Home Blog

Groupon: Get a BJ’s Wholesale Club Membership for Just $10


Get a BJ’s Wholesale Club Membership for Just $10

Groupon has a great deal for anyone looking to join BJ’s Wholesale Club, with one-year memberships starting at just $10.

There are two membership options available, both with BJ’s Easy Renewal:

  • BJ’s Club Membership – $10: Normally $60, saving $50.
  • BJ’s Club+ Membership – $50: Normally $120, saving $70.

Both memberships are valid for one year and give you access to BJ’s Wholesale Club locations and member pricing.

OFFER LINK

Membership Benefits

The regular BJ’s Club membership includes access to BJ’s stores, member-only prices, digital coupons, discounted gas and other membership perks.

The upgraded BJ’s Club+ membership comes with additional benefits, including 2% back in rewards on most eligible BJ’s purchases, extra gas savings and other perks.

Club+ could be worth considering if you shop at BJ’s regularly, but the basic $10 membership is a great deal for someone who just wants to try the warehouse club.

Important Terms

  • Offer available through Groupon.
  • Valid for eligible new BJ’s members.
  • Membership lasts one year.
  • BJ’s Easy Renewal is included, so your membership may automatically renew at the regular price unless canceled.
  • Additional eligibility restrictions may apply.
  • Check the Groupon offer for full redemption instructions and expiration dates.

Guru’s Wrap-up

At just $10 for a full year, this is an easy way to try BJ’s Wholesale Club without paying the usual $60 membership fee.

If you shop there often, the $50 Club+ option could also be worth a look thanks to its extra rewards and benefits. Just remember to turn off automatic renewal if you don’t want to pay the regular membership price next year.

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you take action (i.e. subscribe, make a purchase) after clicking a link, I may earn some beer 🍺🍺🍺 money, which I promise to drink responsibly. When applicable, you should always go through shopping portals to earn cashback. But when that’s not an option, your support for the site is always greatly appreciated. Thank you for reading!

How To Invest In Stock Market 2026 – Shares కొనడం ఎలా? | Stock Market For Beginners | Live Demo



How To Invest In Stock Market 2026 – Shares కొనడం ఎలా? | Stock Market For Beginners | Live Demo

Thinking of investing in the stock market? Before investing your hard-earned money, it’s important to understand how the stock market works instead of investing based on tips or social media recommendations.

In this video, I explain why beginners should first learn the fundamentals of investing—such as what the stock market is, why companies get listed, what causes share prices to move, and how to analyse stocks using fundamental and technical analysis—before making any investment decisions.

I also provide a step-by-step practical demonstration of how you can invest in stocks using the Groww app, so that beginners can understand the investment process and how to place their first order.

Remember, investing without proper knowledge can be risky. Always educate yourself, do your own research, and invest according to your financial goals and risk appetite instead of blindly following others.

If you found this video helpful, please Like, Share, and Subscribe for more videos on personal finance, investing, mutual funds, insurance, taxation, government schemes, and financial planning.

Thank you for watching!

Disclaimer: This video is intended solely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. I am not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Any stocks, prices, charts, portfolio details, watchlists, or live transactions shown in this video are displayed only to demonstrate the investment process and should not be interpreted as a recommendation or a buy, sell, or hold call. The examples used are purely illustrative and are not intended to suggest or endorse any particular security or investment strategy. Investments in securities are subject to market risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Please conduct your own research, read all relevant offer documents carefully, assess your risk tolerance, and consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser before making any investment decisions. I shall not be responsible for any investment decisions or losses arising from reliance on this video.

Hashtags :

#stockmarket #stockmarketforbeginners #investing #investingtips #sharemarket #sharemarketforbeginners #groww #mutualfunds #fundamentalanalysis #technicalanalysis #financialeducation #personalfinance #indianstockmarket #longterminvesting #stockmarketindia #telugu #telugufinance #kowshikmaridi

Tags :

stock market, stock market for beginners, how to invest in stock market, how to buy shares, groww app, groww tutorial, share market basics, stock market investing, investing for beginners, indian stock market, stock market india, fundamental analysis, technical analysis, how to select stocks, best stocks, share market tutorial, stock investing, personal finance, financial education, mutual funds, beginner investing, telugu finance, telugu stock market, stock market telugu, kowshik maridi

source

Starter Homes Are Back. Here’s Exactly Where to Buy One


For years, rookies have heard the same bad news: starter homes are disappearing, and first-time buyers are getting older. But the newest data shows something very different, and we’re breaking down how these recent changes can help you buy your first or next rental property in 2026!

Welcome back to the Real Estate Rookie podcast! Nationally, fewer than four in 10 non-homeowner households can afford a typical starter home. But in some states, things are getting a little easier. We’re breaking down where this market opening exists, where the headlines can be misleading, and how to turn a smaller new construction home or an overlooked resale home into a profitable investment property.

We’re also sharing our own starter home stories, the difference between an affordable home and a “cheap” one, and a five-part screening checklist that will help you separate the two before making an offer. Whether you’re looking to buy a house or find a more affordable real estate market to invest in, stay tuned to learn exactly how to spot a smart next deal!

Ashley:
For years, rookies have heard the same bad news. Starter homes are disappearing. First time buyers are getting older and anything affordable is either in a market you do not understand or needs more work than you think you can handle. But the newest data shows something more interesting than housing is unaffordable. The starter home market is beginning to loosen in a few very specific places.

Tony:
Now, that does not mean that cheap houses are back everywhere. Nationally, fewer than four in 10 non-homeowner households can afford the city’s typical starter home. But in Mississippi, that share is nearly 62% and several other states are above 50%. At the same time, builders are sitting on more inventory, offering more incentives, and designing smaller homes to reach buyers who cannot afford the old model.

Ashley:
Today, we’re breaking down where this opening is real, where the headline can mislead you, and how a rookie can turn a smaller new build or an overlooked existing home into a smart first purchase. We’ll also give you a five-part screen to separate an affordable home from a cheap property that still does not work. Okay. Tony, your first starter home, was that in a good time to buy or was it an expensive market, hard to find affordable homes in your starter home?

Tony:
Yeah, it’s funny. From a layout perspective, my first investment property and my first primary home were almost identical. They were both three bedroom, two and a half baths, good school districts, different parts of the country. Primaries in California, the investment was in Louisiana, but very, very similar. I think my primary was a little bit bigger in terms of square footage, but three bedrooms, two and a half baths, nice house, that was me. And we bought our primary home back in 2018, I think we moved in. And it was a great time to buy. And we got super lucky. I mentioned this on the podcast before, but we got super lucky because we bought in a new development and they’ve continued to build the same exact floor plan. They’re still building it today, but now it’s like, I don’t know, almost double the price that we paid for it back in 2018.
So it’s worked out pretty well for us buying that starter home.

