Home Blog

The Board-Lot Reckoning: Access, Liquidity, and Governance


Board-lot reform may appear to be a technical change, but it reflects a broader shift in how exchanges compete for investors, trading activity, and capital formation. Minimum trading units and high entry thresholds were once accepted features of market design. Today, investors have become accustomed to seamless digital access through online brokerages, fractional-share platforms, and digital-asset exchanges, making such barriers increasingly difficult to justify.

For investors, the reforms could affect execution quality, odd-lot pricing, portfolio rebalancing, and access to high-priced shares. For issuers, they may alter the composition of the shareholder base. For brokers and custodians, they require systems changes across trading, settlement, and market data.

The timing is also significant. As Hong Kong prepares for the launch of its Uncertificated Securities Market (USM) in 2026, many of the physical constraints that historically justified large board lots are disappearing. Paper-based processes are giving way to digital infrastructure that supports greater efficiency, flexibility, and accessibility.

For investment professionals, however, the significance of these reforms lies less in the policy itself than in its execution. In Hong Kong, approximately 25% of listed issuers may need to adjust their board-lot structures, creating the potential for a temporary increase in odd-lot holdings and the risk of liquidity fragmentation. At the same time, brokerages, custodians, exchanges, and technology providers will need to update trading, settlement, and market-data systems alongside broader market modernization efforts.

Meet a British businessman who doesn’t regret his Brexit vote. He says rejoining the EU would be ‘re-boarding the Titanic’ while giving up life vests



Simon Boyd’s firm makes prefabricated steel structures on the south coast of England and ships them to customers as far away as Ghana and Barbados. Mike Hawes represents Britain’s carmakers as the head of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.

The business leaders were on different sides of the debate when Britain voted to leave the European Union in 2016. But 10 years later they are both frustrated by Brexit.

A decade ago, backers promised that Brexit would be the key to a bright new future where, freed from the edicts of EU bureaucrats, Britain would regain control of its laws and its borders and the economy would boom. But the reality failed to live up to the hype as Britain struggled to adjust to life without unfettered access to the 27-nation free trade bloc and its market of 450 million people.

Economic growth is anemic, taxes are high, public services are creaking and successive governments have been unable to stem the flow of migrants who wash up on the English Channel coast in inflatable boats. As a result, it’s not exactly a happy anniversary.

“No, it’s not delivered everything that was said it would deliver on the tin, but it is delivering,” Boyd told The Associated Press. “It’s very sluggish. You only need to look at the statistics to see that.”

Boyd, the managing director of REIDSteel, which employs about 130 people at a plant in Christchurch, England, still stands behind his decision to support Brexit, but blames lackluster results on politicians who weren’t committed to delivering. Britain has also experienced unexpected challenges over the past 10 years, from the COVID-19 pandemic to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, Boyd said.

Economists see fundamental issues

The Brexit vote quickly increased costs for businesses as they prepared for an uncertain future during years of negotiation over the U.K.’s new relationship with the EU. Then, when Britain finally left the bloc on Jan. 31, 2020, new rules governing trade in goods and services made it more expensive and time-consuming to do business with European partners.

Creon Butler, who leads the global economy and finance program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank, said there were long-term consequences to leaving the European single market.

“Whatever was promised, whatever one hoped for, (you have) to accept that it has been a major loss of wealth and prosperity for us through the choice we made to leave,” he said.

“That’s a decision the British public have made, and they’re entitled to make it, but it does make us poorer,” he added.

By most measures, the British economy today is weaker than it would have been without Brexit, according to a recent report published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The report, compiled by researchers in Britain, Germany and the U.S., compares the performance of the U.K. economy to 33 other countries, including its European neighbors, the U.S., Canada and Japan.

Brexit has reduced Britain’s gross domestic product, a broad measure of economic output, by 6% to 8%, investment by 12% to 13% and productivity by 3% to 4%, the researchers concluded.

Carmakers had many challenges

Britain’s carmakers were early and outspoken opponents of Brexit, arguing that increased red tape surrounding shipments of parts and finished vehicles would damage an industry built on a network of interlinked factories in multiple European countries.

Those concerns reduced investment in the U.K. auto industry because international carmakers were less likely to see Britain as an attractive way into the European market. As a result, the industry is hoping that international trade deals will help boost demand for its products.

