More economists and traders expect the Bank of Canada to hike interest rates next week after the central bank’s latest surveys showed inflation expectations rising.
Bank of Canada hike bets grow among economists, traders
Apple vs. ASML: Which Tech Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
Should you bet on the world’s most iconic consumer device brand, or the company that builds the machines required to make them? Comparing Apple (AAPL -0.15%) and ASML (ASML +0.34%) reveals two different ways to play the tech sector.
Apple dominates the high-end consumer electronics market through a tightly integrated ecosystem of hardware and services. ASML provides the essential lithography equipment used by every major chip foundry to produce advanced semiconductors. While one interacts directly with billions of users, the other operates as a critical bottleneck in the global technology supply chain.
The case for Apple
Apple generates revenue by selling consumer electronics like the iPhone while growing its services segment. Indirect distribution channels, including third-party cellular network carriers and resellers, account for roughly 60% of total net sales. The company also maintains a licensing arrangement with Alphabet (GOOG +0.96%) (GOOGL +1.05%) to offer search services on its various platforms.
In fiscal 2025, revenue reached nearly $416.2 billion, representing growth of approximately 6.4% over the prior year. Net income was close to $112 billion, yielding a net margin of 26.9%. This reflects a steady increase from the $93.7 billion in net income reported in fiscal 2024.
As of Apple’s September 2025 balance sheet, the company reported a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1.5. This indicates that total debt is 1.5 times shareholder equity. The current ratio of 0.9 suggests liabilities outpace liquid resources, while free cash flow reached roughly $98.8 billion in fiscal 2025.
The case for ASML
ASML manufactures the lithography systems that enable chipmakers to print patterns onto silicon wafers. This equipment is vital for the production of advanced microchips used in everything from smartphones to artificial intelligence hardware. The company operates as a primary supplier to global semiconductor manufacturers and maintains more than 60 locations worldwide.
In fiscal 2025, ASML reported revenue of nearly $36.8 billion, a 15.6% year-over-year increase. Net income for the fiscal year reached $10.8 billion, resulting in a net margin of roughly 29.4%. This performance improved upon the 2024 fiscal year, when the company earned approximately $8.5 billion in net income.
As of ASML’s December 2025 balance sheet, the company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 0.2. The current ratio stands at nearly 1.3, indicating the company has sufficient liquid assets to cover its upcoming liabilities. During fiscal 2025, ASML produced approximately $12.5 billion in free cash flow.
AAPL & ASML: Performance Comparison
AAPL – Apple
$342.94
–0.15% (–$0.52)

ASML – ASML
$1,647.12
+0.34% (+$5.60)
Key Financial Metrics

AAPL – Apple
$342.94
–0.15% (–$0.52)

ASML – ASML
$1,647.12
+0.34% (+$5.60)
Market Cap
$5.0T
52wk Range
$243.42 – $348.15
Gross Margin
48.65%
P/E Ratio
39.31
EPS (TTM)
$8.72
Dividend & Yield
$1.06 (0.31%)
Market Cap
$635B
52wk Range
$946.11 – $1,999.96
Gross Margin
54.33%
P/E Ratio
40.53
EPS (TTM)
$40.60
Dividend & Yield
$9.08 (0.55%)

AAPL – Apple
$342.94
–0.15% (–$0.52)
Market Cap
$5.0T
52wk Range
$243.42 – $348.15
Gross Margin
48.65%
P/E Ratio
39.31
EPS (TTM)
$8.72
Dividend & Yield
$1.06 (0.31%)

ASML – ASML
$1,647.12
+0.34% (+$5.60)
Market Cap
$635B
52wk Range
$946.11 – $1,999.96
Gross Margin
54.33%
P/E Ratio
40.53
EPS (TTM)
$40.60
Dividend & Yield
$9.08 (0.55%)
Risk profile comparison
Apple faces intense global competition in its primary hardware markets, which are characterized by aggressive pricing and rapid technological shifts. The company is currently subject to significant antitrust litigation, including an ongoing 2024 DOJ lawsuit regarding alleged monopolization. Furthermore, a heavy reliance on single-source suppliers in Asia makes the business vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions.
