The best innovations aren’t always cutting edge.
The best innovations aren’t always cutting edge.
Death and taxes, everybody’s favorite subjects, right? We react to the internet’s best and worst tax advice, from W-4 withholding formulas to Monopoly kids crying about taxes and more.
Discover why becoming a real estate professional offers incredible tax advantages, how cost segregation really works, and the critical difference between tax avoidance (Okay!) and tax evasion (NO way!). Plus, we break down what happens when you don’t file taxes for 8 years and why the IRS will eventually come knocking.
Timestamps
0:00 Introduction: Internet Tax Advice
0:19 W-4 Withholding Strategy
2:46 Monopoly Kid Crying About Taxes
3:39 Never Pay Tax Again Strategy
5:44 Cost Segregation Paper Loss Strategy
7:36 Work Call-In Joke
7:43 Tax Refunds Aren’t Free Money
9:00 Business Owner vs. W-2 Employee
10:26 Sheltering 66% of Income
12:21 Not Filing Taxes for 8 Years
🔗 2026 Tax Guide →
🔗 Tax Planning Strategies →
🔗 Financial Order of Operations →
🎓 Brian Preston (CFP®, CPA) and Bo Hanson (CFA®, CFP®) share professional insights to help you own your financial future.
Jump start your journey with our FREE financial resources:
Subscribe on YouTube for early access and go beyond the podcast:
Connect with us on social media for more content:
Take the relationship to the next level and become a client:
#WealthBuilding #PersonalFinance2026 #RetirementPlanning #FinancialFreedom
source
So you open the mail, and there it is: a letter from your insurance company, letting you know it won’t be renewing your landlord policy. There’s been no claims, missed payments, or drama. Just a polite notice that come renewal, you’re on your own.
If you’re investing in real estate in 2026, this is becoming the new normal. Premiums are up 20% to 40% in key investment states like Florida, California, and Texas. Major carriers are quietly exiting entire ZIP codes. And investors who have been with the same company for a decade are suddenly being told to find coverage somewhere else.
At this point, most investors make a huge mistake: they panic and scramble to replace the policy as quickly as possible, usually with whatever carrier their agent throws at them first. They match the old coverage limits, pay the higher premium, and move on without asking a single question.
That’s a mistake. Nonrenewal is a forced opportunity; it’s the insurance industry telling you that the coverage you had was probably wrong for your rental anyway, and that now is the moment to fix it.
I’ll break down exactly why carriers are dropping landlords right now, the 30-day action plan to follow the second you get the letter, and how to use nonrenewal as a chance to come out with better coverage than you had before.
To fix the problem, you first need to understand why it’s happening. This is less about you and more about an entire industry going through a massive reset. So what’s driving it?
Carriers used to spread catastrophic loss exposure across huge books of business. Now, after back-to-back years of record hurricane damage, wildfire losses, and brutal hail seasons, the math has changed. The reinsurance companies that back your insurance company are charging dramatically more, and those costs are cascading straight down to you.
When reinsurance premiums jump, carriers have two options: raise rates or stop underwriting in high-risk areas. In 2026, they’re doing both.
Properties built before 1980 are getting scrutinized hard right now for items like aging roofs, outdated electrical, polybutylene plumbing, and knob-and-tube wiring. These trigger nonrenewals even if you’ve never filed a claim.
Big-name companies that sell homeowner’s, auto, life, and landlord policies are pulling back from investor properties altogether. They’ve decided rental properties are too complicated, risky, or too small a slice of their business to fight for.
While generalists run for the hills, investor-focused carriers are stepping in. They understand rental property risk because that’s all they do, and they’re writing policies in markets the big names won’t touch.
Getting dropped isn’t personal but rather a structural shift in the insurance industry. And it’s actually pointing you toward better coverage if you know how to respond.
OK, so you’ve got the letter in your hand. What now? The next 30 days matter a lot. Here’s exactly how to handle it.
