Home Blog

How “Deep Industry Research Agents” Can Change Your Organization


End-to-end AI tools that are tuned to specific industries and case types can dramatically boost productivity.

Southwest to Make Changes After Customer Complaints Over Boarding and Bin Space


Southwest to Make Changes After Customer Complaints

Southwest switched from an open-seating to the new assigned-seating policy last year and also started charging for bags.

We have already seen lots of complaints on social media about the new boarding process. Some of the complaints from travelers have been about slow boarding, flight attendants being very strict about seating assignments even on empty planes, and lack of overhead bin space near their seats.

Now Southwest says it will make changes based on that feedback, which will include “several enhancements” to tackle newer issues caused by the transition to assigned seating in late January.

Here’s the full text of the email:

“First, thank you for being a Southwest Customer. As we’ve transitioned from open seating to assigned seating, the feedback we’ve received has been invaluable. We’ve already made several enhancements and will continue refining the experience to reward your loyalty while delivering the industry’s best operational reliability and hospitality.

Here’s what’s rolling out next:

Better-balanced boarding groups: We’re refining how boarding groups are assigned to improve overhead bin availability near your seat while maintaining the fast boarding and deplaning process you expect from Southwest.

More overhead bin space: We’re upgrading our cabins with larger bins that hold up to 50% more bags. At least 70% of our fleet will have these larger bins installed by the end of this year which will improve bin space availability near your seat.

Designating bin space for Extra Legroom seats: Throughout the month of March, we are adding signage to the bins above our Extra Legroom seats to reserve them for Customers sitting in those rows.

Thank you for your continued loyalty. We’ll keep listening to feedback and keep you updated as we roll out additional enhancements.

Best,

Tony Roach EVP Chief Customer & Brand Officer”

75,000 “Relistings” Could Hit the Market


Dave:
If you’re watching inventory climb right now, it can look like supply is surging. But a big part of what is hitting the market is not truly new supply. It is homes that tried to sell last year, got pulled, and are coming back as re-listings. And this is a really new phenomenon in inventory dynamics that really changes how you should be thinking about market dynamics. I’m Dave Meyer, and today I’m joined by Mike Simonsen to break down this re-listing trend, why it’s happening, how to separate re-listings from new listings, and what it tells us about seller behavior, buyer demand, and price pressures as we head into the spring market. We’re also gonna dig into why inventory can rise without sending prices lower, how pending sales can improve at the same time, and what investors should do with this information in the next few months. This is On The Market.
Let’s get into it. Mike, welcome back to On the Market. Thanks for joining us again.

Mike:
Dave, it’s always great to be here.

Dave:
Well, we are excited to have you here. I was thinking about writing an episode to talk about de- listings and re-listings, and, you know, I figured why not just have the inventory master himself come join us. So we’re excited to, to hear from you. So it seems like this, this trend that we’re seeing with a lot of interesting movement in inventory kind of started in the fall with de- listings, right? Can you maybe just give us some background on what’s going on there?

Mike:
Yeah. So the housing market stayed slow for four years now. And if you’re a seller trying to get an offer for your house and, and if you don’t get the, the price you want, you can cut the price or you can pull the house off the market and try again, wait for better conditions. Both of those things were happening last year. Both of those things were happening at a, at an elevated pace. So the most of any, you know, recent years. And so that means like you cut your price and maybe you get the offer and then you move it, but if you don’t have to sell, the option is like to withdraw or de- list or let it expire. And, and there’s any number of ways that that happens. You know, so we watch that. And one way to, to track that is not just in a total number of those, but also as a percentage of the new listings.
So like, what percent of the people who are listing now ultimately withdraw-

Dave:
Oh, interesting. …

Mike:
Is an interesting way to think about it, right? Yeah. So it’s, if there’s more homes on the market, there’s gonna be more withdrawals, there’s gonna be more sales and what, you know, like all the numbers will be bigger. So doing it as a percentage of new listings is an interesting way to look at it.

Dave:
So what did you find? I mean, I, I’m, I’m curious because yeah, like of course if more things are being listed for sale, there’s probably more de- listings, but proportionally, what was going on?

