Lessons on leadership and strategic discipline from Tim Cook’s 15-year tenure as Apple’s CEO.
Lessons on leadership and strategic discipline from Tim Cook’s 15-year tenure as Apple’s CEO.
Start investing with bonuses below ⤵️
► See what I invest in & FREE stock with Public:
► Claim another free stock with Robinhood:
► Up to 12 free stocks with WeBull:
———-
None of this is meant to be construed as investment advice, it’s for entertainment purposes only. Links above include affiliate commission or referrals. I’m part of an affiliate network and I receive compensation from partnering websites. The video is accurate as of the posting date but may not be accurate in the future.
source
SoundHound (SOUN +0.38%) may have just unlocked a much bigger path to scale, but is the market convinced? This is what makes this story so interesting right now, because if execution improves, the upside case could look a lot stronger from here.
Stock prices used were the market prices of April 17, 2026. The video was published on April 21, 2026.
Rick Orford has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends SoundHound AI. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rick Orford is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through their link, they will earn some extra money that supports their channel. Their opinions remain their own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.
This is the worst real estate investing advice I’ve ever heard—and I KEEP hearing it. If you go on to any “real estate investing” TikTok page, they say the same thing: use other people’s money, wait for the crash, interest rates will go down…and that’s not even the worst of the advice.
This type of real estate advice will make investors broke, put them in riskier positions, and stop them from retiring (early) with rental properties. I should know, I became financially free in just over a decade of real estate investing, and I didn’t follow ANY of the advice I’ll mention in today’s episode.
If you’re about to buy a property with negative cash flow or skip small rentals and go right to the big buildings (multifamily), do not skip this video. Following any of this so-called investing “advice” could push you back ten, twenty, or thirty years from financial freedom, while the rest of the real investors hit their early retirement in just a decade.
Dave Meyer:
Do you want to know why most of the real estate investing advice you hear on the internet will actually lose you money? I’ve analyzed thousands of real estate deals. I’ve bought dozens of properties. Now I’m going to share with you 10 pieces of advice that might sound good on TikTok, but are actually holding you back. More importantly, I’m going to share with you why people keep repeating them, even though they’re wrong. Some of this advice, it actually comes from people who haven’t bought a deal in years, but they keep posting because fear and negativity get clicks. I closed the deal last month, and so in this video, I’m going to break down each piece of bad advice, showing you the actual data and sharing what you should be doing with your portfolio instead. Let’s start with the worst one, and this one might surprise you because some of the so- called experts constantly repeat this.
The number one worst piece of advice that I hear about real estate right now is that it takes too long to reach financial freedom with real estate. Or you may even hear this said as real estate is dead or you can’t make real estate work anymore. And I just got to get out front of this and say that this is absolute nonsense. I have done the math. I’ve actually built financial models. You can go and download them for free on biggerpockets.com/resources. Go check them out. I have a financial freedom calculator there. And what it shows is that if you save 20% of your disposable income and you invest that consistently in real estate for eight to 12 years, you can completely replace your income and that is not doing anything fancy. You can get it down to five years if you’re super aggressive with it.
But even just buying on market regular stuff right now that gets a modest cash on cash return, if you do that consistently for 10 to 12 years, you can achieve financial freedom through real estate. So I don’t want to hear that it’s impossible to achieve financial freedom through real estate. That is complete nonsense. I think what people are really saying here is that real estate is not a get rich quick scheme. And that is true. I 100% agree with that because if you are trying to achieve financial freedom in two years or three years or four years, it might not work. It probably won’t work through real estate, but that is normal. Real estate investing is a long game and financial freedom is a long game. If you think that you can build enduring wealth, sustainable wealth in two or three years, you can’t. Even people who made a ton of money in Bitcoin, that has gone back down.
Real estate is slow for a reason because it is deliberate, because it is predictable, because it is consistent. That is why real estate is such a great way to achieve financial freedom. Even if it does take you that seven, eight to 12 years, depending on how aggressive you want to be. So don’t tell me that you can’t achieve financial freedom through real estate because you can. I’ve done it. I’ve seen plenty of other people do it. And even in this market, it still works. So that’s the number one worst advice. The second piece of advice that I absolutely hate is that you cannot scale with residential real estate. You hear this all the time. I’m even going to call out Grant Cardone. He talks about this all the time, how it’s a waste of time to invest in residential real estate or that your primary residence isn’t an investment and that you have to get to multifamilies.
That’s the only way to scale. And maybe if you’re trying to be a billionaire, that could be true. But I think for most people who listen to this podcast, and certainly for me, what I’m trying to do is live a comfortable life with a relatively small portfolio. To me, the ultimate flex is to reach your financial freedom number with as few units as possible. Let’s just speculate here. Think about this. If you bought 10 single family homes, let’s make this easy. And you paid them off over the next 10, 15 years, right? Average single family rent in the United States right now is about 2,500 bucks. So you buy 10 of those, you’re getting $250,000 in tax advantaged cashflow. When you think about the tax advantages, that’s more than having a $300,000 salary. So don’t tell me you can’t scale with residential real estate. That’s a small example.