Nonrenewal and cancellation are not the same thing. Nonrenewal means they’ll honor your policy through the end of the term and just won’t renew it. You have time to shop. Cancellation mid-policy is much rarer and usually triggered by fraud, nonpayment, or a significant change in risk.
Read the letter carefully, and note the exact end date.
Before you call a single new carrier, pull together:
The more organized you are, the better your quotes will be.
Do not take the first quote your agent sends. Get quotes from at least three carriers, and make sure at least one of them is an investor-focused specialist, not just another generalist.
Pay attention to what’s different between the quotes, not just the premium. Coverage limits, deductibles, vacancy clauses, and liability caps can vary wildly, and a cheaper policy might have gaping holes.
Do not let your current policy lapse before the new one starts. Even a one-day gap can trigger lender issues, void coverage for claims during the gap, and cause rates to spike permanently.
Bind the new policy with a start date that lines up with your old policy’s end date. Confirm in writing.
What not to do:
This is the point where a lot of investors leave money on the table. When they replace a nonrenewed policy, they just try to match what they had before. Same limits, deductible, everything, just with a new carrier.
But the policy you had was probably wrong for a rental property in the first place. Many investors, especially those who’ve been in the game a while, are still operating under homeowner’s policies that were stretched to cover their rentals. Or they’re on landlord policies written by generalist carriers who don’t really understand how investors operate.
So what are they missing? Here are the most common coverage gaps.
If your property gets damaged and becomes uninhabitable, does your policy pay you for the rent you’re losing during repairs? A lot of policies don’t, or cap it at embarrassingly low limits. This is one of the most important coverages for an investor, and one of the most commonly missed. Loss of rent coverage is essential for landlords to ensure there are no gaps in income when something happens to their property.
Many policies automatically void or restrict coverage if your property sits vacant for 30 or 60 days. If you’re doing BRRRR, flipping, or turning over between tenants, this can quietly wipe out your protection right when you need it most.
If your 1970s rental burns down, your policy might pay to rebuild it exactly as it was. But current building codes require upgraded electrical, plumbing, and insulation.
Without ordinance or law coverage, that gap comes out of your pocket. And it’s not small. We’re talking $15,000 to $50,000 on a typical single-family home.
A replacement cost policy pays to rebuild at today’s prices. An actual cash value (ACV) policy pays the current depreciated value, which can be 40% to 60% less. Many older policies default to ACV without the investor realizing it.
If your policy still has a $100,000 or $300,000 liability cap, that’s probably inadequate given today’s legal environment. Consider bumping your liability coverage to $500,000 or $1 million, and look at umbrella coverage.
Nonrenewal forces you to shop. And when you shop with intention, you can fix years of accumulated coverage problems in one move.
Now let’s talk prevention. If you don’t change anything, you might just get dropped again by your new carrier in three years. Here’s what actually keeps carriers happy.
Every claim you file gets logged in your CLUE report for up to seven years. Small claims, especially ones under $2,000, often cost you more in premium increases and nonrenewal risk than they save you.
Save your insurance for major losses. Eat the small stuff.
Things like roof inspections, HVAC tune-ups, plumbing updates, and electrical upgrades all matter. Keep a folder of photos, receipts, and inspection reports for each property. When a carrier considers not renewing you, this documentation makes a real difference.
Scattering your properties across five different insurance companies feels diversified, but it actually hurts you. A single specialist carrier that insures your whole portfolio has skin in the game with you. It will be more likely to work through renewal conversations and less likely to drop you over a single claim.
If any of your rentals are insured under a homeowner’s policy, fix that immediately. Not only are those policies cheaper because they don’t actually cover rental activity, but they can also be voided entirely the moment a carrier discovers you have tenants.
The goal is to build a coverage strategy that matches how you actually invest, then document your stewardship so carriers want to keep you around.
So, where does Steadily fit into all of this? While generalist carriers are pulling back from landlord insurance, Steadily is leaning in. It’s a specialist carrier, which means landlord insurance is all it does.
