Home Blog

Congress has a lower approval rating than Hitler in some polls. And we just keep voting for the same 2 parties



Most Americans don’t know this: in 1988, the Republican and Democratic parties fired the League of Women Voters — the neutral, nonpartisan organization that had hosted Presidential debates for decades — and replaced them with a commission they run themselves. Many Americans only tunes in to politics during the runup to a Presidential election, which means the Presidential debates are often the pivotal events in the race.

When that organization — the Commission on Presidential Debates, or CPD — was founded it was jointly run by the chairs of the Republican and Democratic national committees. It existed, in practice, to protect the two parties that created it. 

The most notable rule the CPD instituted was requiring any third-party candidate who wants to participate in these nationally televised debates to receive greater than 15% support in at least five national polls — an effectively impossible hurdle. For context, only two third-party candidates have ever exceeded five percent of the popular vote and received federal matching funds since the law providing them was passed in 1974. The bar set by the CPD is triple that. The two major parties have, in other words, constructed a system specifically designed to ensure no one else can compete.

Through nine election cycles it served that purpose until 2024, when it was no longer even needed.  It had been forty years since the debates were hosted by the League Of Women Voters and the two major parties decided to simply negotiate the details directly with the networks.  Notably, they didn’t invite anyone but each other.


Broken government is serious and dangerous stuff. The two major parties fight for control like petulant children wrestling over a television remote. When one of them shakes it free, the loser storms out of the room. Or the Capitol Building.

When their inability to compromise led to a government shutdown in 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded this country’s debt from AAA to AA for the first time in roughly a century. That will likely cost future generations trillions in interest payments.

The system has been mostly the same for two hundred and fifty years, but for decades after the fall of Communism there was no existential threat to democracy that forced compromise. When Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill couldn’t agree, they didn’t shut down the government — they famously worked it out, because failing to do so risked giving quarter to the Soviets. Once the wall came down, the consequences of not compromising no longer seemed more important than the pursuit of personal power and wealth to our elected officials. Country over party became optional. They chose party.


Is the citizenry pleased with the performance of this duopoly? According to Ballotpedia, in January 2026 the approval rating for Congress sits at around 15% — what pollsters call “the floor,” meaning it is almost impossible to go lower. According to Gallup, since 2010 the approval rating for Congress has almost never exceeded 30%.

To put 15% in context: according to a YouGov poll from roughly a year ago, the approval rating on Adolf Hitler ranges between 11% and 23%, depending on how you interpret the results — 11% of Americans say some of his ideas were “right,” and 12% categorized him as “a bad person who did some good things.” YouGov puts his unfavorable tracker at -88%. Stalin comes in somewhat stronger, with an unfavorable rating of roughly -75% to -80%.

Hitler. Stalin. The U.S. Congress. The polling puts them in roughly the same neighborhood. That sentence should alarm every American.


Most of us have acquiesced to the notion that there is simply nothing we can do about it. I disagree. Things do change. Change often happens when we don’t expect it, or too slowly to observe — but it is inevitable. Just because you can’t see the continents moving doesn’t mean tectonic plates don’t exist. Just because you don’t know that the Republican party was once a third-party movement doesn’t make it untrue. The Whigs would agree — if any of them still existed.

Individual issues no longer matter in an era when we have no functioning political system with which to legislate. That is not an epitaph — it is a call to action. Citizens must push representatives to reverse Citizens United, minimize the effect of money on politics, broaden access to Presidential debates, end the filibuster, dissolve the electoral college, institute term limits, and update the system so it works again.

Whether or not Edmund Burke actually said, “Evil triumphs when good men do nothing because they could only have done a little,” it remains a truism. Change is inevitable, but reform never comes from the top. It comes from the people. More Americans who turn eighteen now register as Independents than join either of the two major parties. They had a good run. We deserve better. Vote Independent. Write your representative. Hold them accountable. Do a little.


The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

What the “Forever Renter” Era Means For Landlords


It feels like every other headline you read about homeownership goes something like: “Is the American dream dead?”

Click-baity as apocalyptic headlines are, plenty of strong data support the argument that homeownership is slipping out of many Americans’ hands. And that has implications for us as real estate investors—including people like me who rent their home while also investing in other people’s housing. 

The Data on “Forever Renters”

A 2025 study by the National Association of Realtors found that the median age of first-time homebuyers reached an all-time high of 40. As my father told me when I turned 40, “You’re now middle-aged.”

The data doesn’t get any rosier from there. The same report found that first-time homebuyers make up just 21% of home purchases, a record low. The median age for repeat homebuyers is 62. 

