Home Blog

Court tosses manslaughter sentence due to an AI-generated video of the victim speaking to a judge



An Arizona man’s 10-year manslaughter sentence has been tossed in a case where a video generated by artificial intelligence portrayed the deceased victim addressing a judge before the punishment was imposed.

In a decision released Wednesday, the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded Gabriel Paul Horcasitas must be resentenced in the 2021 shooting death of Christopher Pelkey because the AI video wasn’t reliable.

The court found the video crossed the line, saying it didn’t reflect actual events and presented statements made in the footage as coming directly from the victim.

“Indeed, rather than document an event or recording a particular moment, the AI video presents a depiction of the victim and his thoughts created from the imaginings of the victim’s sister,” the three-judge panel wrote.

Jessica Gattuso, an attorney who represented victims in the case, and Kristen Reller, Horcasitas’ lawyer, declined to comment Thursday on the decision.

Reller had argued Superior Court Judge Todd Lang violated due process protections by relying on AI evidence. Gattuso and prosecutors told the appeals court that the lower-court judge didn’t err, saying the footage was an accurate representation of Pelkey’s character.

In what’s believed to be a first in U.S. courts, Pelkey’s family used AI to create a video of his likeness to give him a voice. Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales, raised the idea of her brother speaking for himself after struggling to figure out what he would say.

Wales expected an appeal on the sentence and was disappointed the AI video was cited as the reason, saying her only goal was to humanize her brother for the judge. “It feels unfair because there is a convicted murderer sitting in prison that has blankets and walls of protection around their rights. Where are the rights for the victim?” Wales said.

A victim appeals lawyer has told the family that using AI again could result in another appeal. “We will continue to let his voice be heard in whatever allowable medium we can convey that through the court system,” Wales said.

The AI-generated victim impact statement was played during a May 2025 sentencing hearing after nine of Pelkey’s family members and friends stood before the judge describing how emotionally devastated they were by his killing.

Authorities say Horcasitas, 55, fatally shot Pelkey, 37, during a November 2021 road rage encounter at a stoplight in Chandler, a suburb of Phoenix. Pelkey, who was unarmed, was shot after getting out of his truck and walking toward Horcasitas’ vehicle.

Horcasitas was convicted of manslaughter in Pelkey’s death and endangerment for a gunshot that struck another vehicle at the intersection during the encounter.

The AI rendering of Pelkey said he wished he could still be with his friends and family, voiced a belief in forgiveness and said it was a shame Horcasitas had encountered him because “in another life, we probably could have been friends.” The video didn’t request a specific prison sentence.

Horcasitas’ appellate lawyer argued her client had no meaningful opportunity to rebut material in the AI-generated video.

It’s not clear if attorneys or the court were aware in advance that an AI-generated video would be used. But attorneys representing Pelkey’s family said in court records that Arizona law does not require victims to disclose statements they plan to make in court to prosecutors, defense attorneys or the judge — and that victims can exercise their rights by speaking before the court or submitting statements that are written or recorded on audio or video.

In a statement Thursday, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office said its prosecutors knew the victim’s family would address the court during sentencing but weren’t aware of the nature of it.

While the use of AI within the court system is expanding, it’s typically been reserved for administrative tasks, legal research and case preparation. In Arizona, it’s helped inform the public of rulings in significant cases.

But using AI to generate victim impact statements marks a new tool for sharing information with the court outside the evidentiary phases.

Reller told the appeals court that the video doesn’t disclose who wrote the words used by the AI version of Pelkey and wasn’t backed up with evidence establishing that its contents accurately reflected Pelkey’s views. It also had an “undue emotional weight” and conveyed an authenticity that wouldn’t have been there had a family member read the same words aloud, Reller said.

Horcasitas’ lawyer contended the judge weighed the statements made in the AI-generated video when deciding on a sentence, but prosecutors argued Lang didn’t consider the footage when issuing the punishment.

Shortly before delivering the sentence, the judge commented that he “loved that AI” but didn’t say from the bench whether the video factored into his decision. Lang said he felt Pelkey’s “obvious forgiveness of Mr. Horcasitas reflects the character I heard about today.”

