Home Blog

0% Interest मै Pulsar 125 TFT Meter Finance 😱 | #pulsar #pulsar125 #finance #loan #bikefinance



Bajaj Pulsar 125 TFT Meter 0% interest finance Scheme Down Payment & EMI |

Pulsar 125 0% interest finance
Pulsar 125 new best finance scheme 0% interest
0% interest finance pulsar 125
Pulsar 125 down payment & emi
Pulsar 125 tft meter loan details
Pulsar 125 loan Vidoe
Pulsar 125 new loan Vidoe
Pulsar 125 bike finance details
#motovlog #motorcycle #loan #finance #automobile

source

Nearly Half of Buyers Get Concessions as Fed Warns Prices Must Drop


Dave:
The headline can tell you what happened in the housing market, but it rarely tells you what you should do next. Before you change your strategy based on some recent news, you need to know where the story actually applies, what’s driving it, and whether it holds up against what you’re seeing locally. So today on this episode of On the Market, every one of our panelists has brought a different story to the table. We’ll challenge the easy takeaways, we’ll look at the possible implications for investors, and identify the questions you should ask yourself before making your next move. I’m Dave Meyer. This is On the Market. Let’s get to it. Kathy and James, what’s up guys? Good to see you. Thanks for being here.

James:
Good to see you guys.

Kathy:
Good to see you too.

Dave:
I know we say this every week, but man, it feels like things are insane right now. Just like the speed of information.

Kathy:
Are we going to be depressing?

Dave:
No, I have good news. I brought a good news story. I know I’m always the downer around here, so I have a good news story.

Kathy:
Oh, I have a bad news one.

Dave:
James, what’s yours? Good news, bad news, medium news?

James:
It’s half glass full, half glass empty.

Dave:
Then I’m going to go first, then James, we’ll slowly depress you throughout the course of the episode. We’ll start happy. We’ll go to James and then Kathy, you could drag us all

Kathy:
Down at the end. Perfect. End it

Dave:
With tears. My headline for today is 45% of sellers are now offering concessions. This is the biggest opportunity buyers have had in six years. I don’t know, longer. I know there are flip sides to everything. James, my condolences on selling houses right now. It’s hard. I’m trying to sell house too. It’s not going great. But I just think this is hidden from the average person. I know investors see this stuff, but the average homeowner or first time investor, they go out and see the median home price is up. It’s up one and a half percent. It’s 429,000. Not really. If you actually look at what’s going on, the median home price right now is probably 410 because people are getting five, six, 7% discounts. And I think this is good news for buyers. I mean, I started in 2010. This is why I got started because you had so much leverage.
You could just name your price and walk away if you didn’t like it. And I feel like we’re getting back to that. And I know it comes with some scary headlines and some potentially falling prices, but man, this is good news for a buyer in my opinion.

Kathy:
Yeah, absolutely. It’s a buyer’s market, which means it’s time for the buyer and this is time to buy. And people often do the opposite. They buy in a seller’s market, they sell in a buyer’s market. That’s not how you make money. That’s

Dave:
Panic.

Kathy:
That’s panicking. Yes.

Dave:
Yeah, for sure. I totally agree with you, Kathy. So hopefully I brought you some good news today. But I was curious, I brought this story because I kind of wanted to ask you both, and I’m happy to share some things too, just to share how you get good concessions. Because I think people hear, oh, there’s concessions. But a lot of people, especially if they’re new, are not as familiar with negotiating with sellers because it’s been a long time since you could. So James, maybe you’ve negotiated what? 5,000 more, 10,000 deals? How do you go after concessions? And I guess I should even start at a higher level. Do you prefer to negotiate on price, on concessions, some combination of the both?

James:
I love grinding on a deal because there’s so many ways. And it’s not just about like, “Hey, I want it for cheaper.” It’s about how you present your case, just like anything. And so we go for price because we’re investors and we’re going for deeper discounts. I don’t know if anyone can buy my rate down on a hard money loan, but there’s so many different ways. There’s price and term. A lot of people think if you pay the least, it’s the best deal. No, that’s not the case at all. Sometimes if you pay more and the seller’s working with you on their interest rate, the cost. And so the first thing I always tell people is focus on what you’re trying to achieve and what you can afford. And then there’s numerous different ways to get there. Your number one concessions are going to be price first.
The second is what works for you best on concessions? Maybe you’re putting most of your down payment down and you don’t want to have to worry about any bills for five years and you ask for all the things in your inspection. Roof, maybe you have five years left, you want a new roof. It may need a new hot water tank and you go through and you really are covering your costs going forward. And actually that’s what I suggest for most buyers to do because those bills can really beat you up later. And the next is how do you get your monthly payment down, which is going to be what can they buy your rate down in closing costs? We just did this. We had the property listed for 700. We actually sold it for 720, but we’re paying $20,000 in closing costs because it got her rate at the time into 6.3 or 6.4% because the rates were lower when she made this offer.

