Home Blog

How Out-of-Town Buyers Are Driving Rental Demand in 87 of the Top 100 Housing Markets


Out-of-town buyers are no longer a niche market. They are the market.

Those who are old enough might remember their first pre-2008 investment seminar from old-school gurus like Robyn Thompson and Ron LeGrand when they suggested sending postcards to buyers who lived out of state, and you dutifully made a note, thinking, “That’s a good idea.” It was.

Flash forward two decades, and potential out-of-town buyers now comprise 62% of online views for homes in the largest 100 U.S. metros, according to a report from Realtor.com, with 87 of those 100 markets being driven by out-of-market interest. In 2019, 48.6% of online shoppers were out-of-market. 

What’s driving the move away from traditional employment hubs? Affordability and warm weather. Throw in remote work as a facilitator, and more residents are seizing the opportunity to live a more relaxed life away from adverse weather and without stretching their finances. This is also borne out in U.S. News and World Report’s ongoing “Moving Trends,” which shows the allure of affordable metros in the South and Midwest.

Realtor.com notes that Sunbelt enclaves such as Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Lakeland-Winter Haven in Florida and Durham-Chapel Hill in North Carolina attracted around 80% of their listing traffic from out-of-town buyers in late 2025, a figure even higher than during the pandemic, with interest coming from potential owner-occupants, second-home buyers, and investors.

“We have seen a fundamental change in where Americans who are shopping for a home are looking to live,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, when releasing the report. “As the ‘lock-in effect’ keeps some owners from selling, those who are moving are increasingly untethered to the market they’re currently in.”

How Affordability Is Squeezing Buyers

According to a recent Investopedia analysis citing Oxford Economics, a household needed to earn $110,000 in the third quarter of 2025 to buy a single-family home as well as pay property taxes and home insurance costs—almost double the amount needed at the same time five years earlier. Despite house prices slowing rather than collapsing due to tight supply, a starter home is still out of reach for many.

It’s not just sunnier climes that buyers and new residents are looking to. Midwest and Northeast markets that traditionally sourced their buyers locally now average about 56% and 62% out-of-town listing views, respectively, with smaller and mid-sized markets being the target for migration.

Migration and Rental Demand: The Happy Couple

Migration and rental demand often go hand in hand because when moving to a new city, potential homeowners usually test-drive it first by renting. When tenants are moving from larger cities to smaller cities such as Richmond, Virginia, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the end result, according to Yahoo! Finance’s analysis of Realtor.com data, is a lower vacancy rate and higher rental demand.

Renters arriving from expensive metros are helping to bid up prices in what have been considered budget?friendly cities, according to Realtor.com analysts.

Moving Company Reports Back Real Estate Data

Transportation companies echo the same message, adding their own nuances.

United Van Lines’ 2025 National Movers Study shows inbound migration led by Oregon, West Virginia, and South Carolina. Its top destination metros include Eugene-Springfield, Oregon; Wilmington, North Carolina; and Dover, Delaware, with a focus on smaller cities and towns.

Michael A. Stoll, economist and professor in the Department of Public Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in the United Van Lines report:

“For most Americans, interstate relocation is no longer a linear calculation; it’s a complex decision balancing multiple competing factors. It is interesting to see that in general, population movement continues from North/Midwest regions to Southern states, and again, top inbound locations are dominated by smaller- to medium-sized metro areas. This reflects a legacy of COVID-era preferences for lower-density living, combined with the reality that housing costs continue to drive people toward more affordable regions.”

Similarly, Allied Van Lines’ U.S. Migration Report highlights the Carolinas, Tennessee, New York State, and Florida as its customers’ top destinations. The report says that North Carolina has “burst on the scene as a hot destination,” with former resort towns reimagined as full-time hubs for remote workers, while tech and finance workers are drawn to Charlotte.

Seven Is the Magic Number

Metros with vacancy rates above 7% give tenants a tactical advantage, according to a Realtor.com report, with landlords often eager to offer incentives, such as rental concessions, to fill units. 

In smaller cities where tenants have been arriving en masse, that advantage slides back to landlords. U.S. News and World Report’s exhaustive The Fastest-Growing Places in the U.S. is a good companion guide for investors looking for safe havens to buy rental properties. It’s clustered with smaller Southern cities in Florida, South Carolina, and Texas, with some Western states like California and Arizona attracting more affluent movers.

