Upwards of 7 million borrowers must leave the SAVE plan and pick a new repayment plan within 90 days of servicer notification, which began rolling out July 1, 2026.
An analysis of Education Department and GAO data suggests at least 3 million of those borrowers could still qualify for a $0 monthly payment on Income-Based Repayment (IBR).
The new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) eliminates $0 payments entirely, with a $10 monthly minimum.
More than 7 million student loan borrowers are being pushed off the SAVE plan in the next few months, and for many, the anxiety is real: after nearly two years of forbearance, they’re bracing for a monthly bill they fear they can’t afford.
But we’ve been seeing something interesting in our comments on social media – borrowers are surprised that they can still secure a $0 monthly payment on IBR.
That makes sense. If historical patterns hold, at least 3 million of these borrowers would still qualify for a $0 monthly payment under Income-Based Repayment (IBR). They just haven’t run the numbers yet. That’s why borrowers need to use a Student Loan Calculator and see what their expected payments would be.
The Department of Education began notifying enrolled borrowers on July 1 that they have 90 days to choose a new repayment plan. Borrowers who don’t move in time will be moved into a new plan automatically. That deadline has created a scramble among borrowers who, in some cases, have not made a payment since March 2020.
Here’s what borrowers might be missing about still having a $0 monthly payment.
Would you like to save this?
We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!
The $0 Payment Has Always Been More Common Than Borrowers Think
Zero-dollar monthly payments are not a SAVE invention. They have been a standard feature of income-driven repayment (IDR) for more than a decade, and they have always covered a large share of enrollees.
Before the pandemic, roughly 8.2 million borrowers were enrolled in IDR plans, according to Federal Student Aid data from late 2019. A 2019 Center for American Progress analysis, cited in an NPR investigation, found that nearly half of them (roughly 4 million borrowers) had a $0 scheduled payment. The Government Accountability Office reported the same pattern within REPAYE (the predecessor to SAVE) where slightly more than half of borrowers were scheduled to pay nothing because of low reported income.
SAVE pushed that share higher. Because SAVE used a 225% discretionary income formula (compared to 150% under older plans) the GAO found that nearly 60% of SAVE borrowers with scheduled payments (3.6 million of 6.2 million) owed $0 as of January 31, 2024. The Education Department later reported that 4.6 million of the more than 8 million borrowers who enrolled in SAVE had a $0 monthly payment.
Put simply: for the entire history of income-driven repayment, roughly half of borrowers at any given time have owed no monthly payment.
Estimating The Data Today
Here is the math we used to estimate potentially $0 monthly payments, using deliberately conservative assumptions.
Step 1: Total SAVE Borrowers. Roughly 7.7 million borrowers were enrolled in SAVE or SAVE forbearance and must move to a new plan. The Department of Education has said 1 million people have changed plans, but we’ll use the original total.
Step 2: How Many Save Borrowers Had $0 Payments. GAO data shows 58% of SAVE borrowers had $0 payments (3.6 million ÷ 6.2 million) as of early 2024.
Step 3: Adjust for IBR’s 150% Threshold. IBR is not as generous as SAVE was. For a single borrower in 2026, the $0 cutoff falls from about $35,910 in adjusted gross income (225% of the $15,960 poverty guideline) to $23,940 (150%).
History also tells us what happens at that lower threshold: plans using 150% (REPAYE, PAYE, and IBR) produced $0 payments for roughly half of enrollees before the pandemic (about 4 million of 8.2 million in 2019).
Step 4: Adjust for Old Income Data. Most SAVE borrowers last certified income in 2023 or earlier, and wages have grown since. Some borrowers who owed $0 then will earn too much now. To be conservative, we assume the $0 share falls to 40-45% (below anything observed in the program’s history) rather than the 45-55% the pre-pandemic record supports.
Step 5: Multiply. 7.7 million × 40% = 3.1 million. 7.7 million × 45% = 3.5 million.
The estimate: 3.1 to 3.5 million borrowers (let’s call it “at least 3 million”) would likely qualify for a $0 payment on IBR. Even if the true share of borrowers fell all the way to 35%, a level with no historical precedent, that would still be 2.7 million borrowers paying nothing each month.
Two caveats. This is an estimate, not an official Department of Education figure. ED has not published a projection of $0-payment eligibility for SAVE borrowers moving to IBR. And the estimate only holds for borrowers who actually choose IBR. Those who choose RAP or a standard plan will always have an above $0 payment, regardless of income.
Why The Plan You Pick Matters
The choice borrowers make in the next 90 days carries more weight than past plan switches, because the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) (which opened July 1, 2026) breaks with years of IDR design.
RAP has no $0 payment. Borrowers with adjusted gross income of $10,000 or less pay a $10 monthly minimum, and payments scale from 1% to 10% of total AGI as income rises, with a $50 monthly deduction per dependent.
RAP does offer benefits older plans don’t, including an interest subsidy that prevents balances from growing and a principal match of up to $50 per month. But for the lowest-income borrowers, RAP means paying something every month when it used to be $0.
IBR, by contrast, kept its $0 payment. Borrowers can also move to PAYE or ICR temporarily, but those plans sunset by July 1, 2028, forcing a second switch later.
What This Means For Your Family’s Budget
For families bracing for a new bill, the practical advice is simple: calculate before you panic. The College Investor’s Student Loan Calculator and App can help.
A single borrower earning $23,000 would pay $0 on IBR, but about $38 per month on RAP (2% of AGI). A single borrower earning $30,000 lands at roughly $50 per month on either plan. A married borrower with two kids and $45,000 in household AGI would likely pay $0 on IBR, but about $50 on RAP after the $50-per-dependent deduction.