The family’s lawyers say the judge was already inundated with relevant information from Pelkey’s family and friends before the AI video was played — and that nothing in the video was inflammatory. Horcasitas’ attorney didn’t object to the AI video.

Crypto Futures Trading Full Course | Crypto Futures Trading For Beginners | SAGAR SINHA



#sagarsinha #cryptotrading #futurestrading

“Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions.”

👉🎯Crypto Trading FREE Telegram

📈💰 CoinDCX (Crypto) – Get 20% Discount On Brokerage Using This Link

👉Get Featured On Bazar Ke Mahir Youtube

💰📊 Invest In Mutual Fund SIP, SWP, Stocks | Open FREE Demat Account

🛡️ Best Term Insurance – 15% Discount –
🚑 Best Health Insurance – 25% Discount –

———— Social Media Handles ————————————————-
Youtube –
Instagram-
Facebook–
Sagar Sinha Daily –
Podcast –
Linkedin-
Telegram –
Twiter(X) –
WhatsApp –

Website –

———————————————————————
Bazaar Ke Mahir –

Email – biz.sagarsinha@gmail.com

———————————————-

Disclaimer
——————————-
This video is created solely for educational and informational purposes and is based on individual research. It should not be considered as financial, investment, or trading advice. We are not SEBI-registered investment advisors or analysts. Viewers are strongly advised to conduct their own research and consult with a SEBI-registered financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
As per SEBI’s study on the derivatives segment, nine out of ten traders in the Futures & Options (F&O) market incur losses, with the average loss-making trader losing significantly more than the profitable ones gain. Trading in derivatives involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors.
Regarding cryptocurrencies in India: Cryptocurrencies are currently not considered legal tender in India, but trading and holding crypto assets is not banned. However, they are unregulated, and the Government of India, RBI, and SEBI have repeatedly cautioned investors about the high volatility and risk of fraud. Crypto gains are subject to a 30% tax on profits and 1% TDS on transactions as per the current tax laws. Regulatory frameworks may change in the future, and viewers should stay updated with official guidelines before making any decisions in this space.
Stock market investments are subject to market risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. We do not guarantee any profits or protection against losses. This content is for educational purposes only and is based on personal research. Viewers should always conduct their own due diligence before making any financial decisions.
By watching this video, you acknowledge that we and our representatives are not liable for any financial losses or decisions made based on the information provided. Always trade and invest responsibly.

source

I Timed Every Hour I Spent Chasing Rent—Here’s What Automating It Actually Saved


One of my tenants has never paid on the first. He pays on the fourth, every month, for two years, and he’s never actually missed. So for three days each month, I wonder if this is the one he skips.

I like the guy, and that’s the problem: liking somebody turns a late fee from a lease term into a moral decision I get to make twelve times a year. I didn’t charge him one for 18 months.

Eventually I got curious about what that was costing me. I went back through three months of texts, bank alerts, and my spreadsheet and added it up: four hours and 40 minutes a month.

Where the time actually went

I expected the number to be high. What surprised me was how little of it came from the tenant I’d have blamed if you’d asked me on the spot: he accounted for less than a fifth of it. I’d spent two years quietly resenting a guy who was, statistically, an ally.

  • Checking for deposits (1st–6th): ~40 min. Not one sitting: six or seven separate checks, like refreshing a group chat.
  • The day-four tenant: ~55 min. The text, the wait, “sending tonight,” the follow-up, and the 20 minutes I spend drafting a firmer message before deleting it.
  • Late-fee math and the decision: ~30 min. What I’m legally allowed to charge, why this month is different, and talking myself into it.
  • Reconciling what came in against what should have: ~50 min.
  • Month-end spreadsheet cleanup: ~45 min.
  • “Did you get it?” receipt requests: ~35 min.
  • Random stuff: a check to deposit, some loose ends: ~25 min.

That’s 280 minutes, 56 hours a year, for three units. Some of you have 30. Maybe don’t run this exercise on a day you already feel behind.

