Home Blog

US 10-Year yield rises to highest since 2007 as Fed looms


The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose to the highest in almost two decades, the latest milestone in a bruising global bond selloff driven by booming capital investment and soaring energy prices that are exacerbating inflation.

Processing Content

The yield, which serves as a benchmark for borrowing costs across the globe, rose as much as five basis points to 5.04% on Tuesday, the highest since 2007, before wrapping up the New York session at 5.00%. The jump came after oil prices jumped anew on concern that crude supplies could be further choked off as the war in the Middle East widens.

The bond slump raises the stakes ahead of the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate decision on Wednesday, when investors expect officials to raise short-term borrowing costs for the first time since 2023. If they don’t hike, or if Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh is noncommittal about additional increases, traders may demand even higher yields on long-term bonds to safeguard their investments against the risk that inflation will remain elevated.

“It would be very difficult for the Fed to leave rates unchanged this week without eroding its inflation-fighting credibility,” said Vail Hartman, a strategist at BMO Capital Markets. “The market is vulnerable to not only an unexpected hold, but also a dovish hike that entails a more patient takeaway from the dot-plot or press conference.”

Bond yields have been rising globally since the U.S. and Israel launched an assault on Iran in late February, disrupting the supply of Middle Eastern oil and gas. That’s on top of other factors such as massive corporate borrowing to fund artificial intelligence spending, which is both flooding markets with debt and pumping stimulus into an already resilient U.S. economy.

It also comes as the amount of debt governments issue continues to rise, both to refinance maturing bonds and to fund deficit spending. Central banks are no longer hoovering up government bonds as part of their quantitative easing programs, and demand from other traditional buyers is cooling — resulting in a greater reliance on more price-sensitive investors. 

“The scope for long-end yields to fall is somewhat limited given that we don’t see signs of weakness in the real economy and supply/dynamics in the Treasury market are very different relative to 2007,” Phoebe White, head of U.S. rates strategy at UBS Group AG, said via email. “Structural demand for U.S. Treasuries, particularly among foreign official investors, is materially weaker.”

The US Treasury Department in Washington, DC.

Alex Wroblewski/Bloomberg

A Bloomberg gauge of returns on Treasuries has declined around 1% since the start of the month, and is down 1.6% this year. Around a third of fund managers surveyed by Bank of America Corp. identified a disorderly rise in bond yields as the biggest “tail risk” to the market, ahead of an AI bubble or second wave of inflation.

The drop in U.S. government bonds is part of a broader global move that’s seen Germany’s 10-year yield rise to the highest since 2009, while Australia’s equivalent rate touched a 15-year high. Bonds in Japan also retreated Tuesday.

An auction of 20-year Treasury bonds at 1 p.m. New York time drew the highest yield in data going back to 2020, when the U.S. reintroduced it. Demand fell short of expectations despite the lofty yield.

In the U.S., the rise in the 10-year rate is particularly important because it serves as a baseline to price other loans such as mortgages. That makes its rise a headache for President Donald Trump ahead of midterm elections, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having previously said that lowering 10-year yields was a key goal of the administration. 

Tuesday’s selloff is the latest assault by bond bears on the 5% level, a closely watched threshold. Such round numbers are often seized on as key pivot points that can catalyze decisions by investors and policymakers.

Some speculate that investors in other asset classes will be tempted to lock in roughly 5% annualized returns for the next decade, potentially diverting cash away from the stock market. 

“Through 5%, it starts to get worrisome for risk assets,” said Jesse Marre, a senior portfolio manager at Hilbert Group.

The worry for bondholders is that there aren’t enough dip buyers to quell the jump in rates, perhaps because energy prices keep rising or should the Fed disappoint. In that scenario, the cost of borrowing for the US government — and by extension anyone seeking U.S. dollars — could enter a trading range not seen in a generation.  

“Could things get even more sinister? Yes, where a break above 5% on the 10-year yield does nothing more than bring 6% into focus,” said Padhraic Garvey, head of research for the Americas at ING Groep NV. “Such a journey from 5% to 6% would be a far tougher one for the wider market to stomach.”



Quantum Stocks That Could 10X Before 2030!



TSXV: SCAN | OTCQB: LDDFF

You missed #Nvidia when it was under $10 — don’t make the same mistake with quantum computing. This video breaks down the top quantum stocks driving the next trillion-dollar revolution and why early investors are positioning now. From #MSFT and #Amazon’s early moves to emerging leaders like #IonQ, these companies are building the foundation for the future of computing, AI, and cybersecurity.

#QuantumStocks #Investing #Microsoft #Amazon #Google #IonQ #Nvidia

📬 FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Updates and insights on the economy and investments with invest-X BWB Insights:

👉 TOOLS & GEAR I USE
– 😍 Awesome Dividend & Portfolio Tracker:
– 💹RESEARCH: Seeking Alpha :
– 📊FORECASTING: Analyst forecasts & Research:
– 🎥 My Equipment:

📺 OTHER VIDEOS YOU’LL ENJOY!
💰 Our Top 10 Stocks to Set It & Forget It! →
📈 Top 5 AI Stocks Blowing Up and Cheap! →
🚨 The ONLY Quantum Stock I’m Buying! →

00:00 – Intro
01:36 – Quantum Trinity
02:15 – Infrastructure Stocks
02:24 – NVDA
03:49 – MSFT
04:28 – GOOGL
05:06 – AMZN
06:16 – IBM
09:53 – Pure Plays
10:13 – IONQ
11:45 – RGTI
13:03 – QBTS
14:22 – Penny Dreamers
14:47 – Quantum Computing
15:33 – LAES
16:33 – Aquit
17:12 – Mcloud
18:20 – ETF Options
20:04 – Investment Breakout
21:45 – Baseline vs Quantum Foundation Layer
22:14 – Pure Play Projections
23:11 – $25 Invested
23:31 – Penny Stock Dreams
24:23 – $5 Invested
24:53 – Recap of Investment Projections

LET’S CONNECT:
– Instagram:
– LinkedIn:
– Business Inquiries: ateambwb@gmail.com

DISCLAIMER: Links on this page may be affiliate links which have no cost to you, but I may earn a commission for anyone that signs up or makes a purchase from those sites.

