Home Blog

Anthropic To Partner With UK FCA On Artificial Intelligence (AI) Focused Sandbox


The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has shared that it will work with top-tier AI firm Anthropic on its “Supercharged Sandbox,” an environment where firms can test AI products and models geared towards financial services. The FCA stated that all accepted entities will gain access to Claude Code and Claude Cowork.

The AI sandbox is already working with NVIDIA and NayaOne. The relationship with NVIDIA allows access to accelerated computing infrastructure and NVIDIA AI Enterprise software to support the development and testing of AI use cases.

The 21 firms accepted into the second group include: Scottish Widows; Money Advice Trust; TrueLayer; calQrisk; Merx Digital Solutions Ltd (SmartDrops); Aegis Trace; Sardine AI Corp; Zquas; Trustie Labs; Welleness; IntelXview Ltd; RMI Agentic; Ubyx, partnering with Amazon; Deepflow; FSCom; GAI Labs; Condukt; Kaption; and Relace.

The FCA highlighted several goals of the AI Sandbox:

  • enable safer agent-led payments and commerce
  • detect fraud and economic crime more effectively
  • strengthen AI governance and accountability
  • widen access to financial services for vulnerable and underserved consumers
  • streamline compliance and business automation

This is the second group to enter the sandbox.

Jessica Rusu, chief data, intelligence and information officer at the FCA, said partnering with Anthropic will accelerate innovation.

The FCA has also launched a new Agentic Academy, a 10-week specialist AI program for approved firms.

AI is already widely in use in the financial services industry. It is estimated that around 75% of all UK financial services firms use AI and are growing quickly.



Should You Invest $1,000 in VOO in 2026? (Hint: History Says Yes.)


If you’re looking to invest $1,000 in the stock market, it’s hard not to like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO +0.83%). The exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracks the S&P 500, a bucket of 500 prominent U.S. companies. On top of that, you can invest as little as a dollar, the fund charges very low fees, and Vanguard is an iconic and trusted name in the investment community.

Unfortunately, reading the news headlines is stressful these days. People are tossing around frightening words like “recession” or “bubble.” Naturally, the fear of losing money can be paralyzing. But history suggests that investing in VOO will likely work out well for you, especially if you have time and patience.

Image source: Getty Images.

Why the S&P 500 wins over time

The S&P 500 index is famous for a reason: It might be the most proven wealth-building machine humankind has ever seen. The index is an evolving basket of America’s best companies. It weights companies by market cap, so the better a stock performs, the larger it becomes in the index. The index has generated an annualized return of 10.33% since 1957. In other words, your money would double about every seven years.

Of course, that’s annualized, so it smooths out the spikes and dips, and to be clear, it’s not always a smooth ride. The stock market is a collective of human emotions, so things can go to extremes — in both directions, now and then. There have been outright market crashes throughout history, including the Great Depression in 1929 and the COVID-19 pandemic nearly a century later.

History shows that time beats timing

Investing right before the market plunges might be an investor’s worst nightmare. However, history shows that time and patience can overcome even the worst timing. Data compiled by BlackRock shows that investors buying into the U.S. stock market right before the worst drawdowns in modern history have eventually made money, every single time.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(0.83%) $5.66

Current Price

$687.87

For example, investing right before the stock market tumbled 86% during the Great Depression still produced a 46% return after 20 years. That’s the worst scenario on record. If you invested just before the market fell 34% during the Black Monday market crash in 1987, you would have recovered after a single year. You would have made 68% after five years, and 338% after a decade.

That doesn’t mean that the market will always recover. That’s the inherent risk that’s part of investing, the cost of playing the game. Still, a century of history is a pretty good indicator that, as long as the U.S. economy continues to grow over the long term, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF will likely continue to deliver for your portfolio. It just might take some time.

MBA vs PGDM in Advanced Business Administration | Best Business management Course | In Kerala



In this video, we explore the key differences between Advanced Business Administration Programs and traditional management programs. Learn why advanced programs offer a deeper, more comprehensive approach to leadership, strategy, and organizational success. We dive into the benefits of cutting-edge coursework, modern business practices, and how these programs better prepare professionals for the evolving demands of the global business landscape. Whether you’re considering advancing your career or want to understand the growing need for sophisticated management skills, this video will provide valuable insights into why an advanced business administration program might be the right choice for your future.

Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more insightful content on business education!

source

Guide To Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF)


Key Points

  • TEPSLF lets payments made on Graduated, Extended, and certain Consolidation repayment plans count toward the 120 payments needed for loan forgiveness — plans that don’t qualify for regular PSLF.
  • The catch: the amount you paid 12 months before applying and your last payment before applying must each be at least as much as you would have paid on an income-driven repayment (IDR) plan.
  • TEPSLF is funded with a limited congressional appropriation and awarded first-come, first-served.

Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF) is a big deal for a lot of borrowers, especially as they approach 120 eligible PSLF payments.

Here’s the problem we keep hearing about: borrowers log into StudentAid.gov, see their payment count hit 120, and assume forgiveness is coming. Then they get denied. What they didn’t realize is that some of their payments only count under TEPSLF, not regular PSLF, and TEPSLF has an extra requirement most people have never heard of: the final 12 payment rule.

If you spent years on a Graduated or Extended repayment plan before switching to an income-driven plan, this article is for you. Here’s how TEPSLF works, why your StudentAid.gov payment count can be misleading, and how to make sure the last 12 months of your payments don’t disqualify you.

Table of Contents

Why Was/Is PSLF So Hard to Qualify For?
What Is Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF)?
Where Did Temporary Expanded PSLF Come From?
Who Is Eligible? Part 1: Type of Repayment Plan
Who Is Eligible? Part II: Procedure
What Kinds of Loans Are Eligible?
How To Apply For TEPSLF
What About Taxes?
Does This Actually Work for Anyone?
What Else Is Going on with PSLF?

What Is Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF)?

Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness is a companion program to Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) that Congress created in 2018 for borrowers who did everything right for PSLF (right loans, right employer, 120 payments) except they were on the wrong repayment plan.

Regular PSLF only counts payments made under income-driven repayment plans (or the 10-Year Standard plan). TEPSLF expands that to include payments made under:

  • The Graduated Repayment Plan
  • The Extended Repayment Plan
  • The Consolidation Standard Repayment Plan
  • The Consolidation Graduated Repayment Plan

Everything else about PSLF still applies: you need Direct Loans, full-time employment with a qualifying employer (government or eligible nonprofit), and 120 payments made after October 1, 2007.

Here’s a quick infographic to help you understand the differences between PSLF, TEPSLF, and the special Biden PSLF Waiver:

TEPSLF vs. PSLF vs. PSLF Waiver Inforgraphic

Where Did Temporary Expanded PSLF Come From?

When the first PSLF borrowers became eligible for forgiveness in 2017, the results were ugly — only about 2% of applicants were approved. One of the biggest reasons for denial was being on the wrong repayment plan, often because a loan servicer steered the borrower into it.

Under pressure from Congress, lawmakers included $350 million for an expanded version of PSLF in the 2018 budget deal (the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018). Congress added another $350 million in the fiscal year 2019 appropriations, plus $50 million each in 2020 and 2021 — roughly $800 million total, available until expended.

That’s why it’s called “temporary”: the money is a fixed pot, awarded first-come, first-served. The Department of Education hasn’t announced that funds are exhausted, but there’s no public tracker of what’s left. If you think you qualify, don’t sit on it.

Why TEPSLF Is Suddenly Relevant Again

For a few years, TEPSLF faded into the background. The limited PSLF waiver (2021–2022) and the one-time IDR account adjustment retroactively fixed most “wrong plan” payment histories, so fewer borrowers needed it.

But in 2026, we’re seeing a new wave of borrowers crossing 120 total payments — many with stretches of Graduated or Extended plan payments in their history that only count through TEPSLF. At the same time, PSLF tracking moved from MOHELA to StudentAid.gov, where the payment tracker shows one combined count for PSLF and TEPSLF.

The result: borrowers see 120 payments in their dashboard, expect automatic forgiveness, and instead get a denial — usually because of the final 12 payment rule below.