That is an achievable goal for people who are aggressive about this. It really comes down to your own goal. It really frustrates me when people say there’s only one way to grow. You have to get into multifamily. You have to get into senior living. You have to get into self-storage. Are those good strategies? Yeah, for certain people they are, but that is not the only way to scale in real estate. A lot of my friends who are highly successful make tons of money, make millions of dollars a year, have done it entirely on residential real estate. The people who are telling you that you can’t scale with residential real estate probably want you to buy something. So I am here to tell you that is bad advice. If you want to just stick with boring old residential real estate because it is safer and is more predictable and it still offers great returns, you can and absolutely should do that.
All right, so that’s bad advice. Number two, moving on to number three. This is one I hear a lot, especially over the last couple of years. The piece of advice I hate is negative cashflow is worth it for the right house. Now I know this is a big debate in real estate. What’s more important? Cash flow or appreciation. I do not buy properties that do not cashflow. Negative cashflow is the one thing that can force you to sell your property before you want to. That’s maybe the worst case scenario that you have as a real estate investor because even the people who bought in 2007, if they held on and they had cashflow, they were still making money from 2007 to 2015 until their property price rebounded. They were still getting tax benefits. They were still getting cash flow. And because they had cashflow, they could pay their bills, they could pay their mortgage, they were never under any immediate stress.
And then they got to enjoy those massive gains in property values and appreciation that we got from 2013 to 2023, depending on where you live. I am not saying that cashflow is going to make you wealthy overnight. What I am saying is that it is a requirement to make sure that you are not taking on more risk than is necessary. If you go out and buy something just because it’s going to appreciate, maybe you will appreciate, maybe it doesn’t, but that’s a way that you can absolutely get burned. And I hear people pointing to this saying, “Oh, this market in California or in Texas or in Florida, it’s appreciated on average 7%, 8% per year over the last five years.” Yeah, that was a unique time. I don’t think we’re getting to that appreciation. And even if we do, it’s still speculation. But personally, I think appreciation’s going to be muted for the next couple of years.
And that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t buy real estate, but it does mean you need cashflow to hold on, to buy great assets during this time when appreciate is slow. And then when appreciation picks up, which honestly no one knows when is going to happen. Is it next year? Is it three years? Is it five years? You’re in the game when that appreciation pop happens and that’s how you really build wealth, but you need cash flow to get there. Do not speculate unless you’re already wealthy. So that’s number three. Negative cashflow is not worth it for the right house unless you’re super rich.
The fourth piece of bad advice is people saying that you need to get to 50 doors to achieve financial freedom. Or honestly, really, this is people saying you need to get to any specific number of doors to reach your goals because door count is just a terrible metric. I already talked about scaling with residential real estate. You can build a great portfolio with five units, 10 units, 20 units. Personally, I am reconstructing my portfolio right now because I would love to get to like 15 to 20 to mostly paid off units because that could more than fund my lifestyle. I don’t need more than that, right? Now, could I go out today and buy hundreds of units? Literally I could. I have that financial capability to go out and buy hundreds of units, but I’m not going to do that because that would be optimizing for the wrong metric.
If you say, “I want to go and buy a hundred units,” fine, but why? You want a hundred units that give you a hundred bucks a month in cashflow? That’s 10,000 bucks a month. You want to manage a hundred units for 10,000 bucks a month? I could go out and buy four single family homes for cash and get the same amount of cash flow, maybe even better. Do you know how much less work that is? Do you know how much less maintenance cost that is? Do you know how much less headache it is having four paid off units than a hundred units that only get you a hundred bucks a month in cash flow? Most people don’t say, “Hey, I want to be a real estate investor because I have a dream of owning a hundred units.” They say, “I want time with my family.
I want to work less. I want more flexibility in my life.” And if you are optimizing for door count, there is a very good chance you are not actually optimizing for the things that you want. You are just doing it for vanity. It’s just ego. I’m sorry, just saying that you want a hundred units or you have a hundred units, people do that for ego. Be better than that. Think about what you actually want. What are the reasons you got into real estate and optimize for that? And honestly, nine times out of 10, you’ll probably find out that getting a smaller portfolio with more efficient units, more efficient use of your capital and time, that’s going to go further for you than door count. All right. Number five, terrible advice that people are giving out right now is to wait for the housing market to crash.
If you know anything about me, if you follow me on social media, you see that I spend a lot of my time trying to dispel this crash narrative. I want to just say right here, right now, that crashes in the real estate market are extremely rare. I’ve spent, I don’t even know, thousands of hours looking into this. And I will tell you that there has been exactly one housing market crash since the Great Depression that was in 2007 and 2008. And it is totally understandable that people who lived through that expect that or think that a crash could happen again. And I am not saying that a crash will not happen again. I would never say that. I am an analyst. My whole purpose is to think in probabilities, and there is a chance that the housing market would crash. There are scenarios that I could see happening where the housing market crashes.
But is that a likely scenario right now? No, it is not a likely scenario right now. If you can get into the housing market and just ride normal appreciation, the normal trajectory of the housing market, that’s great. Sometimes you will buy a little high. Other times you will buy a little low, but if you keep buying at regular intervals, by definition, you are going to over time achieve that average and that average is good enough. Now I understand the impulse to say, I’m just only going to buy when it’s low, but no one knows when it’s low, literally since I’ve been a real estate investor, 16 years. Every single year, a very famous, a very prominent, a very reputable person has said the housing market’s going to crash. In 2014, really popular influencers, Robert Kiyosaki was saying that the housing market was going to crash.
