Home Blog

Recession Risk Through a Real-Economy Lens


Forecasting economic recessions remains a fundamental challenge in macroeconomic research and investment decision-making. Financial markets often signal recessions before economic data visibly deteriorate, making indicators such as yield spreads and credit spreads valuable early-warning tools. However, market-based indicators can also generate costly false alarms when financial conditions reflect temporary shocks rather than sustained economic weakness.

To capture both market expectations and underlying economic conditions, we develop a framework that integrates financial indicators with a broad set of macroeconomic variables. By integrating financial indicators with measures of consumption, housing, labor markets, production, and financial health, our framework improves explanatory power from 0.38 to 0.54 and increases classification accuracy from 84% to 89%, while reducing false recession signals. Our analysis suggests that recession forecasts become substantially more reliable when financial market signals are combined with measures of real economic activity.

In the United States, recession dates are determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Business Cycle Dating Committee, which evaluates a broad range of economic indicators to assess the depth, duration, and diffusion of economic downturns.

While widely regarded as the definitive record of business cycles, the NBER process is inherently backward-looking. Historically, official recession announcements have been delayed by four- to twenty-one months, with an average lag of approximately eleven months (see Exhibit 1).

By the time a recession is officially identified, markets and economic conditions have often already adjusted, highlighting the need for forward-looking models that can assess recession risk over investor-relevant horizons.

Rocket, Fannie and Freddie downgraded to neutral by BTIG


A trio of the mortgage industry’s biggest names — Rocket, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — had their stock ratings downgraded by BTIG to neutral from buy.

Processing Content

On the other hand, its favored names for the last six months of the year among the publicly traded mortgage companies are Rithm and UWM Holdings, the report authored by Doug Harter said.

The downgrades were announced in Harter’s second half outlook, which started by pointing out the interest rate environment so far this year has been more challenging than initially expected by industry observers.

This shows “the importance of having a balanced business model which can produce stable returns across the cycle,” Harter said. “From a stock perspective the expectations have certainly eased in response to the increase in rates and the push out of the achievement of ‘normalized’ earnings.”

Why BTIG downgraded Rocket

In the case of Rocket, the current valuation reflects what Harter termed its “unique platform.” Specifically, the report mentioned Rocket’s direct to consumer brand, its large servicing portfolio acquired with Mr. Cooper, the Redfin real estate business it also purchased and its technology.

“While these are clear positives we see the current valuation (both on 2027 and 2028 earnings) already reflects the premium nature of Rocket’s platform leaving less relative upside,” BTIG said. “The risk to our neutral rating would be a decline in rates, which while benefiting all the originators, would likely see Rocket’s premium valuation expand.”

The outlook on the short-term future of the GSEs

The downgrades for Fannie and Freddie are a result of Harter not having any visibility into the timing of a release from conservatorship. This includes movement towards the creation of updated capital standards, as well as resolving the status of the government’s senior preferred stock holdings.

“With other topics taking up time in Washington, we do not see the GSEs being a near-term area of focus,” Harter said. “While the stocks have already been weak on these reduced expectations, we do not see the shares being able to sustainably outperform until there is sustained momentum around a release.”

His upside for the government-sponsored enterprises is the capital requirements are lowered and the government’s senior preferreds are deemed repaid. In this case, he values Fannie at $26 per share and Freddie at $32. His current price target for both is $20.

But in the negative case, where those preferreds are converted to common stock, diluting current shareholder value, both companies are worth $4 per share.

Bullish on UWM even with the leverage situation

When it comes to UWM, Harter maintained his buy while acknowledging its outlook regarding leverage and the continuation of a dividend.

The analysts at Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, once the Two Harbors situation is resolved, expect UWM to reduce its dividend in order to alleviate the leverage pressure.

Harter has a similar view, adding a UWM dividend reduction actually creates “a buying opportunity as the improved financial position would allow investors to focus on the strength of the franchise.”

