Bottom line: Go ahead, and get a sitter.
Bottom line: Go ahead, and get a sitter.
In this video, I explain the two non negotiable rules of finance that I have followed throughout my career.
First, every asset must generate a return at least equal to its cost of capital. Second, assets must bring in cash before liabilities demand it.
These two principles apply to individuals, investors, and business owners alike. Ignore them, and financial stress follows. Follow them, and decisions become clear.
#finance #charteredaccountant #financialeducation #business #businessowner #entrepreneur #financeeducation #education
source
Futures offer significant advantages in execution speed.
When regime shifts require exposure adjustment, physical holdings impose transaction costs, potential tax triggers, and multi-day settlement periods. Futures adjustment occurs in minutes at near-zero cost.
A $300 million portfolio detecting rising volatility needs to reduce equity exposure from 70% to 55%, eliminating $45 million of exposure.
Traditional rebalancing: sell $45 million in shares. Cost: 0.3% to 0.5% ($135,000 to $225,000). Time: two to three days. Via futures: eliminate $45 million of synthetic exposure. Cost: $1,000 to $2,000. Time: minutes.
Adjusting exposure multiple times annually as regimes shift? The cumulative savings become substantial. More importantly, low adjustment costs remove hesitation. You can respond to changing conditions without worrying that reversal will be prohibitively expensive.
This agility enables capturing opportunities in favorable regimes by increasing exposure when volatility is low and protecting capital in adverse regimes by reducing exposure when volatility spikes, exactly what’s needed to maintain long-term consistency.
Implementation Risks
The same principle applies beyond protection. Capital efficiency through derivatives isn’t without complications. Three risks require management:
Margin Calls During Stress
Futures require margin. When markets move sharply against positions, you need to add margin quickly, sometimes intraday.
March 2020 taught this lesson clearly. Some institutional investors maintained minimal margin buffers. When requirements doubled or tripled overnight, liquidity squeezes forced liquidation at the worst possible moment.
Mitigation: maintain 3x to 4x the margin requirement in liquid reserves. Use Treasuries as collateral; they’re accepted for margin and continue generating yield.
Basis Risk Between Physical and Synthetic
Futures don’t replicate indices perfectly, particularly during extreme volatility. S&P 500 futures tracking error ranges from 2 to 5 basis points in normal markets to 3 to 80 basis points during stress. For a $150 million position, that’s $45,000 to $120,000 in temporary divergence.
Mitigation: limit synthetic exposure to 25% to 35% of equity allocation. Use only highly liquid futures on broad indices rather than sector-specific or small-cap contracts. Monitor basis daily and adjust if divergence becomes significant.
Operational Requirements
Adding a derivatives layer requires infrastructure: real-time exposure tracking, margin management processes, counterparty monitoring, regulatory reporting.
This can seem daunting. But for insttutional investors already operating derivatives for hedging, adding an efficiency layer is incremental rather than transformational. The systems already exist.
New to derivatives? Start with a single liquid instrument: S&P 500 futures representing 15-20% of equity allocation. Build comfort and establish processes over 6 to 12 months, then scale gradually.
The complexity is real but proportionate.
Compared to 150 to 200 basis points in annual savings and materially improved risk-adjusted returns, the operational investment justifies itself, particularly when viewed as permanent infrastructure rather than temporary overlay.
Decision Framework
Three conditions indicate when this approach is most effective:
Capital in Low-Return Positions.
Maintaining 10% to 15% in defensive positions for operational or strategic reasons? Capital efficiency dramatically reduces opportunity cost. Already 100% invested comfortably? The savings are marginal.
Rebalancing Frequency
Volatility targeting, regime-based adjustments, tactical tilts — each imposes transaction costs. Physical rebalancing costs 20 to 50 basis points per adjustment. Derivatives cost 1 to 3 basis points.
Quarterly rebalancing or less? Savings don’t justify added complexity. Monthly or more frequent adjustments? Annual savings reach 100 to 200 basis points.
Operational Capacity
Already using derivatives for hedging? Adding efficiency layers is natural. Without derivatives experience? Start small with gradual scaling to develop capability without excessive risk.
The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) has sent a letter to the Senate Banking Committee urging members to vote against the CLARITY Act in its current form.
NASAA is the lobbying group that represents all the US state securities regulators, as well as regulators in Canada and Mexico.
While stating they support “responsible innovation, the group lists multiple areas they ask to be changed.
These include:
Maintaining “regulatory parity” in regard to tokenized assets, specifically when it comes to state authority, like anti-fraud and investigative powers.
Beyond this parity, NASAA said they remain concerned that bad actors will use “selective text” in the bill to commit fraud, resulting in “enforcement gaps.”
The group also wants licensing and registration authority over broker-dealers, advisors, and others they deem foundational to investor protection. NASAA worries that current language will undermine the federalism framework, explaining “a few short drafting adjustments” will avoid “years of costly litigation.”
