Want to start trading crypto in 2026?
Here are 3 simple steps.
#CryptoTrading #Bitcoin #Crypto #TradingForBeginners #Crypto2026 #LearnCrypto #BTC #CryptoTips #BeginnerTrader #NotFinancialAdvice
source
Want to start trading crypto in 2026?
Here are 3 simple steps.
#CryptoTrading #Bitcoin #Crypto #TradingForBeginners #Crypto2026 #LearnCrypto #BTC #CryptoTips #BeginnerTrader #NotFinancialAdvice
source
Machine learning is useful because heat damage is unlikely to follow one stable, linear relationship across companies. A small increase in temperature may have little effect until an operating threshold is reached. Beyond that point, heat can reduce productivity and equipment efficiency, increase cooling needs, or constrain production.
The effect can also differ widely across companies facing similar weather. An automated plant with modern cooling and greater operational flexibility may continue operating. A labor-intensive business with older equipment and greater worker exposure to heat may experience a sharp loss of output. Averaging the two can make the overall effect appear modest even when one company faces a material financial loss.
Machine learning can search for these threshold effects and differences across firms more effectively than a model built around one average relationship. A May 2026 working paper by Christian Breitung, Gerard Hoberg, and Sebastian Müller, “Machine Learning the Impact of Climate Change on Firms Worldwide,” illustrates how a machine-learning framework can capture those differences. Their models estimate how abnormal seasonal temperature and precipitation affect sales, efficiency, profitability, and costs, with effects varying widely across firms. The adverse effects are concentrated in more exposed industries, labor-intensive and older firms, and companies operating in less developed regions.
Investors therefore need what could be called a company’s “heat-response function”: an estimate of how production, costs, margins, and cash flow change once temperatures exceed thresholds that matter to its operations. Absent that relationship, investors do not have a valuation input.
Diesel prices have come off their all-time highs in recent weeks, but the key industrial fuel has already moved the needle across the economy and financial markets, making affordability a more potent issue in the midterm elections.
The national average for diesel is about $6.277 per gallon, according to AAA, down from its $6.528 high but still 71% above year-ago levels. By contrast, U.S. crude oil is up 56% from a year earlier as damage to refining capacity in the Middle East and Russia has produced a sharper crunch in fuel markets.
Because diesel is a critical input in manufacturing, agriculture and logistics, the recent price surge has been felt broadly. The latest consumer and producer price indexes showed jumps in transportation costs, while purchasing manager surveys signaled big spikes in prices businesses are paying.
“This is why products have been trading at double the price of crude during the past few months, something that has never happened before. Ultimately, diesel and gasoline drive inflation, not crude oil,” Amrita Sen, director of market intelligence and co-founder at Energy Aspects, wrote in the Financial Times on Wednesday.
And as higher fuel costs keep inflation forecasts elevated, markets are pricing in a more hawkish Federal Reserve that’s ready to hike rates further. Bond yields have risen in anticipation of tighter monetary policy, raising borrowing costs for consumers.
Crude prices had previously moved in tandem with prices for refined products and had long been a proxy for those costs, but that relationship has broken down, according to Sen.
“In fact, since May, 10-year US Treasury yields have correlated more closely with diesel prices than crude prices, for the first time ever,” she added.
That’s why the Trump administration has started paying more attention lately to bringing down diesel prices, Sen said.
Over the past week alone, President Donald Trump has taken steps to ease the cost burden. On Monday, he signed an executive order to defer the 24-cent federal tax per gallon on diesel until the end of the year, though most states have separate levies on diesel.
And on Friday, he said he reached a deal with Vladimir Putin to obtain diesel from Russia, a stunning reversal from years of U.S. pressure on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.
Russia will supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel now, followed by an additional 500,000 tons in November and 1 million tons “immediately thereafter,” according to Trump. Russia will deliver another 3 million tons “within a short period of time” after that.
The surprise announcement was more shocking considering that Trump signed a sweeping sanctions law last month that imposes steep tariffs on the top buyers of Russian energy.