ASML operates in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry, where shifts in demand can lead to volatile spending by chip manufacturers. Because its lithography machines are essential and expensive, any delay in customer orders can significantly impact quarterly results. The company also faces geopolitical risks, as governments may impose export restrictions on advanced technology to certain countries.
Valuation comparison
Apple appears more attractive based on its sales multiple, though both companies trade at similar premiums relative to future earnings estimates.
| Metric | Apple | ASML Holding N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 35.8 | 36.3 |
| P/S ratio | 10.7 | 14.2 |
Valuation metrics include sourcing from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.
The P/S ratio measures a company’s market value against its sales over the past 12 months.
Which stock would I buy in 2026?
Best to say it up front: I’m a longtime Apple shareholder, having bought my first shares in 2012. It’s my best-performing stock, and it’s not even close. So I’m a bit biased here; I obviously already think Apple is a great company, otherwise I wouldn’t still own shares.
I don’t think my investing thesis was particularly sophisticated. If memory serves, it was basically something along the lines of, “Shares look undervalued, seemingly everyone owns an iPhone, and I like my MacBook.” (Warren Buffett, I am not.)
That said, I find ASML’s positioning in the industry extremely appealing. Having a near-monopoly on the machines needed to manufacture the most advanced microchips is a great place to be. Its net margin compares favorably to Apple’s, and its valuation doesn’t seem unreasonable given its strong moat.
Now, turning to the historical data, Apple’s stock has absolutely crushed ASML shares over time:

AAPL data by YCharts
But that leads me to a final, perhaps counterintuitive point that I think is in ASML’s favor. Sure, Apple was a good investment for me in 2012, but we’re talking about 2026. The iPhone maker is one of the biggest companies in the world now, valued in the trillions. How much more growth can we expect Apple to have in the tank? The tech titan also got a new CEO recently, which is likely nothing too worrisome; a ham sandwich can probably run the company at this point. But former CEO Tim Cook presided over the stock’s incredible performance over the past 15 years, so any new person has really big shoes to fill.
This is a long way of saying that, between the two companies, Apple looks closer to a ceiling to me than ASML. Apple’s not going anywhere, to be clear. People will keep buying iPhones and MacBooks, and the company’s “walled garden” strategy will continue to grow and retain users. But I think if you’re looking for growth, ASML looks more attractive. That’s why I’d be more likely to buy shares of ASML here.
The Fine Print Between Landlord and STR Insurance Policies
This article is presented by Proper Insurance.
You bought a short-term rental, told your insurance agent what you were doing at the property, and they sold you a policy. You paid for insurance. But the real question is, what does it cover?
Insurance has a reputation for hiding things in the fine print. That reputation is mostly unfair, as an insurance policy is a contract, and everything it will and will not do at the time of a claim is explained.
Nothing is hidden. You just have to know how to look for it. And the hard part is that many of the words on the policy overview page are familiar enough that they don’t feel like they need translating.
“Rental” feels broad enough to cover any kind of renting. “Premises liability” reads like enough coverage for a guest injury. “Loss of rents” sounds like the income you stand to lose. And “vacancy” sounds like the gap between peak seasons.
Every one of these words is more limited in definition than it reads at a glance because they’re exact on the insurance policy. The contract told you everything upfront. That means it’s on you to understand it.
You signed the policy contract. If it doesn’t work the way you expected, you’re the one who pays for it at the time of a claim.
Here’s what short-term rental insurance actually is, why a landlord policy can’t become a short-term rental policy, and what your insurance contract is actually telling you very clearly right now.
What Is Short-Term Rental Insurance?
Short-term rental insurance is a commercial policy (CP) form built for a furnished property that’s rented out to paying guests on a nightly basis as a business. It contains commercial general liability (CGL) that follows your guests off the property.
You can buy insurance for a short-term rental, but that doesn’t mean you bought short-term rental insurance. While they both get called the same thing, they are not the same policy.
Think of it this way: You’re cooking in the kitchen. You ask your roommate or spouse for a knife. They glance over and see bread on your plate and hand you a butter knife.
That’s what you asked for. They saw what they thought you needed. What they didn’t see was the steak you’re cooking that you actually needed the knife for.
