Universal Music Group generated revenues of EUR €3.294 billion (USD $3.83bn) across all of its divisions (including recorded music, publishing, and more) in Q2 (the three months ending June 30, 2026).
That’s according to UMG‘s fresh set of quarterly results, published today (July 30).
They reveal that UMG’s overall Q2 revenue grew 13.3% YoY at constant currency, driven by the consolidation of Downtown Music Holdings, pricing benefits of Streaming 2.0 agreements, strong physical and licensing and other sales, and healthy performance revenue, contributing to growth in Recorded Music and Music Publishing.
Excluding Downtown, whose results are consolidated from its acquisition date of February 20, revenue grew6.4% YoY at constant currency.
Adjusted EBITDA came in at €674 million ($783.8m), a margin of 20.5%, down from 22.7% in the second quarter of 2025.
One highlight from UMG’s latest results was the company’s recorded music subscription revenue, which grew 16.6% YoY at constant currency to €1.368 billion ($1.59bn) in Q2, benefiting from the consolidation of Downtown and pricing benefits of Streaming 2.0 agreements.
Photo: Austin Hargrave
“Our unique combination of global reach, local expertise, artist development, vast audio and visual IP and entrepreneurial culture positions UMG to deliver long-term growth, sustained value creation, and creative and commercial success for our artists and songwriters.”
Sir Lucian Grainge
Commenting on the Q2 earnings announcement, UMG’s Chairman and CEO, Sir Lucian Grainge, said: “We’re delivering on our strategic plan, and working to further sharpen our execution, while capitalizing on the opportunities presented by new technologies and the ever-evolving music ecosystem.
“Our unique combination of global reach, local expertise, artist development, vast audio and visual IP and entrepreneurial culture positions UMG to deliver long-term growth, sustained value creation, and creative and commercial success for our artists and songwriters.”
RECORDED MUSIC
Universal’s overall Recorded Music revenue for the second quarter of 2026 was €2.516 billion ($2.93bn), up 16.2% YoY at constant currency. Excluding Downtown, Recorded Music revenue grew 8.7% YoYat constant currency.
Within the Recorded Music segment, UMG’s ‘Subscription and streaming revenues’ (including ad-supported and subscription streaming revenues) grew 15.4% YoY at constant currency to €1.757 billion ($2.04bn).
Breaking UMG’s recorded music streaming figure down further reveals that the company’s subscription streaming revenues grew 16.6% YoY at constant currency to reach €1.368 billion ($1.59bn). Excluding Downtown, subscription revenue grew 6.7% YoY at constant currency.
Universal’s ad-supported recorded music streaming revenue grew 11.5% YoY at constant currency to €389 million ($452.4m), as consumers “continue to shift consumption from better monetized video platforms to short-form platforms”, according to UMG.
Within Universal’s recorded music business, Physical revenue grew 15.9% YoY at constant currency to €342 million ($397.7m), with “particular strength in the U.S. and Europe, partially offset by declines in Japan due to the timing of releases”, UMG said.
‘License and other’ revenue increased 34.9% YoY at constant currency to €379 million ($440.7m), with “outsized contributions from audiovisual and live and related income, along with healthy licensing revenue growth”, according to UMG.
Downloads and other digital revenue fell 43.3% YoY at constant currency to €38 million ($44.2m), which UMG attributed to a previously disclosed settlement with an internet service provider in Q2 2025 and the “ongoing industry-wide format shift”.
Top sellers for the quarter included Noah Kahan, BTS, Olivia Rodrigo, Drake, and Olivia Dean.
MUSIC PUBLISHING
Universal’s overall Music Publishing revenue for the second quarter of 2026 was €616 million ($716.3m), up 9.8% YoYat constant currency. Excluding Downtown, Music Publishing revenue grew2.7% YoYat constant currency.
Digital revenue grew 13.6% YoY at constant currency to €392 million ($455.9m), “reflecting strength in subscription, partially offset by softer ad-supported streaming”, UMG said.
Performance revenue increased 12.8% YoY at constant currency to €123 million ($143m), which UMG attributed to “continued industry growth”.
Synchronization revenue fell9.4% YoYat constant currency to €58 million ($67.4m), “related to the timing of deals”.
Mechanical revenue grew 3.6% YoY at constant currency to €29 million ($33.7m), “driven by release schedules”.
Other revenue declined 6.7% YoY at constant currency to €14 million ($16.3m).
MERCHANDISING AND OTHER
UMG’s ‘Merchandising and Other’ revenue in the second quarter of 2026 was €167 million ($194.2m), down 10.7% YoY at constant currency.
According to UMG, the drop reflected a decline in touring income due to the timing of tours, and a decline in direct-to-consumer revenue due to the timing of product releases.
The division posted an Adjusted EBITDA loss of €5 million ($5.8m) in Q2, compared with a €1 million profit a year earlier.
DOWNTOWN
Downtown Music Holdings contributed €202 million ($234.9m) in total revenue in Q2 2026, its first full quarter under UMG ownership.
That was up from the €86 million Downtown added in Q1 2026, when it was consolidated for only around five-and-a-half weeks following the deal’s completion on February 20.
The bulk of Downtown’s Q2 contribution came from Recorded Music, at €162 million ($188.4m), with Music Publishing accounting for a further €40 million ($46.5m).
Downtown’s Adjusted EBITDA was €10 million ($11.6m), an Adjusted EBITDA margin of 5.0%.
EBITDA ETC.
In Q2 2026, UMG’s EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) was €610 million ($709.4m), down 0.2% YoY but up 1.5% at constant currency.
EBITDA margin was 18.5%, compared to 20.5% in the second quarter of 2025.
Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 was €674 million ($783.8m), down 0.3% YoY but up 1.5% at constant currency.
