According to Whaler co-CEO Jo Cronk, diversifying your marketing portfolio with multiple personalities is the ultimate defense against algorithm changes and influencer risk.
According to Whaler co-CEO Jo Cronk, diversifying your marketing portfolio with multiple personalities is the ultimate defense against algorithm changes and influencer risk.
Update 10/18/26: VISATREAT working again, doesn’t show on portals though.
Update 10/14/26: New code: VISATREAT for 10% off virtual Visa gift cards. Limit 2. Valid through 10/15/26. This code is showing on Rakuten, and should stack with portals. (ht reader bonusvault) Code OKTOBERFUN is now expired.
Update 10/5/26: Working again but not currently showing on portals.
Update 10/1/26: Working again.
Direct link to offer (our affiliate link)
Shows up on Rakuten as well so can get an additional 4x back there. You can also get 5% back via Chase Offer. Other promotions still live:
Hat tip to reader MrCredit
Singapore will issue preventive notices to three more Indonesian companies to tackle and prevent forest fires in Kalimantan province that may have sent smoke across the border, the National Environment Agency said Monday.
This brings to 10 the number of Indonesian companies that Singapore is targeting under its Transboundary Haze Pollution Act.
The National Environment Agency said in a statement that it sent preventive measure notices last Friday to seven Indonesian agroforestry companies linked to fires in Sumatra province. Since then, it said that there were indications that smoke from fires in the Kalimantan province on lands held via concessions under three additional companies in Indonesia could also have moved to Singapore.
As such, it said it would also send preventive measure notices to the three companies in Kalimantan: PT Buana Megatama Jaya, PT Mananjung Hayak and PT Baratama Putra Perkasa.
The notices require the companies to deploy firefighting personnel to extinguish fires or prevent them from spreading on land they own or occupy, the agency said in a statement. They must also stop any ongoing burning activities, refrain from starting new ones and submit action plans detailing measures to put out fires and prevent them from recurring.
The earlier seven companies are pulpwood supplier PT Bumi Andalas Permai, PT Bumi Mekar Hijau, PT Paramitra Mulia Langgeng, PT Sumatera Alam Anugerah, PT SBA Wood Industries, PT Hutan Lestari Raya and PT Bangkanesia.
The notices don’t amount to a finding that the companies are legally responsible for the haze in Singapore. But they allow prosecution and financial penalties if the legal requirements for an offense are met.
Forest and land fires in Indonesia have sent thick haze across neighbouring Singapore, Malaysia and other parts of Southeast Asia, pushing air pollution to unhealthy and hazardous levels in some areas, disrupting daily life and prompting school closures and public health measures. The smoke has also turned skies orange in parts of Kalimantan.
Indonesia’s Forestry Ministry has recorded more than 2,020 square kilometers (780 square miles) of burned land between January and July, while the Nusantara Atlas project estimated that nearly 8,960 square kilometers (3,460 square miles) had burned by the end of August.
Singapore Coordinating Minister for National Security K. Shanmugam said that the Singapore Exchange has also sought information from seven Singapore-listed agricultural companies about their operations and possible links to fires in Indonesia that have caused haze in the country.
He said that the smog was “entirely preventable” and warned companies linked to the fires that they shouldn’t think that they can get away from taking responsibility. He reiterated that the problem was “not simply an act of nature,” but one driven by companies pursuing profits.
“They may think that it is hard to get evidence, and that they may think that they can escape scrutiny. But they should not underestimate the Singapore government’s determination to act,” he said in remarks carried by Singapore broadcaster CNA.
“If companies refuse to cooperate, regardless of whether they have a presence in Singapore or do not have a presence in Singapore, we will use every legal and regulatory lever at our disposal to exert pressure where it matters, including on their bottom lines, including on their access to financing, and including on their standing with investors.”
