Difference Between Business Management and Business Administration?
Business Management Vs Business Administration
Management Vs Administration
Taylorism kya hai?
Fayolism kya hai?
Fayolism
Taylorism
#ManagementVsAdministration
#FayolismAndTaylorism
व्यवसाय प्रबंधन और व्यवसाय प्रशासन।
व्यवसाय प्रबंधन और व्यवसाय प्रशासन के बीच अंतर?
व्यवसाय प्रबंधन बनाम व्यवसाय प्रशासन
प्रबंधन बनाम प्रशासन
टेलरिज्म क्या है?
फयोलिज्म क्या है?
Like
Share
Comment
Subscribe (bell icon)
Thanks For your precious TIME.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
#UrStartup
Stay Connected with us on this wonderful journey.
Ur Startup
Two unrelated problems are hitting Public Service Loan Forgiveness borrowers at once: July and August payments that haven’t posted yet, and the Education Department is rescinding qualifying months it says were credited in error during the Biden-era account adjustment.
Our review of affected borrower accounts points to a narrow pattern: forbearance months other than processing forbearance, plus months in the Extended and Extended Graduated repayment plans that were counted when they shouldn’t have been.
Borrowers need to validate their own counts using the MyAid TXT File and compare that to their records of PSLF certification and payments.
Borrowers chasing Public Service Loan Forgiveness have spent the past two weeks watching their qualifying payment counts move in the wrong direction. Some lost six months. Some lost more.
The fear running through borrower forums is that the Trump administration is quietly unwinding PSLF, or reversing the one-time income-driven repayment account adjustment that brought millions of borrowers years closer to forgiveness. Based on the accounts we’ve reviewed and what the Department has confirmed on the record, that is not what’s happening.
What is happening is narrower, more technical, and because the Department has explained almost none of it publicly, considerably more damaging to borrower trust than it needed to be. A banner on StudentAid.gov has told borrowers only that their counts are wrong and that a fix is coming. And here’s what were seeing analyzing dozens of reports and borrower accounts.
Would you like to save this?
We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!
Problem One: July And August Payments Haven’t Posted
The smaller of the two issues is a posting lag. Payments made in July and August are not showing up in PSLF counts on StudentAid.gov for a large number of borrowers, a likely side effect of the system overhaul that took effect July 1 to implement new loan limits and repayment plans.
This one is a data problem, not a policy decision. We’ve heard unconfirmed reports that payment counter should update within 60 to 90 days, and payments made during that window still count. However, it’s simply another reminder about why you need to keep your own proof of payment and employment throughout the process.
The frustrating part is the waiting, particularly for anyone sitting at 118 or 119 payments who can’t tell whether they’ve finished. Those borrowers are also the ones most likely to be weighing a PSLF buyback request, which is hard to evaluate when the underlying count is unreliable.
Problem Two: The Department Is Lowering PSLF Counts
The bigger issue is that the Education Department is rescinding qualifying months from borrowers’ trackers. The Department of Education said it noticed the vast majority of affected borrowers, but many have reported simply watched their totals shrink with no communication at all. Sadly, the communication pattern is familiar to anyone who followed the MOHELA false delinquency notices earlier this year.
Call center staff initially described the drops as a data error headed for correction, which many borrowers reasonably read as a promise that the lost months were coming back. Forbes reported on the resulting panic in early August, as borrowers compared notes on Reddit and found no consistent explanation. It fit a long pattern of student loan servicer errors that borrowers are left to untangle themselves.
Then, the Department of Education, in statements to POLITICO and Forbes, said the agency had found “PSLF counter code errors” traceable to changes made in May 2024. The College Investor asked the Department to confirm the specifics. The full statement we received reads:
While revamping the federal student aid systems for the July 1 changes, FSA identified multiple PSLF counter code errors stemming from changes implemented in May 2024 under the Biden Administration. These errors resulted in inaccurate payment counts for some borrowers. Like other missteps caused by the previous Administration, FSA has resolved the issue and already notified the vast majority of affected borrowers of updates to their payment counts. The Department remains committed to ensuring that every qualifying payment is properly credited to a borrower’s account.
