Home Blog

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International)


Sending money should be simple, but choosing the right app to make it happen can be confusing.

Between splitting rent with roommates, sending money to your college student, or paying for expenses while studying abroad, the wrong app can cost you in hidden fees, delays, or even expose you to security risks.

We tested the most popular money transfer apps (including Cash App, Venmo, Zelle, PayPal, and Wise) to see which ones are actually the fastest, cheapest, and safest for everyday use. Whether you’re a student managing a tight budget or a parent sending money for tuition and living expenses, the differences between these apps can add up quickly.

In this guide, we break down the best apps to send money in 2026 based on real-world testing, comparing fees, transfer speeds, security protections, and ease of use.

🏆 Best Apps to Send Money (Quick Picks)

If you just need a quick answer, here are the best money transfer apps based on how you plan to use them:

  • Best for college students (splitting expenses): Cash App
  • Best for instant bank transfers: Zelle
  • Best for sending money to family: PayPal
  • Best for international transfers: Wise

Best Apps To Send Money Domestically

If you’re trying to send money to someone with a US-based bank account, you can send and receive money in under a minute. However, some apps require users to pay a fee for “instant” transfers to accounts while requiring non-paying customers to wait two (or more) business days to receive their cash. These are the top apps for sending money domestically.

Cash App

apps to send money: CashApp

Cash App stands out as the best overall money transfer app for most people (especially college students and parents) because it combines speed, simplicity, and low fees in a way that few competitors match.

In our testing, Cash App consistently delivered one of the easiest experiences for sending and receiving money. Setting up an account took just a few minutes, and sending money between users was instant. For students splitting rent or covering shared expenses, that simplicity makes a big difference.

Like Venmo, Cash App charges 3% for credit card transactions and
0.5-1.5% for instant transfers back to a bank account. 

Fewer people use Cash App compared to our top three apps, but it is a great platform with a user-friendly interface.

Check out our review of Cash App >>>

Fees and Costs

Cash App is free for standard transfers between users, which covers most everyday use cases. However, there are a few important costs to be aware of:

  • Instant transfers to a bank: 0.5%–1.75% fee
  • Standard bank transfers (1–3 days): Free
  • Credit card payments: 3% fee

Venmo

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Venmo

Venmo remains one of the most popular money transfer apps among college students, largely because it’s built around social payments and shared expenses. 

In our testing, Venmo worked especially well for splitting costs (like rent, utilities, and group dinners) thanks to its intuitive interface and built-in payment notes. Sending money was instant between Venmo users, and the app made it easy to track who paid for what.

Users can transfer up to $4,999 per week to any given individual, and transfers are free for the sender. (If you pay someone with a credit card, the fee will be 3%). 

When you send money to another person, it shows up in their Venmo Wallet instantly. However, it typically takes 1-3 days for the corresponding transaction to show up in your checking account.

Users can either keep the money in their “Venmo Wallet” to pay others, or they can transfer the money to a bank account for spending. Standard transfers (which take 1-3 days) cost nothing for receivers. Instant transfers (which take just minutes to show in your account) cost 1% of the transfer amount. Instant transfer fees max out at $10.

Fees and Costs

Venmo is free for standard peer-to-peer payments funded by a bank account or debit card. However, there are a few fees to keep in mind:

  • Instant bank transfers: 1% fee (minimum $0.25, maximum $10)
  • Credit card payments: 3% fee
  • Standard transfers (1–3 days): Free

Zelle

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Zelle

Many major banks (and some smaller banks too) allow their customers to use Zelle to send money to people in the Zelle network. Customers can send and receive money with Zelle through their mobile banking app. For those whose financial institution does not yet offer Zelle, they can download the Zelle app and enroll with their Visa or Mastercard debit card. Their bank does not have to be part of the Zelle Network, however, at least one of the two transacting parties must have a bank that is in the Zelle Network.

Transfers between Zelle members are as close to instantaneous as it gets. Typically transactions settle within 10 minutes of the transfer (when both parties are already enrolled with Zelle). And transfers among members are free!

The only downside to Zelle transactions is the limits. Banks can limit the amount of money you can send to any given individual over some time. My bank limits me to $2,000 in a single transaction and $3,000 over 30 days.

