Home Blog

Shopify CEO says employees’ ‘slop grenades’ are making more work for everyone else



The tech leaders who once hailed AI use as the key to unlocking every employee’s full potential are now changing their tune.

This includes Shopify cofounder and CEO Tobias Lütke. He told employees last year that using AI is “a baseline expectation,” and they should first prove they “cannot get what they want done using AI” before asking for more resources. He’s now saying Shopify employees are producing unexamined emails and code with AI and not taking responsibility for the sloppy output.

“We call those ‘slop grenades’ that people toss at each other,” he said during an interview on The Knowledge Project podcast  on Tuesday. “That’s definitely a bad thing.”

Lütke said it’s easy to let AI “go nuts,” but abusing it creates more headaches for the people receiving and reviewing the work. For instance, he suggested AI use is supposed to help synthesize points in an email rather than turning it into “a big missive” that wastes time.

“You don’t really read it, and now it has to be reviewed by your colleagues, and they are like, ‘this doesn’t look right’,” he said. “You’re just letting AI do the work for you.”

Duolingo CEO Luis Von Ahn has similarly backtracked. He announced last year the company would go “AI-first,” which meant evaluating employees on their AI usage, replacing human contractors with AI, and only increasing headcount if a team couldn’t automate the required work. But in May, he told Fast Company that he had got carried away by AI demoing well in writing, but said it ultimately doesn’t match the creativity of Duolingo’s people when it scales. 

“We may need to write 1,000 different stories for people to learn a language, then you’ll find that 20% of the things were just pure slop,” he said. “Whenever we scale a lot [of] things with AI, we have to really be careful that slop doesn’t get through.”

The rise of ‘workslop’

Researchers coined the term “workslop” for the phenomenon Lütke described: polished-looking AI output that ends up dragging down productivity because it needs revision.

BetterUp Labs and Stanford’s Social Media Lab surveyed 962 American full-time desk workers this year and found over half (52.7%) reported sending workslop to colleagues and it was more common in people whose organizations encouraged AI use. Over a third (38%) reported receiving workslop and estimated it cost them 3.4 hours per month on average to revise it. 

What separates workslop from low-quality work done by humans is that workslop looks legitimate on the surface while lacking the components that would make it useful. Examples of workslop mentioned by the survey respondents were well-structured emails with broken links or code that was more complicated than it needed to be. 

The survey found relationships also take a hit when there’s suspicion of workslop. Employees said they viewed their colleagues who sent it in as less competent and less friendly. Of those who had received workslop, over a third (36%) also reported wanting to avoid working with those colleagues in the future. 

The 3.4 hours in cleanup time is an increase from last year’s survey, when 40% reported encountering workslop and said they had to spend two hours reworking it. The number pegged to revising workslop in 2025 came out to be $186 per month for single employees and up to $9 million a year in lost productivity for an organization with 10,000 people. 

Financial Habits That Secretly Make You Richer



This video covers every financial habit you might think is weird, but might secretly make you richer.

My complete 60+ page manipulation guide:
👉

👜 Business Mail: everythingprofessor@gmail.com

Watch on Spotify:

——————————————————————————–
Timestamps:
0:00 Spending More Money to Save Time
1:07 Measuring Purchases in Hours Instead of Dollars
2:04 Using Debt to Your Advantage
3:08 Refusing to Save Every Penny
4:06 Investing Into Yourself / Paying for Accountability
5:00 Avoiding “Good Deals”
6:11 Overpaying on Purpose
7:07 Spending on Mistakes and Learning Fast
8:06 Emotionally Detaching Yourself from Money
9:00 Ignoring Windfalls
9:42 Taking Risks (on Purpose)
10:38 Only Buy Things You Can Afford
11:25 Use Envy as Power

——————————————————————————–

Disclaimer:
The information in this video is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here should be interpreted as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and you should always do your own research and consult a licensed professional before making decisions with your money. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and any examples provided are for illustration only. By watching, you agree that the creator is not responsible for any actions you take based on this content.

source

Judge Blocks DHS Four-Year Student Visa Cap, Says Security Rationale “Borders On The Absurd”


A federal judge in Boston stopped the Department of Homeland Security from ending “duration of status” for international students, exchange visitors and foreign journalists, one day before the change was scheduled to take effect.

U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV granted a preliminary injunction on September 14 in Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration v. DHS, postponing the effective date of the final rule DHS published on July 17 under Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act. We covered the rule back when DHS first moved to cap international student stays at four years.

Under the blocked rule, F and J visa holders would have been admitted for four years or the program end date, whichever came first, and I visa holders for 240 days. Students needing longer would have filed a Form I-539 extension request decided at the discretion of a USCIS officer, with no appeal available even inside DHS.

The rule also shortened the departure window from 60 days to 30, barred students from pursuing a second degree at the same or lower level, and restricted transfers between schools. The coalition of colleges and labor unions that sued DHS in August asked the court to throw the rule out entirely.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

Roughly 1.6 million people hold F status and 504,000 hold J status, according to figures DHS itself published in the rule. International students contributed $44 billion to the economy in 2023-24 and directly supported close to 400,000 jobs, one job for every three students, per an economic analysis cited in the record.

Those students also fill seats that American universities increasingly cannot fill any other way, which is why international graduate enrollment losses have already triggered layoffs and program closures on campuses that built budgets around full-pay foreign enrollment.

The damage started before the rule ever took effect. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee reported a 42% drop in international applications for the current academic year. Those campus numbers track the national trend we covered when international college applications fell 10%, with India down 15% and Ghana down 34%.

