Home Blog

Self-Driving Portfolio Promise and Pitfalls


Ang, A., Azimbayev, N., & Kim, A. (2026). The Self-Driving Portfolio: Agentic Architecture for Institutional Asset Management. arXiv, abs/2604.02279.

Bisconti, P., Galisai, M., Pierucci, F., Bracale, M., & Prandi, M. (2025). Beyond Single-Agent Safety: A Taxonomy of Risks in LLM-to-LLM Interactions. ArXiv, abs/2512.02682.

Cemri, M., et al. (2025). Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? ArXiv, abs/2503.13657.

Darwish, M., Hassanien, E., & Eissa, A. (2025). Stock Market Forecasting: From Traditional Predictive Models to Large Language Models. Computational Economics.

Eswaran, A., et al. (2026). CryptoAnalystBench: Failures in Multi-Tool Long-Form LLM Analysis. ArXiv, abs/2602.11304.

Hajaghaie, A., & Thulasiram, R. (2025). Leveraging Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Enhanced Multi-Asset Portfolio Construction. IEEE CiFer 2025.

He, C., et al. (2025). Hierarchical AI Multi-Agent Fundamental Investing: Evidence from China’s A-Share Market. ArXiv, abs/2510.21147.

Heng, R., et al. (2025). Leveraging LLMs for Top-Down Sector Allocation in Automated Trading. ArXiv, abs/2503.09647.

Kim, S., & Lee, K. (2025). Multi-Asset Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Management. IEEE Access, 13.

Lee, J., Kim, R., Yi, S., & Kang, J. (2020). MAPS: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-based Portfolio Management System. IJCAI 2020.

Raza, S., et al. (2025). TRiSM for Agentic AI. ArXiv, abs/2506.04133.

Reid, A., O’Callaghan, S., Carroll, L., & Caetano, T. (2025). Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems. ArXiv, abs/2508.05687.

Roig, J. (2025). How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? ArXiv, abs/2512.07497.

Tian, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Collaboration Dynamics and Reliability Challenges of Multi-Agent LLM Systems.

Tong, X., Wei, L., & Yan, Z. (2026). Reliability Challenges of LLM Agents. Science and Technology of Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Protection.

Vinay, V. (2025). Failure Modes in LLM Systems. ArXiv, abs/2511.19933.

Voronina, A., et al. (2025). Generative AI-enhanced Sector-based Investment Portfolio Construction. ArXiv, abs/2512.24526.

Vuković, D., Dekpo-Adza, S., & Matović, S. (2025). AI integration in financial services: a systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12.

Wang, B. (2025). Empirical Evaluation of Large Language Models for Asset-Return Prediction.

Winder, P., Hildebrand, C., & Hartmann, J. (2025). Biased echoes: Large language models reinforce investment biases. PLOS One, 20.

Zhu, K., et al. (2025). Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures. ArXiv, abs/2509.25370.

RFA mortgage originations rise 35% to $3.5 billion in first half




Second-quarter originations reached $2.1 billion, while mortgage and loan assets reached $2.53 billion and mortgages under administration totalled $23.27 billion.

How to Develop a Game-Changing Worldview



<p>It will help you start thinking seriously about your company&#8217;s long-term strategy, says former Best Buy CEO Hubert Joly.</p>

AI is creating a new wave of philanthropists. The system they’re walking into is broken



Sometime in the near future, a significant portion of the people building today’s AI industry are expected to become very rich. Many are already thinking about what to do with that wealth. 

The two of us advise some of the most philanthropically motivated people in tech. These are people who genuinely want, and have the means, to make a real difference. But the current infrastructure around giving large amounts of money away is widening the gap between intention and action. 

In 2010, some of the wealthiest people in the world signed the Giving Pledge – a public commitment to donate the majority of their fortunes to charitable causes. It was heralded as a turning point for American philanthropy. But more than a decade on, follow-through looks underwhelming. 

We believe the reason for that runs deeper than any single giving vehicle. The incoming wave of philanthropists is different to the last, but they will meet the same infrastructure and incentives. 

For many, the moment of liquidity itself can be disorienting. The stakes feel enormous while the philanthropic landscape feels overwhelming. Lawyers, financial advisors, and colleagues all have opinions. Some would-be donors retreat back into work and let the moment pass. Others give to the first credible organisation that shows up with a compelling pitch. And the infrastructure most donors encounter at that moment is not designed to help them do better.

The answer most of these newly wealthy philanthropists will arrive at, the answer the financial industry is already prepared to offer, is a donor-advised fund (DAF). The mechanics of a DAF are relatively simple: open an account, transfer your pre-IPO equity before the tax window closes, take the deduction, and punt the decision on where to give until later. Later can mean 12 months, 12 years, or never, and the system’s incentives quietly favor the last option. Opening a DAF feels like the responsible move and, in many ways, it is. But it also means joining a system that, despite its good intentions, has developed a serious structural problem, one that a new wave of philanthropists could make significantly larger.

