Home Blog

Chase Marriott Bonvoy Boundless Signup Bonus: 125,000 Points + Free Night Certificate


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Chase Marriott Bonvoy Boundless card and spend $3,000 within the first three months: Get 125,00 points, plus one free night certificate that can be used on properties costing up to 50,000 points per night.
  • You’ll also get the two $50 credits for airline purchases during 2026 that all Boundless cardholders can get – once after spending $250 from Jan-June and again $50 from Jul-Dec.

Card Details

  • Annual fee of $95, not waived first year
  • Eligibility for this product: The product is not available to either:
    • current cardmembers of the Marriott Bonvoy™ Premier credit card (also known as Marriott Rewards® Premier) or Marriott Bonvoy Boundless™ credit card (also known as Marriott Rewards® Premier Plus), or
    • previous cardmembers of the Marriott Bonvoy™ Premier credit card (also known as Marriott Rewards® Premier) or Marriott Bonvoy Boundless™ credit card (also known as Marriott Rewards® Premier Plus), who received a new cardmember bonus within the last 24 months.
  • Eligibility for the new cardmember bonus: The bonus is not available to you if you:
    • are a current cardmember, or were a previous cardmember within the last 30 days, of Marriott Bonvoy™ American Express® Card (also known as The Starwood Preferred Guest® Credit Card from American Express);
    • are a current or previous cardmember of either Marriott Bonvoy Business™ American Express® Card (also known as The Starwood Preferred Guest® Business Credit Card from American Express) or Marriott Bonvoy Brilliant™ American Express® Card (also known as the Starwood Preferred Guest® American Express Luxury Card), and received a new cardmember bonus or upgrade bonus in the last 24 months; or
    • applied and were approved for Marriott Bonvoy Business™ American Express® Card (also known as The Starwood Preferred Guest® Business Credit Card from American Express) or Marriott Bonvoy Brilliant™ American Express® Card (also known as the Starwood Preferred Guest® American Express Luxury Card) within the last 90 days.
  • Chase 5/24 rule applies to this card
  • Free award night every anniversary valid at a property costing up to 35,000 points
  • Card earns at the following rates:
    • 6x points per $1 spent at Marriott Bonvoy hotels
    • 2x points per $1 spent on all other purchases
  • Elite status:
    • Automatic silver elite status
    • Gold status if you spend $35,000 or more within a card member year
    • 15 elite night credits towards status each year

Our Verdict

We saw a 5-night-certificate signup offer a few months back which a lot of people will prefer. That said, this is a solid offer and does offer some additional flexibility over the prior offer. We’ll add this to our best credit card bonus page.

Not sure if this offer is available via referral links.

Buy 1 Rental Every 2 Years and Watch What Happens


Buying just one rental every two years can make you financially free—and by a lot.

So many real estate investing influencers constantly talk about buying dozens, even hundreds of rental units to live your dream life and become a millionaire. But, as someone who’s been consistently investing, doesn’t own dozens of properties, and has made millions from real estate, I thought I’d do the math.

Today, I’m going to show you how buying just one rental property every two (or even three/four) years can turn you into a millionaire with over $16,000/month in cash flow. You don’t need to buy sketchy properties or take on super risky debt; all you need to do is buy the right rentals consistently.

But there’s a better way to do it. Instead of saving up a down payment every two years (hard enough in this economy), I’ll show you the way I “recycled” my down payments to turn one rental property into an entire real estate portfolio.

This is how you slowly, safely, and strategically get to financial freedom with fewer rentals. It’s not magic, it’s math.