Fees and Costs

One of Zelle’s biggest advantages is that it’s usually free to use.

  • Peer-to-peer transfers: Typically free
  • No instant transfer fees
  • No credit card option

PayPal

best apps to send money

PayPal is the quintessential free peer-to-peer transfer app. Users can instantly transfer $10,000 or more to other PayPal accounts. You only need an email address and a phone number to get an account.

In our testing, PayPal was the most versatile option for sending money beyond just friends and family. It worked well for paying bills, sending larger amounts, and making purchases where added protection matters.

Hook up your bank account to the app, and you can make large cash transfers to others with PayPal accounts. Once the receiver gets the money, they can transfer it back to their bank account (which takes 1-3 days).

If the money is needed right away, they can spend from their PayPal account or do an Instant Transfer (which takes up to 30 minutes) back to the bank account. Instant transfers cost 1% of the amount transferred.

Read our PayPal vs. Cashapp comparison here.

Fees and Costs

PayPal’s pricing is more complex than other apps, and costs can add up depending on how you use it:

  • Sending money domestically (bank/debit): Free
  • Credit/debit card payments: 2.9% + fixed fee
  • Instant transfers: 1.75% fee
  • International transfers: Variable fees + exchange rate markup

Apple Pay

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Apple Pay

Apple Pay makes it easy to send money through iMessage. If both people are Apple Users, the transfer takes just a few minutes. However, transferring the money back to a debit card takes 1-3 days.

Apple Pay allows users to send up to $3,000 per message and $10,000 over a seven-day period. You’ll also be charged a 3% fee for transactions that are funded by a credit card.

Google Pay

Home » Banking » Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Google Pay

Google Pay allows users to send up to $10,000 to any of their Google contacts. Your contact doesn’t need a Google Pay account to receive money from you, but they will need to connect a bank account or debit card to claim the money. 

This is a relatively easy process that takes just a few minutes. Since most people have a Google account, this is a convenient way to send larger amounts of money to your friends and family.

Best Apps To Send Money Internationally

Historically, international remittances were dominated by Western Union and MoneyGram. But today, mobile and web-based interrupters have made it faster and cheaper to send money across borders.

International money transfers involve transfer fees and currency exchange rates. Remittance companies can make money on both sides of these. However, our top recommendations keep margins slim for both of these.

When sending money across borders there may also be security and safety concerns. Our top picks are highly rated companies with excellent reputations, but reputation can’t protect you from every bad thing that could happen. Be sure to seek local knowledge about the best remittance companies before committing to the least expensive options.

Western Union

Western Union

Western Union is still one of the best companies to send money internationally. With more than 150 years of international money transfer experience, combined with 600,000 agents around the world to process your payments, you can make sure that you money arrives where it needs to be.

The fees for Western Union vary based on where you’re sending the money, what type of transfer, and more. Typically, doing a transfer online from your bank account will be the most cost effective, whereas transferring money in cash at a location will cost more.

Wise (Formerly TransferWise)

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Wise

Wise, which recently changed its name from TransferWise, is a unique banking service that allows customers to hold money in many different currencies. 

The platform supports over 56 currencies covering over 70 countries. The most populous countries across the world are all covered, but smaller Central American, South American, African, and Asian nations aren’t covered.

Assuming that Wise supports the required currency, it allows users to send large and small sums of money to over 70 countries. The company uses published exchange rates when sending money, so the only money it earns is on modest transfer fees. Typically, transfer fees end up being lower than 1% of the total transaction (though this varies based on currency types, location, etc.).

Wise does not publish transaction limits but may impose additional requirements for people sending very large sums of money.

Xoom

Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) Best Apps To Send Money: Xoom

Xoom is a PayPal Service that emphasizes ease of use and fast transfers for financial transactions that cross borders. Xoom charges small transfer fees ($2.99-$4.99) for small-dollar transactions, but it marks up the exchange rate by around 3%. That translates to a fee of approximately 3% on large transactions or 5-6% on smaller transactions.