Frederic J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images
But Trump’s efforts to lower diesels costs are unlikely to improve affordability significantly.
Farmers and truckers have said his executive order on the diesel tax will offer little relief, especially given that per-gallon prices are $2.60 higher than a year ago while the federal tax is just 24 cents a gallon. Similarly, energy experts said the deal for Russian diesel is also unlikely to make much of a dent.
“It’s kind of shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic,” Michael Lynch, distinguished fellow at Energy Policy Research Foundation, told the Associated Press. “If we get diesel from Russia, basically it means that their existing customers are not going to get it and they’ll have to go somewhere else, and that will keep the price basically where it is now.”
And even if Trump somehow managed to end his Iran war or bring fuel prices down sharply, Republicans may not see a lift with voters in November.
According to a new Politico Poll, just 10% of undecided voters said they would be more likely to vote for a Republican if gas prices went down by $1 a gallon versus 29% who said it would have no impact and 57% who didn’t know.
The results were similar when asked about how an end to the Iran war and a sharp drop in inflation might affect their midterm choices.
“There’s nothing that Trump can do, and frankly, even if he did something, no one would believe it anyway at this point,” one GOP operative working on battleground races told Politico.
Pope Leo XIV on Saturday declared capital punishment ”inadmissible” as he marked the World Day Against the Death Penalty and his native United States announced plans to livestream an execution by firing squad.
In a post on X, the American pope quoted the revised Catholic teaching on capital punishment ushered in by Pope Francis that the death penalty attacks the inherent dignity of a human being.
“The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment,” read the post under Leo’s official handle, @Pontifex. “Effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption.”
The post ended with the hashtag #NoDeathPenalty.
The U.S. Defense Department announced Thursday that the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, convicted of a 2009 shooting at the Fort Hood military base, will be livestreamed. Hasan, scheduled to be executed at Fort Hood on Dec. 3, was convicted of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others.
U.S. President Donald Trump said Saturday he would be making a decision ultimately on whether the execution would be livestreamed.
Leo didn’t refer specifically to the planned execution, or the botched lethal injection in Tennessee earlier that has revived debate over the death penalty in the United States. Saturday is World Day Against the Death Penalty, and it is common for the pope’s official social media accounts to post messages marking such commemorations.
But Leo’s post came just hours after his top deputy, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, said explicitly that the planned U.S. public execution was “unacceptable.”
Pope Francis in 2018 amended official Catholic teaching to declare capital punishment “inadmissible” in all circumstances.
Previously, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the official compendium of church teaching, said the church didn’t exclude recourse to capital punishment “if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.”
Past popes had upheld that position, though St. John Paul II began urging an end to the practice and stressed that guilty people were just as deserving of dignity as innocent ones.
Like Francis before him, Leo has made visiting prisons a key part of his papal travel in a bid to give a message of hope to inmates and underscore their inherent dignity, that God loves them and that there is always a chance for redemption.
“If any of you fear being abandoned by everyone, know that God will never abandon you, and that the church will stand by your side,” Leo told inmates at the notorious Bata prison in Equatorial Guinea during his visit in April. Leo is to visit a prison in Buenos Aires during his upcoming tour through Latin America.
Speaking specifically about the United States, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, said the planned livestreamed execution was “truly incomprehensible” and “unacceptable to turn death into a spectacle.”
“The Church’s position is one of total opposition to the death penalty; it is incompatible with human dignity and serves as no deterrent…,” Parolin said in comments carried by Vatican News. “It is truly incomprehensible that anyone would want to use this system today — I don’t know for what purpose. It is certainly unacceptable to turn death into a spectacle; even if the person is guilty, of course, there are other methods.”
The head of the U.S. bishops conference, Archbishop Paul Coakley, expressed “shock” and “great sorrow” at the Pentagon’s plans.
“In no way can Hasan’s actions be condoned but this decision is a barbaric promotion of a culture of death and must be reconsidered,” he said in a statement Friday. “The public execution even of one who has done grave harm will only further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people.”
The nation’s largest mortgage lender just got rid of its minimum credit score requirement on most home loans.