The right answer differs by income, family size, loan age, and how long a borrower has already been in repayment, especially for anyone pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness or time-based loan forgiveness, where months at $0 count fully.
The worst outcome is doing nothing. Borrowers who miss the 90-day window will be placed in a plan they didn’t choose, and borrowers who simply stop paying face delinquency, credit damage, and (with collections restarting soon) wage garnishment and offset of tax refunds.
Mortgage rates reached their highest level since the end of August, following a week of heightened uncertainty over the Iran conflict, slightly moderated by positive news on inflation.
Processing Content
The 30-year fixed rate mortgage increased by 6 basis points to 6.55% as of July 16 from 6.49% one week prior, the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey found.
The last time the 30-year fixed was at a higher point was for the week of Aug. 28, 2025, at 6.56%.
For the same week a year ago, the 30-year hit its summer peak of 6.75%.
Meanwhile, the 15-year FRM rose by 11 basis points from a week ago to 5.93%. This is actually higher than the 5.92% it was at for the week of July 17, 2025.
Why did mortgage rates move this week?
“Purchase application demand has weakened recently, but housing affordability is more favorable and housing inventory continues to rise, thus the backdrop for prospective homebuyers is modestly improving,” Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist, said in a press release.
Lender Price data posted on the National Mortgage News website put the 30-year fixed just shy of 6.8% as of 11 a.m. on July 17.
At the same time, the 10-year Treasury yield was at 4.58%, up 3 basis points on the day. On July 9, it closed at 4.54%. It posted intraday highs on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday this week above 4.61%.
The now-ended ceasefire with Iran likely improved June’s inflation numbers, Kate Wood, NerdWallet’s lending expert, wrote in a commentary before the Freddie Mac numbers came out.
“Renewed fighting also means inflation fears are back on, so that June data is looking less like the beginning of a recovery and more like a memory of what could have been,” Wood said. “No one’s expecting the Federal Reserve to raise rates at its end-of-month meeting, but the odds of a hike as soon as September are significant. In this kind of environment, we’re unlikely to see mortgage rates drop.”
The case for no Fed short-term rate increase
Louis Navellier, an investment banker, is taking a more upbeat view of the Fed’s next move.
“There is no more talk about the Fed raising key interest rates in the wake of the CPI report,” Navellier wrote in a Wednesday commentary. “The June Consumer Price Index came in better than economists expected and posted a 0.4% decline, which is the first time the CPI declined since 2020.”
Kara Ng, senior economist at Zillow Home Loans, agreed with Navellier that the CPI, along with the Producer Price Index, being substantially cooler than indicated, takes the pressure off for a Fed rate hike in the near term.
But increased inflation from the renewed Iran conflict caused Zillow to change its rate forecast.
It now calls for the 30-year “to ease only gradually, drifting to roughly 6.4% by the end of 2026,” Ng said in a Wednesday evening commentary.
Why June’s positive housing data might not last for long
Zillow’s June housing report had a log of good news, with sales and new listings higher, while monthly mortgage payments moved lower, which created a modest affordability boost for buyers, Ng said.
“That tailwind gets harder to lean on in the second half of the year,” she continued. “If rates end 2026 near 6.4%, that would be slightly higher than the range buyers saw in fall and winter 2025 — meaning affordability could shift from a tailwind relative to last year to more of a headwind, especially when comparing listings and sales.”
The Mortgage Bankers Association’s Weekly Application Survey had the conforming 30-year FRM at 6.65% for the period ended July 10. This is a gain of 7 basis points from the prior week.
“Mortgage rates increased last week to their highest level since last August, continuing to dampen borrower demand,” a Thursday morning commentary from Bob Broeksmit, president and CEO said. This contributed to a 7% weekly decline and 2% annual drop off in applications.
“With housing inventory continuing to improve, borrower demand should strengthen once mortgage rates begin to move lower again,” Broeksmit continued.
Refi volume surprisingly strong
Even though application volume fell 2.7%, refinance activity was up 4% from the previous week and 7% from the prior year.
In a comment issued after the Freddie Mac survey release, Kyle Bass, production business manager at Refi.com, said the volume increase in this activity even after rates rose is notable because it shows it is not all falling rate driven.
“In addition to those homeowners jumping in to refinance when rates retreat, there is another group of homeowners refinancing strategically,” Bass said. “Their focus is accessing the equity they’ve built through a cash-out refinance.”
Boeing(BA 1.02%) delivered 64 jets in June, four more jets than it delivered in May and the same month last year. The number is part of the company’s 314 jet deliveries in the first half of 2026. Its commercial delivery performance is a good sign of its financial recovery. Pushing out this volume of airline jets has a massive, direct impact on the company’s free cash flow (FCF) trajectory.
While Boeing’s overall operating margin remains lean (only 18.1% in the first quarter) as it navigates program overruns and defense drags, deliveries are the raw fuel for its balance sheet. A strong June demonstrates the manufacturing discipline required to chip away at its post-pandemic debt and secure sustainable, positive FCF.
Here is a breakdown of what these delivery numbers mean for Boeing’s cash position moving forward.
Image source: Getty Images.
Boeing is unlocking sunk inventory
The cash flow cycle is highly back-end loaded in aerospace manufacturing. Predelivery payments are generally around 30% of the purchase price, so manufacturers pay for much of the parts, labor, and supply chain overhead long before the plane leaves the tarmac. When the keys are actually handed over to the customer, the remaining 70% of the plane’s total purchase price is collected.
Pushing 64 jets out the door in a single month means Boeing is successfully liquidating parked, fully built inventory and turning it into immediate cash. In the first quarter, it reported an earnings per share (EPS) loss of $0.11, and even that was a 31% improvement year over year.
