Home Blog

How to Get Your Employees to Actually Adopt AI How You Want


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • If leaders want employees to embrace AI, they need to do more than roll out a platform or issue a mandate. They need to create a safe space where people feel comfortable learning, experimenting and building new habits.
  • By coaching vs. mandating, modeling the behavior you want to see and positioning AI as a growth tool, leaders can ensure AI isn’t replacing anyone, but enhancing their abilities.

Most executives believe they’ve done their part on artificial intelligence. They’ve approved the tools, announced the initiative and moved on. But the adoption numbers tell a different story.

According to Slingshot‘s Digital Work Trends Report, 86% of C-suite executives believe AI usage is required in their company operations. Yet fewer than half (49%) of middle managers are reinforcing that expectation with their teams. This gap between what leaders announce and what employees actually do isn’t a technology problem. It’s a leadership one.

I’ve spent more than 35 years leading Infragistics, and one lesson which has remained true through every major technology shift is that the success of any new initiative depends less on the technology itself and more  on how leaders introduce it. The organizations that see lasting change are the ones whose leaders create an environment where people can adopt new tools with confidence.

AI is no different. If leaders want employees to embrace it, they need to do more than roll out a platform or issue a mandate. They need to create a safe space where people feel comfortable learning, experimenting and building new habits. Here are three ways leaders can do so. 

1. Coaching creates the confidence to experiment

Real AI adoption requires employees to experiment with the tools. But people won’t take those risks unless they feel safe doing so.

That’s where coaching becomes far more effective than command-and-control leadership. Rather than simply telling employees to use AI, coaching-oriented leaders work alongside their teams and ask what’s working, what isn’t and where people are getting stuck. 

Anyone who has spent time with an AI tool knows that getting genuinely useful results takes practice. The first prompt rarely gives you what you need. Over time, though, you learn to ask more specific questions, provide the right context and test different approaches until the output actually fits your workflow. 

That kind of learning is personal and iterative, and it looks different for every role. A marketer figuring out how to use AI to track KPIs is going to take a completely different path than a salesperson using it for outreach. Employees need room to go through that process, and that only happens when leaders create an environment where figuring it out is part of that job and not a sign that someone isn’t ready.

2. Model the behavior you want to see

One of the fastest ways to encourage AI adoption is for leaders to use it themselves. 

Employees pay far more attention to what leaders do than what they say. So, when leaders openly incorporate AI into meetings, planning sessions, decision-making or content creation — and are honest about both the successes and limitations — they normalize learning. And that transparency gives employees permission to experiment without feeling like they need to be experts from day one.

One simple habit leaders can implement is to open team check-ins by sharing how they used AI that week, what they tried, what worked and what didn’t, then inviting employees to do the same. Conversations like those are an opportunity to exchange ideas, uncover successful use cases, encourage collaboration and help employees learn from one another instead of experimenting in isolation.

3. Position AI as growth, not compliance

How leaders talk about AI matters just as much as how they implement it. When AI is framed as another mandatory technology rollout, employees often see it as another box to check or, worse, as a threat to their jobs. 

Slingshot’s Digital Work Trends report found that nearly 1 in 5 Gen Z employees (19%) and 17% of millennials worry AI could eventually replace them. A company mandate does nothing to address that fear. But when leaders position AI as a way to remove repetitive work, improve decision-making and give employees more time for higher-value thinking, that conversation starts to look very different.

Employees don’t want to hear that AI will replace what makes them valuable. They want to understand how it helps them become even better at the work they already do well. That means being clear about where AI adds value and where human judgment remains essential. AI can analyze data, summarize information and automate repetitive processes, but people still provide strategy, creativity, relationship-building and accountability. When those roles are clearly defined, AI becomes less intimidating and much more useful.

Ultimately, the organizations making the most progress with AI are the ones whose leaders make it safe to learn, model the behaviors they expect from others and consistently reinforce that AI is an investment in their people, not a replacement for them.

Key Takeaways

  • If leaders want employees to embrace AI, they need to do more than roll out a platform or issue a mandate. They need to create a safe space where people feel comfortable learning, experimenting and building new habits.
  • By coaching vs. mandating, modeling the behavior you want to see and positioning AI as a growth tool, leaders can ensure AI isn’t replacing anyone, but enhancing their abilities.

Most executives believe they’ve done their part on artificial intelligence. They’ve approved the tools, announced the initiative and moved on. But the adoption numbers tell a different story.

According to Slingshot‘s Digital Work Trends Report, 86% of C-suite executives believe AI usage is required in their company operations. Yet fewer than half (49%) of middle managers are reinforcing that expectation with their teams. This gap between what leaders announce and what employees actually do isn’t a technology problem. It’s a leadership one.

I’ve spent more than 35 years leading Infragistics, and one lesson which has remained true through every major technology shift is that the success of any new initiative depends less on the technology itself and more  on how leaders introduce it. The organizations that see lasting change are the ones whose leaders create an environment where people can adopt new tools with confidence.