That focus shows up in how it underwrites and writes policies. Steadily’s coverage is designed from the ground up for investors, not repurposed homeowner’s coverage with a few endorsements tacked on. It covers single-family rentals, multifamily properties, short-term rentals, and fix-and-flip projects across all 50 states.
The quote process is fast. We’re talking minutes, not days. You can get an online quote, upload documentation, and bind coverage without endless phone tag or paper forms. For investors juggling closings, renewals, and rehab timelines, speed matters.
It also handles coverages that generalist carriers routinely miss and that investors actually need, such as:
And Steadily is growing for a reason. It was named by CNBC as one of the best landlord insurance companies of 2026. It raised $30 million in Series C funding in 2025 at a valuation over $350 million, and it’s integrated with over 400 real estate platforms, including BiggerPockets, Roofstock, and TurboTenant. That growth is because investors are actively switching to it from the generalist carriers they used to rely on.
If you’ve just been non-renewed or your renewal quote just spiked 40%, this is exactly the moment Steadily was built for. Instead of patching together another short-term fix, you can use this transition to upgrade to coverage that was designed for how you actually invest.
Don’t wait until your policy expires to figure this out. Every day you wait is a day your portfolio sits exposed.
Get a free quote from Steadily today and see what specialist landlord coverage actually looks like. A few minutes now could save you thousands in coverage gaps, premium hikes, and the kind of stress that comes with finding out your policy didn’t do what you thought it did.
Direct Link to offer
Maybe someone will find this useful. Feel free to analyze in the comments below.
Hat tip to reader Rebecca
By Sarah Ritchie A new poll from the Angus Reid Institute suggests Canadians are giving Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government a passing grade in its first year of international relations, but it has failed to meet expectations on affordability issues. The poll asked 2,013 Canadians a series of questions about the government’s performance since it …
Although artificial intelligence (AI) companies never really lost their place as the market’s leading names, their stocks have been out of favor for most of the past six months. Many stayed relatively flat during that period, while others lost ground. Still, it seems that the market is rotating back to them again. With that in mind, I think investors should position themselves to take advantage, as these stocks haven’t quite reached their full potential. If you’ve got $1,000 to invest now, these are the perfect three stocks to buy.
Image source: Getty Images.
Any AI investing list without Nvidia (NVDA +3.39%) is incomplete, in my opinion. Few companies are benefiting more from the AI build-out than Nvidia, and this trend has driven it to become the world’s largest company by a wide margin. Its graphics processing units (GPUs) are still the most popular computing option available in data centers, and that’s showing up in its results.

Today’s Change
(3.39%) $7.06
Current Price
$215.33
Market Cap
$5.1T
Day’s Range
$207.40 – $215.69
52wk Range
$104.08 – $215.69
Volume
4.8M
Avg Vol
174M
Gross Margin
71.07%
Dividend Yield
0.02%
Last quarter, Nvidia posted 73% revenue growth, but it expects to grow at a 77% pace during its fiscal 2027 Q1. That’s particularly impressive considering its size. Trading at 24 times forward earnings and with a multiyear growth opportunity ahead, it’s the perfect stock to build an AI portfolio around.
Nvidia may be the market leader in AI chips, but Broadcom (AVGO 1.57%) is looking to change that. Broadcom partners with AI hyperscalers to design and build custom AI chips tailored for their workloads. These chips have better cost performance than GPUs, but are less flexible. If the workload changes, these chips no longer excel. However, many AI hyperscalers have reached a maturity level where they know what their computing workloads will look like. As a result, demand is rising for Broadcom’s application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs).

AVGO Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts.
In 2027, Broadcom expects its custom AI chip business to generate $100 billion or more in revenue. For reference, the company generated $68 billion as a whole over the past 12 months, and its AI semiconductor revenue was less than half of that total. That’s major growth for Broadcom, and I think investors need to take advantage of this pick before it’s too late.