The Final 12 Payment Rule (Read This Twice)

This is the requirement that’s catching people. To qualify for TEPSLF, the Department of Education checks the amount of two specific payments:

  1. The payment you made 12 months before applying for TEPSLF, and
  2. The last payment you made before applying

Both of these payments must be at least as much as you would have paid under an income-driven repayment plan at the time.

In practice, treat this as: your final 12 months of payments need to be at IDR levels. The Department checks those two bookend payments, but you generally can’t know in advance exactly which billing cycle will be evaluated as “12 months prior” — so the safe play is making sure every payment in your final year clears the IDR bar.

Why People Fail This Test

Graduated and Extended plans exist to lower your monthly payment. Early Graduated plan payments in particular can be far below what an IDR plan would charge. So the exact plans that make you TEPSLF-eligible are also the plans most likely to fail the 12-month test if you’re still on one when you apply.

How To Pass It

  • Switch to an income-driven repayment plan for your final year. This is the cleanest solution. If you’re on IBR (or the new RAP plan, which launched July 1, 2026) for the last 12 months before you apply, you satisfy the rule automatically.
  • Or verify your payment amounts. Ask your servicer what your calculated IDR payment would be, estimate it with Loan Simulator on StudentAid.gov, or use our student loan calculator. If your current payments are at or above that number, you’re fine. If they’re close, round up — a payment that’s even a dollar short can trigger a denial.
  • Don’t apply the month you hit 120 if your recent payments were too low. A denial here isn’t permanent. You can keep working, make 12 months of IDR-level payments, and reapply — those extra payments count.

Why Your StudentAid.gov Count Is Confusing

Since PSLF servicing moved from MOHELA to StudentAid.gov, your payment progress lives in the PSLF tracker in your StudentAid.gov dashboard. Two things about it confuse borrowers:

1. The count combines PSLF and TEPSLF. Because the PSLF form and TEPSLF request were merged into a single application years ago, the tracker doesn’t clearly separate “these months qualify for regular PSLF” from “these months only qualify if you meet TEPSLF’s extra requirements.” Months you spent on a Graduated or Extended plan can show up in your count — but they only actually pay off if you clear the final 12 payment rule and TEPSLF funding is still available.

2. “Eligible” is not “qualifying.” The tracker also distinguishes months where your loan and plan were eligible but your employment isn’t certified yet. Until you submit a PSLF form covering those months, they don’t count toward 120.

The practical takeaway: if any part of your repayment history was spent on a Graduated, Extended, or Consolidation Standard/Graduated plan, don’t treat “120” in the tracker as a finish line. Check what your last 12 months of payments look like first.

Who Is Eligible For TEPSLF?

To recap, you must meet all of these:

  • Direct Loans only.
    FFEL loans, Perkins loans, and Parent PLUS loans don’t qualify. (Consolidating into a Direct Consolidation Loan can help going forward, but check how consolidation affects your payment count before you do it.)
  • 120 qualifying payments made after October 1, 2007, each made no more than 15 days late, while employed full-time by a qualifying employer.
  • Qualifying employment, certified via the PSLF form, including at the time you apply and when forgiveness is granted.
  • The final 12 payment rule, covered above.

How To Apply For TEPSLF

There is no separate TEPSLF application anymore. You use the same form as PSLF — the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) & Temporary Expanded PSLF (TEPSLF) Certification & Application — ideally through the PSLF Help Tool at StudentAid.gov. If you’re working through the broader process, see our PSLF strategy guide.

When you’re denied PSLF solely because of your repayment plan, you’re automatically considered for TEPSLF. The servicer may follow up asking for income information to verify the 12-month payment test. (The old process of emailing a reconsideration request to FedLoan Servicing is long gone — if you see that advice anywhere, it’s outdated.)

Processing times vary, and the PSLF system has worked through repeated backlogs since the MOHELA transition. Expect months, not weeks, and keep certified copies of everything.

What About Taxes?

Forgiveness under PSLF and TEPSLF is not taxable income at the federal level. A small number of states treat forgiven debt differently, so check which states tax student loan forgiveness — but for most borrowers, the forgiven balance is tax-free.