Fewer Investors Are Buying Homes as the Housing Market Shifts (Again)


James:
The housing market is sending mixed signals, and today’s headline show why the context behind the numbers matter. Foreclosures are rising, but remain well below historical norms. Buyers are gaining more choices in negotiating power and cash offers are losing some of the advantages they once had. Together, these stories point to a market that is slowly becoming more balanced, but still looking very different depending on where you are and what strategies you are pursuing. I’m James Dainard here with Kathy Fettke and Henry Washington to break down what these shifts mean for investors. This is On the Market. Let’s get into it. All right, Kathy, what do you got for us today?

Kathy:
Well, what I’ve got is what confuses people a lot. It’s a headline. And this is from Adam Data Solutions, and they just kind of gave it the facts, but then news articles all over just took it and ran with it. And that is that foreclosure starts rise 18% in the first half of 2026. So that sounds scary, right? And then it goes on to say a total of 227,000 properties with foreclosure filings. So again, very, very scary. And you might read that headline and think, oh my gosh, the housing market is crashing and all these people can’t pay their mortgage. But you got to read the article, people, just read it. So in it, when you look and see, yes, it has increased. In 2021, foreclosure activity was 65,000. So the next year went way up to 164,000. Why do you think that was, you guys?

Henry:
Yeah, because they were holding off on foreclosing.

Kathy:
Because you couldn’t foreclose, right? But the headlines were like, “Oh, it tripled.” And then the next year, 185. And then anyway, it has climbed up quite a bit. And if you were to just look at what happened over the last five years and say foreclosures have quintupled, it is scary. But what’d you think about 2018? Was there headlines all about foreclosures?

Henry:
Not a single one.

Kathy:
And in 2018, it was 362,000. Again, 227,000 today. And if you want to compare today to 2010 was the peak, 1,654,000. So don’t you go and say 2026 is like 2010, 1,650,000 and today 227,000. Can’t compare.

Henry:
Yeah, it’s not the same. Is there a problem in the housing market? Yeah, there’s a problem. There’s an affordability problem. Absolutely. Are there people who bought a house who then realized that taxes, insurance and your principle and it all go up over time and now they can’t afford their house? Yes, there’s a lot of people in that boat and I don’t want to make light of that. I’m not saying there’s not an affordability problem. I’m just saying that the number of foreclosures is not a telling sign for me that the world is ending.

Kathy:
Yeah. And if you’re a foreclosure buyer, if this is your industry, you haven’t had a great industry. I haven’t had a couple years. It’s been very, very low. So I suppose if you’re into that business, there are tens of thousands more people going into foreclosure. So again, not my business. I don’t know. James, do you buy foreclosures?

Henry:
I do.

James:
We don’t buy a lot of foreclosures. I mean, if they come into us, we will, but we don’t see a ton. If I looked at the last 10 foreclosures that I actually bought, they were actually investors in default with their hard money loans. They were not your traditional sellers. And that’s where I’m seeing most of the distress. The homeowners, the banks are still working with them quite a bit. We don’t even actively market to them. We’re known as a dependable home buyer and brokers with their clients will reach out to us with foreclosure clients. But I will say that where we are seeing a lot more surge in foreclosures up in the Northwest at least is because we’ll have one investor and all of a sudden they’ll have 15 to 20 properties all go into default at the same time with six different hard money lenders.

Henry:
Wow.

James:
And that’s where we’re seeing an uptick. But the problem is most of those properties, they’re in expensive debt. They’re compounding at 12 to 18% in default interest. There’s construction liens on them and there’s a bad construction plan on them. And unless the lender is going to take a note discount, you can’t buy them. And the one thing is, what I do remember is short sales were a pain in the butt back in 2008, nine and 10. You’d basically just throw offers out on 50 properties and maybe four would come back after six months. Hard money shorting is a lot quicker and there’s a deal to be made there. And so I do think we’re going to see some short sales going on in the

Henry:
Hard

James:
Money space and they will work deals with logic and if they can back it up with appraisals and actual facts, they look at it that way and they will slide. It’s a good thing to hit is hard money lenders in your market that have more distress going on, call them, see what they have. What do they want off their plate? There’s deals to be done. That has been where we’ve been buying most of them.

Henry:
I’ve bought a few foreclosures in the past couple of years, literally probably three, and they’ve all been homeowners, but we don’t actively market to them. They just come across my desk either through networking, somebody knows who I am and knows that they need us have a seller in a tough situation. And we’ve built a pretty good reputation. I don’t like to buy foreclosures for the payoff amount. I always like to pay extra so they walk away with something. And that helps people bring those deals to me because it helps their sellers because they can actually walk away with some money. I know a lot of people target foreclosures and just try to buy for the debt that’s owed. I always try to pay more.

Kathy:
Another thing that was interesting about this article, it says the average days to complete a foreclosure. How many days do you think?

