Home Blog

From Factory Data to Trusted Action: Putting Agentic AI to Work in Manufacturing









From Factory Data to Trusted Action: Putting Agentic AI to Work in Manufacturing – SPONSOR CONTENT WEBINAR FROM AWS AND 4MINDS




























Skip to content


Shankar Sharma Explains Why Indians Should Continue To Invest In Gold #shorts



For more videos subscribe to our channel:
Visit NDTV Profit for more news:
Don’t enter the stock market unaware. Read all Research Reports here:

Follow NDTV Profit here
Twitter: ,
LinkedIn:
Instagram:
Facebook:

source

Harvard Endowment Hits $68 Billion As 8% Endowment Tax Begins


Key Points

  • Harvard’s endowment hit a record $68 billion after a 27.1% return in fiscal 2026.
  • The new 8% endowment tax will cost Harvard about $300 million a year, roughly 14 times the federal grants and work-study its undergrads receive.
  • Students and parents still borrowed $16.3 million, mostly to cover the share Harvard expects families to pay.

Harvard University’s endowment reached a record $68 billion on June 30, 2026, according the university’s annual financial report. The fund earned a 27.1% return and grew by $11.1 billion in a single year. It also paid out $2.6 billion, or nearly 40% of Harvard’s operating revenue. Part of that money backs Harvard’s free tuition promise for families earning under $200,000, which keeps the school near the top of the list of colleges with free tuition programs.

The same report confirms a much larger federal tax bill. Starting with the fiscal year that began July 1, 2026, the tax on Harvard’s endowment income jumps from 1.4% to 8%. The school reports the new rate will cost about $300 million a year, and Harvard is holding its fiscal 2027 endowment payout flat to help cover it.

Save For Later

Would you like to save this?

We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

While we agree that colleges should face taxes on their investment income, they should also be able to offset those taxes if they spend more on their students and operating costs. Right now, the system is circle of money that just adds bureaucracy with no real benfits to those pursuing their education.

Harvard’s undergraduates still collect federal student aid while the university writes a big check in taxes. The school’s 2025-26 Common Data Set shows $18.7 million in federal grants to undergraduates, most of it need-based aid like Pell Grants. Students also earned $3.2 million through Federal Work-Study, the program that subsidizes campus jobs. About 20% of Harvard undergraduates receive a Pell Grant, according to Harvard College’s financial aid fact sheet.

Put those figures side by side and the money moves in an odd loop. Harvard will pay roughly $300 million a year into the U.S. Treasury, while its undergraduates draw about $21.9 million back out in federal grants and work-study wages. Congress set that 8% rate in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s education changes, and the estimated tax now runs about 14 times the federal aid flowing the other way.

The two money streams aren’t linked in the federal budget. Endowment tax revenue goes to the Treasury, while Pell Grants come from funding Congress sets each year. We argue in another piece that Pell funding needs to be mandatory spending anyway. Eligibility follows the student through the FAFSA, and FAFSA income limits apply the same way at Harvard as at a community college.

That makes the Harvard numbers a policy gap more than a scandal, because the rules never ask whether a school could cover the aid on its own.

.tci-harvard-flow{border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;overflow:hidden;font-family:inherit;color:#141414;margin:24px 0;background:#fff}
.tci-harvard-flow .hd{background:#141414;color:#fff;padding:14px 18px;font-weight:800;font-size:18px;line-height:1.3}
.tci-harvard-flow .hd span{color:#f6c061}
.tci-harvard-flow table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px}
.tci-harvard-flow th{background:#f9f7f5;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.06em;color:#55504a;text-align:left;padding:10px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8}
.tci-harvard-flow td{padding:11px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;vertical-align:middle}
.tci-harvard-flow tr:nth-child(even) td{background:#fcfbf9}
.tci-harvard-flow td.lbl{font-weight:700}
.tci-harvard-flow td.amt{font-weight:800;white-space:nowrap}
.tci-harvard-flow .pill{display:inline-block;padding:3px 10px;border-radius:999px;font-size:12px;font-weight:700;white-space:nowrap}
.tci-harvard-flow .out{background:#fde2e2;color:#7f1d1d}
.tci-harvard-flow .in{background:#dff3e4;color:#14532d}
.tci-harvard-flow .own{background:#f6c061;color:#141414}
.tci-harvard-flow .ft{background:#f9f7f5;color:#8a8378;font-size:12px;padding:10px 14px}
@media (max-width:640px){
.tci-harvard-flow thead{display:none}
.tci-harvard-flow tr{display:block;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;padding:10px 14px}
.tci-harvard-flow tr:nth-child(even) td{background:transparent}
.tci-harvard-flow td{display:block;border:0;padding:3px 0}
.tci-harvard-flow td::before{content:attr(data-l);display:block;font-size:11px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.06em;color:#8a8378;font-weight:600}
}

Harvard’s Money Flow In Fiscal 2026
Item Amount Direction
Endowment Value $68 billion Held by Harvard
Endowment Payout To Operations $2.6 billion Harvard’s budget
Estimated Annual Endowment Tax At 8% About $300 million To U.S. Treasury
Harvard Need-Based Grants To Undergrads $261.7 million Harvard’s money
Federal Grants To Undergrads $18.7 million From federal government
Federal Work-Study Wages $3.2 million From federal government
Student Loans (All Sources) $7.4 million Borrowed by students
Parent Loans $8.9 million Borrowed by parents
Source: Harvard Common Data Set 2025-26, Harvard Magazine. The College Investor.

The Irony In Harvard’s Financial Aid Numbers

Harvard doesn’t need federal dollars to keep its financial aid promises. The Common Data Set shows Harvard met 100% of need for all 3,950 undergraduates who qualified, with need measured through the Student Aid Index. Harvard’s own need-based grants totaled $261.7 million. Federal money made up about 5% of the need-based grant dollars those students received.

But student loan borrowing hasn’t gone away at Harvard either. The Common Data Set shows undergraduates took out $7.4 million in student loans from all sources. Parents borrowed another $8.9 million. Three-quarters of the student loans and all of the parent loans fall in the non-need column, so families borrowed to cover the share Harvard expects them to pay rather than a gap in aid.

If those parent loans are federal Parent PLUS loans, they carry the highest of the federal student loan interest rates.

The debt shows up at graduation too. Among Harvard’s class of 2025, 16% left with loans averaging $22,926, and 7% had federal loans averaging $13,844. The 2% who used private student loans averaged $77,146. That’s a big disconnect considering the school says it meets 100% of need.

This is where the irony sharpens. Harvard’s fact sheet folds federal and outside scholarships into the same financial aid package as Harvard’s own grants. At a school that fully meets need, a federal grant dollar mostly offsets money Harvard would otherwise spend, rather than lowering what the family pays.

