Home Blog

Mortgage Rates Are Now 1% Higher Than They Were a Year Ago


If you asked someone a year ago where mortgage rates would be today, my guess is they wouldn’t say one full percentage point higher.

Yet here we are, with the 30-year fixed now almost exactly 100 basis points (1.00%) higher than it was last September.

Today, prospective home buyers are facing a rate of about 7.125%, up from 6.125% in mid-September of 2025.

Aside from throwing a wrench into any hope of a housing market revival, it has almost completely shut the door on refinances.

The big question is will it get worse from here, or are we at/near the top for mortgage rates?

Mortgage Rates Are Up One Percentage Point From Last September

A year ago, mortgage rates were actually in a pretty good place all things considered.

The 30-year fixed averaged about 6.125%, according to Mortgage News Daily.

That was about two full percentage points lower than its cycle-high of 8% seen in late 2023.

Things were looking brighter for the housing market, which had struggled mightily under the weight of significantly higher interest rates.

It seemed like the worst was behind us, that we could continue to drift even lower and get back to some sense of normal.

Mortgage rates did indeed drift lower, falling below 6% in late February of this year.

That really got everyone excited, whether it was a home buyer staring at a more palatable interest rate.

Or a recent buyer, who could finally lower their interest rate via a rate and term refinance.

But it proved to be very short-lived, with rates surging higher after the Iran conflict broke out.

Since then, there’s been lots of upward pressure on mortgage rates, so much so that they’re now a full percentage point higher than they were a year ago.

Today, a home buyer is looking at a rate of roughly 7.125% versus 6.125% last September.

Clearly that’s not good and will result in another lackluster year for home sales, with transactions still near 30-year lows.

Does It Get Worse for Mortgage Rates Before It Gets Better?

Okay. So we know mortgage rates are in a tough spot right now. That’s pretty obvious.

But they’re still about one full percentage point below those highs seen in late 2023.

So is it possible they could go back to those levels or even higher today?

You can never rule anything out, but one of the main reasons mortgage rates climbed above 8% back then was due to blown out spreads.

Because the market was essentially shocked by the end of QE and rates had risen from sub-3% to 6% in less than a year, the mortgage market wasn’t very liquid.

MBS investors were demanding a premium because there was a lot of prepayment risk (the thought the loans wouldn’t last long before being paid off).

As such, mortgage spreads were very wide, over 325 basis points (3.25% higher than the 10-year bond yield) at times.

Today, they’re largely back to normal around 200 bps or lower depending on the mortgage rate index you use.

So to get back to an 8% mortgage rate you’d need the 10-year bond yield to be a lot higher than 5%.

Really, you’d need it to be closer to 6%, which combined with a 200-bp spread would give you 8% rates.

It seems unlikely we’ll see 10-year bond yields climb that high, or even close.

There’s some argument they could be at a top, with perhaps a little more room to move higher into the low 5s, say 5.25%.

The end result would be a 30-year fixed just a little bit above where it already is, say 7.25% or 7.375%.

Either way, it’s not great, but a return to the cycle-highs seems unlikely because inflation today is being driven by global conflicts, not widespread like it was in 2022-2023.

(photo: FutUndBeidl)

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Saudi Arabia built the East-West pipeline in case Iran closed Hormuz. Militias still blasted it



Saudi Arabia’s closure of a major oil pipeline after a recent attack is raising fears that global energy markets in crisis because of the war with Iran could face even starker shortages, pushing prices higher for fuel and other essentials.

The largest oil producer in the Middle East closed its East-West pipelineon Friday after the attack, which it blamed on drones from Iranian-backed militias in Iraq. Two regional officials told The Associated Press that repairs could take three to five weeks.

The pipeline is crucial to getting some crude out of the Middle East by shipping it to the Red Sea rather than through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passed before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in February.

Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels have seized islands along key Red Sea shipping routes, further threatening Saudi exports. And while several limited alternatives remain, including trickles of tanker traffic in Hormuz, experts warn more supply shocks and higher prices straining households could pile up. Brent crude, the international standard, traded at more than $105 a barrel Monday.

Here’s what we know:

What is the East-West pipeline?

Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline stretches some 1,200 kilometers (746 miles) across the desert nation — carrying oil from a processing facility near the Persian Gulf westward to the Red Sea. There, crude is typically loaded onto tankers that head north towards Europe via the Suez Canal or south through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, on the way to Asia.

The pipeline was built in the 1980s amid fears that Tehran would disrupt shipping through Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq war. And for the first six months of the current war, it was crucial to keeping at least some oil flowing out of the Middle East while most tanker traffic in Hormuz remained at a standstill.

Rystad Energy said Monday that an average 2.6 million to 4 million barrels of oil a day moved through the pipeline and out of the Red Sea port of Yanbu since late August — a volume it said is now at risk of “disappearing from the market.”

Four million barrels per day is about 4% of the global oil supply, according to the International Energy Agency. Saudi Arabia produced nearly 10 million barrels of oil a day in September 2025, but was down to 6 million barrels per day in August, the IEA said.

Janiv Shah, vice president of oil markets for Rystad Energy, noted the recent jump in Brent prices proves the market is already responding to “a significant loss of supply.” Saudi inventories could sustain exports in the coming days, but that could “change quickly,” Shah added.

Where oil flows from the Middle East stand now

The Strait of Hormuz is still top of mind. Before the war, about 20 million barrels passed through Hormuz each day.

Some tankers are again traversing the strait, but traffic is well below what it once was. Maritime data company Lloyd’s List Intelligence counted 90 transits in the first week of September. Before the war, about 130 ships passed through daily.

The Houthis have also tightened their hold on the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a vital passage for the southern Red Sea. Analysts at Melius Research estimated that about 3 million barrels of oil a day were moving through Bab el-Mandeb in early September, but noted Monday that “it’s likely zero now.”

Because of Houthi attacks, most Saudi traffic from Yanbu went north to the Mediterranean, either via the Suez Canal or Egypt’s SUMED pipeline. But the Houthis have also begun targeting Saudi shipping in the north.

Salvatore Mercogliano, a professor of maritime history at Campbell University in North Carolina, noted that at least Hormuz is still on the table.

“If this (East-West pipeline) was the only method for Saudi Arabia to get their oil out it would be absolutely cataclysmic,” he said. “But since the Hormuz route has opened back up — not completely but opened up some — it’s not the death knell for Saudi Arabia. They’re getting oil out.”

Prices keep climbing

Supply squeezes have led to soaring prices worldwide. And analysts warn that the latest disruptions could bring even more pain for consumers in the coming weeks and months.

One of the most immediate consequences is the cost of fuel and household energy bills. Countries in Asia and Africa, which rely more heavily on imports from the Middle East, have experienced some of the starkest shocks.

In Nigeria, for example, diesel prices are now 92% higher than they were in late February, and gasoline prices are up nearly 61%, according to energy tracker Global Petrol Prices. Countries including Indonesia (diesel up 87% and gas up 38%) and Lebanon (diesel up 80% and gas up 46%) have also seen steep spikes.

In the U.S., the price per gallon of regular gasoline was nearly $4.32 on average Monday, up almost 45% from the $2.98 seen before the war, according to motor club AAA. Diesel hit another all-time high (without accounting for inflation) of $6.23 per gallon on average Monday, up nearly 66% from the start of the war.

The cost of diesel, in particular, makes its way into other goods because the fuel is used for long-haul trucks and other delivery networks, as well as farm equipment.

“An inflationary spillover is likely,” warned Melius Research analysts on Monday, pointing to the war’s squeeze on essentials like fertilizer as well as energy sources. “The diesel crunch is also coming ahead of the U.S. harvesting and heating season.”