What The Court Found

Saylor made clear he was not ruling on whether the policy was smart: “this Court does not have the power to block the rule on the ground that it is misguided or ill-advised.” He ruled on process, and found DHS failed the APA on nearly every front. His treatment of the national security justification was unusually blunt for a district court opinion, and it comes at a time when student visa processing has already drawn bipartisan Senate scrutiny in Congress.

The specifics from the 48-page opinion:

  • The security case rested on five anecdotes. DHS pointed to five incidents involving 11 individuals out of tens of millions admitted over four decades. Saylor wrote that the argument “borders on the absurd,” noting a hostile actor could simply operate inside a four-year window or enter on a six-month tourist visa.
  • The fraud case did not add up either. DHS flagged 77,000 F-1 students who spent more than 10 years in student status since 2003, under 5% of the total, without explaining why a decade in school is suspicious when doctoral programs run nearly six years on median.
  • Journalists got no justification at all. The court found DHS offered no national security evidence, no fraud evidence and no reasoned explanation for capping I visas at 240 days.
  • Cost analysis treated harm as zero. DHS called enrollment effects “unquantifiable” and then effectively priced them at zero, even as it conceded first-year compliance costs near $268 million and roughly 135 hours of work per school official.
  • The comment record was dismissed wholesale. About 22,000 comments arrived during a 32-day window the court called “exceptionally short, and barely legal.” DHS waved off the objections as “speculative.”

One rejected DHS response drew particular attention. The comment highlighted that the rule would cost American universities the strongest applicants available anywhere, but the agency wrote a reponse that schools “may be able to fill vacancies left by nonimmigrant students who choose not to enroll with other qualified applicants.” Judge Saylor called the idea that MIT and Harvard graduate researchers are fungible “not a rational response to a legitimate concern.”

The scope of relief is the part immigration attorneys will argue over. DHS urged the court to limit any order to the named plaintiffs under Trump v. CASA, the 2025 Supreme Court decision curbing universal injunctions. Saylor held that APA Section 705 authority is separate from traditional equitable power, citing a First Circuit decision from August, and ruled that a party-specific order would force parallel regulatory regimes across more than 5,000 institutions while students move between schools and pursue joint degrees.

He granted the postponement nationwide but denied outright vacatur.

How This Connects

The higher education system has been absorbing enrollment shocks for three straight years, and international students have been ta key point of concern. International students typically pay full price at colleges, and that revenue stream is essential for college operations.

Syracuse University acknowledged its first budget deficit in years after missing 2026 enrollment targets, and our running count of college closures and mergers in 2026 keeps growing. A four-year international student enrollment cap landing on top of that math is why 600 institutions signed on to fight it rather than wait out the litigation.

What’s Next

The next status conference is set for October 2, and DHS can appeal the injunction to the First Circuit. Duration of status stays in force in the meantime, so students already in F, J or I status keep their current terms and schools do not need to rebuild compliance systems yet.

Anyone thinking about a U.S. program for 2027 should treat the four-year cap as paused rather than dead, and price international student loan options and graduate school borrowing against a timeline that could still change.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Judge Blocks DHS Four-Year Student Visa Cap, Says Security Rationale “Borders On The Absurd” appeared first on The College Investor.

Oil is back above $100—but economists say that number isn’t the real threat to the U.S. economy



When the news this week came out about oil spiking back up above $100 a barrel, analysts didn’t seem to be too concerned. This may be unusual: in the past, oil price surges sent shockwaves through markets and the economy, causing long lines at gas stations and frustrating drivers. But this time, economists say $100 oil is less alarming than the number traditionally suggests.

Brent crude oil climbed as high as nearly $110 a barrel on Monday, up 4%—its highest price since May, before easing to around $107 on Tuesday. The increase raised concerns about inflation and borrowing costs, evoking memories of the oil shock stories from years ago. Back in 1980, Americans spent about 6% of their income on gas because they used more and prices were relatively high, according to JPMorgan’s analysis. Today, that share is about 2.5%.

That doesn’t mean economists are completely at ease. Their greater concern is not that crude crossed the $100 benchmark, but that shortages have pushed up the prices of gas and diesel—fuels that directly affect people and businesses. If those prices remain high, Americans might have to cut back on spending while businesses may have to pay more to ship goods, run factories, and operate farm equipment. 

The re-emergence of the U.S. as a net energy exporter means oil shocks “hit differently” today, according to Michael Pearce, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. Pearce told Fortune that higher oil prices are bad news for households, but good news for energy producers. 

“There is not a ‘tipping point’ for crude oil prices that will tip the economy into recession,” Pearce said.

Inflation has also changed what the $100 number actually means. Patrick De Haan, head of Petroleum Analysis at the gas tracking app GasBuddy, told Fortune that $100 today does not carry the same weight it did decades ago. He said oil may need to reach closer to $200 to have a similar effect on the economy today.

The war has inevitably put pressure on refined fuels such as gasoline and diesel, Pearce said. But at the same time, a shortage of refinery capacity has caused their prices to rise more than one would expect based on oil prices alone. Simply,  gas takes money directly from consumers, while diesel powers the trucks, farms, and factories that keep goods moving across the country.

The national average for regular gasoline was trending toward $4.43 a gallon Thursday, up from $3.20 a year earlier, according to AAA. Diesel reached a record of $6.39 a gallon, compared with $3.70 a year earlier. 

If today’s prices persist, Oxford Economics estimates they could shave a few tenths of a percentage point from consumer-spending growth next year. Pearce said oil closer to $140 would begin causing more serious problems, although the damage would be smaller in the U.S. than in countries where energy takes up more of household budgets. 

