Home Blog

‘You should not be in this game’: Social media sold credit card points dreams, but left out the debt



There is a genre of content on social media where people sit in front of a camera and read their credit card balances out loud—and not from one card, but all of them. $7,500 on one, $8,900 on another, $10,000 on a third. Then a fourth, a fifth. “Everybody wants an Amex Pink card until they have to pay this,” says another user, alluding to the Rose Gold variant, before flashing a five-figure balance. The total climbs past $30,000, $50,000, sometimes $60,000, and that’s before student loans, car payments, and personal loans. The caption is always some version of “pay off debt with me in 2026.”

Elsewhere on social media, a different kind of creator flashes a metal card, walks through an airport lounge, settles into a lie-flat seat, and tells you this could be yours if you just sign up, with the link in bio.

The credit card influencer industrial complex has never been bigger, or more consequential. At a moment when American credit card debt has hit an all-time high of $1.28 trillion and average APRs have climbed past 21%, a generation of consumers is making financial decisions based on 45-second videos created by people who are paid to get them to apply.

A record high, and rising

Americans’ total credit card balance hit $1.277 trillion as of the fourth quarter of 2025, the highest since the New York Fed began tracking the data in 1999. The average cardholder now carries between $6,500 and $6,800 in revolving debt, well above pre-pandemic levels. According to Bankrate’s 2026 survey, 47% of American cardholders carry a balance from month to month, with the rate climbing to 53% among millennials and Gen Xers. That’s complicated with interest rates: the average APR four years ago was less than 15%. By 2024, it was over 21%, and a growing number of Americans now face rates above 30%. As Fortune reported in January, credit card companies are taking larger interest payments from those who carry a balance and redistribute them as rewards to people who don’t.

Nick Ewen, editor-in-chief of The Points Guy, holds 28 active credit cards. He audits every one when the annual fee posts. His wife carries a handwritten cheat sheet of which authorized-user card to use for which purchase category, updated every three months. When asked which card to get, he recommends a lifestyle audit. But he, a man whose full-time job is monitoring credit cards, has a cheatsheet to stay on top of the perks, and the balances.

“I have never once paid a cent of credit card interest,” he says. “If you are carrying a balance month to month, you should not be in this game.”

“These premium cards, the increased annual fees and all of these new benefits, it takes time to understand them and to utilize them properly,” Ewen says. “You have to be honest with yourself. Are you going to take the time to learn how to use all of them? Because if you don’t, you’re leaving money on the table, and there is most likely a lower fee or a no fee card that would be a better fit.”

Richard Kerr, head of travel at Bilt and a veteran of the points-and-miles space since before Instagram existed, uses an analogy he returns to in every talk he gives. Picture a traffic jam on the 405 outside LAX. Everyone within a mile gets out of their car. You ask all of them to explain the best way to use airline miles.

“Three people are going to know how to answer that question,” Kerr says. “It is such a niche space of how many people fully understand this.”

“I would say 90% of people who ask me what travel card to get, I end up not recommending a travel card for them,” he says. “I’m like, tell me where you’re flying this year. And they’re like, ‘Oh, we might go see grandma in Florida.’ You probably don’t need a travel card. You probably need a shopping or cash back card.”

Kerr has watched the influencer ecosystem grow around credit cards for over a decade. He doesn’t dismiss the influencers outright. But he doesn’t endorse what the ecosystem is producing either. “They’re doing a good job doing what their job is, which is influencing people to make decisions. I just don’t know if encouraging that deep of a rabbit hole behavior is a good thing.”

Kerr got into the points-and-miles world by creating a viral Facebook group about credit card rewards before eventually joining The Points Guy. The Instagram points influencer, he notes, didn’t exist when he started. “It’s really done its job,” he said, “and sold the dream to people who probably don’t need that dream sold to them, and should just be getting a flat 2% cash back card.”