When it comes to the battle for Two Harbors, he sees a benefit in UWM growing its servicing portfolio with the lower coupon servicing rights RoundPoint has, as it will improve its balance sheet and cash flow.

“Financially an all cash deal is less attractive than the initial stock deal,” Harter said. “Resolution of the acquisition, either way, should remove an overhang for the stock and bring the dividend decision to the front.”

BTIG stock price target reductions

The leverage/dividend situation did result in Harter cutting his outlook for UWM’s stock price to $4 from $10 per share.

Harter also cut the price targets of three other companies rated as buys: Rithm to $13 from $16; PennyMac Financial Services to $105 from $150; and Onity to $50 from $60.

Meanwhile, the agency maintained its neutral rating on LoanDepot; it does not have a price target.

Starting coverage on Better with a buy

BTIG also started coverage on Better Home & Finance, also giving it a buy rating and price target of $36 per share.

“Better is well positioned from a platform/technology standpoint to grow its business from the recently added partnerships,” Harter said. “As that volume comes online we expect Better to achieve EBITDA break-even in 4Q26 and then turn profitable in 2027.”

Its partnership business model creates what Harter termed “a lower balance sheet intensity.”

Better is still not making a profit, recording a first quarter loss of $70 million, following a $40 million loss three months prior. But Harter noted “the progress towards EBITDA break-even and scaling the business as the biggest catalysts towards achieving our target price.”

BTIG’s volume outlook

BTIG’s base case forecast for volume is more conservative than the most cited outlooks. It is below the Mortgage Bankers Association’s by about 3% and Fannie Mae’s by 10%.

The BTIG analysts are looking at a $2.1 trillion market for both 2026 and 2027. But the purchase prediction is for $1.36 trillion this year and $1.43 trillion next. In turn, refinancings of $772 billion expected for this year fall to $700 billion next.



U.S. Anthropic ban opens door for open-source AI, particularly from China



The U.S. government’s decision to stop Anthropic from offering its Mythos and Fable 5 models to non-U.S. nationals may end up providing a big boost to the adoption of open-source models, including those from Chinese AI labs like DeepSeek and Moonshot AI. 

Users can download open-source models and run them on their own computers or cloud networks, effectively sidestepping the ability of both AI developers and governments to control access. These models can also be more easily fine-tuned by developers to tailor them for specific needs.

Chinese labs are already claiming a public relations win from the Anthropic controversy. 

Shares in Knowledge Atlas, a Chinese AI lab better known as z.ai, surged by over 30% in Hong Kong trading on Monday after it released the latest version of its open-source model, GLM-5.2. (Knowledge Atlas’s shares are up more than 800% since they debuted in January)

“At a time when some frontier models can suddenly become unavailable, we choose to believe in a different path,” Knowledge Atlas posted on social media, according to the South China Morning Post. In a clear reference to the Anthropic news, the company added that “frontier intelligence should not belong to only a few people, nor be subject to withdrawal by a handful of rules at any moment.”

Demand for Chinese models has already overtaken that for U.S. models on OpenRouter, a popular platform for accessing different AI models. Last week, the top four most-used models came from Chinese companies: DeepSeek, MiniMax, Tencent and Xiaomi. The Chinese open source models have proved popular not just within China but also in many other developing countries around the globe, where they are seen as a good trade off between price and performance.

The U.S.’s ban on Fable and Mythos may also end up vindicating China’s broader move towards tech self-sufficiency, which picked up in 2022 after the Biden Administration placed controls on the sale of advanced chips and chipmaking equipment. “It’s a great move for China,” says Neil Shah, vice president of research at Counterpoint Research. “Obviously they’re not on the cutting edge because of the export controls, but they have their own silicon and their own software.”

Why go open-source?