I have seen other influencers say this every single year for the last 15 years, no one knows if it’s going to happen or when it’s going to happen. And if you think about all the people who said in 2015, “Oh, prices have been going up for four or five years, there’s going to be a crash.” Think about, you just missed the biggest bull market in the history of the housing market. How much wealth did you lose because of that? If you’re just sitting around waiting, you think you’re going to be spending every day analyzing the housing market and say, “You know what? I’ve figured out when the bottom is. ” Unlike every other housing market analyst who’s spending all of their time on this, I, as a casual observer of real estate who have never bought a home, never bought a real estate property, I know when the bottom is.
No, you don’t. I don’t even know. So the cost of waiting often exceeds the cost of getting in and maybe buying a little high, even if your property goes down one to 2% per year. This is the same thing with stocks, right? If you talk to any financial planner, they say, “Don’t try to time the market. Just get in the market as long as possible.” The same thing is true in real estate. I am not saying you should go out and buy anything. There is a lot of stuff on the market that is overpriced right now, but if you have a genuine understanding of market value, if you can do the things that we talk about on this channel all the time, like buying below current market comps, doing value add investing, getting cash flow, you can absolutely still make money right now, even if the market goes down next year.
That’s a paper loss. You can absolutely still make this work. Waiting has costs and you’re better off getting in and learning and allowing your investment to compound over time. That’s how you really make money in real estate. The number six piece of terrible advice is you should go out and use other people’s money. The best way to get into real estate is to figure out a way to get your own first deal. Now, if you need to partner on that, that’s a different story. If you can go out and raise some money from friends and family, you can raise a little bit of money, that’s the kind of other people’s money that I do think makes sense. That can really help in the beginning. But I would much rather all of you go out and save money for a couple years and put 3.5% down in house hack, then go out and try and raise money from sophisticated investors, from other people who are doing deals.
It’s just not going to work. I know that people say that this is going to work, but it’s not. Everyone I know who raises money for deals does it primarily from people that they actually know. In the beginning, it is friends and family. And over time, as you become a reliable investor with a track record, then you can expand out and raise money from other people. But getting into real estate, buy raising money from other investors that you do not know is not realistic. I’m sorry. Maybe it happens one out of a hundred times, but this is bad advice. Better advice. Get your financial house in order. Earn more money than you spend. Put that money away. And even if that takes you a year, I would rather you take a year of getting your financial house in order and going out and buying a property than spending all of your time naively trying to raise money from people you don’t know who are probably never going to give you a dime.
So go out and get experience first. Become a great investor. Do that with your own money. Do that with friends and family money. And if you can do that, raising other people’s money will be possible, but you can’t shortcut. You can’t skip the line. You have to build up that credibility before anyone else is going to fund your deals. All right, let’s move on to number seven. Oh, man. I hate this advice. God, this is maybe the worst advice that has popped up over the last couple of years. And I feel vindicated by this. The advice is date the rate, marry the house. I know you all have heard this one. So many people have been saying this for years, and as soon as this started popping up in 2023, as soon as interest rates started going up and people were saying, “Yeah, rates are going to go down and you can refight.” I have to say, I have been right about this.
I’ve been saying for three straight years, this is awful advice because rates might not go down. Yeah, they’ve come down a little bit. They’re not at 8%, but they’re at 6.5%. I promise you, every single person who is out there saying, “Date the rate, marry the house, was promising you that we’d have 5% mortgages right now or 4% mortgages right now.” And that hasn’t happened. And even if it did happen, it’s still bad advice. Going out and buying a house or a property, an investment property, assuming that the rate is going to go down is just, it’s speculation. It’s the same thing that we talked about earlier with negative cash flow. Why would you do that to yourself? You’re better off being patient and disciplined than going out and doing that. If you are analyzing deals based on the numbers you have today and they eventually get better, great.
Cool. But the whole key here is that you have to analyze them based on what you know. What are rents today? What are expenses today? What are rates today? If they get better, great, but you don’t know that’s going to happen. So the only thing you can do as an investor, the best thing you can do to be a good investor is to assume that rates aren’t going to change and be very disciplined in your underwriting, making that assumption that rates are staying what they are and that the rate you get today is the one that you’re going to stick with. That is how you build long-term wealth, right? That’s how you don’t take on extra risk that you don’t have to take and instead build a rock solid portfolio that can withstand any market conditions.
All right, that was number seven. Let’s move on to number eight. Terrible advice. Get into real estate for passive income. This is a hot topic that I hear a lot, but people say, “I own rental properties. It’s passive income.” There is some truth to it. Real estate is probably more passive than a W2 job, but is it truly passive income? No. Real estate takes work. I actually think that real estate investing itself, calling this business that I am in, that you’re trying to get into, that you’re in, real estate investing is a little bit of a misnomer. It is entrepreneurship. You are starting a small business. How involved you need to be in that business is variable. There’s a spectrum, right? Some on one end, you could be in it a lot. You’re flipping houses. That’s a lot of work. You’re wholesaling, that’s a lot of work.