Older Movers Are Increasingly Choosing to Rent Over Buy

Wondering whether all the migration translates into actual tenants? It’s a valid question, especially when the demographics skew toward older tenants who have former homes, equity, retirement funds, and pensions to presumably see them through their later years. Wouldn’t they simply want to buy a place of their own? Apparently not.

According to a study by Point2Homes, a real estate listing website for American Rental Homes, citing U.S. Census data, seniors are one of the fastest-growing rental demographics. In a 10-year period, the senior renter population increased by 30%, adding 2.4 million people. 

But it’s not just seniors who are choosing to rent rather than own. The 55-64 age group is up by 500,000. Finances play a big part, as a Harris Poll cited in the report shows, with older residents less willing to be saddled with mortgages, taxes, insurance, repairs, and possibly HOA fees, preferring the ease of movement that renting offers.

Not surprisingly, Florida is a prime destination, as the Realtor.com report confirms, with Cape Coral-Fort Myers among the top destinations. Also, for smaller investors, older renters are not opting for gleaming new apartment buildings and amenities but instead prefer single-family rentals, with numbers increasing by more than 25% compared to a decade ago among the 65+ age group.

Final Thoughts

Looking at these various reports together helps make the decision of where to invest easier. The good news is that people are moving to more affordable markets and have a preference for smaller single-family homes, especially among older tenants, which plays into the hands of BRRRR investors and buy-and-hold landlords.

For flippers, upgrading homes in smaller markets means less capital at risk and faster turnover, helping feed demand from investors and homebuyers alike.

Is Sprouts Farmers Market Stock Going to $100?


Over the past three years, Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM 1.89%) has experienced roller-coaster price action. When it was one of the popular small-cap growth stocks, shares in the organic grocery store chain surged from the low $40s to more than $180. However, starting last summer, the stock lost its sterling reputation following a series of poorly received company developments.

The sell-off continued into 2026, but consumer staples stock Sprouts Farmers Market is slowly turning things around, gaining 11% in the last month.

Sprouts Farmers Market Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-1.89%) $-1.48

Current Price

$76.52

The question now is whether this continues. Taking a look at the details, I can identify one clear takeaway. It will all depend on whether Sprouts keeps beating expectations in the coming quarters.

A person carries a grocery basket through a supermarket aisle.

Image source: Getty Images.

Sprouts Farmers Market’s steep drop and emerging comeback

It’s not surprising that sentiment for Sprouts took a sharp turn during the latter half of 2025. As with other consumer-focused businesses, high inflation on consumer spending affected operating performance.

For Sprouts, inflation led to lower sales growth, coupled with lower margins. For example, throughout 2025, year-over-year sales growth declined from 19% in he first quarter to just 13% in the third quarter. Same-store sales growth fell from 11.7% to 5.9%, while quarterly earnings per share fell from $1.81 to $1.22 .

Sprouts’ fourth-quarter results, released on Feb. 19, however, were an improvement. Although revenue of $2.15 billion came up short of expectations, EPS of $0.92 beat estimates by $0.03. Overall sales grew 8%. Same-store sales grew 1.6%, beating prior guidance that growth would be flat.

Moreover, management accompanied these figures with 2026 guidance that suggests results will stabilize this year. Guidance calls for net sales growth in a range from 4.5% to 6.5%, with same-store sales ranging from -1% to 1%.

Getting back to $100 per share could prove challenging

Currently, Sprouts Farmers Market trades for around 13 times forward earnings. This valuation is in line with most U.S.-listed grocery store stocks.

Recovering $100 per share in the immediate future may be a stretch. This is, unless, of course, Sprouts not only meets expectations but beats them handily in the coming quarters. Even as the company may be stabilizing, that’s not the same as a growth resurgence.

Moving forward, a lot hinges on whether Sprouts’ plan to continue aggressively expanding its store count will lead to better-than-expected growth. Management may be bullish it can successfully expand as Amazon‘s Whole Foods chain does the same, but the market may be in “wait and see” mode. On the other hand, macro challenges such as high inflation could continue to put pressure on consumer demand and growth.