A portion of this video was disseminated on behalf of Liberty Defense, and was funded by Gold Standard Media LLC and/or affiliates. For our full disclaimer, please visit:

All opinions expressed by Brian are solely provided as content. Do not treat any opinion by Brian as gospel that needs to be recreated. Brian is not a fiduciary or financial advisor. All financial topics are for illustration where the outcomes are not guaranteed or expected. There exists real risks in all forms of investment, so do your homework and make your own decisions.

source

This Is Better Than the 1% Rule (New Real Estate Rule)


Dave:
This is the new 1% rule for real estate investors. For decades, investors use the 1% rule to pick markets and properties. If a house’s rent was more than 1% of the purchase price, it would probably cash flow. But today, 1% rule deals are almost impossible to find in most places. And that rule was created when interest rates and insurance payments and property taxes were much lower. Recently, I’ve been using a new different metric, the rent to payment ratio. It’s rent divided by your full mortgage payment, including principal, interest, taxes, and insurance. And in my own deal analysis, it’s been a much more reliable predictor of cashflow in 2026. So today I’m going deep on this 1% rule 2.0, what it does and doesn’t reveal about a property, the sweet spot ratio I’d target instead of just chasing the highest number and the full ranking of the top rent to payment markets across the US.
This is the new cashflow math you need to know.
What’s up everyone? I’m Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. And today I’m going full data nerd on you guys with a new investing metric, the rent to payment ratio. Now, if you’re investing back in the 2010s or even a couple of years ago, you may have heard of a rent to price ratio or you may have heard of the 1% rule as a rule of thumb for measuring cash flow. That rule of thumb is exactly what it sounded like. You would compare one month of rent to the purchase price of a property. And if it was at or near 1%, your deal was probably going to cash flow. If it was higher than 1%, you were probably getting a great cash flowing deal. And it was a really useful metric for a really long time. During the 2010s when interest rates were lower and taxes were lower and insurance was lower, it worked really well, but it has become a little bit outdated.
I personally haven’t used rent to price ratios in my own underwriting and analysis for a while because I don’t think it actually tells me that much anymore. First and foremost, it’s really hard to find 1% rule deals right now. And it can be really discouraging using a benchmark from a different era when cashflow was easier to find in today’s market because you’re probably missing good deals and good opportunities using an outdated metric. The other thing is that sometimes now when you use rent to price ratio, you might find a deal that looks really good by rent to price, but if it’s in an area that has super high property taxes or super high insurance, it might not actually cash flow and you could actually be getting a false positive because of an outdated metric. So instead, I created a new metric. It is a slight variation on a debt service coverage ratio.
If you’re familiar with that or if you’ve used a DSCR loan before, this will be very familiar to you. I didn’t make this up out of thin air. But what I did was pull together a bunch of different data sources that don’t normally talk to each other to create this new metric. What it is, is the rent to payment ratio. So instead of comparing rent to the purchase price of a property, what I’m doing is comparing the rent to what you’re actually paying to your mortgage company each and every month. This is also known as your debt service. That’s why it’s similar to a debt service coverage ratio. Your full debt service includes your principal that’s paying down your mortgage, interest, that’s the profit that goes to the bank, your taxes, super important in this new era of real estate because taxes have gone up a lot and insurance also really important in this new era of real estate.
That has gone up a lot, particularly in some markets that are prone to natural disasters. By doing this, you’re better incorporating the expenses that investors are facing on a day-to-day basis. Instead of just saying that the purchase price of a property is indicative of what your expenses are going to be, this actually measures the majority of your expenses, but it is not a substitute for underwriting your deal. Once you’ve looked at these deals and thought, okay, this one has at least the benchmark level of cash flow that I am looking for, that’s when you go put it in the BiggerPockets calculator, do the full analysis, understand how this deal is going to add to your portfolio, how it’s going to move you towards financial freedom over time. You can’t substitute that stuff. You got to do it. But by using this rent to payment ratio, you’re going to be able to look through markets and deals so much quicker.
So if you want to calculate this for yourself, it’s actually quite easy. All you need to know is one month of rent and your total mortgage payment. So if you’re looking at a deal, just estimate the rent, estimate what the mortgage payment’s going to be, divide the rent by the mortgage payment, and you got it. The higher the number, the better cash flow potential it’s going to have. And actually we’ll talk about this in a minute, but 1% is actually a pretty good benchmark similar to the rent to price ratio for this new metric. If you are getting a 1% rent to payment ratio or better, you’re going to cash flow, but you do not need to get 1%. I want you to know that. We’ll talk about different tiers, but I’ll just give you a little bit of a preview. If you’re at like 0.7, 0.75 or above, you’re probably going to have cash flow potential.
You still have to go analyze the deals to figure out what it’s going to be, but 1% is not a hard and fast cutoff rule, but if you’re close to 1%, you should feel pretty good about that market or about that deal. So calculating it for yourself on an individual deal, super easy. You’re just taking two numbers and dividing them. Calculating it on a market level is just a little bit trickier because you need to know the average taxes and average insurance. I was able to gather the top 54 biggest markets in the country. I figured out all this information for you and I will share that with you in just a minute and you can download it for free on the BiggerPockets website as well. All right, so hopefully this all makes sense and you’re bought in on this new rule of thumb. I’m clearly stoked about it.
I’ve been using it and think it works really well. I’m going to show you the market rankings and I’m actually going to just walk you through how to use this with a real deal, but we do have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back.
Today we are talking about the new 1% rule for real estate investors. Instead of using the outdated rent to price ratio, we’re going to be talking about and using the rent to payment ratio where you compare one month of rent to your mortgage payment rather than comparing rent to the purchase price of the property. We are going to talk about how to use this when analyzing a deal. It’s super easy, but I’m going to show you and walk you through some actual real live deals in just a minute. But first, I want to show you this spreadsheet that ranks some of the top markets in the country by this new ratio that I created. So what I did was I actually went out and gathered data from a bunch of different sources, but I used Zillow data for home values. I know people get all up in arms about zestimates and zestimates on any individual property can vary a lot, I admit that.
But actually when you aggregate zestimates and look at a whole county or a whole city level, it’s pretty accurate. I’ve looked into this, it is pretty accurate. We’re also doing the same thing with rents. So when you aggregate the data, it’s pretty accurate. I know if your property’s estimate is off, I’ve seen that many times or your neighbor’s is off, I get it. That definitely does happen. But this data for our purposes here, I do think is reliable. We also, I just found a bunch of different tax sources and aggregated those and insurance costs as well. Keep in mind, these are averages. They are not going to be the same for every single property, but what I found is that there are sort of like 10, I would say, elite level cash flow cities in the country right now. These are cities where the average deal has a rent to payment ratio of 1% or above.
