Home Blog

Sip ya lumpsum investing konsa better hai?



Lumpsum investing vs sip explained.

#lumpsumvssip #lumpsuminvestment #sipvslumpsum

source

Sygnum Bank, Fidelity International Introduce Tokenized Product With Moody’s AAA-mf Assessment


Sygnum Bank has recently provided the technological backbone for Fidelity International’s inaugural tokenized product. Launched recently this month, the offering delivers institutional and professional investors round-the-clock access to regulated, yield-generating U.S. dollar liquidity with built-in collateral capabilities. This development arrives amid rapid growth in treasury-oriented tokenized money market funds, whose combined assets are approaching $15 billion and drawing interest from major asset managers, digital exchanges, stablecoin providers, and decentralized finance platforms.

At the center of the product lies Sygnum’s Desygnate platform, an enterprise-grade tokenization system engineered specifically to migrate regulated financial instruments onto blockchain networks.

Desygnate powers a fully digital-native structure that includes an on-chain fund register, automated smart-contract settlements, and seamless stablecoin-based subscriptions.

Investors benefit from continuous 24/7 subscription and redemption windows across global time zones, supported by a layered liquidity mechanism that mirrors the non-stop operation of tokenized markets.

Stablecoin integration further streamlines on-chain transactions, creating an efficient cash component for crypto-native treasury operations, DeFi protocols, and digital asset trading venues.

Fidelity International manages the fund, drawing on more than three decades of expertise in liquidity and short-duration fixed-income strategies.

The product has earned Moody’s AAA-mf assessment, the highest possible rating in its category.

According to Moody’s analysis, the structure demonstrates a very robust capacity to fulfill its core goals of safeguarding capital and maintaining exceptional liquidity levels.

Emma Pecenicic, Head of Digital Assets Distribution at Fidelity International, emphasized the necessity of synchronized liquidity in tokenized ecosystems.

She noted that as markets transition to instantaneous settlement, cash must follow suit.

This launch represents Fidelity’s strategic response, fusing proven fixed-income management with blockchain infrastructure tailored to the demands of the digital asset landscape.

The result is institutional-quality, yield-bearing dollar liquidity optimized for continuous global trading.

Fatmire Bekiri, Head of Tokenization at Sygnum, described the initiative as a pivotal advancement in capital market evolution.

She highlighted how tokenized liquidity products can securely deliver premium, income-generating cash solutions on-chain within a fully regulated framework.

Bekiri added that such offerings establish essential groundwork for tomorrow’s financial markets, enabling real-time cash management that bridges conventional and digital environments.

The collaboration with Fidelity International, she said, raises the standard for compliant investment vehicles in a perpetually active tokenized economy.

A select group of infrastructure specialists supports the rollout. J.P. Morgan handles fund administration and custody services within a unified ecosystem.

Apex Group serves as transfer agent, managing digital investor onboarding, wallet approvals, and instant processing. Chainlink supplies daily net asset value figures and performance indicators directly on-chain.

The tokenized liquidity solution targets professional and institutional clients via Sygnum and will be offered in eligible jurisdictions subject to local regulatory approvals.

By combining traditional asset management with blockchain functionality, the partnership underscores a maturing convergence between established finance and distributed ledger technology, potentially accelerating broader institutional adoption of on-chain liquidity tools.