Dave:
So she basically was flexible on price, but she wanted a lower monthly carry.

James:
Yeah. And that’s what you want to communicate. Where people make the mistake is they just fire in offers. Talk to the broker. What’s the seller’s hot button? What are they willing to do? Are they willing to wait for a longer close? Can you get a better loan? That conversation is what you want your broker to do or your negotiator to do because then they can bring you back all the different options and you can run them on all three scenarios. Is price the best strategy? Is getting all the deferred maintenance covered? Is it interest rate or is it all three? And depending on what that seller says, you might be able to get all three.

Dave:
That’s great advice. Kathy, anything to add there?

Kathy:
I mean, that is it. If I’m buying an older home, I will do every possible inspection, not just the general inspection, get all of them and then get the pricing on what it’s going to cost to fix those things that come up in those inspection reports and present it. It’s like you’ve got those 10 days to be able to do your due diligence or whatever you negotiate in that timeframe, the due diligence period. But usually I do it on the last day like, “Hey, we would love to buy this, but this is what it’s going to cost us. We need this kind of discount.” And by then they’re already so happy to be in contract and just be done with it that it’s like, okay, that makes sense. This makes sense. Someone’s got to pay it. They might come back and say, well, let’s split it or whatever, but you got to go in as an investor knowing this is the max I can pay and they’ll take it or they’ll leave it.
This is the time you negotiate everything. They’ll say yes or they’ll say no, but they might be just like, “You know what? I want to be done with it too. If I keep it, I got to fix these things anyway, so I’ll just let them fix it and I’ll slash the price.”

Dave:
Well, I like that, Kathy, because just so everyone knows, concessions, there are limits depending on who you’re borrowing from, how much of the purchase price you can accept in concessions. So you can’t just get 30% of the purchase price in concessions. It depends on the type of mortgage, conventional, FHI, VA. They all have different rules. What the hell? Boom. What’s going on here?

Kathy:
Howdy.

Dave:
What is going on? Henry is crashing our party right now. All right. Well, Henry, you need to answer the question. Best way to get a concession out of a seller right now.

Henry:
Best way to get a concession out of a seller right now? Yeah. Ask them.

Dave:
That’s basically what Tim said. Talk to them.

Henry:
Literally ask them and most of them will say yes right now.

Dave:
Yeah. Well, there we go.

James:
Actually, I do have one story on concessions real quick. There’s a different way you can do it too. So I’ve had property that’s really expensive right now. Great home. It will sell. Got buyers on the hook and the concessions that we’re negotiating right now, no interest rate buydown, no price change, nothing comes off the net, but they want a bunch of customizations done for the floor plan. I’m literally going to move the kitchen for them.

Dave:
Whoa. How much is that going to cost you?

James:
It’s about $70,000 worth of work, but this is a house where the next price cut would be a hundred grand.

Kathy:
Oh, wow.

James:
Okay. So ask whatever you want and see how you can bridge it. And as a seller, ask what can I do for the buyer to get them to write it up? And they thought that was a non-option, but we had a two and a half meeting. We marked it all out and I’m hoping by this weekend we’re mutual and I’m ripping the house back out.

Dave:
Oh, so that kind of reminds me of the point I was trying to make when Henry so rudely interrupted us, is that there are limits to how much concessions people can offer based on your loan, but things like what James are talking about, when the seller actually fixes the house, that does not count towards that limit. And so it is something that you can negotiate in addition to cash back at closing or covering closing costs or buying down rates that does not bump up against some of those financial limits. So that’s definitely a great strategy. All right, Henry, we decided just, you don’t have to bring a story. I had a happy story. James had a medium one. Kathy had a depressing story, so we’re slowly depressing people over the course of the episode. So James has a medium story for us, but we got to take a quick break.
We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On the Market. I’m here with James, Catherine and now Henry, bonus Henry episode. James, tell us a story. And Henry, you have to answer all the questions now. Kathy and I are just going to relax.

Henry:
I got you. I got you.