Sprouts’ $1 billion share repurchase program could provide support for shares. Announced last August, Sprouts bought back around $472 million worth of shares, with plans to buy back another $300 million throughout the year. This figure represents around 4.2% of Sprout Farmers Market’s current market cap. This could help further stabilize earnings, and at best, could give the bottom line an unexpected boost in the coming quarters.

Tether And Lugano Unveil Plan ₿ Phase II With CHF 5 Million Pledge To Build Resilient Digital Infrastructure


Tether has joined forces with the City of Lugano to launch Plan ₿ Phase II, a five-year strategy running through 2030 that extends their blockchain partnership. The collaboration includes a commitment of up to CHF 5 million, focused on expertise, infrastructure, research, and training.

This initiative builds on the 2022 program, shifting from initial experiments with digital payments to a framework for long-term digital sovereignty and resilience.

Since its debut four years ago, Plan ₿ has delivered tangible results.

More than 400 local businesses now accept Bitcoin, Tether’s USD₮ stablecoin, and the city’s LVGA token for everyday transactions.

The city has pioneered digital bond issuances and incorporated blockchain into select municipal payments, embedding the technology into public finance without exposing taxpayers to undue risk.

A physical innovation hub called PoW.space was established, drawing over 100 fintech and blockchain firms to the region and bridging traditional finance with decentralized systems.

The annual Plan ₿ Forum has grown from a local event into a major international conference, attracting more than 4,000 participants from over 60 countries.

Educational partnerships with universities have also expanded, offering training in decentralized finance, distributed systems, and blockchain development to cultivate local talent.

With Phase II, Lugano is moving beyond pilots to systemic change.

The strategy rests on core pillars: developing institutional infrastructure for digital assets and automation; establishing the city as a center for digital trade and commodity processing; advancing privacy-focused digital identity solutions; nurturing local artificial intelligence ecosystems and autonomous agents; and deploying modular, resilient urban digital networks.

These efforts aim to reduce reliance on centralized global tech providers, mitigating risks around data dependency and cybersecurity while strengthening governance and operational independence.

The renewed memorandum of understanding ensures the City of Lugano retains full authority over all projects, with each initiative governed by separate agreements.

Tether’s contribution emphasizes technical support and capacity building rather than direct financial control.

“Over the past four years, Lugano has shown that public institutions can engage with emerging technologies pragmatically while maintaining oversight,” said Paolo Ardoino, CEO of Tether.

“Phase II focuses on infrastructure, resilience, and local capacity building. The ambition is to support Lugano in becoming a globally relevant digital infrastructure hub, while preserving public governance and autonomy.”

Mayor Michele Foletti added:

“Four years ago, Lugano chose to lead rather than wait. We demonstrated that innovation and institutional responsibility can coexist. With Plan ₿ Phase II, we are investing in open and resilient civic digital infrastructure, because by 2030, a city’s freedom will increasingly be measured by its ability to govern its data and essential services without critical dependencies, with public governance safeguarding the collective interest.”

By transitioning from early adoption to comprehensive digital infrastructure, Lugano is positioning itself as a model for cities worldwide. In an environment dominated by concentrated cloud, payment, and AI services, this partnership underscores a proactive approach to technological autonomy.



This Company Is Now Worth $1.5 Billion. Its Product Is a Better Night’s Sleep



Would you buy a $5,000 smart sleep system to help you get better shuteye?

Trump formally nominates Fed critic Kevin Warsh as chair


Powell said in January that “the threat of criminal charges” against him was directly tied to his refusal, and that of other governors, to bow to Trump’s demands for faster rate cuts.

Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, said Warsh was “a qualified nominee with a deep understanding of monetary policy” but vowed to block any Fed nominee “until the investigation and potential indictment of Chair Powell is completed.” 

The Powell probe followed Trump’s attempt last summer to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook after a housing official he appointed accused her of mortgage fraud, an allegation Cook denied. She remained on the board pending the outcome of a lawsuit challenging her removal, which the Supreme Court heard in January.

Senator Elizabeth Warren responded to Warsh’s nomination by writing that he “cared more about helping Wall Street after the 2008 crash than millions of unemployed Americans” and that no Republican “purporting to care about Fed independence” should advance the nomination while Trump pursued “witch hunts” against Powell and Cook.

Will mortgage rates drop?

“I don’t want to say it’s a total surprise… he was considered a hawk, but recently he seems to have aligned himself with Trump,” Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities, told Mortgage Professional America, adding that it was “difficult to assess how the market is going to accept this nomination.” 