Adjusted EBITDA margin was 20.5%, compared to 22.7% in Q2 2025, with the decline “due to the consolidation of Downtown, pressure from revenue and repertoire mix in Recorded Music, and a loss in Merchandising”, according to UMG.
Excluding Downtown, Adjusted EBITDA was flat at constant currency in Q2.
UMG’s Board of Directors declared an interim dividend for the first half of 2026 of €432 million, or €0.24 per share, in line with the 2025 interim dividend.
The dividend payment date will be on October 27, 2026.
NET DEBT
UMG’s financial net debt stood at €4.131 billion ($4.80bn) at the end of June, up 72.8% from €2.390 billion at the end of 2025.
The increase reflected €806 million of cash used for investing activities, including the Downtown acquisition, alongside €734 million of stock repurchases and €514 million of dividend payments.
That was partially offset by €379 million ($440.7m) in proceeds from the sale of Spotify shares, after UMG confirmed in April that it would monetize half of its equity stake in the streaming company.
“Our focus is on building our market leadership, while driving top and bottom-line growth, improving efficiency, and continuing to invest where we see the greatest returns.”
Matt Ellis, UMG
“This quarter demonstrated both the strong fundamentals of our business and the opportunities we see to improve,” said Matt Ellis, UMG’s CFO. “Our focus is on building our market leadership, while driving top and bottom-line growth, improving efficiency, and continuing to invest where we see the greatest returns.”
All EUR-USD conversions made at the average Q2 2026 exchange rate published by the European Central Bank.Music Business Worldwide
As annual inflation rose to 4.2%, consumers busied themselves with new ways to manage money and lifestyles. For those needing assistance with healthcare costs, solutions like Direct Primary Care are becoming more popular. Others are attempting to increase their income by event-based betting within the global prediction market. And while some shoppers are charging everyday purchases, current credit card debt levels aren’t as high as in past decades.
Home Financing
Market Update: What It Means for Homebuyers
The housing market is constantly evolving, and while headlines about interest rates and the economy can feel overwhelming, the bigger picture is often more encouraging than it seems.
Recent economic reports suggest that the job market is beginning to cool, but it remains healthy overall. Hiring has slowed compared to the rapid pace of the past few years, yet unemployment remains low and the economy continues to show steady growth. As a result, experts are closely watching upcoming inflation and employment data for clues about when the Federal Reserve may begin lowering interest rates.
What does that mean for homebuyers?
While mortgage rates continue to fluctuate, today’s market is being driven more by homebuyers than by homeowners refinancing. Many buyers are choosing to move forward despite higher rates because they recognize that waiting for the “perfect” market isn’t always the best strategy. Life doesn’t pause for interest rates, and many people are finding opportunities that fit their goals today.
The good news is that today’s mortgage market offers more options than many buyers realize. Whether you’re purchasing your first home, moving up, downsizing, or investing, there are financing solutions designed to meet a variety of needs and financial situations.
The market will continue to change, as it always does. If you’re thinking about buying, selling, or simply want to understand what today’s conditions mean for your plans, talking with a knowledgeable loan officer can help you separate the headlines from the opportunities.
Sometimes the best move isn’t waiting for the market to change—it’s understanding how to make today’s market work for you.
Insurance
Healthcare Options to Replace ACA Coverage
If you’re one of the millions of Americans who didn’t renew their Affordable Care Act (ACA) healthcare coverage because of rising costs, you may have had to settle for a plan with less coverage, or even let your plan lapse. If this is the case, you may have one or more options that can help make your healthcare needs more affordable.
Direct primary care (DPC) enables you to access medical care without insurance. You make the care and payment arrangements with a healthcare professional and pay out of pocket. A DPC plan usually covers routine care, management of chronic conditions, and acute-care visits. You can search for a DPC provider at these two sites: DPC Frontier and DPC Alliance.
Medical cost-sharing: Sometimes called healthcare sharing plans, medical cost-sharing programs are communal models where group members pool their money to collectively cover everyone’s approved medical costs. Some have religious affiliations.
Your workplace may offer a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) in lieu of health insurance. (You can also have an HRA with health insurance or use the funds to pay premiums for a plan you acquire yourself.) Only your employer contributes to an HRA. You typically don’t have to pay state or federal taxes on the money reimbursed to you from the account for qualified healthcare expenses.
Source: goodrx.com
In the News
Prediction Markets Take Off
The start of the FIFA World Cup — sometimes described as the most popular sports event in the world — increased marketing of apps like Kalshi that provide easy access to prediction markets. If you’re wondering what it’s like to participate in a prediction market, here are some basics.
Prediction markets are just what their name says. Participants may bet on their predictions of a variety of future events, from weather to sports results.
The easy access and variety of betting options are contributing to a fast growth rate. According to one analysis, the total value of contracts traded in prediction markets could top $1 trillion by 2030, representing a compound annual growth rate of roughly 80%.
While there are hundreds of active prediction markets, the most popular one is Polymarket. It’s the world’s largest, where users can bet on a variety of events, from politics to pop culture. Kalshi, a fully U.S.-regulated exchange overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), is the second most popular.
If you or a family member is considering placing bets within the prediction market, remember that the pros and cons are similar to gambling. It may not be legal in your state, so be sure to check your state’s gambling statutes. Also, some markets are not nearly as regulated as others and may be vulnerable to manipulation and insider trading.
Source: americancentury.com
Credit and Consumer Finance
Some Credit Card Stats That May Surprise You
With inflation on the rise and unpredictable gas and energy prices, more consumers are using their credit cards to manage these challenges. However, the news isn’t all bad, and there are a few surprises as well.
