Home Blog

Was it a secret Chinese spy headquarters or a ping-pong parlor? New York Chinatown case goes to trial



The plain, glass-clad building stands six stories between a hotel, a spa and a coffee shop in the heart of Manhattan’s Chinatown neighborhood.

U.S. prosecutors say it was a secret Chinese spy outpost, with orders from Beijing to silence, harass and intimidate pro-democracy dissidents in the U.S., and a banner inside that said: “Fuzhou Police Overseas Service Station, New York USA.”

Lawyers for the man accused of running it, Lu Jianwang, contend it was a community center — and nothing more — where members of the Chinese diaspora could remotely renew their Chinese driver’s licenses amid COVID-19 pandemic-era travel restrictions and meet to play ping-pong and mahjong.

Lu, 64, went on trial Wednesday in Brooklyn federal court, more than three years after U.S. authorities arrested him at his Bronx home on charges he conspired to act as a foreign agent and destroyed evidence, including WeChat messages with his purported Chinese government handler.

Lu, a U.S. citizen for decades, “was living in New York City but he was working for the Chinese government,” prosecutor Lindsey Oken said in an opening statement.

Lu and a co-defendant who has pleaded guilty, Chen Jinping, established the Chinatown outpost in 2022 after Lu attended a ceremony in his native Fujian province where China’s Ministry of Public Security announced it was opening 30 such secret police stations around the world, Oken said.

China’s communist government uses the outposts to monitor people it “views as enemies of its interests,” Oken told jurors. Among the witnesses set to testify against Lu, she said, is a dissident who was targeted by his outpost.

The Manhattan outpost shared offices with the America ChangLe Association, a community organization that Lu and his brother, Jimmy, helped run and that described itself on tax forms as a “social gathering place for Fujianese people.” ChangLe means “eternal joy,” a defense lawyer said.

Oken acknowledged the organization was open about its driver’s license service — but even doing that was illegal under U.S. law, she said.

Lu worked for China “without asking or telling the U.S. government,” violating the federal Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires people acting as agents of a foreign government or entity to register with the Justice Department, Oken said.

Lu’s lawyer, John Carman portrayed the case as a mundane bureaucratic blip, not an international spy thriller.

“Lu was arrested for essentially failing to file a form,” he told jurors.

Evidence will show that Lu is “not a spy, not a part of Chinese intelligence services, not a part of the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP, and he’s not an agent of the Chinese government,” Carman said in his opening statement. He said the case brought two phrases to mind: “No good deed goes unpunished” and “Guilt by association.”

The FBI, spurred by a report from an organization that monitors Chinese transnational repression, raided the alleged New York City outpost on Oct. 3, 2022, rifling through drawers and paperwork, busting into locked cabinets and a safe, and seizing a computer and cellphones, Carman said.

“They turned the place upside down,” Carman told jurors.

The next day, Oken said, Lu admitted to FBI agents that he established the Manhattan outpost, that he kept in touch with his handler via WeChat and that he had deleted those messages. Carman said neither of Lu’s two-hour FBI interviews were recorded. Lu was arrested in April 2023.

Lu’s co-defendant, Chen, pleaded guilty in December 2024 to a charge of conspiracy to act as a foreign agent. He remains free on bond and will be sentenced after Lu’s trial.

Lu, who also goes by Harry Lu, sat at the defense table Wednesday alongside Baimadajie Angwang, a former NYPD officer who was cleared three years ago of charges accusing him of being an “intelligence asset” for the Chinese government. Angwang, who is suing to rejoin the police force, is working as an investigator for Lu’s defense team.

Lu, wearing a dark suit, pale blue tie and glasses, speaks limited English and listened through an earpiece as an interpreter translated Oken and Carman’s words into Fujianese. He and Angwang both had American flag pins affixed to their lapels.

Several dozen supporters, including members of Lu’s church, rallied outside of the courthouse, holding signs with slogans like “Justice for Harry Lu” and “Chinese Americans Are Americans!” and waving small American flags, as Lu and his legal team arrived.

“No one controls him,” Carman told jurors. “If Harry Lu is an agent of anyone, he is an agent for his community — the local people in his community.”

“You have the life of an innocent man in your hands,” the lawyer concluded.

Iran conflict sours real estate investor sentiment to 3-year low


Real estate investor sentiment fell to its lowest level in at least three years in the first quarter, in large part due to the Iran war, a new report found.

Processing Content

The RCN Capital/CJ Patrick Investor Sentiment Index dropped 14 basis points to 87 last quarter, the lowest score recorded in the 11-quarter history of the report. The first quarter also represented the first time all four elements analyzed in the index, current market conditions, outlook for future market conditions, home price trends and plans for property purchases, decreased quarter over quarter.

“Investor sentiment was clearly affected by the war in Iran,” RCN Capital CEO Jeffrey Tesch said in a press release Wednesday. “Almost 60% of the investors surveyed believed that the war would have a negative impact on the housing market, and on their business, and this reversed the positive outlook investors had expressed about 2026 in last quarter’s sentiment index.”

Mortgage rates reached a near-four-year low at the end of February before they spiked in wake of the conflict.

The percentage of investors who view the market as better than it was a year ago fell to 36% from 45% in the winter, according to the Spring 2026 RCN Capital Investor Sentiment Survey. Those who viewed the market as being worse than a year ago rose from 25% to 36% as well.

Roughly a third of investors expect market conditions to improve over the next six months, down from 44% the previous quarter, while a similar percentage expect conditions to worsen, up from 19%, the release said.

The index plateaued at 101 over the third and fourth quarters of last year. This quarter’s score of 87 was just a point shy of last spring’s score of 88, though.

“Real estate investor sentiment is in line with consumer sentiment, which recorded the lowest numbers on record in April, and homebuilder sentiment, which fell four points in April to record its lowest score in 14 years,” said Rick Sharga, CJ Patrick Company CEO, in the release. “Based on our survey results, the war in Iran is clearly having an impact on investor outlook, but the lackluster performance of home sales in the first quarter is also likely a contributing factor.”

Home sales fell on an annual basis in January and February, but spiked 31.6% month over month and 3.4% year over year in March, according to Remax’s national housing report.

The challenges mentioned most often by investors in the spring survey were: the high cost of financing, cited by just under 55%, followed by rising home prices at 33%, competition at 32%, inventory at 31% and rising costs at 30%, the release said. 