Shanmugam said that it was “disappointing” that an Indonesian official had belittled the crisis by saying Singapore gets oxygen from Indonesian forests where there is no haze. He said that such comments were inappropriate when people across the region are suffering from the haze because of the “bad behavior” of companies breaching regulations in Indonesia.
He welcomed the efforts of Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto to tackle the fires, including accepting foreign assistance to put out the flames. He noted that Prabowo has replaced the head of the agency responsible for firefighting and disaster relief, put in place directives against slash-and-burn practices on peatland, and prioritized fire prevention as a long-term solution.
Indonesia’s top security minister, Dudung Abdurachman, said on Monday that the government wouldn’t declare the forest fires a national disaster for now, insisting that the country remained capable of handling the crisis, despite mounting haze concerns in neighboring countries.
This post is sponsored by InCrowd. The framing and opinions are ours, as always. Links marked as partner links support PIMD at no cost to you.
A while back a physician friend of mine forwarded me an email and asked, “Is this legit or not?”
It was an invitation to a paid physician survey. Fifteen minutes, a few hundred dollars, questions about how he chooses between two medications for a condition he treats every day.
He wasn’t asking whether he could spare fifteen minutes. He was asking whether it was worth his attention, and whether there was a catch.
That’s the right question. So let’s think it through.
I’ll tell you up front: this is not passive income. It won’t replace a shift. But it is one of the lowest-friction ways I know for a physician to earn something from judgment they already have, in time they already have. For some of you that’s exactly the point. For others, it’s a first, low-risk step into earning outside the hospital.
Here’s how it works, what it pays, and where it fits.
Pharmaceutical, device, and life sciences companies spend heavily to understand how clinicians think. Which drug you reach for first and why. What makes you abandon a device. What a new diagnostic would need to do before you’d trust it.
They can’t get that from a chart review. They need a physician to tell them. So they pay for it.
Market research firms like InCrowd sit in the middle. They recruit a panel of verified physicians, send out surveys when a study matches your specialty and practice setting, and pay an honorarium for each one you complete.
Your responses are anonymized. The company asking the questions gets your answers, not your name, and your personal information is never shared with them. You’re answering as a clinician, not as a spokesperson.
This isn’t new. Physicians have been doing paid market research for decades. What’s changed is that it moved online and got short enough to do between patients.
This is the part the typical vendor post leaves vague, so let’s not.
Most InCrowd surveys are what they call micro-surveys: 5 to 10 minutes, built to be done on your phone. Some run as short as 2 to 5 minutes. Publicly reported honoraria for the short ones land around 10 to 20 dollars, with longer surveys paying 25 to 200 dollars or more depending on length and specialty. InCrowd also runs 15 to 60 minute interviews, which pay more and happen at a time you pick.
One thing people get wrong: this is taxable income whether or not a 1099 shows up at year end.
How often you get invited depends on your specialty. Oncology, rheumatology, dermatology, and psychiatry get the most InCrowd surveys, because that’s where pharma is spending. Family medicine, hospital medicine, radiology, NPs, and PAs qualify too, but expect fewer invitations. That’s not a flaw in the platform. It’s where the research dollars are.
What does that add up to? Physicians who treat surveys as a routine, across several panels, report 1,000 to 2,000 dollars a month. On InCrowd alone, in a well-studied specialty, a few hundred a month is a fair expectation. In primary care, less. Nobody is retiring on this. But it’s real money for real expertise, and it compounds with the next section.
I’ve spent years telling physicians the goal is income that doesn’t depend on your hands. Surveys are the opposite of that. Every dollar requires your time.
So why write about it at all?
Because not every physician reading this is ready to buy a rental or write a check into a fund. Some of you are still in the stage of proving to yourself that money can come from somewhere other than an employer’s paycheck. That first dollar earned on your own terms changes something. It did for me.
The other reason is the math. Run it the way you’d run any opportunity.
If a survey pays 20 dollars for 5 minutes, that’s an effective rate of 240 dollars an hour. Most physicians don’t earn that in clinic. If it pays 20 dollars for 25 minutes, that’s under 50 an hour, and you should probably pass.