NASAA describes the bill as granting overbroad exemptive authority to federal regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NASAA says it is committed to working constructively with Congress, but the current legislation needs “mission-critical revisions.”
…” We respectfully urge the [Senate Banking Committee] to vote NO on the legislation unless those issues are resolved.”
The group is one of several comments that have arisen in advance of the Senate Banking Committee’s scheduled markup hearing this Thursday.
The CLARITY Act was approved by the House in 2025 but has been mired in a legislative morass during 2026. NASAA has long been defensive regarding any perceived or actual infringement of its regulatory powers at the state level.
During markup, changes to the bill can be made, and opponents may be able to sway certain Senators to demand changes to the legislation, which could alter the bill’s current compromise status.
Prominent U.S. executives from Big Tech to agriculture have been invited to join President Donald Trump on his trip to China this week, according to a White House official.
Trump leaves on Tuesday for Beijing to meet with President Xi Jinping. Aside from discussions about Iran, the two leaders are expected to discuss trade and artificial intelligence.
Here’s a look at some of the executives according to the White House official, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, led Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency until leaving in the spring of 2025 before the controversial pop-up agency was shuttered in November. The billionaire, who also owns the social media platform X, feuded with Trump last summer in a war of words that included Musk claiming without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president’s association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk eventually said that he regretted some of his posts on X about Trump.
Since then, Musk has refocused his energy on Tesla and his other companies. Tesla has operations in China and Musk has visited there. He’s also been dealing with French prosecutors seeking charges against him and X for child sexual abuse images on the platform, deepfakes, disinformation and complicity in denying crimes against humanity by the platform’s artificial intelligence system, Grok. There’s also trial pitting Musk against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
Cook remains busy as his tenure at Apple winds down. The CEO announced last month that his 15-year reign as the head of the technology company will come to an end on Sept. 1, when he turns the CEO duties over to Apple’s head of hardware engineering, John Ternus. During Cook’s years as the top executive, Apple saw the its market value soar by more than $3.6 trillion during an iPhone-fueled era of prosperity. Cook will remain with the company as executive chairman.
Apple’s reliance on overseas manufacturing required Cook to master the art of political diplomacy, particularly while Trump waged trade wars with China during both his terms in the White House. After persuading Trump to exempt the iPhone and other products from Trump’s first-term tariffs, he faced a more daunting challenge during the current administration.
While insisting that Apple shift its iPhone manufacturing from China to the U.S., Trump imposed some tariffs on the device this time around. But Cook still managed to minimize the fees by shifting the production of iPhones destined for the U.S. market to India and also winning some exemptions after promising Apple would invest $600 billion in the U.S. during Trump’s second administration.
Robert “Kelly” Ortberg, a former CEO at aerospace manufacturer Rockwell Collins, became CEO of Boeing in 2024. He’s spent time focusing on Boeing’s recovery, as the aerospace company was dealing with legal, regulatory and production problems and mounting financial repercussions when he took over.
A year ago Ortberg said that he didn’t expect the U.S. trade war with China to forestall Boeing’s financial recovery, nor prevent it from reaching aircraft delivery targets with Chinese airlines that were refusing to accept its planes. Beijing increased its import tax on American goods to 125% in April 2025 in retaliation for Trump raising the tariff on products made in China to 145%. China’s tariff would more than double the cost of passenger jets that Boeing, the U.S.’ largest exporter, sells for tens of millions of dollars. But Beijing is less of a threat to Boeing now that it used to be, as it has started to send fewer of its finished planes there over time.
Boeing has been in ongoing talks with China over a possible large aircraft sale.
Blackrock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink
Blackstone Chairman, CEO and co-founder Stephen Schwarzman
Cargill Chairman and CEO Brian Sikes
Citi Chairman and CEO Jane Fraser
Coherent CEO Jim Anderson
GE Aerospace Chairman and CEO H. Lawrence Culp
Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon
Illumina CEO Jacob Thaysen
Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach
Meta President and Vice Chairman Dina Powell McCormick
Micron Chairman, President and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra
Qualcomm President and CEO Cristiano Amon
Visa CEO Ryan McInerney
———-
Aamer Madhani in Washington D.C. contributed to this report.
The creation of new homes, and for whom they are being built for, is a hot button topic in Washington today.
Processing Content
On Monday night, in a social media post, President Trump called on the House of Representatives
The Senate bill,
It has run up against Republican opposition in the House, particularly
The housing industry itself is split, with the Mortgage Bankers Association calling on its members earlier this month to urge the House to remove this portion, as well as three others.
On the other hand, the National Housing Conference urged the House to pass its own bill, but build on the Senate’s “strong bipartisan foundation.” This includes holding onto the institutional investor ban.
“The Senate’s proposal to ban institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes reflects not only the President’s priorities, but the growing urgency of preserving homeownership opportunities for first-time buyers who are increasingly being priced out of the market,” a May 12 statement by David Dworkin, president and CEO of the NHC, said.