The statement confirms the PSLF count changes were intentional and pins them to May 2024, and it says the work is done. It does not say what was corrected, and borrowers still watching their counts move can reasonably read “resolved”. But that doesn’t necessarily bring confidence back.
What The Pattern Actually Shows
The Department has not said which months it removed or why. Our review of borrower accounts and records suggests the reversals cluster around two categories: incorrectly counting forbearance time, and borrowers enrolled in a non-qualifying repayment plan.
The first category: forbearance periods other than processing forbearance. A 60 day processing forbearance while a servicer processes an IDR application counts toward PSLF, while a general or hardship forbearance never have, outside the temporary waivers that closed in 2022 and 2024. Our breakdown of which payments and periods count toward PSLF lays out the full eligibility set.
The second category involves borrowers in the Extended Repayment Plan or the Graduated Repayment Plan from late 2024 forward. That plan has never been a qualifying repayment plan for PSLF, yet payments made under it appear to have been credited anyway.
While it’s frustrating for borrowers relying on the PSLF payment tracker for eligibility, these months were never eligible to be credited, and now they’re being taken back. And that’s cold comfort to a borrower who picked a repayment plan based on a number they believed to be accurate.
Not every reduction fits the patterns above and there may be genuine errors still. If your story doesn’t match these patterns, check your records and file a PSLF Reconsideration Request for missing eligible months.
Why This Isn’t A PSLF Rollback
These changes have sparked concerns that the Department of Education is rolling back public service loan forgiveness. From what we’ve seen, this really isn’t the case.
Borrowers should note that PSLF is written into statute. The Secretary of Education cannot repeal it by memo, and forgiveness already granted and discharged is, for practical purposes, final. We walked through in detail in our analysis of whether a president can claw back student loan forgiveness.
Adjusting a payment counter is different. No debt is being un-forgiven, just a tracker is being changed. That’s legal for the Department to do and they should be doing it, especially if there were incorrect payment counts.
The frustrating part for borrowers is that they rely on this data to be accurate. This is just another issue in the 10-plus-year string of errors and changes that PSLF borrowers have dealt with.
The Real Failure Here Is Silence
We put five questions to the Department: which categories of months were pulled, how many borrowers were affected and by how many months, whether any counts were reduced in error and if those months will be restored automatically, the current processing time for a reconsideration request, and when July and August payments will post. None were answered.
Beyond that statement, the Department has released nothing publicly describing what it corrected or whether borrowers who lost legitimate months get them back. Advocacy groups including the Student Debt Crisis Center have called for a payment pause until the errors are sorted out, echoing the long waits already dogging PSLF buyback requests.
That lack of transparent communication turned a technical correction into a panic. Had the Department published a plain-language notice naming the forbearance types and repayment plans involved, most borrowers could have checked their own history in an afternoon.
What To Do Right Now
Analyze your data. Log into your StudentAid.gov aid summary and download the My Aid Data TXT file. It shows qualifying counts loan by loan, which the dashboard tracker doesn’t — and loan-level detail is what exposes a bad repayment plan or forbearance period.
Reconcile month by month. Match your counts against your payment history and approved employment certification forms. Our PSLF checklist covers what a complete file looks like.
Keep both sets of records permanently. Approved ECFs and payment histories are the only evidence you control, and fixing servicer errors on your record is far easier with documentation in hand.
File a PSLF reconsideration request if a period was removed in error. It’s currently the only formal channel, and there’s no published turnaround time. If it stalls, the student loan ombudsman is the next escalation point.
Don’t stop paying or switch plans in a panic. Confirm your plan qualifies first. For PSLF, the qualifying payment plans are IBR, ICR, PAYE, RAP, and the Standard 10-year plan.
Editor: Colin Graves
The post PSLF Payment Counts Drop as Education Department Corrects IDR Adjustment Errors appeared first on The College Investor.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways
Seven AI tools that can now run major parts of a solopreneur business — from research and email to building apps and executing entire workflows.
What these AI systems can do today that they couldn’t reliably do just a few weeks ago — and why the shift from answering questions to doing the work matters.
