Home Blog

How IHH Healthcare CEO Prem Kumar Nair is planning for a longer-lived Asia


So says Prem Kumar Nair, CEO of Asia’s largest private health group, IHH Healthcare, as he grapples with an Asia that’s wealthier, longer-lived, and far more willing to spend money on the finer things in life. “As populations grow more affluent and people indulge in good food and wine, we’re seeing a rise in lifestyle diseases: diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol,” he points out in an interview with Fortune.

Asia is getting older. One in four people in the region will be older than 65 by 2050, according to the Asian Development Bank. Asians generally have longer life expectancies than those outside the region—but longer lives aren’t the same as healthier ones. A Stanford study published in April found that population aging accounted for 33.6% of the increase in disease burden across mainland China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. 

IHH is stepping in with “Healthspan”, a new preventive health and longevity program launched in July. Unlike the aesthetics-driven wellness industry, IHH’s Healthspan is built around clinical intervention. Though the program is now only offered in Singapore, Prem eventually hopes to bring it to IHH’s nine other markets, which include India, Turkey and Greater China.

“For many people, longevity means aesthetics: coloring your hair, and taking a whole lot of vitamins and supplements. But for a healthcare provider like us, longevity is anchored very strongly in clinical science,” Prem says. 

Take sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass. “We’ll encourage older patients to do resistance training, not for them to build biceps, but to make sure that their muscles can hold them up and they don’t fall and sustain knee or hip fractures,” Prem explains. 

IHH’s Healthspan program also leans on GLP-1 drugs, the class of medications (including Ozempic and Wegovy) that has become, in Prem’s words, “the poster boy of longevity”. Yet these drugs are tapped not for cosmetic weight loss, he stresses, but to prevent obesity-driven arthritis and metabolic disease.

As Asia’s population ages, IHH is also building more ambulatory care centers—smaller, community-based facilities that handle procedures like endoscopies and total knee replacements without a hospital admission—in dense, rapidly graying cities like Singapore and Hong Kong. For example, the group’s Parkway MediCentre, which is located in Singapore’s Woodleigh district, offers chronic disease management services and consultations with dermatology and obstetrics and gynaecology specialists.

This marks a larger shift in how healthcare is administered globally, with many aging societies transitioning from hospital-centric care to more personalized and accessible options which are embedded in neighborhoods and communities. 

“We have transitioned from being a mega hospital player to a healthcare ecosystem player in all the countries that we are in,” Prem says. “That’s going to be the future of healthcare.”

Dual-listed in Singapore and Malaysia

IHH Healthcare was incorporated in 2010, as a holding company for Malaysian sovereign wealth fund Khazanah Nasional Berhad’s healthcare investments, which included Singapore-based Parkway, India-based Apollo, and Malaysia-based Pantai and IMU Health.

The entity was converted into a public company in 2012, and went public via a dual IPO on Malaysian bourse Bursa Malaysia and the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX). IHH’s $2 billion IPO was the third-biggest listing globally that year, after Facebook and Malaysian palm oil firm Felda Global Ventures Holding. 

IHH shares are up by more than 20% over the past 12 months.

Today, IHH Healthcare has expanded to 89 hospitals across 10 countries; the firm, with 2025 revenue of approximately $6 billion, ranks No. 58 on Fortune’s Southeast Asia 500 list. 

IHH’s early growth came primarily through acquisitions. In 2015, the firm acquired India-based Globe Healthcare; three years later, it took over Fortis Healthcare, another Indian brand.

That approach changed when Prem joined IHH in 2020, following 27 years at competitor Raffles Medical Group, when he instead redirected the company to focus on organic growth within its existing markets and businesses. (Since he took the helm, IHH Healthcare has added a total of 4,000 beds to its hospitals.)

“A lot of investors were asking us whether M&As were an efficient way to grow, since each time we grow inorganically, we have to integrate the different entities,” Prem says. “Eventually, we decided that the best form of growth is growing within our existing markets and clusters… organic growth is always better since the operational efficiency is there, as we’re leveraging existing businesses and already have hospital executives in the country.”

