Home Blog

Are There Charities That Pay Off Student Loans? Here’s What’s Real In 2026


Borrowers searching online for “charities that pay off student loans” mostly find debt-relief operators charging fees, not nonprofits cutting checks. Real options exist, but they’re narrower (and slower) than most borrowers expect.

By The Numbers

The most prominent debt-cancellation nonprofit, the Debt Collective, has used its Rolling Jubilee Fund to abolish more than $32 million in medical, student, payday, and probation debt over its history.

Notable student debt wins from the Debt Collective and Rolling Jubilee:

  • $9.7 million in Morehouse College student account balances purchased for roughly $125,000 in 2023
  • $1.7 million in Bennett College debt cancelled for 462 former students

The Slowdown: Large-scale buy-and-cancel actions on student debt have stalled. The Debt Collective hasn’t announced a major student debt portfolio purchase in the last couple of years, shifting most of its energy into federal student loan forgiveness advocacy, organizing, and debt strikes.

There is no application portal where individual borrowers can request relief. Cancellation campaigns target institutional debt portfolios (usually tied to a specific school or debt type) not borrower-by-borrower aid.

Where To Get Actual Student Loan Relief

Three real channels still move money against borrower balances:

Federal Forgiveness Programs

Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), Teacher Loan Forgiveness, Income-Driven Repayment forgiveness, Total and Permanent Disability discharge, and Borrower Defense remain the largest sources of cancelled student debt by dollar volume.

State Loan Repayment Assistance

State LRAPs target healthcare workers, teachers, lawyers in legal aid, and STEM roles in high-need areas. The National Health Service Corps and NURSE Corps are the largest federal-state hybrid programs.

Employer Student Loan Repayment Assistance

Employers can pay up to $5,250 per employee per year toward student loans on a tax-free basis. SECURE 2.0 also lets employers match an employee’s student loan payments with 401(k) contributions — meaning the employee gets retirement savings without diverting cash from their loan payment.

How This Connects

The College Investor maintains a running list of companies offering student loan repayment assistance, which is the most realistic “someone else helps pay my loans” path for the average borrower. Hundreds of employers (from Aetna and Fidelity to Google and Estée Lauder) offer some form of student loan repayment assistance today.

We’ve also covered nonprofit student loan forgiveness, which is forgiveness available through working at a 501(c)(3) — not charities writing off your balance.

If a website promises a charity will pay off your loans for an upfront fee, walk away. The CFPB and FTC have brought repeated enforcement actions against operators using “forgiveness charity” branding to collect fees and stop borrower payments.

The legitimate path remains employer benefits, federal and state programs, and (for a small share of borrowers) institutional debt cancellation campaigns that have largely gone quiet on student debt for now.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ddace746e”].tcb-post-list #post-48727 [data-css=”tve-u-19ddace7474″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/25090803116393-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Can President Trump Reverse Student Loan Forgiveness?

Can President Trump Reverse Student Loan Forgiveness?
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ddace746e”].tcb-post-list #post-578 [data-css=”tve-u-19ddace7474″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Ways_To_Get_Student_Loan_Forgiveness_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

How To Get Student Loan Forgiveness [Full Program List]

How To Get Student Loan Forgiveness [Full Program List]
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ddace746e”].tcb-post-list #post-38095 [data-css=”tve-u-19ddace7474″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/WP_OHB-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

How To Get Help From The Student Loan Ombudsman (And When)

How To Get Help From The Student Loan Ombudsman (And When)

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Are There Charities That Pay Off Student Loans? Here’s What’s Real In 2026 appeared first on The College Investor.

[YMMV] PayPal Rewards: Use Pay Later For First Time & Get 15% Back (Up To $30 In Points, Select Merchants)


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • PayPal Rewards is offering 15% back in rewards when you use Pay later for the first time. Up to 3,000 back. Available on: Nordstrom, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Athleta, Banana Republic, Gap, or Old Navy

Our Verdict

Keep in mind PayPal is removing the redeem for cashback offer. Suspect most readers won’t be eligible due to doing better offers in the past. Best Buy really the only interesting merchant. 

Hat tip to reader smiff

Borrowers shift to variable rates as renewal pressures begin to ease: CMHC




CMHC says borrowers are increasingly turning to variable-rate and shorter-term mortgages as renewal pressures begin to ease and insured lending rebounds.