With this backdrop, one company announced an expansion of its homebuilder financing program, while another stepped up its purchases of build to rent communities with a new joint venture.
Builders Capital Exchange has a $2 billion multi-year annual capital commitment from a global institutional partner. The program is build to own, but those owners can be institutional investors (Builders Capital Exchange does do some build to rent financing).
Estimates vary on how big the deficit is, with
While noting the varying numbers being put out regarding the shortage, the end result is one thing, said Robert Trent, CEO of Builders Capital Exchange.
To solve for affordability in the U.S., supply has to be increased. “There’s no way to get there other than building more houses, and these builders can’t build more houses without more capital,” Trent said.
Builders Capital Exchange
The majority of construction funding was handled by banks and other small private lenders, said Trent, whose experience was as a homebuilder in Washington State. During the Great Financial Crisis, he ended up selling to a publicly traded builder because of the capital constraints. The experience led him to create Builders Capital Exchange.
But the banks, with the exception of
On the other hand, private lenders have maximum concentration limits on how much they will lend to a borrower. A builder constructing hundreds of homes a year needs to have “dozens of different capital partners” from both sources, Trent said.
“What we do is, because of the size and scale and the partnership we have with institutional investors, is we’re able to go in there and offer them one giant facility, if you will, that would replace most or all of those smaller facilities,” he continued.
Blackstone recently announced it was
Separately, RCLCO Fund Advisors formed a joint venture with what it called “a Top 50 domestic pension fund” to make investments in purpose-built single-family rental communities.
It already has closed on an 82 home single-family attached property.
“RFA was an early participant and continues to have high conviction in BTR investments based on observed, and too often unmet, demand for high quality and affordable single-family housing,” said Taylor Mammen, CEO, in a press release.
This venture is looking at properties with between 50 and 250 homes. These should be within 30 minutes of a major employment center, with the majority being three bedrooms or more. It also has a preference for amenitized communities with townhomes and/or single-family detached homes.
“We believe the purpose-built single-family rental sector is supported by powerful structural drivers, including evolving household formation patterns, affordability pressures, and strong demand for attainable rental housing options,” said Rick Pollack, RFA’s managing director, in a press release.
The biggest snack maker in Japan is making some of its packaging black and white as the Iran war disrupts the market for a key material used to produce printing inks.
Calbee, which controls half of Japan’s snacks market but also does business in the U.S., said in a press release Tuesday that several of its potato chip products, as well as its Kappa Ebisen shrimp-flavored snacks and its Frugra fruit and granola mix, will switch to monochromatic packaging because of “supply instability affecting certain raw materials amid ongoing tensions in the Middle East.”
The company said while the products themselves will be unaffected, the measure will be applied to select packaging on May 25 to “help maintain a stable supply of products.”
The company’s announcement comes as the Iran war continues to disrupt supply chains worldwide, especially for petroleum-based products, thanks to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world’s oil passed before the war.
Despite a fragile ceasefire put in place by the U.S. and Iran last month, tension between the two sides have flared up in recent days. On Monday, President Trump declared Iran’s latest counterproposal “garbage” and said the ceasefire was “on life support.”
Calbee’s packaging predicament is partly due to a tightening in the supply of naphtha, a liquid hydrocarbon mixture derived from petroleum that is used in plastic production and as a printing ink solvent. Japan imports more than 60% of the Naphtha it needs, and 70% of that supply comes from the Middle East, according to the Japan Petrochemical Industry Association.
Japan’s deputy chief cabinet secretary Kei Sato told the Financial Times that the country’s Naphtha needs were being met and that the government has “not received any reports of immediate supply problems at this time.”
Yet, Japanese companies have become so desperate for naphtha, they pushed U.S. exports of the raw material to an all-time-high of 15 million barrels in a single month in March, Bloomberg reported. Japan Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said late last month that naphtha imports from countries not in the Middle East, such as the U.S., would triple this month to meet supply, the Japan Times reported.
Because Naphtha is used to produce printing ink but also plastics and fertilizers, printing ink manufacturers have had to compete with myriad companies for the same raw material. As such, the price of Naphtha has shot up about 60% year-over-year.
Due to the price increases of oil-related raw materials, other companies besides Colbee have also had to make difficult choices about their packaging and product lines.
Earlier this month, Hiroyuki Urata, the president of Japanese food company Itoham Yonekyu, said it may also implement black and white packaging: “colourful packaging will become difficult,” Urata said, according to the FT.
Japanese beauty company Shiseido Co. is also considering swapping its oil-based materials for those derived from plants partly due to the naphtha shortages, Bloomberg reported. This move could potentially affect some of the company’s products like moisturizers or makeup.
“We are already optimizing our operations while assuming a worst-case scenario,” said Shiseido CEO Kentaro Fujiwara.