Lower-income Americans take the bigger hit and are already more exposed. JPMorgan said they spend more of their income on other essentials needed to live besides just gas, leaving them less room to absorb higher prices. De Haan said diesel’s indirect costs have not become “insurmountable” just yet, but consumers could face more pressure around or shortly after the holidays if prices remain high. 

For now, De Haan said, “Americans can grimace and bear it.”

Maybe Mortgage Rates Did Like the Fed Rate Hike After All


Mortgage rates are lower today after the market finally digested the first Fed rate hike since 2023.

The Federal Reserve hiked its short-term rate 0.25% yesterday, leading to a temporary drop in mortgage rates, followed by a snap back higher.

That had a lot of folks fearing for the worst, but today it’s a different story.

MBS prices are up and mortgage rates are down, as most expected them to be.

And things could get even better for 30-year fixed mortgage rates, even if the Fed hikes another 0.25% later this year.

Mortgage Rates a Rollercoaster Ride Over the Past 24 Hours

It’s been a weird 24 hours or so for mortgage rates, which initially got relief from the Fed’s FOMC announcement, then got worse after Fed chair Kevin Warsh’s presser.

But today it’s a different story, with bellwether 10-year bond yields a lot lower (at last glance about 5 bps lower), which bodes well for consumer mortgage rates.

The 30-year fixed hit a fresh 2026-high of 7.24% after the press conference yesterday, per Mortgage News Daily.

That had many fearing for the worst, but today it’s a completely different story.

MBS prices are a lot stronger, oil prices are down, and things are looking up (actually down!) for mortgage rates.

Sometimes it just takes a little bit of time for things to shake out. Sometimes it’s not about the Fed at all.

And that’s actually something I want to point out.

Does the Fed Even Matter?

While everyone is fussing about the Fed, what’s happening behind the scenes matters more.

The reason the stock market is rallying today, bond yields are lower, and mortgage rates are improving is because of the situation in the Middle East.

The price of U.S. crude fell below $100 per barrel today for the first time since September 11th, and there are whispers that Trump plans to hold talks again with Iran.

Imagine if they iron out some sort of deal there? Who cares if the federal funds rate is 0.25% higher than it was in 2023?

If we can agree to some sort of truce with Iran and Yemen, all of a sudden you’ve got a much better outlook.

You’ve got falling energy prices, you’ve got falling bond yields, which are now close to 20-year highs.

Then you can actually see a scenario where mortgage rates are falling while the Fed is in hiking mode.

And back to the Fed, they could still hike one more time, as is laid out in their latest dot plot, and longer rates could fall.

While the Fed rate hike seems bearish and hawkish, it’s actually telling the market that the Fed is serious about combatting inflation.

And inflation is the #1 enemy of bonds and mortgage rates.

So Warsh essentially established credibility yesterday, instead of succumbing to President Trump’s demand to “lower rates NOW.”

Taken together, mortgage rates could have a really good 2027.

[Check out my mortgage rate calculator to compare rates side by side.]

What If Middle East Conflicts Worsens?

Now that’s just one rosy scenario. If things don’t improve or get worse, inflation could ramp up again.

The price of gasoline and diesel could get even more expensive, sending shockwaves throughout the economy.

That could lead to more rate hikes than anticipated, while also putting additional pressure on the 10-year bond yield that dictates mortgage rates.

If that’s the case, things could get worse before they get better, and a 30-year fixed in the low 7s will quickly be missed.

Then you’re looking at 30-year fixed mortgage rates in the mid-7s or higher.

Hopefully it doesn’t come to that, but it’s something to consider.

And it tells you that the Fed aside, mortgage rates could move up or down regardless of this hike and future hikes.

It’s really the underlying data that matters, whether it’s oil prices, unemployment numbers, etc.

So keep a closer eye on that than the Fed if you want to know where mortgage rates go next.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

SEC Publishes Innovation Exemption For Tokenized Stocks


As expected, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has published its “Innovation Exemption” for tokenized or digital securities. The new rules will allow tokenized securities to trade on marketplaces or Tokenized Securities Venues (TSVs), each of which is a “TSV” under the definition of “exchange” in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC is providing conditional exemptive relief for markets trading tokenized securities. The exemption is live today.

The five-year, temporary order will also provide a conditional exemption from the definition of “dealer” as defined by the Exchange Act.

The exemption will give the SEC a way to monitor and review how tokenized securities are traded.

The exemption is not for DeFi.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the Commission is taking an important step forward to bring capital markets into the digital age by enabling onchain trading of stocks.

“The Innovation Exemption, while temporary, would allow TSVs to trade tokenized NMS stock in a permissioned environment today while the Commission considers the need for additional action to facilitate onchain trading. As we take this important first step, we invite public comment on all aspects of the Innovation Exemption to help inform the Commission as it considers further changes.”

Atkins has strongly supported beneficial innovation that improves ecosystems for both investors and issuers.

Jamie Selway, Director of the SEC Division of Trading and Markets, said that exemptive relief for on-chain secondary trading is an important milestone.

“The division stands ready to work with interested parties seeking to operate a TSV and field questions from investors and market participants,” said Selway.

