𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐂, 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐫𝐢 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚, 𝐝𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨𝐩-𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐲. #𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 #𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 #𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐂
source
𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 (𝐇𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬) 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
The Ten Best Tax Breaks That Currently Exist Today
The U.S. tax code runs thousands of pages, and most of it defines what counts as income and what doesn’t. That’s where the tax breaks live. Whether you earn $30,000 or $300,000, you’re taxed under the same federal tax brackets, but how you earn the money and what you do with it changes how much of it the IRS sees.
The short version: different kinds of income are taxed at different rates, and certain moves (contributing to a retirement account, holding an investment past a year, selling the house you live in) take income off the table entirely. Knowing which moves count is worth hundreds or thousands of dollars a year, and the earlier you learn them, the more years you get to invest the difference.
One definition before the list. A credit reduces your tax bill directly: a $1,000 credit saves you $1,000. A deduction reduces the income you’re taxed on, so a $1,000 deduction saves you $220 in the 22% bracket. An exclusion keeps the income off your return in the first place. Credits beat deductions, and exclusions beat both.
Here are the ten breaks, with the 2026 numbers, and how to tell whether you qualify.
.tci-tb{box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;max-width:100%;margin:0 0 20px 0;border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;background:#fff;font-family:inherit;color:#141414;overflow:hidden}
.tci-tb *{box-sizing:border-box}
.tci-tb__head{padding:12px 16px;background:#141414;color:#fff;font-weight:700;font-size:1.05em;line-height:1.3}
.tci-tb__head span{color:#f6c061}
.tci-tb table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:0.95em;line-height:1.4}
.tci-tb th,.tci-tb td{padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;border-top:1px solid #e5e0d8}
.tci-tb th{background:#f9f7f5;font-weight:700;border-top:0;font-size:0.9em;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.03em}
.tci-tb td:first-child{font-weight:700;white-space:nowrap}
.tci-tb td:nth-child(3){font-weight:700}
.tci-tb tr:nth-child(even) td{background:#fcfbf9}
.tci-tb__type{display:inline-block;padding:1px 8px;border-radius:999px;background:#f6c061;color:#141414;font-size:0.8em;font-weight:700;white-space:nowrap}
.tci-tb__foot{padding:10px 16px;font-size:0.8em;color:#55504a;background:#f9f7f5;border-top:1px solid #e5e0d8}
@media (max-width:640px){
.tci-tb table,.tci-tb tbody,.tci-tb tr,.tci-tb td{display:block;width:100%}
.tci-tb thead{display:none}
.tci-tb tr{border-top:2px solid #e5e0d8;padding:10px 12px}
.tci-tb tr:first-child{border-top:0}
.tci-tb tr:nth-child(even) td{background:transparent}
.tci-tb td{border:0;padding:3px 0;white-space:normal}
.tci-tb td:first-child{white-space:normal;font-size:1.05em;padding-bottom:4px}
.tci-tb td[data-label]::before{content:attr(data-label) “: “;font-weight:700;color:#8a8378;font-size:0.85em;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.03em}
.tci-tb td:first-child::before{content:none}
}
| Tax break | Type | 2026 number | Who it’s for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Saver’s Credit | Credit | Up to $1,000 ($2,000 joint); AGI under $40,250 single / $80,500 joint | Lower-income workers who contribute to a 401(k), IRA, or ABLE account. Last year before the Saver’s Match. |
| 2. Home-sale exclusion | Exclusion | $250,000 of gain single / $500,000 joint | Anyone who lived in the home two of the last five years |
| 3. 14-day rental rule | Exclusion | All rental income if you rent 14 days or fewer | Homeowners near a big event |
| 4. 0% long-term capital gains | Rate | 0% up to $49,450 taxable income single / $98,900 joint | Investors in a low-income year |
| 5. Rental depreciation | Deduction | 27.5-year schedule; 100% bonus depreciation on components | Landlords and house hackers |
| 6. QBI deduction | Deduction | 20% of business income; $400 minimum; permanent | Freelancers, side hustlers, business owners |
| 7. Tips deduction | Deduction | Up to $25,000 (2025–2028) | Tipped workers in listed occupations |
| 8. Overtime deduction | Deduction | Up to $12,500 ($25,000 joint) (2025–2028) | Hourly workers with FLSA overtime |
| 9. Senior deduction | Deduction | $6,000 per person 65+ (2025–2028) | Retirees under the income limits |
| 10. Car loan interest deduction | Deduction | Up to $10,000 (2025–2028) | Buyers of new U.S.-assembled vehicles |
What Changed For 2026
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, rewrote a chunk of the individual tax code, and the IRS published the inflation-adjusted 2026 figures in October 2025. The standard deduction is $16,100 for single filers, $32,200 for married couples filing jointly, and $24,150 for heads of household. The tax brackets keep the 10% through 37% rates, with the 22% bracket starting at $50,400 single and $100,800 joint.