James:
I bet you’re probably like 220 days.

Henry:
I was going to say six months.

Kathy:
This says 563 days to complete a foreclosure.

James:
Wild.

Kathy:
And that’s down, you guys. That’s down from
A few years ago. And I had heard that. I know there’s judicial states where the foreclosure has to go through a judge or there weren’t enough judges when there were so many foreclosures. But pre – GFC, before the foreclosure crisis of 2008, it was like what you just said. It was a couple hundred days was the average. So I think I said earlier that banks got, they learned that foreclosures are not in their best interest. They would rather work with this, I mean not always, but do these loan mods or I don’t know. It’s just complete reverse. It’s doubled since pre – GFC.

James:
Yeah, they definitely will work with a homeowner on it and homeowners need to explore every option if they’re in that situation.

Kathy:
Yes.

James:
But one thing as we were listening to this, we were talking about this in our sales meeting two days ago and it was a listed property. It was in foreclosure. And I said, “Hey guys, look, no matter what, if we’re going to write an offer on this, we are going out there, we’re waving inspection and we are giving them something 100% sure that we can close. You got to make sure that you can close the deal.” For all the wholesalers out there, if you’re tying up those properties, don’t tie those foreclosures up. Every day matters. Don’t burn their clock and don’t over promise. Make sure it’s a guaranteed thing for these people because they need to close. And so we literally had a long talk about that in my sales meeting today. Guys, if they want a higher price, give them the guaranteed close price because they need a guaranteed option.
And so just don’t tie people up, don’t waste people’s time. Time is valuable, especially when you’re in default. We’re taking a quick break. When we return, Henry is looking at the current housing market where growing inventory and stubborn mortgage rates are creating a new set of challenges and opportunities.
Welcome back to On the Market. Henry, what do we got?

Henry:
Yes, I brought an article from Redfin. The title of the article is Investor Pullback: Home Purchases Hit a 10-Year Low. Is this the setup smart investors have been waiting for? So this article is from Redfin and it talks about investor home purchases in the first quarter of 2026 fell 6% year over year. Now that’s investor home purchases fell 6% year over year. That’s its lowest level since 2020. And when you strip out all the pandemic numbers that were inflated and aren’t really telling to the true story here, you’d have to go all the way back to 2016 to find when investor purchases were this low. So that’s 10 years ago. It talks about some of the key points that are causing this. First and foremost is the math is hard for people. So at a 6.6% mortgage rate and median home prices up near 430,000, it’s just hard to make the numbers work unless you’re a super professional investor who’s sourcing their own direct to seller leads.
But for the normal everyday investor who’s just wanting to buy something on the market in a secondary town, it’s a whole lot harder to make those numbers work. Next is the new regulatory uncertainty because the Road Housing Act does restrict investors with 350 or more homes, but that regulation it’s alluding to might be scaring some of the smaller investors from getting into the space for fear of regulation that could hit smaller investors. We have been talking about on almost every show now, we’ve said it already on this show, this is the time to be buying, right? Everything in this article tells me that I need to be buying and buying conservatively, not buying anything, but the people that are winning right now are the professional investors, the people who know how to go and source a deal at a discount. And there’s more opportunity to land those deals because there’s less competition in the market.
This is the least amount of competition we’ve seen in the market since 2016, which is wild to think about. So if you can build up a strategy for sourcing deals at a discount, five to 10 years from now, you’re going to look like a frick-frecking genius. Now the catch is you’ve got to be able to maintain through the hard time to get there. So you can’t buy bad deals, you can’t buy thin deals, you’ve got to buy really good deals. But I think this article is good news for investors because this just spells opportunity to me.

James:
There’s so much opportunity and scared money doesn’t make money. So Henry, how has your buy box changed in the last 12 months? I mean, you got to reset your expectations.

Henry:
Yep. The product that I want to buy has essentially remained the same. What I’m willing to pay for it has changed drastically. We are underwriting so conservatively that I lose out on a lot of deals to investors who aren’t conservative. So what’s changed is I have to make more offers to land the same amount of deals I would because the competition that is in the market is willing to pay more than I’m willing to pay because they’re willing to be a little more risky. Also, the product I’m not buying right now, James, that I bought in the past is the flip house that can only be a flip. In other words, there’s no other exit. I’ve done a few flips where they were bigger flips, maybe they’re in a higher end of town, the numbers wouldn’t work for a rental, but it was such good margins on the flip that I did it.
I don’t do that deal anymore. Even if there’s money to be made, I leave that deal on the table because I have to be able to pivot and rent that thing out if it doesn’t sell, period. That’s the one thing that’s changed in my buy box.

James:
That is the safest thing you can do. Multiple exit strategies on any deal, whether it’s you’re buying a rental property and your rent’s drop and you can short-term rent it, midterm rent it with realistic. Is it a realistic product like you’re buying a rental property, how do you get multiple strategies? Buy something with location where there is demand for the midterm and the short term. Don’t go buy the rental that has no upside butt rental. Those are the things that we have to do. People got so used to cheap money and easy exits when in 2010 it was scrappy. It was like, how can we somehow turn a nickel out of this thing? And we had to do what we had to do, right? When you have a less favorable climate, you got to get scrappy.