A butter knife and a steak knife are both knives. It’s the same word and drawer but different jobs. A butter knife simply won’t cut through a steak the way a steak knife was designed to.
Circling back, think of insurance the same way. “Short-term rental insurance” is a blanket term used for different policies. One is a policy designed for short-term renting. The other is just being used on a short-term rental.
Both get called the same name. Only one was made for the job.
What Landlord Insurance Is
Landlord insurance is written on a dwelling property (DP) form and built for a home that’s rented out to a tenant on a long-term lease. It was built for a specific setup: A tenant moves in, changes their mailing address, brings their own furniture, and usually carries their own renters insurance policy. As their landlord, you might not see them again until the lease ends.
Renting this way takes little day-to-day work. The form is built and priced around that.
DP insurance forms have existed for more than half a century, and they do that job well. But a short-term rental business asks a different question than the question this insurance form was written to answer. An easy way to think about this: Who cleans the tub?
In a long-term rental, the tenant lives there. They clean their own tub. If they slip on soap scum, that’s on them.
In a short-term rental, guests come and go every few days. You, or someone you hire, are cleaning the tub between every stay. If it’s not clean and a guest slips, that guest can hold you responsible. You’re the one who was supposed to take care of it.
A landlord isn’t in the property enough to carry that risk. And this is just one of many examples of why landlord insurance can carry less comprehensive liability coverage and lower liability limits in general. The exposure is far less.
A short-term rental host accesses the property constantly. Your policy should match the risk of the business you’re actually running.
It’s how a landlord policy ends up being called short-term rental insurance. You tell the carrier that you have a short-term rental, and they write it down on the policy. But that doesn’t change what the policy actually covers. It’s still built for the risks that match a long-term tenant and landlord relationship, not a host with short-term guests.
A carrier can know what you’re doing at the property and note it on the policy, but it’s still written on a dwelling property form. That usually means the carrier won’t deny a typical claim like a tree through the roof just because you run a short-term rental business at the location. It doesn’t mean the insurance form understands or addresses the risk your short-term rental creates. Or that they won’t limit that roof replacement to actual cash value (ACV)…but that’s another conversation.
Comparing Landlord Coverage to Short-Term Rental Risk
Any policy on a rental property has three jobs:
- Covering liability
- Covering the building and what’s in it
- Protecting your income
Compare a landlord policy to how a short-term rental actually runs, and each coverage category is built for a quieter property: less activity, fewer people, and less of your contents in the building.
Liability
Landlord insurance typically includes “premises liability.” It’s designed to cover things that happen on your property.
A short-term rental creates liability that leaves the property all the time. The scenarios are endless:
- You provide kayaks and a paddleboard.
- You put bikes in the garage.
- There’s water access to a lake you don’t own.
- Your guests bring a reactive dog to your property, and it bites a person walking on the sidewalk.
- A guest sets off fireworks in the backyard, and the neighbor’s house catches fire.
You can picture the aftermath: A guest is injured out there, injures someone else, or causes damage to a neighboring property.
Premises liability included in landlord/dwelling policies ends at the property line. Your responsibility as the property owner does not. The risk crosses that line. And the lawsuit
lands in your mailbox.
Being named in a lawsuit is not the same as being at fault. You get named because the guest stayed at your property. Either way, you have to pay to defend yourself. If your policy doesn’t include guest accidents or incidents in the coverage, the legal fees and settlement costs come out of your pocket.
Property and contents
In a long-term rental, the tenant brings their own furniture. Their things are theirs, often insured under their own renters insurance policy. A standard landlord form expects the building to be mostly empty.
When it comes to a short-term rental, the furnishings are often what sets your property apart. You furnished every square foot of your property: the mattresses, the couch, televisions, kitchen, hot tub cover, and decor you spent months finding. All of it is yours, and it’s being used by every group of guests that checks in.
Landlord forms may respond to theft resulting from a break-in—someone forces a door open and empties the house. If a guest with a valid check-in code brings a truck and empties the house, that’s different. You let them in. The same logic applies to destruction: A landlord policy wasn’t built to cover a guest wrecking the place.