Housing Market Forecasts Flip as Zillow, NAR, Fannie Mae Make New Predictions


Dave:
At the start of 2026, there was a general consensus among experts and forecasters about what would happen in the housing market this year, modest price growth, lower rates, and improving sales. But that consensus has been blown up. With a continuing conflict in Iran, accelerating inflation and a Fed on hold, expectations have been reshuffled and major institutions and analysts are changing their forecast for 2026. So today on On the Market, we’ll talk through every major forecast, how it’s changed, what is likely to happen for the rest of 2026, and what it all means for you. Hey, everyone. Welcome to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer, investor, analyst, and chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. Today on the show, we’re going to be addressing the shifting expectations in the housing market because at the beginning of the year, forecasters for the most part were aligned on what was to be expected.
Market rates would come down a little bit, sales volume would go up a little bit and prices would grow but modestly. But those expectations are now changing as conditions on the ground have changed. With a new Fed share joining in the next couple of days, the war in Iran, resurging inflation and the corresponding increased likelihood that the Fed is going to pause cuts, put that on top of AI and labor market fears. All of that is forcing forecasters to rethink their predictions. So today in the show, we’re going to see how those major predictions have changed and discuss what it means for the housing market. I’ll also let you know if my personal forecast has changed. As a reminder, I said that rates would stay between five and a half and six and a half percent with an average of around 6.15. I said sales would pick up modestly to about 4.1 million for existing home sales.
And I actually, I guess, sort of bucked the trend of major forecasters and said that national home prices would actually fall this year. Most of them, as we’ll go through in a minute, said that prices were going to grow. I actually think they’re going to come down a litle bit, or that’s what I said at the beginning of the year. I always give a range, my range for this year, by the way, was somewhere between plus 2% and negative 4% on the low end. I said my best guess was negative 1% year over year. Have I changed my mind now in May of 2026? I will share that, but first let’s talk about the big forecasters like Zillow, NAR, Fannie Mae, and JP Morgan. First up, let’s talk about NAR. This is the National Association of Realtor and I’m doing them first because they were sort of the most bullish out of any of the forecasters about a housing market recovery at the beginning of the year.
I think they made their predictions back in December, but for all of 2026, they said that they thought existing home sales were going to pick up a lot, 14%. That’s a lot. Last year were about four million, so they’re saying it was going to get to about four and a half million. That was probably the boldest increase. They were thinking that the housing market was going to get a little bit of life back into it. They saw prices rising 4% and rates coming down to about 6%. Now back in April, just a couple of weeks ago in April of 2026, they actually updated their forecast pretty notably. They slashed their forecast for volume growth. Basically, they thought we were going to see a real significant recovery in the number of transactions, which would be great for the whole industry. If you’re an agent, a loan officer, you’re probably really hoping for that and NAR was saying that was coming.
Now they have slashed that forecast down to just 4% volume growth. So they’re still thinking that it’s going to be up, but it’ll be up to maybe 4.1, maybe 4.2 million instead of the 4.5 million they were projecting. Just for reference, about five and a quarter million is normal. So even they weren’t saying we’re getting back to normal, but they thought we’d get a big jump there. Now, interestingly, even though they have downgraded their sales volume forecast, they’re actually holding their price forecast the same. They’re saying 4% still is what they’re expecting. They acknowledge that lower consumer confidence and a softer job market, it’s holding up pretty well, but it is softer than it was last year, are continuing to hold back buyers. But at the same time, inventory growth is modest. It’s pretty flat year over year. So when I see that, I think that’s pretty balanced, but they think that combination, even with the slower demand, is going to lead to 4% year over year growth.
So this was a major walkback on terms of volume in my opinion. This is a major downshift in what they think sales volume’s going to do, but they’re holding flat with prices. So that’s NAR. Next, let’s go to Fannie Mae, the mortgage giant. They pretty surprising here. I was pretty surprised by what I see here. They revised their price forecast for 2026 up. They think prices are going to go up more than what they had originally forecasted. They had forecasted 3% price growth across 2026. Now they think that we’re going to see 3.4% in quarter two, 3.8% in quarter three, and then 3.2% in quarter four. So it’s not crazy. When you see, oh, they went from three to 3.6, 3.5 in terms of their annual forecast, that isn’t a lot. It’s not going to change your net worth that much. But I think it’s pretty unusual given what we’ve seen going on that a big institution like this would upgrade their sales forecast.
So I was pretty surprised to see that, especially because they increased their mortgage rate forecast. They were expecting 5.7% by year and now they’re saying 6.2%. So they’re saying affordability is going to get worse, but prices are going to grow faster. I mean, that can happen if inventory growth just goes negative, right?That could happen. Right now, inventory growth is about flat. So it’s possible, but I was generally surprised to see this. I think out of the forecast we’re going to talk about, which are NAR, Fannie Mae, Zillow, and JP Morgan, this is definitely the most bullish I think because even though NAR is saying 4% growth, which is higher, they walk back some expectations. But Fannie Mae is saying, “We’re seeing what’s going on in 2026 and we think prices are going up more than the conditions warranted at the beginning of the year.” So that I think is a pretty bullish stance about the housing market.
So that’s what we got two pretty bullish takes on the housing market, in my opinion, from NAR and Fannie Mae. But we got two more to go over. We got to talk about Zillow and JP Morgan and we’ll do that right after we get back from this quick break. Stick with us.
Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer going through updated forecasts for 2026. Before the break, I told you that NAR and Fannie Mae both see prices growing faster than inflation relatively. They’re predicting a pretty good year for the housing market, three to 4%. That’s a normal year. Long-term average appreciation is like 3.5%. It’s kind of what they’re saying is going to happen, normal year in the housing market. What about Zillow? People knock on Zillow and say that they’re really bullish. They hate this estimate, but Zillow has actually been one of the more bearish forecasters for the last year or two. At the beginning of the year, they were only forecasting 0.7% home value growth. So let’s just call it 1% for rounding. 1% growth much lower than Fannie Mae and NAR. And they have actually revised their home price downward. So NAR kept it flat.
