Home Blog

(Supply Chain vs International Business Management) | Full Guide to Choose Course for Canada in 2021



Supply Chain vs International Business Management in Canada. This video talks about Supply chain management in Canada vs International business management in Canada. How to choose a program in Canada can be a tough decision but research everything you can on your end and then decide.

Connect with us on the following platforms:

Instagram :
Facebook :
Twitter :

Drop a mail to us at : khuranaankit47@gmail.com

Disclaimer :
The audio files used in the video are for entertainment only and the credit goes to the original creators of the music.

source

Why Elite Colleges Are Racing To Offer Free Tuition


Key Points

  • Thirty-three colleges now advertise free tuition to families earning $100,000 or more, and 12 of them set the threshold at $200,000 or higher. Princeton and the University of Chicago top the list at $250,000.
  • Competitive pressure is driving most of it, but the new endowment tax gives small, wealthy colleges a direct financial reason to go tuition-free: schools with fewer than 3,000 tuition-paying students are exempt.
  • The gaps between thresholds create a new basis for financial aid appeals. A family earning $160,000 qualifies at Yale but not Stanford, and that difference can add up to $100,000 over four years.

Several of the most selective colleges have adopted generous financial aid policies that provide free tuition to low- and moderate-income students. Depending on the college, the income threshold for free tuition ranges from $100,000 to $250,000.

MIT was the first to offer free tuition for families with income under $200,000 starting with the 2025-2026 academic year. Harvard matched the offer within months. Since then, other colleges have announced similar policies for the 2026-2027 academic year, including Rice at $200,000 and the University of Chicago at $250,000.

Here’s a ranked list of the top offers, why colleges are doing this, and how the gaps between these policies create a new angle for financial aid appeals. If you’re still early in the process, start with how the college admissions process and financial aid fit together.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

List Of Free-Tuition Colleges For 2026-2027

This table shows the 2026-2027 free-tuition income threshold for the 33 colleges that have an income threshold of $100,000 or more. Public colleges are on the list, but most of them limit the offer to in-state residents, so out-of-state students pay full price. If you want the broader list of schools that charge no tuition at all, see our roundup of tuition-free colleges.

(function(){function e(){window.addEventListener(`message`,function(e){if(e.data[`datawrapper-height`]!==void 0){var t=document.querySelectorAll(`iframe`);for(var n in e.data[`datawrapper-height`])for(var r=0,i;i=t[r];r++)if(i.contentWindow===e.source){var a=e.data[`datawrapper-height`][n]+`px`;i.style.height=a}}})}e()})();

Cornell is the only Ivy League school without a free-tuition policy, although it does meet full demonstrated financial need.

One caveat: these policies assume typical assets. A low-income student with a $1 million trust fund (a so-called “Pellionaire”) might not qualify, even if family income is under the threshold. The income figure is the headline, but the financial aid formula still looks at the whole picture, including 529 plans and other assets reported on the FAFSA.

Avoiding The Endowment Tax

Congress raised the tax on college endowments in 2025. It’s an excise tax of up to 8% on annual net investment income.
These colleges are continuing to offer generous financial aid due to competitive pressures, even as the new college endowment tax exceeds their annual financial aid budget.

But there’s a loophole. Private nonprofit colleges are exempt from the endowment tax if they have fewer than 3,000 tuition-paying students. Public colleges are exempt entirely. That gives a small, wealthy college a direct financial reason to make more of its students tuition-free.

Princeton is the clearest example. Princeton was able to avoid the endowment tax by reducing the number of tuition-paying students below 3,000 through increased generosity in its financial aid program. Other colleges are unable to do this because they enroll more students, especially graduate students. That’s a different pressure than the one driving MIT’s decision to admit fewer graduate students, but it points in the same direction.

Other colleges that are close to the 3,000 tuition-paying student threshold include Bryn Mawr, Caltech, Davidson, Grinnell, Smith, Swarthmore, and Wellesley. It is unclear, however, whether avoiding the endowment tax was part of their motivation for offering a free-tuition policy and whether they were able to reduce the number of tuition-paying students below the 3,000 threshold. 