Xoom has a top-notch user experience, which makes it easy to send money without understanding the Forex. It supports transfers to 120 countries. People receiving money from Xoom can receive bank deposits or do cash pickups at select locations throughout the world. For example, Xoom has 38,218 pickup locations in Mexico.

How Students and Parents Actually Use Money Transfer Apps

Money transfer apps aren’t one-size-fits-all—especially for students and families.

In real life, here’s how these apps tend to be used:

  • Students: splitting rent, utilities, groceries, and group expenses
  • Parents: sending money for tuition, emergencies, or monthly support
  • Both: managing shared costs without relying on cash or checks

In our testing, the biggest differences came down to three things: how fast the money arrives, how much it actually costs after fees, and how easy it is to recover your money if something goes wrong.

That’s why we focused this guide on the apps that consistently perform well across those categories—so you can choose the right one for your situation.

Final Thoughts

Transferring money to friends and family should be cheap and easy. If you’re overpaying, switch to an app that can make things simpler and less costly for you. The less you pay to transfer money, the more money your friends and family can receive!

Editor: Clint Proctor

Reviewed by: Chris Muller

The post Best Apps To Send Money (Domestic And International) appeared first on The College Investor.

OSHA Data Exposes the 10 States Failing at Chemical Safety Training


Editor’s Note: This story originally appeared on Trace One.

Millions of U.S. workers handle, store, or work near hazardous chemicals every day—from cleaning solvents and industrial adhesives to flammable gases and corrosive substances.

Without proper training, clear labeling, and accessible safety data sheets, employees may not fully understand the health risks they face, including respiratory illness, chemical burns, or fire and explosion hazards.

Federal regulators and occupational health experts widely view hazard communication as a foundational component of workplace safety because it determines whether workers have the information needed to protect themselves.

To address these risks, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) established the Hazard Communication Standard (HazCom) in 1983. Often referred to as the “right-to-know” rule, the standard requires employers to classify chemical hazards, label containers, maintain safety data sheets, and train workers on safe handling procedures.

Yet more than four decades after its adoption, HazCom remains one of OSHA’s most frequently cited workplace safety standards, indicating persistent compliance gaps across industries and regions.

To identify where U.S. employers are failing to warn workers about chemical dangers, researchers at Trace One analyzed OSHA enforcement data from 2021 through 2025. Learn more about the methodology at the end.

Here are the states with the most HazCom violations.

10. Vermont

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 11.2
  • Total HazCom violations: 141
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 10.6%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $164,855
  • Most common HazCom violation: No written safety plan
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Manufacturing

9. Kansas

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 13.9
  • Total HazCom violations: 817
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 11.5%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $1,373,306
  • Most common HazCom violation: No written safety plan
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Construction

8. Maine

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 14.7
  • Total HazCom violations: 402
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 12.9%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $691,072
  • Most common HazCom violation: No written safety plan
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Manufacturing

7. Hawaii

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 18.4
  • Total HazCom violations: 463
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 10.2%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $264,985
  • Most common HazCom violation: Inaccessible Safety Data Sheets
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Accommodation and Food Services

6. Connecticut

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 19.2
  • Total HazCom violations: 1,393
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 13.4%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $482,962
  • Most common HazCom violation: Missing chemical safety training
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Construction

5. Oregon

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 21.5
  • Total HazCom violations: 1,782
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 6.2%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $355,711
  • Most common HazCom violation: No written safety plan
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Other Services

4. Tennessee

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 22.2
  • Total HazCom violations: 3,159
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 21.6%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $641,782
  • Most common HazCom violation: No written safety plan
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Manufacturing

3. Delaware

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 26.5
  • Total HazCom violations: 542
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 17.2%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $761,460
  • Most common HazCom violation: Missing chemical safety training
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Construction

2. Maryland

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 39.0
  • Total HazCom violations: 4,370
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 20.7%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $1,019,154
  • Most common HazCom violation: Missing chemical safety training
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Construction

1. Alaska

  • HazCom violations per 100k workers: 44.7
  • Total HazCom violations: 553
  • Share of inspections with a HazCom violation: 11.1%
  • Total HazCom violation penalties: $639,068
  • Most common HazCom violation: Missing chemical safety training
  • Most common industry for HazCom violations: Health Care and Social Assistance

Methodology

The data used in this study is from OSHA’s Enforcement Data and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Current Employment Statistics.