COVID: ‘All hands on deck’

The most significant event in Prem’s tenure—at least in his eyes—came right as he started the job, when the COVID-19 pandemic landed in Singapore. He was then IHH’s Singapore CEO, and the global health emergency didn’t lead to a “normal transition.” Between 2020 and 2021, Singapore enacted several rounds of “circuit breakers”: nationwide partial lockdowns which banned social gatherings, shuttered physical offices and mandated the donning of masks outdoors. 

“It was crisis management from the start,” he recalls. During the early days of the pandemic, Prem and his team dispatched medical staff to Singapore’s checkpoints for virus screening, as well as to foreign worker dormitories to care for workers who fell ill. (The purpose-built residences, where 10 to 24 construction workers share a living space, became the epicenter of the nation’s outbreak, accounting for nearly 90% of cases.)

Yet the pandemic affirms Prem’s view that the public and private sectors need to work together in a health crisis. “During peace time, we have our respective roles: The public sector works to provide affordable, accessible healthcare, while the private sector looks after patients who prefer quicker response times, more privacy and have the means to pay a premium,” he explains. “But when you’ve got a pandemic? It’s all hands on deck.”

IHH is a global player, with a presence in multiple countries both in Asia and beyond. That’s been a hedge against volatility in any one particular market. 

“Being diversified has helped us a lot… there were times when Turkey faced macroeconomic issues like inflation, but Malaysia, Singapore and our other markets buoyed our economic performance,” Prem says. 

Apart from deepening its presence in existing markets, IHH is also considering expanding into adjacent countries, though Prem admits that no concrete plans have yet been made.

“All of the countries we’re in will at some point become saturated; competition is a given, so we have to look at new markets,” Prem concludes. “Other players like Thompson and Raffles Medical have gone into Vietnam, and we’re also looking at Indonesia, which has changed its regulations to allow foreign doctors to practice and private hospitals to be fully owned by internationals.”

Future of healthcare

Now four decades into his career in healthcare, Prem thinks the mix of specialties in Asia’s healthcare institutions is changing. Just ten years ago, cardiology was the biggest speciality in most hospitals. But rates of cardiac disease have fallen in recent years, as the medical community pivots to managing cholesterol levels, hypertension and diabetes—all risk factors for heart disease. (A recent study found that from 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized mortality rate of cardiovascular disease in Asia fell by 26%.)

“Cancer is now becoming the biggest subspecialty in all our hospitals,” Prem says. “We’re investing a lot in cancer testing, genomic medicine and precision medicine.”

In 2019, IHH led a $20 million Series A funding round for Singapore-based genomic medicine firm Lucence, which makes ultra-sensitive blood tests called liquid biopsies that can detect over ten types of cancer at an early stage. IHH also invests in proton therapy machines, which provide a more precise form of radiation treatment using accelerated proton particles rather than traditional X-rays, and is often used to treat complex cancers like those in the head, neck, brain and liver.

“We’re a strategic investor, not a financial investor,” Prem explains. “So whatever we invest in, we actually use and validate.”

In February, IHH launched a program called IHH Catalyst, which brings together healthcare entrepreneurs, clinicians and operational leaders to identify and nurture promising health start-ups. The inaugural edition took place in India, and selected a crop of businesses focusing on India’s priority health domains like oncology, chronic disease management and preventive care. IHH will soon bring the initiative to North Asia, led by Gleneagles Hong Kong and Parkway Shanghai.

IHH is also bullish about AI. A few years ago, IHH converted its data and digital department into an AI transformation team, focused solely on identifying AI-enabled healthcare solutions. 

Its most tangible success so far, NurseShift.ai, automates hospital rostering—a task that once consumed roughly 51% of nursing supervisors’ time, according to Prem—and has won a health innovation award from Singapore’s Ministry of Health. It is being rolled out beyond Singapore to Malaysia and Hong Kong.

IHH is also working on a new project to build AI-enabled clinical pathways, where models analyze the symptoms and risk factors of each patient, then suggest a treatment plan which doctors can consider, edit and approve. 

“One of the key reasons behind resource wastage is variation in healthcare,” Prem explains. “Different specialists are trained differently, so they all do things differently. Some specialists may keep you in the hospital for two days, while others could opt for a week, but AI can help in standardizing this by giving clinicians a framework to build upon.”