Three changes matter most for this list. The 20% qualified business income deduction, which was scheduled to expire after 2025, is now permanent. Four temporary deductions for tips, overtime pay, seniors, and car loan interest apply for tax years 2025 through 2028. And the Saver’s Credit is in its final year; starting with 2027 contributions, the government deposits a matching contribution into your retirement account instead. The child tax credit is $2,200 per child and the SALT cap is $40,400 for 2026, neither of which is on this list but both of which show up on the most common deductions page.
1. The Saver’s Credit
The Saver’s Credit (officially the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit) is a tax credit, which means dollar-for-dollar savings off your tax bill, for lower-income earners who meet three tests:
- At least 18 years old
- Not a full-time student
- Not claimed as a dependent on someone else’s return
To earn it, you put money into a workplace retirement plan, an IRA, or an ABLE account. The credit applies to the first $2,000 of contributions per person ($4,000 if married filing jointly), and the rate depends on your income. The 2026 IRA limit is $7,500 and the 401(k) limit is $24,500, so the credit only ever covers the first slice of what you save.
The table below shows how the credit works for different filing statuses and incomes for tax year 2026:
|
|
Married Filing Jointly |
Head of Household |
Single |
|---|---|---|---|
|
50% of Your Contribution |
AGI at or below $48,500
Example: Each spouse contributes $2,000 to a workplace retirement plan for a combined $4,000 contribution. Total credit is 50% of $4,000 or $2,000. |
AGI at or below $36,375
Example: Single person with dependent contributes $2,000 to a Roth IRA. Total credit is 50% of $2,000 or $1,000. |
AGI at or below $24,250
Example: Single person contributes $2,000 to a 401(k). Total credit is 50% of $2,000 or $1,000. |
|
20% of Your Contribution |
AGI from $45,501 to $52,500
Example: Each spouse contributes $2,000 to a workplace retirement plan for a combined $4,000 contribution. Total credit is 20% of $4,000 or $800. |
AGI from $36,376 to $39,375
Example: Single person with dependent contributes $2,000 to a Roth IRA. Total credit is 20% of $2,000 or $400. |
AGI from $24,251 to $26,250
Example: Single person contributes $2,000 to a 401(k). Total credit is 20% of $2,000 or $400. |
|
10% of Your Contribution |
AGI from $52,501 to $80,500 |
AGI from $39,376 to $60,375 |
AGI from $26,251 to $40,250 |
One catch the table doesn’t show: the credit is nonrefundable. It can take your tax bill to zero, but it can’t push it below zero. A single filer with $24,000 of income and the $16,100 standard deduction owes about $790 in federal tax before credits, so a $1,000 Saver’s Credit is worth $790 to them, not $1,000. If you also qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is refundable, that one pays out in full regardless.
When You’re Likely To Qualify
- The year you graduate from college and work a partial year
- During an extended maternity or paternity leave
- The first year you start a business or go freelance and show low profit
- Any year you return to work after a long stretch of unemployment
- If you’re married and one spouse goes back to school
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
The income test uses your adjusted gross income, and pre-tax 401(k) contributions lower AGI. A single person who earns $45,000 and contributes $5,000 to a traditional 401(k) has an AGI of $40,000, which is under the $40,250 cutoff, so the first $2,000 of that contribution earns a $200 credit. Contribute $6,000 and you’re at $39,000, still in the 10% tier. The IRA contribution and income limits page has the deduction rules if you’re using an IRA instead of a workplace plan.
Deadlines matter this year. Workplace plan contributions have to be in by December 31, 2026. IRA contributions for 2026 can go in until April 15, 2027. Both count toward the 2026 credit.
Don’t have a workplace plan? An IRA counts for the Saver’s Credit, and you have until April 15, 2027 to fund one for 2026. Here are the accounts we recommend, with no minimums to open.
2027 And Beyond: The Saver’s Match
Tax year 2026 is the last year for the Saver’s Credit. The SECURE 2.0 Act replaces it with the Saver’s Match starting with 2027 contributions, and Treasury and the IRS published the first rules on August 7, 2026. The match is 50% of the first $2,000 you contribute to an IRA or workplace plan, up to $1,000 per person, and the government deposits it directly into your retirement account rather than reducing your tax bill. That fixes the nonrefundable problem above; a worker who owes no tax gets the full $1,000.