Court Refuses To Pause Dismissal Of SAVE Student Loan Case


Key Points

  • A federal judge denied Missouri’s request to pause the dismissal of the SAVE plan lawsuit while the states prepare an appeal.
  • The court said the case no longer presents a real dispute because the parties are aligned and the policy is already being phased out by law.
  • For borrowers, nothing changes right now — the Department of Education still controls the timing of any repayment plan transitions.

A federal judge has rejected an attempt by several Republican-led states to pause the dismissal of their lawsuit targeting the SAVE student loan repayment plan, marking another procedural twist in the long-running legal fight over income-driven repayment.

The decision (PDF File), issued March 4 by Judge John A. Ross of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, denies the states’ request to temporarily halt the court’s earlier order dismissing the case while they pursue an appeal.

The ruling keeps the dismissal in place and the states can decide to seek review from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

For millions of borrowers currently affected by the SAVE plan’s uncertain future, the order does not change the status of their loans or repayment obligations. However, it does give hope that there may be at least short-term relief.

Editor’s Note:  The plaintiffs (GOP States) have filed a notice of appeal as of late Wednesday, March 4, 2026.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why The Judge Refused To Pause The Dismissal

To receive a pause (known legally as a “stay”) the states had to show several things, including that they were likely to win their appeal and that serious harm would occur without the pause.

Judge Ross said the states failed to meet those standards.

In the order, the court wrote that the states had not made a strong argument that their appeal would succeed. The judge also said the lawsuit no longer presented a real dispute that required the court’s involvement. Courts generally require two sides actively disagreeing about a policy or action. In this case, the judge said that condition no longer existed.

When both sides effectively agree on the outcome (in this case – both agreed that SAVE should end), federal courts typically decline to continue the case because there is no longer an active controversy to resolve.

Judge Ross said forcing the parties to continue litigating would place the court in the position of deciding a “hypothetical” dispute rather than an active conflict.

Congress Already Changed The Policy, It’s On ED To Enact It

Another reason the judge rejected the request involves legislation passed by Congress.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act already requires the federal government to transition borrowers away from the SAVE plan and into other repayment plans..

Because that law sets the direction for the program, the judge said the states’ argument that borrowers might begin applying for SAVE relief again was unconvincing.

In the court’s view, the federal government still has authority to carry out the transition away from the plan without additional court orders. The ruling also notes that the Department of Education could have already begun planning borrower transitions after earlier court orders and after the legislation became law. 

What Happens Next

The states still have the right to appeal the dismissal. The likely next step is asking the the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to review the district court’s decision.

They will also likely ask the appeals court for a stay of the dismissal — essentially the same request the district court just rejected.

If the appeals court grants that request for a stay, the previous injunction will be “reactivated” and everything will be blocked again. If the appeals court denies it, the lawsuit would remain closed while the appeal proceeds – meaning borrowers would be entitled to the benefits of the SAVE rules.

Appeals cases often take several months before a ruling is issued.

For student loan borrowers, the ruling does not immediately change repayment options or timelines. 

Borrowers currently in the SAVE plan should continue monitoring announcements from the Department of Education regarding future repayment plan transitions.

Until the department issues new guidance, loan servicers and borrowers remain in a holding pattern.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b6e”].tcb-post-list #post-76117 [data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b74″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Supreme-Court-Outside-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Republican States Move To Revive SAVE Lawsuit: What It Means for Borrowers

Republican States Move To Revive SAVE Lawsuit: What It Means for Borrowers
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b6e”].tcb-post-list #post-75863 [data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b74″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Supreme-Court-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Judge Dismisses SAVE Plan Lawsuit — SAVE Borrowers Still In Limbo

Judge Dismisses SAVE Plan Lawsuit — SAVE Borrowers Still In Limbo
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b6e”].tcb-post-list #post-22997 [data-css=”tve-u-19cbb359b74″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Best_High_Yield_Savings_Account_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts In March 2026

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts In March 2026

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Court Refuses To Pause Dismissal Of SAVE Student Loan Case appeared first on The College Investor.

Retirement Is No Longer a Fixed Milestone for Older Americans, Survey Shows


Editor’s Note: This story originally appeared on LiveCareer.

Retirement is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve as economic pressures reshape expectations for later life.

