Home Blog

Rs. 20L ya Rs. 100 – kisme hain Zyada RETURNS?! | Ankur Warikoo #shorts



If you wish to be part of the Money Matters series, please fill up this form:

——————————————————————————————————————————

My Money Apps:
Indian Stock Investing (Zerodha):
Mutual Fund Investing (Coin by Zerodha) (You will need to create a Zerodha account for it first. Coin is free):
US Stock Investing + Investment Tracking (INDMoney):
Portfolio Investing (Smallcase):
Corporate Bonds (Wint Wealth):
How to pick the right insurance (Ditto):

The above links are for products that I personally use for my own investing. If you create an account on any of these using the above links, I stand to make a referral income from it. 100% of this income is contributed towards the education of kids who cannot afford it. In 2021 we contributed 38L, in 2022 we contributed 53L and in 2023 we contributed 52L. DO NOT assume that these are the best products in the industry. Please do your research and let me know if you have any questions.

My bestselling books:
‘Make EPIC Money’ here:
‘Get EPIC Shit Done’:
‘Do Epic Shit’:

My gear for shooting this video:
🎥 Sony a7III camera:
🎬 Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 Lens:
🎙 Shure SM7B Microphone:
🔆 Fill Light 60W:
💡 Key Light 150W:
📽 Benro IT15 Tripod for Sony a7III camera:

The above links are on Amazon. If you buy any of these using the above links, I stand to make affiliate income from it. 100% of this income is contributed towards the education of kids who cannot afford it. In 2021 we contributed 38L, in 2022 we contributed 53L and in 2023 we contributed 52L.

Let’s connect online:
🎙 My weekly podcast Woice with warikoo (Spotify):
📩 My weekly newsletter warikoo Wanderings:
📱 Instagram:
🐦 Twitter:
👨🏻‍💻 LinkedIn:
😄 Facebook:
🖋 Daily Blog:

source

Here’s What Investors Should Do Now


Dave:
Interest rates are once again at the center of the housing market, but this week’s two biggest rate stories are pulling in opposite directions. The Federal Reserve just raised its benchmark rate for the first time in three years, while President Trump is calling for rates to be cut all the way to 1% or lower. Today, the whole panel is here and we’re breaking down why the Fed moved higher and what all this can mean for mortgage rates, housing demand, and your portfolio. I’m Dave Meyer here with Henry Washington, James Dainard, and Kathy Fettke to separate the headlines from what investors actually need to know. This is On the Market. Let’s get to it. Welcome to On the Market: The Gang. We’re back together everyone. I’m so happy to see you all. This is making my week. Henry, James, Kathy, how are you guys?

Kathy:
Oh, so good.

Dave:
Kathy jumped off a mountain today, so you’re doing great.

Kathy:
Yeah, I did. I parasailed off an Alp. I mean –

James:
That sounds so fun.

Henry:
Yeah, we define fun differently, but to each his own.

Kathy:
I’m not going to lie. It was really nice to have my feet back on the ground eventually.

Dave:
Well, it’s great to be back together. It has been a while since we’ve all been here and we got a pretty big story here. It’s making the news, everyone in real estate is talking about it. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the first time since 2023. It’s not a lot, just 25 basis points, but this is clearly the opposite of what I think most investors were expecting or hoping for, at least at the beginning of the year. I have my own thoughts about it, but I kind of want to open it up and hear what you all are thinking about this. Good thing, bad thing. Are you mad?

Kathy:
Ding, you haven’t kept your thoughts private about this at all.

Henry:
We’ve

Kathy:
Been talking about this for I think a year. You actually converted me a while ago. I was like, “He’s nuts. He thinks that inflation’s going to be persistent and that

Dave:
Rates

Kathy:
Weren’t going down anytime soon.” And I was not liking your story, but then yeah, I bought into it and here we are.

Dave:
I don’t like my story either, to be fair. I don’t like that this is what’s going on, but unfortunately it’s all playing out.

Henry:
Well, at least the Fed was unanimous, 12 zero on raising the thing.

Dave:
When do you get that many people to agree on anything?

Kathy:
Right. Which doesn’t bring a lot of comfort, right? They all agree. And does it mean more? I mean, it sounds like maybe one more this year, maybe two.

James:
All I know is I don’t want to do any more prediction shows because every time I predict something at the beginning of this year, I am completely wrong. I actually though we were going into quarter four and the market was going to be red hot.

Dave:
Yeah, it’s going to be ice cold.

James:
It is the shower you don’t want in the morning, that’s for sure. I

Henry:
Don’t know. I don’t know that I feel the same way. I mean, does the rate hike suck for some traditional buyers? I mean, yeah, the higher the rates go, there’s another subset of people that are priced out of the market because they just can’t afford to own a home, which affordability is an issue. I get it. But you asked specifically how we feel about it. And I mean, the higher rates are and the less demand there is, the more opportunities I have to get properties at a discount. Now the catch is, yeah, you can buy them at a discount, but can you hold onto them through the turmoil? That’s the challenging part because as you guys were just talking about and what James is alluding to, it’s hard right now to sell flips. If you’re in house flipping, the business is challenging right now. And so if you’re buying a great deal because the market’s giving you this amazing opportunity, but you can’t keep it and you can’t sell it, then you’re still in a tough position.
So it’s not just being able to buy, it’s being able to buy and weather the storm or figure out a way to get your properties to sell, which is kind of what we’ve done over here.

