Home Blog

Bilt Tests Card Upgrade Offers With Welcome Bonuses


Bilt Tests Card Upgrade Offers With Welcome Bonuses

Bilt appears to be testing a significant change to its card upgrade policy, with some existing cardholders reportedly receiving upgrade offers that include signup bonuses.

One reported offer for upgrading to the Bilt Palladium Card includes 50,000 Bilt Points plus $100 in Bilt Cash after spending $4,000 within 90 days.

Check out the new terms below.

Product Upgrades

Eligible Bilt Cardholders may be able to upgrade their Bilt Card. Below you’ll find answers to common questions about upgrading your Bilt Card, from eligibility and timing to fees, rewards, and what happens to your account.

As of September 18, 2026, product upgrades are in Beta to select cardholders and are rolling out in phases. We’ll notify Bilt Members as soon as they’re widely available.

How do I know if I’m eligible to upgrade?

Log in to your Bilt account and navigate to your Bilt Card settings. Under the ‘Account’ section, you may see an option to upgrade your card. From there, you’ll see the Bilt Cards you can upgrade to and can select the one you want.

Eligibility is specific to each card, so an offer may be available for one card and not another. If you select a card and there’s no offer available for it at that time, it means you’re not eligible to upgrade to that card right now. Eligibility is reviewed regularly, so it’s worth checking back.

Please note, upgrades are not permitted before your first statement closes.

Can I upgrade my Bilt Card without closing my current Bilt Card account and reapplying?

Yes. You can upgrade to a different Bilt Card while keeping your existing account. You do not need to cancel your current card and apply for a new one. Your account history stays intact, so you keep the credit history you’ve built, and there’s no new hard credit inquiry on your credit report.

Which cards can I upgrade to?

If you currently have the Blue Card, you may be eligible for an upgrade to the Obsidian or Palladium Card. If you currently have the Obsidian Card, you may be eligible for an upgrade to the Palladium Card.

Can my authorized user request an upgrade?

Only the primary cardholder can request a product change. Authorized users move to the new card automatically when the primary makes the change.

Do I need to submit a new application?

No. Upgrading your Bilt Card does not require a new application. You may be asked to verify your information. Your Bilt account, all the points you’ve previously earned, and your credit history will all carry over to your new card.

How do I upgrade my card?

Navigate to your Bilt Card settings and select the upgrade option. Choose the card you want to move to, then review its benefits, annual fee, and terms. If you are eligible for that card, you can confirm the change request, and we’ll process it and let you know when it’s complete.

What happens to my authorized users?

When you upgrade your card, your authorized users are upgraded too. They’ll receive new cards and the benefits of your new tier, and any applicable authorized user fees are adjusted to match the card you upgrade to.

If you’d prefer not to bring an authorized user to your new card, remove them before you upgrade. You can do this in the Wallet tab under Manage authorized users. 

How long does the upgrade take?

Most upgrades are processed the same day. You’ll see a pending status in the Bilt app while it’s in progress, and you’ll be notified once it’s complete via email.

Can I cancel my upgrade while it’s processing?

Once you’ve confirmed the upgrade, it can’t be cancelled mid-processing. If you change your mind after it completes, you can reverse it by reaching out to Cardless Support at (888) 533-5576.

Will my credit limit change when I upgrade?

At this time, your credit limit stays the same when you change cards. Your limit may still be reviewed and adjusted separately as part of our normal account reviews.

How often can I change my card?

You can make one upgrade in a 12-month period, measured from the date of your last change.

Will I get a new physical card and card number?

Yes. A new card will be issued and mailed to you automatically when your upgrade is complete. Your new physical card will have the same number as your old card with a different expiration date and CVV. 

Can I still use my current Bilt Card while the new one is on the way?

Yes. Your current card keeps working until you activate your new one. Once you activate your new physical card, your previous physical is automatically deactivated. 

This applies to your physical card only, and your virtual card number stays the same and keeps working without interruption.

Can I start using my new card benefits right away?

Yes. Your new benefits are active as soon as the upgrade is complete. You don’t need to wait for the new physical card to arrive. Keep using your current card and you’ll earn your new benefits on it in the meantime.

What happens to my annual fee when I upgrade?

You’ll see two separate line items on your statement: 1) the full annual fee for your new card, and 2) a separate refund (full or prorated) of your old card’s annual fee. Both post approximately 45 days after your upgrade is complete.

The refund amount depends on when you upgrade:

  • If within 30 days of your current card’s fee posting, you get a full refund of that fee. For example if your current card’s annual fee is posted on March 28th and you upgrade on April 10th, you will receive a full refund.
  • After 30 days, you get a prorated refund for the unused portion of your year. For example if your current card’s annual fee is posted on March 28th and you upgrade on April 29th, you will receive a prorated refund based on the time remaining in your current card year.

See <a class=”relative pointer-events-auto a

underline

cursor-pointer” href=”https://legal.cardless.com/schumer/bilt/rates_and_fees.pdf&#8221; target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow ugc”>Rates & Fees.