Ashley:
Well, I think you’ll be a great asset to this episode, really specifically talking about building in phase one in the beginning and to getting into one of these starter homes. So a starter home, the best way that I guess we could explain it is that this is a home that typically newer families get into. It’s usually your first property you’re purchasing as your primary residence where it’s maybe not the lavish and every single expensive detail that you would really like in a home. But in my area, typical starter home is three beds, one bath or three beds, two bath is what you see. A lot of them are ranch style houses where just one floor, and then typically no lavish upgrades or any things like that. And a lot of them that I’m seeing right now that are going really fast, selling really fast in the market are outdated, but really, really well taken care of.
Where somebody older is moving on to another property or something like that and they just haven’t updated in a long time, but they’ve kept it in really great condition. Those properties are actually selling really fast, but they’re going as starter homes where maybe DIYers are coming in and slowly adding value over time to the property by doing cosmetic updates here and there.

Tony:
Just out of curiosity, is there such thing as a starter farm?

Ashley:
No, because farms are really, really expensive to start from scratch. So you basically have to be born into a farm family where you already have all of your equipment, all of your cows and things like that. One cow can just cost you $3,000. So do not recommend starting a farm from scratch unless you already have wealth and you’re looking for agricultural tax write-offs. One other thing I would mention about a starter home is that it’s usually an affordable home in your market. So it’s not on the higher end, but it’s not a super cheap property, but it’s still affordable. So in my market, that would be around 200 to $300,000 for a typical decent starter home in my area. What about in your market, Tony?

Tony:
It’s crazy. In my immediate neighborhood right now, buying a three bedroom, two bath, in terms of new inventory, new construction, they’re almost not even building traditional single family homes anymore. Almost everything that they’re building, a lot of the new inventory right now are town homes. They aren’t even really building a lot of new starter single family homes. If you’re buying a three bedroom, a lot of the new construction right now is townhomes and they’re going for six, 700K probably for that type of product. If you’re buying resale, you can still find those for around the same price, but everything new construction’s about that price point, which is crazy to think right now.

Ashley:
We pulled up a couple articles and things here to give you guys some data, but realtor.com had this article and this is how they describe a starter home. It is a smaller, affordable home, often around 1500 square feet or less. And then we also looked at LendingTree, what their actual definition was, and theirs was the weighted 25th percentile value of owner occupied homes in each state. So basically what this means is the lower priced quarter of each state’s owner occupied housing stock. And then there was actually another inventory analysis done by realtor.com and they said homes price below $350,000 nationally or below 80% of a local market’s median list price. So look at your market and what is the median list price and take 80% of that and that’s kind of the price point of a starter home. So basically your takeaway from that is a $200,000 home could be an entry level starter home in one market, but not in another market.
And me and Tony just kind of shared that as an example comparing our two markets.

Tony:
So let’s talk a little bit more about the affordability piece. So we mentioned Mississippi earlier, but let me just break down what we actually meant by that. So 61%, and again we’re looking at Misissippi, 61% of non-homeowner households in Mississippi have the income that would allow them to meet the threshold of buying a starter home for that state. Nationally, that number’s only 37.6%. So you’ve got 61% of people in Mississippi that based on their finances can afford a starter home compared to 30, almost 8% and other nationally that can afford to buy a starter home in their market. And the data says that the average starter home value is about 200K. The income needed is about 62, $63,000, and the median non-homeowner household income is $55,000. So there’s a gap there. If the income needed is 62 and the average income is 55, we’ve got a gap there of seven to almost $8,000 that we’re seeing nationally across the market.
I think just for context sake, Ash, people always talk about how do we fix affordability and what does that actually mean and how do we get there? Obviously I’m not an economist and there’s lots of other people who are way smarter than me who I’m sure are working on solving this. But just in my mind as someone who’s a real estate investor, I think if a few things were true, we could probably get housing costs down. Number one is make it easier to build things. I think part of the big challenge in a place like California is that there’s so much red tape to build and it’s such a pain and a lot of times it’s not worth it because of how difficult it is. And then I think if we also adopted maybe cheaper ways of building homes, have you seen Ash, these 3D printed homes?

Ashley:
Yeah, I’ve never seen one in person, but yeah, I’ve seen the YouTube videos.

Tony:
And it seems, I think we’re all just so used to these traditional stick-built homes that there’s maybe a stigma around things that aren’t, or even prefab homes that are super similar to stick build, but they’re just majority assembled offsite and they’re just installed on a foundation when they get there. But there’s all of these other building strategies that I think maybe if we adopted and there was less stigma around, we could also have an opportunity to bring costs down. So making it easier for builders to build, employing strategies that are just generally more cost efficient. I think those are the two things that come to mind for me because it’s like supply and demand, right? It’s like the laws of economics say that if we increase the supply dramatically and supply outpaces demand, then we can get some balance there of affordability. Now, I think the bigger question, Ash, and I’m curious what your thoughts are, is say we do get to this point where every home is 3D printed and they can build a home in four weeks and so the prices come down exponentially, what does that happen to everyone like us who has all this equity in our homes if the supply has now just flooded the market and home prices have gone down?
So there’s some give and take. So I don’t have all the answers, but I do think if we want to help affordability, those two things that come to mind. What are your thoughts Ash?

Ashley:
Well, like everything, I think there’s something else that would be offset by that plan. So in theory, that seems like a great idea is to remove the red tape, let more people build. There’s this town near me that has let, it’s a really small town. They don’t even have a grocery store or anything like that. They have their own elementary school that is connected with a town over that is a larger school that has three of their own elementary schools, middle school and high school. The smaller town, just the town permitted two new developments. One just did 63 single family homes. Every single person that moved into those homes besides one family brought kids from other districts. Now the school has two classrooms per grade. The town also just approved development of 163 prefab houses to be built, which will also be going to the school that has two classes per thing.
So I think some of these towns, by me, they can’t keep up if they were to allow more building and keep up with the demand that would come for the resources that the government provides such as school, the staffing, the police, I don’t know, other things like that. But that’s the first thing I thought of is that even if you were going to increase the supply in some areas that –

Tony:
The infrastructure has to keep up.

Ashley:
Yeah, negative effects in that market. Okay, so the purchase price of the property is only one line item. When we come back, we’re going to discuss more about the affordability of starter homes and other expenses you’ll incur, such as property taxes, insurance, HOA fees, and many more that you need to look at before you actually purchase the deal. We’ll be right back. Okay, welcome back. So now that we know the national average is not the opportunity, let’s look at where the numbers are actually moving and what rookies should search for. So we found some markets and rated them by affordability. So Kentucky, 50.7%, $125,000 value, and you need an income of 42,280 to be approved.