A generation going deeper

A 2026 Bankrate survey found that 34% of Gen Zers have no emergency savings at all. Members of Gen Z are carrying $500 more in credit card debt than millennials did at the same age. And a lot of it is induced by what they see on social media. The problem is so widespread in China that the country last year passed a law requiring any content creator discussing medicine, health, law, finance, or education to prove verified professional credentials before posting or going live.

What the content doesn’t show is the effort it requires: tracking rotating bonus categories across multiple cards, comparing portal prices against direct booking rates, understanding transfer partner valuations, running an honest annual calculation of whether each card’s benefits exceed its fee. Ewen and Kerr do this professionally. The person who signed up for a $695 card after a 45-second video almost certainly does not.

“The average American is not going to do that,” Kerr said, advising most to realize that they just don’t have enough self-control and these cards were not meant for them.

Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree, said the influencer incentive structure makes this worse. “I don’t think a lot of influencers do a good enough job explaining how hard managing points and miles actually is,” he told Fortune. “And I completely understand why they don’t, because it’s in their own interest not to.”

Credit card affiliates earn commissions when a viewer applies through their link. Schulz says the sign-up bonus itself is frequently misunderstood. “People don’t necessarily understand that the sign-up bonus is actually a ‘spend $5,000 in three months and then get the bonus’ bonus,” he said. “People end up getting over their skis, and when you’re talking about 25% APRs, it outweighs the perks in a big hurry if you end up carrying a balance.”

Most luxury travel content, Schulz noted, is funded not by personal spending but by business expenses run through a card. “That’s how a lot of big influencers afford all of this. They’re putting all of their business expenses on credit cards and turning it into first class on Emirates to Dubai. And the average person is like, ‘I just want to go to Disney once a year.’”

“We’ve seen data over the years that say that most people just want a simple card,” Schulz says. “And for most people, the extra effort isn’t really going to move the needle all that much.”

Ewen, Kerr, and Schulz all arrive at the same recommendation for most consumers: a no-annual-fee card with a flat 2% cash back on everything. “Never a wrong way to go,” Kerr says.

How To Get A Student Loan (Federal and Private)


About two-thirds of families borrow student loans to pay for college – but can be confusing on how to get a student loan, especially depending on the type of loan you need.

Whether you need a Federal student loan, or a private student loan, there are certain things you need to know about how to take out a student loan.

While it would be great to cover all your college costs using a combination of savings, help from family members, scholarships, and your personal income, those funds aren’t always going to cut it. Many college-bound students will need to apply for student loans to cover the gap between the cost of education and their limited resources.

This guide explains how to apply for student loans, and how to select the amount to borrow when you take out the loans.

A good starting point: How To Find The Best Student Loan Rates >>

Table of Contents

How to Apply for a Federal Student Loan
Criteria And Requirements For A Federal Student Loan
Fill Out the FAFSA
Review the Aid Offer from Your School
Take Out The Appropriate Student Loan Amount
How to Apply for Private Student Loans
Gather All Your Documents
Compare Rates from a Few Lenders
Apply for Identical Loans from at Least Two Lenders
Take Out The Best Student Loan Offer

How to Apply for a Federal Student Loan

For U.S. citizens applying for educational loans in the U.S., the FAFSA application is the starting point for Federal student loans. Here’s how you apply for Federal student loans.

Criteria And Requirements For A Federal Student Loan

If you’re looking to get a federal student loan here’s the criteria:

  • Have a valid Social Security number.
  • Men must be registered with the selective service. Male students between 18-25 have to register with the selective service to receive loans.
  • Be a citizen or eligible noncitizen. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to receive federal or state funding. Permanent residents with green cards can apply for aid. Immigrants with T-1, battered-immigrant-qualified alien, or refugee status may also be eligible.
  • Have a high school diploma or equivalent, such as a GED or certificate from a homeschooling program.
  • Enroll in an eligible school. Students at unaccredited schools might not qualify for federal aid. Some schools also choose not to receive federal aid.
  • Fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Any high schooler interested in financial aid needs to fill out the FAFSA, a form that asks for your family’s financial information to determine how much you qualify for. Even those with little to no demonstrated need can be eligible for student loans, so officers encourage everyone to apply. Without the FAFSA, you won’t receive any federal loans, scholarships or grants.
  • Be in good standing with federal financial aid. Students can’t be in default on other federal loans or owe money on a federal grant.
  • Maintain a 2.0 GPA. Students need to maintain a 2.0 cumulative GPA or risk losing financial aid until their grades improve.
  • Be at part-time status or more. Students must be considered part-time to be eligible for loans. Each college determines what part-time and full-time status means, so ask your financial aid officer how many credits you’ll need to take.