Why you don’t need all seven — and how to decide which parts of your business AI should run while you focus on the work that still needs you.
Something has changed with AI in the past few weeks. The best AI tools are no longer just giving solopreneurs better answers. They’re starting to do the work — researching customers, building specialist AI workers, creating functioning apps from plain English, operating inside browsers, handling routine email conversations and connecting workflows that previously needed you sitting in the middle.
A few weeks ago, many of these jobs still required constant prompting, copying, pasting and supervision. That gap is starting to disappear.
In the video above, I break down seven of these tools and show what this new generation of AI can actually do inside a one-person business. But here’s the counterintuitive part: you don’t need all seven.
The real opportunity is figuring out which parts of your business AI can now run — and which parts still require you. I wrote about an early version of this shift in my book, The Wolf Is at the Door. At the time, intelligent agents were still an emerging frontier. I described how one request could eventually trigger an AI to complete multiple tasks from beginning to end, before reaching a conclusion that feels considerably more relevant today: “the bottleneck is not technology, but humans.” Three years later, we’re starting to see what that actually looks like.
The 2026 Intuit QuickBooks AI Impact Report found that 77% of U.S. small and midsize businesses now use AI regularly, while 43% say it has increased their revenue. But using AI isn’t the same as creating leverage with it.
Every new tool can become another subscription, dashboard and job for you to manage. The bigger shift happens when AI starts removing work from your business rather than adding another layer to it. One AI researches. Another builds. Another communicates. Another automates. Another keeps the process moving. And suddenly the question changes from:
“Which AI tools should I be using?” to: “What am I still doing that AI should already own?”
All seven tools, the workflows they can now handle and the ChatGPT trick I’m using to save Lovable credits are demonstrated in the video above. Your inbox. Research. Follow-up. Content. Reporting. Admin. Even the app you’ve wanted to build but never had the team to create.
Once you start seeing those as jobs AI can take off your plate, the interesting question isn’t which tool you need next. It’s what you could build if you weren’t the one doing all of it.
The free AI Success Kit, available to download for a limited time, comes with a free chapter from my new book, The Wolf is at The Door – How to Survive and Thrive in an AI-Driven World.
Key Takeaways
Seven AI tools that can now run major parts of a solopreneur business — from research and email to building apps and executing entire workflows.
What these AI systems can do today that they couldn’t reliably do just a few weeks ago — and why the shift from answering questions to doing the work matters.
Why you don’t need all seven — and how to decide which parts of your business AI should run while you focus on the work that still needs you.
Something has changed with AI in the past few weeks. The best AI tools are no longer just giving solopreneurs better answers. They’re starting to do the work — researching customers, building specialist AI workers, creating functioning apps from plain English, operating inside browsers, handling routine email conversations and connecting workflows that previously needed you sitting in the middle.
A few weeks ago, many of these jobs still required constant prompting, copying, pasting and supervision. That gap is starting to disappear.
After a stint on the high-yield desk at Goldman Sachs, David Tepper launched the hedge fund Appaloosa Management in the early 1990s. Over the last couple of decades, Tepper has generated an average annual return in the mid to high 20% range — highlighted by an outsize performance in 2009 after he bought distressed bank securities near their lows during the financial crisis.
Combined with his ownership of the Carolina Panthers football team, Tepper’s fortune has made him an investment personality whose moves are dissected for clues about the market’s direction. During the second quarter, Appaloosa’s 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission showed that the firm fully exited its position in Lyft(LYFT +0.40%) while simultaneously adding more than 1.3 million shares of its ride-hailing rival, Uber Technologies(UBER +0.32%). Uber is now one of Appaloosa’s five largest positions, representing about 7% of the portfolio.
Investors watching Tepper closely see this transaction as more than a simple rotation. Rather, it reflects a calculated judgment about relative competitive strength and long-term value creation in an intense ridesharing and delivery landscape.
David Tepper. Image source: Getty Images.
