Home Blog

‘A bond-market crisis would be a good thing’: Wall Street losing patience with government debt


This year, our Most Powerful Women Asia list captures the women at the forefront of change in Asia. DBS Group CEO Tan Su Shan retains the No. 1 spot, while Lens Technology founder Zhou Qunfei makes the year’s biggest leap, climbing 25 places to No. 3. Nearly a quarter of the 100 women are newcomers. Collectively, they represent 14 markets across the region. Technology leads the list with 16 women, ahead of banking with 14—a reflection of Asia’s formidable strength in hardware, electronics, and advanced manufacturing. Together, they are shaping industries, companies, and markets far beyond the region.—Ashleigh Nghiem

Why Oura pulled its IPO

Hours before Oura, the smart-ring maker behind one of the season’s most closely watched IPOs, was expected to price its shares, CEO Tom Hale delivered a stunning announcement: The company was calling off its public debut, citing “uncertainty in the IPO market.”

But no one takes that statement seriously, according to Fortune’s Morgan Chittum.

“What else are you gonna say? ‘We aren’t meeting our expectations.’ I mean, that’s just not a thing to say to the public,” Kat Siu of IPOX said. 

“They always blame it on market conditions,” said Jay Ritter, director of the IPO Initiative at the University of Florida. “They never say, ‘Uh, the reason we’re pulling the IPO is we had unrealistic expectations about how much we’re worth.’”

MORE FROM FORTUNE

What Really Happened to Red Lobster? | Fortune Daily

The Future 120—How vital firms stay forever young – Ketil Gjerstad, Johann Harnoss, and Viacheslav Romanov

It’s ‘more likely than not’ humanity loses control: Former AI insiders testify safety fixes may be ‘duct tape that will fall off later’ – Catherina Gioino

Amazon’s answer to data center backlash: $1 billion for community college and home energy upgrades – Mia Osmonbekov

Inside Europe’s biggest companies—and the forces reshaping them – Sam Forsdick

Redfin signals a shift in power to buyers as a record share of sellers cut prices for this time of year—but 7% mortgage rates are a problem – Bilin Lin

Wealthy boomers doubt their heirs will keep giving as $124 trillion changes hands, BofA finds. The data shows a different reality – Sydney Lake

THE MARKETS

A break in the bond drama gives breathing room for stocks

The drama in the global bond markets eased off in the last 24 hours, helped by a drop in the price of oil, and stocks are broadly up this morning as a result. Oil fell to under $100 per barrel, and the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury fell beneath 5.3%, sitting at 5.27% at the time of writing. Even French government bonds rose, despite rioting on the streets in protest at lack of funding for schools. The Macron government has repeatedly attempted to get its debt under control but has met political opposition at every step—and that’s why traders are selling out of French bonds.

“Markets have had another volatile session over the last 24 hours, as investors grappled with European contagion risk and a fresh Treasury selloff,” Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid told clients this morning. “On the bright side, yesterday brought some initial signs that the pressure on France was stabilizing, with a clear outperformance in French debt.”

  • S&P 500 futures were up 0.26% this morning. The index rose 0.66% yesterday. 
  • In Europe, the Stoxx 600 was up 0.94% in early trading, and the U.K.’s FTSE 100 was up 0.86% before lunch.
  • Asia: South Korea’s KOSPI was down 0.89%. Japan’s Nikkei 225 was up 1.05%. India’s Nifty 50 was up 0.63%. China’s markets are closed. 
  • Brent crude was $98 per barrel.
  • Bitcoin was at $85,986.

France leads the way when it comes to bond market mayhem

This chart from Ed Yardeni and Toby Hearst at Yardeni Research shows countries ranked by the increase in yields on their 10-year bonds, versus a year ago. France has got it the worst, with the U.S. coming in as a decent runner-up. Both countries’ bonds performed worse than those of Italy or Greece—something that rarely happens.

“Six of the 22 bond markets on our list have seen 10-year yields climb 100bps [basis points] or more this year. France leads at 131bps, with the U.S. second at 112bps. Italy, Indonesia, Japan, and South Korea round out the group,” the pair told clients.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“We take the unpopular stance that a bond-market crisis would be a good thing.”

—AllianceBernstein’s Inigo Fraser Jenkins, who argues that such a crisis is “probably the sole route to engender change and avoid worse intergenerational tension later. However, in practice politicians might balk and stop yields from rising by fiat, thereby triggering inflation and currency implications.”