One of Broadcom’s primary clients is Alphabet (GOOG +2.42%) (GOOGL +2.46%). The two have collaborated to create the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), which is gaining popularity among AI hyperscalers. The TPU is one of the reasons Google’s AI models can be so much cheaper than alternatives while also maintaining impressive performance. Other companies, like Meta Platforms (META +0.65%), have started to use them as well. And one of the leading AI start-ups, Anthropic, uses TPUs (as well as rival AI chips) to train its Claude model.

Today’s Change
(2.46%) $8.47
Current Price
$352.87
Market Cap
$4.2T
Day’s Range
$342.70 – $353.18
52wk Range
$147.84 – $353.18
Volume
991K
Avg Vol
32M
Gross Margin
59.68%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
All of this success shows up in the results from the Google Cloud segment. During its past quarter, the cloud computing division grew by 48% year over year, and with the way AI spending is trending, its growth rate will likely accelerate in Q1. Combine the impressive Google Cloud division with a strong legacy product (the Google Search engine) and a strong offering in the generative AI space, and you have a combination that looks primed to deliver market-crushing returns over the long haul. Alphabet is a solid and safe bet for the AI era, and investors shouldn’t miss it.
Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
A new study found that a key omega-3 fatty acid could interfere with the brain’s natural repair process.
Key Points
Anna Maria College’s closure announcement last week brought the 2026 U.S. nonprofit college shutdown count to eight. The 80-year-old institution in Paxton, Massachusetts said its Board of Trustees could no longer project the financial resources to sustain academic operations past the spring 2026 semester. This decision came less than two weeks after the Massachusetts Department of Higher Education formally flagged the college as a closure risk.
Anna Maria’s announcement came the same day workers at Hampshire College (which announced its own permanent closure on April 14) launched a relief fund ahead of June layoffs. Together, the two Massachusetts institutions underscored the accelerating pressure on small, tuition-dependent liberal arts colleges in the Northeast.
Since the summer of 2025, a steady cadence of small-college shutdowns and high-profile mergers have reshaped parts of American higher education.
A parallel trend has emerged: a growing number of schools are choosing merger or acquisition instead of winding down.
What follows is a running tracker of both, based on institutional press releases and verified reporting as of April 24, 2026.
Eight institutions have either ceased operations in 2026 or announced they will do so before year-end. Three Massachusetts colleges (Labouré, Hampshire, and Anna Maria) are among them, and four of the eight announced in a window between around early February 2026:
Sixteen nonprofit colleges closed in 2025. Since March 2020, roughly 48 public or private nonprofit institutions have closed or announced planned closures, affecting an estimated 52,600 students, according to tracking by Higher Ed Dive and BestColleges.
The 2026 list shares several common threads. Enrollment declines of 30% to 70% over the last decade appear in nearly every case. Every closing school relied heavily on net tuition revenue, and several lost federal grant funding heading into fiscal 2026.
Providence Christian cited the end of its Hispanic-serving institution grant (roughly $600,000 annually) as a factor its $25,322 endowment could not absorb. Lourdes University reported that the Sisters of St. Francis could no longer subsidize operations at the level required to keep the 68-year-old institution afloat.
Labouré, a nursing-focused institution in Milton, will transition programs to nearby Curry College. Anna Maria’s FY2025 audit carried a “going concern” qualification from its auditors that triggered new federal financial aid restrictions, a warning sign that preceded its closure decision by just weeks.
Alongside outright closures, a wave of mergers and acquisitions has picked up momentum. Mergers tend to draw less public attention because they often preserve the campus name or mission under a larger institution’s umbrella, but the financial logic behind them is frequently identical.
Six mergers currently in process:
A closure or merger announcement should set off warning bells for currently enrolled or prospective students. Federal rules preserve the option of a closed school discharge for federal student loans if borrowers cannot transfer and complete a comparable program elsewhere, but the window is short. The U.S. Department of Education generally requires withdrawal within 120 days of the official closure date to qualify. Students who accept a teach-out transfer forfeit the discharge.
Most 2026 closing schools have lined up teach-out partners to help students complete their degrees. Providence Christian is working with Biola, Concordia, and The Master’s University. Lourdes has partnered with the University of Toledo, which has committed to admitting Lourdes students in good standing into aligned programs. Labouré’s nursing programs will transition to Curry College. Trinity Christian has teach-out agreements with Saint Xavier, Calvin, and Olivet Nazarene universities.