Does my card anniversary date change when I upgrade?

Yes. The anniversary date of your card is updated to the end of the statement cycle that follows your new card’s annual fee posting date. Your card anniversary date is your new annual fee billing date, and your annual fee will renew each year from that new date. 

I already got a welcome bonus. Do I get an upgrade bonus for my new card?

When you upgrade to another Bilt Card, you are eligible to receive an upgrade bonus as indicated in the Bilt app or website at the time of your upgrade. The exact bonus depends on which card you upgrade to and is subject to the <a class=”relative pointer-events-auto a

underline

cursor-pointer” href=”https://www.biltrewards.com/terms/bilt-card-offer-terms&#8221; target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow ugc”>Bilt Card Offer Terms.

I have the Obsidian Card. What happens to my Bilt Hotel credits?

You receive the difference in credits when you upgrade to the Palladium Card right away, less anything already received under your Obsidian Card during the same period. Because these credits are distributed semi-annually, the difference is based on the current period’s amount, not the full annual total.

For example, say you’ve already received your $50 Obsidian hotel credit for the current period. When you upgrade to Palladium, on which the credit for that same period is $200, you receive the $150 difference rather than the full $200 on top of what you already received. Going forward, you’ll receive your full Palladium hotel credit each period.

Will upgrading my Bilt Card interrupt any autopay (rent or card payments) that I have set up on my existing Bilt Card?

No. Your autopay settings carry over when you upgrade. Your scheduled card payments and any housing payments you’ve set up through Bilt continue as normal, with no action needed from you. Once your upgrade is complete, we recommend checking your autopay settings in the app to confirm everything is in place.

Do I need to update recurring payments or digital wallets?

When your new card is ready, it’s worth reviewing any recurring payments or saved card details to make sure everything’s up to date. Your card in mobile wallets like Apple Pay or Google Pay will continue to work.

If you have payments saved directly with a merchant, check that your card information is current so those payments aren’t interrupted.

What happens to pending transactions, returns, disputes, and existing balances?

Nothing changes. Your pending transactions, returns, disputes, and balances all stay with your account. Everything continues right where it is, with no action needed from you.

What if my upgrade request is declined?

If you select a card and there’s no offer available for it at that time, it means you’re not eligible to upgrade to that card right now. Eligibility is reviewed regularly, so it’s worth checking back.

Social Security Retirees Aren’t Getting a Real Raise in 2027, No Matter What the COLA Numbers Say


In 2027, retirees who receive Social Security will get more money in their benefit checks. That’s because Social Security cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are a part of the program and happen automatically.

The COLA is often called a raise, because that’s the term people use when their annual income increases. However, it’s important that retirees realize they are not getting a real raise in 2027, and they essentially never will get a real raise from Social Security. Here’s why.

Image source: Getty Images.

The COLA isn’t a raise, and retirees shouldn’t treat it like one

The reality is that a Social Security COLA is not a raise. Instead, it adjusts benefits to account for inflation. In fact, it is calculated from year-over-year changes to the price of a basket of goods and services that make up the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

When CPI-W shows prices in the third quarter have increased, the COLA is adjusted accordingly. For example, if the average CPI-W data for the third quarter of the year (the period used to calculate benefits) shows costs rose by 3.6%, retirees would see their Social Security checks increase by 3.6%. The AARP is currently projecting that the 2027 COLA will come in at that amount.

But retirees won’t get 3.6% more buying power if this happens. They can’t go out and buy more things. The COLA just keeps them from losing ground. Their standard of living doesn’t increase because of these benefit bumps, and it isn’t meant to.

COLAs may be underestimating the inflation retirees actually experience

There’s also a bigger problem beyond just a misunderstanding of whether COLA is a raise or an inflation adjustment. The reality is that COLAs aren’t even doing a very good job of helping seniors avoid losing buying power, despite that being their purpose.

Unfortunately, the COLA formula has an inherent flaw. The spending habits of retirees do not align with those of urban wage earners and clerical workers. And seniors tend to spend more of their money in categories that often see above-average inflation. For example, healthcare and housing prices are a major line item in most retirees’ budgets, and the costs of both tend to rise faster than the overall inflation rate.

This problem with the COLA formula means retirees have lost an estimated 13.7% of their buying power since 2016 alone, according to the Senior Citizens League.

When your “raise” causes the buying power of your benefits to decline, that’s not a real raise in any sense of the word. Retirees need to understand this reality when making their retirement plans so they don’t overestimate what Social Security will do for them and ensure they have sufficient supplemental income for the comfortable retirement they deserve.

Universal and Sony sue Suno for a second time, claiming platform’s v6 models are ‘the fruit of the same poisoned tree’


Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment have sued Suno for a second time.

The joint complaint, filed on Friday (September 18) in Boston federal court, accuses the AI music company of copying 60,202 of the labels’ sound recordings, without a license, and using them to build the models that run its music generation service.