The average aided family contributed about $14,000 toward an $87,900 budget in 2024-25, a useful benchmark against what families really pay for college out of pocket.

There is a fair argument on the other side. Pell Grants belong to eligible students, and leaving federal aid entirely would also end federal loan access for Harvard’s roughly 14,100 graduate and professional students.

The Common Data Set covers undergraduates only, so it misses that graduate borrowing, which is facing major changes under the new loan rules.

Still, colleges can decide to opt out of the Federal student aid system and simply take care of their students themselves. Grove City College refuses Pell Grants and federal loans outright. Harvard could replace every federal grant and work-study dollar its undergraduates receive with less than 1% of this year’s $2.6 billion endowment distribution. They likely don’t simply because there is no incentive to do so.

How This Connects

The endowment tax hike targets the wealthiest schools by design. Under the final OBBBA law, the tiered endowment tax applies to private colleges with at least 3,000 tuition-paying students, starting with tax years after December 31, 2025.

The rate is 1.4% when endowment assets run $500,000 to $750,000 per student. It rises to 4% up to $2 million per student and 8% above that. The College Investor has tracked this tax since lawmakers first proposed raising the college endowment tax.

Spread across all 20,851 students, Harvard’s endowment works out to roughly $3.3 million each, well past the top threshold. That wealth stands out at a time when colleges are closing in 2026. Even large private schools are feeling pressure, with Syracuse reporting its first budget deficit in years after missing its enrollment target.

What’s Next

Fiscal 2027 is Harvard’s first full year at the 8% rate, and the flat estimated payout shows the tax already shapes its budget. Harvard’s next Common Data Set, usually posted in early summer, will show whether federal grant totals change.

Families applying this fall can estimate their own aid with The College Investor’s financial aid calculator before comparing offers from wealthy schools.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Harvard Endowment Hits $68 Billion As 8% Endowment Tax Begins appeared first on The College Investor.

GSE shareholders closer to big payout after petition denial


Processing Content

  • What’s at Stake: Whether many GSE shareholders are one step closer to winning a lawsuit with monetary stakes.
  • Supporting Data: A collective payment estimated to be nearing $1 billion
  • Forward Look: FHFA has 90 days to decide whether to petition the Supreme Court.

Overview bullets generated by AI with editorial review.  

A federal appeals court has rejected the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s petition for an en banc review of a decision favoring certain government-sponsored shareholders in the Fairholme Funds case.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied the FHFA’s petition for the full bench to rehear the case with a terse filing stating there was “an absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote.” 

“We think that was the appropriate and the right outcome. We’re very pleased the court saw it the same way,” said Hamish Hume, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP representing investors who had challenged the petition.

Hamish Hume, partner at Boise Schiller Flexner LLP

Eli Meir Kaplan for Lawdragon

The denial means GSE shareholders, with the exception of those who hold Fannie Mae common stock, could receive some portion of a pending payment in the case estimated to be near $1 billion, according to Hume.

(Fannie common shareholders were excluded from the case because that GSE is incorporated in Delaware, where dividends are discretionary. Freddie Mac is incorporated in Virginia, which has different rules. Junior preferred shares at Fannie are included in the case due in part to other contractual privileges they have.)

The remaining hurdle for investors

After this ruling, the FHFA does have another opportunity at overturning the verdict, by going to the nation’s highest court. 

“There’s an open question of whether FHFA takes one last shot by filing a petition to the Supreme Court,” he said.

FHFA will have 90 days to decide whether or not to file a Supreme Court petition and investors would oppose this if it were to come to pass, according to Hume.

“I think that to do that, they need the Solicitor General at the Department of Justice to both approve it and file it for them. At least that would be the typical procedure,” Hume said.

A FHFA spokesperson had not responded to an inquiry about this at the time of this writing.

The FHFA’s position has been that it had powers and immunity under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act to engage in a temporary profit sweep after the GSEs went into conservatorship during the Great Financial Crisis.

The case has pitted the FHFA’s claims on the net worth sweep along with the Supreme Court ruling in Collins v. Yellen against investors’ rights under contract law, which plaintiffs have argued are distinct.

Hume has said investors could get paid in the next year or so if FHFA does not petition the Supreme Court.

“The mechanics of claim submission and claim distribution, we’d like to get that rolling sooner rather than later, so that you know that the amounts can be distributed as soon as possible,” he said.

Both legacy shareholders from before the GSEs went into conservatorship and those that purchased stock from them could receive the payments if they hold anything other than Fannie common, according to Hume.

Although FHFA Director Bill Pulte showed interest in a new GSE stock offering at one point there have not been any since Fannie and Freddie went into conservatorship in 2008.



Google Pixel Watch 4 LTE (41mm) for $249.99 on Amazon


🛍️ Support DDG

Enjoying the deals and content? When you shop through our Amazon affiliate links, we may earn a small commission — at no extra cost to you. Your support helps keep the deals, bank bonuses, and giveaways coming. Thank you!


Shop Amazon & Support Us

HDFC Bank: 3 Key Takeaways for Long-Term Investors


On its second quarter of fiscal 2027 earnings call, held on Oct. 17, 2026, HDFC Bank (HDB +1.32%) announced that its operational efficiency and lending momentum are accelerating across core retail and commercial segments.

Expanding frontline capacity through digital tools enables India’s largest private bank to serve more customers per branch. Higher-yielding retail loans and an upward shift in the interest rate cycle support long-term expansion in interest income. Three takeaways from management’s call stand out for long-term investors.

1. Automated Workflows Boost Frontline Productivity

The bank is expanding digital adoption and straight-through processing, which automates loan processing without manual intervention, to reduce turnaround times (TATs), or the total time required to fulfill customer requests. Shorter processing cycles allow branch employees to handle higher transaction volumes and conduct more client interactions each day.

The turnaround times on product deliveries have come down anywhere between 10% and 15% in a short span of time, while service delivery TATs have come down by 30% during the quarter, which means the frontline can touch more customers within the same work hours.
— Sashidhar Jagdishan, Chief Executive Officer

2. Net Interest Margins Near an Upward Turning Point

A turning interest rate environment and floating-rate loan repricing are positioning net interest margin (NIM), which measures the gap between interest earned on assets and interest paid on deposits, for a structural recovery. Management expects profitability metrics to improve as borrowing costs stabilize and higher-yielding assets reprice.

The trajectory will be upward from the next quarter onwards.
— Sashidhar Jagdishan, Chief Executive Officer

3. Retail Lending Accelerates Across Key Categories

Disbursements across consumer loan categories, including vehicle financing and personal lending, are rising as branch productivity improves. Expanding retail credit increases exposure to higher-margin assets relative to wholesale corporate lending, enhancing overall balance sheet yields.