Business revenue
Most property owners and investors choose short-term renting over long-term in the first place because it’s far more lucrative. If your property has a covered loss, you’ll want your income coverage to match your business model.
A landlord form carries loss of rents, calculated on fair market rent for comparable properties in the area. The problem is that it values your income like a landlord’s income, because after all, a landlord policy is what you’re holding. It’s based on what a tenant would pay for a year-long lease on a similar house.
If your property makes $12,000 a month but the comparable long-term rental down the street rents for $3,000, that’s what your downtime is worth. During peak season, that gap could get even bigger.
Then there’s the time limit. Loss of rents is typically capped at 12 months. A total loss can take 18 to 24 months to rebuild. After month 12, you’re not only getting less money than you usually make; you’re then getting nothing at all.
What Short-Term Rental Insurance Should Actually Include
Closing these gaps happens at two levels: the form the policy is written on and what that policy actually says.
First, at the form level, short-term rental protection needs to be built on a commercial foundation: commercial property coverage plus commercial general liability.
Second, at the coverage level, it comes down to what the policy actually says. Not the brief outline on the first page, but the terms underneath it—what’s covered, what’s left out, and
what’s limited.
Here’s what you are looking for:
- No exclusion for running a short-term rental business at the property
- No restriction based on granting access to a guest. You hand the keys to a new group of guests each week, and the form has to account for that.
- Contents coverage at replacement cost for everything you furnished, not just the building itself. If the property burns down, your furnishings need to be included too.
- Guest-caused damage coverage, whether it’s an accident or done on purpose
- Commercial general liability that follows your guest off property lines
- Amenity liability that covers what you offer guests, like a pool, hot tub, bicycles, golf cart, canoe, etc.
- Income protection based on what the property actually earns, up to a limit you set, not a set number of months
- Coverage that accounts for risks specific to hosting, like animal and pet liability, liquor liability, communicable disease, and invasion of privacy
That’s the blueprint for true short-term rental insurance: a policy that matches the risk of short-term renting. If a policy does not cover those things, it is not short-term rental insurance, no matter how it is labeled or described.
How to Verify You Have Real Short-Term Rental Insurance Before a Claim
If nobody asked you about it and you didn’t know to mention it either, it probably isn’t covered. Not the hot tub liability, the contents inside your Airbnb property, or what the property actually earns during peak season.
Here are three warning signs your policy isn’t short-term rental insurance:
- It was fast. A real short-term rental policy takes some digging. If you really got a quote in minutes, nobody looked closely at what you actually do.
- It was cheap. A low price usually means the carrier isn’t taking on much risk. Cheap isn’t a deal. It’s a signal that it’s covering far less.
- Nobody asked questions. A real short-term rental policy comes with underwriting.
If no one reviewed your listing, asked about safety features, or inspected the property, they didn’t plan to cover much.
The good news is you don’t have to wait for your policy renewal to start asking questions or switch coverage to a policy designed to handle the risks of short-term renting. If any of that sounds familiar, pull out the policy that currently protects your short-term rental and check for the following:
- The form: This is the policy type: homeowners, dwelling property, or commercial. This single line determines more than anything else on the page.
- The occupancy: Who stays there? Does it describe what you actually do?
- The liability: What liability does it say you have, and what are the exclusions?
- The income: How does it calculate lost income? Loss of use, loss of rents, or loss of income?
Next, send your agent the actual link to your Airbnb or direct booking site. They cannot build a policy around a business they’ve never seen. If you own more than one property, do this for each one. Policies bought at different times through different agents rarely match, so check each policy.
Better yet, you don’t have to sort through all of this on your own. Have a short-term rental insurance specialist read through it with you during a free coverage comparison from Proper Insurance.
The Proper Policy is a unique commercial homeowners policy built for short-term renting:
- It’s written on a commercial form with commercial general liability that follows your guests off the premises.
- It offers replacement cost coverage on the building and your contents inside it.
- It includes guest-caused damage.
- It provides coverage for amenity liability for the kayaks, bikes, pool, and hot tub.
- It provides loss of business revenue coverage based on what your property actually earns, at a limit you set, with no time cap.