“We have been able to move with the times, so to speak, but undoubtedly it’s putting us at more cost into the industry, more pressure,” Hawes said.

Brexit supporters trumpeted the freedom to negotiate its own trade agreements as one of the primary benefits of leaving the EU, and Britain has since signed dozens of deals with countries ranging from Australia to India to the United States.

But EU countries still account for 41% of Britain’s exports and half its imports, according to the latest government figures.

During more than 50 years as a member of the EU and its predecessors, many British businesses also came to rely on Europe as a source of cheap labor, especially after the bloc’s eastward expansion in 2004.

That pipeline dried up after Brexit ended the free movement of labor, one of the bloc’s founding principals.

The owners of Britain’s curry restaurants, an integral part of communities from Aberdeen in Scotland to Aberystwyth in Wales, have been especially hard hit by the loss of Eastern European workers who went home rather than deal with burdensome new visa requirements. And they’re furious because the industry backed Brexit after assurances it would lead to more visas for South Asian cooks, something that hasn’t happened.

“We feel betrayed,″ said Oli Khan, president of the Bangladesh Caterers Association UK, who serves up tandoori lamb chops, vegetable biryani and chili paneer at his restaurant in Stevenage, north of London.

In an effort to mitigate some of the problems caused by Brexit, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has begun talks with the EU about rebuilding a closer relationship as he seeks to energize the country’s stagnant economy.

Starmer won’t finish them, however. On Monday, he said he is stepping down.

Polls suggest frustration with Brexit is growing

Starmer’s move comes as a survey by the Ipsos polling firm, the Policy Institute at King’s College London and the think tank UK in a Changing Europe suggests that frustration with Brexit is growing.

The survey of 2,245 Britons aged 18 and older carried out in May, found that 48% said Brexit was going worse than they expected, up from 28% in March 2021. Some 9% said it was going better than expected and about one in three said it was going as expected.

But Boyd said the most important survey is still the one that took place on June 23, 2016, when 51.9% of those who cast ballots — or 17.4 million people — voted to leave EU.

He continues to believe that Britain has a brighter future outside the EU.

Brexit hasn’t delivered on its promise because politicians, large corporations and other entrenched interests worked to thwart the will of the people, Boyd said. This resulted in a Brexit deal that kept Britain too closely tied to the EU and unable to realize its potential as an entrepreneurial nation filled with creative, hardworking people, he said.

And there’s no going back, he said.

“Imagine if we were to rejoin … today. The conditions upon which we would be allowed back in would be akin to us re-boarding the Titanic on the condition that we surrender our life vests first,″ he said. “Need I say any more?”

Oil and Gas Investing for Physicians: Mineral Rights, Tax Benefits, and How to Vet Operators



Most physicians who’ve built wealth outside medicine end up in a similar place. They’ve got real estate exposure, maybe some index funds, a few syndications. And then they start asking a question that doesn’t have an easy answer: what else belongs here?

That’s where I was several years ago. I was looking for assets that genuinely behaved differently from what I already owned. Things that didn’t move in lockstep with the stock market, didn’t depend on the same interest rate cycle as real estate, and could produce consistent income in conditions where my other assets were under pressure.

Oil and gas kept coming up in that search.

My first reaction was skepticism. It felt opaque. You can’t look up comparable prices the way you can in real estate. There’s no Zillow for mineral rights. The people who do it well have been doing it for decades and they’re not always easy to find or evaluate.

I’ve spent a lot of time since then learning the space. Here’s what I found worth understanding before making any decisions.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Any investment involves risk, and you should consult your financial advisor, attorney, or CPA before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The author and associated entities disclaim any liability for loss incurred as a result of the use of this material or its content.

If you’ve been circling ideas but still feel stuck, you’re not alone.

PIMDCON, the #1 Real Estate & Entrepreneurship Conference for Physicians, is where doctors finally stop spinning their wheels.

Leave with a plan and the confidence to move.

LEARN MORE ABOUT PIMDCON

Why the IRS Treats Oil and Gas Like Real Estate (And Why That Matters)

The reason oil and gas feels foreign to most investors is that nothing about it looks familiar. There’s no address. No building. You can’t drive past your asset or show it to anyone on a map.

But the framing that made it click for me was simpler than I expected.

