How to 2X Your Cash Flow (or More) on the Property You Already Own (Rookie Reply)
What if you could take the rental property you already own and make 2-3 times more? Whether you’re in the red, barely breaking even, or wanting more from your rentals, we’re showing you multiple ways to boost your cash flow!
Welcome back to another Rookie Reply! Today, we’re answering three questions from the BiggerPockets Forums that cover some of the most searched and most overlooked strategies in real estate investing right now. Is co-living actually realistic, and how do you pivot to the model without losing your mind? Don’t think you have enough for a down payment? The good news is that there are several loans and strategies that require much less than you think. Stick around until the end because we’ve got a couple of strategies most rookies never consider that could make you $10,000 from just one house!
Whether you’re trying to squeeze more cash flow from a property you already own, get into your first deal with limited savings, or find an investing strategy that most beginners overlook, this episode has something for every stage of the journey!
Ashley:
What if you could take the exact same property you are already looking at and rent it out for two to three times more than a standard single family rental without buying anything bigger or more expensive?
Tony:
And what if not having money for a down payment is not actually the thing that’s stopping you? I mean, there are creative ways to get into your first deal right now that most rookies might never even.
Ashley:
This is The Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kehr.
Tony:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson. And rookies, today we are answering three questions coming straight from the BiggerPockets community and they line up with topics that we’ve been getting the most questions about lately, co-living, getting into your first deal with limited capital and a strategy that is genuinely one of the most overlooked cashflow plays in all of residential real estate. So let’s get into it. Our first question today comes from the BiggerPockets Forums and it says, “I keep seeing people talking about co-living and renting by the room as a way to dramatically increase cashflow. I own a three bedroom, single family home that I currently rent to one family for $1,600 per month. Someone told me I could potentially rent the same house, buy the room for six to $700 per room and make close to double. Is that actually realistic? What does it look like to transition from a single tenant model to a buy the room model?
And what are the biggest things I need to think through before I make that change? This is great. I think we’ve heard a lot about co-living over the last couple of years and BiggerPockets actually has a guide that was authored by Miller McSwain, who we’ve had on the podcast a few times. So if you want to learn more about co-living, you can check out the BiggerPockets of Bookstore and find that guide by Miller McSwain. But let’s talk about what co-living is first and how it’s different from traditional long-term rentals. Co-living is a strategy where instead of renting your entire three bedroom property to one tenant, to one family, you individually rent out every single room. So you rent out bedroom one, bedroom two, bedroom three. There are some folks who kind of take this to an extreme, like we’ve interviewed the Nawsums and their strategy in the Pacific Northwest is they’ll buy a four bedroom and convert it to an eight bedroom.
And they’re converting the formal dining area into sleeping spaces, maybe the garage into a converted bedroom as well. So they’re taking four bedrooms and making it eight, but then effectively renting out every single space that’s there. And the benefit to the point that was made in this question is that when you rent by the room in a lot of scenarios, you can actually make more money than renting out the entire space. So that is the idea behind co-living and why it’s important. Now the demand for co-living I think is also growing because people want more affordable places to live. And if you can get them into a nice neighborhood, into a nice home, for a fraction of what it would cost them to maybe rent an apartment by themselves, that is something that a lot of folks are looking for. And maybe it could be folks who are young professionals just getting started in their career.
It could be people who are maybe living there temporarily for work. They’re only going to be there for six months to a year and then they don’t want a big place of their own. It could be people who are in transitional housing. Maybe they’re just recently divorced, maybe whatever it may be. They’re in some sort of life moment where they just need something for the short term. But there’s a lot of demand and I don’t think we’ll ever lose demand for affordable housing. So there’s a lot of upside both to you as a landlord and to the tenant when you can do co-living strategies correctly.
Ashley:
I think the piece that I think about most with co-living is the operational difference from renting to a single tenant to doing room by the room model. So you’re collecting rent from multiple people instead of just one tenant that’s in that one unit. But also you’re now having to manage these people, manage the common areas. They don’t get along what happens. So I think there’s maybe more management at first, or at least putting in the operational pieces as to who buys the toilet paper for the one shared bathroom, who’s cleaning the bathroom. And we’ve had so many guests on that share the different rules, the different operational models that they have for some of these things. Some landlords will supply all of the paper products for the house. They supply the toilet paper, the towels. Then they also have, we’ve had guests on that they split it.
So they are in charge of splitting it and supplying it. And then we’ve had tenants that just are guests on that are just bringing it for themselves. They have their own toilet paper. I don’t know if they take it into the bathroom with them and then take it out with them, but there’s so many different ways to actually set up the co-living model that I think that is probably the biggest difference from just renting to one person or one family that’s going to be living in the unit is really setting up how that operational piece will work.