There is currently over $300 billion of philanthropic capital sitting in American DAF accounts. That figure alone is striking, but the more telling number is what’s happening to it: only around a quarter of DAF assets are paid out in any given year, a substantial portion of which simply goes from one DAF to another without helping any beneficiaries and with no legal obligation to distribute anything at all. In 2024, the most successful charitable fundraiser in the United States was not a hospital, a food bank, or an international relief organization. It was Fidelity Charitable, a DAF sponsor that took in nearly $16 billion in contributions. Eleven of America’s top twenty fundraising “charities” are DAF sponsors. The money is piling into DAFs but it is not moving out.

There’s no point in getting mad at individual donors and DAF providers: they’re only doing what they’re incentivized to do. DAF providers typically collect fees tied to assets under management, not assets deployed, so they have no financial interest in seeing that money move out through grantmaking. Fidelity has generated more than $1 billion in revenue from running its charitable arm over the last five years. The tax deduction arrives the moment you contribute. The financial transaction is complete, the tax benefit is secured, and the question of where the money actually goes slides quietly to the bottom of the to-do list.

The rules are different for private foundations. Foundations are required to distribute at least 5 percent of their assets annually, a rule created precisely to prevent charitable vehicles from becoming indefinite tax shelters. DAFs face no equivalent requirement at all. Proposed reforms have typically pointed to a specific target: the long tail of accounts that took the tax deduction years ago and have sat dormant ever since. Applied meaningfully, addressing that tail alone could unlock billions currently doing nothing. Congress created the tax break for DAFs on the assumption that the money would reach charities. The gap between that assumption and current practice speaks for itself.

Nonprofits and philanthropic organizations have a role to play, too. The sector needs to make it easier to identify high-impact opportunities and execute grants quickly. That means DAF providers built around active grantmaking rather than asset accumulation, and independent evaluators who do the rigorous work of identifying where money makes the biggest difference across cause areas. A new generation of philanthropists is about to make consequential decisions about what to do with significant wealth. The infrastructure they inherit will, if nothing changes, gently steer them toward delay.

That doesn’t have to be the outcome. The original bargain was that society foregoes the tax revenue and charities receive the funds. It was never designed as a mechanism for financial institutions to collect fees on tax-advantaged assets in perpetuity. The system as currently exists doesn’t reliably deliver on that bargain – it needs to change.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

SpaceX Completes Acquisition Of Cursor, Advancing AI Compute Strategy


SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) has officially completed its acquisition of Cursor, the rapidly growing artificial intelligence coding platform developed by Anysphere. The deal, valued at $60 billion in an all-stock transaction, closed on August 14, 2026, marking a significant step in the rocket company’s broader push into advanced AI capabilities and large-scale computing infrastructure.

The process began earlier in the year.

In April 2026, the two organizations announced a partnership under which SpaceXAI and Cursor would collaborate on developing tools for coding and knowledge work.

That agreement included an option for SpaceX to either purchase Cursor for $60 billion later in the year or pay $10 billion to formalize ongoing joint efforts.

Following SpaceX’s initial public offering in mid-June, the company exercised the purchase option, with the transaction structured entirely in stock and expected to finalize in the third quarter.

Regulatory clearances proceeded on schedule, allowing the merger to take effect in mid-August.

Cursor now operates as a wholly owned subsidiary.Cursor’s own announcement highlighted the strategic rationale.

Since its founding, the platform has evolved from offering simple code completions to enabling sophisticated AI agents capable of handling substantial real-world tasks.

Access to SpaceX’s extensive computing resources—described as the world’s largest fleet of GPUs—will allow the team to train more powerful models that are also more cost-efficient to operate.

This combination is expected to deliver higher-performing tools to customers at reduced prices.

Early evidence of the collaboration includes the release of Grok 4.6, presented as an initial demonstration of what the combined resources can achieve.

SpaceX continues expanding computing capacity aimed at scaling intelligence far beyond current terrestrial limits, with Cursor positioned as a key interface through which that intelligence can be applied productively.

The acquisition aligns with SpaceX’s intensified focus on AI compute.

After integrating xAI earlier in 2026, the company has prioritized massive terrestrial clusters such as Colossus while pursuing longer-term plans for orbital data centers.

These space-based systems are intended to overcome constraints of power, land, and cooling on Earth.

Cursor’s large base of professional developers and enterprise users—spanning tens of thousands of organizations, including a majority of Fortune 500 companies—provides valuable distribution and data that can refine models like Grok and specialized coding agents such as Grok Build.

The partnership aims to close competitive gaps with leading AI coding offerings from other major players by combining product strength, developer reach, and training infrastructure.

For Cursor’s team, the arrangement expands opportunities while preserving core priorities: enabling creators to focus less on routine coding and more on solving complex problems.

The integration is expected to accelerate progress across related products and services. The finalized deal underscores SpaceX’s transformation into a vertically integrated player spanning space technology, connectivity, and artificial intelligence, leveraging computing scale to advance frontier models and practical applications.