Crypto Trading For Beginners Full Course | Learn Trading From Scratch | Trading Course (Day 2/10)
This is the Second video of a complete 10-video trading series. This video is based on Crypto trading for beginners, Crypto trading full course or trading full course. So if you are interested in trading kaise sikhe in 2026 or crypto trading for beginners then this video is for you. Here you learn how to trade crypto, Crypto trading for beginners, how to start trading for beginners or complete Crypto trading Full Course.
I’m attaching our Trading Full Course playlist here so you can watch the entire Trading series step by step:-
————————-
Crypto Trading APP Link ✅👇🏻
Bitcoin ya Crypto me Trade krne ke liye is link par click karke apna Delta Exchange me Ac Open karen jisse aapko milega adhirah AI ka Free subscription, uske liye Ac open krne ke baad niche diya hua google form Fill karen.
AdirahAI Google Form ✅👇
Fill this form to get Adirah AI Subscription, You must have opened Delta Exchange Account Using our link and actively Trading.
—————————-
📲🎉 Buy Our Basic to Advance Stock Market Investing Course :
🤖 Android:
📱 iOS:
Org code: ytdlyk
————————–
Stock Market Millionaire Book Link –
Neeraj Joshi Intraday Trading Book-
Quants App For Algo Trading –
—————————
Insurance is Important ✅
Buy Online Term Insurance (Online Discount Upto 10% ) 👇🏻
Buy Online Health Insurance (Online Discount Upto 25%) 👇🏻 :
————————–
Follow me on :-
🔵 Telegram :-
🙋 Instagram:-
❤ Facebook:-
🐦 Twitter (Now X) :-
🏢 LinkedIn :-
🌳 All Links
—————————–
Topic Covered:-
trading course,
crypto trading,
trading for beginners,
crypto trading for beginners,
crypto trading full course,
trading,
trading full course,
trading kaise sikhe,
how to start trading,
how to start trading for beginners,
how to trade,
learn trading,
trading basics for beginners,
how to trade crypto,
crypto trading course,
learn trading from zero,
best trading app,
learn crypto trading,
crypto trading kaise kare,
trading kaise kare in hindi,
full trading course,
trading course for beginners,
free trading course,
learn crypto trading,
crypto trading for beginners full course,
trading kaise kare,
Neeraj Joshi,
Disclaimer –
Investing in the share market, including equity, derivatives, commodity, and currency, involves market risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. The risk of loss can be substantial, and it may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved and invest at your own risk. We are not a SEBI registered advisor, and this channel is for educational purposes only. Neeraj Joshi and any person associated with this channel accept no liability for any content uploaded on this channel or responsibility for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising from actions taken based on the information provided on this channel.
#cryptotrading #tradingcourse #tradingforbeginners #trading
source
Non-affiliate disclosure: all information about this card has been collected independently by US Credit Card Guide and has not been reviewed by the issuer.
2026.5 Update: New benefit added to this card: $300 ChatGPT Business credit. Note that its pricing differs from the more familiar personal plan, and a minimum of 2 users is required.
2025.9 Update: Today there are a few changes to this card:
The personal platinum card is now significantly better than this business version after the upgrade on 9/18/2025. BTW, now you can see a 300k welcome offer with incognito mode, see screenshot.
This card has various credits to cover some expenses. They are:
This card comes with a very generous welcome bonus, and the targeted offer isn’t that hard to get. It has long dominated the top spot in welcome bonus rankings. The minimum spend requirement is tough for many people, so be sure to carefully evaluate your “business”’s cash flow before applying.
For long-term holding, think carefully about whether the high annual fee is worth it. In my opinion, the personal Platinum card is a better keeper — more credits, lower effective annual fee, and more value overall. If you don’t plan to keep this card and still have unredeemed MR points when closing, you can apply for a no-annual-fee card like AmEx Checking or AmEx Blue Business Plus to preserve your MR points for future use.
One unique perk of this card is the 35% rebate on MR redemptions (not available on the personal Platinum). That makes your MR points worth about 1.54 cents each when redeemed — not the absolute best value, but still a very solid option.
You can downgrade this account to the AmEx Business Gold Rewards (BGR) card after the first year. Once downgraded, most (all?) people are given the option to upgrade again to the AMEX Business Platinum while earning 50,000 MR after spending $10,000 (even if you have already received a sign-up bonus on the AMEX Business Platinum). I have used this trick to receive the annual fee credits, additional MR sign-up bonus, and all the other perks of the AMEX Business Platinum many times. Also note that, when you upgrade, AMEX does NOT do a hard-credit pull!
Dave:
Senior housing is one of those asset classes that people talk about like it’s either a guaranteed wave where you’re going to make a ton of money no matter what, or it’s this complicated niche you should never actually touch. But the truth is it’s neither. It is a real operating business. It’s heavily driven by demographics and it has its own risks and regulations and underwriting rules that are not all that similar to buying a single family rental. But at the same time, there are really strong demographic demand and supply tailwinds that are propelling this business into being one of the most interesting and dare I say, exciting asset class for real estate investors to consider. I’m Dave Meyer and today I’m joined by Jerry Vinci for a deep dive into the senior housing market. We’ll break down the demand story and why this can be such a compelling asset class, but we’ll also talk about how those headline occupancy numbers you see can be a little misleading, how there are different product types within the senior housing umbrella that you should consider and what investors really need to understand about operations, margins, and risk before they ever consider writing a check.
