Subscribe now!
Don’t miss out! Enter your email and we will keep you in the loop with every new article published on the site!
Subscribe now!
Don’t miss out! Enter your email and we will keep you in the loop with every new article published on the site!
In March 2020, I watched my entire portfolio move in the same direction at once. Stocks down. Real estate under pressure. Two asset classes, one outcome. I thought I had built something diversified. I hadn’t, not really.
If you own stocks and real estate and consider yourself diversified, this is worth reading carefully. Because diversification has six dimensions. Most physicians are only covering one or two of them.
Before we get into the framework, there’s something worth naming that most financial content skips over.
Before you’ve made a single investment, you are already concentrated.
Your primary income is human capital tied to one profession, one license, one body showing up to work. That’s a significant single-point-of-failure that most asset allocation models don’t account for. Which means the bar for true diversification, for physicians specifically, is higher than it is for someone whose income is already spread across multiple sources.
That’s not a reason to feel behind. It’s just useful context for why getting this right matters more for us than for the average investor.
Ray Dalio talks about what he calls the holy grail of investing. The idea is that holding enough truly uncorrelated assets can dramatically reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing much in the way of returns. He puts the number at around 13 to 15 uncorrelated assets.
When I first heard that, my reaction was somewhere between impressed and overwhelmed. Most physicians I know are working with two or three asset classes, not 15.
But the number isn’t really the point. The point is the principle. And the honest reality is that finding 13 to 15 truly uncorrelated assets is hard for most of us. We’re not running endowments. We have clinical schedules, limited bandwidth, and we’re building something sustainable alongside a demanding career.
So what do you do with that gap?
You get more intentional within the asset classes you already have. You stop assuming that because you own two different things, they’re actually behaving independently. And you start looking at your portfolio across more dimensions than just asset type.
That’s what this framework is for.
This is where almost everyone starts. And it’s the right starting point. But I want to spend more time here than most people do, because even physicians who understand asset class diversification are usually thinking about it too narrowly.
The basic version goes like this: stocks and real estate are different asset classes. They respond to different economic forces. Having both is better than having only one. That’s true. But it stops short of what’s actually useful.
Think about what we mean when we say stocks. You probably already know that owning a single stock is very different from owning a broad index fund. Within equities, you can hold domestic and international exposure, large cap and small cap, growth and value, different sectors. The equity asset class has a whole internal structure to it. Most physicians who invest in the stock market understand this, at least intuitively.
Now apply that same thinking to real estate.
Most people hear “real estate” and think of it as one thing. But real estate has sub-asset classes just like equities do, and they don’t all behave the same way. Multifamily residential. Industrial. Self-storage. Medical office. Retail. Hospitality. Mobile home parks. Each of these responds differently to interest rate cycles, employment trends, demographic shifts, and consumer behavior.
Multifamily held up relatively well through the 2008 financial crisis because people still needed places to live. Retail got hit hard. Industrial and self-storage have had long runs because of e-commerce tailwinds and changing consumer habits. Medical office is driven by a completely different set of forces than any of those.
So when you say you own real estate, what does that actually mean? If everything you own is multifamily in the same market, you’re much more concentrated than the label “real estate investor” suggests. If you have exposure across different property types and different markets, you’re actually using the asset class the way it’s designed to be used.
A lot of physicians build their real estate portfolio deal by deal, chasing whatever looks good at the time. The result is concentration inside an asset class they thought was already diversifying them.
Dimension one isn’t just about owning different asset classes. It’s about understanding the internal structure of each one, and being intentional about where your exposure actually sits within it.
This is the dimension that March 2020 made visceral for a lot of us.
Correlation measures how much two assets move together. Truly diversified assets have low correlation, meaning when one goes down, the other doesn’t necessarily follow.
The problem is that correlation isn’t static. Assets that look uncorrelated in normal markets can suddenly move together in a crisis. Liquidity dries up, sentiment shifts, and things that were supposed to zig when the market zagged, don’t.
This is why I now think about not just what I own, but how those assets have historically behaved relative to each other, and what happens to that relationship under stress. Normal market correlation is less useful information than stress correlation.
Stocks and real estate are not interchangeable when you need access to capital. A publicly traded position you can exit in a day. A real estate syndication with a 5 to 7 year hold, you can’t.
