Home Blog

Capital One Transfer Bonus, Get 30% More Japan Airlines Miles


Capital One has a new transfer bonus that kicked off today. You can currently get a 30% bonus when you transfer your Capital One Miles to the JAL Mileage Bank program. This is a newly added partner, and the extra bonus gets you close to a 1:1 transfer. Let’s see the details.

Capital One Transfer Bonus for Japan Airlines

Limited Time Offer: Eligible cardmembers can transfer Capital One Miles to JAL Mileage Bank (JMB), Japan Airlines’ frequent flyer program and receive a 30% bonus. Promotion ends 11:59PM Eastern Time on 04/30/2026.

Here are some important details about this Capital One transfer bonus for Japan Airlines miles:

  • Transfers are often completed within 24 hours, however the process may occasionally take up to 5 business days. 
  • Transfers require a minimum of 1,000 Capital One Miles.
  • First and last name on your Capital One account and loyalty partner account must match.
  • JAL miles expire after 36 months.

Capital One Transfer Partners

Customers will need to transfer a minimum of 1,000 Venture X, Venture X Business, Venture or Spark Miles at a time to travel loyalty programs, and will need to transfer in 100 mile increments.

If you’re an eligible Capital One cardholder, you can transfer your rewards by signing in to your account online or through the Capital One Mobile app. Once you’re signed in, navigate to the rewards section button and select the option to transfer your miles. Before you confirm, remember that there’s no way to transfer miles back into your Capital One rewards account.

Partner Ratio
Accor Live Limitless 2 : 1
Aeromexico Club Premier 1 : 1
Air Canada Aeroplan 1 : 1
Air France KLM Flying Blue 1 : 1
Avianca LifeMiles 1 : 1
British Airways (Avios) 1 : 1
Cathay Pacific Asia Miles 1 : 1
Choice Hotels (Choice Privileges) 1 : 1
Emirates Skywards 1 : 1
Etihad Airways Etihad Guest 1 : 1
EVA Air Infinity MileageLands 2 : 1.5
Finnair Plus 1 : 1
I Prefer Hotel Rewards 1 : 2
Japan Airlines Mileage Bank 2 : 1.5
JetBlue TrueBlue 5 : 3
Qantas Frequent Flyer 1 : 1
Qatar Airways Privilege Club 1 : 1
Singapore Airlines Krisflyer 1 : 1
TAP Air Portugal (Miles&Go) 1 : 1
Turkish Airlines (Miles&Smiles) 1 : 1
Virgin Red 1 : 1
Wyndham Rewards 1 : 1

Guru’s Wrap-up

This is a good opportunity for those who need to add more JAL miles to their accounts. Japan Airlines was added as a Capital One transfer partner last year (with the same 30% bonus), and the only other partner is Bilt. So transfer option are quite limited.

However the standard transfer ratio from Capital One to Japan Airlines is 4:3, so this bonus will get you 975 JAL Miles for every 1,000 Capital One Miles that you transfer.

I always suggest not to transfer points speculatively. As with all Capital One transfers, once you move your miles to JAL, the move is permanent and cannot be reversed. In this case you should also keep in mind that JAL miles expire after 36 month with no option to extend through any activity. 

HT: Anki

How to Invest in 2026: Don’t Fight the Fed



⭐ Visit our Patreon to see what I’m investing in for 2026 and more investing content:

📘 My Book on Wealth-Building is Now on Amazon
English Version:
Spanish Version (Español):

💵 FREE STOCKS:
Receive FREE STOCKS (as a sign-up bonus) when you open a free stock market account.

💵 Need a Small Business Loan?
We can help you get financing at ClearValue Lending:

ClearValue Tax and affiliates and related parties do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.

This post may contain affiliate links that at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Thank you for your support!

Legal Disclosure: I’m not a financial advisor. The information contained in this video is for entertainment purposes only. Before investing, please consult a licensed professional. Any stock purchases I show on video should not be considered “investment recommendations”. I shall not be held liable for any losses you may incur for investing and trading in the stock market in attempt to mirror what I do. Unless investments are FDIC insured, they may decline in value and/or disappear entirely. Please be careful!

source

Treasury yields slide again | Mortgage Professional


Kansas City Fed president Jeff Schmid, who does not vote on policy this year, warned that officials should not assume inflation from higher oil prices would prove transitory.

US secretary of state Marco Rubio, speaking to Al Jazeera, said American objectives in Iran would take “weeks, not months” to achieve, suggesting the conflict might remain a live factor for markets into the second half of the year.