You’re self-managing 10 plus rentals. That’s a lot of work. Still worth it, 100% still worth it. And over time, you can probably get more passive. But for most people, getting into real estate, you’re going to have to hustle in the beginning. And then as you get five, 10, 15 years into your investing career, you could be a lot more passive. Not saying it takes 40 hours a week. For me, it didn’t. Even in the most busy parts of my real estate investing career, 10, 15 hours a week at most, that’s when I was self-managing properties. I still did this when I was in grad school and working a full-time job at the same time. You absolutely can do this. It is not a full-time job unless you want to be a flipper or a wholesaler or developer, but it does take work. So you need to decide if you want to be in this industry, are you willing to put in that effort?
For me, I can tell you from experience, me, my personality, my goals, 100% worth it, absolutely worth every single minute of it, but you have to make that decision for yourself because it’s not truly passive. Let’s move on to terrible advice, number nine, which is X strategy is dead. And by X, I mean, anytime someone says a strategy is dead, they’re wrong. I hear a lot of people say short-term rentals are dead. I hear people say that the Burr is dead. I hear people say that rental properties is dead. This is just not true. If maybe you’re looking for just absolute easy returns, you don’t have to think you don’t have to do anything. Yeah, maybe it’s dead. Can you just go out and do a perfect Burr without putting in a lot of effort right now? No. Does that mean Burr is a bad strategy?
Absolutely not. I personally have been pretty critical of short-term rental investing over the last couple of years. I’ve been saying the last three or four years that I think it’s oversaturated, that returns are going to go down, and that only the best operators are going to do well. And that is the key difference in what I am saying, and I think what you hear a lot out there. Short-term rentals aren’t dead. You just need to be very good at it to make money. And you know what? That is normal for every single business. If you think you can go out and open a mediocre restaurant and you’re going to kill it, why are you an entrepreneur? You have to try and be good at the things that you’re doing. So anytime you hear someone say, “Short-term rentals are dead,” they’re wrong. What they mean is you need to be good at short-term rentals to make money.
And it’s true if you’re not committed to being good at that strategy, don’t do it. It’s not going to make you money. If you’re not committed to be good at Burr or good at flipping, maybe it is dead to you. But every single real estate investing strategy makes money. I see people making money on flips right now. I see people making money. Burrs. I know people making tons of money on short-term rentals right now because they’re good at it. So these blanket statements that any strategy or approach to real estate investing are dead, it’s just bad advice. All right. Number 10, bad advice that I hear. It’s our last one today, and it is quit your job and go all in on real estate. A lot of my friends, full-time real estate investors, that’s great, but the idea that you need to quit your job, and that is a prerequisite for being successful in real estate is just complete nonsense.
I have taken a completely different approach to real estate, and I know a lot of people have. I have worked a W2 job because that provides me stability. It gives me healthcare. It gives me an income that exceeds my living expenses so I can save money and put it into my real estate portfolio. It allows me to be patient in real estate because if I don’t do a deal this month, if I don’t do a deal next month, if I don’t do a deal this year, I’m fine. It doesn’t matter to me because I have an income. It allows me to be opportunistic. I don’t have to take on excessive risk because I’m not that thirsty. If you have a job that you like or have a job that allows you some level of disposable income, that is such an advantage in real estate. You are going to be more lendable.
It is so much easier to get a mortgage if you have a W2 job instead of flipping houses. That’s just true. You’re going to be more lendable. It allows you to take more risks. At the same time, it allows you to be more patient. There are so many advantages to this. So I’m not saying you shouldn’t quit and go all in, but I am saying that it is not a prerequisite and everyone should be thinking about this for themselves. And so don’t get caught up in this bad advice that you have to quit your job to get into real estate. All right. Those are the 10 worst pieces of advice that I hear right now. And just as a recap, number one, takes too long to reach financial freedom with real estate. No. Number two, can’t scale with residential real estate. I’ve seen literally hundreds, if not thousands of examples that are contrary to this.
Don’t listen to this. Number three, negative cash flow is worth it for the right house. Disagree. Do not speculate. It’s not worth it. Number four, you need to get 50 doors to achieve financial freedom. Absolutely nonsense. Optimizing for door count is optimizing for the wrong thing. Don’t scale for scaling’s sake. Number five is waiting for the crash. No one knows when it’s going to happen and there is an opportunity cost for waiting. Do not forget that. Number six, go out and raise money from private investors. Where are these people? I don’t know. If you can raise money from friends and family, go do it, but do not waste your time thinking that you are going to go walk up to a sophisticated investor and pry money away from them before you have experience. Not going to happen. Number seven, date the rate, marry the house.
Hopefully everyone has seen that this is bad advice. Do not underwrite your deals with anything other than the rate that a lender has quoted you in the last couple of weeks. Number eight, do real estate for passive income. Real estate is not passive. It does take work more passive than a full-time job. It’s faster than working for 45 years for a shaky retirement. I promise you that, but you’re going to have to put some work into it and it’s well worth it. Number nine, X strategy is dead. Don’t listen to anyone who says short-term rental strategies are dead or burr is dead. They probably are trying to get you to buy some course on the strategy that they’ve just pivoted to two months ago. Number 10, bad advice. You got to quit your job and go all in. If that’s you and you want to do it, go for it.
Best of luck to you. It works for a lot of people, but it is absolutely not a prerequisite for being successful in real estate. So those are the 10 pieces of advice I hate. What do you hate? What is the worst real estate investing advice you’re hearing right now? Drop them in the comments I would love to know. Thanks so much for watching this video. I’m Dave Meyer. I’ll see you next time.