Breaking down Tepper’s Lyft trade
According to filings, Appaloosa initiated its stake in Lyft during the first quarter of 2024, buying 467,618 shares. Throughout the rest of the year, its position grew to 13.5 million shares. While Tepper held the stock for roughly two years, his fund steadily pruned the position throughout 2025 and fully exited during the second quarter of this year.
Today’s Change
(0.32%) $0.25
Current Price
$78.80
Key Data Points
Market Cap
$160BMarket cap calculated using publicly traded shares outstanding only. Does not include unlisted, private, or dual-class non-traded shares. Implied market cap may vary.
Day’s Range
$77.85 – $80.22
52wk Range
$65.41 – $101.99
Volume
12.8M
Avg Vol
20.7M
Gross Margin
35.42%
I think the decision to exit was influenced less by any problems at the company and more by a broader desire for sharper focus in the industries in which Lyft operates. The company continues to post respectable growth in rides and gross bookings, but it remains a much narrower service provider whose scale lags that of Uber.
Analyzing Uber’s business results
Uber and Lyft compete in overlapping markets, yet Uber’s more-diversified platform and stronger financial momentum make it a more compelling long-term holding. During the second quarter, it reported gross bookings of $58 billion, up 24% year over year. The number of trips grew 18% to 3.9 billion, driven by robust growth in monthly active platform consumers (MAPCs).
These performance metrics translated to 33% growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Free cash flow for the quarter totaled $2.8 billion, lifting Uber’s trailing-12-month free cash flow above $10 billion for the first time. This performance proves Uber commands impressive operating leverage across its mobility and delivery segments, both of which are supported by the company’s expanding higher-margin advertising services.
Should you buy Uber stock right now?
The consensus price target for Uber among Wall Street analysts is $101, implying roughly 30% upside to current trading levels. This disconnect between the share price and Wall Street’s forecast can largely be explained by persistent anxiety over the disruption promised by autonomous vehicle (AV) fleets.
Expanding services from Alphabet‘s Waymo and Tesla‘s Robotaxi have come with a perception of increased competitive pressures. This has resulted in significant multiple compression relative to Uber’s historical valuation profile. Nevertheless, management is quietly scaling up its own AV partnerships and targeting several cities for launches over the coming quarters.
UBER PE Ratio data by YCharts; PE = price to earnings.
Uber’s network effects, global footprint, and proven ability to convert rider and order volumes into expanding margins provide a durable foundation that robotaxi fears shouldn’t erode overnight (if at all). The combination of accelerating free cash flow, an attractive valuation, and its model for adapting to embrace autonomous vehicles creates an asymmetric opportunity most investors appear to be overlooking.
There are currently two Canadian odd lot tender opportunities (we posted about DCBO before, but target price has been increased and offer extended)
Our Verdict
These offers are a bit more complicated than the OPTU deal we previously posted about due to tax implications. The site that I linked to does a good job explaining some sort of the risks involved, but as always do your own research and decide if these offers are worth doing for your own circumstances.
ధనవంతులు ఎక్కువగా డబ్బుని Invest చేసేది ఇక్కడే! 💰 – Top 5 Investments of Rich People
Open free Demat A/C with shoonya
Discover the 5 major investments that many wealthy people prioritize to build long-term wealth.
In this video, I explain how successful people often focus on creating assets instead of increasing expenses. We discuss Business, Real Estate, Stocks & Mutual Funds, Gold, and Self-Investment (Skills & Health), along with practical insights that anyone can learn from.
In this video:
• Business Investments
• Real Estate Investments
• Stocks & Mutual Funds
• Gold Investments
• Self-Investment (Skills & Health)
• Importance of long-term investing
• Why investing is essential for wealth creation
• Asset allocation basics
If you found this video helpful, don’t forget to:
👍 Like the video
💬 Share it with your friends and family
🔔 Subscribe to the channel for more personal finance content.
Disclaimer:
This video is created solely for educational and informational purposes, I am not a SEBI Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) or SEBI Registered Research Analyst (RA). The content shared in this video should not be considered investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Stock market and mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Please read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. All investments carry risks. Returns are not fixed or guaranteed and depend on market performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Platform Disclaimer:
This video include information about the Soonya platform for educational or promotional purposes, Before opening a Demat or Trading Account, please compare brokerage charges, Annual Maintenance Charges (AMC), platform features, terms & conditions, and other applicable fees. Choose a brokerage platform only after conducting your own research and selecting the one that best suits your financial needs.
