Home Blog

2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 10 Years


When the discussion turns to “monster stocks” that have done extremely well from the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI), many investors’ first thoughts turn to chip companies like Nvidia. If they expand their notions of stocks expected to be AI beneficiaries, the thoughts might include memory storage companies (i.e., data centers). Further expansion might eventually lead to the realization that the companies that could deliver some of the biggest gains from AI over the next several years aren’t even from the tech sector. Rather, the biggest beneficiaries might just be the energy companies uniquely positioned to serve the growing power needs of data centers.

Two energy companies experiencing AI tailwinds you might want to consider buying and holding for the long term are Bloom Energy (BE +9.93%) and Vistra (VST +1.90%).

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Bloom Energy: Quick launches, constant power

Bloom is carving out a role as an on-site infrastructure provider with its solid oxide fuel cells. These cells convert fuel into electricity in a highly efficient and relatively clean way that also provides consistent power, and Bloom’s energy servers can be up and running in 90 days.

Bloom initiated a contract in July 2025 to provide its fuel cells onsite to power to select Oracle data centers. It also expanded an agreement with Equinix in 2025 to help power its data centers.

As it ramps up production, the company is unprofitable, but revenue is growing steadily. Bloom reported $2 billion in revenue in 2025, a roughly 37% increase from the previous year. It’s also showing that the demand for its cells is persistent. At the end of 2025, Bloom finished with a product order backlog of $6 billion.

Bloom Energy Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(9.93%) $13.49

Current Price

$149.40

For this stock to work out for long-term investors, Bloom will need to show it can convert its backlog into revenue, then turn growing revenue into eventual profits. The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is a steep 94.3, and the beta is 3.1, meaning the stock price is more than three times as volatile as the broader market. That means this is an investment only the most aggressive long-term buyers should consider.

Investors who believe in Bloom’s long-term potential could consider dollar-cost averaging (DCA) — buying a set number of shares or investing a fixed dollar amount on a set schedule. That helps offset some of the worry about buying a large number of shares all at once and watching the price swing lower, as using DCA can help lower your average cost per share over time.

2. Vistra: The transition from a utility to a high-growth opportunity

Vistra operates a diversified energy generation fleet, including natural gas, nuclear, coal, solar, and battery storage that serves residential, commercial, and industrial clients. Over recent years, the narrative around the company has shifted from a traditional utility to a high-growth opportunity, as it has tapped more into servicing AI demand.

As two examples, it has an agreement with Meta Platforms to support its energy needs through nuclear power plants. It also has an agreement with Amazon to supply Amazon Web Services with nuclear power.

Vistra Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(1.90%) $2.92

Current Price

$156.60

To further its capabilities to meet energy-driven demand, pending regulatory approvals, Vistra has a definitive agreement to acquire the utility company Cogentrix Energy for $4 billion. If the acquisition closes, it will add 10 natural gas facilities to Vistra’s operations.

Shifting into the narrative of being a potential growth stock also means Vistra will have higher expectations to clear. The stock price is up 54% over the last year, but it has been on a noticeable downward dip since its Q4 2025 earnings report largely seemed to underwhelm investors after its release in late February.

The forward P/E ratio is 16.8, so its next quarterly report will be important to show it can justify its valuation, as well as the narrative that it truly is more than a traditional utility provider.

A bonus worth mentioning on Vistra is that it offers a dividend payout. The yield of 0.6% is not significant for those primarily seeking income generation, but Vistra is still paying shareholders as its growth story continues to take shape.