The income phase-outs are lower than the current credit’s: $20,500 to $35,500 for single filers, $30,750 to $53,250 for heads of household, and $41,000 to $71,000 for joint filers, indexed after 2027. The first matches will be paid in 2028 for 2027 contributions, and Treasury plans to launch TrumpIRA.gov on January 1, 2027 with the list of accounts that can receive them. The rules are still proposed (Notice 2026-48; comments are due October 5, 2026), so the claim process can still change before launch.
2. Capital Gains Exclusions on the Sale of a Primary Home
When you sell your primary residence, you can keep up to $250,000 of profit ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) without paying capital gains tax on it. You qualify if you owned the home and lived in it as your main home for at least two of the five years before the sale, and you haven’t used the exclusion on another home in the two years before this sale. The two years don’t have to be consecutive.
Most homeowners use this a few times in their lives without thinking about it. Used deliberately, it’s one of the few ways to earn a living without paying income tax on the earnings. Buy a home that needs work, live in it while you fix it up, sell after two years, and the profit is excluded. Our mortgage calculator will tell you what you can afford to start with.
When You Are Likely To Qualify For The Capital Gains Exclusion
Fixing up a house is hard work, but anyone who buys with the intention of improving it and staying two years can qualify. The math behind a live-in flip is laid out in this post from Chad Carson, and house hacking (renting out part of the home while you live in it) can cover the mortgage while you wait out the two years. Have DIY skills or a realistic renovation budget before you commit.
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
FHA, conventional, and VA loan programs let buyers close with a few thousand dollars down, or nothing down for eligible veterans. If you can add sweat equity, a live-in flip can produce tens of thousands of dollars of tax-free gain every two years. The gain counts toward the $500,000 joint exclusion only; anything above it is taxed as a long-term capital gain (see break number 4).
3. Short-Term House Rentals
If you rent out your primary residence for 14 days or fewer during the year, the rental income is tax-free and you don’t report it at all. The IRS rule is that a home rented fewer than 15 days is treated as personal use: no income reported, no rental expenses deducted. Tax professionals call it the “Augusta rule” after the Masters tournament, where homeowners rent to visitors for one week a year.
The 2026 World Cup ran June 11 to July 19 across 11 U.S. host cities, and homeowners near those stadiums who rented for two weeks or less owe nothing on that income when they file their 2026 returns. The same applies to the Super Bowl, SXSW, a college graduation weekend, or any event that fills hotels near you. Two weeks of event pricing can cover several months of mortgage payments, and Airbnb and Booking.com both handle short stays.
When This Is Worthwhile
- When you can rent out your home for 14 days or fewer in a calendar year
- When your home is near a major event, a stadium, a university, or a tourist draw
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
Wherever you live, it’s worth knowing you can rent your home for 14 days without owing tax. Even a rural home can land in the path of a solar eclipse, a music festival, or a group looking for a quiet week away. The side hustle list has other ways to earn from a spare room, but none of them are tax-free the way this one is.
The line is hard. Rent for 15 days or more and every dollar from day one is taxable rental income, reported on Schedule E with the expenses to match.
4. Zero Percent Tax Rate on Long-Term Capital Gains and Qualified Dividends
The tax code is built to reward long-term investing. Profits on stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and other investments held more than a year are taxed at long-term capital gains rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) instead of the ordinary income rates that top out at 37%. Qualified dividends get the same treatment.
For 2026, the 0% rate applies to taxable income up to $49,450 for single filers, $98,900 for married couples filing jointly, and $66,200 for heads of household. Taxable income is what’s left after the standard deduction, so a married couple with $131,100 of total income ($32,200 standard deduction plus $98,900) and all of it from long-term gains and qualified dividends would owe $0 in federal income tax. The full 2026 capital gains brackets show where 15% and 20% start.

Check out the full breakdown of the capital gains tax brackets here >>
When You May Qualify For This Tax Break
- When you sell long-held investments during a sabbatical year, early retirement, or another low-income year
- When one spouse leaves the workforce and household income drops
- When you’re a student or early-career worker with a taxable brokerage account and a small gain
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
If you hold long-term investments in a brokerage account, plan the sale, not just the purchase. A year of unemployment, a gap year, or the first year of retirement is the cheapest time to realize gains, and you can “harvest” gains up to the 0% ceiling and immediately rebuy to reset your cost basis. In a high-income year the opposite move, tax-loss harvesting, does the same job from the other direction. Check the thresholds before you sell; the gain itself counts toward taxable income and can push part of it into the 15% bracket.
Long-term gains only get the 0% rate in a taxable brokerage account. If you’re opening one, start with the brokers our readers ranked highest.