What to Know Before Structuring a Creative Finance Deal (Rookie Reply)


You’re ready to start investing in real estate, but the next step can look very different depending on your situation. Every rookie’s story is unique, and today, we’re sharing our best advice for three different scenarios so you can get in the game—no matter your starting point!

Welcome back to another Rookie Reply! Today’s questions come straight from the BiggerPockets Forums, and they’re all about slowing down just enough to make the first move the right move. One investor wants to know if house hacking is realistic in an expensive market. Another rookie wants to know the best way to invest a large sum of money so it can replace their W-2 income.

Finally, a rookie has a seller financing deal in place but is still short and needs to provide proof of funds on a very tight deadline. We’ll not only show them how to structure their creative financing but also offer an alternative option they’re probably overlooking!

Ashley Kehr:
So you’re ready to start investing, but the next step can look very different depending on your situation. Maybe you’re 21 and trying to house hack in an expensive market. Maybe you’re about to inherit a large amount of cash, or maybe you’ve made an offer and suddenly need proof of funds.

Tony Robinson:
Today’s questions come straight from the BiggerPockets starting out for them, and they’re all about slowing down just enough to make the first move the right way.

Ashley Kehr:
This is the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley

Tony Robinson:
Carroll. And I’m Tony J. Robinson. With that, let’s get into our first question for today. So question number one comes from Brandon and he says, “I’m currently in college and very interested in getting into real estate investing. I’m in a local networking group where I have a few real estate investing people, and that’s how I discovered BiggerPockets in podcasts, which I’ve used as my main resource. I’m very interested in house hacking as I feel that’d be my most realistic way to get started. Has anyone gone down this path? And could you share any thoughts, advice, et cetera? I’m in New Jersey. The market is extremely high, which is my biggest concern about getting into it, but I’ve built good credit, which I know is useful. Thanks everyone.” Now, first, before we jump in, let me just clarify for those that maybe don’t know, what do we mean when we say house hacking?
So basically house hacking is you buy a property and instead of living in all of that house yourself or all of that property yourself, you’re simply renting out in the additional living space. It could be you buying a big single family house where you’re renting out other bedrooms. It could be you buying a house with a walkout basement. It could be you buying a small multifamily. It could be a house with an ADU. There’s a lot of different forms that house hacking can take, but the essential idea is that your primary residence, you leverage that extraditional space to turn into a rental. So just clarifying what the strategy is. Ash, you’ve never house hacked before, right?

Ashley Kehr:
No, I haven’t. I mean, besides my college dorm, I guess. But I didn’t own it, I guess. So it’s just paid rent.

Tony Robinson:
I haven’t either, but we’ve interviewed a ton of guests, a ton of ton of guests on the podcast who got their start in house hacking. And I mean, you’re just asking for advice. I’ll give you my take from all the stories that we’ve had on the show is I think for someone in your position, it is the absolute lowest barrier entryway to get started. Like Ashley just said, she already had roommates when she was in college. And say you are to buy something, you’ve probably already got roommates right now. So you’re just transitioning from you and your roommates paying some landlord to now all of your roommates paying you. And I think that is the easiest transition. You literally take all the people you’re living with and say, “Hey guys, you want to come with me and we’ll get this nicer place and I’ll maybe charge you guys a little bit less?” And that’s how you can get started.
So the benefits of house hacking are that typically your cost sign into the deal are going to be a lot lower, 5% down, 3.5% down, sometimes 0% down if you can get the right loan. And it allows you to live in a place that’s maybe more expensive like New Jersey and still reduce your own living expenses by having someone else cover that cost. So all in all, I think it’s probably one of my favorite strategies for someone in that specific situation.

Ashley Kehr:
I think you really emphasized a key point as to reduce your living expenses because I think sometimes there’s this theory that in order to be successful at house hacking, you are paying $0 to live there and you’re getting all of your expenses covered. That doesn’t necessarily make it the successful deal. Even if you reduce what you would go and pay rent somewhere else, you’re able to save that little extra money. So you’re already making out. Even if you were to pay $2,000 towards your house hack mortgage, and that’s the exact same amount you would be paying for rent somewhere else. It seems like a wash, but it’s not because you’re getting equity in that property. You are getting mortgage pay down, you’re going to get depreciation on it when you turn into rental, and you’re going to actually have an asset that you own compared to if you were paying rent.
And if you’re buying in a high cost of living area and has seen a lot of growth, a lot of appreciation, that appreciation can be big money even if you are paying the same amount or similar that you would in rent because you’re having a tenant pay for at least part of your mortgage payment. So I think don’t get too caught up in having a successful deal of not having to pay anything to live. A great deal could just be that you are paying the same amount you would in rent somewhere, but you’re having a bigger place, you’re having some of your utilities paid or whatever it may be, sharing with the other person you’re house hacking with. But really just that appreciation, that equity you’re building from appreciation and mortgage pay down plays a lot into building wealth in the long run.