Tony:
Kansas comes up next at 52.3% and the home values are 125K and the income you need is about $46,000. And

Ashley:
Next up we have North Dakota at 52.7% and that’s $150,000 value and you’ll need an income of $48,000 on that one.

Tony:
Next we have Alabama at 54.1%. And again, guys, just to clarify in case you forgot, the 54.1% represents all of the non-household or non-property owning households that have the income to actually qualify for a mortgage. So that’s what the 54.1% means. And the value there is 120K for properties and the income needed is only $39,000.

Ashley:
Next up we have Arkansas, 54.3% with $110,000 value and the income you need is $37,862.

Tony:
Side note, we always talk about my lack of geographic know-how. And I remember when I found out that Arkansas was a state because we were going on a road trip and I was young. I had to be in, I don’t know, second grade maybe. And we did this long road trip and I knew Kansas, but I’d never heard of Arkansas. And I saw it on paper and I was like, “Mom, what’s Arkansas?” And she’s like, “Actually, it’s Arkansas.” So if you wanted some trivia on Tony Robinson’s ineptitude of maps, it traces all the way back. I

Ashley:
Never ever put that together that it has Kansas in the name.

Tony:
Kansas is in there, right? It’s like how does SAS, how is that pronounced Saw? It makes no sense to me and it never has, even when I was in second grade. We got to lobby to get Arkansas to change how they spell it. All right. But anyway, Arkansas comes up next at 54.3% of households, $110,000 value and income at 37,000.

Ashley:
Then we have West Virginia, and this one is at 58% with a value of 90,000 and income needed is only $29,114.

Tony:
West Virginia also just from a median home price, it actually has the lowest median home price across all the states in the country. So it’s just generally a really, really affordable or low cost place to live.

Ashley:
You had looked at a deal there before, right? Like a glamping?

Tony:
We did, yeah. We were looking at a glamp site and there’s a national park in West Virginia as well. A lot of people don’t know, but in 2020 during COVID, it got its designation, so it wasn’t super popular. But yeah, there is a national park that’s pretty popular as well. And then rounding out the list, we have Mississippi coming in number one. Again, 61.8, almost 62% are able to afford. $85,000 is the typical starter home value, and then the income needed is only 29,000. Now, Ash, I just want to get your take because obviously long-term rentals are your thing. From your perspective as a landlord, is it better to buy in an area like this where the starter home is so accessible or is it better to buy in an area where it is slightly out of reach so that you do have more consistent rental demand?

Ashley:
Well, like we said in the intro, it is important to not confuse affordability with cheaper options. So when I started investing, I was going for those cheap properties and they just ended up being headaches and didn’t see a lot of appreciation and just I wouldn’t do it again. Yes, it got me started, but we’re talking about a completely different thing. Those cheap properties, they had lots of updates to them that were bandaids. They were never well taken care of properties. They had been resold and resold and resold multiple times with people doing different DIY things and everything like that. So I think a big thing to really be cautious of is not only the property itself, is this going to just be a money pit to you where you’re constantly going to have to be doing repairs to the property? And repairs are different than maintenance, where maintenance is maintaining and more proactive than actually making repairs because things are constantly breaking in the property.
With these older properties, you want to take that into account, but also you want to look at the market. So just because a property is affordable or cheap in one of these markets doesn’t mean that you should go and invest in that market. You still need to do your market analysis. So right off the bat, I’m probably not going to purchase a property in Mississippi or West Virginia. I don’t know a ton about either property, but West Virginia is, I’m pretty sure the last I looked was seeing a huge decline, people actually not moving into the property or to. Let me say that again. Is seeing a huge decline in property. God, I still can’t say it. Is seeing a huge decline in population growth where people aren’t moving to West Virginia. Arkansas though, I would be very interested in investing there. Our good friend, Henry Washington from the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast, he does a lot of investing in Arkansas and is from there also.
So they have a lot of industry drivers, a lot of headquarters are also in Arkansas, like I think Walmart and a bunch of other ones. So definitely looking at the property itself and looking at the market that it’s in. The markets that I had invested in, they were very small. They didn’t have any industries. There was no economic drivers and there was not population growth, anything like that. I just saw the price tag and I saw that there was renters that wanted units in these areas and I just purchased them. So make sure you know the difference between these affordable starter homes and cheap properties.

Tony:
And me, I’m just kind of looking at the math. If we use Mississippi, $85,000 starter home, 3.5% down, say they go FHA, that’s just under $3,000 that they’d need in terms of down payments to get into that deal. The income’s $30,000 that they need to qualify. So maybe in the course of a couple of years, someone could save up the three grand on a $30,000 income to buy a house. Whereas in other markets where maybe it’s like, I would need to save for a decade to be able to actually get to the down payment that I need to buy in this house. It just feels like there’s maybe a little bit more stability if actually the gap in the number of people who can afford a starter home is actually a little bit lower. So affordability as the investor doesn’t always necessarily equate to maybe the best deal.
So just more data points that I think we should try and look at.

Ashley:
Okay. Now this is the part I was really excited talking about because I get shiny object syndrome over this and we’ve had several guests come on and talk about this, but buying smaller new builds and house hacking them as a single family home or maybe renting out the rooms while you’re living there and then moving out after a year going and purchasing another property or just buying it right off the bat as an investment property and renting it out. I actually pulled a report here from the Census Bureau and it reported that 485,000 new homes for sale were in June of 2026. This is equal to 9.3 months of supply if we stay at the current sales pace. The median sale price was 398,000, which is down from about 410,000 one year earlier. So you can see the year over year change isn’t significant, but it is still kind of a little margin of error there that you have.
The big thing I think that makes these new builds so attractive is the builder incentives that can come with it. So we pulled this other report that states that 64% of builders are offering sales incentives and 37% of them have actually cut prices to be able to move through inventory.

Tony:
And guys, I think that’s one of the biggest benefits of new construction is that you can get things like having the builder cover all of your closing costs, giving you permanent rate buydowns, temporary rate buydowns, additional upgrades inside of the property. So I think right now, at least in recent history, might be one of the best times to go after a new build because it could actually in a lot of ways be cheaper to buy a new build than it is to buy a home that was built 20 years ago. And I think that’s kind of a unique situation for us to be in. But to Ash’s point, we’ve had investors who do exactly that. They buy a new build in phase one, they refinance again at phase 10 when they built up a lot of equity and they use that money to go just repeat that same process.
So I love the idea of new builds as a specific strategy to build your portfolio consistently over time.