What it meant for mortgage desks

For US mortgage desks, the drop in Treasury yields highlighted that markets have begun to see the oil spike less as a pure inflation story and more as a potential drag on growth.

That shift helped pull benchmark yields off their highs, easing immediate pressure on mortgage‑backed security valuations and warehouse funding costs.

However, lower yields on a single day does not guarantee a smoother path for borrowers. Brokers still face clients trying to time volatile markets, lenders ready to withdraw products at short notice, and a Fed that looks in no hurry to deliver the rate cuts many households hope will follow. 

Congress has a lower approval rating than Hitler in some polls. And we just keep voting for the same 2 parties



Most Americans don’t know this: in 1988, the Republican and Democratic parties fired the League of Women Voters — the neutral, nonpartisan organization that had hosted Presidential debates for decades — and replaced them with a commission they run themselves. Many Americans only tunes in to politics during the runup to a Presidential election, which means the Presidential debates are often the pivotal events in the race.

When that organization — the Commission on Presidential Debates, or CPD — was founded it was jointly run by the chairs of the Republican and Democratic national committees. It existed, in practice, to protect the two parties that created it. 

The most notable rule the CPD instituted was requiring any third-party candidate who wants to participate in these nationally televised debates to receive greater than 15% support in at least five national polls — an effectively impossible hurdle. For context, only two third-party candidates have ever exceeded five percent of the popular vote and received federal matching funds since the law providing them was passed in 1974. The bar set by the CPD is triple that. The two major parties have, in other words, constructed a system specifically designed to ensure no one else can compete.

Through nine election cycles it served that purpose until 2024, when it was no longer even needed.  It had been forty years since the debates were hosted by the League Of Women Voters and the two major parties decided to simply negotiate the details directly with the networks.  Notably, they didn’t invite anyone but each other.


Broken government is serious and dangerous stuff. The two major parties fight for control like petulant children wrestling over a television remote. When one of them shakes it free, the loser storms out of the room. Or the Capitol Building.

When their inability to compromise led to a government shutdown in 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded this country’s debt from AAA to AA for the first time in roughly a century. That will likely cost future generations trillions in interest payments.

The system has been mostly the same for two hundred and fifty years, but for decades after the fall of Communism there was no existential threat to democracy that forced compromise. When Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill couldn’t agree, they didn’t shut down the government — they famously worked it out, because failing to do so risked giving quarter to the Soviets. Once the wall came down, the consequences of not compromising no longer seemed more important than the pursuit of personal power and wealth to our elected officials. Country over party became optional. They chose party.


Is the citizenry pleased with the performance of this duopoly? According to Ballotpedia, in January 2026 the approval rating for Congress sits at around 15% — what pollsters call “the floor,” meaning it is almost impossible to go lower. According to Gallup, since 2010 the approval rating for Congress has almost never exceeded 30%.

To put 15% in context: according to a YouGov poll from roughly a year ago, the approval rating on Adolf Hitler ranges between 11% and 23%, depending on how you interpret the results — 11% of Americans say some of his ideas were “right,” and 12% categorized him as “a bad person who did some good things.” YouGov puts his unfavorable tracker at -88%. Stalin comes in somewhat stronger, with an unfavorable rating of roughly -75% to -80%.

Hitler. Stalin. The U.S. Congress. The polling puts them in roughly the same neighborhood. That sentence should alarm every American.


Most of us have acquiesced to the notion that there is simply nothing we can do about it. I disagree. Things do change. Change often happens when we don’t expect it, or too slowly to observe — but it is inevitable. Just because you can’t see the continents moving doesn’t mean tectonic plates don’t exist. Just because you don’t know that the Republican party was once a third-party movement doesn’t make it untrue. The Whigs would agree — if any of them still existed.

Individual issues no longer matter in an era when we have no functioning political system with which to legislate. That is not an epitaph — it is a call to action. Citizens must push representatives to reverse Citizens United, minimize the effect of money on politics, broaden access to Presidential debates, end the filibuster, dissolve the electoral college, institute term limits, and update the system so it works again.

Whether or not Edmund Burke actually said, “Evil triumphs when good men do nothing because they could only have done a little,” it remains a truism. Change is inevitable, but reform never comes from the top. It comes from the people. More Americans who turn eighteen now register as Independents than join either of the two major parties. They had a good run. We deserve better. Vote Independent. Write your representative. Hold them accountable. Do a little.


The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

What the “Forever Renter” Era Means For Landlords


It feels like every other headline you read about homeownership goes something like: “Is the American dream dead?”