Tony:
Yeah. Now there is a part of the question that talks about the transition. And honestly, I think it’s a prety straightforward transition. It’s, hey, whenever your current lease expires or if they’re already on a month to month, you give them their notice and then you start to market the place for co-living. We’ve seen it done in different ways, but oftentimes you’ll want to furnish some of the main living spaces. I know some folks do co-living where they’ll also furnish the room. Others say, “Hey, you got to bring your own stuff.” But oftentimes the communal spaces are furnished. So maybe it’s just a matter of getting the furnisher kind of set up in those core places. And then you’re basically just starting the screening process in the same way that you would if it was a traditional long-term tenant. So I don’t think there’s a huge massive jump you need to make.
Now you do want to do the math. I know you said someone told you that you could get six to $700 per month, but I try and validate that. Are there other rooms for rent in the area? And if so, what are they renting for? If you compare that to maybe a studio apartment or maybe a one bedroom apartment, are one bedrooms going for 400 bucks per month in your market? Well, then it’s probably going to be a little hard to get a six or 700 bucks on a room rental. But if one bedroom apartments are going for 1,200, well then yeah, 700 for a room seems pretty reasonable at that rate. So I think just doing a little bit of research as well on the actual revenue potential will be important before you jump into actually converting this property into a co-living strategy.
Ashley:
And there will also be more work upfront. So yes, you are going to hopefully potentially make more money, but you are going to have to go out and find these tenants. So instead of just one tenant for the unit, you’re going to have to go out and find one for each bedroom, which will take a significant amount of work instead of just having to place one tenant. You can outsource this to a leasing agent. I actually have never heard how they would charge on that. Typically, a leasing agent charges one month’s rent to rent out a unit and probably would be similar to renting out by the room, whatever that person is. So you’re paying them one month’s rent per each room that they rent out. But one other thing that I want to add on to the operational piece to actually think about too is the utilities.
Are you going to cover all of the utilities? Will they split the utilities, things like that. So easily transition, I would say into it as far as the property. I don’t see like you don’t have to really do a rehab or anything like that, but it’s more just getting these operational pieces in order. And some of them you might have to add in and figure out as you go, but there’s so many people that are doing it that if you go to the bigger pockets forums and you just ask in there, if someone could give you what their guidelines are, what their rules are or a copy of their lease agreement and how they handle co-living situations, you’ll get so many people that will actually send you a list of like, “Here’s what I provide, here’s what they provide, here’s what I’m responsible for, here’s what they’re responsible for.
” It can be really beneficial.
Tony:
There’s also a PadSplit, which is an option for investors as well to kind of help source and list your co-living opportunities. And I’ve heard a lot of investors having some success with PadSplit as well. We’re going to take a quick break, but when we come back, we’re answering the question that is probably the most search thing on our entire YouTube channel right now. It’s how do you actually buy your first rental property when you don’t have a lot of money? We’ll be right back after this.
Ashley:
Okay. Welcome back. Our second question is from the beggar pockets forums. I am 27 years old and I desperately want to buy my first rental property. The problem is I only have about $8,000 saved. Every time I look at a deal, the down payment alone is 20,000 to 40,000 and I feel like I am years away from being able to actually do this. My income is solid. I make $65,000 a year, but I cannot seem to save fast enough. Is there a way to actually get into real estate investing right now with only $8,000 or do I just need to keep saving and wait? I’m starting to feel like I’m going to miss the window. First of all, no window to be missed. You don’t want to just jump into real estate for fear of missing out on the window and think that you need to buy something now.
But on the flip side, the sooner you start, the more appreciation, the more equity that will build up over time in your properties. So there definitely is an advantage to starting now compared to later, but don’t rush into it because you think you’re going to miss out on perfect timing of purchasing a deal. So the first recommendation I’m going to give is doing a house hack. It’s a powerful way to own an investment property. Have some of your living expenses covered if not all of them and you can buy a two to four unit property, live in one unit.
I don’t think in this question we know where the person is living as far as how much they’d actually need for a down payment, what their purchasing power is in their area. But with an FHA loan, if you’re going to live in it in your primary and rent out the other units, that’s three and a half percent down. Or we just talked about co-living, buying a property and maybe you live in one unit, your one bedroom and then rent out the other bedrooms. So house hacking is such a powerful way to actually get started. And then after a year, once you’ve satisfied the loan requirement of living in the property for a year, you can move out and rent out that area and now you have a full investment property.