The Senate’s 21st Century Road to Housing bill, which included a ban on home purchases by large institutional investors, was passed in March as well. But more than 46% of respondents identify as smaller investors, and don’t think the bill will affect them. Another 25% of respondents were small investors who believe the ban will reduce competition.

Among large investors, roughly twice as many said the ban will make it harder for them to continue to invest, while a smaller number said they’ll find a way to continue to purchase properties, according to the release.



Turn Talks Into Your Most Effective Marketing Tool


Catch the Full Episode:

Overview

Most small business owners are sitting on one of the most powerful marketing channels available and never use it. In this episode, John Jantsch welcomes back Jess Ekstrom, founder of Mic Drop Workshop, to make the case that speaking from a stage is not a vanity play. It is a lead generation, brand building, and audience growth strategy that compounds over time.

Jess built her first company, Headbands of Hope, almost entirely by convincing professors to let her speak in class. She did not know she could charge for keynotes until a university emailed asking for her fee. Now she teaches entrepreneurs and founders how to turn their story into a signature talk that earns bookings, builds an audience, and drives business without ever feeling like a sales pitch.

This episode covers the difference between keynote speaking and lead gen speaking, why sharing your failures lands better than your wins, how to build a talk backwards from the outcome, and the mindset shift that dissolves stage fright almost instantly.

About Jess Ekstrom

Jess Ekstrom is an entrepreneur, two-time bestselling author, and Forbes top-rated speaker. She founded Headbands of Hope as a broke college student and grew it into a nationally recognized brand before it was acquired. She is the founder of Mic Drop Workshop, where she helps women step into their voice and build careers as confident, paid speakers. Her TED talk on the spotlight vs. lighthouse speaker mindset has driven significant attention to her framework. She hosts the Amplify podcast and can be found at micdropworkshop.com.

Key Takeaways

  • Speaking is a marketing channel, not just a career. The keynote can drive awareness, build an audience, and generate leads without ever directly selling anything from the stage.
  • Know which lane you are in. Keynote speaking means the talk is the product. Lead gen speaking means you waive your fee in exchange for the right to sell from the stage. Both work. Pick one and be intentional about it.
  • Build the talk backwards. Start with a transformation promise: after people hear you speak, what do you want them to do, believe, think, or feel? Everything else builds toward that outcome.
  • Spotlight speakers ask what everyone thinks of them. Lighthouse speakers ask what everyone needs from them. The second mindset makes you a better speaker and kills stage fright faster than any rehearsal trick.
  • Share what went wrong, not just what went right. Audiences do not connect with wins. They connect with the arc. Admitting the $10,000 wire to a fraudulent manufacturer landed better than any highlight reel.
  • Build one signature talk and stick with it for three to five years. Changing your topic every year means no one has time to associate your name with a solution.
  • Use the slide deck as a lead magnet. Offer to send notes, discussion questions, and slides via a QR code before your closing. It converts better than almost any other stage-based list building tactic.
  • The false finish line is the biggest trap. You do not need a certain follower count, revenue number, or website to start pitching yourself to speak. You need a topic you are excitedly curious about and the willingness to do the reps.
  • Simplify, do not complicate. The best speakers remind people of something they already knew but forgot. Novelty is overrated. Clarity wins.

Timestamps

[00:00] Opening hook: the most underused marketing channel for small business owners is a stage.

[00:37] Jess’s background: building Headbands of Hope by speaking in college classrooms before knowing speaking was a paid profession.

[01:37] The moment she realized speaking could be a revenue channel, not just an advertising channel.

[02:22] The difference between an elevator pitch and a keynote, and why the keynote becomes the product.

[03:18] Keynote speaking vs. lead gen speaking: two lanes, two different business models.

[05:03] How to weave what you do into a keynote without it feeling like a sales pitch.

[07:14] Using a QR code slide deck as a lead magnet from the stage.

[08:26] The difference between wanting to be on a stage and actually having something worth saying.

[09:09] The spotlight vs. lighthouse framework from her TED talk, and why it changes everything about how you show up.

[11:18] Why sharing failures lands better than sharing wins, and what that requires you to give up.

[11:36] Her framework for building a keynote: transformation promise, work backwards, simplify.

[17:35] Why having one signature talk beats being a Cheesecake Factory speaker.

[19:52] The billboard exercise: the simplest way to figure out what you should be speaking about.

Memorable Quotes

“The keynote becomes the product. It’s not about selling your product through the keynote. It’s about raising awareness for it and most importantly, sharing a story in a way that inspires someone to do something about it.”

“The more you give, the less nervous you’ll be. And sometimes that means not looking good.”

“No one wants to learn from someone who’s always been at the top. We need the arc.”

“Stop making people think too hard. The best speakers remind people of something they once knew that maybe they forgot.”

“If you’re not willing to stick with a keynote for three to five years, don’t do it. You’re not giving anyone time to associate your name with a solution.”


Connect with Jess Ekstrom at micdropworkshop.com or find her on LinkedIn.

Daily Stock Market News(Mar 23, 2026): Iran War Impacts, Rupee Hits Low & Supply Chain Crisis



#stockmarket #finance #investing #iranwar #crudeoil #rupeefall #nifty50 #fpi #rbi #lng #idbibank #tatacapital #economy #businessnews #sharemarket

Escalating tensions in West Asia are impacting global energy and tech supply chains. Today we cover the RBI’s fight to stabilize the rupee amid massive FPI outflows, rising oil prices, and LNG supply risks for India. Plus, key updates on IDBI Bank, Tata Capital, and the AC sector.

Coupon Code: WORLDCUP (65% OFF on Model Portfolio All, Fund-o-meter & Stock-o-meter)

How to Achieve Financial Freedom – Offline Workshop by Parimal Ade & Gaurav Jain (Mumbai)

How to Use Artificial Intelligence for Investing – Combo of 5 ebooks

00:00 Start
00:50 Iran Strikes Israel & US Ultimatum
04:19 US Temporarily Allows Iranian Oil Sale
05:24 Iran Halts Qatar Helium Output
06:12 India Faces LNG Supply Risks
07:21 CII Warns of Shipment Delays
07:37 RBI Fights to Stabilize Rupee
09:36 AC Makers Face Demand Disruptions
10:27 Urea Plants Face Gas Shortages
11:19 AIDA Offers Higher Ethanol Blends
12:04 L&T West Asia Operations Stable
13:08 Govt Considers IDBI Bank OFS
13:57 Tata Capital Gets Tax Notice
14:23 Knowledge Section

Complete Fundamental Stock Analysis Tool – Stock-o-meter:

Research Based Ready-made Model Portfolios:

Comprehensive Mutual Fund Reviews:

Yadnya Books and eBooks now available:
On Amazon –
On Flipkart –
On our website –

Find us on Social Media and stay connected:
Whatsapp Channel –
Blog –
Telegram –
Facebook Page –
Twitter –

LEGAL DISCLAIMER:

Use of this information is at the user’s own risk. The Company and its directors, associates and employees will not be liable for any loss or liability incurred to the user due to investments made or decisions taken based on the information provided herein. The investment discussed or views expressed herein may not be suitable for all investors. The users should rely on their own research and analysis and should consult their investment advisors to determine the merit, risks and suitability of recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee for future performance or future results. Information herein is believed to be reliable, although its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. The images used may be copyright of the company or third party. As a condition to using the services, the user agrees to the terms of use of the website and the services.