5. Depreciation on an Investment Property
A lot of these breaks go to people who invest, and this one is the landlord’s. When you invest in real estate and rent it out, the IRS lets you deduct “depreciation,” the assumed wear on the building (not the land) spread over 27.5 years for residential property. A $275,000 building produces a $10,000 deduction every year, on top of mortgage interest, repairs, insurance, property taxes, and management software.
The result is that a rental can put cash in your pocket while showing little or no taxable profit. The One Big Beautiful Bill also restored 100% bonus depreciation, permanently, for qualifying property acquired after January 19, 2025. That doesn’t cover the building itself, but it does cover shorter-lived components like appliances, flooring, and land improvements, which a cost segregation study can carve out and write off in year one.
When You May Qualify For This Tax Break
Anyone who owns rental property, or rents out part of the home they live in, can claim depreciation on the rented portion. The effective tax rate on rental income is what makes real estate compare well with other investments. One caveat: depreciation lowers your cost basis, and the IRS recaptures it at up to 25% when you sell, unless you roll the sale into another property.
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
Buying a first rental isn’t easy, and most people get there by “house hacking,” taking on roommates, or converting a former home into a rental after moving. Each of those puts you on the depreciation schedule from the first month a tenant moves in.
6. Skip Paying Taxes on the Last 20% of Your Qualified Business Income
Before you decide this one isn’t for you, check whether any of your side income counts as a business. Freelancers, Uber and Lyft drivers, Etsy sellers, tutors, and anyone with a Schedule C are business owners for this purpose. The qualified business income (QBI) deduction lets you skip tax on 20% of that profit, and as of 2026 it’s permanent.
Say Tia earns $70,000 at her day job and $20,000 of profit from an Etsy printable business. The QBI deduction removes roughly 20% of the Etsy profit from her taxable income, so she’s taxed on about $16,000 of it (a bit less than $4,000 off after the self-employment tax adjustment) plus her $70,000 salary. In the 22% bracket, that’s roughly $850 saved for filling in one line on Form 8995.
The 2026 rules, from the IRS and the One Big Beautiful Bill: the full deduction is available to anyone with taxable income up to $201,750 (single) or $403,500 (joint). Above that, limits based on wages paid and property owned phase in over a wider range than before ($75,000 single / $150,000 joint, so the deduction fully phases out at $276,750 / $553,500 for service businesses). And there’s a new floor: if you have at least $1,000 of QBI from a business you actively run, your deduction is at least $400, even if the 20% math produces less. The QBI glossary page covers the details.
When You May Qualify For This Tax Break
Working for yourself isn’t for everyone, but earning money as a business rather than an employee is unusually tax-efficient right now, and a “side business” doesn’t have to be large to count. The best side business tax deductions stack on top of QBI, and a solo 401(k) lets a side hustler shelter far more than the IRA limit.
Why This Tax Break May Be Accessible To You
Growing income while containing expenses is the clearest path to wealth, and a business with any profit qualifies. Whether the business is large or small, it gets the QBI deduction, and the $400 minimum means even a small first-year profit produces a deduction. If you have a business, the year-end checklist for business owners covers the moves to make before December 31.
7–10. The Four New OBBBA Deductions (2025 Through 2028)
The One Big Beautiful Bill added four deductions that didn’t exist before tax year 2025. All four are available whether or not you itemize, all four require a Social Security number on the return (and a joint return if you’re married), and all four are scheduled to end after tax year 2028. Filers who qualified in 2025 claimed them for the first time this past spring; the tax refund data showed the effect.
7. Tips (Up To $25,000)
Workers in occupations the IRS lists as customarily tipped can deduct up to $25,000 of qualified tips per year. The deduction phases out above $150,000 of modified AGI ($300,000 joint). We published the list of 68 tipped occupations when Treasury released it. Tips still count as income for Social Security and Medicare tax and for the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is why the deduction helps and the credit still applies.
8. Overtime (Up To $12,500, Or $25,000 Joint)
The premium portion of overtime pay required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “half” in time-and-a-half) is deductible up to $12,500 for single filers and $25,000 on a joint return, with the same $150,000/$300,000 phase-out. Employers report the qualifying amount on your W-2. Overtime that isn’t FLSA-required, such as overtime paid under a union contract above the federal minimum, doesn’t count, so check the W-2 box rather than your pay stubs. Our employment income page explains what does and doesn’t count as wages.
9. Seniors (An Extra $6,000 Per Person)
Anyone who turns 65 by December 31 of the tax year gets an additional $6,000 deduction ($12,000 for a married couple where both spouses qualify), on top of the standard deduction and the existing extra deduction for age. It phases out above $75,000 of modified AGI ($150,000 joint). For a retiree living on Social Security and a modest withdrawal, this can take federal tax to zero, which also makes the 0% capital gains rate easier to reach.