Validating its free cash flow target
In the company’s first-quarter earnings call, Boeing chief financial officer Jay Malave projected full-year 2026 FCF to finish between $1 billion and $3 billion. That’s a big change from the $1.5 billion FCF loss in the first quarter, as the first half of the year saw heavy operational expenditures and narrower operating margins.
Strong June momentum serves as proof of concept for the Street, validating that the era of aggressive cash burn is fading and that the $1 billion to $3 billion FCF target is highly achievable if execution remains steady. The company had consecutive positive FCF quarters in the second half of 2025.
Malave said that because of cash outflows in the first half of the year, achieving the full-year FCF target depends on a back-end-loaded second half, driven heavily by increased delivery volumes. As it is, Boeing booked a net total of 113 new orders in June and a total of 408 new orders this year.
Today’s Change
(-1.02%) $-2.22
Current Price
$215.90
Key Data Points
Market Cap
$172BMarket cap calculated using publicly traded shares outstanding only. Does not include unlisted, private, or dual-class non-traded shares. Implied market cap may vary.
Day’s Range
$214.39 – $217.74
52wk Range
$176.77 – $254.35
Volume
74.9K
Avg Vol
6.5M
Gross Margin
4.83%
Supply chain and delivery health are improving
Investors are still playing a wait-and-see game with Boeing, as its shares are flat so far this year.
To generate robust, multibillion-dollar FCF plateaus in the coming years, Boeing needs volume stability. June’s delivery numbers (which included 42 of the workhorse 737 MAX models) provide a critical insight into its operations. Delivering at this rate demonstrates that major supply chain and parts delays are no longer the absolute ceiling they were in previous quarters.
This operational rhythm sets the stage for Boeing’s upcoming push to lift 737 production from 42 to 47 aircraft per month, now that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved that change.A synchronized supply chain executing higher monthly production rates is the primary structural driver that will expand program-level cash margins moving forward.
Advertiser Disclosure: This site is part of affiliate sales networks and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. This compensation may impact how and where links appear on this site. This site does not include all financial companies or all available financial offers.
[2026.7 Update] The new offer is $1,000+$250.
[2025.8 Update] The new offer is $1,000.
[2025.6 Update] The new offer is $1,500, and this is the best ever offer on this card.
Learn More
Benefits
$1,000+$250 offer: Earn a $1,000 cash bonus plus a $250 Capital One Business Travel credit when you spend $10,000 within 3 months. The best recent offer is $1,500.
Earn 2% cashback on all purchases.
If you have a Capital One Miles earning card (such as Capital One Venture), then you can transfer your cashback to Miles and improve its potential value.
No foreign transaction fee.
Disadvantages
$95 annual fee, waived for the first year.
Capital One will pull all three major credit bureaus (Experian, TransUnion, Equifax) for one credit card application!
Capital One business credit cards WILL be reported to your personal credit history (most other banks won’t report business credit cards to your personal credit report). Therefore, the balance on this card will affect your personal credit score, and this card will count towards Chase 5/24.
Introduction to Capital One (C1) Miles
You can earn C1 Miles with two kinds of cards: Miles earning cards, or cashback earning cards. Miles earning cards mainly include: Capital One Venture, Capital One Venture X, Capital One Venture Business, Capital One Venture X Business, etc. Cashback earning cards mainly include: Capital One Savor, Capital One Quicksilver, Capital One Spark Cash Plus, Capital One Spark Cash, etc.
You can move your C1 Miles from one Miles earning card to another Miles earning card at any time, and you can also move your cashback from a cashback earning card to a Miles earning card at any time. However, you can not move your Miles from a Miles earning card to a cashback earning card, therefore cashback is more flexible than Miles in C1’s system.
C1 Miles never expire. You will lose the C1 Miles on one card if you close the account, but you can prevent losing your C1 Miles by moving the points to another C1 card beforehand.
If you have a Miles earning card, C1 Miles can be transferred to some airline miles and hotel points. Some good 1:1 transfer options are: Air Canada (AC) (Star Alliance), Avianca (AV) (Star Alliance), Asia Miles (CX) (Oneworld), British Airways (BA), and Wyndham hotel points, etc. If you use C1 Miles in this way, the value is about 1.6 cents/point.
You can redeem your C1 Miles towards travel expense at a fixed ratio 1.0 cent/point. You can also redeem your C1 Miles towards some merchants gift cards at a fixed ratio 1.0 cent/point.
You can redeem your C1 Miles towards statement credit at a fixed ratio 0.5 cents/point.
In summary, we estimate that C1 Miles are worth about 1.6 cents/point.
Recommended Application Time
We recommend you apply for this card after you have a credit history of at least two years and you are very comfortable with the credit card game.
[1/6 rule] You can only apply for 1 Capital One credit card for every 6 months, including both personal and business credit cards. You will get automatic denial if you violate this rule, but there will be no hard pull.
Summary
This card is very similar to Capital One Venture Business. The major difference is: this is a cashback earning card while Venture Business is a Miles earnings card. Cashback can be converted to Miles, but Miles can not be converted to cashback. Therefore cashback card is better in the Capital One system. The welcome offer is really good. In 2021, Capital One improved its Miles system a lot, which makes this card more valuable. Now that C1 Miles are valued more than 1 cent/point, its everything 2x earning structure is attractive. The earning structure on itself is similar to Citi Double Cash (DC) in the TYP system, and this card has an annual fee, but C1 Miles system has other good cards that have a good earning rate to work together. Note that Capital One will pull all three major credit bureaus (Experian, TransUnion, Equifax) for one credit card application, and it is very difficult to get approved if you have a lot of recent hard pulls.