For example, credit card debt was considerably worse almost 20 years ago — the household record occurred during Q4 2007, when it rose to over $13,000. Currently, the national average credit card balance is $11,153 per household.
If you’re assuming that younger, less experienced cardholders run up bigger balances, think again. People aged 30 to 59 have an average of 128.38% more credit card debt than their older and younger counterparts.
Depending on where you live, inflation could be taking a bigger (or smaller) bite out of your paychecks. However, the following state statistics may surprise you. For example, Hawaii is often considered the most expensive state, but its residents have the 10th lowest amount of median credit card debt. (Median credit card debt means that exactly half of the cardholders in that state owe more than that amount, and half owe less.)
States with the most median credit card debt:
1. Alaska, $3,683 2. District of Columbia, $3,502 3. Colorado, $3,305 4. Connecticut, $3,162 5. Washington, $3,051
If you’re concerned about credit card debt or would like to learn more about budgeting, feel free to contact your local APM loan advisor.
Source: wallethub.com
Did You Know?
How To Solve Problems with Your HOA
Homeowners’ associations (HOAs) are usually led by several residents who are elected by their neighbors. However, those who are elected will decide who will act as President, Vice President, Treasurer, and any other existing role(s). Each will have their own responsibilities.
While most HOA leaders understand their obligations, things don’t always run smoothly. For example, some Texas homeowners were fined by their HOAs for brown lawns, even though county water rationing was in effect. A similar problem arose in Florida, but the HOA fines were overruled by a state statute that permits homeowners to replace water-guzzling lawns with native landscaping.
If you’re a member of an HOA or considering buying a home with an HOA, here are options for solving HOA-related problems.
Discuss your concerns with one or more HOA board members. There may be a good reason as to why the HOA isn’t maintaining the common areas or enforcing parking rules, such as problems with hiring workers to do these jobs.
During these talks, you may realize that a single board member is the source of one or more challenges. If you’re not able to get through to this person, you may want to work with other residents and discuss your options. As a last resort, you may want to research what steps are required to remove them from the board.
Review your county’s rules and statutes. Your board members may not be aware that a local statute prohibits HOA rules that aren’t environmentally friendly, or that these statutes will override their rules almost every time.
The previous options should be enough to solve an HOA problem, but if it isn’t, you can consider taking legal action. When this happens, you and any affected neighbors will need to gather valid evidence and consider hiring an attorney that specializes in these types of cases.
People are sick of AI; they’re sick of predictions that AI will take your job, and they’re sick of the supposedly smartest economists around failing to explain what is happening. Perfect timing, then, for a new theory that ties all of the threads together in an elegant explanation: AI isn’t wiping out jobs, but it is cutting wages. No wonder workers are in revolt.
New research from Apollo Global Management shows the technology’s earliest measurable damage isn’t job losses, but smaller paychecks. That finding arrives in the middle of one of the most fractured debates in economics right now — one where even the people building the AI systems can’t agree on what their own data shows.
An economist changes his mind
Apollo chief economist Torsten Slok has spent much of 2026 arguing that the macroeconomic impact of AI on the labor market was essentially invisible. In April, he wrote that “AI is everywhere except in the incoming macroeconomic data” and you just couldn’t see it in data on employment, productivity or inflation.
At the same time, the influential analyst, known for his Daily Spark blog and for his Chart of the Day in a previous stint at Deutsche Bank, has been predicting an “industrial renaissance” and a prediction that AI will lead to a boom of entrepreneurship for small businesses. As recently as May 29, he published a Spark titled “Zero Evidence of AI-Related Job Losses,” arguing AI was creating more jobs than it destroyed. He invoked the Jevons Paradox, as he has done since April, helping to popularize the idea that efficiency gains expand overall demand rather than shrinking the workforce. None other than Dario Amodei, the Anthropic CEO, started using the term shortly afterward, as he walked back his own predictions of the massive job-destroying impact of his technology.
In mid-July, Slok signaled his annoyance with the lack of clarity from the economics field on AI’s impact, noting that “the experts can’t agree” on what is actually happening in the corporate sector with AI and jobs. On July 30, Slok and co-author Sania Edlich published a paper that seems to tie all the contrasting theories together. Rather than relying on the theoretical “exposure” scores that have dominated AI labor research for years, the team used observed usage data from Anthropic’s Economic Index — actual Claude interaction logs — to measure what workers are doing with AI rather than what they theoretically could do. What they found wasn’t job losses, but “wage compression.”
“Analysis of actual Claude usage data shows workers in AI-exposed occupations are experiencing slower wage growth, while employment levels in these occupations remain unchanged, suggesting companies are capturing AI productivity gains through wage compression rather than workforce reduction,” Slok wrote. This would also explain the backlash — even outright resistance — to AI adoption in the wider economy. Workers seem to know that these machines will make them poorer.
Workers feel it regardless of what economists conclude
A separate June 2026 survey of 1,005 employed U.S. workers by Software Finder captured this ground-level anxiety, independent of any academic model. Half of workers described themselves as actively resisting new AI tools, and some findings sit in some tension with Slok’s paper — while Apollo’s data shows AI exposure compressing wages regardless of adoption, Software Finder’s snapshot shows current adopters out-earning resisters, a gap likely explained by who tends to adopt (managers, higher earners with more job security) rather than evidence that adoption itself protects pay.
For instance, Software Finder reports that workers who resist AI earn roughly 20% less on average than those who embrace it, $65,645 versus $81,526. Forty-five percent cite fear of becoming replaceable as their reason for holding back, and only 16% believe their company is adopting AI for genuine business value rather than hype or competitive pressure. The two effects can coexist: resisters may be penalized on pay even as the wages offered for AI-exposed work drift lower, per Slok’s research. AI just might be a wage-eating machine.