The Proper Policy isn’t an add-on to your homeowners or landlord policy—it replaces it entirely. And with it, you gain a dedicated risk manager who will review your current policy against your actual business, virtually walk your property and your listing with you, and show you exactly where your biggest gaps are.
Don’t wait to discover your policy won’t cover a claim the way you thought it would. Start a quote today with Proper Insurance.
AmEx Blue Business Cash Credit Card Review (2026.10 Update: AS HIGH AS $500 Offer)
Non-affiliate disclosure: all information about this card has been collected independently by US Credit Card Guide and has not been reviewed by the issuer.
[2026.10 Update] The new offer is AS HIGH AS $500.
[2023.10 Update] The offer is now $250 ($3,000 spending in 3 months).
[2023.6 Update] The $250 offer (with $3k spending requirement) is expired. The current offer is $500 (with $15k spending requirement).
Application Link
Benefits
- AS HIGH AS $500 offer: Earn $500 after spending $5,000 in first 3 months.
- Earn 2% cashback on the first $50,000 in purchases each year, 1% cashback on purchases thereafter.
- With this card, you can get access to Amex Offer, which usually offers very good discounts at some stores, such as: spend $15 or more and get $5 back at Walmart; spend $75 or more and get $25 back on Amazon.com.
- No annual fee.
- 0 APR for the first 12 months.
Disadvantages
- It has a foreign transaction fee, so it’s not a good choice outside the US.
Recommended Application Time
- You can only get the welcome bonus once in a lifetime, so be sure to apply when the historical highest offer appears.
- AmEx doesn’t care about the number of hard pulls.
- You can try to apply for it when you have a credit history of 6 months.
Only one AmEx credit card can be approved in a day. This rule does not apply to charge cards, you can be approved for one credit card and multiple charge cards in the day.Multiple cards approved in the same day will only have one Hard Pull.- Only 2 AmEx credit cards can be approved within 90 days, but again, this rule does not apply to charge cards.
- You can keep at most 5 AmEx credit cards, not including charge cards.
Summary
This card has similar structure to AmEx Blue Business Plus, but with Plus you earn 2x MR while with this card you earn 2% cashback. Cashback is not as rewarding as MR points. You can also earn 2% cashback with personal credit cards, such as Citi Double Cash or PayPal Cashback Mastercard, with no cap. Therefore personally I do not recommend this card.
Related Credit Cards
After Applying
- Click here to check AmEx application status.
- AmEx reconsideration backdoor number: 877-399-3083. The “real” backdoor number of Amex is well protected. Different from Chase, the representatives from this AmEx reconsideration backdoor number only have the right to help you submit requests.
Historical Offers Chart
Application Link
If you like this post, don’t forget to give it a 5 star rating!
BofA cuts Werner Enterprises stock price target on cost pressures

BofA cuts Werner Enterprises stock price target on cost pressures
B of A: Agency MBS issuances to decline by 16% in 2027
Processing Content
- Key Insight: See why Bank of America expects 2027 agency MBS issuances to drop by 16%.
- What’s at Stake: Whether lenders can survive a grim market while investors benefit from lighter supply.
- Supporting Data: $1.12 trillion in projected gross MBS volume for 2027.
Agency securitization issuances are predicted to decline by 16% in 2027 on weaker home sales and more all-cash transactions due to persistently high mortgage rates, the latest Bank of America Securities weekly report said.
Gross MBS volume for next year of $1.12 trillion compares with B of A’s latest forecast of $1.33 trillion during 2026, a slight upward revision from the previous prediction of $1.32 trillion for this year.
Its forecast is based on expectations that the 10-year Treasury yield will average 5.25%. Between Sept. 25 and Oct. 14, this had been close to or above this mark. But thanks to a rally at the end of the week, on Monday morning it opened at 5.09%.
Other inputs into the 2027 forecast included a 2.5% drop in existing home sales, a 0.5% gain in new home sales and 1% annual home price appreciation.
How B of A 2027 outlook compares with Fannie and MBA
Fannie Mae just reduced its
But the B of A analysts are more bearish for next year, and are now predicting $1.72 trillion of 2027 volume.
“We believe our numbers reflect our slightly more conservative view on housing and home sales and a marginally higher projected year-end rate level,” the report said.