Click-baity as apocalyptic headlines are, plenty of strong data support the argument that homeownership is slipping out of many Americans’ hands. And that has implications for us as real estate investors—including people like me who rent their home while also investing in other people’s housing. 

The Data on “Forever Renters”

A 2025 study by the National Association of Realtors found that the median age of first-time homebuyers reached an all-time high of 40. As my father told me when I turned 40, “You’re now middle-aged.”

The data doesn’t get any rosier from there. The same report found that first-time homebuyers make up just 21% of home purchases, a record low. The median age for repeat homebuyers is 62. 

Consider another study entitled “Giving Up” by Northwestern University’s Seung Hyeong Lee and the University of Chicago’s Younggeun Yoo. They found that Gen Z “will reach retirement with a homeownership rate roughly 9.6 percentage points lower than that of their parents’ generation.” 

The study also cites a Harris Poll survey revealing that 42% of Americans and 46% of Gen Z respondents agreed with the statement: “No matter how hard I work, I will never be able to afford a home I really love.”

Yikes.

Implications for Investors

If this pattern continues playing out, it could affect real estate investors in the following ways.

An older, more stable tenant pool

Historically, a huge percentage of renters have been young adults ranging from college students to thirtysomethings. They’ve aimed to buy a home before “settling down” with either marriage or kids. In 1991, the average first-time homebuyer was just 28 years old

As Americans wait longer to buy homes—or just rent their whole lives—that means that landlords get to rent to older, more stable tenants. That means:

  • Workers who are more established in their careers
  • Families with children in school who don’t want to move
  • Older adults, such as empty nesters, who have larger net worths and fewer expenses 

That’s potentially a more attractive renter pool than rowdy twentysomethings who move every other year. 

Longer tenancies

Older, more established renters tend to move less frequently. And as anyone who’s ever owned rental units knows, turnovers are where most of the cost and labor lies for landlords

In other words, longer tenancies are all upside for rental and multifamily investors. Lesley Hurst, landlord and owner of Penn Charter Abstract title company, is already seeing this play out in Pittsburgh, telling BiggerPockets: “My rental properties cash flow well, largely because we’re seeing a more stable, long-term tenant base. That reduces turnover and vacancy risk and helps me earn consistent rental income without relying solely on appreciation.”

Higher-end rentals

Not every renter wants to buy a home. 

“In Wichita, I work with plenty of people who could buy but choose to rent because it’s more flexible and more affordable than buying at today’s interest rates and prices,” explained Derek Grandfield of Freedom Property Investors in a conversation with BiggerPockets. “It’s changed how we think about our properties, focusing more on making them comfortable and livable for the long haul, not just quick turnovers.”

Also consider extremely expensive markets like San Francisco, where the rent-to-price ratio is nearly 36. It just doesn’t make any financial sense to buy there, even for the upper-middle class

Senior living investments

Lifelong renters theoretically have fewer ties to their homes and are more open to moving into senior housing. 

That runs the gamut from active adult communities up to assisted living and nursing homes. Either way, the “silver tsunami” is coming, and there isn’t enough infrastructure for it, so these senior living investments could continue to do better in the years and decades to come. 

Huge appeal for entry-level homes for sale

Not every Gen Zer has given up on homeownership—they’re just pessimistic about it. But plenty of investors have built business plans to meet their needs.

For example, my co-investing club partnered with an investor who buys vacant land parcels and installs manufactured homes on them to sell to first-time homebuyers. They price them at literally half the local median home value. And they sell like hotcakes. 

The Rise of Renter-Investors—Including Me

My family and I sold our prior home and have rented for the last 11 years. At first, we did so as expats living overseas, but even after moving back to the U.S., we continue to rent for flexibility. But that doesn’t mean I don’t have any real estate. 

I own an interest in over 5,000 units around the country as a passive investor. In fact, I keep investing in new passive real estate investments every month as a member of a co-investing club. 

I may or may not buy a home again in the future. Either way, I want plenty of diverse real estate in my “set-it-and-forget-it” portfolio. That includes a mix of hands-off JV partnerships, syndications, and secured private notes. 

Even among homeowners and active investors, too many don’t bother to diversify their real estate investments. Their home makes up a disproportionate amount of their net worth, and they have tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in each investment property. 

That’s not a diverse real estate portfolio. I invest $5K-$10K at a time, every month, to practice dollar-cost averaging with real estate as I do with stocks. 

Whether you rent or own, get more intentional with diversifying your portfolio. Don’t try to pick the next hot market or asset class—just steadily keep investing small amounts in new real estate investments. 

Verizon Is Up 24% in 2026 and Pays Over 5% in Dividends: Time to Buy?