To determine the states where U.S. employers most frequently fail to warn their workers about chemical dangers, researchers at Trace One analyzed and ranked states based on their total HazCom violations per 100,000 workers from 2021 through 2025.

Violations were considered to be HazCom-related if the enforcement record referenced OSHA’s 1910.1200 standard and any of its subsections.

For additional context, the total HazCom violations, share of inspections with a HazCom violation, total HazCom violation penalties, the most common HazCom violation, and the most common industry for HazCom violations were calculated for each state.

The S&P 500 Just Broke a Key Technical Level, but History Says Don’t Be Concerned



The stock market fell through its 200-day moving average for the first time in nearly a year.

[TX, Select Counties] Primeway Federal Credit Union $100 Referral Checking Bonus


Offer at a glance

  • Maximum bonus amount: $100
  • Availability: Four counties in TX: Houston, Washington, Fort Bend, Harris
  • Direct deposit required: Yes, $500+
  • Additional requirements: 5 debit card transactions
  • Hard/soft pull: Unknown 
  • ChexSystems: Unknown
  • Credit card funding: Unknown 
  • Monthly fees:
  • Early account termination fee:
  • Household limit:
  • Expiration date: None listed

The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Primeway Federal Credit Union is offering a $100 referral bonus to both parties. Person being referred must complete the following requirements within 60 days:
    • One (1) or more direct deposits totaling $500
    • Five (5) or more debit card transactions (excluding ATM transactions)

The Fine Print

  • All bank account bonuses are treated as income/interest and as such you have to pay taxes on them

Avoiding Fees

Monthly Fees

Checking the Way You Want It has no monthly fees to worry about. 

Early Account Termination Fee

I wasn’t able to find a fee schedule so unsure if there is any EATF. 

Our Verdict

Feel free to share your referrals in the comments below, along with if it’s a hard or soft pull to open the account. 

Hat tip to ShawntheShawn

Useful posts regarding bank bonuses:

  • A Beginners Guide To Bank Account Bonuses
  • Bank Account Quick Reference Table (Spreadsheet) (very useful for sorting bonuses by different parameters)
  • PSA: Don’t Call The Bank
  • Introduction To ChexSystems
  • Banks & Credit Unions That Are ChexSystems Inquiry Sensitive
  • What Banks & Credit Unions Do/Don’t Pull ChexSystems?
  • How To Use Our Direct Deposit Page For Bank Bonuses Page
  • Common Bank Bonus Misconceptions + Why You Should Give Them A Go
  • How Many Bank Accounts Can I Safely Open Within A Year For Bank Bonus Purposes?
  • Affiliate Links & Bank Bonuses – We Won’t Be Using Them
  • Complete List Of Ways To Close Bank Accounts At Each Bank
  • Banks That Allow/Don’t Allow Out Of State Checking Applications
  • Bank Bonus Posting Times

Markets wait for Trump and Iran to follow through on Hormuz threats



Wall Street is bracing for a Monday deadline that President Donald Trump set for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz while the global economy reels from an energy crisis that shows little signs of abating.

Futures tied to the Dow Jones industrial average fell 78 points, or 0.17%. S&P 500 futures were down 0.25%, and Nasdaq futures lost 0.32%.

U.S. oil futures dipped 0.12% to at $98.11 a barrel, and Brent crude eased 0.38% to $111.76. The national average gasoline price reached $3.94 a gallon on Sunday, up more than $1 over the past month, according to AAA.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose 1.7 basis point to 4.409%. The U.S. dollar was up 0.1% against the euro and flat against the yen.

On Saturday evening in the U.S., Trump gave Tehran 48 hours to comply with his demand or else face the destruction of power plants, potentially escalating his war to civilian infrastructure.

Iran responded to the ultimatum by warning that such an attack would result in its forces similarly targeting vital infrastructure, including desalination plants that provide much of the region’s fresh water.

Trump’s AI and crypto czar, David Sacks, raised alarms earlier this month about this exact path of escalation as he called on the president to declare victory and “get out” of Iran.

