Home Blog

Chase Is Advertising Mortgage Rates With Nearly Two Discount Points to Keep Them Looking Attractive


Was reading about how Chase plans to hire a staggering 850 new Home Lending Advisors when I stumbled upon their mortgage rates page.

I check rates from big banks and lenders pretty frequently, but was surprised to see their latest offerings.

Instead of displaying rates with a fraction of a point, they’re advertising rates with nearly two discount points required!

For example, a $500,000 loan amount with two points would result in $10,000 in upfront fees.

The idea is you pay more upfront for savings during the life of the loan. But this is unusually high from what I’ve seen in the past.

Big Upfront Points Can Make Mortgage Rates Look Lower

This seems to be a sign of the times. I’ve seen a lot of smaller, online lenders use this tactic after mortgage rates surged higher a few years ago.

But the big banks tend to only advertise rates with some fraction of a mortgage discount point due at closing, such as 0.75%.

It seems Chase is borrowing from that playbook and going with some aggressive point assumptions to display lower-than-market interest rates.

I get it. Times are tough right now and 30-year fixed mortgage rates are nearing 7% again.

This essentially allows lenders to offer below-market rates and keep them looking halfway decent.

However, they require the borrower to pay this prepaid interest at closing to reduce the interest rate during the loan term. And it can get expensive.

For the record, it can make sense if rates are expected to remain elevated or move even higher.

At that point, the borrower who paid a few thousand at closing would perhaps keep the loan long enough to recoup the upfront cost.

But if rates were to come down, maybe due to the conflict with Iran finally coming to an end, it’d be a bad move.

The borrower who paid two mortgage points to snag the 6% 30-year fixed rate wouldn’t be incentivized to give it up.

Even if rates dropped to 5.5%, they’d have to consider eating that big cost if they were to apply for another rate and term refinance.

Do the Math Before You Pay the Points

I recently created a mortgage points calculator to tackle this very issue.

Sometimes it can make sense to pay points upfront, and other times it can be a terrible decision.

Aside from what mortgage rates do after you get your loan, there’s also the matter of tenure.

How long do you plan to stay in the property? If the answer isn’t a very long time, paying points is probably not for you.

If it’s a forever home and mortgage rates likely won’t get better anytime soon (that’s never a guarantee by the way), paying points could be worthwhile.

It might be even more worthwhile if you get the home seller to pay for it via seller concessions. Or the builder to pay for it in the case of a new home.

One last thing though. You should also shop around and see what competing banks and lenders can offer without having to pay points.

Sometimes you can get the low rate (or lowish rate) without having to pay all the points.

The best of both worlds. You just have to put in a little time and perhaps negotiate as well.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

AS 13 Revision | Investment Accounts | Concepts + IMP Questions | CA Inter | CA Aakash Kandoi



Telegram Channel for CA Inter:

Enroll Now for CA Inter Lectures:

Instagram –
Linked In – / aakash-kandoi-161168a2

source

GAO: 94% Of College Sports Programs Lose Money — And Students Help Cover The Gap


A new Government Accountability Office report found that 94% of Division I athletics programs (330 of 352 colleges) spent more than they generated in revenue in the 2023–24 academic year. Or, to flip that around, only 22 college DI sports programs made enough money to cover their costs.

DI colleges spent $20.8 billion on sports while generating $13.1 billion, and the median school’s gap was $20.6 million — one more force behind why college costs keep rising faster than inflation.

To close those gaps, colleges had to contribute $7.2 billion of their own money to athletics from tuition, student fees, and other unrestricted sources, which can indirectly include federal student aid. That’s on top of the mandatory fees that already catch families off guard on many tuition bills.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

GAO estimates the median DI college contribution works out to about $8,500 per undergraduate over a four-year degree, ranging from $3,200 at Power conference schools to $10,800 at Football Championship Subdivision schools. Every student pays, not just athletes, and families don’t really see it broken out when they calculate the real cost of college.

Athletics deficits also feed the opacity problem in college pricing. Schools rarely disclose how much general tuition revenue props up sports, part of the broader black box of how colleges set prices.