Consider another study entitled “Giving Up” by Northwestern University’s Seung Hyeong Lee and the University of Chicago’s Younggeun Yoo. They found that Gen Z “will reach retirement with a homeownership rate roughly 9.6 percentage points lower than that of their parents’ generation.” 

The study also cites a Harris Poll survey revealing that 42% of Americans and 46% of Gen Z respondents agreed with the statement: “No matter how hard I work, I will never be able to afford a home I really love.”

Yikes.

Implications for Investors

If this pattern continues playing out, it could affect real estate investors in the following ways.

An older, more stable tenant pool

Historically, a huge percentage of renters have been young adults ranging from college students to thirtysomethings. They’ve aimed to buy a home before “settling down” with either marriage or kids. In 1991, the average first-time homebuyer was just 28 years old

As Americans wait longer to buy homes—or just rent their whole lives—that means that landlords get to rent to older, more stable tenants. That means:

  • Workers who are more established in their careers
  • Families with children in school who don’t want to move
  • Older adults, such as empty nesters, who have larger net worths and fewer expenses 

That’s potentially a more attractive renter pool than rowdy twentysomethings who move every other year. 

Longer tenancies

Older, more established renters tend to move less frequently. And as anyone who’s ever owned rental units knows, turnovers are where most of the cost and labor lies for landlords

In other words, longer tenancies are all upside for rental and multifamily investors. Lesley Hurst, landlord and owner of Penn Charter Abstract title company, is already seeing this play out in Pittsburgh, telling BiggerPockets: “My rental properties cash flow well, largely because we’re seeing a more stable, long-term tenant base. That reduces turnover and vacancy risk and helps me earn consistent rental income without relying solely on appreciation.”

Higher-end rentals

Not every renter wants to buy a home. 

“In Wichita, I work with plenty of people who could buy but choose to rent because it’s more flexible and more affordable than buying at today’s interest rates and prices,” explained Derek Grandfield of Freedom Property Investors in a conversation with BiggerPockets. “It’s changed how we think about our properties, focusing more on making them comfortable and livable for the long haul, not just quick turnovers.”

Also consider extremely expensive markets like San Francisco, where the rent-to-price ratio is nearly 36. It just doesn’t make any financial sense to buy there, even for the upper-middle class

Senior living investments

Lifelong renters theoretically have fewer ties to their homes and are more open to moving into senior housing. 

That runs the gamut from active adult communities up to assisted living and nursing homes. Either way, the “silver tsunami” is coming, and there isn’t enough infrastructure for it, so these senior living investments could continue to do better in the years and decades to come. 

Huge appeal for entry-level homes for sale

Not every Gen Zer has given up on homeownership—they’re just pessimistic about it. But plenty of investors have built business plans to meet their needs.

For example, my co-investing club partnered with an investor who buys vacant land parcels and installs manufactured homes on them to sell to first-time homebuyers. They price them at literally half the local median home value. And they sell like hotcakes. 

The Rise of Renter-Investors—Including Me

My family and I sold our prior home and have rented for the last 11 years. At first, we did so as expats living overseas, but even after moving back to the U.S., we continue to rent for flexibility. But that doesn’t mean I don’t have any real estate. 

I own an interest in over 5,000 units around the country as a passive investor. In fact, I keep investing in new passive real estate investments every month as a member of a co-investing club. 

I may or may not buy a home again in the future. Either way, I want plenty of diverse real estate in my “set-it-and-forget-it” portfolio. That includes a mix of hands-off JV partnerships, syndications, and secured private notes. 

Even among homeowners and active investors, too many don’t bother to diversify their real estate investments. Their home makes up a disproportionate amount of their net worth, and they have tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in each investment property. 

That’s not a diverse real estate portfolio. I invest $5K-$10K at a time, every month, to practice dollar-cost averaging with real estate as I do with stocks. 

Whether you rent or own, get more intentional with diversifying your portfolio. Don’t try to pick the next hot market or asset class—just steadily keep investing small amounts in new real estate investments. 

Verizon Is Up 24% in 2026 and Pays Over 5% in Dividends: Time to Buy?


After years of underperforming the market, Verizon Communications (VZ 0.30%) is one of the bright spots in the tech sector this year. It’s up 24% year to date through March 27.

Those results look even better when you factor in that Verizon is one of the more generous dividend stocks. It has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years, most recently to $0.71 for the next quarter, and it has a dividend yield of about 5.6%.

Image source: Verizon Communications.

The announcement of the latest dividend hike came on Jan. 30, 2026, but that wasn’t the biggest news of the day for Verizon, because the wireless carrier also had one of its best earnings reports in years. It reported 616,000 postpaid phone net additions in Q4 2025, its highest quarterly net additions since 2019. Verizon also completed its acquisition of Frontier Communications, growing its fiber access to over 30 million homes and businesses.