The Stock Market Sounds an Alarm as Investors Get a Warning From the Federal Reserve. History Says This Will Happen Next.


The S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.16%) fell sharply in March when the Iran conflict pushed oil prices above $100 per barrel for the first time since 2022. The index has already recovered its losses, but the rebound may have been premature.

Geopolitical tensions are still elevated, energy prices are still increasing, and no one knows when the situation will improve. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said as much during a recent press conference: “The economic outlook remains highly uncertain and the conflict in the Middle East has added to this uncertainty.”

Meanwhile, Fed officials recently warned that inflationary pressure could lead to interest rate hikes, and the S&P 500 just sounded an alarm last witnessed during the dot-com crash. Here’s what investors need to know about the current market environment.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell addresses reporters at a press conference. Image source: Official Federal Reserve Photo.

The Federal Reserve says inflationary pressure could lead to interest rate hikes

The Federal Reserve’s biannual financial stability report identifies and assesses risks to the U.S. financial system. The latest report was released in May 2026, and it ranked geopolitical tension and elevated oil prices as the most pressing concerns.

“Inflationary pressure from an energy shock could force central banks to tighten monetary policy even if economic growth were to weaken,” warned the Fed Board of Governors. That could be particularly bad in the current environment because stocks already trade at very rich valuations by historical standards.

Under normal circumstances, the Fed would cut rates to stimulate a weak economy. But inflation accelerated substantially in March due to soaring energy prices caused by the Iran conflict, and inflation may continue climbing as the oil shock drives up manufacturing and transportation costs. In that scenario, the Fed may be forced to raise its benchmark rate.

That could sink the stock market in several ways. Higher interest rates would hurt corporate earnings, both directly by increasing interest expense and indirectly by reducing consumer demand. Higher interest rates would also make bonds more attractive, which could cause investors to sell stocks.

Historical context is valuable here. The Federal Reserve’s last rate-hike cycle started on March 17, 2022, and the S&P 500 fell 17% in the next three months. In fact, the Fed has initiated four rate-hike cycles since 1999, and the S&P 500 has always declined over the next three months, with an average drawdown of 7%.

The stock market sounds an alarm last seen during the dot-com crash

The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio, sometimes called the Shiller PE, is a valuation metric used to evaluate entire stock market indexes. As of early May, the S&P 500 had a CAPE ratio of 39.6. Excluding the last few months, the index has not traded at such a high valuation since the dot-com crash in September 2000.

In fact, the S&P 500’s average CAPE ratio has only exceeded 39 during 27 months since its creation in 1957. In other words, the S&P 500 (a benchmark for the U.S. stock market) has only been this expensive about 3% of the time in the last 70 years, and such rich valuations have historically correlated with dismal future returns.

The chart below shows the S&P 500’s average return over different time periods following a monthly CAPE reading above 39.

Time Period

S&P 500’s Average Return

1 year

(4%)

2 years

(20%)

3 years

(30%)

Data source: Robert Shiller.

Here is what the chart above suggests about the future: If the S&P 500’s returns match the historical average, the index will fall 4% by May 2027. It will drop 20% by May 2028. And it will plummet 30% by May 2029.

Should investors sell their stocks right now? No. Past performance is never a guarantee of future results. The CAPE ratio is based on the S&P 500’s average inflation-adjusted earnings from the past 10 years. And earnings could grow faster in the future as artificial intelligence boosts productivity. In that case, the S&P 500 may keep moving higher while its CAPE ratio falls to something more reasonable.

However, while it doesn’t make sense to exit the stock market simply because the S&P 500’s CAPE ratio is near the upper end of its historical range, it would be equally foolish to dismiss the stock market’s rich valuation. In the current environment, investors should only buy high-conviction stocks they would be comfortable holding through a steep downturn, and only if shares trade at reasonable prices.

I’ll end with advice from Warren Buffett. “Your goal as an investor should simply be to purchase, at a rational price, a part interest in an easily understandable business whose earnings are virtually certain to be materially higher five, 10, and 20 years from now.”

My 2 Non-Negotiable RULES OF FINANCE | Dr. Anil Lamba



In this video, I explain the two non negotiable rules of finance that I have followed throughout my career.

First, every asset must generate a return at least equal to its cost of capital. Second, assets must bring in cash before liabilities demand it.