Mike:
So proportionally, you get a few things. You get, uh, you get a kind of a canoe shape in the year, uh, where de- listings climb over the holidays and then fall again in the spring, you get fresh new inventory and you get new buyers. And so you’re not withdrawing over the spring, but then if the, the year progresses and you don’t have a buyer, now you start thinking about it. And so it’s very common to have more withdrawals over the holidays. As a percentage of new listings though, last year might have been 35 or 40% in the third quarter. So 30, 35% of those new listings are ultimately getting frustrated. And that compares to like 25% the year before- Okay. … which, which compares to maybe 20%, you know, each- Yeah. … year or longer in a slow market, you see more people who are getting frustrated.
Over the holidays, that might normally drop to 50% or s- you know, last year, 24 was 60%, and in December of 25, we counted 80%- Oh, whoa. … uh, in that. Oh my God. Really dramatic. Like a elevated number of de- listings. So that’s as a percentage of the new listings. January dipped back down to 44%, so dips down, uh, and will fall February or fall lower again in March, April will be the lowest months, and then, and then you get a little, uh, elevation in the spring. So that’s the de- listing. Okay. So de- listing is definitely elevated, hasn’t resumed back down to the very normal, you know, the more normal levels, like it’s still elevated. All of those pieces are in place now. Okay. Uh, it really kicked in last year.

Dave:
De-listing’s probably not a sign of a healthy market, right? Like it reflects some imbalance between buyer demand and, and supply out there, right, or pricing, uh, mismatches. But the, the thing I kept thinking about, it was like, it also, maybe it reflects health in home sellers, that the fact that they are able to pull their property off the market rather than continuing to slash prices, or at least that’s what I was thinking, like there’s not e- this is better than forced selling, which is kind of the other option, right?

Mike:
Uh, I think that’s exactly what it reflects. In other words, almost everybody in the country s- still has the best mortgage terms-

Dave:
Yes.

Mike:
… ever in the history of mankind. And so for those folks, if they don’t get the offer, one option is to sell never. It is super cheap to hold the house.
Yep. Um, each day, that be- there’s fewer and fewer of those folks. Some of those people, you know, those deals transition. There are more people who have expensive mortgages, and so that option fades a little bit every day. Uh, but there’s still a lot of them. Mm-hmm. And at the same time, there are folks, even if you don’t have a cheap mortgage, like let’s say you bought in 2023, you still have your job, unemployment’s low, and so you may want to move, but find yourself with really no price appreciation over the past few years, or maybe negative if you bought at the peak in Austin or something like that. Yeah. Mm-hmm. And now it’s, you know, it’s painful to take that loss. It is. So you say, “Well, I’m gonna try to do it at a, at a gain, but I can’t, and so I’m gonna wait.” So it also is a reflection of the fact that basically everybody’s still employed.
Yeah. You know, unemployment is still low. So there isn’t force selling on that side really either, yet in the cycle. Maybe that comes, but it hasn’t come yet.

Dave:
Right. Of course this can change. Like if unemployment shoots up, something will change, right? It, it will, but there’s no evidence of that just yet. I think, you know, when you hear these ideas that there’s gonna be massive foreselling or foreclosure crisis, that is speculation. I’m never gonna say it could never happen, but it is speculation at this point, not, not really evidence. We gotta take a quick break, everyone, but we’ll be right back with Mike Simonsen. Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s jump back in with Mike Simonsen. So, Mike, you alluded to sort of the flip side of this though. I remember reading something you, you wrote talking about de- listings and saying, like, maybe what happens in the spring? Are they all gonna be relisted or are these permanently coming back? So maybe update us on the re-listing trend now.

Mike:
Yeah. So I think, you know, it is very easy to look at the, the, the de- listings of last year purely as supply for this year, like supply that wants to happen. These are home sellers that want to sell. Therefore, if they come back on the market, there could be a flood of inventory, uh, that, uh, of these folks who clearly tried to sell but couldn’t sell. And so that’s the intuitive take, right? Wow, there’s a lot of de- listings. If they come back, then there’s a lot of selling. There’s a lot of listings and, and there’d be a lot of active inventory, and maybe that has therefore, uh, negative price implications, right? More supply. My observation in, in, in the Compass data, we dove in and looked and, uh, did some, some evaluation of, like, who are the D-listers?

Dave:
Mm-hmm.

Mike:
And it turns out that most of them are- Flippers? Owner-occupiers.

Dave:
Oh, really? Okay. I thought it was gonna be all flippers. That’s super

Mike:
Interesting. So most of them are not investors or flippers.

Dave:
Interesting.