Dave:
I’m with you, man. I actually think it’s a good opportunity for buyers. I don’t see this as necessarily a bad thing. I guess big picture, I think prices are going to start coming down everywhere. Not a crash, but I just think in most markets, this is going to be the straw that breaks the camelback. We’ve been in this gridlock for four years between buyers and sellers. And frankly, buyers have been holding back because prices and rates make things not pencil, but sellers have just been sort of stubborn about it. I think that’s going to start to change. This low affordability is going to pull more buyers out of the market, and the only way people are going to be able to sell is to lower pricing. And so to Henry’s point, if you’re trying to buy things for the long run, that’s the discount people have been waiting for for years.
Everyone’s saying, “Well, buy when prices go down.” Well, prices are probably going to go down. And I don’t personally think that this is leading to a crash, which is kind of the scenario you want. You don’t want to buy when things are absolutely falling apart, but if this is going to give people more negotiating leverage to buy things at a discount, to Henry’s point, they still got a cash flow. You got to be able to hold onto them. But I think those opportunities are going to become more and more because rents probably aren’t going to go down. And so if prices go down and you can get better prices and rents are the same thing, cashflow prospects are improving. You can walk into more equity if you’re able to buy below current comps. If you’re a buy and hold investor, I think conditions are now improving.

Henry:
If you’re buy and hold, this is it.

Kathy:
It really just depends on where you are. Here’s the thing, inflation is usually a result of a few things. Right now we know it’s partly because of this oil mess and oil prices being up and that affects everything. But also in the report, or at least in certain markets, AI is booming. And I am from California. I have family still in the San Francisco Bay Area. There is so much freaking money. Prices are going up insanely. That

Dave:
Is true.

Kathy:
Insanely. AI is creating jobs right now. I know there’s all this fear that’s going to take jobs away, but right now in certain markets, it’s crazy. And so we’re seeing, again, in the San Francisco Bay Area, prices going up hundreds of thousands of dollars over asking price. So it does just depend on the market that you’re in. And inflation is actually good for real estate. If you’re a buy and hold investor, owning a home over time in an inflationary environment can make you very wealthy. I just want to add one thing because I know it feels depressing, but time does pass and I’ve been doing this for 30 years. This is what I tell people. As you know, I’m in Europe, jumping off of the Alps. The reason I’m here is because my daughter just got married. And when she was born, Rich and I set aside an investment property for this moment.
And Dave, listen up because you just had a baby. I did. You could do the same when you just kind of set aside a house. We knew her wedding was going to be expensive. We knew that that would be stressful at the time, but when we bought this 20 years ago, knowing that it was for this purpose, all we had to do was refi, take all that cash out and pay for the wedding. It was specifically designed for that and even though we put the. I know. We put the loan on it. We refi, there’s a loan on it, but it’s still cash flows. So it’s easy to get caught up in these, oh my gosh, quarter percent rate hike, but it still works over the long term. And I think that’s what people need to understand. Man,

James:
You guys are just full of sunshine and bunnies this morning. Yeah,

Henry:
James is a flipper. Well, you’re a house flipper.

James:
You’re

Henry:
A house flipper in an expensive X market.

James:
I feel like I’m going through a motivational. I’m like, all right, I got to get pumped up. No, it’s not great news, but I mean, at the end of the day, the rates didn’t move much whatsoever if they moved at all. It went

Dave:
Down.

James:
Yeah, it did.

Dave:
Which I said was going to happen, by the way. This is a good thing for long-term rates, but keep going, James. Sorry.

James:
No, and you got to look at, because I had a bunch of people call me freaking out. They’re like, “I got all these houses for sale.” I’m like, “I bet I got more than you.” But at the end of the day, we had to do this. Well, luckily I’ve been listening to Dave for so long now. I’m like, “Oh no, this is a good thing.” That’s what I was trying to explain. I’m like, “This is a good thing because we got to get normalized.” And one thing that I am seeing that could also be a good thing for you flippers out there, we’re seeing so many canceling listings right now. Inventory is starting to shrink in some spots because there’s only a few buyers come in. The buyers don’t like their houses, and the sellers are just staying tight. They’re not really cutting price. What I’m looking at these canceled and Dave, in our neighborhood, because me and Dave, me and Dave are listing our third flip?

Dave:
Third, fourth, I don’t know. But it’s going live today, so you better be giving me good news.

James:
Good news is we have no bad news. There’s no low comps, there’s no bad comps. Okay. I like that. But in this little pocket when I was looking at it, we have over 17 canceled listings in the last 12 months in this price point. This is a market that never cancels. That neighborhood, it sells out all the time because people want to live there. Out of these 17 homes, only two cut price.

Dave:
Interesting.

James:
They just stayed on market for 90 days and then they canceled. And so for people predicting a big crash, because people are like, “2008.” I’m like, “Chill out.” No. No.

Henry:
It’s

James:
Real estate. It goes like this, right? There’s little waves. These things actually for flippers could help too because inventory could dry up a little bit more and we could see rate relief by that spring market now. It’s a good time to buy deals if you could hit that first spring market. I know going forward, I’m trying to chime everything for that spring. And if I can’t, I am adjusting my numbers dramatically.