Pentagon admits that Iranian strikes damaged and destroyed hundreds of buildings at US bases



A U.S. government watchdog released its first report on the impact of the Iran war on Monday, acknowledging the military’s advanced weapons shortfalls and offering the first public look at the damage to American aircraft, bases and diplomatic outposts in the Middle East.

Much of the information has been previously reported over the past six months, but the Pentagon inspector general’s report offered the fullest official accounting so far of the conflict’s costs in American lives, taxpayer dollars and physical damage. It included information from the watchdogs for the Defense and State departments as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The report, whose publication was first reported by NBC News, noted that the U.S. war with Iran “has resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls and revealed industrial base bottlenecks for munitions resupply” in regard to advanced weapons. Experts have previously said it will take about three years for military contractors to replenish advanced missiles and defensive missile interceptors to prewar levels.

The report, which covers April 1 to June 30, also acknowledged that Iranian strikes damaged and destroyed hundreds of buildings and other structures at U.S. bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman and Jordan. Dozens of American aircraft and drones also were destroyed or damaged.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress in late July that the war had cost $37.5 billion so far.

The costs to U.S. diplomatic facilities, however, had not been previously publicly released. Such outposts in Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE took the brunt of the physical damage, with an estimated cost of $184 million, according to the report.

The State Department reported in early June that its overall costs from the conflict came to $113 million, with nearly $80 million used to respond to contingency plans, including evacuation expenses for U.S. personneland their families as well as other American citizens and eligible third-country nationals.

The State Department reported that in the weeks and months after the U.S. and Israel first struck Iran on Feb. 28, the Trump administration evacuated about 9,000 U.S. citizens from countries in the Middle East and Europe. Through private and commercial flights as well as land and water travel, the cost of the department’s evacuation operation was more than $11 million as of late June.

“State determined that consular officers would not be able to fully document travel itineraries required to seek reimbursement from evacuees and therefore it would be impracticable to seek reimbursement from them,” the report states.

The majority of the evacuations were made from Israel, with Iraq and Jordan following shortly behind. While the U.S. only evacuated 1,200 Americans from the United Arab Emirates, those trips to Istanbul, Athens and Washington cost the most, at more than $4 million.

The State Department reported that more than $44 billion in emergency and non-emergency military sales also were made in that span of time, with the majority of sales going to Saudi Arabia. Sales included military helicopters, munitions and munitions support as well as advanced precision weapons system.

Other regional countries, including Qatar, Kuwait, UAE and Israel, also received billions in sales, as Iran retaliated against nearly every country in the region that hosted a U.S. military base.

[Update] Qatar Adds Restrictions On Booking Awards For Friends & Family/My List


Update 9/14/26: Qatar has dropped qualifying activity requirement for unlocking adding people to my list and friends and family list, 30 day active period still remains. Hat tip to /r/awardtravel

Original post: Qatar has added some new restrictions when making award bookings for friends and family. There are now two separate groups you can book awards for: ‘My List‘ (F.A.Q. here) and ‘Family & Friends Pool‘ (F.A.Q. here)

  • You can add up to four people to your list
  • You can add up to six people to your family and friends pool (up to 9 if previously added)
    • These members cannot have an existing Qatar Airways Privilege Club account
    • Miles acqured by family and friends go towards the main member 
  • You can only book award flights for people on your list or family & friends pool
  • You need to meet the activation condition (credit a flight to Qatar Airways Privilege Club or earn points on a cobranded card. Account must also be active for 30 days) to join or form a “My List” pool, or to form a Friends & Family pool. Seems like this has been changed.

These changes seem to be targeting points brokers that purchase award miles and then book tickets with miles (normally in business or first). While I’m sympathetic to trying to shut these brokers down to free up award space I don’t think it should be at the expense of harming real users and these changes are definitely too harsh and poorly thought out. Looks like there might still be some work arounds. 

I’m also really against anything that makes miles already earned so much more difficult to use. For example the activation condition seems needlessly extreme. Just a good reminder that the best miles are redeemed miles. 