Fannie Mae increased their forecast, Zillow downgraded it. So they’re at 0.7%. Now they’ve downgraded it as of April 2026 to 0.3%. So it was kind of flat. Now they’re basically going even flatter. Zillow, I would say, is not really revising much. I think going from 0.7% to 0.3% is basically saying the same thing. They think flat home price growth and they’re basically sticking with that. Just if you’re curious, they also in this report put out their rent growth forecast. They think single family rent’s going to go up 2% for the rest of the year and multifamily rent growth at 1% for the rest of the year. And they still think existing home sales are about 4.13. So up a litle bit from last year, that’s now about in line with what NAR is saying and about what I said at the beginning of the year about 4.1%.
Last forecast we were going to go into before we talk about what this all means and my take on all of this is JP Morgan. So they were relatively bearish. They said flat. Zero national price growth in 2026 is what they predicted at the beginning of the year and they basically haven’t upgraded it. They’ve quote said the size of the housing shortage has been overemphasized and they actually just think it’s staying flat. So when you look at these four major forecasters, these are some of the most notable, reputable forecasts in the industry, you’re no longer seeing a lot of consensus. You’re actually seeing a big divergence with NAR and Fannie Mae saying prices are going to go up 4%, whereas Zillow and JPMorgan are saying closer to flat. Let’s go kind of closer to where I’ve been. And this may not seem like a big difference, but I think it matters.
I think this is a big difference because it’s the difference between real home price growth and not. And when I say real home price growth, what I mean is inflation adjusted home price growth. Because if you believe NAR or Fannie Mae, you’re saying that home prices are going to keep up with inflation. That’s a strong reason to buy real estate, right? And on an average $400,000 home, if it goes up 4%, that’s $16,000 in equity, right? That really matters versus something that’s flat. If you believe something that’s flat, you’re going to take a very different approach to buying real estate if you think the market’s going to be flat this year into next year, or perhaps you’re like me and think they’re going to go down modestly. So that stuff really matters. Before I give you my updated forecaster, I do want to just call out there are some people who are calling for a crash, but I have not found any forecasters who maintain their own economic models who have ways of measuring inventory and demand and supply and balance between supply and demand and all these things.
I have not seen anyone forecast a major crash there. I mean, we’ve had guests like Melody Wright, she thinks that prices could come down double digits. I’ve not seen anyone else really saying that. Of course, there are people on TikTok and social media who just say prices are going to crash. They’re going to be worse. It’s going to be the worst in 2008. None of them offer data. None of them offer actual evidence of any of this stuff happening. I would tell you, I stand to gain nothing by hiding that information from you, but I cannot find it. There is no evidence of it, right? We talk about foreclosures. We talk about delinquency rates on the show. We would see it there. It’s not there. So that’s the major thing to remember that even though there is this divergence here, the band of what can happen is not forecasted to be very big.
I’m actually one of the most negative. I’m saying it could be down 1%, maybe down 2%. That’s one of the more negative forecasts I’ve seen. On the upside, maybe plus 4%, but I’m not seeing any extremes. Now, everyone could be wrong. Everyone could be missing it, but I just want to show you that the people who look at the data here see it in this band between negative 2% plus 5%. Where it falls in that does matter a lot and I’ll talk about that in just a minute, but I just kind of want to anchor everyone and provide that context that we’re not talking about dramatic shifts in either direction or at least that’s not very likely. The other thing I promise I will get to my own forecast. The other thing I do want to mention though is of course this is regional, right?
I am talking about on a national basis. I know people often say when I talk about the national stuff, they’re like, housing is regional. It absolutely is. I talk about on the show, I give you regional data all the time, try and help people understand how to go gather that regional data for themselves. But what often happens in the housing market is you can take some of the national trends and apply them to your market. So I’m not saying that this is true everywhere, but generally speaking, if the housing market is going to go down one or 2% this year, you can expect that most markets in the country will see declining appreciation rates. Now that might mean for some markets it goes from plus five to plus three, it’s still positive. In some markets that might go from negative five to negative seven, but there is some truth that there is a correlation generally to the national housing market with most markets.
Of course there are outliers. I am not saying that there are difference. We talk about these regional differences a lot, but they have held up for years and they probably will for the foreseeable future. The so- called Rust Belt, you see this in parts of Western New York and parts of New England, parts of the Midwest still doing well. They have low inventory growth. Many of them still have inventory below pre-pandemic levels and prices are forecasted to grow in most of those markets. But like I said, even those ones that are growing forecasted to grow less than they did last year. Markets in the Sunbelt, Florida, Texas, Arizona, still facing affordability challenges, probably going to continue to see prices decline in most of those places. So make sure to remember that when I’m forecasting this stuff, you should look at this for yourself. Zillow actually does city by city forecast.
You can go check those out. You can go Google this for yourself. A lot of local housing companies will make these kinds of forecasts, so you can go check them out for yourself. But remember, no matter what you do, remember that this stuff is regional and you need to do that research for yourself. Finally, I will get to my forecast because as you can see, everyone’s changing their forecast and I want to share you how my thinking has evolved, but we do have to take one more quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer, giving updated forecast for the 2026 housing market. We’ve talked about how there’s kind of a divergence so far in major forecasters with NAR and Fannie Mae predicting a pretty good price year with three to 4% appreciation, whereas JP Morgan and Zillow are projecting pretty much flat, 0% price growth this year. My forecast, as a reminder, I said I thought prices would be somewhere between negative four and positive two. So I’ve been more negative than most people on this stuff. I said that rates would be between five and a half and six and a half percent because if you follow this show, you know my thesis is mostly about affordability and I thought home sales would increase modestly to about 4.1%. With those things, let’s just break them down. Rates, I don’t see them coming down that much.
