Home Blog

BetterLife Pharma closes $100M public offering for drug trials




BetterLife Pharma closes $100M public offering for drug trials

Live Gold & Bitcoin Scalping – Forex & Crypto Trading Strategies



🎯 Live Gold (XAUUSD) & Bitcoin (BTCUSD) Scalping – Real-Time Forex & Crypto Trading Strategies
Watch me trade the London and New York sessions live with in-depth market analysis, entry/exit setups, and risk management techniques.

💹 What You’ll Learn in This Live:
* Gold & Bitcoin price action analysis
* High-probability scalping setups
* Day trading strategies for Forex & Crypto
* Real-time trade execution & risk control

💬 Stay Connected:
📌 Subscribe & turn on notifications 🔔 for daily trading live streams and market updates.

⚠️ Disclaimer:
This content is for educational purposes only. Trading involves significant risk. Do your own research before making financial decisions.

#GoldScalping #BitcoinScalping #ForexTrading #CryptoTrading #XAUUSD #BTCUSD #DayTrading #LiveTrading #ScalpingStrategy #ForexSignals #cryptosignals
Join & Follow Me 👇

📲 Telegram:
📸 Instagram:
💹

source

You’re Not Gonna Like What Happens to Mortgage Rates


Dave:
The Treasury Secretary of the United States, Scott Bessett, looked at the bond market this week and said, and I am quoting here, “I am the house now. You can bet against me if you want.” Well, the bond market took that bet and the bond market won. Within hours, the 10-year treasury yield blew out to a new high. The next day, the average 30-year mortgage rate hit 7.07%, the highest it’s been since May of 2025. And here’s why this matters more than any Fed meeting you’re going to watch this year. Washington is now actively publicly trying to push long-term interest rates down, and it isn’t working, which tells you something really important about what’s actually driving our mortgage rates right now. So today at On the Market, we’re breaking down the bond market, what’s happened to yields over the last few weeks, why it’s happening, what the treasury department is doing about it, how markets responded, and the part that actually you care about, what all this means for mortgage rates and for your deals.
And I’ll also give you my honest mortgage rate forecast. And a little spoiler alert, I feel pretty good about this forecast, but you’re probably not going to like it. But these are things that you need to hear to prepare for what’s coming next. This is On the Market. Let’s get to it.
Hey everyone. Welcome to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. And I have been waiting, not happily, but I have been waiting to make this episode for a couple of years now because if you listen to the show for any length of time, you’ve heard me say some version of the same thing over and over again. The Fed doesn’t set your mortgage rates, the bond market does. And the bond market has been acting in a way that I’ve been saying for a couple of years was probably going to happen. And they’re acting in a way that makes it really hard for any Fed chair or as we’re seeing any treasury secretary to fix. And I’ve been calling the risk of persistently high rates out for a long time. I’ve been trying to say on the show, every year we make predictions, every time I post something on social media, I’d say rates aren’t going down.
I have so many people telling me that I’m being a downer or that I’m wrong, but some of the things that I’ve been predicting were going to happen are starting to happen. I think we’re starting to get there. And I am not trying to do a victory lap here. I’m not excited about what’s going on here. I’m not trying to fear monger. I’m not saying there’s a crash, but something real is happening in the bond market. It has been building for years and I feel like just in the last couple weeks, maybe in the last month or so, it is starting to finally show up in mortgage rates. It’s starting to get attention in the investor world. And I do think it is going to have a real direct, probably long-term impact on the housing market. So first up, let’s just talk about what actually happened.
The big picture headline is that the 10-year treasury yield, which again, this is the thing that is most closely correlated to mortgage rates. When the treasury yield goes up on the 10-year, mortgage rates go up. When it goes down, mortgage yields goes down. That’s not always true throughout history, but over the last several decades, they have really worked in lockstep. And the 10-year treasury has gone up a lot. It’s now nearing 5% where it has not been for quite a while. About a year ago, it was up about 4.3%. And so it’s not like some crazy thing, but the fact that it is moving up and moving up so quickly is what’s concerning me. And I think what’s concerning investors, not just real estate investors, stock investors, gold investors, this is something that impacts everyone. I made this joke a lot on this show, but it is true.
I think bonds rule the world. What happens with the bond market cascades through every other type of investment. I’m not going to spend a lot of time on that today, but just think of it this way. Bonds are what are known as “risk-free assets.” They’re not risk-free. That is not true, but investors see it that way. They are the lowest risk investment out there other than putting your money in a savings account, that’s FDIC insured. But because they are the lowest risk out there, when bond yields go up and you get a better rate, you get a better interest rate, a better return on bonds, then all of a sudden riskier assets look less attractive. If you can earn 5% lending the US government money for 10 years, maybe you don’t invest in gold or maybe you don’t invest in the stock market because you can get a decent return on low risk.
And so the fact that yields are climbing is going to ripple throughout the entire economy, real estate included. Now I want to mention that this is not just happening with 10 years, it’s also happening with the 30-year treasury. It’s now at 5.34%, and this is the highest it has been in nearly 20 years. This is the part I think that really matters for real estate investors because when you look at bond yields and the yield curve, this is complicated, I’m not going to get super into it, but bonds come in all lengths. There are short-term bonds and there are long-term bonds. And where we’re seeing yields go up are in long-term bonds, 10-year treasuries and 30-year treasuries. And this matters for real estate investors because we borrow at the long end. We borrow for long periods of time with 30-year fixed rate mortgages, or even relatively long, even if you’re getting an arm or something for seven, 10 years, that’s a relatively long loan.
And so seeing the yields go up on those bonds are going to push up mortgage rates and it’s going to push up commercial lending rates too. So this really does matter for real estate investors. And the fact that where we’re seeing yields go up is for long-dated bonds, not the shorter term ones, tells you, this is an important signal. It tells you that the market, what they’re worried about, why this is happening is something long-term. They’re worried about long-term performance, and I’ll get to what I mean by that, but they’re worried about something structural in the global economy that’s going to impact returns. It’s not something that’s cyclical. They’re not worried about something that’s going to happen in one year or two years. If they were worried about that, we would see yields on short-term bonds go up, but they’re going up on long-term bonds.
I know this is kind of complicated, but here’s what you need to know. Yields are going up for long-dated bonds. That’s going to push up borrowing costs for investors. Now you know that we need to talk about why this is happening. This is the question, right? The answer is clearly not the Fed because the Fed has sort of been sitting still. By the time this episode comes out, it’s coming out the day after the Fed meeting. I am willing to bet I’m going to record this and put it out to the public and say that the Fed raised rates yesterday, but all this stuff happened before raising rates. So it’s not the Fed and I actually think there’s a bunch of different factors that are influencing them. Let’s go through them because I think this is really what’s going to tell us what happens with mortgage rates in the next three months, six months, six years.
Number one, fiscal anxiety. This is one I have been sort of hammering on for years and calling out as a risk to the entire economy for years. And what I mean by that is that investors are starting to worry about the massive amount of public debt that we have here in the United States. Our total public debt just crossed $40 trillion, right? That is huge and it is going up fast. Less than a year ago, we were at 38 trillion. We are getting a trillion dollars in new debt every five months. This is not normal. This is not good. I know people have different opinions about debt, but no one can convince me that right now with the economy that we’re in, that a trillion dollars in debt every five months is a good thing. Interest on that debt is now one of three biggest line items in the entire budget, and there’s no end in sight.
We have not had a balanced budget in the United States for more than 25 years. This is a problem that spans administrations, political parties. It has just been going on and on and on. And frankly, it’s gotten a lot worse over the last couple of years. I’ve been worried about this and clearly bond investors, bonds rule of the world, they are starting to get worried about it as well because what do bond investors care about? They care about inflation. Think about it. Bond investors are extremely sensitive to inflation because if you’re going to lend the US government money for 10 years or for 30 years, the big risk to you is not that the government is not going to pay you back. There is almost no risk that the government’s not going to pay you back. The risk is that to pay you back, the US government is going to start printing money and devalue the debt.