The new filing against Suno, obtained by MBW, can be read in full here.

US copyright law sets damages for willful infringement at up to USD $150,000 per work.

At that ceiling, the 60,202 recordings would carry a theoretical maximum of just over $9 billion.

The labels are also asking for up to $2,500 for each act of circumventing YouTube‘s anti-downloading technology, which is the maximum US law allows on that separate claim.

Applied once to each of the 60,202 recordings, that would add roughly $150 million.

Universal and Sony are also seeking a court order stopping Suno from any further use of their recordings, and have demanded a jury trial.

The complaint’s central new allegation concerns v6, the model suite Suno launched on September 9.

Suno says v6 was built in partnership with Warner Music Group, BMG, and Believe.

Chief Product Officer Jack Brody told MBW at launch that “v6 was trained entirely from scratch, from the ground up,” on data that “doesn’t include data from Universal or Sony.”

The labels argue that this does not wipe out Suno‘s liability because, they allege, v6 was built on the output of models trained on their recordings.

“Training a ‘new’ model on the outputs of an infringing model does not eliminate the infringement; it launders it, passing the value of Plaintiffs’ expression from the copied recordings into the tainted models, from those models into their outputs, and from those outputs into v6,” the complaint states. “…v6 is not a fresh start; it is the fruit of the same poisoned tree.”

“Training a ‘new’ model on the outputs of an infringing model does not eliminate the infringement; it launders it.”

Universal and Sony’s new suit

On the data used to build the new models, the filing alleges: “Suno has admitted that it trained v6 using ‘user interactions’ with previous iterations of its models.

“But these ‘interactions’ are the outputs of, and preference data derived from, Suno’s prior models, each of which was trained on the unlicensed corpus of copyrighted sound recordings described above, including Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Recordings.”

(Suno generates two tracks per prompt. The “preference data” is its record of which one the user picks in each case – data it’s used to inform the development of V6.)

“To date, every such signal has been a judgment about audio outputs generated using Suno‘s unlicensed models – that is, synthetic outputs embodying the expressive features that Suno’s tainted models derived from Plaintiffs’ recordings,” the complaint states.

The filing also alleges that Suno built v6 using knowledge distillation, a process it describes as one “whereby a new ‘student’ model is trained to reproduce the learned behavior of a predecessor ‘teacher’ model.”

“Here, the ‘teachers’ are Suno‘s prior models, and the capabilities they transmit – how to compose, arrange, and render convincing imitations of human-created music across genres and styles – were derived from the unlicensed recordings on which those models trained, including Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Recordings,” the complaint reads. “…v6’s training corpus, in substance, embodies the accumulated learnings of models built on Plaintiffs’ works.”

“the capabilities Suno’s prior models transmit [to V6] – how to compose, arrange, and render convincing imitations of human-created music across genres and styles – were derived from the unlicensed recordings on which those models trained.”

Accusation in Universal and Sony suit

The filing names v4, v4.5, v4.5+, v5, v4.5-all, and v5.5 as trained on the same copied corpus.

“Thus, every model Suno has ever released – from its earliest versions through v6 – is the product of, and continues to exploit, Suno’s unauthorized copying of the Copyrighted Recordings,” the complaint states.

The filing adds that Suno has never said it destroyed the recordings it copied: “v6 thus rests on a foundation of unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs’ works that Suno continues to hold and exploit…”


The complaint additionally turns Suno‘s own deals against it.

The company settled with Warner Music Group in November 2025, signed BMG on August 12, and announced a partnership with Believe on September 8.

“Three agreements with three major rightsholders in less than a year confirm that a functioning market exists for licensing sound recordings to train generative AI models and that Suno itself recognizes that using copyrighted sound recordings for this purpose requires permission,” the filing reads.

That matters because Suno‘s core defense is that training a model on copyrighted material is ‘fair use’, and one factor a court weighs is the potential market damage such a practice might inflict on the original works.

The complaint quotes Brody saying the revenue share with partners is “not in exchange for training” and that the deals are “not really about the data”.

It calls that characterization “self-serving.”

On market harm, the complaint points to Deezer, which said in July 2026 that more than half of new tracks arriving on its platform each day were AI-generated, at around 90,000 a day.

“Every machine-generated track delivered to a streaming service competes with the Copyrighted Recordings for placement, for discovery, for finite listener attention, and for a share of the fixed royalty pools from which genuine artists and rightsholders are paid,” the filing states.

“Dilution at this scale and velocity is not just a future harm; it is a present, measured, and accelerating one.”

“Dilution at this scale and velocity is not just a future harm; it is a present, measured, and accelerating one.”

Universal and Sony’s new suit

Setting out the wider harm, the complaint states: “Suno‘s wholesale theft of the Copyrighted Recordings threatens the entire music ecosystem and the numerous people it employs.

“It also degrades the rights of artists to control their works, determine whether future uses of their works align with their aesthetic and personal values, and decide the products or services with which they wish to be associated.”