Dave Meyer:
You want financial freedom, but the real estate influencers posting on social media all own dozens or even hundreds of units. Is that really what it takes to live on passive real estate income? No, you don’t need to scale a giant portfolio. You don’t even need 20 properties. If you can just buy one property every two years, you will be completely set financially and that doesn’t even mean you have to save up an entire down payment every two years. Today, I am going to explain how you can buy a property every other year and to prove it, I built a financial model demonstrating how much you need to save, when to buy your next property, and how to recycle your capital over and over. I’m going to show you an example with real math of how you can grow a two and a half million dollar portfolio with over $200,000 in annual cash flow by just buying one deal every two years.
That is the power of investing in the US housing market. So forget the massive scale. Forget the bigger is better mentality. If you want to embrace a sustainable low risk path to building wealth, this approach is for you.
What’s up everyone? I’m Dave Meyer, Chief Investment Officer at BiggerPockets and real estate investor myself for 16 years now. Today on the show, we are cutting through all that noise out there and I’m just going to say the point of this episode upfront. You do not need to own dozens of properties or hundreds of properties to achieve financial freedom. You only need to buy one property every two years and that is easier than you think or than it might sound. And in today’s episode, I’m going to give you a framework that I personally use myself and I’ve seen thousands of others use to successfully build long-term wealth in a sustainable, manageable way. The reason I use it and like it so much is because it is first and foremost, it’s just achievable for most people regardless of where you start. If you’re starting at 25 years old or 55 years old, it works.
If you’re starting with 50K in income or 250K in income, it works. That’s the thing I just love about it most. Second, it is sustainable. It is not so much work or so much effort that you have to quit your job or you have to give up other parts of your life. This is an approach that works for people who are busy. Third, it doesn’t rely on market timing or perfect investing conditions. Fourth, it ensures that you capture all the benefits of real estate both in the short and long term. And fifth, it is just reliable. This is a reliable proven way to get you to financial freedom. It’s an approach that works with really any kind of investment, whether you’re investing in stocks or bonds, or in our case, we’re talking about real estate. And the number I have come out to for what the best pace is to try and shoot for every two years.
Buy a rental property, whether it’s a single family, a duplex, or triplex, every two years. I like this number because it is feasible. Almost anyone can do this and I will explain to you exactly how you can do it. It is sustainable. Again, it works on almost anyone’s schedule and it is reliable. It can get you to financial freedom in 10 to 15 years and I will show you the math in just a minute to prove that to you. So that’s what we’re talking about here. That’s the goal that you should be aiming for is trying to buy a property every two years. Now, I don’t want everyone to think that this has to be exactly 24 months. If you want to do it every year, great. If it sometimes takes you three to four years between deals, that’ll happen. That’s totally fine. I actually personally waited four years between my first and second deal.
But the goal here, the mentality that you need to have is to keep buying and keep buying ideally on regular intervals. If you keep buying on regular intervals, that’s the key to attaching yourself to that long-term average performance of the housing market and the rental market. But now we got to talk about how you actually go out and do this. What are the steps that you need to take to make this happen? Because it’s natural and it is true that for most people who are just getting into real estate or maybe done one or two deals, just getting that next deal, one more deal can be intimidating, let alone buying every two years. So let’s talk about how you can pull this off. This is probably obvious, but the major barrier for most people is going to be capital, money to go out and buy these things.
Real estate is a very capital intensive industry. And honestly, that’s a legitimate barrier. We’re going to talk about how you can get around that. I have two great strategies that I’m going to show you, but if you’re worried about the other stuff like managing the properties, I promise you, you can do that. It’s really just not that hard. I think people really exaggerate how difficult it is to be a property manager. We’re not going to get into that today. We have other stuff to talk about, but trust me, you can do the property management part that should not be a barrier. We have other episodes of the podcast that you can listen to about being a great property manager. Today we’re going to talk instead about these two strategies, these two levers you can pull to make this buying a property every two years possible.
Now the first is probably a little bit more obvious. That’s just saving money. You set aside X dollars a month from your W2 income toward the next down payment. If you can save enough money to buy every two years just from your lifestyle and income, that’s amazing. It is huge and it is going to help. As an investor, you’re going to need to put usually 25% down unless you’re doing an owner occupied like a house hack, which I highly recommend because if you do those, if you do a house hack where you live in one unit, rent out the second, rent out, you can actually buy up to four units at a time. So you can live in one unit, rent out three. You can put as little as 3.5% down. So that is a great way to do this. That’s going to lessen the amount you need to save up between deals.
That means you can maybe go faster or it’s just not going to be as hard to save up and buy a property every two years. So that is one pretty critical decision to think about. Are you up for a house hacking? I hope so. I’ve done it. It’s a great way to get into the game and to scale up and it really makes everything easier. Just think about it this way. If you want to buy, let’s call it a $400,000 duplex. Investors are going to need something like $110,000 saved up. That is a lot of cash. You’re putting 25% down, that’s a hundred grand and you need five grand for closing costs, cash reserve, something like 110. House hackers need 15 to 20 grand if you’re putting 3.5% down. So there’s a huge difference in scalability and it’s an important one if you’re just going to save up money for those deals because again, it’s going to be a lot harder to save 110 grand every two years than it is to save 20 grand.