Kathy:
And if you’re an investor, you need to think like an investor. You need to be the opposite of everything everybody else is doing. You need to look at the headlines and look underneath them, interpret it differently. Most headlines are for non-investors. They’re for everybody else. So don’t be afraid of distress. Distress is your friend. Distress is literally what makes you an investor. So when I hear questions like, oh, is it a bad time to buy? It’s like you’re not ready. If you are asking that question, you need more information. You’ve got to look for the distress and entrepreneurs fix that problem. Whatever that problem is, whatever. Like Henry, you were saying before, if somebody’s in distress losing their home to foreclosure, you’re going to help them. You’re going to find a way to help them get out of that home. For me, I’m looking at distress as a buy and hold investor, and I see builders in a lot of pain.
How can we help them move their inventory? How can we work with them to find out without lowering your prices, can you just pay our investors pay down their rates? So their rate is now three or 4% and their properties are cash flowing. Another pain point is insurance, huge pain point. Well, how can you negotiate? How can you find a better insurance agent? How can you buy property that’s not affected by it? Again, new builds have, I think it’s like 36% lower insurance costs because they’re built to the hurricane standards, fire standards, they’re just built better. So look for the distress and fix the problem. That is how you make money and don’t run away from it. Don’t run away from distress. Run towards it.

Henry:
That is a formula for profitability. And one other thing to think about, this article touches on a little bit, every major buying opportunity in real estate history has been preceded by a period when the institutional and professional investors stepped back. Look at 2009 through 2012, all the institutional professional investors, mom and pop investors, they stepped, they backed off. And then 2009 and 10 and 11, you could scoop up crazy deals if you had the cash to make them hold on through the remainder of the downtime. Because yes, you could buy a property super cheap then. The problem wasn’t buying it cheap. The problem was getting somebody to either rent it out for a price that was going to cover or being able to turn around and sell that thing. So you’ve got to be able to buy when the prices are low, when there’s less competition, but you have to hold through that short window and then you’ll be looking like a genius.
So this is a sign of hopefully some good times to come in the future. We’ll see, but that doesn’t really matter to me. What matters to me is can I buy now at a discount and can I hold it for the next five years and see where things go?

James:
We’ll be right back after the break. We’re asking, is cash still king and why finance buyers may have more power in today’s market? Welcome back to On the Market. We’ll finish off with my article and let’s start talking about why cash offers are losing some of its edge. The article that I brought in is cash is no longer king in home sales. And this is published by CNBC and it talks about that cash transactions are down. It says cash share fell down to 31.4%, but that’s only down 0.9% from last year. Because

Kathy:
You’re not going to read the article if they tell you that. That’s boring.

James:
No, cash is no longer king. Well, it’s slightly down, but – It’s

Henry:
Slightly less king. Cash is prince.

James:
It’s because people are making high interest on some other things. They don’t want to move it around right now, but it does talk about cash buyers are actually dropping out faster in the overall market decline. Total home sales during that same period were down 8.5% year over year, but this year it was 11.2%. And this all goes in relation of there’s just less investor transactions going on. And one thing that I did look into was what defines a cash sale? And a lot of people did consider that cash. I mean when you borrow from us, I mean we don’t have any appraisals, we’re just cash money to the bank, but it does get secured with a deed of trust. But with investor activity going down, for us, we’ve been really trying to take this information and use it as there’s less investor transactions going on, less transactions in general like Henry’s talking about, less cash getting thrown around.
It can make you very competitive in a market to buy some really good deals. And so everything that we’re writing up right now, we are writing up on a 14-day close with earnest money, non-refundable, and then we write it with a hard money loan, but we waive all contingencies in that. And so it’s true cash. There is no conditions to our funding. It’s 100% funding at this point. That has been able to get us some very good buys recently because people want dependability. The deal I just closed on yesterday, I paid 300 grand less for the house that I did around the corner that I have on the market right now. There is some deals out there, but you have to come in with cash or very dependable financing that is just like cash because you want to go supply and demand. Sellers have switched their tune quite a bit.
I mean, calling an off-market seller 24 months ago was like, “How much are you going to pay me?” Now they’re like, “Would you like to buy my house?” And so the message has changed, but then they want to make sure that it’s for real, and that can give you that competitive advantage to get the deal. If they want a quick close, there’s not a whole lot of people buying right now. Transactions are down, cash is down. Use it to your advantage because you either get terms or price if you’re a seller. And if you want that good term with no conditions close quick, then you got to take a haircut on your price. And so I think it’s the time to audit who your lenders are, who are you borrowing money from, how much access to cash do you have, and to make sure it’s dependable because when that home run deal crosses your plate, you don’t want to not be able to close.