The cost that doesn’t show up

None of that captures the real expense: rent week took up headspace whether I was doing anything or not. I’d be on a call about an RV park acquisition and think, did the Willow Creek payment hit? That’s not a task, so it never made the 280 minutes. It was still the most expensive line item.

The fix

I moved all three units onto Avail and turned on four things. It took one evening.

  • Autopay. Tenants set rent to withdraw automatically on the due date. This solved my day-four guy: money was never his problem; he just needed rent to happen without remembering it.
  • Automated reminders. Avail emails renters before rent is due, so the nudge doesn’t come from me. When it comes from software, nobody’s feelings are involved.
  • Automated late fees. Avail assesses the fee based on the settings you configure. No more deciding whether to be the bad guy this month. One caveat: software applying a fee doesn’t make the fee legal. That’s still your lease and your state.
  • FastPay. Standard deposits land in three business days; FastPay moves eligible ACH payments in as soon as one. It’s on the Unlimited Plus plan ($9/unit/month when I wrote this, versus the free Unlimited plan), so check current pricing before you build cash flow assumptions on it.

What it actually saved

I’m at about 20 minutes a month now:  opening the dashboard once to confirm everything posted.

Twenty minutes against 280 is roughly 52 hours a year back. More than a full workweek, previously spent on the administrative act of receiving money I was already owed.

The money side is smaller than the time side, and I won’t pretend automation made me rich. Two things changed: late fees get charged when they’re incurred, because software doesn’t have a relationship with the tenant. And deposit timing got predictable, which matters when a mortgage payment and an insurance draft are landing on their own schedule.

Avail’s own data says landlords accepting automatic online payments are five times more likely to be paid on time than those collecting cash or checks. That’s their number, not an independent study. Three doors can’t prove a multiplier, but the direction matched.

There’s a side benefit for tenants too: Avail’s CreditBoost lets renters report on-time payments to TransUnion ($3.95/reported month) to help build their credit score, giving them a reason to care about the due date beyond avoiding a late fee.

Your action items this week

Connect your bank account first: everything else depends on it. Build the payment schedule for each unit, including recurring charges beyond base rent; anything you skip stays manual forever.

Then set the grace period and late fee to match your lease and state law, before you invite anyone. Correcting a late fee setting after a tenant’s already been charged under it is a conversation with no good version.

Invite tenants last, and ask them to turn on Autopay in the same message. Don’t make it a separate follow-up they’ll ignore. If someone insists on paying by check, you can record it manually so your rent report stays complete at tax time.

Final thoughts

Nobody’s getting rich automating rent collection. You just stop burning 56 hours a year to receive money you were already owed. And get to spend that time somewhere it compounds.

Ready to stop chasing rent? Avail’s Unlimited plan is free to start, with online rent collection, automated reminders, and automatic late fees built in. Create your account at Avail.com.

Bitcoin coils at $85,337 in bull trap or breakout setup: Live




Bitcoin coils at $85,337 in bull trap or breakout setup: Live

American Airlines Adds Cash and Miles Flight Bookings


American Airlines Adds Cash and Miles Flight Bookings

American Airlines is finally adding more flexibility for AAdvantage members who don’t have enough miles to cover an entire award ticket.

Starting in the coming weeks, eligible AAdvantage members will be able to book flights using a combination of cash and AAdvantage miles. The feature will be available on both AA.com and the American Airlines app.

Members will first search for a flight using the regular cash option. During checkout, American will display available cash-and-miles combinations and provide a slider that lets travelers adjust how much cash and how many miles they want to use.

The initial rollout will be available to U.S. AAdvantage members booking domestic U.S. flights on American, excluding Alaska and Hawaii. American says additional routes will be added later.

To book with cash and miles:

  1. Once logged into the AAdvantage® account, members will select their desired flights with cash.
  2. During checkout, members will be presented with an optional trip insurance offer.
  3. After making their trip insurance selection, available cash and miles options will be displayed. Members can use a slider to choose the combination of cash and miles that best fits their preferences.
  4. Once a selection is made, the cost summary will automatically update to reflect the chosen combination.
  5. Members can then enter their payment information and complete their booking.