Ashley:
And here’s a little list we can give you guys. So if you got a pen and paper, take out your notes app. Here’s things you can ask the builder for. The first one is a permanent rate buy down. So they’re going to buy down your rate. The next one is maybe just a temporary buydown. So the first year, first two years, they’re buying down your rate and then it’ll go back to whatever the bank is offering. A closing cost credit, an impliance package, a lot premium waiver and a price reduction as separate line items. So there’s different advantages for asking for things separately, but these are just a list of things that you can ask and see what you can get from the builder.

Tony:
I think the only thing to consider as you’re going after the new builds is also just the total cost. So sometimes you’re going to have to deal with HOAs and a lot of these bigger subdivisions, including that cost. Things like your property taxes. For example, for us, when you buy a lot of times a new construction, really any property in the county that we live in, you get this thing called a supplemental tax bill where you buy the property, it gets reassessed and you get this massive bill at the end of year saying, Hey, here’s how much you owe us because you paid more for the property than what it was the last time that this transacted. So just know that there are some ancillary costs that you want to be aware of as you go through new construction. But I think the last big thing that I’ll say that it’s a benefit is that you often, most builders will give you some sort of warranty for the first year or two after you buy.
And that can help, especially if something big happens. We had a leak, Ash, at our primary residence and it was like 10 months into owning and we had a 12-month warranty and it was right up against the edge of this deadline. But there was this big leak, they had to cut out a big part of my ceiling. They had to reconstruct my guest bathroom upstairs, and it was all covered under the warranty, which would’ve been a much bigger expense had I had to take care of that myself. So I do love new builds for that reason.

Ashley:
And also too, I’m not positive about this, and maybe you can confirm this Tony, but also when you’re buying in phase one, I would assume that the builder wants a higher purchase price to be able to sell for phase two. So say the property is listed at 500 or they’re selling the new build for 500,000 and instead of asking for the purchase price to be 450,000, you keep it at 500,000, but you ask for all these additional things so that way they can close with a sale price of 500,000 and that is then a comp used for phase two.

Tony:
Yeah, absolutely. And that’s my exact understanding as well is that the builders want to protect their appraised value for the second phase. They can continue to increase prices. So we do have leverage as buyers when it comes to new construction. All right guys, new construction is just one of the ways we can go, but there’s also tons of homes that are resale that we can go buy as well. So we’ll talk about that after a quick word from our show sponsors. All right guys, welcome back. So the next area that we want to talk about is the existing homes that are just kind of hiding in plain sight. So these are all of the resale homes, the homes that aren’t new construction, but that are just someone’s been there for a while and now they’re moving out and selling it to you. And I think the kind of sweet spot here is that we’re looking for homes because again, we’re talking about the starter home product.
And I guess we can really go two ways here. As an investor, if you have your investor cap on, I think if we can find the house that has good bones, but just needs to be brought into the year 2026, those can oftentimes be the best deals. And that was my exact first deal. It was a home that was built in, I believe it was the 1950s, and it looked still like a home from the 1950s. It was like pink tile, the parquet floor, but it was in generally really good condition, but we had to renovate everything. And that ended up being a really, really solid first deal for me to walk into because it wasn’t this big heavy rehab where I had to do these additions or move walls or anything. It was like, “Hey, the bones and the structure of the house is actually really well taken care of.
It’s just cosmetically. Everything’s super old and outdated. So we’re going to tear all that down, start from scratch and build it up.” But it wasn’t a full gut renovation. And the benefit of going after these deals, guys, is that generally it’s going to be lower than something that’s already been renovated. So we get some of that upside. And if you can find that sweet spot, it’s a meaningful first renovation for you to step into without feeling overwhelming.

Ashley:
I mean, I’ve been investing for over 10 years now, and I just bought my new primary that was exactly one of those properties is needed some love and updating, but it was kind of taken care of over the years. It had really good bones, but it was a hoarder that lived in there. So it was just tons of stuff, which actually kind of protected the walls and the flooring and things like that. But we still ended up gutting it anyways, but that gave us some time to make it into what we wanted. And we close in February and we just moved in two days ago and we still have one bathroom to finish. There’s still not all the trim on the walls and we’re going to continue to do that. But that is the exact opportunity I’m talking about in my market where you’re finding a property that is in move-in condition, it’s just not updated.
So we had to do a pretty extensive rehab. So my property may not be the exact definition of that, but we’re still going to be doing updates to it as we’re living through it. But I think they talk about mom and pop for businesses like, oh, finding the mom and pop laundromat, buying that, finding the mom and pop campground and buying that. These are the mom and pop homes that have been taken care of and maintained. One thing I will mention though is when you are looking at a property and it’s going to be a rental, look at what it takes to actually maintain the property. So I would like, if I’m buying a single family home that’s going to be an investment property, I want a smaller driveway. I don’t want to have to pay a lot for snow removal. I want a smaller yard to maintain.
So even if I’m paying for the lawn care for somebody to cut it, I want it to be small. Even if you are having a tenant maintain it or pay the cost of it, when you go and charge for rent, they’re going to have to factor in what that cost will be for them. Or if they have a lawnmower to mow it all, or they could just use a push mower, or if they have a snow plow or any kind of means themselves to snowplow it. I want to decrease the size of things that need to be maintained. So those are two small lawn and small driveway. And some people would do it differently and say, no, the bigger the driveway, the bigger the yard, I’ll be able to charge way more rent. I would like to look at less to maintain. And then the same with the actual physical building.
So just what needs to be maintained, the HVAC filters need to be changed out. Does the property have a propane tank where it’s going to need to be filled every once in a while? Different things like that. So making a list of those things that need to be maintained on the property, putting a cost associated with that, the tenant’s going to do it if you’re going to do it. And if a tenant is in charge of doing something like replacing the air filter HVAC system, how are you going to make sure that they’re actually doing it and taking care of your property too? So I would just not only the purchase price and things like that, or what it will cost to update it, look at these other maintenance costs that will be with you throughout the future too.

Tony:
All right. As we wrap up here guys, let’s just talk about the screening process that we can go through, like a five-part checklist of what we want to look at as we evaluate starter homes from the lens of being a real estate investor. And I think the first thing that we want to look at is market liquidity or market health. So we want to look at things like supply, both supply of properties to purchase, days on market, how long are they sitting there? Price reductions on the actual acquisition side, what does that look like? And then also on the actual rental side, how many rentals are there right now? How long have they been active? Are you seeing price reductions on what they’re charging for rent? So just understanding the current balance in a market between supply and demand is the first box that we want to check.