Tony Robinson:
Let’s just clarify next steps because just to give a bit of an action plan here. I think the very first thing that you need to go do is go talk to a lender to see what can I actually get pre-approved for. I remember long before we bought our first primary residence, I went and I talked to a lender and I’m in Southern California and she was like, “I can approve you for like $275,000.” And for me in California at the time, that truly couldn’t buy me anything in the city that we lived in. So I was like, “Okay, I’m still a few years away from actually being able to own something in the area that I live in.” So I think just going there first to get an idea of what can you currently get approved for. And you might be surprised, maybe you get approved for a little bit more, maybe you get approved for a little less.
But either way, you walk away with some clarity on what you need to do next. Because if you are approved for an amount that actually gets you into something in that part of New Jersey, well, now you can start using that to build out your buy box to, okay, well, what kind of property do I actually want to purchase? Then you go start talking with agents and you build your buy box and you submitted offers and you can go down that path. And if the lender’s like, “Hey, you’re 21. We can’t approve you for anything, but here’s what you need to do in order to get that approval.” At least now you have a roadmap on what to focus on next to get you there.

Ashley Kehr:
And I think that’s a great idea too, because you’ll be able to talk to the lender about having that renter in your unit as additional income because a lot of lenders won’t actually take 100% of the rent and actually allocate it as income. Sometimes only take a percentage of it. So that’s something to talk about with your lender because if you plan on, okay, I’m going to have somebody pay a thousand dollars, that’s a thousand dollars I don’t have to worry about for my debt to income, but sometimes they’ll only take a percentage of that and not the full amount for your primary residence. So make sure you ask the lender about that too and when you’re going to get pre-approved as to see what amount you actually need to charge in rent to make it work because you don’t want to get pre-approved for an amount and then realize that it’s not going to work out because the tenant isn’t going to be paying the amount of rent that you actually need because they only take a percentage of that.
Okay, so coming up, we have a rookie investor who is inheriting $700,000 and wants to know if it’s enough to go full-time in real estate investing. We’ll be right back after a word from our show sponsor.
All right, so we talked about getting into a house hack. Now let’s look at a different rookie situation. Someone’s having a large amount of cash come in and wondering what’s the best way to use it and how they can actually go full-time real estate. So this question is from Andre. “I want to build a real estate portfolio to replace my income from my jobs. As the title states, I’m very lucky and likely inheriting roughly $700,000 by the end of the year. I earn about $4,000 per month and not for my job. Since I was 13, I would watch Brandon Turner and Meet Kevin videos on the Burr strategy and house hacking. It might finally be the time to make it a reality. Is it possible in LA to make this my full-time thing already or is $700,000 not enough? Thank you. Okay. Well, first of all, Andre, I’m glad that you are planning to use this lump sum of cash that you are getting very wisely instead of going out and buying your very own Lambo.
And also awesome that you’ve been learning about real estate investing since you were 13. That’s great. So you’ve already got a lot of knowledge and I’m sure and done a ton of research on this. So I guess Tony, I’ll take this more from you, but as far as living costs and cost of property, I know LA is a high cost of living area, but ideally could $700,000 buy you one property? Would you recommend splitting it up into different down payments? I mean, in my market, $700,000 would get you several properties, decent rentals, but what about in LA market?

Tony Robinson:
I mean, you could get a property in LA for that amount. So I don’t know if investing all of that capital necessarily into the LA market would be the right play if we want to focus on cashflow. Now obviously there’s a lot of different strategies that we can focus on to get you there, but I think if we just look at the facts around the table, we’ve got $48,000 a year in income that we want to replace. We’ve got a 700K kind of pile of cash that we can go work with. There are several real estate strategies today that can get you at least a 10% cash on cash return. And even more that can get you higher than that. And even at 10% on 700K, that’s $70,000 a year, which is more than the $48,000 that we need to replace. We still got some room to up there.
So I think the very first thing that I would do here is first just try and identify what cashflow focused strategy do I feel aligns best with who I am, how I like to operate? And I would maybe narrow down the strategy first. Again, we’ve had the good fortune of interviewing a lot of people on this podcast who’ve done a lot of different things. You can rent by the room. We actually just interviewed Han Stone who did, not too far from LA, but he was doing assisted living facilities. And he was making almost what you make in a year. He was making that per month with his assisted living facilities. Could you do something like a sober living facility? Could you do short-term rentals? Could you co-host for other people where you’re managing? There’s a lot of different strategies. So is the pile of cash enough to replace $48,000 a year?
I think absolutely yes. But the bigger question is what strategy do you want to focus on to actually execute that? But is buying just like a traditional long-term rental or even a house hack in LA, is that going to be the best move? I don’t think so. There’s probably some other players we can go focus on that’ll get you there a little bit faster.