Tony:
I think one of my favorite loan products, and we’ve talked about this before, but it’s the NACA loan and we’ve interviewed folks who have used it before. Nancy Rodriguez, I know she used it. There’s some other folks we brought in as well, but NACA is a nonprofit that’s partnered with, I believe it’s Bank of America to offer what I think is potentially the best house hacking loan product that I’ve seen, but it’s essentially 0% down with zero closing costs. I think the only thing you might have to pay for, I think is either your inspection or your appraisal or there’s one minor thing you have to pay for and the interest rate is typically about a point lower than whatever the prevailing interest rates are today. I’m going to pull up the NACA website because you can go onto their website at any point in time and pull up the mortgage rates that they’re offering.
And if I look today, I’m just going to type in today’s mortgage rates and it looks like coining at least to… All right, as of today, at least as of this recording, the 30 year fixed is about 6.73%. On NACA’s website, they’re offering a 30-year fixed at 5.6%. So they’re an entire point lower right now than where prevailing interest rates are. And that’s just how they operate. That’s not like a promo. There’s nothing special you need to do to get that. That is just simply the loan product that they offer and you can use a NACA loan product up to four units. So you can buy small multifamily, live in one unit, rent out the others. There are definitely some restrictions that come along with that loan in terms of purchase price in terms of your ability to move out. I want to say it’s longer than a year.
I want to say it’s maybe two years, might even be three years, you have to live with the property before you can move out of it. And you can only have one NACA loan open at a time. So if you ever decide to try and use the NACA loan again, you’d have to sell that existing property. So there are some restrictions there. But if you want to talk about getting started and potentially the most cost-effective way possible, I think that the NACA loan product is one of the best that I’ve seen.
Ashley:
Next we have creative financing. So there’s multiple different ways to get creative with your financing and one of them is seller financing, finding a property where the seller is willing to hold the mortgage on the property. So you’re negotiating the terms of your financing with them and you’re making payments directly to them. So you negotiate what your down payment is, you negotiate with your interest rate is and you’re actually just paying them and they’re holding the mortgage on the property instead of having to go through a bank and need a large down payment amount. The next thing is if you decide that you don’t want to live in the property, you don’t want to house hack, the NACA loan won’t work for you. The creative financing options, you can’t find a seller who will do seller financing. Then there’s also the save faster method, I guess per se, is increasing your income.
How can you increase your income to aggressively save more money each month? I’m not a budgeter. I can’t stand budgeting. I did the Dave Ramsey way of paying off a debt and I love a lot of things about Dave Ramsey, but I prefer to increase my income. And yes, if there are some expenses you know you could easily cut, go ahead, but I’m not saying live frugal on race and beans like Dave Ramsey, see if there is any side hustles. With AI today, there are so many different ways to make money doing side hustles, social media even, that is there a way that you could increase your income consulting or doing jobs on Upwork, things like that and use that to aggressively save for the next year to increase the amount that you actually have for a down payment. Okay. We have one more break and then we’re going to get into the question that honestly blew my mind when I first learned about it and it involves the same three bedroom house everyone is already buying just used in a completely different way.
We will be right back.
Tony:
All right guys, welcome back. Our last question today is covering one of my favorite topics that we’ve covered recently and it’s a strategy that’s genuinely hard to believe until you understand how it actually works. So we’ll get into our final question, but this one comes from the forms. It says, “I’ve been hearing a lot about assisted living as a real estate strategy where you can make eight to $12,000 per month on a standard single family home. I own a three bedroom, two bath home that I currently rent for $1,800 per month. Is it actually realistic to turn a home like this into a assisted living facility? What does it take to get started, licensing, renovations, staffing? And is this something regular real estate investors can do or do you need a healthcare background? What are the biggest risks?” Man, we recently interviewed Hans Stone. So if you want to go back and listen to Hans’s episode, it’s Hans Stone, but he’s based in Southern California just outside of Los Angeles.
So very high cost of living market and he’s been able to cash flow incredibly well with, I think he has two or three residential assisted living facilities and that episode is honestly a really well laid out kind of mini masterclass on how to get started in the residential assisted living facility space. But for folks that aren’t aware, assisted living facilities are homes for typically elderly individuals who are unable or maybe no longer desire to live on their own and they’re looking for basically twenty four seven support and care to help them continue to live with some level of independence. So these are homes where typically all of your meals are included. There’s activities they’re doing for the residents that are there. Obviously your room, utilities, furnishings, all those things are included as well. So it’s truly a place where the elderly can get the care that they need without having to go into a traditional, call like an old folks home, a senior kind of place like that.