So hopefully this makes sense to you why this works financially, but I’m sure you probably have questions about how this works for you. How do you actually go out and buy all these deals as you’re probably figuring out just how to save up for one property? How do you do it every two years? Well, I am going to explain that to you, but first we have to take a quick break.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer today talking about how a simple formula of buying on rental property every two years can help you achieve financial freedom in les time than you think. Before the break, we talked about why every two years and why dollar cost averaging this idea of buying assets at a regular interval over a long period of time is such an effective strategy. But there is that second way to access capital, which is really just recycling the money that you’ve put in, plus taking advantage of the effort that you put in as a real estate investor by forcing appreciation, by doing renovations, by doing value add projects. This is a key way that pretty much every single investor I know uses to keep buying at a regular interval. Here’s kind of how it works. So you save up for that first property, right?
Yo maybe do a house hack or maybe you can save up $100,000 for that $400,000 house. I should mention, you don’t need to buy a $400,000 house. You could buy a $250,000 duplex somewhere in the Midwest. You can partner with someone, but you find a way to get that first one. Then what you do is often called the Burr strategy. And I’ll just talk about it step by step. You buy the property, then you got to renovate it. The object here, the goal here is to do a project, a renovation to increase the value of the property and this should hopefully make sense. You want to increase the value of that property buy more than it costs you to do that renovation. If you spend 50 grand on that renovation, you want it to increase the value of that property by a hundred grand or 150 grand ideally.
So that’s a key thing here. You need to look for properties that have that opportunity. You can’t go out and buy a perfectly polished thing in the nicest neighborhood. You’re not going to be able to add value to that. That’s already at its highest and best value. You got to go out and buy something a little rundown. You got to find something you can add a unit to. You could find something you could do a gut rehab. There are lots of ways to do it, but what you got to do is force the value of that property up through your own effort and renovation. Once you do that, you have built equity and you can take the capital out of that deal using different financing options. You can do it through a refinance. You could do it through a home equity line of credit. But let’s just talk about how this works in the Burr strategy using a refinance.
Refinance is just another word for getting a new mortgage. You’re paying off the old mortgage with the new mortgage and you’re going to pull out some equity. Here’s a simple example. Let’s just assume that you go out and buy a $300,000 duplex. You’re doing full investor thing. You’re putting 25% down, which comes out to 75K. Now, I know not in every market, you’re not going to be able to go out and buy this personally. One of the reasons I like to buy and invest in the Midwest and the Southeast is you absolutely can find duplexes that need renovations at this price point. You can actually find them cheaper than that. I buy properties that are cheaper than that. So it’s absolutely possible. I invest out of state. So I just want to call out that you absolutely can do this regardless of where you live if you just build the right systems.
So you go out there, buy a property $300,000, down payment is 25%. So you’re putting in $75,000. That means that your mortgage is $225,000. But then you do need to actually do the renovation. So I’m going to assume, and I’m trying to make this example simple here, but I’m going to assume that the renovation that you’re going to do on this $300,000 property is $50,000. That is a good size rehab for a property that costs that much. And just for simplicity’s sake, I am including the soft costs in that cost of the renovation. So I am saying that this is $50,000, which we are going to borrow. We’re going to use, let’s call it a hard money or private loan to get this. And I’m including the interest costs in that $50,000. So let’s just say for simplicity here, labor and materials are 40,000, our soft cost.
How much it takes to borrow that 40,000 is another $10,000. So we’re all in for 50 grand of cost on this renovation. That in this hypothetical scenario brings the value of the property up to $450,000. That is not made up. I have done projects that do this. I see people who do these kinds of projects. You can put 50 grand in and get the ARV up to the ARV means after repair value. That’s what the property’s worth after you’ve done the renovation. You can put in 50 and raise the value of it by 150. You got to find a good deal. You got to do it right, but that is absolutely possible. And once you’ve done that, this is the real key to being able to buy every two years to scale your portfolio. Because now you’ve invested $75,000, but you actually have $175,000 in equity.
Your property is worth 450 now, but your remaining loan, that mortgage that you took out is 225. So now you have equity that is worth $175,000 because now instead of a property worth 300, it’s worth 450. You still have that mortgage of 225. That’s a liability that you have to pay back. You have $50,000 that you have to pay back to the hard money lender. That’s another liability. But once you’ve paid those back, you have $175,000 in equity. You put in 75 of that. So you’ve made $100,000 in profit so far. And this is where you do the refinance. And basically what you do is you go out and take out a new mortgage. So you’re going to go to a new bank. You can go to the same bank and say,” I want to do a cash out refinance. “This is not magic. This is something people do literally every single day.