Stock market volatility could also be contributing to Verizon’s success. Investors often rotate out of growth stocks into value stocks, including high-dividend stocks, during periods of instability.

Verizon Communications Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.30%) $-0.15

Current Price

$50.15

So, is now a good time to pick up shares of Verizon? If your goal is passive income or to balance out a growth-heavy portfolio, then Verizon is worth considering. The recent results are promising, and the dividend provides stable returns. But I wouldn’t invest with the expectation that Verizon will continue to beat the broader market, because that’s unlikely. Wireless carriers tend to deliver modest returns, so periods of outperformance usually don’t last too long.

Lyle Daly has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

[YMMV] Capital One Shopping: Chow Sang Sang, Spend $650+ & Get $390 Back


The Offer

No direct link to offer, check portal. Might need to visit site with browser extension installed and wait a few days to get the offer to show

  • Capital One Shopping portal is offering $390 back when spend $650 at Chow Sang Sang

Our Verdict

This is a Hong Kong jewelry brand. They do offer free shipping when you spend ~$500+. Might be also able to stack with any offers the merchant has, but check terms of your specific capital one offer to confirm. It seems that it excludes gold bars, but you still might be able to get a piece that is profitable on the gold content alone. 

Things to note with Capital One shopping:

  • Payout is not cash but giftcards
  • There is a $80 referral bonus, you can use Chuck’s link here. Full terms of that here.
  • Tips for maximizing these offers here. 
 

Hat tip to reader BonusVault

Morning Bid: April fools rush in




Morning Bid: April fools rush in

The Psychology of Money in 33 minutes | Animated Book Summary



This video is a 33 minutes animated book summary of The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel.

🟨 UPGRADE YOUR FINANCIAL LIFE
Understanding money is one thing. Managing it well is another.
The MONEY MASTERY SYSTEM 1.0 bridges the gap between what you know and what you do.
👉

📖 The Psychology of Money 👉

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

This full animated book summary of The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel reveals the psychological traps that keep people broke, uncovers the hidden forces behind your financial decisions, and shows you how to build lasting wealth through smarter habits and a better mindset.

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️

⏰ Timestamps:
0:00 – Introduction

1:01 – Act 1 – The False Confidence
1:18 – Trap 1. You Think You’re Logical
2:39 – Trap 2. You Think You’re in Control
5:02 – Trap 3. You Believe the Story, Not the Reality
6:51 – Trap 4. You Think You’re a Spreadsheet

8:05 – Act 2 – The Emotional Hijack
8:20 – Trap 5. You Chase More Than You Need
10:44 – Trap 6. You Think Stuff Will Make You Admired
12:09 – Trap 7. You Think Looking Rich Means Being Rich
13:36 Trap 8. You Fall for Fear Disguised as Wisdom

15:18 – Act 3 – The Hidden Rules of Money
15:35 – Trap 9. You Think Saving Needs a Goal
17:36 – Trap 10. You Want the Gains—But Not the Ride
19:05 – Trap 11. You Think Getting Rich Is the Hard Part
20:53 – Trap 12. You Overestimate Your Plan

22:18 – Act 4 – The Long Game
22:30 – Trap 13. You Underestimate the Power of Time
24:01 – Trap 14. You Ignore How Rare Success Really Is
26:03 – Trap 15. You Buy Stuff and Sell Your Time

27:42 – Act 5 – Become the Person Who Wins Long Term
27:56 – Trap 16. You Expect the Market to Be Predictable
29:14 – Trap 17. You Forget That You’ll Change
31:01 – Trap 18. You Copy People Who Aren’t Playing Your Game

📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈

Notion Tools by Antidote:
🟨 Premium Blueprint “12 Weeks Year Planner – Achieve More in 12 Weeks Than Most Do in a Year!” 👉

🟨 Money Mastery System 1.0
👉

More from us:
🟨 Premium Blueprint “Master the Art of Human Behavior” 👉

🟩 Support the Channel : 😊☕

🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️🏵️

CREDITS:
🔵Characters designed by @Macrovector
🔵Musics from Artlist

#booksummary #morganhousel #thepsychologyofmoney #moneymindset #psychology #personalgrowth

Disclaimer:
I’m not a financial advisor. This content is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. For guidance specific to your situation, please consult a licensed professional.

Disclosure:
Some links above are Amazon affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase (at no extra cost to you)

source

Mortgage Rates Get Relief Thanks to Jerome Powell!


What was once unimaginable has now become reality. Jerome Powell may have made mortgage rates go down.