“If you see that type of destruction continue, you could literally render the Gulf almost uninhabitable,” he said in an episode of the All-In podcast on March 13. “I mean you’re not going to have enough water for 100 million people, and human beings just cannot survive very long without water. So that would be a truly catastrophic scenario, and we’re talking about destroying the Gulf states economically and then also from a humanitarian perspective.”

Both sides showed no signs of backing down and further upped the ante militarily. Trump is sending three more amphibious assault ships and 2,500 additional Marines to the Mideast, joining a separate Marine Expeditionary Unit already headed there. There are already more than 50,000 U.S. troops in the region.

Meanwhile, Iran launched ballistic missiles at a U.S.-U.K. base 2,500 miles away on the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. The attack was unsuccessful, but it demonstrated that Iran’s missiles have much longer range than previously known and could theoretically reach most of Europe.

On Sunday, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte backed the Iran war and predicted the alliance would eventually come around to support it too, after several members rebuffed Trump’s demand that they provide naval escorts.

“If Iran would have the nuclear capability, including, together with the missile capability, it will be a direct threat, a existential threat, to Israel, to the region, to Europe, to the stability in the world,” Rutte told CBS News. “So the president doing this is crucial, and I’ve seen the polling, but I really hope the American people will be with him, because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

In addition to NATO, Trump got more signs of support from the United Arab Emirates, which has suffered from a barrage of Iranian missiles and drones.

Anwar Gargash, a senior UAE diplomat, suggested an increasingly hardened stance toward Iran that aligns more closely with the U.S. and Israeli stance.

“Our thinking does not stop at a ceasefire, but rather turns toward solutions that ensure lasting security in the Arabian Gulf, curbing the nuclear threat, missiles, drones, and the bullying of the straits,” he wrote on X. “It is inconceivable that this aggression should turn into a permanent state of threat.”

With no evidence of any talks aimed at halting the conflict, the thousands of Marines headed to the Mideast could be involved in a climactic battle to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and crush Iran’s ability to weaponize it again.

Still, some have called for a less dangerous option, namely a naval blockade of Iran’s oil exports meant to pressure the regime to open the strait.

“The US can implode Iran’s economy by shutting down its oil exports,” Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, wrote in a Substack on March 13. “That might open up the Strait of Hormuz a lot faster than anything else. Time to implode Iran’s economy and give the Ayatollahs a taste of their own medicine.”

Iron ore miners could face billions more in fuel costs due to Iran war, Fortescue says




Iron ore miners could face billions more in fuel costs due to Iran war, Fortescue says

Fannie, Freddie place large bids for mortgage-backed securities


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have begun placing sizable orders to purchase mortgage-backed securities, stepping into a market roiled by widening bond spreads and a surge in volatility, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

Processing Content

The government-controlled entities are moving to capitalize on a sharp selloff while expanding their already significant portfolios of bonds and loans, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. Their efforts follow a directive two months ago from President Donald Trump instructing the companies to acquire $200 billion of MBS as part of a push to drive down mortgage rates and bolster housing affordability.

READ MORE: What Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac MBS purchases mean for reform

The increased buying could help cushion a spike triggered by the Iran war that’s sent those rates to a three-month high. Still, it may only partially offset the broader market pressures stemming from the conflict, punctuated by a marked jump in Treasury yields on Friday.

Representatives for Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees both companies, didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment.

Fannie and Freddie, which purchase and package home loans into securities and financially guarantee them to buyers, rank among the largest holders of US mortgage debt via their so-called retained portfolios — the bonds and loans they hold onto rather than sell to investors.

READ MORE: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac’s total portfolio at multiyear high

The pair, under federal conservatorship since 2008, once held a combined $1.5 trillion worth, but by late 2022 that figure had dropped to just $158 billion. Since the middle of last year the portfolios have been on the rise again, climbing to $278 billion as of January, according to the most recent data available.

Trump’s directive for Fannie and Freddie to ramp up bond and loan purchases sparked an almost immediate move in the roughly $9 trillion MBS market, with relative yields to Treasuries on recently issued securities narrowing about 0.2 percentage point.