That’s the discipline. Set a floor for what your time is worth. Take the surveys that clear it. Decline the ones that don’t. The platform lets you see the honorarium and the estimated time before you commit, so the decision takes five seconds.
Done that way, surveys are not a side hustle. They’re a filter you apply to your inbox a few times a week.
And here’s the part I keep coming back to. The best kind of extra income is the kind that doesn’t cost you any extra time.
I’ve talked about this before with real estate and with investing in general. You want money working while you’re doing something else. Surveys are a smaller version of the same idea. A 5 minute survey fits in time that was already going to disappear. Waiting in line for coffee. Sitting in the barber’s chair. The last twenty minutes of your kid’s soccer practice. The dog’s third stop on the same bush.
That’s the test I’d apply. If a survey would pull you away from your kids or a shift to do it, skip it. If it fits inside time you were already going to spend waiting, it’s close to free money, and it never shows up on your calendar.
Here’s what I think most survey posts miss, and it’s the reason I’d take this more seriously than the dollar amounts suggest.
Survey honoraria are paid to you as an independent contractor. That’s 1099 income, not W-2.
If you’re an employed physician with no other self-employment income, this may be the first self-employment income you’ve ever had. That matters, because self-employment income is what opens the door to a solo 401(k) or SEP-IRA.
The contribution limits scale with the income, so a few thousand dollars of survey money won’t let you shelter a huge amount. But the account itself, once open, is the same account you’ll use when the consulting work, the expert witness fees, or the speaking income shows up later. Opening it early means it’s ready.
Two caveats. First, self-employment income also means self-employment tax, so the net is smaller than the gross. Second, the rules here have edges, and your situation may have more of them. Confirm with your CPA before you count on any of this.
But the principle holds. Small 1099 income can unlock accounts that W-2 income can’t. That’s a lever most employed physicians never pull.
A few things I’d want to know before putting my name on a panel.
You will get screened out. Many surveys open with qualifying questions. If your practice doesn’t match what the study needs, you’re out. InCrowd pays a dollar for a screen-out, which is more than most panels do, but it’s not the honorarium you clicked for. It’s normal. Budget for it mentally and it stops being annoying.
Invitations are uneven. Some weeks bring several. Some bring none. Volume tracks your specialty and whatever studies are in the field that month. Don’t build a budget around it.
Check your employment contract. Most outside-activity clauses allow this, but some academic and health system contracts require you to report outside income or get approval first. Read the clause before you register, not after.
Academic physicians: check your COI policy. Market research honoraria are typically paid by a research firm, not a manufacturer, and blinded studies are generally not reported under the Sunshine Act. But your institution may still want it disclosed. Ask.
Keep patient information out of it. You’re asked about your practice patterns and opinions. Never about a specific patient. If a survey ever drifts that way, close it.
None of these are reasons not to do it. They’re the things I’d want a friend to tell me before I started.

Subscribe to receive the 7 Steps you can follow to achieve Financial Freedom
If financial freedom is your goal, there’s no better time to get started than right now.
Unlock actionable steps that you can take every day to fine-tune your goals, discover your interests, and avoid costly mistakes on your financial freedom journey.
If you want to try it, InCrowd is the platform we’ve partnered with for this post. It’s part of Konovo, one of the larger healthcare market research groups, and the panel is big enough that invitations actually show up. It’s open to physicians, NPs, PAs, and pharmacists in the US, Canada, the UK, and the EU.
Registration takes a few minutes. You’ll verify your credentials, describe your specialty and practice setting, and then invitations arrive by email as studies match your profile. You see the honorarium and the estimated time before you open each one.
My suggestion: register, set your hourly floor, and give it 60 days. Take what clears the bar. Then decide whether it earns a permanent place in your routine or whether it was a useful experiment that pointed you toward something bigger.