Those cities, if you’re in one of these 10 cities, it is going to be much easier for you to find cash flow than any other city. Now keep in mind, other cities will cash flow. A lot of these other cities on this list will cash flow, but these ones are going to be the easiest. So those 10 are, I’m going to start with number 10 and I’ll just count down. So this is the 10th best is Milwaukee. That’s at 0.99. I’m rounded up to 1%, 0.99. Then we have Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Baltimore, Maryland, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, St. Louis, Missouri, Hartford, Connecticut, Birmingham, Alabama, Memphis, Tennessee, Cleveland, Ohio, and Detroit, Michigan. Now you’ll probably notice a pattern here. Eight out of 10 here are in the Midwest and all 10 of them are relatively inexpensive markets. The most expensive market on this list with the highest median home value is Philadelphia at 248,000.
That is well below the national average, which is about 440 right now. But the other markets like Milwaukee’s at 195, Pittsburgh’s at 198, Cleveland 135, and Detroit really stands alone at $72,000. So if you’re in any of these markets, cashflow is going to be easier to find than any other markets in the country. Now you still have to go out and find the right deals, but if you are an investor wondering where to invest, this is such a good way to create a short list. You shouldn’t use this to pick the whole market, but if you say cashflow is a priority to me, the first 10 or 20 on this list is where I would start my further research. And we’ve talked a lot on the show about how to do more research into a market because you can’t just use cashflow. You need to figure out are there good economic prospects?
What are the appreciation is going to be? What’s happening with population? You still have to do all of that, but if I were a cashflow focused investor, I’d take the first 10 or 15 here and then figure out which of them has the best blend of other metrics that are in line with my long-term strategy. So for me, I’m not a pure cash flow investor. So what I would be looking for is what’s a good hybrid market? I want a market that is going to appreciate and I’m willing to sacrifice cash flow for some of that appreciation. So when I’m just eyeballing this list, I would say places like Hartford, Connecticut stand out to me. Philadelphia is a good market. Indianapolis, Columbus, Ohio, those are still below 1% during the top 15 or so, but still really good markets with strong fundamentals, exciting things happening and do offer good cashflow.
Now, if you’re looking at this on YouTube, you’ll see that I’ve ranked the markets green, yellow, red. And if you’re listening on audio, I’ll just let you know. The top 10, the ones I named to you, those are green. Those are kind of like the elite level cashflow markets. Then I brought in another 19 markets are in yellow and those are going to be solid cash flow markets. You could probably still find cashflow in any of these markets with the exception of New York. New York just has some unique idiosyncrasies here where it’s on this list, but I don’t think you could probably find cashflow there. But all the other ones here, maybe not Minneapolis, but a lot of them, you will be able to find cashflow on these deals because two things here. First and foremost, 1% rule is not dogma. It is not the be-all end-all.
It is just telling you how likely it is you are to find cash flow. The second thing to remember here is these are averages. So if you’re looking at a city like Buffalo, New York, I’m just picking one random, it has a rent to payment ratio of 0.89. That means that’s the average of all of the deals. So as an investor, you better not be looking for average deals, right? If it’s at 0.89, that means by rule, just the math, half of the deals in that market are better than 0.89. And so your job as the investor is to go out and find that deal that is better than 0.89. That is a really good way to use this metric. Even if you’re in some of these lower markets, I think Dallas is a great example. It’s actually in my third tier by rent to payment ratio at 0.74.
It’s not terrible. That’s still pretty good, but Dallas is a great market. So can you go out and find a deal in Dallas at 0.9? I bet you can because half the deals in that city are going to be above 0.74. And so just knowing that 0.74 is the average and that average is kind of low, your goal should be to say, “Hey, how much can I beat that average by? How much can I beat 0.74 by?” And you can do this in almost every market. Now I’m not going to say every market cash flows like when you get down to the bottom of this list, San Jose, California, Austin, Texas, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, these markets are probably not going to cashflow. They just aren’t. It’s really, really challenging. Now, I want to just call out a couple of things here. As we’re looking at the bottom here, there are some markets here that used to be great cash flow markets.
I’m looking at Houston here that for a long time had a good cash flow rate or Oklahoma City, for example, which had pretty strong cash flow. I want to just show you in Oklahoma City where the average rent is $1,130, the average insurance per month is $814. So this is why the rent to payment ratio is important is because if you’re just comparing the rent to the home value in Oklahoma City, you’re missing the most important variable here for investors, which is that your insurance is going to take up about 75% of your monthly rent, just the insurance. You see similar things in Denver, right? Denver has super high insurance. Houston has really high insurance. Houston has the double whammy of high insurance and high taxes. If you put the average taxes and insurance for Houston together, it’s 1,100 bucks. Meanwhile, your rent is under 1,700.
So just looking at this in Houston, on average, you can see your monthly payment is significantly more than your rent. There’s no way you’re going to get cash flow unless you get a screaming deal. And obviously, I should have said this earlier, but these are for on-market deals, so they’re as is. So if you’re doing a heavy renovation and a burr, you can reconsider this, right? The way you would do that is by evaluating the future rent that you’re going to get once you renovate the property by your future payment, once you refinance. That’s how I would look at it. Future rent, future payment, calculate your rent to payment ratio that way. One other thing I want to call out is on the total opposite end of the spectrum, these markets, Detroit, which really stands alone in terms of its rent to payment ratio. It’s at two.
That’s really high. The average payment in Detroit right now is $642, where the average rent is nearly $1,300. That’s amazing. So if you’re looking for pure cash flow, Detroit stands alone. But Detroit, similar to Cleveland and to Memphis and to Birmingham, certainly these first four markets at least, there are trade-offs in these markets. They may not appreciate in the same way that other markets do. Now, a lot of them have been growing in recent years, but in this new great stall era, I do personally expect a reversion to the mean for a lot of these high flying cities. That doesn’t mean they’re necessarily going to turn negative, although some of them could turn modestly negative. It’s just important that you understand the fundamentals. Detroit is recovering as a city, but as an example, its population has really declined since the financial crisis. And so there is an oversupply of homes.
There might be high vacancy rates. This is why you can’t just take this metric and use it to evaluate everything. If you really want cash flow, look at Detroit, but make sure you’re buying in a good pocket of Detroit where there’s going to be strong rental demand and home values are going to go up. You can do that. That absolutely exists in Detroit. I’ve been looking at deals there. That definitely works. That works in Cleveland, but don’t just assume because it’s the highest rent to payment ratio that it’s automatically a good buy. So that’s how you use this at a market level. Again, you use it by comparing to one another the relative availability of cash flow. And then two, once you pick market, knowing what the average is and then using that to set a baseline for what your deals are going to be.
They’re going to have to beat that level. That’s how you use it at a market level, but it’s also really valuable at a property level. And to show you how to do that, I’m just going to actually pull up a listing. But before we do that, we have to take one more quick break. We’ll be right back.