Fill Out the FAFSA

Applying for Federal student loans starts by filling out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). To fill out the application, you’ll need your information and your parents’ information from tax filing from two years ago (for the 2026-2027 school year, you’ll need the 2025 tax returns), plus information about your parents’ assets, your assets, and other financial details.

Once you submit the FAFSA, your school (or schools of choice if you’re still deciding where to attend) will create a student aid report for you. This report will include information about free aid (such as grants, scholarships, and more). It will also show information about work-study options and, of course, student loans.

In the United States, almost all schools use the FAFSA to issue need-based aid to students. Even if you don’t plan to take out student loans, you should be completing the FAFSA. You may learn that you qualify for grants or extra scholarships from your school of choice based on your financial status.

Some schools may use the CSS Profile, but that’s for financial aid, not student loans.

Review the Aid Offer from Your School

About two weeks after you submit the FAFSA to your school, you can expect to receive an aid offer (most financial aid offers usually arrive between January and March). The offer will include information about all sources of aid including:

  • Scholarships
  • Grants
  • Work-study programs
  • Subsidized student loans
  • Unsubsidized student loans

In general, you want to take all the free money you can get. That means accepting the scholarships and the grants. If you plan to live on campus, you may want to consider taking the work-study offer too.

However, consider work-study as a baseline for your earnings, not a cap. Often, work-study jobs do not pay very well. Side hustles like reffing soccer or basketball, tutoring, waiting tables and tending a bar, or any form of skilled labor typically pay much better.

And, of course, starting a business may be the best way to earn money during college.

The last form of aid will be student loans. These will include subsidized loans, which have a lower interest rate (and interest doesn’t accrue while you’re in school), and unsubsidized loans (where interest starts accruing right away).

Read our full guide to paying for college here >>

Take Out The Appropriate Student Loan Amount

Once you review the offer, you can accept any part of the offer you want. You do not have to take out all the loans. In fact, I recommend borrowing as little as possible to pay for your tuition and other upfront costs. You also have to content with federal student loan borrowing limits, which are very low.

Between savings, frugal living, and working, most undergraduate students can pay for their living expenses without borrowing money.

Student loans aren’t free money. You will have to pay them back. It always makes sense to look for alternatives to borrowing to pay for your education.

It may seem smart to borrow a little extra now, but I advise against that. After college, you may have a salary of $50,000 to $60,000 to start (or even lower in many fields). That sounds like a lot of money, but paying back $50,000+ of student loans on a starter salary is a huge challenge.

Think about your future self, and limit your borrowing today. You might also want to make sure you complete the student loan entrance counseling first so you have a good understanding of the expectations for repayment. You can also use The College Investor’s How Much Student Debt Can You Afford Calculator to see what the future repayment would look like.

Finally, remember that the collateral for student loans is your future earnings!

Collateral For Student Loan Debt | Source: The College Investor

Source: The College Investor

How to Apply for Private Student Loans

In some cases, students in the U.S. may want to apply for private student loans rather than Federal student loans. A few reasons to consider private loans include:

  • You want to attend a non-accredited educational opportunity (such as a coding bootcamp).
  • You plan to take one course at a time (you need at least half-time enrollment to qualify for most Federal programs).
  • You’re not a U.S. citizen, so you don’t qualify for Federal loans.
  • You have a strong income and a strong credit score, so private lenders may offer better rates than the unsubsidized Federal loans.
  • You’re refinancing your existing student loans to a private lender with a substantially lower interest rate.