And so if you’re worried that the inflation rate over the next 10 or 30 years is going to be 4%, you sure as heck don’t want to earn a 4% yield on your bond because then you’re basically making no money in real terms, inflation adjusted returns. If inflation’s 4% and your yield is 4%, you’re breaking even. That’s it. And so when investors are worried about inflation, they demand higher rates from the government, right? So this is one of the main reasons we are seeing yields go up. The second thing about this increasing debt is just supply and demand because the more we need to borrow means there is more supply of bonds, right? You can’t just go out and magically create bonds and have people buy them. There’s actually people who have to go and buy these bonds. And the more supply out there means there might not be as many people who want to lend the US government money at these rates.
And so in order to entice people to buy and create the demand for all this new supply, they need to increase their yield. So those are two different reasons our national debt is creating higher yields. Now on top of that, a third thing is AI. AI is creating a massive amount of supply for debt. These companies that are scaling and spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year on infrastructure build out and data centers, they need debt. And so they’re issuing bonds, they’re getting debt from the private market. And so now the US government has to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic who are offering higher yields than the US government. And surely those AI build out bonds are riskier, but it’s more competition. All of this is to say the debt market has a lot of supply and investors are clearly worried about the amount of debt out there.
That is, I think, one of the major reasons why we’re seeing yields go up. And remember that because in a couple minutes we’re going to talk about what happens from here, but I’ll just fast-forward a little bit. We’re going to talk about are things getting better? You think the deficit’s getting better anytime soon? I don’t. 25 years since we’ve had a balanced budget, that wouldn’t even reduce our debt. We would need a surplus to reduce the deficit, but I mean, it would be a step in the right direction. So that’s the first thing. The second thing is short-term inflation, right? That is also bad. The war in Iran has created an energy shock and inflation has remained sticky. Inflation was going down until the war in Iran, and then it started going up. We’re now seeing oil back up near $100 a barrel because there is no end in sight to the war.
No one’s even talking about a peace deal anymore. It’s just going on in the background silently while oil’s going up, fertilizer prices are going up, food costs are going up. And so inflation has remained sticky. We just got a print the other day and inflation’s at 3.4%, well above the target of the Fed, which is 2%. We also had a hot producer price index, which is different measure of inflation, but that came out, that was hot as well. And so again, bond investors worried about inflation, that’s another reason yields go up. The third reason, and there are other reasons, but the third reason and last one I’m going to talk about here today is what has to do with the Fed. It’s not actually what they do this month or next, but we have a new Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, and people just don’t know what he’s going to do.
A lot of people are fearful that because Trump has repeatedly said he wants lower interest rates, that Warsh is going to lower interest rates even in the face of inflation, and he hasn’t said that he’s not. And so until we get a sense of what the Fed is going to do, I think bond investors are going to be very cautious. Now, as I said, I’m recording this a few days before the Fed meeting. I think they’re going to raise rates because they have to address this. They have to address what is going on in the bond market. Otherwise, we’re going to see bond yields go up and that can be very damaging to the economy, but I do think that’s playing in here. I think the bond market is trying to send a signal to Kevin Warsh, “You better raise rates.” Not because that’s good for the country short term, but because if he doesn’t, and if he and the rest of the FOMC vote on interest rates, if they collectively say, “Hey, we’re going to keep rates low, we’re even maybe going to lower,” even in the face of all the fears that the bond market has, not good.
That’s why I think the Fed doesn’t really have an option anymore. They have to raise rates to send a signal back to the bond market that they are taking inflation seriously and they are not going to let it run wild. Now, it’s not totally up to the Fed, right? All the spending and debt, that comes down to the President and Congress. Congress has power of the purse, not the Fed, but the Fed showing that they’re going to do what they can on the monetary side could help, that could help send the right signal to the bond market. Okay, so now we’ve talked about what has happened. Yields are going up. We’ve talked about three of the main reasons why it’s happening. Let’s turn our attention to what happened with the treasury last week and Washington, the Trump administration’s intervention, because this really matters. We do have to take a quick break though.
We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today at On the Market, we’re talking about a crazy week, crazy month that we’ve been having in the bond market. We’ve talked so far about what has happened, why the bond market is going up. Now let’s turn our attention to what actually happened because this is a pretty crazy thing in my opinion, and I don’t think it’s getting nearly enough attention in the media or in the real estate world in particularly. But back in August 19th, one day after the 30-year yield hit that 19-year high, the Treasury Department announced it would double the size of its bond buyback operations for long-dated treasuries. A buyback is the government buying back its own outstanding bonds in the open market. Fewer long outstanding bonds. In theory, this theory means less supply pressure, right? There’s less bonds out there, and so maybe demand and supply will become in equilibrium.
But what they’re doing here is just a little bit of financial engineering here, because what money is the treasury going out and buying those long-dated bonds with? They’re just buying them with new debt. They’re issuing short-term debt, short-term treasury bills to go out. They’re borrowing money to go out and buy back their own money that they borrow. It’s just kind of confounding. Now, bond buybacks are not a new thing. They’ve absolutely happened before under different administrations as well. I think that they were definitely doing it during the Biden administration as well. But during previous times, they’ve at least said it was more of a liquidity and cash management thing. They’re directly trying to change the yield curve. Bessett has said it. He’s basically trying to manipulate the market and the yield curve. I think what’s really amazing here is the market just doesn’t care. They’ve done this a couple times now.
The first time he came out and announced it, it kind of worked. On that announcement day, 10-year yields fell six basis points, so 0.06%, that’s six basis points, right? Cool. 30-year drop, nine basis points. Those are meaningful drops, but not changing anything, but then it just went back up. So then Biscette came out and said, “Actually, we’re going to do even more bond buybacks.” And that announcement, the dip, it dipped a little bit for 48 hours, and then it just came back and actually went higher from where they were before the announcement, erasing the entire sort of relief rally that it created. Then Biscette responded by signaling he’d go even bigger. And on September 9th came out and said, “I am the house.” He literally said, “I am the house now.” They say, “Don’t bet against the house. I am the house. You can bet against me if you want.” They announced a $6 billion long end buyback.
Well, not enough, right? $6 billion sounds like a lot, not against $40 trillion in debt. It didn’t even matter. The opposite effect, bonds tanked, bond prices and bond yields move inversely. So when bonds are being sold for cheaper, when their prices go down, yields go up. So basically bonds tanked, prices went down on bonds and yields went up. And we actually just saw the 10-year hit a new long-term high after that third announcement. So the bond market said to Scott Bessent, “Challenge accepted. We don’t care about your buyback.” So just think about what we just watched. The most powerful financial officer in the United States stood up, told the market he was going to push long-term rates down, dared traders to fight him, and they fought him and won and rates went up. That is the bond market telling Washington pretty firmly that a few billion dollars of buybacks do not solve a $40 trillion problem.
$40 trillion, by the way, is 40,000 billion. So six billion versus 40,000 billion, probably not enough. The other thing is I just don’t think the bond market wants to be manipulated in this way because the reason it’s going up is for all these structural issues, the deficit and inflation. And by Bessent going out there and sort of saying, “Well, we’re going to buy back these bonds,” it shows they’re not trying to address these issues. They’re not trying to fix inflation. The war isn’t ending. Tariffs aren’t stopping. The deficit is not being closed. They’re signaling they’re not going to start buying this debt because Scott Bessent went out and said, “We’re going to do bond buybacks.” They want real structural fixes to go in place. So pretty crazy wild. People say bonds are boring. For me, this has been an exciting couple of days because a lot has been going on.