Before the break, we talked about how to calculate this and how to use it at a market level, but I’m just going to show you how to use it at a property level. And to do that, I am going to look for a property in Memphis. I just use my list and instead of using Detroit because it’s kind of an outlier, I just picked another one of the high up markets that have a strong rent to payment ratio. And I’m going to just pick the first one here on our list on Zillow. I’m just going through Zillow. I just searched for multifamily here. And we found a property on Harbord Avenue. It is listed at $340,000. It’s a six bed, two bath built in 1927, a little bit older, but it is 3,200 square feet and actually looks nice. The bricks had some tuck pointing, so there’s some work done there.
The roof is in pretty good shape, but it’s got some charm. It’s a nice house. Seems like it’s in a decent neighborhood for sure. What I would do if I were looking at this deal is first and foremost, I always look at the pictures just to see is this place reasonable? And I actually like what I’m seeing here. We got hardwood floors, we have fresh paint. The kitchen definitely needs an updating, which I like personally. I think that’s great. That’s a sign of a cosmetic rehab opportunity. Yard needs a little bit of work, but it’s not bad. There’s a nice fence. It’s a good property. So what I would do in this scenario is just quickly calculate the rent to payment ratio. And lucky for us, if we look at this duplex, they have listed the actual leases, so we don’t even need to estimate the rent here.
What we know here is that our rent is going to be 1,255 for the lower and 1,385 for the upper unit. And what we get there is 2,640. So this property is pulling in 2,640. So already in my head, I’m asking myself, is my monthly payment on this mortgage going to be more or less than 2,640? Let’s find out. To do that, I’m just going to pull up the BiggerPockets mortgage calculator and figure out what our payment is going to be. So I’m going to just assume that we’re paying full price for this. So my loan amount, if I’m putting out 25% as an investor, is going to be $255,000. I’m going to do a 30-year fixed. Interest rate’s probably around seven right now. Our annual taxes, they’re pretty high, are $9,800. And on the listing, the insurance is estimated at $1,350 a year. So I’m going to just hit calculate my monthly mortgage payment.
And what we got here is $2,625. So this is darn close to a 1% rule deal. Pretty good, right? Because what we found is that our monthly payment is $2,625. Our monthly rent is $2,640. And if you do 2,640 divided by 2,625, it’s basically 1.01%. So we got a 1% rule here in Memphis, but remember in Memphis, our average deal was going to be 1.17. And so while this deal probably will cash flow, it is probably not the best cashflow opportunity we can find in Memphis because we know that on average, the ratio is a bit higher. Now, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy this deal because when I look at this deal, I’m like, can I fix this thing up, put 20 grand into it and bring our rents from 2,640 up to 2,800 or 2,900? If so, might be worth buying this deal.
But if I’m looking for a turnkey kind of investment where I just put tenants in, because this place is nice enough, you could just put tenants in, this probably isn’t the best pure cashflow opportunity. So the way I would look at this and use this ratio is instead I would look for another deal. So let’s just see if we can find another one. Let’s look at this duplex instead. This is a six bed, three bath. It’s cheaper. So it’s about $300,000. The kitchens are a little bit older, but it’s still in decent shape. You could definitely rent this out today. The kitchens I would put a little bit of money on if it were me, but you could rent this right now. Now these are big units. They’re three bed, two bath. And so I’m going to assume that I can get 2,500 bucks in rent for this.
And so we’re taking out a smaller loan at 2.25, and then our annual taxes are going to be cheaper at around 7,000. Our insurance, I’m just going to assume is going to be the same. And now we’re getting 2,192. So this is a better cash flowing deal. So 2,500 divided by 2,192, what do we got? Now we have 1.14. This is closer to the average for the area. So this is a deal I would consider personally. I think this is a better cash flowing opportunity. I think there’s a better upside on this deal personally for a cosmetic rehab because if you just look at it, we could maybe drive the rents up to 2,800 on this by fixing it up. It’s a nice property, but just needs some work inside. And the other thing I like about this is this one’s been sitting on Zillow for 55 days.
So I’m probably going to get this below what they’re asking at 295, right? Let’s just assume we get a little bit of a discount. We get it at 280. If we do that and update our payment, now we’re at 2076. If we divide 2,500 by 2076, now we’re at a 1.2. So even if you don’t do the renovation, if you just buy this at a little bit of a discount, 15 grand off after sitting for 55 days, you buy this thing at a discount, now you’re getting a 1.2. Now that’s above the average. Now you’d go do the renovation, that’s a really good opportunity. So of course I would have to do more due diligence and do a full analysis on the BiggerPockets calculators to understand if this is the kind of deal that I want to buy. But just in those five minutes I just showed you, that first deal I thought was going to be good.
I looked at it and I was like, this is going to be a good deal. And it was, it probably would cashflow, but two minutes later, I found another deal that has better cashflow opportunity. Still going to do analysis on the second one, but it allows me to say, I’m better off spending my time digging into that second deal than I am the first one. That’s what rules of thumb are for. They’re not the absolute be all end all of any analysis. They’re used to help you save time and to eliminate deals that are clearly not going to work and to spend your time on the deals that have a high potential of penciling out. So go out and do this for yourself. Hopefully you can see how useful this is. We will put a link to the spreadsheet for the markets below and then go out and calculate this on deals on Zillow, Redfin, Realtor, whatever you use.
Go check out some deals and see if it works. Go see where the best rent to payment ratios are in your market or compare between two different markets and see which one have a better cashflow perspective. Once you’ve done that, go really work hard to estimate your rents, estimate your expenses, put all of that into the BiggerPockets calculator. You just go to biggerpockets.com/calculator, go calculate the deal, see what the cash on cash return is going to be, what your annualized return over time is going to be. You still got to make great offers. You got to do the work, but this rule of thumb I think will help you streamline your deal flow and your analysis so much. It’s been helping me a lot and hopefully this completely free tool that you can use can help you find your next deal as well. Before we go though, I do just want to reiterate, although higher rent to payment ratio does indicate better cash flow potential, the higher the number does not mean that is a better deal.
You heard me just talking through those two deals. Some deals are going to have better opportunity for value add. They’re going to be in a better neighborhood. They’re going to have better demand. So you need to think about that. And I actually think oftentimes if the rent to payment ratio is too high, that’s actually a red flag because there’s something wrong with that property. If it is priced really inefficiently, sometimes it happens where some people just price properties poorly. I’ve been the beneficiary of that several times in my career. It sometimes happens, but it’s a red flag too. It’s something you need to investigate. I think in this kind of market, if you can find a deal that’s in the 0.8 to 1.1 ratio, that’s probably going to be pretty good. That’s after you do a renovation. So the deal you might buy might not pencil, but if you’re going to do a cosmetic rehab or you’re going to do a rehab and drive up the rents, if you can get in that 0.8 to 1.1, you’re probably going to find a good deal.
Again, it’s a rule of thumb. It’s not going to work for every single time. This is just a means of filtering deals, and I’d love to hear how it works for you. Like I said, it’s been working for me, but let me know in the comments if this new ratio, this new rule of thumb, this new 1% rule is something you’re going to be using in your own investing. I would love to hear how you’re using it. Share it with the BiggerPockets community. That’s our episode for today. Thank you so much for watching this episode of the BiggerPockets Podcast. We’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Execution-Led Adaptability Is the New Supply Chain Advantage