I’ve done dozens of them in my career. They’re very, very common. So what you do is say,” I want to cash out refinance. “What they’re going to say is, ” Okay, great. You’re an investor. You’re basically, it’s like buying the property again. You got to put 25% down. Now you got to put 25% down of that new value, which is $450,000. So your new down payment rather than being $75,000 is going to be $112,500. And that means you had 175 in equity, you’re going to have to use 112.5 of that for your new down payment, which leaves you $62,500 that you can refinance out of this deal. Now think about that for a second. Remember how much we put into this deal in the first place, $75,000. I’m saying that if you do this right, you can pull out $62,500. Now, some people talk about a perfect BER that would be pulling out 75,000, but you don’t need a perfect BER.
As just this example shows, you are going to be able to pull out about 80% of what you put into it on a very good BER and you should be able to do a very good BER. Now on top of that, you have to assume if you’re buying a good deal, you’re also getting cashflow from this deal. Even if it just cash flows $500 a month, which is a reasonable amount that’s not crazy, it’s absolutely achievable. That means you’re making $6,000 a year in cashflow. And if you’re waiting and buying every two years like I’m recommending, that’s another $12,000 that you’re going to be able to put to your next deal. So between your refi and two years of just collecting cash flow, you’re back at $75,000 that you can invest into your next deal and you own a cash flowing rental. Now using this example in extrapolating, you are going to need to put in a little bit of extra money because you’re going to need closing costs.
You’re going to need cash reserves. That’s probably another $10,000. Maybe appreciation takes your acquisition cost from 300,000 to 305 to 310 or something like that, but you could probably put in 10 to $20,000 in new capital every two years, or just use the $74,000 this first property has made you. Now, hopefully you can see how powerful this is. You save up for that first deal, which is a big deal. It is hard to do to figure out how to do that. But once you do it, the momentum starts to build. The snowball starts to roll downhill and you can recycle this capital as many times as you want. And this is a proven way for you to be able to buy deals every two years, even if you’re not house hacking. Now, if you put those two things together, that is probably the most powerful, fastest way to achieve this.
But as you can see, even if you don’t want to do owner occupied, if you want to invest out of state like I do, you can use this approach to recycle your capital and build that portfolio. Now this is obviously just the example of one property, but what does this look like over the long term? If you keep doing this just once every two years, does it really amount to that much? Yes. The answer is absolutely yes and I’ll show you how much it amounts to right after this quick break.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer. Today we’re talking about how all you got to do is buy one property every two years and you can become financially free. Before the break, I walked you through an example, something that would work in the Midwest or the Southeast using a $300,000 property. But even if you invest somewhere else, you want to do house hacking, the same principles apply. You could recycle your capital and you can buy every two years. Now in that example, you could pull out 62,000, you could get annual cash flow of about six grand, but let’s talk about the big picture. What does this actually amount to if you did this for 30 years? And I’m going to show you a model that I created. Basically what I do is take that one deal that I gave you an example and I buy that deal almost exactly the same every two years for 30 years.
And I decided not to get bogged down in a super complicated spreadsheet. I hit all of those lines for you if you’re watching this on YouTube. So here’s how the model works over 30 years. So you put in $75,000. That is the hardest part. It is the hardest part by far. And then the assumptions that I make is that for every new deal that you do, you need to bring $20,000 of new capital. You’re going to recycle all the rest. So every two years you need to save up an additional 20,000 or you need to go out and find a partner who can contribute $20,000, which of course is a lot of money but is not unreasonable. In this world, if you want to get into this, you need to be able to save 20 grand every two years, or you need to be able to partner with people who can help you.
Both approaches I’ve used, both approaches completely common, completely workable. So again, you get that first deal, then you’re putting $20,000 in every two years and you’re forcing $50,000 of appreciation in every deal you do. Totally reasonable. I’m not even asking you to do 100,000 in appreciation, right? If you do this every two years and refinance that $50,000 at the end of just 10 years, your total equity of your portfolio will be worth over a half a million dollars, 575,000. And I just want to call out that in those 10 years, all you contributed was 155,000. So you have more than tripled the equity that you have put into that deal. And at 10 years, your cashflow is about $40,000 per year. That’s pretty good, right? Over $3,000 a month in tax advantaged cashflow. But as I said at the beginning, real estate deals get better over time.
Your cash flow goes up over time. The amortization, basically loan paydown, people paying off your mortgage for you gets better. So by year 15, your portfolio value rather than being 576 is now 904,000. Instead of making about $3,000 a month in rent, you’re now making over $5,000 a month in tax advantaged cash flow and it gets better from there. By 30 years, if you start today 30 years from now, your portfolio will be worth nearly $2.5 million and your cashflow tax advantage cash flow is going to be nearly $220,000 per year. That is incredible. During that time period, the capital you’ve contributed is $355,000. It’s nothing to sneeze at. That’s a lot of money, but 2.5 million, which is what your portfolio is worth, is a heck of a lot more, right? And it’s generating $218,000 for you every single year. That’s it. This is just buying every two years, recycling your capital.