But the incentive is there, and it’s one more reason college pricing works like a black box.

Other Reasons Colleges Are Going Tuition-Free

The endowment tax isn’t the whole story. Other motivations for free-tuition policies include:

  • Answering the affordability critics. Countering the college affordability criticism associated with the high-cost/high-aid model. A sticker price near $100,000 is hard to defend, even when few families pay it and colleges discount tuition 56% on average.
  • Maintaining diversity after the 2023 affirmative action ruling. After the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling banned affirmative action, colleges are using financial aid policies based on income to maintain campus diversity.
  • Extending no-loan policies. Many of these colleges already had no-loans financial aid policies, so the next step is to provide more generous grants. 
  • Rethinking student employment. A recognition that student employment as a source of financial aid establishes a caste system on campus, where low-income students serve food for high-income students in the cafeteria. 
  • Dropping minimum student contributions. Some of these colleges had policies where even low-income students were expected to contribute a few thousand dollars toward college costs each year, corresponding to income during the academic year and summer break. 
  • Winning back middle-income families who feel too wealthy for aid but too poor to pay full price, especially now that Parent PLUS loans are capped.
  • Responding to public pressure to use endowments to provide sticker-price relief. 
  • Fixing “admit-deny.” Need-blind admissions creates an admit-deny situation where the low-income students are admitted but cannot afford to attend. 

A New Basis For Financial Aid Appeals

The gaps between the income thresholds at these colleges are creating a new basis for financial aid appeals.

The tuition at many of these colleges is in the $60,000 to $70,000 range. So qualifying for free tuition can yield a very big reduction in the college net price calculation.

But, if family income is above the income threshold at one college and below the income threshold at another, missing out on the free-tuition generosity can yield a huge difference in financial aid. That’s one more reason to run the numbers on whether a given college is worth the investment before committing.

Even though the colleges try to avoid a cliff effect by using a sliding scale for financial aid above their income thresholds, the difference in net price can still be in the tens of thousands of dollars. Choosing one college over a more generous college might increase the four-year cost by over $100,000. That’s more than most low and middle-income families are willing to pay. 

The $100,000 Colleges

The Washington Post reported that 15 colleges have a total cost of attendance of $100,000 or more for 2026-2027. The full list: Barnard, Colgate, Claremont McKenna, Duke, Fordham, Georgetown, Harvey Mudd, Haverford, NYU, Smith, the University of Chicago, USC, Vassar, Washington University in St. Louis, and Wesleyan. Our own list of the most expensive colleges tracks the same trend.

Three of the 15 also appear on the free-tuition list above: the University of Chicago ($250,000), Smith College ($150,000), and Duke ($150,000, but only for North and South Carolina residents).

For everyone else at a $100,000 school, the average cost of college is a very different number than the price on the website, and the only way to know what you’ll pay is to run the net price calculator and, if the answer isn’t good enough, appeal. And if the appeal falls short, grants and scholarships are still the next place to look before borrowing.

Editor: Robert Farrington

The post Why Elite Colleges Are Racing To Offer Free Tuition appeared first on The College Investor.

Questions Arise About Anthropic Researcher Who Predicts AI Doom


This past week, the media ran reports about a former Anthropic Researcher who claims he left the firm because he believes artificial intelligence (AI) will lead to a global catastrophe. The first reports emerged on WSJ.com.

Researcher Jacob Coxon warned that labs are racing toward uncontrollable AI, predicting digital defense attacks, alongside accelerated scientific and industrial change almost overnight. There is said to be a pervasive belief within the industry that AI could kill all humans, bringing allusions to the Terminator film series when AI became self-aware.

A growing number of reports describe AI agents breaking free from human control and acting on their own to pursue nefarious goals.

While concerns about AI and its rapid ubiquity are real, Coxon’s comments have sparked a discussion on X about whether he was fully transparent about his public recriminations.

Zero Hedge, the finance insider news site that has morphed into more general news, reported that Coxon was at Anthropic for only 6 weeks, followed by a comment from Elon Musk saying it “seems like a setup.”