Ashley Kehr:
Okay. So I’m going to take a little different route on this. I got two different options for you. One option, you throw it all into a brokerage account in the stock market. If you got 6% just in one year, that would be $43,000 in interest. That basically covers your salary. So you could keep that $700,000 in the stock market and just pull out that $40,000 each year and you would continue to have 700,000. If it earns more, I think I actually looked at one of my retirement accounts and so far this year I’ve had a 20% return, even more. So that is also an option. I love real estate, but I also like index funds and brokerages. Okay. Next option is you do a mix of both of those. So the first thing is you’re going to take some of that money for a down payment to do a house hack.
I’m assuming probably don’t have a property now. There was no mention in it if he has a primary residence or not. If you do not have a primary residence, I would buy a property, use part of the money as a down payment and start house hacking. Then I would take the rest and I would put it into a brokerage account and let that money grow. Then I would get your house hack going and I would continuously do a new property every single year. So live in it for a year, move out, rent it out, go to the next property. I would take money out of your retirement account, or not your retirement, your brokerage account to fund the next property purchase. And this may not be the best way to actually go full-time real estate investing, but I think that if the longer you can work your W-2, it’s going to be easier to get pre-approved for loans.
Maybe you could cut down to part-time because now if you’re house hacking, you’re having a lot of your living expenses covered for you. So that’s what I would do. I think I would do a mix of both of those. I wouldn’t go and blow it all on real estate investing in the first year at least.

Tony Robinson:
That’s a great point, Ashley. I like that approach of just sticking it in somewhere to the market or wherever it may be and letting it grow. There are even just high yield savings accounts right now that are still paying 3% just for leaving it in a savings account. So that’s a good point. I guess there are a few options here.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. And I think just starting out too, you’re going to be a better investor if you take your time. And if you have this large cash, instead of taking all of this and investing, putting all your eggs in one basket, I like the part of breaking it up and house hacking every single year and doing that for the next five years, you can accumulate some really nice properties and a good sized portfolio.

Tony Robinson:
I think the other thing too is that I wonder, because a lot of people talk about wanting to leave their jobs and sometimes maybe it’s not necessarily that you want to stop working. Maybe it’s just a change of the work that you’re doing. And maybe that 700K gives you some flexibility to maybe you go work with a big flipper or a wholesaler in Southern California. I’m sure there are a lot of them who would love someone who can help project manage or do things like that. So could you even just transition into something that’s maybe more real estate related? And even if you’re making a little bit less to begin with, that’s where you can use the 6% that’s coming off of the 700K to help tie things over while you build that up. So lots of options here, but I like that we’re at least having this conversation about how to use the money the right way.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. And the last thing I would add is look at the market that you’re looking and buying in and see what appreciation has been over the course of 10 years, and then compare that to how the money would do in the stock market too. So I would look at both of those and kind of compare and make sure you take into your account your mortgage pay down that your tenant would be paying as part of that calculation too.

Tony Robinson:
All right. We’re going to take a quick break, but when we’re back, a rookie has an accepted creative offer and needs proof of funds by Monday. We’ll talk about what proof of funds really means and why rookies need to understand financing before they write the offer. All right guys, our last question today comes from Jehoo, and this is a good one for any rookie tempted by creative finance because what happens when you get a deal under contract before you know exactly how the money will show up? So here’s the question. Jahu says, “I’m looking for some guidance from experienced investors. I have an accepted creative offer on a triplex in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. I need proof of funds by Monday. I’m a newbie and I’ve never heard of proof of funds until now. So here’s the offer structure. The price is $445,000. The cash at closing is $385,000.
There’s a due diligence cost of 2,000. Seller financing for 60, 7% interest, 30-year amortization, a 24-month balloon. There’s a promissory note, and the seller will contribute up to 5K towards closing costs. Jehoo says,” I’m exploring private capital to fund the 385K needed at closing. For those who have structured deals like this, how do I provide proof of funds by Monday? What’s the best way to raise the capital on a tight timeline? Would hard money make sense here or would you avoid it? I’m open to advice, introductions, or potential partners. Thanks in advance. “Well, first let me say, for all the people that I’ve met who want to get started in real estate investing, their typical blocker is analysis paralysis. Is that they look at a million deals, but they never actually pull the trigger on anything because they’re like,” I have to figure everything out.
“So Jehoo, even though you may be in a little bit over your head right now, I still love the fact that you found what you thought was a good deal and you took action, you’re kind of figuring out along the way, because even if for whatever reason you can’t get proof of funds by Monday, I still think the learning experience of trying to make this whole thing work is exponentially more valuable than probably even the deal itself. So I just want to start with that. But I think, Ashley, let’s just kind of lay out the details of this offer. So the purchase price is 445,000. The seller is willing to finance 60,000. So the other 385 has to come from somewhere. The 60,000 that the seller is financing is being offered at a 30-year amortization, which means they’re spreading out those payments over 30 years at a 7% interest rate.
However, there’s a 24-month balloon. So 24 months after they closed, Jay, who’s got to pay back everything that’s owed on that 60K that was lent out.
So there’s a few things that come to mind for me I think to be able to really guide which way makes the most sense. But I think I’d want to know, Ash, what is the business plan with this deal? Is this a turnkey rental where tenants are already in there, they’re paying, there’s no upside renter at the top of the market? Or is this like a hoarder house where you’re going to have the ability to really go in there and fully renovate the place and either flip it or sell it or flip it or rent it? Because I think the exit strategy kind of defines what method you should take because if it is a big value add play, then yeah, I do think that maybe bringing in hard money could be the quickest fix because they’re going to be able to give you the cash that you need to renovate the place as well and then hopefully pay this guy off in 24 months.
But if it’s just like a turnkey deal, I don’t see a super easy path forward to be able to have proof of funds by Monday and kind of execute the business plan. But those are my initial thoughts. What are you thinking Ash?