I know what many are thinking. This can’t be possible. The Fed chair is a super villain when it comes to mortgage rates.

He raised rates 11 times and made mortgage rates surge higher.

The man defied the President, who had a clear goal of getting mortgage rates back into the 3s or even lower! Or so the story goes…

But it’s true, Powell calmed the bond market and in the process mortgage rates during a Q&A session at Harvard University yesterday.

Powell Says Fed Can Wait and See on Higher Energy Prices

The big headwind for mortgage rates lately has been surging energy prices, namely oil skyrocketing to over $100 a barrel due to the strikes and ensuing conflict in Iran.

Oil prices were in the $60s prior to the unanticipated conflict in late February, and are hovering around $105 today.

That has led to fears of another inflation wave, just as it appeared we were getting over the initial one.

After all, it oil costs a lot more, consumers will face higher gas prices. This has already materialized.

In addition, anything that requires energy/oil in its input costs, which is basically everything, will go up in price.

That all spells higher inflation, which led to a big increase in bond yields over the past month.

That rise in the 10-year bond yield corresponded with higher 30-year fixed mortgage rates, with the benchmark rate rising from 3.95% to nearly 4.50%.

Meanwhile, the 30-year fixed climbed from sub-6% levels at the end of February to roughly 6.625%.

Emphasis on rough because the big rate increase happened at the worst possible time of the year, peak spring home buying season.

However, current Fed chair Jerome Powell seemed to shrug off fears of rate hikes due to the Iranian conflict.

While not surprising to me, it might surprise others who feel Powell is the enemy of low mortgage rates.

During the Q&A session, he noted that “We feel like our policy’s in a good place for us to wait and see how that turns out.”

In other words, the sky isn’t necessarily falling, even though oil prices have gone haywire lately and many expect much higher inflation as a result.

This is classic Powell if you’ve been paying attention. He never reacts haphazardly to anything.

He fully understands this is a fluid situation and can change at any given moment. So for the Fed to all of a sudden hike or cut as a result would be out of character.

As such, it’s going to be the status quo, despite what’s happening.

He did add that “We’re getting now an energy shock: no one knows how big it will be. It’s way too early to know.”

And that’s exactly right. We don’t know yet what the impact will be, just as we didn’t know what the impact would be from the tariffs, which also drove mortgage rates higher temporarily.

Perhaps this situation will be short-lived as well, and thus won’t require Fed intervention.

Weak Labor Market Makes Powell’s Job Easier

One thing making the Fed’s job easier (and Powell’s) is the fact that the labor market isn’t too hot right now.

The Fed’s dual mandate is to ensure maximum employment and price stability.

The price stability piece is in question with the recent surge in oil prices, but the employment piece is another story.

There are plenty of signs that labor is struggling, though it’s not yet in full crisis mode.

The latest data delivered today, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover (JOLTS) report, revealed that job openings are down and hiring is the lowest in about six years.

It’s a low-hire, low-fire environment and workers aren’t feeling too confident to leave their existing job and find new work. Nor are employers keen to bring on new talent.

Powell recognizes this, saying “There’s sort of downside risk ​to the labor market, which suggests keep rates low, but there’s upside risk to inflation, which suggests maybe don’t keep rates low.”

He added that there is “⁠tension between the two objectives,” which explains the do-nothing approach.

Just wait and see what happens and don’t react without fully understanding the entire picture.

And if you look at Fed rate projections, the odds of a rate hike are now basically minuscule again after jumping last week.

Of course, the Fed doesn’t set mortgage rates, but bond traders pay close attention to Fed rate expectations.

Meanwhile, the 10-year bond yield has plummeted nearly 20 basis points (bps) in the past few days, which has led to a mini mortgage rate rally.

And maybe, just maybe, you can thank Jerome Powell for a fair chunk of that.

New tool: Compare offers quickly with my new mortgage rate calculator!

(photo: Federalreserve)

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Capital Gains Tax Brackets And Tax Tables For 2026


Each year, the IRS adjusts federal income brackets and thresholds, and capital gains taxes are no exception. Whether you hold stock, real estate, or other capital assets, knowing the correct long-term and short-term rates—and how they might shift—is critical to planning your investments and understanding your tax bill. 

We’ll break down the 2026 capital gains tax brackets, highlight the newly released brackets, show you how to calculate your gain, and share strategies to potentially reduce what you owe.

Use the tables, examples, or The College Investor’s Capital Gains Tax Calculator to see exactly where you fall and what changes you need to watch. 

Note:
This article is updated annually. 

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

2026 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2026 capital gains tax brackets and rates.

The actual rates didn’t change for this year, but the income brackets did adjust significantly due to rising inflation.