James:
So the article that I have is from, it’s realtor.com. It’s Fed official sounds warning on housing as affordability hits a 21 year low. The reason this article I think is so important is because we’re always trying to forecast down what do we do next? Whether it’s with the assets we have, the inventory we have, or what are we going to buy? How do we want to buy? What’s our buy price? What do we see? And our good friend here, Michael Barr, he’s predicting that things are not going to get more affordable, but the only thing that really is going to bring down affordability is price. It’s not going to be rate.

Dave:
That’s right. That’s correct.

James:
And right now, since 2000, prices are up 70% and incomes are only up 17%. And that’s the major issue and we might be time for a moment of truth with some pricing correction.

Dave:
I think that’s right.

James:
The Fed is signaling to us that we might see more rate hikes on the future and that if we think that rates are going to go much further down, they’re going to fluctuate a little bit here, but we shouldn’t… I think at the beginning of the year I was predicting they were going to be in the low sixes going into December, and that is not the case or it doesn’t appear to be.

Dave:
So what was the positive side of this story?

James:
What this tells me though is the money I’m losing today, I can make up if I buy right and I think there’s going to be plenty of deals. So as a buyer, I’m happy with this. As a seller, I’m not happy with this. But also as a seller, it tells me, “Hey, this isn’t going to get better, so I need to plan to sell now or refinance and keep.” You have to make that decision. Don’t get stuck in the middle going, “Man, I just hope it gets better.” It’s not going to. It may not get that much worse than, at least it depends on the market. I think Seattle’s gotten pretty hammered. I don’t know if it’s going to get that much worse, but it’s not going to get any better. I do know that. The other thing is I feel like the Fed’s actually being kind of fiscally responsible and this could help the bond markets.

Dave:
I agree. I do think it’s good in the long run. It’s definitely good in the long run. I was just going to say, James, the whole thing about affordability, it’s like this isn’t just housing. This is just human and American households. Affordability is too low. Something has to change. It can’t have this level of low affordability across everything. Assets are expensive. Insurance is expensive. Gas is expensive. Groceries are expensive. It has to get under control. There’s no easy button to get things moving again. And it’s going to be a while, in my opinion. There’s no off-ramp here that is quick. In the past, when inflation’s high like this, it can take years. Well, inflation was going down before the war in Iran. They were sort of winning that battle and now that’s reversed, but that war doesn’t seem like it’s ending anytime soon. And so it’s just going to be here for a while and people should plan accordingly.

Henry:
Two things I’m thinking about through all this turmoil and chaos is one, how do I prepare myself so that I can buy opportunities that come and hold them through the tough time? Because there are great opportunities and we’ve all seen cycles and the people who come out the winners in the cycles are the ones who found a way to buy when everybody said things were crazy. The people who were buying in 2009 and 2010, people though they were crazy, they made crap tons of money, right? Totally. So can you find a way to buy right now and hold through the downtime? And then can you find a way to transact and continue to produce income? What we’re finding is if a property is less expensive right now, it’s selling fast. Not only is it selling, but it’s selling quickly. Condition isn’t as important as an affordable price in the market that I’m in right now.
So go talk to your real estate agent and research what is selling. Who’s buying it? How frequently are they buying it? How long is it taking to sell? You just got to do a little more research right now and be super conservative and be ready to buy.

Dave:
I also just think, I’ve said this before, but the quality of assets that are going on sale is better.

Henry:
Yes.

Dave:
I’ve seen multifamily that would’ve never touched the MLS lingering on the MLS for a while. All stuff that would’ve been off market, pocket listing, sold for a lot of money. A location stuff was trading at a four cap off market. Now it’s like, that’s just lingering? Kind of like that. I also personally just think multifamily is going to recover faster than residential. Residential won’t take the hit that multifamily has hit, but that’s why I think multifamily is a better opportunity potentially in the next few years because everyone’s scared of it. Prices have already corrected 20%, some markets more. And when you start at a lower basis, the recovery is just better. It has more room to grow. So anyway, that’s kind of what I’m getting more personally interested in.

Kathy:
Well, the thing about multifamily is it is simply numbers. With housing, there’s a little bit more emotion involved. People are buying their home to live in. With multifamily as an investor, you’re buying it because you’re looking at numbers, period. Or you should be anyway, you should be emotionally attached to it. So anytime you have inflation and costs are going up, you better see incomes going up at the same time or else the value’s coming down, period. Because the way you judge the value of a multifamily property is income versus expenses. That’s it. There’s nothing more to it. So if expenses are going up and incomes aren’t going up, the price is coming down. And unfortunately, a lot of owners of multifamily are emotionally attached and not looking at, it’s just math. So hopefully the sellers will eventually, they’ll have to come to terms with the fact that it’s not that they’re discounting the property, they’re just coming in at the price the property is worth today.
There’s a difference. It’s not discounted.