Now, Hans’s numbers were incredible. I don’t recall off the top of my head, but they were pretty close to like 12 to 14 grand per month, which is phenomenal cashflow, especially if you’re doing this in a high cost of living market. But there are also some very important things to call it as well. There is a licensing process you have to go through in order to set up one of these residential assisted living facilities. There’s a renovation process typically where you have to have certain elements in the home that abide by the rules of your specific state or county or whoever is a licensing body for where you live. So his strong recommendation was like, you need at least about 12 months of just like holding costs set aside when you close this deal in addition to your renovation budget to make this type of asset work.
So even if you already have the property itself, you’d still want to make sure that you set aside the funds to renovate it, to meet whatever requirements your state or city or county needs, but then also have enough funds for the 12 months it’ll take to convert it into an assisted living facility and to get it fully leased up. So it’s not like an immediate spigot where you get a rental today and you can maybe have someone sign on a lease tomorrow. The runway’s a little bit longer with assisted living than it is with traditional rentals.
Ashley:
One thing that I actually didn’t realize was when you do assisted living, you don’t actually need a healthcare background and in some cases, neither do your employees. I think it was even Hans that we had on that I was also on a panel recently where someone else was doing this too, and they didn’t have a healthcare background that you are hiring people to work and they’re not necessarily nurses or doctors. You can have some kind of relationship with nurses and doctors that come into the facility, but you are acting as assisted living, which you are not acting as a healthcare facility. So you don’t need to have people in the property that are actually licensed. So there’s restrictions on what you can do and can’t do obviously if you don’t have healthcare workers, but that’s why you’re offering your assisted living where they need assistance with maybe bathing with maybe having somebody cook their meals for them, maybe getting dressed or things like that where it’s definitely not like you’re thinking a nursing home where there is nurses on staff at all times too.
So that was a big myth buster for me was I didn’t realize you didn’t need to have a background in healthcare at all to have one of these facilities.
Tony:
But to the point of the original question, the income potential here is pretty big. I want to say Hans was charging, I think it was like 7,500 for someone who was sharing a room, I think it was like 10 grand a month or something. It was a pretty big number for someone who had their own room. Now again, this is Southern California outside of Los Angeles. So that number’s not going to translate everywhere, but that’s what allowed him to cash flow 10 or 15 grand per month was that he had three bedroom houses, four to five residents per house, each paying somewhere between 7,500 to 10 grand per month. Now there are obviously expenses as well. You got to pay staff to be there. You’ve got to buy all the groceries and do all those things and the activities, the insurance to kind of hold as well.
That was one of the biggest risks that Hans talked about was you’re caring for elderly people, you got to make sure that your I’s are dotted, T’s are crossed, but the profitability margins are definitely there.
Ashley:
Yeah. And I don’t remember what his insurance was, but I do remember it not being as expensive. My insurance on a five unit I have was way more expensive than what he was even paying in for insurance. And one last thing I think about this strategy too that we learned from him was it was definitely, it’s an operational business. It’s a hospitality business. It isn’t just like, oh, let’s fill these rooms, we’re getting these people and they’re paying, that’s great. It’s hands off. It’s definitely an operational business, that hospitality piece, just like short-term rentals. So many people got into short-term rentals not realizing how much they have to do with – The work. Yeah, really the work that they have to do to provide that customer service that experienced things like that. And that’s the same with assisted living. He said they have a waiting list for the properties because of the care and the activities and different things that they do in their property.
And I guess one more thing is too is he mentioned that he doesn’t take insurance and he said that’s just like less hoops they have to jump through. So if somebody gets to that point where they financially cannot afford to pay there, he has different programs, different people that they can talk to to help get that person into some kind of assisted living where insurance does cover it on their behalf, but he said most of the time, I think there was maybe one person that he had a problem with in his whole time doing this that didn’t pay and he ended up helping them getting to somewhere where they could pay.
Tony:
It is really one of those asset classes and strategies that truly is a win-win. It reminds me of, we interviewed Devonna, and this was a while ago, but she did sober living homes and it’s one of those asset classes where it truly is a win-win.You’re providing meaningful housing to a population that’s in need. The elderly, folks recovering from addiction who are searching for sobriety in the right environment to turn their lives around. So you’re truly giving them an incredible opportunity, but yet you’re also making a really great investment into your own financial future and ability to provide for your family. So I do like these… Again, they’re businesses that are just kind of disguised as real estate investing, but I do like these strategies because it makes it better for everyone involved.
Ashley:
Well, thank you guys so much for joining us today on this episode of Real Estate Rookie. I’m Ashley. He’s Tony, and we’ll see you guys on the next episode.
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].