In the weeks that followed, however, the pair bought at only a modest pace. That likely reflected already compressed risk premiums on many mortgage bonds, which left limited profit potential and reduced scope to meaningfully influence mortgage rates.

Mortgage-bond spreads have widened sharply since then, as a pickup in interest-rate volatility, driven in part by swings in oil prices amid the escalating conflict in the Middle East, ripples through fixed-income markets.



Bitcoin Live Trading



Join Chento for live Bitcoin trading with real market execution, using price action and market structure. Every trade is taken and explained live as the market moves, with disciplined risk management. No demos. No hindsight. Just real BTC live trading.

___________________________________________

𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗔 𝗥𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡 𝗨𝗣 𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗟?
⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇

🟧 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗡 – 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝗩𝗜𝗣𝟭 + 𝗨𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 $𝟭,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗕𝗼𝗻𝘂𝘀 + 𝗮 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗪𝗜𝗡 𝟵,𝟰𝟬𝟬 𝗨𝗦𝗗𝗧!
👉 Sign up:
✅ 𝗡𝗼 𝗞𝗬𝗖 𝗼𝗿 𝗩𝗣𝗡 𝗥𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱!
___________________________________________

𝗙𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗢𝗪 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗢
⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇

👉 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝗻 𝗫:
👉 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼’𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹:
👉 𝗦𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗫 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆:
___________________________________________

👁️‍🗨️ 𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁:

We take our code of ethics very seriously and have engaged @zachxbt ( / zachxbt ) to monitor our progress. If you feel we’re not living up to it and have hard evidence please mail ZachXBT directly at reportcb@protonmail.com

⚠️ 𝗕𝗘𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝗜𝗡 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟𝗦
___________________________________________
📝 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿:

Crypto Banter is a social podcast for entertainment purposes only!
All opinions expressed by the hosts, guests and callers should not be construed as financial advice! Views expressed by guests and hosts do not reflect the views of the station. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research.

#LiveTrading #BitcoinLiveTrading #BTCLiveTrading #Chento

⏱ 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗺𝗽𝘀:
00:00 Trading Bitcoin Live: First Stream Alpha
02:28 Bitcoin Long Reveal: $6,000 Profit Captured
03:04 My Secret Order Flow Trading Strategy
05:03 Michael Sailor Is Buying: Market Impact
11:10 Why I Only Trade High-Liquidity Bitcoin
23:40 Closing The Long: Secure Your Gains
30:00 New York Open: The 10AM Pivot
54:54 High Stakes: Entering a 75x Scalp
1:10:54 Why Michael Sailor is Dangerous for Bitcoin
1:33:13 Spotting Liquidity Walls and Sell Pressure
1:58:22 High-Risk Move: Letting Chat Decide Trades
2:42:04 Trading Reality: Handling Losses and Rejections

🎬 𝗪𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗻 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲:

source

Singapore’s MAS Rolls Out AI Risk Toolkit For Banks, Insurers, And Capital Markets Firms


Singapore’s central bank has released an industry-developed toolkit to help financial institutions manage risks from artificial intelligence, as regulators and banks move from broad AI principles to more practical controls for generative and agentic AI.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it had concluded phase two of Project MindForge with the publication of an AI Risk Management Toolkit for the financial services sector.

The toolkit was developed with a consortium of 24 banks, insurers, capital markets firms and other industry players, and is intended to support risk management across traditional AI, generative AI, and emerging agentic AI systems.

At the core of the package is an “AI Risk Management Operationalisation Handbook”, which gives financial institutions practical guidance on how to implement AI risk controls.

MAS said the handbook is accompanied by a supplement compiling case studies from financial institutions, outlining lessons learned, implementation challenges, and approaches to managing AI in different organisational settings.

The handbook is structured around four areas that mirror MAS’s proposed Guidelines on AI Risk Management: scope and oversight, AI risk management, AI lifecycle management, and organisational enablers such as capabilities, infrastructure, and resources.

MAS had launched a public consultation on those proposed guidelines in November 2025, saying they would apply across the financial sector and set out supervisory expectations on oversight, governance and lifecycle controls for AI use.

