Home Blog

Q3 2026 5% Quarterly Categories: Activate, Offers & Suggestions (Freedom/Flex, Discover, Dividend, Cash+ & More)


It’s now possible to activate all 5% category credit cards for the third quarter of 2026, including the Chase Freedom, Chase Freedom Flex, Discover IT, Citi Dividend, US Bank Cash+ and some smaller cards. In this post we’ll provide the activation link for each card, spend tracker links, and strategies to help increase spend within these categories.

Dates: July 1st – September 30, 2026. Store purchases can usually be done until the last minute while online purchases should be given a buffer zone since the charge typically posts on the shipping date.

Chase Freedom – Gas, Transit, Entertainment

Activation Link / FAQ / Our original post

With the Chase Freedom and Freedom Flex cards, activate to earn 5% back this quarter on up to $1,500 in spend on Gas/EV, Public Transit, Select Live Entertainment, and United Way.

  • Gas Stations and EV Charging – some convenience stores count as Gas, and they might sell gift cards too. 
  • Public Transit – Merchants in this category include operators of passenger trains, buses, ferries, toll bridges and highways, and parking lots and garages.
  • Select Live Entertainment – (Possible stack with the Paze promo?) Merchants in this category sell tickets for live in-person entertainment such as major sporting events, zoos and aquariums, concerts, theatrical productions, museums, tourist attractions and exhibits, amusement parks, circuses, carnivals, bands, and entertainers. Ticket agencies selling on behalf of the entertainment venue are included. Some merchants that sell tickets for in-person entertainment are not included in this category; for example, movie theaters, bowling alleys, horse racing tracks, casinos, and dance hall/clubs. Purchasing from a hotel/concierge is not included nor excursions or purchases as part of a travel package.
  • United Way – charity

Tip: Click this link (login required) to check how far you are along the $1,500.

 

Discover – Gas, Transportation, Drugstores

Activation Link / Our original post

With the Discover card, activate to earn 5% back this quarter on up to $1,500 in purchases on Gas, Transportation, and Drugstores.

  • Gas and EV charging – some convenience stores count as Gas, and they sometimes sell gift cards too. 
  • Transportation – includes airlines and also commuter services such as bus and train. (Does not include car rental or taxi/rideshare.)
  • Drugstores – this is always a favorite since popular drugstores carry a wide array of goods and gift cards too.

Tip: Login, then click this link to see you how far along the $1,500 you are.

    • Gas Station purchases include those made at merchants classified as places that sell automotive gasoline that can be bought at the pump or inside the station and public electric vehicle charging stations. Gas stations & EV charging affiliated with supermarkets, supercenters, and wholesale clubs may not be eligible. Certain parking garages where public electric vehicle charging is offered or included may not be eligible.
    • Transportation purchases include those made through merchants classified as airlines, and local commuter passenger transport (such as bus, rail and ferry services). Long-range passenger landrail and bus charters are also included. Purchases made through travel agencies, travel aggregator sites or other third-party booking services may not qualify. Car rentals, cruise lines, taxi & rideshare services (including shared bikes and scooters), limousines, parking garages and toll-related purchases are not included.
    • Drug Store purchases include those made at stand-alone drug stores, pharmacies, and online pharmacies. Pharmacies inside of other retail stores may not qualify.

 

Citi Dividend – Gas, Home Improvement

Landing Page | Our Original Post

With the Citi Dividend card, activate to earn 5% back this quarter on Gas Stations and Home Improvement. Citi is different than the other cards in that you have a $6,000 annual cap rather than a $1,500 quarterly cap. You can get 5% back on up to $6,000 in this quarter, you can save the entire amount for a different quarter, or you can use part up each quarter.

  • Gas Stations – not clear if EV charging will count.
  • Home Improvement – nice category for the summer. Can buy gift cards at home improvement stores as well.

Gas Stations: Excludes gasoline purchases at warehouse clubs, discount stores, convenience stores or other merchants that do not use the gas station merchant category code. Home Improvement Stores: Includes purchases at home supply warehouse stores, lumber and building materials stores, paint and wallpaper stores, hardware stores, nurseries – lawn and garden supply stores and paints, varnishes and supplies stores. Excludes florists and florists’ supply stores; nursery stock; wholesale construction stores; and glass stores.

U.S. Bank Cash+/Elan – Select your Categories

Activation link | Merchant List | Our Original Post

U.S. Bank Cash+ and Elan Max offer 5% cash back in two categories, up to $2,000 combined total per quarter.

Here are the current options:

  • TV, Internet, and Streaming Services
  • Home utilities
  • Select clothing stores
  • Cell phone providers
  • Electronic Stores
  • Gyms/Fitness
  • Fast food
  • Ground Transportation
  • Sporting goods
  • Department Stores
  • Furniture Stores
  • Movie theaters

Tip: Login here, then scroll down and click on the red “View Your Cash+ History” button.

U.S. Bank Shopper – Select your Categories

Our Original Post

The U.S. Bank Shopper Cash Rewards comes with a $95 annual fee and offers 6% cashback on your first $1,500 in combined eligible purchases each quarter with two retailers you choose. Options include Amazon, Apple, Best Buy, Home Depot, Lowe’s, Walmart, Target, and many more. You must enroll each quarter for two retailers.

Bank of America Customized Cash Rewards

Our Original Post

The Cash Rewards card from Bank of America offers 3% back on one selected category, up to $2,500 per quarter. If you don’t select anything it defaults to gas. Once you selected a category for one quarter, that remains your category in the future unless you change it. Each calendar month you can change it if you’d like, but you’re always limited to $2,500 for the entire quarter.

  • Gas and EV charging stations (default category)
  • Online Shopping; this category also includes cable, streaming, internet, and phone plan
  • Dining
  • Travel
  • Drug Stores
  • Home Improvement/Furnishings

This category is especially lucrative for those who have Preferred Rewards status with Bank of America which can get you 5.25% back on one of these categories at the higher relationship level.

Lots of useful categories here. Important note: the Cash Rewards card also offers 2% back at grocery stores and wholesale clubs up to $2,500 per quarter, and that $2,500 limit combines with the Category Selection limit. After spending $2,500, you’ll earn 1% back on everything.

Other Cards with 5% Category

Nusenda FCU – Wholesale, Discount, Home & More

Landing Page & PDF with full details| Our Original Post | 2025 Post

  • Earn 5% this quarter, up to $1,875 in purchases, for Airlines, Hotels, Rental Cars, Gas, Miscellaneous Stores, Business Services (electronics, books stores, etc.), Retail Outlet Services, Education. See full list and eligible merchants on this PDF.