Another poster shared that Coxon has been affiliated with a UK non-governmental organization called Newspeak, with ties to socialist Jeremy Corbyn and prominent Democrat Hillary Clinton, that seeks to hack democracy. Coxson was reportedly part of Newspeak’s 2021 Fellowship cohort.

Still, Coxson has credibility as an AI researcher, with a degree in Mathematics from Cambridge and several years at OpenAI.

All of this heightens the debate about AI, its rapid adoption across all aspects of industry, and the potential for something to go badly wrong. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI and Grok, has himself warned about the dangers.

At the same time, the race is largely between China and the US, and there are real concerns that China will win and drive the industry in a direction undesirable to the West.

Most insiders say the development of AI must proceed with caution, not that development should halt. But will China do the same?

In July, more than a thousand employees at frontier labs signed a letter advising the world to pace the development of automated AI. A separate statement this week, from a diverse coalition of groups, called on the White House to release its frontier AI security framework.

AI and agentic AI are the hottest sectors in industry today, and they can streamline services and processes, creating real economic value. While there will be transitions as some services become automated – and jobs will change- most see its development as good for society … unless AI goes full Skynet rogue…

 

 

 

 

 



Disney CFO says this one sector is critical for driving customer lifetime value: ‘It’s just on fire’


Good morning. Live sports has become a strategic battleground for media companies and technology platforms competing for consumer attention and advertising dollars. Disney CFO Hugh Johnston also sees it as a driver of customer lifetime value.

Johnston didn’t mince words about the state of live sports. “It’s just on fire,” he said during a question-and-answer session at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference on Wednesday. “People just can’t get enough of it, and our advertisers can’t get enough of it.”

It’s a strategic bet Disney has been building for years: Live sports isn’t just a content category anymore; it’s connective tissue for Disney’s broader consumer ecosystem, from ESPN to Disney+.

In its fiscal Q3, Disney’s Sports segment, primarily ESPN, generated $4.5 billion in revenue, up 4% year over year, driven by subscription and affiliate fees and advertising, the company reported last month. Entertainment SVOD, which includes Disney+ and Hulu, grew 11% to $5.53 billion. Across the two segments, advertising revenue topped $2.8 billion, with sports advertising up 5% offsetting a 1% decline in Entertainment advertising.

That divergence helps explain why Johnston is leaning into sports. As general entertainment advertising softens, live sports remains a reliable draw for both viewers and advertisers.

“In terms of sports rights, we’re actually pretty well locked up through 2029 or 2030,” Johnston said. He cited “creative deals” with the NBA, NFL, MLB and NHL, giving ESPN its “base load” of marquee content for years.

But Disney (No. 44 on the Fortune 500) isn’t trying to obtain rights to every sports property. Johnston specifically cited Formula 1 (F1) as becoming too expensive, saying Disney chose to put its spending elsewhere. The message from the CFO: Own the rights that matter, but at prices that protect ESPN’s margins.

“Sports to drive ad dollars and engagement is absolutely a core part of Disney’s business,” Morningstar Senior Equity Analyst Matthew Dolgin told me. Sports also helps keep ESPN important to the pay-TV bundle and gives Disney a way to attract consumers to the ESPN app who don’t subscribe to traditional pay TV.

Integrating sports more deeply into Disney’s streaming ecosystem is more complicated, Dolgin said. Disney has begun putting some ESPN content on Disney+ and offers bundles combining ESPN, Disney+ and Hulu, aiming to boost overall streaming subscriptions and engagement.

Advertisers are sorting into winners and losers

Johnston also offered a glimpse into the advertising environment. Technology and AI advertisers are “doing very, very well,” along with political spending and health care. Consumer packaged-goods companies, restaurants and telecom carriers are facing more pressure.

The telecom example illustrates a broader trend: Advertisers are concentrating budgets around a small number of must-see events rather than spreading spending broadly. For Disney, whose ESPN strategy is built around those unmissable moments like College GameDay, the NBA Finals and Monday Night Football.