MAS said it is still reviewing feedback from that consultation. The central bank added that the handbook will be updated periodically as industry use of AI matures and as supervisory expectations evolve.

To support wider adoption, MAS plans to set up an AI risk management workgroup under its BuildFin.ai initiative, bringing together MindForge consortium members and other practitioners to develop implementation resources and frameworks for newer technologies such as agentic AI.

Project MindForge was launched in mid-2023 as part of MAS’s broader push to encourage responsible AI adoption in finance.

MAS has also been building out a wider AI-in-finance agenda, including a 2024 information paper on good practices in AI and generative AI model risk management and a 2025 partnership with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority on AI in financial services.

Kenneth Gay, MAS’s chief fintech officer, said the toolkit marked “a major step forward” in promoting responsible AI use in finance and would help strengthen governance and risk management practices across the industry.

MAS is trying to move the market from principle-setting to implementation. That matters because many banks already have AI policies on paper, but generative and agentic AI create newer operational risks around oversight, accountability, model behaviour, and lifecycle controls.

By publishing a handbook built with industry participants rather than issuing rules alone, MAS appears to be signalling a more collaborative supervisory approach.



Indianapolis is America’s #1 Market For Buyers—But It Also Ranks High For Foreclosures


Indianapolis and the state in which it sits, Indiana, couldn’t be further apart when it comes to their real estate fortunes. For mom-and-pop landlords eyeing Indiana for future investments, the sharp divide between parts of the city and state is indicative of the modern-day market realities that need to be considered when underwriting deals.

Indianapolis: Zillow’s Top Buyer-Friendly Market

Indianapolis has been on investors’ radars for some time, culminating in Zillow ranking it as the most buyer-friendly market among the 50 largest U.S. metros for 2026. The listings giant cited a perfect storm of buyer favorability.

Orphe Divounguy, senior economist at Zillow, said of the list, which featured mainly Midwestern and Southern cities:

“Home shoppers have room to breathe in these buyer-friendly markets. Lower competition gives buyers more time to decide and wiggle room to negotiate, adding up to a less stressful shopping experience. Cooling prices today, paired with expected growth ahead, make for a good entry point for those who have been waiting for the right moment. For sellers, pricing strategically from the start becomes that much more important when buyers hold the power.”

Affordability Is a Key Driver

“People are gravitating toward this area due to the market affordability,” Laura Turner, a broker and owner of F.C. Tucker Laura Turner Realty Group, told local news outlet WRTV. ”Nationally, they may be spending 50% to 60% of their income [on their mortgage]; here, it’s 30% or less of their income.”

“Companies are going to be looking at this area to say we want to locate headquarters to Indianapolis,” Turner continued. “Because of the affordable housing, because this is a destination that people are wanting to raise their families in.”

For smaller investors looking to augment their incomes with additional cash flow, Indianapolis works because entry-level prices and cap rates make turning a profit or at least breaking even a real possibility, even as interest rates flutter around 6%. However, Indianapolis also serves as a cautionary tale for what investors need to watch for when scouting markets.

Regional Indianapolis: A Tale of Two—or More—Cities

Metro Indianapolis, like Pittsburgh and Detroit and other older Midwestern cities, functions as a regional system rather than a single city. Commuting patterns and housing patterns mean that neighboring regions are often influenced by one another.

Stats show that growth across all regional areas does not happen at the same pace, and generally, regional growth, where residents can live and work, has grown much faster than city growth in the downtown areas. 

The same is true of Indiana as a whole. Recent metro growth in suburban neighborhoods in central Indiana has not been matched by growth in the denser city centers, which have suffered. 

According to Indianahub.org, the state’s growth has spread out into:

  • Logistics corridors
  • Suburban office nodes
  • Life sciences clusters
  • Industrial parks

However, in the city center, signs of urban decline are evident. According to Axios, the Indianapolis metro area grew by 2.2% between 2020 and 2023, making up half of the gains in Indiana’s population.

Indiana’s Foreclosure Problem Uncovered

According to real estate analytics and data platform ATTOM, Indianapolis ranked near the top of national foreclosure rates with roughly one filing for every 1,249 housing units in February. Another Indiana city, Evansville, recorded one for every 1,316 units, giving it a top-five foreclosure berth alongside the state’s capital.