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].
Update 4/23/26: Available again for 2026. Starts May 1, 2026.
Direct link to offer (for parents) | (homeschool)
Cool way to encourage kids to read. Obviously you don’t want your kids to eat unhealthy food to often, but this makes a perfect free treat and gets them excited to read at the same time. As always more free food deals can be found by clicking here.
Folks have been debating so-called “mortgage rate lock-in” for years now.
It’s also known as the golden handcuffs of an ultra-low interest rate that make it difficult to move.
On the one hand, you’ve got this well-below-market mortgage rate and corresponding cheap housing payment.
On the other hand, it makes it hard to give up that rate if/when you sell, so you stay put, even if you don’t want to.
Now there’s a new program where you get a carrot; a principal reduction if you surrender that sweet rate.
Imagine you’ve got this 2.75% 30-year fixed mortgage you took out in 2021. It’s still got a balance of $500,000 and your payment is spectacularly low.
You’ve wanted to move because your family is growing, or simply because you don’t like your home anymore. Perhaps there’s a job opportunity in a different city.
Problem is today’s mortgage rates look quite a bit different. If you sell and lose that 2.75% fixed rate, you might be looking at a 6.50% rate instead. Ouch!
This is a real dilemma countless existing homeowners face due to the ZIRP era, followed by a series of Fed rate hikes and surging bond yields, driven by inflation.
Just look at the chart above from the FHFA’s National Mortgage Database (NMDB). Roughly two-thirds of California homeowners have a mortgage rate of 3.99% or below!
Sure, they can probably sell for a pretty penny relative to what they paid, but the replacement home is likely super expensive too.
We’ve seen both home prices and mortgage rates rise in tandem, to the disbelief of many who think there’s an inverse relationship.

Enter the DREAM program from a fintech company called Takara.
It stands for Discount for Real Estate Affordability and Mobility, and as the name implies, provides a deal to existing home sellers who are willing to sell.
Not only is mortgage rate lock-in a problem for owners, it also means there’s less for-sale inventory for prospective home buyers.
So this gets the housing market moving again, hopefully, by eliminating the “penalty” of giving up a super low mortgage rate.
The way it works is relatively straightforward. The lender offers the borrower a discount if they sell and repay the loan early.
While you always hear that myth that the banks don’t want you to pay off your mortgage early, it couldn’t be further from the truth for the 2020-2021-era mortgages.
Those are sitting on a bank’s balance sheet somewhere, driving them crazy while prevailing markets are in some cases more than double that.
And if they remain there for another 25 years, it’s going to be very painful for the investors.
To alleviate that, you agree to sell, give up your rate, and take out a brand-new mortgage at today’s rates.
In return, you get a discount “capable of reaching 10% or more of the remaining mortgage balance.”
As seen in this screenshot, the discount could be pretty sizable, a whopping $75,000 on a $500,000 loan balance.
In other words, the bank is paying off $75,000 of your loan if you pay off your cheap mortgage ahead of time.
You then need to determine if it’s worth giving up that low rate (and the much lower interest expense) for the ability to move.
There are all these posts online about how someone paid off a mortgage ahead of schedule.
And how much they saved. But what’s the opportunity cost? Could that “investment” in the mortgage gone further someplace else?
When you voluntarily agree to pay off a 2-3% mortgage early, you are essentially locking in an investment return of just 2-3%.
It doesn’t sound so good does it? Especially when stocks are rising double-digits, and even a plain old savings account earns 3-4% these days.
The fact banks are willing to pay you to pay off a cheap mortgage ahead of time tells you everything you need to know.
Imagine Entertainment founder Brian Grazer shares his playbook for turning “no” into “yes.”
In 45 years in personal finance — as a CPA, a Wall Street investment advisor, and a two-time Emmy-winning financial journalist — I’ve seen thousands of retirement portfolios, as well as what protected them, what didn’t, and what most financial advisors consistently fail to discuss with clients who are within 10 years of retirement.
This article covers five of those risks. None of them are exotic. All of them are real. And almost none of them come up in a typical advisor meeting — because there’s no commission in pointing them out.
If you already know you want to explore protecting your savings with physical gold, you can request Augusta Precious Metals’ free Gold IRA Guide here and skip ahead.
Most retirement projections show you a number: your target savings balance. What they rarely show you is what that number will actually buy.
If you have $600,000 saved today and inflation averages 4% annually over the next 20 years, that $600,000 has the purchasing power of approximately $274,000 in today’s dollars by the time you’re in your late 70s. That’s not a projection — that’s arithmetic. Compound it further and the erosion compounds with it.
The Federal Reserve’s own data confirms that the U.S. dollar has lost approximately 96% of its purchasing power since 1913. History doesn’t promise the next 20 years will be kinder. The investors I’ve watched protect their purchasing power most effectively have not relied on the dollar alone to hold its value.
Every dollar in a traditional IRA or 401(k) has never been taxed. That sounds like a benefit — and it is, while your money is growing. But it also means the IRS is a silent partner in your retirement account. Every dollar you withdraw is taxed as ordinary income, at whatever rate Congress decides is appropriate at the time you need it.