After years of underperforming the market, Verizon Communications (VZ 0.30%) is one of the bright spots in the tech sector this year. It’s up 24% year to date through March 27.

Those results look even better when you factor in that Verizon is one of the more generous dividend stocks. It has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years, most recently to $0.71 for the next quarter, and it has a dividend yield of about 5.6%.

Image source: Verizon Communications.

The announcement of the latest dividend hike came on Jan. 30, 2026, but that wasn’t the biggest news of the day for Verizon, because the wireless carrier also had one of its best earnings reports in years. It reported 616,000 postpaid phone net additions in Q4 2025, its highest quarterly net additions since 2019. Verizon also completed its acquisition of Frontier Communications, growing its fiber access to over 30 million homes and businesses.

Stock market volatility could also be contributing to Verizon’s success. Investors often rotate out of growth stocks into value stocks, including high-dividend stocks, during periods of instability.

Verizon Communications Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.30%) $-0.15

Current Price

$50.15

So, is now a good time to pick up shares of Verizon? If your goal is passive income or to balance out a growth-heavy portfolio, then Verizon is worth considering. The recent results are promising, and the dividend provides stable returns. But I wouldn’t invest with the expectation that Verizon will continue to beat the broader market, because that’s unlikely. Wireless carriers tend to deliver modest returns, so periods of outperformance usually don’t last too long.

Lyle Daly has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

[YMMV] Capital One Shopping: Chow Sang Sang, Spend $650+ & Get $390 Back


The Offer

No direct link to offer, check portal. Might need to visit site with browser extension installed and wait a few days to get the offer to show

  • Capital One Shopping portal is offering $390 back when spend $650 at Chow Sang Sang

Our Verdict

This is a Hong Kong jewelry brand. They do offer free shipping when you spend ~$500+. Might be also able to stack with any offers the merchant has, but check terms of your specific capital one offer to confirm. It seems that it excludes gold bars, but you still might be able to get a piece that is profitable on the gold content alone. 

Things to note with Capital One shopping:

  • Payout is not cash but giftcards
  • There is a $80 referral bonus, you can use Chuck’s link here. Full terms of that here.
  • Tips for maximizing these offers here. 
 

Hat tip to reader BonusVault

Morning Bid: April fools rush in




Morning Bid: April fools rush in

The Psychology of Money in 33 minutes | Animated Book Summary



This video is a 33 minutes animated book summary of The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel.

🟨 UPGRADE YOUR FINANCIAL LIFE
Understanding money is one thing. Managing it well is another.
The MONEY MASTERY SYSTEM 1.0 bridges the gap between what you know and what you do.
👉

📖 The Psychology of Money 👉

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

This full animated book summary of The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel reveals the psychological traps that keep people broke, uncovers the hidden forces behind your financial decisions, and shows you how to build lasting wealth through smarter habits and a better mindset.

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

⏰ Timestamps:
0:00 – Introduction

1:01 – Act 1 – The False Confidence
1:18 – Trap 1. You Think You’re Logical
2:39 – Trap 2. You Think You’re in Control
5:02 – Trap 3. You Believe the Story, Not the Reality
6:51 – Trap 4. You Think You’re a Spreadsheet

8:05 – Act 2 – The Emotional Hijack
8:20 – Trap 5. You Chase More Than You Need
10:44 – Trap 6. You Think Stuff Will Make You Admired
12:09 – Trap 7. You Think Looking Rich Means Being Rich
13:36 Trap 8. You Fall for Fear Disguised as Wisdom

15:18 – Act 3 – The Hidden Rules of Money
15:35 – Trap 9. You Think Saving Needs a Goal
17:36 – Trap 10. You Want the Gains—But Not the Ride
19:05 – Trap 11. You Think Getting Rich Is the Hard Part
20:53 – Trap 12. You Overestimate Your Plan

22:18 – Act 4 – The Long Game
22:30 – Trap 13. You Underestimate the Power of Time
24:01 – Trap 14. You Ignore How Rare Success Really Is
26:03 – Trap 15. You Buy Stuff and Sell Your Time

27:42 – Act 5 – Become the Person Who Wins Long Term
27:56 – Trap 16. You Expect the Market to Be Predictable
29:14 – Trap 17. You Forget That You’ll Change
31:01 – Trap 18. You Copy People Who Aren’t Playing Your Game

📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈

Notion Tools by Antidote:
🟨 Premium Blueprint “12 Weeks Year Planner – Achieve More in 12 Weeks Than Most Do in a Year!” 👉

🟨 Money Mastery System 1.0
👉

More from us:
🟨 Premium Blueprint “Master the Art of Human Behavior” 👉

🟩 Support the Channel : 😊☕

🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️

CREDITS:
🔵Characters designed by @Macrovector
🔵Musics from Artlist

#booksummary #morganhousel #thepsychologyofmoney #moneymindset #psychology #personalgrowth

Disclaimer:
I’m not a financial advisor. This content is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. For guidance specific to your situation, please consult a licensed professional.