DISCLOSURES UNDER SEBI (RESEARCH ANALYST) REGULATIONS, 2014:

Yadnya Academy Pvt. Ltd. (InvestYadnya) is registered with SEBI under SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations, 2014 with registration no. INH000008349.
Disclosure with regard to ownership and material conflicts of interest
1. Neither Research Analyst nor the entity nor his associates or relatives have any financial interest in the subject Company;
2. Neither Research Analyst nor the entity nor its associates or relatives have actual / beneficial ownership of one per cent or more securities of the subject Company, at the end of the month immediately preceding the date of publication of the research report or date of public appearance;
3. Neither Research Analyst nor the entity nor its associates or his relatives have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of the research report or at the time of public appearance.
Disclosure with regard to receipt of Compensation
1. The Research Entity and its associates have not received compensation from the subject company in the past twelve months.
2. The subject company is not or was not a client during the twelve months preceding the date of recommendation.

source

Education Department’s New Rules May Block PAYE Enrollment Before July 1 Deadline


Federal student loan borrowers wanting to enroll in the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) plan as their next move after SAVE may have a much narrower window to enroll than expected.

New regulations released last week (PDF File) and set to take effect on July 1, 2026, impose conditions on PAYE enrollment that could lock out a large share of borrowers — including many who are about to be pushed off the SAVE plan this summer. PAYE was already scheduled to be phased out entirely by July 2028, but borrowers not enrolled in the plan may have a limited to to sign up.

Why It Matters: With SAVE terminating this summer, PAYE could offer the lowest monthly payment among the remaining income-driven options for borrowers who qualify – especially borrowers who first took out loans between 2011 and 2014.

Using a 10% discretionary income formula and 20-year forgiveness timeline, PAYE typically beats both old IBR and ICR. 

The new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), launching July 1, 2026, requires 30 years in repayment before forgiveness — the longest timeline of any income-driven option. However, RAP will likely be better than old IBR for many borrowers.

What The New Rules Say: The regulations published in the Federal Register state that through June 30, 2028, a borrower may repay under PAYE only if they:

  • Have loans eligible for the plan
  • Are a “new borrower”
  • Elect to have their aggregate monthly payment recalculated at entry
  • Were repaying under PAYE on July 1, 2024

The rules also state: “A borrower who was repaying under the PAYE plan on or after July 1, 2024, and changes to a different repayment plan… may not re-enroll in the PAYE plan.

As such, the language appears to block two groups of people: borrowers who were eligible for or previously enrolled in PAYE but switched to another plan (like SAVE) before July 1, 2024, and borrowers who leave PAYE for another plan and later try to return.

The bottom line is that borrowers not currently in PAYE before July 1, 2026 may not be able to enroll in the plan.

Conflicting Guidance: The regulatory text appears to contradict the Education Department’s own guidance on StudentAid, which currently states there will be “If your loans are all first disbursed before July 1, 2026, you’ll have access to the following repayment plans, if you’re eligible:

PAYE Eligibility Screenshot StudentAid

The restrictions also are not expressly written into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the underlying law the regulations are intended to implement.

What Borrowers Should Do Now: Borrowers already in PAYE should think twice before switching out. Once they leave, the new rules suggest they cannot return.

Eligible borrowers not yet enrolled (especially those still in SAVE forbearance) may want to apply for PAYE before July 1, 2026, when the new rules take effect. Online applications at StudentAid.gov with IRS data linkage typically process fastest – 7 to 10 business days.

How This Connects: The College Investor has been tracking the end of the SAVE forbearance closely. Roughly 7 million borrowers in SAVE forbearance will be moved off the plan starting July 1, with a 90-day window to select a replacement before being auto-enrolled in the Standard plan. For many of those borrowers, PAYE was a good alternative.

PAYE has always carried a narrower eligibility test than other income-driven plans, requiring no outstanding federal loans as of October 1, 2007, and a new Direct Loan disbursement on or after October 1, 2011, along with requiring a partial financial hardship. For borrowers with loans after 2014, IBR repayment is generally the same.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a90″].tcb-post-list #post-77630 [data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a96″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Education-Secretary-Linda-McMahon-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

SAVE Plan Forbearance Ending: What To Know

SAVE Plan Forbearance Ending: What To Know
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a90″].tcb-post-list #post-43763 [data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a96″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Strategic_Default_For_Student_Loans_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

Strategic Default On Student Loans: It Always Backfires

Strategic Default On Student Loans: It Always Backfires
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a90″].tcb-post-list #post-22857 [data-css=”tve-u-19dfd7f7a96″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/PSLF_Buyback_Program_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

How To Qualify For Public Service Loan Forgiveness [Guide]

How To Qualify For Public Service Loan Forgiveness [Guide]

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Education Department’s New Rules May Block PAYE Enrollment Before July 1 Deadline appeared first on The College Investor.

Silo Markets: Ongoing Brokerage Bonus (0.5x – 1x Points Per $1, Transfer Partners Coming)


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Silo Markets is a brokerage that is offering an ongoing bonus and benefits. It looks like funds are managed through IBKR. There are two tiers:
    • Gold points ($20 per month)
      • Earn 0.5x points on your entire account balance every year, up to 50,000 points per year. Redeem up to 50,000 points per month for 1¢ each. 
    • Platinum points ($80 per month)
      • Earn 0.5x points on your entire account balance every year, up to 250,000 points per year.
      • Eligible for American Express Gold, Platinum, & Costco credits
        • Silo Preferred Status ($750K+ account size): Costco Executive Membership Fee ($130/year)American Express Gold Annual Fee ($325/year)
        • Silo Elite Status ($1M+ account size): Costco Executive Membership Fee ($130/year) American Express Gold Annual Fee ($325/year)American Express Platinum Annual Fee ($895/year)
  • Full fees can be seen here.