Langley FCU – Various

Landing Page | Our Original Post

  • Langley Federal Credit Union offers 5% back each month in one selected category, on up to $100 cash back total ($2,000 spend).
  • The category options at time of this writing: Automotive Services, Dining, and Amazon. (via email: Automotive Services includes charging, gas, and automotive maintenance)

Huntington Business Voice – Select 4% Category

Landing Page

Huntington Voice Business credit card you choose one of ten categories where you’ll earn 4% cash back—on the first $7,000 you spend per quarter.

  • Category options: Grocery Stores, Gas Stations, Restaurants, Travel and Entertainment, Home Improvement Stores, Utilities and Office Supply Stores, Department, Apparel, and Sporting Goods Stores, Electronic, Computer, and Camera Stores, Discount and Warehouse Stores, Auto Parts and Services Stores.

Safe Credit Union [CA] – ADD ME

Landing Page | Our Original Post

Safe Credit Union Cash Rewards Visa card offers 5% this quarter on your choice of one category each quarter, now limited to $1,500 in spend each quarter. This quarter the category is one of these:

  • ADD ME

Redstone FCU (TN,AL) – Dining, Travel, Amazon & More (?)

Landing page | Our original Post

  • Redstone Visa offers 5% on a category of your choice: travel, Amazon, restaurants, home improvement, and more options.
  • $1,500 cap per quarter.
  • You must select a category or you don’t get 5% on anything.

Your Marketing Has All the Pieces. Here’s Why That’s Not Enough.


Most founders who’ve been at this for a few years have pieces.

Some strategic clarity. A decent presence. Content running, mostly. Owned channels being built. Customer work happening somewhere.

The pieces are disconnected. Nobody owns the full picture. Different parts run on different rhythms. Reporting covers what each piece did in isolation, not whether the whole thing is moving.

That’s an assemblage. Assemblages are fragile in a specific way.

What makes an assemblage fragile

The founder gets pulled into client work for a month and it frays. A key person leaves and part of the picture walks out with them. A new tool shows up, gets bolted onto the existing structure, and the whole thing gets more complicated without getting more effective.

I use a simple test for this: if you got hit by a bus tomorrow, could anyone in your business run the marketing for 6 months? If the answer is no, the system isn’t installed. The assemblage is being held together by you.

A Marketing Operating System is the opposite. Integrated, documented, connected, running on a rhythm the business can maintain with or without the founder’s constant attention.

The four components

Integration

Strategy, messaging, the engines, and the Hourglass diagnostic all connect to each other. Nothing sits in isolation.

When the strategy updates, the messaging updates with it. When the Hourglass surfaces a gap at Trust, the Brand Engine responds with specific work. When the Growth Engine tests a new offer, the Customer Engine updates onboarding.

In practice: one source of truth for strategy and messaging, engines that are explicitly defined and visibly connected to that strategy, and a shared vocabulary the whole team uses. When any of those are missing, changing one thing doesn’t change the things connected to it. The system drifts.

Cadence

Most small businesses have emergencies and campaigns. Cadence is different.

What it looks like in practice: a 30-minute weekly review covering what shipped, what moved, what’s blocking. A 60 to 90-minute monthly performance review against the 3 engines. A half-day quarterly planning cycle. A full-day annual strategy refresh.

Cadence is unglamorous. It’s also the most reliable predictor of whether a Marketing Operating System survives or decays over time.

Measurement

Five to seven metrics connected to business outcomes. Brand Engine: presence health, content engagement, list growth. Growth Engine: inbound volume by channel, conversion by channel, owned vs paid ratio. Customer Engine: repeat rate, referral rate, customer lifetime value.

Reported consistently, in context, against a goal. A report that tells a story: what happened, why it matters, what we’re doing about it. Not 16 numbers in a spreadsheet that nobody changes a decision based on.

AI as a leverage layer

This is where AI actually belongs, and most advice on this is either too enthusiastic or too dismissive to be useful.

AI can’t make strategic judgments about your market, your customer, or your business. It can’t produce your point of view. The thinking is still your job.

Where it does belong: research, production, reformatting, analysis, and the communication mechanics layer (follow-up, scheduling, first drafts). Installed on top of a working system, AI compounds advantage. Installed in the absence of one, AI amplifies the confusion that’s already there.

That distinction is the one most founders aren’t being given clearly right now.

What it looks like when it’s working

A professional services firm I worked with did the Founder Portrait work, rebuilt around a single service line, installed Strategy First, built out presence, content, owned channels, and a Customer Engine, then ran the full system for 2 years.

Revenue up 60% on lower marketing spend than before. Paid acquisition dependence cut significantly. Meaningful recurring revenue from the Customer Engine. And the founder can step away for 2 weeks without the system breaking.

Because it’s no longer being held together by his attention.

That’s a Marketing Operating System.

One thing to do this week

Do the bus test honestly. Write down everything about your marketing that only you know. Who the real ICP is, because the document is out of date. What the actual priorities are, because the quarterly plan never got finalized. Which conversations are in progress.

Whatever ends up on that page is the gap between the assemblage and the system. That page is the first draft of the Marketing Operating System document.


The Marketing Operating System is the final step of a seven-step framework I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full system, from the Founder Portrait through the MOS, is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

To shrink the balance sheet, Fed must move past 2019 fears



  • Key insight: The biggest hurdle to shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet is the amount of reserves in the banking system necessary to ensure smooth market function. Fears of 2019-like reserve scarcity have shaped balance sheet management in the post-COVID era.
  • Expert quote: “They are haunted by this. They feel that was an own-goal and there’s been a lot of work in the Federal Reserve System to find out when those risks are in danger of repeating.” — Anil Kashyap, professor of economics and finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business
  • Forward Look: New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh wants the central bank’s balance sheet to be smaller. This week he will give his first public remarks. 

New Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh wants to turn back the clock on the central bank’s balance sheet to 2010. To get there, he will have to go through 2019. 

Processing Content

The Fed’s first attempt to shrink its balance sheet resulted in a liquidity crunch that September, driving up funding costs across a host of financial markets. The episode caused the Fed to expand its balance sheet again and introduce new market-correcting tools. It has also made reserve management the primary consideration for the Fed’s balance sheet.

Reserves, or funds held by commercial banks at the Fed, make up about 45% of the liabilities on Fed’s $6.7 trillion balance sheet. The other two major components are currency in circulation and the Treasury’s general account, neither of which the Fed has direct control over. 

When conversations about shedding assets from the Fed’s balance sheet turn to the question of which liabilities will offset those reductions, reserves are the clear answer. But, inevitably, those discussions come back to those weeks of financial stress in September 2019 and the institution’s imperative to avoid a repeat performance. 

“They are haunted by this,” said Anil Kashyap, professor of economics and finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. “They feel that was an own-goal and there’s been a lot of work in the Federal Reserve System to find out when those risks are in danger of repeating.”

Warsh, who will give his first speech as chair after this week’s Federal Open Market Committee meeting, has his own history with the Fed’s balance sheet to contend with. 