Henry:
Yep, you’re right. This is the buyer’s time. And yes, as real estate investors, especially flippers, we think a lot about being on the sale side because that’s when we put the money in our pocket, but we don’t get to that point unless we’re buying. And right now in 41 of 50 states, buyers have the power, so go get you a deal.

Kathy:
Especially in multifamily, that’s why we started our multifamily fund to have cash ready because everyone’s waiting for these deals to come across, and you’ve got a lot of companies with deep pockets and cash and they’re going to make their move quickly as prices come down. We just found, I think I talked about it on a show prior, a building where we can get per door for 30% of what it was trading at before.

Henry:
Now

Kathy:
It needs work. Some of these deals have not been cared for because whether you’re in single family or multifamily, if you are running into trouble, if you don’t have enough cash, you can’t fix it. You get a little desperate and you just get anyone in there to rent. And so a lot of these multifamily do not have the highest level tenant and there’s a ton of deferred maintenance. So you need to know that before going into it. Distress means distress. There’s problems. So just because you get it at a discount doesn’t mean that’s truly the cost per door. You got to put some money into it. But if you can have cash ready, oh boy, oh boy, the deals are out there and they’re coming. It’ll be a good couple of years that these deals will be coming.

James:
I think that’s the biggest thing. When everyone’s saying the same thing, go opposite.

Kathy:
Do the opposite. Yes. Go rush

James:
Into data centers. Go rush into short term. It’s always those rushes and people rush this way. And it’s the same way when buyers rush out of the market, then there’s opportunity there and we’re seeing it. Some of the reasons that the cash has gone down also because some of the foreign money is not coming around anymore too. China is down 11% year over year on funds coming in. This went from the largest dollars and they brought in $7.6 billion in dollar volume. Canada is up though. The return is the top origin for cash buyers in the US.

Henry:
That’s because loans are crazy there, so you just got to pay cash anyway. There’s no 30-year fixed product there.

James:
There isn’t. They’re up 16%. And so this is how you can really get some good opportunities though. When we’re seeing fall, like Henry says, cash is down. As an investor, just take those steps to get prepared and that’s gunpowder, access to capital, and just so you can get in the deal. I know Kathy, you guys have had this fund.

Kathy:
Well, we were early. We were too early. A lot of people thought that these properties would come online last year and it’s taking a while. Sellers are not maybe as desperate as they need to be maybe because of those loan modifications or they’re taking all the cash flow and just hanging on, but it’s starting and we’re getting some stuff finally. I mean, we were underwriting. We were tossing out 95% of what was coming across the desk and the final 5%. We’d go to the sellers and say, and again, this is multifamily, but we’d go to the sellers and say, “This is the number that’s going to work. Your sales prices, it doesn’t matter what you paid. It doesn’t matter that it’s a 50% discount. It’s not. This is actually what it’s worth today.” And they’re having such a hard time seeing that. So you’re not really getting a deal, you’re just getting the property for what it’s worth right now.
So there’s still some adjusting that needs to happen and banks don’t love that either. So they’re extending pretending, but not as much as they were. Yeah, 2027 might be the year.

James:
But you’re ready.

Kathy:
But we’re ready. When it is. We’re ready.

James:
Right.That’s the thing. You don’t want to be going and asking for the money when it’s already going on, because by the time you get the money,

Kathy:
You’re going to get

James:
Too late.

Kathy:
That’s right.

James:
And so just be prepared, right? As investors, if we want to be in this business for the long term, we have to be prepared for every dip and cycle. And so just switch around your financing, talk to people, get access to capital, because when we see these gaps, there’s good opportunities in there. I can’t wait till Kathy comes in. She’s like, “I’m on a buy and spree.” And she’s buying way more

Kathy:
Money. We’re so ready. Me

James:
And Henry are going to have promo. It’s going to be great.

Kathy:
But a lot of people who did what I’m doing and they started these funds way too early, they are now in distress. You got to be careful of that falling knife. I know we’re always talking about getting the deals, but the underwriting still was too aggressive even on those.

James:
Yeah. And just because you have the money doesn’t mean you should spend it either.

Henry:
Yeah. I mean, I think that’s the gist of investing is to read your market, whether that’s stocks, real estate, crypto, whatever it is that you invest in. Read the market, figure out where the opportunities are, position yourself to be ready when the opportunity comes, because we don’t always know when the opportunity comes. It’s about preparation. And then when it does come, the ones who win are the ones who are prepared. These are just investing fundamentals. It doesn’t matter the investment vehicle. We just happen to choose real estate. There’s a lot of shift happening, but all that to me says someone’s going to make money. How do we figure out where that money’s going to be made and does it make sense for us to be in that space? That’s our job.