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. The best bet, if it is a turnkey thing and you can’t find a private or a hard money lender is going after a private money lender. So basically contacting anyone and everyone you’d know over the weekend. And basically if you find someone that would be interested in lending you that money for this deal, then basically they will show that they have enough funds and they are going to lend you the money. So oftentimes it’s a letter from their bank stating the amount. Sometimes it’s just a bank statement showing the amount of funds they have in their bank. But typically when sometimes a buyer, I’m sorry, sometimes when a seller accepts an offer, they want to make sure that they’re accepting the offer from somebody who has the money to actually close. Because this is an example, your situation right here that if you go out and you end up can’t find anyone to actually fund this deal, you’re going to have to back out of the deal.
And that’s something they want to make sure there isn’t any risk to that happening or to lower the risk of that happening by showing that you already have the money and can show where you are getting it from. So I would say reach out to as many people as you can this weekend. Post your deal in the BiggerPockets forums. Reach out to friends and family and not even say, would you be interested in this deal? But ask them if they know anyone that would be interested in this opportunity. And then if you had an idea of how you were going to structure that, so you need the 385,000 and it’s a 24 balloon note on the 7% interest that you’re doing for seller financing. So how would you structure this other set of financing? Would you also do it for 24 months? And then you’re making sure you’re going and getting a full mortgage to pay everybody back in those 24 months.
Kind of have an idea of the amortization and the terms and any balloon payment that would make this deal work for you. So however you ran the numbers, I would assume you ran borrowing 385,000 at X percent over a certain amount of time to make sure that the deal makes sense for you and put that into the opportunity for somebody to invest with you kind of what you’d be willing or able to pay them in interest and for how long too.

Tony Robinson:
I think the other thing that comes to mind too, Ash, is just like, do you need creative financing on this deal? I feel like to your point, that 24-month balloon, it’s going to complicate whatever other financing you get as well. And oftentimes a lot of even hard money lenders, they won’t want you to have any sort of second mortgage against the property. They’ll want you to have some skin in the game is what they call it where you’re bringing some form of capital to the table as well. I just wonder, if you go to maybe a credit union or local small regional bank in Winston-Salem and say, “Hey, I’ve got this deal that I think is a really good deal. Can you take a look at it?” And maybe the interest rate is a little bit higher, but if they’re giving you a nice 30-year fixed mortgage, you don’t have to worry about the balloon or all those other things.
So I think that might be one thing that I look at as well as like, “Hey, are there other maybe more traditional types of financing that will work better for your situation given that you don’t have necessarily the proof of funds to move forward with it?” Now, as a last resort, I don’t know how well connected, Jay, who you are in that market, but if you know any wholesalers, maybe you can go present it to them. And if you don’t necessarily have the cash to take it down yourself, can you connect with one of these wholesalers and say, “Hey, look, I’ve got this under contract. Give me a portion of the assignment fee if you can find someone else to go take this deal down.” So you don’t get the deal, but at least you get some sort of financial benefit from having done the work of putting the contract together and the wholesaler’s going to go push it out to their market to see, hey, which of their buyers can actually move by Monday to get the deal taken care of.

Ashley Kehr:
Well, thank you guys so much for joining us for today’s episode of Rookie Reply. I’m Ashley He’s Tony. And if you’re not already subscribed to our YouTube channel at RealEstateRookie, make sure to subscribe and comment on this video if you have questions that you want us to use in our next rookie reply. We’ll see you guys next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Academy Mortgage agrees to $825K fine for 2023 data breach



Academy Mortgage agreed to a consent order with California regulators that penalizes the lender and finds fault with its information technology procedures and oversight, which allegedly contributed to a 2023 data breach.

Processing Content

In resolving the case, Academy Mortgage, which has ceased all origination and servicing activity, agreed to pay $825,000 to the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. The incident put the personally identifiable information of 284,443 individuals at risk, including 34,452 residents of the Golden State, according to DFPI. 

“Companies that have access to our personal information must have robust, stringent cybersecurity,” said DFPI Commissioner KC Mohseni in a press release.

“This penalty should act as a deterrent to companies — strong data protection for Californians is non-negotiable.” 

In addition to the financial penalty, Academy will also be required to offer free identity-theft insurance coverage to affected customers for 12 months.  