There is also a lot of AI shame going on: 13% admitted they’ve faked AI use — appearing to use a tool while doing the task manually — and only 6% believe their managers accurately understand how often employees actually use the tools they’ve rolled out.
Fortune‘s own reporting shows this resistance can escalate well past quiet avoidance into deliberate sabotage. An April 2026 survey of 2,400 knowledge workers across the U.S., U.K., and Europe — including 1,200 C-suite executives — conducted by Writer and Workplace Intelligence found that 29% of employees admitted to actively sabotaging their company’s AI strategy, a figure that jumps to 44% among Gen Z workers. The sabotage takes concrete forms: entering proprietary company information into unapproved public AI tools, using unauthorized “shadow AI” systems, refusing outright to engage with company-mandated tools, and in some cases tampering with performance reviews or deliberately producing low-quality work to make AI look ineffective. Of the workers who admitted to sabotage, 30% cited fear that AI would take their job as their primary motivation — the same fear driving the Software Finder resisters.
What the data shows
Using a difference-in-differences model across 321 occupations matched to Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2015 to 2025, the Apollo paper found that workers in high-AI-exposure occupations saw real wage growth slow by 6.7 percentage points relative to less-exposed workers after 2023 — with no statistically significant employment effect. That is the crux of the argument: the productivity gains are real, but they are landing with employers rather than employees. This aligns with what Fortune reported in March: AI is shrinking work, which means companies can assign more work to their workers.
The pain is concentrated at the bottom of the income ladder:
Bottom wage quartile: down 10.7% relative to low-exposure occupations
Second quartile: down 5.4%; third quartile: down 4.0%
Top quartile: no statistically significant effect — high earners appear better positioned to absorb or benefit from AI adoption
Service occupations: down 24.3%, though the authors caution this is based on a small subsample
Management and professional occupations: down 4.1%; blue-collar workers: no significant effect
Today, roughly 5.8 million U.S. workers — about 3.7% of the labor force — sit in occupations exposed enough to feel this squeeze, amounting to a conservative $28 billion in annual labor income loss, a number the authors said they expect to keep climbing.
Anthropic’s own economist says something different
Complicating things further: the very data underlying Slok’s paper comes from Anthropic, whose head of economics offered his own take in a lengthy essay on X in late July. Drawing on 18 months of internal research, he concluded that the U.S. labor market has “not yet taken a visible hit from AI,” pointing to a 4.2% unemployment rate — a level the Federal Reserve considers full employment — with job openings roughly matching the number of unemployed workers and prime-age employment near multi-decade highs.
McCrory and Slok aren’t necessarily contradicting each other, though — they’re answering different questions with overlapping data. It’s entirely possible for a labor market to show flat unemployment and quietly falling relative pay at the same time — which is exactly the distinction that’s easy to lose in a debate where “no jobs crisis” and “workers are getting squeezed” get treated as if they can’t both be true.
That confusion isn’t unique to Anthropic. A comprehensive literature review cited by Reuters in July found “most datasets find little evidence of economy-wide job loss or wage decline,” attributing AI’s impact so far to “task reallocation and within-firm productivity gains, rather than mass displacement” — a conclusion that sits uneasily next to Slok’s wage-compression findings.
A quieter, harder-to-see threat
AI’s wage-compressing effect, if Slok’s data holds up, would fit a much older pattern rather than break from one. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, successive waves of technology — mechanized agriculture, industrial automation, computing, and offshoring-enabled supply chains — have repeatedly lowered the cost of production and, in doing so, put downward pressure on wages in the occupations they touched, even as they expanded overall economic output.
Infamously, textile mechanization crushed wages for hand-loom weavers well before it created higher-paying factory jobs elsewhere, giving rise to the Luddite movement, so often recalled in the AI age. Over 100 years later, use of industrial robotics in manufacturing during the 1980s and ’90s coincided with decades of stagnant real wages for blue-collar workers even as productivity climbed steadily. This is where the “Rust Belt” originated.
The Financial Times‘ Joel Suss recently argued that gains from new technology have not automatically flowed to the workers producing them since around 1970, as labor’s share of GDP has fallen relative to capital’s. This time is turning out to be no different, he found in an analysis of data across the U.S., Japan and most of Europe. “Insofar as advances in AI constitute capital-biased technological change,” he argued, “the pay-productivity gulf will widen further.”
What emerges from all of this is a labor story that resists the clean narrative either side wants to tell. It’s not the mass-layoffs scenario Amodei has warned about, nor is it the all-clear McCrory’s unemployment data suggests. It’s something quieter and more corrosive: a mechanism that shows up in paychecks rather than pink slips, one indistinct enough that reasonable economists looking at adjacent data can reach opposite-sounding conclusions.
That ambiguity may be precisely why worker anxiety remains so widespread yet so hard to substantiate in the aggregate numbers — and why, even as Slok’s own paper acknowledges its limits (the exposure measure relies solely on Anthropic’s data, and only 321 of roughly 800 BLS occupations could be matched), he remains unambiguous about the stakes of getting this wrong: “The critical policy question is not whether AI will reshape the labor market more broadly, but how quickly, and whether workers will have the support they need when it does”.
Amazon is offering 40% off when you buy four products from a list of select dog treats.
Our Verdict
I’m not a pet owner, but from a quick look at the pricing this looks like a real deal with real 40% savings. Feel free to chime in below on the best buys. You can get 4 of the same item or 4 separate items from the list.
If you’re in your 20s and want to start crypto trading but don’t know where to begin – this video is for you.
Raj Shamani and Pankaj Balani (Co-founder, Delta Exchange) discuss how young investors can approach crypto trading smartly.
🎙 Full Podcast:
💡 Delta Exchange – Trade smarter with advanced tools and strategies.