10. Car Loan Interest (Up To $10,000)
Interest on a loan for a new personal vehicle that underwent final assembly in the United States is deductible up to $10,000 a year, for loans originated after December 31, 2024. The phase-out starts at $100,000 of modified AGI ($200,000 joint), and you’ll need the vehicle identification number on your return. Used cars, leases, and vehicles assembled abroad don’t qualify. If you’re deciding between paying cash and financing, the best order of operations for your money still says fund the retirement match first.
Other Credits And Deductions Worth Checking
These didn’t make the top ten because they’re narrower, but several are worth more than the ones above if you qualify. The Earned Income Tax Credit pays up to $8,231 for 2026 and is refundable. The student loan interest deduction is worth up to $2,500 of income, and the education credits cover tuition. An HSA ($4,400 single / $8,750 family for 2026) is the only account that’s deductible going in, tax-free growing, and tax-free coming out for medical costs, and it doubles as a retirement account. A 401(k) contribution up to $24,500 is the biggest deduction most employees will ever take. And if you’re near the standard deduction line, the 10 year-end tax moves post shows how to bunch deductions into one year.
Tax Break FAQ
What’s the difference between a tax break, a tax credit, and a tax deduction?
“Tax break” is the umbrella term. A credit reduces the tax you owe; a deduction reduces the income you’re taxed on; an exclusion keeps income off the return. A $1,000 credit is worth $1,000 to everyone who can use it, while a $1,000 deduction is worth $120 in the 12% bracket and $370 in the 37% bracket. Here’s the longer answer.
Is the Saver’s Credit going away?
After tax year 2026, yes. You can still claim it on the return you file in early 2027 for 2026 contributions. From 2027 on, the Saver’s Match deposits up to $1,000 into your retirement account instead.
Do I have to itemize to get these?
No. Every break on this list is available to filers who take the standard deduction. The QBI deduction and the four OBBBA deductions are taken on top of it, the Saver’s Credit is a credit, and the capital gains, home sale, and 14-day rules are rates and exclusions.
Which tax software handles these?
All of the major programs handle the Saver’s Credit (Form 8880), QBI (Form 8995), and the new OBBBA deductions (Schedule 1-A); the free tiers differ on Schedule C and Schedule E. The best tax software for your filing status comparison breaks it down.
Are You Ready to Save Money on Your Taxes?
Early in your career it’s easy to skip tax planning because the dollars are small. Learn the rules now anyway: the Saver’s Credit is worth the most to people with the least income, the 0% capital gains rate rewards the years you earn the least, and the QBI deduction grows with every dollar of side income you add.
None of this involves offshore accounts. These are breaks written for everyday people with everyday incomes, and they’re some of the 10 rules for building wealth that compound the longest.
Editor: Clint Proctor
Reviewed by: Robert Farrington
The post The Ten Best Tax Breaks That Currently Exist Today appeared first on The College Investor.
September Effect: 3 AI Stocks to Buy on a Potential Market Pullback
September is generally a poor month for stocks, with the S&P 500 Index down an average of 1.1% since 1928.
It tends to get even worse during midterm election years, with Cantor Fitzgerald noting that the index has dropped by 5% during the September-October period 15 times since 1930. The market this year faces additional pressure from a war in Iran and a struggling consumer.
However, market pullbacks can be good buying opportunities. Let’s look at three AI stocks to buy if there is a pullback.
1. Palantir
Today’s Change
(-0.43%) $-0.75
Current Price
$172.56
Key Data Points
Market Cap
Day’s Range
$169.45 – $176.59
52wk Range
$106.37 – $207.52
Volume
31.2M
Avg Vol
40.1M
Gross Margin
84.80%
The biggest knock on Palantir Technologies (PLTR -0.43%) is its valuation, which would make the stock intriguing if there is a big market pullback.
The company has established itself as a prime beneficiary of AI, as its platform essentially serves as an AI operating system that helps make AI more useful in real-world situations. The secret to its success is the company’s data-gathering capabilities, which enable it to capture information from a variety of sources and organize it into an ontology that it then links to physical objects, processes, and concepts. This helps ground AI into the real world and helps reduce costly AI hallucinations.
Palantir’s AIP solution has been a huge success with customers. This is not only seen in its huge revenue growth, but also in its extraordinary net revenue retention figures. Last quarter, the company grew its revenue by 93% year over year, while its net dollar retention was an impressive 157%. Any number over 100% indicates growth from existing clients of over a year, and that type of number is rarely seen.
With AIP being used across industries to solve all different types of problems, Palantir has the technology to one day grow into one of the most important companies in the world, making it a buy on a pullback.