The Numbers

  • Spending outran inflation: Median Power conference athletics spending rose 81% over the past decade (to $166.8 million), against 31% inflation.
  • The gap is widening: The median Power school’s spending gap grew more than five-fold since 2014–15, from $2.7 million to $15.2 million.
  • Division II is worse: All DII programs lost money. Generated revenue covered just 14% of expenses, and colleges contributed $2.3 billion, about $11,350 per student over four years at the median.
  • Debt is piling up: 96% of Power schools carry athletics debt, with a median of $120.3 million.
  • Student fees: 87% of Non-Power FBS colleges charge students fees for athletics, a median of $550 per student per year.

How This Connects

These subsidies land on students at a time when tuition has risen 914% since 1983 and financial strain is already closing colleges outright. Athletics deficits compete directly with academics, financial aid, and instruction for the same institutional dollars, which affects what families really pay out of pocket.

The report covers finances before the House settlement around NIL dollars took effect. Starting in 2025–26, DI schools can share up to $20.5 million per year with athletes and 310 of 361 DI colleges opted in. That cap rises annually, and GAO notes stakeholders expect the spending gap to keep growing.

But as long as deficits continue, watch for colleges to respond with new student fees, tuition increases, or cuts to non-revenue generating sports.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d642″].tcb-post-list #post-16427 [data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d648″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/fb-real-and-honest-ways-to-make-money-in-college-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

100 Ways To Make Money In College As A Student

100 Ways To Make Money In College As A Student
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d642″].tcb-post-list #post-52635 [data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d648″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/How_To_Get_A_Full_Ride_Scholarship_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

How to Actually Get A Full-Ride Scholarship

How to Actually Get A Full-Ride Scholarship
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d642″].tcb-post-list #post-47635 [data-css=”tve-u-19fdd85d648″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/10_Biggest_FAFSA_Mistakes_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

10 Biggest FAFSA Mistakes That Could Cost You Financial Aid

10 Biggest FAFSA Mistakes That Could Cost You Financial Aid

Editor: Colin Graves

The post GAO: 94% Of College Sports Programs Lose Money — And Students Help Cover The Gap appeared first on The College Investor.

$10 Off $35+ With Promo Code FAST30/DOUBLE10 (Next 3 Delivery/Pickup Orders)


Update 8/9/26: Looks like promo code DOUBLE10 is also triggering the same $10 off $35+. You can’t stack FAST30 & DOUBLE10 but it does mean you can redeem it a total of five times (3 for FAST30 and 2 for DOUBLE10)

The Offer

  • Walmart is offering $10 off $35+ when you use promo code  FAST30. Works for your next three delivery or pickup orders.

The Fine Print

  • Offer excludes alcohol and prescription purchases

Our Verdict

Walmart+ offers free shipping otherwise just use the pickup option. Should stack with other Walmart deals such as:

F.A.Q’s

How many times can I do this deal?

Terms say three times, but seems like some people are only able to do two. There might be a velocity limit in place (e.g two orders max within 24 hours). 

How much does delivery cost?

$9.95 or free with Walmart+

The promo code isn’t working

Make sure you have $35+ in eligible items in cart. 

Algorithmic Shopping Is Here. Is Your Company Ready?


In April 2025, Amazon launched “Buy for Me,” which lets its AI agent visit brand websites, select products, enter payment details, and complete purchases without the customer ever leaving the Amazon app. By September, OpenAI had introduced “Instant Checkout” with the open-source Agentic Commerce Protocol, enabling purchases directly inside ChatGPT. In January 2026, Google unveiled the Universal Commerce Protocol at the National Retail Federation conference: an open standard, built with Shopify, Target, Walmart, and more than 20 other partners, covering the shopping process from discovery to post-purchase support. Microsoft launched Copilot Checkout at the same conference, and Shopify has since switched on agent-readable storefronts by default across millions of merchants. Gartner now projects that by 2028, 90% of B2B purchases, more than $15 trillion, will flow through AI agent exchanges.



SpaceX vs. Quantinuum: Which Recent IPO Stock Is a Better Buy?


Investors have been treated to a pair of compelling investment opportunities in 2026. Two of the most anticipated initial public offerings in recent memory have experienced share price declines since their IPOs: Quantinuum (QNT -0.29%) and Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SPCX +15.83%), better known as SpaceX.