For the past several years, borrowers with defaulted federal student loans have had an unusual amount of breathing room. The Department of Education paused the Treasury Offset Program in January 2026, which meant tax refunds were off the table as a collection tool for the entire 2026 filing season.
That window is closing. The Department has said involuntary collections restart once its new repayment system is in place, and the pieces are now falling into place — the Repayment Assistance Plan launched July 1, 2026, and borrowers pushed off SAVE were given 90 days from that date to choose something new.
Our reporting has garnishment and offsets ramping back up in the fall, which puts the returns you file in early 2027 squarely back in the crosshairs. There are already signs of movement: seniors with defaulted loans are facing Social Security withholding again, and that runs through the same Treasury Offset Program that takes tax refunds.
If you’re married and your spouse is the one carrying the defaulted loans, back child support, or old tax debt, this lands on you directly. When you file a joint return, the IRS doesn’t sort out whose refund is whose before handing it to the Treasury. It takes the whole thing, which is why understanding how tax offsets work matters before you file rather than after.
Form 8379, the Injured Spouse Allocation, is how you get your half back and it belongs on the short list of tax forms worth knowing before you file.
Table of Contents
Who Is the Injured Spouse?
How Much Money Could I Get Back by Filing Form 8379?
How To Fill Out Form 8379
How Long Does It Take to Process Form 8379?
When Should I File Form 8379?
Do I Have Any Options Besides Filing Form 8379?
Who Is the Injured Spouse?
The name is misleading. “Injured” here has nothing to do with physical harm — it means financially harmed by your spouse’s debt, and it’s one of the more commonly misunderstood corners of the tax code.
Per the IRS, you may be an injured spouse if you file a joint return and all or part of your portion of the overpayment was, or is expected to be, applied to your spouse’s legally enforceable past-due federal tax, state income tax, state unemployment compensation debts, child support, or federal nontax debt — the last category being where defaulted student loans sit.
To qualify, IRS Publication 504 lays out two conditions. You must not be legally obligated to pay the past-due debt. And you must have either made and reported tax payments — withholding from your paycheck or quarterly estimated tax payments — or claimed a refundable credit on the joint return. It’s an “or,” not an “and.”
That refundable credit path matters more than people realize. If you had little or no withholding but claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Child Tax Credit, you can still qualify as an injured spouse. If you live in a community property state, only the first condition applies at all.
In plain terms: you contributed something to that refund, and the government took it to pay a debt that isn’t yours. Your filing status is what pooled the money in the first place.
One important distinction. Injured spouse relief is not innocent spouse relief. Injured spouse (Form 8379) is about recovering your share of a refund that got offset. Innocent spouse (Form 8857) is about being released from liability for tax your spouse understated or failed to pay — closer to the territory of setting up an IRS payment plan than to refund allocation. The instructions are blunt: don’t file Form 8379 if you’re claiming innocent spouse relief.
What’s Changed For The 2027 Filing Season
A few things are worth knowing before you file a return covering tax year 2026, on top of the usual annual bracket and deduction adjustments.
Offsets are expected to be live again. The Treasury Offset Program restarted in May 2025 after a five-year pandemic-era pause, then got paused again on January 16, 2026. Under Secretary Nicholas Kent has previously said collections “will function more efficiently and fairly after the Trump Administration implements significant improvements to our broken student loan system.” Those improvements are the ones now rolling out across the federal loan system.
The Department has not published a hard restart date for the Treasury Offset Program, so treat fall 2026 as a working assumption rather than a confirmed calendar entry. But plan as though your 2026 refund is exposed, and check the refund schedule against how long an injured spouse claim actually takes.
You can now e-file Form 8379 by itself. This is a genuinely useful change. The IRS updated its instructions for tax year 2026 to allow Form 8379 to be filed electronically by attaching it to Form 1040-X even if you are not amending your return. Previously, filing on its own after a joint return had already processed meant mailing paper. If your tax software supports amended returns electronically, this should cut weeks off your wait.
A line reference was corrected. The instructions for line 17 now read “lines 28 through 30, and Part II of Schedule 3 (Form 1040)” — line 30 was missing before. Minor, but if you’re filling this out by hand instead of letting tax software handle it, use the corrected reference.
A second rehabilitation is coming, but not yet. The 2025 budget law gives borrowers a second chance to rehabilitate a defaulted loan, where prior rules allowed exactly one. Watch the date: for loans rehabilitated before July 1, 2027, the old one-and-done rule still applies. Starting July 1, 2027, a borrower can rehabilitate up to twice, which is after the 2027 filing season, and precisely why Form 8379 matters this year.
The form itself is still the November 2023 revision and the instructions are the November 2024 revision. The IRS is not republishing them; the tax year 2026 changes are posted separately on IRS.gov, so don’t assume a printed copy reflects them. Same caution applies to any older tax guidance you have saved.
How Much Money Could I Get Back by Filing Form 8379?
The IRS calculates your share by running a hypothetical “married filing separately” computation. It figures what your tax liability would have been on your income alone, credits you with the payments you made, and refunds the resulting overpayment. Your spouse’s share stays with the offset — the same mechanism that drives wage garnishment on defaulted loans, just applied to refunds.
That means the split is rarely 50/50. If you earned $70,000 and your spouse earned $15,000, you’ll get back substantially more than half. If your spouse out-earned you, expect less — and if you’re a two-earner household, it’s worth understanding how the tax code already treats married couples before you assume the math favors you.
For reference, the 2026 standard deduction is $16,100 for single and married filing separately, $32,200 for married filing jointly, and $24,150 for head of household. The IRS allocates the standard deduction between spouses in this calculation, so it isn’t a clean apples-to-apples comparison with actually filing separately.