Henry:
Yeah. Things seem like they’re cooling in a lot of places because they are. But as I was researching for this show, I actually found another article that said that prices are cooling in 46 metros, so they’ve gone down since the previous month, but they’re still rising in 54 other metros. So that is not a big signal to me that there’s some massive crash coming. There’s demand in certain markets and there’s not in other markets. I don’t know, that seems normal to me. Yeah,

Dave:
It is. I think that is normal, but I guess my thought is that rate relief just isn’t coming. I don’t think we’re getting below six and a half anytime soon, and I mean next year. And it doesn’t even matter what the Fed does. We’ve gone past the point where what the Fed does even is going

Henry:
To

Dave:
Impact more. It’s true. The bond market is deciding everything and there’s just clearly a revolt in the bond market. They don’t buy what the US government is selling. Literally, they are not buying. They’re not investing in what the US government is selling. And so what are the ways that the US government can fix that? Well, they could control short-term inflation by ending the war. No one’s even talking about ending the war anymore. That’s even been in the news. That’s not coming anytime soon. And then the other real thing that is going to keep rates persistently high for the foreseeable future, maybe forever, is the national deficit. Bond investors are worried that because we cannot control the deficit, that the government is going to print their way out of this. And that’s probably right. That is a reasonable fear. And until that fear goes away, bond yields aren’t going to go down meaningfully.
And I said this in the show the other day, but you can’t even say or forecast the deficit going down with a straight face. It’s a joke. No one is going to do it. We haven’t had a balanced budget in the US for 26 years. So you have to just think about what mechanism is going to bring rates down. I don’t see one. And so that’s why I just think we’re in for this, not a crash, but persistently downward pressure on home prices because the affordability’s too low. And now I think people are going to just say seven, six and a half seven is the rate and they’re going to not buy things expecting to be able to refinance. And that’s going to push home prices down in a lot of places. Not 20%, but are we going to see three, 5% declines next year?
I think so. All right everyone, we got to take a quick break, but we’ll be back with the whole panel right after this. Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s jump back into our conversation about what the Fed is doing and what it means for your portfolio.

Henry:
Well, it’s interesting that you say that because in preparation for this show, the article I’ve wanted to talk about and I say I wanted to talk about, what I really mean is I want to get Dave riled up and get him to talk about it because one of my favorite things to do on this planet is to get Dave on a soapbox because it is f – hilarious.

Dave:
What is it going to be about?

Henry:
Well, I mean it’s about the rates because right after the decision, President Trump came out and said that he demands that he wants 1% interest rates. And he said that right after the Fed decision. Now I’m bringing this up because this is an article that’s out there. It’s something that he said somebody somewhere is going to read this and think there’s a situation in which this can happen. And so I want to hear from you guys, specifically Dave, on is it even a possibility, what situations have to happen for rates to get that low? And what does that mean? Do we want that? How does that impact us or not?

Dave:
Okay, here we go. First and foremost, I think what Trump is talking about is the federal funds rate, not mortgage rates because it came out right after the Fed decision. And so just to be clear, that is the one interest rate the Federal Reserve controls is the federal funds rate. It’s basically what banks borrow and lend to each other at. It’s kind of the lowest baseline for interest rates across the economy. It is not what dictates mortgage rates. And so big picture here, could it happen? Yeah, for sure. The FOMC, the people in the Fed who vote on monetary policy could absolutely choose to get the federal funds rate down to 1%. It was at zero during COVID. It was at zero during the GFC. So

Henry:
There

Dave:
Is precedent for interest rates to go that low. The problem that the Fed has is that if they do that, it is going to completely backfire and have the opposite effect of what everyone wants. Because the reason bond yields are going up and mortgage rates are going up is that people are afraid of inflation. And if you lower the federal funds rate when we already have an inflationary environment, that is usually fuel to the fire of inflation. You

Kathy:
Get more of it.

Dave:
Exactly. So if you’re a bond investor and you see the federal fund rate go down to 1%, you’re going to stop buying 10-year US treasuries at 5% and you’re going to demand 6% or you’re going to demand 7% to compensate for the risk of inflation. And when bond yields, when 10-year treasuries go from 5% to 7%, what does that do to mortgage rates? That takes them from 7% to 9%. And so this would have a really bad impact on real estate in my opinion. This is why I’ve been rooting for rate hikes, not because it’s good in the short term, it’s not helpful for real estate in the short term, but long-term, we need to control inflation. That is the way we get back to persistently better rates and to a better environment. And I know a lot of this on both sides is politically motivated, but if you’re just truly rooting for the long-term health of the US economy, which I am, job number one is to win the battle against inflation.
So that’s why I was happy. Even though that means some of my properties, the value is going to go down on paper. James and I might be screwed on this flip we’re listening to. Oh no, we’re not.

James:
We got good going out.

Dave:
But anyway, that’s my take on this. Was that riled up enough for you, Henry? I

Henry:
Felt like I wanted a little more heat, but I’ll take it. That was a very reasonable and honest approach to answering that question because headlines are headlines, right? They’re clickbaity, but this actually happened and that’s part of what we do on the show is let’s talk about what it really means for people and take the clickbaity out of it. I

Dave:
Mean, I think would commercial real estate investors like the federal funds rate at 1%? Probably. They sure would. Because those loans are much more tied to the federal funds rate than the 10-year US treasury. They just work a little bit different. So that would be helpful for commercial real estate, but for residential, it would backfire for sure. Would the

Kathy:
US treasurer like the rates down to 1% so that the interest on the debt would be lower? Yes. They sure

Dave:
Would.

Kathy:
They would sure like that too, but just doesn’t work that way.