Conditions of the Innovation Exemption include:

  • Real ownership only. Tokens must confer the same rights as the underlying NMS stock (dividends, voting, etc.). Synthetics and derivatives are out.
  • Issuer veto. If a third party tokenizes a stock, the TSV must give the issuer written notice and 30 days to object. An objection bars that token from the venue. Issuers can opt out.
  • Limits. Symbol counts and volume caps, calibrated to limit-up/limit-down tiers.
  • Tech and market integrity. Smart contracts must be public, auditable, and deployed on a public permissionless ledger. Trading in a tokenized stock must halt when the underlying stock is halted on its primary listing exchange.
  • Access and sanctions. TSVs must be U.S. persons, comply with OFAC sanctions, and restrict who can trade.
  • Transparency. Public notice of operations; regular publication of USD-denominated trade data (price, size, time, pool address, end-of-day pool size, daily volume); books and records; technology safeguards.

Commissioner Hester Peirce explained, “Temporary, limited exemptions like this one are intended to provide the Commission and market participants with an opportunity to observe how tokenized NMS stocks are used and traded in different onchain contexts and how onchain and traditional markets interact with one another.” She added:

“Making practical, careful, and sensible adjustments to the existing framework allows us to accommodate innovation without undermining our regulatory objectives of protecting investors and market integrity.”

Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the exemption offers a path to data-driven rulemaking while embracing public feedback.

Digital securities or tokenized shares are widely expected to replace their more analog brethren over time. By leveraging technology, tokenized shares can benefit from streamlined settlement and transfers, improved security, and automated services.

While the previous administration did what it could to inhibit beneficial innovation, the Commission under Chairman Atkins has supported change and innovation, which clearly improves capital markets.

Commissioner Uyeda said the “Innovation Exemption is the latest instance of the Commission using scoped relief to experiment responsibly, learn, and translate old protections to new contexts.”

The Innovation Exemption arrives just as Congress failed to pass updated laws to support the digital asset ecosystem. The CLARITY Act, which was voted down this week, would have provided regulatory clarity, investor protections, along with rules that would support innovation in the digital asset industry.



 



Greg Abel Exited a Consumer Brand Warren Buffett Backed for 6 Straight Quarters. Here’s Why That Was the Wrong Move.


Greg Abel has the unenviable task of succeeding legendary investor Warren Buffett as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA -1.66%) (BRKB -1.61%). Still, it’s only natural that Abel will put his own stamp on the company he leads.

That includes making changes to the portfolio. Since becoming CEO at the start of the year, company filings show that Abel has whittled down Berkshire Hathaway’s equity portfolio. He’s also added and subtracted positions. This includes selling Domino’s Pizza (DPZ -0.29%) shares this year.

However, here’s why investors shouldn’t follow Berkshire Hathaway’s lead on this stock. In fact, it’s a good time to buy shares.

Image source: Getty Images.

Berkshire Hathaway’s previous holding

Before examining Domino’s Pizza, it’s instructive to see when Berkshire Hathaway built its position. The firm bought Domino’s Pizza shares during the third quarter of 2024. During that period, it purchased nearly 1.3 million shares, valued at nearly $550 million as of Sept. 30, 2024.

Showing confidence in the company, Berkshire Hathaway bought more shares over time. At the end of 2025, the company owned over 3.3 million shares, which were worth nearly $1.4 billion. However, Abel acted decisively early in his tenure as CEO. Under Abel’s stewardship, Berkshire Hathaway sold all of its Domino’s Pizza shares during the first quarter.

Long-term fundamentals remain intact

Still, the company’s fundamentals suggest Berkshire Hathaway made the wrong decision. Domino’s, the largest pizza company in the world, believes in providing quality food at reasonable prices. Its delivery and takeout business seeks to offer customers convenience.

That business philosophy led to a successful long-term track record. However, the company’s recent sales have been tepid. But with consumers’ wallets squeezed by higher prices for basic items like gas, it’s not surprising that they’ve cut back on eating out. Domino’s second-quarter same-store sales (comps) at its U.S. locations grew a scant 0.1%. And they fell 0.1% at international restaurants.

Investors can take comfort in Domino’s growing market share, which will put the company in a stronger competitive position when economic conditions ease. For instance, the company expanded its share of the quick-service pizza market from 22.5% in 2024 to 23.3% last year.

Although founded in 1960 and already the world’s largest pizza company, management still sees expansion opportunities. Over the last four quarters, Domino’s added 995 restaurants, including 209 in the second quarter. Most of these have been outside the U.S., with 825 new international locations over the last year. It ended the period with 22,531 worldwide restaurants.

Domino’s franchise model (99% of restaurants) means it can expand without expending a lot of capital. Franchisees make initial investments to build restaurants. They also pay an up-front fee and an ongoing royalty to Domino’s.

Domino's Pizza Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.29%) $-0.87

Current Price

$300.43

Stock valuation presents a buying opportunity

Investors haven’t been pleased with recent results. They’ve sent the share price down 25.2% through Sept. 11 this year. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 gained 11.9%.

However, this has created a better valuation that long-term investors should view as a buying opportunity. Since the start of the year, the stock’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio has dropped from 24 to 18. The shares trade at a much lower multiple than the S&P 500’s P/E ratio of 26. Domino’s stock also looks attractive compared to its historical valuation. The shares have a 10-year median P/E ratio of 31.

Granted, it’s not easy to go against the market and, given its investment track record, Berkshire Hathaway. But with Domino’s gaining market share during a challenging period, an expansion opportunity ahead, and an attractive valuation, long-term investors should view the stock as a major buying opportunity.

BetterLife Pharma closes $100M public offering for drug trials




BetterLife Pharma closes $100M public offering for drug trials

Live Gold & Bitcoin Scalping – Forex & Crypto Trading Strategies



🎯 Live Gold (XAUUSD) & Bitcoin (BTCUSD) Scalping – Real-Time Forex & Crypto Trading Strategies
Watch me trade the London and New York sessions live with in-depth market analysis, entry/exit setups, and risk management techniques.