Execution-Led Adaptability Is the New Supply Chain Advantage – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM INFIOS




























Skip to content


Amazon Kindle Unlimited: 3 Months Free


The Offer

Amazon Kindle Unlimited subscription three months free (affiliate links here and below)

  • Get three months of Amazon Kindle Unlimited for free. 
  • For the fourth month and onward you’ll be charged the regular $11.99/month unless you cancel. 

Offer valid through October 8, 2026. 

Our Verdict

Check to make sure the offer is correct before signing up; I believe this deal is only working for Prime members. And set up a reminder to cancel before the fourth charge if you don’t want to keep it. You might be able to cancel immediately after signup and still keep the 3 months paid membership.

This is another lead up deal to the Prime Day Big Deal Days event (10/6/26 – 10/7/26). 

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, says he’s living in an Airstream trailer while xAI expands



Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, has some new digs—an Airstream trailer in Memphis, parked just steps from xAI’s most ambitious project yet.

Musk, who has a net worth of $917 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index and became the world’s first trillionaire for 12 days in June, said Monday he was in his new “palace” as he spoke during a taping of the All-In podcast alongside Gwynne Shotwell, the president and chief operating officer of SpaceX.

Shotwell, for her part, praised Musk’s latest unusual home as an example of his long history of committing fully to projects he cares about throughout his career.

“This is Elon, by the way, doing what people don’t believe he does. He sleeps on the factory floor. He’s in Memphis, helping build buildings,” she said during the interview.