Henry:
I think this is a great time for the seasoned or kind of mid-tier investor to be evaluating the portfolio and seeing what’s performing and what’s not performing and taking a look at things they’ve bought recently to see how those are performing and then make some decisions about how you want to go about continuing to grow. Because if I’m a buy and hold investor who’s looking to grow, I’m probably looking to see how I can get a little bit more aggressive in this environment while there’s opportunity to buy at a discount. And if I’m a flipper, then I’m looking at the market and this I am doing, then I’m taking a hard look at the last 30 days of properties that have gone under contract or sold and figuring out what price points are selling, what neighborhoods they’re selling, how long were those on the market, what amenities did those have, what did they.
I am analyzing all of that hard because if I want to be profitable in this market where things are a lot slower, then I’ve got to do what people want. And what people want right now is not what people wanted even 60 days ago. The market’s moving quickly. And so this is when you really need to be analyzing. Another

Kathy:
Thing you could do as a real estate investor in this environment, and I’ll be actually talking about this at BP Con, which is going to be awesome and coming up very soon. I’m so stoked.

James:
Yes.

Kathy:
But yeah, it’s harder to find cash flow today in an inflationary environment. So how do you do it? Well, you’ve just really got to look at the expense side. And so that might be how do I cut insurance costs? How do I – How

Henry:
Do you cut insurance costs? Because I’m trying.

Kathy:
Yeah. I mean, one way we’re doing it, we have a single family rental fund in Texas and we were able to put all those properties under one insurance policy and we dramatically lowered our costs actually that way. So again, I’ll be speaking in detail about how to do that, but shopping it around, trying to pay points, especially if you’re a buyer today and builders, it’s actually going to be my next story, so I’ll save it for that. But how do you pay points to lower the payment? But right now it’d be really, really important. Again, if you’re a buyer, make sure that you’re getting every inspection possible so that you don’t get stuck with costs you’re not expecting because it costs more to fix things. Everything is going to cost more. So get more inspections than you would normally get to protect yourself. I

Dave:
Love the idea of paying down points, Kathy, right now. I think that’s such a good move in this environment because as I’ve told you, I don’t think rates are really coming down in any meaningful way anytime soon. And the move right now is to buy long term, in my opinion. Better assets are coming for sale, better quality assets. So you want to buy something for 20 years, get a concession from the seller or pay down the points so you can lower your interest rate into the fours. Yeah, it’s like 20 grand upfront, but a lot of times the seller will pay that for you or you negotiate on price and then use the savings to buy down the rate. That’s what, to Henry’s point early in the show, that’s a way you can buy a great asset and be sure that you hold onto it through this downturn until things get better.
And obviously you just have to buy at a good price.That’s just kind of the name of the game right now. All right, we got plenty more to talk about, but we have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s jump back in with Henry, James and Kathy.

James:
People really need to spend some time getting clarity in their own buy box because what Henry wants to buy, what Dave wants to buy, Kathy wants to buy, what I want to buy, it’s all different. But when you’re in an unstable market, the best thing that you can have is clarity. Don’t worry about what you won’t buy and what’s going on. What will you buy? And if you’re going to put in your money, what does it need to pay you? That’s

Henry:
So true. And if

James:
It doesn’t hit that number, don’t buy the thing.
But everyone needs to spend some time getting clarity behind that because it’s no longer the COVID boom where you just buy things and pray. It’s put a strategy behind what you want to do. And in the meantime, if you have product that you have and the numbers aren’t good, my buy box today is a lot different than it was nine months ago. I’ll tell you that much. It is vastly different. And what we’re doing right now, I was going through my spreadsheet this morning. I’m going through all my short-term debt right now and you go, okay, well, how do we get over the hump? Because every time there’s bad news in the news, we get these little stall outs. How do you get through it? I’m literally refinancing. I just went through this. Instead of chasing rate, I’m actually chasing liquidity because no matter what you do in this market, you can cut price, it could still sit.
You got to make sure that your liquidity is balanced right now. Cash is really, really important that you don’t get yourself in hot water. So reach out to all your lenders. Do they do interest reserves? That is a huge thing I’m using right now. I’m looking at all my loan to values and some of these deals might not be profitable anymore, but there’s a lot of equity in them because we have a lot of cash in these deals and we’re refinancing those. I’m going to pull four month interest reserves on every one of those because it just buys me till the spring. Then I don’t have any financial pressure and I can make smart decisions. So get clarity and set yourself up where you can make smart decisions because reactionary ones are the ones you really get hurt on. That’s

Henry:
Such a great point because where the hard part is for me, and I think for a lot of investors right now, it’s not avoiding bad deals. Those are pretty easy to spot. The hard part is being so locked in on your buy box that you’re willing to leave a deal on the table that still has some room to make some money, but it doesn’t quite fit your buy box because those are the deals. If I look over the last six to eight months, the deals that have bit me in the butt are the ones where there was some margin there, but I needed everything to go perfectly in order for me to get that margin. And that market just doesn’t exist right now. We don’t know what’s going to work and what’s not going to work in every single deal. It’s very hard for me to predict which houses are going to sell fast and which aren’t unless they’re just super cheap.
And so where I struggle is when I’m underwriting a deal and yeah, that deal might have $30,000 of profit built into it, but right now I’m not doing flips unless I’m going to make at least $40,000. And so I have to leave the $30,000 ones on the table because there’s just too many areas where you can screw that up and end up in the red. And so those are the ones, the ones where I’m like, “Ah, I could make it work. I could do it.” Then I end up losing sleep. I’m stressed out the whole time. Maybe I’m profitable, maybe I’m not, but it wasn’t worth my time. So the discipline right now to stick to your buy box is very challenging. I know

James:
It’s hard because there’s so many deals out there, you have to be disciplined. There’s a lot more opportunities floating around, but be picky. Geez. Dude,