The same passage quotes Suno co-founder and CEO Mikey Shulman saying: “[i]t’s not really enjoyable to make music now…[i]t takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of practice, you need to get really good at an instrument or really good at a piece of production software.”

“The time, practice, and skill Mr. Shulman derides are exactly what copyright law exists to encourage and reward, and exactly what spurred the creation of the Copyrighted Recordings Suno copied and ingested into its AI models,” the complaint states.


This second case has been triggered by a recent ruling in UMG and Sony‘s first case against Suno, originally filed in June 2024.

The two majors had asked to add 61,026 recordings to that original lawsuit against Suno, which covers 560 works.

Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV refused that request on August 18, ruling that the extra works would delay a case he wants decided on fair use, and noting that the labels could bring them as a separate suit.

“Because Suno concealed the contents of its training data, the complaint in the previous action identified a minuscule, illustrative fraction of the recordings Suno had actually copied,” the new complaint states.

“Though the 60,202 sound recordings asserted in this action may more closely reflect the breadth of Suno’s infringement, in reality they remain only a small portion of Plaintiffs’ works that Suno infringed.”

The labels say they pinpointed their works inside Suno‘s training data using audio fingerprinting company Audible Magic, during discovery in the first case.


In the first case brought against it by Universal and Sony, Suno argues that training its models on copyrighted recordings is “quintessential fair use.” It admitted in a September 1 filing that it obtained audio from YouTube using the tool YT-DLP.

Fact discovery in that case closes on September 30.Music Business Worldwide

Lower Your Initial Mortgage Payments With A 2-1 Or 1-0 Buydown


Higher interest rates can make the first few years of homeownership more challenging. We offer temporary buydown options that can reduce a borrower’s mortgage rate and monthly payment during the first one or two years of the loan.

Our 2-1 and 1-0 buydown programs are available with eligible conventional, FHA, and VA purchase loans. The cost of the temporary rate reduction is paid through seller or builder concessions, allowing buyers to ease into their full mortgage payment without changing the loan’s permanent terms.

How Does a Temporary Buydown Work?

A temporary buydown reduces the effective interest rate during the beginning of the mortgage term.

With a 2-1 buydown, the rate is reduced by 2% during the first year and 1% during the second year. Beginning in the third year, the borrower pays the full payment based on the mortgage’s note rate.

With a 1-0 buydown, the rate is reduced by 1% during the first year. The full note-rate payment begins in the second year.

For example, if the permanent note rate is 7%, a 2-1 buydown would provide an effective rate of 5% during the first year, 6% during the second year, and 7% for the remaining term.

Program Highlights

  • 2-1 and 1-0 temporary buydown options
  • 30-year fixed-rate mortgages
  • Non-standard loan terms may be available
  • Primary residences only
  • Purchase transactions only
  • Single-family residences, PUDs, and condominiums
  • Conventional, FHA, and VA financing
  • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac eligible programs
  • High-balance loan options available
  • Fannie Mae HomeReady financing available
  • Freddie Mac Home Possible financing available
  • FHA DPA Pro and eligible down payment assistance options
  • Eligible CalHFA conventional and FHA programs
  • 24-month buydown term for eligible 2-1 programs
  • 12-month buydown term for eligible 1-0 programs
  • Buydown funds paid through seller or builder concessions
  • Seller-concession limits vary by loan program

Borrowers Must Qualify at the Full Note Rate

Although the borrower receives a reduced payment during the temporary buydown period, qualification is based on the loan’s full note rate, not the temporarily reduced rate. This helps confirm that the borrower can afford the regular mortgage payment once the buydown period ends. The interest rate stated in the mortgage documents does not change. Instead, funds contributed by the seller or builder are placed into an account and used to cover the difference between the reduced payment and the full scheduled payment during the buydown period.

A Valuable Seller-Concession Strategy

Temporary buydowns can be particularly useful in a market where sellers or builders are willing to offer concessions. Instead of using those funds solely toward closing costs, an eligible buyer may be able to apply them toward lower mortgage payments during the early years of homeownership. This can provide additional breathing room while the buyer adjusts to expenses such as moving, furnishing the home, maintenance, property taxes, and insurance. We help buyers, real estate professionals, and sellers determine whether a 2-1 or 1-0 buydown is available for a particular transaction. We will review the loan program, property type, seller-concession limits, and qualification requirements to structure the most appropriate financing option.