‘It’s just his AI and my AI going back and forth’: how ‘social offloading’ erodes work relationships
Stop if you’ve heard this one before: An employee received a message from her boss and didn’t quite understand its meaning. Suspecting it was written by AI, the employee asked her AI tool to interpret the message. The AI responded and then asked if she wanted a draft response back to her boss.
The employee paused. “‘I literally think [my boss’] AI is talking to my AI. That is the actual conversation happening right now,’” the employee told Leena Rinne, vice president of leadership, business, and coaching at Skillsoft, an edtech and skills management platform. She told Rinne, “‘I can’t crack the code of working with [my boss], because it’s just his AI and my AI going back and forth.’”
Rinne calls this phenomenon “socially offloading,” or when interpersonal skills that require human judgement, empathy, or courage gets outsourced to AI. It’s similar to “cognitive offloading,” or shifting often menial tasks to technology like AI to reduce mental effort, and has the potential to disrupt workplace culture.
Social offloading can look like a boss is preparing for a performance review and asking AI how to have the conversation. Or, it could be an employee asking to craft a response to a stressful email from a manager.
“If I’m always asking AI how do I respond to my boss,” Rinne told Fortune, “I don’t actually learn how to engage with my boss. I don’t actually learn how to build a relationship with my boss.”
Humans are increasingly using AI in more human ways, with the most common use being for therapy and companionship, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis of AI usage patterns. The problem is not that AI doesn’t give helpful advice, Rinne said, but the skills we lose when we rely too much on it.
“The risk is then that we don’t develop these critical skills that we can use in the moment, because we don’t know how to navigate emotional intelligence, if AI is navigating emotional intelligence for us,” Rinne said.
Skillsoft uses and sells AI tools to their customers, but their tools aim to coach people through how to have real-world conversations. Its product, CAISY, allows people to practice having conversations and provides feedback, before they have important work conversations.
Instead of “here’s the answer, here’s what you should say,” Rinne said, the AI instead teaches the person how to develop those intrapersonal skills. “I’m actually building my skill of navigating a difficult conversation or navigating a client conversation because I’ve had the practice,”
Paying the price of cutting middle management
AI isn’t the cause of the problem, but rather a leadership vacuum, Rinne said. As organizations have flattened their organizational structures and cut out middle managers, mentorship and coaching have fallen by the wayside.
A prime example of this strategy is Meta, which has cut 25,000 jobs since 2022 and touts an AI team that has one boss for every 50 engineers. Traditionally, a 25-to-1 employee-to-boss ratio is usually seen as the outer limit of the so-called span‑of‑control scale, but the company is going all-in on AI. With AI, some organizations are pushing the limits of management.
The recent uptick in younger hires seems to be a common approach, similarly taken by Cognizant, an IT consulting firm that boasts more than 350,000 employees globally on their site, and is on an entry-level hiring spree.
“If you can equip these people with AI, you have commoditized expertise. You’ve handed over expertise on the fingertips. So you could have more entry-level programs, and you could do more school graduates and take them to expertise faster,” Cognizant CEO Ravi Kumar S told Fortune earlier this year. While it does flatten the workplace pyramid, “the asymmetry is not going to come from expertise. It’s going to come from interdisciplinary skills,” he said.
Rinne sees the upside from an organizational perspective as fewer managers can lead to quicker decisions and more autonomy. However, managers are still needed to turn strategy into results and into execution, develop talent, and hold a team together, she said.
“There’s a risk that organizations start treating the span of a leadership’s role like it’s a math problem, when this is really a capability problem,” she said.
While other generations have had decades to learn how to navigate change and the organizational dynamics that come with change, now “young people enter the workforce, and they’re just thrown into the deep end,” Rinne explained.
Some have blamed young workers’ struggle to navigate the workplace on being generally less social. They’re dating and socializing less, and Tessa West, a professor of psychology at New York University whose research focuses on communication between employees and bosses, says that is affecting their ability to perform at work.
“You learn a lot of skills in those early relationships that you then leverage in the workplace,” West said. “Negotiation is a huge one, and so is compromise.”
Even romantic relationships can’t fill the gap Rinne sees forming between employees and their bosses. She points to her own experience coming up as helping her prepare for her current role as an organization’s leader.
“I’ve had amazing opportunities to be coached and to have investment in my development,” she said. “The contrast of that is you’ve got Gen Z coming in, and I think there’s this assumption as a digital child, that they are already ready for the pace of change, or they’re already ready to navigate.”
But leaders are not actually equipping younger employees to navigate change, communicate effectively, and have good judgment, she said, which lowers their competitive advantage when human-centric skills are driving success in the AI era.