If one of these situations applies to you, then follow these steps below to apply for private student loans.

Gather All Your Documents

When you apply for any loan, you’ll need documents to prove your income, credit score, and whether you have assets. In general, you’ll need the following:

  • Tax returns or W-2 forms from the previous years.
  • Employment pay stubs.
  • Personal identification information (driver’s license, etc.).
  • Bank statements.
  • If you’re applying for private loans while attending school, you’ll need information about the cost of attending.
  • If you have a cosigner, you’ll need their information too.
  • Loan documents for existing student loans (if refinancing).

Compare Rates from a Few Lenders

Once you’ve gathered up the information, start doing some loan shopping. We recommend the lenders on our Best Places To Find Private Student Loans list.

Many lenders allow you to preview rates without having a hard credit pull. You can also “shop” for rates using sites like Credible.

Comparing rates using an aggregation site (like Credible) will help you get a feel for the interest rates and terms available to you.

Apply for Identical Loans from at Least Two Lenders

After unofficially comparing rates, apply for loans from at least two lenders. That way you can pick the best possible interest rate. The underwriting and approval process can take anywhere from a few hours to a few weeks depending on the lender.

Remember to also compare key features like loan repayment terms, loan discharge options (like disability discharge), and more.

Take Out The Best Student Loan Offer

When you have a few loan offers in hand, compare them to see which loan is the best for you. Then sign the loan documents and move forward with your education or paying off your loans.

If you have a cosigner, you may also want to get a term life insurance policy to protect your cosigner should anything happen to you. A term life insurance policy for the loan balance (when you’re a young adult) can be very inexpensive.

Remember, some private student loans require immediate payments, so make sure you double-check your lender and their repayment plans before you commit.

Editor: Clint Proctor

Reviewed by: Colin Graves

The post How To Get A Student Loan (Federal and Private) appeared first on The College Investor.

Chase Sapphire Preferred 10% Anniversary Bonus Going Away


Chase Sapphire Preferred 10% Anniversary Bonus Going Away

The Chase Sapphire Preferred card offers a 10% anniversary points bonus. Each account anniversary year, you’ll earn bonus points that equal 10% of your total spend in points from purchases made with your credit card during the previous account anniversary year at a rate of 1 point for each $1 spent.

This bonus is just based on the total spend for the anniversary year, and not the points you have earned during those 12 months. So if you spend $50,000, you will receive an anniversary bonus of 5,000 points. 

It’s just an extra 0.1X on all your spend so it’s not a huge bonus. But it’s apparently big enough for Chase to take it away. Some Chase Sapphire Preferred cardholders are now seeing the following message in their app:

“The Anniversary Bonus is retiring. You will continue to earn 10% of your spend through 10/1/26.”

This is showing under Rewards Activity, but I don’t see it in my account. Maybe they jumped the gun on publishing it, and they removed it. Or maybe it’s only showing for some people.

Update: I reached out to Chase for comment and they said the following via email:

“This update appeared early in our app. The benefit will be discontinued as we regularly evaluate and update our benefits based on cardmember feedback and what benefits resonate most. We look forward to sharing additional updates to the Sapphire Preferred card in the near term.”

HT: BillardMcLarry

Is The Trade Desk Stock Finally a Buy? Or Is Its Slide Justified?


Shares of digital advertising specialist The Trade Desk (TTD 2.15%) tumbled on Friday morning after the company reported its first-quarter results late Thursday. The sell-off added to what has already been a brutal stretch for the growth stock, which is now down more than 40% year to date.

So is the steep pullback finally a chance to get into a name once viewed as a high-quality way to play the shift of advertising dollars to the open internet? Or is the stock’s recent beating justified?

Despite the stock’s meaningful decline this year, I’ll be staying on the sidelines — at least for now.

Image source: Getty Images.

