Home Blog

Mutual Funds లో Invest చేసి చూపిస్తా రండి! – Live Demo! #sip #mutualfunds #investing #shorts #live



Mutual Funds లో Invest చేసి చూపిస్తా రండి! – Live Demo! #sip #mutualfunds #investing #shorts #live

In this video, I have shown how to invest in mutual funds practically, step by step. 📈

I have demonstrated both:
• How to make a one-time (lump sum) investment in a mutual fund
• How to start a SIP (Systematic Investment Plan)
• How to select and invest in a mutual fund using an investment platform
• What the actual investment process looks like

For demonstration purposes, I have invested 1,000 as a one-time investment in one mutual fund and also shown how to invest through SIP.

⚠️ **Disclaimer: The mutual funds/schemes shown in this video are used **only for educational and demonstration purposes** and should not be considered as investment advice, recommendation, or a solicitation to invest. I am **not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser/financial adviser**. Please conduct your own research and consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before making any investment decisions.

Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

This video is intended solely for educational and informational purposes.

#mutualfunds #mutualfundsindia #sip #mutualfundinvestment #investing #personalfinance #investment #financialliteracy #stockmarket #wealthcreation #moneymanagement #sipinvestment #lumpsuminvestment #investments #finance

Tags :
mutual funds, mutual funds india, how to invest in mutual funds, how to invest in mutual funds in india, mutual fund investment, mutual fund investment for beginners, how to start investing, how to start mutual fund investment, sip, what is sip, how to start sip, sip investment, mutual fund sip, lump sum investment, one time investment mutual fund, mutual funds for beginners, best way to invest in mutual funds, mutual fund investing, investing for beginners, personal finance, investment, wealth creation, financial planning, money management, mutual funds telugu, mutual fund investment telugu, sip telugu, investment telugu, finance telugu, personal finance telugu, mutual funds explained, how sip works

source

The Best Short-Term Rental Market in Every State Ranked by Gross Yield


Every “best cities for Airbnb” list has the same markets: Gatlinburg, Joshua Tree, Scottsdale, and the Smokies. 

We looked at things differently to show you what the data is actually saying. This data produced Sandusky, Ohio.

BNBCalc pulled it themselves: 462 cities across all 50 states, every one backed by at least 50 real properties. I ranked the best city in each state by revenue per dollar of purchase price, then threw out the ones their own quality review flagged.

What’s left is a list of places nobody is making content about, which is the entire reason to read it. The markets everybody talks about are priced like everybody’s talking about them.

Then keep going past the list. Underneath it, I put a mortgage on the median winner, and about half of this stops working.

Why Gross Yield Matters

Every number below is modeled gross yield: annual revenue divided by home value. There’s no mortgage, down payment, property taxes, insurance, cleaning, utilities, or management fee factored in. Gross yield is what a property throws off before anybody touches it.

That sounds weaker than the cash-on-cash returns I was working with a month ago, and in one way, it is. Cash-on-cash tells you what actually lands in your account, and this measures something a step earlier than that.

But cash-on-cash only works if you accept somebody else’s guesses about your deal, like your rate, down payment, expense ratio, and whether you’re hiring a manager. Miss any of those, and the number breaks down without telling you which assumption did it.

Gross yield carries none of that. It’s revenue over price, the same for me as it is for you. Then you add your own financing and expenses, which is what I do further down. That’s where this list gets uncomfortable.

The Best Short-Term Rental City in Every State, by Gross Yield

Here’s every percentage modeled by gross yield, annual revenue divided by home value, best to worst by state and then city.

How the rankings work: BNBCalc ranked cities by modeled gross yield; annual short-term rental revenue divided by the city’s median home value for the same bedroom count. We used the median result and required enough listings and independent hosts to prevent one unusual property from skewing the ranking.

Source: BNBCalc national analysis of short-term rental performance and city-level median home values segmented by bedroom count, based on 10M Airbnb & VRBO Listings.

Kansas City appears twice, once on each side of the state line, and the Kansas side yields better.

Now, the Uncomfortable Part

The median winner yields 10.91%. That’s a healthy-sounding number. Let’s go buy one (with less paperwork than it actually takes, luckily).