Indiana’s dive into foreclosure despair hasn’t been sudden. Last year’s ATTOM foreclosure reports showed one filing for every 302 housing units, signaling a multiyear blip, comprising homeowners who, amid job losses, inflation, and rising interest rates, simply don’t have the money to pay their mortgages.

How Exactly Can Indianapolis Be the “Best” and “Worst” at the Same Time?

If Indianapolis were a comic book character, it would be the Joker, wearing two expressions at the same time. But how does a mild-mannered Midwestern city manage to have such an extreme split personality? 

It’s because we are not comparing apples with apples. The Zillow report focuses on conditions facing would-be buyers today—mortgage affordability, competition levels from other buyers, and expected appreciation. ATTOM, on the other hand, focuses on borrower distress among existing owners. Also, ATTOM’s figures account for households that fell behind on payments months or even years earlier, reflecting economic conditions over a long period, some stemming from the forbearance conditions put in place after the pandemic.

The Idiosyncrasies of the Indianapolis Market

Indianapolis is a unique market in many ways because it is many things at once. Regarding its foreclosure ranking, the city had a high number of “zombie foreclosures,” according to ATTOM data: 6.5% of foreclosures stemming from financial mishaps years earlier, often in the form of vacant or distressed houses.

“ATTOM’s data doesn’t pinpoint the local nuances behind why certain metros stand out, but in parts of the Midwest, it likely reflects a mix of older housing stock, slower demand in some neighborhoods, and ownership or equity situations that make distressed owners more likely to walk away early,” Rob Barber, CEO of ATTOM, told Realtor.com. “Those conditions can increase the chances that a foreclosure becomes a zombie, even though overall zombie rates remain low nationally.”

Investors Are Flipping Foreclosures Into Rentals

Additionally, because of Indianapolis’s unique regional layout, many disparate areas—some thriving, others struggling—are included in its overall reported numbers, creating a somewhat confusing picture.

While the investor heat has been turned up on Indianapolis for a while, with out-of-towners rushing in to rehab and rent, many locals feel this has only contributed to the real instability, taking homes away from local owner-occupants.

“Far too often, when these homes end up going into foreclosure, they end up being purchased by out-of-state investors, who then flip them into expensive rentals,” Amy Nelson, executive director of the Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana, told Indiana Public Media (IPM).

Final Thoughts: How Out-of-Town Investors Should View Indiana

Overall, Indiana’s foreclosure numbers are not off the scale and reflect normalization after years of housing instability rather than a crash. In ATTOM’s national release, CEO Barber emphasized that even with year-over-year increases, “overall foreclosure levels remain well below historic norms.”

Realtor.com noted that foreclosures in Indianapolis and other Midwestern towns actually represent an opportunity for new investors. However, as with any investment, due diligence is required, especially with an out-of-state investment where you cannot just jump in your car to check on your rental. That means meticulous tenant screening, hiring the right property manager, and doing your homework on which neighborhood you are investing in.

In Rust Belt Midwestern cities like Indianapolis and Pittsburgh, neighborhoods can change not only from region to region but also from block to block. FHCCI’s review of Marion County pinpointed specific neighborhoods such as Crown Hill, Near Northwest-Riverside, Maywood, Near Southside, and Martindale Brightwood as having the highest foreclosure rates, with the far Eastside also flagged for heavy out-of-state investor activity. Homes in these neighborhoods will need to be examined block by block. It’s also probably best to examine alternative neighborhoods to stave off competition.

It’s important not to believe all the investor hype about Indianapolis, which would have you think that, amid the deluge of new residents, jobs, and affordable housing, you can throw a dart anywhere on the city map and make money. Mortgage rates, employment, and tenants’ profiles are only part of the picture.

“It is rising escrow costs, for instance,” FHCCI’s Amy Nelson told WBOI News. “Although your mortgage payment very often hasn’t changed much, it’s the other costs that have, and that can be home insurance rates, which have been escalating, and utility costs and property taxes, all of which can have a significant impact.”