I know NIR, even in their recent study said they see rates coming down below 6% by the year and I don’t see it. I mean, hopefully they’re right, but I don’t really see where that comes from, right? Every day that the war in Iran drags on, that becomes less likely. If you look at the inflation prints from last month, if you look at the PPI, the producer price index, if you look at the CPI, the consumer price index, if you look at PCE, all of those things are pointing to increased accelerating inflation and all of the reports I’ve seen say that even if the strait of hormones open tomorrow, we’d see oil prices stay high for the rest of the year and the strait of hormones is not open. So when does inflation fall? I don’t know, but I think expecting rates to go back down below 6%, optimistic thinking.
I know I’ve been pessimistic about this for four straight years, but I’ve kind of been right and I don’t have a lot of optimism for rates right now. How does it come down? It either needs to be inflation comes down to like 2.5%, probably not going to happen. We go into significant recession. I think there’s a chance of recession this year, significant recession by end of the year, not looking likely at this point, right enough to bring rates down below 6%. Maybe it could happen. It could happen or quantitative easing. That’s what could get us into the low fives, 5%, probably not going to happen. So maybe we get a recession of rates come down, but I just don’t see that happening. So I’m sticking with my mortgage rate prediction of 5.5 to 6.5%. I said I thought 6.15 would be about our average. I like it.
I’m sticking with it. All right, next home sales. I said 4.1%.
Briefly at the beginning of the war in Iran, I thought pending sales could go lower. I thought maybe we were going to hit 3.9%, but I’m happy to say I think those fears weren’t warranted at that point and I’m sticking with it. I’m still staying with my forecast here. I think one to 2% growth in home sales here, we might get 4.1, 4.2% here. I’m staying there. Then in terms of home sales, I’m going to stay the most bearish here. I’m sorry, I think prices are going to go down a little bit. Right now they’re at like 0.7. If you look at the Case Schiller, 0.7, Redfin has plus 1% year over year. So to believe that prices are going to go up to three or 4% year over year, like for NAR or Fannie Mae, you have to see that housing market getting stronger from here and I don’t see that happening.
Obviously in some markets and I’m happy that we’re not seeing the bottom fallout because we definitely aren’t. But I just think with rates hovering around 6.5%, we’re not going to see a lot of demand growth and we are seeing some moderation of inventory growth, but I do think we’ll see inventory go up a little bit more. There’s going to be, in my opinion, a little bit of distress, not a ton. Some of these deals might happen off market. We’re going to see more of that in my opinion, but whether it’s looking at the data or just talking to people in these markets, I think it’s kind of just this psychological shift that has happened in the market where buyers know they have the power now. They are not going to bid up the price of homes. They’re looking for deals. They are looking for value and that does not mean the bottom is falling out, but I think the trend is towards people trying to get deals under list price, which you should by the way, if you’re trying to buy.That’s the advantage of being in the market right now is you can do this.
I think more and more agents are seeing this, more and more investors are seeing this, more and more home buyers are seeing this. And so even though I don’t think there’s going to be massive changes in demand and supply, I think the trend is towards discounting. The trend is towards negotiating and that’s why I believe even from here, home prices are going to be relatively flat. Like I said at the beginning of the year, but if I had to pick a little bit up or a little bit down, I’m picking a little bit down. So with that, I’m not changing my forecast at all. I’m not trying to be arrogant here. I’m just looking at the data. I think, man, mortgage rates five and a half, 6.5%. That sounds pretty good. Averaging a litle bit above six. Modest home sales increase? Yeah, I hope so.
And prices, I think they’re going to be close to flat. And if I had to pick, I’d say they’re going to be a little bit negative. But I think if I had to just give some general advice, like I could be wrong, I will be wrong at points in the future. I’ve been good on this the last couple of years, but I will be wrong in the future. But I think whoever you believe, if you’re inclined to believe me or NAR or Fannie Mae or Zillow, whatever, remember that no one is predicting a lot of appreciation. And so when I hear investors underwriting for three or 4% appreciation, or I hear agents saying, “Yeah, it’s average 4% appreciation over the last couple of years, that’s going to continue.” I don’t like it. I don’t recommend that. Even if you think NAR is right, I would recommend you underwrite like me, not because I’m some genius, but because I’m more conservative, right?
Because I’m thinking as an investor here, not someone who works for the National Association of Realtors or the biggest mortgage company in the country. Not saying they’re biased, but I’m just saying I am biased towards investors, right? I am biased towards thinking like an investor. I’m giving you my honest take of where I think things are going to go, but I think as investors, it makes more sense to take the pessimistic view, not so you stay out of the market, but so you have disciplined underwriting. If you want to underwrite like NAR and Fannie Mae and think that you’re going to get this three, four, 5% appreciation and you’re wrong, that can really hurt. But if you underwrite like me and think prices are going to go down a little bit and you’re wrong, you’re fine. You’re actually better than fine. You’re doing great. If you say prices are going to go down 1% and Fannie Mae is right and it goes up 3%, you’re golden, right?
Because you found a deal that worked even with prices going down and now when prices go up, that’s just the cherry on top. So that’s really where I recommend because you’re going to hear a lot of forecasts, a lot of different opinions. I’m not saying you got to agree with me. What I am saying is I really recommend underwriting and approaching new deals assuming the pessimistic case here. I know you can still find deals with that kind of underwriting. So if you can find deals like that underwriting conservatively, why wouldn’t you? Why would you underwrite deals at three or 4% and use that as your metric for finding deals when you don’t have to, when you can be a little safer, when you can take a little bit more risk off the table. That’s my recommendation regardless of what you think of any of these individual forecasts.
So that’s it. That’s how I see the market shaping up for the rest of 2026, at least as of now, but of course things are changing really fast and if I do change my opinion or my forecast, you will be the first to know I will put an episode about that out ASAP, but I want to know your predictions. What do you think of prices and sales volumes and mortgage rates for the rest of the year for the rest of 2026? Where will we be sitting in December 2026? Let me know in the comments. Thank you all so much for watching this episode of On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. I’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Why Midge Purce Refuses to ‘Wait Her Turn’