Related Credit Cards
Historical Offers Chart
Note: Sometimes there are offers such as $500+$1,500 on this card. But the spending requirements after the first $500 are huge, so we don’t treat them as sign-up bonus, we treat them as spending bonus instead.
Learn More
If you like this post, don’t forget to give it a 5 star rating!
Cutting Edge Group (CEG) has acquired the music rights and royalty streams to composer Brian Tyler‘s catalog of film and TV scores.
The catalog comprises more than 60,000 minutes of music.
The acquired soundtracks accompany films that have generated a cumulative global box office of more than $21 billion over the past two decades, according to CEG.
CEG did not disclose financial terms of the transaction, but described the deal as one of the largest ever completed for the rights of a single film and TV composer.
Tyler‘s credits include the Fast & Furious franchise, Iron Man 3, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Thor: The Dark World, Crazy Rich Asians, The Super Mario Bros. Movie, Rambo: Last Blood, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and the Now You See Me films.
He also scored Taylor Sheridan‘s Yellowstone universe and composed the first official theme for Formula 1, which airs during the global broadcast of every race.
“Music is how we remember the stories that matter most to us. It’s the invisible thread running through a scene or story that makes it unforgettable, and I’ve spent my career trying to serve those stories as honestly as I can.”
Brian Tyler
“Music is how we remember the stories that matter most to us. It’s the invisible thread running through a scene or story that makes it unforgettable, and I’ve spent my career trying to serve those stories as honestly as I can,” said Brian Tyler.
“Knowing that these compositions will be in the hands of a team that genuinely understands their value – not just commercially, but creatively and culturally – means everything to me.”
“Brian is a one-of-a-kind composer who has played a pivotal role in shaping some of the most iconic films and TV shows of the 21st century,” said Tara Finegan, COO of Cutting Edge Group.
“I am extremely grateful and proud that he has trusted us with these world-class compositions and recordings, which are the emotional heartbeat of films and TV shows that span a multitude of genres and styles, and resonate with such a broad range of audiences.
“That quality and breadth is what makes this catalog so compelling as a long-term investment.”
Photo credit: Faye Thomas
“Brian is a one-of-a-kind composer who has played a pivotal role in shaping some of the most iconic films and TV shows of the 21st century.”
Tara Finegan, Cutting Edge Group
Tyler‘s catalog joins a portfolio of more than 400,000 owned and managed media music rights that CEG values at over $1 billion.
The company’s recent expansion includes a joint venture with Warner Bros. Discovery announced in January 2025 to co-own and co-manage the studio’s film and TV music catalog, in a deal reported to be worth more than $1 billion.
In September 2025, CEG acquired AMC Studios‘ full catalog of TV music rights, adding compositions from The Walking Dead franchise.
Earlier this year, it acquired the royalty streams to composer John Paesano‘s catalog of more than 80 film, TV and video game scores.
Founded in 2006, the UK-based company has completed roughly 30 acquisitions in four years, led by CEO Philip Moross.
“This investment reflects our unwavering commitment to securing the very best rights in media music and our ability to complete deals of this calibre is testament to the reputation we have established within the composer community over many years,” said Tim Hegarty, Cutting Edge Group‘s Head of M&A.
“Film and television music remains one of the most resilient asset classes in the rights market, and this acquisition is a further demonstration of our ability to identify and secure its very best catalogs.”
Photo credit: Faye Thomas
“Film and television music remains one of the most resilient asset classes in the rights market, and this acquisition is a further demonstration of our ability to identify and secure its very best catalogs.”
Tim Hegarty, Cutting Edge Group
“For an elite, rarified-air composer like Brian Tyler, it was key for us to find a company who truly understood the unique value of his legendary body of work,” said Sam Schwartz and Michael Gorfaine of the Gorfaine Schwartz Agency, which represented Tyler. “We are pleased we found that in the team at Cutting Edge.”
Tyler was named a BMI Icon in 2022, an honor previously given to composers including John Williams and Alexandre Desplat.
He has also received three Emmy nominations and 12 Goldspirit Awards, including Composer of the Year, according to CEG.
Tyler was represented in the transaction by Dave Kaplan at Surfdog, Sam Schwartz and Michael Gorfaine of the Gorfaine Schwartz Agency, Scott Edel and Mitchell Manger at Loeb & Loeb, and Jean Lee at Citrin Cooperman.