The move is effective immediately and applies to conventional loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as FHA, VA, and USDA loans.
Instead of relying upon a hard credit score floor, such as a 620 FICO score, eligibility will be determined by the automated underwriting system (AUS).
The company is essentially removing an overlay it had in place above and beyond what agency guidelines required.
Why they’re doing it now is somewhat curious given loan volume has recently taken a dive.
First things first. This isn’t 2008 all over again. We aren’t going back to no doc underwriting and ninja loans.
Instead, United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM), like other lenders before them, is throwing out the minimum credit score requirement.
My understanding was that they used to require a minimum credit score of 620 for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac approvals (conforming loans).
And a 580-credit score for both FHA loans and VA loans. Now they’ll apparently go as low as what AUS allows.
So if your loan file is run through Desktop Underwriter or Loan Product Advisor and gets an approve/eligible, or accept/eligible, it doesn’t matter what your credit score is.
It could be a 550-score depending on other attributes of the loan.
For the record, you’ll likely need compensating factors if you have poor credit history.
That means things like a larger down payment, or a low debt-to-income ratio (DTI), the good stuff that offsets the bad.
So before anyone gets too excited here, your credit history still matters. It’s just not as rigid as it was prior.
And for the record, this move simply aligns with the guidelines of Fannie and Freddie implemented last year.
Prior to this change, UWM had imposed a lender overlay where they required more than the minimum requirement to qualify for a mortgage.
Which bring up an interesting point; why now? Perhaps loan volume is getting low and they want to expand their offerings?
Or they’re just aligning with other top lenders and can’t not do it being one of the largest in the nation.
UWM will still rely on credits scores for mortgage rate pricing, which means loan-level price adjustments (LLPAs) aren’t going away.
So if your score is low, you’ll still pay more for the loan and/or get stuck with a higher interest rate.
However, you won’t be automatically denied because of a certain number like you were in the past.
That’s the key distinction here.
UWM CEO Mat Ishbia said the company’s own research found that credit scores aren’t the “strongest predictor of a borrower’s ability to qualify,” and that the AUS gives a more complete picture.
While minimum scores are going away on Fannie, Freddie, and FHA/VA/USDA, they will remain in place for jumbo loans, bank statement loans, and investor loans.
For borrowers with lower credit scores, this could turn a denial into an approval, assuming the rest of the loan file looks good.
And because UWM works exclusively through mortgage brokers, those brokers now have a bit more room to say yes.
It also makes sense from a business standpoint. With mortgage rates now closer to 7.5% and loan applications sputtering, lenders are fighting over a smaller pool of borrowers.
By effectively widening who qualifies, it’s another way for UWM (NYSE: UWMC) to go after more of them.
However, it’s unclear how many borrowers will fall into this category of low credit but otherwise healthy finances, job stability, etc.
This is also a good reminder to shop around as some lenders have stricter requirements than others and you may be told you don’t qualify when in fact you might elsewhere.
Ledger, the maker of hardware wallets, is investigating a serious incident involving one of its official partners in Southeast Asia. The company has urged customers who bought devices from the Malaysian reseller CryptoBilis in the past three months not to set them up, and those who already have to move funds to a fresh device with a newly generated recovery phrase.
On-chain researchers tracking the drains have put the losses near $90 million so far, concentrated among buyers in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
CryptoBilis, based in Kuala Lumpur and listed on Ledger’s own reseller directory for those three markets, had long marketed itself as an authorized seller of genuine, sealed devices.
Reports of emptied wallets began circulating on social platforms in early October 2026.
Investigators such as Specter and MistTrack followed inflows from hundreds of victim addresses across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tron networks, with estimates ranging from the low $70 millions to just under $93 million.
Ledger has stated that its own systems and directly sold products appear unaffected, framing the problem as limited to this particular reseller and market.
Later updates from the firm confirmed that at least one affected device contained an unauthorized hardware implant, supporting suspicions of physical tampering in the supply chain.
Adding another layer of concern, company records indicate CryptoBilis changed hands earlier in 2026.
