate, marry the house.
Hopefully everyone has seen that this is bad advice. Do not underwrite your deals with anything other than the rate that a lender has quoted you in the last couple of weeks. Number eight, do real estate for passive income. Real estate is not passive. It does take work more passive than a full-time job. It’s faster than working for 45 years for a shaky retirement. I promise you that, but you’re going to have to put some work into it and it’s well worth it. Number nine, X strategy is dead. Don’t listen to anyone who says short-term rental strategies are dead or burr is dead. They probably are trying to get you to buy some course on the strategy that they’ve just pivoted to two months ago. Number 10, bad advice. You got to quit your job and go all in. If that’s you and you want to do it, go for it.
Best of luck to you. It works for a lot of people, but it is absolutely not a prerequisite for being successful in real estate. So those are the 10 pieces of advice I hate. What do you hate? What is the worst real estate investing advice you’re hearing right now? Drop them in the comments I would love to know. Thanks so much for watching this video. I’m Dave Meyer. I’ll see you next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].