 

[CO] Credit Union of the Rockies $300 Checking Bonus


Offer at a glance

  • Maximum bonus amount: $300
  • Availability: Must live or work in one of the following counties:
    • Clear Creek County
    • Eagle County
    • Gilpin County
    • Grand County
    • Jefferson County
    • Summit County
  • Direct deposit required: Yes, $500+ per month
  • Additional requirements: 5 debit card transactions and keep account open for 90 days
  • Hard/soft pull: Unknown
  • ChexSystems: Unknown
  • Credit card funding: Unknown
  • Monthly fees: None
  • Early account termination fee: $25, 90 days
  • Household limit: None
  • Expiration date:

The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Credit Union of the Rockies is offering a $300 bonus when you open a new checking account and complete the following requirements:
    • Sign up for direct deposit of at least $500 per month
    • Complete a minimum of five (5) transactions using your CUR Visa debit card within the first 90 days of account opening
    • Keep account open for at least 90 days

The Fine Print

  • Offer available for a limited time. Membership eligibility required.
  • Offer valid for new Credit Union of the Rockies members age 18 or older.
  • To qualify for the $300 bonus, you must: (1) open a new Credit Union of the Rockies checking account; (2) establish and receive a qualifying direct deposit of at least $500 into the new checking account; and (3) maintain the checking account in good standing for at least 90 days after account opening. (4) Complete a minimum of five (5) transactions using your CUR Visa debit card within the first 90 days of account opening.
  • The $300 bonus will be deposited into the qualifying checking account after all requirements have been met.
  • Limit one bonus per individual.
  • Bonus may be reported to the IRS and is the recipient’s responsibility for any applicable taxes.
  • Offer cannot be combined with any other promotional offer and may be modified or withdrawn at any time. Accounts are subject to approval.
  • All bank account bonuses are treated as income/interest and as such you have to pay taxes on them

Avoiding Fees

Monthly Fees

In touch checking account has no monthly fees to worry about.

Early Account Termination Fee

$25 if closed within 90 days

Our Verdict

There was a $150 referral bonus that didn’t require a direct deposit as well but did have some big requirements for the full bonus. This new bonus should be a better option for most/all people. Share your experiences in the comments below. 

Hat tip to reader snailrock

Useful posts regarding bank bonuses:

Nifty 24,000-த்தை Defend பண்ணலைனா? | MSCI explanation | IPS Finance – 594



Follow the IPS FINANCE channel on WhatsApp:

A crypto investment scam has reportedly surfaced in Madurai, raising fresh concerns about fake investment schemes and online fraud. How do these scams work, and what warning signs should investors watch out for before putting their money into cryptocurrency? The Nifty 24,000 level is in focus as investors track market momentum and key support levels. What could happen if Nifty fails to hold this important level? And how could MSCI-related changes and global fund flows influence Indian equities? In this episode, we decode the Madurai crypto scam, Nifty’s key support level, MSCI factors, and what investors should watch next.

#sharemarket #investing #imperfectshow #brandingaachi

பொறுப்பு துறப்பு:

இந்த ‘IPS Finance’ பாட்காஸ்ட் நிகழ்ச்சியில் இடம்பெறும் தகவல்கள், ஆலோசனைகள் அனைத்தும் மிகுந்த கவனத்துடனேயே தரப்படுகின்றன. எனினும், எதிர்பாராத நடப்புகளால், சூழலே தலைகீழாக மாறிவிடும் வாய்ப்புகள் வர்த்தகத்துறையில் இருப்பதை புரிந்துகொள்ள வேண்டுகிறோம். எனவே ஆலோசனைகளை செயல்படுத்தும்முன், சொந்தப் பொறுப்பில் முடிவெடுக்கவும்.

Disclaimer:

All information and advice provided in this ‘IPS Finance’ podcast is given with the utmost research and care. However, we ask you to understand that there are possibilities in the market for unexpected events to turn the trend anytime. Vikatan is not responsible for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Therefore, before implementing the advice, as investment in securities are subject to market risks, please carry out your due diligence before investing.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Video Credits:

###

Host : Nivetha
Editor : Sushanthika
Audio Engineer : Vignesh R
Video Producer: N Cibi Chakravarthy
Thumbnail Artist: Santhosh.C
Channel Manager : Sylwester L.
Video team head : M Niyas Ahmed

###

Vikatan Tv Channel Description link:

Subscribe to Vikatan E-Magazine –
Install Vikatan App :

source

My Student Loans Are Finally Being Forgiven. Could I Owe Taxes On Them?


The Question

I’m expecting to get my student loans forgiven soon. I’m at about $148,000. I borrowed $65,000 for a social work degree back in 2001 and I’ve paid something every single month since.

A coworker mentioned you pay taxes on this and now I don’t know what to think. I make $58,000 a year. I’ve got about $14,000 in a retirement plan, $3,000 in savings, and other debt. I can’t afford to pay more taxes.

Does this even apply to me? And is there something I should be doing before the end of the year?

— Sam


Welcome to the Friday mailbag, where we take one reader question and answer it. Have one? Send it to us — details at the bottom.


The Short Answer

It depends entirely on which program you’re getting student loan forgiveness from, and you may be in the tax-free one without knowing it. A social work degree generally also has a career that often qualifies for Public Service Loan Forgiveness, which isn’t taxable at all. Check that before you plan around a tax bill.

If this turns out to be income-driven repayment forgiveness, the potential maximum tax based on what you described above would be $3,740, but the “other debt” and any variables you left off could change that.