Short-Term Capital Gains Rates

Tax rates for short-term gains are 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37%.

Short-term gains are for assets held for one year or less – this includes short term stock holdings and short term collectibles and crypto.

Long-Term Capital Gains Rates

Just like short-term gains, there are four filing categories: single, married and filing jointly, head of household, and married and filing separately. The amount of taxes paid is based on income.

The brackets adjusted upwards for 2026 due to rising inflation.

Long-term gains are those on assets held for over a year. Below, the percentage of taxes paid are listed on the left with the corresponding income on the right.

2026 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Bracket | Source: The College Investor

Learn More About The 2026 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here is a chart for the 2026 Short Term capital gains tax brackets:

2026 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

10%

$0 – $12,400

$0 – $24,800

$0 – $17,700

12%

$12,401 – $50,400

$24,801 – $100,800

$17,701 – $67,450

22%

$50,401 – $105,700

$100,801 – $211,400

$67,451 – $105,700

24%

$105,701 – $201,775

$211,401 – $403,550

$105,701 – $201,775

32%

$201,776 – $256,225

$403,551 – $512,450

$201,776 – $256,200

35%

$256,226 – $640,600

$512,451 – $768,700

$256,201 – $640,600

37%

$640,601+

$768,701+

$640,601+

Here is a chart for the 2026 Long Term capital gains tax brackets:

2026 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

0%

$0 – $49,450

$0 – $98,900

$0 – $66,200

15%

$49,451 – $545,500

$98,901 – $613,700

$66,201 – $579,600

20%

$545,501+

$613,701+

$579,601+

Net Investment Income Tax (Medicare Tax)

The Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) or Medicare Tax applies at a rate of 3.8% to certain net investment income of individuals, estates and trusts that have income above the statutory threshold amounts.

In general, investment income includes, but is not limited to: interest, dividends, capital gains, rental and royalty income, non-qualified annuities, income from businesses involved in trading of financial instruments or commodities and businesses that are passive activities to the taxpayer

Individuals will owe the tax if they have Net Investment Income and also have modified adjusted gross income over the following thresholds:

2026 Net Investment Income Tax

Filing Status

AGI Threshold Amount

Single

$200,000

Married Filing Jointly

$250,000

Married Filing Separately

$125,000

Head Of Household

$200,000

Qualifying Widower with Dependent Child

$250,000

Collectible Long Term Capital Gains Rate

Collectibles held over one year are always taxed at 28%. 

Collectibles include gold and silver, art work, rare coins, antiques, and more.


Prior Years Capital Gains Tax Tables 

Are you looking for capital gains tax brackets for prior years? Check out the drop down list below, find your year, and you can see the brackets:

2025 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2025 capital gains tax rates.

Here are the short term capital gains tax brackets:

2025 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets And Rates

Here are the 2025 long term capital gains tax brackets:

2025 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets And Rates | Source: The College Investor

2024 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2024 capital gains tax rates.

Here are the short term capital gains tax brackets:

2024 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2024 long term capital gains tax brackets:

2024 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

2023 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2023 capital gains tax rates.

Here are the short term capital gains tax brackets:

2023 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2023 long term capital gains tax brackets:

2023 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

2022 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2022 capital gains tax rates.

Here are the short term capital gains tax brackets:

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

10%

$0 – $10,275

$0 – $20,550

$0 – $14,650

12%

$10,276 – $41,775

$20,551 – $83,550

$14,651 – $55,900

22%

$41,776 – $89,075

$83,551 – $178,150

$55,901 – $89,050

24%

$89,076 – $170,050

$178,151 – $340,100

$89,051 – $170,050

32%

$170,051 – $215,950

$340,101 – $431,900

$170,051 – $215,950

35%

$215,951 – $539,900

$431,901 – $647,850

$215,951 – $539,900

37%

$539,901+

$647,851+

$539,901+

Here are the 2022 long term capital gains tax brackets:

2022 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

0%

$0 – $41,675

$0 – $83,350

$0 – $55,800

15%

$41,676 – $459,750

$83,351 – $517,200

$55,801 – $488,500

20%

$459,751+

$517,201+

$488,501+

2021 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2021 capital gains tax brackets. The rates didn’t change from 2020, but the income brackets did adjust slightly.