Artist rendering of AI in brain.
2. Marvell

Today’s Change
(1.32%) $2.88
Current Price
$221.70
Key Data Points
Market Cap
Day’s Range
$220.92 – $227.62
52wk Range
$67.36 – $329.88
Volume
12.7M
Avg Vol
31.1M
Gross Margin
51.42%
Dividend Yield
0.11%
Another stock that has been riding some powerful waves but which has looked a little pricey is Marvell Technology (MRVL +1.32%). The company is at the forefront of optical connectivity with a strong portfolio of optical DSPs, switching, and broadband analog components. This business is benefiting from the shift in AI data centers away from copper wires and toward fiber optics.
In addition, Marvell is also a major player in providing intellectual property (IP) to help companies design custom chips. It currently counts Amazon and Microsoft among its large ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) customers, and it recently signed a multi-year deal with Alphabet for products that integrate with its tensor processing unit (TPU) ecosystem, such as inference accelerators and storage and network interface controllers. Piper Sandler analyst David O’Connor believes this could be an $18 billion annual revenue deal once the program is fully ramped up.
With Marvell expecting to see 50% revenue growth in fiscal 2028 and the Alphabet deal kicking in fiscal 2029, this is a growth stock to buy if the stock dips.
3. Snowflake

Today’s Change
(-2.82%) $-9.37
Current Price
$322.98
Key Data Points
Market Cap
Day’s Range
$318.50 – $328.66
52wk Range
$118.30 – $384.56
Volume
4M
Avg Vol
5.5M
Gross Margin
66.00%
Snowflake (SNOW -2.82%) is another stock that has a great growth runway in front of it but whose stock is looking a little frothy at the moment. The company is the leader in cloud-based data warehousing and analytics, where its solution splits storage from compute to let customers store data and then process it across multiple cloud computing providers. This has turned it into one of the most integral systems of record for agentic AI.
The company has been seeing strong revenue growth, led by its AI solutions. Last quarter, its revenue rose by 35%, while it saw impressive net revenue retention of 126%. It is seeing rapid adoption of its new AI coding agent, CoCo, and ready-to-use agentic app, CoWork. Meanwhile, revenue growth is projected to accelerate next quarter to between 37% and 38%.
Snowflake has positioned itself as a model-agnostic platform at the center of enterprise AI deployment, giving it a long runway of growth in this emerging field. This makes it a stock to own on any meaningful pullback.
Air France to Open 29,000-Square-Foot Lounge at New York-JFK’s New Terminal One
Air France to Open Lounge at New York-JFK’s New Terminal One
Starting next year, Air France will transfer all its flights to New York JFK’s New Terminal One, providing customers with an enhanced travel experience. The airline will also unveil a new lounge spanning more than 29,000 square feet, making it the largest lounge in its international network.
The new lounge will welcome La Première and Business customers (excluding Business Light fares), Flying Blue Elite Plus members, as well as eligible travelers flying with KLM and SkyTeam partner airlines.
Designed by Air France teams in collaboration with design agency MARKS Brandimage, the elegant lounge will span two levels, and offer seating for more than 400 guests. Travelers will have access to dining areas celebrating French gastronomy, as well as a bar featuring an exclusive selection of French wines and champagnes. Dedicated areas for beauty treatments, relaxation and work will also be available. An exclusive space will be reserved for Flying Blue Ultimate members.
With this new lounge, La Première customers will benefit from a seamless and personalized airport experience, from arrival at the New Terminal One at JFK to boarding the aircraft. Within the lounge, they will have access to an exclusive area featuring a dining offer created specially for them by a renowned French chef. The lounge experience will be complemented by the elevated passenger journey at the New Terminal One, featuring cutting-edge technology, world-class retail and dining, and modern amenities.
During the summer season, Air France is operating up to 11 daily flights between Paris-Charles de Gaulle and New York, split between JFK and Newark airports. The airline operates up to 6 daily flights to New York-JFK, including four Boeing 777-300ER flights equipped with the new La Première cabin, in addition to three flights operated by its transatlantic joint-venture partner Delta Air Lines. Air France also operates up to 2 daily flights to New York-Newark.
Independence in an interdependent industry.
MBW Views is a series of op-eds from eminent music industry people… with something to say. The following MBW op/ed comes from Richard Leach, CEO of Curve Royalty Systems.

Here, Leach explains why the European Commission’s investigation into Curve as part of the Universal/Downtown probe – and Curve’s subsequent divestment from UMG/Virgin to Jamen Capital and Merlin – changed how he thinks about the word ‘independent’.
This op/ed is adapted from a speech Leach delivered at AIM‘s Connected event in London on Thursday (September 10).