 

Best High-Yield Savings Rates for September 14, 2026: Up to 4.15%


High-yield savings account rates held steady to start Septmeber. With the Fed looking at rate increases this week, banks are using this opportunity to capture savers.

As of September 14, 2026, some online banks are still offering interest rates up to 4.15% APY. This is still much better than the average of 0.38% APY, according to the FDIC.

Banks and credit unions are constantly adjusting their annual percentage yields (APYs) as markets react to Federal Reserve policy and inflation data, so staying up to date can make a real difference. Here’s where the best savings rates stand today — and what you should know before moving your money.

💰 Today’s Best Savings Rates At a Glance

Here are the best bank and credit union savings accounts rates today:

Bank or Credit Union

Top APY

Balance Requirement

NexBank

4.15%

$1

CIT Bank

4.10%

$2,500

Always.bank

4.10%

$0

Pibank

4.10%

$0

FVCbank

4.01%

$500

1. NexBank – NexBank is the largest privately held bank in Texas and currently is offering up to 4.15% APY in partnership with Raisin. They’re also offering up to a $1,000 bonus for new deposits. 

2. CIT Bank – CIT Platinum Savings a two-tiered savings account. 

Open an account with promo code CITBoost and you’ll earn 4.10% APY* on balances of $5,000 or more for the first six months* — that’s 10x the national average savings rate.

After 6 months, you’ll return to the regular rate of 3.75% APY* with a $5,000 minimum balance. Otherwise you’ll earn 0.25% APY. See website for full details. Read our full CIT Bank review.

3. Always.bank – Always.bank is the digital banking arm of 22nd State Banking Company, they’re currently offering a competitive 4.10% APY with no minimum balance requirements.

4. PiBank – PiBank is the online brand of Intercredit Bank, N.A and offers 4.10% APY with no monthly maintenance fees and no minimum balance requirements. However, lots of consumers complain about only being allow to withdraw via wire transfer. Read our full Pibank review.

5. FVCbank Advantage Direct Savings – FVCbank offers the Advantage Direct Savings Account and currently pays 4.01% APY with no monthly maintenance fees and just $500 minimum balance to open, and you must maintain a balance of $0.01 to earn stated APY. Read our full FVCbank review.

You can find a full list of the best high yield savings accounts here >>

How High Yield Savings Accounts Work And Why Rates Matter?

High-yield savings accounts function just like traditional savings accounts, but they pay a much higher annual percentage yield (APY) — often 10 to 15 times more. You can see how these rates compare to the savings rates at the 10 largest banks in America – and these rates put them to shame.

“The odds of a Fed rate hike are high, but banks are using this opportunity to capture savers in the current interest rate environment.” – Robert Farrington

The banks and credit unions on this list typically always have above-average rates, so even if the Federal Reserve lowers rates and these accounts lower their rates, you’ll still be head. 

For example, a $10,000 balance earning 4.00% APY will generate about $400 in interest per year, compared with less than $20 at a big-bank rate of 0.20%. That gap makes it worth tracking rate changes regularly and switching institutions if your current bank stops staying competitive.

However, we expect more rates to dip below that 4.00% level in the coming weeks.

What To Know Before Opening An Account

Before opening a new account, review the key details that determine how much you’ll earn — and how easily you can access your funds.

  • Watch For Intro Or Promo Rates: APYs can rise or fall at any time. But a strong introductory rate doesn’t guarantee long-term performance. None of the rates listed here are introductory, but some referral codes may only be temporary rates.
  • Transfer Limits: Federal rules no longer cap savings withdrawals at six per month, but many banks still impose limits.
  • Safety: Confirm that the institution is FDIC- or NCUA-insured, which protects up to $250,000 per depositor, per bank or credit union.
  • Access: Many top-yield accounts are online-only. Make sure you can deposit via mobile app and link external accounts for easy transfers.

These details help you separate truly high-performing savings options from accounts that look appealing but may include hidden limitations or slower rate adjustments.