Take the median property: $251,338, producing $27,671 a year. At 20% down, it puts $50,267 of your money in. Finance the rest on a 30-year note at 7%, and debt service runs $16,052. Operating expenses at 37.5% of revenue, covering cleaning, supplies, utilities, insurance, taxes, and repairs, take another $10,376.

You clear about $1,241. On $50,267 in, that’s a 2.5% cash-on-cash return. You’d do better in a savings account, and you wouldn’t have to unclog anything.

Now hire somebody to run it, because you live four states away and you aren’t driving out to meet a plumber. A property manager takes roughly 20% of gross, which is $5,534 here. That means you’re losing about $4,292 a year.

Run it backward, and you get the number I keep thinking about. Covering debt service and operating costs at those assumptions, before a single dollar of profit, takes a gross yield of roughly 10.5%. Twenty-six of these 50 cities clear it, while 24 don’t. That means roughly half the best-in-state list doesn’t break even on a conventional purchase at today’s rates.

That’s the actual lesson. Nobody eyeballs a ranking and finds a deal. Everything between a 10.91% gross yield and money in your account is a decision you make after closing.

Five to Watch

Sandusky, Ohio

A 15.35% gross yield on 181 properties at $145,150, and the top of this list. Cedar Point drives the calendar. At 48% independent hosts, the market hasn’t fully professionalized, which is the most interesting combination on here for somebody who wants a real shot at outrunning the competition.

Detroit, Michigan

A 15.1% gross yield on 506 properties, one of the deeper samples, at $137,024. Big enough that the citywide figure averages streets that work with streets that don’t. Do address-level homework here more seriously than anywhere else.

Kapolei, Hawaii

A 15.06% gross yield on 337 properties at $597,065, generating $109,736 a year, by far the largest revenue figure in the file. Read the regulation section before you get excited, because this one is a zoning story more than a market one.

Abilene, Texas

A 15.05% gross yield on 315 properties at $194,996, with 58% independent hosts. There’s no beach, theme park, or rally. Whatever demand exists there runs year-round, and on a list this seasonal, that’s worth more than it looks.

Lewes, Delaware

A 5.43% gross yield on 212 properties at $540,439, dead last. I include the bottom of the list every time I do this. Delaware’s best available answer yields under 6% gross, which doesn’t survive contact with a mortgage. Every state has a top city, which is a very different thing from every state having a deal worth doing.

Don’t Get Blindsided

Nothing here addresses local short-term rental law. It will show you a gorgeous yield in a city that outlawed the thing you’re modeling.

Kapolei is the clearest case on the list, and it runs counter to what you’d expect. Honolulu allows short-term rentals in resort-zoned areas and a handful of designated apartment districts. Everywhere else on Oahu, residential rentals face long minimum stays, and the city has spent years in court over whether that minimum is 30 days or 90. Ko Olina, which sits in Kapolei, is one of the designated resort areas.

So that 15.06% gross yield is real, and it exists because of where the zoning line falls. A citywide number can’t tell you which side of that line an address sits on, and on Oahu, that distinction is the entire investment.

Atlantic City, Baltimore, Detroit, and Myrtle Beach all sit in places that have been actively rewriting short-term rental rules, and any of them can move again. Regulation isn’t a footnote on the yield. Sometimes, regulation is the yield.

How to Find the Actual Deal

Rankings hand you a shortlist and nothing more. BNBCalc is a short-term rental analytics platform covering more than 10 million listings across 2,400 global markets, including 487 U.S. metro markets. Its AI Agent helps investors estimate realistic benchmark comps and operating expenses for a specific address before modeling revenue, cash flow, and tax savings.

Start at an address, not a city

Every figure here is citywide, and Detroit shows you why that isn’t enough. Enter a specific address, and you get a revenue projection, average daily rate, occupancy, and up to 40 comparable rentals. In a market with real neighborhood variance, the comp set is the entire answer.

Filter the comps down to a house you could actually buy

Comps are filtered by property type and amenities, and revenue, occupancy, and nightly rate all recalculate based on whatever set you build. Filter to what your budget really gets you in that city, and see whether the revenue survives. Sometimes it does. Finding out for free beats finding out at closing.

Pull the monthly seasonality

That’s your direct answer to the Sandusky problem. See the shape of the year before you sign, then stare at the trough months and ask whether you can cover the note through them.