Still, Prem thinks there’s still room for human medical judgment in the hospital. The medical staff are ultimately the ones performing the procedure, so there must be consensus,” Prem says. “We must also allow for exceptions, since the profiles of patients can be quite different.”

“Healthcare and medicine can be complex in that way.”

In Fortune’s “Asia Agenda” column, released at least twice a month, we speak with Asia’s top business leaders about how they are building for the future and the lessons they’ve drawn from leading companies in one of the world’s fastest growing and most dynamic regions. Explore all of our profiles here.

As GSE uncertainty grows, Figure CEO says his company is ready to fill the void


“Figure Connect coming in at 65% when we only launched that platform two years ago reflects that the market is really interested in what we’re offering there,” he said. “There’s a lot of pull into that marketplace.”

The Kiavi deal adds the business purpose lending market, where roughly 25% of US housing stock is investor-owned, and Kiavi holds approximately 10% market share while the next largest competitor sits at around 2%, according to Tannenbaum.

The combination of Figure and Kiavi opens new doors for both companies. Figure’s home equity product is capped at around 85% loan-to-value, while Kiavi’s technology allows loans to go above 100% of the current home price based on a post-renovation valuation, creating a valuable product for home improvement borrowers.

“Forty percent of home equity is home improvement,” he said. “Think about how many people would be interested in borrowing against the pro forma — borrowing 100% of today’s value or more for renovation. Kiavi is not doing the HELOC, but we have the HELOC technology, and we can add their post-renovation valuation. That’s a really valuable connection point.”

What brokers need to know

Tannenbaum said the $35 trillion in available home equity, a Federal Reserve figure tracked quarterly, is where the action is for mortgage partners right now, and brokers without a home equity strategy are leaving business on the table.

Taylor Swift’s 10-Word Rule Explains the Work Ethic That Sustained Her 20-Year Career



During a recent fireside chat, the songwriter reflected on creativity, collaboration, and why discipline matters more than waiting for the perfect idea.

Crypto Live Trading| 16 july #vinbullindia #livetrading #vinbulllive #live #trading #cryptotrading



Crypto Live Trading| 16 july #vinbullindia #liv etrading #vinbulllive #live #trading #cryptotrading

✅ XM Global (Gold & Forex Trading)… 15 years old….

🎯 Partner Code: TFBK6 (Mandatory) for 100% Bonus

✅FREE TELEGRAM-

✅DELTA ACCOUNT-

✅BINGX ACCOUNT-

✅crypto course link……..

✅ Open an Exness account using our link 👇

✅ Code : nysrmxngif

Live trading, gold live trading, trading live, trading, forex trading, swing trading, crypto trading, btc live trading, day trading live, live crypto trading, trading strategy, live trading crypto, options trading live, bitcoin trading, gold live trading today, crypto trading strategies, price action, trading psychology, crypto trading live

#livetrading #stockmarket #trading #vinbulllive #nifty #daytrading #vinbullindia

source

How Andres Martinez Used Co-Living to Build a 14-Property Portfolio


Name

Andres Martinez
Location Dallas, Texas
Occupation Full-time real estate investor (former waiter and jazz musician)
Assets 14 properties (10 owned, four under management), 107 co-living rooms, ~$27,000/month gross portfolio cash flow
Investment strategy Wholesaling, co-living conversions, in-house general contracting, 50/50 capital partnerships
Financing

Subject-to purchases, private partner capital, HELOC second-position financing

Andres Martinez studied jazz in college, waited tables for years, and never considered real estate until a mortgage rate hike locked him out of buying a house with his wife in late 2023. 

Determined to find another way in, he fell down a rabbit hole of creative financing and started cold-calling every listing on Zillow, sometimes 500 to 600 calls a day. His first deal was a wholesale assignment that took nine months and nearly broke him before it paid off. 

From there, Andres discovered co-living, a strategy of renting properties out room by room, and rebuilt his entire business around it. Two years later, he owns 10 properties, manages four more, and takes home $12,000 to $14,000 a month while leaving the house once or twice a week. 

Here’s how he built it.

Your first deal took hundreds of cold calls and nine months to close. Walk us through what actually happened.