Ashley:
Now the second one is the payment test. So you’re going to want to underwrite the principal, interest, taxes, insurance, any PMI, if you’re putting less than 20% down what your monthly HOA is, utilities you are going to pay each month. If you don’t know what those are, you can call the utility provider and they can give you an average. So they won’t be able to tell you exactly what they’re billing for the property, but they can go back over a year and tell you what the average that was billed for the year. So that’s pretty useful information to get. Figure out your maintenance to maintain the property. Any repairs, I would leave a percentage available for repairs. Vacancy, if you have one month vacancy, two month vacancy, how much do you want to set aside for that? And then also a management fee. So do put these together, run the payment after any temporary builder incentives you may have now, and then what happens after they expire?
So say you get the interest rate buydown, but it’s only for one year, what does the property look like year one? And then what do the numbers look like year two after the rate changes?

Tony:
And the number three is just really understanding your total all-in costs. So your closing costs. I feel like a lot of people just think about down payment, not realizing there are other closing costs associated with closing on a property as well. Any immediate repairs you need to make to get the property ready for your tenants or for your guests or whoever it may be, appliances, landscaping, just really making sure you’ve got a full picture of everything that needs to be done, front loading your reserves. We talked earlier about, or in other episodes about the importance of building out your reserves, just having a clear picture of not just what does it cost for me to acquire the property, not with just my down payment, but everything that I need to get to the point where I can start producing revenue. What are all the costs to get me there?

Ashley:
And then our fourth one is functional demand. So you want to find out what people actually want in a rental in your area. So how many bedrooms, how many bathrooms are they looking for? Also the layout. In my area, nobody cares renting an apartment if there’s a dining room or not. Nobody cares. I have one property right now that the person just moved out. I’ve owned it since 2014. I’ve had three different renters in there. Every single person used the dining room as a bedroom, as an additional bedroom. So thinking about what tenants are going to want, and then also whenever you plan to sell this property as to, that’s I think a big advantage of buying a single family home is in your exit strategy. You not only have investors that are looking to purchase your property, but also just everyday people to buy the property as their primary, which is a very slimmer pool when you’re selling a small multifamily property.
And then also looking at comps in the area of what other rentals are offering. You can look at just Google properties for sale, see what’s being listed, what’s available in the area. And then also what industries are you near, what school districts do people want to be in and maybe kind of tailor your choice of property in one of those markets or neighborhoods.

Tony:
And then the final piece, number five, is just having a clean exit strategy. So obviously the first goal, at least for the context of this episode is that we’re thinking about traditional long-term rentals, but could you sell this property to another non-investor who just wants to live there or is the layout so wonky that maybe it only makes sense for an investor? We have some folks who buy properties and they convert three bedrooms into six bedrooms by getting rid of the dining area and the living room because they’re not needed for co-living. So can you resell this to someone who just wants to live there as their primary residence? I think sometimes if you get into a deal and maybe it’s too unique or too tricky, your exit strategies kind of dwindle. So just make sure you’ve got a clear roadmap or exit ramp to get out of the deal as well.

Ashley:
Now for our final takeaway, just remember the opportunity is not moving to the cheapest state or buying there and it’s not buying the smallest new build property you can find. It is finding the overlap between an attainable payment, improving local supply, durable rental demand, and a property that ordinary buyers will still want later on when you’re ready to exit the property. Thank you guys so much for joining us on this episode of Real Estate Rookie. I’m Ashley and he’s Tony and we’ll see you guys on the next episode.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Visions of Geopolitical Stability



<p>Eurasia Group&#8217;s Ian Bremmer on why we may be on the brink of a more stable business environment.</p>

Canadian retail sales rebound set to continue in September




Canadian retail spending is on track to continue growing in September, although at a slower pace than in August.

Abbott Laboratories vs. UnitedHealth: Does Health Innovation or Health Insurance Make for a Better Stock to Buy?


Healthcare investors often weigh the growth potential of medical technology against the stability of diversified health services. Deciding between Abbott Laboratories (ABT +1.16%) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH -1.62%) requires comparing two very different business models.

ABT & UNH: Performance Comparison

Key Financial Metrics

Abbott Laboratories Stock Quote

ABT – Abbott Laboratories

$103.70

+1.16% (+$1.19)

Market Cap

$179B

52wk Range

$81.97 – $132.03

Gross Margin

59.63%

P/E Ratio

38.29

EPS (TTM)

$2.71

Dividend & Yield

$2.52 (2.43%)

UnitedHealth Group Stock Quote

UNH – UnitedHealth Group

$418.09

–1.62% (–$6.89)

Market Cap

$375B

52wk Range

$255.97 – $461.62

P/E Ratio

23.86

EPS (TTM)

$17.52

Dividend & Yield

$9.06 (2.17%)

Abbott focuses on scientific innovation in diagnostics and medical devices, while UnitedHealth manages the massive administrative and insurance infrastructure of the modern healthcare system. Both companies offer significant scale but face unique regulatory and operational hurdles. This comparison helps clarify which stock better fits your specific goals for income or growth in 2026.

The case for Abbott Laboratories

Abbott Laboratories generates revenue from four primary areas: medical devices, diagnostics, nutritional products, and generic pharmaceuticals. It serves a broad range of customers including hospitals, pharmacies, and government agencies through programs like Medicaid and WIC. The company is currently working to diversify its diagnostic capabilities through the pending acquisition of Exact Sciences. This expansion into the cancer diagnostics market signals a shift toward higher-growth specialty testing.

In its latest annual report, covering FY 2025, revenue reached about $44.3 billion, representing growth of approximately 6% over the prior year. Despite the top-line increase, net income fell to roughly $6.5 billion compared to $13.4 billion in the previous fiscal year. This decrease in profitability was largely influenced by a $385 million settlement related to government program allegations. The company maintained a net margin of approximately 14.7% during this period.

As of its December 2025 balance sheet, the company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of nearly 0.3x. This ratio, which measures total debt against shareholder equity, indicates a relatively conservative debt load. The current ratio, which compares short-term assets to short-term liabilities, is roughly 1.6x. During FY 2025, the business generated free cash flow of approximately $7.4 billion. This figure represents the cash remaining after the company pays for its operations and capital expenditures. Abbott’s presence among medical device stocks remains a core driver of this cash generation.

The case for UnitedHealth

UnitedHealth Group operates a dual-pronged business model through its UnitedHealthcare insurance arm and its Optum health services division. UnitedHealthcare provides coverage to millions of individuals, employers, and government beneficiaries through Medicare and Medicaid. The company is heavily dependent on government-funded programs, with premiums from Medicaid and Medicare representing 44% of total consolidated revenue in 2025. Customer concentration like this adds a layer of risk to the business if reimbursement rates or policy priorities change. Optum provides health services through data analytics, pharmacy care, and direct clinical delivery.