Either answer is fine. The point was never the surveys. It was finding out what your judgment is worth outside the exam room, and what you’d do with the first dollars that proved it.
What would you do with yours?
P.S. If you’re curious whether this is worth your time, the fastest way to find out is to register with InCrowd (partner link) and take one survey. Ten minutes will tell you more than this post did.
Were these helpful in any way? Make sure to sign up for the newsletter and join the Passive Income Docs Facebook Group for more physician-tailored content.
Peter Kim, MD is the founder of Passive Income MD, the creator of Passive Real Estate Academy, and offers weekly education through his Monday podcast, the Passive Income MD Podcast. Join our community at the Passive Income Doc Facebook Group.
Well that didn’t take long.
One day after mortgage rates finally caught a much-needed break, bond yields are right back at new 52-week highs.
The bellwether 10-year yield briefly touched 5.35% this morning, the highest level since 2002.
That means 30-year fixed mortgage rates will probably give back yesterday’s gains and possibly more.
I expect rates to climb back to around 7.60% today, which puts us back at the high end of the recent range.
Yesterday, I pointed to easing oil prices as the reason for the rare down day in mortgage rates.
Well, that was yesterday. Oil is back up today. Brent crude is trading above $100 a barrel again after Houthi attacks on Saudi airports and more incidents in the Strait of Hormuz.
There’s also a tropical storm headed for the Gulf Coast, and Chevron is reportedly pulling some nonessential workers off its offshore platforms.
None of this is great for inflation, which means none of it is helpful for bonds or mortgage rates.
But oil is just one part of the story.
Bond yields are climbing all over the world, with the UK 10-year gilt back above 5.4% and French yields climbing higher again too.
Meanwhile, the 10-year here briefly jumped above 5.36% to a new 52-week high.
Stocks are hurting too. The Dow was down more than 500 points this morning, a day after the S&P 500 and Nasdaq both closed at record highs.
There are two big events this afternoon that could push bond yields even higher.
First, the Treasury is selling $39 billion in 10-year notes at 1pm EST.
Investors have already been nervous about demand for U.S. debt, so a weak showing here would signal they demand an even larger premium to hold it.
Then later at 2pm EST the Fed releases the minutes from its September meeting.
That’s when it raised its own rate a quarter point to a range of 3.75%-4.00%, the first hike since 2023.
What everyone wants to know is whether that was a one-and-done move or the first of what could be several.
Fed chair Kevin Warsh came off hawkish in September, though the data since has been softer, with a weak jobs report and a cooler-than-expected PCE reading last week.
At last glance, traders see ~20% chance of another hike this month.
Keep in mind the Fed doesn’t set mortgage rates. But the expectation of more hikes can push bond yields higher, and mortgage rates often front-run those expectations.
Redfin recently said that the share of sellers cutting their asking prices hit a new record for this time of year.
That sounds like a sliver of good news for prospective home buyers. And obviously it is to some degree.
But the 30-year fixed averaged 7.28% in last week’s Freddie Mac survey, the highest average since November 2023 and well above the 6.34% seen a year earlier.
And as I always say, it takes about an 11% drop in home prices to match a 1% drop in mortgage rates.
So while prices might be lower in the face of higher rates, the math probably still works against the buyer unless the price drop is massive.
In addition, I’ve argued we’re just seeing another round of mortgage rate lock-in as sellers simply decide not to list. Or de-list if they’re already on the market.
Mortgage applications have now fallen five weeks in a row, and I don’t see that changing unless bond yields stop climbing.
We’ve gone from sub-6% in early March to 7.60% in about seven months. That’s painful.
If today’s bond auction goes badly and 5.35% breaks, a re-test of 8% mortgage rates in the next month or two isn’t off the table.
This is the RIGHT time to exit from the Indian stock market?
The equity market has fallen 13% so far this year. In fact, it has been continuously underperforming for the past 2 years now, leading to heavy losses for investors. But, does it mean that it is only the asset which is at fault?