Warsh was a Fed governor and member of the FOMC when it undertook its second round of quantitative easing — a move he was highly skeptical of at the time. According to a transcript of the committee’s meeting in November 2010, he expressed a litany of concerns, including that large scale asset purchases would have little impact on lending to the real economy, disproportionately benefit large financial institutions and increase the Fed’s footprint in financial markets. 

Warsh ultimately voted for the action grudgingly, noting that he did so only out of respect for then-Chair Ben Bernanke and with a hope that the Fed would swiftly reverse course if the policy did not deliver on the objective of stimulating economic growth.

“If I were in your chair, I would not be leading the committee in this direction, and frankly, if I were in the chair of most people around this room, I would dissent,” Warsh said to Bernanke at the time, adding, “I think this is called the Bernanke Fed for a reason. I’ve got a lot of confidence that if the risks that I talk about materialize, you will not hesitate and you will change your view, you will change this experiment.”

Warsh called for inserting caveats into the Fed’s policy statement that would have made it easier to end the expansion, but he gained little traction with the rest of the committee. He left the board four months later.  

Ample vs. abundant

One of the key lessons from the episode was that “ample” reserves — meaning slightly more than banks need to comfortably settle payments and meet liquidity needs — are not always enough to keep the financial system moving smoothly. 

Shortly before the crisis, banks believed the amount of reserves to be well above their needs. A survey of senior financial officers conducted by the Fed in August 2019 found that banks believed their lowest comfortable level of reserves was around $650 billion, or slightly more than half of the $1.15 trillion of reserves they collectively held at the Fed. At the time, reserves in the system totalled nearly $1.6 trillion, according to data tracked by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 

That perceived excess disappeared quickly on September 17, 2019 following a confluence of events related to the Treasury’s general account — another liability on the Fed’s balance sheet that competes for space with reserves. An influx of corporate tax payments and a settlement of a large Treasury auction increased the general account, thus shrinking the supply of reserves to about $1.4 trillion. While still well above the aggregate lowest comfortable level, reserves were not evenly distributed throughout the banking system, with a handful of large banks hoarding large quantities and smaller banks bidding up borrowing costs to get more or retain what they had. 

The Federal Open Market Committee — the Fed’s monetary policy arm — held an emergency conference call on October 4, 2019 to discuss how to respond to the stresses in overnight funding markets. Patricia Zobel, then vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, told the group that a “higher level of reserves may be needed to accommodate distributional frictions in reserve markets.”

In the months that followed, the Fed steadily added about $400 billion assets, which corresponded with $200 billion in additional reserves held by banks. How this would have played out of the longer term is unclear, as the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 instigated the Fed’s biggest balance sheet expansion to date — more than doubling in a matter of 18 months.

Still, the post-2019 view toward reserves in non-crisis moments remains prevalent. In a speech last July, Fed Gov. Christopher Waller said he uses the episode to gauge baseline demand for funds parked at the central bank. He noted that going into 2019, reserves equaled 8% of gross domestic product, but slipped below 7% in September — a level that he said could be a critical threshold. 

“I start from the view that problems emerged when reserves fell below 8% of GDP,” Waller said. “One might argue that banks are now larger relative to GDP, so they may desire a bit more reserves. Furthermore, there is also a genuine concern that it is not only the total amount of reserves that matters but also the distribution of reserves across the banking system. So, I would add a buffer to the 8% of GDP that I cited earlier and assume 9% is the threshold below which reserves would not be ample.”

Based on this calculation, Waller argued that the minimum amount of reserves the system needed was $2.7 trillion — around $600 billion less than the amount of reserves at the time. He said the Fed could get to that optimal reserve level by continuing the balance sheet reduction schedule it was pursuing at the time. However, the FOMC voted to end that program during its December meeting and the amount of reserves in the system has climbed back to more than $3 trillion. 

This leaves the banking system in a position it has been in since 2020: one in which reserves are not only ample but “abundant,” or a level that is well in excess of what banks need. 

Darrell Duffie, professor of finance and management at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business, said the Fed is making the logical choice by erring on the side of too many reserves.

“The Fed’s being conservative, but if you think about the asymmetry on the costs and benefits, the cost of going too small is very high, the cost of going too big is not that high, if you’re talking within the range of a few $100 billion,” Duffie said. “So, I think the Fed’s current policy is appropriate until they figure out a way to reduce the overall demand for reserves by banks.”

Policy remedies

Duffie, who has studied the Fed’s balance sheet and the 2019 liquidity crisis extensively, said the Fed has several options for curbing reserve demand among banks. He said a liquidity saving mechanism could be incorporated into Fedwire — the central bank payment rail used for bank-to-bank transfers — to reduce the volume of reserves needed to settle payments on a day-to-day basis. Similarly, the Fed could convince banks that they will not be penalized if they overdraft their accounts to meet payment obligations, so long as they are sufficiently collateralized. 

Yet, banks have shown a reluctance to trust that they will not be cited for taking advantage of such leniencies. Fears of supervisory rebuke have also made banks unwilling to use the Standing Repo Facility, the liquidity provision system established by the Fed in response to the 2019 liquidity crisis.

“Until recently, banks have said they are stigmatized by the idea of using the Standing Repo Facility, because it would indicate that they aren’t meeting the spirit, at least, of their regulatory requirement to be self-sufficient,” Duffie said. “Because, if you go to the Fed for more reserves, that means you didn’t have enough on your own, and  [an executive] might worry … that would signal to the Fed that you weren’t meeting this liquidity requirement.”

Duffie noted that the Fed has made some changes to the facility that have resulted in a modest uptick in use by banks, but more work should be done.

Others say the key to reduced demand should come through regulatory reform, namely changes to the liquidity requirements and changes to certain capital charges — like the supplemental leverage ratio — to make it easier for banks to hold other highly liquid assets to manage their liquidity needs. 

Andrew Levin, an economics professor at Dartmouth University and a former staffer at the Fed Board of Governors, said many of these reforms would require coordination across multiple agencies. 

“The right way to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet is in close coordination with the [Financial Stability Oversight Council] and Treasury’s Office of Debt Management,” Levin said. “Part of the issue in 2019 was that the Fed tried to do it in isolation.”

Others say more drastic reforms are needed. Norbert Michel, vice president and director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives, said the most effective way to reduce interest in reserves is to stop paying interest on them. 

In the broad sweep of Fed history, interest on reserves is a relatively new phenomenon, being rolled out amid the financial crisis in 2008. Some policy advocates, including Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman had called for reserves to bear interest as far back as the 1970s, arguing that failing to pay interest amounted to a tax on banks. Michel said there is some merit to this logic but, ultimately, the benefits banks reap from holding reserves — including their safety, liquidity and the ability to transact on the U.S. payment rails — is compensation enough. 