Community property states work differently. If you live in Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, or Wisconsin, state law overrides the income-based split. Generally, 50% of a joint overpayment (excluding the Earned Income Credit) goes to non-federal tax debts — so a defaulted student loan or back child support typically eats half your refund regardless of who earned what. If that’s your situation, getting out of default is a far better use of your energy than filing this form annually.
For federal tax debts, the rules vary by state. The IRS points to four separate revenue rulings: Rev. Rul. 2004-71 (Arizona and Wisconsin), 2004-72 (California, Idaho, Louisiana), 2004-73 (Nevada, New Mexico, Washington), and 2004-74 (Texas). A community property state plus a federal tax debt is a conversation with a tax pro, not a guess — and possibly a case for an installment agreement with the IRS instead.
How To Fill Out Form 8379
The form runs two pages and four parts. Most people should let tax software walk them through it, but it helps to know what’s being asked.
Part I — “Should You File This Form?” is a short branching questionnaire that determines eligibility. Line 1 asks the tax year. Lines 2 through 9 walk through whether the debt belongs solely to your spouse and whether you made payments or claimed a refundable credit. Answer honestly — a “no” in the wrong spot means rejection, not just delay, and you’ll be back to tracking a refund that never arrives.
Part II asks about the joint return: names, Social Security numbers in the same order they appeared on the return, and which spouse is the injured one. Getting the name order wrong is one of the more common reasons these get kicked back, which is exactly the kind of error free filing options will catch for you.
Part III is the allocation itself. You split income, adjustments, deductions, credits, other taxes, and federal income tax withheld into three columns: the amount on the joint return, the amount allocated to you, and the amount allocated to your spouse. Line 19 says to enter federal income tax withheld from each spouse’s income as shown on Forms W-2, W-2G, and 1099 — and you have to attach copies. If you have education expenses in the mix, your 1098-T matters here too.
Here’s what Part 3 looks like:
Part IV is your signature, required only if you’re filing Form 8379 on its own rather than attached to a return. If you’re filing it alongside an amended return, the 1040-X process governs the rest.
Most major tax software supports Form 8379, including TurboTax, H&R Block, FreeTaxUSA, and TaxSlayer. Support quality varies, so check our current tax software rankings before committing.
How Long Does It Take to Process Form 8379?
This is the part that frustrates people, and it’s worth setting expectations against the normal refund timeline. The IRS estimates:
How You File
Processing Time
With your joint return, electronically
About 11 weeks
With your joint return, on paper
About 14 weeks
By itself, after the joint return is processed
About 8 weeks
Those are estimates, not guarantees, and they run from when the IRS receives the form — not when you hit send. Backlogs push them longer. If you’re counting on that money, build in a cushion, and know that the “Where’s My Refund” tool often shows confusing status codes while an injured spouse claim is pending.
Note the counterintuitive part: filing the form by itself after your return processes is faster on paper (8 weeks versus 11), but you don’t see money until the joint return finishes processing first. Filing it with the return is still usually the better move — and it means one filing deadline to track instead of two.
When Should I File Form 8379?
Best case: with your joint return. Attach it and file electronically. Whenever Form 8379 is attached to a joint return, the instructions direct you to enter “Injured Spouse” in the upper left corner of page 1 — tax software handles this automatically when you e-file. This is the cleanest path and avoids a second round of processing.
If the offset already happened: file Form 8379 on its own. You don’t have to wait for a notice, and you don’t need to have received one. If you’re unsure whether a debt is even flagged, your loan servicer can usually tell you where the account stands.
The deadline is longer than most people think. You generally have three years from the due date of the original return (including extensions), or two years from the date you paid the tax that was later offset — whichever is later. Many summaries mention only the three-year rule, which can cost you a valid claim. Check the relevant year’s tax due dates to pin down your actual window.
You have to file it every year. Form 8379 is not a standing election. If your spouse’s debt is still outstanding next year, you file again next year — which is one more argument for fixing the underlying default instead.
If you want to know whether an offset is coming, call the Treasury Offset Program call center at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service: 800-304-3107 (TTY/TDD 866-297-0517). They can tell you whether a debt is flagged, though not the amount the IRS will take. Debt collectors assigned to defaulted loans can sometimes confirm the same information.
Alternatives To Filing Form 8379
Form 8379 works, but it’s a workaround. These are the actual fixes, and most of them run through resolving the default itself.
File separately. If you file married filing separately, your refund never gets pooled with your spouse’s, so there’s nothing to offset. The catch is cost. Filing separately bars the American Opportunity Credit, the Lifetime Learning Credit, and the student loan interest deduction outright.
It also generally bars the Earned Income Credit — with a narrow exception if you had a qualifying child living with you more than half the year and you either lived apart from your spouse for the last six months or were legally separated and not sharing a household at year-end. Run the numbers both ways before deciding; our breakdown of what each filing status actually costs is a reasonable starting point.
That said, there can be real upside to separate filing when loans are involved, because a borrower who files separately has only their own income counted in the payment calculation. Our full analysis of the math behind married filing separately for student loans walks through when it pencils out.
What changed is the surrounding math. RAP has no poverty-line exemption and no family-size adjustment — it’s a flat 1% to 10% of AGI by income band, reduced by $50 per dependent, with a $10 monthly minimum. Under IBR and PAYE, a borrower filing separately could still count a spouse in family size, which softened the tax hit. That cushion is gone. Re-run this for 2026 rather than assuming what worked under the older income-driven plans still holds.
Get the loan out of default. This is the permanent solution. Rehabilitation removes the default and takes you out of the offset system entirely — the regulation requires nine voluntary, reasonable and affordable monthly payments, each made within 20 days of the due date, during 10 consecutive months.