Gold & Crypto Analysis – Live || 13 March || Trade Time with Pranjal – Pranjal Singh



✅ XM-
(Partner code – Pranjal )
———————————————————
⚡ Join My Only Official Telegram Groups:
🔹 🟢Free Telegram Channel link –
———————————————————-

Gold & Crypto Analysis – Live || 13 March || Trade Time with Pranjal – Pranjal Singh

———————————————————–
✅ Message Me At Telegram – +91 6393537648
or Telegram I’d – @Pakkibhai007
———————————————————————————————————————
—————————–

🚀🚀 Open account By given Link And Get Access Of VIP Group And PSC Course

✅ XM-
( Partner code – Pranjal )

✅Vantage –
( Partner code – Pranjal )
🚀 Top Recommended Brokers:
Best For Indian User-
✅ Delta Exchange India – Secure & Reliable FIU 👉

—————————-
💰 Best Indian Broker:
✅ Dhan – Trade Smart with India’s Top Broker 👉
—————————–
⚡ Join My Only Official Telegram Groups:
🔹 🟢Free Telegram Channel link –
🔹 🟢Free Gold And Crypto Telegram Group –
—————————–
📢 Stay Connected on My Verified Social Media:

——————————————————————————
📢 ⚠️ Important Disclaimers:
📌 I am not a SEBI registered advisor. This video is intended strictly for educational purposes. We aim to explore and understand subjects related to the Stock Market, Cryptocurrency, Futures & Options—covering instruments such as Nifty, Bank Nifty, and individual stocks.
We do not offer any buy or sell recommendations in this video. All content is purely informational and should not be considered financial advice.
Trade Time With Pranjal will not be responsible for any profit or loss, whether direct or indirect, arising from the information shared in this video.
According to FEMA regulations, it is illegal to trade in currency pairs that do not include INR or to use brokers not registered with Indian authorities.
Investing and trading in the stock market or cryptocurrency involves significant risk. Always conduct your own research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any financial decisions.
All content on this channel is produced with the sole intention of education and awareness.
Note: Some links in the video description or pinned comment may be affiliate links. Using them may earn me a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the channel and its future content.
Legal Note for Indian Viewers:
This video is accessible globally. .

🔔 Like, Share & Subscribe for More Trading Insights! 🔔

Gold & Crypto Analysis – Live || 11 March || Trade Time with Pranjal – Pranjal Singh
#goldtrading #cryptotrading #bitcoin #cryptotrading #livebitcointrading #livecryptotrading #goldtrading #bitcointrading #tradingtechstreet #tradingtechstreetlive #livetrading
———–

source

New Data: Colleges Now Discount Tuition 56% on Average — A Record High


Key Points

  • Only about 12% of college students pay full sticker price. The share paying the advertised rate has been shrinking for 25 years and hit new lows in the 2024-25 academic year.
  • Roughly one in four students pays nothing in tuition after grants and scholarships. At community colleges, that figure is closer to 40%, and full-time community college students have received enough average grant aid to cover tuition since 2009.
  • Despite widespread discounting, most families still pay $25,000 to $100,000 out of pocket over the life of a degree when room, board, fees, and living costs are included — meaning tuition discounts alone do not tell the full story of college affordability.

The sticker price at some private colleges now tops $70,000 a year. At public universities, the published rate for in-state students averages nearly $12,000. But federal data and institutional reporting tell a consistent story: the vast majority of students are not writing checks for those amounts.

The frustrating part is that most of this discounting is done in secret – via individual financial aid awards. That makes price transparency difficult – and many families get stuck on the headline numbers. 

According to the most recent data, only about one in eight undergraduates pay the full advertised price. This aligns with The College Investor’s recent study of what families actually pay for college out of pocket.

Nearly everyone else receives a discount — and for a growing share, tuition is covered entirely.

Donut chart showing what college students actually pay vs. sticker price — 28% pay $0 tuition, 22% pay 1–25%, 28% pay 26–75%, 10% pay 76–99%, and only 12% pay full sticker price, based on NACUBO and College Board 2024–25 data. Source: The College Investor

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Actual Numbers Of How Many Families Get Scholarships That Discount The Costs

At private nonprofit colleges, the gap between sticker price and what students pay has never been wider.

NACUBO’s 2024 Tuition Discounting Study, found that the average discount rate reached 56.3% for full-time undergraduates in the 2024-25 academic year — a record high. That means for every dollar of published tuition, these schools returned roughly 56 cents in institutional gift aid.

In other words, if a school published a tuition rate of $50,000 per year, the actual tuition cost out of pocket would only be $21,850. Nearly 90% of incoming freshmen received some form of institutional discount.