Quantinuum is among the latest public companies in the exciting field of quantum computers. It was born out of a merger between Honeywell‘s quantum computing division and U.K.-based Cambridge Quantum. SpaceX made history as the biggest IPO ever.

Their share price pullback presents a potential entry point for those seeking exposure to the frontiers of space exploration and quantum computing. To choose between these newly public companies, here are insights into which one makes a better stock investment.

Image source: Getty Images.

A look at Quantinuum

Quantum computers harness the properties of quantum mechanics to execute complex computations beyond the capabilities of today’s computers. The company claims this enables its machines to achieve breakthroughs in areas such as healthcare, materials science, and energy.

Demand for Quantinuum stock was so large, the company upsized its IPO to $60 per share, raking in $1.7 billion. Since then, the price has sunk as low as $47.06 per share as its sky-high price-to-sales (P/S) ratio contributed to a sell-off. Even so, the stock’s sales multiple of 99 as of Aug. 6 remains elevated, indicating investors maintain high future growth expectations.

Quantinuum’s revenue in the first quarter was $5.2 million, down 73% from $19.1 million in 2025. However, because quantum computers are still an emerging technology with limited customer adoption, it’s typical for companies in the sector to see wide swings in sales, as a single big contract can make a huge difference. In fact, Quantinuum was awarded $100 million by the U.S. government this year in a sign of confidence in its ion-based technology.

A potential concern over the long run is Quantinuum’s rising operating loss, which totaled $77.2 million in Q1 2026, more than double the prior year’s loss of $29.9 million. Developing quantum tech requires substantial research investment, so the company is likely to continue experiencing losses over the next several quarters, if not for years.

Right now, the mounting losses are not a problem. Quantinuum had over $677 million in cash and equivalents at the end of Q1, and combined with the windfall from its IPO, it has enough funds to sustain operations as it builds up sales.

Quantinuum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.29%) $-0.17

Current Price

$58.71

The case for SpaceX

SpaceX stock has steadily fallen since its IPO in part because its sales multiple of 73 is high. Yet after the company released its second-quarter earnings report, the first since going public, the stock rose 6% on Aug. 6, the day a share lockup for pre-IPO investors expired.

SpaceX put up solid Q2 2026 results, contributing to its post-earnings share price rise. This includes an impressive 92% year-over-year increase in revenue to $7.8 billion. Its artificial intelligence (AI) division was a key sales contributor with nearly 250% year-over-year growth to $2.6 billion, suggesting SpaceX’s investments in this area are paying off. The company also shrank its operating loss to $143 million compared to a $970 million loss in Q2 2025, a sign of strengthening financial health.

Even so, the company’s rapidly rising capital expenditures are a reasonable concern. Q2 capex totaled $18.4 billion, an enormous increase from the $2.8 billion spent in 2025. While SpaceX may be known for its reusable rockets, $15.8 billion of its capex spending went to AI. Despite this, the company turned to debt to continue funding its AI ambitions with a $25 billion bond issuance.

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(15.83%) $18.19

Current Price

$133.11

Choosing between Quantinuum and SpaceX stock

While both Quantinuum and SpaceX operate in emerging sectors brimming with promise, the latter looks like the better investment right now. SpaceX’s sales are growing, a sign that its offerings are capturing customers, while its operating loss is improving. Also, its P/S ratio of 73 is much lower than Quantinuum’s 99, indicating its share price valuation is more reasonable.

In addition, quantum computing is still a nascent field. It’s too early to tell if Quantinuum’s tech will ultimately win out in a highly competitive industry that includes big players with deep pockets, such as IBM.

SpaceX possesses a differentiated offering in its rocket and satellite-based internet businesses, although it’s also battling in a competitive field when it comes to AI. Its strong sales growth in the artificial intelligence division points to the ability to capture its share of the customer demand driving AI industry expansion. These factors tilt the pendulum in SpaceX’s favor, making it the better long-term stock investment.

Housing minister says B.C. in talks with Ottawa over cutting development cost charges




British Columbia’s housing minister said her government is working with Ottawa to help fund the infrastructure needed as it pushes to build more homes in the province. 