Musk is in Memphis as xAI races to expand Colossus, a massive supercomputer center that has provided it with so much computing power that it has struck deals to provide excess capacity to Google and Anthropic for billions. The company started building Colossus in 2024 to provide compute for Grok, xAI’s large language model, and the initial build reportedly took only 122 days.

While putting a data center in space could still be far off, Memphis has emerged as the center of xAI’s infrastructure buildout here on Earth. In late July, the company announced it would build a fourth data center called Minihard that will add to its other facilities.

Musk did not say which Airstream model he was living in, but some of the aluminum-shelled campers pack a sleeping area, kitchen, and bathroom into a 16-foot space.

Still, Musk has been known to want to sleep close to the action when a new project interested him or required his direct attention. When Musk and his brother Kimbal were building their first startup, Zip2, in the ‘90s, they slept in a tiny Palo Alto office for six months while showering at the YMCA, according to Walter Isaacson’s biography of Musk. 

Even as a newfound multi-millionaire, having received $22 million from selling Zip2 to Compaq, Musk slept under his desk most nights as he prepared to launch X.com, the online bank that would later become PayPal, in 1999, according to Isaacson’s biography.

Even when he rose to the rank of super wealthy, having received another approximately $175 million from eBay’s acquisition of PayPal, he often stayed at colleagues’ homes while traveling in Silicon Valley, including the home of Michael Marks, who briefly served as Tesla CEO in 2007 before the pair clashed and Musk later took over the role.

Musk’s habit of finding a resting place close to the action was even more pronounced during the “production hell” era in 2017 and 2018 when Tesla aimed to churn out 5,000 Model 3s per week, nearly double the rate it was producing previously.

“It was a frenzy of insanity,” he told Isaacson of that time. “We were getting four or five hours’ sleep, often on the floor. I remember thinking, ‘I’m like on the ragged edge of sanity.’”

During that production rush, he spent Thanksgiving Day at the factory with some of his sons because he had asked workers to work that day as well, wrote Isaacson.

Finally, when in 2022 he purchased the social media website Twitter , which would later become X, Musk claimed a couch in the company’s seventh-floor library and slept there as he pushed employees to realize his vision of turning Twitter into a “digital town square.” He said in an interview with journalist Bari Weiss that he needed to sleep in the office because the company was in a “code-red situation.”

To be sure, Musk didn’t shy away from spending his money on lavish homes for years. He bought a mansion in the Bel Air neighborhood of Los Angeles, complete with seven bedrooms, 11 bathrooms, a tennis court, and a two-story library for $17 million in 2012, according to his biography. He also owned a $32 million Mediterranean-style estate in Silicon Valley and bought late actor Gene Wilder’s home in 2013 to try to preserve it. 

In 2020, though, Musk sold many of his properties and moved with his then-partner Claire Boucher, known as Grimes, to Texas, where they lived in a small, $50,000 house he was renting from SpaceX near the company’s Starbase facility in Boca Chica. 

Now, with xAI’s Memphis expansion heating up, Musk seems to want to be close to the action once again, and he’s traded in the factory floor, at least, for the comfort of his own trailer.

Industry veteran warns that the ‘low-rate cavalry’ isn’t showing up


Not only have refinances been limited, but a new challenge has arrived for brokers. Borrowers coming through the door increasingly do not fit the profile agency lending was built around in the first place, pushing more loans into the non-agency space.

Bill Dallas (pictured top), chairman of Dallas Capital, has spent more than 40 years in the mortgage industry, including building companies through the last non-agency boom in the 1990s and 2000s. He said the mistake he sees most often among clients is treating this cycle as temporary.

“Look, you’ve been in this mess for a while, and the low-rate cavalry, you kept praying that these guys are going to show up,” Dallas told Mortgage Professional America. “I’ve tried to tell my clients that that’s not going to happen. They want to think about it as episodic. What I’m trying to get them to think about is, guys, this is structural.”

The wrong market conditions

Dallas said the current market conditions make agency lending a bad match for many customers coming in the door.

“Agency serves you really well in a purchase-driven, owner-occupied, low-rate environment, especially with employed borrowers,” he said. “We’re in a market with things they don’t do well: cash-out, HELOCs, second mortgages. They don’t want to talk about non-owner-occupied, and they don’t like self-employed.”

This ₹9000 Finance course is Free !!!!



This ₹9000 Finance course is Free !!!!
Complete Personal Finance in 30 Minutes
Once You Learn Personal Finance, You Can’t Be MANIPULATED Anymore

Video about:- 99% log paise ke matrix mein phanse hain kyunki unhe ‘Income’ aur ‘Wealth’ ka asli farq nahi pata. Is masterclass mein Kaju aur Mota Bhai ke practical examples se samjhiye budgeting, compounding, aur leverage ke wo bare minimum basics jo aapko debt trap se nikal kar true financial freedom tak le jayenge. Money is just a tool; learn how to master it!

📚 500,000+ eBooks :

🎓 Join on Telegram:

Topics covered

00:00 The Money Problem Nobody Taught You
00:39 How Money Was Invented
01:29 What Your Work Is Really Worth
02:43 Kaju vs Motabhai
03:33 What Money Actually Is
04:21 Income vs Wealth
05:07 Assets vs Liabilities
06:06 Lifestyle Inflation
06:35 Time Value of Money & Compounding
07:45 Cash Flow
08:36 Budgeting & The 50/30/20 Rule
09:31 Pay Yourself First
09:54 Saving vs Investing
10:20 The Saving Pyramid
11:43 How Banks Actually Work
12:19 Fractional Reserve Banking
12:58 RBI & The Repo Rate
14:14 Debt & Credit Score
15:01 The EMI Trap
15:41 UPI, Credit Cards & Cashless Spending
16:21 The Power & Danger of Leverage
17:43 Buy, Borrow, Die
18:06 Why You Need Insurance
19:14 Understanding CIBIL Score
19:57 Investing Basics
20:28 Risk, Return & Diversification
21:40 Financial Independence
22:10 Retirement Planning
22:53 Net Worth
23:33 Needs vs Wants
24:07 Inflation
24:35 Taxes & Other Financial Concepts
25:24 Passive Income
25:56 Behavioral Finance & Financial Scams
27:04 The Lifestyle Inflation Trap
27:20 Complete Financial Recap
28:06 The Complete Money System
28:52 Your Path to Financial Freedom