Why stocks haven’t been hammered by falling bonds—yet

The S&P 500 seems to have cruised on, unaffected by the drama in bonds, which is odd because panic in one sector usually leads to panic in another. The index is up 13.56% year-to-date.

In fact, this is something of an illusion, according to Charu Chanana, the chief investment strategist at Saxo. “Over the past month, the S&P 500 is up around 0.7%. Yet only two sectors are positive: technology, up 7.1%, and communication services, up 3.3%. Every other sector is down,” she writes.

“There are two simple ways higher yields can hurt equities,” she says. “First, bonds become more attractive. If investors can earn more than 5% from U.S. government debt, stocks need to offer a more compelling return to justify the additional risk. Second, borrowing becomes more expensive. Companies refinancing debt, households taking mortgages and businesses funding new investment all face a higher cost of money. But the impact is not equal across the market. Some sectors feel it much more quickly than others.”

CHART OF THE DAY

Mortgage applications have ‘collapsed’ as the U.S. bond market drives up financing costs

Mortgage rates track the longer end of the bond market. The 10-year Treasury recently hit 5.3%, and the average mortgage rate is now around 7.3%—high enough to price many out of the market. Indeed, mortgage applications have “collapsed” this year, according to Christopher Wood at Jefferies. They’re down 6% week-on-week and down 37% from this point last year. 

“This is another major negative for the White House incumbent,” he told clients. “This is why the 47th American president’s polling on the economy remains dire.”

NUMBER OF THE DAY

6 New York cities

The equivalent shortfall of power needed by the AI buildout, as estimated by Morgan Stanley’s Stephen Byrd and his colleagues. “The midpoint shortfall remains at a daunting 33 GW [gigawatts]. As a point of reference, New York City demands 5.5-6 GW of baseload power: we are short power by six New York cities,” or 34% of the estimated power needed, they said in a recent note.

THE FRONT PAGES TODAY

Warnings of possible Iranian drone attack led US to pull bombers from RAF Fairford – FT

Trump offers U.S. help to Russia after plague death; WHO assesses the situation as low risk – CNBC

GOP senator warns Anthropic of “alarmist” approach to AI – Axios

Saudi-Backed Forces Launch Fight to Free Bab al-Mandeb From Houthis – WSJ

DeepSeek to Raise at Least $12 Billion in Tencent-Backed Funding – Bloomberg

Sailors reportedly offered $25K per trip to move oil out of the Persian Gulf amid strikes, drone attacks – NY Post

ONE MORE THING

AI will kill off the keyboard, some believe

Take this with a pinch of salt but … The London School of Economics has warned that the days of the keyboard are numbered, according to Fortune’s Orianna Rosa Royle. By 2028, voice AI will become the default way of working. In the next few years, a study says, workers will be talking to their phones or laptops instead of typing, thanks to the explosion of AI.

“By the time Gen Alpha enters the workforce, AI will be fully embedded, and their work will be spoken long before it’s ever typed,” Paul Sephton, global head of brand communications at Jabra, told Fortune. 

(Also worth bearing in mind: The keyboard has been around for decades and has survived every technical revolution thrown at it. Don’t be surprised if it survives this one too.)

Looking At How We Interact With Whistleblowers


Just over a week ago, we received the incredibly sad news that a whistleblower, Simon Andriesz, who we had been in contact with over many years, had died. We’ve shared our condolences, and our thoughts are with his family and loved ones.

We’re often in contact with people in challenging circumstances.

They may be sharing information about a firm we regulate that they’re concerned about, or in the middle of a dispute affecting their financial security.

The personal stress of those situations, and dealing with an official body like us, can be – and for many, is – significant.

I know the many colleagues who are in contact with whistleblowers and vulnerable individuals always aim to treat them as the people they are – with empathy and professionalism, not simply cases to be managed.

That’s vital if people are to feel confident coming to us with their concerns. We’re grateful so many do, with the number of whistleblowing reports increasing 22% last year.

To build greater confidence, we’re sharing more information with whistleblowers about the action we take. We provided feedback on each of the 1,252 whistleblowing reports we closed last year. Overall, 42% of these led to direct action to manage or reduce harm. A further 53% informed our wider work and supported harm prevention.

We know, though, frustrations remain. Legal restrictions can mean we’re not able to share as much as people understandably want, and sometimes the actions we take don’t meet people’s expectations.

None of this means that there aren’t things we could improve.

We’ve asked Lea Paterson, who has just joined our Board as an independent non-executive director, to review how we interacted with Mr Andriesz. Lea will look at whether there are things we could have done better, and she’ll help us learn for the future.

