Home Blog

Americans pull $47 billion in equity from their homes in 1Q


American homeowners removed 2% more equity from their properties year-over-year in the first quarter, the most for the three-month period since 2021, ICE Mortgage Technology found.

Processing Content

It estimated $47 billion in equity was withdrawn in the quarter, down from $49 billion in the fourth quarter but up from $46 billion in the first quarter of 2025, according to data from the June ICE Mortgage Monitor report.

While the use of second lien products had a slight majority in terms of how equity was accessed, the period also saw significant percentage growth in cash-out refinancings.

The number of borrowers taking a cash-out refi grew 18% compared with the first quarter of 2025, to about 234,000, with the group withdrawing a total of $22 billion. This was up 2% from a year ago, with an average of $93,000 per borrower.

Meanwhile, 248,000 homeowners opted to tap equity via a second lien, withdrawing $25 billion, a gain of 1%.

The “lock-in effect” for pandemic-era borrowers whose rates are still well below the current market, drove the growth in second lien products. Nearly two-thirds of the home-equity product volume in the first quarter came from borrowers who took out a first mortgage between 2020 and 2022; a total of 3.9 million people who have a mortgage of those vintages added second liens, ICE Mortgage Technology said.

But the cash-out borrowers came from a broader range when it comes to their original loans. Nearly half of them got their last first lien in 2023 or later, while one-quarter was from the 2020-2022 period.

Rates for second lien home equity lines of credit fell to 6.6% in March, which ICE said was the most attractive for the product since late 2022. The average introductory HELOC rate fell slightly below the prime rate, which it attributed to increasing aggressive lender competition for this business.

The data does not include any home equity product originated as a first-lien. It only includes loans with an existing first which now have a second lien as determined through linking McDash data from ICE with public records.

When it comes to extracting equity, historically cash-out refinances have led the way, said Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing market research for Intercontinental Exchange.

“We’ve been in kind of the most predominant second-lien era that we’ve seen over the last 20 years,” Walden said in an interview. “Since 2022, it’s been running above 50% seconds for all the reasons that you expect, trying to hold on to those low rate firsts that they took out in ’20 and ’21.”

Right now, the market is at the higher end of the spectrum in terms of second lien utilization.

The high point was in the third quarter of 2024 at 58%, with the first quarter of this year at 54% second-lien share. Historically, the split was around 60%-40% in favor of cash-out refinanices, Walden said.

Home equity lending activity is likely to slow going forward. This is in part because home price growth has been slowing, meaning less of it can be tapped, Walden said.

It’s worth keeping an eye on rates for second-lien products. Many HELOC lenders index these loans to the prime rate. When the Federal Open Market Committee changes the Fed Funds Rate, many banks will in turn raise or lower their prime rate by the same amount.

Latest bets regarding the FFR have shifted to a 70% probability that short-term rates will be increased if and when the FOMC votes to make a change, Walden pointed out.

This will put pressure on HELOC rates. Looking at the spreads for HELOCs right now they are slightly below prime on average, “so they’re already being aggressive,” Walden pointed out. An increase by the Fed could eat into home equity lending growth.

But the spread between HELOCs and the 30-year fixed could remain relatively tight, which could keep homeowners more interested in second lien products rather than cash-out refis, ICE said.

ICE noted rising interest rates since the end of February has reduced the number of borrowers who have a financial incentive to refi to 1.8 million as of May 21. This compared with 5.4 million during a brief period when the 30-year fixed fell under 6%.

In current conditions, the 30-year FRM would have to fall below 6.25% to drive a meaningful rebound in refi volume. For the week of June 4, the 30-year was at an average of 6.48%, according to Freddie Mac.

Cash-out refi apps had a 65% share in late May versus those homeowners seeking new mortgages for rate-and-term reasons. This particular dataset ICE is able to obtain from its Encompass loan origination system and thus can see the rate lock activity on a timelier basis.