Illiquidity isn’t automatically bad. You’re often compensated for it with better returns. But it means you need to think carefully about whether your assets are liquid at the right times for your life. Are you thinking about a career transition, a sabbatical, a business investment in the next few years? Those questions should inform how much of your portfolio is locked up and for how long.
Related to liquidity, but distinct. This is about matching your investments to when you actually need the money to work for you.
A long-term real estate fund with a 10-year hold serves a different purpose than capital you’re planning to redeploy in 18 months. Both can belong in a well-constructed portfolio. But treating them as interchangeable is how you end up with a mismatch between your investment structure and your actual life.
Ask yourself: what do I need this money to do, and when? Then look honestly at whether your investment timelines actually line up with that.
This is where physician-specific framing earns its place in the conversation.
The after-tax return is the real return. A real estate investment that generates passive losses and depreciation looks very different on paper than one that doesn’t. The tax efficiency of different asset classes, and the structures you use to hold them, can have a significant impact on what you actually keep.
If you haven’t sat down with a CPA who works with physician investors to look at how your portfolio is structured from a tax perspective, that’s worth prioritizing. A lot of physicians optimize for returns before tax and underoptimize for what stays in their pocket.
This is the most overlooked dimension on this list.
Single-market concentration in real estate is a real risk that’s easy to miss. If you have multiple properties in the same city, or heavy exposure to one regional economy, you’re more correlated than you think. Local job market shifts, population changes, municipal policy decisions, these things affect all of your properties at once if they’re all in the same place. Geography applies beyond real estate too. If your income, your practice, your home value, and your real estate investments are all tied to the same regional economy, that’s a form of concentration risk that doesn’t show up in a typical asset allocation breakdown.

Subscribe to receive the 7 Steps you can follow to achieve Financial Freedom
If financial freedom is your goal, there’s no better time to get started than right now.
Unlock actionable steps that you can take every day to fine-tune your goals, discover your interests, and avoid costly mistakes on your financial freedom journey.
Pull up whatever you use to track your investments and run it against these six dimensions. Not to grade yourself, but to see clearly.
How many asset classes do you hold, and what does the internal structure of each one actually look like? How correlated are they under stress, not just in normal conditions? Do you have the right balance of liquidity for where you are in your career? Are your time horizons matched to your actual goals? How is your portfolio taxed, and is there room to improve that? And is there geographic concentration hiding somewhere you haven’t looked?
Most physicians, if they’re honest, are missing coverage in at least two or three of these. That’s not a failure. It’s information. And information is what lets you build something more resilient going forward.
Stocks plus real estate is a start. But the physicians who build portfolios that actually hold up are the ones who go a layer deeper and ask: how do these things actually behave together, and where am I exposed in ways I haven’t fully accounted for?
If you want to dig into passive real estate, specifically, including how to evaluate deals across these dimensions before you commit capital, the Passive Real Estate Academy is where we cover this in depth. We’re not always open for enrollment, but you can join the waitlist at passiveincomemd.com/prea and we’ll reach out when the next cohort opens.
Were these helpful in any way? Make sure to sign up for the newsletter and join the Passive Income Docs Facebook Group for more physician-tailored content.
Peter Kim, MD is the founder of Passive Income MD, the creator of Passive Real Estate Academy, and offers weekly education through his Monday podcast, the Passive Income MD Podcast. Join our community at the Passive Income Doc Facebook Group.
On March 31, over a hundred of Baidu’s Apollo Go robotaxis simultaneously froze on the streets of Wuhan. Vehicles stalled on overpasses and elevated roads, trapping passengers for up to two hours.
A few weeks later, Beijing suspended all new autonomous driving permits nationwide. The suspension suspension blocked robotaxi companies from adding to their fleets, starting new tests, or expanding to additional cities, according to Bloomberg.
In the U.S., meanwhile, some autonomous vehicles are driving into street lights and even into the middle of ongoing crime scenes. In just one month in Austin, Tesla’s robotaxis crashed into a fixed object head on and in reverse, while also hitting trees, poles, buses and trucks. Waymo’s robotaxis are incapable of closing their own doors—and the company has taken to hiring DoorDashers to door dash and close the doors after a passenger gets out. In October 2023, a Cruise AV dragged a pedestrian 20 feet.