💹 What You’ll Learn in This Live:
* Gold & Bitcoin price action analysis
* High-probability scalping setups
* Day trading strategies for Forex & Crypto
* Real-time trade execution & risk control

💬 Stay Connected:
📌 Subscribe & turn on notifications 🔔 for daily trading live streams and market updates.

⚠️ Disclaimer:
This content is for educational purposes only. Trading involves significant risk. Do your own research before making financial decisions.

#GoldScalping #BitcoinScalping #ForexTrading #CryptoTrading #XAUUSD #BTCUSD #DayTrading #LiveTrading #ScalpingStrategy #ForexSignals #cryptosignals
Join & Follow Me 👇

📲 Telegram:
📸 Instagram:
💹

source

You’re Not Gonna Like What Happens to Mortgage Rates


Dave:
The Treasury Secretary of the United States, Scott Bessett, looked at the bond market this week and said, and I am quoting here, “I am the house now. You can bet against me if you want.” Well, the bond market took that bet and the bond market won. Within hours, the 10-year treasury yield blew out to a new high. The next day, the average 30-year mortgage rate hit 7.07%, the highest it’s been since May of 2025. And here’s why this matters more than any Fed meeting you’re going to watch this year. Washington is now actively publicly trying to push long-term interest rates down, and it isn’t working, which tells you something really important about what’s actually driving our mortgage rates right now. So today at On the Market, we’re breaking down the bond market, what’s happened to yields over the last few weeks, why it’s happening, what the treasury department is doing about it, how markets responded, and the part that actually you care about, what all this means for mortgage rates and for your deals.
And I’ll also give you my honest mortgage rate forecast. And a little spoiler alert, I feel pretty good about this forecast, but you’re probably not going to like it. But these are things that you need to hear to prepare for what’s coming next. This is On the Market. Let’s get to it.
Hey everyone. Welcome to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. And I have been waiting, not happily, but I have been waiting to make this episode for a couple of years now because if you listen to the show for any length of time, you’ve heard me say some version of the same thing over and over again. The Fed doesn’t set your mortgage rates, the bond market does. And the bond market has been acting in a way that I’ve been saying for a couple of years was probably going to happen. And they’re acting in a way that makes it really hard for any Fed chair or as we’re seeing any treasury secretary to fix. And I’ve been calling the risk of persistently high rates out for a long time. I’ve been trying to say on the show, every year we make predictions, every time I post something on social media, I’d say rates aren’t going down.
I have so many people telling me that I’m being a downer or that I’m wrong, but some of the things that I’ve been predicting were going to happen are starting to happen. I think we’re starting to get there. And I am not trying to do a victory lap here. I’m not excited about what’s going on here. I’m not trying to fear monger. I’m not saying there’s a crash, but something real is happening in the bond market. It has been building for years and I feel like just in the last couple weeks, maybe in the last month or so, it is starting to finally show up in mortgage rates. It’s starting to get attention in the investor world. And I do think it is going to have a real direct, probably long-term impact on the housing market. So first up, let’s just talk about what actually happened.
The big picture headline is that the 10-year treasury yield, which again, this is the thing that is most closely correlated to mortgage rates. When the treasury yield goes up on the 10-year, mortgage rates go up. When it goes down, mortgage yields goes down. That’s not always true throughout history, but over the last several decades, they have really worked in lockstep. And the 10-year treasury has gone up a lot. It’s now nearing 5% where it has not been for quite a while. About a year ago, it was up about 4.3%. And so it’s not like some crazy thing, but the fact that it is moving up and moving up so quickly is what’s concerning me. And I think what’s concerning investors, not just real estate investors, stock investors, gold investors, this is something that impacts everyone. I made this joke a lot on this show, but it is true.
I think bonds rule the world. What happens with the bond market cascades through every other type of investment. I’m not going to spend a lot of time on that today, but just think of it this way. Bonds are what are known as “risk-free assets.” They’re not risk-free. That is not true, but investors see it that way. They are the lowest risk investment out there other than putting your money in a savings account, that’s FDIC insured. But because they are the lowest risk out there, when bond yields go up and you get a better rate, you get a better interest rate, a better return on bonds, then all of a sudden riskier assets look less attractive. If you can earn 5% lending the US government money for 10 years, maybe you don’t invest in gold or maybe you don’t invest in the stock market because you can get a decent return on low risk.
And so the fact that yields are climbing is going to ripple throughout the entire economy, real estate included. Now I want to mention that this is not just happening with 10 years, it’s also happening with the 30-year treasury. It’s now at 5.34%, and this is the highest it has been in nearly 20 years. This is the part I think that really matters for real estate investors because when you look at bond yields and the yield curve, this is complicated, I’m not going to get super into it, but bonds come in all lengths. There are short-term bonds and there are long-term bonds. And where we’re seeing yields go up are in long-term bonds, 10-year treasuries and 30-year treasuries. And this matters for real estate investors because we borrow at the long end. We borrow for long periods of time with 30-year fixed rate mortgages, or even relatively long, even if you’re getting an arm or something for seven, 10 years, that’s a relatively long loan.
And so seeing the yields go up on those bonds are going to push up mortgage rates and it’s going to push up commercial lending rates too. So this really does matter for real estate investors. And the fact that where we’re seeing yields go up is for long-dated bonds, not the shorter term ones, tells you, this is an important signal. It tells you that the market, what they’re worried about, why this is happening is something long-term. They’re worried about long-term performance, and I’ll get to what I mean by that, but they’re worried about something structural in the global economy that’s going to impact returns. It’s not something that’s cyclical. They’re not worried about something that’s going to happen in one year or two years. If they were worried about that, we would see yields on short-term bonds go up, but they’re going up on long-term bonds.