All right guys, we got more on the bond market and what you should be doing in your own portfolio, but we got to take a quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s jump back into our conversation about the bond market and how it’s going to impact the real estate market. Let’s talk now though about what this means for mortgage rates. Let’s bring this home for what this means for real estate investors. So again, mortgage rates, they track the 10-year US Treasury and that has gone up. I just have to say, I just don’t think mortgage rates are going to go down. It’s really hard for me to see the 10-year treasury going down. There’s only a couple things that can move it, right? I think number one is if the Fed raises rates. I know this sounds crazy, but hear me out. I know it sounds insane, but I think if the Fed lowered rates right now are kept in the same, I think the bond market would be like, they don’t care at all about inflation, yields would go up.
I actually think if the Fed raises rates, we might see mortgage rates go down just a little bit. That might help in the short term a tiny bit. It’s not going to really be a deference breaker. The real things that we can do are, number one, win the war on inflation. We know that inflation is too high right now, and we know that the primary drivers of this are tariffs and the war in Iraq. We could stop those things. Politically, it doesn’t seem likely, but that is one thing that could move down inflation. The second thing we could do is get control of the national deficit. That is entirely within our power to do, but it is almost like not even worth talking. I’m not going to waste your time talking about the government getting control of our debt. It’s just not going to happen, right?
It’s not happening anytime soon. No party is even talking about it. At least a couple years ago, they would pretend that they were going to get it under control. Now, no one even talks about it. So I’m not even going to talk about it, but that would work. That would really work. That’s probably really what would work in the long run, but it’s not going to happen. The third thing that could happen is a recession because what happens with supply and demand on bonds is if there’s a recession, a lot of investors move their money out of risky assets like stocks or crypto or whatever, and they want relative safety and bonds are relatively safe. Remember, it’s that risk-free asset. And so that creates more demand for bonds that pushes up the price of bonds and pushes down yields, right? So a recession typically lowers yields and lowers mortgage rates.
But right now, are any of those things going to happen? I don’t think inflation’s going to go crazy unless the war really gets worse or there’s new tariffs or something like that, but I don’t think it’s going to go down anytime soon in a meaningful way. Deficit we talked about, maybe there’ll be a recession, but it doesn’t seem like a recession is going to happen the rest of this year. That is definitely possible, but it doesn’t seem imminent, right? So are mortgage rates going to go down? No, they’re not. I actually think right now the risk is that they’ll go up more than they’ll go down. Hopefully they’ll stay around seven, maybe hover in the high sixes, and I think that’s what we have to plan for. I was actually starting to put together my talk for BP Con, which is in a couple of weeks, and I always give a mortgage rate forecast during that, and I was coming up with my range, and I think six and a half to seven half percent is probably where we’ll hang out in 2027, is my guess.
There’s so many geopolitical things that could go on here, but where we’re sitting here today, that’s probably where I would say things are going. And that’s going to matter for investors, right? I predicted last year that prices were going to go down in 2026. They’re still up a little bit this year, but I think they’re going to be close to flat. I said probably negative one. We might get there, we’ll see by the end of the year, but flat, negative one, somewhere around there is probably where we’ll end the year. I think next year, if things continue on the current trajectory, we’re going to have negative home prices on a national basis. I don’t think it’d crash, but negative one, negative two, negative 3%, that seems likely to me. And I think we’re going to see even slower housing market, which sucks because we’re at four million home sales right now, very slow by historical standards.
Normal years like five and a quarter million. We’re at four million, that’s slow. It’s 20% below average. I think it could go even slower. I think we could get to 3.9, 3.8, 3.7, because people don’t have money and this low affordability is going to negatively impact the housing market. There’s still the lock in effect. I just think the market’s going to be stuck. It’s going to be bad, in my opinion. I think we’re getting for a rough time in the housing market. Now, that doesn’t mean a rough time for investors, actually. I think there are a lot of reasons to think that good deals are coming. When prices go down, it improves the rent-to-price ratios. It gives you better negotiating leverage. Buyers are getting great concessions right now. Two of the markets I invest in Seattle and Denver, we’re seeing huge price drops, better deals on assets than I’ve seen in a long time.
So as for someone who’s a buy and hold investor like me, I think there’s actually opportunity. It’s a good thing, but if we’re talking about the industry, all the agents, loan officers out there, it’s going to be rough. I hope I’m wrong. I really do, but I don’t see how affordability gets better in this market, right? Prices have to come down. That’s the only way. If mortgage rates are going to stay high, the only other levers are prices coming down or real wage growth. Real wage growth now because of inflation is negative. So affordability is going down because of that. It’s going down because of mortgage rates. The only way affordability can get up better in the next six months, in my opinion, next year maybe, is prices going down. And because of the lock-in effect, they’re not going to go down that much, right?
We just don’t have enough inventory on the market. And so I think we’re in the great stall still. We still are, but it’s just getting longer and prices, I think they’ll go down a little bit, but they’re going to be relatively flat. I don’t think it’s going to be a dramatic crash. I don’t really see any evidence of that at this point. I’ll of course update you, but to me, this just means investors should look to buy, right? It’s a good time to use your negotiating leverage to buy undercurrent comps, to buy cash flowing assets, because rents aren’t going down. Rents are pretty flat. If you could find places where rents are staying stable or growing, which is a lot of places and prices are going down, improves your cash flow, right? So that’s what I’m doing. I’m actually looking more at real estate right now.
I think there’s better deals coming. Next six months, we’re going to start to see, I think the winter, we’re going to see a lot of good deals. Good time to negotiate this winter. So that’s sort of how I’m thinking about it for my own portfolio. But in these types of markets, same thing I’ve been saying for three or four years. I wish I could say something different, but we’re in this great stall. Nothing’s really changed, and in fact, it’s getting worse a little bit. And so you got to be careful. You don’t need to be scared. You got to be careful. You can still buy, you can still invest. People who have cash to deploy right now, you’re going to have a lot of negotiating leverage. Use it. Use it. That’s what you got to be doing, right? But be careful. Buy under comps. Don’t just go out and buy anything.
Buy excellent assets. They got to be great assets, great locations, no tertiary locations, not even secondary locations. Buy great assets in great places right now and see if you can stock up because it will recover. It’s just going to take a few years. We need to work through a lot of issues. A lot of issues we need to work through, but it will come back. So buy things that work today and then wait for them to get great over the long run. That is the great stall playbook I’ve been talking about for years and I’m sticking by it. Been saying it for four years, but I’m sticking by it even during the challenges that we’re going to go through now with these higher mortgage rates. I wish I had better news, everyone. I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but my job here is to be accurate as much as I can, to warn you and share information about what’s likely to come.
And although I will be wrong in the future, I think I’ve been right about this, about interest rates and prices for three or four years now, and I feel pretty strongly about the direction things are headed. And so be careful, keep your eyes open, look for opportunity, but don’t overextend yourself and understand that this is likely to stay this way for a while. That’s our show for today. Thank you so much for listening and watching this episode of On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer and I’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Distributional consequences of borrower-based macroprudential tools – Bank Underground