“We’re just kind of expecting them to enter this crazy whirlwind moment and be able to navigate it effectively,” she said.
A version of this story was published on Fortune.com on March 28, 2026.
More on AI in the workplace:
How Four Seasons Turns Recruiting into Competitive Advantage
<p>Four Seasons CEO Alejandro Reynal tells HBR editor at large Adi Ignatius why the luxury hotel brand hires for attitude over experience.</p>
Citi Merchant Offer for Home Depot, Save Up to $30
Citi Merchant Offer for Home Depot
Citi Merchant Offers are similar to Amex Offers and Chase Offers. With these offers, Citi credit cardholders can unlock additional savings and benefits when making purchases with select merchants. Citi Merchant Offers often include discounts, cashback rewards, or special promotions tailored to cardholders’ spending habits and preferences.
Citi Merchant Offers are now available for all Citi cardholders, although specific offers might still be targeted. Some people are now seeing an offer that can save you $up to $30 at Home Depot, either online or in-store. Check out the details below.
Offer Details
There are two separate offers:
- Earn 15% Back on any purchase. One-time use. Online or in-store. Maximum reward of $30 statement credit.
- Earn $5 Back on a purchase of $50 or more. Minimum of $50 or more in a single-receipt purchase, one-time, online and in-store, with maximum reward of $5 statement credit.
Important Terms
- Offer expires on July 31, 2026.
- Find your Citi Merchant Offers here.
- Limit of one enrolled card and one statement credit per card member.
- Valid in the US and US territories.
Guru’s Wrap-up
With this Home Depot Citi Merchant Offer you can save $5 or $30, depending on which version you find in your accounts.
You can take advantage of this offer by simply using your Citi credit cards for eligible transactions. Just make sure you enroll in the offer first, before making a purchase. You can enroll multiple Citi credit cards for this same offer, as long as the offer shows up in that account.
HT: DoC
Soft Jobs Report Takes Pressure Off Mortgage Rates
I said it was going to be a big week for mortgage rates and it didn’t disappoint.
But oddly, mortgage rates shot up for a reason unrelated to jobs data.
It was words from new Fed chair Kevin Warsh that caused rates to jump yesterday.
Today, they will likely ease thanks to underlying economic data, which matters more than words.
And that’s perhaps a taste of what’s to come under Warsh. Tough talk but ultimately data leading the way as always.
Weak Jobs Data Gives Mortgage Rates a Break
This week’s slate of economic data has all been released ahead of the July 4th holiday, culminating with the BLS jobs report today.
A day earlier than usual, it was tame and well below forecast, with just 57,000 jobs added during June versus a consensus of 115,000.
Meanwhile, April’s numbers were revised down by 31,000, from +179,000 to +148,000, and the May was revised down by 43,000, from +172,000 to +129,000.
Thanks to these revisions, employment numbers for April and May combined are 74,000 lower than previously reported, per BLS.
In other words, the labor market is still questionable, despite showing continued “resilience” over the past year and change.
Had it come in hotter-than-expected, there would have been even more pressure on bond yields and mortgage rates, which were near their recent highs going into the report.
Instead, the 10-year bond yield has fallen from around 4.50% to a couple ticks below.
Now everyone can breathe a sigh of relief until the next batch of data arrives.
Tough Talk From Warsh But Economic Data Still Calls the Shots?
I got to thinking that the new Fed chair, who was ostensibly hired by President Trump to cut rates, might be taking a tough talk approach knowing the data will be soft.
So the other day he said “prices are too high,” leading many to believe a rate hike was coming.
But then he gets this weak labor report and he can say well, we need to look at things on the whole.
Our dual mandate is price stability and to promote maximum employment, so we’ll stand pat here. We’ve got no other choice.
Put another way, Warsh can talk tough and satisfy the bond hawks while letting the data bail him out as to not upset the man who hired him.
In the end, that means he’s not much different than his predecessor, Jerome Powell, in that he stays grounded and makes decisions based on data.
And of course, he is but one vote and there are 11 other voting members of the Federal Reserve.
Rate Hike Expectations Fall Substantially
The weak jobs report already reduced rate hike expectations pretty significantly, per CME FedWatch.
The odds of a July hike are down to 17.6% today from 28.9% yesterday, while September is also now odds-on staying put as opposed to a hike.
It was 49.8% in favor of a 25-basis point hike yesterday, and now down to 46%, slightly below the 46.2% odds of holding steady.
While the Fed doesn’t set mortgage rates, Fed rate expectations can push mortgage rates higher or lower.
If the expectation is no longer hikes, mortgage rates can ease, especially if stability in the Middle East is maintained and oil prices continue to fall.