The pace of retail disbursements is accelerating and has crossed INR 90,000 crores during Q2 FY ’27 as against INR 76,000 crores in Q1 of this year.
— Sashidhar Jagdishan, Chief Executive Officer

Looking Ahead

Branch distribution expansion, deep customer relationships, and core technology investments give the bank structural scale advantages in Indian financial services. Incoming executive leadership is prioritizing capital discipline, digital infrastructure, and risk governance to drive compounding returns.

The clear long-term goal is to deliver sustainable long-term value for shareholders, employees and clients.
— Anup Bagchi, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

Operational efficiency and artificial intelligence adoption provide clear runways for profitable growth across commercial and retail segments.

As macroeconomic dynamics evolve and AI technology and digital infrastructures accelerate, we’ll focus on capturing these opportunities with prudence and discipline.
— Anup Bagchi, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Scaling a Company Forces Founders to Make 3 Key Shifts


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Early-stage companies often rely on the founder’s judgment, and for good reason. But as you grow, you have to learn to delegate to give your team the confidence to make decisions without you.
  • Don’t just hire people to execute — hire people who genuinely want to learn.
  • Give your employees enough trust to surprise you with the way they step up to the plate.

When I started Infragistics, I was used to solving problems myself. That was partly because I had to. We were a small company with limited resources and few people to hand things off to. If a task needed to get done, I did it. If a decision needed to be made, I made it. If something went wrong, I jumped in and fixed it.

Those instincts served me well and helped me build a company from a 10-person startup into a global organization with hundreds of employees across six countries. But eventually, they stopped serving me.

The bigger Infragistics became, the more I realized that being the person with all the answers was actually becoming a limitation. I couldn’t be in every meeting, make every decision or personally solve every problem. More importantly, if I kept doing those things, I was preventing other people from developing the judgment and confidence to do it themselves.

That was one of the hardest transitions of my career. I realized that the skills I had relied on to build the company were not necessarily the skills I needed to lead it. Over 35 years, I’ve had to rethink how I manage, how I develop people and how much control I’m willing to give up. I’ve learned that scaling a company requires a founder to make three fundamental shifts.

1. Stop being the only person with all the answers

Early-stage companies often revolve around the founder’s judgment, and there’s good reason for that. Founders are deeply involved in the product, the customers and the day-to-day business. Decisions get made quickly because they don’t have to travel through layers of approval, and that speed is often a real advantage when trying to get ahead of the competition.

But most founders are also, without realizing it, running a command-and-control organization. The leader sets the direction, makes the decisions and expects the team to execute. It works when the company is small enough to manage directly, but as the company grows, people stop bringing problems forward because they expect to be told what to do anyway. The organization becomes dependent on one person’s judgment at the exact moment it needs to be building more of it. And the founder who was once the engine of the company becomes the bottleneck. 

Eventually, a founder’s job is no longer to have the best answer, but to help other people develop the ability to find the best answer. That shift requires moving from command-and-control to coaching. Coaching isn’t about telling people what to do, but about helping people understand why a decision needs to be made and giving them the tools to make better decisions themselves. It builds judgment over time rather than substituting someone else’s. Done consistently, it creates a team that can operate, adapt and lead without the founder in the room.

2. Stop hiring people to execute and start hiring people who want to learn

Most hiring decisions focus on what someone can do right now. Can they handle the role? Do they have the relevant experience? Those are reasonable questions, but as a company grows, the answers become less obvious. Everything from markets and technology to customers can change drastically in the course of a year, and the skills that once made someone an excellent hire may not be the skills the company needs from them down the line. A team built entirely around execution, and around people who are very good at doing what they are told, will struggle to adapt when the ground shifts.

That’s why curiosity matters as much as capability. Leaders who build learning cultures start at the hiring stage. The questions worth asking in an interview are not just about what someone has done, but about how they think and whether they are actively invested in their own growth. 

Once those individuals are hired, the other half of the equation is investing in their curiosity. That means giving people a real budget for learning — conferences, courses, advanced degrees — and building development plans that take their growth seriously. 

A company cannot stay competitive by relying only on the knowledge it already has, and the founders who scale are the ones who hire for who someone can become, not just what they can do on day one. 

3. Give people enough trust to surprise you

Control feels safe, especially when the stakes are high. But a company can’t scale what only one person can manage, and at some point, the need for speed and the need for control become incompatible. 

Real delegation requires trust, and trust requires accepting that people will sometimes do things differently than you would. And while different can feel intimidating, it doesn’t mean the approach is worse. Founders who can’t tolerate change or a different way of thinking tend to pull decisions back toward themselves, which trains their teams to stop taking initiative and wait for direction. 

Building trust means giving people responsibility before it feels completely comfortable, letting them make decisions and resisting the urge to step in every time the approach differs from your own. At the end of the day it’s not about the path to a goal. What’s most important is that the goal is met. 

Trust is also cultivated when leaders model the behavior they want to see. If a leader can’t be challenged, no one else will feel comfortable challenging bad ideas. If a leader cannot admit mistakes, employees will learn to hide theirs. And if people do not feel safe disagreeing, the organization loses some of its best thinking.

The strange paradox of building a company is that the instincts that make a great founder are eventually the same ones that have to be unlearned. The founders who scale aren’t the ones who hold on to control the longest, but are the ones who build people who can think for themselves, create a culture that rewards curiosity and establish enough trust that the organization can make good decisions even when the founder isn’t in the room.

Key Takeaways

  • Early-stage companies often rely on the founder’s judgment, and for good reason. But as you grow, you have to learn to delegate to give your team the confidence to make decisions without you.
  • Don’t just hire people to execute — hire people who genuinely want to learn.
  • Give your employees enough trust to surprise you with the way they step up to the plate.

When I started Infragistics, I was used to solving problems myself. That was partly because I had to. We were a small company with limited resources and few people to hand things off to. If a task needed to get done, I did it. If a decision needed to be made, I made it. If something went wrong, I jumped in and fixed it.

Those instincts served me well and helped me build a company from a 10-person startup into a global organization with hundreds of employees across six countries. But eventually, they stopped serving me.

The bigger Infragistics became, the more I realized that being the person with all the answers was actually becoming a limitation. I couldn’t be in every meeting, make every decision or personally solve every problem. More importantly, if I kept doing those things, I was preventing other people from developing the judgment and confidence to do it themselves.

Now He Owns 40 Rentals!


Lawrence “Landlord Larry” Guerguis thought he would spend the next 40 years of his life in finance. But one conversation with a regretful investment banker changed his life’s trajectory and set him on a path toward financial freedom through real estate investing. Just three years later, he owns 40 rental properties producing thousands in monthly cash flow!