We must be open and consider if there are ways in which we can improve, especially in how we interact with people who may be particularly vulnerable. I’m grateful to Lea for taking on this important work. We plan to share any lessons she thinks we should learn from, and how we’ll take them forward, early next year.



Wealthy baby boomers are losing faith in their millennial heirs’ giving



Wealthy baby boomers have spent decades building their fortunes—and the foundations, donor-advised funds, and giving traditions that come with them. But as the $124 trillion Great Wealth Transfer gets underway, a growing share of the older generation isn’t so sure their kids will carry on tradition the way they hope.

Fewer than half of wealthy Americans (47%) believe the next generation is prepared to take on family philanthropic causes, down from 55% in 2024, according to research from Bank of America released last week. The share of parents who believe their children share their commitment to giving back fell even more sharply to 65% from 76%. The bank surveyed more than 1,430 wealthy individuals in the U.S. aged 21 or older with at least $3 million in investable assets, excluding primary residence.

The confidence gap in philanthropy mirrors a broader anxiety wealth advisors have noticed about whether heirs are ready for any of it. 

“This is a very real concern I’m hearing from ultra-affluent families right now,” Tom Thiegs, managing director of leadership and legacy at Ascent Private Capital Management with U.S. Bank, told Fortune of parents’ fears that wealth could dampen their children’s drive. Trent Von Ahsen of Cedar Point Capital Partners also told Fortune his clients are leaning on mentorship and phased wealth transfers rather than lump-sum inheritances.

But the irony is younger donors are, by several of the study’s measures, more engaged donors than older generations. Gen Z and millennial donors support an average of 12 charitable causes, compared with eight among wealth donors overall. They’re also roughly twice as likely to use a donor-advised fund, and 87% say honoring their family’s philanthropic tradition is important. Meanwhile, 86% say it’s equally important to establish their own charitable identity.

“Younger donors want to honor the charitable traditions that shaped them, but they also want to define their own impact,” Jennifer Chandler, head of philanthropic solutions at Bank of America Private Bank, wrote in the study. “The opportunity for families is to engage the next generation early, creating a shared vision for giving while allowing room for new priorities and approaches.”

Gen Z and millennials give differently

Generations also diverge in how they give. Among baby boomer and Silent Generation donors, 92% give through cash contributions, while just 56% of Gen Z and millennial donors do. Instead, younger donors are more likely to give through charitable trusts, family foundations, fundraising, and mentorship. 

Some of that comes down to inheritance. Many young donors come from families that already set up foundations, charitable trusts, or donor-advised funds (DAFs), Dianne Chipps Bailey, managing director of BofA’s Philanthropic Solutions division, told the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Younger donors also gravitate to DAFs because they’re digital-first, she said.

The way they give also reflects how they want to be involved. Younger donors are nearly three times as likely as older ones to fundraise for the causes they support (30% versus 11%) and six times as likely to mentor (26% versus 4%). 

But that hands-on approach is what nonprofits are struggling to adapt to. Community organizations spent decades cultivating wealthy baby boomer donors, and so that connection fades with each generation removed from the original donors. 

“A lot of nonprofits feel a bit paralyzed in how to tackle that problem,” Steve Isom, chief operating and financial officer of donor-software firm Bloomerang, previously told Fortune. Younger donors, he said, are willing to trust organizations, but want to see exactly where their money goes first.

Bloomerang’s data also showed Gen Z and millennials are very active donors. In fact, their 2026 Giving Signals Report, conducted with The Harris Poll, pegged millennials as the most active donor generation right now.

“Donors are ready to trust nonprofits, but they want to see the receipts more,” Isom said. 

Where to invest in Nigeria this August 2026



Wondering where to invest your money in August 2026?

In this episode of Everyday Money Matters, host Olusegun Akin-Olugbenjo sits down with Nairametrics Senior Analyst **Idika Aja** to break down the Nigerian stock market and the opportunities investors should be watching this month.

We discuss:

* Why banking stocks continue to dominate the market
* Whether oil and gas stocks still have upside
* The impact of inflation, interest rates and crude oil prices
* Stocks that analysts believe deserve attention this August
* Common mistakes investors should avoid
* How to think about building a balanced investment portfolio

Whether you’re a first-time investor or an experienced market participant, this episode offers practical insights to help you make more informed investment decisions.