Jagdish Tripathy, Arzu Uluc, José-Luis Peydró and Francesc Rodriguez-Tous

Borrower-based macroprudential measures – such as limits on loan to income (LTI) and loan to value (LTV) ratios – have become a standard feature of the post-crisis regulatory landscape. A growing body of country-specific evidence suggests these measures are effective in moderating the self-reinforcing loop between mortgage credit and house prices, and in reducing default rates and limiting house price volatility during periods of economic stress. Yet their distributional consequences are less well understood. In a new paper, we survey the existing evidence and find that these tools deliver clear financial stability benefits, while also generating distributional effects across borrower groups. Further, we identify areas where future research is needed to provide a comprehensive welfare assessment of these measures.

A large body of literature shows that the global financial crisis was preceded by a large increase in mortgage credit, which fuelled high household leverage and house prices. Once the crisis hit, highly-indebted households cut consumption more sharply than less-leveraged households, were more likely to default and contributed to waves of foreclosures. This explains why crises preceded by household credit booms last longer and go deeper. Therefore, when housing markets and mortgage credit experience rapid growth, policies that limit excessive leverage can help mitigate the economic costs of future downturns.

Borrower-based measures (BBMs) are such policies designed to curb the build‑up of household leverage at mortgage origination and are typically introduced relative to collateral value or income. The use of these measures expanded rapidly after the global financial crisis. While they were loosened during the pandemic, their usage has picked up again in recent years (Chart 1). They sit within a broader prudential toolkit, complemented by underwriting standards and capital‑based tools – such as sectoral capital requirements, countercyclical capital buffers (CCyB) and stress testing – which are used to build system resilience and maintain lending capacity when household risks materialise.


Chart 1: Recent trends in tightening and loosening in borrower-based measures globally

Notes: The chart shows the total instances of net tightening in borrower-based measures across jurisdictions worldwide in a given year. Each instance of policy tightening is assigned +1, policy loosening is assigned -1.

Source: International Monetary Fund iMaPP.


Effects of borrower-based measures

A large empirical literature finds that BBMs are effective in limiting household leverage. Using both granular micro data and cross-country analysis, most studies show that tightening of these measures is associated with slower growth in mortgage credit and housing transactions, particularly during expansions. Early evidence from Korea demonstrates that LTV and LTI limits significantly reduced housing transactions and dampened price expectations, with speculative buyers delaying purchases in response to the policy. Cross-country studies similarly document that tightening of BBMs leads to slower credit and house price growth.

However, leverage at origination is not evenly distributed across borrower groups: younger borrowers, lower-income households and first-time buyers typically require higher leverage (refer to Figure 2 in our paper) and are more likely to be constrained by these measures. Studies using granular mortgage data find sharp reductions in high-leverage lending to these groups. However, this does not imply that credit access is necessarily a barrier to ownership: existing evidence points to deposit accumulation as the binding constraint. Moreover, lending often rebalances across borrower types and locations rather than collapsing in aggregate, indicating that these measures reduce systemic risk partly by reshaping the composition of borrowers and loan terms.

Beyond their effects on mortgage lending, BBMs also influence decisions about home ownership and location choice. Evidence shows that tighter leverage limits can delay home ownership for constrained households and influence where they choose to live. Some borrowers purchase smaller or more distant properties – often in less advantageous areas – as lenders tighten lending criteria to stay within regulatory limits, while others postpone purchasing to accumulate larger deposits, trading lower leverage for reduced post-purchase liquidity. These adjustments imply that BBMs can affect commuting patterns, job search, and households’ exposure to income shocks, extending their effects beyond housing and credit markets.

The key benefits of BBMs become apparent during downturns. Empirical evidence shows that borrowers subject to tighter leverage constraints are less likely to default when house prices or incomes decline. In the UK, low-income borrowers in areas more affected by LTI limits were less likely to default following the Brexit-induced house-price slowdown. Complementary evidence from agent-based models finds that lower leverage going into downturns reduces defaults and dampens house-price cycles.

BBMs also affect lenders’ behaviour and their balance sheets. When high-leverage lending is restricted, lenders tend to adjust the composition of loans towards unregulated segments of the portfolio. In some cases, lenders reallocate risk toward other asset classes or borrower segments as documented in Ireland. These responses underscore the potential for regulatory arbitrage and spillovers, highlighting the importance of monitoring lender behaviour alongside borrower outcomes.