Check what the property does as a long-term rental

BNBCalc runs long-term and Section 8 numbers in the same analysis, and that’s your downside case. If an ordinance passes in year three, long-term rent is your floor. In a place like Kapolei, that floor isn’t hypothetical.

Read the regulations before you fall in love

BNBCalc publishes city-level regulation guides and state lodging and occupancy tax guides. Their Oakland guide breaks out the business tax rate and the registration, renewal, and inspection fees line by line. Those live separately from the calculator, so it’s a step you take rather than something the projection does for you. 

They say it in their own guides: Verify with the city. Five minutes on a municipal website is the cheapest due diligence in this business.

Run the tax math before you decide, not in April

Most people skip the tax math, and it changes deals, especially for W-2 earners. If you meet the applicable short-term rental and material participation requirements, you may use depreciation losses to offset W-2 income. BNBCalc’s short-term rental tax calculator models potential 100% bonus depreciation on qualifying components, cost segregation, and the possibility of non-passive treatment.

That last piece is worth understanding. If your average guest stay is seven days or less and you materially participate, those losses may offset active income rather than be passively held. They’ll also connect you with a cost seg partner that runs a free benefit analysis, so you see the number before paying for a study.

Given what debt service does to a 10.91% yield, the tax outcome carries more weight in year one than the operating outcome for a lot of these properties, and a yield ranking has no way to surface that for you.

The Smart Move

I wouldn’t buy a house because it showed up on this list. I’d buy one because the list pointed me in the right direction, and then I did the work.

What’s useful here is the pattern. Revenue efficiency lives in unglamorous places, and the cities producing the most revenue per dollar of price are Sandusky, Detroit, Abilene, Gulfport, Montgomery, and Shreveport. Nobody puts those on a vision board.

Meanwhile, the mountain and coastal markets everybody actually wants to sit near the bottom of the yield table, because you’re paying for the address, and the address doesn’t book nights.

And a yield in the low teens, which reads strong on a page, mostly evaporates once you add a mortgage and a manager. That’s the rate environment talking rather than any particular city on this list, and it applies everywhere.

So pick two cities. Pull five real addresses in each. Filter the comps to a house you could actually close on, look at what the calendar does in February, call the city about the ordinance, and run the tax math before you get attached to anything. Give it a Saturday.

One Saturday will teach you more than any ranking on the internet, mine very much included.

Data Note: The data shared in the article comes from BNBCalc. We looked at 462 cities across all 50 states (with at least 50 analyzed properties in each). Gross yield is just annual revenue divided by the estimated home value, so it doesn’t account for mortgages, operating expenses, or management fees. We limited the list to cities where BNBCalc has high confidence in the data. Just a heads up: the debt service and expense assumptions in the cash flow section are my own, not BNBCalc’s. This isn’t tax or investment advice; please check with your CPA and your local city officials regarding regulations before making any decisions.

Two Big Inflation Reports Could Push Mortgage Rates Back to 7% This Week


Mortgage rates have already had a rough couple of weeks.

But it could get even worse if a pair of inflation reports come in hot later this week.

We’ve got both the Producer Price Index (PPI) and Consumer Price Index (CPI) being released this week, with the potential to make or break a Fed rate hike next week.

There’s also surging oil prices, more aggressions in the Middle East, and retaliatory tariffs to worry about.

None of it seems to bode well for mortgage rates, which are already on the cusp of a return to 7%.

Are Mortgage Rates Going to Hit 7% Again?

It’s going to be another turbulent week for mortgage rates, which currently sit at their highest levels since last June.

The 30-year fixed is currently averaging 6.89% according to the daily index from Mortgage News Daily.

It was a slightly higher 6.91% a week ago, but remains stubbornly high due to myriad factors.

The biggest one continues to be the Iranian war, which has sent oil prices surging.

Over the weekend, Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabian energy facilities pushed the price of Brent crude up to nearly $100 per barrel.

And there are fears prices could rise a lot more from here, with consumers already feeling it at the pump and elsewhere.

That oil price shock is making its way into prices on just about everything, leading to higher inflation readings again.

Making matters worse is retaliatory tariffs from Canada on anything from U.S. milk to perfume.

All of it boils down to price pressure. The cost of everything was already expensive, and this just makes it worse.