Our Verdict

Let’s assume you have $500,000 with them, you’d earn a maximum of 250,000 points worth $2,500. You’d also pay $960 in monthly fees for a total return of $1,540. If you compare this to other brokerage bonuses it’s significantly worse especially as the hold period is minimum of one year. The upside is that this is set and forget (assuming the program doesn’t drastically change which is a big assumption). 

They do say transfer partners are coming in June, 2026. That could make the program slightly more interesting if you highly value particular points and its a 1:1 transfer rate but you might as well just wait until that happens. I do find it off putting that they make the figures regarding AUM etc for IBKR so prominent but don’t display any data on the scale of the operation they are running. 

 

PSBD Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript


Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Wednesday, May 6, 2026 at 1 p.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • Chief Executive Officer — Christopher D. Long
  • President — Angie Kartzman Long
  • Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer — Jeremy P. Goff
  • Chief Investment Officer — Matthew R. Bloomfield
  • Chief Accounting Officer — Jeffrey Fox

TAKEAWAYS

  • Total Investment Income — $26.2 million, reflecting a 16% decrease compared to $31.2 million in the same period last year.
  • Net Investment Income — $11 million, or $0.35 per share, compared to $12.9 million, or $0.40 per share, in the prior-year period.
  • Total Dividend Declared — $0.37 per share, consisting of a base dividend plus a $0.01 supplemental distribution, including approximately $0.02 of spillover income.
  • Dividend Yield on NAV — 11.1%, with a 13.5% yield on stock price as of April 30.
  • Net Asset Value (NAV) per Share — $13.30 at period end, down from $14.85 at December 31, 2025.
  • Total Net Realized and Unrealized Losses — $48.3 million, including $52.8 million in net unrealized depreciation on existing investments and $15.2 million in net unrealized appreciation on exited investments.
  • Investment Portfolio Fair Value — $1.15 billion across 44 industries, compared to $1.2 billion at year-end 2025 (decrease of approximately 4.1%).
  • First Quarter Capital Deployment — $109.4 million invested, with 42 new commitments averaging approximately $2.1 million each.
  • Senior Secured Focus — 96% of the portfolio is senior secured, and 10 largest investments comprise only 10.64% of the overall portfolio.
  • Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity) — 1.7 times at March 31, up from 1.54 times at December 31, 2025, reflecting changes in NAV and share repurchases.
  • Available Liquidity — $325.3 million (cash and undrawn credit capacity), up from $311.3 million at the end of 2025.
  • Weighted Average Total Yield to Maturity — 11.73% at fair value on debt and income-producing securities, and 8.26% at amortized cost.
  • Portfolio Credit Quality — Average internal loan rating of 3.6 (value-based scoring), first lien borrowers’ average EBITDA of $452 million, leverage of 5.5x, and interest coverage of 2.4x.
  • Nonaccruals — Less than 1 basis point at fair value, and 90 basis points at cost; PIK income is 1.64% of total investment income.
  • Share Repurchases — 140,149 shares repurchased for approximately $1.6 million during the quarter; manager purchased an additional 67,875 shares for $800 thousand; remaining repurchase authorization of approximately $4.2 million.
  • Declared Q2 Base Dividend — $0.36 per share, in line with policy, with supplemental to be announced in the normal course.
  • CLO Noncall Period Expiry — The 2024-issued CLO exits its noncall period in July 2026, with refinancing options under consideration in Q2.
  • Third-Party Loan Valuations — CEO Bloomfield said, “It is completely driven by third-party marks” for both broadly syndicated and private credit loans.
  • Software Sector Activity — AI application adoption reached 40% at one ERP company (over 7,000 customers), with management expecting more than 75% by year-end 2026.
  • April Portfolio Activity — Bloomfield indicated a modest rebound in NAV and market prices, with leverage expected to come down; monthly NAV update to be disclosed in May.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]

RISKS

  • Net Unrealized Losses — $52.8 million in net unrealized depreciation on portfolio investments signal material market impact.
  • NAV Decline — NAV per share fell to $13.30 from $14.85 at year-end due to sector-wide market volatility and unrealized losses.
  • Income Downtrend — Total investment income decreased 16% from prior-year period, and net investment income per share fell to $0.35 from $0.40.
  • Sector Dislocation — Bloomfield stated, “undoubtedly software was the most disrupted sector in the first quarter, and that is predominantly responsible for the unrealized mark-to-market move in NAV.”

SUMMARY

Palmer Square Capital BDC (PSBD 1.88%) reported significant unrealized portfolio losses and a sequential decline in NAV per share, directly tied to software sector dislocation and overall market volatility. Portfolio diversification was emphasized, with exposure across 44 industries and 96% in senior secured debt, while nonaccruals and PIK income remained minimal relative to industry norms. The company deployed over $109 million of capital in new investments, executed substantial share repurchases, and maintained considerable liquidity. Management confirmed a continued focus on transparency, with third-party portfolio valuations and planned monthly NAV disclosures. Strategic positioning leverages spread widening and emerging opportunities, particularly in technology, AI, and cyclical sectors affected by macro events.

  • Management expects further acceleration in AI adoption, highlighted by rising end-customer penetration rates in portfolio companies.
  • The firm is closely monitoring credit trends and proactively managing exposure to volatile segments such as software and chemicals, seizing tactical investments when justified by valuation and risk.
  • CLO refinancing is under review, which could alter funding costs and structure following the July 2026 noncall period expiration.
  • Dividend policy remains tied to realized earnings and market conditions, with the Q2 base dividend reaffirmed and a supplemental distribution anticipated.
  • Improvements in lending terms and documentation have been observed in the current market, resulting in a more lender-friendly environment, according to management commentary.
  • April trends indicate stabilization and partial reversal of negative marks in major sectors, implying potential near-term recovery in NAV and leverage metrics.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • PIK Income: Payment-In-Kind income; non-cash interest that accrues and compounds rather than being paid out in cash, accruing additional risk.
  • CLO: Collateralized Loan Obligation; a structured credit product backed by a pool of corporate loans.
  • First Lien Loan: A loan that holds primary claim on collateral in the event of borrower default, ranking above other secured creditors.
  • Nonaccrual: Loans for which interest is no longer being accrued due to borrower financial distress or expected credit losses.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Jeremy Goff: Welcome to Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Joining me this afternoon are Christopher Long, Angie Long, Matthew Bloomfield, and Jeffrey Fox. Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s first quarter 2026 financial results were released earlier today and can also be accessed on our Investor Relations website at palmersquarebdc.com. We have also arranged for a replay of today’s event that can be accessed on our website. During this call, I want to remind you that the forward-looking statements we make are based on current expectations. The statements on this call that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, market conditions caused by uncertainty surrounding interest rates, changing economic conditions, and other factors we identified in our filings with the SEC. Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions can prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions can be incorrect. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made during this call are made as of the date hereof, and Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of SEC-related filings, please visit our website at palmersquarebdc.com. With that, I will now turn the call over to Christopher Long.