“What you would have is more like what you had pre-2008 for almost a century, and … for the entire post-war period,” Michel said. “You would have banks in the market with each other and financial firms in the market with each other, and with banks funding themselves in what looks a lot more like a market-based, free enterprise-type system, one that works — one that did work very well, by the way.”



Trump gets Iran peace deal and rages against Netanyahu: ‘He has no f—ing judgement’


President Trump, Iranian officials, and Pakistani mediators have all said publicly that a deal has been reached to end the conflict in the Middle East. Stocks in Asia and Europe rose on the news as the price of oil fell. Few details have been made available as to what, exactly, is in the deal. Here’s what is being reported this morning

  • The deal will be signed in Switzerland on Friday.
  • It contains a pledge of no further hostilities for 60 days.
  • Both sides commit to further talks.
  • The nuclear issue remains unresolved—talks to come later.
  • The unfreezing of $12 billion in Iranian assets.
  • The Strait of Hormuz to be reopened after mine clearing.
  • The peace deal includes Lebanon but Israel isn’t signing it.

Back to the future: The deal basically puts the region back where it was before the conflict started. “For now the can kicking exercise has been very well received by markets,” Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid said in a note this morning.

Leaked: Trump has lost faith in Israel’s Netanyahu

Another astonishing report by Axios claimed Trump was furious that Israel was attacking Hezbollah even as the talks neared their conclusion:

  • “It is so bad — I couldn’t believe it. An hour before we are supposed to sign the deal.” Trump acknowledged Hezbollah attacked Israel first but stressed it didn’t cause any damage and nobody had been killed. “Why did Bibi have to do a f—ing attack? I was so pissed off. I let him know. He has no f—ing judgement. I let him know that,” Trump said.

Trump also chided Netanyahu on social media. “This morning’s attack on Beirut should not have happened,” he said. “There should be no more attacks by Israel anywhere in Lebanon.”

“Ships of the World, start your engines”

Trump, exultant: In one of many posts on social media the president hailed the end of the war: “The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all! I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, and, simultaneously herewith, authorize the immediate removal of the United States Naval blockade. Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!” 

The Rich Starry is on the move

The sanctioned Chinese oil tanker that Fortune has been tracking has made it through the Strait. For weeks it was trapped just off Qeshm island. Now it’s further south, off the coast of the UAE.

THE MARKETS

From war premium to peace dividend: Markets surge

  • S&P 500 futures were up 1.29% this morning. The index closed up 0.5% yesterday. 
  • In Europe, the Stoxx 600 was up 0.64% in early trading and the U.K.’s FTSE 100 was up 0.15% before lunch.
  • Asia: South Korea’s KOSPI was up 5.2%. Japan’s Nikkei 225 was up 4.99%. India’s Nifty 50 was up 1.26%. China’s CSI 300 was up 2.39%. 
  • Brent crude was $82 per barrel this morning, down from 92 yesterday.
  • Bitcoin was $65.6K.

Chart via TradingEconomics.com

Is the market’s stomach big enough to eat all these $1 trillion IPOs?

 

The SpaceX IPO last week was so massive that some traders worried that there would not be enough investment money to eat it all. That worry is likely to continue if and when Anthropic and OpenAI both go public, as they are both likely to also carry $1 trillion-plus valuations. 

Fear not, say Kriti Gupta and Abigail Yoder of J.P. Morgan Private Bank. “The scale is undeniably historic. But it is underappreciated how immense the public equity market these firms are entering has become. While we may not have seen companies of this size before, we’ve also never seen a market this large,” they said in a note seen by Fortune. “IPO supply is rising. But so has the market’s capacity to absorb it.”

“Consider two hypothetical scenarios for new IPOs valued at $1 or $2 trillion with a 10% float (shares available for public trading in the market). Naturally, that leads to some selling by benchmark indices. But … the total outflows would only be equal to about 1-2 days of their average daily trading volume. In other words: these are large deals, but may not be too large for today’s market to digest.”

In fact, estimated IPO volume for this year will still be slightly below that of 2021:

  • The market already has vehicles of this size within it. The three largest S&P 500 index funds now hold more than $2.6 trillion combined, per Apollo Global Management’s Torsten Slok. “Prices are increasingly set by mechanical flows rather than by anyone judging what companies are actually worth.” 

WARSH REALITY

The new Fed chair has little room to deliver the interest rate cuts Trump wants 

New Fed chairman Kevin Warsh will host his first interest rate decision on Wednesday. He’s highly likely to keep interest rates on hold at the 3.5% level, according to the futures markets. But as inflation is above that, at 4.2%, it means “the Fed is effectively easing monetary policy by not hiking rates, loosening financial conditions,” according to Bank of America’s Claudio Irigoyen and Antonio Gabriel. “After five years of above-target inflation, and with supply shocks becoming the new normal in a more geopolitically fragmented world, sound risk management for monetary policy may advocate otherwise.”

“Furthermore, the recent decomposition of inflation is bleak. Unless core goods inflation somehow becomes negative, no cuts should be in sight any time soon, even with a deal in Iran,” they predict.

  • What to watch for: Until yesterday, most Fed-watchers expected Warsh would remove the word “additional” from the Fed’s next statement, implying that the central bank was no longer enthusiastic about the prospect of applying more interest rate cuts. That’s probably still the case, but with the price of oil now in decline … who knows. Whether this word appears or not on Wednesday will be one of the market-moving issues in the announcement.
  • The dot-plot: Warsh is a critic of the chart which shows future rate expectations from the various members of the FOMC. He may remove this from the Fed’s traditional statement.

ONE BIG THING

Anthropic reels after White House bans new models on national security fears 

Dario Amodei, chief executive officer of Anthropic. 

Chris Ratcliffe—Bloomberg via Getty Images

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei was given 90 minutes by the White House to pull its Fable 5 AI model from international markets after Trump Administration officials were warned by Amazon CEO Andrew Jassy about concerns that the new models’ powers could be misused by hostile foreign actors, according to Bea Nolan of Fortune. A source told Fortune the company was given no previous communication of a national security threat. 

What followed were several calls between Amodei and senior administration officials during which Amodei argued the security bypass found by Amazon was narrow rather than a full jailbreak of the model’s safeguards.

MORE FROM FORTUNE

Social Security faces steep cuts. These senators want to bet on stocks and $27 trillion in debt to save it—but ‘the gamble does not always pay off’ – Jason Ma

A 1% mistake costs $10 billion: Inside the impossible math of managing Elon Musk’s trillionaire SpaceX wealth – Sydney Lake

Meet Gwynne Shotwell, the engineer-turned-COO who runs SpaceX in platform heels and is now worth over $2 billion – Eva Roytburg

Animoca Brands cofounder Yat Siu argues Asia will fuse AI and the blockchain before the West does – Angelica Ang

AI job disruption is here. The problem may be compounded because nearly 75% of people don’t apply for unemployment benefits – Jacqueline Munis

Kevin O’Leary says being liked has nothing to do with success—Steve Jobs taught him: ‘You can’t worry about whose feelings you bruise’ – Emma Burleigh

CHART OF THE DAY

The Iran war accelerated the adoption of electric vehicles in China

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, pushing the price of oil to over $90 per barrel, reinvigorated the Chinese electric vehicle market. “The EV share in car sales jumped since the war started, Daan Struyven and his team at Goldman Sachs advised clients recently. EVs are now the majority of new car purchases in China.