I know this is kind of complicated, but here’s what you need to know. Yields are going up for long-dated bonds. That’s going to push up borrowing costs for investors. Now you know that we need to talk about why this is happening. This is the question, right? The answer is clearly not the Fed because the Fed has sort of been sitting still. By the time this episode comes out, it’s coming out the day after the Fed meeting. I am willing to bet I’m going to record this and put it out to the public and say that the Fed raised rates yesterday, but all this stuff happened before raising rates. So it’s not the Fed and I actually think there’s a bunch of different factors that are influencing them. Let’s go through them because I think this is really what’s going to tell us what happens with mortgage rates in the next three months, six months, six years.
Number one, fiscal anxiety. This is one I have been sort of hammering on for years and calling out as a risk to the entire economy for years. And what I mean by that is that investors are starting to worry about the massive amount of public debt that we have here in the United States. Our total public debt just crossed $40 trillion, right? That is huge and it is going up fast. Less than a year ago, we were at 38 trillion. We are getting a trillion dollars in new debt every five months. This is not normal. This is not good. I know people have different opinions about debt, but no one can convince me that right now with the economy that we’re in, that a trillion dollars in debt every five months is a good thing. Interest on that debt is now one of three biggest line items in the entire budget, and there’s no end in sight.
We have not had a balanced budget in the United States for more than 25 years. This is a problem that spans administrations, political parties. It has just been going on and on and on. And frankly, it’s gotten a lot worse over the last couple of years. I’ve been worried about this and clearly bond investors, bonds rule of the world, they are starting to get worried about it as well because what do bond investors care about? They care about inflation. Think about it. Bond investors are extremely sensitive to inflation because if you’re going to lend the US government money for 10 years or for 30 years, the big risk to you is not that the government is not going to pay you back. There is almost no risk that the government’s not going to pay you back. The risk is that to pay you back, the US government is going to start printing money and devalue the debt.
And so if you’re worried that the inflation rate over the next 10 or 30 years is going to be 4%, you sure as heck don’t want to earn a 4% yield on your bond because then you’re basically making no money in real terms, inflation adjusted returns. If inflation’s 4% and your yield is 4%, you’re breaking even. That’s it. And so when investors are worried about inflation, they demand higher rates from the government, right? So this is one of the main reasons we are seeing yields go up. The second thing about this increasing debt is just supply and demand because the more we need to borrow means there is more supply of bonds, right? You can’t just go out and magically create bonds and have people buy them. There’s actually people who have to go and buy these bonds. And the more supply out there means there might not be as many people who want to lend the US government money at these rates.
And so in order to entice people to buy and create the demand for all this new supply, they need to increase their yield. So those are two different reasons our national debt is creating higher yields. Now on top of that, a third thing is AI. AI is creating a massive amount of supply for debt. These companies that are scaling and spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year on infrastructure build out and data centers, they need debt. And so they’re issuing bonds, they’re getting debt from the private market. And so now the US government has to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic who are offering higher yields than the US government. And surely those AI build out bonds are riskier, but it’s more competition. All of this is to say the debt market has a lot of supply and investors are clearly worried about the amount of debt out there.
That is, I think, one of the major reasons why we’re seeing yields go up. And remember that because in a couple minutes we’re going to talk about what happens from here, but I’ll just fast-forward a little bit. We’re going to talk about are things getting better? You think the deficit’s getting better anytime soon? I don’t. 25 years since we’ve had a balanced budget, that wouldn’t even reduce our debt. We would need a surplus to reduce the deficit, but I mean, it would be a step in the right direction. So that’s the first thing. The second thing is short-term inflation, right? That is also bad. The war in Iran has created an energy shock and inflation has remained sticky. Inflation was going down until the war in Iran, and then it started going up. We’re now seeing oil back up near $100 a barrel because there is no end in sight to the war.
No one’s even talking about a peace deal anymore. It’s just going on in the background silently while oil’s going up, fertilizer prices are going up, food costs are going up. And so inflation has remained sticky. We just got a print the other day and inflation’s at 3.4%, well above the target of the Fed, which is 2%. We also had a hot producer price index, which is different measure of inflation, but that came out, that was hot as well. And so again, bond investors worried about inflation, that’s another reason yields go up. The third reason, and there are other reasons, but the third reason and last one I’m going to talk about here today is what has to do with the Fed. It’s not actually what they do this month or next, but we have a new Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, and people just don’t know what he’s going to do.
A lot of people are fearful that because Trump has repeatedly said he wants lower interest rates, that Warsh is going to lower interest rates even in the face of inflation, and he hasn’t said that he’s not. And so until we get a sense of what the Fed is going to do, I think bond investors are going to be very cautious. Now, as I said, I’m recording this a few days before the Fed meeting. I think they’re going to raise rates because they have to address this. They have to address what is going on in the bond market. Otherwise, we’re going to see bond yields go up and that can be very damaging to the economy, but I do think that’s playing in here. I think the bond market is trying to send a signal to Kevin Warsh, “You better raise rates.” Not because that’s good for the country short term, but because if he doesn’t, and if he and the rest of the FOMC vote on interest rates, if they collectively say, “Hey, we’re going to keep rates low, we’re even maybe going to lower,” even in the face of all the fears that the bond market has, not good.