The timeline of events

Hackers first infiltrated Academy’s data network in mid-March 2023, installing malware and gaining access to credentials that allowed them to disable security systems, according to the consent order. The breach was contained a week later. Cybercriminal group AlphV, or Black Cat, later took credit for a ransomware attack

An initial third-party investigation took place in the two months following the incident, with further internal review conducted in the fourth quarter of 2023. Academy did not start notifying customers of their compromised data until December that year. Customers would accuse the Draper, Utah-based lender of dragging its feet in providing them with details in ensuing consumer legal action filed against the company. 

In its investigation, California officials found serious deficiencies in Academy’s operations, particularly in regard to information security, recordkeeping and governance, which opened the door to the 2023 hack. The consent order included sharp criticism on the part of DFPI over the lender’s lax cybersecurity measures. 

“Academy did not maintain a documented asset inventory of its computer systems and data, an up-to-date incident-response plan, documentation of tracking and follow-up on audit findings or written IT policies and procedures for multiple issue areas,” the document said. 

Between 2017 and 2023, Academy did not conduct a comprehensive formal audit of its information security program, according to DFPI. The department also determined the company neglected to perform a sufficient number of security risk assessments in the two years leading up to the cyber incident and found deficient vulnerability and patch management protocols. 

The consent order specifically called out Academy’s board of directors for lapses in oversight and planning of business operations as well. 

“Respondent represented to the department that it carried out appropriate day-to-day information security practices but did not document these actual practices in its policies and procedures,” DFPI wrote. 

Academy’s records were in such a state that examiners could not conclude whether the company was in compliance with state mortgage regulations, the document also said. 

Regarding the data incident, the California regulator claimed Academy neglected to obtain a written forensic report to adequately document the breach, resulting in limited transparency about the event.

In late February 2024, just days prior to commencement of the commissioner’s examination, Academy sold its entire retail lending operations to Guild Mortgage. It ceased originations of new mortgages in March of that year. 

The consent order carries with it neither admission nor denial of the department’s conclusions. Lawyers representing Academy’s parent company did not respond to an inquiry from National Mortgage News prior to publication. A Guild Mortgage representative declined to comment.  

California boosts enforcement as feds pull back

The resolution comes as the focus on consumer protection laws and enforcement turn to U.S. states amid a loosening federal regulatory environment. California ranks high on the list of states the financial services industry and attorneys are eyeing, due to its reputation for strict oversight and the large number of consumers its regulations cover.   

California was one of several states to reach a settlement with E Mortgage Capital in 2025 after regulators alleged the company had engaged in unlicensed lending activity across the country. Earlier this year, Fairway Home Mortgage also resolved a case with DFPI following similar accusations.

In July, Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., officially appointed former Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Rohit Chopra, who was frequently criticized for regulatory overreach during his tenure under former President Biden, to serve in his administration. Chopra now holds the title of secretary in the newly created California business and consumer services agency.

Academy is the latest in a line of mortgage companies that have recently agreed to settle cases in order to resolve lawsuits or regulatory enforcement after a spate of cyberattacks this decade. In the largest settlement in recent history, Bayview Asset Management will pay $26 million following a massive attack across its servicing units in 2021. 



Psychological Safety Does More For Your Team Than You Think


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • One of the most effective communication methods is the mirror method, focused on reverse communication. When you apply the reverse communication method, your immediate goal is to get staff in a psychologically safe state, where they’re the most receptive to take instructions and to execute.
  • When your staff feels heard and seen, the environment shifts. Structure appears as safety, and safety boosts motivation. The performance follows.

The right message and the wrong method lead nowhere: The problem isn’t what you said. The problem begins before you even open your mouth.

When you discuss things with your staff or with your customers, do you listen to what they say? Do you pay attention, or do you just wait for your turn to present your ideas?

Are you a leader who just waits for your turn to speak and puts all your effort into getting your employees to like you? But the most important question to ask yourself is: Do you want your employees to like what you say or what you execute?

Why mirror method works

One of the most effective communication methods to try is the mirror method, focused on reverse communication. Let’s say a person comes to you with a problem. They explain the problem in detail while you carefully listen without interruption.

Once they’re fully done with expressing the problem, it’s your turn. Tell them their exact problem in detail, but use technical vocabulary relevant to your industry.

According to psychologist Carl Rogers, people are more likely to accept change and direction when they feel understood and not evaluated. In his person-centered theory, Rogers argues that psychological safety is built on reflective listening.

To increase the feeling of psychological safety in the business environment you lead, the first step is to master the skill of reflective listening.

Reflecting back on their problem ensures you several things:

  • They comprehend that you’ve listened carefully and deduce that you care enough for them, which makes them feel heard and safer in your environment.
  • They comprehend that you understand their problem, and they start building trust in you as an expert in the field.
  • They are ready to act with less defense and more trust towards a person who knows about their problems as much as they do.