Dave:
That’s a good point.

Kathy:
It’s maybe lower than what they paid, but this is just, it’s what it’s worth. Yeah, that’s right. Period. There’s no arguing numbers. You can’t argue it. I

Dave:
Also just add, this is nerdy, but a rising treasury yield competes directly with multifamily and commercial real estate.

Kathy:
That’s

Dave:
Right. Because as Kathy said, it’s just math. You’re buying an income stream. And so if you can get a 5.2% yield on a 10-year US treasury with virtually no risk, would you take a multifamily deal that’s only getting you five and a half or 6% cash on cash return? No.

Kathy:
No, you better not.

Dave:
So I think this is a fresh, big competition for commercial that’s going to push down values even more. And I don’t want anyone to lose their shirt, but commercial real estate is cyclical. It goes through these boom and bust cycles. It’s part of the business. The people who are in this business understand that. And I think we’re probably in the next year or two going to be in the good part of that cycle to start buying. All right, so that’s our second story. We have one more coming from Kathy, which is apparently depressing, but stick around. Stick around for the depressing part, okay? We’ll make it fun somehow. We’ll still make it funny. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to On the Market. I’m Dave Meyer here with Kathy, Henry, and James. We’ve so far talked about concessions. We’ve talked about what’s going on with rates.
Kathy, what do you got for us?

Kathy:
Well, we were talking about multifamily, so let’s keep talking about it. This is an article from BizNow. The subject line is, “Mold is growing into major problem for apartment owners.” Mold? Mold, as if apartment owners don’t have enough to deal with.

Dave:
James loves mold.

James:
Sounds like a deal.

Kathy:
So the article goes on to say that lawsuits against multifamily landlords over mold and habitability are on the rise and significantly. And the article kind of goes on to say it’s partly due to all these rising expenses, so there’s not enough money left for maintenance, for general maintenance. So some of that deferred maintenance is building up, which is just like, oh, these owners are getting so hammered, it’s hard to watch. But also what I hated about this article is that, let me see if I can find this quote. It’s really, the issue has emerged over the past five years now. It’s not like maybe the mold has changed so much in five years, but what did change is the litigation around it. And there’s literally a quote, “Southern California attorney told Bisnow that his firm began focusing on mold litigation during the pandemic when fewer people were driving and its auto accident business slowed down.” Ever since COVID, this has become now in the spotlight.
So you do need to be just so careful. I owned an apartment you guys once with mold and it was painful. It was painful and expensive. So I know James loves mold, but maybe if you’re buying and negotiating, but not if you’re owning, it’s very hard. I’m curious, James, what do you do with mold?

James:
We buy cheaper, and so we can afford to rip everything out.

Kathy:
Just rip it all out.

James:
I mean, that’s why I like heavy value add, because some properties, especially in the ’80s, the ’80s have a lot of, after the high inflation, you got kind of cheaper energy code, the insulation, the windows, the siding, they sweat a lot more than a lot of houses, at least from my experience. Those are the harder ones because you’re not ripping them all the way out. Luckily, the homes, the properties that we’re buying that have a lot of mold, major mold, we’re taking them all the way down to studs and a lot of the wood’s being replaced. We kill as primer it, we bleach it, and then you can snap an air quality test, but you just want to cover yourself, but you got to take care of it or it keeps going and it keeps running. And the best thing you can do as a buyer, if you don’t have that experience in construction, hire a mold remediation company.
We’ve been talking a lot about sellers giving concessions. Well, they’ll concede and pay that bill to make sure it’s done by a licensed and bonding company.

Dave:
That’s great advice.

Kathy:
Well, if you are not a buyer and you are an owner, make sure that you are checking your homes, your properties to make sure there is not water intrusion, get those regular property inspections. I’m guessing there might be, because people are cutting back on budget, they’re not doing those inspections as often as they should be because they don’t want to know what they have to pay.

Henry:
If you’ve got a sizable portfolio in a lot of areas, I know there’s a couple companies out here that do it, but there is companies who literally specialize in just preventative maintenance. They’ll go to all your properties and do checks like this on a regular basis so that you can have some peace of mind.

Kathy:
Yeah. And also for your tenants, I mean, it’s a serious issue. If it’s bad mold, it can really cause serious health problems. You want to stay on top of it.