ICE uses Mortgage Bankers Association weekly application survey and then takes the Encompass rate lock data to make its determinations.



Google Parent Alphabet Is Issuing More Shares. Time to Sell?


Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL 1.26%) (GOOG 1.14%) made a decision that seemed unthinkable until recently. It announced it will issue $80 billion worth of shares, a move that will slightly dilute its stock.

On the surface, the move seems hard to believe. As of the end of the first quarter, it held $127 billion in cash, and its digital ad business generated over $64 billion in free cash flow over the trailing 12 months.

That situation forces investors to confront this investment thesis head-on. Do the massive capital expenditures (capex) spending and share sales mean investors should sell the communications stock, or should they continue to hold shares in the Google parent?

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Alphabet’s capex spending

Despite Alphabet’s tremendous financial resources, the capex spending seems concerning on the surface. The company pledged to spend between $175 billion and $185 billion in capex in 2026 as it seeks to compete in the artificial intelligence (AI) market. This is after it spent $91 billion in capex last year.

Nonetheless, before panicking, investors should put the share sale into perspective. Alphabet’s market cap is almost $4.5 trillion. This means that the $80 billion should increase the share count by under 2%. Considering that the stock rose by around 120% in the last year alone, the added shares may escape the notice of most investors.

Alphabet Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-1.26%) $-4.64

Current Price

$363.67

Moreover, Alphabet has likely increased capex spending so dramatically because it seems to be paying off. As previously mentioned, the company generated more than $64 billion in free cash flow over the last year, a figure that subtracts capex spending. One year ago, when capex spending was considerably lower, the company generated almost $75 billion over the previous 12 months.

Additionally, yearly revenue growth rose from 12% in the first quarter of 2025 to 22% in Q1 of 2026. This includes a revenue increase for the AI-focused Google Cloud from 28% in Q1 2025 to 63% one year later. Amid such improvements, investors may want to consider the benefits of the capex spending before reacting to what are admittedly massive cash outlays.

Should investors sell Alphabet?

Given the effects of higher capex spending, investors should not only hold their Alphabet shares but also consider buying some of the newly issued shares. Indeed, spending up to $185 billion in capex in one year and issuing shares to pay for it may not comfort investors when viewed in isolation.

Fortunately, Alphabet still has everything one looks for in a long-term winner. The spending seems to have already generated rapid revenue growth, persuading investors to overlook somewhat lower free cash flows.

Ultimately, considering that the benefits of the capex spending appear to outweigh the massive costs, it seems the company has made a prudent decision by issuing shares to raise capital.

Gen Z interviewer slams her generation’s ‘attitude’ after candidate dialled in from their phone



It’s no secret that Gen Z often gets slammed for, in the words of Sister Act star Whoopi Goldberg, not “busting their behinds” at work quite like previous generations did. Despite struggling to land entry-level roles, bosses have accused them of showing up late to the interview, refusing to put in any overtime for screening tests, and ghosting recruiters. Now, even a Gen Z hiring manager is backing the bosses slamming her generation.

“I fear that the people who say that Gen Z aren’t getting jobs because of their attitude are slightly accurate,” the 23-year-old who goes by @Sopharoch posted in a TikTok video that’s now gone viral. 

LA-based Sophie Rocha works in marketing for Gen Z career platform Home From College—and because of the nature of her employer, she’s regularly on the other side of the hiring table, interviewing candidates from her own generation.

But one recent interview pushed her over the edge.

“I interviewed a candidate last week, and they showed up on the call on their phone,” Rocha slammed, adding that their reasoning was “it’s not that serious” because it was a first-stage interview. 

The candidate then gushed about the job’s remote setup before openly admitting they had no intention of ever working from home—instead revealing they’d use the policy to work full-time while on vacation.

“I don’t know if that’s something that you want to say in an initial interview, like, hey, I’m actually going to be lollygagging in Europe, so I won’t be paying attention to this role,” Rocha added. 