CEG was represented by Michael Poster and Mehdi Sinaki of Michelman Robinson.Music Business Worldwide
Dave: Mortgage rates just climbed back over 6.7%. And while we’re all used to a lot of volatility in the mortgage market these days, here’s the part that should get your attention. It happened on the same day we got an inflation report that looked, at least on the surface, like good news. And that disconnect tells you almost everything about the market we’re in right now. Nothing is exactly straightforward these days and you need to go a level deeper to understand what’s going on and where the market is heading, which is exactly what we’re doing here on On the Market Today. We’re covering a lot of economic news that came out this week from inflation reports and the surprising direction of mortgage rates to the housing bill that finally got enacted into law and some fresh trouble in the credit markets that you should be paying attention to. We’ve got three big stories and one big theme. The stuff that’s moving your deals and shaping the investing climate right now is actually happening away from the housing market not in it. This is on the market. Let’s get to it. Hey everyone welcome to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. I’m also a housing and economic analyst and real estate investor. Today’s episode, we’re going to be going through news as we often do because there is a lot to cover. A lot tends to happen mid-month with economic news, and that’s what we’re seeing here in July of 2026. The June inflation report just dropped and there’s just enough going on that I want to break down a couple of stories that you may not have seen because they’re not directly happening in the housing market day-to-day right now, but it’s still impacting rates, what’s going on with your portfolio and the American consumer. So we’re going to go over all those stories and as always, I’m going to tell you what each story means for you as an investor and what you should be thinking about with your own businesses. Let’s get to it. First up, why are rates going back up? Why are mortgage rates back at 6.75? Though we were doing a little bit better and we were. Just for some context back in February before the war in Iran started, rates were at about 6%. That was great. Then when the war started and fear was super high, we had rates climb up to where they were today, but they had been gradually easing and getting a little bit better. We were seeing them closer to 6.5%, but now they’re back up again. Now, the weird thing about this that might not make so much sense, at least on the surface, is that inflation has actually improved a little bit. Just today, I’m recording this on July 14th. Just today, the CPI, the Consumer Price Index, which measures inflation across the economy came out and it was better than it’s been in several months. It was actually down 0.4% month over month. The annual rate, which is what we usually talk about, fell from 4.2% to just 3.5%. That’s still elevated. It’s well above the Fed’s target of 2%, but it is moving in the right direction. And a lot of that, a lot of the relief came from gas prices as you can imagine. We up until a couple days ago had a ceasefire with Iran. Oil prices were falling down. They weren’t back to where they were before the war, but they were much, much better. We saw gasoline prices. The prices you’re paying at the pump fall about 10% in June. And so that really brought down the CPI. But the good news is that the core CPI, we talk about this a lot, but the core CPI is another thing that economists track. It removes food and energy from the total equation because those things are really volatile. And the core CPI was flat month over month. That’s good. And it fell annualized to 2.6%, both good things. So even if you don’t factor in gas and oil and all of that, we still got a better inflation rating. So the question you should be asking yourself is why are mortgage rates going back up? What we always talk about on the show is that mortgage rates are very tied to 10-year treasuries and the spread. Those are the two things that we always talk about that is what impacts mortgage rates. But one of the major drivers of yields is inflation. And a lot of people have said if inflation gets better, mortgage rates will come down. Now I did a whole show on this recently and said I don’t think they will come down quickly, but I did say that if inflation gets better, rates will probably not go up. So what happened here? Why are mortgage going up? Well, there are two reasons. One I think is kind of obvious and the other one no one seems to be talking about, but we’re going to get into it today. The first reason is that even though inflation has gotten better, that report is backward looking. We’re midway through July and we got an inflation report today for June. What’s happening right now is signaling that we’re not out of the woods on inflation. So yes, we got one good print, but that does not mean inflation has gotten better. And just over the last couple of days, the war and conflict in Iran is flaring up again. The ceasefire that we had for a couple of weeks, President Trump declared it over last week. There are fresh airstrikes going on. The Revolutionary Guard is attacking boats going through the strait of hormous. The strait of Hormuz definitely not open. We’re seeing tanker traffic decline again and oil prices just yesterday went up 10% in one single day. So we are clearly seeing an environment where we got one good month amidst an environment of high inflationary pressure. And clearly right now what’s going on in the markets, especially with oil stocks, the bond market is that traders, people who influence this stuff who have lots of money like pension funds and hedge funds and sovereign wealth funds, they don’t think the strait is opening. If you look at the situation, I kind of agree. It’s really hard to imagine how this gets better. I know we just had a tentative ceasefire in place, but that fell apart pretty quickly and it seems like both sides are digging in even more. It doesn’t seem like we’re moving towards an agreement anytime soon. Even the other day, the Trump administration came out and said that the prospects of a nuclear deal is looking less and less likely. And so if you look at this big picture, the inflationary pressure we had in March and April and May that eased in June is probably coming back. If we look forward to what we’re going to see in the July inflation data next month, it’s probably going to look worse. And the bond market doesn’t wait. It does not wait for that inflation print. They could read the tea leaves. The inflation fear is back even though it came on the day. Even though all this stuff is happening the day we got a good inflation print, inflation fear is worse right now even after that print. And that is the number one reason we are seeing mortgage rates go up. By the way, don’t expect the Fed to come in and rescue things because they are seeing the same thing. Even though we had a good inflation print just this week we saw Kevin Warsch, the new chair of the Federal Reserve said that the Fed has zero tolerance for inflation. And so even though they got one good print, they also see what’s going on here and that the underlying inflationary pressure that we have in the economy has not gone away. Some would argue it’s getting worse. We have to see we don’t really know if it’s getting worse, but the pressure has not gone away. And so most people still think that a rate hike is on the table and is more likely than a rate cut. So the inflation picture is keeping those rates up despite the good print we got today. Now that should kind of make sense. If you listen to this show, we talk about this stuff a lot. The second reason is one that people are not talking about is not really directly related to inflation or is it even connected