James:
Yep. Well, we’ll leave you here today. Kathy Henry, it’s always good. Chopping it up on what’s going on with the market and what you’re doing. Follow On the Market wherever you get your podcasts and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more real estate news analysis and investor strategy. I’m James Daynard. Thanks for joining us and we’ll see you next time on On the Market.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Trump will look into requests to release records that could shed light on alleged Saudi role in 9/11



President Donald Trump said Sunday that he will look into requests from families of Sept. 11 victims to release records that could shed light on Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in the attacks 25 years ago.

Several families have long alleged that a group of extremist religious leaders in Saudi Arabia gained influence in the Saudi government and aided the hijackers. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were Saudis, but the Saudi government has long denied any involvement in the attacks.

The families have asked Trump to declassify and release the relevant records. Asked about it Sunday during his trip to Ireland, the president said he would consider it.

“I’m going to look at it when I get back,” Trump said just before boarding Air Force One to return to Washington after a weekend in Ireland. “I know they asked me Friday.”

The relatives of 9/11 victims have been engaged in a lengthy legal battle against the Saudis. One of them, Terry Strada, called on Trump during the remembrance in New York City on Friday to “tell the Saudis to stop lying.”

Strada, who lost her husband Tom Strada on 9/11, said U.S. presidents had chosen “to protect the Saudis instead of standing with the 9/11 families.”

Strada, who was one of the 9/11 family members who read aloud the names of victims at this year’s remembrance, added that the current administration should “stand with the families, stand with the survivors.”

“It has been one betrayal after another,” she said. “President Trump can still change that.”

Exclusive: In a new sit-down interview with Fortune, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman explains safety standards are “not at a place” to push AI capabilities much further and warns AI beyond human control is “absolutely” possible. Watch or listen here.

Switzerland’s Bitcoin Suisse To Shift Up To Half Of Swiss Jobs To Bratislava, Slovakia And Vietnam


Bitcoin Suisse, a digital assets focused firm currently based in Zug, is preparing a far-reaching reorganization that would transfer a large share of its Swiss workforce to operations in other countries. The company, founded in 2013, currently employs about 120 people in Switzerland and roughly 200 worldwide.

Under the plan, as many as 60 Swiss positions—about half the domestic headcount—could be relocated, mainly in back-office, administrative, and software development functions.

Leadership describes the change as part of a deliberate shift from a largely Swiss crypto specialist toward an international wealth and asset-management platform.

Group CEO and co-founder Andrej Majcen has said the firm previously concentrated on the Swiss market and now intends to serve high-net-worth individuals, family offices, asset managers, and institutions with a wider set of services that go beyond trading, custody, staking, and lending.

Recent regulatory steps support that ambition, including a Markets in Crypto-Assets authorization for its Liechtenstein unit, licenses in Bermuda, and full approval in Abu Dhabi.

Cost is the principal operational reason given for moving support work.

Majcen told Finews that the same functions can be delivered at substantially lower expense from Bratislava, where the company already maintains a hub, and from Vietnam, where it intends to build a new site over the coming years.

The firm is also shutting its IT development office in Copenhagen.

Client-facing teams are expected to remain in Switzerland, and Zug is to stay the group headquarters.

Majcen has stressed that Switzerland remains an attractive financial center and that the company wants to keep growing there, including through possible acquisitions.

The company rejects the idea that the reorganization is a reaction to a weak crypto market.

Majcen has said Bitcoin Suisse has sufficient reserves to weather the current cycle and that the decision is about investing in growth and building a global brand.

Officials also point to more efficient processes and new technology, including artificial intelligence, as factors that change how many people certain functions require.

The group custodians more than $3 billion in digital assets.

Staff were informed at a town-hall meeting. A consultation period runs until 20 September 2026; the exact number of Swiss roles affected will be settled after that process.

Initial departures are expected before the end of the year.

If the upper range of the plan is implemented, the Swiss operation would shrink to around 60 people while international hubs absorb software and support work. Existing offices in Liechtenstein, Abu Dhabi, and Bermuda are not part of the announced reductions.

The episode illustrates a broader pattern among digital asset firms: concentrating regulated, client-facing activity in established financial centers while placing scalable, cost-sensitive work in lower-cost locations.

For Crypto Valley, it is a reminder that even early industry participants are now optimizing for global scale rather than keeping every function in Switzerland. It now remains to be seen if the particular strategy succeeds will depend on how well Bitcoin Suisse retains Swiss client relationships while building capacity abroad.



Two indicted in $15M mortgage modification fraud scheme


The criminal charges represent the second major legal action against the pair over the same conduct. In February 2024, a federal court found the defendants liable for approximately $19 million in combined penalties and restitution in a civil enforcement action brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI).

According to the FTC, the scheme harmed more than 3,000 people nationwide, many of them elderly or veterans.

Meanwhile, an Orange County woman was arrested on wire fraud charges after she allegedly siphoned more than $411,000 from a nonprofit she oversaw as treasurer — using the diverted funds, in part, to clear a delinquent balance on the mortgage of her Aliso Viejo home.