Avenues for further research

While the literature has made substantial progress in understanding the effectiveness of BBMs, these policies are relatively recent, and further research is needed to build a holistic view of their consequences.

Much of the existing evidence focuses on what happens when BBMs are introduced during economic expansions. This provides an incomplete picture since the key benefits only materialise during downturns. One exception is our previous work where we study the effects during both a boom and the correction following the Brexit referendum. We find that BBMs moderated the slowdown in house-price growth and led to fewer defaults, especially among low-income borrowers, after the referendum.

Calibration

Relatedly, more work is needed to calibrate the overall costs and benefits of these measures, including their distributional consequences. While structural models of mortgage markets  offer promising avenues for such calibration, none yet fully capture both the demand-side and supply-side determinants of household leverage. Agent‑based models provide a complementary approach by capturing heterogeneous borrower and lender behaviour across the full housing and credit cycle, helping to generate more realistic assessments of the net benefits of BBMs grounded in real‑world dynamics.

Policy levers

Policymakers can restrict household leverage using different BBMs, such as limits on LTV, LTI or debt-service ratio, each targeting different risks. Although these measures are correlated, they are not perfect substitutes. More research is needed to understand how these measures interact, how to choose between them, and how their effectiveness varies with macroeconomic conditions and institutional settings. In addition, understanding their interaction with monetary policy and with other prudential regulations is crucial for assessing their overall effectiveness and welfare implications.

Fintech

The growing role of fintech and non-bank lenders may alter how BBMs operate in practice. Increased use of algorithms and alternative data could change how lenders underwrite mortgages and rebalance portfolios under leverage constraints, raising questions about whether these technologies mitigate or amplify the distributional effects of BBMs.

Political economy

BBMs may also have broader political and institutional implications, given their effects on house prices, home ownership and borrower distress. Recent research links financial crises and household debt distress to political outcomes, suggesting that understanding how these measures interact with mortgage market features and voter incentives remains an important open question.

Health outcomes

Finally, a growing literature examines the relationship between household leverage, financial stress and mental health. While BBMs may reduce the likelihood that households experience severe financial distress following negative shocks, more evidence is needed to assess their broader impacts on health and wellbeing.

Conclusions

Our review points to several policy implications. First, BBMs work best when implemented early in the credit cycle, before systemic risks become entrenched. Second, because these tools bind unevenly across borrower groups, policymakers should assess distributional impacts, including effects on home ownership and location choice, alongside financial stability benefits. Finally, monitoring of lender behaviour and potential spillovers is crucial to ensuring these tools operate as intended.


Jagdish Tripathy works in the Bank’s Centre for Central Banking Studies, Arzu Uluc works in the Bank’s Macroprudential Strategy and Support Division, José-Luis Peydró works at LUISS University and EIEF, and Francesc Rodriguez-Tous works at Bayes Business School of City, University of London.

If you want to get in touch, please email us at bankunderground@bankofengland.co.uk or leave a comment below.

Comments will only appear once approved by a moderator, and are only published where a full name is supplied. Bank Underground is a blog for Bank of England staff to share views that challenge – or support – prevailing policy orthodoxies. The views expressed here are those of the authors, and are not necessarily those of the Bank of England, or its policy committees.

Get BJ’s Membership for $10 or Club+ for $50


BJ’s Membership for $10 or Club+ for $50

BJ’s is offering a 1-year BJ’s Club membership for just $10, down from the regular $60 price. There’s also a BJ’s Club+ membership for $50, compared with the regular $120 price. Both options require BJ’s Easy Renewal.

The basic BJ’s Club membership includes access to all BJ’s locations and BJs.com, BJ’s Gas, digital and manufacturer coupons, ExpressPay checkout, and one household membership.

The upgraded Club+ membership adds 2% back in rewards on most BJ’s purchases, up to $500 per year, an extra 5¢ off per gallon at BJ’s Gas, free curbside pickup, and two free Same-Day Deliveries per membership year on orders of $50 or more.

OFFER PAGE

Guru’s Wrap-up

At $10 for a full year, this is an easy way to try BJ’s if you don’t already have a membership. If you shop frequently at BJ’s, the discounted Club+ membership may provide even more value with 2% back and an extra 5% off gas. 

Just keep in mind that these memberships require you to enroll in Easy Renewal. You can turn that off afterwards if you don’t want to renew automatically at full price.

Bank of Canada troubled by high gas prices, warns of hike risk




The Bank of Canada’s governing council warned that it may need to hike interest rates, saying the longer gasoline prices remain elevated, the more likely that would pass through to other goods and services.

Ryan Serhant says the American city isn’t dying—wealth is ‘multiplying’



While Florida, California, and New York continue to undeniably be hot spots for wealth, one real estate CEO says there are more markets to watch out for. 

Ryan Serhant, CEO of his namesake firm and Owning Manhattan star, said high-net-worth clients continue to buy in the historically wealthy and luxury-oriented cities—but they’re also seeking secondary homes in unexpected markets.

“You would think that the American city is over, the metropolis is dead, and people are scattering,” he told Fox Business in an interview published this week. “And what you actually see is wealth multiplying to the benefit of both the individuals and the real estate assets.”

He envisions the three localities with top net migration during the next few years will be Huntsville, Ala.; Central Ohio; and Charlotte. These are the markets “investors are paying a lot of attention to right now,” he said, adding they’re hot spots for data centers that drive wealth and jobs. “You go to Ohio and you look around, and there are more very expensive cars than you’ll see in South Beach, but no one talks about it.” 

That could appear contrary to Fortune‘s own reporting, which found billionaires have been flocking to Florida—19 of the state’s 20 richest now live in Miami alone—as states like California and Washington float new wealth taxes. But Serhant’s argument is that the ultrawealthy aren’t just picking one place and settling, but rather diversifying their real estate portfolios.

In other words, we’re seeing wealth be stretched, he said. Wealthy buyers continue to purchase multiple homes across the nation: “They all want ease of access to great cities without necessarily paying to be in the center,” he added.

But it’s not just the ultrawealthy diversifying. Affordability is pulling a much broader wave of buyers toward the same kinds of markets.

“People move with their wallet,” he added. 

A warning sign for places like New York

Serhant also noted that even irreplaceable cities aren’t completely untouchable. He estimated New York lost about 12,000 residents last year, which he called “definitely a warning sign,” although not quite a crisis. Even a one-of-a-kind city like New York can lose people if living there costs too much or taxes climb too high. 

New York is testing that limit. A four-bedroom apartment near his SoHo office recently rented for $75,000 a month, which he said proves the city is “too expensive.” New York has consistently been ranked as one of the least affordable markets in the country: It was among the six U.S. cities where even a 0% mortgage rate wouldn’t make buying a home affordable.