Here are the short term capital gains brackets:

2021 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

10%

$0 – $9,950

$0 – $19,900

$0 – $14,200

12%

$9,951 – $40,525

$19,901 – $81,050

$14,201 – $54,200

22%

$40,526 – $86,375

$81,051 – $172,750

$54,201 – $86,350

24%

$86,376 – $164,925

$172,751 – $329,850

$86,351 – $164,900

32%

$164,926 – $209,425

$329,851 – $418,850

$164,901 – $209,400

35%

$209,426 – $523,600

$418,851 – $628,300

$209,401 – $523,600

37%

$523,601+

$628,301+

$523,601+

Here are the long term capital gains tax brackets:

2021 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

0%

$0 – $40,400

$0 – $80,800

$0 – $54,100

15%

$40,401 – $445,850

$80,801 – $501,600

$54,101 – $473,750

20%

$445,851+

$501,601+

$473,751+

2020 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2020 capital gains tax rates. The actual rates didn’t change this year, but the income brackets did adjust slightly.

Here are the short term capital gains tax rates:         

2020 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

10%

$0 – $9,875

$0 – $19,750

$0 – $14,100

12%

$9,876 – $40,125

$19,751 – $80,250

$14,101 – $53,700

22%

$40,126 – $85,525

$80,251 – $171,050

$53,701 – $85,500

24%

$85,526 – $163,300

$171,051 – $326,600

$85,501 – $163,300

32%

$163,301 – $207,350

$326,601 – $414,700

$163,301 – $207,350

35%

$207,351 – $518,400

$414,701 – $622,050

$207,351 – $518,400

37%

$518,401+

$622,051+

$518,401+

Here are the long term capital gains rates and brackets:

2020 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

0%

$0 – $40,000

$0 – $80,000

$0 – $53,600

15%

$40,001 – $441,450

$80,001 – $496,600

$53,601 – $469,050

20%

$441,451+

$496,601+

$469,051+

2019 Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Here are the 2019 capital gains tax rates.

Here are the short term capital gains tax brackets:

2019 Short Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

10%

$0 – $9,700

$0 – $19,400

$0 – $13,850

12%

$9,701 – $39,475

$19,401 – $78,950

$13,851 – $52,850

22%

$39,476 – $84,200

$78,951 – $168,400

$52,851 – $84,200

24%

$84,201 – $160,725

$168,401 – $321,450

$84,201 – $160,700

32%

$160,726 – $204,100

$321,451 – $408,200

$160,701 – $204,100

35%

$204,101 – $510,300

$408,201 – $612,350

$204,101 – $510,300

37%

$510,301+

$612,351+

$510,301+

Here are the 2019 long term capital gains tax brackets:

2019 Long Term Capital Gains Tax Brackets

Tax Bracket/Rate

Single

Married Filing Jointly

Head of Household

0%

$0 – $39,375

$0 – $78,750

$0 – $52,750

15%

$39,376 – $434,550

$78,751 – $488,850

$52,751 – $461,700

20%

$434,551+

$488,851+

$461,701+

What Are Capital Gains?

When you sell a stock for a profit, you realize a capital gain. Basically, when most assets are sold for a profit, a capital gain is generated. Profits or gains are taxable. How much you’ll pay depends on a number of factors, including the current tax brackets, which change periodically.

Personal assets and investments are called capital assets. This includes your home, car, investments, recreational vehicle, and more. IRS Topic Number 409 covers these items in more detail. A capital gain or capital loss is based on the difference between the asset sale price and your adjusted basis, which is referenced in IRS Publication 551.

Calculating Capital Gains and Losses

While you can have a capital gain from the profitable sale of an asset, you can also have a capital loss from the sale of an asset below your purchase price or adjusted basis.

As an example, say you buy and sell stock in the same year up to November. Your trading has netted $10,000 in profits. These profits are classified as short-term gains because they’re less than a year old. Then in December of the same year, you sell more stock for a loss of $3,000. Your capital gain is reduced to $7,000.

A different investor buys and sells some stock during a year and manages to lose $5,000. This investor has a capital loss of $5,000 but can only declare $3,000 ($1,500 if married filing separately) for the current year. What happens to the remaining $2,000?

The $2,000 capital loss in the previous example is carried over to the next year. It can be applied as a capital loss. Using another example, our investor has a capital gain of $10,000 in the next year. They can offset this gain and reduce their taxes by the amount carried over from the previous year: $2,000. Their new capital gain is then $8,000.

With capital gains, your capital gain is stacked on top of other ordinary income before the bracket and rate is calculated. This does leave some planning opportunity to try and minimize the taxes paid, but given the 0% bracket is relatively low, it likely means your gains will extend into other brackets.

While at the marginal level, capital gains are flat taxed – in practice, your gain can be subject to different tax rates depending on the amount of the gain. You can see this in the tax brackets section above. If you are single and make a $45,000 capital gain on top of your $40,000 in ordinary income, your long-term capital gains tax bracket is 15%. You will then pay $6,750 ($45,000 x 0.15) in taxes on this gain.