See, all assets, be it equity, gold, real estate, go through cycles.
For example, in CY 2021 Gold gave a negative return of 2.1%, however the same asset rose to as high as 75.9% in CY 2025 and has given a YTD return of about 13%.
Does this move make Gold a good or bad asset?
The cyclicity holds true for Equity as well.
As a prudent Investor your job should be to create a diversified portfolio, which can handle the pressure when one asset class goes through a bad time.
And that is the whole point of diversification.
Link for the full report:
source
Key Points
California released its 2025-26 statewide test results on October 15, 2026, and the gains were small again. Just 49.3% of students scored proficient or advanced in English language arts, up 0.5 percentage points from last year. Math proficiency rose 1.1 points to 38.4%, a pace that tracks the national picture after U.S. teens ranked 23rd in math on a 2026 global exam.
Both scores still trail pre-pandemic results. In 2018-19, 50.87% of California students met the English standard and 39.73% met the math standard. The state now sits 1.6% below that English mark and 1.4% below it in math.
Those gaps matter more because grade inflation has made report cards a weaker signal of readiness.
Math is the weak spot, and the statewide CAASPP results database shows how wide the gap is. About 38.2% of California students scored at the lowest “minimal” level in math, nearly the same share that reached proficient or advanced.
That gap shows up on campus, where UC San Diego’s remedial math class filled up for fall 2026 with 175 students on waitlists.
Weak math skills carry a large price tag for families. That UC San Diego course costs about $1,762 in tuition and fees and earns no credit toward a degree. Each delayed quarter at UC San Diego adds about $6,608 in tuition and fees, and those costs feed the average student loan debt graduates carry.
When you push that into real life, it’s not a shock why so many young adults don’t understand how a lot of the basics of personal finance work in their own lives.
Third graders made no progress in reading, and high school juniors are still behind in math. The table below compares 2025-26 results with last year and with 2018-19. Those 2018-19 scores were the last ones posted before COVID-19 and before the University of California went test-optional.
.tci-ca-scores{font-family:inherit;color:#141414;border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;overflow:hidden;margin:24px 0;background:#fff}
.tci-ca-scores .tci-ca-head{background:#141414;color:#fff;padding:14px 18px;font-size:18px;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3}
.tci-ca-scores .tci-ca-head span{color:#f6c061}
.tci-ca-scores table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px}
.tci-ca-scores th{background:#f9f7f5;color:#55504a;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.05em;text-align:left;padding:10px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8}
.tci-ca-scores td{padding:10px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;vertical-align:top}
.tci-ca-scores tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#fcfbf9}
.tci-ca-scores td:first-child{font-weight:700}
.tci-ca-scores tr.tci-ca-total td{background:#f6c061;color:#141414;font-weight:700}
.tci-ca-scores .tci-ca-foot{background:#f9f7f5;color:#8a8378;font-size:12px;padding:10px 14px}
@media (max-width:640px){
.tci-ca-scores thead{display:none}
.tci-ca-scores table,.tci-ca-scores tbody,.tci-ca-scores tr,.tci-ca-scores td{display:block;width:100%;box-sizing:border-box}
.tci-ca-scores tr{border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;padding:6px 0}
.tci-ca-scores td{border:0;padding:4px 14px;display:flex;justify-content:space-between;gap:12px}
.tci-ca-scores td:first-child{font-size:16px;padding-top:8px}
.tci-ca-scores td:not(:first-child)::before{content:attr(data-label);color:#55504a;font-weight:400}
}
| Test | 2018-19 | 2024-25 | 2025-26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Grades: English | 50.9% | 48.8% | 49.3% |
| All Grades: Math | 39.7% | 37.3% | 38.4% |
| Grade 3: English | 48.5% | 44.2% | 44.1% |
| Grade 3: Math | 50.2% | 46.3% | 47.0% |
| Grade 11: English | 57.3% | 57.0% | 57.4% |
| Grade 11: Math | 32.2% | 30.5% | 31.9% |
Third-grade English proficiency held at 44.1%, compared with 44.2% last year and 48.5% in 2018-19. Third-grade math rose to 47.0% but remains more than 3 points below its pre-pandemic level. Math builds on itself, and the high school math sequence colleges prefer depends on skills students master during elementary school.