Inflation has been top of mind for years now, with the Fed hiking rates 11 times to combat it.

But then it seemed to finally get under control, allowing a few cuts beginning in September 2024.

Progress made on that front allowed mortgage rates to fall to the lowest levels since late 2022 earlier this year.

The 30-year fixed was sub-6% and the housing market was showing signs of life again.

There was also a nice little refinance boom, with lots of recent home buyers taking advantage of a rate and term refinance.

However, it proved to be very short-lived. Out of seemingly nowhere there were strikes on Iran that pushed rates up nearly a full percentage point in the months that followed.

PPI and CPI Could Sway the Fed to Hike Rates at September Meeting

This week’s PPI and CPI reports are super important. They’re the last major data points the Fed has to go on before its September meeting.

They could make or break the decision to hike rates a ¼ point or stand pat.

At last glance, the odds of a hike are just over 60%, according to CME FedWatch.

That’s up from around 44% a month ago, thanks in part to a hot jobs report in August and more tensions in the Middle East.

But the Fed has a new look with Trump’s appointee Kevin Warsh, who is attempting to convince everyone that hikes aren’t needed.

That there will be a massive supply shock due to AI productivity gains, leading to lower prices over time.

Of course, even if true, when exactly will that take place? It could be years…or longer.

In the meantime, the Fed will need to convince everyone that monetary policy is restrictive enough as-is, which could be tricky.

Just remember the Fed doesn’t set mortgage rates and only makes move based on the underlying economic data, which is what drives mortgage rates.

The 7% Mortgage Rates Are Almost Here

Today, you’re looking at a mortgage rate on the cusp of 7%, perhaps 6.875% or higher.

Back in February and early March you were maybe looking at a rate of 5.875%. That’s a huge difference.

It’s also a massive psychological hit. It seems anytime we make progress, there’s a setback.

And you see it in home sales, which have remained near 30-year lows for the past 3-4 years, with this year shaping up to be no different.

If mortgage rates don’t turn around soon, we could see inventory spike again, putting some serious pressure on home prices.

So there’s a lot at stake here. As I’ve mentioned before, the difference in monthly payment for a rate of 6.875% and 7% is negligible.

But if prospective home buyers start seeing scary headlines that mortgage rates are back at 7%, it will likely give them pause.

That could have knock-on effects for the housing market, pushing more people to remain in place, quite possibly because they’re rate-locked.

With a 2-3% mortgage rate, the thought of trading it for a 7-handle might be unthinkable.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

SpaceX Is No Longer Just a Rocket Company. Here’s What Investors Are Really Buying.


When most people hear Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +3.73%), they probably picture a rocket blasting into space.

That’s understandable. Rockets are how SpaceX became famous. But investors who think SpaceX is simply a rocket company are missing the bigger picture, since the company is increasingly becoming a collection of businesses that reinforce one another.

And I think investors should think about it in three layers.

Image source: Getty Images.

Starlink is the economic foundation

The first layer is Starlink.

Starlink provides internet connectivity through a growing constellation of satellites orbiting Earth. Unlike Starship or some of SpaceX’s more ambitious projects, it’s no longer a promise about the future.

It’s a real business with millions of paying customers. Starlink ended the second quarter with approximately 12 million subscribers, double the number from a year earlier. Connectivity revenue rose 66% to $4.3 billion, while operating income reached roughly $1.7 billion.

That’s significant. Starlink is increasingly becoming the financial engine that allows SpaceX to pursue much larger opportunities.

And the market opportunity extends well beyond households. Starlink is expanding into aviation, maritime, enterprise, government, and mobile connectivity. Enterprise and government revenue grew 108% year over year in the latest quarter, accounting for 42% of total revenue.

If Starlink can continue to scale profitably, it will generate even more profits to fund SpaceX’s other ambitious projects.

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(3.73%) $5.52

Current Price

$153.47

Artificial intelligence (AI) could become the next massive growth engine

The second layer is much newer: artificial intelligence (AI).

SpaceX’s AI-related revenue jumped 247% year over year to $2.6 billion in the second quarter. The company is rapidly building computing infrastructure to serve demand for AI workloads.