A growth story losing steam

The Trade Desk’s first-quarter report wasn’t necessarily bad. The ad-tech company posted revenue of $689 million during the period, up 12% year over year, living up to the company’s guidance for revenue of “at least” $678 million. Additionally, customer retention remained above 95%, as it has for over a decade. And free cash flow stayed healthy, at $276 million — 40% of revenue.

But when viewed in the context of the type of growth the Trade Desk shareholders are accustomed to, it’s pretty disappointing.

Revenue grew 25% in the first quarter of 2025. By the fourth quarter, the growth rate had slipped to 14%. The first-quarter 2026 figure of 12% marks yet another step lower. And profitability went the wrong way, too. Non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share fell to $0.28 from $0.33 a year earlier, with adjusted EBITDA margins compressing meaningfully versus the year-ago period.

This is the kind of trend that should give investors pause. After all, even at much lower stock prices, investors are still paying for growth, given the stock’s valuation. Shares trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of 26.

The Trade Desk Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-2.15%) $-0.51

Current Price

$22.98

A tough macroeconomic backdrop and weak guidance

But here’s my main concern.

During The Trade Desk’s first-quarter earnings call, CEO Jeff Green indicated that the current macroeconomic environment is weighing on its business.

“The macro environment has certainly become more complex in 2026,” Green said. “Geopolitical tensions have increased. All advertisers and agencies are navigating a rapidly evolving landscape. Global economic pressures, wars, and tariffs have created an environment that is harder for some brands and some brand categories to grow.”

That backdrop helps frame management’s softer outlook for the second quarter.

The Trade Desk guided for second-quarter revenue of at least $750 million — an outlook implying year-over-year growth of just about 8%. This would be yet another notable step down from the 12% growth posted in Q1.

During the earnings call, management cited the macroeconomic environment as one of the factors behind the company’s lower growth rates in 2026. But here’s the issue. There’s no guarantee that the global economy will improve anytime soon, and you can’t rule out things getting worse before they get better. Tariff policies remain unsettled, and geopolitical tensions could take years to ease. Further, new economic issues could arise.

Sure, The Trade Desk’s stock isn’t priced like it was a year ago. Shares are down sharply from their 52-week high of $91.45, and the stock’s forward price-to-earnings ratio has compressed substantially to just 19. But cheaper isn’t the same as cheap enough — not when revenue growth has dropped from the mid-20s to low double digits and is staring down a backdrop that may take a while to improve (or could even get worse).

I’d rather put my money to work in a business growing at strong rates relative to its valuation — one that doesn’t need a meaningful improvement in the macro environment to deliver. Until The Trade Desk’s growth shows signs of reaccelerating, or the stock comes down even further to compensate for these risks, I’m comfortable watching from the sidelines.

Title agent accused of rebranding to evade fraud penalty


First American Title Insurance Co. is suing a former agent to recover sums owed after her firm erroneously wired funds, claiming she changed her business’ name to evade more than $600,000 in penalties.

Processing Content

In a lawsuit filed in Eastern District Court of New York, First American accused Patricia Stein-Oliva, principal of Consumer Direct Title Agency, of rebranding to its current name in an effort to avoid likely future financial obligations, just as judges were determining an appropriate penalty after ruling against her in an earlier civil suit.  

Stein-Oliva formerly owned and headed Long Island, New York-based Liberty National Title Agency, which entered into an agreement to become a policy issuer for First American in 2012. In the current lawsuit, Liberty, two Consumer Direct entities in New York and Florida and Stein-Oliva are all listed as defendants. 

“This action seeks to unwind that fraudulent scheme and to hold each defendant – each a mere alter ego of Liberty – jointly responsible,” First American attorneys wrote, referring to the lawsuit. 

“Defendants have abused the corporate form to insulate Liberty and its principal from satisfying the judgment they indisputably owe.”

The sequence of events

In a June 2020 New York residential transaction where Liberty was assigned as closing and settlement agent, the firm received a faxed statement indicating a mortgage held by the Department of Housing and Urban Development had been paid off. Instructions directed Liberty to wire payoff funds to a Comerica Bank account belonging to FF Operations. 