Independence means freedom from outside control, rule, or support. It is the state of living, acting, and making choices by yourself without needing help or taking orders from other people or nations.
Broadly speaking, no-one is independent, not in this industry anyway.
Whereas “interdependent” is an adjective that means “dependent upon one another” or “mutually dependent”. It describes two or more people, things, or groups that rely on each other for support, survival, or function.
What I have come to believe, is that for the majority ‘independent’ means either the ability, freedom or opportunity to speak for oneself, or the freedom of choice of a trusted 3P partner to speak on your behalf – that’s why AIM, Merlin, IMPALA, IMPF, A2IM, AIMPF exist and are so important and cherished.
Let me expand.
Almost every Curve client has asked us a variant of the same question:
“What are your intentions?”
It’s not a casual question. Royalty infrastructure isn’t a short-term commitment. Music businesses don’t move platforms every couple of years. So when we are asked about future plans, what is really being asked is:
‘Can the client trust that the decision they’re making today won’t become a problem in five years?’
We always answered the question honestly. Curve may have come to market in 2019, but myself and the two co-founders have been working in the music industry since 2003. We did not have a ‘get rich quick, tech-bro agenda’. We do what we do because we have made this industry our home. Our intentions have always been to serve the “independent” partners that we have worked with for decades.
BUT…success has a habit of creating situations that good intentions alone can’t navigate. Successful businesses, like ours:
- attract buyers,
- founders and/or investors of successful businesses like (deserve even) an exit,
- buyers have agendas,
- and agendas have a way of quietly reordering priorities.
Good intentions don’t immunise against that.
For companies providing critical infrastructure to the music industry, trust is shaped as much by how a business is owned as by how it behaves. Intentions matter. Structures endure.
That wasn’t how I thought about ownership when Curve became part of Downtown Music Holdings in 2022.
As I said, we always answered that question honestly. Downtown was independent. There was no cause for concern. What we didn’t do was ask the follow-up question.
We knew Downtown had backers. But we didn’t take the time to learn how long those backers had been invested, what their return horizon might look like, or what the realistic buyer’s universe for Downtown actually was. Had we done so, we might have been less self-assured that yes, a sale of Downtown will probably happen eventually, but hey, we have years yet to focus on our mission.
Downtown believed in Curve when we were still proving what we could become, invested significantly in the business, and gave us the opportunity to grow far faster than we could alone. I remain grateful for that. But I was too humble and did not leverage our position in our sale to Downtown to understand better what the future might hold.
It turns out we didn’t have very long.
Within two years, UMG’s Virgin Music Group had agreed to acquire Downtown, Curve was at the centre of a European Commission investigation, and we were watching a public debate about our operations, conducted, we felt, on the wrong terms.
What do I mean by that?
Today, I concur that the EC’s theory of harm was/is sound: if UMG owned Curve, they COULD gain access to commercially sensitive data – royalty rates, advances, DSP sales etc – that belongs to the independent labels, publishers and distributors who use our platform, our cherished customers. They MIGHT use this intelligence to poach artists, undercut competitors, tilt the playing field. The rascals.
I resisted this argument for a long time. Not because I was naïve about competitive dynamics, but because it didn’t match my experience: we would simply never have handed the data over. Trust is the bedrock of Curve. The second anyone believes we’re doing anything untoward with client data, we are finished. We are ISO certified, moving toward SOX certification, bound by confidentiality obligations to every client. It’s not a question of willpower; it’s architecture. It’s existential.
However, eventually (it took time, I’m stubborn), I came to accept the EC’s position; not because I was persuaded it was even likely (UMG doesn’t need your data to pinch your artist, if they want them, they will just stick one more zero on the number than you!), but because I had to acknowledge it was possible. A theory of harm doesn’t require probability. It just requires plausibility. And the Commission was right: the structure created the conditions. Fair enough.
Anyway, as I said to the EC case team when I was summoned to Brussels in January, “I don’t agree with how you have made your decision, but I do agree WITH the decision.”
Though I now see the logic of the decision, I still feel that what is far more important to Curve and its customers is not explicitly addressed in that logic.
The threat that was bothering us at Curve was something more mundane, more inevitable, and in some ways more insidious.
It was the drag of corporate complexity.
When we sold to Downtown, Curve was thirteen people. By the time of the divestment announcement, we were thirty-seven. A team of thirteen has a singular way of working. This is the thing we’re building next. This is the thing we need to fix right now. The agenda is short and the focus is fierce.