Mike:
Okay. Most of them are owner-occupiers, and that means that these are actually delayed demand- mm-hmm. … as well as delayed supply. Yeah. So these are folks who wanna move up or wanna move down, but they’ve delayed it because they, the conditions aren’t right. So if conditions improve or as conditions improve, you could look at these and see that most of them are owner-occupiers, most of them are two transactions that wanna happen. And so there is shadow demand there as well. Now there’s, there are some investor flippers. There are some folks like, you know, in some of the second home markets of Florida, where maybe these are not two transactions. These are people like, “I just wanna unload this thing.” And to that extent, those would be, those would add to supply. But-

Dave:
Yeah.

Mike:
… in our analysis, most of the folks we see, because de- listing, it’s not just happening in Florida, it’s everywhere.

Dave:
Yeah. Okay. That was kind of my next question is, like, it’s just ubiquitous.

Mike:
It is, you know, is by our measurement and when I get to talk to agents across the country, they’re all, you know, “Well, I had a seller, he tried, and, you know, it’s probably overpriced, but the, the, you know, he’s gonna wait and try again.” That is super common.

Dave:
Yeah. I wonder what happens with transaction volume in the next couple of months because I, I think at some point people just have to realize, like, rates are probably not going down that much this year and, like, maybe, you know, we’ll get, you know, sort of a proportionate rise in supply and demand at the same time and hopefully kick us back up from that dismal, uh, home sales <laugh> report that we had at 3.9 million. I’m curious if you think that’s likely this year.

Mike:
Well, uh, so in, in our data, in the weekly data, we don’t see nearly as dip, uh, as NAR reported. I am suspect of the seasonal adjustment they did. I, I can’t find that. I can’t find a massive dip in the data anywhere.

Dave:
Okay.

Mike:
So I didn’t see it. Maybe, maybe timing of the snowstorm and there, maybe there was some end of month closings- Yeah. … that didn’t happen in the NAR data. I don’t, I don’t know where it came in, but man, I couldn’t find it in, in any of the, the real time. Uh, you know, uh, December, the pendings in December slowed, and so, you know, not great improvement in endomen, but, like, we’re measuring a few percent every week, uh, better, typically better than, than a year ago.

Dave:
I’m optimistic. I, I just feel like, you know, I saw this dealer report that came out the other day that said the average mortgage payment now is 8.4% lower- Yeah. … than it was a year ago. And I just gotta believe it’s, you know, we’re still not great affordability, but any improvement in affordability has gotta help get those pendings and the transaction volume up a little bit, right?

Mike:
Yes. I, I agree. It’s, yeah, it’s 8% cheaper now, and every dollar makes a few more people, puts a few more people in the market. Mm-hmm. And so, yes, I think that’s, that’s the case. We, you know, the one week we saw dip that last week with the deep freeze below year over year. But here’s the thing, you know, my assumption and my hypothesis about the, the de- listings relistings is that these are really two transactions that wanna happen. And right now, we can see the relistings and there are 75,000 single family homes that are now relisted. They were pulled last fall and they’re relisted back on the market now. It’s like 11% of the active inventory.

Dave:
It’s a lot. Yeah.

Mike:
It’s higher than last year, right? They are coming back on the market now. But if they come back on and the, the pendings don’t climb, or if they come back on and inventory expands- mm-hmm. … that would disprove my hypothesis, right? That would just say that these are people, this is only supply that wants to come on the market. You know, if there’s 75,000 people, like, if inventory is rising by 75,000, uh, because these are all relisted, that’s a thing I’m looking for. Mm-hmm. What we’re seeing though is that active inventory is actually, it’s not yet below last year at this time, but in Florida, it is below. There are fewer homes for sale in Florida now than last year at this time. Really? And I think- That

Dave:
Is surprising.

Mike:
… almost nobody is aware of this, right? Yeah. And you, if you ask anybody, they’d assume inventory in Florida is expanding.

Dave:
Yeah. Like one thing that I have been tracking is what you would expect in a normal correction, right, is that in the markets where prices are declining and their softness, new listing data is declining the fastest, right? Like, aga- another sign that people just have the option not to sell and in markets like Florida, they’re just choosing not to.

Mike:
Yeah. But, you know, we have sales up 8% in the pen to weekly pending data. Sales are up 8% year over year in Florida. Oh, interesting. Okay. So there’s more sales happening too. There’s more homes available to buy. There’s more transactions that can happen. There are some bargain hunters happening. Yeah. Like there’s, there’s a few of those things coming into place, uh, that are keeping sales a little bit elevated and inventory falling in Florida. So inventory is still up 8%, 8.5% year over year nationwide, but that was, you know, inventory a year ago has grown by 30%.

Dave:
Right. Yeah.