In the United States, real estate is actually divided into three distinct categories: air rights above the surface, surface rights (the land itself), and mineral rights covering everything below it. You can buy, sell, or lease any of them independently. Most people just never encounter that third category.

The IRS treats mineral rights the same way it treats traditional real estate. There’s depreciation. There’s depletion. There are write-offs. The legal structure and tax treatment are fundamentally parallel. The main difference is that you can’t go see what you own. It’s two miles underground, not eight stories above it.

That’s the thing that makes this asset class hard to get comfortable with. It requires a different kind of due diligence than what physicians are used to. But the underlying framework is more familiar than it looks.

Mineral Rights vs. Working Interest: The Two Main Ways to Invest

Like real estate, oil and gas investing isn’t one thing. There are two primary entry points for accredited investors, and they serve different purposes.

Mineral rights ownership is the more passive approach. You’re buying the rights to resources below a specific piece of land. If an oil company is already leasing and drilling on that land, you receive a royalty on production. You don’t fund the drilling. You carry no operational costs or liability. You receive a percentage of revenue for as long as the wells produce, which can run 25 to 100 years.

Think of it as the analog to buying raw land in real estate. The cash flow starts when someone else develops it.

Working interest is the more active participation. You invest in the drilling of a specific well and take on a proportional share of both costs and production. The upside is significant: current tax law allows a 100% write-off of working interest investments against ordinary W-2 income in the year you invest.

One nuance physicians should know: most passive investment losses can’t offset W-2 income because of passive activity rules. Oil and gas working interest is a statutory exception. The IRS treats it as active income, which is why the deduction is available in a way it simply isn’t for most alternative assets.

For a physician earning $800,000 annually at a 37% federal rate, a $200,000 working interest investment can substantially reduce taxable income in year one. The trade-off is commodity price risk and execution risk on the drilling itself.

Both approaches have legitimate places in a portfolio. Which one fits depends on your income, tax situation, and how much complexity you’re willing to take on.

The Tax Math Physicians Often Miss

The working interest write-off is where most high earners get interested. But there’s a less-discussed play worth knowing about.

If you hold mineral rights inside a self-directed IRA, you can use them as part of a Roth conversion strategy. When minerals are held inside that structure, the depletion allowance reduces the taxable basis on the conversion, meaning you pay taxes on significantly less than the converted amount. Depending on the deal structure, this can reduce the taxable amount on a traditional-to-Roth conversion by 65% to 80%.

For physicians with substantial IRA balances approaching required minimum distribution age, that math deserves a serious conversation with a CPA. Working the last years of a 40-year career to fund a tax bill you could have reduced with better tax planning is a painful outcome.

Additionally, up to 15% of gross income from oil and gas production is exempt from federal income tax through the depletion allowance. That’s a structural advantage built into the tax code, not a loophole or gray area. These are among the tax benefits that make working interest ownership worth understanding in detail.

None of these are obscure strategies. They’re just rarely explained in a context relevant to physicians.

How to Evaluate an Oil and Gas Operator (And What Red Flags Look Like)

This is the part that matters most.

A meaningful percentage of operators in the oil and gas space are not people you want to invest with. The business can be structured to benefit the operator even when investors never see a real return. Hidden fees, vague reporting, deals that look attractive on paper but carry so many cost layers that a successful well barely breaks even for the investor.

Troy Eckard, who has spent over four decades in the oil and gas business, described it this way when I had him on the podcast:

“The bad actors stack the fees so high that even if you hit a good well, you’re never going to get payout. And you don’t know that because you’re not an expert in oil and gas.”

This is where real estate due diligence translates directly. You’ve learned to evaluate a real estate syndication sponsor by their track record, fee structure, transparency, and alignment of incentives. Oil and gas requires exactly the same rigor.

You’re looking for operators who will show you precisely what they own, what they’ve returned to investors historically, and exactly how they make money on a deal. Engineers and geologists on staff.

A disciplined acquisition approach. A good operator doesn’t guess where oil is. They only buy minerals where production is already happening or where a well-capitalized company is actively permitted to drill.

One structural note worth understanding: direct ownership through an aggregated model is typically how individual investors access institutional-quality assets in this space. Middle-market oil and gas deals have largely disappeared over the last decade.