Once Larry realized the impact that rental properties could have on his wealth, time, lifestyle, and flexibility, he wasted no time in buying his first rental property. While still in college, he sold his car, scrounged together a down payment, and bought a duplex out in the Midwest. With proof of concept and a few hundred bucks lining his pockets each month, he went all-in on real estate. He’s since moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he’s built a real estate portfolio of 40 single-family homes (and counting!).

In today’s episode, he’s giving you all the secrets he’s used to buy deal after deal without having the W-2 income to qualify for traditional bank financing. From locking in better rents with Section 8 investing to building a brand that creates greater opportunities, Larry has found a formula that really works in 2026!

Henry:
Today’s guest owns 40 rental properties, producing thousands in monthly cash flow, and he’s only been in real estate for a few years. Before real estate, Larry Guirguis thought he’d be spending the next 40 years of his life working on Wall Street, but one conversation with a regretful investment banker changed his trajectory and set him on a path toward financial freedom through real estate. Larry knew he wanted to buy rentals, but how? He was a college student living in California with no W-2 income, so he couldn’t possibly buy a rental property, right? But Larry wasn’t taking no for an answer. He sold his car, scrounged together a down payment and bought a duplex in a Midwest market he could actually afford. Then with proof of concept and a few hundred bucks lining his pocket each month, he moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he has built a real estate portfolio of 40 single family homes and counting.
Today, he’s sharing how he bought deal after deal without qualifying for traditional bank financing, from focusing on low price but high cash flow rentals to locking in higher rents with Section eight investing. Landlord Larry has found a formula that really works today.
What’s going on everybody? I’m Henry Washington, co-host of the BiggerPockets Podcast. And today we have an investor story with Larry Guerguis. You might know him as landlord Larry on Instagram and TikTok, so let’s bring him on. Lawrence Guerguis, better known as Landlord Larry. Welcome to the BiggerPockets Podcast, my friend.

Larry:
Thank you very much for having me. Appreciate it.

Henry:
We’d like to start off by learning a little bit about who you are, what you do, and how you even got into real estate in the first place.

Larry:
My name’s Larry or Lawrence. Some people call me landlord Larry on the internet. I’m from California, Southern California. And I started investing in Section eight real estate, particularly during my junior year in college. And I did take a big leap from Southern California from the people that are from there. They know it’s a very nice place to live. And I moved to the Midwest to do it full-time right after college. So thank God it’s been a blessing to do it and I’ve been doing it for a little over three years now and it’s been great.

Henry:
What even sparked the interest in real estate? Because college is not that path.

Larry:
No, college isn’t that path. And it wasn’t always real estate for me. It was originally investment banking. I thought I was going to be the typical finance bro.

Henry:
Finance bros.

Larry:
Yeah, that was going to be my path, living in New York, working crazy hours. It’s a pretty funny story. I was actually just out at the bars with friends during my junior year of college, my first semester. And like I said, I went to college in San Diego. It’s a fun place to be, but we were at a bar and then we went to a pizza parlor right next to it. And there was some guy sitting next to me, looked a little down. He was just kind of on his own. And I was like, “Hey bro, everything all right?” And he was like, “Don’t talk to me. I only get two weeks out of the year off.” I was like, “Okay, what do you do by chance?” And he was like, “I’m in investment banking.”

Henry:
I was

Larry:
Like, “Okay. I’d love to talk to this guy. Okay, let’s hear it.” So I ended up talking to that guy in that pizza parlor. My friends leave for an hour and a half and he gave me some pointers. The thing that really stuck with me from that conversation, he asked me if I loved money, not liked, not enjoyed spending it, loved. And I said, “No, no, I don’t love money. Money’s great. I think everyone enjoys having a little bit more of that, but loving is something different.” And I didn’t love it. And he said, “Forget about investment banking. Forget about anything finance because that’s what you need to have to work these crazy hours and you make great money.” But he says he doesn’t even have the time to spend it. And I was like, “All right.” So after that day, I was like, “We’re going to figure out this real estate stuff out before we graduate so that we have some sort of path coming out of college.”

Henry:
All right. Okay. So you got tapped on the shoulder and you took it seriously. So how did you go from that moment to actually taking action and working towards your first deal?

Larry:
I ended up selling my car, my first car, and I sold it for around 16 grand. And I was like, “Listen, I don’t need a car. I use one of the family. I have a family hammer down car from 2008.” I still drive that car. I love that thing. And I was like, “I’m going to sell this and we’re going to figure out a down payment for something.”

Henry:
So you didn’t buy in San Diego,

Larry:
Is that what you’re saying? No. Unfortunately, I didn’t have the budget for it. Didn’t buy in San Diego, didn’t buy anywhere in California. Pretty much I just went on Zillow, Redfin, all those websites and I put my budget in. I put like 70 grand max purchase price. And the states that came up were Ohio, Missouri, Illinois, parts of Illinois, Alabama, all these Midwestern Southern states. I was like, okay. So now we’re not investing in our home state. We’re going to have to figure out management. For me, it was like, we’re going to figure this stuff as we get there. As long as I get the ball rolling, then I’m going to make a mistake. And even if I buy a house, the loan payment on it’s 400 bucks, that’s a $400 monthly mistake that I’ll figure out over 30 years.

Henry:
So

Larry:
Ended up coming across a place called Peoria, Illinois.

Henry:
Oh yeah.

Larry:
I’ve been there a couple times. It’s interesting. I didn’t go there to look at the property. I pretty much just trusted some handyman I found on a Facebook group. Seems legit.

Henry:
I see no problem with that.

Larry:
Oh yeah. Legit’s the word we’ll use. So yeah, I joined all the Facebook groups in the Peoria area and I just found a handyman and I was like, “Hey man, I just need you to go look at this property and see if it’s not awful.” At the time, even if he told me things that were wrong with it, I wouldn’t know. Like I said, I’m college finance. I don’t know what a water heater was, none of that. So I pretty much just needed a thumbs up or thumbs down from him. He gave me a thumbs up. Don’t know the reliability on that, but I took it and I ended up buying that house. I put around 15,3 down.

Henry:
Purchase price was 70?

Larry:
65.

Henry:
So you did a conventional mortgage?

Larry:
I did a DSER because I don’t have a W2. I have no pay stubs, no income. So the only one I applied for was DSER and closing took forever and even to get the pre-approval before took forever because I was looking for a lender that go down to that loan amount. And the place where I found them was actually BiggerPockets. During class I was scrolling through, you could even see my history. It’s just like sub 100K loan amount DSER. And I’m like, does anyone know a lender? Finally got connected one and bought through him.