I couldn’t qualify for a mortgage once rates jumped to 7.5%, so I started calling every single listing on Zillow, asking about seller financing and subject-to deals. After about 500 to 600 calls, I found my first deal and wholesaled it for a $10,000 assignment fee.

My next deal took nine months of nothing but nos, calling 200 to 300 people a day, and getting fired from my restaurant job twice for taking seller calls during shifts. 

I’d actually given up two weeks before it finally happened: A seller who’d told me no months earlier texted me back because the person under contract with him couldn’t close, and he was already behind on payments. That became my first real proof that the process worked.

What made you pivot from wholesaling into co-living?

I passed on a deal where another investor wanted to add 10 rooms to a house, since I thought it sounded like he was going to overextend himself financially to do it. But it planted a question in my head about room rentals in general. Through my real estate mastermind, I learned co-living was a real, replicable strategy, not something sketchy. 

Shortly after, I found a five-bedroom, three-bathroom house in pre-foreclosure through an agent at a meetup that nobody else wanted because they didn’t understand co-living. I put it under contract for $3,000 down using a subject-to structure, taking over the seller’s existing payments instead of getting a new mortgage.

That first co-living conversion needed real renovation money. How did you fund it, and what went wrong?

I needed about $58,000 to add three more bedrooms, redo the flooring, and furnish the property. A partner offered to bring all the capital in exchange for a 50/50 split, with me managing the project. 

My contractor ended up stealing money and not finishing the work, and the subcontractors she’d hired hadn’t been paid, so I ended up covering roughly $40,000 out of pocket to redo the flooring myself and finish the renovation. 

Once it opened, I rented rooms for $800 to $850 each, with one private-bathroom room at $1,000, bringing in about $6,500 a month gross against a $2,100 mortgage, taxes, and insurance. That netted around $2,700 to $2,800 a month from a single property.

After getting burned by contractors twice, how did you fix that gap in your business?

On my second co-living deal, an eight-bedroom house with an ADU, the same pattern happened: My new contractor’s crew leader ended up doing the actual work while the contractor herself disappeared without paying anyone. 

Instead of finding a third contractor, I offered that crew leader steady work if he helped me learn construction directly: tile, drywall, and flooring. I became my own general contractor from that point forward, which let me finish renovations in about two weeks instead of the standard six to eight, since I kept one crew moving through a single property instead of splitting their time across multiple job sites. 

That skill set became a business of its own. I’ve now GCed 29 co-living conversions for other investors in addition to running my own portfolio.

What do people misunderstand about co-living as a business model?

The biggest myth is that it’s a passive strategy with constant turnover and tenant conflicts. I target working adults making enough to need housing but not enough to rent their own place, and I always start on a month-to-month lease so either side can walk away cleanly before committing to a full year. 

Once a house stabilizes, turnover mostly disappears. I have tenants from my very first property who just signed another one-year lease.

The other misconception is that a co-living conversion locks you out of a normal resale. Since I only add interior walls and drywall, not permanent structural changes, converting a property back to a standard layout costs about $3,000 to $4,000, which keeps my exit options open to any buyer, not just another co-living investor.

Amazon Pixel 11 Deal: Up to $350 Gift Card + Extra $150 Off


Amazon Pixel 11 Deal: Up to $350 Gift Card + $150 Off

This article contains Amazon affiliate links.

Amazon is running a limited-time promotion on select Google Pixel 11 phones.

Eligible models come with an Amazon gift card worth up to $350, and you can also use promo code PIXEL11 for an extra $150 off select devices.

The promo page shows several Pixel 11 configurations, including Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro Fold models. Gift card amounts vary by phone and configuration, with some models offering $250 or $350 Amazon gift cards alongside the additional coupon savings.

The offer is valid through August 27, 2026 at 11:59 p.m. PT, while supplies last, and is limited to two uses per customer.

SHOP NOW

 

Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases made through this article. Using links on the site for Amazon purchases is the best way you can support the site as you normally can’t earn cash back for these purchases. But, you should still check shopping portals such as Rakuten, TopCashback, RebatesMe, ShopBack and others for possible cashback. Your support is always greatly appreciated!

If I Could Tell Everyone 1 Thing About the Stock Market, It’s This: It Will Crash


For best results when investing, take time to learn a lot about the stock market and about how to invest effectively. Alternatively, you can opt out of that and stick with low-fee, broad-market index funds, such as S&P 500 index funds, which can also build your wealth powerfully.