Dave:
I feel like it’s really regional. Northwest, big problem. My property’s in Colorado, I’ve never even heard the word mold. It’s so

Kathy:
Hot.

Dave:
I’m sure it’s in Utah. It’s just so dry. You don’t really have to deal with it. I’m sure in the South, Henry, it’s pretty –

Henry:
No, it’s moist.

Dave:
Everything’s just fumid there. I feel like it’s just always kind of moist.

Henry:
Moist, yes. It’s just a little damp. Everything’s a little damp.

James:
As a landlord, stay in front of your repairs to prevent this. I had something happen at one of my single families and I went out there and they’re like, “Yeah, there’s a little bit of moisture building up.” And I’m like, “What? We just had tenants in here. I just cleaned it up.” And I went out there and it turns out randomly seven windows failed for whatever reason. Whoa. And there’s so many different ways I could have tried to fix that, but at the end of the day, I didn’t want to spend the money, but I just replaced all the windows in that house. As the tenants were in, I gave them one free month’s rent because we had to do that process. And so it sucks. Sometimes you got to pay the bill, but you got to take care of your tenants.

Kathy:
Oh yeah, absolutely.

Dave:
Absolutely. And it makes you money over the wrong thing. It’s the right thing to do, but it’s also, it’s better for everyone long-term. It’s ridiculous not to. But Kathy, I don’t think this is… I feel bad for the current owners, but another reason, multifamily’s going to be on sale for the next couple years. We’re going to have a long sale on multifamily and it’s going to be a good opportunity because to Kathy’s point, unlike the residential market, the recovery won’t be emotional either. When the math starts making sense, if you buy in, the recovery will grow. It’s not all about personal finance. There’s a lot of institutional capital here. I think it’s something to keep an eye on. I invest a lot in multifamily through syndications, but I’m pretty seriously considering buying just straight up owning and operating my own in the near future because I think it’s just a great way to secure retirement.
I’m not even in it for the cycle. If you think, can I buy a 12 or 15 unit, pay it off in a couple years, and that could be all of your income for your retirement.That’s an opportunity to keep an eye out for the next few years.

Henry:
Yeah.

Dave:
All right. Well, that’s our show. Thank you guys so much for being here. Henry, thanks for the surprise visit. And thank you all so much for listening to this episode of On the Market. We’ll see y’all next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Bank of America Fined $1.2 Billion + $750 Million For Anti Money Laundering Failures


Bank of America has been assessed the third largest penalty in treasury history and the largest in The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) history for anti money laundering failures. Bank of America failed to report over $5 billion in suspicious activity to FINCEN. 

Secretary Scott Bessent stated that:

“Financial institutions are on the front lines of protecting our economic and national security,”

 “When a bank of this size fails to meet its anti-money laundering and sanctions obligations, the consequences extend far beyond its own walls, exposing the entire U.S. financial system to significant illicit finance risks. Today’s actions send a clear message that even the biggest financial institutions are not above the law.”

A Bank of America statement stated that:

“Financial crime compliance ​is serious, and we are responsible for getting it right,” 

“We ​have invested billions of dollars in technology and dedicated thousands of employees to combat financial crime, and our team is far ‌along ⁠with and committed to completing the work required to address the issues raised by our regulators.”

Third quarter results will include a non-tax-deductible charge of $1.2 billion. American Express was recently fined $350 million by The OCC. 

A Dallas Restaurant Defended Its $70 Entrée. Experts Say That Was Its Second Mistake



As diners are increasingly selective about where they spend their dollars, industry experts say restaurant owners should embrace a different approach.

Prediction: $1,000 Invested in SpaceX Will Be Worth This Much by 2030


Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX -4.21%) is a popular stock that went public earlier this year. Better known as SpaceX, it’s one of Elon Musk’s companies, and it has a few business lines. It has seen success in all of them, and is growing rapidly in many. This could make it a substantially larger company by 2030, but just how big could it get?

Let’s take a look at what a $1,000 investment in SpaceX could become, as it may be a no-brainer buy at these prices.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

SpaceX has a lot of growing to do

SpaceX is divided into three segments: space, artificial intelligence (AI), and connectivity. While the space division may be what it’s best known for, it’s actually the smallest business unit by a wide margin in terms of revenue. Furthermore, it’s growing the slowest, too. While the company’s ultimate goal is to be the premier space-economy investment, SpaceX sees huge opportunities in other industries and is focusing its growth on those right now.