During the June 2025 anti-ICE protests in downtown Los Angeles, demonstrators smashed, spray-painted, and torched at least six Waymo robotaxis. The cars reportedly honked in unison as they burned, as activists claimed the cars’ camera data was shared with the LAPD and was representative of the surveillance state. As a result, Waymo suspended service in the downtown area and went on to pause service during subsequent protests. Still, no federal regulation followed.
In February this year, a Waymo blew past cop cars at a live crime scene in Atlanta. A month later, another blocked ambulances in Austin during an active shooter situation.
In L.A. in December, a Waymo was observed driving into an active crime scene; the driverless tech was unable to navigate the officer’s directions to reroute and leave the scene.
That month also witnessed probably the closest parallel to what occurred in Wuhan. A major power outage knocked out traffic signals across San Francisco, leading to Waymo’s fleet of 800-1,000 robotaxis blocking roads and impeding emergency vehicles. At a March 2 hearing about what happened to the fleet during the power outage, San Francisco’s Department of Emergency Management Executive Director Mary Ellen Carroll expressed outrage.
“What has started to happen is that our public safety officers and responders are having to be the ones to physically move” the robotaxis, Carroll said. “In a sense, they’re becoming a default roadside assistance for these vehicles, which we do not think is tenable.”
Waymo has since shipped a software update to the AVs, but there’s still no federal regulation.
The U.S. has no federal autonomous vehicle safety law. The SELF DRIVE Act of 2026, a bipartisan House bill, would create the first statute, yet it remains a draft. Earlier versions in 2017 and 2021 died without passage.
While federal regulation stalls, a separate movement is gaining traction at the state level: legislation to reduce how much Americans drive. The Brookings Institution found that California, Minnesota, Colorado, and Oregon now have laws requiring transportation agencies to mitigate vehicle miles traveled. In Colorado, this has already redirected $900 million from highway expansion toward bus rapid transit. Maryland, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts are considering similar bills in 2026.
Autonomous vehicles deployed at scale are widely expected to increase total driving: empty robotaxis cruising between fares, commuters choosing longer trips, freight trucks running around the clock.
But Tony Han, founder and CEO of Chinese robotaxi startup WeRide, said at the Fortune Global Forum in Riyadh that AVs likely will never be 100% safe, but they would be 10 times safer than humans within a decade.
Hi!
First, I want to thank everyone who continuously support my channel. Thanks for watching my videos. I hope I am able to inspire you. 💛
Next, I want to share my experience as a BA student. Watch the video until the end! 🥳
Fb: Chicky Quijano
IG: _chicky02
Twitter: @chickybels
Tiktok: @chickyquijano
For any other inquiries, message me at:
quijanochicky02@gmail.com
source
Skip to content
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving from an experimental capability into a core production input across industries. Public markets have responded accordingly, with firms perceived as AI beneficiaries experiencing significant multiple expansion—often ahead of any observable improvement in cash flows.
For financial analysts, the central question is not whether AI will transform business operations, but whether it will support sustainable economic profits. This distinction is critical. Markets tend to reward narratives in the short term, but over the long term, valuation converges toward realized cash flows and return on capital.
This blog evaluates AI adoption through a fundamental valuation lens, focusing on its implications for cash flows, risk, and portfolio construction.
And just like that, mortgage rates are back above 6.50% and could be heading even higher.
I’ve been warning folks for a couple weeks now that the worst may not have been behind us.
Between seasonal factors and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, upward pressure on rates was to be expected.
But they seemed to defy expectations for weeks, nearing the low-6s for a 30-year fixed despite all the goings-on.
Now it seems they’re back to re-testing recent highs and could climb even further this month and next.
We knew the conflict in the Middle East wasn’t over, despite a ceasefire and subsequent extension.
While things have been mostly quiet lately, the Strait of Hormuz has remained effectively shut since day one.
And now there are new reports of drones fired at the UAE, a U.S. warship hit, several Iranian boats sunk, and more.
Simply put, there’s renewed fears that things could be ratcheting up again.
That has kept a lot of pressure on oil prices, which remain above $100 per barrel, along with pushing 10-year bond yields up about seven basis points on the day.