Henry:
One thing you said that I liked was you though through what the fear was, the worst case scenario. What’s the worst case scenario? I buy a house and my mortgage payment is 300 bucks and if it doesn’t go well, I’ll just be stuck paying 300 bucks a month for a while. I can figure that out.
When we break our fears down sometimes and we figure out, okay, well what’s the real consequence to the action that I’m taking? We sometimes realize that the fear is not that big of a deal. So I like that approach you took and I want other people to do that. If you’re stuck in a decision, break down your fears. What’s the worst case scenario and can you survive that worst case scenario? Can you get back on your feet and not compromise your family’s wellbeing, the roof over your head? Those things are important. But if it’s just like, “Yeah, I might lose some money, but I’ll be okay.” I don’t know. Might want to rethink that calculated risk.

Larry:
Yeah, exactly.

Henry:
The other thing, you just started putting in your budget on the realtor to look for a place to invest and you landed on this property in Peoria. So purchase price, 65-ish thousand. You put about 15,000 down and you said it was fairly turnkey, so no renovations?

Larry:
Not much, no. I maybe put a couple hundred bucks and paint, painted some walls and stuff like that, and then that’s about it.

Henry:
And then you needed a tenant.

Larry:
Yeah.

Henry:
How long did it take you to find one?

Larry:
I needed not any tenant. I needed the perfect tenant because I couldn’t afford a non-payment, otherwise I wouldn’t make the mortgage payment. It took me a couple months, to be honest. It wasn’t immediate because I started advertising just on Zillow and I was getting a bunch of people and I was kind of messing around for the first time with tenant screening websites, which ones did I like, which one gave me the information I needed. I ended up just thinking, I was like, okay, if I need a tenant that’s going to pay me for sure, let’s look into Section eight. I was like, okay, let’s take a look at it. I mean, baseline, if I sign this government paper, I should get paid rent, right? And I was like, okay, so let’s start to advertise on affordable housing. I advertised on affordable housing, found a couple tenants that’s very light screening.
Screening wasn’t really good at all. I got one.

Henry:
How did it go? Was it a good tenant?

Larry:
So the tenant didn’t end up paying anything. Her portion was nothing. As a lot of people know, Section eight does pay 70 to 100% or even less depending on the tenant’s income. Her income was nothing. So I was getting 100% from Section eight, which was pretty sick and I was cool with that.

Henry:
So the government was your reliable tenant that you were looking for?

Larry:
Exactly. That’s what I was saying. I was looking for the perfect tenant. The government never misses a payment. So yeah, no, I ended up getting around 1,400 in rent and my payment was 480 something, which wasn’t bad.

Henry:
No, that’s pretty freaking

Larry:
Awesome. That’s

Henry:
Really

Larry:
Good cash flow. I was like, “This is sick.” And I’m still in my college dorm doing this. So I got a little bit of party money. It’s cool. I was like, “All right, my roommates ain’t doing this.” So I was like, “This is sick. This is sick.” But for me, in reality, that was the moment where it clicked. I was like, “Okay, this works.”

Henry:
Proof of concept.

Larry:
Exactly. Proof of concept. This works. And obviously one house, 700, 600, 1,000, whatever net is not life changing. It’s not going to do much for me. Not much for anyone, especially living in California, but if I can manage to scale up, there you go.

Henry:
All right. Well, made a few mistakes, but you came out clean on the other side, got some cash flow. And if you’re anything like me, once I got a taste of that proof of concept and it was working after my first deal, I was like, “How do I do a lot more of these right now?” Because I was ready to scale as soon as I did that first one. So I’m very curious what that meant to you, and we’ll learn about that right after the break. All right. Welcome back to the Victor Your Pockets podcast. I am here speaking with landlord Larry, and he just told us about his first deal that he did while in college. Pretty impressive, made some mistakes, but ended up with some good cash flow. What did you do next?

Larry:
So I’m still in college. Like I said, I just added that real estate major, so my college actually just got extended and that just wasn’t going to work, especially after seeing this work happen. After you

Henry:
Get the proof of concept,

Larry:
Now you want to get

Henry:
Out of there.

Larry:
So I kind of went to my academic advisor and I was like, “Hey man, we’re going to have to chop this up. How are we going to squeeze all these credits so I can graduate on time because I still want to graduate?” He was like, “You’re going to have to take a lot of credits every semester and then also do summer and winter classes. Let’s do it.” So that junior year, second semester, I did I think 18 credits. I did six credits that summer, and then I did three credits during the winter, and then another 23 credits my senior year, second semester. And thank God graduated on time.

Henry:
That’s wild.

Larry:
Yeah, it was a lot of – That

Henry:
Is a lot of class because

Larry:
What’s

Henry:
A full load? 12?

Larry:
12 to 15. Yeah.
Yeah. Wild. I did a double overload, especially on my last semester senior year. I actually took a class at the community college nearby. So we finished. We finished that god. And during this time, I’m doing all the backend because I was preparing to move out to wherever I was going to invest. So I wanted to get my set DSER lender, my lawyer, my real estate agents in whatever state I was going to go to. I’m still figuring this out at the time, but I did a lot of this on BiggerPockets too. It’s just finding connections so that wherever I did move out, I can hit the ground running. And also funding this portfolio that I wanted to do.

Henry:
What was that process like to get to the next deal?

Larry:
So like I said, I used all my money on that first deal and I didn’t have any personal assets to take money from. So I ended up kind of going around asking different people, but I’m very familiar with Discord. That’s my online presence. I love Discord. So I was going in different crypto Discord channels and for lack of better term, just trash talking these people.
So I was pretty much just telling them that their assets are not tangible and it could be gone tomorrow. You have no idea. Crypto’s great, but I have nothing against it, but I’m going to do what I can to tell these people that tomorrow could be worth nothing. And if all your money’s in crypto, that’s a little bit of a risk. So I just tell people invest in tangible assets, invest in tangible assets. And I was doing it to so many Discords with hundreds of thousands of people. And I got people that were serious, not serious. And I finally got some younger guy that came up on some crypto money. He messaged me on Discord. He’s like, “Yeah, I do agree with you. I have some money in crypto and I do want to take a chunk of it out to invest in something tangible.
What are you talking about?” And I make a pitch deck with Canva and bootstrap that. And I was like, “Hey man, you should really come down to San Diego and we’ll have a conversation about it.” He actually comes down to San Diego earlier in May. I’m graduating end of May. He comes down earlier in May, taking out to some Korean barbecue, which he doesn’t eat because he doesn’t like raw meats like that. So we were just talking the whole time and it ended up working out. We agreed to a certain start money and I ended up taking that and moving out. The first place I chose was Cleveland, Ohio.

Henry:
Okay. And what did you decide to do with that money? You said you moved to Cleveland. I’m assuming you researched Cleveland

Larry:
Before

Henry:
Moving there?