It’s either large-scale institutional transactions or very small operators. Pooling capital with other accredited investors is often the only realistic path to the tier of assets where the economics actually work.


Subscribe to receive the 7 Steps you can follow to achieve Financial Freedom

If financial freedom is your goal, there’s no better time to get started than right now.

Unlock actionable steps that you can take every day to fine-tune your goals, discover your interests, and avoid costly mistakes on your financial freedom journey.


How Much Should Physicians Allocate to Oil and Gas?

Oil and gas isn’t right for everyone. The learning curve is real. The asset class is harder to research than real estate, and it requires trusting an operator you can’t fully evaluate until you’ve built a track record with them.

What it offers in return is something most alternatives don’t: genuine non-correlation with public markets, meaningful tax advantages, and long-duration passive income from a single investment decision.

Most physicians I know who are exploring this start with a position somewhere between $50,000 and $200,000, with the intention of learning the asset class before scaling. Education before capital is the right sequence here.

Here’s the honest reframe on why more people don’t pursue this.

Most of us were trained on a three-bucket framework: stocks, bonds, real estate. Oil and gas doesn’t fit cleanly into any of them. It doesn’t trade on an exchange. There’s no price feed. You can’t look it up in the Wall Street Journal or run comps on Zillow.

That obscurity is probably why over 22 million millionaires exist in the United States and fewer than 500,000 have any oil and gas ownership at all. The asset isn’t inaccessible. Most people just never get past the first question of how it works.

If you want to understand the mechanics before making any decisions, Eckard recently launched OilClarity.com, a free educational resource built specifically for investors who are starting from scratch. Worth going through before you take any next step.

Disclosure: This is not a paid or sponsored post. Eckard Enterprises is a partner of Passive Income MD. Nothing here constitutes financial or investment advice. Oil and gas investments carry significant risk, including loss of principal. Consult your own CPA or financial advisor before making any investment decision.

Were these helpful in any way? Make sure to sign up for the newsletter and join the Passive Income Docs Facebook Group for more physician-tailored content.

Peter Kim, MD is the founder of Passive Income MD, the creator of Passive Real Estate Academy, and offers weekly education through his Monday podcast, the Passive Income MD Podcast. Join our community at the Passive Income Doc Facebook Group.


Disclaimer: I am not a CPA, attorney, or financial advisor. The information in this post is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as tax, legal, or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional about your specific situation before making any decisions.

Further Reading



Bank Of England Posts Update On Stablecoins In The UK, Coinbase Likes What They Read


The Bank of England has posted an update on draft rules regarding stablecoins. The bank stated:

“[This] marks a significant milestone in delivering a comprehensive UK regime for stablecoins. It sets a clear pathway for UK-issued, sterling-denominated stablecoins to operate at scale across a range of retail and wholesale use cases.”

Stablecoins are privately issued digital currency which are typically tied to fiat currency.

The bank said that users should be able to transfer value using a variety of options which include traditional bank deposits, tokenized ones, stablecoins and, perhaps CBDCs [central bank digital currency].

In general options provided to the public should fuel competition and thus provide better services.

While in the US, CBDCs are on the way to being banned, due to extensive privacy and abuse concerns, elsewhere, CBDCs are still up for discussion with the EU heading to issue one and the Chinese already offering a digital yuan.

The Bank of England says that there may be a “complimentary role” for stablecoins alongside commercial bank money in wholesale markets

Further updates are said to be coming soon.

The draft includes requirements for reserves.

There is a a “Temporary guardrail” on the level of issuance per systemic stablecoin which has been set at £40 billion.

The bank said they have listened to the feedback provided by interested parties and have made “substantive changes.”

The bank differentiates between systemic stablecoins, largely used for payments, and non‑systemic stablecoins. Both will be regulated by the Bank and the FCA.

The draft is open for public feedback with the deadline being September 22, 2026.

Coinbase, a player in the stablecoin market, issued a stamp of approval for the update as shared by Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase. He stated on X that “We pushed for clear, workable rules and the UK delivered: no more wallet limits, simpler reserve requirements and recognized US oversight for foreign stablecoins. We are going to see more and more clarity around stablecoins globally.”

Dollar based stablecoins currently dominate the sector of digital assets led by Tether (USDT) and USDC with hundreds of billions outstanding. Pound based stablecoins are currently almost non-existent.