Christopher Long: Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s first quarter 2026 conference call. On today’s call, I will provide an overview of our first quarter results, touch on our market outlook and competitive positioning, and then turn the call to the team to discuss the current industry dynamics at play, our portfolio activity, and financial results. During the first quarter, our team deployed $109.4 million of capital and generated total and net investment income of $26.2 million and $11 million, respectively.

We delivered net investment income of $0.35 per share and paid a $0.37 per share total dividend, which includes a $0.01 supplemental distribution above our base dividend and included approximately $0.02 of spillover income. Consistent with the sector, our earnings profile is reflective of monetary policy tightening over the last several quarters, in addition to experiencing a slowdown in new deal and refinancing activity given the macro backdrop. With this in mind, our dividend payout still represents an 11.1% yield on NAV and a 13.5% yield on the stock price as of April 30, which we believe is a compelling value proposition for investors.

We also believe we are beginning to experience a pickup in activity in April, which we are hopeful continues for the remainder of the second quarter. As such, our Board has confirmed our second quarter base dividend of $0.36, with the supplemental to follow in normal course. We will continue to prioritize, to the extent possible, a distribution strategy that maximizes cash returns to investors. Our March NAV per share was $13.30. This mark is based on real actionable prices in the market and underscores our intentional commitments to transparency and accountability regardless of the day’s market condition. This level of transparency is especially relevant in today’s environment.

With heightened scrutiny around BDC portfolio company valuation, we believe our monthly NAV disclosure delivers an added layer of confidence in the underlying value of Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s portfolio while highlighting the uniqueness of our portfolio’s positioning in liquid senior secured debt. We are pleased with the increased amount of positive feedback we have been receiving in this regard. 2026 presented another episode of volatility, induced by the software sell-off and credit cycle concerns in general, factors we discussed on our fourth quarter earnings call in February. These issues have continued to drive headlines in the months since, in addition to concerns and economic impacts resulting from the Iran war.

As I did last quarter, I would like to spend a moment reiterating our philosophy around software and technology investments as it remains very topical. We continue to prefer deeply embedded mission critical software in areas such as cybersecurity, IT infrastructure, and ERP systems, which we believe will ultimately be net beneficiaries of AI advancements. Within these subsectors, we lend to large, highly scaled providers that have meaningful profitability and cash flow. We have found that these large enterprise platforms tend to be backed by sophisticated private equity sponsors and believe their capital structures provide meaningful equity cushion below our senior secured loans. In our experience, these providers also frequently benefit from significant incumbency advantages.

We believe another advantage is the breadth and depth of their data collected across industries. This data positions incumbents to develop more effective AI and infrastructure than their more nascent peers, as data quality remains a foundational element of model performance and inference. To that end, we believe our portfolio companies are already realizing the benefits of AI advancements. Examples include one data analytics business that has over 60% of its top 50 customers using at least one AI-native product, while one of our large ERP software companies’ AI application has seen adoption by 40% of its over 7 thousand customers. In the latter example, management expects that adoption to be over 75% by year-end 2026.

Beginning in April, we started to observe a stabilization and, in some cases, a reversal of the mark-to-market prices on software and other AI-impacted loans, which we believe reflects the market’s growing realization of the advantages incumbent providers hold amid the AI-driven disruption. To echo recent commentary from a large private equity sponsor, these incumbents are well positioned to win, but that position is not guaranteed. We believe that advantage is predicated on their long-term customer relationships, their ownership of critical data that underpins the day-to-day functions of their clients, and their ability to incorporate AI into existing software systems to improve services. With that, I will hand the call over to Angie.

Angie Long: Thank you, Chris. Through the first quarter, Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s portfolio faced many macro headwinds, but we believe it performed respectably given the degree of volatility across asset classes. Importantly, given this backdrop, we continue to see stability in our underlying credits, continued earnings growth in our software exposure, and minimal fundamental impacts from the Iran war. As the broader market begins to regain its footing, we believe Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s portfolio will perform steadily as we look to capitalize on an improving opportunity set in what we believe should be better risk-adjusted spreads going forward.

Stepping back, the first quarter was defined by significant macro volatility driven by the sell-off in software and technology credit, persistent headlines around redemptions in evergreen vehicles, and geopolitical uncertainty, most notably the situation in Iran. Within that context, our views on software remain unchanged. As Chris alluded to earlier, we continue to believe that deeply embedded mission critical platforms are well positioned to be net beneficiaries of AI advancements. As we are already seeing across parts of the market, these businesses are beginning to incorporate AI into their existing systems, leveraging long-standing customer relationships and differentiated data sets to enhance their offerings. Across the broader market, the dislocation has started to create more attractive entry points.

In the secondary loan market in particular, we are seeing pricing that, in certain cases, reflects macro concerns more than company-specific performance. That shift is beginning to create a much better risk-reward dynamic than we have seen over the past several quarters. From an activity standpoint, M&A volumes slowed during the quarter as sponsors paused in response to the macro backdrop. However, with improving visibility, we are beginning to see activity return, including increased refinancing activity and select new opportunities across both the broadly syndicated and private credit markets. Importantly, spreads are now beginning to move wider across both markets. We are cautiously optimistic and believe the extended period of spread tightening is likely behind us.

Finally, we must acknowledge that geopolitical developments remain a key variable. A timely resolution in Iran would likely be supportive of market conditions, particularly given the potential for elevated oil prices to have broader inflationary impacts across the economy. While the environment remains fluid, we believe the combination of more attractive pricing and a disciplined approach positions us well for the periods ahead. At the portfolio level, underlying credit performance continues to remain solid, and capital markets remain open for high-quality borrowers. We have experienced increased volatility in NAV, which is not unexpected given the market dynamics we have discussed thus far and the overall liquid nature of our underlying loans.