Its connectivity division is space-adjacent. Its primary business is Starlink, a satellite-based broadband internet service that gives users connectivity in most places on Earth. This is game-changing for many people in remote or underserved locations, and the service’s user base has expanded quickly. It’s also SpaceX’s only profitable division. I’m confident this business unit will continue to see rapid growth between now and 2030, but at some point in time, it will have attracted a majority of the potential market for its service, at which point growth will start to slow down significantly. I’m not sure if that will happen by 2030, but it will eventually.

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(-4.21%) $-6.88

Current Price

$156.54

Perhaps the most exciting business segment is SpaceXAI, which was previously another Musk-owned company, xAI, that he had SpaceX acquire a few months before it went public. The AI division of the company develops Grok, a popular large language model commonly deployed for use cases requiring up-to-date information. This is SpaceX’s fastest-growing segment, growing at a 213% pace in Q2. I think this is where the majority of SpaceX’s revenue growth will come from over the next few years, and while it’s currently unprofitable, I think it will eventually provide the cash flow necessary to fund SpaceX’s space endeavors.

But where does all that leave a $1,000 investment made today by 2030?

Modeling SpaceX’s growth isn’t easy

SpaceX has only been a public company since June, so modeling its growth is not an easy task. Furthermore, it’s impossible to know how xAI will perform over the next few years, as it already faces stiff competition from other AI labs. So, let’s start with the immediate future.

For 2027, Wall Street analysts estimate that SpaceX’s revenue will grow by 155% to $115 billion. If the stock didn’t move at all from today’s level, that would price it at 18 times sales. For reference, Nvidia (NVDA +0.97%) trades for 18 times sales right now. So, I’d estimate that all of SpaceX’s 2027 growth is already accounted for in the stock price.

But to project what might happen from 2028 through 2030 requires guessing whether SpaceX will actually launch data center satellites into space in commercially meaningful numbers, and do so in a way that points to that business becoming profitable. If Musk’s plan for a massive constellation of data center satellites becomes a viable business, then SpaceX stock could skyrocket from here. On the flip side, xAI could lose ground to rival AI labs, Starlink’s growth could plateau, and its space division may not achieve meaningful launch growth. If some combination of those things happens, SpaceX’s stock could retreat.

It’s hard to predict the future, and with SpaceX not having a ton of public available performance history, it’s difficult to estimate. However, I have confidence in the business segments SpaceX is involved in, so I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect SpaceX’s stock to double to $2,000 by 2030, driven by growth in at least one of its three segments.

Mortgage Rates Move Lower as Oil Prices Cool Ahead of CPI Report


Mortgage rates are a little better today, extending their move lower to three days in a row.

The bond market is open again and 10-year yields are slightly improved on the day as well.

We’re still around 5.20%, which should put the 30-year fixed mortgage around 7.45% or so.

So it’s not going to make or break your loan application, but it’s better than going even higher.

Whether it lasts is another story, with the important September CPI report due out tomorrow morning.

Oil Mostly Dictating Mortgage Rates Right Now

Oil prices were lower today after a weekend of fresh attacks and a deal with Russia.

President Trump said Russia agreed to supply more diesel to global markets, and the United States temporarily eased sanctions on Russian fuel.

On his Truth Social platform, Trump also announced a so-called “ENERGY CEASEFIRE” between Russia and Ukraine, which Moscow didn’t actually confirm.

Even so, it was perhaps enough to avoid another increase in energy prices, especially given the escalation over the weekend between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis.

Oil is still above $105 per barrel and somewhat close to recent highs. And could easily hit new highs if things take a turn for the worse in the Middle East.

In other words, we got some relief but it’s very much flimsy at best.

It feels more like we’re getting a “break” from more increases than we are a full reversal.

Are We Seeing a Shift From Stocks to Safe Haven Bonds?

While the story is mostly about oil right now, there’s also a sense that a flight to safety might be materializing.

It’s when investors flee the stock market and park their money in bonds instead as a way of de-risking.

We haven’t seen it in a long time because the stock market keeps moving higher, propelled by AI build out and a chip frenzy.

But at a certain point, bonds will begin to look attractive, and perhaps we’re starting to see that a little bit.

Especially if tech valuations feel a bit too rich and there’s risk of losses there instead of additional gains.

It’s one way to get mortgage rate relief without job losses and pain on Main Street, but it does mean people would feel less of the wealth effect.

That could harm home sales if prospective buyers don’t feel as rich with their portfolios no longer at all-time highs.