NUMBER OF THE DAY

$1 billion

The size of a request to buy SpaceX stock on Friday from a single family office, according to the Wall Street Journal.

THE FRONT PAGES TODAY

OnlyFans ‘agents’ control and threaten creators while taking half their earnings – BBC

Keir Starmer to announce Australia-style social media ban for teenagers – FT

Trump to Axios: Netanyahu has “no fucking judgment” but Iran deal still on – Axios

Anthropic Dispatches Staff to D.C., Racing to Resolve AI Export Restrictions – WSJ

Hedge Funds Reopen Pre-War Playbook as Iran War Risks Recede – Bloomberg

Protest at Stanford University graduation as Google CEO Sundar Pichai takes the stage – NY Post

ONE MORE THING

Ozempic’s hidden superpower: a $200K lifetime saving

People between the ages of 40 and 50 will save on average $192,735 in lifetime medical bills if they take GLP-1 weight loss drugs, according to a new report from the National Bureau of Economic Research. Surprisingly, those savings climbed to $220,000 for adults within the same age range without college degrees, Fortune’s Mia Osmonbekov reports.

“Obesity is a big comorbidity for a lot of different chronic conditions, so if you start GLP-1s, like that’s gonna kind of trickle down, and it’s gonna save money,” the study’s lead author, Felipe Montano-Campos, says. 

There’s only one problem: All those chronic conditions are likely to return the moment a patient stops taking the drug.

UK Finance Shares Roadmap For UK-EU Financial Services Collaboration


Ten years on from the Brexit vote, UK Finance has released a detailed report in partnership with law firm Freshfields, proposing a fresh strategic approach to ties between Britain and the European Union in the financial sector. Titled Unlocking Growth Through a Stronger UK-EU Financial Services Partnership, the update from UK Finance now urges both sides to prioritize the industry at the forthcoming leaders’ summit and integrate it into broader efforts to reset political relations.

The UK’s financial services industry serves as a driver of economic expansion, cross-border investment, and stability for companies and households throughout the UK and EU.

The report, informed by in-depth research and discussions with diverse stakeholders—including British, European, and international banks, diplomatic officials, policy experts, and industry groups—advocates building a more purposeful partnership that respects each side’s autonomy while delivering shared benefits.

At its core is a phased three-stage plan designed to begin with feasible, immediate actions that lay the groundwork for progressively deeper integration over time.

In the short term, over the next two years, the focus should be on practical enhancements to existing frameworks.

This includes fully leveraging the UK-EU Memorandum of Understanding by transforming the joint Regulatory Forum from a forum for basic updates into a platform for proactive alignment on emerging rules and initiatives.

Financial services should also become a regular, high-level topic at annual UK-EU summits to ensure consistent high-level engagement.

Additionally, both parties need to provide lasting stability through permanent equivalence decisions for UK central counterparties (CCPs) and by eliminating the expiry clause on the EU’s data adequacy ruling for the UK.

Looking further ahead, over the next four years, structural reforms would tackle regulatory mismatches and reduce unnecessary obstacles to serving Europe’s financing requirements.

Key proposals include negotiating a dedicated mobility pact for financial professionals, drawing inspiration from the UK-Switzerland arrangement, to ease the movement of skilled talent.

Authorities should also resolve the gap in the EU’s Capital Requirements Regulation by granting equivalence, which would cut compliance burdens and operational hurdles for firms operating across borders.

Collaboration could be expanded through pragmatic, issue-specific equivalence assessments, alongside experimental joint projects such as a “competitiveness laboratory” and shared regulatory sandboxes to foster innovation.

In the longer term, the vision extends to more formal arrangements, potentially including a comprehensive UK-EU Financial Services Agreement modelled on the UK-Switzerland Berne framework.

An even bolder aspiration involves contributing to a truly integrated pan-European capital markets framework spanning the UK, EU member states, the European Economic Area, and European Free Trade Association countries.

Kerstin Mathias, UK Finance’s Director of International Affairs, highlighted that while the UK and EU maintain closely linked financial ecosystems, their formal ties have yet to reach full potential.

She emphasized that neither side seeks a return to single market arrangements, but both can gain significantly from smarter cooperation that aligns with their respective goals and global obligations.

Emma Rachmaninov, a partner at Freshfields, noted the common objectives and adherence to international standards shared by both jurisdictions.

The phased approach aims to strengthen foundations today while gradually expanding mutually advantageous cooperation without compromising sovereignty.

Marsha de Cordova MP, Co-Chair of the UK-EU Parliamentary Partnership Assembly, acknowledged the report’s emphasis on how enhanced partnership could stimulate growth and deliver tangible advantages for businesses and economies on both sides. As Europe navigates various economic challenges, this roadmap offers a pragmatic pathway to harness the strengths of interconnected global financial markets.



The Best Property Management Software for Small Landlords (Rookie Reply)


Thinking about self-managing your rental property? Then, you’ll need property management software to help with things like processing applications, collecting rent, and managing maintenance requests. In this episode, we’re sharing our favorite tools so you can pick the right one for your portfolio!

Welcome back to another Rookie Reply! There are dozens of property management tools floating around, but which ones are best for new landlords? Ashley breaks down the different categories of landlord software and shares four steps to finding the right option for you. Next, are regulations slowly killing the short-term rental industry? The short answer is no. However, there are two things every investor should do before committing to a short-term rental market, and Tony’s going to tell you what they are!

Finally, we’ll get into wholesaling, a strategy that could help kickstart your real estate investing journey without having thousands of dollars to deploy. We’ll show you how the entire wholesaling process works and three easy ways to find deals today!

Ashley:
What if the software that every rookie landlord on Facebook keeps telling you to use is quietly the wrong one for your first rental?

Tony:
Or maybe you’ve been saving for a year to buy your first short-term rental and then your city passes an ordinance that kills half of your night’s overnight. Is this short-term rental even worth it in 2026?

Ashley:
And for anyone watching right now thinking there’s no way in without capital, what if wholesaling actually might be the doorway, but only if you do it the right way on day one? We’re answering all three today on Rookie Reply. This is The Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kehr.