To add further fuel to the fire, the candidate demanded more money and made clear they expected the role to simply be handed to them—a level of entitlement that left Rocha speechless.

“Then they complained about the compensation, and then said, I know that you’re probably not interviewing anybody else for this position, so I’ll just expect to hear back and start Monday,” Rocha concluded incredulously.  “I’m sorry, what?” 

Gen Z really are the hardest to work with—even managers of their own generation say they’re difficult

Rocha isn’t the first Gen Z-er to reach management ranks and then complain about her generation’s shortcomings.

Resume Genius asked hiring managers which generation is the most challenging to work with, and 45% pointed to Gen Z, the generation born between 1997 and 2012. Most shockingly, even 50% of Gen Zers admitted that their own generation is the most difficult to manage. 

Another study found that nearly three-fourths of managers consider Gen Z the most difficult to work with, and many bosses get frustrated with their new hires regularly. Only 4% of respondents said it was never difficult to manage Gen Z.

And they’re not just complaining about the latest generation of workers; 65% of the bosses surveyed have put Gen Z at the top of their firing list before any other generation. Over half of respondents had already sacked a Gen Zer, and 12% said they fired one less than one week after a start date. 

A separate study pointed to a lack of initiative, unprofessionalism, poor communication skills and general unreadiness for the workplace as top reasons for firing Gen Z grads just months after hiring them. 

Being late to work and meetings often, not wearing office-appropriate clothing, and not using language appropriate for the workspace were specific examples used of this.

In the end, it’s making hiring managers more reluctant to hire the next generation of workers. Instead, most studies concluded that bosses are hiring more millennials as a result.

Career advice from a Gen Z hiring manager: ‘You should be joining every interview from a computer’

In a series of follow-up videos, Rocha shared some tips for young job seekers on how to not “totally bomb” their shot at landing a role,“ since Gen Z apparently don’t know how to act in interviews”.

“Apparently, this is controversial, and the main reason why that video went viral, but you should be joining every interview from a computer, not your phone,” she stressed.

Failing that, for young people who don’t have a laptop or desktop, she recommended setting up your phone sideways so the video appears horizontal on the hiring manager’s screen—leaving them none the wiser.

“And do not touch it throughout the interview,” Rocha added. “I don’t want to be on FaceTime with you.”

Other tips included showing genuine interest in the company, making sure you take up no more than 50% of the conversation, and answering any questions in under 2 minutes. Essentially, an interview should be a back-and-forth, not a monologue.

“If you notice that you’re dominating the conversation, stop talking, because that means that you’re rambling,” Rocha said. 

“The tell me about yourself question is not an invitation for your life story,” she added.

The advice Rocha gave that got the most hate in the comments section was to thank the hiring manager for their time with a follow-up email.

Although the topic of thank-you notes is quite contentious (with some arguing that candidates shouldn’t have to do more free work, and it adds to a hiring manager’s already full plate), Rocha insisted it’s “just polite”—and even an ex-Meta recruiter agrees it’s a green flag. 

“It really takes two seconds, and clearly, according to my last couple of videos, people aren’t sending them, so you will stand out if you send a thank you to your interviewer after you get off the call,” Rocha concluded.

Chipotle: BOGO On 6/11 When You Wear Soccer Jersey (After 3PM)


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Chipotle is offering a buy one, get one free entree on 6/11 after 3PM if you’re wearing a Soccer Jersey

Our Verdict

These promotions are always crazy busy. Good deal I guess if you really like Chipotle. 

Trump steps up attacks on California’s election system




Trump steps up attacks on California’s election system

Anduril CEO Brian Schimpf says economic warfare is the ‘new normal’ for military conflicts



Brian Schimpf, CEO of defense tech company Anduril, says that the nature of modern armed conflict has fundamentally shifted—and that the U.S. military’s supply chain is dangerously unprepared for it.

“The U.S. and Israel did something like ten times as many strikes in the first month of the war as they did in the entire Gulf War,” Schimpf said at Fortune‘s Brainstorm Tech conference in Aspen on Monday. “This is the new normal of what these conflicts are going to look like.”