I’m not talking about going out and starting some fund or syndications, not recommending you buy massive apartment buildings. In this example, I’m not even telling you you have to go out and house hack. You could just go buy affordable small multifamily properties and achieve these kinds of numbers. This is how it’s done. This is how financial freedom is done. It’s reliable. It’s relatively low risk, although all investments do have risk and it is proven. This approach works for anyone who has a stable W2 income or any kind of income and wants to invest in real estate on the side to eventually replace it. It’s for anyone who wants simplicity, right? Not a second job. We’re going out there and flipping houses or managing a large portfolio. This is achievable for people in their spare time. It’s relatively simple and it’s obviously more complicated than doing nothing or investing in the S&P 500, but it’s a lot better financially in my opinion over the long run.
This is also a great strategy for people who are risk conscious, who don’t want to take huge swings and want to take a very risk adjusted approach to getting good returns in the real estate market and frankly for people who want to sleep well at night. This is good for people who start in their 20s or their 30s or their 40s or 50s. It really works for everyone, actually not for everyone. I will say there are a couple people it doesn’t work for. I’ll just call that out. If you’re trying to replace your income in two or three years, not going to work, obviously. In this model after three years, your cashflow is only 6,500 bucks a year, right? That’s obviously not going to work for you. You are going to need a more agressive path. If you just want out of your job, you want to go into real estate, you’re going to need to probably flip houses or wholesale or something to get your income up in two or three years.
This won’t work. If you want to build a big real estate business, if you want to own thousands of units, all the power to you, go for it. You’re going to need to be more aggressive than this. You’ll probably need to go out and raise a lot of private capital and buy bigger units. That’s a perfectly good path as well. The third avenue for people this isn’t great for is if you happen to just have a lot of cash and you want to deploy it quickly, you could probably just do this, but I would say instead of buying every two years, buy every six months or buy every year or whatever. But for everyone else, for the people who just want to achieve financial freedom 10, 15, 20 years from now, this works for almost everyone. I just want to say that this works regardless of market timing.
If you’re worried about a market crash, dollar cost averaging actually helps because you buy at different points in the cycle. Sometimes you’re going to buy when prices are low. Sometimes when you’re going to buy when prices are a little bit higher, but over the long run, you are attaching the performance of your portfolio to the long-term performance of the United States housing market, the United States rental market, pretty powerful markets. So if you can do that, the timing matters so much less. That’s the point of dollar cost averaging. Maybe you’re worried you can’t find good deals. Deals are kind of hard to find right now, but the beauty of this approach is that you’re giving yourself two years to go out and find new deals. So you should be able to do that absolutely if you’re committing yourself to this. If you’re worried about interest rates being too high, it’s kind of the same idea as the market timing.
We don’t know. Interest rates might be up in three years. They might be up in 10 years. I actually think there’s a good chance they will be up. And so the reason I love dollar cost to averaging is because it’s kind of the humble approach. You’re admitting you don’t know. You don’t know if interest rates are going to be up next year or in two years or three years, but you’re going to buy anyway. You’re going to buy when they’re six, they’re going to buy when they’re four. When you’re going to buy when you’re two, you’re going to buy when they’re eight. And the average, that’s what you want. You just need to be average. I know that sounds crazy because every guru out there says you have to be amazing. You don’t. You just need to hitch yourself to the average performance of the real estate market that is good enough.
So that’s personally how I think about real estate. It’s the model that I have used. Now as I’ve gotten more successful and over time, I do buy more frequently. I sell more frequently, but I did this approach for 10 years or more. This is the approach that has worked for me. It’s the approach I use in the stock market. This just makes sense to me. And I’m like the market timing guy. I spend all day looking at analytics and data and what’s going on in the market and I still choose to admit that no one really knows what’s going to go on. And the best thing to do is to try and just hit yourself to this powerful housing market that we have here in the United States. During 2020, 2021, 2022, when things were going crazy, sometimes I admit, I was kind of questioning myself.
I thought maybe I should be more aggressive. I should be doing what all these gurus and people on social media are doing. And I’ll say right now in 2026 sitting here, I feel pretty validated with my approach because there are a lot of people they’re not talking about on social media, but I can tell you right now there are a lot of people in real estate who are in trouble who bought too much, who scaled too fast when they thought they knew the answers about what was going to happen in the market in the next couple of years, but they didn’t because no one does. Absolutely no one does. But the people who have been struggling and are struggling right now are the ones who scaled really fast. Now some of them have been hugely successful, don’t get me wrong, but I just mean of the people who are struggling, it’s not people who have been doing dollar cost averaging.
I can tell you that. Maybe they have one deal go bad, right?That happens, of course. But I don’t really know a lot of people who have taken this disciplined long-term approach and are struggling because it worked in 2010, it worked in 2015, it worked in 2020, it worked in 2025, and it’s going to work in 2030 and 2035 as well. All different markets, it still works. The people who can weather uncertain economic periods are the ones that just keep showing up one deal at a time. That’s what I do and that’s my advice for the majority of you out there hoping to achieve financial freedom through real estate. That’s our episode for today for the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer, and I’ll see you next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Anthropic’s President Reveals the Real Reason the Company Is Going Public