Public four-year universities show a similar pattern, though the mechanics differ. The College Board reports that average net tuition and fees for first-time, full-time in-state students at public four-year schools fell to an estimated $2,300 for 2025-26 — compared to a published sticker price of $11,950. That is an effective discount of more than 80% on tuition alone

Community colleges stand out even more. Full-time students at two-year public institutions have been receiving enough average grant aid to fully cover tuition and fees since the 2009-10 academic year, according to the College Board. 

With more than 30 states now operating some form of free community college program, that number makes sense.

Very Few Families Pay Full Sticker Price

Brookings Institution research by economist Phillip Levine found that only 26% of in-state public college students and 16% of private nonprofit students paid the full sticker price in the 2019-20 academic year. 

Both figures have dropped sharply over time: down from 53% and 29% respectively in 1995-96.

Even among higher-income families who do not qualify for need-based aid, the share paying full price has fallen significantly. 

At public institutions, 79% of higher-income students paid sticker price in 1995-96, but by 2019-20, that had dropped to 47%. At private schools, the decline was steeper: from 64% to 28%.

The growth of merit-based aid explains much of this shift. Colleges increasingly use institutional scholarships to attract students regardless of financial need, making discounts available across the income spectrum. 

The result: the sticker price is becoming an unreliable indicator of what college actually costs for almost everyone.

Trying To View The Full Picture: What Families Actually Pay

Tuition discounts are real, but they don’t tell the whole story of college affordability. As we reported in our analysis of what families really pay for college out of pocket, most households end up spending between $25,000 and $100,000 over the course of a degree once room, board, fees, transportation, and other living costs are factored in.

Only about 1.35% of bachelor’s degree students receive grants and scholarships that fully cover the entire cost of attendance, according to the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study.

In other words, a student who pays zero in tuition may still face tens of thousands of dollars in housing, meal plan, and living expenses that are not covered by grants. 

This gap between “tuition is free” and “college is free” is where many families get caught off guard. A $0 tuition bill at a state university still comes with a $10,000-$15,000 annual tab for housing and food alone.

This is also where families can get themselves in financial trouble, and need to separate out the value of the degree vs. the value of the experience. 

Sticker Shock Deters Families From Even Applying

If most students are not paying sticker price, why does it matter? Because the published number still shapes decisions. Research consistently shows that lower-income students are more likely to rule out schools based on the advertised price without investigating the net cost.

A 2025 EducationDynamics survey (PDF File) found that 46% of students considered tuition cost the most important factor in their college decision, yet fewer than half found it easy to locate actual pricing information on college websites.

Some colleges have responded with “tuition resets,” dropping published prices closer to what students actually pay. Others have expanded net price calculators and financial aid messaging. But the broader system still relies on a high-sticker, high-discount model that rewards families who know how to navigate it and penalizes those who don’t.

What Families Should Do

Never eliminate a school based on sticker price alone. The published cost is the ceiling, not the floor. Run the school’s net price calculator before making any assumptions about affordability.

File the FAFSA regardless of income. Merit aid, state grants, and institutional discounts often require a FAFSA on file. Skipping it can cost you money you would have qualified for.

Budget for the full cost of attendance, not just tuition. Room, board, and living expenses routinely add $10,000-$20,000 per year on top of tuition. A school with free tuition is not the same as a school with free college.

Compare net prices across school types. A private school with a $45,000 sticker price and a 56% discount may cost the same as a public school at full in-state rates. Use tools like TuitionFit to compare your financial aid award and see how it compares to others.

Consider the community college pathway. With 30+ states offering free tuition programs, starting at a community college and transferring can cut total degree costs nearly in half.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19d3b2c6b8a”].tcb-post-list #post-22108 [data-css=”tve-u-19d3b2c6b90″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/What_Are_Private_Non-Profit_Student_Loan_Providers_1280x720-150×150.jpeg”) !important;}}

10 Best Private Student Loan Lenders For College

10 Best Private Student Loan Lenders For College
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19d3b2c6b8a”].tcb-post-list #post-21877 [data-css=”tve-u-19d3b2c6b90″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Average_Cost_Of_College_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

How To Pay For College: The Best Order Of Operations

How To Pay For College: The Best Order Of Operations

Editor: Colin Graves

The post New Data: Colleges Now Discount Tuition 56% on Average — A Record High appeared first on The College Investor.