However, if you’re single, and have no other income other than your $45,000 capital gain, your first $40,000 would be in the 0% bracket, and the remaining $5,000 would be taxed at 15%.

If this sounds confusing, check out our Capital Gains Tax Calculator and Estimator.

How to Reduce Your Taxes

Nobody likes paying taxes and everyone is looking for ways to reduce them. There are a few ways that you can reduce your capital gains taxes.

Keeping Investments for at Least a Year

If you hold investments for at least a year before selling, you’ll be able to take advantage of long-term gains.

Use a Robo-Advisor

Robo-advisors have become very popular. While they haven’t yet replaced financial advisors, for most people, they can help save on taxes.

Robo-advisors use a method called tax-loss harvesting. By selling losers, gains on winners are offset. Of course, you can perform tax-loss harvesting manually. However, robo-advisors make this task easy through the use of automation.

It seems there is nowhere to hide from taxes. But arming yourself with knowledge about capital gains taxes can help you save money. We’ve already seen a few practical tips. Your accountant is likely to have more. Ask your accountant questions throughout the year so you can set yourself up for maximizing capital gains tax reductions.

Common Capital Gains Questions

Q: What counts as a long-term vs short-term capital gain?

A: If you hold an asset (stock, real estate, etc.) for more than one year before selling, it qualifies for long-term capital gains rates (0%, 15%, 20%). If held for one year or less, gains are taxed as ordinary income (short-term).

Q: How does the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) factor in?

A: If your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds certain thresholds ($200,000 unmarried, $250,000 married filing jointly, etc.), you may owe an additional 3.8% on net investment income (including capital gains).

Q: Can my capital losses offset gains?

A: Yes. Capital losses first offset capital gains (short-term vs long-term matching). If losses exceed gains, you can deduct up to $3,000 ($1,500 if married filing separately) of the excess against ordinary income. Any remainder carries forward.

Q: Are collectibles taxed differently?

A: Yes — long-term gains from collectibles (e.g. art, rare coins, antiques) are taxed at a maximum 28% rate, regardless of your income level.

Q: If my ordinary income is low, can I qualify for the 0% long-term rate?

A: It’s possible. If your total taxable income (ordinary income + gains) stays under the 0% bracket threshold for your filing status, then your long-term gains may be taxed at 0%. But once you cross that threshold, the excess moves into the next bracket (15%).

Q: When should I sell to minimize taxes?

A: It depends on your income level, timing, and strategy. Sometimes it makes sense to wait for a year so gains qualify for long-term treatment; other times to harvest losses to offset gains. Always factor in your current year’s income, upcoming changes, and state or local taxes.

Q: Will Congress change these brackets mid-year?

A: It’s possible, though rare. If tax laws change (due to new legislation or budget acts), we’ll update this page. Watch the top of the article for update notices.

Q: How do I estimate my capital gains tax liability?

A: Use a capital gains tax calculator or worksheets with your projected income + gains. Input your filing status, tax brackets, and apply the relevant rates, then layer in NIIT if applicable.

Editor: Ashley Barnett

Reviewed by: Ohan Kayikchyan Ph.D., CFP®

The post Capital Gains Tax Brackets And Tax Tables For 2026 appeared first on The College Investor.

ITA Airways Joins Star Alliance


ITA Airways Joins Star Alliance

Star Alliance officially welcomed ITA Airways as its newest member. ITA Airways marked its entry into the Alliance during a ceremony held at the Piazza di Spagna Lounge, Rome Fiumicino Airport Terminal 3. 

Starting April 1, ITA Airways will be fully connected into the Alliance’s global network, linking its Rome Fiumicino hub and Milan Linate airport, served by 17 Star Alliance members collectively, with more than 1,150 destinations worldwide. Customers travelling across the network can now benefit from through check-in, reciprocal frequent flyer recognition and access to Star Alliance lounges, creating a more seamless customer experience, in and out of Italy.

ITA Airways, which flies over 16 million customers every year, adds more than 350 daily flights to the Alliance network, supported by a strong domestic and regional footprint. The addition expands travel options across Italy and Europe, while improving connectivity between Southern Europe and key international markets.

As part of its membership, eligible customers can enjoy priority services, lounge access across the Alliance network, and reciprocal frequent flyer programme recognition, including earning and redeeming miles. Star Alliance Gold customers will also have access to ITA Airways lounges in Rome, Milan and Catania.

With the addition of ITA Airways, Star Alliance now comprises 26 member airlines, offering more than 17,500 daily flights across a global network spanning over 190 countries.