Disclaimer

“Quick disclaimer before we start!
This video is just for education and entertainment,
not actual financial advice. We’ve used some AI images
and pictures of famous people in a funny way to explain
things better—no disrespect intended to anyone. Also,
some video clips and images belong to their original owners.
If you own any of this content and want it removed
or credited, please email us first before giving a
copyright strike.”

Money Basics, Finance Basics, Wealth vs Income, Financial Literacy, Budgeting Tips, Saving and, Investing, Compound Interest, Inflation Explained, Cash Flow Management, How Money Works
Financial Literacy in Hindi, Personal Finance for Beginners, Income vs Wealth, Power of Compounding in Hindi, 50 30 20 Budgeting Rule, How Banks Make Money, Good Debt vs Bad Debt, Investment for Beginners in India, Financial Freedom, Money Masterclass
finance,stock market india,bank,banking,financial literacy,financial illiteracy,indian finance,how to invest,finances,finance education,xplained in minutes,financial literacy for beginners, finance masterclass

for any enquiry contact hello.learnnest@gmail.com
Thanks

source

DOJ Sues Hawaii, Utah, Arkansas And D.C. Over In-State Tuition, Reaching 25 States


The Justice Department filed complaints last week against Hawaii, Utah, Arkansas and the District of Columbia over laws that let students without lawful immigration status pay in-state resident tuition rates at public colleges. Those four filings bring the department’s total to 25 cases, and every state with a similar law has now been sued.

Each complaint focuses on two issues: the residency provisions that set the tuition rate, and the separate state scholarship and grant programs that run alongside them.

This is a simple matter of federal law: colleges cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,” Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate said in the department’s announcement. Associate Attorney General Stanley E. Woodward, Jr. said the filings mean “no more placing illegal aliens over American citizens on this Department of Justice’s watch.”

The same two-count structure appeared in the late-August suits against Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington, which took the count to 21.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

The money at stake is the tuition differential, and it is large. Average published tuition and fees at public four-year schools ran $11,950 for in-state students in 2025-26 and $31,880 for out-of-state students, according to the College Board’s Trends in College Pricing 2025. That’s a gap of $19,930 a year before housing.

At individual flagships the spread runs wider still: Arizona State’s resident and non-resident rates differ by roughly $14,800.

Students in this group also have no access to federal aid programs. They cannot receive Pell Grants or Direct Student Loans, so a reclassification means this group of students would have to make up the difference with cash or private scholarships.

The Scoreboard So Far

  • Six state laws already enjoined: Texas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Illinois and Kansas.
  • Kansas lost in court the day before this round of filings. U.S. District Judge Holly Teeter entered a permanent injunction against KSA 76-731a on September 10, ruling the 2004 statute preempted because it “confers a postsecondary education benefit on an unlawfully present alien based on a state-defined residency conclusion without making that same benefit generally available to United States citizens,” Kansas Reflector reported. Governor Laura Kelly criticized the outcome and efforts by students to intervene were denied.
  • The Fifth Circuit closed the door in Texas on September 8, denying petitions for reconsideration of its July 9 decision, according to the Presidents’ Alliance litigation tracker. MALDEF is seeking further review.
  • Kentucky ended by consent decree on March 31, 2026, with an appeal noted days later. Illinois lost its tuition and related aid provisions on July 24 and did not appeal. Oklahoma’s order dates to August 2025.
  • Minnesota is the outlier. A district court dismissed the federal challenge there on March 27, 2026, finding that federal law does not preempt the state’s eligibility criteria. The government appealed to the Eighth Circuit on May 1.
  • Fifteen cases remain active, including California, New York, Virginia, Colorado, Maryland, New Jersey and the four Western states sued in August.

That record is lopsided but not unanimous, and Minnesota is the reason the question is still open at the appellate level. A circuit split between the Fifth and Eighth would be the cleanest path to Supreme Court review.

The Legal Argument

Every complaint is about 8 U.S.C. § 1623(a), the 1996 provision barring a state from making an unlawfully present immigrant eligible “on the basis of residency” for a postsecondary benefit unless citizens qualify for the same benefit regardless of where they live.

The DOJ pairs that with the Supremacy Clause and asks for declaratory judgments plus permanent injunctions. The mechanics matter for anyone tracking residency requirements at public universities: the theory targets residency-based classification itself, not immigration status as an eligibility screen, which is why the scholarship counts travel with the tuition counts.

How This Connects

The College Investor has followed these cases since it stood at 12 states with the Massachusetts and Rhode Island filings, through the August round that reached 21.

That residency classification has become the pressure point in public college pricing, which is the same mechanism families use when they chase tuition reciprocity agreements between states to get a resident rate away from home.

What’s Next

Watch the Eighth Circuit briefing in the Minnesota appeal, any petition out of the Texas case, and whether the newly sued states answer or settle. For example, Kentucky and Kansas both resolved by consent rather than trial.

California and New York carry the largest affected populations and the biggest state grant programs, so their dockets set the practical stakes.

Students enrolled in any of the 25 states should be pricing the non-resident number for next year now, and asking financial aid offices in writing what happens to institutional awards if a court order lands mid-term.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post DOJ Sues Hawaii, Utah, Arkansas And D.C. Over In-State Tuition, Reaching 25 States appeared first on The College Investor.