Dave:
Patience is the number one thing right now. I think you got to go out there and look because there are good deals, but there’s a lot of trash too. And so you just got to be patient. And again, there’s a flip side, a silver lining to every market. It’s bad for some, it’s good for other things. And right now you got time. I don’t think there’s a window closing for buying opportunities right now. I think we’re going to be in a period where buying opportunities might even just keep getting better, especially heading into winter. I think two, three months from now, we’re going to start to see really good deals come onto the market. And so that doesn’t mean don’t look now because we’re getting to a point where the market is inefficient, which sounds bad, but as a buyer, that’s kind of what you want.
You want there to be inefficiency in the market where you can find these opportunities where things are priced below what they should cost or not even what they should cost. They are priced to what they should cost for an investor. And so those opportunities are out there, just don’t buy anything that’s not really safe. If you are worried that prices are going to go down 5%, buy something 15% under market comps, buy something 20% under market comps to Henry and James’ point, and just don’t waver from that. If that’s the number that makes you feel comfortable, that’s what you should stick to. Yeah. And

James:
Explore multiple exit strategies. There’s so many different ways you can cut up a deal because the more strategies you have, the safer it is. And so really go through the basics. There’s a property right now that I just listed. Gray area is worth 175. I’m at 165. And instead of cutting more price, I’m like, what’s the point? Because if I need to get into a new financing bracket, I got to be below 1.5 at this point. That’s a huge drop off the list price. But what I’m going to do is drop it to 1.4 because that’s moving, but I’m also cutting off the backyard. I’m flipping the lot off for two. And so there’s so many different ways that you can do this business. Just look at how you can cut because my next price drop is a hundred grand and then I’m in the red, or I can drop at 200 grand, but cut the backyard off and one four is really moving in this neighborhood and the lot’s worth 200 because it was worth 300 12 months ago.
And so it’s like, how can you cut it up? You got to explore every different exit.

Dave:
Well, I think this is the exact sort of sober perspective that investors should be hearing is that this isn’t all bad. The headlines and the media make everything seem scary. And if you were trying to sell every property you own this week, it probably is a little bit scary. But if you’re in the game for the long run, I think you just have to do what we always talk about, which is find what the market is giving you. Sometimes it gives you good pricing, sometimes it gives you great appreciation. You never get all of it, right? You never get a perfect market. And right now what we’re going to get, in my opinion, is better pricing. And so use that. Go explore that. That’s awesome. I feel like we’re going to get better deals than we’ve seen at least four or five years. So that to me is encouraging if you’re in this game for the long run.
So thank you guys for all the sober, good perspective here. Any last thoughts? Yeah,

Kathy:
My final thought is that the builder sentiment came out this week and it was very weak. Builders are frustrated. They’re needing to move inventory. And the important thing I think for investors to know is that they are giving incentives,

Henry:
So

Kathy:
Many incentives. That’s what we are focused on. Like we talked about earlier, they’re buying down your rate. You could get extra things added on, but mainly lower prices and buying down the rate. So there is opportunity. It’s a bummer. It’s hard to be a seller right now, but that’s something to think about and that people should be looking into. Be

Henry:
Careful out there. It’s

James:
All about clarity. And you know the best way to get clarity? Come to BP Con and listen to a lot of smart people talking and then adjust your strategy. It’s going

Dave:
To be super fun. If you haven’t bought your ticket yet, still tickets available. Go to biggerpockets.com/conference. We’re all going to be there speaking. We have Morgan Housel who wrote The Psychology of Money, one of my favorite books, and so many other incredible investors and teachers and networking and so much fun to do there. Well, thank you all so much for coming and giving these great perspectives. This was a lot of fun. Kathy, stay inside the plane on your flight home from Europe, and hopefully we’ll see you all at BP Con, but if not, we will see you all for another episode of On the Market very soon.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Marshalls Is Closing Stores: See Updated List of Doomed Locations for 2026



Retail analysts say the chain is swapping expensive leases for locations that offer a better long-term return.

Debt Advice Warning: Spot The Red Flags


This post was originally published on fca.org.uk 

Free debt advice is available to everyone. However, the FCA is concerned that some consumers are being steered towards fee-paying debt solutions that may not be suitable for their needs, sometimes through high pressure sales tactics, misleading information or being advised by firms that do not have the appropriate permissions.

Red flags include:

  • Pressure tactics: Feeling hassled, or repeatedly contacted, particularly after an online enquiry or unexpected phone call, and being pressured to agree to a debt solution quickly over the phone or via WhatsApp, without time to properly consider their options.
  • Changing details: Being asked or encouraged to change details about income or outgoings on an application or assessment form, or being ‘coached’ to say certain things.
  • Failing to disclose, or discouraging, fee-free alternatives: Being steered towards a fee-charging debt solution, such as Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs) or some debt management plans, without alternative debt solutions being properly explained or offered first.
  • Unclear identity: The person contacting the consumer does not explain who they work for, or their details do not match with the firm’s official details.

Alison Walters, director of consumer finance at the FCA, said:

‘Anyone struggling with debt deserves advice that puts their interests first. Free, impartial debt advice is available to everyone, and no one should be pressured or misled into paying for a debt solution that may not be right for them.’

Advice for consumers

  • You can find information on how to get free, impartial debt advice on the MoneyHelper website.  
  • Before considering a debt solution, use the FCA Firm Checker to confirm a firm is authorised and that its contact details match.  
  • If you think you’ve received poor debt advice, or been pressured into an unsuitable debt solution, please contact us.
  • If you’re unhappy with the way you are treated by an authorised firm, you can complain. If you’re dissatisfied with the firm’s response, you should refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Read more about unauthorised or unsuitable debt advice.