Tony:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson. With that, let’s get into our first question for the day. So question one, which comes from the BiggerPockets form says, “I’m curious what you all use as property management software to screen tenants, create applications for tenants to apply, create leases, list of properties for rent, maintenance, et cetera, et cetera. A do- it-yourself program that is landlord friendly to a beginner landlord. Right now I’m using Avail and I’m not loving it as I cannot upload my own rental application. What do you all use for your properties? So Ash, our resident long-term rental property manager, Queen. You’ve used a lot of different softwares, right? So maybe just first just give us all the different ones you’ve used and then tell us what you’re using today and why.

Ashley:
Yeah. So I’ve used Rent-Ready. I’ve used BillDiem. I’ve used AppFolio and I’ve used TurboTenant. So I have not used a Val that was talked about in the question, so I really can’t give any kind of opinion or preference on that. But I will say there are categories of how many units you have as to which long-term rental property management software you should select. So when I was using AppFolio and Buildium, I had at least 40 units plus. They have a minimum fe that you have to pay no matter how many units you have. So if you have one unit, you don’t want to pay AppFolio’s $200 minimum, they’re going to charge you every single month because that could be all of your cash flow. So there are these superior property management software that just has more bells and whistles. Ultimately, most of them do the same thing.
They have tenant screening, they collect rent online, they have messaging capabilities. So some of the ones, if you have 50 units or less, rent ready, turbo tenant, I’m pretty sure a Val is kind of in that category of property management software as to you don’t have a ton of units. What I would look at is do demos and look at the user interface because I do think that is really important as to how you interact with the software if you’re actually going to enjoy using it. Because if you don’t like logging into it and you get frustrated and you can’t figure things out and you don’t like the way it’s viewed and the dashboard looks, you’re not even going to implement it or use all the things it has to offer anyways. So do a demo on each of the different softwares that you’re interested in looking at.
And the next thing is compare their capabilities. So TurboTenant, for example, that’s what I use and they have a lease auditor. So you will upload your own lease agreement and you’ll tell them what state you are in and it will go through and do an audit of your lease agreement to make sure that it complies with all New York State laws and rules and regulations. It will also give you recommendations of maybe things you should add in there. So I don’t know of any other software that has that right now, maybe some of the bigger ones that I don’t look at anymore, but I really like that feature of TurboTenant. So I think also look what you want to get out of property management software. So is it the ease of the screening process? Is it just rent collection? And then also look at pricing too.
You don’t want to kill yourself on pricing if you only have a couple properties and you just need the basic features of the property management software too.

Tony:
Ash, one last question. How painful is it to switch from one PMS to the next? Let’s say that someone tries out one of these ones and they’re like, ” I don’t really know if I want to keep this one. I just want to jump to something else. “Having gone through that yourself, is it somewhat seamless to move or is it really like, man, there’s a lot of switching costs?

Ashley:
When I did it myself, yes, super, super painful. When I did it, this is probably five years ago, six years ago and moving it all over, you would have to download every document, every receipt, everything that you had in there, move it over to the new one. So one recommendation I do have is I do keep double records and yes, this is more work, but if you ever do switch software, even if you’re using QuickBooks or things like that, I still do this even for bookkeeping is I’m saving in Google Drive a receipt, the lease agreements, any documents for that property for that tenant, then I’m also uploading it so that I don’t have to go in and manually download everything. Right now, a lot of property management software has help with onboarding. So they will help you go through the onboarding process. This should be free.
Whatever one you’re looking at, if they try and charge you, maybe you should be looking at another software, but do an onboarding call for them to walk you through that process and how to do it. The second time I did it, I actually hired a virtual assistant at $8 an hour. I made a Loom video saying,” Here’s one tenant, here’s the information I want you to get from the property management software and here’s how I want you to put it into the new property management software. “And they went through and did it all for $8 an hour. I don’t remember how much it ended up costing me, but not a lot of money at all to be able to move data from one to the other.

Tony:
And honestly, you could use something like Claude today to probably automate that for you now.

Ashley:
Okay. So we have to take a short break, but you may think picking a property management software is the hard part, but maybe it’s you’re finally ready to buy your first short-term rental next month and your city just rolls out new short-term rental rules that basically are going to wipe out half of your projected income. So let’s talk about if short-term rental investing is even still a strategy that will work in 2026. We’re going to break that down right after a word from our show sponsors. Okay, welcome back. Our second question today says,” I’m a beginner investor looking to get started with short-term rentals, but I’ve been following the news and it seems like many cities are tightening regulations, issuing stricter permits and enforcing occupancy rules. I’m trying to understand whether short-term rentals are still a good strategy in 2026 given these changes. Any insights, personal experiences or advice would be greatly appreciated.
I want to make sure I start on the right foot without running into unexpected legal or financial issues. “So Tony, I took the first question, this one’s all you.

Tony:
So it’s a great question and I know a lot of people have questions about the regulatory landscape for short-term rentals, but here’s what I’ll say guys is that the presence of regulations in an industry is not the end of that industry. If you think about every other major industry that exists in the United States, there’s typically some level of regulation within that industry. I think what makes short-term rentals a little bit more jarring is the fact that there weren’t a ton of regulations because short-term rentals just weren’t all that popular. And as they exploded in popularity, we just saw so many cities reacting to try and keep up with the pace of short-term rentals in their cities and their counties. So the mere presence of regulations is not a bad thing. Now that said, I think that there’s two different ways that you can approach regulations as a short-term rental operator.
The first way is to choose cities that are economically dependent on short-term rentals. And then the second way is to choose cities where you have multiple exit strategies, and I’ll break down both of those. For the first way, choosing cities that are economically dependent on short-term rentals. Think about a comparison between a city like New York City and a city like Destin, Florida. New York City effectively banned short-term rentals a couple of summers ago and they did that because New York has zero economic incentive to protect short-term rentals and the revenue that they generate. When you think about New York City and you think about all of the different industries that exist, they have everything. They have multiple professional sports teams. They have Wall Street, they have business headquarters, they have literally every potential industry exists with some capacity inside of New York City. So for them, the little revenue that short-term rentals generates is like a drop in the bucket, maybe not even a drop in the bucket, right?
Whatever is smaller than a drop in the bucket. That’s how New York City viewed short-term rentals. So of course they had no issues in banning Airbnbs. Now, if you take a market like Destin Florida, it is almost the exact opposite of New York City. There are no business headquarters. There’s no major international airport. There are no universities. There are no major medical centers. There are no professional sports teams. There’s nothing there except for people coming in, spending a few nights at short-term rentals, spending money in the local economy, and then going back home. So for a market like Destin where travel and tourism is truly the backbone of that economy, they actually have a strong economic incentive to protect short-term rentals. So that’s the first approach is to find cities where maybe there’s a smaller permanent resident population, there’s low diversity of industries there and where travel and tourism is truly the backbone of that local economy.
That’s one way to reduce regulatory risk. The other way to reduce regulatory risk is to go into a city where you’ve got multiple exit strategies. There are some folks that work within our coaching program who’ve bought in Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh might not, at the surface level, seem like a place that’s a great location to go buy a short-term rental, but when you look at the data, it actually is pretty strong. However, Pittsburgh also has a really large permanent resident population. Pittsburgh has a lot of the things we talked about in New York City. So the regulatory risk in Pittsburgh is inherently higher than a place like Destin. So as we’re working with those folks, well, then the question becomes if we can’t short term in Pittsburgh say regulations change, can we midterm profitably? Can we switch to 30 day stays or more and still be profitable?
Could we, in a worst case scenario, long-term rent this thing and at least break even for us? So that’s kind of like the cascading way that we look at it is option one or option A would be high economic dependence on short-term rentals, or then option B would be, “Hey, let’s give multiple exit strategies.”