Read on: Use my mortgage rate calculator to compare different rates and payments side by side.
How to Start Crypto Trading in the Philippines (Step-by-Step Guide)
Sa video nato ay ituturo ko sa inyo kung paano mag trade ng Crypto (Step by Step Guide) for beginners.
YouTube Link:
Trading Interface Guide for Beginners | Master the Basics!
What You’ll Learn:
How to create account
How to deposit
How to execute a trade
How to trade crypto
Trading tips and mindsets
#coins.ph
#cryptotrading
#cryptoforbeginners
#cryptotutorial
#tradingtutorial
#cryptocurrency
DISCLAIMER: Please be advised that I am not a professional advisor in business areas involving Cryptocurrency Trading, Staking, Investing, etc. The information and content written, broadcasted, and/or disseminated by and through “KyrosPH” is intended FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Nothing written or discussed is intended to be construed, or relied upon, as investment, financial, or similar advice, nor should it be. All content expressed, created, and conveyed by “KyrosPH” is premised upon subjective opinions pertaining to currently-existing facts readily available.
source
Lawsuit Demands Proof Education Dept. Delivered $23 Billion in Student Loan Forgiveness
A new federal lawsuit is trying to answer a question more than 1.5 million student loan borrowers have been asking: did the Department of Education actually cancel the loans it publicly promised to forgive?
The Project on Predatory Student Lending (PPSL) sued the Department (PDF File) on July 1, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, after the agency sat on fifteen Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests (some for more than two and a half years) seeking records on how it carried out its announced group discharges.
The College Investor team has previously filed similar FOIA requests for borrower defense data, the latest with a response in 2023, which took roughly 14 months to process.
Would you like to save this?
The Key Points
Between April 2022 and January 2025, the Department announced ten group discharges for borrowers who attended schools it found had engaged in widespread misconduct:
- Marinello Schools of Beauty
- Corinthian Colleges
- ITT Technical Institute
- Westwood College
- CollegeAmerica
- Rhe Art Institutes
- Ashford University
- Schools owned by the Center for Excellence in Higher Education (CEHE)
- Drake College of Business
- Certain Lincoln Technical Institute programs in Massachusetts.
Each announcement told approved borrowers their federal loans would be discharged automatically — no application, no further action needed. In total, the announcements covered more than 1.5 million borrowers and more than $23 billion in federal student loan debt, by the Department’s own estimates.
According to the lawsuit, the Department has never publicly released data on its progress toward fulfilling those commitments. PPSL says it continues to hear from hundreds of borrowers who were approved for group discharge relief but whose loans remain outstanding.
Why It Matters
Group discharges were supposed to be the easy path towards student loan forgiveness. Instead of filing an individual borrower defense application, approved borrowers were told relief would arrive automatically, along with credit repair and, in some cases, refunds.
If loans that should have been canceled are still sitting on borrowers’ accounts (accruing interest, blocking mortgages, or landing in collections), borrowers may not even know they need to complain.
The lawsuit won’t cancel anyone’s loans directly. But the records it seeks (servicer guidance, compliance audits, and counts of how many approved borrowers still have outstanding loans) would show for the first time whether the Department of Education followed through on its public announcements.
The Details
PPSL filed five FOIA requests in November 2023 covering the CollegeAmerica, Corinthian, ITT, Marinello, and Westwood discharges, and ten more in April 2025 covering all ten schools.
The Department acknowledged every request, telling PPSL its average processing time was 185 business days — well beyond FOIA’s 20-business-day deadline. As of the lawsuit filing date, all fifteen requests were still listed as “In Process” in the Department’s FOIA portal.
“The Department made public promises to more than 1.5 million borrowers,” said Eileen Connor, PPSL’s president and executive director, in a statement. “It shouldn’t take a lawsuit to learn whether those promises have been fulfilled.“
How This Connects
Borrowers covered by these announcements can check whether their school qualifies on The College Investor’s for-profit college student loan forgiveness list. The suit also lands amid broader processing breakdowns at the Department — hundreds of thousands of borrowers remain stuck in application backlogs, and the AFT’s lawsuit has similarly pressed the agency to deliver forgiveness borrowers already earned.
The case, PPSL v. U.S. Department of Education, asks the court to declare the Department’s inaction unlawful and order it to produce the records at no cost. FOIA cases often end in negotiated production schedules, so documents could emerge in stages.
Borrowers approved for a group discharge whose loans remain outstanding should contact their servicer and file a complaint with the FSA Ombudsman and keep records of both.