Credit transfer is typically honored, but families should confirm program-level articulation, since specialized credits in nursing, education, or the arts do not always map cleanly to a receiving institution’s degree requirements.
Financial aid also resets. A teach-out student’s federal aid package is rebuilt at the new institution based on its cost of attendance and state aid portability varies. Families in states with significant tuition grant programs (Pennsylvania’s PHEAA, New Jersey’s TAG, California’s Cal Grant) should verify eligibility before committing to a transfer.
For prospective students, the pattern is a reminder that financial health needs to be a part of your due-diligence checklist before committing.
Useful indicators published through the Department of Education’s College Scorecard include full-time equivalent enrollment trends , graduation rates, transfers, and more. Under the federal financial responsibility framework, schools with enrollment declining more than 25% over five years, tuition discount rates above 55%, or a CFI below 1.0 tend to face elevated closure risk.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
Editor: Colin Graves
The post 8 Colleges Closing In 2026: Full List Of Closures appeared first on The College Investor.
There’s a quote most investors have heard at some point. Warren Buffett said it decades ago, and it still gets passed around: “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.”
The first time I heard it, I thought I understood it. It made logical sense. Buy when prices are down. Move when others are panicking. Simple.
But understanding a principle in theory and actually applying it when the moment arrives are two completely different things. And the last few years in real estate taught me that distinction in a way I won’t forget.
Most physician investors I talk to are doing one of two things.
They’re either waiting for certainty that never comes, sitting on cash until the environment feels safer. Or they’re following macro predictions, listening to economists and media voices make contradictory calls, and trying to make sense of it all before they commit.
Neither of those is a strategy. But for physicians specifically, the waiting problem has a texture that’s worth naming.
We are trained to gather data before acting. In clinical medicine, that instinct saves lives. You don’t make a diagnosis on incomplete information if you can avoid it. You order the test. You wait for the result. You confirm before you move.
That same instinct, applied to investing, becomes a trap. Because in markets, there is no clean result to wait for. The data is always incomplete. The picture never gets fully clear. And waiting for certainty in an environment that doesn’t offer it isn’t caution. It’s just a more comfortable version of paralysis.
The real cost isn’t a missed investment. It’s years of compounding that never started. That’s the number most physicians don’t stop to calculate.
There’s another layer to this that doesn’t get talked about enough.
Most physicians don’t have colleagues who are actively investing in alternatives. When you decide to move while others are sitting still, you’re not just going against media sentiment. You’re doing something that none of the people around you are doing, with no one in your immediate circle who can validate the decision.
That’s a lonelier version of the contrarian problem than Buffett was describing when he said it.
In the broader investing world, being contrarian means tuning out CNBC and going the other direction. For physicians, it often means being the only one in your practice group who’s even thinking about this. No peer confirmation. No one who’s been through it to call. Just you, the analysis, and a decision that feels uncomfortably solitary.
That social isolation is real, and it makes acting on a contrarian thesis significantly harder than the principle suggests.
A few years ago, real estate felt expensive. Interest rates had been historically low for a long time, and the direction of travel seemed clear. Rates would eventually move. I had a thesis. I was in deals I believed were structured to handle a rate environment shift. We’d looked at historical patterns, talked to operators we trusted, and felt reasonably positioned.
What I didn’t model for was the velocity.
Here’s where medicine actually gives us a useful frame. In clinical practice, you learn early that direction matters, but rate of change matters just as much. A sodium that’s been slowly trending down over weeks is a different clinical picture than one that drops the same amount in 24 hours. The number might look similar on paper. The urgency is completely different.
Investing works the same way. I had a read on direction. What I hadn’t stress-tested was the speed of the scenario. Deals built to handle a gradual rate shift got caught in a fast one. Refinancing timelines compressed. Business plans that made sense in one environment stopped making sense in another.