Larry:
Yeah. So that entire senior year while I was doing my classes, that’s where I actually needed to research where I was going. So I researched Chicago, which I turned, I wasn’t going to do that. I researched Alabama, Missouri. I actually had a friend in Missouri, so I researched a lot of Missouri and then Cleveland, Ohio. And Cleveland, Ohio just kind of, first of all, it was tolerable to live in. There was a downtown, even though I don’t really use it, but I’m here

Henry:
For work. Boosting Southern California folks.

Larry:
Yeah.

Henry:
It’s a decent city. It’s fine. It’s got character everybody. It’s not San Diego, but it’s good.

Larry:
Yeah. And it was an insane Section eight market and it still is. So I’d pretty much just after class go on Zillow and I felt kind of bad because I was kind of wasting these agents’ times, but I’d give them calls, the listing agents, and I’d ask them to send me video tours of the houses and then also answer questions about the area because my understanding of obviously there’s East Cleveland, which is pretty bad and different parts in the Cleveland surrounding areas. So I wanted to get an understanding of which areas are good or bad to buy in and now also understanding the insides of these houses. I probably did this to 50 agents, poor guys, I wasted their time, but I got the knowledge that I needed so that when I did move there, I went immediately. The first week I was there, I toured easily over 60, 70 houses.

Henry:
What did you learn by getting the video tours?What were you looking for and then what did you actually learn from that?

Larry:
For example, different video tours had older panels, older electrical panels, and some of them had new. I’d look at different basement walls. Some of them you could see condensation building up or horizontal cracks, vertical cracks. And I’d ask questions. I’d be like, “Oh, what is that?” Because I had no idea. And some agents are very knowledgeable about houses and some aren’t, that’s just normal. But the ones that were, which is how I found my agent, because he was answering every single question about the mechanics of the house. I was like, “This guy knows the stuff.” I’d be like, “Why does this water heater look different than this one? Oh, it’s an older one, so it’s due for however many years.” And now I just know the fact that they made that comment, it’s due to be replaced soon. Now I know, okay, water heaters are roughly need to be replaced every 10 or so years.
I had no idea. So just asking these questions kind of put those timelines for, or difference between three tab, two tab or whatever, shingle roofs. So these are all important things. I didn’t care about the cosmetic. These things are all cheap. It was understanding the mechanics behind homes. So asking these questions taught me kind of a baseline. And then when I was there, I can kind of connect the dots and be like, “Oh, I did see that in the video. Look it, that’s an older panel. I should probably be careful about this house.”

Henry:
All right. So you got familiar with properties, you got familiar with Cleveland, you moved, now you’re living there. How long did it take you to get your first deal? What’d you do?

Larry:
Yeah, so I moved to Cleveland 2024 end of July. Immediately, I had that agent that I was speaking with, one of the ones that I was speaking with asking for video tours and all that. And this guy was a dog. He knows everything about houses. I was like, “I’m going to move this day.” I believe it was a Thursday, and that Monday we started looking at houses. Nice. And I made a huge list that weekend. A poor guy. I mean, I probably put 50, 60 houses on that list. And on a sheet that I shared with him, I was like, “We’re going to tour all of these.” And that gave me a huge understanding of what areas were bad. I mean, I was walking around places in Cleveland, gunshots, two doors to the left of me. It was interesting. And I knew, okay, maybe this is an amazing place to buy, and then some other places were great.
So first deal was a duplex. I was planning on going in just single family, but it was actually a duplex in kind of a rough area. I’m not going to lie. But there were two Section eight tenants in there top down that had been there for, one was 16 years and one was for 11 years. They’d been there forever, and the rent was super low. It was like 650 bucks each unit. So from my understanding of studying the Section eight there, the authority there, I could increase the rents right away to the standard of 2024.

Henry:
Without doing any work.

Larry:
Without doing any work because they already passed Section eight inspections. So I knew that it was turnkey enough. I toured the property in person. It looked great. The tenants took great care of the property. I met the tenants. I still have this tenant to this day. He’s a great guy. And I was like, okay, let’s put an offer. I put a pretty aggressive offer on. And this was my first offer, so I was asking all the questions along the way. I read every single page letter by letter, and thank God we got that first one at 88,000 was for that duplex. Wow. Yeah.

Henry:
That cash flows without you raising the rent. That’s

Larry:
A

Henry:
Decent cash flowing deal without raising the rents.

Larry:
My mortgage was 675 on the dot 675, I remember. And I’m still making 600 bucks, paying water and sewer. They’re both very old, so the water and sewer was very minimal. So I’m making 500 and something dollars. Great, I’ll take it. But the HUD for that time, they were both three bedroom units, but they had two bedroom vouchers, so I could only get to two bedroom rent, were around $1,200 for two bedroom rent. Both of them, three months later, went up to that amount.

Henry:
Nice.

Larry:
And it cash flowed like crazy. I was like, wow, that is wild. So the first one was a home run. Even my agent to this day said those first six were home runs.

Henry:
It sounds like you found a kind of a niche opportunity there because if the property was a three bedroom, but only getting two bedroom vouchers, there’s obviously opportunity for you to get increased rent. Was the previous landlord just not on top of maintaining his rents? Is that an opportunity you can find if you look for it? Is

Larry:
That normal?
Yeah. Yeah. I actually recently bought two properties with tenants that have been there for a very long time and increases that haven’t been there for a long time. You could see that, for example, for that first property, it was being transferred from owner to owner to owner to owner, bought and sold, bought and sold. And no one really went because usually section eight, you need to hand in a rent increase in person. So maybe they didn’t have an agent in the area to hand in a rent increase or just didn’t think about it. So no one handed in a rent increase to the housing authority there. And I was like, “I’m just going to give it a shot and see what happens.” And still to this day, I mean, I recently bought two houses where it was a three bedroom, tenant has amazing income. The rent was 900 and it went up to 1600.
Geez. It’s a lot of out-of-state investors that just don’t understand the, and I don’t blame them, don’t understand the rules of the housing authority there, but I was like, “I’m going to ask.”

Henry:
Super cool. So you bought that duplex, then what?

Larry:
And then around the same time, it’s funny, the first six I bought, it was six houses in six months, and I bought them kind of in duos. It was pretty interesting how that happened. My goal was six houses in a year. So thankfully we bought the six houses in six months. I bought a single family at the time. That one needed a little bit of work. I didn’t know anyone there. So I actually have pictures of me doing the work myself.
And it was, I’m not going to lie, the work was kind of bad. The work was kind of bad. I mean, I was painting a room. I didn’t put any primer on it. I tried to re-sand wood floor. Didn’t go out right. But thankfully I did get another housing authority tenant. The numbers on that, the payment on it was 524 and I got a housing authority for 1850. So that one did really well. So I bought those around the same time. That one was already occupied, the duplex, and then the move-in date for the other tenant was October 1st. Right around October, I bought two more. One was a four bedroom, two bath, single, and the other one was a three bedroom, one bath, single in a nicer area, still section eight. The zip code for that area was really good, so I got really good rents on that.
The payment on that one was 709, I believe. And I got 1720. Nice. And then on the four bedroom, she didn’t have any income, but my payment was also like 540 something and the rent was 1300.