How We Track And Verify Rates

At The College Investor, our goal is to help you make smart, confident decisions about your money. To create this list, our editorial team reviews savings account rates daily across more than 50 banks, credit unions, and fintechs. We verify data using each institution’s official website, rate disclosures, and regulatory filings.

Only accounts available to U.S. consumers and insured by the FDIC or NCUA are included.

Our coverage is independent and editorially driven – we never rank accounts based on compensation. While we may earn a referral fee when you open an account through certain links, this does not influence our recommendations or reviews. Our opinions are our own, based on a consistent evaluation of usability, fees, yields, and customer experience.

FAQs

How often do savings account rates change?

Banks can adjust rates daily or weekly based on market conditions.

Are online banks safe?

Yes — as long as they’re FDIC-insured. Verify coverage on the FDIC’s BankFind site.

Is interest on savings accounts taxable?

Yes. You’ll receive a 1099-INT if you earn $10 or more in interest.

Should I move my money if rates drop?

It depends on the difference in APY and your transfer limits, and frequent rate chasing can reduce returns if transfers take time.

Disclosures

CIT Bank

For complete list of account details and fees, see our
Personal Account disclosures.

* Platinum Savings is a tiered interest rate account. Interest is paid on the entire account balance based on the interest rate and APY in effect that day for the balance tier associated with the end-of-day account balance. APYs — Annual Percentage Yields are accurate as of July 1, 2026: 0.25% APY on balances of $0.01 to $4,999.99; 3.75% APY on balances of $5,000.00 or more. Interest Rates for the Platinum Savings account are variable and may change at any time without notice. The minimum to open a Platinum Savings account is $100.

* Platinum Savings APY Boost Promotion Terms and Conditions

This is a limited time offer available to New and Existing customers who meet the Platinum Savings APY Boost promotion criteria.

Accounts enrolled in the Platinum Savings Annual Percentage Yield (APY) Boost promotion will receive a 0.35% APY boost on the Platinum Savings current standard APY tiers for 6 months following the opening of a new account or when an existing Platinum Savings account is enrolled in the promotion. The Platinum Savings APY boost will be applied on account balances up to $9,999,999.00. Account balances above $9,999,999.00 will earn the standard APY. If the standard-published APY should change during the promotion period, the APY boost will move with it, offering an account APY above the standard rate.

The Promotion begins on February 13, 2026, and ends October 31, 2026. Customers enrolled in the promotion prior to the end date will receive the APY boost for the 6-month period outlined in the terms and conditions.

The promotion can end at any time without notice. 

Editor: Colin Graves

Reviewed by: Richelle Hawley

The post Best High-Yield Savings Rates for September 14, 2026: Up to 4.15% appeared first on The College Investor.

Home sales in B.C. down again in August amid ‘gradual recovery,’ association says




British Columbia home sales fell again in August on a year-to-year basis, although the real estate industry says a “gradual recovery” is underway.

SpaceX Spent $15.8 Billion on AI in a Quarter. Here’s What Happens to the Stock if Orbital Data Centers Don’t Work.


Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX -2.02%) is best known for its Starlink satellite communications business and orbital launching services built around its reusable rocket technologies, but the company is actually positioning artificial intelligence (AI) as the most important pillar of its growth strategy. Within the category, SpaceX is looking to orbital data centers as a potentially revolutionary performance driver.

Orbital data centers could offer far more direct access to solar energy, alleviating power consumption concerns, and could also provide superior heat-diffusion solutions that eliminate the need for water-based cooling. On the other hand, it’s still unclear whether SpaceX’s major investments in the tech will pay off.

Image source: Getty Images.

SpaceX placed a $15.8 billion bet on AI last quarter

SpaceX is already significantly diversified, with operations across rocket-launching services, satellite-based internet and communications, and AI — but it’s clear that artificial intelligence is at the center of its growth ambitions. The second quarter saw SpaceX’s total capital expenditures (capex) come in at roughly $18.4 billion, with $15.8 billion in spending devoted to the company’s AI business. Meanwhile, capex for Starlink was $1.4 billion, and capex for its space and rockets business was $1.2 billion.