Daniela Amodei says the need for compute will push AI companies into the public markets.

Senate Dems introduce bill to fully restore CFPB funding


Senator Elizabeth Warren, ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Processing Content

  • Key insight: The bill is largely symbolic since it has little chance of passing the Senate. But it signals what Democrats have in store if they are successful in the midterm elections. 
  • What’s at stake: The legislation aims to immunize the agency from future partisan attacks. The CFPB’s funding was slashed in half last year by the Republican-led Congress.
  • Forward look: The bill mandates a funding floor and makes the transfer of funds to the CFPB from the Federal Reserve System compulsory and automatic. 

The 11 Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, led by Ranking Member Sen. Elizabeth Warren, introduced legislation to restore funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

The bill introduced Thursday aims to block any future administration from dismantling the consumer watchdog by starving it of funds. 

Last year, Republicans slashed the CFPB’s budget in half as part of a sprawling budget bill that narrowly passed the Senate, 51-50, along party lines. Under President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill”, Republicans capped the CFPB’s funding at $446 million in fiscal 2025, down from $785.4 million in fiscal 2024. The bulk of the bureau’s budget pays for employee salaries. A longtime goal of the CFPB’s opponents is to subject the agency to congressional appropriations. 

Technically, Congress last year lowered the amount that the CFPB can draw from the Federal Reserve System to 6.5% of the Fed’s total operating expenses, from the 12% that was mandated by Congress in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. 

The Democrats’ new legislation is surgically precise. It would dictate that transfers to the CFPB “shall not be less than 12%” of the Fed’s total operating expenses, or what is “reasonably necessary to carry out the authority of the Bureau under Federal consumer financial law.”

The bill mandates a funding floor and makes the transfer compulsory and automatic. It is an effort to eliminate challenges after accusations by consumer groups last year that Republicans had “invented legal theories” that they used to question the CFPB’s constitutionality and sideline enforcement and supervision of financial firms.

“By locking in a 12% funding floor and making disbursements mandatory, this bill ensures that invented legal theories cannot sideline the CFPB from protecting people from financial predators,” said Adam Rust, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America.

Still, the bill is largely symbolic. It has little chance of passing the Senate. But it signals what Democrats have in store if they are successful at winning back the House, and potentially the Senate, in the midterm elections. 

Last year, Russell Vought, the CFPB’s acting director, refused to request any funding for the bureau. But in January, he capitulated after a judge’s order would have held him in contempt if he failed to fund the agency. 

Vought’s refusal to request funding for the CFPB was part of a novel legal theory pushed by Republican critics of the bureau: that the Fed was unprofitable and, therefore, could not fund the agency. In December, three nonprofit groups led by Rise Economy, sued the bureau claiming they would suffer “imminent harm” if the CFPB was defunded.

In March, a federal judge issued a scathing rebuke of Vought, who also heads the Office of Management and Budget, ruling that he unlawfully refused to seek funding for the bureau. U.S. District Judge Edward J. Davila, of the Northern District of California, ruled that Vought’s refusal to request funding from the Federal Reserve Board last year was unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act. Further, the judge ruled that Vought had unlawfully relied on a memo from the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel to claim the Federal Reserve lacked “combined earnings” to fund the CFPB.

The move by Democrats to codify funding in legislation is a response to what Warren described as “an assault” on the agency. 

“Donald Trump and his administration launched an assault on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, trying to drain it of its resources so it could no longer stop big banks and giant corporations from scamming Americans out of their money,” the Massachusetts senator said in a press release. “Democrats are united in fully-funding the CFPB when we take back Congress.”

The Democratic bill itself is just over 100 words. It would amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 by setting a funding floor for the agency.

For years, the CFPB has been a lightning rod for partisan friction, with Republicans introducing dozens of bills aimed at changing the agency’s funding structure, turning it into a commission, and weakening its powers.

The Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee who co-signed the bill with Warren are Sens. Jack Reed, D-R.I., Mark Warner, D-Va., Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., Tina Smith, D-Minn., Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Andy Kim, D-N.J., Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Delaware, and Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.



Why Rigetti Computing Stock Just Crashed


I’ve got bad news and good news for Rigetti Computing (RGTI 13.04%) investors today.

Bad news first: Rigetti stock is plunging 11.6% through 11:30 a.m. ET Friday. And the good news?

Image source: Getty Images.

No bad news for Rigetti Computing

The good news is that there’s no specific bad news behind the sell-off — no earnings reports that missed targets, no analyst downgrades, not even so much as a lowered price target on Wall Street. Instead, Rigetti stock seems to be going down simply because everything tech is selling off today: Bitcoin (BTC 5.39%) is off nearly 5% so far this morning, Nvidia (NVDA 4.62%) shares are off a similar amount, while memory company Micron (MU 7.38%) is down even more.

Basically, what we’re looking at here is just a “risk-off” day for the market.

What sparked it? The most likely catalyst seems to be worries over Broadcom’s (AVGO 5.97%) earnings report Wednesday night. Broadcom spooked investors when it warned that sales of its artificial intelligence chips will “only” triple in Q3, and not grow even faster, as analysts had hoped.

And now everyone is panicking about everything tech, quantum computing stocks included.

Rigetti Computing Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-13.04%) $-3.15

Current Price

$21.01

So, is it safe to buy Rigetti stock?

Just knowing why Rigetti stock is selling off doesn’t necessarily mean it’s safe to buy it, however. As a technology and as an industry, quantum computing is still in its infancy and probably years away from being a profitable endeavor.

In the case of Rigetti, analysts polled by S&P Global Market Intelligence don’t expect profits to arrive as far out as analysts are willing to make forecasts (which is 2030), with the company burning through hundreds of millions of dollars in cash along the way. Before buying this dip, make sure to check your risk tolerance first.

Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Broadcom, Micron Technology, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Hilton Expands Florida Keys Presence With New Key West Resort


Hilton Expands Florida Keys Presence With New Key West Resort

Hilton has announced plans to expand its footprint in the Florida Keys with the addition of Hilton Key West Resort & Marina. The waterfront property will join Hilton’s portfolio as the company continues to grow its presence in one of Florida’s most popular leisure destinations.