Inside the scheme

Barron, who served as a beneficial owner and senior manager of the operation, and Ahiga, who oversaw the collection of monthly client payments and documents, ran the enterprise under a succession of company names: Green Equitable Solutions (d/b/a Academy Home Services), South West Consulting Enterprises Inc. (d/b/a Home Matters USA), Apex Consulting & Associates Inc. (d/b/a Golden Home Services America), and Infocom Entertainment Ltd. (d/b/a Atlantic Pacific Service).

Prosecutors allege the rebranding was intentional, a tactic to outpace regulators and suppress negative online reviews.

This Common Health Problem Is Linked to a 58 Percent Higher Risk of Cognitive Decline, New Study Finds



A study of more than 833,000 adults found that one trait was associated with a higher risk of dementia.

Top 5 Business Courses After 12th | Best Professional Courses After 12th | By Sunil Adhikari



Top 5 Business Courses After 12th | Best Professional Courses After 12th | By Sunil Adhikari

📞 Book Personal Consultation Call:

✅ Enroll in Personality Development Course:

✅ Books Recommendation:

—————————————————————————-

⏬ Social Media Handles :

☑ Facebook:
☑ Instagram:
☑ Telegram:
☑ Twitter:

#businesscourses #Careerguidance #SunilAdhikari

Disclaimer: This Video is Just for educational purposes and does not have any intention to mislead or violate Google and youtube community guidelines and policy. I respect and follow the terms & conditions of Google & Youtube.

source

SpaceX vs. Apple: Wall Street Sees Strong Upside for One of These Stocks and Remains Neutral On the Other


Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SPCX +2.04%) and Apple (AAPL +1.75%) are two of the largest publicly traded companies in the world. However, they are markedly different.

Apple, which focuses on consumer tech hardware, went public in 1980 and now has a market cap of nearly $4.7 trillion. SpaceX, which focuses on building rockets, broadband, and artificial intelligence (AI), only went public in June and has a market cap of over $2 trillion.

Wall Street sees strong upside for one of these stocks and remains neutral on the other, at least from an appreciation perspective.

Image source: Getty Images.

Apple: Analysts largely view the stock as fully valued

While it often gets compared to hyperscalers, Apple varies in that it has been less direct in its AI strategy. The company is not investing hundreds of billions to build data centers, and it has spent far less than any other hyperscalers on capital expenditures.

The company recently turned over a new leaf with the departure of longtime CEO Tim Cook, who is being replaced by John Ternus. As the former senior vice president of hardware engineering, Ternus brings back traits of the late Steve Jobs, in that he is a “product guy.”

Apple recently unveiled a slate of new products, including the Apple 18 Pro and the iPhone Duo, the company’s foldable smartphone that starts at $1,999. It’s one of the biggest changes to the iPhone in quite a while.

Apple stock has performed pretty well this year, up roughly 18%. But Wall Street analysts, on average, now view the stock to be nearly fully valued. Of the 32 analysts who have issued a research report on Apple over the past three months, 16 have a buy rating on the stock, 12 recommend holding, and four assigned a sell rating.

Apple Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(1.75%) $5.70

Current Price

$332.27

The average price target among all the analysts is nearly $336 per share, implying about 5% upside from current levels (as of Sept. 10), according to TipRanks.

Earlier this month, Rosenblatt analyst Barton Crockett maintained a neutral rating on Apple and assigned a price target of $303 per share. Crockett believes the new iPhone rollout will be a major test for Ternus, demonstrating whether its product innovation can validate the current valuation.

Recently, Crockett, in a separate note, said gross margins could be pressured due to higher memory costs.

I certainly agree with the concerns about innovation. However, I do think Apple will be able to participate in the AI revolution by bringing AI to consumers through its hardware, which puts the company in a strong position. Furthermore, I like how Apple has not overinvested in AI infrastructure like other hyperscalers.

SpaceX: Controversial, but with significant potential upside

SpaceX is the largest initial public offering ever, raising an incredible near-$86 billion once everything was said and done.

The company is built on its signature fully reusable rockets, which make voyages into space significantly cheaper and quicker than older methods. It’s this innovation that serves as the backbone of the entire business.

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(2.04%) $3.03

Current Price

$151.21

SpaceX has a launch business, a low-Earth-orbit satellite internet service, Starlink, and an artificial intelligence division, which encompasses the social platform X, Grok Intelligence, data centers on land, and a future terafac facility, among other things.

In its registration statement, SpaceX claims to have a $28.5 trillion total addressable market (TAM).

While SpaceX has begun signing some large data center deals, investors are split because much of what the company is attempting to do in space depends on getting its fully reusable, super-heavy-lift rocket, Starship, operational. The business is also incredibly capital-intensive.

Starship is still in testing mode, and SpaceX has talked about the rocket operating on a launch schedule more like a commercial airline. Still, the company is run by Elon Musk, who has significant market sway, and analysts, on average, still see significant upside.