This is on the market. Let’s get into it. Jerry, welcome to the show. Thanks for being here.
Jerry:
Thanks for having me, Dave. Appreciate it.
Dave:
Yeah, excited to have you on. Give us a litle bit of your background. Who are you and what do you do?
Jerry:
Yeah, sure. Happy to. Yeah, I spent nearly 30 years kind of at the intersection of the operating side of senior living as well as the capital facing side of senior living. For the operators side, I’m the founder of a company called CCRG, short for CCR Growth, and it’s a demand generation agency. We work exclusively with senior living and I always describe it as we help operators optimize their pipeline. So we typically own the whole experience from the moment a family starts their search online to the day that they move in. And then on the capital side, I’m co-founder of a company called Nordon, that’s N-O-R-D-O-N. And we’re essentially an independent diagnostics firm built for investors and capital allocators who are underwriting senior housing. So it’s like the same core methodology we’re using as the marketing side of our business, but it’s just a completely different customer.
All
Dave:
Right. So Jerry, when you talk about senior living, it feels to me that there’s a lot of different subcategories of senior living. So what are we actually talking about? Is this assisted living? Are they big facilities, small facilities, or what entails this big umbrella of senior living?
Jerry:
There’s typically four categories of senior housing. There’s independent living, which is your 55 plus housing. You also have in that category, sometimes you’ll see CCRCs, which stands for continuing care retirement community or life plan community. Those are your active adults, people who might just be looking to downsize and live among other people who like similar things and are of a similar age that they are. Then you have assisted living, which is kind of like the next level of care. Then you have memory care, which is for dementia, Alzheimer’s. And then you have skilled nursing, which is kind of the old nursing home model just improved more so it’s not such a dark, scary place like it used to be. But those are typically the four main categories. And then even within those, you have residential assisted living, which are like micro communities of five or six residents all the way to buildings that have 800, 900 residents.
So it’s really just a broad stroke.
Dave:
Yeah. So generally it’s just people, it sounds like anywhere from 55 years up in all different walks of life, different stages of their life, different needs, different desires. So there’s a lot to cover there. I would also imagine though, is it a different customer too? Because I would imagine for an active community like you mentioned, it’s one or two individuals making the decision for themselves. As it gets older, like you just talked about dealing with family members. So in terms of different asset classes, where are the opportunities? Where are the challenges?
Jerry:
The challenge with the housing market, I think is the fact that boomers, there’s a good percentage of them that are house rich and cash poor. So you see that number that I think it’s over 50% of them have less than 250,000 in assets. So it’s like, how can they afford senior living? Well, they’re selling their homes to do it. So you’ve got the top third of boomers who will sell their home. They’ll get into senior living, no problem. They’ll pay those higher monthly fees and all is good. Then you’ve got the middle tier. And that’s kind of where I think the most opportunity is because affordable senior housing is not necessarily something that there’s a lot of right now. You see a lot of investors are pumping money into these luxury independent living communities. And what we really need is assisted living and memory care.
And that kind of goes back to the demographic piece of it too, because we look at this number, we hear about silver tsunami, we hear, oh, there’s this massive swell. And like you had said on one of your episodes too that I think tsunami is like the worst word you could possibly use because when I think of tsunami, I think of this giant wave that’s going to come crashing down really fast and destroy everything around it. But it’s more like a glacier than it is like a tsunami. For sure. It’s moving slow and there’s really no way to stop it. It’s just it’s coming for us whether we like it or not. But the demographic story is like by 2030, all boomers will be 65 and by 2040, we’ll have 110% more people over the age of 85 than we have right now. And typically 80 to 85 is the age range where people move into senior living.
So even though this population is hitting 65 and above now, it’s not really until they hit 80 that it’s really going to start impacting senior living. So we’re kind of just at the beginning of stages of this. And I think that’s why everybody’s kind of like blowing it off. They’re saying, “We’ve heard about this for 10 years. Everybody’s been talking about the silver tsunami, but nothing’s ever come of it. ” And now here we are starting tose that transition happen.
Dave:
So it seems that the investing cases just demand then, right? There’s just going to be a lot of demand for senior housing in the next, sounds like for decades.
Jerry:
Yeah, at least the next two decades. I mean, there’s also been a little bit of a misnomer about the baby boomer generation too, because I think there’s an assumption that there’s this massive generation and then once they’re gone, what are we going to do with all this housing that we’ve built or all these things that we’ve created for the boomers? Is it just going to be wasted? But there’s actually more millennials than there are boomers, 73 million millennials and 71 million boomers or something like that. So there’s actually more. So anything that’s built or being repurposed now for senior housing is going to be available for the next two generations as well. So I think it’s a pretty sound investment. But yeah, like you’re saying, I mean, 10, 20 years, it’s not going to be an overnight thing. But looking at the industry overall in terms of demand, I mean, we’ve had 18 consecutive quarters of growth and in Q4 of 2025, I think the national average occupancy was at 89% and by the end of 2026, it’s supposed to be over 90%.