Tags :
Top 5 Investments of Rich People, rich people investment, where do rich people invest their money, Where Rich People Invest Their Money?, where rich people invest their money, where rich people invest their money telugu, rich people investments, rich people investment strategy, top 5 investments, best investment options, best investment options in telugu, investment ideas telugu, investing in telugu, wealth creation telugu, personal finance telugu, money management telugu, stock market telugu, mutual funds telugu, sip investment telugu, equity investment telugu, real estate telugu, gold investment telugu, business ideas telugu, financial education telugu, passive income telugu, kowshik maridi
When the Equity Premium Was New: How the Baleful Impact of Deflation Eluded E. L. Smith Edward F. McQuarrie is a Professor Emeritus, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University
EBITDA, EBITA or EBIT? Doron Nissim is Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting and Finance at Columbia Business School, Columbia University
Profitability Meets Investment: The Wealth Creation Effect in Stock Returns Francesco Franzoni is Professor of Finance at US/Lugano and Research Fellow at CEPR Daniel Obrycki is a partner at The Applied Finance Group Rafael Resendes is a partner at The Applied Finance Group,
Carbon Beta: A Market-Based Measure of Climate Transition Risk Exposure Joop Huij is an Associate Professor and Head of Indices, Rotterdam School of Management and Robeco Indices Dries Laurs is a Lecturer in Finance and Quantitative Researcher, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Robeco Indices Philip Stork is a Professor of Financial Markets and Instruments, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Remco C. J. Zwinkels is a Professor of International Finance, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute,
Analyzing ESG Follow-Through of Pension Funds: Evidence from Korea’s National Pension Service Sehee Kim, Assistant Professor, School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University. Woo-Jong Lee, Professor, Business Administration, Seoul National University. Hee-Yeon Sunwoo, Associate Professor, Business Administration, Sejong University. Aaron Yoon, Professor, Business Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
Earlier this week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced new proposed rules for issuers to raise capital under new exemptions for crypto assets. Regulation Crypto Asset (Reg CA) is widely modeled after two existing securities exemptions, Reg CF and Reg A.
Reg A and Reg CF were created by the JOBS Act of 2012. They are two of the three exemptions that allow for online capital formation – the other being Reg D 506c.
Under Reg CF, an issuer can raise up to $5 million from anyone in an online securities offering. The documents submitted to the SEC before relying on the exemption are a fairly simple notice filing and do not need to be qualified by the SEC.
Under Reg A, an issuer may raise up to $75 million (Tier 2), but the SEC must qualify the offering documents.
Of course, both exemptions have other requirements, but the SEC said it is mirroring these two exemptions for Reg CA offerings: one for startups and one for larger offerings.
The Startup Exemption allows for a crypto offering of up to $5 million in aggregate over four years. This may be used only once.
There is a required Transition Report or Form TR that must be submitted no later than four years after the Notice of Reliance the issuer must make to begin using the Startup Exemption
No financial statements are required. Securities are not restricted and face no rule-based resale restrictions; general solicitation is permitted; the exemption itself does not limit sales to retail/non-accredited investors. The issuer may be an individual, group, or entity. The exemption is a temporary “regulatory runway” while the issuer works to fulfill its objectives, which likely include decentralization.
The Fundraising Exemption has two tiers for issuers: Tier 1 up to $20 million and Tier 2 up to $75 million may be raised over a 12-month period. Tier 2 issuers must have an offering statement qualified by the SEC. Tier 2 requires audited financial statements.
Both Startup and Fundraising require forms of ongoing reporting, but the Startup requirement is limited. Neither requires an intermediary.
While the proposal could change before it goes into effect, the rules are pretty hardened. What will inevitably happen is that existing securities crowdfunding platforms will offer these crypto exemptions to stay relevant and competitive.
Below is a comparison table for Reg CA and Reg CF/ Reg A.