Of the 35 analysts who have issued a research report on SpaceX over the past three months, 26 have a buy rating on the stock, six recommend holding, and three assigned a sell rating. The average price target is roughly $228 per share, implying roughly 51% upside from current levels (as of Sept. 10), according to TipRanks.

Earlier this month, Oppenheimer analyst Timothy Horan maintained an outperform rating on the stock and raised its price target from $250 per share to $280. Horan praised SpaceX’s recent acquisition of Cursor, a platform that leverages AI to more easily write code that can create software.

Horan is bullish on SpaceX’s vertically integrated platform, which now includes intelligence, data centers, proprietary chips, and broadband via Starlink. Horan said SpaceX is targeting a $100 billion revenue run rate by year’s end and could hit $120 billion to $130 billion next year.

While I can certainly see the potential of SpaceX, I’m still cautious on the name, given the large valuation and capital-intensive nature of the business.

While everything Musk and the team want to do sounds incredible, I do think obstacles are inevitable, and the timelines for most of these ambitious projects will take much longer than investors expect.

Wellesley Goes Tuition-Free At $200,000, Joining Harvard And MIT


Wellesley College announced that families earning under $200,000 a year will pay no tuition beginning in fall 2027, under a policy it is calling the Wellesley Tuition Promise. The threshold replaces the $150,000 cutoff the college adopted for this fall, a jump of $50,000 in eligibility less than nine months later. Wellesley now sits alongside the small group of endowment-heavy institutions that have pushed free tuition into six-figure household income territory.

Tuition alone for the 2026-27 academic year runs $72,570, with housing at $12,020, meals at $11,186 and a $360 activity fee on top. Dean of Admission and Financial Aid T. Peaches Valdes said the college is “committed to expanding accessibility by making a Wellesley education more affordable.

As the Boston Globe reported, eligible students will still owe somewhere between $0 and roughly $26,000 for housing, meals and other costs depending on need. This is why families still need to run the net price calculator before applying.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

Free tuition is not free college, and the gap between those two things is where families get in trouble. A student from a household earning $180,000 gets $72,570 off, but can still face a $23,000 annual bill for room and board ($92,000 over four years). Families planning around these offers need the full cost of attendance figure, not just the tuition line.

The timing is not accidental. The 2025 tax law raised the endowment tax to a top rate of 8% but exempted institutions with fewer than 3,000 tuition-paying students. Wellesley enrolls about 2,400.

Schools that dodged the tax have money to redirect, which is exactly the outcome we flagged when Congress wrote the endowment tax while still funding those same schools through federal aid.

There is also an admissions play buried in the financial aid language. A $200,000 cutoff reaches households that earn well into the top 10% nationally, and the schools using it are competing for the same applicants. Wellesley enrolls about 2,400 students, so the marginal cost of extending the promise is small next to the yield it buys, and families weighing the offer against in-state tuition and a smaller loan balance now have a cleaner comparison to run.

The Details

  • Under $100,000: tuition covered, no loans in the aid package, and 100% of calculated need met.
  • $100,000 to $200,000: tuition covered plus 100% of calculated need met, though housing and meals remain a family expense scaled to the aid formula behind the CSS Profile.
  • Above $200,000: need-based aid continues, with awards determined by the same institutional methodology used to calculate the Student Aid Index.
  • Asset test: families need “typical assets” for their income band. Business ownership, rental property or oversized taxable accounts can disqualify a household.
  • Who qualifies: U.S. citizens and permanent residents whose families live and work in the United States, and who live on campus with a meal plan. International students, roughly 13% of enrollment, still receive need-based aid but fall outside the pledge.

Where Wellesley Lands

The $200,000 line is now the standard among wealthy private colleges. Harvard set it in March 2025, and MIT, Yale, Penn and Caltech followed. Rice extended the same cutoff for fall 2027, while Boston University capped total family costs rather than just tuition. Two schools have gone further: UChicago doubled its threshold to $250,000, and Princeton uses the same figure.

Roughly 60% of Wellesley students already receive aid, with an average award of $70,519, meaning much of this announcement is PR around a policy it was doing anyway.

That pattern shows up sector-wide, where tuition discount rates hit a record 56%. The competitive pressure is also federal: with Parent PLUS borrowing capped at $20,000 a year and $65,000 in total since July 1, expensive private colleges lost the borrowing tool that many families used to close the affordability gap.

What fills the remaining gap is the open question. Room, board and fees at Wellesley total $23,566 a year before books and travel, and the federal caps leave parents short of that at most private colleges. Analysts expect to nearly double private student loan volume this year in response to the federal caps. A tuition promise removes the largest line on the bill without touching the one families most often borrow for.

What’s Next

Watch which colleges offer tuition-free pledges next. Public flagships and mid-tier privates cannot fund a $200,000 cutoff, but some state schools like Texas State’s move to a $100,000 cap shows where that market actually is.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Wellesley Goes Tuition-Free At $200,000, Joining Harvard And MIT appeared first on The College Investor.