That’s why I think the Fed doesn’t really have an option anymore. They have to raise rates to send a signal back to the bond market that they are taking inflation seriously and they are not going to let it run wild. Now, it’s not totally up to the Fed, right? All the spending and debt, that comes down to the President and Congress. Congress has power of the purse, not the Fed, but the Fed showing that they’re going to do what they can on the monetary side could help, that could help send the right signal to the bond market. Okay, so now we’ve talked about what has happened. Yields are going up. We’ve talked about three of the main reasons why it’s happening. Let’s turn our attention to what happened with the treasury last week and Washington, the Trump administration’s intervention, because this really matters. We do have to take a quick break though.
We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Today at On the Market, we’re talking about a crazy week, crazy month that we’ve been having in the bond market. We’ve talked so far about what has happened, why the bond market is going up. Now let’s turn our attention to what actually happened because this is a pretty crazy thing in my opinion, and I don’t think it’s getting nearly enough attention in the media or in the real estate world in particularly. But back in August 19th, one day after the 30-year yield hit that 19-year high, the Treasury Department announced it would double the size of its bond buyback operations for long-dated treasuries. A buyback is the government buying back its own outstanding bonds in the open market. Fewer long outstanding bonds. In theory, this theory means less supply pressure, right? There’s less bonds out there, and so maybe demand and supply will become in equilibrium.
But what they’re doing here is just a little bit of financial engineering here, because what money is the treasury going out and buying those long-dated bonds with? They’re just buying them with new debt. They’re issuing short-term debt, short-term treasury bills to go out. They’re borrowing money to go out and buy back their own money that they borrow. It’s just kind of confounding. Now, bond buybacks are not a new thing. They’ve absolutely happened before under different administrations as well. I think that they were definitely doing it during the Biden administration as well. But during previous times, they’ve at least said it was more of a liquidity and cash management thing. They’re directly trying to change the yield curve. Bessett has said it. He’s basically trying to manipulate the market and the yield curve. I think what’s really amazing here is the market just doesn’t care. They’ve done this a couple times now.
The first time he came out and announced it, it kind of worked. On that announcement day, 10-year yields fell six basis points, so 0.06%, that’s six basis points, right? Cool. 30-year drop, nine basis points. Those are meaningful drops, but not changing anything, but then it just went back up. So then Biscette came out and said, “Actually, we’re going to do even more bond buybacks.” And that announcement, the dip, it dipped a little bit for 48 hours, and then it just came back and actually went higher from where they were before the announcement, erasing the entire sort of relief rally that it created. Then Biscette responded by signaling he’d go even bigger. And on September 9th came out and said, “I am the house.” He literally said, “I am the house now.” They say, “Don’t bet against the house. I am the house. You can bet against me if you want.” They announced a $6 billion long end buyback.
Well, not enough, right? $6 billion sounds like a lot, not against $40 trillion in debt. It didn’t even matter. The opposite effect, bonds tanked, bond prices and bond yields move inversely. So when bonds are being sold for cheaper, when their prices go down, yields go up. So basically bonds tanked, prices went down on bonds and yields went up. And we actually just saw the 10-year hit a new long-term high after that third announcement. So the bond market said to Scott Bessent, “Challenge accepted. We don’t care about your buyback.” So just think about what we just watched. The most powerful financial officer in the United States stood up, told the market he was going to push long-term rates down, dared traders to fight him, and they fought him and won and rates went up. That is the bond market telling Washington pretty firmly that a few billion dollars of buybacks do not solve a $40 trillion problem.
$40 trillion, by the way, is 40,000 billion. So six billion versus 40,000 billion, probably not enough. The other thing is I just don’t think the bond market wants to be manipulated in this way because the reason it’s going up is for all these structural issues, the deficit and inflation. And by Bessent going out there and sort of saying, “Well, we’re going to buy back these bonds,” it shows they’re not trying to address these issues. They’re not trying to fix inflation. The war isn’t ending. Tariffs aren’t stopping. The deficit is not being closed. They’re signaling they’re not going to start buying this debt because Scott Bessent went out and said, “We’re going to do bond buybacks.” They want real structural fixes to go in place. So pretty crazy wild. People say bonds are boring. For me, this has been an exciting couple of days because a lot has been going on.
All right guys, we got more on the bond market and what you should be doing in your own portfolio, but we got to take a quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On the Market. Let’s jump back into our conversation about the bond market and how it’s going to impact the real estate market. Let’s talk now though about what this means for mortgage rates. Let’s bring this home for what this means for real estate investors. So again, mortgage rates, they track the 10-year US Treasury and that has gone up. I just have to say, I just don’t think mortgage rates are going to go down. It’s really hard for me to see the 10-year treasury going down. There’s only a couple things that can move it, right? I think number one is if the Fed raises rates. I know this sounds crazy, but hear me out. I know it sounds insane, but I think if the Fed lowered rates right now are kept in the same, I think the bond market would be like, they don’t care at all about inflation, yields would go up.
I actually think if the Fed raises rates, we might see mortgage rates go down just a little bit. That might help in the short term a tiny bit. It’s not going to really be a deference breaker. The real things that we can do are, number one, win the war on inflation. We know that inflation is too high right now, and we know that the primary drivers of this are tariffs and the war in Iraq. We could stop those things. Politically, it doesn’t seem likely, but that is one thing that could move down inflation. The second thing we could do is get control of the national deficit. That is entirely within our power to do, but it is almost like not even worth talking. I’m not going to waste your time talking about the government getting control of our debt. It’s just not going to happen, right?