Consolidation is the faster route if you need out quickly, though it doesn’t erase the default from your credit report the way rehabilitation does. Remember the timing on the second rehabilitation: if you already used your one shot, that door doesn’t reopen until July 1, 2027.
Check whether forgiveness applies. Before you build a plan around annual Form 8379 filings, confirm the debt should exist at all. Borrowers regularly miss eligibility for one of the forgiveness and discharge programs, and public sector workers in particular should verify their PSLF standing. Parent PLUS borrowers have a narrower set of options and should check theirs early.
Request a review of the offset itself. If the debt is disputed, already paid, or you’re facing genuine hardship, there’s a separate challenge process. Our guide to stopping tax offsets due to student loan debt covers the paperwork and the deadlines.
Adjust your withholding. The blunt-force option: if the IRS never owes you a refund, there’s nothing to take. Dialing in your W-4 so you break even means you keep the money during the year instead of fighting for it afterward. It isn’t right for everyone — some people rely on the forced-savings effect of a refund — but it removes the problem entirely.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does filing Form 8379 hurt my credit?
No. Form 8379 is a tax form with no connection to your credit report. Your spouse’s defaulted loan already affects their credit; this form changes nothing either way.
Can I file Form 8379 if my spouse owes back child support?
Yes. Child support is one of the debts that triggers an offset, and it’s among the most common reasons people file — the same offset system handles both.
What if we already filed and the refund was taken?
File Form 8379 on its own. You have up to three years from the original return’s due date including extensions, or two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later. Confirm your year’s deadline before you assume you’re out of time.
Do I need to file it again if I filed last year?
Yes. It applies to a single tax year, so file again each year you need protection — or resolve the default and stop needing it.
Will Form 8379 stop the offset from happening?
It protects your share, not your spouse’s. Filing it with the joint return can keep your portion from being taken at all; filing after the offset means clawing it back. Either way, your spouse’s share still goes to the debt. The Taxpayer Advocate Service also warns that filing separately from your original return risks the refund being offset before your claim is processed — one reason understanding the offset process up front is worth the time.
I’m no longer married to that person. What now?
If the offset came from a joint return filed while you were married, Form 8379 still applies for that year. Once you’re filing single or head of household, the issue shouldn’t recur — see how filing status affects your return.
Where can I get more help with tax questions like this?
Our tax resource and help center covers filing, credits, deductions, and refund issues in one place.
Editor: Clint Proctor
Reviewed by: Chris Muller
The post Injured Spouse Relief: How To File Form 8379 And Protect Your Tax Refund In 2027 appeared first on The College Investor.
High-net-worth, self-employed borrowers often have difficulty obtaining mortgage financing. Being self-employed has its advantages and disadvantages. In this case, our self-employed borrowers have difficulty obtaining conventional financing, which carries cheaper rates. Still, ournon-QM loan programshelp these types of borrowers get the financing they need. It might be a quarter higher on the rate, but the programs exist.
Scenario Overview
Our borrower is a successful self-employed interior designer working in the luxury home market. Her spouse is a freelance photographer. Together, they have built a thriving business and maintain a strong financial profile, including a 773 credit score and significant liquidity.
They recently sold their home and entered into a contract on a luxury property, seeking a $4.4 million loan. Despite their financial strength, they were declined by conventional lenders. The issue was not credit, assets, or down payment. It was their tax returns.
Like many self-employed borrowers, their CPA strategically minimized taxable income. While beneficial for tax purposes, this created a high debt-to-income ratio under conventional underwriting standards, making them ineligible for a jumbo loan.
The Non-QM Solution
This is where our Non-QM Super Jumbo Bank Statement program made the difference. Instead of relying on tax returns, we evaluated the borrower’s actual cash flow using 12 months ofbank statements. Their accounts showed consistent, strong deposits, accurately reflecting a healthy and growing business. By focusing on real income rather than reported income, we structured a loan that matched the borrower’s true financial capacity. With a 35% down payment, resulting in a 65% loan-to-value, strong post-closing reserves, and excellent credit, this became a well-qualified, low-risk transaction that conventional underwriting failed to recognize.
Program Highlights
Loan amounts from $3.5 million to $5.0 million
12-month personal or business bank statement option
Minimum 680 FICO
Up to 75% LTV for purchases
Up to 65% LTV for refinances
Maximum 35% DTI
Primary residence eligible
Self-employed borrowers in high-income professions, such as designers, consultants, entrepreneurs, and creatives, often report lower income on their tax returns due to legitimate deductions. Conventional Jumbo financing does not account for this reality, leading to unnecessary denials. Our Non-QM Jumbo Bank Statement program bridges that gap by recognizing true earning power through documented cash flow.
If you’re a self-employed borrower seeking jumbo or super jumbo financing, we have the loan programs to help youpurchaseorrefinancea property.
Grayscale Investments has highlighted that the HYPEtoken linked to the Hyperliquid protocol continues to appear attractively priced relative to publicly traded fintech companies, even after substantial price appreciation earlier this year.
The assessment comes from Zach Pandl, the firm’s head of research, in a recent note published on the company’s research platform.
Hyperliquid stands out as a decentralized platform focused on perpetual futures trading.
Unlike conventional corporations, it does not issue equity shares. Instead, value generated by trading activity on the network flows to holders of its native HYPE token.
Analysts at Grayscale argue that this cash-flow dynamic allows the token to be evaluated in a manner comparable to traditional stocks, using an adapted metric called earnings per token rather than the more familiar earnings per share.
Under their framework, the research team projects that Hyperliquid could produce roughly one billion dollars in earnings during 2027.
That figure represents an increase of about 20 percent from estimated 2025 levels.