And starting at age 73, the IRS will force you to start taking money out regardless of whether you need it. Required minimum distributions push many retirees into higher tax brackets than they planned for — triggering Medicare surcharges, taxing Social Security benefits, and compressing the tax efficiency of an entire plan.
This is the tax bill that almost no one is talking about during the accumulation phase. By the time it becomes visible, the options for managing it have narrowed considerably.
The Real Number in Your Retirement Account
Take your current balance. Subtract taxes on every withdrawal. Then reduce it by 4% annually for 20 years of inflation. The result is your real purchasing power in retirement — and it may be substantially smaller than the number on your statement.Get Augusta Precious Metals’ free Gold IRA Guide to learn how physical metals can help address both risks.
A well-diversified portfolio is supposed to protect you by spreading risk across different asset classes. The problem is that in a genuine financial crisis, most paper assets — stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs — lose value at the same time. During the 2008 financial crisis, the S&P 500 fell nearly 57% from peak to trough. Most bond funds fell with it. A portfolio that looked diversified on paper was not diversified in practice.
Gold behaved differently. While paper assets collapsed in 2008, gold rose approximately 25% over the same period. Not because gold is magical, but because it does not depend on counterparty performance, corporate earnings, or government solvency. It is a store of value that has operated independently of paper systems for thousands of years.
The investors I’ve covered who weathered 2008 most effectively were not the ones who had the best stock picks. They were the ones who held assets that didn’t move in lockstep with everything else.
Augusta Precious Metals offers a free one-on-one educational web conference with an on-staff Harvard-trained economist — no cost, no obligation. It’s designed to answer exactly these questions before you make any decision. Request their free Guide to get started.
If you’re 43 and your portfolio drops 30%, you have time. You can stop drawing down, let it recover, and continue contributing. If you’re 63 and your portfolio drops 30% in the year you retire, the math is categorically different.
This is called sequence of returns risk, and it’s one of the most underappreciated threats to retirement security. When you start drawing income from a declining portfolio, you’re selling assets at their lowest value and locking in losses permanently. The sequence of returns in the first five years of retirement has more impact on whether your money lasts 20 years or 30 than your average annual return over the entire period.
The investors who managed this risk best did so by holding at least a portion of their wealth in assets that don’t move in correlation with equity markets — specifically so they had something to draw from during a stock market downturn without selling equities at the bottom.
If your entire retirement savings is in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and cash — all denominated in U.S. dollars — you have made a specific bet: that the U.S. dollar will maintain sufficient purchasing power over the next 20 to 30 years to fund your retirement at the standard you’ve planned for.
That may be a good bet. It may not. But the investors I’ve covered who think carefully about this generally conclude that making an explicit, informed decision to hold some assets outside the dollar system — even 10% to 20% of a portfolio — is more defensible than inadvertently concentrating 100% of their retirement wealth in one currency.
Physical gold is the most established way to do that. It’s not an argument that gold always goes up. It’s an argument that owning something with 5,000 years of purchasing power history is a rational hedge against the risks outlined in the four points above.
A Gold IRA is an IRS-approved self-directed individual retirement account that holds physical gold and silver instead of — or alongside — traditional paper investments. You can fund one with a 401(k) or IRA rollover, with no taxes or penalties if the transfer is executed correctly.
I’ve spent time looking at the companies in this category. The gold IRA industry has more than its share of high-pressure sales tactics, misleading fee structures, and commission-driven agents. When I looked at this space with that skepticism, one company stood out from the field.
Augusta Precious Metals — named “Best Overall Gold IRA Company” by Money Magazine — has earned a reputation that is unusual for this category:
Zero complaints on the BBB. Augusta is the only major gold IRA company with a spotless record — an A+ BBB rating and a AAA rating from the Business Consumer Alliance, with no unresolved complaints. In an industry known for disputes, that record is genuinely notable.
A Harvard-trained economist handles your education. Augusta’s Director of Education, Devlyn Steele, designed and personally leads a free one-on-one web conference available to anyone who requests their information kit. It’s not a sales call. It’s a substantive education session designed to help you understand whether a Gold IRA makes sense for your specific situation — before you commit to anything.
Transparent, flat fees. Augusta charges approximately $80 annually for account administration and $100–$150 for storage — fixed amounts, not percentages. At a $500,000 account balance, the difference between flat fees and a 1% annual percentage fee is $4,800 a year.
Up to 10 years of fees waived. Every customer who opens a qualifying account receives zero custodial and storage fees for up to 10 years. There are no qualification hoops. Everyone gets it.
95% of the paperwork handled for you. Setting up a Gold IRA and executing a 401(k) rollover is technically complex. Augusta coordinates the custodian, the depository, and the IRS compliance requirements, handling virtually all of the administrative process on your behalf.
The minimum investment is $50,000 — which is higher than some competitors and reflects Augusta’s focus on serious investors who will benefit from that level of service.
Get Your Free Gold IRA Guide from Augusta Precious Metals
Augusta’s free Guide explains exactly how a Gold IRA rollover works, what it costs, and whether it makes sense for your situation. No sales pressure, no obligation — and a free one-on-one web conference with a Harvard-trained economist is included with your request.The short form asks for a phone number so Augusta’s team can schedule your free web conference. You control whether and when you respond to anyone.