 



The End of Cheap Capital


For nearly two decades, executives operated in a world of extraordinarily cheap capital. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, central banks cut interest rates to historic lows and flooded markets with liquidity through quantitative easing. Between 2008 and 2020, the after-tax cost of borrowing for many large companies hovered at or below inflation—making debt, in real terms, effectively free.



Bajaj Finance Card Kaise Banaye | Bajaj Finserv EMI Card 2026 | Bajaj EMI Card



About This Video :

Are you planning to buy a smartphone, laptop, TV, refrigerator, or any expensive product but don’t want to pay the full amount at once? Then this video is specially made for you. In this detailed guide we are going to explain everything about the Bajaj EMI Card, also known as the No Cost EMI Card, in the simplest language possible.

In today’s world, where inflation is rising and expenses are increasing day by day, managing big purchases becomes difficult. That’s where No Cost EMI options come into the picture. Among all the EMI options available in India, the Bajaj Finserv EMI Card is one of the most popular and widely used financial tools.

But the biggest question is ?
Is Bajaj EMI Card really “No Cost EMI”?
Are there any hidden charges?
Should you take Bajaj EMI Card or avoid it?

In this video, we will answer all these questions in detail.

The Bajaj EMI Card is a digital payment instrument provided by Bajaj Finserv that allows you to convert your purchases into easy monthly installments (EMIs) without using a credit card.

This card is specially designed for people who:

Don’t have a credit card
Want instant EMI approval
Want to buy products without paying full amount upfront
Want “No Cost EMI” facility
With this card, you can shop online or offline and convert your purchase into EMIs within seconds.

Here are the top features of Bajaj Finserv EMI Card:

Instant approval process
No need for credit card
Pre-approved loan limit
No Cost EMI available on selected products

How Bajaj EMI Card Works?

Let’s understand in a simple way:

You apply for Bajaj EMI Card
Bajaj gives you a pre-approved limit (example ₹1 lakh)
You go to a store or website
Choose a product (like mobile phone ₹30,000)
Select EMI option
Convert into monthly installments

What is No Cost EMI?
This is the most searched keyword — “No Cost EMI meaning”

No Cost EMI means:

You don’t pay extra interest
You pay only the product price in installments

BUT HERE IS THE REAL TRUTH

Sometimes, the interest is already adjusted in the product price or discount is reduced.

So technically, it’s not always 100% free.

Many people think Bajaj EMI Card is completely free, but that’s not true.

Here are some charges you must know:

1. Processing Fee
₹100 to ₹500 per transaction
2. Interest Charges (if not No Cost EMI)
Around 12% to 24% annually
3. Late Payment Charges
₹200 to ₹500 or more
4. Bounce Charges
If EMI auto-debit fails
5. Annual Fee / Joining Fee
Sometimes ₹530 (including GST)
So always read terms before using.

Products You Can Buy
Using Bajaj EMI Card, you can purchase:

Smartphones
Laptops
TVs
Washing Machines
Refrigerators
ACs
Furniture
Fitness equipment

Important Rules You Must Know
First purchase may need to be done offline
Some stores may push insurance or add-ons
EMI auto-debit is mandatory
Missing EMI affects your CIBIL score

Topics Covered In This Video :

Bajaj EMI Card
No Cost EMI Card
Bajaj Finserv EMI Card
Bajaj EMI Card benefits
Bajaj EMI Card charges
Bajaj EMI Card eligibility
No Cost EMI meaning
Bajaj EMI Card hidden charges
Bajaj EMI Card review
Bajaj EMI Card apply online

source

Where to Park Cash Between Deals (Without Letting It Rot in a Savings Account)


This article is presented in partnership with Connect Invest.

You finally found a deal. Then it died at inspection. Or the seller got cold feet. Or some cash buyer with no contingencies and a closing date of “yesterday” swooped in while you were still waiting on your lender to return a phone call.

So you are back to hunting. And while you hunt, your money sits.

Every active investor knows this stretch. The pile of cash you raised, saved, or pulled out of a refi is now parked and waiting for the next thing. It feels productive because it is ready. But ready and productive are two different jobs.

Here is the part most operators never run the math on: That waiting period is more expensive than it looks.

The Quiet Cost of “I’ll Just Keep It Liquid for Now”

Idle cash does not feel like a loss. No statement shows it. Nobody invoices you for the deal you did not earn. So it hides.