On Friday, Anthropic revealed that the U.S. Department of Commerce had ordered it to stop providing access to its frontier models to anyone outside of the U.S. The way U.S. export rules are interpreted also means the company cannot offer the models to any “foreign national” inside the U.S., including its own employees. In response to the government order, the company decided to suspend access to these models to all users. 

Anthropic had previously argued that its Mythos model was too powerful to be released to the public without safeguards, and had embarked on an early-access program, titled Project Glasswing, for key institutions to use the model to uncover security vulnerabilities. Institutions in about 15 countries, including U.S. allies like Japan and South Korea, eventually got access to Mythos through Project Glasswing.

But the U.S.’s move against Anthropic raises the possibility that frontier models from other labs, like OpenAI or Google, might also get hit by export controls. In that event, non-U.S. organizations may be completely locked out from accessing the best U.S.-developed models.

Open-source models could be an alternative, particularly for governments hoping to invest in sovereign AI, domestically-developed and -controlled AI models and infrastructure. The U.S.’s export controls on Anthropic only highlights the danger governments have from being locked in to one country’s AI models. 

“It is the first time that a government has ordered a model developer to restrict access to a particular model based on nationality,” says Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group. “Companies and governments will start reconsidering how they are approaching application development based on a particular model, and for governments, which companies they will want to partner with for sovereign AI deployments.”

“Until there is further clarity about what criteria the U.S. government will use in assessing and approving frontier models, companies and governments will definitely be exploring options such as non-U.S. origin models,” such as those from Mistral, Cohere, and “capable Chinese open-source models,” he adds.

The Anthropic order will “push scale for Chinese open-source models,” Shah says. “But we’ll also see lots of ambitious and self-sufficient economies, like in the Middle East, who will try to build their own indigenous software models.”

Asian governments in particular have made a public push for “sovereign AI.” South Korea, for example, launched a national state-backed competition to develop Korean-language AI models. 

“We need to advance our own technology as quickly as possible and become as self-reliant as we can,” Sung Kim, the founder of Korean AI startup Upstage, said at a press conference on Tuesday, adding that AI was now a “strategic national asset.”

Japan, for its part, is suggesting that it might turn to Anthropic’s arch-rival OpenAI to bolster its cybersecurity defenses.

How good are China’s open-source AI models?

Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic make their models available in China, including the Chinese city of Hong Kong (which sits outside Beijing’s internet controls). 

Both Anthropic and OpenAI have accused Chinese labs like DeepSeek of conducting “distillation” attacks, where their models are used to train smaller, more efficient models. 

Chinese models still lag models from the U.S. DeepSeek’s most recent model V4 performs at approximately the same level as Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI’s GPT 5.4. Those models were released in February and March 2026, respectively. The Chinese startup estimated it was three to six months behind state-of-the-art frontier models. 

However, while Chinese open-source models are not as powerful as their U.S.-developed peers, they are still significantly cheaper. DeepSeek’s V4 Pro cost $3.48 for 1 million tokens of output; Anthropic’s Fable 5 model cost $50 for the same output. (A token is the basic data unit that contemporary AI systems, most of which are large language models, process. It is equivalent to about a word-and-a-half of English text.)

Save 20% with Three Wyndham Amex Offers


Three Wyndham Amex Offers

American Express has three new Wyndham Amex Offers, giving cardholders an easy way to save up to 20% on their next stay. As with most Amex Offers, these may be targeted, so you’ll want to check all of your cards to see where the offers have landed. I see them on most of my consumer and business credit cards. Let’s look at the details for each offer.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Value Destinations – US & Canada

Earn a one-time $20 statement credit after using your enrolled eligible Card to spend a minimum of $100 USD in one or more qualifying purchases on room rate and room charges at select Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Value Destinations in the US and Canada from 6/15/2026 to 9/30/2026. Book at wyndhamhotels.com.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Midscale Destinations – US & Canada

Earn a one-time $50 statement credit after using your enrolled eligible Card to spend a minimum of $250 USD in one or more qualifying purchases on room rate and room charges at select Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Midscale Destinations in the US and Canada from 6/15/2026 to 10/15/2026. Book at wyndhamhotels.com.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts – Select Luxury Destinations

Earn a one-time $100 statement credit after using your enrolled eligible Card to spend a minimum of $500 USD in one or more qualifying purchases on room rate and room charges at select Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Luxury Destinations in the US and Internationally from 5/27/2026 to 10/27/2026. Book at wyndhamhotels.com.