The Retirement Reality Check Report from LiveCareer, based on a survey of 878 U.S. workers aged 50 and older, highlights how rising costs and financial volatility are altering how people prepare for life after full-time work and address the complexities of retirement planning over 50.

Many older workers are now adjusting plans, delaying retirement, and rethinking what financial security will look like in practice.

Despite relatively positive investment performance in recent months, a full 75% of respondents say they are delaying retirement due to stock market volatility. The substantial impact of inflation on retirement planning is evident, with 91% reporting that inflation or tariffs have impacted their retirement plans.

Key Findings

  • The rising cost of care is the biggest financial concern among older workers. 55% cite healthcare costs in retirement or long-term care expenses as their top worry.
  • Many fear their savings won’t last. 49% say they’re worried about outliving their retirement funds.
  • Confidence is eroding in the face of economic instability. 91% say inflation and tariffs have affected their retirement outlook.
  • Volatile markets are triggering action. 41% have made changes to their investment strategy due to stock market uncertainty.
  • Retirement savings are functioning as a safety net. 6 in 10 workers over 50 are actively withdrawing from retirement accounts to cover everyday expenses.

Retirement Is Being Rewritten by Uncertainty

Most older workers aren’t stepping into retirement with confidence:

  • 55% say their biggest worry is the cost of healthcare or long-term care.
  • 49% fear they will outlive their savings.
  • 30% cite stock market instability as a major concern.
  • 21% worry about inflation reducing their buying power.

Only 2% of respondents said they aren’t worried at all about their financial future.

What this means: The concerns show that older workers are attempting to plan for retirement in an environment where costs and risks feel volatile. This is reshaping expectations for what “secure” retirement means today.

Most Are Rethinking Their Retirement Plan

Given the market uncertainty, many are rethinking their approach to retirement planning in their 50s. When asked how inflation and tariffs have affected their retirement confidence:

  • 45% said they’re rethinking their entire plan.
  • Another 46% have made smaller adjustments.

Only 9% said those concerns have had little or no impact on their retirement outlook.

What this means: Retirement is becoming a more active, ongoing calculation, where plans must adapt to shifting economic conditions rather than follow a fixed timeline.

Delayed Retirements, Adjusted Expectations

Along with delaying retirement, many older workers are also making significant lifestyle and investment changes:

  • 41% have made changes to their investment strategy due to market instability.
  • Just 8% said they’re staying the course with no changes.

What this means: Retirement is becoming a gradual adjustment rather than a planned milestone, shaped by evolving financial realities rather than a single decision point.

Most Are Already Tapping Their Retirement Savings

Even as they delay retirement, many older workers are already drawing from their retirement savings, often out of necessity:

  • 61% are regularly withdrawing from their retirement accounts.
  • 30% dip into savings occasionally, for specific expenses.
  • 8% are holding off and saving their funds for later.

What this means: These numbers underscore the ongoing financial strain many over-50 workers face, even as they try to preserve long-term security.

Methodology

This report is based on a survey conducted by LiveCareer in November 2025 with 878 U.S. workers aged 50 and older.

Respondents answered a mix of single- and multiple-choice questions regarding their retirement planning, financial concerns, investment behavior, and perceptions of modern retirement realities.

Yes, judge tells Trump: you have to refund all the companies that you charged with illegal tariffs



In a defeat for the Trump administration, a federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that companies that paid tariffs struck down last month by Supreme Court are due refunds.

Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade wrote that “all importers of record’’ were “entitled to benefit’’ from the Supreme Court ruling that struck down sweeping double-digit import taxes President Donald Trump imposed last year under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The Supreme Court found tariffs that Trump imposed under the emergency powers law were unconstitutional, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country.

In his ruling, Eaton wrote that he alone “will hear cases pertaining to the refund of IEEPA duties.’’ The ruling offers some clarity about the tariff refund process, something the Supreme Court did not even mention in its Feb. 20 decision. Trade lawyer Ryan Majerus, a partner at King & Spalding and a former U.S. trade official, said he expects the government to appeal or “seek a stay to buy more time for U.S. Customs to comply.″

The federal government collected more than $130 billion in the now-defunct tariffs through mid-December and could ultimately be on the hook for refunds worth $175 billion, according to calculations by the Penn Wharton Budget Model.