The 11th-grade results matter most for college costs. Only 31.9% of juniors scored proficient or advanced in math, below the 32.2% posted in 2018-19. Junior English scores reached 57.4% and edged past their pre-pandemic level, according to the state’s grade 11 results.
Cal State uses these junior-year scores to place admitted freshmen across the 22 campuses that now offer three-year bachelor’s degrees.
Under the state’s Early Assessment Program, juniors who score “advanced” can start in college-level English or math at a CSU campus. Students who score “developing” or “minimal” go into supported college-level courses unless SAT, ACT, or other measures exempt them.
Roughly 68% of California juniors fell short of proficient in math. Since an SAT score can exempt students from supported courses, SAT prep gives those juniors a second route into standard college-level math.
Black and Latino students posted the largest gains, but wide gaps remain. EdSource reported that 21.5% of Black students and 27% of Latino students scored proficient in math, compared with 51.4% of white students and 70.5% of Asian students.
About 36% of UC San Diego freshmen are first-generation college students. Most of the school’s remedial math students come from high schools that serve large numbers of low-income and minority families.
Black students gained 1.5% in math and 0.9% in English, reaching 33.7% proficiency in English. Among socioeconomically disadvantaged students, 72.6% did not meet the math standard.
State Superintendent Tony Thurmond said in the Department of Education release that “our work is far from finished.” Troy Flint of the California School Boards Association went further, telling EdSource the pace of growth is “unacceptable.”
Neither reaction addresses college readiness directly, and we’re seeing how high GPAs and test-optional admissions can mask weak math skills.
Juniors in California should release their 11th-grade scores to Cal State. The Early Assessment Program requires students to authorize the release of their English and math results separately, and the scores are used only for placement after admission.
Juniors who score “proficient” must still pass an approved year-long senior English or math course with a C- or better. Put the score release on your college application checklist for junior year.
Seniors who scored “developing” or “minimal” can still avoid a catch-up course with strong SAT or ACT results or high school coursework. Families can use the College Investor ROI calculator to see how an extra term of tuition changes the payoff of a degree.
Parents of younger students can look up their own school and district results in the state database, then compare them with the statewide figures above.
California’s scores land in the middle of a fight over college admissions testing. The University of California went test-optional in 2020, and a group of 1,427 faculty members has since pushed UC to restore the SAT for STEM applicants. The 2026 scores continue to give that push more data, since fewer than one in three juniors can show math proficiency on the state test.
Families of high achieving students are already adjusting. Students are sending SAT scores again even though most colleges don’t require them, and a growing list of schools has brought back SAT and ACT requirements for 2027.
This year’s score reports use new labels: “proficient” and “advanced” replace “standard met” and “standard exceeded.” The state says only the reporting labels and descriptions changed, so the 2026 scores compare directly with past years.
The 2026-27 tests will be the first taken by students who went through California’s new K-2 reading screening, according to EdSource. Separately, the UC faculty push to restore the SAT heads to an Academic Senate recommendation due by June 2027.
Editor: Colin Graves
The post California Test Scores Rise Again, But Only 38% Of Students Are Proficient In Math appeared first on The College Investor.
Steve H. Hanke is a senior contributing columnist at Fortune, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University, and a director of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation, which advocates for a fiscal responsibility amendment and a statutory fiscal commission. He is also co-editor, with Barry W. Poulson and John Merrifield, of Public Debt Sustainability: International Perspectives (Lexington Books, 2022).
David M. Walker is the former Comptroller General of the United States and the chairman of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation. He is co-author, with Joe Penland, Sr., of the forthcoming Saving Social Security and America’s Future: Common Sense Solutions.