B of A prediction for total originations in 2026 is also slightly under both MBA and Fannie Mae’s predictions, at $2.03 trillion.
A “grim” MBA Annual
“Light expected issuance was a theme at the MBA annual conference, where the tone from lenders was grim, but the light supply should be a positive technical for investors,” said the report, which lists Jeana Curro as the lead analyst.
As for the 10-year, the analysts remain “secular bears,” but the rally could bring yields to levels between 4.92% and 5.02%, “or potentially deeper but not to fall below 4.74%.”
The conforming 30-year fixed rate mortgage averaged 7.458% at its most recent high point, on Oct. 4, according to data from Optimal Blue. Since then, the rate — except for Oct. 14, the day
Why net issuance will decline
B of A also predicted a 23% drop off in net issuance (takes into account mortgage pay downs, prepayments and pay-offs) in 2027. This is “driven primarily by
“These headwinds are expected to be partially offset by a modest increase in cash-out refinance activity and
The amount of agency-eligible investor loans going into non-agency issuances has grown since 2023, from $1.5 trillion to $10.1 trillion for last year and $12.4 trillion so far in 2026.
The 2026 total does not include $5.3 trillion of agency conforming loans which went into private-label securities, up from $2.7 trillion in 2025.
“We expect this strength to continue in to 2027, and estimate the corresponding reduction in Agency MBS net issuance at $25 billion,” the report said.
A hold-out expecting an October FOMC hike
The B of A economists are also maintaining their prediction that the Federal Open Market Committee will raise short-term rates in October, but added it is “a close call,” as the markets gave it a 25% probability when the report was written on Oct. 16.
On Monday morning, probabilities as measured by CME FedWatch were nearly 83% for no action and just 17.2% for a 25 basis point increase in the target.
This being said, the likelihood of a December hike was over 90%, CME FedWatch said.
Ex–OpenAI engineer accused of bugging office stays in jail as prosecutors allege Saudi ties
A federal judge on Monday ordered a former OpenAI engineer accused of bugging an executive conference room to stay in jail, after questioning whether a $1 million bond the Saudi government offered to guarantee would bring him back if he fled.
Abdulrahman Alfozan, the 35-year-old former OpenAI engineer, appeared in court today wearing an orange jumpsuit and white face mask while escorted by two U.S. marshals. He will remain in federal custody until his next court date, a preliminary hearing on Nov. 6. He has been in jail since the FBI arrested him on Oct. 9, alleging he planted the device in a conference room where executives, and sometimes government officials, discussed sensitive information, on Sept. 28.
Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse said a $1 million bond had to be weighed against the possibility that Alfozan “potentially has access to much greater wealth.”
“Once he leaves, there’s no getting him back, and that’s why this is a bigger case,” Tse said in the courtroom Monday morning.
OpenAI terminated Alfozan’s employment on Oct. 9, although Alfozan’s lawyer said Monday in court the company never formally told him that. However, per his defense motion, he was told before his arrest that he had been placed on administrative leave. Tse noted that OpenAI would not have fired him if it had no concern about what it found.
Fortune was in the San Francisco courtroom for the hearing, as were about 60 others, including a group of high school students who had come to witness a case involving one of the most prominent companies in the world.
Ahead of the court hearing Monday, both prosecutors for the federal government and the defense, Alfozan’s attorney William Pernik, filed court documents revealing new details about the case. Alfozan sought release from federal custody, with supervision, such as an ankle monitor, while the U.S. argued there was reason to believe he would leave the country and that he posed a danger to the community and to U.S. national security.
Alfozan faces one count of using or attempting to use a device to intercept oral communications, which carries a maximum of five years in prison. He was charged by criminal complaint and has not been indicted or entered a plea. The complaint does not charge him with espionage, theft of trade secrets, or acting as an agent of a foreign government, a point his defense stressed in its motion. OpenAI has said it has “no indications” that he inappropriately accessed or took model weights, source code, or customer data.
The filings reveal far more than has been known to date about Alfozan and some of the most controversial details of the case, including why Alfozan had a one-way flight booked to Saudi Arabia three days after his arrest. Alfozan’s lawyer said he is a citizen of Saudi Arabia, although he has been in the U.S. for 15 years; got his green card in 2020; and joined OpenAI in 2025.