We view this as a function of an efficient market attempting to price in perceived risks, rather than a reflection of any meaningful deterioration in underlying credit quality. To reiterate Chris’ earlier comments, our monthly NAV is based on real, actionable market prices, providing more frequent transparency into how the portfolio is valued and eliminating perceived questions around the true NAV of the BDC. In terms of our balance sheet, we continue to believe the flexibility of our financing facilities is a core benefit of the BDC. The CLO that we issued in 2024 will exit its noncall period in July 2026, and we will likely be looking at potential refinancing options for that during the second quarter.

During the first quarter, we remained active and disciplined with our share repurchase program. We bought back 140 thousand 149 shares for approximately $1.6 million and have remaining availability of approximately $4.2 million. In addition, Palmer Square Capital Management, our manager, purchased an additional 67 thousand 875 shares for approximately $800 thousand via its program. The Board will continue to evaluate share repurchases in the second quarter and beyond, given the attractive trading levels of our stock relative to NAV, and will consider future upsizes to the program if deemed appropriate. For added context, Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. shares were yielding 13.5% as of 04/30/2026, a significant premium to the 11.1% yield on NAV.

We believe this presents a compelling value proposition in the current environment, especially when taking into account the quality and conservative position of Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s portfolio. As we look ahead to the remainder of 2026, we are constructive on the emerging opportunity set and believe the depth of our platform combined with Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.’s flexibility to nimbly allocate across both public and private markets will continue to serve as a strong advantage in positioning the portfolio to capitalize on attractive risk-adjusted opportunities as they emerge. I will now turn the call over to Matthew to discuss our portfolio and investment activity in more detail.

Matthew Bloomfield: Thank you, Angie. As Angie mentioned, Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. navigated 2026 well despite heightened volatility facing the sector and broader markets. Relative to the fourth quarter, our net investment income per share decreased to $0.35 per share in the first quarter 2026, predominantly due to a combination of lower base rates as well as slower prepayment activity and the shortest quarter of the year. I would like to note that the full impact of lower base rates was felt more in 2026 than in 2025, due to how our borrower contracts are structured, and we believe the second quarter should represent a more normalized environment assuming no additional rate cuts in the near term.

In recent weeks, we are beginning to observe increased new-issue activity and refinancings. While prepayment activity is difficult to predict, we believe it could reaccelerate as we move through the year. In addition, to reiterate Chris and Angie’s comments, we also believe we are in a more reasonable spread environment today versus the past several quarters and are optimistic about the opportunity to reinvest paydowns into a higher-spread environment in the near term. Our total investment portfolio as of 03/31/2026 had a fair value of approximately $1.15 billion, diversified across 44 industries that demonstrate strong credit quality, industry and company-specific tailwinds, and a variety of end markets.

This compares to a fair value of $1.2 billion at the end of 2025, reflecting a decrease of approximately 4.1%. In the first quarter, we invested $1.094 billion of capital, which included 42 new investment commitments at an average value of approximately $2.1 million. During the same period, we realized approximately $79.9 million through repayments and sales. Importantly, we remain focused on diversification as we allocate new capital across the portfolio, as we believe the recent market turbulence has refocused investors on the importance of risk management through diversification.

To recap key portfolio highlights, at the end of the first quarter, our weighted average total yield to maturity of debt and income-producing securities at fair value was 11.73%, and our weighted average total yield to maturity of debt and income-producing securities at amortized cost was 8.26%. We believe our focus on first lien loans combined with diversification across industries and company size contributes to a strong credit profile, with exposure to 44 different industries. Further, our 10 largest investments account for just 10.64% of the overall portfolio, and our portfolio is 96% senior secured, with an average hold size of approximately $4.4 million. We view this as a key risk management tool for Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc.

On a fair value-weighted basis, our first lien borrowers have a weighted average EBITDA of $452 million, senior secured leverage of 5.5 times, and interest coverage of 2.4 times. Additionally, new private credit loans comprised 22.3% of overall new investments at a weighted average spread of 486 basis points over the reference rate. While credit quality remains an industry-wide concern, nonaccruals continue to be low at Palmer Square Capital BDC Inc. On a fair value basis, nonaccruals represent less than one basis point, and on an at-cost basis, only 90 basis points. Our PIK income represents approximately 1.64% of total investment income, well below our peers and the industry average.

We have maintained an average internal rating of 3.6 on a fair value-weighted basis for all loan investments. Our rating is derived from a unique relative value-based scoring system. We believe credit performance across the portfolio remains strong, continue to experience stable leverage levels and loan-to-value ratios, and our diversification positions us attractively within the dynamic markets we participate in. As we have discussed in the past, we believe larger borrowers are better positioned to deliver favorable credit outcomes over the long term, a dynamic we expect to continue as AI is advantageous to companies with the scale to invest in and leverage these technologies.

As Angie described, in conjunction with the Board, we continue to evaluate share repurchases as a means of driving shareholder value given the discounts in the market. We will continue to evaluate share repurchases on a go-forward basis and will look to balance attractive investment opportunities in conjunction with those potential repurchases. Earlier in the call, we mentioned dislocations in the secondary market creating a better risk-reward dynamic than we have seen over the past several quarters. While we are actively evaluating new investments, we plan to approach these opportunities with balance.

We are managing leverage carefully given movements in NAV, which Jeffrey will discuss in more detail, and we will be discerning in weighing the return profile of any new investments against that available through share repurchases to ensure we are making the most accretive capital allocation decisions on behalf of our shareholders. Now I would like to turn the call over to Jeffrey, who will review our first quarter 2026 financial results.

Jeffrey Fox: Thank you, Matthew. Total investment income was $26.2 million for 2026, down 16% from $31.2 million for the comparable period last year. Income generation during the quarter reflected a mix of contractual interest income, paydown-related income, and select fee income from new deal activity. Total net expenses for the first quarter were $15.2 million compared to $18.3 million in the prior-year period. Net investment income for 2026 was $11 million, or $0.35 per share, compared to $12.9 million, or $0.40 per share, for the comparable period last year. During 2026, the company had total net realized and unrealized losses of $48.3 million compared to total net realized and unrealized losses of $21.3 million in 2025.

This consisted of net unrealized depreciation of $52.8 million related to existing portfolio investments and net unrealized appreciation of $15.2 million related to exited portfolio investments. At the end of the first quarter, NAV per share was $13.30 compared to $14.85 at the end of 2025. Moving to our balance sheet, total assets were $1.2 billion and total net assets were $413.8 million as of 03/31/2026. At the end of the first quarter, our debt-to-equity ratio was 1.7 times compared to 1.54 times at the end of 2025. This difference is predominantly due to the change in NAV as well as the modest impact from share repurchases.