Crypto Derivatives Exchange BitMEX Sale Fails Over Founder Ownership Issues And Declining Trading Activity


Once a dominant force in cryptocurrency derivatives trading, BitMEX has failed to complete a long-running sale process, according to people familiar with the matter. The platform, which pioneered perpetual futures contracts and once commanded a large share of leveraged trading activity, spent roughly two years seeking a buyer before its parent company decided to wind down operations.

Potential acquirers ultimately walked away, citing persistent founder ownership stakes and a steadily shrinking business as key obstacles.

Investment bank Broadhaven advised on the sale, which reportedly targeted a valuation near $1 billion.

Discussions involved rival exchanges as well as payments and wallet firm Exodus.

Yet none of the talks produced a completed transaction. Sources indicated that buyers grew uneasy over the continued majority equity control held by co-founders Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, and Samuel Reed.

Although the three had stepped away from day-to-day management after US criminal charges related to anti-money laundering compliance in 2020, their substantial ownership remained intact.

This structure complicated negotiations, as acquirers typically prefer arrangements that allow them to retain and incentivize key personnel through portions of the purchase price rather than navigating significant founder influence post-deal. Compounding the ownership issue was BitMEX’s deteriorating market position.

Throughout the sale process, trading activity continued migrating to larger centralized platforms such as Binance and Bybit, as well as emerging decentralized perpetual futures venues.

Market share eroded sharply from the double-digit percentages the exchange once enjoyed to fractions of a percent in recent periods.

Daily volumes in some segments fell to levels that made growth-oriented revenue multiples difficult to justify.

Lingering reputational concerns tied to earlier regulatory actions further deterred interest, even after the co-founders received presidential pardons in 2025.

The unsuccessful sale paved the way for the decision to close.

HDR Global Trading, the Seychelles-based operator, announced that BitMEX would cease operations on September 23, 2026.

New user registrations stopped immediately, with risk limits and forced position closures planned in the intervening weeks to allow an orderly exit.

The company has stated that assets exceed liabilities and that no customer funds were ever lost to hacks over its more than decade-long history.

Still, the combination of regulatory history, competitive pressure, and the inability to secure an exit via sale left continued independent operation unviable.

BitMEX’s trajectory illustrates broader shifts in the crypto derivatives landscape.

The perpetual swap product it helped popularize now dominates volume across many competing venues, yet the original innovator could not maintain its early advantages.

Declining liquidity and the challenges of operating a fully compliant global platform under reduced activity levels made a clean sale elusive.

For potential buyers, the risks associated with founder ties and a contracting franchise outweighed any remaining brand value or technical infrastructure.

As the platform prepares for final shutdown, the episode underscores how ownership structures and sustained competitive performance can determine outcomes in crypto mergers and acquisitions. What began as an ambitious effort to transfer a pioneering exchange ended without a deal, marking the close of a significant chapter in the crypto industry’s development.



Clicks and Credibility 2.0 | RPC


This report is relevant for a wide range of stakeholders involved in or affected by the growing role of finfluencers in capital markets. Regulators and policymakers, capital market firms, social media platforms, investors, and finfluencers can all gain insight from this research.

Investors: When making investment decisions and acting on advice, investors need to stay vigilant about fraud and misrepresentation for informed decision making. Investors should find this report useful in understanding risks with unrealistic promises, allowing them to be realistic in their return expectations.

Regulators and policymakers: The report will interest regulators (including SEBI) and other relevant authorities as they continue to assess and strengthen frameworks to capture finfluencer activity and decide whether additional supervision and clarity are required.

Capital market firms: This report is relevant for capital market firms and advisers that engage with (or are evaluating engaging with) finfluencers or social media channels as part of their product distribution architecture. The findings should inform compliance considerations when using such distribution channels.

Social media platforms: The report highlights the responsibility of social media platforms, whose function in hosting, amplifying, and monetising financial content raises important questions around platform responsibility, content governance, disclosure standards, and cooperation with financial regulators.

Finfluencers: Content creators and finfluencers themselves may find this report useful in understanding emerging expectations around ethical conduct, transparency, and accountability, which are essential to maintaining credibility and supporting financial market integrity.