Mike:
And so it’s now down to 8%. And on the cur- if the current trends hold, we could be negative year over year by June. We could have inventory shrinking.

Dave:
Right. I know. It’s wild. It, it just makes you laugh about all these, like, doom and gloom things that we’re saying over the last couple years that we’re gonna see this massive explosion of inventory. I think, uh, on this show, we’ve been a little bit more measured and maybe that’s proving correct. But I, I think that, you know, that phenomenon is super interesting and important for our audience because it tells us a lot about, like, where the housing market might be going, which I wanna ask you about. But before we do, the last thing, just on the pure inventory side, new listings are down, right? Are you seeing that as well, that fewer people are posting new properties for sale?

Mike:
In our data, weekly new listings are really about the same as they were- Flat. … a year ago.

Dave:
Okay.

Mike:
In the last two weeks with the deep freeze and storm- Yeah. … they dipped below last year. That’s totally common in February. Like storms happen, and so you can get, like, if the storm happens in January, then l- you’ll get the dips earlier. But in general, outside of that weather, uh, I’d say that they’re about the same as they were, uh, a year ago, maybe, you know, within a few percent plus or minus.

Dave:
Yeah. The market is adapting in the way that, to me, logically makes sense, right? This is not … We’ve moved to a buyer’s market, so to see, in, in a lot of markets, to see sellers choose not to sell makes sense, right? Like, especially given the recency bias <laugh> that’s going on, right, where they’re like, “Oh, my neighbor sold three years ago, like, 100,000 over asking. I don’t wanna sell into this market.” It’s just not that appealing to sell these days. So I think, you know, it does seem like the market is heading towards some more stable equilibrium. At least that’s what I’m seeing. What, what is your sort of outlook for the year from here?

Mike:
Yeah. Our outlook for the year is that because inventory’s up and affordability improves not just mortgage rates, but, you know, income’s rising faster than home prices- Yep. … in most of the country, like, that approves affordability, that leads us to forecast about a 5% sales growth in 2026, 5%, not huge, but a little bit. Yeah. And in the weekly data, the weekly pending data, it’s been, uh, been coming out, right, three, five, 8% improvements over last year, like I said, with the dip for the storm for the first week, last week, but, but in general, it’s been averaging about three, 5% more. So that, in my view, bears out our forecast. A year ago, the opposite was happening. So we kept coming in slightly under, you know, and a year ago, mortgage rates were 100 basis points higher- Yeah. … than they are now. And so we were missing on the forecast numbers each week.
And so this, this year, they’re, they’re coming in right, right where they need to, to have a, a full year of, of gains. It would, you know, we looked at scenarios of, like, what would it take to have a big gain year? Yeah.

Dave:
What would

Mike:
It take to have, like, a 10% growth year in home sales? And a bunch of things would have to align at the same time to make that happen, like, you know, mortgage rates dip maybe into the fives in the first quarter here.

Dave:
Yeah.

Mike:
That kind of thing would move. But it’s also, it’s not just that, it’s also the jobs market, unemployment’s still relatively low, and the latest numbers, you know, show it just seems like it’s actually dipping. The number that I’m, that I care about really for the year is the hiring rate. So even though unemployment’s low, companies are hiring at a rate that is- Yeah.
… much more like a deep recession. I know, it’s weird. It’s weird, right? They’re holding on- Yeah. … everybody’s, like, holding onto the job they have and, you know, it’s like, if I wanted to sell my house in Chicago to move to Denver, but I’m afraid about getting a job in Denver, I’m delaying that move. And so I’m not selling in Chicago and I’m not buying in, in Denver. So if hiring rate ticks up during the year, maybe, you know, you get some Fed rate cuts, you get a, whatever, you get AI investment things, whatever the things are, hi- if hiring rates improve this year, I believe that will have a cascading effect down to the housing market- Yeah. … allow people to go like, okay, now I can finally move out of Ohio and, and go to Texas where I’ve been wanting to go for a while.

Dave:
Interesting. Yeah. And I guess that probably just extends beyond voluntary relocations too, where companies are probably not hiring people from other states and asking them to relocate to a new location, which, uh, we see that in the migration data now too, that it’s, it’s slowing down generally.