Disclaimer: This discussion is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always do your own research or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

#Nairametrics #NGX #StockMarket #Investing #Nigeria #EverydayMoneyMatters #PersonalFinance #August2026

source

College Athletes Earned $1.77 Billion In The First Year Of Revenue Sharing


Key Points

  • Schools paid 34,915 college athletes $1.77 billion directly in the first year of revenue sharing. That works out to about $50,700 per athlete on average.
  • Only 68 of the 319 opted-in schools reached the $20.5 million cap or came within 5% of it. The cap rises to $21.58 million for 2026-27.
  • Revenue sharing is separate from third-party NIL deals. The CSC reviews NIL deals through its NIL Go platform, and NIL income is generally taxed as self-employment income.

Colleges paid student-athletes $1.77 billion in direct revenue-sharing payments during the 2025-26 year. This was the first year schools could pay athletes directly from their own budgets and the data released was October 1 by the College Sports Commission (PDF File).

The money went to 34,915 athletes at 307 schools across 33 conferences and 45 sports.

Schools reported $1.98 billion in total distributions through the CSC’s College Athlete Payment System. That figure adds $42 million in Alston Awards and $163 million in new and incremental athletic scholarship spending on top of the revenue-sharing checks.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

Divided evenly, the revenue-sharing pool works out to roughly $50,700 per paid athlete, based on The College Investor’s math using CSC figures. Athletes earning that money face the same financial planning questions as NIL earners, such as how the IRS and the FAFSA treat their income.

The averages, though, hide wide gaps between schools. Each participating school could share up to $20.5 million, yet only 68 of the 319 opted-in schools reached the cap or came within 5% of it. The average paying school distributed about $5.8 million.

At the top end, we know that UCLA paid $20.5 million to 229 athletes and UC Berkeley paid $20.5 million to 147.

The Details

  • Revenue sharing: $1,770,453,776 paid directly by schools
  • New scholarship spending: $163,485,499
  • Alston Awards: $42,034,090
  • Schools paying athletes: 307 of 319 opted-in schools
  • 2026-27 cap: $21.58 million per school, up from $20.5 million

Revenue-sharing money comes from the school itself. Third-party name, image and likeness (NIL) deals are separate, and the CSC reviews those through its NIL Go platform.

That split matters at tax time, because NIL income is generally treated as self-employment income subject to self-employment tax.

How This Connects

Most athletic departments already run deficits before revenue sharing enters the budget. Sharing this money with athletes, while incredibly beneficial to the athletes (and most people would say fair), is simply adding to the cost of college.

A GAO review found 94% of Division I programs spent more than they earned in 2023-24, and colleges covered $7.2 billion of that gap with tuition, student fees, and other unrestricted funds.

A school that pays out the full $20.5 million cap adds a cost roughly equal to the median Division I athletic deficit of $20.6 million.

What’s Next

The 2026-27 cap year began July 1 with a higher $21.58 million limit, and the CSC says it will publish aggregate revenue-sharing data after each year.

Congress could also change the rules: the Senate passed the Protect College Sports Act 77-22 on September 28, and the House has until January 3, 2027 to act before the bill dies.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post College Athletes Earned $1.77 Billion In The First Year Of Revenue Sharing appeared first on The College Investor.

Atmos Rewards Communities Are Now Live: Benefits for All 6 Groups


Atmos Rewards Communities Are Now Live

Alaska Airlines has officially launched its new Atmos Rewards Communities, giving members a way to choose a group that better fits how they travel.

The feature went live on October 1, 2026, expanding from the two existing resident-focused groups, to a total of six Communities. Members can join one group at a time and change Communities once per calendar year.

Atmos Communities are basically themed groups inside Atmos Rewards. Each one comes with extra perks such as bonus-point challenges, special flight deals, partner offers and discounts on select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences. Joining a Community is completely free.

Atmos Rewards Communities and Benefits

Global Locals

Best suited for members who travel internationally.

  • 10% bonus status points on international travel
  • Earn 1 status point for every 25 Atmos Rewards points transferred from an eligible partner
  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Community-specific Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Families on the Go

Built for families traveling with kids.

  • 20% points rebate on award flights for children age 12 or younger
  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Culinary Journeys

For travelers who like planning trips around food.

  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying food destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Active Escapes

Geared toward outdoor trips and adventure travel.

  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Club 49

Available only to Alaska residents.

  • Free checked bags
  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Huakaʻi by Hawaiian

Available only to Hawaiʻi residents.