While others wait for “later,” she’s already building what’s next.

President Donald Trump’s 5-Word Response on Inflation May Come Back to Haunt Wall Street


Volatility aside, the stock market has delivered outsize returns under President Donald Trump.

In his first, non-consecutive term, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI 0.14%), S&P 500 (^GSPC +0.58%), and Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC +1.20%) delivered gains of 57%, 70%, and 142%, respectively. Since his second term began on Jan. 20, 2025, the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq have rallied 14%, 23%, and 33%, respectively.

President Trump delivering remarks from the South Lawn of the White House. Image source: Official White House Photo by Patrick B. Ruddy.

What’s been noteworthy about these second-term gains is that they’re occurring amid an ongoing war (as of this writing on May 12). The Iran war has had a decisive impact on energy markets and U.S. inflation.

Though the president has been clear about his stance on inflation, claiming “our inflation is just short-term,” while fielding questions on the White House lawn on May 12, historical trends suggest Trump’s words may come back to haunt Wall Street.

The Iran war has sent U.S. inflation to a three-year high

Earlier this week, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported trailing 12-month (TTM) inflation for April of 3.8%, which is up 140 basis points in two months (i.e., since the Iran war began) and represents a three-year high.

US Inflation Rate Chart

US Inflation Rate data by YCharts.

Shortly after President Trump gave the order for U.S. military forces to commence operations against Iran on Feb. 28, the latter closed down the Strait of Hormuz to commercial vessels. This closure halted the flow of approximately 20% of the world’s crude oil supply (about 20 million barrels of petroleum liquids per day).

Unsurprisingly, energy prices have soared. West Texas Intermediate crude oil has jumped from $67 per barrel the day before the Iran war began to more than $102 per barrel, as of this writing. This has driven up fuel pump prices at the fastest pace in decades, pinching consumers’ pocketbooks and leading to a sizable increase in TTM inflation.

The worry for Wall Street is that we may not have seen the worst of inflation, even if Trump is successful in quickly ending the Iran war.

A calculator placed next to several newspaper clippings warning of inflation and rising prices.

Image source: Getty Images.

A second wave of inflation can wreak havoc on a historically pricey stock market

While energy supply shocks tend to hit consumers at the fuel pump within days, the adverse effects of energy supply disruptions can come in waves. For instance, we observed higher airfares impacting inflation in April.

History tells us that the inflationary effects of energy price shocks on businesses lag by a few months. But higher transportation and/or production costs are invariably passed on to consumers. Once this impact begins to work its way into economic data, U.S. TTM inflation can rise even more, despite Trump’s prediction that “our inflation is just short-term.”