Eaton was ruling specifically on a case brought by Atmus Filtration, a Nashville, Tennessee, company that makes filters and other filtration products, claiming a right to a tariff refund.

All goods that go through U.S. Customs and Border Protections enter a process called “liquidation,” when the agency issues its final accounting of what is owed. Once liquidated, importers have 180 days to formally contest the duties. After that window closes, the liquidation is legally final.

The judge ordered customs to stop collecting the IEEPA tariffs the Supreme Court struck down last month on goods going through the liquidation process. And if the goods were past that part of the process, the agency would have to recalculate them without the tariffs.

“This is a great decision for importers and consumers who paid,” said Barry Appleton, a law professor and co-director New York Law School’s Center for International Law. “It will make customs brokers busy. It should make things easier for the courts — and get a process underway for those importers who paid within the last 180 days.”

On Monday, another federal court rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to slow the refund process. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit started the next phase in the refund process by sending it to New York trade court to sort out.

Now the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency must come up with a way to process the refunds. Customs routinely refunds tariffs when there’s been some kind of error, but its system was “not designed for a mass refund,″ said trade lawyer Alexis Early, a partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner. “The devil will be in the details of the administrative process.″

____

Anderson reported from New York.

AP Writer Lindsay Whitehurst contributed to this story.

Caesars Rewards Chase Offer: Save 10%, Up to $50 Cash Back Maximum


Caesars Rewards Chase Offer

Chase is targeting some cardholders with a new offer that can save you 10% on your next stay at Caesars stays in Las Vegas, Reno, Lake Tahoe and Atlantic City. The offer is showing up on some most cards, so check your accounts now if you are interested and save the offer. Let’s go over the details below.

Offer Details

  • Earn 10% cash back at Caesars Rewards select properties only in Las Vegas, Reno, Lake Tahoe and Atlantic City, including taxes and after any discounts, with a $50 cash back maximum.
  • Offer expires 5/31/2026.
  • Find Chase Offers here.

Caesars Rewards Chase Offer details

Important Terms

  • Offer valid one time only.
  • Offer only valid on purchase made directly with the merchant.
  • Offer only valid on room rate and room charges.
  • Excludes gift card purchase, pools, lounges, bars, and other amenities.
  • Offer valid only at Caesars Rewards select destinations; Caesars Palace Las Vegas, Nobu Hotel Caesars Palace, The Cromwell, Paris Las Vegas, Planet Hollywood, Horseshoe Las Vegas, Flamingo Las Vegas, Harrah’s Las Vegas, and LINQ Hotel; Caesars Atlantic City, Harrah’s Resort Atlantic City, Tropicana Atlantic City, and Nobu Hotel Caesars Atlantic City; Eldorado Resort Casino Reno, Silver Legacy Resort Casino Reno, and Circus Circus Reno; Harrah’s Lake Tahoe and Caesars Republic Lake Tahoe.
  • Excludes all Caesars Rewards hotels outside of Las Vegas, Reno, Lake Tahoe and Atlantic City.
  • Reservations must be made directly through Caesars Rewards by phone, online at US website caesars.com/book or individual property websites.
  • Offer not valid on purchase made using third-party services, delivery services, or a third-party payment account (e.g., buy now pay later). 
  • It is possible that the merchant may split your purchase into multiple transactions. Offer redemption awarded as statement credit on the first qualifying transaction amount.

About Chase Offers

Chase Offers are available on Chase credit cards and debit cards. With these offers, you usually get cashback when you use your eligible Chase card to shop at a participating store. You can see your offers in the Chase app or in your account online. Here are a few things worth noting about these offers:

  • You can add the same offer to multiple cards, and you will receive multiple credits. The Savewise app helps you add and manage these offers.
  • Chase Offers could be targeted to certain accounts, so not every offer will be available for everyone.
  • Credits will appear in your account in 7-14 business days.
  • Usually the same offers will also show up for US Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Regions Bank, Suntrust Bank, BBVA, BB&T, PNC, Columbia Bank and Beneficial Bank customers.

Guru’s Wrap-up

A nice offer for savings at eligible Caesars Rewards properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Lake Tahoe and Atlantic City. You can only use this offer once.

You can find more Chase Offers here.

Use the social media buttons below to share this article. Your support and engagement is always greatly appreciated.