So demand is there. The real challenge in senior living is the supply.
Dave:
That was going to be my question. Yeah.
Jerry:
I mean, we are so woefully behind. It’s almost scary at this point.
Dave:
Tell me about that because that’s sort of where multifamily has gone awry in the last couple of years. There’s demand for housing, but very localized oversupply. Some areas still undersupplied, but big glut of multifamily, particularly in the Sunbelt, you look at that, that’s hurt returns, rent growth, cap rates, all that. But it sounds like on the senior living side, that supply glut isn’t there and maybe the opposite exists.
Jerry:
Yeah, it actually is. It’s the complete opposite of that. If we look at between now and 2040 to meet the demand that’s going to be coming with senior housing, we would have to build around 100,000 to 125,000 units every year to meet that. And if we just look at last year as an example, in Q3 of 2025, there was 1,000 units that had started construction and in Q1 there was like 1,500. So in all of 2025, there was probably like 4,000 units that had started construction and in total there’s like 20,000 active units being built. So we have less than 25% of the supply being created right now than we actually need.
Dave:
Wow, that’s insane. I mean, from an investor standpoint, seems like a strong case, high demand, relatively low supply. But to me, just being a novice, I don’t know anything about this, but the operations seem complicated. So tell me what is the operating model for an investor?
Jerry:
Yeah, I think that’s the biggest challenge because I would say multifamily is like 70% of the way they’re in understanding senior living, but that last 30% is the operating piece of it.
Dave:
You just mean underwriting and what
Jerry:
It
Dave:
Takes, financing, that kind of stuff.
Jerry:
Yeah, because the real estate drives the asset value, but then the operating business inside of it drives the NOI. So that’s the piece that is like the variable that really until you get into this market, you don’t really know what that looks like. Operators, they’re not just running the building, they’re running like the revenue engine, for example, that’s running the building. They have to create the operating profit that is being underwritten in those deals. In multifamily, you sign a 12-month lease, the resident pays or they don’t. It’s pretty mechanical in terms of collecting rent and things like that. But in senior housing, every resident is the result of a long sales process. Families, they don’t sign up online. That’s interesting. They have to visit, they have the tour, they ask 30 questions, and then they come back with their adult children a lot of times and then they think about it for six months before they ever even sign.
Dave:
It’s a big decision.
Jerry:
Yeah. Yeah. It’s a huge decision. And then if you think about all the pieces that are running inside of the community itself that have to be run and managed well, you’ve got the caretaking side, you’ve got dining, you’ve got entertainment, you’ve got travel, hospitality, all of these things wrapped together around a real estate asset. It’s pretty complex to try to figure out who’s performing well. And even if one number, like say occupancy looks great on paper, there could be some underlying issues that maybe they’re not seeing.
Dave:
Yeah. Okay. That’s super, super helpful because I
Get the macro trends here. It makes a lot of sense to me, but the operations is every business is hard, but it’s a specialization, right? You have to know this. As an investor though, I’m curious how you get involved because you could do what you’re talking about and you start a business where you’re operating this whole thing. But I actually was looking at investing in a fund that was buying senior living and they were going out and buying the facilities and then doing triple net leases to operators and that way they didn’t actually have to do all that stuff you just talked about and
Jerry:
They
Dave:
Had a tenant doing that essentially. So I’m just curious what you think about different models and ways people can access this asset class. Maybe some people in our audience want to go out and do that, but if they don’t, what other avenues are there to get in?
Jerry:
Well, what you’re talking about with the triple net leases, essentially, that’s kind of the old model where the investors would partner with the operators and essentially the operators would pay rent to that investment committee. Now we’re seeing a lot more of the shop, the senior housing operating partner relationships where they’re taking a piece of that profit as well.
Dave:
The housing.
Jerry:
Yeah.
Dave:
Yeah. Oh, interesting.
Jerry:
Yeah. So their profits are tied directly to the operational piece of that business now. So if it’s run well, if they’ve optimized all areas of that community, then that’s going to be more profitable for everybody, not just for the community.
Dave:
And I guess what’s in it for the operator then? Do they get lower rents or something in exchange for giving up equity to the real estate owner?
Jerry:
I mean, probably less risk for them because they’re not shouldering at all themselves. That would probably be the first thing I would think. But for multifamily, looking to get into this space, I mean, you see there’s a lot of REITs out there that are doing this where you can invest say like 100 to 500,000 or something and get in with a public fund or something like that. I would start somewhere like that. I wouldn’t necessarily go into private lending or anything crazy like that right out of the gate before you really understand this industry.