That growth is remarkable. But here’s where investors need to look beyond the headline. SpaceX spent approximately $15.8 billion on AI infrastructure during the quarter. That’s roughly 6 times the segment’s quarterly revenue.

So the important question isn’t simply whether AI revenue is growing quickly. It’s whether SpaceX can earn attractive returns on the enormous amount of capital it is investing. If it can, the opportunity could be huge.

SpaceX has already demonstrated that it can build infrastructure at a scale few companies can match. Its ability to combine that infrastructure with access to capital, engineering talent, and its own launch capabilities could give it an unusual competitive position.

Still, AI is the exciting new part of the SpaceX story, so it’s not quite as proven a business as Starlink. Investors should closely monitor the development of this business and how it complements Starlink’s existing offerings.

Rockets are the infrastructure

This is the part of SpaceX that investors could easily misunderstand. The rocket business isn’t necessarily the destination. It’s the transportation infrastructure that allows the rest of the ecosystem to exist.

Think of it this way. Falcon 9 already gives SpaceX a highly successful launch platform. But the newer Starship is designed to change the economics of space much more dramatically.

Starship is SpaceX’s next-generation reusable rocket system. The company intends for both the spacecraft and its booster to be rapidly reusable, while carrying substantially more payload than Falcon 9.

SpaceX believes Starship could eventually increase payload capacity dramatically and reduce launch costs by roughly an order of magnitude. If that happens, the implications go far beyond launching rockets.

SpaceX could deploy more Starlink satellites. It could build larger satellite networks. It could support more commercial and government missions. And it could potentially put large amounts of computing infrastructure into orbit.

That last possibility is particularly interesting.

SpaceX is already pursuing orbital AI infrastructure and has announced plans for a $100 billion Starbase Louisiana complex intended to support Starship and future AI satellite operations. That’s a remarkable investment in infrastructure for something that doesn’t yet exist at a meaningful commercial scale.

But it reveals how SpaceX thinks about the future. Starship isn’t merely a bigger rocket. It could be the platform that makes SpaceX’s next generation of businesses economically possible.

Putting the SpaceX flywheel together

Put the pieces together, and the investment thesis for SpaceX becomes much more interesting.

Starlink generates recurring revenue and profits. Those profits can help fund new infrastructure like Starship. Starship could eventually make launches dramatically cheaper. Cheaper launches could allow SpaceX to deploy more satellites, more quickly. More satellites increase Starlink’s capacity.

At the same time, growing demand for AI creates another enormous market for computing infrastructure. And if SpaceX can eventually deploy some of that infrastructure in space, it could open an entirely new market.

Each business potentially makes the others more valuable. And that’s the SpaceX story.

In short, investors aren’t simply buying rockets. They’re buying a company attempting to control multiple layers of the infrastructure connecting Earth, satellites, communications, and computing.

Few companies on the planet are positioned to do that.

Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard 50,000 Point Bonus


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • The new Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard is offering a 50,000 point bonus after $1,000 in spend within 90 days

Card Details

  • No annual fee
  • Earn 1 Status Qualifying Star per dollar spent
  • Card earns at the following rates:
    • 3x on Carnival purchases
    • 2x on gas and grocery purchases
    • 1x on all other purchases 

Our Verdict

Looks like the standard bonus on this new card will be 20,000 points so this is probably as high as we will see the bonus on this card. Points can be redeemed for drinks/food/experiences onboard and seem to be worth roughly 1¢-2¢. 

Stars are the currency used for elite status, gold status (second level, immediately after the free level). requires 10,000 stars so the extra 1 star per $1 spent isn’t exactly generous. 

Don’t think this is a super attractive offer unless you’re a big cruiser and can get good value from the points. Because of that we won’t be adding it to our list of the best credit card bonuses, we will add it to the new credit cards of 2026 though. 

F.A.Q’s

Can points be redeemed for gift cards?

No, that’s no longer an option for this new card as per their F.A.Q’s.

Silver Lake, Dell director, sells $24.67m of Dell shares




Silver Lake, Dell director, sells $24.67m of Dell shares

Crypto.com Linked Cronos Network Claims $9.19 Million Still Unrecovered After Tectonic Exploit And Chain Rollback


Cronos, the Layer 1 network associated with Crypto.com, has released its official accounting of the August 30 attack on Tectonic. The review confirms that more than $9 million extracted during the incident remains outside the chain’s reach.