Growth is expected to stem from a rebound in overall cryptocurrency trading volumes and additional revenue streams created by a newly introduced stablecoin arrangement.
A portion of the income generated from stablecoin reserves is expected to flow back to the protocol under its updated infrastructure design.Token supply considerations also play a central role in the analysis.
Circulating HYPE currently stands near 270 million units.
The supply can expand through staking rewards and scheduled releases of tokens held by core contributors, while protocol fee burns work in the opposite direction by reducing the total.
Grayscale anticipates that circulating supply by the end of 2027 will fall somewhere between 270 million and 310 million tokens.
The range depends largely on the speed of contributor unlocks.
Core team members have been releasing approximately 550,000 HYPE each month; the firm’s models examine scenarios ranging from continuation of that pace up to five times the current rate.
Combining the earnings forecast with the projected supply range produces an estimated earnings-per-token figure of between 3.25 and 3.75 dollars for 2027. At a reference price of 54 dollars used in the study, this translates into a forward earnings multiple of roughly 15 to 18 times.
According to Pandl, that valuation multiple appears modest when set against those of comparable publicly listed fintech firms.
The research note therefore concludes that HYPE may still be undervalued relative to its traditional-market peers.
The analysis is not without caveats.
Potential risks include weaker-than-expected growth in network revenue or faster expansion of token supply than currently modeled.
Even so, the key message remains clear: despite the gains already recorded by HYPE this year, the token continues to look inexpensive on a comparative basis with fintech equities.
This perspective arrives at a time when institutional interest in decentralized trading platforms has been rising, with multiple exchange-traded products now offering exposure to HYPE. Grayscale’s earnings-based approach provides one structured method for investors seeking to assess the token’s fundamentals beyond pure market momentum.
The market is giving investors a few gifts right now. There are several companies whose shares are on sale, and investors should be taking advantage of these deals while they are available. Two stocks down significantly from their all-time highs that look like solid buys are Alphabet(GOOG +0.95%)(GOOGL +0.90%) and Broadcom(AVGO -2.78%). Alphabet is down more than 15% while Broadcom is down about 20%.
I don’t expect these levels to last for long, as each has several growth catalysts that can push them to new all-time highs before 2026 is over.
Image source: Getty Images.
Alphabet
Alphabet is a major player in artificial intelligence (AI). It’s competing with its own large language models, as well as supplying computing infrastructure for others to rent out to run AI workloads and applications. Lastly, it’s integrating AI across all aspects of its business, including its legacy Google Search engine. This transition is paying off big-time for Alphabet, as its revenue throughout its business is skyrocketing. Overall, Alphabet’s Q2 revenue rose 24% year over year, and its operating margin widened from 32.4% last year to 34% this year. So, Alphabet is not only growing larger but also becoming more efficient.
Today’s Change
(0.90%) $3.00
Current Price
$336.71
Key Data Points
Market Cap
$4.1TMarket cap calculated using publicly traded shares outstanding only. Does not include unlisted, private, or dual-class non-traded shares. Implied market cap may vary.
Day’s Range
$331.62 – $342.50
52wk Range
$187.82 – $408.61
Volume
122.9K
Avg Vol
33M
Gross Margin
60.94%
Dividend Yield
0.25%
Alphabet also has a huge paper gain on its balance sheet from a early Space Exploration Technologies(SPCX -3.32%) investment, which it may choose to liquidate to fund more data center construction once the lockup period ends. Alphabet is really crushing it right now, and its success is headlined by its cloud computing division delivering 82% year-over-year growth.
Valuing the stock is tricky because Alphabet’s earnings have been skewed by its SpaceX profits on paper (which it’s required to report as actual earnings). But when valued on operating profits instead, Alphabet has come down significantly from recent highs.
GOOG Operating PE Ratio data by YCharts
I think the stock is a phenomenal investment with a reasonable price tag. Wall Street is also on board, as analysts expect 24% revenue growth this year and 22% next year, which is easily enough to surpass the long-term growth rate of the broader market. With a great future growth story on hand and a valuation that’s off its all-time highs, it’s a perfect stock to buy now.
Broadcom
Broadcom is emerging as an AI computing powerhouse. While Nvidia(NVDA -3.55%) may get most of the attention in this industry, Broadcom is starting to make a name for itself. Instead of making broad-purpose graphics processing units (GPUs) like Nvidia, it’s partnering with AI hyperscalers to develop custom AI chips that are tailored to their workloads. The best example of this is the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) designed in collaboration with Alphabet. These computing units have become so popular that Alphabet is starting to sell them to others, allowing more companies to benefit from a purpose-built chip.
Today’s Change
(-2.78%) $-10.59
Current Price
$370.32
Key Data Points
Market Cap
$1.8TMarket cap calculated using publicly traded shares outstanding only. Does not include unlisted, private, or dual-class non-traded shares. Implied market cap may vary.
Day’s Range
$369.51 – $386.12
52wk Range
$281.61 – $495.00
Volume
75.6K
Avg Vol
25.9M
Gross Margin
65.66%
Dividend Yield
0.69%
Broadcom is seeing monstrous growth in its AI semiconductor division, which grew a blistering 143% year over year to reach $10.8 billion in Q2. In 2027, management expects this division to generate more than $100 billion in revenue. That’s a rapid and sustained growth rate, and will transform Broadcom into an entirely different company.
If you value Broadcom’s stock using next year’s earnings (to account for the huge growth it anticipates), the stock trades for less than 20 times next year’s earnings.
AVGO PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts
That’s a pretty reasonable price to pay for a company that Wall Street expects to put up 66% revenue growth this year and 63% growth next year. As a result, I think Broadcom is one of the top stocks to load up on now, as it will have significant growth that will push the stock to new heights.