Vancouver-area home sales down 8.4% in September as prices fall: board




Home sales in the Vancouver region were 8.4% lower last month compared with a year ago, as fewer apartment-style homes changed hands.

Is It Too Late to Buy Micron Technology Stock After Its 12-Month Gain of 500%?


Graphics processing units (GPUs) are the most important data center chips for processing artificial intelligence (AI) workloads, which is why investors have piled into suppliers like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices over the last few years. However, GPUs require an increasing amount of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) to keep data flowing smoothly. Without it, bottlenecks would throttle the performance of AI chatbots and agents.

Micron Technology (MU -2.05%) is one of the world’s top suppliers of memory, and it’s experiencing significant AI-related demand across multiple categories, including the data center. As a result, its revenue and earnings are growing at an explosive rate, fueling a whopping 500% gain in its stock over the last 12 months (as of the market close on Thursday, Oct. 1).

Can the rally continue, or have investors already priced in most of the company’s future growth?

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Micron just reported a blockbuster set of results for fiscal 2026

Micron wrapped up its 2026 fiscal year on Sept. 3. The company generated a record $133.1 billion in total revenue, a staggering 256% increase from the previous year. That growth rate accelerated significantly from fiscal 2025 when revenue increased by 49%.

AI-related demand for memory fueled the incredible result, and it didn’t come solely from the data center industry. Below are Micron’s four business units, their fiscal 2026 revenue, and their growth rates.

Segment

Fiscal 2026 Revenue

Growth (Year Over Year)

Cloud Memory

$43.1 Billion

219%

Core Data Center

$37.6 Billion

420%

Mobile and Client

$36.6 Billion

209%

Automotive and Embedded

$15.9 Billion

234%

Data source: Micron Technology.

The cloud memory segment is where Micron accounts for memory sales to hyperscale customers (including companies like Amazon and Microsoft), as well as HBM sales to all data center customers. The core data center business includes sales of storage and non-HBM memory solutions to data center operators.

The mobile and client segment includes memory sales to manufacturers of smartphones and personal computers. This is an increasingly important category because AI models are quickly becoming more efficient, so many devices can now process them locally rather than relying on external data centers.

Finally, the automotive and embedded business is where Micron accounts for memory sales to car and robot manufacturers. The company says vehicles fitted with Level 4 autonomous capabilities (full self-driving) require more than double the memory and storage capacity than vehicles with older Level 2 and Level 3 technologies. Moreover, humanoid robots are expected to use as much memory as Level 4 autonomous vehicles, so both of these emerging industries present Micron with an enormous opportunity.

In a series of prepared remarks to shareholders released on Sept. 30, Micron Chief Executive Sanjay Mehrotra said memory supply could be even tighter in fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 compared to fiscal 2026, suggesting the company’s revenue is likely to continue growing at a brisk pace.

Micron stock is technically cheap, but there’s a catch

The ongoing global shortage of memory is giving suppliers the ability to dictate prices, significantly boosting their profit margins. As a result, Micron’s earnings exploded higher by 879% to $74.33 per share during fiscal 2026. That places its stock at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 14.7, so it’s cheaper than both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100 indexes which trade at P/E ratios of 23.5 and 35.2, respectively.

Wall Street’s average estimate (provided by Yahoo! Finance) suggests Micron could grow its earnings to $176.69 per share in fiscal 2027, placing its stock at a forward P/E of just 6.2. But why is a company growing at Micron’s pace trading at such a steep discount to the broader market? Simply put, the semiconductor industry has always been highly cyclical, so investors know the recent bonanza probably won’t last forever.

Micron Technology Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-2.05%) $-22.50

Current Price

$1,074.89

Micron and its competitors are racing to build more manufacturing capacity, which will eventually ease supply constraints and put downward pressure on prices. Micron won’t be able to maintain its current level of earnings when that time comes, so its stock might be more expensive than it currently appears at face value. Plus, the rising cost of chips and components could significantly impact demand in the near future.