Ashley:
I think that goes with all strategies, to be honest. We’ve seen a lot of our friends have midterm rentals and have to pivot to long-term rentals because short-term rentals weren’t allowed in that market and the traveling nurses weren’t there anymore as much as they were and they actually had to go to long-term rentals or sell their property. So I think what you said is really important, being able to pivot and make sure the property has those exit strategies for any strategy that you buy it for. All

Tony:
Right guys, we’re going to take one quick break, but while we’re going, if you haven’t yet subscribed to the Real Estate Rookie YouTube channel, you can find us @realestaterookie and you can see mine and actually smiling faces. And last, if you want to be a guest on the Real Estate Rookie podcast, head over to biggerpockets.com/guest and get your application in. And we’d love to feature your story to inspire the next generation of rookie investors, but we’ll be right back after a quick word from our show sponsors. All right guys, welcome back. We are onto our final question and this question says, can anyone provide some advice on getting started with wholesaling and how to find good, reliable investors as well? Thank you in advance. All right. Wholesaling, what is it? We actually just interviewed Janelle Carlson. So if you look up Janelle Carlson, you’ll see an episode we did with her where she talked about finding off market deals and the bulk of her business is in wholesaling.
But for our rookie investors who are not familiar with what wholesaling is, wholesaling is basically the act of selling contracts in real estate. So you go out and you find a below market valu property, you then get that property under contract and then you sell the rights of that contract to an in buyer, typically another investor who’s going to flip it, bur it, whatever it may be. So that’s what wholesaling is in a nutshell. And the reason that wholesaling is I think attractive to a lot of newer investors is because you’re not actually buying the property. So you don’t have to come up with several hundred thousand dollars to buy the property. You are just getting the contract in place, which oftentimes costs nothing. And then you’re selling that contract at a profit. So it’s like arbitraging real estate contracts basically. So that’s what wholesaling is.
Now, how to get started, you can do direct mail, right? There’s a cost, you can put up billboards, you can run commercials, you can do a lot of pay-per-click. There’s a lot of different ways to get started. But for me, if I was maybe looking for ways to get started with very little capital, I think the easiest way … Actually, I’ll give you two easy ways because I’ve seen people execute both of these. The first way is to network with real estate agents. I have a friend who runs a wholesaling business based out of California and Nevada and the majority of his deals comes from him just cold calling, not homeowners, but agents and just telling these agents, “Hey, you’re probably going to find some deals that maybe aren’t a good fit for the MLS. Let me be your first call.” That’s all he says.
And he just all day, he’s just cold calling agents with that same spiel. And then every once in a while, one of them’s going to say, “Hey, I remember this guy who called. Let me give him a call.” And that strategy is somewhat smart because the agents are cold calling homeowners all day. So you can call one agent who they themselves are cold calling a lot of homeowners. So your reach expands in a way and kind of multiplies in a way that would be hard if you’re calling these homeowners yourself. And then I think the second way is just to partner with someone who’s already wholesaling in your market. But if you can just go partner with someone and say, “Hey, I’ll help source the deal,” whether that’s door knocking, whatever you want to do, but then you can partner with someone else who can show you the ropes of how to really scale that business up.
But if I were brand new, I had limited capital, those would be the first two things that I focus on.

Ashley:
Or look for somebody who’s wholesaling but wants to get into your market and you’d be the boots on the ground for them. So you put out in meetups or Facebook groups or whatever, get into the local wholesaling groups and put out there, I can be the boots on the ground. So even if it’s not a wholesaler that’s already doing it in your market, you could go to a wholesaler that already has a system, already has a process, has this business built and help them bring it into your market also too. The second piece of wholesaling is actually having, you can get the deal locked up, but having somebody to actually buy the property. So you need to build also a buyer’s list of once you get these properties under contract, you need to have somebody to sell them to. You could go ahead and list them on the MLS, but you also, if you can’t close on this property when the contract comes due, then you need to make sure you have a way out.
But most often the way to wholesale is to sell it to an end buyer. There are people that do go and what do they call it wholetaling where they actually do buy a property, do nothing to it and then list it on the MLS and sell it to whoever. But with wholesaling, you want to find buyers and that’s where going to the local meetups, not working with other investors in the area. I went to a meetup in Buffalo before where there was a guy, he was doing his first wholesale deal and he had a clipboard and he said, “This is the property I got.” H did his whole speech telling you all about it. And he’s like, “If you’re interested in this deal or any other deals I find in these areas, these are the areas I’m looking, put your name and your email.” Ends up, I knew exactly the house he had bought.
It was right around the corner from my parents’ house actually. And I think my parents live in a gray area, but this house was actually a meth house, came to a big surprise to my parents and someone raided this house near them. But yeah, it was a meth house and the people went to jail, whatever, and then I don’t know, it was foreclosed on something, whatever, and it got into this wholesaler hands, but he had no idea that it was actually a meth house.
So be very careful because you’d need to do some remediation with that. You just can’t and that property is sat and sat and sat and it finally sold. But just be careful and cautious of what you’re getting into if you do start wholesaling too, is all on that property he had to do was do a simple Google search of the address and all these news articles would come up saying that this was a house. But yeah, you want to find your buyers. And him going around that clip already, he had a ton of names on there just at the small local meetup.

Tony:
Ashley, just for my own knowledge, are you aware what does remediation look like for a meth house? What do they even do?

Ashley:
So that was my second Google after I confirmed that this was the meth house, that was my second one, but it’s like fire and restoration companies can do the same thing, but you go in because the meth can soak into the walls and the floor and everything. So I don’t remember exactly what it was. It was something that it’s recommended that it was handled by somebody licensed with chemicals and things like that to remove it out like you would asbestos or something like that, but it could eventually be a lawsuit if you find out someone rented you a house that was used as a meth lab.

Tony:
And you’re raising your kids in this house. Well, I learned something new every day in this podcast, so thank you for- That my

Ashley:
Parents lived near my house.

Tony:
That’s the one takeaway from this episode.