Mike:
Yeah. And migration data is a little tricky because it’s lagging. Yeah. It’s, you know, backward looking, but all of it shows a lot less migration, you know, 24 and 25 really, uh, down migration in places like Tampa with actually out migration, negative. Um, I, I would expect Tampa flips around this year and actually comes back to positive growth on the, on the migration side because we didn’t have any hurricanes last year. People have a short memory. <laugh>

Dave:
Yeah. We gotta take one more quick break, but we’ll be right back. Stick with us. Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer, joined today by Mike Simonsen. Let’s jump back into our conversation. Mike, I think what you’re saying to me sounds encouraging. I know 5% sales growth, flat home prices may not sound like the most exciting thing in the world to people listening to this, but you gotta bottom out somewhere, right? Like, yeah, if, if the switch gets flipped, I think that’s a good sign. We’re not gonna get, in my view, some dramatic recovery all of a sudden. And if that comes, it’s probably because something bad has happened in the economy. Like, you know, if mortgage rates drop to 4%, it’s because something bad has happened, or if we see a huge influx of supply, it’s because unemployment’s popping up. You know, like something not good is going on.
And so it’s frustrating. It’s hard to be patient when you’re in this industry for three or four years and it’s just kind of stunk. But, you know, the fact that things are moving in a positive direction and are no longer getting worse is a good sign, I think.

Mike:
I think so. And, and the way we’ve described it is really, it’s sort of the, the next era of the housing market. In the last era, the last four years has been ultra low sales, but affordability is sort of relentlessly getting worse.

Dave:
Yeah. Yep. Mm-hmm.

Mike:
And we’re now, we have sufficient inventory in most of the country where sales can climb, like in Florida right now, but also prices are flat or down, meaning incomes rise faster than home prices, meaning affordability gets to improve for the first time in many years.

Dave:
Yep.

Mike:
So you have the next era, which is allows sales to increase and improving affordability, where the last era was the opposite of that. Sales were low and affordability kept getting worse. Yeah. So in that sense, you know, that, that next era is underway and it may be multiple years of that where it’s slight growth in sales each year- mm-hmm. … which would be, you know, a growth market. I’ll take anything we can get.

Dave:
Exactly. That’s the sentiment we need around here. <laugh>

Mike:
And, and, and likewise with the affordability improvements, you know, not a- Yeah. … not a price cor- not a major price correction, but, but slowly every year getting an improvement on affordability slowly gets us back into line where actually things need to be, right, for, for affordability for the median income family.

Dave:
100%. I mean, I, you know, we’ve talked about this before. I’ve labeled this in, in the bigger pockets community, we’re calling it the great stall. Like it’s not, you know, it’s not this dramatic thing, but we have to see home prices stagnate a little bit, I think, to get back to a healthy market. And to, the only way we get affordability is either prices, you know, you could have a dramatic event like a crash, which no one wants, right? The patient approach is, yeah, real home prices are negative. They’ve been negative for a while now. And just for everyone listening, that means not the price you see on Zillow or Compass, you know, like that’s the nominal home price. That means not inflation adjusted. But by most measures, you know, everyone’s got different data. We’re somewhere between zero and 2%-ish up year a year, something like that.
Inflation this, this past year was two and a half-ish percent towards three. Wage growth, similar, right? And so when you combine those things, affordability is getting better without a crash. And that’s, I think, personally, I think that’s what we got for at least this year and maybe even longer. I don’t know how long you think this might last, Mike.

Mike:
Oh, I think it’s probably these conditions are, uh, underway for a while- Yeah. … would be my expectation. Um, I mean, there could be big catalysts that change things, but- Sure. … but if you think about it, we’re in this 6% mortgage rate range and we’d have to have some big crisis for it to drop dramatically lower. There are some forces that wanna push mortgage rates down and, but there’s plenty of forces that are pushing the bond rates up and therefore mortgage rates up too. So I don’t see anything in the data that suggests a big crash in, you know, a big dip in mortgage rates. Yeah. Mortgage rates are impossible to forecast. Yes. Like they could go up, they could go down, uh, but, but, uh, I haven’t seen any indication of dramatically down yet either. If we were to get the unlucky and get some inflation news or the jobs market heats up or something, mortgage rates could push the other direction.

Dave:
Yes, that’s correct.

Mike:
And that would, I think we’d have immediate correction on prices- Yeah. … and slower sales. I think, you know, whatever recovery we have right now is consistent, but also very fragile.