It’s not happening anytime soon. No party is even talking about it. At least a couple years ago, they would pretend that they were going to get it under control. Now, no one even talks about it. So I’m not even going to talk about it, but that would work. That would really work. That’s probably really what would work in the long run, but it’s not going to happen. The third thing that could happen is a recession because what happens with supply and demand on bonds is if there’s a recession, a lot of investors move their money out of risky assets like stocks or crypto or whatever, and they want relative safety and bonds are relatively safe. Remember, it’s that risk-free asset. And so that creates more demand for bonds that pushes up the price of bonds and pushes down yields, right? So a recession typically lowers yields and lowers mortgage rates.
But right now, are any of those things going to happen? I don’t think inflation’s going to go crazy unless the war really gets worse or there’s new tariffs or something like that, but I don’t think it’s going to go down anytime soon in a meaningful way. Deficit we talked about, maybe there’ll be a recession, but it doesn’t seem like a recession is going to happen the rest of this year. That is definitely possible, but it doesn’t seem imminent, right? So are mortgage rates going to go down? No, they’re not. I actually think right now the risk is that they’ll go up more than they’ll go down. Hopefully they’ll stay around seven, maybe hover in the high sixes, and I think that’s what we have to plan for. I was actually starting to put together my talk for BP Con, which is in a couple of weeks, and I always give a mortgage rate forecast during that, and I was coming up with my range, and I think six and a half to seven half percent is probably where we’ll hang out in 2027, is my guess.
There’s so many geopolitical things that could go on here, but where we’re sitting here today, that’s probably where I would say things are going. And that’s going to matter for investors, right? I predicted last year that prices were going to go down in 2026. They’re still up a little bit this year, but I think they’re going to be close to flat. I said probably negative one. We might get there, we’ll see by the end of the year, but flat, negative one, somewhere around there is probably where we’ll end the year. I think next year, if things continue on the current trajectory, we’re going to have negative home prices on a national basis. I don’t think it’d crash, but negative one, negative two, negative 3%, that seems likely to me. And I think we’re going to see even slower housing market, which sucks because we’re at four million home sales right now, very slow by historical standards.
Normal years like five and a quarter million. We’re at four million, that’s slow. It’s 20% below average. I think it could go even slower. I think we could get to 3.9, 3.8, 3.7, because people don’t have money and this low affordability is going to negatively impact the housing market. There’s still the lock in effect. I just think the market’s going to be stuck. It’s going to be bad, in my opinion. I think we’re getting for a rough time in the housing market. Now, that doesn’t mean a rough time for investors, actually. I think there are a lot of reasons to think that good deals are coming. When prices go down, it improves the rent-to-price ratios. It gives you better negotiating leverage. Buyers are getting great concessions right now. Two of the markets I invest in Seattle and Denver, we’re seeing huge price drops, better deals on assets than I’ve seen in a long time.
So as for someone who’s a buy and hold investor like me, I think there’s actually opportunity. It’s a good thing, but if we’re talking about the industry, all the agents, loan officers out there, it’s going to be rough. I hope I’m wrong. I really do, but I don’t see how affordability gets better in this market, right? Prices have to come down. That’s the only way. If mortgage rates are going to stay high, the only other levers are prices coming down or real wage growth. Real wage growth now because of inflation is negative. So affordability is going down because of that. It’s going down because of mortgage rates. The only way affordability can get up better in the next six months, in my opinion, next year maybe, is prices going down. And because of the lock-in effect, they’re not going to go down that much, right?
We just don’t have enough inventory on the market. And so I think we’re in the great stall still. We still are, but it’s just getting longer and prices, I think they’ll go down a little bit, but they’re going to be relatively flat. I don’t think it’s going to be a dramatic crash. I don’t really see any evidence of that at this point. I’ll of course update you, but to me, this just means investors should look to buy, right? It’s a good time to use your negotiating leverage to buy undercurrent comps, to buy cash flowing assets, because rents aren’t going down. Rents are pretty flat. If you could find places where rents are staying stable or growing, which is a lot of places and prices are going down, improves your cash flow, right? So that’s what I’m doing. I’m actually looking more at real estate right now.
I think there’s better deals coming. Next six months, we’re going to start to see, I think the winter, we’re going to see a lot of good deals. Good time to negotiate this winter. So that’s sort of how I’m thinking about it for my own portfolio. But in these types of markets, same thing I’ve been saying for three or four years. I wish I could say something different, but we’re in this great stall. Nothing’s really changed, and in fact, it’s getting worse a little bit. And so you got to be careful. You don’t need to be scared. You got to be careful. You can still buy, you can still invest. People who have cash to deploy right now, you’re going to have a lot of negotiating leverage. Use it. Use it. That’s what you got to be doing, right? But be careful. Buy under comps. Don’t just go out and buy anything.
Buy excellent assets. They got to be great assets, great locations, no tertiary locations, not even secondary locations. Buy great assets in great places right now and see if you can stock up because it will recover. It’s just going to take a few years. We need to work through a lot of issues. A lot of issues we need to work through, but it will come back. So buy things that work today and then wait for them to get great over the long run. That is the great stall playbook I’ve been talking about for years and I’m sticking by it. Been saying it for four years, but I’m sticking by it even during the challenges that we’re going to go through now with these higher mortgage rates. I wish I had better news, everyone. I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but my job here is to be accurate as much as I can, to warn you and share information about what’s likely to come.
And although I will be wrong in the future, I think I’ve been right about this, about interest rates and prices for three or four years now, and I feel pretty strongly about the direction things are headed. And so be careful, keep your eyes open, look for opportunity, but don’t overextend yourself and understand that this is likely to stay this way for a while. That’s our show for today. Thank you so much for listening and watching this episode of On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer and I’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].