The conflict has already led to a surge in gas prices, hurting consumers directly. And it’s likely to affect just about everything else soon as well.
Remember, oil and gas touch pretty much everything, whether it’s the production of goods, or the transportation of said goods after they’ve been produced.
In the end, we consumers pay the price in the form of a markup to compensate for the producers and transit companies who face higher input costs.
That tends to lead to inflation, at least initially, even if it can turn into a recession further down the road.
The temporary reaction for mortgage rates will likely also be higher, as increased inflation means fewer or no rate cuts in the near future.
There’s even talk about rate hikes, though I think we just stand pat and maintain a wait-and-see approach.
Bonds and mortgage rates tend to take cues from Fed rate expectations, meaning they stay higher until we know more.
It’s all pretty straightforward. If oil leads to a second wave of inflation, mortgage rates will stay elevated or even move higher again.
The takeaway for me is to expect higher mortgage rates for the next several months.
Because even if things get sorted out in the Middle East, which seems unlikely, the damage of $100+ per barrel oil (and all the related backlogs) will take time to work its way through the market.
That means prices will stay high and/or elevated for months and inflation readings could well tick up again in coming months.
Bond traders, MBS investors, and mortgage lenders will all likely invest and price conservatively knowing all this.
Nobody will want to get caught out offering a low interest rate only to see inflation ramp up again.
Adding to this narrative is the fact that mortgage rates tend to be highest in spring and summer.
So it would kind of line up perfectly timing-wise for mortgage rates to rise again in May and June.
However, they could also settle down again in fall, as they tend to, especially with the election midterms on deck.

Offer is made significantly better when you stack with other deals, most notably 4x fuel points.
The former ‘Bachelorette’ star and her co-founders, Mallory Vaughan Patton and Ben Patton, make each retail launch a moment.
Shares of Robinhood Markets (HOOD +5.12%) fell after the company released its latest quarterly numbers last week. Its results fell short of analyst expectations, and a big reason for that was lighter crypto trading. Robinhood’s platform can be used for stock trading, crypto trading, and making bets on prediction markets.
While the business has generated strong growth in recent years, the excitement (or lack of it) in the crypto markets can play a big role in its performance. The big question for growth investors, however, is whether it has become too dependent on crypto, and whether that could make the stock a risky option for the long term.
Image source: Getty Images.
During the first three months of 2026, Robinhood generated $623 million in transaction-based revenue, which was up a fairly modest rate of 7%. While event contracts (i.e., prediction markets) have unlocked a huge new growth opportunity for the business, that relatively new revenue stream (which totaled $104 million and was up from just $3 million a year ago) merely helped to offset the sluggish performance in crypto trading; Robinhood generated $134 million from cryptocurrency transactions during the period, which was a decrease of 47% from the same period last year.
Cryptocurrency transactions accounted for 43% of the company’s total transaction revenue in the prior-year period, and that share dropped to just 22% this past quarter. It’s good that the business is becoming more diversified, but it also highlights just how much of its growth has come from cryptocurrency trading.

Today’s Change
(5.12%) $3.77
Current Price
$77.43
Market Cap
$66B
Day’s Range
$74.59 – $78.28
52wk Range
$45.56 – $153.86
Volume
513K
Avg Vol
34M
Gross Margin
94.92%
Robinhood’s success over the years has come from its ability to draw in retail investors, who look to its platform as a one-stop option for all types of trading. The challenge for Robinhood, however, is that with an increasing number of ways for people to make predictions, trade cryptocurrencies, and buy and sell stocks, whether it will continue to be as popular as it has been in recent years is the big question moving forward. That uncertainty, along with a fairly high dependence on crypto trading, does make the stock a bit of a risky buy.
While Robinhood stock has the potential to rise higher in the long run, its valuation isn’t all that cheap; the stock trades at close to 40 times its trailing earnings. If its growth rate isn’t strong, it’ll be difficult for investors to justify paying such a high multiple for the stock.
If you’re OK with the risks that come with the stock, it may be worth buying on weakness right now, as it is down more than 30% since the start of the year. However, with its valuation still not being all that cheap and question marks hovering around its long-term growth, a rally may not necessarily be around the corner; this is an investment that will require patience.