The addition gives Hilton another option in Key West, complementing existing properties in the area and providing travelers with a new way to earn and redeem Hilton Honors points. 

Hilton Key West Resort Marina pool

The resort is located on the Gulf side of Key West and features a full-service marina, waterfront accommodations, dining venues, resort amenities, and convenient access to many of the island’s most popular attractions. Hilton says the property will undergo a phased renovation while remaining open to guests.

The announcement is part of Hilton’s broader expansion throughout the Florida Keys, a market that continues to see strong demand from both domestic and international travelers. The company already has a presence in Key West through properties such as Casa Marina Key West, Curio Collection by Hilton, one of the island’s most historic and well-known resorts.

Hilton Key West Resort Marina pool

For Hilton Honors members, the addition means another property where points can be earned and redeemed. The resort’s marina location may also appeal to travelers looking for boating, fishing, diving, and other water-based activities that have made the Florida Keys a popular vacation destination.

International Business Management | Job Opportunities, Salary, Course Details



Career In International Business Management, International Business Management Job Opportunities, International Business Management Salary, International Business Management Course, International Business Management Admission, International Business Management Course After 12th

Best Institute For International Business Management Course

BBA In International Business Management –
MBA In International Business Management –
Diploma in International Business Management –
Certification In International Business Management –

– – –

📞 For Admission Call Us At +91-9582309117

➡️ Website –

➡️ Admission Form Link –

source

This Week In College And Money News: June 5, 2026


We’re now less than a month from the July 1 OBBBA implementation deadline, and the cracks are starting to show. Our reporting this week revealed that medical, dental, and veterinary students are seeing real loan disbursement delays and incorrect borrowing-cap notices as financial aid offices scramble to rebuild their systems on a six-week timeline. Meanwhile, the campus finance crunch keeps spreading — even Harvard isn’t insulated.

Here’s a quick look at the most important stories shaping higher education and student finances this week for June 5, 2026.

🎓 Headlines at a Glance

  • Med, dental, and vet students are facing federal loan disbursement delays and incorrect cap notices as the OBBBA rollout stalls aid.
  • Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences lays off three administrative deans as it tries to close a $365M deficit.
  • Ursinus College cuts 15% of its staff, the latest in a wave of Pennsylvania small-college pressure.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

1. Vet And Medical Students Face Loan Disbursement Delays As OBBBA Rollout Stalls Aid

Over the past several weeks, we’ve heard multiple reports from graduate students about financial aid delays and miscommunication as they start summer classes. For medical, dental, and veterinary schools that begin in May or June with a “summer header” semester, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act rollout is causing real chaos. 

One student reported receiving an inaccurate notice claiming they hit the updated graduate borrowing limits despite being grandfathered in while another reported delayed loan disbursements that pushed past tuition due dates and orientation supply windows. 

Our full reporting is here.

➡️ Impact: If you’re starting a med, dental, or vet program this summer and you’re a current borrower expecting grandfathering protection, double-check your financial aid notice against your enrollment records. If you’ve been incorrectly flagged as capped, contact your financial aid office immediately — the issue is fixable but requires manual intervention. 

Health professional students should budget for $1,500 to $4,000 in first-year supply costs (stethoscopes, instruments, scrubs, dissection kits, required technology) and have a backup plan in case loan disbursements slip past your orientation window. 

2. Harvard’s Largest School Lays Off Three Administrative Deans In $365M Restructuring

Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences laid off three divisional administrative deans on June 2 as part of a sweeping summer restructuring aimed at closing the school’s $365 million structural deficit. The cuts were the first confirmed step in a plan developed with McKinsey & Company (Harvard paid the consulting firm $250,000) that could lay off up to 25% of FAS staff. The deficit is driven primarily by the federal endowment tax hike Congress imposed last year and deferred capital expenses.

➡️ Impact: If you have a student at Harvard or another elite research university, expect changes in administrative responsiveness, department-level support, and possibly course offerings as schools consolidate.

More broadly, the Harvard story is a warning shot for parents and students evaluating prestige private universities: the federal funding environment is squeezing institutions that families have long assumed were financially bulletproof. Endowment size alone doesn’t tell you how stable a school’s operations will be over the next four years. Ask specific questions on tours and during admitted-student events about hiring freezes, program cuts, and graduate program contractions.

3. Ursinus College Lays Off 15% Of Staff In Latest Pennsylvania Small-College Cut

Ursinus College, a small private liberal arts school about 30 miles northwest of Philadelphia, laid off 15% of its staff this week (26 full-time and 10 part-time workers) as part of a $10 million budget reduction. The college had already cut 29 faculty positions earlier this year. Enrollment has fallen 11% over the past four years. Ursinus sits in one of the most crowded higher-ed markets in the country, per Chronicle analysis, and is the latest in a string of Pennsylvania institutions under acute financial stress.