But pushing out wealthy residents isn’t the answer either, he argued. Those buyers can just go purchase a home somewhere else, he said, so the city loses either way. He likened it to how companies compete for workers. 

“If you have restrictions on employees on one company, really smart people at that company might say, ‘You know what? Maybe I’ll look for other jobs,’” he said. “Those companies are states. American citizens are employees.”

Where the data agrees with Serhant

Homebuyers are increasingly prioritizing affordability and steady employment, and Ohio has emerged as a quiet winner in the housing market. Homes there run about 30% cheaper than those on the coasts, and Gen Z and millennials accounted for nearly 30% of all interstate movers, a StorageCafe analysis shows.

“For many, it’s not just about cheaper homes, but about being able to build wealth earlier without drowning in overhead,” Danielle Andrews, a realtor with Realty One Group Next Generation, previously told Fortune.

Meanwhile, there have been more job opportunities in markets like Ohio. Intel is building two chip factories outside Columbis in a project it raised to $28 billion, the largest private investment in Ohio history. Amazon Web Services also plans to invest more than $23 billion in the state through 2030.

“Importantly, the cost of living [in the Midwest], especially for essentials like groceries, gas, and health care, is better aligned with local wages, allowing Gen Z buyers to not just get by—but actually get ahead,” Andrews added. “The Midwest is no longer just affordable: It’s aspirational for a generation redefining success.”

DICE owner Fever raises $250M led by EQT, at a $5.2B valuation, in ‘largest ever’ round for a live-entertainment tech company


Live-entertainment platform Fever has raised USD $250 million in a primary equity financing round.

The round was led by EQT, a new investor in the company, with participation from fellow newcomer Baillie Gifford, existing backer Point72 Private Investments, and other existing shareholders.

Fever, which owns UK-headquartered ticketing platform DICE, announced the financing on Thursday (September 17), describing it as “the largest ever for a live-entertainment tech company.”

Fever’s announcement did not include an updated valuation. However, Spanish broadcaster Atresmedia, which first invested in Fever’s Spanish business in 2015 through a media-for-equity deal, told Spain’s securities regulator, the CNMV, on Tuesday (September 15) that it had sold its entire stake in the company, which stood at just over 5%, for approximately EUR €227 million.

The buyer was existing Fever shareholder Vitruvian Partners, according to Cinco Días and Europa Press. The reported valuation implied by that price is approximately EUR €4.5 billion – roughly USD $5.2 billion at current exchange rates.

Atresmedia said its Fever stake sale generated a net post-tax gain of approximately EUR €205 million. Including earlier partial divestments in 2023 and 2024, the broadcaster says its Fever investment has returned total proceeds of EUR €296 million and a post-tax profit of around EUR €264 million.

Fever says it has more than tripled its revenue over the past three years while remaining EBITDA-positive, and that it has strengthened its position across North America and Asia.

The company plans to use the money to expand beyond the 55 countries where it currently operates, and to deepen its presence across all major entertainment categories.

Fever says it will also increase spending on technology for its partners, among them promoters, venues, sports teams, attractions, artists, museums, and cultural institutions. The company says those tools are designed to help partners gauge demand, reach the right audiences, improve their ticketing, and take successful formats into new markets.

“In a world rapidly being reshaped by AI, demand for in-person, shared experiences is accelerating, as more people turn to live entertainment for the kind of connection no screen can offer.”

Fever

“In a world rapidly being reshaped by AI, demand for in-person, shared experiences is accelerating, as more people turn to live entertainment for the kind of connection no screen can offer,” Fever said in a press release.

Spain-founded, New York-headquartered Fever is led by co-founders Ignacio Bachiller, who serves as CEO, Francisco Hein, and Alexandre Perez.

Under a five-year global agreement announced in June, Fever will serve as an Official Supplier to Formula 1 from the 2027 season through 2031, supplying ticketing technology and supporting work on the fan experience.

The platform will roll out across every Grand Prix from 2027, and will be available through Formula 1’s official global website.

Fever and Formula 1 will “jointly implement cutting-edge solutions to enhance the fan experience and expand the international distribution of official race tickets, hospitality and Paddock Club packages,” said the live events company.

Recent additions to the company’s partner roster include SailGP, the X Games, the FIFA Arab Cup, Kew Gardens, the National Museum of the Royal Navy, and the Frida Kahlo Museum.

Those names sit alongside FC Barcelona, Atlético de Madrid, the Palace of Versailles, Netflix, and Warner Bros.

On the music side, Fever’s partner network includes festival Primavera Sound, along with Fabrik, Last Tour, Cercle, and TCE Presents.

DICE, meanwhile, works with venues, festivals, and promoters including Club Space, Sonar, the Newport Jazz and Folk Festival, London’s Alexandra Palace, and Rough Trade.

Fever acquired DICE in June 2025 for an undisclosed sum, as previously reported by MBW.

That deal was confirmed a day after Fever secured more than USD $100 million in equity funding from L Catterton and Point72 Private Investments, alongside existing investors.

Fever’s last company-confirmed valuation was USD $1.8 billion, reached in 2023 after a USD $110 million round led by Goldman Sachs.

Goldman also led a USD $227 million round in the company in 2022, which Fever called at the time “the largest ever for a live-entertainment tech startup.”

Fever describes EQT, the Stockholm-headquartered investment group, as “Europe’s largest private markets investor.”

EQT says it had EUR €341 billion in total assets under management as of June 30, 2026, of which EUR €186 billion was fee-generating.

EQT has been building its exposure to music and entertainment assets for close to a decade.

It bought a 40% stake in Epidemic Sound in 2017 – a position it has since partly sold down while remaining the Swedish company’s largest shareholder – invested in talent agency UTA in 2022, and backed Denis Ladegaillerie’s consortium in its 2024 takeover of Believe, followed last year by a move to take the company fully private.

Point72 Private Investments is the private-investing arm of Point72, the alternative investment firm founded by Steve Cohen, its Chairman and CEO.Music Business Worldwide

All about International Business Management | Jobs in Canada | MBA vs Supply Chain Management



Hey Everyone ,

Finding your dream job is a detailed process don’t stress yourself just be smart do your homework well and work on your skill.

Know your passion and interests and then look for job don’t fall in trap of other people opinions.

I am trying to build a community of positive people and let’s help each other in finding job and guiding each other in right direction.

Lots of love ❤️
Komal

Udemy Link for Ms Advanced Excel –

( ask someone from India to buy this course for you )

#jobsincanada #internationalbusinessmanagement #parttimejobsforstudents

source

How To Do Your Own Taxes In 2027: Free File, Tax Software, Or Paper


Doing your own taxes is way easier than it seems, and for most filers the easiest method is tax software that pulls in your W-2 and 1099s and walks you through the credits. The return you’ll file between late January and April 15, 2027 covers tax year 2026.