Wyndham Amex Offer 2026

Important Terms

  • Offer valid at participating Wyndham Hotels & Resorts in the US and Canada.
  • Must make reservations directly with Wyndham online at wyndhamhotels.com.
  • Excludes timeshares, and gift card purchases.
  • Qualifying purchases must total a minimum of $250 USD, following conversion from a foreign currency.
  • Offer only valid on room rate and room charges.
  • Offer not valid for lodging stays that are paid for before the promotion start date or after the promotion end date. 

About Amex Offers

Amex Offers are an extra perk on all American Express credit cards, charge cards, and even prepaid cards. You can see these offers in your accounts either as a statement credit or extra Membership Rewards points for spending a certain amount at eligible merchants. You will need to add the offer to a specific card first, and then use that card to get the credit. Here are a few things you should know:

Guru’s Wrap-up

These are solid Amex Offers that can save you anywhere from $20 to $100 on upcoming Wyndham stays. The value is fairly straightforward. With all three offers providing roughly 20% back when you spend exactly the minimum spending requirement.

If you are planning your next trip, it’s worth checking all of your American Express cards. Just be sure to review the list of participating properties before booking, as eligibility varies.

As always, you can stack these offers with Wyndham promotions, elite benefits, and discounted rates, making them an easy way to save even more on your next stay.

Remember that you can use the search bar within the “Amex Offers” section in the app to find this offer quickly, instead of scrolling through 100+ deals.

Sonic Automotive President Sells 50,000 Shares


Sonic Automotive (SAH 0.58%), a major U.S. auto retailer, reported a notable insider sale amid ongoing shifts in executive shareholdings.

On June 9 and June 10, Jeff Dyke, President of Sonic Automotive, reported the direct sale of 50,000 shares of Common Stock in multiple open-market transactions, as disclosed in this SEC Form 4 filing.

Transaction summary

Metric Value
Shares sold (direct) 50,000
Transaction value $4.3 million
Post-transaction shares (direct) 543,668
Post-transaction shares (indirect) 111,622
Post-transaction value (direct ownership) ~$45.7 million

Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($85.19); post-transaction value based on June 10 market close.

Key questions

  • What proportion of Dyke’s direct holdings was impacted in this transaction?
    The sale accounted for 7.1% of Dyke’s direct holdings at the time, leaving him with a substantial continuing ownership stake in both direct and indirect accounts.
  • Were any shares sold from indirect holdings or through derivative transactions?
    No shares were sold from indirect holdings or via derivative securities; all shares disposed in this transaction were directly held common stock.

Company overview

Metric Value
Revenue (TTM) $15.2 billion
Net income (TTM) $108.9 million
Dividend yield 2.0%
Price (as of market close June 10) $84.15

Company snapshot

Sonic Automotive is a U.S. automotive retailer, operating through a network of franchised dealerships and EchoPark used vehicle stores across multiple states. The company offers new and pre-owned vehicles, while also offering comprehensive after-sales and finance solutions.

  • Offers new and pre-owned vehicle sales, replacement parts, maintenance, warranty repairs, collision repair, and finance and insurance products through franchised dealerships and EchoPark specialty stores.
  • Serves retail automotive consumers across the United States, targeting both new car buyers and value-focused used car customers.
  • Generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales, parts and service operations, and the sale of finance and insurance products, leveraging a dual-segment model to address both new and used car markets.