These two principles apply to individuals, investors, and business owners alike. Ignore them, and financial stress follows. Follow them, and decisions become clear.

#finance #charteredaccountant #financialeducation #business #businessowner #entrepreneur #financeeducation #education

source

Capital Efficiency With Derivatives | EI Blog


Futures offer significant advantages in execution speed.

When regime shifts require exposure adjustment, physical holdings impose transaction costs, potential tax triggers, and multi-day settlement periods. Futures adjustment occurs in minutes at near-zero cost.

A $300 million portfolio detecting rising volatility needs to reduce equity exposure from 70% to 55%, eliminating $45 million of exposure.
Traditional rebalancing: sell $45 million in shares. Cost: 0.3% to 0.5% ($135,000 to $225,000). Time: two to three days. Via futures: eliminate $45 million of synthetic exposure. Cost: $1,000 to $2,000. Time: minutes.

Adjusting exposure multiple times annually as regimes shift? The cumulative savings become substantial. More importantly, low adjustment costs remove hesitation. You can respond to changing conditions without worrying that reversal will be prohibitively expensive.

This agility enables capturing opportunities in favorable regimes by increasing exposure when volatility is low and protecting capital in adverse regimes by reducing exposure when volatility spikes, exactly what’s needed to maintain long-term consistency.

Implementation Risks

The same principle applies beyond protection. Capital efficiency through derivatives isn’t without complications. Three risks require management:

Margin Calls During Stress

Futures require margin. When markets move sharply against positions, you need to add margin quickly, sometimes intraday.

March 2020 taught this lesson clearly. Some institutional investors maintained minimal margin buffers. When requirements doubled or tripled overnight, liquidity squeezes forced liquidation at the worst possible moment.

Mitigation: maintain 3x to 4x the margin requirement in liquid reserves. Use Treasuries as collateral; they’re accepted for margin and continue generating yield.

Basis Risk Between Physical and Synthetic

Futures don’t replicate indices perfectly, particularly during extreme volatility. S&P 500 futures tracking error ranges from 2 to 5 basis points in normal markets to 3 to 80 basis points during stress. For a $150 million position, that’s $45,000 to $120,000 in temporary divergence.

Mitigation: limit synthetic exposure to 25% to 35% of equity allocation. Use only highly liquid futures on broad indices rather than sector-specific or small-cap contracts. Monitor basis daily and adjust if divergence becomes significant.

Operational Requirements

Adding a derivatives layer requires infrastructure: real-time exposure tracking, margin management processes, counterparty monitoring, regulatory reporting.

This can seem daunting. But for insttutional investors already operating derivatives for hedging, adding an efficiency layer is incremental rather than transformational. The systems already exist.

New to derivatives? Start with a single liquid instrument: S&P 500 futures representing 15-20% of equity allocation. Build comfort and establish processes over 6 to 12 months, then scale gradually.
The complexity is real but proportionate. 

Compared to 150 to 200 basis points in annual savings and materially improved risk-adjusted returns, the operational investment justifies itself, particularly when viewed as permanent infrastructure rather than temporary overlay.

Decision Framework

Three conditions indicate when this approach is most effective:
Capital in Low-Return Positions.

Maintaining 10% to 15% in defensive positions for operational or strategic reasons? Capital efficiency dramatically reduces opportunity cost. Already 100% invested comfortably? The savings are marginal.

Rebalancing Frequency

Volatility targeting, regime-based adjustments, tactical tilts — each imposes transaction costs. Physical rebalancing costs 20 to 50 basis points per adjustment. Derivatives cost 1 to 3 basis points.

Quarterly rebalancing or less? Savings don’t justify added complexity. Monthly or more frequent adjustments? Annual savings reach 100 to 200 basis points.

Operational Capacity

Already using derivatives for hedging? Adding efficiency layers is natural. Without derivatives experience? Start small with gradual scaling to develop capability without excessive risk.

NASAA Says No To The CLARITY Act: Critical Revisions Needed


The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) has sent a letter to the Senate Banking Committee urging members to vote against the CLARITY Act in its current form.

NASAA is the lobbying group that represents all the US state securities regulators, as well as regulators in Canada and Mexico.

While stating they support “responsible innovation, the group lists multiple areas they ask to be changed.