JetBlue: 20% Off Base Fares With Promo Code SPRING20 (Tuesday & Wednesday Travel)


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • JetBlue is offering 26% off base fares when you use promo code SPRING20
    • Book by 4/8/2026
    • 4/14/2026 to 5/20/2026 (Tuesdays & Wednesdays only)

Our Verdict

Tuesday & Wednesday travel only makes it difficult. 

Hat tip to FM

Here’s How AI ‘Workslop’ From Managers Is Eroding Workplace Trust


PeopleImages.com – Yuri A / Shutterstock.com

AI is reshaping how work gets done, but not always for the better. More than half of U.S. employees say they’ve received “workslop” from a manager, raising new concerns about leadership standards and accountability. What is workslop? In Zety’s latest survey of 1,000 U.S. workers, workslop is defined as AI-generated work that looks polished but lacks accuracy, substance, or proper review.

Freddie, Fannie updates lead wave of secondary market news


Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Vice Capital Markets, Better Mortgage and Wolters Kluwer are among companies adding new secondary market offerings, financing or related technology this week.

Processing Content

Freddie has released two new types of low-loan balance 30-year mortgages that receive cash pay-ups, according to Vice Capital Markets, which has added the products to its system. The company also plans to add new cash pay-ups Fannie has in the works.

The Freddie mortgages, which have maximum balances of $450,000 and $425,000, have been incorporated into secondary market execution workflows lenders use to price and commit loans to the government-sponsored enterprises.

Freddie added the pay-ups for these loan types on Monday, according to a spokesperson. Investors may pay more for certain small loans because historical performance generally shows they are less likely to refinance.

Vice Capital Markets also plans to make products on new 30-year commitment grids currently pending at Fannie immediately available when launched. These include small mortgages that max out the same levels as Freddie’s pay-ups, and a manufactured housing loan.

Shawn Ansley, chief information officer at Vice Capital Markets

“Speed to market matters in secondary, especially when new execution options become available,” Shawn Ansley, chief information officer at Vice Capital Markets, said in a press release.

Better completes warehouse line renewals

In other news, Better Mortgage now has renewed all of its warehouse lines and increased capacity by over $275 million in the last three months, according to information Treasurer Rob Wilson provided in a company press release.

Most recently, Better has raised its total warehouse financing from $750 million to $850 million by increasing its capacity on an existing line, raising it from $250 million facility to $350 million. 

A global investment firm is providing the facility, which Better renewed for a year. Better did not identify the name of the warehouse provider. A portion of the facility has committed terms, which call for the financing to remain in place for the full period so long as requirements are met.

“We are thankful to our lending partners for leaning into and doubling down on Better in a tough macro environment,” Vishal Garg, CEO and founder, said in the release.

Vishal Garg

Vishal Garg.

Garg indicated that improved access to financing and cost of capital are priorities in the company’s recent earnings call. 

“We continue to improve our warehouse terms while working to expand capacity to support partnership volume growth,” he said. “In parallel, we are working toward a secured tokenized credit facility via stablecoin-ecosystem that we estimate could lower costs by up to 100 basis points.”

Wolters Kluwer provides new digital vault visibility

Wolters Kluwer Financial & Corporate Compliance has added new access to its digital vault platform that provides warehouse banks and investors with a broader view of assets pledged to them.

This allows secured parties to get a single view across multiple customer vaults rather than accessing them individually.

Simon Moir, vice president, lending systems, at Wolters Kluwer
Simon Moir, vice president, lending systems, at Wolters Kluwer

Ron Jautz

“The rise in fraud and double pledging has raised the stakes for warehouse lenders and secured parties. They need clear, real-time into the digital lending assets backing their portfolios,” said Simon Moir, vice president, lending systems, in a press release.



a16z-backed Infinite Machine is building e-bikes that feel like mopeds. Cyclists may have qualms


Last week, in Queens, I met up with Infinite Machine CEO Joseph Cohen at his startup’s new vibey office space in Long Island City. After a brief tour, Cohen and I donned motorcycle helmets and went for a ride, spinning through the cobble and paved roads and bike lanes on Infinite Machines’ new e-bike, the Olto. The Olto is quick, fun, and smooth, and it was a blast.