Rapidly rising inflation is particularly worrisome for a historically expensive stock market. Investors had been counting on several rate cuts in 2026-2027 to propel the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq higher. But with the Iran war effectively taking these cuts off the table, an expensive stock market is exposed and vulnerable for the first time in years.

The velocity at which inflation is increasing might also spur the Federal Reserve to shift to a neutral or hiking bias, or even raise interest rates. This is shaping up as a potential nightmare scenario for Wall Street.



Allegiant Acquires Sun Country Airlines in $1.5 Billion Deal


Allegiant Acquires Sun Country Airlines

Allegiant today announced it has successfully completed its acquisition of Sun Country Airlines, bringing together two low-cost carriers focused on affordable leisure travel. When the deal was first announced in January, Allegiant said it was valued at about $1.5 billion, including debt. The news comes just weeks after another budget carrier Spirit Airlines shut down in the biggest U.S. airline collapse in decades.

“Today marks a defining moment in Allegiant’s history as we officially join forces with Sun Country to create the leading leisure-focused airline in the United States,” said Allegiant CEO Gregory C. Anderson. “With a combined fleet of 195 aircraft serving nearly 175 cities, we are expanding access to affordable, reliable, and convenient travel for the communities that have long been the foundation of our business, while offering customers broader reach and more destinations. By bringing together two strong airlines with similar business models, we are creating a more differentiated and durable airline – one well positioned to deliver lasting value for our customers, team members, and shareholders. I want to recognize Team Allegiant and Team Sun Country, whose dedication and hard work made this day possible.”

Customers can continue to book travel through existing channels, and there are no changes to current reservations, flight schedules, or travel plans. Both airlines will continue to operate as separate carriers in the near term, maintaining their respective brands. Allegiant Allways Rewards and Sun Country Rewards will remain separate in the near term, and members’ points, benefits, and account status will retain their current value. Customers should continue to manage reservations, check in, and access customer service through the airline with which they booked travel. Over time, Allegiant expects to introduce additional benefits that make it easier for customers to access the combined network.

Together, Allegiant and Sun Country will serve approximately 22 million annual customers across nearly 175 cities, with more than 650 routes and a combined fleet of 195 aircraft.

Financially, the combination of Allegiant and Sun Country brings together two profitable airlines with complementary networks, diversified revenue streams and strong balance sheets, creating a platform with meaningful long-term value creation potential. Allegiant reported a $42.5 million profit for the first quarter, up 32% from a year earlier. The airline expects to realize approximately $140 million in annual synergies within three years following closing and integration, driven by expanded customer choice across the combined network, scale efficiencies, fleet optimization, and procurement benefits. 

Make the Ultimate Personal Finance Tracker in Excel (+ Free Template)



How to build a personal finance budget tracker in Excel step by step.
🚀Get FREE Excel chart templates from Hubspot:

🆓 DOWNLOAD Free Personal Finance Tracker Excel file for this video:

In this video, I’ll show you how to build a fully dynamic personal finance tracker where you simply have to log your transactions once, and everything flows automatically into a tracker.Here you have some KPIs and visuals up top, like the year-to-date savings and the savings by month. This is followed by the breakdown of income, expenses, and savings by month, by category, and even the annual averages. Once you complete this tracker, it’s fully automatic, so there is no copy-pasting formulas or pivot tables you need to use. First in the transactions sheet is where you log any new incomes or expenses. Second, we’ll lay out the tracker with all the different months, averages, and totals. Thirdly, we’ll fill in the values with the SUMIFS function and calculate the savings. Then we will work on formatting using conditional formatting before use inverted color charts and KPIs to finish the tracker.

LEARN:
👉 Excel for Business & Finance Course:
📈 The Complete Finance & Valuation Course:
🔥 Power BI for Business Analytics:
🚀 All our courses:

SOFTWARE:
📌 Ever wish Google Sheets had Excel features like Shortcuts, Trace Precedents, or What-If Analysis? SheetWhiz brings them straight into Google Sheets. Sign up for free or get 30% OFF the Pro plan with code KENJI30:

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Chapters:
0:00​ -​ Intro
0:30​ -​ Transactions Sheet
3:40​ – Tracker Formatting
6:42​ – Filling in the Values Automatically
9:55​ – Calculating Savings
12:50​ – Formatting Clean Up
14:20​ – KPIs and Visuals

source

Not All Lending Agency Guidelines Are The Same: Key Underwriting Differences Borrowers Should Know


In today’s mortgage landscape, it’s easy to assume that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHA all underwrite loans the same way. On the surface, their guidelines may look increasingly similar, but when you dig into the details, important differences still exist.

These nuances can make or break an approval, especially for self-employed borrowers, borrowers with multiple jobs, or those with non-traditional financial profiles.