By early August, full ownership had passed to an individual with a registered address in China’s Heilongjiang province.
A former co-founder confirmed the March sale and said the original team had stepped away from operations and management, noting that confidentiality restrictions limited further details.
While no public evidence yet ties the ownership shift directly to the compromised devices, the timing and non-disclosure elements have fueled discussion in security circles about transparency in authorized reseller channels.
This episode highlights persistent risks in hardware wallet ecosystems.
Earlier in 2026, Coldcard devices from Coinkite suffered a long-hidden seed generation flaw dating back to 2021 firmware.
A build error caused some models to fall back on weak software randomness instead of proper hardware entropy, leaving seeds with far less security than advertised—roughly 40 bits on older units and around 70 bits on newer ones, well below the 128-bit standard.
Attackers exploited the weakness starting in late July, draining well over $100 million in Bitcoin from thousands of addresses across multiple waves. Firmware fixes arrived quickly, but existing weak seeds required full migration.
Ledger is investigating reports of loss of funds from users in South East Asia who purchased products from a reseller named CryptoBillis. As a precaution, and pending the results of our investigation, we have asked CryptoBilis to pause all sales and shipments of Ledger devices.…
— Ledger Support (@Ledger_Support) October 9, 2026
Ledger and Trezor have also faced repeated third-party data exposures and supply-chain worries over the years, even when their core products held up.
Together these cases illustrate how difficult it remains to secure private keys end-to-end, whether through physical devices or the surrounding distribution and software layers.
Centralized platforms have not offered a clear alternative.
In September 2026, the exchange Bitget suffered a major breach in which attackers drained roughly $387.5 million from its hot and warm wallets by compromising a backend system and spoofing transaction data that the platform then signed.
Private keys themselves were not stolen, yet customer funds still left the platform; the firm later said its protection fund would cover losses.
Non-custodial DeFi interfaces present their own friction.
Wallets from providers such as Blockchain.com frequently show zero or missing balances on certain chains due to sync delays, account-type confusion between trading and self-custody sections, or network-specific activation requirements (for example, needing a small native token deposit before Tron assets appear).
Signing in can also be cumbersome, involving recovery phrases, single-sign-on limitations, or multi-step verification that frustrates everyday users.
Display problems do not usually mean funds are gone, but they erode confidence and complicate recovery.
Taken together, these incidents suggest that neither hardware wallets, exchange custody, nor polished non-custodial apps have yet reached the reliability and simplicity needed for broad mainstream use.
As the industry looks toward 2027, repeated supply-chain compromises, entropy failures, exchange drains, and everyday usability gaps continue to show that secure, convenient digital asset custody remains an unsolved problem.
MIT 15.S21 Nuts and Bolts of Business Plans, IAP 2014
View the complete course:
Instructor: Joe Hadzima
What is it, why do I need it and what is it used for? Practical do’s and don’ts in preparing a Business Plan. Things to keep in mind in writing a Business Plan which will improve your chances of obtaining funding and running a successful business.
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at
More courses at
source
Right now, frozen pipes probably aren’t on your radar. But your insurance company is already thinking about them.
Cold snaps don’t follow your calendar. One hard freeze on a night your tenant is out of town, or during a two-week gap between leases, and a small crack in a supply line can soak your property before anyone notices.
And the bill isn’t small. State Farm reports that from 2024 through June 2025, it paid more than $628 million on over 20,000 freeze-related water damage claims. The average payout was more than $30,000. That’s one insurer, and an average that high means some claims came in bigger.
So here’s the question most landlords never ask: What happens if your insurer decides you didn’t do enough to prevent the damage?
Many property policies treat winter prep as more than good maintenance. In certain situations, it’s a condition of coverage. Skip it, and a claim you assumed was covered can get denied.
We’ll walk through the policy language that trips up property owners, the winterization steps that actually matter, and how to make sure your landlord insurance coverage holds up when the temperature drops.
This winter, make sure your first freeze isn’t your most expensive one.