Validators later rolled the ledger back and reversed most of the damage, but assets that had already left Cronos could not be restored.

The attacker inflated the price of TONIC, Tectonic’s thinly traded governance token, then posted that inflated token as collateral.

Using the distorted valuation, the attacker borrowed about $120.4 million across nine of Tectonic’s lending markets.

The protocol’s price feed tracked the manipulated market, allowing the borrower to pull stablecoins, bitcoin, ether and other liquid assets far beyond TONIC’s real tradable depth.

Operators identified the irregular activity about 36 minutes after it started.

Validators then halted block production at height 90,907,150. After reaching consensus, they restored the chain to block 90,896,188—the last height recorded before the first malicious transactions.

That decision discarded 10,961 blocks, or one hour and 54 minutes of history.

Every transaction packed into that window, related to the exploit or not, was erased.

Balances that had remained on Cronos returned to their earlier state, reversing roughly $111.2 million of the borrowed value.

The remaining $9.19 million—about 7.6 percent of the $120.4 million total—had already been moved off the network through bridges and other outbound routes before the halt.

Those funds sit on other chains and therefore fall outside the rollback.

Cronos stated that the departed sum has not been recovered and is beyond the restoration’s reach.

The episode illustrates a hard limit of chain-level emergency measures.

A coordinated rollback can rewrite history inside one network, but it cannot reach assets once they have crossed a bridge.

Earlier on-chain estimates had placed the escaped amount closer to $6 million–$8.3 million; the official figure is now higher.

The same intervention also cancelled legitimate activity that happened to fall inside the discarded window, an unavoidable cost of resetting the entire chain rather than targeting individual addresses.

Tectonic, previously the largest lending protocol on Cronos, saw its total value locked collapse around the attack.

The network itself resumed block production later on August 30 after the pre-exploit state was restored.

Cronos has said it is coordinating with exchanges and investigators to trace the outbound transfers, but recovery of the escaped $9.19 million remains uncertain.

The case adds to a wider pattern of price-manipulation attacks against DeFi lenders that accept low-liquidity tokens as collateral.

Here, a thin TONIC market, a relatively generous collateral factor, and a price feed that followed the manipulated pool created the opening. The rapid halt limited further leakage, yet it could not close the gap left by funds that had already departed.



Biggest Financial Mistake you make in your 20s!



DON’T START A SIP WITHOUT KNOWING THIS.

Watch the whole reel to know why.

This is Episode 1 of teaching my younger sister about finances.

Ideally, you should save for your nearest goal first. But if you only focus on short-term goals, you might miss out on long-term compounding.

So, you can start an SIP for the long run with a fixed amount, say ₹5,000–₹10,000 depending on your salary. Then, save whatever is left towards your short-term goals in safer assets.

The Point is –
The closer the goal, the safer and more accessible your money should be.
For short-term goals, we choose safer assets because you don’t have much time to recover if the market falls.
For long-term goals, you can take more risk and invest in the stock market through mutual funds. Even if the market falls, you have more time for it to recover.

One exception: if your short-term goal is something important, like funding higher education, that money should also be kept in safer assets.

Stay tuned for the next episode.

[Anushka Rathod, Finance, India, Investment, Series]
#anushkarathod #finance #india #investment #series

source

Indianapolis Ends Its No-Zero Grading Policy: What It Means for College Readiness


Indianapolis Public Schools can hand out zeros again. On August 27, 2026, the Board of School Commissioners unanimously passed Resolution No. 8111 (PDF File), amending Board Policy 5421 and ending the district’s six-year-old no-zero rule for grades 1 through 12.

The policy changes exactly one thing in the grading table: the F band moves from “50-59%” to “0-59%.” That single edit reopens a debate around grade inflation nationally, and it sits behind reports that high GPAs are masking weak college-level math skills.

Under the revised policy, students who make a real attempt still earn at least 50%. A zero is reserved for work a student never attempts after repeated opportunities and documented teacher support. The resolution requires documented interventions before any zero is entered and carves out developmentally appropriate handling for K-5.