In its latest annual report, covering FY 2025, the company reported revenue of approximately $447.6 billion, an increase of nearly 12% year over year. Net income for the period was roughly $12.1 billion, which was a decrease from the $14.4 billion reported in the prior fiscal year. This resulted in a net margin of approximately 2.7% for the year. Higher medical costs and disruptions in service contributed to the lower profit levels.

Based on its December 2025 balance sheet, the debt-to-equity ratio is roughly 0.8x. This measure of total debt against shareholder equity suggests the company uses more leverage than its peer. The current ratio is approximately 0.8x, indicating that short-term liabilities exceed short-term assets. Free cash flow for FY 2025 reached about $16.1 billion. This represents the total cash left over after accounting for operational spending and capital expenditures.

Risk profile comparison

Abbott Laboratories faces significant oversight from global health authorities and the Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Recent legal settlements involving infant formula and ongoing litigation regarding heart valves demonstrate the high stakes of its manufacturing processes. The company must also manage the debt load from its $20 billion acquisition of Exact Sciences, which could limit financial flexibility. Competition from other diversified giants like Johnson & Johnson (JNJ -1.42%) also pressures its market share in several device categories.

UnitedHealth Group is highly exposed to changes in government policy, particularly shifts in Medicare Advantage funding. The company also faces persistent cybersecurity threats, having dealt with significant disruptions and lawsuits following a major attack on its Change Healthcare business. Predicting medical costs accurately is vital for its insurance segment, as unexpected inflation can quickly erode its narrow net margin. Competitors such as Elevance Health (ELV -1.20%) continue to vie for the same large-scale government and employer contracts.

Valuation comparison

Abbott Laboratories appears to offer a lower sales multiple, while UnitedHealth Group trades at a slight premium based on future earnings estimates.

Metric Abbott Laboratories UnitedHealth
Forward P/E 19.0x 20.3x
P/S ratio 3.9x 0.8x

Valuation metrics include those sourced from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from those of other data providers.

Which stock would I buy in 2026?

Abbott Labs’s last reported quarterly results, for the period ended Sept. 30, and its guidance for fiscal 2026 presented investors with a mixed bag. The company beat on revenue expectations, with more than $13 billion in the quarter, but missed on estimates for net income and therefore earnings-per share.

Abbott’s strengths are that adding Exact Sciences adds a cancer screening arm and folds in the popular Cologuard product to its portfolio. Abbott should be able to power sales outside the U.S. for Cologuard. For 2026, Abbott should get companywide sales over $50 billion, which would be about 13% year-over-year growth.

There is an interesting wrinkle for investors. Abbott is spinning off its nutrition business into a new publicly traded company through a planned tax-free distribution to Abbott shareholders. Upon completion of the separation, Abbott shareholders will own shares of both Abbott and the new nutrition company, allowing shareholders to participate in the value creation opportunities of both businesses. Long-term, this should benefit Abbott stock, as investors like more focused businesses that are faster-growing (spin-off stocks like this tend to suffer after the transaction, because shareholders prefer to sell those stocks and retain the original stock).

UnitedHealth, meanwhile, is the healthcare giant it seems most Americans can’t avoid, even though they want to. There is reputational risk to the business given its poor perception among its customers. One risk that comes is that, as a company so dependent on federal spending, UnitedHealth could end up in the crosshairs of a Congress seeking to lower costs for consumers.

Setting that risk aside, UnitedHealth Group is barely growing its top-line revenue this year (Wall Street expects a little over $1 billion to be added to get the business to close to $500 billion). Yet it will squeeze a nearly 50% increase in net income from those sales, to more than $17.4 billion, according to consensus estimates. That’s a big plus for its shareholders.

Which is the better buy then? Go with Abbott Laboratories, which has a long history of innovation and occupies a niche of the healthcare system less likely to be part of an overhaul that may (or may not) come from a government seeking to wrangle crushing medical costs and inferior care for Americans.

AmEx Offers: Marriott, Spend $300 Get $150


Update 10/23/26: New round send out for $150 off $375 (I guess this expires at the end of November as well). Apparently, some people are seeing two offers on the same card which should make for quite the deal. (ht reader Mark)

The Offer

Check your AmEx Offers for the following deal:

  • Spend $300 or more on Marriott stays in US, Caribbean, Mexico & Canada and get $150 statement credit. Offer expires 11/30.
  • Others got spend $450 and get $200 credit. 

The Fine Print

  • Offer valid only at participating Marriott Bonvoy® properties in the U.S. and U.S. territories, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean.
  • Reservations must be made online at Marriott.com, through the Marriott Bonvoy® App or by calling 1-888-236-2427.
  • Excludes Marriott Vacation Club®, Marriott Grand Residence Club®, Design Hotels™, Protea Hotels®, Marriott Executive Apartments®, Homes & Villas by Marriott Bonvoy®, Vistana Signature Network and Vistana Residence Network.
  • Excludes gift card purchases, online retail purchases, hotel amenities and purchases of Marriott Bonvoy® points.
  • Qualifying purchase means a purchase at a participating Marriott Bonvoy® property made during the offer period with your enrolled American Express Card and which is in an amount totaling at least $300 USD as posted to your account, following conversion from a foreign currency, if applicable, in accordance with your Card Member Agreement. Offer only valid on room rate and room charges.
  • Offer not valid for lodging stays that are paid for before the promotion start date or after the promotion end date. 

Our Verdict

Nice savings here for hotel stays. Despite the term, this has historically worked on Marriott gift cards purchased at the front desk of Marriott hotels (though the regular checkout person might not know how to do it and a manager might have to step in). 

Hat tip to Inquisitor911ok

NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • The safest software bet isn’t always the fastest box. NVIDIA wins on compatibility; Apple quietly wins on raw inference speed.
  • AMD’s pricing only makes sense once you understand you’re buying two different products under one name, not one product at two prices.
  • The right machine depends entirely on what you’re building with, not just what fits your budget. Match the ecosystem to your workflow before you match it to a benchmark.

A local AI box isn’t there to replace the cloud for large-scale training. It exists for three specific things: keeping sensitive data off someone else’s servers, avoiding metered API costs when you’re iterating hundreds of times a day and getting a fixed, predictable machine you fully control instead of a shared, rate-limited one. Cloud GPUs still win for large training runs and burst capacity. A local box wins for prototyping, fine-tuning smaller models and running inference on data you’re not allowed to send anywhere else. That’s the tradeoff, and it decides which of these three ecosystems actually fits your work.