Schimpf’s remarks opened on a pointed note: back in March, when he was interviewed for a profile of Anduril in Fortune, he predicted that the Strait of Hormuz could still be blocked by the time the Brainstorm Tech conference rolled around. It was.  

For Schimpf, that’s not an anomaly, it’s the new blueprint. Modern conflicts, he argued, are no longer primarily about destroying military assets; they’re about strangling economies. Data centers, oil refineries, and shipping lanes are the targets now, and low-cost drones have made striking them cheaper than ever. “The economic warfare that is effectively the Strait of Hormuz, this is the new normal of what these conflicts are going to look like,” he said.


More from Fortune’s 25th Brainstorm Tech:

Anthropic’s Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code, says there are days he manages tens of thousands of AI agents at once

Twitch CEO: Social media has become ‘anti-social’ and can’t match the shared, human connection of live streaming

Your career needs a ‘gym membership’ to keep up with continuous AI advancements, says Campus founder Tade Oyerinde


For the U.S. he said, the new reality is a particularly tricky problem. It’s “essentially impossible to inflict economic pain on China without catastrophic economic pain on the U.S.,” Schimpf said.

That logic flows directly into how he thinks about Anduril’s business. Schimpf was especially candid about supply chain fragility. He noted that the U.S. fired through roughly 850 Tomahawk missiles in four weeks of conflict with Iran—burning through a stockpile that the Pentagon had been replenishing at a rate of about 90 per year. 

His proposed solution is not just redesigning weapons to be more manufacturable—it’s moving upstream into raw materials. “We’re looking at how do we secure supply of germanium years out,” he said, pointing to China’s systematic acquisition of critical minerals, including rare earth magnets and copper film suppliers, as a strategic stranglehold the U.S. has been slow to counter.

The CEO was equally as candid speaking about the current defense tech valuation frenzy—where some companies are raising at 50x or even 100x forward revenue. “I do think there is a bit of a bubble.” He invoked the Uber-and-Lyft dynamic, arguing that in any hot category, roughly 90% of returns accrue to the top two players, and that companies chasing stratospheric valuations are setting themselves up for an impossible growth bar. Anduril has been deliberate about its own pricing, he said, but acknowledged the temptation is real.

An Anduril listing on the public markets is a long-running subject of speculation. Schimpf, when pressed on the IPO question, declined to give a timeline. In March, the company raised a $5 billion Series H raise at a $61 billion valuation, led by venture capital firms Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz. Last week, Anduril cofounder Trae Stephens told Fortune he saw the company ideally going public in the next couple of years. 

Schimpf, however, made an argument for the advantage of remaining private. “Right now, we’re in a hype-y time. We’re growing like crazy. Why would we go out right now? We don’t need to, he said.” Schimpf laid out a simple 3-point framework for contemplating an IPO: If you go public in the middle of a “hype cycle,” when growth is slowing, or when you’re more than two years from profitability, and you’ll have a bad three-year stock return. Anduril checks at least one of those boxes, he said, citing the current industry-wide hype cycle, and therefore sees no rush.

Did Everyone Forget Mortgage Rates Were 2-3% Back in 2012 Too?


I was on LinkedIn the other day and came across a post featuring a mortgage rate history chart with rates for each year.

It started with 1975, when the 30-year fixed apparently averaged 9.0%, 1980 when it was supposedly 14.4%, and 2015 when it was 4.0%.

For whatever reason they skipped a lot of years in between, I suppose to make the chart more concise.

But what jumped out at me was the fact that mortgage rates were in the 2-3% range in 2012 and 2013 and didn’t make the chart.

It seems a lot of people either don’t know that or don’t remember.

You Could Get a 2-3% Mortgage Rate in 2012 and 2013!

Believe it or not, it wasn’t just 2020 and 2021 when mortgage rates were at their lowest.