Dave:
Yeah. This is great stuff learning a lot about the senior housing market, but we do have to take a quick break. We’ll be back with Jerry right after this. Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Let’s dive back in with Jerry Vinci. What about really small assets? Because I’ve heard other real estate investors who go out and buy an eight unit or whatever and it’s nice and they convert it into an assisted living facility. What do you make of that model where you’re kind of doing a small boutique kind of thing?
Jerry:
Who’s running it? That would always be my first question. Well,
Dave:
That’s the thing I’m always wondering. It’s like you’re a real estate investor, which is fine, but being a landlord and being operating senior living, assisted living facility seem like really different businesses to me. I hosted another podcast, BiggerPockets Podcast, and I’ve had a guest on there who’s doing this really successfully, but he was working in assisted living as a nurse and then he was like, “Oh, I can do this. ” Exactly. And so he knew what it took and has a genuine care for seniors and being in that world, that makes sense to me. But just based on your body language, it seems like maybe you don’t recommend the average real estate investor go out of there and do
Jerry:
This.
Again, who’s going to be operating the place? Is it going to be them? If it is, then they have a serious crash course ahead of them to learn how to operate even a small community because most of those small residential assisted living homes that you’re talking about that are like five, six, maybe eight residents, they’re typically like a higher level of care. It’s usually a memory care or assisted living. So it’s not like you’re just going to be able to step in and manage this place like a hotel. You’ve got to provide meals, entertainment twenty four seven around the clock care in most cases. So it’s pretty complex. And yeah, I’m pretty shocked. I’ve seen quite a few investors get in and I think it’s because from a multifamily housing standpoint, it seems similar, right? You can get in, it’s not a huge investment. I mean, a typical senior living community can go anywhere from like five to 15 million as a investment.
So starting there would be a pretty big hill to climb, whereas like a residential assisted living home, you could purchase a home for 500,000, a million, something like that and renovate it and turn it into one of these communities pretty quickly and easily and turn it around and make a profit on it. But it’s all about the operating piece who’s running this. So
Dave:
Assuming people in our audience would be interested in getting into this in some way or another whether it’s syndication, REITs, the public option or operating it themselves, what are the major things you need to understand as you underwrite a deal? What are you looking for in a senior living facility, both from a real estate perspective and sort of a demand and I guess whatever else?
Jerry:
I think due diligence in senior living is very similar to any other industry. There’s a ton of different workflows that typically will go through with due diligence, but there’s questions that are not being asked right now. And again, I keep going back to the operator piece of it, but I think that’s probably the most important one is making sure that you’re learning and understanding how things are functioning inside enough to know whether if this asset’s already producing, can it keep producing and can it do that sustainably? So just looking at that. Some of the questions that I think that people looking to invest in this space should probably be asking the first question would definitely be, can this operator actually sustain or grow occupancy in this specific local market? And that’s the thing about senior living too, unlike some other markets, it’s hyper local. 85 to 90% of residents will move in from a five to 10 mile radius of your community on average.
Oh, wow.
Dave:
Okay.
Jerry:
Yeah. So it’s not like you have to create some massive national campaign to fill your building. It’s typically a small radius, but just making sure that you have all of those pieces in place. But yeah, answering that question would be first and foremost. And then some of the other things that we typically look at, depending on where somebody is in terms of writing a deal, there’s multiple things. There’s like pre-acquisition. So if they’re just looking to get into it, there’s a market entry position. So if they’re looking at like maybe they want to expand into a new space, but they’re not sure there’s a specific question for that. So if somebody’s looking to get into the market, they should be asking like, “Is there actually room for us in this market or is it already locked up?” Outside of just what the community’s doing, is there space?
Can we create a new community in this space or are the competitors so strong that there’s no room? Another big one in senior living is transitions because you’ll see a lot of times that the operator will change or management will change within the building. So a lot of times you have to ask yourself like six months from now when occupancy softens, can I actually prove what the new operator inherited? So we can, for example, have a diagnostic that here’s where occupancy and here’s where performance stood the day the deal was signed and here’s where it stands the day the keys change hands because those can be very different numbers. So making sure you understand so you can hold your operator accountable is very important.
Dave:
All right everyone, we’ve got to take one more quick break, but we’ll be back with Jerry right after this. Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s get back to my conversation about senior housing with Jerry Vinci. What about from the real estate perspective? Obviously you need to operate it well, but what makes a good facility and are most of them developed specifically for the purpose of senior living or do some of them get retrofit from multifamily or something else?
Jerry:
I think we’re starting to see more retrofitting happening just because of what I talked about with the supply side, because a construction project, for example, that started right now, it wouldn’t be done until 2027, 2028. And if we’re this far behind with inventory, we’re going to have to find it somewhere. So you see a lot of retrofitting happening. Also, 25%, it’s like 25 or 30% of inventory right now is more than 25 years old. So a lot of it has to be updated as well, which is another challenge all on its own. Depending on size, they’re going to have different amenities and different features and functionalities, but your standard, say like an assisted living community, it’s going to be anywhere from 50 to 100 units and it’s going to be a mix of individual like studio apartments, one bedroom, two bedroom typically. And sometimes they even have like friends will get a unit together.