These include:

Maintaining “regulatory parity” in regard to tokenized assets, specifically when it comes to state authority, like anti-fraud and investigative powers.

Beyond this parity, NASAA said they remain concerned that bad actors will use “selective text” in the bill to commit fraud, resulting in “enforcement gaps.”

The group also wants licensing and registration authority over broker-dealers, advisors, and others they deem foundational to investor protection. NASAA worries that current language will undermine the federalism framework, explaining “a few short drafting adjustments” will avoid “years of costly litigation.”

NASAA describes the bill as granting overbroad exemptive authority to federal regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NASAA says it is committed to working constructively with Congress, but the current legislation needs “mission-critical revisions.”

…” We respectfully urge the [Senate Banking Committee] to vote NO on the legislation unless those issues are resolved.”

The group is one of several comments that have arisen in advance of the Senate Banking Committee’s scheduled markup hearing this Thursday.

The CLARITY Act was approved by the House in 2025 but has been mired in a legislative morass during 2026. NASAA has long been defensive regarding any perceived or actual infringement of its regulatory powers at the state level.

During markup, changes to the bill can be made, and opponents may be able to sway certain Senators to demand changes to the legislation, which could alter the bill’s current compromise status.

 

 

 

 

 



Elon Musk, Tim Cook and Larry Fink expected to join Trump’s entourage to Beijing this week



Prominent U.S. executives from Big Tech to agriculture have been invited to join President Donald Trump on his trip to China this week, according to a White House official.

Trump leaves on Tuesday for Beijing to meet with President Xi Jinping. Aside from discussions about Iran, the two leaders are expected to discuss trade and artificial intelligence.

Here’s a look at some of the executives according to the White House official, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elon Musk

Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, led Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency until leaving in the spring of 2025 before the controversial pop-up agency was shuttered in November. The billionaire, who also owns the social media platform X, feuded with Trump last summer in a war of words that included Musk claiming without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president’s association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk eventually said that he regretted some of his posts on X about Trump.

Since then, Musk has refocused his energy on Tesla and his other companies. Tesla has operations in China and Musk has visited there. He’s also been dealing with French prosecutors seeking charges against him and X for child sexual abuse images on the platform, deepfakes, disinformation and complicity in denying crimes against humanity by the platform’s artificial intelligence system, Grok. There’s also trial pitting Musk against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Tim Cook

Cook remains busy as his tenure at Apple winds down. The CEO announced last month that his 15-year reign as the head of the technology company will come to an end on Sept. 1, when he turns the CEO duties over to Apple’s head of hardware engineering, John Ternus. During Cook’s years as the top executive, Apple saw the its market value soar by more than $3.6 trillion during an iPhone-fueled era of prosperity. Cook will remain with the company as executive chairman.

Apple’s reliance on overseas manufacturing required Cook to master the art of political diplomacy, particularly while Trump waged trade wars with China during both his terms in the White House. After persuading Trump to exempt the iPhone and other products from Trump’s first-term tariffs, he faced a more daunting challenge during the current administration.

While insisting that Apple shift its iPhone manufacturing from China to the U.S., Trump imposed some tariffs on the device this time around. But Cook still managed to minimize the fees by shifting the production of iPhones destined for the U.S. market to India and also winning some exemptions after promising Apple would invest $600 billion in the U.S. during Trump’s second administration.

Kelly Ortberg

Robert “Kelly” Ortberg, a former CEO at aerospace manufacturer Rockwell Collins, became CEO of Boeing in 2024. He’s spent time focusing on Boeing’s recovery, as the aerospace company was dealing with legal, regulatory and production problems and mounting financial repercussions when he took over.

A year ago Ortberg said that he didn’t expect the U.S. trade war with China to forestall Boeing’s financial recovery, nor prevent it from reaching aircraft delivery targets with Chinese airlines that were refusing to accept its planes. Beijing increased its import tax on American goods to 125% in April 2025 in retaliation for Trump raising the tariff on products made in China to 145%. China’s tariff would more than double the cost of passenger jets that Boeing, the U.S.’ largest exporter, sells for tens of millions of dollars. But Beijing is less of a threat to Boeing now that it used to be, as it has started to send fewer of its finished planes there over time.

Boeing has been in ongoing talks with China over a possible large aircraft sale.