to the housing market. It actually has to do with AI. I know everyone’s talking about AI. I can’t go through a conversation without AI right now, but this is really true. AI is pushing up mortgage rates and maybe not in a way that you have noticed before, but all of these companies that are building these massive data centers, they are spending hundreds of billions of dollars per year on data centers. The way that they’re raising money for that, some of them are just using cash that they have, but many of them are raising money. They’re going out and finding investors to help them invest and build all this infrastructure. And the way that they do that, some is through stock issuance, but the other way is through bond issuance. Basically they put out corporate bonds. It’s similar to what the US does. We talk all the time on the show about treasuries. That’s a US government bond where the government raises money, they borrow money from investors and pay them back four and a half percent. That’s the yield on a 10-year US treasury right now. Companies can do the same thing. They can issue bonds and basically take out a loan from investors and pay them back over time. And this happens all the time. There are always corporate bonds, but the scal of how much AI companies are raising through bonds not really something that we’ve seen before. In the first half of the year in 2026, the first half of the year alone, these six hyperscalers, these are companies like Microsoft and OpenAI and Anthropic and these big companies that are investing heavily, heavily, heavily into data centers, they raised $244 billion alone, six companies in half a year, a quarter of a trillion dollars. That actually takes AI companies from 1% of investment grade bonds, corporate bonds to roughly 18%. That is a massive increase. In one month, July alone, Amazon put out $25 billion in bonds. And I know with these companies, billions, hundreds of billions, trillions, the numbers start to sound benign, but these are huge, huge numbers and it matters. And the reason it matters, the reason you should care about this is because all of this borrowing, it competes with US treasuries. There is a limited pool of capital that people are willing to lend in the form of bonds. And yes, the US government is considered the safest bond. It is where most of the money in the world goes to in terms of bonds, but corporate debt tends to pay a higher yield. It’s a little bit riskier than the US government. It is much riskier than the US government, so it pays a higher yield. And right now, investor appetite for that risk and for those higher yields is high. People want it. People are absorbing it. Just in July alone through July 8th, in eight days, the bond market took down $32 billion of new AI bonds. And the way that this impacts mortgage rates, the mechanism is that when people are putting their money, when these big institutions are putting their money into AI bonds and debt instead of US government debt, that means there’s lower demand for US government debt, lower demand for treasuries. When there is lower demand for treasuries, the yields go up because the government has to pay a higher interest rate to compete against these AI bonds. And as we’ve talked about, that yield on US treasuries is vitally important to mortgage rates. It is one of two variables. It’s the 10-year US treasury and it’s the spread on treasuries. And right now, although it’s not completely changing the mortgage market, it is putting upward pressure on mortgage rates. And so that is why if you combine these two things, both the war in Iran spike again, and all of this insatiable need for money to go into the AI infrastructure building, which I have a lot of questions about, but that’s a topic for another episode. Those two things combined are pushing up mortgage rates. And unfortunately for us in the housing market, it’s probably going to stay like this for a while. It’s why I’ve said mortgage rates are not going down. I did not expect them to go back up to six and a quarter, but I’ve said they were going to remain in the mid sixes and that is generally correct. Hopefully they don’t go up anymore, but we’re just going to have to wait and see. And this is going too way on the housing market. Luckily, mortgage rates were about this high last year. So this isn’t unprecedented and it’s not like we’re in some crazy era where people in the last few years haven’t seen mortgage rates this high. They definitely have, and people are just adjusting to it, which is good. But if you were hoping for some mortgage late relief, this is just another step back. Kind of feels like we take one step forward, two steps back, and today it kind of feels like that. We had a good inflation print, but the inflationary pressure is getting worse again and this AI competition is a new variable that is impacting mortgage rates. And so this is what we’re going to have for the foreseeable future. We’re still in the great stall. Nothing really changes about that, but I do hear a lot of people on social media in the media saying mortgage rates are going to get better. I wouldn’t count on it. Maybe they’ll come back down a little bit, but we’re not getting to low sixes anytime soon in my opinion, maybe even not by the end of the year. So buckle in for this. It doesn’t mean the market’s going to collapse. We’re seeing higher demand. Just remember that. People are still buying homes more than they were last year. It’s not great. It’s still a slow, sluggish market. So for right now, it’s probably not going to change things fundamentally for the worst, but if affordability does continue to erode either from mortgage rates, prices going higher, wages going down, unemployment going up, that will impact the housing market, but that’s not happening right now. So right now what you need to know, rates are up and they’re probably staying relatively high for the foreseeable future. Not the best news, but stuff you need to know. So let’s move on. We have two more stories about the new housing bill that did get enacted into law and some stress in the credit market you should be paying atention to. Got to take a quick break though. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today going over a lot of economic news we are getting in mid-July. Our second story here today is about the new housing bill, the 21st Century Road to Housing Act. It actually took effect this past Saturday. There’s a lot of drama about this. It passed both chambers of Congress a couple of weeks ago. President Trump refused to sign it, but there’s actually this parliamentary rule where if the Senate sends over their finished bill to the president and the president doesn’t do anything for 10 days, it actually just goes into the law. And President Trump didn’t do anything. He didn’t officially veto it. He just didn’t sign it because he was hoping to attach this to a voter registration bill that he’s been pushing for. But instead of vetoing it, he just sort of did nothing and we got the Road to Housing Act, one of the first big bipartisan bills I can remember in recent history. And I’ve talked about this a lot. You can go back and check out other episodes where I go into a lot of the provisions and details. There are dozens of them. There’s a lot in there. But big picture, I’m a fan of the bill. It’s not a silver bullet. I think it does good stuff. I think the spirit of the bill is what I like about it is because instead of just trying to stimulate demand by offering down payment assistance or trying to lower mortgage rates somehow through portable mortgages or 50-year mortgages or stuff that you know I am not a fan of, it targets the main issue, which is supply side. There are some demand side things in there and I’m not against demand side solutions. I think there can be a bandaid for the low affordability that we have. But to fix the long-term