Ashley:
Well, thank you guys so much for listening to Real Estate Rookie. I’m Ashley, he’s Tony. And if you guys have questions, you can reach out in the BiggerPockets forums, put your question in there. Most likely it will be answered by another investor before we even get to it on the show, but we love your guys’ questions, so please keep them coming. We’ll see you guys next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Animoca Brands cofounder Yat Siu argues Asia will fuse AI and the blockchain before the West does



As the West is increasingly polarized between “capitalism and anti-capitalism,” Animoca Brands cofounder Yat Siu thinks Asia can lead the way in pioneering the next wave of AI and cryptocurrency innovations.

“Based on my experiences in crypto communities in Europe and the U.S., people are creating a gap between crypto and AI and saying that they shouldn’t be related,” Siu told Fortune on the sidelines of the SuperAI summit in Singapore. “In Asia, we don’t have this problem since we’re much more comfortable with money.”

Siu cofounded Animoca Brands in 2014. It originally focused on developing free-to-play mobile games before shifting to blockchain gaming and NFTs in 2018. The firm is also a frequent investor in the Web3 space, backing more than 600 AI and blockchain companies including China-based investment platform GROW Digital Wealth and AWARP, parent company of the Laos National Digital Technology Group.

Investor interest in cryptocurrencies has waned. Shares in crypto-related companies have plunged by double-digit percentages over the past 12 months, while AI-related stocks are booming. Crypto-focused venture capital firms, like Paradigm, are also expanding into AI and robotics investments.

But Siu argues AI and the blockchain are tightly connected. “To truly empower AI, you need to give it access to money so it can transact autonomously on your behalf… and the technology that can enable this safely, securely and at scale is blockchain,” he said. 

Payment giants like Visa, Mastercard and Stripe are both starting to allow payments in stablecoins and establishing systems to let AI agents discover and purchase goods on behalf of users. Exchanges like Coinbase have made it easier for AI agents to conduct transactions with cryptocurrencies. 

Global consumers have been slow to adopt stablecoins compared to traditional methods of payment. Just $7 billion of annual settlements on Visa’s platform are made in cryptocurrencies, compared to $14 trillion overall.

Siu believes as many as 200 billion AI agents could soon be in operation. “Agents will do commerce with each other, they will negotiate with each other; and they’re going to negotiate not just business transactions, but also social interactions in relationships,” he said. (He currently taps 280 agents to perform different tasks on his behalf).

He’s less certain that credit card companies will be able to “protect their base” in a rapidly shifting payments landscape. In theory, blockchain-enabled payment mechanisms can cut out the middleman—whether credit card companies, traditional banks, or cross-border money transfer firms—and remove their usual margin on facilitating transactions. 

“Agents just go for what’s better, faster and cheaper,” he said. “If your agent transacts with mine, do you think it’ll use a credit card which charges a 2.5% fee, or do an on-chain transaction which costs basically nothing?”

Bank regulators ramp up AI scrutiny in lending and underwriting


“Whenever you’re engaging vendors, what’s their training data?” Idziak said. “From a fair lending perspective, we have ECOA, so you can’t discriminate based on sex, race, or national origin. But if you have a vendor from outside the space that’s come in saying, ‘Hey, I’m going to help you underwrite your loans,’ one, what data do they train on? Two, how does it do its thinking, and how is it producing the result? Because for ECOA adverse action notices, you need to have a reason. You can’t just say ‘The AI said so.’ Well, why did it say so? ‘I don’t know. It’s a black box.'”

What regulators are looking for

A central concern is whether AI tools are staying in their lane. Regulators are asking whether systems can access or pull in data they were never meant to see, a risk that gets serious fast when tools are designed to connect information across multiple platforms. Vendor chains are getting the same treatment, with supervisors pressing banks on whether third-party AI providers and their subcontractors are held to the same standards as the banks themselves.

Michelle Bowman, the Fed’s vice chair for supervision, signaled in an April speech that the existing toolkit may not be enough.

“Today, banks are relying on existing risk-management frameworks to guide their use of AI,” Bowman said. “While these supervisory tools are intended to support banks in applying sound governance and risk management, we should assess whether our supervisory guidance is fit for the future.”

Experts are concerned that formal guidance, when it does arrive, risks being outdated before the ink is dry. The technology is moving faster than the regulatory process was built to handle.

The Best Cryptocurrency to Buy With $135 Right Now


There are a lot of things you could do with $135 in the financial markets. You could, for example, have used it to buy one share of Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, at its IPO valuation of $135 per share.

That got me thinking: Is there any cryptocurrency with the same type of moonshot potential as SpaceX? Preferably, this cryptocurrency would offer the same type of diversification as SpaceX, which is far more than just a space exploration company. It would also be available at a price of $135 or lower.

That’s a big ask, of course, but I’ve found a cryptocurrency that satisfies all three conditions. I’m talking about Ethereum (ETH +2.38%), the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency.

Moonshot potential

Ethereum has had an epic run since its debut, soaring in value by approximately 55,600%. It’s hard to imagine it repeating the same type of performance over the next decade, but it may still have plenty of rocket fuel left to deliver stratospheric returns to investors.

Image source: Getty Images.

Wall Street strategist Tom Lee, for example, thinks Ethereum is going to $62,000. If so, then that’s a potential head-spinning 37x gain based on today’s prices.

Those out-of-this-world returns are being driven by Ethereum’s historic dominance in decentralized finance (DeFi). As the worlds of Wall Street finance and blockchain finance continue to blur, Ethereum will only become more valuable.

Don’t forget: Ethereum is one of the few cryptocurrencies to have been to outer space. In 2021, SpaceX brought a node of the Ethereum blockchain to the International Space Station (ISS), to see if it had what it takes to work in outer space. (Spoiler alert: It did.)

Diversification

Unlike Bitcoin, which is primarily just a store of value, Ethereum has many real-world use cases. The most obvious use cases are in finance, of course, thanks to Ethereum’s innovative use of smart contracts.

Ethereum is now getting ready to pivot into artificial intelligence. According to founder Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum can provide the underlying infrastructure for innovative AI projects.

How to put $135 to work

Even after its recent market slide, Ethereum is not cheap. It currently trades for $1,670, so we’ll have to look for other options if we want to stick to our $135 budget.

iShares Ethereum Trust - iShares Ethereum Trust ETF Stock Quote

iShares Ethereum Trust – iShares Ethereum Trust ETF

Today’s Change

(-1.02%) $-0.13

Current Price

$12.57

That’s easier than it sounds, thanks to the launch of spot Ethereum ETFs in July 2024. The most popular of these, the iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA 1.02%), currently trades for approximately $12.50. With $135, you’d be able to pick up 10 shares of the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, and still have some money left over.

If history is any guide, that $135 investment could appreciate over time. If you had invested that $135 in Ethereum in 2015, you’d have $75,200 today. You wouldn’t be Elon Musk rich, of course, but you might just have enough money to afford a future trip to Mars aboard a SpaceX rocket.