Last Tuesday, ChatGPT creator OpenAI launched a new $500-per-month subscription plan to suit its heaviest users. At the same time, it halved the number of tokens available through its $200-per-month subscription, which used to be its top plan. In essence, the company has increased the price of its most expensive offering by 150% overnight, and rising infrastructure costs are almost certainly the reason why.

A few months ago, a survey conducted by UBS Group found that 60% of businesses were already routing some AI tasks to cheaper, more efficient models in an effort to reduce costs. These models use less computing power, so if this trend continues, Micron and every other semiconductor company could see a gradual drop in demand.

With all of that in mind, I personally won’t be buying Micron stock at the current price. I’m not predicting it will suffer a sharp decline in the near term, but it’s very difficult to determine its fair value given the potential shift in supply demand dynamics over the next couple of years.

Nature & Significance of Management | Detail ONE SHOT | Class 12th Business studies. Board exam 2027



👉Class 12th Accounts 2026-27 Session

👉Class 12th Economics 2026-27 Session

👉Class 12th Business Studies 2026-27 Session

🔴Live Ch 1 to 4 Revision

🔴Live Ch 5 to 8 Revision

🔴Live Ch 9 to 12 Revision

🔴Final Revision Full Syllabus

🔥Quick Revision Series in BST

🔥Exam Gap Live Revision in Business Studies Board Exam 2026

🔥Exam Gap Most Imp MCQ in Business Studies Board Exam 2026

🔥Exam Gap Most Imp Case Studies in Business Studies Board Exam 2026

Join Our Whatsapp Group
7800365625

🔴Live One Shot Revision Business studies for Boards 2026

🔥Chapter wise Most Important MCQ in Accounts for Boards 2026

🔥Chapter wise Most Important MCQ in Business studies for Boards 2026

🔥Chapter wise Most Important Case studies in Business studies for Boards 2026

Join Our Free WhatsApp channel for Every Chapter Notes Updates Regarding XII BOARDS & CUET

Our Telegram Channel Link is
Here you can get free Notes/ PDF and All Important Information
Sunil panda

SPCC application link (ANDROID)

Mobile: 7800365625
FOR IOS USER (APPLE DEVICE)

For Laptop/ desktop user
you can register through your laptop/desktop.
Step 1. Go to
Step 2. Enter Org. code: SPCC then click on verify button
Step 3. Login with your mobile number

12TH ACCOUNTS PLAYLIST | 2025-26

ONE SHOT ECONOMICS CLASS 12 BOARD EXAM 2026

ONE SHOT BUSINESS STUDIES CLASS 12 BOARD EXAM 2026

PLAYLIST FOR ACCOUNTS 2025 BOARDS

PLAYLIST FOR ACCOUNTS ONE SHOT SERIES FOR 2025 BOARDS

PLAYLIST FOR ECONOMICS 2025 BOARDS

PLAYLIST FOR BUSINESS STUDIES 2025 BOARDS

HOPE THIS CHANNEL WILL HELP TO SCORE GOOD MARKS
IF YOU FIND IT HELPFUL DO SHARE WITH YOUR CLASS MATES.
BEST WISHES
( SUNIL PANDA )
Accounts Class 12 Board exam 2026
Economics Class 12 Board exam 2026
Business studies Class 12 Board exam 2026

source

SAT Scores Rise For A Second Straight Year As The Test Turns 100


The average SAT score for the high school class of 2026 climbed to 1045, a 16-point gain over the class of 2025, according to the College Board’s 2026 SAT Suite annual report released this week. It marks the second consecutive year of increases, with scores up across all demographic groups. This marks a positive improvement coming out of Covid as more students choose to send SAT scores even when colleges don’t require them.

Both test sections improved. Reading and Writing rose 7 points to 528, which the College Board says returns that section to pre-pandemic levels. Math gained 9 points to 517 but still trails the 523 average posted by the class of 2020. Students can compare their own results against what counts as a good SAT score.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

The SAT improvement is coming at a time when test optional is ending at many colleges nationwide. Every Ivy League school now requires test scores, and Notre Dame will require the SAT or ACT starting with fall 2028 applicants. In the class of 2026, 42% of test takers met or exceeded both the Reading and Writing and Math college readiness benchmarks, approaching the 45% the class of 2019 reached, per the College Board.