Available liquidity, consisting of cash and undrawn capacity on our credit facilities, was approximately $325.3 million. This compares to approximately $311.3 million at the end of 2025. Finally, on May 6, the Board of Directors declared a second quarter 2026 base dividend of $0.36 per share in line with our dividend policy. Furthermore, our policy continues to be distributing excess earnings in the form of a quarterly supplemental distribution. And with that, I would now like to open up the call for questions.

Operator: We will now open the call for questions. To ask a question, press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. Our first question will come from the line of Kenneth Lee with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Kenneth Lee: Hey, good afternoon, and thanks for taking my question. Just one on the NAV. It sounds like a lot of the marks are driven by market and actionable pricing there. Could you remind us again how much input does Palmer Square have in terms of the loan valuations within the book? Or is it completely driven by what you are seeing on the secondary markets there? Thanks.

Matthew Bloomfield: Ken, it is Matthew. Thanks for the question. It is completely driven by third-party marks. On the broadly syndicated side, those are real quotes, real levels, tradable in the secondary market. Those come from a third-party service provider that aggregates all those daily marks on the syndicated loans. On the private credit side, those are marked from a third-party valuation provider.

Kenneth Lee: Okay. Great. Very helpful there. And one follow-up, if I may. I just want to get your thoughts around dividend coverage just given where NII is leveling out right now. Thanks.

Matthew Bloomfield: It is obviously something we and the Board spend a lot of time on. The first quarter of the year is always the slowest from a prepayment activity standpoint and the shortest day count of the year, and the volatility that transpired predominantly in February and March slowed activity down pretty dramatically. As we moved into April, we do feel incrementally better about what we are seeing from new origination activity and conversations. We have had a couple of recent items that have already hit. So we feel very good about the $0.36 base dividend and the ability to pay a supplemental this quarter. That is the consideration.

Base rates certainly play a big impact in that—obviously out of our control—but we are incrementally feeling better about where those are settling out, at least in the near term. We are not interest rate prognosticators per se, but as we look through things, look through the portfolio, and look through activity in April, we felt increasingly comfortable with where we are at here for the near to intermediate term.

Kenneth Lee: Right. Very helpful there. Thanks again.

Operator: Again, for questions, press star then one on your telephone keypad. Our next question will come from the line of Richard Shane with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Richard Shane: Hey, guys. I need to queue in a little faster. Kenneth kind of asked my question, but I am curious as well about cadence of deal flow, both repayments and investments, and you largely addressed that. But any other color you want to add, I would be appreciative.

Matthew Bloomfield: Similar to past years, coming into the end of last year, conversations and activity level felt pretty robust, and it was likely that would continue into the first half of 2026. With what transpired in the software space and then followed by the Iran war, as has been the case for the past several years, M&A conversations can grind to a halt pretty quickly. That being said, specifically outside of software, it feels like conversations have reengaged through April and into early May. That always takes a little bit of time to translate to actual deal activity. From what we are seeing, early looks on the broadly syndicated side have increased the past couple of weeks.

Conversations and term sheets on the private credit side have marginally increased as well. We expect spreads to be wider. There is always a bit of digesting that from the borrower standpoint and from the sponsor community. I do not expect a huge acceleration, but I definitely expect it to pick back up from the very depressed levels we saw in February and March of the first quarter.

Richard Shane: Got it. And then just one follow-up question, and thank you for that. One of the things we are hearing more generally is improved documentation, better covenants associated with deals, and more thoughtful opportunity for due diligence. Is that something, particularly in the BSL market, it is fair to extrapolate as well?

Matthew Bloomfield: Yes, I think it is. Given the bandwidth we have across the firm from a capital deployment standpoint in the broadly syndicated market—outside of the BDC with our global CLO platform and private funds business—we tend to have meaningful relationships with those sponsors, so we get a lot of early access with management teams. The amount of time we are getting to spend has certainly increased. As that flows through to the credit documentation, in times of volatility and wider spreads it becomes a more lender-friendly environment, which we certainly welcome. It has been quite some time since we have been able to say that.

We will use that to get as good documentation and as favorable levels as we can from a lender standpoint, and that has certainly come to our favor recently.

Richard Shane: Got it. And then last question, and I apologize for so many, but we have asked most of the management teams in the space. When you think about where we are in the continuum in terms of structure and pricing, is it fair to say we are back to the middle? We have gone from tight, but we are not at distressed-type markets. It is more in the normal range right now.

Matthew Bloomfield: The way we look at it—and we have been pretty vocal over the past year plus—is that spreads had been very tight relative to risk across corporate credit, structured credit, investment grade, and high yield. In a lot of ways, I would have expected spreads to be considerably wider given everything going on from a macro sentiment standpoint. We did see spread widening. I think spreads will stay a little bit wider. The markets we participate in feel more like fair value—certainly not cheap and not super wide to stress or distress levels.

You are being better compensated than we have been in quite some time, but we view it as fair compensation relative to what we have seen over the past twenty-plus years.

Richard Shane: Sounds good. I appreciate it very much, guys. Thank you.

Operator: Our next question will come from the line of Derek Hewitt with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Derek Hewitt: Good afternoon. Could you provide some color on pro forma leverage as of April, since we have seen some recovery in the BSL market? And then secondly, are there certain sectors that have been significantly dislocated earlier this year, maybe even software, that you might lean into from a new investment perspective?

Matthew Bloomfield: Hi, Derek. Appreciate the question. From April’s standpoint, we should be posting the updated NAV later next week. To your point, we have seen a modest rebound in prices in April, so we expect leverage to come back down, but we will disclose the updated NAV for April by the end of next week, which gives good directionality to where things are headed. Given the underlying collateral and credit facilities we have, we are able to manage leverage quickly. We even paid down about $14 million in total on the credit facilities in the first quarter to maintain appropriate leverage levels that we were comfortable with.

There were a lot of moving pieces in the quarter, but that is something we have good control over and can manage effectively on a daily basis. To the second part of your question, undoubtedly software was the most disrupted sector in the first quarter, and that is predominantly responsible for the unrealized mark-to-market move in NAV as the whole sector traded off considerably. Our opinion is we want to be prudent in how we think about overall exposure there, but there are some really great companies trading at real discounts to par. When we have conviction, we will certainly look to take advantage where it makes sense.