The FCA recently took action against debt advice firm Curtis Faraday (PDF), after identifying serious concerns, which included leading customers to give answers that made them appear to qualify for a fee-charging IVA, rather than being offered impartial advice and a debt solution that may have better suited their circumstances. The FCA has stopped the firm from providing debt advice to new customers.  

The FCA has also recently banned Mr Howard Duckett, senior manager at debt advice firm Beauforce Corporation Limited, for a lack of honesty and integrity. The FCA is urging consumers who currently have a debt management plan arranged with Beauforce Corporation Limited to stop payments and seek alternative support.  

Notes to editors



Sponsored Links by DQ Promote

This entry was posted in Global, Politics, Legal & Regulation and tagged fca. Bookmark the permalink.



AbbVie vs. Pfizer: Which Dividend Stock Is the Better Buy in September?


Dividend stocks are always great additions to a portfolio, as they offer investors the opportunity to earn passive income during any economic or market environment. This may compensate for weakness in your portfolio during tough market times and supercharge performance during better days — so you’ll always be happy to hold onto at least a few of these players.

Where to find dividend stocks? They’re present throughout industries, but you’ll notice many in the healthcare space. Generally, dividend players are well-established companies — such as some of the world’s top pharma names — that don’t have to pour every dollar into growth. They can afford to reward shareholders regularly. And two that fall into this category are AbbVie (ABBV +0.20%) and Pfizer (PFE +0.29%).

These companies are both committed to sharing their winnings with investors. But which of these two is the better buy in September? Let’s find out.

Image source: Getty Images.

The case for AbbVie

It’s important to note that AbbVie is a Dividend King, meaning the company has raised its dividend for more than 50 consecutive years. This shows that dividend growth is a priority for this pharma giant, and with such a streak, it’s likely AbbVie will continue along this path. And with free cash flow of $18 billion, it has the financial strength to do so. Today, AbbVie pays a dividend of $6.92, representing a dividend yield of 2.6%, which is higher than the 1.06% dividend yield of the S&P 500. So all of this is positive.

AbbVie Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(0.20%) $0.52

Current Price

$264.48

On top of this, AbbVie has proven that it can continue to generate growth after losing exclusivity on one of the world’s best-selling drugs, immunology blockbuster Humira. AbbVie prepared by developing its immunology portfolio, and today, two other immunology products are delivering double-digit quarterly gains into the billions of dollars. In the recent quarter, Rinvoq and Skyrizi together brought in $8 billion — that’s on the company’s total of $16 billion in net revenue.

Meanwhile, AbbVie has a full portfolio of treatments across specialty areas, from neuroscience to oncology. All of this is driving growth in revenue and profit.

The case for Pfizer

Pfizer is in the middle of an exciting recovery story. The pharma giant saw earnings soar after the release of its coronavirus vaccine and treatment — revenue even reached a peak of more than $100 billion back in 2022. But as the pandemic reached its later stages, demand for these products declined, and that resulted in much lower revenue for Pfizer.

The company shifted its investments and costs to account for this and has made major efforts to boost its pipeline internally and through acquisitions. And all of this is powering revenue higher. For example, in the recent quarter, Pfizer said its focused execution resulted in an 18% operational revenue gain for a selection of top recently launched and acquired products. Pfizer has reported profits as well as losses periodically in recent quarters as it continues its recovery. Meanwhile, strength in its oncology platform and the potential of its late-stage pipeline could drive future growth.

Pfizer Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(0.29%) $0.08

Current Price

$27.74

As for dividends, Pfizer’s has remained stable in recent times, at $1.72 with a 6.2% yield, and though some investors have worried that the company could suspend this payment, Pfizer has confirmed its commitment to maintaining it.

“We feel extremely confident that we will — even the most stretched scenarios that we are running, we will be able to maintain our dividend,” chief Albert Bourla said during the recent earnings call.

The better buy?

AbbVie and Pfizer both make interesting pharma investments — and if you’re looking for a turnaround story, you might favor Pfizer as the company is making significant progress. But here, I’m focused on the strongest dividend player to buy right now, and with that in mind, I would go for AbbVie.

Though Pfizer clearly is committed to maintaining its dividend, AbbVie has the free cash flow to keep its payments growing year after year — as it’s done for decades. Meanwhile, AbbVie has proven its ability to grow following the Humira loss of exclusivity. That’s why right now in September, this Dividend King is the better buy.

Digital Mortgage 2026 showcase: 20 lender AI solutions



The next wave of technology solutions for lenders is using artificial intelligence to significantly speed up workflows and supercharge loan officers’ capacities. 

Twenty mortgage companies vying for a $10,000 grand prize last week at the Digital Mortgage tech showcase highlighted their unique uses of AI to automate the loan lifecycle and promote newer and faster business opportunities. The 2026 demo lineup included familiar and new tech providers, who promoted strict adherence to compliance and quick implementation timelines. 

Serving as judges were Julian Hebron, founder of the basis point; Christina Randolph, vice president of distribution and single-family acquisitions at Freddie Mac; and John Wines, chief strategy officer at Atlantic Bay Mortgage Group. They judged companies on factors including market relevance, proof of return on investment, and demo quality and salesmanship. 

Read on to learn about the various digital solutions for lenders and servicers, including the top three entries.