Dave:
Yeah. I think just psychologically, there’s obviously the economic element of it, but psychologically, I don’t think anyone, if we saw six and a half, six and three quarters again, it, it would hurt. You know, people who’ve been sitting on the sidelines, I don’t think they’re gonna be able to justify that. So I’m with you. I think from an investor standpoint, it means lock in what you can today and underwrite deals today. But as an investor, I like these conditions. It’s just more predictable than it’s been in the last couple years. There’s still a ton of uncertainty. But I just feel like 23, 24 was just like peak uncertainty. No one knew, like, could interest rates go down 1% next month? Maybe. Could they go up 1% next month? Maybe. Now it’s like at least the variance is smaller. You know, the fluctuations are smaller and that just makes buying a home feel much more approachable to me.
Whether you’re a homeowner or a real estate investor, stability, I think is like a good place for us to be.

Mike:
Yeah. I mean, you know, that’s right. Like you wanna be able to underwrite your deal and if it, if it pencils out at mortgage rates in the sixes, then it pencils out. If it doesn’t, you’re not, you don’t wanna make the deal because you’re hoping it’s gonna fall. You know, and on the other hand, if you start a deal and it’s at six, and by the time you’re done with the deal, it’s at seven and a half, that doesn’t help anybody. <laugh> Right.

Dave:
Yeah. And I think from, from my seat, you know, I, I just am enjoying the fact that you don’t need to make these split second decisions anymore on a deal. Like you can think about it for a week or two. You could go visit it. You can have your property manager and your contractor in the building before you go and write an offer. Those are the conditions I think as an investor, I appreciate. But I would imagine that translates to homeowners too when we talk about home sell volume. You know, the years of just writing offers sight unseen, I don’t miss it at all, even though there was crazy appreciation. I don’t miss that at all. Yeah. I personally would rather something like this where it’s just a little bit more balanced. Um, so thank you, Mike, for, for sharing all this information with us.
Before we get out of here, any other insights you have with your work at Compass or inventory news you wanna share with the, on the market community?

Mike:
Well, I do think that this withdrawn and re-listings phenomenon is the data to watch each week this spring.

Dave:
Okay.

Mike:
If we’re seeing the relists come back in, which we are, if it’s not com- accompanied by an increase of demand and the demand, you know, numbers, that’s the bearish scenario. Mm-hmm. But as of right now, it is, they’re both, we see the relist and we see the demand coming back in and that, so that is bearing out the hypothesis that these are generally owner-occupiers.

Dave:
Mm-hmm.

Mike:
Generally two transactions waiting to happen. And if we’re lucky, that means there’s a lot of two transactions and it actually translates into good growth for home sales in the first and second quarter.

Dave:
Great insight, Mike. Thank you. See, this is why we gotta have you on. You know, I learned something very new. I assumed it was flippers and investors and learning that changes my opinion about this a little bit. So Mike, thank you as always, always great insight information. We appreciate you being here.

Mike:
Always great to see you, Dave.

Dave:
And thank you all so much for listening to this episode of On the Market. If you like this episode, make sure to share it with someone. If you hear anyone who’s confused about inventory or what’s going on with the market, what’s likely to happen, share this episode with them, hopefully they’ll learn something too. Thanks again for listening. We’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac drop Anthropic, address DHS shutdown


William Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency during a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Washington on Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg

Al Drago/Bloomberg

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and their oversight agency have responded to a couple of broader federal developments this week, including a falling out with a government vendor and a partial government shutdown.

Processing Content

The two government-sponsored enterprises will sever ties with artificial intelligence firm Anthropic following President Trump’s dispute with it, Bill Pulte, the director of the GSEs oversight agency, said in one of the social media posts on X he often uses for announcements.

Separately, Fannie and Freddie also announced that they may extend some leeway to people affected by an impasse in budget negotiations at the Department of Homeland Security.

Anthropic ban’s origins and implications

The ban on Anthropic stems from two boundaries the company set on use for its artificial intelligence technology that the federal government has challenged: mass surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons.

Anthropic said it balked in its work with the Department of War because a contract for AI strategy calls for them to agree to any “lawful use” of technology without restrictions. 

The company said in a statement last week that when it comes to mass surveillance, “the law has not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI,” while in the case of autonomous weapons “frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough” not to be a risk to US lives.

In a social media post last week issued just prior to US involvement in a new Middle East conflict, President Trump called for an end to work with the company, claiming the refusal as undermining his authority, representing political opposition and endangering troops.

“There will be a six month phase-out period for agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic’s products, at various levels,” Trump’s social media post said, calling for the company to accommodate this or face penalties.

“Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider,” it said in response.