The report also found that more than 1.3 million students earned SAT scores that affirmed or exceeded their high school GPA, making the score a strength on their application. That held for more than 82% of Black and Latino students and nearly 80% of first-generation students, a useful signal at a time when grade inflation makes GPAs harder for admissions offices to read.

The Details

  • More than 1.95 million students in the class of 2026 took the SAT, a 2.5% decrease from the prior class and the first drop since the pandemic-affected class of 2021.
  • Participation still grew in 42 states and the District of Columbia, while international participation rose 13.5%.
  • SAT School Day, often free to students, accounted for 65% of test takers, with more than 10,000 schools offering it.
  • About 3 million students took the PSAT/NMSQT, the only qualifying test for the National Merit Scholarship. Mean scores on PSAT-related tests ticked up after three straight years of declines.

How This Connects

Math remains the weak spot, and that lines up with other data we’ve tracked. U.S. teens ranked 23rd in math on the 2026 global exam, and UC San Diego’s remedial math class filled up this year.

For families, scores carry a direct financial payoff because many schools tie merit aid to test results, which can offset part of the $34,019 families spent on college last year.

What’s Next

The class of 2027 is testing now, and its fall SAT and PSAT/NMSQT results will show whether the math recovery continues.

Families deciding whether to test can check which colleges require the SAT or ACT for 2027 and compare paid and free SAT prep options, including the College Board’s free Official SAT Practice on Khan Academy.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post SAT Scores Rise For A Second Straight Year As The Test Turns 100 appeared first on The College Investor.

Bill Withers’ publisher sues UMG, Sony, and Kobalt, claiming Olivia Dean’s ‘I’ve Seen It’ copies ‘Just the Two of Us’


Bill Withers‘ publisher is suing UMG, Capitol Records, Sony‘s publishing arm, and Kobalt over an Olivia Dean track.

Mattie Music Group, which does business as Bleunig Music, claims that Dean’s I’ve Seen It copies the melody of Just the Two of Us, the 1981 hit co-written by Withers.

Under its Bleunig Music name, the company is one of three publishers credited on Just the Two of Us, alongside Antisia Music and BMG Ruby Songs. Neither of the other two has joined the case.

The complaint describes Mattie Music Group as “a copyright proprietor” of the composition, and says Withers was signed to it as a songwriter when he co-wrote the song.

The publisher says its representatives reached what they considered the “obvious and inescapable conclusion” that I’ve Seen It copied the Withers track.

The seven-page complaint was filed on Thursday (October 1) in federal court in Los Angeles, under case number 2:26-cv-11383. The filing, obtained by MBW, can be read in full here.

I’ve Seen It is the closing track on Dean’s second album, The Art of Loving, which Capitol released on or about September 26, 2025, according to the complaint.

The filing credits the song to Dean, Bastian Langebaek, and Max Wolfgang.

Neither Dean nor her two co-writers on the track are named as defendants, though the complaint also sues 50 “Doe” defendants and says it will add their real names once known.

Instead, the suit targets the companies behind the recording and the song: Capitol Records, LLC; Universal Music Group, Inc., named in the complaint as a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Los Angeles County; a Sony publishing company named as Sony Publishing (US) LLC, doing business as Sony/ATV Songs LLC; and Kobalt Music Publishing America, Inc., doing business as Songs of Kobalt Music Publishing.

UMG‘s US recorded-music company is ordinarily named in litigation as UMG Recordings, Inc., and Sony‘s US publishing company as Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC.

MBW has contacted Capitol parent UMG, Sony, and Kobalt for comment. None had responded at the time of publication.

The complaint refers to Just the Two of Us as the “Original Work.” It calls Dean‘s song the “Infringing Work,” a term it uses from the middle of the filing onward without expressly defining it.

It states that “Defendants Capitol and UMG distributed and exploited sound recordings of the Infringing Work and Defendants Sony and Kobalt licensed and exploited publishing rights in the Infringing Work.”