Outside of that, with the Iran situation, there have been interesting opportunities in the chemical space. That has been a very tough sector for the past two-plus years given supply-demand dynamics and the effective dumping by Chinese producers in some pan-European markets. With the closure of the Strait for the past couple of months, that has led to meaningful earnings tailwinds for some petrochemical producers. We have been able to see some benefit from a couple of tactical positions there. Over the last several quarters, there has not been as much interesting to do from a total return standpoint given how tight spreads had gotten. That dynamic has certainly changed with the moves across software and the geopolitical tensions.

That said, we want to be prudent and make sure we have dry powder to the extent there are further dislocations, but we are certainly seeing more that is interesting to us now than we have in quite some time. Thank you.

Operator: And this concludes our question and answer session. I will turn the call back over to Jeremy for any closing comments.

Jeremy Goff: Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for your time and all the thoughtful questions. We look forward to updating everyone on second quarter 2026 financial results in August. Thank you again.

Operator: That concludes our call today. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.

Iran war darkens mood for US property investors, survey shows


Investors pulled back as geopolitics, rates and insurance risks squeezed returns



The IRS may owe COVID-era refunds to tens of millions of taxpayers. Here’s who could qualify



Tens of millions of taxpayers may be able to get money back from the IRS for certain penalties and interest they were charged during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recent blog post from National Taxpayer Advocate’s Erin M. Collins.

But the refunds are not automatic, and most taxpayers who may qualify need to file a claim by July 10.

The stakes are significant. In fiscal 2022 alone, the IRS levied more than 12 million estimated-tax penalties and over 16 million failure-to-pay penalties totaling more than $12 billion. The IRS previously refunded about $1.2 billion in penalties to roughly 1.6 million taxpayers under a narrower 2022 relief notice, but tax professionals say the legal theory at issue here reaches far more taxpayers.

Why the IRS may owe refunds

The possible refunds stem from Kwong v. United States, a November 2025 ruling by Judge Molly Silfen of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims that turned on how long pandemic-era tax deadlines were paused.

FEMA’s COVID-19 disaster incident period ran from Jan. 20, 2020, through May 11, 2023, and tax law added another 60 days, extending the period to July 10, 2023, for tax purposes.

In Kwong, the court interpreted the law to mean that the filing and payment deadlines were automatically extended for the entire 3.5-year window.

“The plain meaning of that statute is that the automatic extension runs from the beginning of the disaster declaration, through the end of the declared disaster period, and until 60 days after the end of the declared disaster period,” the court wrote.

If that view holds up, taxpayers who were charged late-filing or late-payment penalties or interest during the COVID period may have been charged on returns and payments that, by the court’s reading, were never actually late.

The ruling did not come out of nowhere. It builds on a 2024 U.S. Tax Court decision, Abdo v. Commissioner, which similarly held that the disaster postponement was mandatory and self-executing. Together, the two decisions reject the IRS’s narrower regulatory reading that capped pandemic relief at one year.

Tax practitioners say the cases are also a downstream effect of the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which ended the longstanding Chevron doctrine requiring courts to defer to federal agencies’ readings of ambiguous statutes. Courts now interpret tax statutes independently—and in Kwong, that reading favored the taxpayer.

Taxpayers may also have a second, independent legal basis for some claims. In December 2025, Congress passed the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (P.L. 119-64), which requires the IRS to treat disaster-related postponements as extensions of return deadlines for refund-lookback purposes. A properly filed claim can rely on both.

Who could qualify

The affected taxpayers could include individuals, small businesses, large corporations, estates, and trusts. The issue could apply to several kinds of taxes, including income, employment, estate, gift, and excise taxes, according to Collins.

In other words, if you filed or paid certain taxes late during the pandemic period and the IRS charged you penalties or interest, you may want to check whether you have a potential claim.

Taxpayers who filed late international information returns may also be affected, because those filings can come with large penalties even when no tax is owed, Collins said.

How to check and file a claim

A good first step is to review your IRS account transcript, which shows penalties, interest, payments, account adjustments, and refunds, according to the Taxpayer Advocate Service. Taxpayers should look for penalty or interest charges and check whether the dates fall between Jan. 20, 2020, and July 10, 2023.

To request a refund or reduction, taxpayers generally use IRS Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, to claim a refund or request an abatement of certain taxes, interest, penalties, fees, and additions to tax.

Collins said taxpayers should also consider filing a protective claim, which preserves their right to a refund while the legal issue is still being resolved. To file one, taxpayers would write “Protective Refund Claim Pursuant to Kwong Case” or similar language across the top of Form 843.

But Form 843 cannot be filed electronically. Taxpayers must mail it on paper, and the IRS does not provide confirmation that it received the claim. Collins recommends sending claims by certified mail, and has called on the IRS to build an electronic portal to handle what could be a flood of filings.

The important caveat

There is no guarantee taxpayers will get money back.

The Kwong ruling is not yet a final, appealable judgment—as of early May 2026, the parties were preparing a stipulated judgment that would clear the way for the government to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, according to tax practitioners tracking the case. The government has argued for a narrower reading of the law, and Collins said she expects the Department of Justice to appeal. Final resolution could take years.

Still, the deadline matters. If taxpayers wait too long to file a claim, they may lose the chance to get a refund later if the courts ultimately side with taxpayers.

For this story, Fortune journalists used generative AI as a research tool. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 

Blockchain.com Adds Prediction Market With SnapMarkets


Incubated by Blockchain.com, SnapMarkets prediction market has announced its launch.

According to Blockchain.com, SnapMarkets will transform the “traditionally slow prediction markets with lightning speed.” The platform promises moves in seconds, not minutes. SnapMarkets claims to be the fastest prediction market in operation.

SnapMarkets aims to provide real-time changes:

“It is a high-speed, skills-based environment where users can call direction with precision and feel the outcome almost instantly.”

SnapMarkets is described as the future of prediction markets. Blockchain.com explains:

“Every 30 seconds, a new BTC prediction round begins. You get a short window to read the market, make a call, and lock it in. Up or down. You choose your entry level. As low as one dollar, scaling up depending on how confident you are. When the clock closes, the market decides. If you call it right, you win. Simple as that. We added a social layer because markets are not isolated. Instead of just individual calls, SnapMarkets is an interactive experience. There is a live chat alongside real-time price action. You can see how others are thinking, track streaks, and climb a global leaderboard. Over time, it becomes clear who actually understands market momentum and who is guessing.”

Users can connect with Blockchain.com or any other DeFi wallet. While Bitcoin may be the first event-driven option, more are in the queue.