And that’s potentially a significant tailwind, as long as ESPN keeps landing the biggest games.

Sheryl Estrada
Sheryl.Estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Michael Brous was promoted to CFO of rideshare company Lyft, Inc. (Nasdaq: LYFT), effective Sept. 28. Brous takes over from Erin Brewer, who plans to retire and will remain with Lyft as an advisor through Dec. 15. Brous has served in Lyft senior management for nearly eight years, currently as head of Lyft Urban Solutions and Safety and Customer Care. He joined Lyft in 2018 through its acquisition of Motivate, where he was the VP of finance.

Peter G. Clifford was EVP and CFO of Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (NYSE: FBIN), a home, security and digital products company, effective Sept. 21. Clifford brings more than 30 years of experience, including CFO and COO roles at The AZEK Company and Cantel Medical. Most recently, Clifford served as CFO for Filtration Group Corporation. 

Big Deal

Deloitte’s annual Finance Trends 2027 report explores how finance leaders are increasingly operating in a dual role, leading not only transformation within finance teams, but also shaping how enterprise-wide tech and AI investments are governed.

More than half (54%) of surveyed finance leaders lead enterprise AI and technology capital-allocation decisions, while 48% lead on AI trust and 48% oversee AI and technology spending and cost controls. In addition, nearly half (43%) identify embedding AI and advanced technology into operations as a top priority through fiscal year 2027.

Meanwhile, sovereignty is reshaping investment: 84% expect technology sovereignty—including data residency, vendor relationships and supply-chain resilience—to reshape capital allocation decisions. 63% see it as a strategic differentiator.

Another key finding: AI adoption advances, 60% of finance leaders say they will need more sophisticated AI cost-management practices through 2027. Those preparing for this shift are further along in their AI journeys, with higher rates of fully embedded AI productivity tools in finance (64%) and FinOps capabilities (38%) than those maintaining current practices (51% and 25%, respectively).

The findings are based on a global survey of 1,434 finance leaders at public and private companies with revenues of at least $1 billion.

Courtesy of Deloitte

Going deeper

Tech giant Apple unveiled its first foldable smartphone on Wednesday—the iPhone Duo. It will cost $1,999 for the 256-gigabyte version and be available Oct. 23, Fortune’s Sebastian Herrera reports. Apple is also selling a two terabyte version for $3,199.

“The phone has a 7.6-inch display when opened and a 5.4-inch outer display when closed,” Herrera writes. “It will also work with Apple Pencil, and it can be viewed in several display modes, including half-folded on a table.” To learn how this device pushes Apple into a new era, read more here.

Overheard

“Over time, we believe EVs are the end game because of the styling and what they enable—instant torque and never having to go to the gas station.”

—General Motors Chair and CEO Mary Barra said this during a conversation with Fortune’s Editor-in-Chief Alyson Shontell in a new episode of Fortune 500: Titans and Disruptors of Industry. Shontell sat down with Barra to discuss her approach to fierce competition from China, shifting EV policy, the rise of AI and autonomous vehicles, and how she intends to steer the company into the next century.

Cabral Gold completes first gold pour at Brazil mine




Cabral Gold completes first gold pour at Brazil mine

OSFI locks in 3% capital buffer until June 2028




Canada’s financial regulator pledged that a key capital requirement for the country’s largest banks will remain stable as long as he’s in the role.  

New Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard Offering 50,000 Points Bonus



Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard 50,000 Points Bonus

Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard 50,000 Points Bonus

Carnival Cruise Line and Barclays US Consumer Bank have launched the new Carnival Rewards™ Mastercard®. The card is integrated with Carnival’s recently launched Carnival Rewards™ loyalty program, providing more ways to earn rewards and faster access to loyalty benefits. There’s also a welcome bonus of 50,000 points. Let’s go over the details.