Either way, here’s one key thing every investor should know about the stock market: It will crash now and then.

Image source: Getty Image.

Portfolio values don’t go up in a straight line. The line will be jagged, marked by occasional corrections and occasional crashes. Corrections are drops of at least 10% from recent highs, and drops of 20% or more are considered a crash.

Here are some things to know about market pullbacks:

  • They’re not infrequent. According to my colleague Trevor Jennewine, “Since 2010, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite have dropped into correction territory 10 times (once every 18 months) and 14 times (once every 13 months), respectively.”
  • Crashes, followed by bear markets, are less frequent. Bear markets happen, on average, about every 3.5 years.
  • They don’t necessarily last a long time. The average length of a bear market, since 1928, has been 11.4 months, according to Yardeni Research.
  • The stock market has lost about 35%, on average, in bear markets, says The Hartford Funds, while bull markets have averaged gains of 111%.
  • Recoveries can be strong. Jennewine writes: “Since 2010, following the S&P 500’s first close in correction territory, the index has returned an average of 18% during the next year and 38% during the next two years.”

What should you do?

Instead of worrying about a market crash, simply prepare for one:

  • Don’t keep any money in stocks that you might need within at least five years.
  • Consider holding on to a bunch of healthy dividend-paying stocks and value stocks, as they can be more stable than high-flying growth stocks when there’s a market pullback.
  • Consider keeping a modest portion of your portfolio in cash, to take advantage of great stocks on sale after a market crash.

Pope Leo XIV on AI’s new ‘form of domination’: it risks becoming a tool of ‘economic colonialism’



Pope Leo XIV warned that artificial intelligence risks becoming a new form of “economic colonialism,” deepening the gap between wealthy and poor nations, and said algorithms are already creating “a subtle form of domination” over who gets seen and heard.

“We must remain vigilant in this regard,” Leo told the network of officeholders who make up the International Catholic Legislators Network (ICLN) on Friday. “Lest innovation become another vehicle for ideological or economic colonialism.” He warned that AI’s rapid development risks leaving poorer countries increasingly dependent on wealthier ones for the technology.

He went further, describing what he called “a subtle form of domination when algorithms decide who is seen, and who remains invisible, when digital platforms shape public discourse without accountability, and when the dignity of workers is subordinated to the optimization of systems.” Such developments, he said, “reveal a new face of the ancient temptation to domination and mastery without service.”

To guard against that, Leo called for “robust legal frameworks, independent oversight, informed users and a political system that does not abdicate its responsibility,” so that “no single ideology or interest dictates the values embedded in artificial intelligence systems.” The pope’s words to call for a responsible political system echoes language he has used before in tension with the Trump administration’s deregulatory approach to AI. President Donald Trump has pushed to loosen federal AI rules and repealed the Biden administration’s AI executive order in January 2025. When Leo released “Magnifica Humanitas” in May, dubbed the pope’s “AI encyclical,” the Trump administration was split in response when Vice President JD Vance praised it and others dismissed the warning.

Since that time, the pope said AI and technology at large decreases the interactions and relationships people have with one another. This in turn is causing marriage and birth rates to decrease as the ages people reach these milestones increase, if at all. AI, the pope warned, “must never be allowed to erode” the family, and it does so by “reducing persons and relationships to data and simulations,” by “flooding young minds with content that distorts desire,” and through “economic models that make family life economically precarious.”

A redelivery of the church’s stance

The address built on his first encyclical, which made AI’s effect on human dignity, labor and family life the centerpiece of his papacy’s early teaching. Christopher Hale, a political consultant and founder of the newsletter Letters from Leo, said Friday’s remarks were less a new position than a redelivery of ideas already laid out in the encyclical.

“No one reads a 200-page encyclical,” Hale told Fortune. “Oftentimes what will happen is over weeks and months the pope will reveal different parts of that encyclical.” The pope’s Friday’s remarks were in gist a reiteration of his first encyclical—but the point is who it is redelivering the point.

Hale said Leo’s religious authority gives him standing that other AI critics lack in confronting the technology industry.