What this transaction means for investors

Investors should read neither positive nor negative signals from President Dyke’s recent share sale activity. While key insider selling could signal a bearish signal, that’s not the case here.

Dyke set up a 10b5-1 trading plan. This sets the terms of his sales activity ahead of time in an effort to avoid accusations that key officers and directors traded ahead of material insider information. His recent sales activity was conducted under this arrangement.

Additionally, Sonic Automotive’s president still holds substantial shares in the company. He directly holds 543,668 shares and indirectly, through an LLC, owns another 111,622 shares. The combined 655,290 shares have a value of about $55 million.

Looking at returns, Sonic Automotive’s stock performance has lagged the overall market lately. The shares returned 13.9% over the last year through June 15, trailing the S&P 500 index’s 28%. Both factor dividends into the total return.

Aperture Investment Opportunity #2: "Bot Trust"



In this week’s informational video, Aperture Science founder Cave Johnson explains why robots’ll get you the biggest bang for your testing dollar. Don’t wait until April 19th to get in on the ground floor. Invest in documentary game futures today!

source

How Deandra McDonald Went From Lender Rejections to 10+ Unit Multifamily Properties


Name Deandra McDonald
Location Virginia
Occupation Real estate investor
Assets Multifamily real estate
Investment strategy House hacking, long-term rentals, joint ventures, seller financing
Financing Conventional, FHA, seller financing

Deandra McDonald graduated from college, took her first job as a lab technician making $28,000 a year, and got her first rent increase notification shortly after. That was all it took. She decided she was done being at a landlord’s mercy and started trying to buy a property. 

The first lender denied her outright. She had $5,000 in credit card debt, minimal savings, and no wiggle room. So she got a second job bartending, a third job lifeguarding, and a fourth job teaching swim lessons. 

For 18 months, Deandra cut every expense she could, including internet and cable, paid off the debt, and saved $3,500. That got her approved for an $85,000 loan and into her first property. She hasn’t looked back since. 

Here’s how she built from there.

You got denied the first time and had almost nothing saved. How did you finally get into your first deal?

I had to go back to that lender’s rejection list and work through it, line by line. I couldn’t make more money overnight, so I had to do two things: pay down my credit card debt and save more. 

I took on four jobs and cut everything I could. After 18 months, I had cleared the debt and saved $3,500, which was enough to qualify for an $85,000 loan. 

What I wish I had done was look up down payment assistance programs first. I would have qualified easily. There are programs that will cover 20% down on a multifamily if you just agree to live there for five years. I learned that too late, but I tell everyone now: Google what’s available in your ZIP code before you spend 18 months grinding it out the hard way.

What’s the move for someone who genuinely has no money and no experience?

Before we talk about creative financing, I always ask why you don’t have any money. Because whatever habits got you there, you’re going to repeat them in real estate. If you overspend in regular life, you’ll overspend on a flip. If you like to bet it all, you’ll buy the property with the foundation problem and convince yourself it’s just cosmetic. 

So fix the habits first. Then house hack. It is always the right first move. It lowers your cost of living, locks in your housing expense so no landlord can raise it on you, and puts you in a position to build equity and experience at the same time.

I just bought my dream home, and it has a full apartment in the basement, because house hacking never stops making sense.

You mentioned partnering as another path in. How do you actually make that work when you have nothing to bring to the table?

You have to be honest with yourself about what you’re offering. Nobody with money is going to hand you equity because you found a listing on Zillow. But if you’re willing to live in the property, manage it, fix things, and be present every single day, that is something real you can offer. 

I started hiring live-in handymen for my larger multifamily buildings and splitting profits with them instead of just paying a wage. That arrangement works because they’re invested. They hear the dog that’s not supposed to be there. They notice when something breaks before it becomes expensive.

If you want a partner with capital, show them for two or three years what you do with a smaller property first. Let them watch you operate before you ask them to write a check.