Pulte did not immediately comment on whether the ban affects industry partners or provide details on the extent of any Anthropic use at Fannie, Freddie or his agency, which he calls US Federal Housing. USFH has historically been called the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

How the enterprises use AI to access information in fraud detection allegedly for political purposes is among numerous Freedom of Information Act requests the FHFA reported it and its inspector general have been processing at a cost of over $700 million in the past fiscal year.

One potential challenge banks have identified in working with the limited number of feuding AI companies with some common ties has been that they face Treasury directives around reducing concentration risk. The Treasury Department also is severing ties with Anthropic.

How Fannie and Freddie can help DHS workers

Meanwhile, to respond to the partial government shutdown that began last month and persists due to the budget impasse, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have directed mortgage companies to offer some relief to people affected by payments suspended because of it.

The temporary leeway, which will end when the shutdown does, extends to meeting timelines typically necessary for mortgages. Deadlines where some wiggle room is now offered include those for employment verifications, paystubs and financial reserves in originations.

Preexisting borrowers facing payment difficulties due to the partial government shutdown  may be able to get some relief on deadlines for their standard or loss mitigation payment obligations through forbearance plans that allow them to suspend payments for a limited period.



Investors turn away from yen as haven asset during Iran war


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Japan’s currency has fallen against the US dollar since the war in Iran broke out this week, defying its traditional role as a haven asset as traders in Tokyo braced for possible government intervention.

The yen has weakened 1 per cent since Friday to ¥157.2 a dollar. That marks a sharp departure from the buying surge and rapid unwinding of the so-called yen carry trade once associated with heightened geopolitical tension, according to traders.

“The yen is no longer a safe haven,” said Neil Newman, Japan strategist at Astris Advisory. He noted that in past crises, the yen tended to rise on bets that Japanese companies would rapidly repatriate overseas earnings.

“Companies haven’t behaved like that for about four years,” he said. “The pressure is actually on them to do the opposite and invest overseas, which they are still doing like crazy. In Japan’s current economic situation, there is no incentive to bring the money back.”

Analysts said the yen’s unexpected weakness highlighted fundamental shifts and vulnerabilities in the Japanese economy.

The currency has fallen nearly 5 per cent in the past 12 months as markets wrestled with the implications of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s expansive spending plans and her resistance to further interest rate increases by the Bank of Japan.

Tai Hui, chief Asia-Pacific market strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, said volatility had significantly reduced the yen’s attractiveness as a hedging currency.

“Investors are looking at the [Iran] situation and saying: ‘How do I hedge my risk without introducing unintended risk?’,” said Hui. “You have a lot more policy crossroads in Japan right now and a new government. The calculus for using yen as a hedge against geopolitics is really not clear.”

The war in Iran has also increased Japan’s exposure to surging energy prices and the risk of higher inflation. The country relies on imported crude oil and natural gas for much of its energy.

Takahide Kiuchi, an economist at the Nomura Research Institute, said rising commodities prices would make the BoJ “even more cautious about raising interest rates”, adding that growing expectations of a delayed rate increase would put further pressure on the yen.

Japan’s commitment to invest $550bn in the US over the next three years as part of a trade deal struck with President Donald Trump’s administration to reduce tariffs is likely to affect the currency further.

After the yen tumbled on Tuesday, Japan’s finance minister Satsuki Katayama said the government was watching market movements “with an extremely high sense of urgency” and would take all necessary measures — including direct intervention. 

The force of those comments appeared to put a floor on the yen’s slide for now, analysts said, even as downward pressure remained strong. 

“The Japanese government is being increasingly open about the possibility of intervention . . . so if the yen goes towards ¥160, people’s cautiousness will be high,” said Koichi Sugisaki, Japan macro strategist at Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities.

The Middle East conflict has also not caused an abrupt reversal of the yen carry trade — the relatively risky practice of borrowing yen cheaply to invest in higher-yielding assets elsewhere — which has in the past caused sharp strengthening in the Japanese currency.

The absence of a clear unwinding suggested “the risk aversion is not too extreme”, said Naomi Fink, chief global strategist at Amova Asset Management.

“Markets are not yet reflecting the seriousness of the situation in the way that other physical markets, such as Baltic freight rates and war risk insurance, are currently doing,” she said.

4 Steps for Turning Your Overseas Property Into a Reliable Source of Passive Profits


Editor’s Note: This story originally appeared on Live and Invest Overseas.

Buying property to rent out for profit can be easy money. You identify the right market, invest in a piece of property, and set it up to receive renters and rake in income.

This is one way to unlock a wealthy lifestyle … and if you organize it the right way, it can operate on autopilot. But you need to have the right information to make sure this is successful.