Disclosure:
Some links above are Amazon affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase (at no extra cost to you)

source

Mortgage Rates Get Relief Thanks to Jerome Powell!


What was once unimaginable has now become reality. Jerome Powell may have made mortgage rates go down.

I know what many are thinking. This can’t be possible. The Fed chair is a super villain when it comes to mortgage rates.

He raised rates 11 times and made mortgage rates surge higher.

The man defied the President, who had a clear goal of getting mortgage rates back into the 3s or even lower! Or so the story goes…

But it’s true, Powell calmed the bond market and in the process mortgage rates during a Q&A session at Harvard University yesterday.

Powell Says Fed Can Wait and See on Higher Energy Prices

The big headwind for mortgage rates lately has been surging energy prices, namely oil skyrocketing to over $100 a barrel due to the strikes and ensuing conflict in Iran.

Oil prices were in the $60s prior to the unanticipated conflict in late February, and are hovering around $105 today.

That has led to fears of another inflation wave, just as it appeared we were getting over the initial one.

After all, it oil costs a lot more, consumers will face higher gas prices. This has already materialized.

In addition, anything that requires energy/oil in its input costs, which is basically everything, will go up in price.

That all spells higher inflation, which led to a big increase in bond yields over the past month.

That rise in the 10-year bond yield corresponded with higher 30-year fixed mortgage rates, with the benchmark rate rising from 3.95% to nearly 4.50%.

Meanwhile, the 30-year fixed climbed from sub-6% levels at the end of February to roughly 6.625%.

Emphasis on rough because the big rate increase happened at the worst possible time of the year, peak spring home buying season.

However, current Fed chair Jerome Powell seemed to shrug off fears of rate hikes due to the Iranian conflict.

While not surprising to me, it might surprise others who feel Powell is the enemy of low mortgage rates.

During the Q&A session, he noted that “We feel like our policy’s in a good place for us to wait and see how that turns out.”

In other words, the sky isn’t necessarily falling, even though oil prices have gone haywire lately and many expect much higher inflation as a result.

This is classic Powell if you’ve been paying attention. He never reacts haphazardly to anything.

He fully understands this is a fluid situation and can change at any given moment. So for the Fed to all of a sudden hike or cut as a result would be out of character.

As such, it’s going to be the status quo, despite what’s happening.

He did add that “We’re getting now an energy shock: no one knows how big it will be. It’s way too early to know.”

And that’s exactly right. We don’t know yet what the impact will be, just as we didn’t know what the impact would be from the tariffs, which also drove mortgage rates higher temporarily.

Perhaps this situation will be short-lived as well, and thus won’t require Fed intervention.

Weak Labor Market Makes Powell’s Job Easier

One thing making the Fed’s job easier (and Powell’s) is the fact that the labor market isn’t too hot right now.

The Fed’s dual mandate is to ensure maximum employment and price stability.

The price stability piece is in question with the recent surge in oil prices, but the employment piece is another story.

There are plenty of signs that labor is struggling, though it’s not yet in full crisis mode.

The latest data delivered today, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover (JOLTS) report, revealed that job openings are down and hiring is the lowest in about six years.

It’s a low-hire, low-fire environment and workers aren’t feeling too confident to leave their existing job and find new work. Nor are employers keen to bring on new talent.

Powell recognizes this, saying “There’s sort of downside risk ​to the labor market, which suggests keep rates low, but there’s upside risk to inflation, which suggests maybe don’t keep rates low.”

He added that there is “⁠tension between the two objectives,” which explains the do-nothing approach.

Just wait and see what happens and don’t react without fully understanding the entire picture.

And if you look at Fed rate projections, the odds of a rate hike are now basically minuscule again after jumping last week.

Of course, the Fed doesn’t set mortgage rates, but bond traders pay close attention to Fed rate expectations.

Meanwhile, the 10-year bond yield has plummeted nearly 20 basis points (bps) in the past few days, which has led to a mini mortgage rate rally.

And maybe, just maybe, you can thank Jerome Powell for a fair chunk of that.

New tool: Compare offers quickly with my new mortgage rate calculator!

(photo: Federalreserve)

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)