NVIDIA, AMD and Apple are all shipping new local AI hardware on a near-constant cycle right now. Let’s look at which machine actually makes sense for you.

NVIDIA: the safe, expensive default

The NVIDIA DGX Spark pairs 128GB of unified memory with a Grace Blackwell GB10 chip built around CUDA, which is still the deepest, most battle tested software ecosystem in AI. Existing PyTorch code, TensorRT and cuDNN pipelines run on it without modification, which is not something you can say about the other two options yet.

The advantage is that nothing needs to be rewritten or reverse engineered. If your team already builds on CUDA, this is the lowest friction way to bring that work local. The drawback is memory bandwidth: at 273 GB/s, it’s the slowest of the three when a model has to move a lot of data, and reviewers consistently find it underperforms Apple’s Mac Studio on raw token generation despite the mature software.

This fits teams already deep in the CUDA and TensorRT stack who want to prototype locally before deploying to NVIDIA cloud infrastructure without touching their code. For models, think quantized versions of Llama, Qwen and DeepSeek in the 70B to 200B range, where TensorRT-LLM optimization matters more than raw bandwidth.

AMD: one chip, two very different products

This is where things get confusing on purpose. AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 chip, marketed as “the world’s smallest AI development PC” capable of running 200-billion-parameter models locally, ships in two completely different products. Third-party mini PCs built around the same chip, like the GMKtec EVO-X2 and the Framework Desktop, sell for a fraction of AMD’s own official Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform. Same processor, same 128GB of memory and more than double the price on the official kit.

LTT Labs, one of the more rigorous independent testing outfits, explains the gap plainly: the premium buys AMD’s curated software configurations, “AI Playbooks,” and first party support, not extra hardware. The advantage of the third party route is price. You get the same chip and memory pool for far less if you’re comfortable managing the software yourself. The advantage of AMD’s own kit is exactly that support layer, plus the promise of continued driver and playbook maintenance. The drawback, either way, is raw speed: LTT Labs found “the Apple Silicon Mac Studios outperform the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 machines,” generating tokens two to three times slower in their testing.

There’s a software catch too, specific to the operating system. ROCm, AMD’s answer to CUDA, is still meaningfully more mature on Linux than on Windows. Windows support runs through WSL and a newer compatibility layer that only recently expanded to more Ryzen hardware, while Linux has had direct, better supported access for longer. This fits budget conscious developers who want a large memory pool for training and fine tuning experiments on Linux, and don’t need NVIDIA specific tooling. On the models side, AMD has actually leaned into this: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was the first consumer processor to run OpenAI’s gpt-oss 120B, which needs around 61GB of memory at MXFP4 precision and runs at up to 30 tokens per second on the 128GB configuration.

Apple: the quiet winner on bandwidth

Apple’s Mac Studio comes with the M5 Max chip and up to 128GB of unified memory, or the M5 Ultra with up to 512GB. The real differentiator is memory bandwidth, and it’s worth being precise here since the two chips aren’t equal: The M5 Max reaches up to 614 GB/s, while the M5 Ultra doubles that to 1.2 TB/s. Even the lower tier beats NVIDIA and AMD’s local options at moving model data, which is why reviewers keep clocking the Mac Studio ahead of both rivals on local inference despite Apple never marketing these chips as AI accelerators first.

The advantage is that bandwidth, plus a memory ceiling (512GB on the Ultra) that lets you load models neither of the other two machines can hold without heavy quantization. The drawback is the ecosystem: Your code needs to run through Apple’s stack rather than CUDA or ROCm, which is a real cost if your team’s tooling already assumes one of those. That said, this doesn’t mean writing everything in MLX. Most people running models on a Mac just load GGUF files directly through llama.cpp’s Metal backend, Ollama or LM Studio, all of which work out of the box. MLX only matters if you’re optimizing specifically for Apple Silicon.

This fits developers who care more about inference speed and model size than ecosystem compatibility. For models, 512GB is enough to run a 70B model with zero quantization, which is a real advantage over the other two machines. It is not, however, enough for the largest open models.

The bottom line

None of these is a universal answer. If your code already runs on CUDA, NVIDIA removes the most risk. If you want the most memory for your money and you’re comfortable on Linux, AMD’s ecosystem, official kit or third party board, gets you there cheaper. If you want the fastest actual inference and don’t mind stepping outside CUDA and ROCm entirely, Apple quietly wins the benchmarks. Pick the ecosystem your workflow already depends on first. The hardware comparison only matters after that.

Key Takeaways

  • The safest software bet isn’t always the fastest box. NVIDIA wins on compatibility; Apple quietly wins on raw inference speed.
  • AMD’s pricing only makes sense once you understand you’re buying two different products under one name, not one product at two prices.
  • The right machine depends entirely on what you’re building with, not just what fits your budget. Match the ecosystem to your workflow before you match it to a benchmark.

A local AI box isn’t there to replace the cloud for large-scale training. It exists for three specific things: keeping sensitive data off someone else’s servers, avoiding metered API costs when you’re iterating hundreds of times a day and getting a fixed, predictable machine you fully control instead of a shared, rate-limited one. Cloud GPUs still win for large training runs and burst capacity. A local box wins for prototyping, fine-tuning smaller models and running inference on data you’re not allowed to send anywhere else. That’s the tradeoff, and it decides which of these three ecosystems actually fits your work.

NVIDIA, AMD and Apple are all shipping new local AI hardware on a near-constant cycle right now. Let’s look at which machine actually makes sense for you.

NVIDIA: the safe, expensive default

The NVIDIA DGX Spark pairs 128GB of unified memory with a Grace Blackwell GB10 chip built around CUDA, which is still the deepest, most battle tested software ecosystem in AI. Existing PyTorch code, TensorRT and cuDNN pipelines run on it without modification, which is not something you can say about the other two options yet.

Explaining Basic Financial Concepts YOU Should Understand



This video goes over everything basic financial concept you should understand, and explains them if you don’t. Hope you enjoy!

We are hiring editors and animators, apply here 👉

———————————————————–

Timestamps:
0:00 Taxes
1:27 Banks
2:43 Interest
4:02 Inflation
5:36 Recessions
6:49 Credit Scores
8:11 Currency
9:15 Investing
10:16 Value
11:13 Time

source

Division III Athletes Sue NCAA Over Scholarship Ban


Key Points

  • Three current and former Division III athletes filed a class action against the NCAA on October 23, 2026, arguing its athletic scholarship ban fixes the price of their labor at zero.
  • The suit targets NCAA Bylaw 15.01.3. It seeks triple damages for athletes who competed since October 21, 2022, plus an order ending the ban.
  • Nothing changes for families right now. Division III athletes still pay for school with need-based and merit aid, and the case could take years.