Let’s start with the fine print, because this is where a lot of winter claims are won or lost. Many property insurance policies include what’s called a freezing exclusion. The wording varies by carrier, but most property policies won’t pay for damage from frozen household systems unless you used reasonable care to either keep the heat on or shut off the water and drain the system. Many versions apply that rule when the property is vacant, unoccupied, or under construction.
Read that again: Whether you’re covered depends on something you did or didn’t do before the pipe burst.
And some policies don’t limit that condition to vacant properties at all. They exclude freeze damage unless you maintained heat or drained the plumbing and shut off the water.
During the December 2022 freeze in Texas, a commercial building owner had turned off the heat while the property was being renovated. He didn’t drain the pipes or shut off the water before leaving for Christmas; a pipe froze, burst, and flooded the building.
State Farm denied the claim under its freezing exclusion. The dispute went to federal court, and the court sided with the insurer.
That result isn’t unusual. Courts have generally found freezing exclusions clear and enforceable.
Now think about how often rental properties are in that exact situation:
Sound familiar?
Before the first cold front, pull your full policy, not just the declarations page, and search for three words: freezing, vacant, and unoccupied. Then write down:
If the language is confusing, ask your agent to explain it in plain English. It’s a much easier conversation to have now than after a claim.
If you only have time to winterize one system, make it your plumbing.
Water damage and freezing aren’t rare events. Insurance Information Institute data cited by This Old House shows that about 22.6% of home insurance claims from 2019 to 2023 involved water damage or freezing. The average claim was $15,400, and roughly 1 in every 67 insured homes filed one each year. Multiply that across a portfolio, and the odds stop feeling abstract.
The good news? Most freeze damage is preventable with a few hours of work and some inexpensive supplies.
Exterior plumbing is the most exposed, so start there:
Next, look for pipes in the coldest parts of the property:
Here’s a question to ask yourself: If a pipe bursts at 2 a.m., does your tenant know how to shut off the water?
Find the main shutoff, label it, and show tenants where it is. Every minute the water keeps running adds to the damage.
Smart thermostats and water leak sensors are like insurance for your insurance. They can alert you when the indoor temperature drops or water shows up where it shouldn’t, even if you’re hundreds of miles away.
An inexpensive sensor that catches a leak in minutes can keep a small problem from turning into a months-long repair.
Frozen pipes get most of the attention. But winter has another way to leave you with the bill: the neglect denial.
Most property policies are designed for damage that’s sudden and accidental, like a burst pipe or a tree limb through the roof. Damage that builds slowly because something wasn’t maintained is a different story. Claims can be denied when water damage is blamed on a lack of upkeep, and a roof leak that gets worse over time may not be covered.
Winter makes those slow problems show up fast.
Ice dams form when melting snow refreezes at the edge of the roof. Water pools behind that ridge of ice and can work its way under the shingles. The result is leaks that damage walls, ceilings, and insulation and can lead to mold.
And the ice dam usually isn’t the root problem. It’s a sign that heat is escaping into the attic or that the gutters can’t drain.
If you file a claim this winter, the adjuster may want to know one thing: Was this property maintained?
Make that easy to prove. Take dated photos of your gutters, roof, attic, and plumbing work. Keep invoices from plumbers, roofers, and HVAC techs in one folder for each property. A few minutes of photos today could help get your claim paid later.
Remember the freezing exclusion from earlier? Vacant units are where it matters most.
An empty rental in winter is a perfect storm. No one is there to notice the heat went out or to spot a leak. And depending on your policy, the vacancy itself may change what’s covered.
For every empty unit, pick one of these two paths and stick with it:
Whichever path you choose, schedule in-person checks and log each visit with photos. Also ask your agent how long a unit can sit empty before your coverage changes.
Occupied properties have their own winter risks, and those are more about people than pipes:
An icy step or a heating problem can turn into a liability claim quickly. Winterizing protects the building, the people living in it, and your business.
So you’ve winterized the pipes, cleaned the gutters, and made a plan for vacant units. That takes care of the physical side of winter risk.