We specialize in Non-QM home loans, but we also work extensively across agency programs. Understanding where these agencies differ allows us to structure loans more strategically and avoid unnecessary roadblocks.

Below are several underwriting distinctions.

Schedule C Deductions: Fannie Mae vs. Freddie Mac

For self-employed borrowers who file Schedule C, expense treatment can vary by agency:

  • Fannie Mae deducts both travel and meals as business expenses when calculating qualifying income.
  • Freddie Mac deducts only meals, leaving travel expenses untouched.

For self-employed borrowers with significant travel expenses, Freddie Mac may result in a higher qualifying income than Fannie Mae, sometimes enough to change an approval outcome.

Secondary Employment: Job Gap Rules Are Not Equal

Borrowers with a second job often assume consistency across agencies, but that’s not the case.

  • Fannie Mae allows up to a 30-day gap in secondary employment.
  • FHA does not allow any job gap in secondary employment.

If a borrower recently paused or changed a second job, FHA may be off the table, while Fannie Mae could still be viable.

Automated Valuation Model (AVM) Risk Score Thresholds

When it comes to appraisal waivers and AVMs, risk score cutoffs differ:

  • Fannie Mae requires a risk score of 2.5 or higher to trigger an AVM.
  • Freddie Mac requires a higher threshold of 3.0 or above.

A borrower who qualifies for an appraisal waiver with one agency may not qualify with another, affecting costs, timelines, and the certainty of closing.

FHA and the 30-Day AMEX Balance Requirement

One lesser-known FHA distinction relates to short-term liabilities:

  • FHA does NOT require the borrower to have sufficient funds to cover a 30-day balance on an American Express charge card.

For borrowers who rely on charge cards for cash flow management, FHA underwriting can be more flexible than expected in this specific area.

Why These Differences Matter More Than Ever

As agency guidelines continue to converge, it’s easy for lenders to treat every file the same way. That’s often a mistake. We take a strategy-first approach, whether that means placing a borrower with the right agency program or moving beyond agency rules altogether with Non-QM solutions such as:

Sometimes the difference between an approval and a denial isn’t the borrower; it’s knowing which rulebook to use.

Work With a Broker Who Knows the Differences

Not all guidelines are created equal, and not all lenders take the time to analyze them. As a Non-QM-focused mortgage broker, we understand both agency nuances and alternative lending options.

If you’ve been told “no,” or if your income or employment doesn’t fit neatly into a box, there may still be a path forward.

Connect with us, and one of our experienced loan officers will have a mortgage program that fits your situation.

IDR Backlog Falls to 530,295 in April as Education Department Sets New Processing Record


The Department of Education’s income-driven repayment (IDR) application backlog dropped to 530,295 at the end of April 2026, down from 553,966 a month earlier, the agency reported in its court-ordered status filing (PDF File) on May 13, 2026.

The Department’s loan servicers decided 456,594 IDR applications in April — a new monthly high, surpassing the 424,583 it processed in March. The roughly 24,000-application drop in pending cases came even though the agency processed zero IDR plan discharges last month (though that’s due to administrative issues).

It’s important to note that roughly 7 million borrowers in the SAVE forbearance need to change repayment plans in the next few months. It’s likely that application volume will dramatically increase, and so processing volume will be a key indicator to watch.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

By The Numbers (April 1-30, 2026)

  • 444,692 IDR applications received (vs. 321,481 in March)
  • 456,594 IDR applications decided with 401,561 approved, 55,033 denied
  • 530,295 IDR applications still pending
  • 0 IDR plan discharges processed (vs. 21,200 in March)
  • 11,500 PSLF discharges (vs. 10,050 in March)
  • 88,000 PSLF Buyback applications pending (vs. 89,720 in March)

Why it matters: Income-driven repayment plans tie monthly student loan payments to a borrower’s income and family size. The pending applications are for borrowers who are enrolling for the first time, switching plans, and recertifying income annually. Application volume is increasing largely because borrowers pushed off SAVE need to change plans and recertification season is back on the annual calendar for others.

The discharge holdup: After processing 21,200 IDR plan discharges in March (10,500 IBR, 9,900 Original ICR, 800 PAYE), ED logged zero discharges in April. The agency’s March eligibility check identified another batch (3,600 IBR, 1,400 Original ICR, and 300 PAYE borrowers) but data validation problems pushed the file delivery to loan servicers into mid-April. ED says servicers should begin processing those discharges in May. We’ve seen a general trend of every-other-month for IDR loan forgiveness.

The PSLF Buyback wrinkle: ED disclosed for the first time that 18,000 to 19,000 of the 88,000 pending PSLF Buyback applications are duplicates. Borrowers can only receive one Buyback offer per loan, but many submitted multiple requests. ED plans to identify and remove duplicates upfront rather than administratively denying them after a Buyback offer is made.