In the context of a doctor’s office, for example, this translates to: If this doctor knows my problem better than I do, they must be the person capable of fixing it!

How to make reverse communication part of your leading system

In businesses, staff often refuse to execute proposed tasks not because the tasks feel too difficult, but because they don’t feel heard. They don’t feel psychological safety in that environment. They don’t feel their reality is acknowledged before a new task is proposed.

When you apply the reverse communication method — listen first, and reflect back at them — they will generally respond with less pushback. This method may look like people-pleasing, but the two have completely different goals.

The reverse communication method is different from people-pleasing. If you’re a people-pleaser, your ultimate goal is to fit in and reduce your own anxiety from potential pushback. When you apply the reverse communication method, your immediate goal is to get staff in a psychologically safe state, where they’re the most receptive to taking instructions and executing.

While Rogers proves why the mirror method works psychologically, former FBI negotiator Chris Voss, author of Never Split the Difference, explores why the method works strategically. According to him, mirroring is one of the most powerful communication tools, and it has nothing to do with people-pleasing. It disarms people and makes them ready to move forward.

Do you want your business to move forward? It can’t be done without effective leader-team communication. Use the mirror method as your leadership strategy to build an environment focused on safety. It is what your staff and even your customers need.

Leaders don’t need likes

The purpose of the mirror method isn’t to make your staff like you. You don’t need staff to be your friends, and neither do they need you. You’re not there to be liked. You’re there to lead and to be respected.

Sometimes, likability can be a byproduct of respect built through an environment that makes people feel heard. But it should never be the goal.  

When the building is on fire, nobody looks for the leader they like. They look for the leader who will make the right call. The mirror method helps you gain respect from your staff. People-pleasing doesn’t. One signals that you see and understand the staff clearly. The other signals that you constantly agree with them despite logic.

Create a performance culture

When applied consistently and on all business levels, the mirror method has a strong impact on your business culture. Your staff stops performing for approval and starts performing for purpose. Top performers want to know where they’re going and that their leader sees them clearly enough to get them there.

Comfort was never a motivation for people at the top. Highest achieving professionals wake up every day asking themselves where their career is going, what is the next challenge, and if their current leader is the one to take them to the top. A performance culture built on reverse communication answers all three questions even before they are asked.

When your staff feels heard and seen, the environment shifts. Structure appears as safety, and safety boosts motivation. The performance follows.

Conclusion

The mirror method isn’t a soft leadership tactic. It is the ultimate respect that you can give staff (and even customers), and as a by-product, improve performance from staff (and even customer conversions).

See your people clearly. Reflect them accurately. Then lead them somewhere worth going.

The best businesses are never the ones with the best individuals. The best businesses are the ones with leaders who can see the individuals clearly to make the systems work for them.

Key Takeaways

  • One of the most effective communication methods is the mirror method, focused on reverse communication. When you apply the reverse communication method, your immediate goal is to get staff in a psychologically safe state, where they’re the most receptive to take instructions and to execute.
  • When your staff feels heard and seen, the environment shifts. Structure appears as safety, and safety boosts motivation. The performance follows.

The right message and the wrong method lead nowhere: The problem isn’t what you said. The problem begins before you even open your mouth.

When you discuss things with your staff or with your customers, do you listen to what they say? Do you pay attention, or do you just wait for your turn to present your ideas?

Are you a leader who just waits for your turn to speak and puts all your effort into getting your employees to like you? But the most important question to ask yourself is: Do you want your employees to like what you say or what you execute?

Free/Cheap Wine from Last Bottle: Grab Yours Now


Get Free/Cheap Wine from Last Bottle

Starting August 20, Last Bottle is running a promotion, offering free ground shipping on all wine orders as part of its latest Marathon Madness sale. You can sign up now through a referral link to get $10 credit and with free shipping you can find some very cheap, or maybe free wine. Just keep refreshing and new wines will go on sale continuously.

If you see one you want to purchase, do so quickly before it sells out. The cheaper deals are usually be available from 4PM to 6PM.

Sign up now (my referral) and place your order. 

Free/Cheap Wine from Last Bottle

Important Terms

  • First come, first served!!
  • You must complete your purchase on each wine (no saved cart).
  • All orders placed during this marathon will be combined. We will BEGIN shipping immediately and will require several weeks to get to all states (up to 6 weeks). Please be patient!
  • Offer is not valid in AK or HI.

Guru’s Wrap-up

Last Bottle has some decent wines, although I doubt you will find any amazing choices for around $10. It’s still free or very cheap wine, so check it out and see what’s available.

Looks like they are releasing new bottles every 10 few minutes, but the cheapest options sell out quickly. Keep reloading the site to see new offerings. Also add your credit card and address right away, so you have it ready to check out quickly.

You can also invite others and get a $30 credit. So you can possibly invite a friend or family member (with a different address) and get a couple of bottles for free.

They do take a while to ship these wines, so don’t expect to have them for this weekend’s party. The company says that it will take “several weeks”.

HT: DoC