  • Free checked bags
  • 50% bonus points and status points on interisland travel starting January 1, 2027
  • Earn up to 10,000 bonus points and status points after visiting 10 qualifying destinations
  • Exclusive flight deals
  • 20% off select Atmos Rewards Unlocked experiences

Atmos Rewards Communities Benefits

Guru’s Wrap-Up

Atmos Rewards Communities are now live, and there’s really no reason not to pick one if you’re already in the program.

Some of the perks are more useful than others, but the 20% kids award rebate, extra international status points and the 10,000-point destination challenges stand out.

Just choose carefully since you can only switch Communities once per calendar year.

Is Michael Burry Right About MercadoLibre?


Michael Burry is one of the most followed investors working today. The longtime head of the hedge fund Scion Asset Management gained fame from The Big Short, when his huge bet on the housing crash paid off in 2008.

That tale established Burry as a top contrarian investor, and investors have followed his moves since. Burry shut down his hedge fund last year and now shares his thoughts and investments on his Substack. One of his most intriguing ideas this year has been MercadoLibre (MELI +9.67%). The stock is now down nearly a third from its peak in 2025, even as tech stocks and the S&P 500 are hovering around all-time highs.

The Latin American e-commerce star has been a top performer on the market since its IPO in 2007, but has struggled more recently due to concerns about competition, falling margins, and its risky venture into the credit business.

MercadoLibre got some good news on Monday as the stock popped 9.7% as Brazilian stocks rallied in response to Flavio Bolsonaro’s strong showing in yesterday’s election, as Bolsonaro is regarded as the pro-business candidate. However, Burry has been making his case for months.

Image source: MercadoLibre.

Why Burry is bullish on MercadoLibre

Burry has also gotten attention for short bets against Nvidia and Palantir, and that’s part of his thesis behind MercadoLibre. He believes investors have piled into popular AI stocks, leaving strong companies like MercadoLibre trading at bargain prices. He compared it to 1999, when the rush into tech stocks left quality names in other industries trading at attractive prices.

The contrarian investor also argued that management was making a smart long-term move by investing in areas like logistics, lower free shipping thresholds, and growing its credit business. He has cited MercadoLibre’s strong top-line growth as evidence that those investments are paying off.

MercadoLibre’s unbeatable track record

It’s understandable why MercadoLibre would pull back on lower margins, as competitors like Amazon and Sea Limited have stepped up their investments in the market.

However, one data point offers a good reminder of MercadoLibre’s prowess and its unrivaled growth potential.

It just became the first major company to grow revenue by 30% over 30 consecutive quarters, something no other large publicly traded company has done.

The company managed to do that by expanding its e-commerce business across Latin America, investing in its logistics service to support that growth, and scaling its MercadoPago fintech business in Brazil and Mexico. That growth streak is a tribute to management’s execution, the opportunity the company has in Latin America, and the potential it has in new businesses like credit.

MercadoLibre Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(9.67%) $164.05

Current Price

$1,860.61

Is MercadoLibre a buy?

The sell-off in MercadoLibre seems to signal that investors believe that its profit margin will be impaired over the long term or that competition will continue to eat into its market share and profitability.

However, I tend to agree with Burry that MercadoLibre’s investments are paying off in its growth rate, and it’s a mistake to assume the business is in trouble. Revenue jumped 50%, or 43% on a currency-neutral basis, to $10.2 billion in its second quarter, with strong growth in both fintech and e-commerce.

Meanwhile, key metrics like assets under management per user and items sold per buyer continue to move higher, showing the business continues to gain scale. Analysts also expect earnings growth returning next year, calling for earnings per share to jump nearly 50% to $55.95, meaning it’s trading around 33 times next year’s expected earnings.

That looks like a great price to pay for a company with MercadoLibre’s history of growth and its potential. The stock continues to look like a strong buy.

Mortgage Rate Lock-In Is Baaack


Everyone knows mortgage rates are a lot higher today than they were just a month ago.

We’re all aware that housing affordability has gone downhill quick as a result.

But one thing we might be forgetting is mortgage rate lock-in, the phenomenon where existing mortgage rates and market rates diverge sharply.

When the difference becomes wide enough, you get lock-in, a situation where existing homeowners no longer want to sell for fear of losing their low rate.

Or worse, no longer can sell because the math simply doesn’t pencil.

With Mortgage Rates Back Above 7.5%, the Housing Market Grinds to a Halt

With 30-year fixed mortgage rates back above 7.5%, the housing market is going to come to a standstill.

A lot of people are thinking about like it’s a home buyer issue. And it is. But it’s not just a home buyer issue.