Sure, the 30-year fixed technically hit its all-time low in January of 2021, per Freddie Mac data.

And the 15-year fixed hit its record low in July 2021.

But there were some incredibly good years for mortgage rates nearly a decade earlier.

Not only that, but home prices were about 50% off at the time as well!

So if you had purchased real estate in 2012-2013, you likely made out really, really, well.

Anyway, I saw the chart and commented that mortgage rates were also sub-3% in 2012 and 2013.

Most responded to be with doubt or snarky sarcasm, so I took the time to review some old Freddie Mac mortgage rate data.

Didn’t take long to find it. In the Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS), I found that 30-year fixed rates were in the low 3s during 2013.

The lowest was 3.34% in January of 2013. And in 2012, spent nearly the entire second half of the year at 3.50% or lower, as seen above.

In case you’re unaware, Freddie Mac mortgage rates are mere averages and actual rates can be a lot lower (or higher).

But I fondly recall many people snagging rates in the 3s and even sub-3% rates back then.

My Friend Got a 2.75% Mortgage Rate Nearly 15 Years Ago!

A vividly remember a friend of mine got a 2.75% 30-year fixed way back then and a super low purchase price to boot!

If we turn our attention to 15-year fixed mortgages, they were even lower, averaging around 2.625% to 2.75% for a good chunk of the year.

So it wasn’t just pandemic-era mortgage rates that were sub-3%. A full decade earlier home buyers were snagging these low interest rates.

And they made out even better, as noted, because home prices were about 50% lower at the time as the market was still recovering from the early 2000s housing crash.

As for why mortgage rates were that low back then, it was the same story as 2020-2021.

The Federal Reserve was running Quantitative Easing (QE) at that time as well and buying billions in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to push mortgage rates lower.

Whether they needed to do it again a decade later is a bigger question, as all that easy money led to another big wave of inflation and arguably wasn’t really necessary.

Read on: Try my mortgage rate calculator to quickly compare interest rates an .125% to 0.25% (or more) apart to determine the difference in payment and total interest expense.

(photo: Michael Coghlan)

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Q&A | all about my degree! AD



Head to to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain!

This video is kindly sponsored by Squarespace 🙂

Updated second year Q&A:

Answering all your questions about my degree: BA Business Management!

TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 intro
1:13 what is Business Management? How is it different from other business degrees?
2:22 why did I choose Business Management?
3:50 entry requirements – do you need specific A levels or GCSEs?
5:18 modules and course structure
8:05 my favourite and least favourite modules
9:24 how much maths is involved?
10:29 contact hours and teaching styles
11:53 MY NEW BLOG!!
13:03 is it difficult?
13:47 what’s the workload like?
14:46 what are the assignments like?
15:57 am I doing a placement or study abroad year?
16:47 my career plans after graduation and career opportunities from Business Management
17:50 outro

Subscribe: bit.ly/2qmJUE8
🔔 Make sure to enable ALL push notifications! 🔔

Follow my social media:
Instagram:
Twitter:

Business email: lydia@storyofmoxie.com

Outfit details:
university of leeds hoodie!

(Disclaimer: Items marked with an asterisk (*) are affiliate links & I receive a small commission from purchases made via them.)

FAQs:
How old are you? – 18 (my birthday is the 26th April!)
Which university do you go to? – University of Leeds
What do you study? – BA Business Management
Which A levels did you take? – English lit, biology & history
What camera do you use? – Canon G7X Mark II
What editing software do you use? – Final Cut Pro

Products I use:
University
– Laptop:
– Desk lamp:
– Alarm clock (similar):
– AirPods:
– Squared notebook:
– Black pens:
– Highlighters:
YouTube videos:
– Camera:
– Tripod:
– Editing software:

(DISCLAIMER: Some links are affiliate, meaning I make a small commission from purhcases made via them.)

Intro made by the wonderful Laura Medley:

Thanks for watching & make sure to subscribe! x

source