Who else is going

Blackrock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink

Blackstone Chairman, CEO and co-founder Stephen Schwarzman

Cargill Chairman and CEO Brian Sikes

Citi Chairman and CEO Jane Fraser

Coherent CEO Jim Anderson

GE Aerospace Chairman and CEO H. Lawrence Culp

Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon

Illumina CEO Jacob Thaysen

Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach

Meta President and Vice Chairman Dina Powell McCormick

Micron Chairman, President and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra

Qualcomm President and CEO Cristiano Amon

Visa CEO Ryan McInerney

———-

Aamer Madhani in Washington D.C. contributed to this report.

Funding to build or buy SFR hits market as debate rages


The creation of new homes, and for whom they are being built for, is a hot button topic in Washington today. 

Processing Content

On Monday night, in a social media post, President Trump called on the House of Representatives to pass the Senate version of a housing bill which impacts institutional investors’ ability to purchase homes, and limit their ability to hold on to newly constructed properties.

What’s happening in DC

The Senate bill, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed in March, includes implementing an executive order he signed regarding large investors owning residential properties. This bill passed with strong support from both parties.

It has run up against Republican opposition in the House, particularly over Section 901, the institutional investor ban.

The housing industry itself is split, with the Mortgage Bankers Association calling on its members earlier this month to urge the House to remove this portion, as well as three others.

On the other hand, the National Housing Conference urged the House to pass its own bill, but build on the Senate’s “strong bipartisan foundation.” This includes holding onto the institutional investor ban.

“The Senate’s proposal to ban institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes reflects not only the President’s priorities, but the growing urgency of preserving homeownership opportunities for first-time buyers who are increasingly being priced out of the market,” a May 12 statement by David Dworkin, president and CEO of the NHC, said.

Filling the funding void

With this backdrop, one company announced an expansion of its homebuilder financing program, while another stepped up its purchases of build to rent communities with a new joint venture.

Builders Capital Exchange has a $2 billion multi-year annual capital commitment from a global institutional partner. The program is build to own, but those owners can be institutional investors (Builders Capital Exchange does do some build to rent financing).

Estimates vary on how big the deficit is, with the White House putting out a claim of 10 million homes.

While noting the varying numbers being put out regarding the shortage, the end result is one thing, said Robert Trent, CEO of Builders Capital Exchange.

To solve for affordability in the U.S., supply has to be increased. “There’s no way to get there other than building more houses, and these builders can’t build more houses without more capital,” Trent said.

Robert Trent is the founder and CEO of Builders Capital Exchange

Builders Capital Exchange

The majority of construction funding was handled by banks and other small private lenders, said Trent, whose experience was as a homebuilder in Washington State. During the Great Financial Crisis, he ended up selling to a publicly traded builder because of the capital constraints. The experience led him to create Builders Capital Exchange.

But the banks, with the exception of small, regional credit unions, have been pulling back on providing construction financing in recent years, he said. Today, homebuilders are concerned if their bank will remain in this line of lending. It is just one more bit of worry for the industry, whose March 31 results for many were significantly lower than the year before.

On the other hand, private lenders have maximum concentration limits on how much they will lend to a borrower.  A builder constructing hundreds of homes a year needs to have “dozens of different capital partners” from both sources, Trent said.

“What we do is, because of the size and scale and the partnership we have with institutional investors, is we’re able to go in there and offer them one giant facility, if you will, that would replace most or all of those smaller facilities,” he continued.

Blackstone recently announced it was providing funding for 50,000 newly constructed homes a year.

Buying certain SFR communities

Separately, RCLCO Fund Advisors formed a joint venture with what it called “a Top 50 domestic pension fund” to make investments in purpose-built single-family rental communities.

It already has closed on an 82 home single-family attached property.

“RFA was an early participant and continues to have high conviction in BTR investments based on observed, and too often unmet, demand for high quality and affordable single-family housing,” said Taylor Mammen, CEO, in a press release.

This venture is looking at properties with between 50 and 250 homes. These should be within 30 minutes of a major employment center, with the majority being three bedrooms or more. It also has a preference for amenitized communities with townhomes and/or single-family detached homes.

“We believe the purpose-built single-family rental sector is supported by powerful structural drivers, including evolving household formation patterns, affordability pressures, and strong demand for attainable rental housing options,” said Rick Pollack, RFA’s managing director, in a press release.