So you’ll have one person staying in one room, one, the other. So companion suites, they call them. So those are typically like the four different types of housing in there. And then you’ve got all of your amenities, your dining. And today it’s not just like a cafeteria. You’ve got multiple restaurants, you’ve got sometimes like a quick grab spot, things like that. And that’s typically what that’s going to look like on the inside. And then from the operating piece of it, again, you got to look at where the pipeline is getting filled from. I think that’s an important piece of understanding the real estate because in senior living and I know other industries have similar things, but we have a lot of problems with third party aggregators, which is essentially if you’ve heard of a placeformom or caring.com, these websites that people go to when they’re searching for senior housing, they type in senior housing in Santa Fe or something like that.
And when they do that, oftentimes a website like A Place for Mom, which is just a directory of communities in your area is going to show up. And a lot of times that shows up before the actual communities do in the search results. So people click on that first not realizing they’re on one of these sites. And what happens is those aggregators will send that lead to like five or 10 or 15 different communities at the same time. So now they’re all fighting over that same lead. If you’ve ever tried to buy insurance online, it’s the same damn thing. It’s so frustrating
Dave:
Or a mortgage.
Jerry:
Yeah.
Dave:
Our audience
Jerry:
Are
Dave:
Very familiar with this.
Jerry:
So just imagine if you’re trying to find a place for a mom or dad and they’re dealing with, they just got diagnosed with dementia. Now you’re getting calls from 15 different salespeople from 15 different communities. So it doesn’t do anything to help the experience for the family and it also doesn’t do anything for the community because now the community is chasing a lead that may not even be a good fit for them and they don’t know because they just got it from this third party instead of getting it directly from that family. And there’s some portfolios right now where 80% or higher of their move-ins of their occupancy is from those aggregators. And the problem with that is that every single time one of those people moves in, you pay the first month’s rent as commission. So first month’s rent out the door on 80% of your move-ins, can you imagine what that would do to your bottom line?
So I think looking at that mix of where that community is getting its leads from and do they have a system that’s optimized well to get people from the initial touchpoint all the way through to move in and that includes marketing, sales and operations. I mean, I think you have to have some understanding of that to really understand what makes a good community versus one that’s not run well.
Dave:
That’s a great point. And it’s a really good reminder for our audience of the risk and reward of this industry. I think we see this too, Jerry, I don’t know if you’re familiar, but we talk a lot about self-storage here and how that’s different from multifamily because you need to be a good marketer there. It’s not like
Jerry:
There’s
Dave:
Just a steady stream of people who are like, “Oh, I want to live on this block. There’s an apartment on this block. I’ll reach out to that landlord.” For those of us who mostly work in multifamily or residential real estate, you still have to have a good product, but the marketing piece, it’s not really that hard. You can throw it on Zillow and apartments.com and you’re fine. This is a different business as you’re pointing out that you need to be good at marketing. So I really recommend for anyone who’s, I guess either if you want to be an operator or if you’re going to partner with an operator, you need to make sure they’re good at that, that they’re good at this lead flow and figuring out how you’re going to get demand on top of actually providing a quality service that meets resident expectations on top of that.
Jerry:
Yeah. There’s just so much on the line and you don’t often think about that if you’re outside this industry, but when that lead comes in, it’s not just a person looking for housing, it’s a family trying to find a solution to a crisis. And so acting fast, acting in a careful, mindful, compassionate way when you do reach back out to them and making sure that you’re holding their hand the entire way through the process, that makes it very different than your typical real estate asset for sure.
Dave:
Well, thank you so much, Jerry. This has been super helpful. Any other last thoughts or advice to our audience about this asset class?
Jerry:
I think the demographics of the senior housing space, they’re literally handing this industry 20 years of demand, this isn’t going anywhere. What investors decide to do with it is their story. The operators who own their demand infrastructure, like I was just talking about owning that pipeline, the ones who treat sales and marketing as one accountable system, making sure that they’re focused on what’s best for the family first. They’re the ones where the success of those communities is going to compound and anyone who’s tied to that, investors, whoever else is going to reap the benefits of that as well. So I think investors who know how to tell those two apart what’s working and what’s not working before they commit, they’re the ones that are going to make the most money and get the most out of this 20-year cycle that’s coming.
Dave:
Awesome. Well, thank you so much, Jerry. If people want to learn more from you, where should they connect with you?
Jerry:
Yeah, thanks for having me. Yeah, two places. If you want to learn more about the operator side of senior living and talk to us about demand generation, you can go to ccrgrowth.com. And if you want to learn about due diligence on investing in the senior housing space, you can go to Nordonadvisory, that’s N-O-R-D-O-N advisory.com.
Dave:
Thanks again, Jerry. And thank you all so much for watching this episode of On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. We’ll see you next time.
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].