Orbital data centers have the potential to effectively address some of the biggest energy and resource challenges in scaling AI computing. Data centers positioned in orbit could also be ideal for meeting the computational needs of the space economy. 

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(-2.02%) $-3.06

Current Price

$148.15

On the other hand, it would probably be a mistake to think that SpaceX needs to succeed with orbital data centers anytime soon to deliver wins for investors. Even a complete project failure wouldn’t necessarily be an insurmountable setback for the company.

While capital expenditures for the company’s AI unit totaled $15.8 billion last quarter, it’s unclear how much of that spending was devoted to developing orbital data centers. Notably, CEO Elon Musk was far more focused on terrestrial data centers during the company’s Q2 conference call — with the tech leader highlighting the advantages that the company’s expertise in rocketry and space technologies created for the engineering of data centers here on Earth.

Space-based data centers received relatively little focus in SpaceX’s Q2 report and conference call, which could suggest that they’re not expected to be a meaningful performance driver anytime soon. Given the heavy emphasis on terrestrial data centers in the call, there’s a good chance the company is focused on building out its AI infrastructure on Earth before turning to orbital data centers as a central component of its strategy.

Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

US NTSB says one-third of FAA answers to safety recommendations are ’unacceptable’




US NTSB says one-third of FAA answers to safety recommendations are ’unacceptable’

US Federal Reserve Expected To Raise Benchmark Rates This Week


Pretty much across the board, analysts and observers expect the US Federal Reserve to raise benchmark rates this week by at least 25 basis points.

Prediction markets have the probability at near certainty. Kalshi is currently at 86% for a 25 bps hike. Polymarket is at 84% for the same move.

As inflation remains too warm, even as employment has stayed steady, some observers see the forthcoming decision as a test of Fed credibility and a reminder the institution must stay above politics and maintain independence from the administration.

Roman Ziruk, Lead FX Strategist at Ebury, notes that the 10-year is now at 5%, the first time since 2023.

“The rise in the term premium – the extra compensation investors demand for holding long-dated debt – appears to be the main driver behind the spike in yields,” says Ziruk. “More recently, this has been partly a reflection of the increased geopolitical risk: the ongoing Iran war has fuelled a surge in oil prices, reviving inflation fears and adding a fresh layer of uncertainty as to the path for long-term central bank rates. This is clearly not just a US phenomenon, but a global one. Yields across the major economic areas have all risen in tandem with US Treasuries in recent weeks, pointing to a shared, geopolitically-driven pressure on bond markets that is not confined to the US alone.”

Ziruk also points to fiscal policy as sovereign debt rises not just in the US, now at $40 trillion, but in other nations.

Jesse Marre, Senior Portfolio Manager at Hilbert Group, anticipates a hike too, as the FOMC goes into the meeting.

“When something is that close to fully priced, you create more market disruption by going against the pricing than by going with it. A hike is not outrageous with headline CPI still at 3.4 percent, and it would answer the people who think Warsh was installed purely to cut rates.”

Marre says that “the risk is in the tails rather than the decision. If they hike and the talk is very hawkish, the market starts pricing a proper hiking cycle and the liquidity drain from that hits risk assets.”

The ongoing war in the Gulf does not help, as oil prices rise due to the conflict, nearly all other prices follow. With no end in sight to the fighting, the Trump administration finds itself in a bit of a quandary – especially with midterms just around the corner.

President Trump railed against Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s predecessor Jerome Powell, calling him names and threatening political prosecution for not doing his bidding and lowering rates. It seems Trump’s pick to lead the Fed will now raise interest rates, which raises the question of how the President will take a rate-hike decision. Will more political drama distract from more important issues? Will Trump deliver a new nickname for an emerging nemesis?