What Else Is Going on with PSLF?

TEPSLF isn’t the only ting happening with student loans. A few 2026 developments matter for anyone in this situation:

  • RAP launched July 1, 2026. The Repayment Assistance Plan, created by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is a new income-driven plan that qualifies for PSLF — and satisfies the TEPSLF 12-month test if you’re enrolled for your final year. Borrowers can now apply for RAP online at StudentAid.gov. Going forward, IBR and RAP are the qualifying IDR plans, with PAYE and ICR phasing out by 2028.
  • The SAVE plan is gone. After the courts struck down SAVE, remaining enrollees are being moved to other plans in 2026. Time spent in the SAVE litigation forbearance didn’t count toward PSLF — which is pushing more borrowers to look at PSLF buyback and TEPSLF to fill gaps.
  • The new employer eligibility rule was blocked in court. The Department finalized a rule in October 2025 allowing it to exclude employers found to have a “substantial illegal purpose,” but a federal judge vacated it on June 30, 2026 — hours before its effective date. The existing qualifying-employer definition remains in effect, though the Department could appeal.
  • PSLF buyback is an alternative for some. If your issue is non-qualifying months (forbearance, deferment) rather than a non-qualifying plan, PSLF buyback — not TEPSLF — is likely your path.

TEPSLF FAQ

Is TEPSLF still available in 2026?

Yes. Congress appropriated roughly $800 million total, available until expended on a first-come, first-served basis. The Department of Education hasn’t announced that funding has run out, but it doesn’t publish a running balance either — so apply as soon as you’re eligible.

Do I need to file a separate TEPSLF application?

No. The PSLF and TEPSLF applications were combined into one form. If you’re denied PSLF because of your repayment plan, you’re automatically considered for TEPSLF.

StudentAid.gov shows I have 120 qualifying payments. Why haven’t my loans been forgiven?

A few possibilities. If some of your 120 months were on a Graduated, Extended, or Consolidation Standard/Graduated plan, those months only count through TEPSLF — which means you also have to pass the final 12 payment rule. Processing backlogs are another common reason. And if any months show as “eligible” rather than “qualifying,” you still need to certify employment for those periods.

What exactly is the final 12 payment rule?

The amount you paid 12 months before applying for TEPSLF, and the last payment you made before applying, must each be at least as much as you would have paid under an income-driven repayment plan. The simplest way to guarantee you pass: spend your final 12 months on an IDR plan.

How do I find out what my IDR payment amount would have been?

Ask your loan servicer directly, use Loan Simulator at StudentAid.gov, or estimate it with our student loan calculator. If you’re paying an amount close to the IDR figure, round up to be safe.

I was denied TEPSLF because my recent payments were too low. Am I out of options?

No. The denial isn’t permanent. Keep working for a qualifying employer, make the next 12 months of payments at or above your IDR amount (switching to an IDR plan is the easiest way), then reapply.

Do FFEL, Perkins, or Parent PLUS loans qualify for TEPSLF?

No. Only Direct Loans qualify. FFEL and Perkins borrowers can consolidate into a Direct Consolidation Loan to become eligible going forward, but talk through the payment-count implications first. Parent PLUS loans don’t qualify for TEPSLF even after consolidation.

Is TEPSLF forgiveness taxable?

Not federally. A few states may tax forgiven debt, so check your state’s treatment.

Should I use TEPSLF or PSLF buyback?

They solve different problems. TEPSLF fixes months where you paid on the wrong repayment plan. PSLF buyback fixes months where you made no qualifying payment at all — like time in forbearance or deferment. Some borrowers with SAVE forbearance gaps plus old Graduated/Extended plan history may need to think through both — here’s which payments and periods count toward PSLF and buyback.

How long does TEPSLF processing take?

Longer than it should. Since PSLF processing moved from MOHELA to the Department of Education, backlogs have been common — plan on several months and keep records of your form submissions.

Editor: Clint Proctor

Reviewed by: Chris Muller

The post Guide To Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness (TEPSLF) appeared first on The College Investor.