Last month, the AAUP chapter at nearby Muhlenberg College warned that the school’s $10 million budget deficit would also lead to layoffs. The pattern is consistent: small, tuition-dependent liberal arts colleges in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, facing enrollment declines of 10% or more over the past few years, are running out of room to cut.

➡️ Impact: If you have a student enrolled at (or admitted to) a small private liberal arts college, financial stability is no longer a soft factor in the decision. Pull the school’s IRS Form 990, check Moody’s or S&P credit ratings if available, look at enrollment trends over the past five years, and watch for warning signs like deferred capital maintenance, program cuts, faculty buyouts, or auditor “going concern” qualifications. Students already enrolled at a financially stressed school should make sure their credits are transferable and have a backup plan if their program is cut. Our 2026 college closures tracker is here.

Related Reading:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae55″].tcb-post-list #post-76955 [data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae5c”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Education-Secretary-Linda-McMahon-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

$180 Billion in Student Loans Are Now in Default, New Federal Data Shows

$180 Billion in Student Loans Are Now in Default, New Federal Data Shows
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae55″].tcb-post-list #post-76643 [data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae5c”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cosmetology-School-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Low-Earning Degrees Will Soon Lose Access to Federal Student Loans

Low-Earning Degrees Will Soon Lose Access to Federal Student Loans
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae55″].tcb-post-list #post-33583 [data-css=”tve-u-199ef3eae5c”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WP_TAX-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

$5,250 of Employer Student Loan Assistance Is Tax-Free

$5,250 of Employer Student Loan Assistance Is Tax-Free

Editor: Colin Graves

The post This Week In College And Money News: June 5, 2026 appeared first on The College Investor.

Why Clarity Comes Before Strategy


Catch the Full Episode

 

Overview

Most small business owners blame their marketing when growth stalls. They hire a new agency, rebuild the website, launch another campaign — and six months later, nothing has changed. In this solo episode, John Jantsch makes the case that the real problem lives upstream of tactics: it lives with the founder.

This is Step 1 of John’s updated “Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success” — a completely refreshed version of the ebook that was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times over the past two decades. Here, John introduces what he calls the Founder Portrait: a one-page, four-question exercise designed to surface the clarity that every downstream marketing decision depends on.

If you are a small business owner, entrepreneur, or marketing consultant working with founders, this episode cuts through the noise. It asks the uncomfortable questions about what is actually working, what you are doing out of habit or guilt, where the real profit lives, and what you want the business to give you — questions that most marketing engagements never touch.

Key Takeaways

01: Marketing consistently fails not at the tactical level but at the founder level — before any campaign is built.

02: Business drift happens slowly and then all at once. Many founders are operating a business that no longer reflects what they intended to build.

03: Activity is not the same as results. What you are doing a lot of and what is actually producing revenue or reducing acquisition cost are often very different things.

04: Naming the things you do out of habit, guilt, or misplaced optimism is the first step toward stopping them — and stopping the right things is often the beginning of real marketing strategy.

05: Revenue and profit are not the same. Some service lines, channels, and client segments look productive but are actively costing you growth.

06: Serving the wrong client — often picked up during a slow period — can hold back scale far more than any tactical gap.

07: Question four — what do you want this business to give you — is the one most founders have stopped asking. No marketing strategy serves a founder who has not answered it.

08: The Founder Portrait is a private document. It is not a plan, not a strategy deck, not something to share. It is the ground you stand on before any other marketing decision is made.

09: One blank page, four questions, no team, no advisors, no AI. The clarity has to come from you.

10: This framework is Strategy First in practice — revisiting who you are and what you want before defining who you serve and how you reach them.

Great Moments

00:01 John introduces the seven-episode series and the updated Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success workbook.

01:50 Why marketing fails upstream — the founder is the variable nobody talks about.

02:50 The concept of business drift: slow at first, then all at once.

04:44 Question 1: What is actually working in your business — and how do you know?

05:27 Question 2: What are you doing out of habit, guilt, or misplaced optimism that you should stop?

06:51 Question 3: Where is your business actually making money — versus where are you pretending it is?

09:00 Question 4: What do you actually want this business to give you?

10:45 Introducing the Founder Portrait — the private document that everything else is built on.

12:10 John’s personal ask: email him your answer to question four at [email protected].

Memorable Quotes

“Marketing fails upstream — in the tactics, when they are being done — but the founder is often the variable that nobody talks about.”

— John Jantsch

“Drift goes very slowly and then all at once — you find yourself somewhere you never thought you wanted to be.”

— John Jantsch

“There is a difference between activity and what is working. A lot of times we conflate the two.”

— John Jantsch

“No marketing strategy is going to serve you if you do not know what you want the business to give you.”

— John Jantsch

 

 

 

[6/5] Tropical Smoothie Cafe: Free 12oz Mango Monsoon Smoothie When You Wear Flip Flops


The Offer

  • Tropical Smoothie Cafe is offering a free 12oz Mango Monsoon Smoothie when you wear flip flops on nation flip flop day (6/5)

Our Verdict

Free is free, will repost on 6/5.