stuff, which is what we should all be hoping for, you need to go after the supply side. And I like that this bill targets it. It’s not going to fix everything overnight. It’s at a federal level, which is a problem in itself because most housing policy happens at a state and local level. And although this bill does encourage local governments to be better about allowing development and revitalizing housing, they don’t have to do it. There’s no requirement in there. But today I want to talk about one part of the bill because this is making a lot of news. It’s making all the headlines. Ben on a couple of news programs recently and it’s all anyone wants to talk about, which is the Wall Street part of it. Is Wall Street actually getting banned from the housing market? Let’s dig into it. Now the section in the bill, it’s kind of funny. If you look at the bill, the section about Wall Street is literally titled Homes Are For People Not Corporations. So that makes you feel like, oh man, they’re getting Wall Street completely out of the housing market. That’s not exactly what’s going on here. So let’s talk about what’s actually in the bill. The big headline is that it bars institutional investors, which they define as organizations that own 350 or more homes. No really sure where they came up with that number, 350, but that’s where they came up with 350 or more homes from buying single family houses on the open market. So that’s a thing. It does actually stop you from buying single family houses on the market and there’s some teeth to it. There are real penalties. The penalties for doing it could be up to a million dollars or three times the price of the home. It also opens the door if states want to pass stricter bans, but there is a little bit of teeth to that. There are a lot of exceptions that I think it’s not really going to stop institutional ownership. Big landlords, people like Invitation Homes, Tricon, Predium, they could still buy rental homes under a few conditions. So there are two big exceptions. One, if they make renovations, which is kind of what they do. They don’t really go out and buy that many turnkey homes. Sometimes they do. They were during COVID, but if they buy something and fix it up, they’re still allowed to do it. Or if they give tenants a chance to buy the home and do sort of a rent-to-own kind of model, they can do that. So that’s one carve out. Another carve out is they can still sell and buy homes from each other. I don’t know how much that really happens, but that is still possible. And one of the bigger ones is they can still buy build-to-rent product. So if a developer goes out and carves something out as build to rent, those big institutional players can still buy it. So I would say, is this a ban on institutional buyers? No, definitely not. It’s kind of just like setting some rules and guidelines about what parts of the housing market institutional owners can play in. As some context, I just kind of want to remind everyone that I personally do not think that Wall Street is the problem in the housing market. I’m not saying I love that they participate in the housing market. If they got banned, I wouldn’t really care personally. Doesn’t really matter to me that much. I am not some huge fan of giant corporations owning rentals. I would rather mom and pop investors like you and me own that. Small entrepreneurship, small businesses, people pursuing financial freedom. I would prefer that. But I just kind of want to be honest that big firms own about 3% of single family rentals. The BiggerPockets community may own more rentals than all of Wall Street combined. I don’t really know, but we have 3.5 million people in the BiggerPockets community. 90% of rentals are owned by people with 10 units or fewer. So it is kind of possible. It’s interesting. Anyway, I think that institutional buying panic, it’s just kind of overblown, but this will have some effects. What’s happening recently is that institutional investors have slowed down waiting to see what these provisions are. We’ve seen a lot of big institutions basically stop buying. Some of them were actually laying off employees on this. And so even though I think just to be candid, what’s in this bill is a little bit more political pandering. Again, it’s by both sides, it’s bipartisan bill. They want to say, “Hey, we got Wall Street out of housing.” Not really. I don’t really think they did. It just kind of reshapes how these institutions are going to go about participating in the real estate market. They’re moving them more towards build to rent and for renovating, which is fine in my opinion. I think build to rent has an important part in the housing market. I think it could actually add supply. If developers are encouraged to create build for rent, that could create more rental supply and improve affordability. But I think the thing for us is that for small and mid-sized investors, there’s this pullback that’s going on right now and it might not last in institutional buying. It could be a window. There’s less competition right now in the resale and open market for the next year or two when they’re trying to figure out what to do, where to allocate capital. These are big institutions. And although they’re not like the government in how slow they move, they’re probably still going to take some time to figure out what the next play is. And in a buyer’s market like we’re in right now, that reduced competition does create an opportunity for small and mid-sized investors. So if you’re in one of those markets in the Southeast where they had been buying, this is a time to look, time to go find opportunity. Could they come back? Yeah. And so I think this is kind of a window that you should look at if you’re in Florida or Tennessee or South Carolina or Phoenix, Texas. A lot of the Sunbelt basically where these institutions are super active, this might be your window right now to out – compete them and get great assets at good prices because we’re in a buyer’s market. A lot of those markets are in a correction. You’re going to have lower competition. That’s a good time to buy. Still got to buy smart and do everything we talk about, but I think that’s the headline here is that they’re going to probably pause and you can keep going. So that’s my advice on the housing bill. We’re going to have to see everything else, but that’s kind of the near term thing that I think could benefit small and mid-sized investors like all of us. So that’s our second story. We have one more about cracks in consumer credit, and I’ll of course share why you should care about this. We got to take one more break though. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today going through three big stories that are impacting the housing market. We talked about mortgage rates and why they’ve gone up in recent days. Just talked about the housing bill and the impacts on institutional investors. Next, we’re going to talk about cracks in consumer credit. We spent a lot of time on the show talking about housing credit, what’s going on with mortgages and that delinquencies are still doing fine, that the foreclosure hysteria on social media is really overblown. Today though, I want to look outside housing and talk about credit cards and student loans because that’s where the stress is and it can come back into real estate in some direct ways that I’m going to talk about. So big picture here, total household debt, just what Americans are taking out, not corporations or the government, but household debt keeps going up, hit almost $19 trillion in Q1 of 2026. Of that, credit cards are actually kind of small in terms of total consumer debt. It’s 1.25 trillion. It’s still an enormous amount of money, but when we’re talking about 19 trillion in consumer debt, most of that is mortgages. The vast majority is mortgages. Credit cards, 1.25 trillion. Student loans, 1.7. Auto loans, 1.7 as