A one-way ticket to Saudi Arabia and potential plans to move back
Alfozan booked the flight to Saudi Arabia on Sept. 13, according to the defense motion, along with his wife, also a Saudi national, and 3-month-old baby. The economy fare for all three cost $1,897.59 and could be changed for a $180 fee, the defense said, adding this wasn’t unusual for its client: Alfozan often books one-way tickets to allow for scheduling flexibility around his work schedule, the defense motion says. In fact, 70% (96 of 138) of the airline bookings “in his email since January 2021 were one-way tickets.” His naturalization application lists 25 trips abroad between 2020 and 2025, 20 of which included Saudi Arabia, and he returned from every one, according to the defense.
As for the date of Oct. 12, Alfozan booked it for then because that’s the day his wife’s 60-day grace period ended after her work permit in the U.S. expired on Aug. 13. Since giving birth, she has “struggled with postpartum depression and anxiety,” the defense motion says. Alfozan filed for paternity leave from OpenAI, set for Oct. 19 to Dec. 20, after which he planned to return to the Bay Area and his role at OpenAI.
After Alfozan’s arrest, his wife allegedly told authorities that she and their baby intended to permanently move to Saudi Arabia, according to the court filing. She told them her husband intended to move there at some point to be with them, but for now, was spending two months of his paternity leave in the country before returning to the U.S. In court Monday, however, the defense said she now plans to return to the U.S. on a temporary, short-term B-1 visa. The defense also said she left the U.S. rather than overstay her visa.
That is consistent with a letter one of Alfozan’s friends submitted for the defense motion, in which the friend says he spoke to Alfozan about his plan to continue working in the U.S. and supporting his wife and baby when they returned to Saudi Arabia.
As further evidence of Alfozan’s intent to return to the U.S., his lawyer notes that on Sept. 26, two days before he allegedly planted the device, Alfozan registered to attend the Consumer Electronics Show (CES), a convention in Las Vegas scheduled for early January 2027.
In court, Pernik argued that Alfozan stayed in the country for about eight to 10 days after OpenAI confronted him. “If he really were an agent of a foreign government … why wouldn’t he just leave right away?” Pernik said in court.
Evidence found on his iPhone
The U.S. filing also reveals the results of a federal search of Alfozan’s home and cell phone. They found “several electronic components similar” to the recording device Alfozan allegedly installed behind a TV in the conference room, and a second one OpenAI security staff found in his bag.
On Alfozan’s iPhone were several photographs, dated from Sept. 22 to Sept. 28, 2026, of another recording device. Other photos showed what appeared to be the input and output panels on televisions and other devices in “various locations in OpenAI buildings” including another conference room where “sensitive meetings” frequently occurred, according to the filing. This suggested Alfozan “had done reconnaissance at OpenAI to determine where he might install additional devices,” the U.S. filing says.
Also on Alfozan’s iPhone was a note he had deleted from September 2026, which had links to different recording devices, including ones made by Seeed Studio, the type of device Alfozan allegedly put in the conference room and which had been found at his residence.
Two other notes stood out. One titled “Riyadh tasks,” last modified Sept. 13—the day he booked the flight—listed finding an apartment and a job for his wife and getting a Saudi passport for his son. Another, titled “OpenAI leave” and last modified Oct. 7, suggested he planned an “early … pick up” of the devices and extending his leave “to full,” according to the U.S. filing. His wife also told FBI agents she had seen her ChatGPT account open on her husband’s laptop, the filing says.
In court, Pernik disputed the government’s account of the room. “This was an open room where anyone could walk in,” he said, adding that Alfozan held meetings and led teams there. The complaint, however, says Alfozan had no authority to enter the room or take part in meetings there.
“OpenAI encouraged Mr. Alfozan to be involved with Saudi Arabia,” Pernik said.
Prosecutors said in court they don’t know what information Alfozan may have tried to take out of OpenAI and the U.S. “That is the concern, that something is going to leave OpenAI and the U.S., and quite frankly we don’t even know what that is,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nick Parker said.