“Silicon Valley has an opponent that operates on a terrain that they’re not used to,” Hale said. “They’re used to dealing in transactional relationships, but Leo XIV represents something of a quagmire for them because he cannot be bought off, he cannot be terrorized, he can’t be indicted, he can’t be deported.”

Hale added that pairing AI criticism with religious language broadens its reach beyond activists already skeptical of the technology.

“When this language is combined with moral language, with religious language, what it does is it takes a leftist critique that might have marginal support in the United States and makes it mainstream,” he said.

Hale pointed to the backlash against AI data centers as evidence that opposition to the industry already cuts across party lines, even without a shared political language to unite it.

“If you look at the criticism of AI data centers, particularly over the summer, they’re really coming from all factions, from the left and the right,” Hale said. “What’s been hard about it, though, is that there has yet to be a language that can combine the two.”

“He strangely represents the fusion of the populist left and the populist right,” Hale said. “That’s what makes him so powerful.”

Is AI Pushing Mortgage Rates Higher?


A lot of the recent uptick in mortgage rates has been attributed to the ongoing war with Iran.

But there is perhaps another, lesser known reason mortgage rates have pushed back into the high 6s.

And it’s all the artificial intelligence (AI) spending, which has arguably crowded out other investments, leading to higher bond yields.

When this happens, it increases the supply of bonds that compete with Treasuries and mortgage securities for investor capital.

And that can put even more upward pressure on rates. But perhaps over the long run it’ll do the opposite.

How AI Is Making Your Mortgage Rate Higher

  • AI companies need lots of money right now for their build out
  • They borrow funds by issuing corporate bonds
  • Buyers of these bonds only have so much money to invest
  • And also invest in Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
  • High bond supply is forcing these companies to offer higher yields
  • That means MBS have to offer higher yields as well to attract investors
  • And that can lead to higher interest rates on home loans too

As laid out above, AI spending is off the charts lately.

And in order to fund all the spending, these companies are issuing bonds.

So-called “hyperscalers” like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle have been spending hundreds of billions each year to build out data enters and related infrastructure.

And a lot of these costs are being financed by large investment-grade corporate bond sales.

To put it in context, U.S. hyperscaler bond issuance has risen “from 2% of total USD investment-grade issuance between 2022 and 2024 to an expected 9% in 2026,” per J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

And just this year, hyperscalers have issued a whopping $219 billion in “investment-grade bonds” to fund these massive projects.

When it comes down to it, there’s only so much capital available, and if a ton of it is being allocated to build data centers, there’s less available for things like mortgage lending.

This means when someone does want to apply for a home loan, the rate will be higher, all else equal.

You’re essentially competing for those borrowing dollars with AI companies, which drives up the rate of interest.

The same investors who are buying these AI-backed bonds also buy things like Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

To attract these investors, they have to increase the yield (interest rate) to remain competitive.

Otherwise these investors, whether they’re banks, insurance companies, or pension funds, will just invest in those tech bonds instead.

How much is another question. Maybe it’s only .125% higher.

So if the 30-year fixed is 6.75% today, perhaps it’d be a slightly less unattractive 6.625%.

But there’s an argument it could be even larger, perhaps 0.25% or more.

And ultimately any increase in rates is impactful given how poor housing affordability is at the moment.

It’s yet another reason why interest rates remain elevated and the old “higher for longer” adage remains in play.

Eventually AI Could Push Mortgage Rates Lower

While massive AI investment might be piling upward pressure on interest rates now, the opposite could play out later.

It’s one of the arguments new Fed chair Kevin Warsh made a while back, saying productivity gains could prove to be disinflationary and allow the Fed to cut rates instead of raise them.

Of course, a lot of people are skeptical at the moment, but only time will tell how it actually plays out.

If the theory proves to be true, bond yields and mortgage rates could drift lower over time.

In addition, AI-driven processes could simply make mortgages cheaper to produce, eliminating a lot of costs with the savings passed on to consumers.

However, that might take years to play out and isn’t very practical to a prospective home buyer today.

Nor an existing homeowner with a 7% mortgage rate looking to get some relief with a rate and term refinance.

So while AI might eventually lead to lower mortgage rates, the build out could be exacerbating things at the moment.

(photo: Robert Scoble)

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)