Don’t Miss These Other Stories:
Borrower Defense Claims Expand Beyond For-Profits
27,000 Borrowers Stuck In Student Loan Complaint Backlog
Editor: Colin Graves
The post Lawsuit Demands Proof Education Dept. Delivered $23 Billion in Student Loan Forgiveness appeared first on The College Investor.
Should You Buy the Invesco QQQ ETF After the Recent Nasdaq Sell-Off? History Offers a Crystal-Clear Answer.
The Nasdaq-100 is made up of the 100 most valuable companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange, excluding banks and financial institutions. It has a very high degree of exposure to the “Magnificent Seven,” a group of technology companies operating at the forefront of revolutionary industries like artificial intelligence (AI).
Unfortunately, those tech giants delivered a sluggish performance during the first half of 2026, which is partly why the Nasdaq-100 is down 3% from its all-time high as I write this (June 30).
The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ 1.73%) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 by holding the same stocks. Should investors buy it while the index is trading at a discount? History offers some very clear guidance.
Image source: Getty Images.
A sluggish year for America’s top growth stocks
The Nasdaq is often the exchange of choice for small technology companies looking to go public, because it offers lower fees and fewer compliance hurdles compared to alternatives like the New York Stock Exchange. Some of those budding companies went on to become the trillion-dollar giants that now make up the Magnificent Seven, which together represent a whopping 34.9% of the entire value of the Nasdaq-100 index.
|
Stock |
Invesco ETF Portfolio Weighting |
|---|---|
|
1. Nvidia (NVDA 1.39%) |
7.60% |
|
2. Apple (AAPL +4.88%) |
6.80% |
|
3. Alphabet (GOOG 0.37%)(GOOGL 0.23%) |
6.18% |
|
4. Microsoft (MSFT +1.69%) |
4.52% |
|
5. Amazon (AMZN +0.55%) |
4.08% |
|
6. Tesla (TSLA 7.35%) |
3.09% |
|
7. Meta Platforms (META 4.80%) |
2.66% |
Data source: Invesco. Portfolio weightings are accurate as of June 28, 2026, and are subject to change.
Unfortunately, the Magnificent Seven stocks delivered sluggish returns during the first half of this year. In fact, each of them underperformed the Nasdaq-100. The worst of the bunch is Microsoft, which has plummeted by more than 23%.

Data by YCharts.
On the bright side, the Nasdaq-100 also holds positions in soaring semiconductor stocks like Micron Technology, Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, Applied Materials, and Lam Research, which have each more than doubled this year. Their performance is offsetting some of the sluggishness in the Magnificent Seven, which is a key reason why the Nasdaq-100 isn’t down even more.
There is currently more demand for AI chips and infrastructure than those companies can possibly supply, which is why they have experienced such strong gains. This imbalance is likely to persist for the foreseeable future, which should buoy their share prices.
History is clear about what happens over the long term
Stock market sell-offs can be unnerving, and the uncertainty of what might come next often keeps many investors on the sidelines. However, history suggests they offer the best buying opportunities, because the market typically trends higher over the long term.
The Invesco QQQ ETF has delivered a compound annual return of 11% since it was established in 1999, even after accounting for every sell-off, correction, and bear market along the way. In fact, the ETF has endured five bear markets (peak-to-trough declines of 20% or more) over the last 27 years, triggered by events like the bursting of the dot-com internet bubble in 2000, the global financial crisis in 2008, and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

Today’s Change
(-1.73%) $-12.57
Current Price
$712.60
Key Data Points
Day’s Range
$707.56 – $730.83
52wk Range
$549.58 – $748.65
Volume
51.1M
Since the Nasdaq-100 climbed to new highs after each of those drawdowns, investors who bought the Invesco ETF in the face of extreme uncertainty would have done exceptionally well in the long run. The current drawdown in the index — which is just 3% as I write this — is far less severe, but history suggests investors with a time horizon of five years or more are likely to earn a positive return if they use it as a buying opportunity.
Most of the Magnificent Seven stocks are entering the second half of 2026 at extremely attractive valuations. Nvidia, for example, is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 29.8, which is less than half its 10-year average. Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon each have a P/E ratio of below 30, so they are cheaper than the Nasdaq-100, which trades at a P/E of 34.1.
In my opinion, Wall Street won’t be able to ignore the value that’s on offer in some of America’s highest-quality stocks for much longer. That could lead to a recovery with the potential to lift the Nasdaq-100 to a new record high.
Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Applied Materials, Intel, Lam Research, Meta Platforms, Micron Technology, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Intercontinental Exchange and Nasdaq. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
13 Founders Whose Businesses Changed America
In recognition of America’s 250th birthday, iconic Inc. profiles that stand the test of time.