Even a well-prepared property can still take a hit, though. A deep freeze can outlast a furnace. A tenant can leave a window cracked while they’re away for a week. That’s where your insurance policy comes in.
Winterization lowers the odds of a loss. Your policy decides who pays when one happens.
Too many landlords learn that their coverage doesn’t fit their rental only after the damage is done. Before temperatures drop, get out your policy and ask your agent these five questions:
If the answers are vague or you don’t like what you hear, it’s time to compare your options.
Steadily offers landlord insurance built for rental property investors, and you don’t need days of back-and-forth to find out what coverage would cost. You can get a quote online in minutes, without making a phone call.
That speed matters in the fall. Instead of pushing your insurance review past the first freeze, you can compare coverage for your rental before your coffee gets cold.
Keep in mind that whether a specific loss is covered always depends on the facts and the terms of your actual policy. That’s exactly why you should review your coverage before winter.
Winter will show up whether your rental is ready or not. The landlords who come out ahead get both the property and the insurance policy ready first.
So take five minutes this week and get your free landlord insurance quote from Steadily to make sure your coverage is ready for winter.
The best time to check your coverage is before you need it.
There are only a handful of companies in the world worth more than $1 trillion, and Oklo (OKLO +0.38%) is nowhere near joining them. And yet if Oklo’s ambitious plans for small nuclear reactors work out, it could become one of the most — if not the most — important energy companies in the U.S.
If it’s successful, could Oklo possibly become a trillion-dollar company?
Today’s Change
(0.38%) $0.13
Current Price
$34.70
Market Cap
Day’s Range
$34.10 – $35.13
52wk Range
$33.70 – $193.84
Volume
7.5M
Avg Vol
9.7M
Gross Margin
-2347.11%
I won’t mince words: I doubt Oklo will ever have 12 zeros after its name. That doesn’t make it a bad stock; it just means there will be a limit to its growth. That limit, I think, will be determined by how profitably Oklo can sell power.
The gist of Oklo’s business is this: Sell electricity generated from small nuclear reactors. More precisely, Oklo is developing sodium-cooled fast reactors that use metallic nuclear fuel and are engineered to operate for a decade or longer without refueling. It has an insanely talented executive team — including CEO Jacob DeWitte, who holds a Ph.D. in nuclear engineering from MIT — as well as agreements with companies leading the way in developing AI infrastructure.
Image source: Oklo.
Small nuclear reactors, like Oklo’s Aurora, have a smaller footprint and theoretically will take less time to build. They can also be mass-produced in factories, which should make them cheaper to build.
Whether Oklo’s Aurora reactors will actually be cheaper remains to be seen, but even if they are cheaper to build, there’s another lingering question: How much will it cost Oklo to operate them?
A preprint, titled “The consequences of high SMR costs in electricity markets,” suggests the answer might not be encouraging.
This study, which hasn’t undergone peer review, found that many small reactor developers would need to charge unusually high electricity prices to earn a profit. The reason? Fuel and operating costs will simply be too high.
The study puts it bluntly: “SMRs are uneconomical primarily because investment cost reductions are offset by increased marginal costs.” In other words, a reactor that is relatively inexpensive to build can still be very expensive to operate. So expensive, in fact, that some customers might not be willing to pay the prices needed to make Oklo profitable.
Of course, high electricity prices won’t scare away every customer. Indeed, some might be willing to pay a premium for the kind of around-the-clock, clean power that Oklo hopes to provide. In fact, the study even mentioned Oklo’s older 15-megawatt (MW) Aurora model as one of the better-performing SMRs, suggesting its economics could be better than those of some competitors.
Still, that’s hardly a guarantee of profitability, at least not at the level a trillion-dollar company would need to justify its valuation. Add to that all the other uncertainties — building reactors, operating them safely, selling power to customers — and the question of a trillion dollars pales in comparison to a more pressing one: Can it actually build a successful business in the first place?
For now, Oklo remains a speculative growth stock with no guarantee of success. Only aggressive investors who can stomach volatility should consider opening a small position.

Russian tech giant Yandex halts Vladimir data center after fresh drone attack