Henry:
These are great numbers for reasonably affordable houses that were not purchased that long ago. That’s why Cleveland is one of the most popular landlord markets because of the affordability versus rents that you can get there, which is really, really cool. And you funded all six of these through that private money partnership that you had?

Larry:
The down payments. Yeah. The down payments fell anywhere between 17,000 and 20,000 at the time. Those were my cash to close on all those.

Henry:
And how much equity were you giving up on each one of these deals?

Larry:
I was giving him 30%.

Henry:
And rent 70 / 30 split or fifty fifty split on rents?

Larry:
Fifty fifty.

Henry:
Okay. What was the long-term plan with the partnership and the loans? Do you still have these partnerships? Did you buy him out? How does it end?

Larry:
Yeah, so he’s actually a really nice guy. And the reason why I gave him equity, first of all, I’m a desperate college kid and I didn’t have any experience, and I knew that I could work it out with him. He’s a younger guy, so I was like, “We’ll figure it out later.” But obviously that’s not the right way to go about it. Definitely if you’re going into partnerships, don’t think that way. Have your long-term plan set from the beginning because once you sign that paper, you sign it. But he was a cool guy, so I kind of figured that once we get the ball rolling, then we can figure out moving forward. But yeah, the goal was to buy him out eventually when all these properties are cash flowing, give him his big check at the end and he’ll be happy. And that’s eventually what ended up happening.
I did buy out the equity and then I started getting all the cash flow from all these properties and then I dumped all of that back into now my personal portfolio.

Henry:
All right, Larry. Well, this is pretty cool. It’s a pretty cool story about getting started. I love hearing stories about how people got started at a younger age. I was an old fogey when I got started. The other thing that’s really cool is you did this while in college, and a lot of people think that they aren’t prepared or ready to get started, and you didn’t let that stop you. As a college student, you figured out a way to do it. You figured out a way to raise money, you figured out a way to find deals, all while taking two times the load of a normal college student. So that’s pretty impressive in itself. Do you mind giving us a breakdown of where your portfolio stands today?

Larry:
Yeah. So thank God I’ve been able to build it around 40 properties now.

Henry:
Wow.

Larry:
Impressive. Yeah. I still only have that one multifamily duplex, so I did that.

Henry:
All singles.

Larry:
Yeah, all singles. Yeah, all singles. My strategy’s pretty simple. I like three ones, three twos, maybe some four bedrooms. They’re easier to manage, longer term tenants. But yeah, I’ve been able to grow into that. And to be honest, I dump everything back into it. I love buying these houses. I’m passionate about it. So I try not to take too much home. I try to just buy every month down payments, down payments, down payments.

Henry:
Okay. And is this all in Cleveland or did you venture into another market?

Larry:
Yeah, so majority’s in Cleveland, and then I also have a bunch in St. Louis, Missouri. Like I mentioned before, I have a friend out there that went to college with me. So when we both finished, I was like, “Hey man, I kind of need my boots on the ground.” And he wanted to also learn Section eight. So I was like, “This is a great opportunity. We can work together. We have a partnership in St. Louis.” So I was able to buy out there because I had my friend out there.

Henry:
These are markets where people think it’s competitive because of the popularity of the markets for landlords. How has that impacted or not impacted your strategy going forward? Have you had trouble finding deals? What’s that look like?

Larry:
Yeah, so deals have definitely gotten more expensive for sure. I mean, the appreciation on the houses that I already own is insane, but it’s always kind of understanding now off-market deals, thankfully, obviously through social media, which is pretty cool. It’s a great opportunity to have. I’ve been able to meet a lot of wholesalers, meet a lot of people that have off-market deals. So I’ve been able to buy some off-markets, but even still on the market, it’s really just understanding the numbers. Yeah, a deal might be more expensive, but if the rent number’s out, number’s out. Buy the deal. My biggest regret in my first year, and maybe it turned out to be fine because those first six houses were home runs, but I was penny pinching. I was going crazy on deals. I had lost deals because I was a thousand, $2,000 away from what the seller wanted.
And in reality, what is that? On a small deal, that’s $5 a month different. And I was going crazy over it. I wish I bought every deal sooner.

Henry:
Set every investor ever.

Larry:
Literally. Yeah, exactly. I didn’t understand that when I first got into it and people, maybe older investors I was talking to at time, they’re like, “Get as much as you can, man. I wish I got more.” And at the time, they’re like, “At your age, it’ll turn out good. Just get the deal.” And I was being a little cocky. I was like, “I’m going to buy perfect deals all the time.” Unrealistic. Buy the deal, get it under your belt, because real estate, for me, I look at it if you’re buying these kind of assets, they’re pretty much forever appreciating.

Henry:
I think that there’s value in being cautious when you’re

Larry:
Deal,

Henry:
But there’s a very, very delicate balance of being overly cautious and it hindering you versus being cautious in order to protect yourself. So you definitely have to have the balance. That’s where having a network of other investors can come in handy to help you get out of your own head sometimes and know when to make the offer and when not to make the offer. I want to pivot before we get out of here because we call you landlord Larry, and that’s because of your social media handle where you’ve got a presence where you’re talking a lot about this. So I’d love to learn more about how that’s helped you and maybe how that’s not helped you, but we’ll do that when we come back from a break.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I am here with landlord Larry. He has shared his journey from starting to invest in college to moving to Cleveland and buying six deals in six months, and then pivoting and doing some deals in St. Louis. So you’re very familiar with being an out-of-state investor. But the thing I’m curious about is you’ve built a social media presence as landlord Larry, and as someone who’s built a social media presence myself, there’s upsides and downsides to it. So I’m curious about your social media journey. What prompted you to even start creating a social media presence?