Named “Best Overall Gold IRA Company” by Money Magazine. A+ BBB. Zero complaints. Up to 10 years of fees waived. $50,000 minimum investment.
→ Get Your Free Guide (No Obligation)
None of the five risks in this article require a market crash to do damage. They work in the background — inflation compounding, taxes accruing, correlations tightening — regardless of what the headlines say. That invisibility is exactly what makes them dangerous for investors who are otherwise doing everything right.
The retirees I’ve watched preserve their wealth most effectively share one characteristic: they made explicit, informed decisions about each of these risks rather than leaving them unexamined. A Gold IRA is one tool for addressing several of them at once — and Augusta’s free Guide is a straightforward way to understand whether it belongs in your plan.
There’s no cost to request the Guide. No obligation to open an account. The only thing you risk is spending 20 minutes better informed than you are today.
Don’t leave these risks unexamined.
Augusta Precious Metals — “Best Overall Gold IRA Company,” Money Magazine. A+ BBB. Zero complaints. Free one-on-one web conference with a Harvard-trained economist. Up to 10 years of fees waived. $50,000 minimum investment.→ Get Your Free Guide Now
MoneyTalksNews is an independent personal finance publisher. We may earn a referral fee from partner services at no cost to you. Our editorial recommendations are based on merit, not compensation.
Intel has spent the last few years trying to reinvent itself and prove it’s still relevant in an AI-centric world dominated by Nvidia’s chips.
On Thursday, as Intel crushed Wall Street financial targets, the company had a new message: There’s nothing wrong with being a 58-year-old maker of PC and server microprocessors.
“We are embracing our roots as data driven, paranoid, and engineering driven,” CEO Lip Bu Tan said at the start of the company’s Q1 earnings conference call, referencing the famous “only the paranoid survive” philosophy of Andy Grove, the late cofounder of Intel.
Shares of Intel surged more than 22% in after hours trading Thursday after the company reported first-quarter results. Instead of the 2% decrease in revenue that analysts were expecting for the first three months of the year, Intel grew revenue 7% year-over-year to $13.6 billion. Revenue in the current quarter will range between $13.8 billion and $14.8 billion, Intel said, well above the $13.06 billion analysts have been expecting.
Demand for Intel’s central processing units (CPU) chips, which are based on its longstanding x86 architecture, is booming, the company said. In fact, revenue would have been even higher had it been able to produce more of the chips.
“A year ago the conversation around Intel was about whether we could survive,” Tan said. “Today it’s about how quickly we can add manufacturing capacity and scale our supply to meet enormous demand for our products.”
It was hardly an exaggeration when it comes to the bleak outlook for the company, which he joined as CEO in March 2025, a few months after Pat Gelsinger was ousted from the top job. At the time, many observers, including former board members, wondered whether the company should be broken apart, with its manufacturing facilities sold or spun into a separate business. A few months after Tan started, the U.S. government bought a 10% stake in Intel, helping to shore up the company in a deal the Trump administration said was important for national security and American industry.
The resurgence in demand for Intel’s CPUs is a somewhat surprising turn of events after several years in which the GPUs, or graphics processing units, made by Nvidia appeared to be the future because of their prowess with AI models.
“In recent months we have seen clear signs that the CPU is reasserting itself as the indispensable foundation of the AI era,” Tan said on the call. The reason, he explained, is that CPUs are better suited for running AI services, as opposed to creating—or training—AI models, where GPUs have the edge. In the early days of the generative AI boom, as companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google were training giant new AI models, GPUs were the clear winner. But as the market evolves, Intel said the pendulum is swinging back to CPUs.
Intel finance chief Dave Zinsner said that the ratio of GPUs to CPUs in AI data centers is changing. While there are typically seven or eight GPUs for every one CPU for the job of training AI models, the ratio is only three or four GPUs for every one CPU when it comes to inference, or running AI models. And as agentic AI gains ground, Zinsner said the ratio could hit parity or even flip in Intel’s favor.
But there are still plenty of challenges. Nvidia recently released its first standalone CPU, adding to existing competition Intel faces from longtime rival AMD, as well as from server chips based on the ARM architecture (including an upcoming chip that ARM is making itself, instead of strictly licensing the chip design to other companies).
And the bigger question is whether Intel’s resurgence is truly a sign that the company is on the mend, or simply a reflection of the booming AI infrastructure buildout, as data center companies snap up as many chips as they can. Big questions also remain about Intel’s so-called foundry business, which manufactures chips for other companies and competes with global giant TSMC—particularly whether Intel will continue to invest the massive sums required to develop the next generation of chipmaking technology.
Tan has previously said Intel would not commit to building factories using the most advanced 14A fabrication process (capable of producing chips with 1.4 nanometer circuits) unless it has committed customers. And he gave no update on that front on Thursday, despite speculation that Elon Musk and Telsa’s recently announced partnership with Intel, via Terafab, might be the much-anticipated 14A customer.
Asked about Terafab deal, Tan described it as a broad relationship in which the two companies will learn a lot together, but provided few specifics. “Elon and I believe the global supply chain is not keeping pace with the rapid acceleration in the demand,” he said.
As for 14a customers, Tan was equally tight lipped: “We’re making great progress in terms of yield and cycle time. And clearly we’re engaging with multiple customers; heavy engaging. My style is underpromise, over delivering. So we have no plans to announce the customer unless a customer wants to announce it.”