Here are four factors to consider when buying property overseas to rent for profit.

1. Select the Right Rental Manager

A rental manager can make or break a property investment.

When deciding on a rental manager overseas, start by reviewing their website.

Do they keep it updated? This is the first point of contact renters will have with your property, so the website must look clean, modern, and legitimate.

The photos they show of your property should be of high quality, and the information should be clearly laid out.

Check how well they market their properties. A lot of managers rely solely on Airbnb, which might not get your ROIs where you want them.

To avoid any surprises, make sure they clearly state their fees for management and what services they include for that fee. Standard fees for management are usually between 20% and 50%, depending on their services.

If you can contact other clients, getting their feedback will help you find out if they are the right fit for you and your property.

You should also be aware of how many other properties they manage and if they can keep up. A good rental manager does not overpromise.

2. Select the Right Market

If your goal is to buy to rent for cash flow, you need to get to know the market you’ll be investing in. If possible, spend time in the country and city you’re interested in.

You need to understand your renter profile. Find out where they come from, their age, how long they usually stay in this market, the time of the year they prefer to visit, and so on.

Does the capital requirement of this market suit your portfolio? Do you need the apartment furnished, or do renters prefer unfurnished apartments in this area?

Ask rental managers what inventory is already on the market and what is lacking. Is there a demand for more two-bedroom units or studios? Try to get a unit that will stand out from the rest.

3. The Location Matters

Once you decide on a country and city, you must understand where renters want to be in a specific market. They need access to attractions and services within walking distance or easy access to public transport.

Your property could be attractive on the inside, but you can’t hide a poor location. It won’t matter how nice it is inside; if it’s not well located, you’ll have trouble with occupancy. In this digital age, visitors will make sure to speak their minds in the reviews.

When looking at different neighborhoods, visit the locations at night and on the weekends. You never know if at night your neighbors turn their home into a club or if the area hosts events every weekend that might deter your target renters from staying at your place.

Maybe that’s exactly what visitors will be looking for, but you need to understand the full picture and be prepared to deal with the intricacies of buying into a particular community.

4. The Actual Asset

Depending on the type of renters the area gets, the climate, and the location, you can choose the appropriate type of furnishings for your unit.

Make sure the property has everything you would need if you were the one staying there, but keep it simple. Don’t let your personal style dictate how you decorate the place, because it could make it harder to rent.

The amenities of a building or community can influence whether someone stays there or not, so consider them in your buying decision. Do visitors have access to a gym, co-working space, a pool, or anything else that will make it more attractive than other similar properties?

Overspending on the asset is easy, so be careful.

Don’t get the fancy kitchen sink you would love to have in your own home that will be too difficult and expensive to repair or replace if something happens to it (and something will). Get a nice, practical sink that will get the job done and can be easily repaired or replaced if needed.

If the property you’re buying is a new build, it’s not uncommon for developers to work with on-site property management to offer investors a turn-key investment.

If not, fitting property management into your budget will prove to be worthwhile. It will save you time and energy, and the manager will make sure that your property is ready for visitors after every stay.

Target’s New CEO Announced a $5 Billion Plan to Win Back Customers—and Bring Back the ‘Tarzhay’ Magic



CEO Michael Fiddelke says trendier brands, revamped stores, and an investment plan will help restore the retailer’s signature shopping experience.

[YMMV] Capital One Shopping: Spend $650, Get $300 Back On Homes & Villas & More


The Offer

  • Capital One Shopping portal is offering a number of e-mail targeted offers. To get these offers to trigger your best bet is to visit the websites with the browser extension installed.
    • Homes & Villas by Marriott: Spend $650 and get $300 back
    • Caesars Rewards: Spend $225 and get $75 back 
    • Reader also reported getting 15000 miles for $450 spend at Expedia (this was a Capital One card linked offer)

Our Verdict

As always, keep in mind that Capital One Shopping portal does not require having a Capital One card or bank account. Also remember that the rewards are not cash but rather they cash out as gift cards for various brands. Can stack the Marriott deal with this one as well.

Hat tip to FM

Stocks Vs Mutual Funds: Where to Invest Money? Deepak Wadhwa



Stocks Vs Mutual Funds: Where to Invest Money? Deepak Wadhwa
#stocksmarket #mutualfunds #stocksvsmutualfunds #deepakwadhwa

For Brand Collaboration / Podcast with our community or Business enquiry please Contact – 9899449610

source