Let’s drag it into the light with real numbers. Say you have $100,000 sitting between deals. You park it in a standard savings account paying around 0.5% (and many pay less than that). Over six months, that $100,000 earns you about $250 for half a year of holding six figures.

Now run inflation against it. At even 3% a year, the buying power of that same $100,000 drops roughly $1,500 over those six months. So your $250 in interest not only underperforms, but it also gets lapped. You earned $250 and lost $1,500 in purchasing power, which means the “safe” move quietly cost you around $1,250 in real terms.

The savings account did not protect your money. It slowly leaked out.

This is the trap. Operators obsess over cap rates, cash-on-cash returns, and a 4% interest rate difference on a loan, then let a hundred grand sit at half a percent for months at a time and call it “being conservative.” 

Being conservative is fine. Being asleep is not.

What “Ready” Cash Actually Needs to Do

The instinct to stay liquid is correct. You do not want your reserves trapped in a five-year lockup when the right property hits the market next month. Liquidity is the whole point of dry powder.

But liquidity and dead money are not the same thing. You can have both. You just have to define what you actually need from a money parking spot.

For cash between deals, you need four things:

  1. A yield that beats inflation, so your reserves grow instead of shrinking while they wait
  2. A real exit date, so you know exactly when the money frees up
  3. Something backing the investment, not a promise and a vibe
  4. No requirement to lock it up for years to get a real return

Most “safe” options give you one or two of these. A savings account gives you liquidity and nothing else. A CD offers a slightly better rate but penalizes you if you need the money early. A long syndication gives you yield but buries your cash for five to seven years, with no early door.

Between-deal cash needs a tool built for the gap. That is a narrower job than most investment products are designed for.

Where Short Notes Fit

Connect Invest offers real estate-backed Short Notes. You are investing in a pool of private real estate loans and earning a fixed monthly income from it. You are on the lending side, which is the boring, predictable side. Boring is exactly what you want from your reserves.

The structure is simple, which is the best thing you can say about a financial product:

  • Three term lengths: Six, 12, or 24 months, each with a defined exit date.
  • Fixed annualized returns of 7.5% on the six-month note, 8% on the 12-month, and 9% on the 24-month note
  • Income is paid monthly and deposited straight into your Connect Invest Wallet.
  • $500 minimum to start, with zero account fees
  • Every note is backed by real property and secured by first-position liens, which puts you in a senior spot if a loan goes sideways.
  • No accreditation is required to participate.

Run the same $100,000 from earlier through the six-month note at 7.5% annualized. Over six months, that’s roughly $3,750 in income, compared to the $250 the savings account gave you. It’s the same six months, waiting period, and liquidity horizon, but about a $3,500 difference is earned while you do the exact thing you were already doing, which is looking for your next deal.

That is the case in one sentence: Your hunt does not have to be free labor for your bank.

Why the Six-Month Note Is the Sweet Spot for Between-Deals Money

Six months is long enough to put up a real number and short enough that you are never far from a clean exit. When a deal surfaces, you are at most a few months from your principal coming back in full, and you have been collecting monthly income the entire time. You are not begging to break a lockup. You just ride to the maturity date and redeploy.

The 12-month and 24-month notes pay higher yields (8% and 9%), and they earn it by offering more time. But those are the wrong choice for the cash you might need to move quickly. 

Match the term to the job. Short timeline, short note.

A Simple Framework for Splitting Your Cash

You do not have to choose between “all liquid” and “all invested.” The smarter move: Slice your cash by how soon you actually need it, then match each slice to the right tool.

A clean way to think about it is three buckets:

1.  Deployable reserves

This is the cash you genuinely expect to move in the next zero to three months because you are actively in escrow, under LOI, or circling something specific. 

Keep this fully liquid and accessible. Its job is to be ready, not to perform.

2. Standby reserves

This is real money earmarked for deals, but with no specific target yet. Realistically, it will sit for several months while you hunt. 

This is the natural home for six-month Short Notes. It earns a fixed return, pays you monthly, and frees up on a known date so you can roll it into the next deal or a fresh note.