US musicians union urges court to reject Universal and Warner bid to dismiss lawsuit over Suno and Udio deals


The American Federation of Musicians (AFM) has urged a New York federal court to let its lawsuit against Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group proceed, rejecting the majors’ effort to dismiss the case over their AI licensing deals with Suno and Udio.

The union says the deals triggered the “new use” provision of its collective bargaining agreement with Universal and Warner, which it argues requires the labels to compensate members whose recordings were licensed to the AI companies.

It argues that this “new use” provision is contained within Article 21(a) of the Sound Recording Labor Agreement (SRLA) – something the two major music companies dispute.

At issue is whether the musicians who performed on those recordings are owed a share of the revenue flowing from the majors’ settlements and licenses with Suno and Udio.

In its response to the labels’ dismissal bids, filed on Friday (July 17) the AFM told Judge Edgardo Ramos that Article 21(a) of the Sound Recording Labor Agreement (SRLA) “is ambiguous and susceptible to more than a single interpretation.”

The union argued in the letter, which you can read here, that Article 21(a) imposes “an independent, mandatory payment obligation” – the company “shall pay” – and that any reference to other AFM agreements goes to how much is owed, not whether payment is due.

The provision applies to “all new uses,” the union said, “not simply those with a rate already established in another AFM agreement,” and it called the contrary reading “nonsensical.”

“Past practice confirms this: For example, when companies first licensed music for video games, no AFM agreement had set a rate for that use, yet the parties treated it as a new use for both notification and payment purposes.”

American Federation of Musicians 

“Past practice confirms this: For example, when companies first licensed music for video games, no AFM agreement had set a rate for that use, yet the parties treated it as a new use for both notification and payment purposes,” the AFM wrote.

Even if Article 21(a) requires that a rate already exist, the union argued, likely AI uses fall under rates the SRLA already sets.

“Since the SRLA sets rates for streaming, an AI recording on a streaming platform would be covered,” the AFM said.

“Other likely AI uses – video games, sampling, commercials – are similarly subject to express SRLA rates.”

The union’s response follows separate bids by Universal and Warner to have the case thrown out, each filed as a letter requesting a pre-motion conference ahead of a motion to dismiss.

In its July 7 letter, UMG argued that Article 21(a) “is a rate conversion provision, not an open-ended royalty provision,” covering only new uses for which another AFM agreement already sets a rate.

Warner, in a letter filed on July 10, argued that the union brought the lawsuit “in an improper attempt to place a judicial thumb on the negotiation scales,” as previously reported by MBW.

The company argued that Article 21 “merely points to other agreements” and “does not itself confer legal rights,” and that because no AFM agreement covers AI licensing, the provision “has nothing to point to, and there is no entitlement to payment.”

Both majors also asked the court to pause discovery while their challenges are decided, a request the AFM opposed, telling the court that “a stay of discovery is the exception and not the rule in this District.”

The AFM also said in a separate letter that it would amend its complaint to name Warner Records, Inc. as the defendant rather than Warner Music Group Corp., after Warner argued that the parent company was not a proper party.

The AFM sued Universal and Warner in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on June 5.

Its complaint alleges that the two companies breached the SRLA by licensing recordings made by its members to Suno and Udio without compensation or credit.

In that complaint, the union stated that the “use of sound recordings in generative AI software models is not a purpose covered by the SRLA” – a line Warner has cited as a concession that AFM members have no claim.

Universal settled its copyright case against Udio in late October 2025, announcing a compensatory settlement and a license agreement for a new AI music platform.

Warner reached its own settlement and licensing deal with Udio in mid-November 2025, and days later became the first major to settle its copyright case with Suno, with the AI company acquiring Warner’s Songkick platform as part of that deal.

Sony Music, which has not settled with either AI company, is not a party to the AFM case.

The three majors first sued Suno and Udio in 2024, in a case coordinated by the RIAA that alleged “mass infringement” of copyright.

The AFM and the labels are negotiating the next SRLA, with AI at the center of the talks.