The failure wasn’t the principle. It was that I asked “where is this going” without asking “how fast could it get there.” Those are two different questions, and both need answers before you enter a position.
Here’s the distinction I’ve come to think matters most.
Timing means predicting peaks and troughs. You’re trying to call the bottom, buy in, ride the recovery. Almost nobody does this consistently. The data on market timing is not kind, and that holds even for professional fund managers with full research teams.
Positioning means something different. It means understanding where you are in the cycle with reasonable confidence, and adjusting your exposure, leverage, and liquidity accordingly. You’re not predicting what comes next. You’re reading where things are and making decisions that hold up across a range of scenarios, not just the one you’re hoping for.
There’s an investor named Howard Marks who runs Oaktree Capital. He tends to do his best work when markets are falling apart. What I’ve noticed studying him is that he’s not operating on better data than everyone else. What he has is a framework for reading where investor sentiment sits relative to underlying reality, and he builds his conviction and his liquidity before the pressure moment arrives.
So when the opportunity opens, he’s not making the call under duress. He’s executing a decision he already made in a calmer moment.
That’s the gap most physician investors have. We’re making the biggest decisions at exactly the wrong time, often in the small windows between patients or late at night when we finally have a moment to look at something. That’s not a good decision-making environment for anything, let alone a six-figure capital commitment.
I’m still refining this. These aren’t principles I’ve held for years. They came from expensive lessons.
Separate direction from velocity. In medicine you already know this. A trend moving slowly and a trend moving fast require different responses, even if they’re pointed the same direction. The same is true in investing. Ask both questions before you enter any position.
Liquidity runway comes before the thesis. It doesn’t matter how right your directional read is if you can’t hold the position long enough for it to play out. Physicians often have high incomes but tighter liquidity than people assume, because so much is tied up in retirement accounts, a mortgage, practice overhead, or existing deals. Know your real number before you commit.
Set your criteria before the noise starts. When things are quiet, that’s the time to decide what you would act on if the environment shifts. If you wait until things are falling apart, you’re making decisions under emotional and social pressure you didn’t need to invite. Pre-decide your posture.
Learn to sit in the discomfort of being early. Being early and being wrong look identical for a stretch of time. If you can’t hold that without second-guessing the position, you’ll never apply a contrarian framework when it actually counts.

Subscribe to receive the 7 Steps you can follow to achieve Financial Freedom
If financial freedom is your goal, there’s no better time to get started than right now.
Unlock actionable steps that you can take every day to fine-tune your goals, discover your interests, and avoid costly mistakes on your financial freedom journey.
The questions worth sitting with aren’t “when is the bottom” or “when do rates come down.” Those are timing questions and they’ll send you in circles.
The better questions: What is sentiment telling you in the markets you care about? Where is there genuine distress that others are avoiding? What is your actual liquidity position, and if an opportunity opened in the next six months, are you ready to act on it?
Physician investors tend to overthink the analysis and underprepare the infrastructure. The math on the deal gets attention. The balance sheet that lets you act on the deal gets less.
What cycle investing actually requires isn’t a better prediction. It’s a better process. One you build in calm conditions, before the pressure arrives.
The Buffett quote is right. But it only works if you’ve done the preparation to act on it. Most people hear it, nod along, and then freeze when the fearful moment actually arrives. Not because the principle is wrong. Because they hadn’t built the capacity to act on it before they needed to.
Medicine trained you to read direction. The velocity piece, and the infrastructure to act when the moment comes, that’s the part you have to build yourself.I’ve been on the wrong side of that. I’ve also learned from it. And that learning, expensive as it was, is what I’d point any physician investor toward before anything else.
Were these helpful in any way? Make sure to sign up for the newsletter and join the Passive Income Docs Facebook Group for more physician-tailored content.
Peter Kim, MD is the founder of Passive Income MD, the creator of Passive Real Estate Academy, and offers weekly education through his Monday podcast, the Passive Income MD Podcast. Join our community at the Passive Income Doc Facebook Group.