Brands Trick us to Spend More #apple #finance #education #money



Let’s say you went to a fast food store, and the fries are sold in different sizes. You see two options:

Small Fries: $3 | Large Fries: $7

You would probably pick the small fries, because who wants to spend $7 on some fries.

But now, let’s say you see not two, but three options:

Small Fries: $3 | Medium Fries: $6.5 | Large Fries: $7

Which one do you pick now?

Most people would instead buy the $7 fries because they feel they’re getting a lot for the extra $0.5.

The original options are still around, and the $7 option only appears to be a winner because of how well it compares with the $6.5 option. Your brain’s comparison system has been tricked. You’ve been gamed.

Very few people will buy the medium $6.5 fries. The company did not intend to sell you the medium fries. They intended to use the medium fry option to get you to buy the large fry instead of the small fry.

People feel that they assign value to things in an absolute sense, that the item under assessment has an intrinsic value that does not change. The reality is, humans can only assess value on a relative basis.

The decoy effect works by setting the brain’s relative viewpoint on the decoy and tricking it into thinking that by spending a little more, it can receive a disproportionate return.

Source:- Lifemathmoney

source

New Bipartisan Bill Would Count SAVE Forbearance Months Toward PSLF, No Buyback Required


Reps. Bill Foster (D-IL) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) introduced the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Inclusion Act of 2026, which would update what counts as a qualifying payment under Public Service Loan Forgiveness in two ways: it would let payments under graduated, extended, and the new tiered standard plans count during a borrower’s first 60 months, and it would treat months spent in administrative forbearance as qualifying payments for borrowers working in public service.

It was referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce the same day it was introduced, with nine cosponsors.

This first provision is a win for many borrowers who’ve found themselves in the wrong repayment plan (especially graduated – which we’ve called a trap). These borrowers have seen their payment counts drop as a result.

The second provision is especially important for the roughly 7 million borrowers who spent more than two years in the SAVE forbearance. Under current law, those months earn zero PSLF credit unless the borrower buys them back. Under this bill, they would count automatically, with no lump-sum payment and no application.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

The SAVE forbearance began in July 2024 when courts blocked the plan, and it has been ongoing until servicers started sending 90-day exit notices on July 1, 2026.

A public servant who stayed in it the entire time lost more than 24 months toward the 120 payments PSLF requires, and interest has been accruing on those balances since August 1, 2025.

The only current fix is PSLF Buyback, a program that requires 120 months of certified employment before you can even apply, a lump-sum payment based on what you would have owed under an eligible income-driven plan, and a wait that reader reports put at 20 to 24 months.

The math on buyback also catches people off-guard. After the court settlement barred the Department from using REPAYE as a calculation basis, buyback amounts shifted toward the older IBR formula, which produces a higher payment for borrowers whose loans predate 2014.

A borrower buying back 24 months at a $300 IBR-equivalent payment would owe $7,200 in one check. This bill would erase that bill entirely for any month the borrower can document public service employment.

What The Bill Would Change

Administrative forbearance would count. Section 2(b) amends the definition of “monthly payment” in 20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3) to include a payment the borrower “would have made” during any period when repayment was suspended by administrative forbearance and the borrower held a public service job. That language covers the SAVE forbearance directly. Borrowers would still need to certify employment for those months, but the buyback lump sum and application would disappear.

The first 60 payments would count regardless of plan. Current law only counts payments under the graduated and extended plans only if they are at least as large as the 10-year standard amount. The bill drops that floor for a borrower’s first 60 months. From month 61 forward, the existing rule returns – eligible repayment plan. This matters because the Education Department is currently rescinding PSLF credit from borrowers who were on the extended or graduated plans, on the grounds that those months never qualified.

The tiered standard plan would count. The bill adds the standard plan under subsection (d)(7)(A)(i), which is the tiered standard plan created for loans issued on or after July 1, 2026. That plan has repayment terms of 10 to 25 years based on balance and is not PSLF-eligible today, which means new borrowers who pick it get no forgiveness credit.

Borrowers would get notice. The Department would have 180 days after enactment to tell every Direct Loan borrower about both changes and explain how to switch plans.

Where There Are Still Questions

The applicability clause in Section 2(c)(2) says the 60-payment rule applies to borrowers who have made fewer than 120 payments as of enactment. There is no matching clause for the forbearance provision, and the text does not state whether it reaches forbearance months that occurred before the bill became law. The plain reading of an amended definition, combined with the mandatory notice to all borrowers, points toward retroactive credit for the SAVE period, but a court or Department rulemaking would have to officially settle that question. Borrowers should not assume it until the language is clarified or the Department issues guidance.

The bill also does not address the PSLF Buyback program itself. Borrowers already in the buyback queue of roughly 88,000 requests would presumably see those requests become moot if the forbearance months counted on their own, but nothing in the text says how the Department should handle pending applications or lump sums already paid. Again, another rulemaking issue that would likely have to be resolved.

How This Connects

Foster’s office says 97% of public servants who applied for PSLF have been denied, a figure that dates to the program’s early years and predates the current numbers. The latest tracking shows over 1 million borrowers have received their loan forgiveness under PSLF, and roughly 120,000 are on track each year for the next few years.

The wrong-payment plan problem is still alive, though. Our reporting on the Department’s August payment-count corrections found borrowers losing six or more months because they had been on extended or graduated plans that were never eligible. This bill would restore that credit for anyone under 60 payments, though borrowers past that mark would still lose those months.

Being in the wrong repayment plan is also something that Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF) solves for, but we estimate that roughly half of the program’s funds have already been exhausted. There may be only 2 or 3 years left of this benefit.