Controlling the Strait of Hormuz is the top priority in Iran and Trump may abandon it


As Donald Trump searches for an exit from the Iran war, the narrow Strait of Hormuz increasingly looks like a labyrinth in which the commander-in-chief has no good options. 

Any ceasefire or U.S. disengagement that cedes control of the strait risks creating new problems, including potentially triggering a nuclear arms race among Gulf states, experts say. But taking control of the strait militarily requires massive costs and risks, including a strategic invasion that comes short of occupying the country. Trump said March 31 he wants to leave Iran in two or three weeks, hours after he vented against allies to “go get your own oil!”

Continuing with the status quo, meanwhile—in which the U.S. and Israel pound Iranian targets, while Iran charges multimillion-dollar tolls to let select ships pass through the strait—could send the global economy into a recession.

“If this goes on for another two months, we’re in a global recession. There’s no way around it,” Jim Wicklund, a veteran oil analyst and managing director at the PPHB energy investment firm, told Fortune, arguing the U.S. is staring down the barrel of a credit crash and sky-high inflation. 

Even a slight opening of the strait would bring only temporary relief. Oil and natural gas prices may fall as more traffic flows through the strait, but they would remain much higher than in February before the U.S. and Israel initiated the war, especially if Iran continues to charge a $2 million toll per vessel. “The whole world won’t stand for a long-term toll,” said Wicklund. “There will be a higher risk premium even if the strait opens tomorrow.”

The U.S. must either put “boots on the ground” to take control of the narrow strait—through which 20% of the world’s oil, liquefied natural gas, and petrochemicals pass—or achieve some kind of truce that’s unlikely to last, he said. “Trump has to do something, and he has to do something soon.”

Bob McNally, former White House energy advisor under George W. Bush and founder of Rapidan Energy Group, took it a step further if the U.S. were to walk away without militarily seizing control of the strait.

“That would be a catastrophic setback for U.S. foreign policy interests that would, in my view, transcend even our defeat in Vietnam,” McNally told Fortune. “One would struggle to find a precedent or a parallel for what a defeat that would be.”

Where we are

More than a month into the slog of war, the average U.S. price for a gallon of regular gasoline rose above $4 on March 31 for the first time since 2022. California, Oregon, and Hawaii all exceeded $5.

And the impacts remain much worse in the rest of the world where supply shortages are mounting in Asia, and where Europe is now beginning to see scattered fuel shortfalls. This is where demand destruction escalates in April.

On March 30, Trump threatened “completely obliterating” Iranian power and water infrastructure if the strait is not opened—potentially a war crime. One day later, he lashed out at U.S. allies for not helping enough. “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!” he posted on social media.

“We leave because there’s no reason for us to do this,” Trump later told reporters at the White House. “We’ll be ‌leaving very soon.”

With Pakistan and now China increasingly serving as negotiation mediators, they offered a five-point peace initiative March 31 that included a call to “restore normal passage through the strait as soon as possible.”

Rystad Energy chief economist Claudio Galimberti sees a tenuous peace as the most likely outcome in the coming weeks. After all, only about 5% of the typical traffic is passing through the strait, which is not sustainable.

“It would be a very fragile ceasefire. It’s very unstable,” Galimberti said.

If a ceasefire only allows 50% or less of traffic to resume, then “this would be a very high inflationary scenario” for the world with oil prices likely remaining above $100 per barrel, he said. If it’s almost fully opened under a tolling scenario, then prices would fall further, but still remain well elevated above February levels before the war.

That is why McNally and Wicklund see U.S. boots on the ground as more likely to see the military campaign through. They think Trump is frustrated, but mostly posturing for now.

“What I think is likely is we’re going to see an intensification of combined operations—air, sea, and land—to degrade Iran’s ability to threaten Hormuz traffic,” McNally said.

The doctrine effect

The alternatives are much worse, McNally argued.

“The Arab Gulf countries and Israel would not accept Iran’s long-term domination of Hormuz. I think it would make another conflict just a matter of time. And it’s a conflict the United States would likely get dragged [back] into,” McNally said. “I don’t think it’s a durable scenario where we just sort of leave and say, ‘Hey, cut your deals with Iran. They’re the toll keeper now. Good luck.’”

The geopolitical precedent also would prove awful, McNally said, effectively canceling the Reagan Corollary to the Carter Doctrine. The 1980 Carter Doctrine said the U.S. would intervene militarily to protect its interests in the Middle East against external powers, which was in response to the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan. The 1981 Reagan Corollary, which came during the Iran-Iraq War, extended the doctrine but also pledged to secure internal stability in the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia.

“We would be canceling the Reagan Corollary to the Carter Doctrine, and eventually, perhaps the doctrine itself,” he said. “I think eventually a China or Russia would want to step in there.”