The 3 Leadership Instincts That Actually Cost You Job Offers


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Your leadership instincts aren’t flaws, but the challenge is recognizing when you’re the candidate rather than the leader and adjusting how you communicate.
  • With practice, either by yourself or alongside a trained professional, you can learn to notice what interviewers hear that you no longer do.

Most executives assume their track record will carry them through interviews, but in reality, the leadership instincts you’ve spent years refining can actively hurt you when you’re a candidate.

I see this pattern regularly in my interview coaching practice. Accomplished leaders often walk out of interview loops confused about why the offer went to another candidate. The truth is, their qualifications were never the issue. Instead, the issue was that they interviewed the way they lead, and although leading this way serves them well day-to-day, it’s costing them opportunities in the interview room.

Let’s explore the three leadership instincts I most often see working against executives in interviews, as well as how to adjust each one.

1. You give your team all the credit

Great leaders distribute praise to their team. When a project succeeds, they spotlight the people who did the work, and over time, “we” becomes their default language. This habit builds trust and loyalty when you’re leading a team, making you look like a secure, selfless leader, but when you’re interviewing, it creates a major problem.

Employers are hiring only one person: you. When every story is told in “we” language, interviewers are left guessing about your individual contributions. Some interviewers will assume you’re being modest. Others will conclude you were just along for the ride and didn’t drive the results yourself. Neither assumption helps you, particularly when you’re competing against equally qualified candidates who more clearly communicate their impact.

I recall working with a product management executive who kept advancing to final rounds but never receiving an offer. When he requested feedback, one panel shared that they struggled to pinpoint what he had personally contributed to his team’s wins. We reworked his stories to name the specific decisions he had made, as well as the initiatives he had personally led, and he received an offer shortly after.

In my experience coaching hundreds of leaders through executive interviews, the fix isn’t to take credit that rightfully belongs to your team. Instead, it’s to continue calling out their contributions while also being clear about your own. For each interview story, identify your individual role or what would have gone differently without you. That is the part interviewers need to hear in the first person. This might sound like, “My team delivered an incredible product launch. My role was making the call to delay the release by two weeks, which protected the customer experience and helped us renew every one of our major accounts.”

2. You assume your scope speaks for itself

Inside your company, everyone shares context. Your colleagues already know how complex your organization is and why a particular initiative was challenging. Because of this, you don’t need to explain the backstory behind your work when you’re communicating internally.

But interviewers don’t share that context, and when executives compress a major accomplishment into a single sentence, their achievement arrives without the stakes that made it impressive. “I led the AI transformation effort” means very little to someone who doesn’t know that adoption had stalled twice before or that the board had made it the company’s top priority.

One of my clients, an operations executive, described a two-year turnaround in a single sentence during our coaching sessions. It sounded routine until we unpacked the situation he had walked into, including millions of dollars in sunk costs and a system that multiple predecessors had failed to fix. Once he named those stakes in interviews, the same accomplishment landed more powerfully.

I coach leaders to highlight the stakes around each story. You don’t need to craft a dramatic screenplay like Shonda Rhimes, but you do need to set the scene. Before your next interview, take your strongest accomplishments and answer these questions about each one: What was at stake if this failed? What did the before and after look like? While these answers are likely already obvious to you, saying them out loud turns a resume bullet point into a memorable story and sets you apart from other candidates.

3. You’ve mastered diplomatic communication

Senior leaders are often trained by experience to hedge in public. You’ve likely learned to build consensus before taking a stand and acknowledge diverse stakeholder perspectives before committing to your own. This is how you usually gain alignment and trust, but in an interview, it can backfire and sound like you don’t have a point of view.

Companies hire executives for their discernment. When you answer a strategic question with carefully balanced considerations and no conclusion, interviewers walk away unsure whether you can commit to a direction. Even worse, some will conclude that you’re a leader who waits to see where the group lands before speaking up.

I recently worked with an IT executive who had pushed back when his CEO wanted to move forward full throttle on an AI transformation. He worried that the story would make him sound difficult, so in interviews he softened the details until his position disappeared entirely. Once we reworked the story so that he stated his stance and the reasoning behind it upfront, the feedback changed. Interviewers began commenting on his sound judgment and asking thoughtful follow-up questions about how he had managed the disagreement.

The adjustment I recommend is simple to describe but uncomfortable to practice: Lead with your position, then add the nuance. In my coaching sessions, we rehearse responses like, “Here’s my recommendation, and here’s what would change my mind.” This structure allows you to demonstrate conviction while remaining open to input, and it leaves interviewers confident that you can make the tough calls.

Your leadership instincts aren’t flaws. They helped you become the leader you are today, and you’ll need them again once you land your new role. The challenge is recognizing when you’re the candidate rather than the leader and adjusting how you communicate. This can be difficult to do on your own because your leadership habits have become second nature. With practice, whether by yourself or alongside a trained professional, you can learn to notice what interviewers hear that you no longer do. You’ve got this!

Key Takeaways

  • Your leadership instincts aren’t flaws, but the challenge is recognizing when you’re the candidate rather than the leader and adjusting how you communicate.
  • With practice, either by yourself or alongside a trained professional, you can learn to notice what interviewers hear that you no longer do.

Most executives assume their track record will carry them through interviews, but in reality, the leadership instincts you’ve spent years refining can actively hurt you when you’re a candidate.

I see this pattern regularly in my interview coaching practice. Accomplished leaders often walk out of interview loops confused about why the offer went to another candidate. The truth is, their qualifications were never the issue. Instead, the issue was that they interviewed the way they lead, and although leading this way serves them well day-to-day, it’s costing them opportunities in the interview room.

Let’s explore the three leadership instincts I most often see working against executives in interviews, as well as how to adjust each one.