IPS chief learning officer Lela Simmons framed it as a middle ground driven largely by teacher feedback. The rest of the IPS scale is “normal”: A is 90-100%, B is 80-89%, C is 70-79%, D is 60-69%. A student at 70% in Indianapolis gets a C-, which most parents would view as a traditional grading scale.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

The original no-zero policy was adopted July 30, 2020 in the middle of pandemic remote learning, when a missed week of quarantine could bury a student under unrecoverable zeros.

The math behind it is real. On a 100-point scale, a single zero costs the same as five Fs, and one blown assignment can sink a quarter grade past recovery.

Six years later, teachers reported students were using the no-zero policy as a way to pass by doing nothing. The end result of nearly six years of this has been rampant nationwide grade inflation and a cohort of freshman college students that are ill-prepared for the realities of college and the real world.

IPS Goes To Traditional Grading, While Other Districts Remain Lax

In contrast to IPS, San Diego Unified School District has continued to maintain their lax grading policies. Under AR 5121, academic grades “shall be based solely on students’ current levels of mastery of the Board-adopted standards and shall not be influenced by behavior or nonacademic measures.” And while the district themselves does not publish percentage equivalents of their lax grading scale, numerous reports have surfaced of individual campuses showing what this conversion looks like in practice.

This conversion is where the real concern lies. Dana Middle School (a school in the San Diego Unified School District) has a conversion chart that shows the following scale:

  • 4 (A) at 88-100%
  • 3 (B) at 67-87%
  • 2 (C) at 46-66%
  • 1 (D) at 25-45%
  • F below 25%.

When you compare Indianapolis to San Diego, the gap is hard to miss: 70% is a B in that San Diego classroom and a C- in Indianapolis. A 50% is a C in that San Diego classroom and an F in Indianapolis.

Neither district is wrong that letter grades are a crude instrument for measuring what a 13-year-old knows. But at the same time, passing along underprepared students just does the student a disservice. This gets magnified when a student believes they are ready for college, only to find themselves struggling and dropping out with the burden of student loan debt.

The Grade Inflation Problem

ACT research published in 2025 (PDF File) found average adjusted high school GPA climbed from 3.17 for the class of 2017 to 3.38 for the class of 2022. That is 0.21 points in five years, over a stretch when test scores did not follow.

The bigger finding is what inflation does to the signal: two students with identical 2.5 GPAs had predicted first-year college GPAs differing by 0.37 points depending on how inflated their high school was. ACT composite scores held their predictive value across the same range.

A GPA increasingly tells you which school a student attended, not what that student can do, which is part of why test-optional admissions has produced its own measurement gap.

How This Connects

The big issue here is that great inflation is creating a false sense of academic preparedness, which, in turn, is having dire financial consequences after high school graduation.

A grade that overstates academic readiness follows a student into a college, then into remedial coursework that carries full tuition and no degree credit, and into borrowing for a degree that takes five or six years instead of four. Or even worse, dropping out.

With the average cost of college rising more than 2.5% per year, every extra semester is real money. And the worst outcome is leaving college with student loan debt and no credential: the financial hit from dropping out is a loan payment attached to none of the earnings premium.

So is Indianapolis promoting accountability? Partly. Restoring the zero for work never attempted closes a loophole students had clearly learned to use, and the 50% floor for genuine effort keeps the original protection intact for kids who try and struggle. That is a defensible middle.

What it does not fix is the larger issue neither district has solved: a grade that stops meaning the same thing from students around the country. And thats why colleges nationwide are bringing back test requirements for college admissions.

The post Indianapolis Ends Its No-Zero Grading Policy: What It Means for College Readiness appeared first on The College Investor.

Peru’s monetary system would not work in Venezuela



Steve H. Hanke is a Senior Contributing Columnist at Fortune and a Professor of Applied Economics at The Johns Hopkins University. From 1995 to 1996, he was an economic advisor to President Rafael Caldera and is presently Special Adviser on Economic, Monetary, and Energy Affairs in the office of Congressman Antonio Ecarri at the National Assembly of Venezuela. His latest book, co-edited with Francisco Zalles, is La Dolarización en Ecuador: El Triunfo del Orden Espontáneo (2026). Emilio Ocampo is an Argentine economist and historian and professor at Universidad del CEMA (UCEMA) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. He is the co-author of two recent books, Dolarización: Una solución para la Argentina (2022) and Argentina dolarizada (2024).