well. Overall, delinquency rates aren’t terrible, but they’re not great. They’re at 5%, 4.8%. It’s not a crisis, anything like that we would know. And actually what we’re seeing is in a lot of these things, I keep updating you guys because I do think this is an important part of the economy to watch. Usually what happens to drive us into a recession is there’s credit default. That’s kind of the thing that tips us over the edge.Maybe the economy runs too hot, people spend too much money, they take out too much debt. That is usually what happens. And then when delinquencies start to rise, that’s when the economy resets through a recession. And so that’s why we look at this stuff. We know mortgage rates are doing okay, but I’ve shared with you in recent months that things like student loan delinquencies, auto delinquencies, credit card delinquencies have been going up. And so even though that total number is not in crisis levels, the trajectory recently hasn’t been great. Now there is some good signs around the credit card front. It’s basically flattened out. It’s still relatively high. We’re still at about 8.6%. It’s not terrible. Serious delinquency flows on credit cards, basically flat. It’s up, but it’s not in the panic session. And the fact that it’s flattening out is a good sign. So with credit card stuff, still something to watch, but I’m not super concerned about that right now. Obviously I don’t want people delinquent on their credit cards. That stinks. But in terms of how it plays into the housing market, I don’t think it’s going to be that bad. If you look at where the delinquencies are in credit cards, it’s really with subprime borrowers. There are not a lot of subprime borrowers in the housing market anymore. A lot of regulations since the financial crisis got that segment of the market out. So I don’t think this has an immediate spillover. Could spill over into the rental market. It’s kind of extrapolation at this point. I’m not that worried about it. But student loan delinquencies is a real factor in the housing market. If you see the number, the percentage of student loan balances that are seriously delinquent, 90 plus days delinquent, it’s up above 10%, 10.3%. It’s actually up from 9.6% the prior quarter. So that’s going up at a pretty decent rate. That’s not great. And just the scale of number of people is a lot. The number of people who are more than 120 days past due is 2.6 million. That is a lot of people, right? Now there is some good news here. The rate at which it’s increasing is going down a little bit. So it’s not like going exponential. It’s kind of starting to level off a little bit, but the level is high. So we need to pay attention to it. Since this pandemic pause was fully over, we kind of knew student loan repayments were probably going to hit the market a little bit and we’re starting to see exactly how. So first and foremost, it’s just people don’t have a lot of money. It’s getting spread out and it’s not going to housing. So actually NAR, they just did a survey asking what the biggest challenges are to buying a home and saving for a down payment. And the number one obstacle by far was student loans. 43% of first time home buyers say that student loans are their number one obstacle to saving for a down payment. That’s crazy. The average federal student loan payment right now is about $382 a month. That’s a lot, right? Because if you actually extrapolate that, Zanda actually did a study on this, they show that in certain states that can delay what you need for down payment by up to seven years. If you’re paying full price, I think it’s about like 18, 19 grand of affordability that it knocks off. And if you’re an investor, you buy a lot, maybe 19 grand doesn’t sound like a lot, but in certain markets, it knocks you down to being able to afford about under a $300,000 home. It’s possible in some markets, some markets that’s not possible. So this is one of the reasons why we see the age of first-time home buyers keep getting pushed later and later. It sort of softens demand for first time home buyers. So that is two things that you need to know there. One, it’s going to lower demand for entry level flips or resale, something important to know, but it could be a tailwind for rental demand. Now I’m not happy about this. I’m just saying, I just want to make clear, I wish more people could afford primary residences. I really do. I think that’s important for society. I even think it’s good for investors. I think if there’s that demand, that is good. But in the trade-off here, and there’s always trade-offs in the market, is that more of these people will be renting. So single-family rentals might get an actual benefit in terms of rents and occupancy because of this. So two things you need to know. So that’s the first reason. The second reason that demand is coming down, just not even the saving part is the qualification part because student loan payment resumption, it dings credit scores. It adds to your debt to income ratio. So even buyers who might have saved up or who want to get in are having a harder time getting approved. And so this is just another reason to extrapolate what I said before. Another reason we’re going to see low demand for entry level homes. So be careful on the resale if you’re trying to flip those kinds of things and why single family rentals might actually get a boost in terms of occupancy and rent because of these two things. Saving for a down payment and qualifying are hitting the same group hard. So big picture with credit, remember housing credit is fine, but these things do spill over. People only have so much money. If they’re delinquent on their credit cards or their student loans, it impacts housing demand and it impacts rental demand both in positive and negative ways. If you’re renting to folks in the subprime category who are credit card delinquent, you might see lower demand for housing. You might see non-payment of rent go up because people are stretched. They have to consider where to put their money. Meanwhile, people who are in that kind of gray area where they’re trying to save for a down payment but can’t be qualified or they can’t save up, rental demand in that category might go up. So these are things that you should think about in your own decision making about where demand’s going to be, about what properties to buy and to hold and to renovate. These are trends that I think are going to be here for a little while. I don’t think we’re all of a sudden, although things are getting better, I don’t think affordability for first time home buyers is getting better anytime soon. So these are things that you can use to make decisions in your own portfolio. It’s something I definitely think about in the things that I am buying and the things that I am selling. So that’s it. That’s our headline for today. Rates are up. They’re probably going to stay higher. The housing bill finally passed. I encourage you to go back and listen to the episode, use Claude to analyze the bill and see where there are provisions that might benefit or hurt you in your portfolio. It’s mostly benefit, I think, but go in and check what opportunities you can take from that. And then third, look at credit stress. Look at who your tenants are, look at your own portfolio and how stress outside the housing market may be seeping into your portfolio because it’s happening and it’s not obvious, but investors who are going to thrive and do well in this environment are the people who are paying atention to this stuff that’s not just immediately in front of your face, that’s not just the headlines about housing. This stuff matters. It does impact the housing market and hopefully today’s episode helps you understand how. I’m Dave Meyer. Thank you so much for watching this episode of On the Market. I’ll see you all next time.
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].