Larry:
It’s always kind of been in the back of my mind. I’ve always liked making videos, whether for me when I was younger, it was gaming and different vlog style, funny videos with my friends. I liked making videos. It was cool. So when it comes to the real estate side, I was like, okay, well, for me in Cleveland, I’m one of the youngest investors and I don’t see why that’s the case. I do think it’s possible for younger investors. And a lot of the questions I got just from my friends and different family friends were like, “How did you get into it so young or is it possible for me as a younger person?” And I’d be like, “Absolutely. You just need to understand some fundamental ideas and educate yourself just as you would like any other career. It’s really nothing special. Trust me, my friends that are becoming doctors, it’s harder to be a doctor.
No questions asked. I tell them all the time, God bless you, man. I can’t do medical school.” So if you took a percentage of that, any education into understanding real estate, for sure it’s possible, almost at any age. Younger, 18 and up. Some people that are younger than 18 get their parents to co-sign as possible. So I got these questions. I was like, how about I start making videos? I made this account, I told a couple of my friends, I’ll start posting consistently. I didn’t. The first eight months I didn’t post. I posted awful videos. If you scroll all the way down, it’s just me holding a camera, talking, just happened pretty much. But it wasn’t until January of this year is I was like, I’m going to post every single day quality content so I can genuinely teach these people, be completely upfront, show numbers, show rent amounts, bank statements.
I want people to truly understand that this is possible and it’s just understanding the steps to do it and then make it also quick because I understand that short form content, you need to keep these people glued to their phone for the 30 second max or else you lose them. So yeah, I truly have a passion for teaching. I’d eventually like to become a professor at my university just for fun. I think it’d be great time to teach a real estate class.

Henry:
I think that’s really cool and I hope you get the opportunity to do that in the future.
In terms of a direct return on your business, so think buying deals or finding lenders or finding contractors, what has having a social media presence brought you the most in your business? I know for me, I’ve bought a couple of deals from leads I’ve gotten from social media, but it’s marginal compared to the volume of deals I do from outside of social media. Where I’ve gotten the most benefit in my direct real estate business has been private money. Because of the credibility that you build online, it’s opened up doors for lenders to reach out to me and say, “Hey, I’d like to work with you.” So what’s the online brand brought to you?

Larry:
Yeah, so I’ve actually had some private lenders reach out to me and I haven’t tapped into that yet, but that is something that I am going to look forward into because I do want to amp up the volume a little bit. But honestly for me, it’s kind of been connections. I’ve been able to either lenders or other people in the social media real estate world, it’s been nice to meet them and learn from them. I try to learn from everybody really. And yeah, mainly that. And even the people that I don’t buy from, those are the people on my wholesale list and my Discord. So it’s cool to have that connection.

Henry:
Awesome. And one last question before we get out of here. There is no doubt someone listening to this episode who is in college, maybe just about to finish college and they’re like, “Man, I think I want to do this.” What advice would you give to that person?

Larry:
So I tell this to a lot of new investors, whether you’re going to get into Section eight, Flipping, Bird, anything, do yourself a favor because thank God I got pretty lucky with just going crazy at it and that’s not necessarily how it always goes. So do yourself a favor and educate yourself. Do your homework. School is boring, but so is real estate. The back end of it is all numbers. Absolutely. Yeah. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows and it’s understanding the things that you need to do. So educate yourself, whether that be books, articles, podcasts, mentors, whatever. First tap into that because remember, real estate is a high ticket career. If you’re going to invest, you’re going to spend money, right? A ton of it. It’s not free. So invest in some education of some sort. Understand just before you go crazy at it, because I’m telling you it is possible, but just having the steps, understanding the steps to go through it first is definitely a necessary aspect of getting into it.

Henry:
Landlord Larry, thank you so much for joining us on the BiggerPockets Podcast. Thank you for sharing your journey with us. It’s pretty impressive what you’ve been able to build and create. You should be proud of yourself, man.

Larry:
Thank you so much for having me, man. I really appreciate it.

Henry:
We’ve been talking about social media, so let everybody know where they can find you.

Larry:
Yeah, so you can find me at landlord.larry on Instagram and yeah, that’s about it. All

Henry:
Right. Landlord.larry on Instagram. And if you’re listening to this episode and you think you’ve got a cool story to share, well, you can always head over to biggerpockets.com/guest and fill out the form. Who knows? We could be talking to you very shortly and you could be sharing your journey on the BiggerPockets Podcast. As always, thank you for listening and we’ll see you on the next episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Rakuten: Get $100 For Chase INK Cash/Unlimited or $25 For Freedom Unlimited.


Update 10/18/26: Chase Ink Cash & Unlimited are back at $100. 

Update 8/20/26: INK Cash and INK Unlimited both have the $100 bonus now. (ht Monty) INK Cash is new – it was never available on Rakuten in the past. 

Update 8/14/26: Ink Unlimited back at $100

Update 7/3/26: bonus is back for the INK Unlimited at $100. Freedom Unlimited is still $50/$90.

Update 6/2/26: $90 for new Chase customers, $50 for existing Chase customers exclusively for the Freedom Unlimited

Update 5/2/26: Now $25.

Update 4/18/26: Now $75 for new Chase customers for the Freedom Unlimited, $25 for existing. 

Update 12/5/25: Now only Freedom Unlimited has an offer on Rakuten. It’s $65 for new Chase customers and $30 for existing.

Update 5/13/25: Rates reduced to $25 for all three cards. (If you have a friend with a referral link, they can often get 10,000/$100 for referring you to the card instead.)

Update 5/8/25: Rates reduced to $100/10,000 for Sapphire Preferred/Ink Unlimited and $75/7,500 for Freedom Unlimited.

Update 5/4/25: Rates have been DRAMATICALLY increased. $300/30,000 for Sapphire Preferred/Ink Unlimited and $150/15,000 for Freedom Unlimited. If you’ve ever wondered how much money we give up by not using affiliate links on this site, this gives you some insight.

See this follow up post: FAQ On The $300 Rakuten Credit Card Bonus (Chase Sapphire Preferred, INK, Freedom)

Original Post:

In a surprising move, Rakuten is now promoting a $50/5,000 bonus when signing up for the Chase Sapphire Preferred, Chase Freedom Unlimited, and Chase INK Unlimited.

Sapphire Preferred | Freedom Unlimited | INK Unlimited

This is perfect timing on the Sapphire Preferred card which is already offering an excellent 100,000 points bonus (ending soon). 

Typically shopping portals are not allowed to offered kickbacks for credit card signups. While the affiliate can sometimes earn well in excess of $50 per signups, the banks and affiliate networks don’t typically allow incentivizing signups in that manner. Apparently Rakuten negotiated this deal specially with Chase. (We don’t use credit card affiliate links on Doctorofcredit ever.)

A lot of us apply using the referral link of a player-2 or a friend which might be better than with using Rakuten. Still, many people prefer an easy bonus like this, especially if you value Rakuten/MR points at more than 1 cent each. (There’s yet another option of buying a card signup bonus on eBay.)

It’s kinda strange to earn Membership Rewards points for signing up on a Chase card. 🙂

If you’re new to Rakuten, it’s a good time to sign up now with their $40/4,000 bonus. You can find our referral link in this post.

Hat tip to Greedyenthusaism91