“Defendants Capitol and UMG distributed and exploited sound recordings of the Infringing Work and Defendants Sony and Kobalt licensed and exploited publishing rights in the Infringing Work.”

Mattie Music Group‘s complaint

“In early August, 2026, upon listening several times to I’ve Seen It, representatives of Plaintiff came to what they considered to be the obvious and inescapable conclusion that I’ve Seen It copied in large and significant part the Original Work,” the complaint states, “including without limitation repeated copying of the distinctively protectable melody, and clearly infringed Plaintiff’s copyrights in and to the Original Work.”

Mattie Music Group then hired musicologist Alexander Stewart to compare the two songs.

“Dr. Stewart conducted a preliminary musicological comparison and a search for similar prior art and concluded that the works contain substantial similarities in protectable musical expression, including repeated copying of the distinctively protectable melody,” the filing reads.

The complaint argues that the success of Just the Two of Us means Dean and her co-writers could have heard it.

“Because of the Original Work’s extraordinary and sustained commercial dissemination, including its Billboard success, Grammy recognition, decades of radio play, widespread streaming availability, and numerous commercially released cover versions, Olivia Dean, Bastian Langebæk, and Max Wolfgang had a reasonable opportunity to encounter the Original Work before creating I’ve Seen It,” it states.

The Withers publisher goes further, claiming the overlap between the songs would point to copying even without that evidence of exposure.

“Independently of the widespread-dissemination evidence, the number, character, and arrangement of the shared musical features are so striking that they support an inference that the similarities did not result from coincidence, independent creation, or reliance on common musical elements,” the lawsuit reads.

The publisher says it sent written notice to each defendant on or about August 17, 2026, identifying its copyright registration for Just the Two of Us, the accused composition, and the material musical similarities. The 1981 registration certificate was filed with the complaint as a separate exhibit.

“Despite receiving notice, Defendants continued reproducing, distributing, licensing, publicly performing, and commercially exploiting the Infringing Work,” the complaint claims.

“Despite receiving notice, Defendants continued reproducing, distributing, licensing, publicly performing, and commercially exploiting the Infringing Work.”

Mattie Music Group‘s complaint

The publisher alleges that the infringement by Capitol, UMG, Sony, and Kobalt was, and remains, “willful.”

Mattie Music Group seeks its losses plus the profits the defendants made from the alleged infringement, with “the exact sums to be proven at the time of trial.”

Alternatively, it can opt for statutory damages at any point before final judgment – up to USD $150,000 per work if the infringement is found to be willful.

The publisher is also asking the court to permanently bar the defendants from further infringing its copyright in the Withers song, and to award interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees. It further says it is entitled to an order authorizing the seizure, impounding, or destruction of infringing copies.

Just the Two of Us was co-written by Withers, who died in 2020, with Ralph MacDonald and William Salter. According to the complaint, a recording featuring jazz saxophonist Grover Washington Jr. and lead vocals by Withers was released as a single in February 1981.

The filing states that the song reached No. 2 on the Billboard Hot 100 and won the Grammy for Best R&B Song.

Dean won the Grammy for Best New Artist in February 2026, and she was among UMG’s top sellers in Q4 2025.

In April 2026, co-writer Langebaek signed a global deal covering his future works with Sony Music Publishing UK and joint venture Second Songs, having previously been signed to Universal Music Publishing Group. Wolfgang is signed to Kobalt worldwide.

The complaint does not set out which publisher administers each writer’s share of I’ve Seen It. Langebaek‘s Sony deal was announced more than six months after the album’s release and covers works written from that point on.

Copyright claims pitting one hit against another have been tested in US courts before.

In June 2025, the US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Structured Asset Sales, which claimed that Ed Sheeran‘s Thinking Out Loud copied Marvin Gaye‘s Let’s Get It On, leaving lower-court wins for Sheeran, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music Publishing in place. A separate Structured Asset Sales claim, built on the sound recording rather than the sheet music, was left untouched by that ruling.Music Business Worldwide