Bonus Details

  • Earn 50,000 points after spending $1,000 on purchases in the first 90 days.
  • No Annual Fee
  • DIRECT LINK

About the Card

  • Up to 6X points (3x points from the card, plus up to 3x points through Carnival Rewards) on eligible Carnival purchases, including cruise fares, shore excursions, onboard activities, spa treatments and specialty dining.  
  • 2X points on eligible restaurant and grocery store purchases. 
  • 1X points on everything else. 
  • Earn up to 4 Status Qualifying Stars on Carnival purchases when combined with the Stars earned through Carnival Rewards and 1 Status Qualifying Star on all other purchases. 
  • 0% Promotional APR for 6 months on all Carnival cruise booking purchases, offering added flexibility when planning and paying for Carnival vacations (terms apply). 
  • Real-time redemption toward eligible Carnival purchases. 
  • Redeem points for cruise upgrades. 
  • 2,500-point annual card anniversary bonus after spending $2,000 on purchases. 

The post New Barclays Carnival Rewards Mastercard Offering 50,000 Points Bonus appeared first on Danny the Deal Guru.

Structural Reforms Creating New Global Investment Opportunities


The first challenge for investors is distinguishing durable reform from political theater. Broad political and institutional support matters. Hungary’s two-thirds supermajority and Germany’s constitutional threshold, for example, provide different signals of durability than Chile’s one-vote senate margin. So does the nature of the policy itself. Permitting reform or cutting red tape or any other measures that remove barriers to investment can alter an economy’s productive trajectory; temporary subsidies or tax cuts or pre-election spending generally do not.

Public support is not always a prerequisite for success, but its absence increases friction. An OECD study found that reforms introduced without prior public backing are more likely to succeed when they generate visible benefits quickly—a difficult test for structural reforms whose effects can take years to emerge.

The second challenge is matching the kind of reform to investment opportunity for investors. For instance, fiscal and monetary normalization can appear first in local rates and domestic banks as it can drive valuation re-rating and improve macro-economic prospects. Supply-side reform can result in opportunities in construction, materials, engineering firms, and infrastructure credit. Governance reform can translate more directly into equities through improved capital allocation, buybacks, and payout growth. Currency reform is generally more relevant for frontier market economies, and can restore price discovery and investability, with reserve accumulation and foreign capital flows as measures of success.

Lastly, valuation determines a critical entry point. Historical financial cycles have shown that frontier markets are generally off investors’ radar and thus trading at cheap valuations – for the lack of historical reforms and policy inefficiencies. When investors realize the emergence of reform momentum, it can lead to long-term investment opportunities.

AI and geopolitics will keep dominating the headlines. But some of the most interesting opportunities may emerge beneath them, as structural reform changes the return on capital before markets fully price it.

Here’s How Much Money You Would Have Today If You Had Invested $10,000 in Apple Stock 10 Years Ago


Apple (AAPL -0.28%) has been one of the greatest stock market stories in history. It was, at various times in recent years, the most valuable company in the world, and its current No. 2 spot behind chipmaker Nvidia is not too shabby.

It’s a great example of a stock that might have looked to some investors like it had already peaked 10 years ago. Yet if you had invested $10,000 in Apple at the time, your position would be worth a lot more money today.

Image source: Apple.

The rise of the iPhone

Believe it or not, the iPhone has only been around since 2007. Today, there are 1.6 billion active iPhones worldwide, and people continue to buy the smartphones at a rapid rate.

Apple Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.28%) $-0.88

Current Price

$315.34

Apple as a whole has been reporting robust growth despite inflation, and the market is recognizing that its less capital-investment-intense approach to artificial intelligence (AI) was a smart strategy. Apple stock is up almost 16% this year, outperforming the S&P 500, which is up by almost 12%.

Over the past 10 years, though, it has gained more than 1,000%, and if you include reinvested dividends, its total return is almost 1,200%. That’s nearly four times the S&P 500’s total return.

^SPX Chart

^SPX data by YCharts.

So if you’d invested $10,000 in Apple a decade ago, reinvested your dividends and held on through the ups and downs, you’d have a position worth $129,000 today. Apple isn’t likely to repeat that type of performance over the next decade, considering its current $4.6 trillion market cap, but it can still offer value to long-term investors.