CPI Tomorrow Can Make or Break This Lower Mortgage Rate Trend

While I’m a tad hesitant to say mortgage rates are in a downtrend, they have strung together a few winning days in a row.

And that’s saying something because they haven’t been able to do that for months.

It’s been up, up, up since early August.

But if we get a favorable CPI report tomorrow, mortgage rates could rally even more and perhaps get back closer to 7.375% or even 7.25%.

If they can inch closer to 7% again, there might be some real momentum to get quotes back in the high-6s.

That could even be painted as a win for President Trump headed into the midterms.

Despite promising to deliver the 3% rates again, a 6-handle 30-year fixed would seem like a victory after seeing high-7s and the threat of 8% again.

But that remains to be seen and the data still needs to cooperate. If it does, you also get a Fed that has vowed to be patient despite warning of additional hikes in the future.

Read on: Compare different mortgage rates fast with my mortgage rate calculator.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Best Crypto exchange in India 🔥



Looking for the best crypto exchange in India? 🇮🇳 In this short video, I’ll show you which platforms are most reliable, safe, and beginner-friendly for crypto trading in 2025. Whether you’re a new trader or experienced investor, choosing the right exchange is the first step toward success in crypto.

source

Bank Of America To Pay $1.2 Billion, Including Record $750 Million OCC Penalty


The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency fined Bank of America $750 million on October 13, 2026, for failures in its anti-money laundering program. It’s the largest civil money penalty in OCC history, and it hits the bank behind millions of everyday Bank of America savings and checking accounts.

The OCC penalty is one part of a larger Treasury action. FinCEN, the Treasury unit that recently ordered banks to report student aid fraud, assessed a $1.2 billion penalty that credits the OCC’s $750 million. The Office of Foreign Assets Control added an $11.6 million settlement over 475 apparent sanctions violations, according to the Associated Press.

According to a statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, “Financial institutions are on the front lines of protecting our economic and national security. When a bank of this size fails to meet its anti-money laundering and sanctions obligations, the consequences extend far beyond its own walls, exposing the entire U.S. financial system to significant illicit finance risks.“

Why It Matters

Bank of America is the second-largest bank in the U.S., with about 3,500 branches and 15,000 ATMs, according to the OCC consent order. The OCC’s previous record was the $450 million penalty against TD Bank in October 2024.

The money comes from the bank’s revenues, not customer accounts. The OCC says the penalty goes to the U.S. Treasury, and deposits stay protected by FDIC insurance up to $250,000 per depositor, per bank, per ownership category.

Why The Massive Penalties

Here’s why Bank of America is facing such massive fines:

  • The bank failed to properly monitor trillions of dollars in transactions since at least 2019, leading to missed and late suspicious activity reports involving billions of dollars.
  • From 2019 to 2023, management received reports showing the bank skipped suspicious activity reports on roughly 18% to 44% of potentially suspicious activity, depending on the year.
  • Its backlog of cases waiting for investigator review peaked at nearly 200,000 in 2024.
  • OCC examiners sampled the bank’s $102 billion credit card portfolio and flagged 10 accounts. That review led to reports on hundreds of millions of dollars in suspicious transactions.
  • About 33,300 outgoing wires totaling roughly $1 billion went out with inaccurate sender information between November 2021 and October 2024.

“The bank’s poor response to its BSA deficiencies is unacceptable,” Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould said. “Financial crime compliance is serious, and we are responsible for getting it right,” Bank of America said in a statement.

How This Connects

Regulators have stepped up action against consumer-facing money platforms. The College Investor has covered Cash App’s $175 million order over fraud concerns and New York’s lawsuit against Zelle over $1 billion in alleged fraud. Both cases involved fraud moving through payment apps, while this one centers on a bank failing to flag suspicious money for investigators.

This has also been coming at a time as the U.S. government has been cracking down on waste and fraud across the board. We’re seeing it in banking, but also in financial aid and student loan disbursements.

What’s Next

Bank of America will take a $1.2 billion non-tax-deductible charge in its third-quarter results. The bank remains under its December 2024 cease-and-desist order, and the OCC kept the right to add penalties if the violations continue.

Customers who want out can follow our steps on how to switch banks.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Bank Of America To Pay $1.2 Billion, Including Record $750 Million OCC Penalty appeared first on The College Investor.

CLARITY Act Supporter Argues That SEC, CFTC Crypto Rules Fall Short Without Legislation


House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill has argued that recent efforts by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to craft digital-asset rules fall short of the lasting framework only Congress can deliver.