This year, you potentially get a bigger standard deduction and four new deductions on a new schedule, so the software route is worth more than usual this year.

Our parents had it rough during tax season. Doing their own taxes sometimes took a week or more. They’d spread papers and receipts across the kitchen table, punch numbers into a calculator, and flip through the IRS’s annual instructions until ink coated their fingertips. Today, doing your own taxes with software should take you less than an hour if you’re organized, and you can do it on your phone.

Here’s what you need to know about how to do your own taxes in 2027, what each method costs, and the situations where paying a professional pays for itself.

Table of Contents

3 Ways to Get Your Taxes Done By Yourself
1. Paper Forms
2. Free IRS E-filing
3. Tax Software
How to Choose Tax Software If You Plan to DIY
Essential Info For To File Your Own Taxes
Who Should NOT Do Their Own Taxes
Conclusion

What Changed For The 2027 Filing Season

Five things are different from the last time most people filed, and three of them affect which method you should pick.

IRS Direct File is gone. The IRS’s own free filing tool, which 296,531 people used in 25 states during the 2025 season, was shut down by the Treasury Department in late 2025 and won’t be offered for 2026 returns. We reviewed it while it lasted. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act directed Treasury to study a public-private replacement that could cover up to 70% of taxpayers; as of September 2026 nothing has been announced for the 2027 season. IRS Free File, the private-partner program, continues under an agreement that runs through October 2029.

Paper refund checks are ending. Under Executive Order 14247, the IRS generally stopped issuing paper refund checks to individuals after September 30, 2025. If you don’t include bank account details on your return, the IRS mails a CP53E notice asking for them and holds the refund about six weeks before it falls back to a check. Direct deposit refunds on e-filed returns still arrive within 21 days for most filers, which our refund schedule tracks.

The standard deduction is $16,100 single, $32,200 married filing jointly, and $24,150 head of household for tax year 2026. That’s the return you file in 2027. Fewer people than ever will itemize, which means fewer people need anything beyond a basic software tier. Here’s how to decide between the standard deduction and itemizing.

Four new deductions live on Schedule 1-A. Tips (up to $25,000), overtime pay ($12,500, or $25,000 joint), a $6,000 per-person deduction for filers 65 and older, and up to $10,000 of interest on a loan for a new U.S.-assembled car all go on the new schedule, for tax years 2025 through 2028. Every major software product handles it; the free tiers don’t all include it. Here’s the list of jobs that qualify for the tips deduction.

The 1099-K threshold went back to $20,000 and 200 transactions. If you sold a few things on eBay or got paid through Venmo for a side gig, you’re less likely to get a 1099-K than you were two years ago. The income is still taxable, and it still counts as employment income if it came from work.

3 Ways to Get Your Taxes Done By Yourself

Tax professionals exist for a reason. Some returns are too complicated for even the best software, and we cover those cases below. Everyone else can file this year’s return by mailing a paper form, using the IRS’s free options, or using an online or desktop tax program. The federal tax brackets for 2026 are the same no matter which route you take; the difference is time, cost, and how much help you get finding credits.

1. Paper Forms

You can still mail a paper Form 1040 to the IRS. You’re upholding a tradition that dates to 1913, when the 16th Amendment made the federal income tax constitutional, and you’re also choosing the slowest possible refund.

The IRS no longer mails blank forms automatically. You’ll download your tax forms and instructions from irs.gov, fill them out by hand or on screen, and mail them to the processing center listed for your state. Paper returns take the IRS weeks longer to process than e-filed returns, and with paper checks phased out you should still put a routing and account number on the form so the refund arrives by direct deposit rather than after a CP53E notice. If you’re filing late or catching up on prior years, here’s what to do.

Who should do this? Filers with a remarkably simple return and a lot of patience, or someone with a return the IRS won’t accept electronically. Everyone else leaves money on the table, because paper doesn’t prompt you for credits you didn’t know about. The Earned Income Tax Credit alone is worth up to $8,231 for 2026, and the IRS estimates one in five eligible filers doesn’t claim it.

2. Free IRS E-Filing: Free File And Free File Fillable Forms

The IRS offers two free electronic options, and they are not the same thing.

IRS Free File is guided tax software from eight private partners, offered at no charge if your adjusted gross income (AGI) is at or below the IRS limit. For the 2026 season that limit was $89,000. Each partner sets its own rules on age, state, and military status, and some include a free state return while others don’t. You get through it from the IRS Free File page, not from the partner’s own site, or the free offer may not apply. The program is under agreement through October 2029, so it isn’t going the way of Direct File.

Free File Fillable Forms is the option for everyone above the income limit. These are the paper forms as electronic forms: you type your numbers into the boxes, the forms do the arithmetic, and you e-file. There’s no interview, no import, and no state return. Other than saving paper and postage, and getting your data to the IRS faster, this approach offers little over paper. You’d still need to know what’s on the schedules and how the pricing tiers of paid software compare before you decide it’s worth the effort.

Someone who is single, has no dependents, works one W-2 job, and isn’t claiming the student loan interest deduction or an education credit can make Fillable Forms work. Even then, you could miss a credit you didn’t know about.

Several commercial products also have free tiers with no income limit. Check out our list of free tax software options, which includes the two products that are free for federal and state for everyone. Anyone with a more complicated return should hire a professional or use the next option.

3. Tax Software

Many younger taxpayers have never seen a paper 1040, and for good reason: software takes your tax information, populates the forms, and files your federal and state returns. Most products import W-2s and 1099s directly from your employer, bank, or broker, and the better ones photograph a form from your phone. You can also file as early as the IRS opens in late January, which is when the software is cheapest.

The real advantage is the interview. You don’t have to know that the American Opportunity Tax Credit is worth up to $2,500 or that Schedule 1-A exists; the software asks whether you paid tuition or earned tips and does the rest. With software, you can do your own taxes without being completely on your own, and if you get stuck, every major product now sells live help by the question or by the return. You can also track your return after filing, which removes most of the “where is my refund” guesswork.

How to Choose Tax Software If You Plan to DIY

Unless you’re a tax accountant or the simplest of filers, your best bet is a good online or desktop program to file federal and state. Which one depends on your return, and the advertised price is rarely the price you pay. Many services offer free filing; fewer follow through once you have a dependent, a 1099, or a state return.

Some software services bait you with the promise of free filing, then require payment if you have children, itemize, or claim a credit outside the free tier. Others let you file federal for free but charge when you start the state return.

Prices rise as April approaches. Generally, someone with multiple income sources or a home office will need to pay for a Deluxe or Premium tier, and that’s fine: when a paid tier finds a credit the free tier skipped, the upgrade pays for itself. TaxHawk runs the same engine as FreeTaxUSA if you want a second look at the cheapest full-featured option.