Bitcoin Vegas 2026:
Welcome to the Crypto Lifer Channel!
JOIN THE TRADING GROUP ➡️
Pionex: Best Bot Platform
Join My Pionex Trading Strategies
Trading Bot:
💱 My Exchanges💱
WEEX:
Bitunix:
BTCC:
TOOBIT:
MEXC:
KCEX:
Lifer Trading Class:
Lifer’s Key Insight Newsletter signup:
Token Metrics:
Nord VPN:
Social Media Accounts ➡️
💱 Other Exchanges💱
Binance:
Binance: (non-US residents):
🛠Helpful Tools🛠
ALTRADY:
BOOKMAP:
Koinly:
Trezor:
🕒Timestamps
0:00
11:05 INTRO
11:46 BOOKMAP
12:48 BTC 1
12:56 TRADING GROUP
13:23 BTC 1
14:04 BTC LAS VEGAS 2026
15:26 BTC TRADE
24:32 TRADING GROUP
27:08 BTC TRADE
29:18 BTC 15
29:22 BTC 1
29:31 BTC TRADE
39:55 BTC 15
39:38 BTC 3
39:49 BTC 1M
42:12 BTC TRADE
42:52 TRUMP SPEAKING
43:29 BTC TRADE
44:08 BTC 15
44:36 BTC TRADE
44:53 BTC 1M
45:01 BTC 2W
45:36 BTC 1W
46:09 BTC 3D
46:15 BTC 1D
47:42 BOOKMAP
48:05 BTC 1D
49:25 BTC 22H
49:46 BTC 4H
50:05 BTC 2H
50:10 BTC 1H
50:21 BTC 15
50:26 BTC TRADE
54:36 OIL TRADE
55:45 BTC TRADE
57:44 BOOKMAP
57:46 BTC TRADE
1:01:15 BTC 15
1:03:04 BTC TRADE
1:07:48 BOOKMAP
1:08:39 BTC TRADE
1:09:21 BTC 15
1:09:54 BTC 1
1:10:06 BTC 1D
1:11:13 BTC 15
1:11:48 BTC TRADE
1:17:45 BOOKMAP
1:18:05 BTC TRADE
1:18:13 TRUMP SPEAKING
1:19:01 BTC 15
1:19:13 BTC 1D
1:19:25 BTC TRADE
1:23:20 BTC 15
1:24:59 BTC 1D
1:25:02 BTC 15
1:25:16 BTC TRADE
1:28:24 TRUMP SPEAKING
1:35:55 TRADING GROUP
1:36:03 BTC 1D
1:36:06 BTC 1H
1:36:16 BTC 15
1:36:21 BTC 1
1:36:32 BTC TRADE
1:38:45 OIL TRADE
1:40:15 BTC TRADE
1:43:03 FEAR & GREED INDEX
1:43:08 BTC 15
1:45:34 BTC 7
1:45:55 BTC 4H
1:46:19 BTC 1
1:46:28 BTC 5s
1:48:03 BTC 30s
1:48:08 BTC 1
1:48:11 BTC 5
1:48:20 BTC 1H
1:50:14 BTC TRADE
1:50:48 BTC 1H
1:50:50 BTC 1
1:50:53 BTC 5s
1:52:33 BTC 1H
1:54:36 BTC 15
1:55:44 BOOKMAP
1:55:47 BTC 15
1:56:29 BTC 30
1:57:08 BTC TRADE
1:57:23 BTC 1
1:57:25 BTC 30
1:57:33 BTC 15
1:57:36 BTC 1H
1:57:45 BTC 4H
1:58:20 BTC 15
1:59:36 BTC 1H
1:59:40 BTC TRADE
2:09:35 BOOKMAP
2:09:47 BTC TRADE
2:22:50 BTC 1
2:22:58 BTC 8H
2:25:13 TRADING GROUP
2:26:19 BTC TRADE
2:29:20 BTC 8H
2:30:18 BTC 1D
2:30:26 BTC 4H
2:30:45 BTC 1H
2:31:17 BTC TRADE
2:31:32 OUTRO
Disclaimer:
Please note that all information and opinions shared on the Crypto Lifer YouTube channel, as well as any affiliated channels or publications, are intended solely for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes. None of the content available on the platform should be viewed as legal, financial, investment, or tax advice, nor should it be viewed as guidance, solicitation, or suggestion regarding investment strategies or purchase/sale/retention of investments.
Any and all information and opinions shared on Crypto Lifer are based purely on personal research and beliefs, and while such opinions are considered reliable, no guarantee or representation is made with respect to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability. The information presented on Crypto Lifer is subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as specific advice or guidance to any individual or entity.
It is important to note that cryptocurrency trading and investing entails high risks and may result in significant losses; therefore, it is advisable to conduct one’s own research and seek professional advice from a licensed financial professional. Crypto Lifer does not provide financial advice and is not a licensed financial professional. In addition, past performance does not necessarily predict future results, and should not be taken as a reliable indicator of future performance.
Please be advised that Crypto Lifer may, on occasion, discuss projects, tokens, services, or entities that have compensated the channel in some form, and in such cases, the channel will always disclose that relationship fully. It is important to take this information into account when considering opinions, strategies, or trades discussed on Crypto Lifer.
source