Judge Ramos has yet to rule on whether to let the majors move to dismiss or to pause discovery.Music Business Worldwide

Walmart: VIZIO 65-Inch Quantum 4K QLED TV on Sale for $196.80


Walmart: VIZIO 65-Inch Quantum 4K QLED TV on Sale for $196.80

Walmart is offering the VIZIO 65″ Quantum 4K QLED HDR Smart TV (VQD65M-08) for $196.80, down from its regular price of $298.00. That’s a savings of over $100 and one of the best prices we’ve seen on a 65-inch QLED TV.

The TV features a 4K UHD resolution, Quantum Dot (QLED) technology, HDR support with Dolby Vision, built-in VIZIO OS with popular streaming apps, Wi-Fi connectivity, and access to free channels through WatchFree+.

Highlights

  • Price: $196.80 (was $298.00)
  • 65-inch 4K UHD display
  • Quantum Dot (QLED) technology
  • Dolby Vision HDR support
  • Built-in VIZIO OS with streaming apps
  • Free shipping

BUY NOW

Guru’s Wrap-up

At under $200, this is an excellent value if you’re shopping for a large TV on a budget. While it won’t compete with premium OLED or Mini-LED models, it’s hard to beat a 65-inch QLED TV at this price.

Republicans tout Federal Home Loan Banks’ liquidity role



  • Key insight: Republicans highlighted the Federal Home Loan Banks’ role as a reliable liquidity backstop for member institutions.
  • What’s at stake: Discussion drafts considered at a House Financial Services Committee hearing would ease capital rules for the banks and designate FHLB advances as “core” deposits.
  • Forward look: The discussion drafts set the stage for potential changes down the line, but have dim prospects for passage in the 119th Congress. 

WASHINGTON — House Financial Services Committee Republicans praised the Federal Home Loan Banks’ role as a provider of liquidity, putting forward a number of discussion drafts of legislation that would bolster the system’s ability to do so. 

Processing Content

“For decades, the federal home loan bank system has served as a reliable source of liquidity,” said Rep. William Timmons, R-S.C. “By ensuring these institutions have dependable access to funding, the system has helped support local lending and expand access to credit for families, businesses, and communities. Much of this important work has taken place by making it easy to overlook the critical role the system plays in maintaining the strength and stability of our financial system.” 

At a subcommittee meeting in the House Financial Services Committee to consider reform to the FHLBanks, Republican lawmakers asked both how to bolster the banks’ role as a lender and to ease the way for more housing liquidity. 

“The Federal Home Loan Banks serve important and related dual roles,” said Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., chairman of the subcommittee on housing. “They provide short-term liquidity to member institutions that can be used to provide more loans at the local level, and they provide direct assistance through grants in the Affordable Housing Program to communities across the country.” 

Read more:

The committee posted a number of discussion drafts of potential legislation ahead of the hearing, including one bill that would classify FHLB advances as “core” deposits. 
Those discussion drafts, however, have little chance of being developed into formal legislation that could be enacted before the end of the 119th Congress, after which time control of either chamber could potentially change hands after this fall’s midterm elections. Even so, they could serve as a starting point for future legislation, particularly if Congress decides to revisit housing affordability in the wake of the bipartisan inroads made by the housing package that recently passed into law. 

During the Biden administration, the Federal Housing Finance Agency released a report that outlined a range of changes for the FHLB system, many of which were aimed at fulfilling the system’s original role of helping Americans afford homes. The liquidity role came later and has periodically  sparked criticism. 

A few Democrats touched on those dynamics during the hearing. Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., asked witnesses at the hearing whether the FHLBs have any disincentive to lend to a failing bank, especially when the costs of those advances might ultimately be borne by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 

“I do feel like there’s a problem of moral hazard here,” he said. “It could be the case that the cure is worse than the disease.” 



Billionaire Mike Bloomberg warns Trump’s AI ownership plan would make ‘George Orwell blush’



The initial deal behind the American AI boom seems to be: private investors would help finance it, taking on the risk; private companies would initially own the benefits of the breakthroughs, then distribute them t​​o public markets later; and the government would help regulate the industry after the fact. In China, by contrast, the deal is that companies still have to compete for investment and customers, while the government provides the compute.