Despite public HUD and servicer policies stating wire funds were not acceptable for payoffs, Liberty sent more than $371,000 held in client escrow to what turned out to be a fraudulent account, failing to confirm the validity of the instructions with any of the transaction’s other associated parties, attorneys wrote. Non-verification constituted a violation of Liberty’s agreement and underwriting requirements with First American.

The Southern California-based title company was eventually forced to cover the full amount fraudulently wired to comply with terms of its insurance policy after Stein-Oliva refused to pay from her own business funds, despite terms of their contract.

A civil suit lodged by the title company two years later eventually led to a court decision in 2024 in favor of First American. The judge’s ruling found Stein-Oliva’s company liable for $611,070, a total that included compensatory damages and related legal fees. 

Upon collection attempt, Stein-Oliva declared under oath that Liberty ceased operations in December 2024 and no longer owned any assets.

“Investigation into Liberty’s activities revealed that it had in fact not ceased operations, as Stein‑Oliva had falsely affirmed, and had instead simply changed its name to avoid satisfaction of the judgment,” First American’s lawyers stated in the legal filing.

Further investigation uncovered that in August 2024 — while determination of the amount  of monetary damages owed was underway — Stein-Oliva had formed Consumer Direct Title Agency in New York. Findings also showed Liberty continued operating under its own name as a foreign corporation in Florida. 

In January 2025, immediately after financial damages were awarded, Liberty withdrew from Florida, replaced by a newly incorporated Consumer Direct Title Agency, with Stein-Oliva listed as president. Headquarters of the new title firm corresponded to its New York counterpart, with the address of both at the same Melville, New York location previously belonging to Liberty. 

“Stein‑Oliva — the sole principal of both Liberty and the Consumer Direct entities — exercised exclusive dominion and control over each entity, orchestrated the restructuring and rebranding of the business, and deployed the Consumer Direct entities as a mere continuation and alter ego of Liberty to evade satisfaction of the judgment,” the lawsuit claimed. 

With those findings, First American was able to garnish over $90,000 of the amount owed still held in a Liberty bank account. 

The lawsuit also pointed to Stein-Oliva’s public acknowledgements that Consumer Direct was “formerly Liberty National Title” on various social media channels and in marketing materials, where she referred to the new name as a “rebrand.”

With the marketing claiming a direct link to Liberty and continuity of leadership, First American characterized that the rebrand to Consumer Direct entities effectively qualified as a “de facto” merger, which would make them responsible for assuming Liberty’s legal obligations

“This sequencing and continuity were undertaken for the purpose of hindering, delaying or avoiding enforcement of Liberty’s judgment obligations while continuing the same title insurance business under a different name and corporate form,” attorneys alleged.

Consumer Direct did not respond to an emailed request for comment regarding the allegations. A representative from First American said the company could not publicly comment on active litigation.  

Along with the remaining compensation owed in connection with the 2020 fraudulent wire and initial penalty judgement, First American is requesting courts to impose a constructive trust or lien over assets belonging to Consumer Direct and order an accounting of all its assets, revenues and business activity. It is also asking for “further legal, equitable, and declaratory relief as the court deems just and proper” and imposition of measures to prevent Stein-Oliva from transferring or concealing existing assets of her business. 



Trump administration reaches deal with non-profit over DC golf courses




Trump administration reaches deal with non-profit over DC golf courses

Clearer Way to Benchmark Private Equity


Private equity benchmarking is shifting toward greater transparency, attribution, and analytical rigor. The Department of Labor’s recent guidance reinforces the importance of meaningful benchmarks in fiduciary evaluation, but the momentum extends beyond regulatory compliance.

Investors increasingly expect to understand what a benchmark includes, what it excludes, and which assumptions materially influence its results. The standard is shifting from trusting the number to understanding its construction. Dispersion, attribution, and transparency are becoming core features rather than optional enhancements.