Start Here: Are You Sure It’s Not PSLF?

Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) is NOT taxable. Neither is teacher loan forgiveness, death and disability discharge, or closed school discharge. Forgiveness at the end of an income-driven plan is taxable, and that’s the key to focus on.

The reason to check rather than assume: social work is concentrated in employers that qualify for PSLF. Government agencies at every level, 501(c)(3) nonprofits, public hospitals, public schools, and community mental health organizations are all qualifying employers under PSLF. Someone who earned a social work degree in 2001 and has been working in the field since has a real chance of having spent 120 qualifying months at eligible employers without ever certifying any of them.

Pull your employment history and compare it against the qualifying employer rules before you do anything else. Our PSLF checklist covers what to gather, and the 2026 strategy rundown covers the newer employer rule that changed which organizations count. If the answer comes back yes, your forgiveness is tax-free and it may also arrive sooner than the income-driven timeline you’re currently on.

There is a risk here, that because your loans were from before 2009, if you never consolidated them, you could have old FFEL loans. FFEL loans do NOT qualify for PSLF. In that case, it’s likely you may be going for IDR-based loan forgiveness.

If It Is IDR Forgiveness, Here’s What Changed

The American Rescue Plan Act made all student loan forgiveness federally tax-free from 2021 through the end of 2025. It expired on December 31, 2025, and Congress did not extend it. Now, loan forgiveness through IDR on or after January 1, 2026 fall back under the old rules, where canceled debt counts as ordinary income.

We flagged the approaching deadline before it arrived and covered the return of the tax bomb as it landed.

State treatment is a separate question. Several states tax forgiven student debt in years when the federal government doesn’t, and others conform automatically to whatever the federal rule is. Our state-by-state breakdown can you show you what. you may face in your state.

What The Worst Case Looks Like

Your $148,000 discharge would get added to your $58,000 salary, putting $206,000 of gross income on that year’s return. After the $16,100 standard deduction for single filers, that leaves $189,900 in taxable income, which reaches into the 24% bracket according to the Federal 2026 tax bracket tables.

However, because of your high loan balance and low assets, you are also likely going to be insolvent. Using the numbers you provided, only $17,000 of the forgiven amount is taxable. That makes your total tax due about $3,740.

Run your own numbers through our tax bomb calculator rather than borrowing this example, since it’s important to use all your assets and liabilities.

The Most Important Line In Your Letter

You wrote “and other debt” almost as an aside. That phrase is what determines whether you owe $33,400, something closer to $2,900, or nothing at all.

The tax code excludes canceled debt from income to the extent you were insolvent immediately before the discharge, meaning your liabilities exceeded your assets at that moment — and the forgiven loan itself counts as one of those liabilities. This is the insolvency exclusion, and it’s the reason the tax bomb has been more theoretical than real for most borrowers who’ve faced it.

When we went through IRS canceled-debt data, roughly 5.5 million Forms 1099-C were filed for 2012 while only about 770,000 returns reported canceled-debt income. Insolvency accounts for most of that gap.

Since It Hasn’t Happened Yet

This is where your timing works in your favor, and you may want to be aware of your choices as a result.

Insolvency is measured immediately before the discharge. Your personal balance sheet on that specific date sets the exclusion, which means paying off a credit card or building up savings in the months right before forgiveness lands can shrink the amount you’re allowed to exclude.

Nobody should stop paying their minimum payments on debts over this, and running up new debt to manufacture insolvency is not a good strategy. But knowing that the timing of a large payoff or a big deposit has tax consequences is enough, you can avoid making any big moves for a few months.

Waiting for the exclusion to come back isn’t a plan either. No replacement provision is scheduled for a vote, and delaying forgiveness costs you payments while providing no guarantee the rules improve. Our broader overview of taxes and forgiveness covers what has and hasn’t been proposed.

The year the discharge posts is the tax year it has to be reported in, which matters if your income is going to change.

What To Do Before December 31

Settle the PSLF question first. Everything else in this article is contingent on the answer, and it’s the only step that could take the tax bill to zero outright.

Document your assets and liabilities as they stand now, and keep documenting them through the discharge. Account statements, the loan balance letter, and balances on every other debt are what support an insolvency claim later, and they can’t be reconstructed convincingly two years after the fact. The IRS insolvency worksheet in Publication 4681 lists what belongs on each side, and retirement accounts count as assets.

Watch for a Form 1099-C once the discharge processes. It reports the canceled amount to you and to the IRS, and its arrival doesn’t settle what you owe. The exclusion gets claimed on Form 982 with your return, and our explainer on 1099-C reporting covers how the two forms work together.

Get a tax professional involved before the discharge rather than after. Insolvency claims carry elevated audit exposure, and contemporaneous records are the defense.

Where People Get This Wrong

The first mistake is assuming forgiveness is still tax-free because it was for five straight years. That exclusion was temporary.

The second runs the other way: treating a 1099-C as a final bill. Borrowers have paid tax they never owed because an official-looking form arrived and nobody told them insolvency existed. The form reports a discharge. It does not determine taxability.