3. The long-term passive sleeve

This is capital you are not planning to deploy into an active deal anytime soon—your “this should just compound quietly” money. The 12-month and 24-month notes fit here, and you can ladder them so a chunk of cash matures every few months. A ladder keeps part of your money always rolling toward a payout while the rest keeps earning the higher rate.

The split is personal. A full-time acquirer chasing deals every week might keep most cash in buckets one and two. Someone between bigger moves might tilt heavier into bucket three. The point is that none of the three buckets is a savings account earning half a percent and losing to inflation.

The Operator Mindset, Applied to Your Own Cash

You would never let a rental unit sit vacant for six months and shrug it off as “keeping my options open.” Vacancy is the thing you fight hardest against. It is the silent killer of returns and the line item that turns a good year into an average one.

Idle cash is a vacancy: same problem, different asset.

So treat your reserves like a property you refuse to let sit empty. Keep what you truly need ready and liquid. Put the rest to work in something that pays you, backs your money with real estate, and hands it back on a date you picked. Stay an active investor. Just stop volunteering your reserves for unpaid duty while you do it.

The deals will keep falling through and coming back. That part never changes. The only thing you control is whether your money earns while you wait or quietly rots in a savings account, and you pretend that counts as a strategy.

This article is sponsored content presented in partnership with Connect Invest. It is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment, financial, tax, or legal advice. Short Notes are investments and carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. Returns are fixed by term but not guaranteed. Rates and terms referenced reflect Connect Invest’s published figures at the time of writing and are subject to change. Review all current offering details and disclosures before investing.

Learn more at connectinvest.com.

Why CVS Stock Trounced the Market Today


CVS Health (CVS +3.03%) is pushing harder into a hot segment of the pharmacy market, and on Monday investors rewarded the company for the effort. The pharmacy retailer’s stock rose 3% on the news, contrasting very favorably with the slight (0.2%) decline of the bellwether S&P 500 index.

Weight loss equals business gain

That morning, before market open, CVS announced it is expanding support for GLP-1 weight-loss medications across its many U.S. pharmacies and MinuteClinics.

Image source: Getty Images.

This includes more pharmacy support to improve access to such medications for patients and help them maintain their regimens. CVS added that it has introduced a new specialty MinuteClinic virtual visit offering focused on GLP-1 prescription and administration, priced at $49 per visit.

More importantly, on July 1, CVS will begin participating in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Medicare GLP-1 Bridge Program, a federal discount initiative.

In the press release touting the new offerings, CVS quoted its interim president of pharmacy and consumer wellness, Sid Tenneti, as saying that “Access is only part of the equation with GLP‑1 medications. Patients also need support to stay on therapy and see results.”

CVS Health Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(3.03%) $2.98

Current Price

$101.30

Getting them to the pharmacy counter

American consumers can’t get enough of obesity medications, so CVS is right to bulk up its GLP-1 services. I feel that the Bridge program discount will be a particularly attractive draw for qualifying patients, and overall, this expansion will provide a lift to CVS’s business. Just now, this company looks like one of the best — if not the best — U.S. pharmacy stock.

Home-flipping profits stabilize after near-decade-low returns


“The first increase in flipping returns in nearly two years is a welcome sign for investors,” said Rob Barber, chief executive officer of ATTOM.

“The market remains far more competitive than it was during the peak profit years, but this quarter’s gains suggest that conditions may be stabilizing. Success still depends heavily on local market dynamics, with some metros producing strong returns while others remain difficult places to flip profitably.”

Wide variance across metro markets

Among large metros with populations over one million, Pittsburgh, PA, led with typical gross returns of 85.9%, followed by Buffalo, NY, at 84% and Virginia Beach, VA, at 74.9%.

Texas markets registered near-minimal margins: Austin at 2%, Dallas at 4.3%, San Antonio at 5.1%, and Houston at 7.2%, reflecting persistently elevated acquisition costs in those cities.

The highest flip rates by activity were concentrated in the South and Midwest. Columbus, GA, led all markets at 15.2%, ahead of Atlanta, GA, and Canton, OH, both at 12.3%. Year-over-year, flip rates declined in 56.3% of the 174 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) analyzed.

Your Health Insurance Premiums Are Likely Going Up. Here is How Companies Are Trying to Limit the Pinch.



A new Mercer survey finds businesses facing a 6.7 percent hike on coverage costs this year, leading over half to plan employee premium increases in 2027.