This evolution does not eliminate tradeoffs. Highly standardized benchmarks remain valuable for broad comparability, but they often obscure the drivers of performance. More granular, transaction-informed approaches offer deeper insight into exposures and risks, but they require stronger data foundations and greater analytical judgment.

The challenge ahead is not to produce more benchmarks, but to develop frameworks that make private market performance interpretable, comparable, and decision relevant. As private assets compete more directly for capital within diversified portfolios, clarity is no longer a luxury. It is a necessity.

Disclosure:
HarbourVest Partners, LLC (“HarbourVest”) is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This material is solely for informational purposes; the information should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. In addition, the information contained in this document (i) may not be relied upon by any current or prospective investor and (ii) has not been prepared for marketing purposes. In all cases, interested parties should conduct their own investigation and analysis of any information set forth herein and consult with their own advisors. HarbourVest has not acted in any investment advisory, brokerage or similar capacity by virtue of supplying this information. The opinions expressed herein represent the current, good faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication, are not definitive investment advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This material has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, HarbourVest does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. The information is subject to change without notice and HarbourVest has no obligation to update you. There is no assurance that any events or projections will occur, and outcomes may be significantly different than the opinions shown here. This information, including any projections concerning financial market performance, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information contained herein must be kept strictly confidential and may not be reproduced or redistributed in any format without the express written approval of HarbourVest.

Free Bakeful After Aisle Rebate


The Offer

Direct link to offer (copy and paste if it doesn’t work)

  • Get a free box of Bakeful mini treats after Aisle rebate. 

Our Verdict

You can read more about Aisle here. Free is free. No merchant restriction so should be able to purchase them anywhere. 

From Tencent Music’s 250K song takedowns to Sony and WMG’s calendar Q1 results… it’s MBW’s weekly round-up


Welcome to Music Business Worldwide’s Weekly Round-up – where we make sure you caught the five biggest stories to hit our headlines over the past seven days. MBW’s Round-up is exclusively supported by BMI, a global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music.


This week, Warner Music Group posted calendar Q1 revenues of $1.73 billion, up 12.1% YoY at constant currency, with subscription streaming revenues rising 12.7% YoY.

Meanwhile, Sony‘s combined revenues from recorded music and music publishing topped $3 billion for a second consecutive quarter in calendar Q1 (January–March), generating an estimated $3.03 billion in the period.

Elsewhere, YouTube rolled out a new tool letting creators replace copyrighted audio with AI-generated instrumentals, allowing them to resolve Content ID claims without pulling videos.

Also this week, Bloomberg reported that Sony Music Group is in advanced talks to buy Blackstone’s Recognition Music Group for up to $4 billion.

Plus, Tencent Music Entertainment said in its ESG report that it took down more than 250,000 policy-violating songs and reviewed over 600,000 cases involving “high-risk copyright content” across its platforms in 2025.

Here are some of the biggest headlines from the past few days…


1. WARNER MUSIC GROUP GENERATED $1.73B IN CALENDAR Q1 2026; SUBSCRIPTION STREAMING REVENUES ROSE 12.7% YOY

Warner Music Group has issued its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026 (calendar Q1 – the company’s fiscal Q2).

According to the company’s fiscal Q2 (calendar Q1) results, published on Thursday (May 7), WMG saw its quarterly global company-wide revenues reach USD $1.732 billion (across recorded music, music publishing, and other activities).

Total revenue was up 12.1% YoY at constant currency.

Other highlights from the quarter include recorded music revenues up 12.7% YoY at constant currency to $1.38 billion, and recorded music subscription streaming revenues up 12.7% YoY at constant currency to $734 million.

“Our Q2 results demonstrate the powerful combination of creative and operational success, as well as financial discipline, providing clear evidence that our strategic transformation is working,” said Warner Music Group CEO Robert Kyncl in a note to investors on Thursday (May 7)… (MBW)


2. SONY GENERATED $3.03BN FROM RECORDED MUSIC AND PUBLISHING IN CALENDAR Q1 2026, UP 19.5% YOY

Sony‘s combined revenues from recorded music and music publishing topped USD $3 billion for a second consecutive quarter in calendar Q1 2026 (January–March), generating an estimated $3.03 billion in the period.