That bargain is showing signs of collapse — on the U.S. side. As costs soar, Chinese competitors gain ground and Washington increasingly considers AI to be a national-security asset, President Donald Trump is considering taking a governmental stake into AI companies. While both the populist left and the right, and the AI companies themselves, have lauded the proposal, one person isn’t cheering: Billionaire Michael Bloomberg.  

In an opinion column published in Bloomberg Opinion on Monday, the media company’s founder attacked the proposal, arguing that it would turn Washington from an industry regulator into an investor with incentives for profit, leading to “cronyism.” 

“Somewhere, Karl Marx is smiling,” Bloomberg wrote of the centrally planned economy on offer, while the propaganda possibilities would “make George Orwell blush.”

The former New York City mayor argued that Americans do not need their governments to own AI companies in order to share in the technology’s gains. For one, once they go public, they could just buy shares. But also, consumers and businesses already benefit from AI through fraud detection, medical research, bookkeeping and other helpful applications, he wrote, while the resulting economic growth could eventually generate more tax revenue for public services.

If AI companies are failing to contribute enough to the public, Bloomberg argued, Washington should fix the tax code to serve the public; not buy them. Ultimately, he predicted, federal shareholders will likely lead to corruption as the market will transform into a “smoke-filled backroom.”

Subscribe to Fortune Gulf Brief. Every Tuesday, this new newsletter delivers clear-eyed, authoritative intelligence on the deals, decisions, policies, and power shifts shaping one of the world’s most consequential regions, written for the people who need to act on it. Sign up here.

Do you need alternative investments in your mutual fund portfolio?



Do you need alternative investments in your mutual fund portfolio?

In this exclusive episode featuring Edelweiss Mutual Fund’s MD & CEO Mrs Radhika Gupta, we deep-dive into the needs and benefits of alternative investments in your mutual fund portfolio. People can invest in mutual funds with very low amounts. There are also multiple categories of mutual funds which cater to multiple financial needs. However, mutual funds are not very flexible. However, there is no use of derivatives in mutual funds. Now, SIF falls in the middle of mutual funds and AIFs. It brings the advantages of mutual funds and the flexibility of AIFs. Don’t chase narratives. Understand your needs as finance is personal. Have a shopping list and choose funds based on your needs. The Mutual Fund universe is very big and you can’t buy everything. So always invest in mutual funds as per your financial needs.

00:00 Highlights
01:09 Introduction:
03:25 Do you need alternative investments in your portfolio?
07:20 What are SIFs and how do they work?
11:54 What are the risks and returns of SIFs?
15:27 What are the different SIF strategies?
20:53 Does one really need SIFs in their portfolio?
23:47 What should be your time horizon for equity-oriented SIFs?
25:39 Learn about Mrs Radhika Gupta’s investment journey
28:40 How many mutual funds does one need in their portfolio?
29:56 Which AMCs have different investment styles than Edelweiss Mutual Fund?
31:27 How often does Mrs Radhika Gupta check her portfolio?
33:16 Mrs Radhika Gupta recently noted a ‘frothy element’ in the markets. What are its implications on investors?
35:35 What would Mrs Radhika Gupta tell a 25-year-old who is just starting their financial journey today?
36:52 Rapid Fire Round
40:06 Key Learnings

Subscribe to Groww Mutual Fund Channel :

About Groww

Groww is India’s Best Investment App and the Largest Stock Broker.

Find us here:

Android app:
iOS app –
Website –

RA Disclaimer Link –

We also have a Kannada, Tamil, Telugu & a Malayalam channel
Please subscribe here:
👉 Groww Kannada –
👉 Groww Tamil –
👉 Groww Telugu –
👉 Groww Malayalam
👉 Ipo review by Groww –

Follow us on:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Instagram:
LinkedIn:

#groww #mutualfund

Disclaimer: These are not any recommendations for any funds or stocks and are meant only for educational purposes.

If you have any concerns with respect to Groww, please feel free to write to us at support@groww.in or you can call us at +91 9108800000.

source

Everyone Is Talking About Context for AI. Here’s What Most Companies Still Miss.









Everyone Is Talking About Context for AI. Here’s What Most Companies Still Miss. – SPONSOR CONTENT FROM CELONIS




























Skip to content