As Cohen and I waited at a traffic light, people on the corner pointed at us, grinning. Olto’s sleek and modern design—like a Cybertruck for the bike lane—tends to grab attention. But is it really a bike?

The Olto follows all the technical parameters of a Class 2 e-bike, where you don’t need a license plate or registration, and it’s allowed in the bike lane. Legally, it’s a bike. In motion, it felt more like I was riding a moped. The Olto is a whopping 176 pounds, has a moped-style seat position, and uses a throttle that gets it up to 20 miles per hour—or more if you’re in a city like New York where higher speeds are allowed. 

While there technically are pedals, Cohen advised me not to use them, and said that customers keep the pedals in the locked position—like pegs. Almost as proof of this, the chain on the Olto I rode was really rusty, and a piece of black plastic covered most of it, which I couldn’t help but notice would make the chain impossible to lube or service.  

Courtesy of Infinite Machine

For Cohen, these quirks are exactly the point. He and his brother, Eddie, wanted to design a brand new kind of two-wheel transit option designed for both the road and the bike lane. The two spent a lot of time riding their Vespas during Covid, and Cohen says they realized “that two wheels is kind of a hack for New York.” Infinite Machine started manufacturing its first vehicle, an electric moped the P1, and later this e-bike Olto, which they started delivering to customers last year, though he wouldn’t tell me how many had been sold yet

Infinite Machine, which launched a moped motorcycle before the Olto, is already dabbling in what other kinds of vehicles it can build next—and how the startup could (eventually) plug in some sort of autonomy to its e-bikes and scooters. It’s a well-funded venture, with $14.2 million from investors including a16z’s American Dynamism fund (a little funny when you consider that Infinite Machine, like many transit companies, has its scooters and e-bikes assembled in Shenzhen, China). Cohen and his brother, Eddie are energetic and bubbly about their sleek designs and where they see the future of transit going. When you’re talking with them, it’s hard not to get excited right along with them.

At the same time, it’s hard to imagine Infinite Machine won’t run into some trouble as they scale. The e-mobility space is notoriously difficult and full of cautionary tales, but more than that, I wonder what the reaction will be from cyclists like me to have something like Olto passing them in the bike lane. At a speed of 20 or 25 miles per hour, a 176-pound bike carries much more energy than a traditional bicycle, and collisions don’t look the same. E-bike accidents are drawing additional scrutiny from residents in cities, including New York, where some groups are pushing for more parameters for e-bikes and scooters. 

After thinking all of that over for a few days, I called up Cohen yesterday and asked about some of those concerns. He said that Infinite Machine is proactive with regulators and has built a “good relationship” with the New York City transportation department, and pointed out that he hadn’t heard of any complaints so far. From his perspective, he wants customers to ride in the bike lanes as a safety precaution from cars and dangerous drivers. “The real threat to safety is from cars and trucks, not from e-bikes,” he said.

Olto isn’t the only vehicle that may redefine the bike lane. Last week, I saw Amazon’s new four-wheel “e-cargo quadricycle” pedaling through the Lower East Side and making last-mile deliveries. It’s a stretch, but the enormous quadricycle technically meets all of the qualifications of a bike, even though it weighs many hundreds of pounds. 

It’s hard not to feel that these new modes of transportation may erode the social order of the bike lane—the idea that bike lanes are solely for lower-speed vehicles and the commuters who are most vulnerable on the road. I’m a cyclist with four bikes—I use bike lanes all the time—and can’t help but wonder as some of these new designs get prolific, whether it could start to feel hostile to the people who are actually pedaling.

See you tomorrow,

Jessica Mathews
X: 
@jessicakmathews
Email: jessica.mathews@fortune.com

Submit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter here.

Joey Abrams curated the deals section of today’s newsletter. Subscribe here.