After the Senate blocked the CLARITY Act, Hill credited the agencies with stepping in but insisted their actions cannot replace a statutory solution.

The CLARITY Act, which Hill helped advance as a primary sponsor, aimed to establish clear market-structure rules for most cryptocurrency activity in the United States.

It would have drawn firmer lines between the SEC’s and CFTC’s jurisdictions over digital assets and digital commodities.

The House had previously passed related legislation with bipartisan support, but the Senate failed to advance the measure in a 49-50 procedural vote in mid-September 2026.

It required 60 votes to move forward, leaving the bill stalled and prompting immediate regulatory responses.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins and CFTC Chairman Michael Selig both indicated their agencies would proceed under existing statutory authority.

Within days, the SEC introduced an innovation exemption allowing certain tokenized stock trading under temporary relief, and it proposed updates to custody rules for investment advisers and funds handling crypto assets.

The CFTC submitted market rulemaking proposals for White House review and outlined steps toward bringing crypto trading platforms under federal oversight.

These steps sought to address questions about permissible activities, custody, and platform regulation that the legislation was designed to settle.Hill acknowledged the progress.

He noted that Atkins and Selig have used their regulatory powers and exemptive relief to give practical definition to digital assets and digital commodities, helping create a functional system for this form of finance in the United States.

Yet he was direct about the limits: in his judgment, these regulatory policies fall short of what is required, which is a legislative solution.

He pointed to his earlier work on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act in the prior Congress as further evidence of the need for statute.

According to Hill, the core distinction is durability.

Exemptions, guidance, and even formal agency rules can be challenged in court, revised or withdrawn by a future administration, or limited by questions of statutory authority.

A law passed by Congress, by contrast, would set durable jurisdictional boundaries and obligations that the agencies would then implement.

Without that permanent change, the framework remains vulnerable to shifts in regulatory priorities.

Hill has argued that only such legislation can secure lasting certainty and keep the United States leading in digital assets and blockchain technology.

His stance pushes back against a view that has gained traction in parts of the industry since the Senate vote: that market participants can achieve much of what they need by working with regulators rather than waiting on Congress.

Hill has continued to hope the CLARITY Act can be revived during the post-election lame-duck session, when a narrow window of Senate session days remains before the next Congress. It’s uncertain whether they can resolve the disagreements that blocked the bill in that period, but the agencies are already moving ahead with their own initiatives in the meantime.



Sam’s Club CEO Latriece Watkins feels most powerful watching the people she’s invested in succeed



Sam’s Club CEO Latriece Watkins has a career resume that most workers would gawk at, working her way up from an intern at Walmart all the way to leader of one of America’s biggest grocery retailers.

But it isn’t the executive titles or career milestones that makes her feel powerful: The greatest source of power comes from watching the peers she’s helped ultimately succeed.

“When I feel most powerful is when I see the people I’ve invested in make moves,” Watkins told Most Powerful Women Editor Emma Hinchliffe onstage at Fortune’s annual MPW Summit in Santa Barbara, Calif., on Tuesday. “When I see them get promoted, I see all of their faces running across memory from very early in my career, or very early in their careers, to where they’ve moved now.”

Solely focusing on one’s own career could leave opportunities for greater impact on the table, according to the Fortune 500 executive. Watkins has made many strides in her own career, becoming the first woman and person of color to serve as Walmart’s chief merchant back in 2023—one of the most influential roles in retail. And in helping others along her three-decade career at the $890 billion parent company (Walmart), she’s leveraged a symbiotic strategy with her peers so that everyone succeeds. 

“The contributions we make are more than we could individually do,” she continued. “So power for me is the names of all the people that I can say who [have] benefited from my contributions, and I’ve benefited from being able to either contribute or get feedback from them.”

Watkins said that despite being in the top role, business leaders will always need people—and finding the best way to shepherd them can be a challenge for busy executives. In her eight months as CEO, the 51-year-old has found that understanding the power of workers and delivering clarity are required in leadership. Employees will be looking to the top boss for transparency and a clear vision. To get that clarity, Watkins recommends setting aside time to think things through.

“People look to you for clarity, which means you have to be clear. You don’t think out loud,” she said. “When you’re the leader, people want to know what you think, and if you haven’t cleared it up for yourself and you’re thinking out loud, you’ll confuse them.”

“So take the time—make the time—to create clarity for yourself,” Watkins continued. “It’s one of the hardest things to find this time for yourself. But it’s required, because you can’t get clarity without it.”