The third is skipping the PSLF question because the income-driven clock was already running. Borrowers spend years on one track without checking whether the tax-free track was open to them the whole time, and for anyone in social work, teaching, public health, or government, that’s the first thing to understand.

Send Us Your Question

Got a student loan, financial aid, or money question you can’t get a straight answer on? Send it to us and we may answer it in a future Friday mailbag.

var gform;gform||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,function(){gform.scriptsLoaded=!0}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,function(){gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,function(){gform.domLoaded=!0}),gform={domLoaded:!1,scriptsLoaded:!1,themeScriptsLoaded:!1,isFormEditor:()=>”function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});

Reader Mailbag

Name(Required)



Email(Required)



Have a question for us? Ask away. Questions submitted may appear articles on The College Investor. We may not answer every question. We reserve the right to edit and publish your questions. But don’t worry — your identity will remain anonymous.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post My Student Loans Are Finally Being Forgiven. Could I Owe Taxes On Them? appeared first on The College Investor.

When Is It Time to Step Down?



<p>This week&#8217;s HBR Executive Agenda tackles one of a CEO&#8217;s biggest challenges: deciding when to hand the reins to a successor.</p>

Polish PM warns Russia plans drone or rocket strikes on European countries supporting Ukraine



Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hosted leaders and representatives from seven regional countries for talks on deepening cooperation on Friday, after overnight Russian strikes in multiple regions sparked fires and caused several deaths and injuries.

The inaugural summit of the so-called “Carpathian Eight” brings together Ukraine, Romania, Serbia, Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Austria and Hungary, with the European Union also involved.

It comes as U.S.-mediated efforts to end Russia’s 4 1/2-year full-scale invasion have stalled, with the issue of territorial concessions in eastern Ukraine among the central sticking points. Ukraine is also seeking security guarantees from partners for a deal.

The summit also comes as three days of voting began in Russia’s first wartime parliamentary election, which features virtually no opposition to President Vladimir Putin’s party and is all but certain to secure the Kremlin’s political dominance.

Some of the nations attending the meeting in western Ukraine’s Ivano-Frankivsk region, such as Poland and Romania, have been staunch supporters of Ukraine. Others, such as Hungary, Serbia and Slovakia, have refused to provide Kyiv with direct military assistance.

Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram that the summit was a “significant beginning” of a movement intended to “further strengthen ties between our countries and create another strong element of cooperation at the EU level.”

He added that the participating countries would work together on security, energy, logistics, cross-border economic ties and support for local communities.

European countries concerned over Russian hybrid threats

The meeting in the western Ukrainian ski resort of Bukovel came amid increasing concern among many European countries that Russia is ramping up hybrid threats including sabotage, cyberattacks, disinformation and potential drone incursions into NATO territory.

Tusk, Poland’s prime minister, warned on Thursday before departing for Ukraine that Moscow is planning hybrid strikes with drones or rockets on European countries supporting Kyiv, among them Poland.

Officials in Poland, Germany and Denmark have in recent weeks accused Russia of involvement in drone incursions, sabotage, arson, surveillance of defense facilities and planning to use a drone carrying explosives to attack an airport.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday that the EU needs a NATO-like mechanism to better respond to hybrid attacks blamed on Russia, and to develop “a consensus on how to respond to certain incidents … that fall below armed aggression but clearly threaten our national security.”

Putin issues a new warning against seizing Russian ships

Speaking at a meeting of a government commission on new weapons, Putin declared that the Western claims about Russia’s purported aggressive plans were intended to justify a boost in defense spending. He again denied that Russia has any hostile intentions toward Europe, but warned that it will be forced to respond to any aggressive action by Western allies, such as the seizure of merchant vessels operated by Russia.

“Let’s live in peace, otherwise we will be forced to respond in kind – it must be quite obvious to everyone,” he said.

Last month, Putin threatened retaliation for Western seizures of Russia’s commercial vessels, describing them as “piracy.” He warned that the Russian response wouldn’t necessarily come in the waters where the Russian ships were seized, noting that Moscow could retaliate in any area.

Russia is believed to be using a fleet of hundreds of ships to evade international sanctions imposed after Moscow sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022.

France and the U.K. have detained tankers suspected of being part of Russia’s “shadow fleet” shipping oil in violation of international sanctions. The EU has sanctioned hundreds of “shadow fleet” ships.

Russia has recently started deploying warships to escort its commercial vessels.

Meanwhile, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said on Friday it had summoned the British Chargé d’Affaires to strongly protest the United Kingdom’s continued increase in the supply of drones and other weapons systems to Ukraine.

The ministry said the U.K.’s “fiercely confrontational stance” was aimed at “prolonging and escalating the armed conflict by every possible means.” It added that Russia reserves the right to take necessary countermeasures in self-defense, and that “any British military facilities in Ukraine used to strike Russian territory represent legitimate targets.”