The court filings also reveal Alfozan’s browser history, which allegedly shows he accessed a folder called “Saudi Gov Docs” on Oct. 4, 2026. Between July 6 and Sept. 21, 2026, he queried an internal OpenAI productivity tool about which OpenAI staff could be suitable to attend a high-level informal meeting with ministers in Saudi Arabia, and about planned OpenAI visits to Saudi Arabia. He also asked the tool on Sept. 7 who at OpenAI might be likely to attend a meeting with the Saudi state–backed AI company Humain and the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) of Saudi Arabia.
He asked the tool about matters related to MCIT again on Sept. 8, such as an upcoming Saudi MCIT visit on Sept. 9, as well as on Sept. 21. Alfozan’s base salary at OpenAI was $385,000, (up from $325,000 when he was hired) plus a $2.2 million new-hire equity grant.
“OpenAI encouraged Mr. Alfozan to be involved with Saudi Arabia,” Pernik said in court.
Returning to Saudi Arabia
Alfozan’s wife and child left the U.S. within 36 hours of his arrest. They did not take the originally planned Oct. 12 flight. Instead, the Saudi government first booked and paid for another one-way ticket for her and their son to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on Oct. 11. However, they also did not take that flight, but rather left a day earlier on Oct. 10 on another business class flight to Qatar booked and paid for by a member of the Saudi military, court documents say.
In court Monday, the defense specified that Alfozan’s brother-in-law (his wife’s sister’s husband) booked the flight. He works in the Saudi government, and paid for the flight with his own money.
The Saudi Consulate General in Los Angeles said in an Oct. 14 letter, filed with the defense motion, that it stands ready to cover the full amount of any bail bond the court requires. It also told Pretrial Services in writing that it “will not issue any travel documents” to Alfozan while he is on release. In court, Pernik said the Saudi government was willing to guarantee $1 million, “giving their full faith and credit,” and would notify the State Department. Tse asked whether the offer amounted to Saudi Arabia keeping him in the U.S. so it wouldn’t lose its money. Pernik said the relationship mattered more than the $1 million.
Alfozan was “in frequent communication via WhatsApp with a member of the Saudi Royal Family,” the U.S. alleges in its motion. The unnamed royal allegedly tried to recruit Alfozan for an AI initiative being launched in Saudi Arabia, and asked Alfozan when he would leave OpenAI. Alfozan allegedly said he wouldn’t leave until his stock vested, the government’s detention memo read.
Alfozan communicated with the unnamed royal as recently as Oct. 5, 2026, court documents say. In May 2026, the royal told Alfozan, “Saudi needs you more then [sic] the US!” Alfozan responded, “100,” indicating agreement.
Alfozan had applied in July to a program for young Saudi Arabian leaders, the Misk Foundation’s 2030 Leaders program, according to the U.S. filing. He had proceeded to the second stage of the process, and checked the status of his application, as recently as Sept. 4, filings say. The program would have required him to take part in person in Riyadh, the filing says.
At the same time, Alfozan was on the “verge” of getting U.S. citizenship, the defense motion says. A day after OpenAI found the device, on Oct. 1, 2026, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services notified him that his citizenship interview was set for Nov. 6, 2026. This was “a long-held dream for the Alfozan family, as it is for so many immigrants,” reads the defense motion. That interview has since been postponed because of the case, and his next court date is set for Nov. 6, the date of the originally scheduled interview. The defense also told the court that Alfozan had worked and paid taxes in the U.S. for years, and had disclosed even traffic tickets on his citizenship application.
“His plan was always to return to the Bay Area, where his home, his career, and his community are,” the defense motion says. “The evidence shows that Mr. Alfozan planned to accompany his wife and son to Saudi Arabia for his paternity leave and then return.”
Accelerating Agentic AI in Production to Drive Measurable Outcomes
Skip to content
[INTERVIEW] Skip and Instacart Delivery Partnership

Today, we welcome Paul Sudarasn from Skip who will share with us the details of the new partnership with Instacart. Thank you for answering our questions Paul and looking forward to how this partnership will continue to evolve. 1) Please…
The post [INTERVIEW] Skip and Instacart Delivery Partnership appeared first on Pointshogger.