Bottom line: go free if you qualify, and pick the service that best meets your needs rather than the one with the loudest ad. Here are a few of our top picks to get you started:

  • FreeTaxUSA for the cheapest full-featured federal return
  • H&R Block for the best free tier and in-person backup
  • TaxSlayer for self-employed filers on a budge

Essential Info For To File Your Own Taxes

Even with the right software, you’ll gather some information and make a few decisions before you start. The income tax binder method works for a shoebox too.

  • Work forms: W-2s from employers and 1099-NEC or 1099-K forms for contract work. Employers must send W-2s by January 31, 2027. Tipped and hourly workers should also confirm the tips and overtime boxes on the W-2, because those feed Schedule 1-A.
  • Filing status: Married filing jointly or separately? Head of household if you’re unmarried with a dependent? The software asks, and for married couples with student loans on an income-driven plan the answer affects the loan payment, not just the tax bill.
  • Social Security numbers for you, your spouse, and every dependent. The child tax credit is $2,200 for 2026 and requires a Social Security number for the child.
  • Do you have to file? If you’re someone’s dependent or earned little last year, you may not be required to file, but you should file if any tax was withheld or you qualify for a refundable credit. Students, check whether your parents claimed you before you file.
  • Standard deduction or itemize? The 2026 standard deduction is $16,100 single, $32,200 joint, and $24,150 head of household, and you claim it without documentation. Itemize only if mortgage interest, charitable gifts, medical costs above the floor, and state and local taxes (capped at $40,400 for 2026) add up to more.

Having this information in one place before you sit down is what turns a weekend into an hour. If your return has more moving parts, collect these too:

  • Deductible interest: Your mortgage servicer sends a 1098 and your student loan servicer a 1098-E. Student loan interest is deductible up to $2,500 even if you don’t itemize.
  • Tuition: Form 1098-T from your school supports the American Opportunity Tax Credit and the Lifetime Learning Credit. There is no longer a tuition deduction; the credits are better anyway.
  • Capital gains or losses: Your broker’s 1099-B, which most software imports directly, feeds IRS Schedule D.
  • Receipts: Freelancers claiming a home office, mileage (72.5 cents per mile for 2026), or equipment need the records before they start, not after. The most common deductions are the ones people forget to document.
  • Property taxes: Your county assessor or your mortgage escrow statement has the figure; remember the $40,400 SALT cap.
  • Withholding check: If you owed a lot or got a huge refund last year, adjust your W-4 after you file so 2027 comes out closer to even.

Related:
How To Get Organized To File Your Taxes

How Much Does It Cost To Do Your Own Taxes?

Between $0 and about $174, depending on your return and your software, versus a base fee that averaged $236 for a professionally prepared Form 1040 in 2026 before a single schedule or state return was added, according to the National Association of Tax Professionals’ fee study. That base fee was $162 two years earlier.

For a W-2 filer with a state return, the realistic DIY range is $0 (Cash App Taxes, or Free File if you qualify) to $88 (TurboTax Deluxe). A self-employed filer pays $15.99 to $174. Whatever you pay, don’t let the software take its fee out of your refund; the processing charge for that convenience is pure cost.

The comparison isn’t only price. A preparer’s fee buys someone who signs the return with you and answers the IRS letter if one comes. Software buys the same forms, the same math, and a support line. For a return with fewer than three schedules, the $150 to $200 gap is hard to justify; for a return with rental property or a business, it’s cheap.

Who Should NOT Do Their Own Taxes

Some filers need more than software offers, which is why preparers still make a good living. The test: if every number on your return arrives on a form the software can import, do it yourself. If you’re making judgment calls about what counts as income, what’s deductible, or which entity you are, get help. Here’s our full comparison of a tax pro versus DIY online, and a second look at whether paying someone is worth it.

Taxpayers in these situations will most likely benefit from hiring help:

  • Active investors with options, crypto, or wash sales: Broker imports handle plain stock sales. Cost-basis questions across accounts and exchanges are where a preparer earns the fee.
  • Consultants and freelancers with employees or an S corporation: A solo Schedule C is fine in software. Payroll, a separate business return, and quarterly estimated taxes that went wrong are not.
  • Landlords: One rental with a clean depreciation schedule is manageable. Several properties, a sale in the year, or a 1031 exchange is not.
  • Business owners: Your business return has more moving parts than your personal one, and a mistake in one flows into the other. A CPA, not a storefront preparer, is the right hire here.
  • Anyone who feels uncertain: If you’ve already used the software’s support and still don’t understand what you’re filing, or you think a professional could find a credit you’re missing, pay for the conversation. A tax return review is cheaper than full preparation and catches most of what a first-time DIYer misses.

If you want a professional but don’t know where to start, a virtual service like TurboTax Live is the middle ground: you pay more than the software alone, and you get a credentialed preparer who reviews the return or does it for you, on your schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I do my own taxes?

Yes. If your income comes from W-2 wages, bank interest, a brokerage account, or a simple side gig, tax software will import the forms and complete the return. Free options exist at every income level: IRS Free File under the AGI limit, Free File Fillable Forms above it, and Cash App Taxes for federal and one state.

What is the easiest way to file taxes?

Tax software with document import, filed early. You photograph or import your W-2, answer the interview, and e-file with direct deposit. Most people finish in under an hour, and the refund arrives within 21 days.

Is IRS Free File the same as Direct File?

No. Direct File was the IRS’s own software; it ended after the 2025 season. Free File is guided software from private partners, free under the IRS income limit, and it continues through at least October 2029.

How much does it cost to file taxes?

$0 to about $174 with software, depending on tier and state. A preparer’s base fee for a 1040 averaged $236 in 2026 before schedules, and adds up quickly for a Schedule C or rental.

Do I need an accountant for taxes?

Not if every figure comes from a form you can import. You do if you own rental property, run a business with employees or an S corporation, moved between states mid-year, had a large one-time event like a home sale or an inheritance, or don’t understand your own return.

When are 2026 taxes due?

April 15, 2027. An extension moves the filing deadline to October 15, 2027 but not the payment; here’s how to file one with tax software.

Final Thoughts

Some people will still file on paper or with the IRS’s Fillable Forms, and both remain legal. Most taxpayers will do better with software: it asks the questions a preparer would ask, finds the credits the paper form never mentions, and files in an hour for $0 to $174. You get to do your own taxes on your own schedule while borrowing professional knowledge.

The exceptions are real, and they’re listed above. If you’re in one of them, the $236 a preparer charges is one of the better deals in personal finance. If you’re not, pick your software from our comparison, set up direct deposit, and file in February.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post How To Do Your Own Taxes In 2027: Free File, Tax Software, Or Paper appeared first on The College Investor.