The legal fight over paying college athletes just reached the NCAA’s largest division. Three current and former Division III athletes sued the NCAA on October 23, 2026. They argue the ban on athletic scholarships at more than 400 schools is illegal price fixing under federal antitrust law.

The case, Printz v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2:26-cv-12448), seeks damages for athletes who competed in Division III since October 21, 2022. It also asks the court to stop the NCAA from enforcing the ban.

About 210,000 athletes compete in Division III each year, according to the NCAA (PDF File). None of them can receive an athletic scholarship today.

Save For Later

Would you like to save this?

We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

What Does The Division III Lawsuit Claim?

The lawsuit claims Division III schools have agreed not to compete on price for athletes. Its target is NCAA Division III Bylaw 15.01.3, which says a school “shall not award financial aid to any student on the basis of athletics leadership, ability, participation or performance.” Division III athletes can still receive merit aid and need-based grants on the same terms as other students.

“The NCAA has engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to fix the price of Division III athletic labor at zero by prohibiting every member of Division III, the NCAA’s largest division at more than 400 schools, from offering a single penny of athletic scholarship,” the complaint states.

Jackson Hale, the first named plaintiff, is a senior defensive back at Pacific Lutheran University. Connor Printz played basketball from 2020 to 2024 at Claremont McKenna College, which ranks among the most expensive colleges in the country. Chris Jennings swam and played lacrosse at the University of Lynchburg from 2019 to 2023.

Lynchburg reached a negotiated resolution with the NCAA in January over $155,325 in improper aid to athletes in 2022-23. The suit doesn’t say whether Jennings received any of that money. Division III rules let schools give athletes merit scholarships only on the same terms as other students.

Why Connor Printz Says The Ban Cost Him

Printz says the ban pushed him off the team. He quit basketball early in the 2023-24 season to focus on his social media business, and he took out substantial student loans to cover nearly $80,000 in tuition, room and board that year.

“With even just a meaningful partial scholarship, Printz would have continued playing through his senior season because his basketball labor would have served to cover a part of the cost of his education,” the complaint states.

The irony sits at the center of the case. Printz says he earned up to $50,000 in endorsement deals with Reebok, Clif Bar and other brands while playing, and Hale also received NIL money. Under current rules, a brand can pay a Division III athlete, but the athlete’s own school can’t put a dollar toward tuition for playing.

How Does This Case Connect To NIL And The House Settlement?

The case is built on the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in NCAA v. Alston. The unanimous decision held that NCAA limits on athlete benefits face ordinary antitrust review. That ruling opened the door to NIL deals and, later, the House settlement that lets Division I schools pay athletes directly.

The money in college sports has been growing ever since. College Sports Commission data shows schools paid 34,915 athletes about $1.77 billion in the first year of revenue sharing. That works out to about $50,700 each.

The cap was $20.5 million per school for 2025-26, and the Senate voted 77-22 in September to write it into federal law through the Protect College Sports Act.

.tci-athpay{border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;overflow:hidden;font-family:inherit;color:#141414;margin:24px 0;background:#fff} .tci-athpay-head{background:#141414;color:#fff;padding:14px 18px;font-size:18px;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3} .tci-athpay-head span{color:#f6c061} .tci-athpay table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px} .tci-athpay th{background:#f9f7f5;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.04em;color:#55504a;text-align:left;padding:10px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8} .tci-athpay td{padding:11px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;vertical-align:top} .tci-athpay tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#fcfbf9} .tci-athpay td:first-child{font-weight:700} .tci-athpay .pill{display:inline-block;padding:2px 9px;border-radius:999px;font-size:12px;font-weight:700;margin-right:6px} .tci-athpay .yes{background:#dff3e4;color:#14532d} .tci-athpay .no{background:#fde2e2;color:#7f1d1d} .tci-athpay .mixed{background:#f6c061;color:#141414} .tci-athpay-foot{background:#f9f7f5;color:#8a8378;font-size:12px;padding:10px 14px} @media (max-width:640px){ .tci-athpay thead{display:none} .tci-athpay tr{display:block;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;padding:8px 0} .tci-athpay td{display:block;border:none;padding:6px 14px} .tci-athpay td:not(:first-child)::before{content:attr(data-label);display:block;font-size:11px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.04em;color:#8a8378;margin-bottom:2px} }

How College Athletes Get Paid By NCAA Division In 2026
Division Athletic Scholarships Direct Pay From School NIL Deals
Division I Yes YesOpted-in schools, $20.5M cap in 2025-26 Yes
Division II PartialOften split across a roster No Yes
Division III NoBanned by Bylaw 15.01.3 No Yes
Source: NCAA, College Sports Commission. The College Investor.

The plaintiffs argue Division III can’t keep a zero-dollar rule while the rest of college sports pays. “The Division III prohibition on athletic aid is undeniably a multi-conference agreement in Alston’s own taxonomy,” the complaint states. The case also lands in the Ninth Circuit, which handled both O’Bannon and Alston. That same court circuit is who allowed schools to pay athletes millions directly.

The NCAA has history on its side too. A federal court in Indiana dismissed similar Division III claims in Rock v. NCAA in 2013, finding the scholarship ban presumptively pro-competitive. However, that ruling came eight years before Alston and before any athlete could legally sign an endorsement deal.

What This Means For Families Paying For Division III

Nothing changes for current recruits or this year’s financial aid offers. Division III schools still build packages from need-based grants and institutional merit awards, and many Division III schools are private colleges that discount tuition heavily.

Mark Kantrowitz’s analysis of 2015-16 federal data found 36% of students at private nonprofit colleges received merit-only institutional grants, averaging $12,060.

If the plaintiffs win, Division III schools would be allowed to offer athletic aid, but not required to. Schools would have to fund that aid from budgets that already typically lose money, and federal auditors found 94% of Division I programs spent more than they earned in 2023-24.

A court could also award damages to former athletes if a class is certified, though that outcome is years away.

What Happens Next In Printz V. NCAA?

The NCAA’s next move is its formal response to the court filing, which we likely won’t see for weeks or months.

A motion to dismiss is the stage where the Rock claims failed, so the first ruling will show whether Alston changed the math. The plaintiffs want triple damages under the Clayton Act, which could make this case worth billions if all Division III athletes are involved. That compares with the $1.77 billion Division I schools paid athletes in a full year of revenue sharing.

It’s important to remember that court cases like this typically take years to resolve. The House v. NCAA case took just about 5 years, and it ended in a settlement agreement, not a trial. If Pritz follows the same path, athletes may not see any resolution until around 2031.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Division III Athletes Sue NCAA Over Scholarship Ban appeared first on The College Investor.