That’s according to MBW‘s calculations based on Sony Group Corp‘s calendar Q1 2026 (fiscal Q4, FY2025) results, as announced by the Japanese conglomerate on Friday (May 8).

The calendar Q1 2026 quarter also marks the end of Sony‘s fiscal year (which runs April 2025 to March 2026), meaning full-year figures are also available for the first time.

The $3.03 billion quarterly combined total was up 19.5% YoY at US dollar-converted consistent currency, compared to $2.54 billion in calendar Q1 2025.

That means Sony‘s recorded music and publishing operations generated approximately $495 million more in calendar Q1 2026 than in the prior-year quarter… (MBW)


3. YOUTUBE CREATORS HIT BY MUSIC COPYRIGHT CLAIMS CAN NOW REPLACE TRACKS WITH AI – AT THE TOUCH OF A BUTTON

YouTube is now letting creators generate AI-produced instrumental tracks to replace copyrighted audio in their videos — positioning the tool as a way to resolve Content ID claims without removing content from the platform.

The update, announced via YouTube‘s Creator Insider channel on Friday (May 1), adds a new “Create” button to the existing “Replace Song” tool in YouTube Studio on desktop.

Rene Ritchie, presenting the update on YouTube’s Creator Insider channel, said: “The Replace Song tool in YouTube Studio Desktop will now include a new Create button. Hit it and YouTube will generate four royalty-free instrumental tracks that you can use to replace copyrighted audio in your videos and release Content ID claims.”

The feature is currently limited to US desktop users of YouTube Studio.

A global launch and rollout to Studio mobile are planned for later this year, according to Ritchie(MBW)


4. TENCENT MUSIC TOOK DOWN OVER 250,000 SONGS AND REVIEWED 600,000+ ‘HIGH-RISK’ COPYRIGHT CASES IN 2025 AMID ‘EMERGING AI RISKS’

Tencent Music Entertainment, China’s largest music streaming service provider, says it took down more than 250,000 policy-violating songs and reviewed over 600,000 cases involving “high-risk copyright content” across its platforms in 2025.

The figures come as TME said it bolstered compliance and risk management across key areas in 2025, including copyright licensing, emerging AI risks, and its overseas business expansion.

The figures were disclosed in TME‘s 2025 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report, published in April.

The 250,000-plus songs removed from platforms including QQ Music were identified through a combination of AI-powered detection tools and manual inspection as posing “reputational risks” or violating platform content policies.

Separately, TME said it took down over 27,000 songs specifically involved in what it categorizes as “song theft,” “song laundering,” and “trend hijacking” — three distinct forms of so-called “gray-market” manipulation that the company says are “becoming increasingly covert and complex.”… (MBW)


5. SONY IN ADVANCED TALKS TO BUY BLACKSTONE’S RECOGNITION MUSIC FOR UP TO $4B, REPORTS BLOOMBERG

Sony Music Group is closing in on a deal to buy Blackstone‘s Recognition Music Group, whose catalog is home to songs from Justin Bieber, Neil Young, and others.

That’s according to Bloomberg, which reported on Wednesday (May 6) that Sony is in exclusive negotiations with the private equity giant in what it described as “one of the largest such deals in music history”.

The acquisition would be made through Sony‘s music rights-buying joint venture with Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC, which would pay between $3.5 billion and $4 billion, the news outlet reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

Bloomberg‘s report follows a Billboard story from May 1 that reported Sony was negotiating a deal for Recognition‘s assets.

Sony and Blackstone are pushing to finalize the agreement inside the next seven days, the report said, though Bloomberg cautioned that the talks could yet collapse… (MBW)


Partner message: MBW’s Weekly Round-up is supported by BMI, the global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music. Find out more about BMI hereMusic Business Worldwide