VENTURE CAPITAL

E2, a Menlo Park, Calif.-based developer of medical technology designed for venous thromboembolism, raised $80 million in Series C funding. Gilde Healthcare and Norwest led the round and were joined by existing investors.

True Footage, an Austin, Texas-based residential appraisal and appraiser services company, raised $40 million in Series C funding from Cox Enterprises, Nava Ventures, Roger Ferguson, Pilot Enterprises, and others.

Membrane Technology & Research, a Newark, Calif.-based industrial membranes company, raised $27 million in Series B funding. Climate Investment led the round and was joined by Hartree Partners.

HexemBio, a New York City-based biotech company focused on blood stem cell rejuvenation therapy, raised $10.4 million in seed funding. Draper Associates led the round and was joined by SOSV, Seraphim, and others.

CONXAI, a Munich, Germany-based agentic AI platform designed to automate construction workflows, raised €5 million in pre-Series A funding. BayBG Venture Capital and Capricorn Partners led the round and were joined by Pi Labs, Earlybird, Noa, Zacua Ventures, and Argonautic Ventures.

FLORA Fertility, a Calgary, Canada-based fertility insurance platform, raised $5 million in seed funding. ManchesterStory led the round and was joined by Slauson & Co., BDC, Marathon Fund, and Adara Venture Partners.

Felix, a Prague, Czech Republic-based AI workflow platform designed for legal, finance, and insurance professionals, raised $1.7 million in pre-seed funding. XYZ Venture Capital led the round and was joined by angel investors.

Prism Layer, a Washington, D.C.-based AI-powered platform for enterprise risk management, raised $1 million in pre-seed funding. Fenway Summer led the round and was joined by Plural VC and others.

PRIVATE EQUITY

Bay Collective, backed by Sixth Street, agreed to acquire Sunderland AFC Women, a Sunderland, U.K.-based women’s soccer club. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Caylent, backed by Gryphon Investors, acquired Pronetx, a Columbia, Md.-based customer experience consulting firm. Financial terms were not disclosed.

First Reserve acquired a majority stake in Lindsey Systems, an Azusa, Calif.-based designer and manufacturer of electric transmission and distribution equipment. Financial terms were not disclosed.

EXITS

Gamut Capital Management agreed to acquire Acousti Engineering Company, an Orlando, Fla.-based ceiling, drywall, flooring, and specialty interior services provider, from Ardian. Financial terms were not disclosed. 

Triton Partners agreed to acquire Integris, an Amsterdam, The Netherlands-based ballistic protection company, from Agilitas Private Equity. Financial terms were not disclosed.

FUND OF FUNDS

Eclipse, a Palo Alto, Calif. and New York City-based venture capital firm, raised $1.3 billion across two funds focused on companies in physical industries. 

PEOPLE

500 Global, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based venture capital firm, hired Nadia Karkar as managing partner. Previously, she was with TPG Rise.

H.I.G. Capital, a Miami, Fla.-based private equity firm, promoted Brian Schwartz to CEO.

Rally Ventures, a Menlo Park, Calif.-based venture capital firm, hired Liz Benz as operating partner. Previously, she was Chief Sales Officer at Jamf. 

Rethinking Exit Multiples in High-Growth Company Valuations


These are approximations, but they tie the exit multiple to the assumptions about long-run growth (g), WACC, ROIC, margins and taxes.

Valuers should then cross-check their exit multiple assumption against current medians, long-run sector bands, and transaction evidence. If comps diverge, valuers can explain why; differences in growth durability, capital intensity, or risk.

In reality, the selection of the multiple is based on the median or average of current valuations at the time of the analysis, or the average of the median over the last five to 10 years. But is this correct?

Well, as always—it depends. It could be. Data teaches us something important that we should incorporate into our thinking when selecting the exit multiple.

For exit EBITDA multiples, Michael Mauboussin found that expected EBITDA growth and the spread between ROIC and WACC have a significant impact on valuation for unprofitable companies. However, determining ROIC or exit EBITDA margin is difficult when companies are not yet profitable or in a stable phase.

For this reason, revenue growth and gross margin are often used instead.