For SAVE borrowers, the bill would fix the fact that the forbearance does not directly count for PSLF, and buyback is the only workaround.

What’s Next

Foster has introduced a version of this bill five other times. The 2026 version is the first to address administrative forbearance directly, and it carries support from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Council on Education.

The signal to watch is whether the Education and Workforce Committee schedules a hearing before the 119th Congress ends on January 3, 2027. Without one, the bill dies with the session and would need to be reintroduced. SAVE borrowers face their own deadlines in the meantime: the first 90-day exit notices expire September 29, 2026, and the last deadline lands around March 31, 2027.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post New Bipartisan Bill Would Count SAVE Forbearance Months Toward PSLF, No Buyback Required appeared first on The College Investor.

Mamdani confronts Trump with ‘all the members of the press’, hours after CNN, MS NOW, Politico suit



President Donald Trump has long had an antagonistic relationship with the press. He famously popularized the phrase “fake news” and has called reporters “the enemy of the people.” Yet the president is also more accessible to reporters than his recent predecessors, making media appearances on roughly 80% of his days in office during stretches of his second term and taking far more shouted questions and interviews than Obama or Biden ever took.

It’s a contradiction that defined Monday: a president who grants extraordinary access on his own terms, and revokes it entirely when the coverage displeases him. And at New York’s Gracie Mansion on Monday, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani made sure to portray a different scene to the press.

“I told the president that we’re going to have all of the members of the press here on the lawn, and that is something that I believe in,” Mamdani said.

Standing next to him on the lawn of the famed city house was Trump, who on Friday announced he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House grounds over the “constant ‘reporting’ [of] FAKE NEWS.”

By Monday morning, the three banned outlets had filed a joint First Amendment lawsuit in federal court in Washington D.C., arguing the ban amounted to viewpoint discrimination and violated their due-process rights. Other networks refused to provide White House pool coverage that day in solidarity, since CNN normally handles that rotation.

Friday’s action isn’t Trump’s first attempt to ban the press. In 2018, the White House revoked the press pass of then-CNN reporter Jim Acosta, until a federal judge ordered it be restored. More recently, in February 2025, he barred the Associated Press from the Oval Office and other small-pool events over the news agency’s refusal to adopt “Gulf of America,” instead of the widely-accepted “Gulf of Mexico.” (A judge initially ordered the access restored, only to be overruled by the the D.C. Circuit in June 2025.)

Asked by reporters about his closed-door conversation with Trump, Mamdani said he made sure the president knew the press would be present at Gracie Mansion.

Trump, in response, joked that the press would never boycott him, and again called the three outlets fake news. “If you look at CNN, it’s fake news. If you look at MS NOW, I don’t even know what MS NOW is,” he went on.

“I really think I have an obligation not to allow them into another very special house. This is a special house, Gracie Mansion. Well, the White House is the most special of all houses,” Trump said of the ban.

Temporary Protected Status

When The City reporter Katie Honan asked Trump about Temporary Protected Status, Mamdani said he and the president spoke about possibly restoring that status for Haitian immigrants, explaining it in economic terms and citing concern from “pastors, developers, executives in healthcare and hospitality.” He added that Trump, by controlling who gets TPS status, “can either deliver or deny stability” for people who’ve built lives in New York.

TPS status is granted to nationals of a designated country who are already living in the U.S., regardless of how they arrived, so long as the DHS determines that war, natural disaster or other extraordinary conditions make it unsafe for them to return. Recipients of TPS status are able to live and work in the U.S., but have no pathway to permanent residency.

Haiti has held TPS status since the 2010 earthquake, but upon removing TPS status for Haitians, then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem argued that the administration was “returning TPS to its original status: temporary.”

Trump’s history with the Haitian community has swung wildly during his time in politics. As a candidate in 2016, he called himself Haitians’ “biggest champion” during a visit to Miami’s Little Haiti. Yet in his first administration, he tried to end TPS for Haitian immigrants in 2017, with the DHS arguing Haiti had recovered from the earthquake. Haitian TPS holders sued in Brooklyn, arguing the decision was motivated by political bias, and a federal judge agreed in April 2019.

Trump again tried to revoke TPS status in 2025, only for his ban to again be challenged int he courts; the Supreme Court ruled in June 2026 that DHS could proceed with cutting off protections for an estimated 330,000 to 350,000 Haitians. A new lawsuit alleges that Trump’s decision was racially motivated, though the termination remains in effect.

The end of TPS status cuts off work authorization for hundreds of thousands of Haitians as of July 24, and New York City Hall was forced to let go of Haitian employees with no other legal path to work.

“The mayor feels very strongly about [TPS],” Trump said Monday before leaving Gracie Mansion. “I feel strongly about a lot of things. I feel strongly about taking care of people, and that’s what we do. We’re doing a good job of it.”

New York has the country’s second-largest Haitian population after Miami, more than 160,000 people, concentrated in Brooklyn’s Flatbush and East Flatbush. Many work in healthcare: New York State alone has roughly 7,000 Haitian TPS holders working as nursing assistants and home caregivers, in a citywide healthcare workforce that’s 57% immigrant and nearly three-quarters immigrant among home health aides, according to the Center for Migration Studies.

After Trump left, Mamdani disclosed that he had personally invited Trump to the mayor’s residence, after the two discussed Trump’s own fond memories of Gracie Mansion.

Citi Introduces “Once Per Lifetime Language” for Strata Cards, Replaced 1/48 Rule