How do you think about how much money someone actually needs to get started responsibly?

Before anything else, you need enough to cover the most expensive repair that insurance will not pay for. On a condo, that might be $3,000 for a mini-split. On a quadplex with an old roof and an aging furnace, that number is a lot higher. Figure out your worst-case scenario, and make sure you can cover it without calling your partner in the first month. 

Beyond that, if you have good credit, a 0% intro APR business credit card gives you real financial runway for furnishings or repairs without paying interest for 12 to 18 months. That only works if you have the discipline to pay it off. But if you do, it is essentially free financing, and it has been one of the most useful tools I have found for closing the gap between what you have and what the deal needs.

What do you know now that you wish someone had told you at the beginning?

The biggest expense most people never think about is taxes, not rent. Once I started doing joint ventures and seller financing, I realized how much leverage you have when you own property outright and how much money you leave on the table when you don’t understand your tax position. 

I’ve been collecting 8% and 10% checks on seller-financed deals I no longer have to manage. That’s money coming in while I sleep. You don’t need to start there, but you need to know that’s where this goes if you stay patient and keep building. 

Commit to seven to 10 years. That’s the whole strategy.

Reckitt CEO expects delayed inflation impact from Iran war




Reckitt CEO expects delayed inflation impact from Iran war

Million-dollar starter homes now span 242 US cities, Zillow finds


What the qualification math looks like

A household needs an annual income of nearly $117,000 to afford the average US home, according to Redfin. At the median price of roughly $418,000, a buyer putting 15 percent down at current rates would need to spend around 40 percent of income on housing. Most lenders and financial advisers recommend keeping that figure below 30 percent.

For a million-dollar starter home, the income requirement rises well beyond that threshold. The 30-year fixed rate has hovered around 6.6 percent in recent months, with forecasters expecting rates to stay in the mid-sixes through the end of 2026.

At that rate, qualifying for a $1 million home typically requires annual household income of at least $200,000, according to financial education site SoFi. That’s well above what most first-time buyers earn.

Where million-dollar starter homes are concentrated

California accounts for the largest share, with 105 cities where entry-level homes carry a seven-figure price tag. New York follows with 41, and New Jersey with 26.

[AmEx Statement: No Nerf] American Express To Nerf Resy Credit (Select Restaurants Only)


Update 6/15/26: American Express has provided the following statement:

We have added a Resy Credit eligible badge to Resy venues pages to provide additional clarity to diners at the time of booking. We have not removed Resy venues that are eligible today and will be adding more eligible venues later this year when Tock venues become bookable on Resy

I’m still of the opinion that in the fullness of time this will lead to a nerf, but in the short to medium term it seems that is incorrect. 

Original post: American Express is nerfing the Resy credits that Platinum & Gold cards offer by restricting the credits to select restaurants. Statements are showing the following:

Update to the Resy Credit Benefit

Effective August 1, 2026, U.S. restaurants and other food and beverage establishments (e.g., wineries, cafes) must be indicated as eligible for the Resy Credit on the Resy website or the Resy app at the time of purchase to qualify for the benefit. Qualifying restaurants and other food and beverage establishments will be indicated as eligible on their booking page on the Resy website or the Resy app and are subject to change at any time.

When you check the Resy app it now lists restaurants as ‘This venue qualifies for the Resy Credit…’. Currently it seems like all restaurants are listed as being eligible, which makes sense as this change doesn’t come into effect until August 1, 2026. Even after that date I suspect most restaurants will remain eligible, the problem is that this can change at any moment and doesn’t give you any certainty going forward. It’s only a matter of time until restaurants begin to not be eligible. 

I suspect American Express will either start charging restaurants directly if they want to be eligible for this credit or use it to upsell other services. Some people are saying this is actually a good thing as some restaurants are on Resy but don’t accept American Express for example, I think in time we will definitely see that this is not a good thing. 

Hat tip to Fit_Asparagus9845