In a statement, Britain’s Foreign Office said the U.K. will remain committed to providing the equipment Ukraine needs to defend itself. The office called the diplomatic reprimand “yet another attempt to deflect attention from Russia’s barbaric full scale invasion of Ukraine and discredit the U.K. on the world stage.”

Ukraine receives nearly $4 billion in EU support

Following a phone call with von der Leyen on Friday, Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post that Ukraine has received a 3.3 billion-euro tranche (roughly $3.8 billion) from an EU financial support package meant to strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities including the purchase of missiles and drones.

The funding comes as Kyiv faces a projected budget deficit of roughly $27 billion this year. Zelenskyy said Ukraine was also preparing for a meeting with von der Leyen at the United Nations General Assembly in New York next week focused on the country’s financial stability.

Russian strikes spark fires and cause deaths and injuries

Two people were killed and two others injured in Russian strikes overnight in the Zhytomyr region, west of Kyiv, Ukraine’s State Emergency Service said in a statement on Telegram.

The strikes sparked fires in warehouse and production buildings. Rescuers were forced to retreat during repeated air raid alerts, while emergency de-miners inspected the area for explosive devices. Firefighters later extinguished the blazes.

Elsewhere, one person was killed and six others injured after Russian forces attacked an electric train in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region, the state emergency service said. The drone strike targeted a railway station in the Novovodolazka community and sparked a fire in two carriages of the suburban train.

Russia’s state nuclear corporation Rosatom said that a Ukrainian drone on Thursday hit a cooling tower of a reactor unit at the Kursk nuclear power plant, but the attack hasn’t posed any radiation threat and hasn’t affected its operation.

The Russian Defense Ministry on Friday said its air defenses intercepted and destroyed 629 Ukrainian drones overnight over 14 Russian regions, as well as illegally annexed Crimea and the Azov and the Black seas.

Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said more than 350 drones were headed toward Moscow, but that most were destroyed far from the Russian capital while 64 were downed as they approached the city.

The Russian military said Friday it carried out drone strikes overnight on Ukraine’s ports, vessels and a logistics center operating for the military.

Russian forces hit a bulk carrier in the Ukrainian port of Chornomorsk and a Nova Poshta logistics facility, 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) northwest of Odesa, that the Russian Defense Ministry said was used for storing and distributing military cargo from Europe.

Digital Bank Revolut Denies Direct Contact From Group Claiming Data Breach Ransom


Revolut has stated that it has not received any direct ransom request from people claiming responsibility for a recent customer-data incident. The digital bank said it has had no contact from the group that later posted a public ultimatum online.

The company first disclosed the problem on 12 September 2026.

An unauthorized party used an email account on a genuine government-agency domain to send fraudulent information requests.

Revolut treated those messages as official legal demands and supplied records over a period of months.

Once the deception was identified, the firm blocked the address, notified the relevant government body, law enforcement, data-protection authorities and financial regulators, and contacted the customers involved.

Revolut has stressed that its own systems, databases and customer accounts were not penetrated.

Customer funds were not taken.

A source familiar with the matter has said the episode involved roughly 680 customers rather than a mass compromise of the platform’s tens of millions of users.

Many of those accounts appear to have been selected because of suspected cryptocurrency activity.

The material that left the company included names, dates of birth, postal and email addresses, phone numbers, copies of passports and driving licences, verification photographs, account statements, IBANs and transaction histories, including Bitcoin activity.

Revolut has described the episode as a sophisticated impersonation scam rather than a conventional hack of its infrastructure.

Days after the disclosure, a group using the name iamnotavillain published an online demand.

It asked for payment equivalent to about $3 million in Monero within 24 hours and threatened to sell the records to other criminal groups if the money was not paid.

The Financial Times reported that the group said it had used a compromised Italian government email system to pose as law enforcement and that it had chosen targets through blockchain analysis.

The same group told the newspaper it had not negotiated privately with Revolut and was using the website to make its first public demand.

Revolut’s response was unambiguous.

A spokesperson told Reuters that the company had received no direct contact or demand from the individuals or group making the claims.

Similar statements were given to other outlets.

The distinction matters: a public countdown on a third-party site is not the same as a ransom note delivered to the bank itself.

The case has drawn attention because it exploited a routine compliance process rather than a software vulnerability.

Banks and payment firms are required to respond to legitimate government and law-enforcement requests.

When those requests arrive from an authenticated official domain, technical checks can still pass.

The incident therefore raises questions about how financial firms verify the substance of legal demands even when the sending infrastructure looks genuine.

Revolut says it has already informed the small number of affected customers and offered support.

Italian authorities have begun examining the reported compromise of government email accounts.

As of mid-September 2026 there was no independent confirmation that the records had been sold after the public deadline passed.

The episode leaves Revolut managing reputational risk rather than a collapse of its core systems. For customers whose identity documents and transaction histories were handed over, the practical danger is targeted fraud or further extortion attempts that sit outside any payment the company itself might or might not make.