It’s a home seller issue too. Why? Because most home sellers are also home buyers.

When they decide to list their property, they’re typically looking to buy a replacement home.

If mortgage rates are cost-prohibitive, they might decide against listing their property.

This is the essence of mortgage rate lock-in, where the gap between existing mortgage rates and current market rates grows too wide.

For example, a home seller who was pondering a sale might hold a 30-year fixed priced at 3.25% and decide to just stay put.

The Tradeoff Wasn’t Bad When Mortgage Rates Were Sub-6%

Back in March when 30-year fixed rates were just below 6%, the tradeoff wasn’t horrendous.

Especially if you consider the seller sitting on a good chunk of home equity thanks to surging home prices over the past decade.

Yes, they’d have to exchange a low rate for a significantly higher rate, but if they could snag say 5.875%, it might be palatable.

It might be something they can wrap their heads around.

But that was six months ago. Today, home sellers are facing rates well into the 7s again, something we haven’t seen since late 2023.

If you recall back then, we started talking about a new term called “mortgage rate lock-in.”

It was never an issue because rates had never experienced such sharp moves in short periods of time (other than perhaps in the early 1980s).

Fortunately, rates eased after rising to around 8% in late 2023, but now it appears we’re headed for a possible double-top for mortgage rates.

Trading a 3% Mortgage for an 8% Mortgage Might Be a No-Go

Assuming that transpires, you might be looking at a 30-year fixed back above 8%, and maybe close to 9%.

If you’re not a believer in mortgage rate lock-in (some aren’t), you might be if/when rates are that high.

After all, you’d be looking at a spread of six full percentage points in some cases.

Many would-be home sellers today locked their 30-year fixed below 4%, some even below 3%.

Asking them to trade in that rate for something that starts with an 8 seems like an absolute nonstarter.

And who can blame them really? Aside from it looking super unattractive, it might even be a matter of failing to qualify for the new mortgage.

[Compare different monthly payments with my new mortgage rate calculator.]

Your Low-Rate Mortgage Increases in Value as Rates Rise

In addition, as mortgage rates rise, the “value” of a low-rate mortgage increases.

You have to look at your fixed-rate mortgage as an asset of sorts in a rising rate environment.

As rates go up, a 3% mortgage carries more value. And vice versa.

This is why there’s even a pilot program where a lender will pay you to give up your low-rate mortgage.

Something to think about if/when you want to sell and hold a 2-4% fixed-rate mortgage.

What’s worse is if you sell today, you’re not only giving up a really low interest rate, you’re likely parting with the home for a discount too.

The only tiny silver lining is if the replacement home is on sale too.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Exclusive-Accenture contractor removed from FBI following damaging data breach, sources say




Exclusive-Accenture contractor removed from FBI following damaging data breach, sources say

Un seul candidat a tenu 10 minutes face aux traders | The Candidate #2



🚨 4 nouveaux candidats tentent leur chance face à un jury composé de 5 traders.

🎯 Le principe est simple : chaque candidat doit tenir 10 minutes d’entretien face au jury. Mais à la moindre erreur, n’importe quel trader peut buzzer et mettre fin à l’entretien immédiatement.

✅ Parmi ces candidats, un seul a réussi à tenir les 10 minutes.

Qui a réussi à résister au jury ?
Et surtout… les traders avaient-ils deviné sa véritable école ?
👉🏼 Réponse dans cet épisode de The Candidate. 🚨

Publicité – Commencez à investir intelligemment avec IG ! Ouvrez votre compte et IG vous offre jusqu’à 150 € d’actions :
Conditions :
Ce contenu ne constitue pas un conseil en investissement. Tout investissement comporte un risque de perte en capital. Les performances passées ne préjugent pas des performances futures.

🎯 Vous souhaitez préparer sérieusement vos entretiens en finance (M&A, Private Equity ou finance de marché) ? Prenez rendez-vous gratuitement ici :
👉

🚀 Et si vous souhaitez participer à la prochaine édition ?
👉
👉 candidat@thefinancegames.com

🔔 Abonnez-vous pour retrouver chaque semaine un nouvel épisode.

⏱ Chapitres :
0:00 Introduction & règles du jeu,
0:44 1er Candidat : Benjamin,
02:18 Défendre le trading lors d’un repas de famille,
5:51 La superficie de la France,
12:30 Contango ou backwardation,
16:49 Appel à un ami : La VaR
27:26 Le dilemme : 1 milliards ou 0.10$

source