ED also did not break out approvals and denials for the 6,870 PSLF Buyback decisions made in April, citing a data delay. An updated report is expected next week.

It’s nice to note that the PSLF Buyback Backlog declined for the first time. Removing the duplicates and accounting for the larger amount processed, the PSLF buyback backlog is down to taking just 10 months to clear.

However, this month’s processing numbers are an outlier. It will be interesting to see the updated data next week. If we rely on the normal 2,000 – 3,000 applications processed we’ve seen, the backlog may still take up to 2 years.

How this connects: This update follows our prior coverage of the March report, when 553,966 borrowers were stuck in the backlog despite record processing. April’s 444,692 incoming applications was the highest monthly application volume since the court began requiring monthly disclosures, meaning ED is now processing fast enough to outpace a much heavier inflow than what it faced earlier this year. However, will it be up to the challenge of migrating 7 million borrowers in SAVE forbearance?

What’s next: May’s report should show the first IDR discharges from the March eligibility batch, the missing PSLF Buyback approval and denial breakout from April, and the next round of eligibility identification. The next monthly status report is due in mid-June.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb2″].tcb-post-list #post-78206 [data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb9″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/What_Is_Administrative_Forbearance_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

Can You Change Repayment Plans While Waiting For PSLF Buyback?

Can You Change Repayment Plans While Waiting For PSLF Buyback?
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb2″].tcb-post-list #post-76502 [data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb9″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PSLF-Buyback-Math-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

PSLF Buyback and REPAYE: How New Settlement Changes Costs

PSLF Buyback and REPAYE: How New Settlement Changes Costs
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb2″].tcb-post-list #post-66898 [data-css=”tve-u-19e2416aeb9″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Calculate-Your-PSLF-Buyback-Amount-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

How PSLF Buyback Amounts Are Calculated

How PSLF Buyback Amounts Are Calculated

Editor: Colin Graves

The post IDR Backlog Falls to 530,295 in April as Education Department Sets New Processing Record appeared first on The College Investor.

The crypto industry’s Clarity Act hits a critical juncture: Where things stand before Senate markup



The Clarity Act, a landmark bill that would create a U.S. regulatory framework for the crypto industry, is set to undergo a Senate committee markup starting Thursday. The prospect of its passage has buoyed investors, but significant obstacles remain before the bill is ready for Congress to send to President Trump’s desk.

Clarity, short for Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, passed the House of Representatives last year but has faced setbacks in the Senate Banking Committee as banks and stablecoin companies squabble over the question of how and when rewards can be paid on stablecoin balances. Now, as Senators convene to introduce amendments, Democrats are pushing for ethics guardrails related to the Trump family’s crypto involvement. 

Members of the Senate Banking committee have filed over 130 proposed amendments ahead of Thursday’s markup, with 44 coming from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) alone, according to a copy of the proposed amendments reviewed by Fortune

While some of the proposed amendments are minor, others seek to advance the position of opponents to the bill, which include banking interests who fear stablecoins could denude bank deposits, and those who fear crypto’s expansion is fraught with ethical and national security implications. 

“I think it’s going to pass, based on all the great progress that has been made on both sides of Congress, and the support this bill is getting from the White House,” Steve Yelderman, general counsel of Ethereum-focused advocacy organization Etherealize, told Fortune. “That said, it’s Washington, and anything could happen.”

Clarity nearly reached a Senate Banking markup earlier this year before Coinbase pulled its support from the bill over a proposed ban on stablecoin rewards. Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) have since reached a deal on stablecoin yield, but bank lobbying groups are now grousing that the compromise is too friendly to stablecoin companies. Members of the American Bankers Association have reportedly sent more than 8,000 letters to Senate offices criticizing the yield compromise. 

In tomorrow’s markup, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is expected to highlight protecting “Main Street” and national security while keeping crypto innovation in the U.S. as Clarity’s major goals, a Senate aide told Fortune. Democrats are expected to zero in on ethical concerns related to President Trump’s many crypto entanglements, a different Senate aide said.

“There are growing concerns amongst Democrats that if ethics is not included in the bill that is marked up in the Banking Committee, it will not be included at all,” the staffer said, adding that Democrats are focused on addressing the Trump family’s profiting off of crypto in market structure legislation. Republicans and Democrats have met multiple times this week to address adding ethics into Clarity.

As things stand, the bill has a good chance of making it to the Senate floor. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a key Republican Clarity holdout on the Banking Committee, told Semafor that he plans to support the bill. But as time ticks down toward summer recess and the midterm elections, the Clarity Act still has an uncomfortably thin margin for error. Traders on Polymarket have grown less optimistic on the Clarity Act’s chances throughout the week. The prediction market now gives the bill a 60% chance of passing this year.