That is why we commissioned the Mills Review, published in July, focused on how AI could reshape retail financial services by 2030.
Some developments we anticipated are already emerging, including the transition towards agentic finance, such as the launch of Meta’s Muse.
Our response to the review is not to consult, study and report progress. Our focus is testing, assurance, monitoring and surveillance: directly with industry to understand how AI systems are being deployed.
Whilst the Review focused on retail, the AI shift does not stop at the retail boundary. Across wholesale markets too, AI is accelerating how firms analyse, trade, monitor and make decisions.
We are embedding 6 of the 7 recommendations into live work immediately. Our innovation services such as the AI Lab give us direct insight into what firms are building from agent-led payments and fraud detection to consumer support.
On frontier AI security, we are working directly with banks to understand how frontier models are changing cyber defence, identifying and linking vulnerabilities and assisting with triaging, patching and recovering at greater speed. Those insights are feeding directly into our supervisory and policy response.
Firms are not bystanders in that process. The leaders will be those that deploy AI effectively, innovatively and safely.
But increasingly, AI is also changing what happens before a consumer ever reaches a regulated firm. Consumers are turning to general-purpose large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, for financial information and advice, while regulated firms are beginning to integrate their services into AI platforms.
The good news – this can significantly widen access to financial tools and information. But it can also blur the boundary between regulated and unregulated activity, and the protections consumers receive.
Four in five less-experienced investors aged 18-40 have used AI to help with investing, but only 40% of consumers correctly recognise that there is no recourse if something goes wrong after acting on advice from a general-purpose AI tool. Our answer is not simply to expand our remit, but to make the existing boundary clearer.
Through InvestSmart and the FCA Firm Checker, we already help consumers understand the protections they have. But warnings may be more effective at the point where AI-generated financial information is delivered.
So we are calling on AI providers to help consumers understand the limits of financial information and advice generated by their models through clear, proportionate and consistent disclaimers.
And rather than create a new public-interest financial capability tool, as the Mills Review suggested, we will build on existing work, including IOSCO’s first TechSprint, powered by our AI Lab to help investors spot scams, verify information and challenge unreliable AI outputs.
Like the head-turning Roadster it reintroduced last week with some snazzy new performance features, Tesla (TSLA -2.13%) shares come with a big price tag. The stock enters this week at $354.72.
Despite the triple-digit price of admission, now could be a good time to buy at least a single share. Even if your broker is open to selling you fractional shares, going with a round share is more than just a cleaner transaction. It provides you with full voting power and the ability to transfer to a brokerage account, which may not allow fractional purchases.
Image source: Getty Images.
There’s a lot going for Tesla stock these days. A surge in gas prices is boosting the value proposition of electric vehicles, reversing the bearish narrative that began for U.S. drivers in the fall of last year after federal tax credits of up to $7,500 for new purchases or leases expired.
The high-end Roadster is just one of the many new offerings coming from the world’s most valuable automaker by market cap. Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robots, improvements in its autonomous driving platform, and a push into commercial vehicles leave analysts expecting annual revenue to nearly double in the next three years.
$354.72-$7.72 (-2.13%)
NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/16/26
A lot can also go wrong. Profitability was cut in half in its previous quarter. Analysts see a much smaller decline on the bottom line when it reports third-quarter results later this week, but it still needs to turn that around.
The top line has recovered quickly from last year’s fourth-quarter decline, bringing us to today’s opportunity. The shares are down 21% this year. The fundamentals are holding up better. Even as we head into Wednesday afternoon’s financial update, analysts are bracing for flat sales. This is actually a good thing, since last year’s third quarter was when sales spiked as U.S. buyers scrambled to get their orders in before the federal tax credit expired.
Tesla is out of favor with investors this year. Volatility has always been part of this story, but historically, as with its new Roadster Rocket, it’s just a matter of time before it lifts off the ground.
Rick Munarriz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.