A team inside a larger organisation operates in a fundamentally different environment. Not a worse one, necessarily. But a far more complex one. We reported into senior management at Downtown Music Group, who reported to the board at Downtown Music Holdings, who reported to the shareholders, who, it turns out, wanted to capitalise on their investment. Which meant that Downtown itself was going through transformation, centralising processes, running a sale process, navigating an EC investigation, managing the inevitable politics. And at a ground level priorities were shifting, multiple agendas competed for the same resources, the work of alignment, as it often does, crowded out the work itself.
Let me be clear, eyes wide open or half squinting, or even clammed shut: we signed up for this. Of course, we did not know everything that was going on or about to happen. But I’ve worked at larger companies. I had a pretty good idea of what MIGHT be in store for us. We weren’t acquired simply to run Curve; we were brought in to help build Downtown. I don’t regret the collaboration, and I’m proud of what we achieved together, it certainly contributed to the continual improvement of the platform. But we also started pushing in multiple different directions at once, diluting efforts across various fronts. And we underestimated the strain. I can tell you, that, just like DIY, integrations are always longer, harder and more expensive than you think they will be. We were only just finding a pathway through when Phase 2 was announced, and we then were somewhat in limbo until the divestment closed. The whole thing took over a year .
This is not a story about bad actors. Downtown are not the villains. Nor, deep breath, are UMG. This is about the structural cost of success, in other words what happens when a small, focused business enters a larger one. It happens every time. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s just how organisations work.
And in a market where independent businesses are making decade-long commitments to their critical royalty infrastructure, the slow dilution of focus is a harm as real as any theory about data access. It just doesn’t have a paragraph number in the merger regulations, doesn’t make for salacious headlines or have immediate catastrophic consequences, but it does create a creeping drag on businesses not generously equipped with resources to absorb easily.
The EC investigation also helped reframe how I think about the word “independent.” I believe it is employed… imprecisely in this industry.
No one is truly independent. Not the labels, the publishers, not the distributors or the platforms and not Curve. We are all embedded in a web of relationships, dependencies and mutual obligations. When we converge around this word ‘independent’ what we are trying to preserve is not isolation: it’s autonomy. The ability to remain wholly focused on your clients, to make decisions on their behalf without those decisions being filtered through someone else’s P&L, to be the kind of partner any business can select and trust without wondering who they’re eventually going to sell to.
Whilst it serves as a lightning rod, I think “Independence” does not describe what we’re protecting. Interdependence – a network of aligned, mutually reinforcing relationships that collectively preserve autonomy – is closer to the truth I think.
“We never really saw ourselves ‘independent’ anyway. Instead, we see ourselves as a hub of interdependence amongst our client base. In that, we have always taken a ‘hive-mind’ or ‘crowd-sourced’ approach to the continual development of the service.”
Richard Leach, Curve
Which brings me to what happened next in our little story.
At the beginning of last month the divestment finally closed with Curve being acquired by Jamen Capital and Merlin. For those that don’t know, Jamen is a London-based investment firm built specifically to provide growth capital to independent music businesses without exchanging equity. Merlin is the global digital licensing body for independent labels; a membership organisation constitutionally structured so that no major label can hold any ownership stake.
That matters. Curve’s “independence” is now not just a statement of intent but is an architectural fact. It is built into the agreement between Merlin and Jamen that Curve cannot be directly sold into major label ownership. EVER. Indeed, there is even a restriction to sell Curve to a list of large businesses for a good number of years. (I’m curious to see what the circumstances would be where Merlin would ever want to sell Curve). This is an ownership structure in which alignment is embedded in the fabric of the partnership rather than assumed. This is not a promise that can be walked back in a future board meeting. It is as close to a guarantee as these things get.
So, after nigh-on four years of acquisitions, investigations and unexpected lessons, experience has taught me that trust is best served not just by well-articulated, and indeed sincere intentions alone, it is most meaningful when it is intrinsically built into ownership.
We never really saw ourselves ‘independent’ anyway. Instead, we see ourselves as a hub of interdependence amongst our client base. In that, we have always taken a ‘hive-mind’ or ‘crowd-sourced’ approach to the continual development of the service. We take everything we see, feel and hear across the client-base (and beyond) and synthesize all those perspectives and practices into Curve. So, all of our clients are, in some way, dependent upon, and benefitting greatly from, being inter-connected through using Curve.
Importantly for Curve, and for its clients, the more immediate significance is simpler: for the first time in a number of years, 100% of our attention and energy is directed towards the people we serve. This week the Curve management team spent a lot of time with the newly formed board. The total ownership of the company, indeed the totality of the decision-making authority, was in the room.
The complexity is gone. The agenda is short. The focus is fierce once again.Music Business Worldwide
US 10-Year yield rises to highest since 2007 as Fed looms
The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose to the highest in almost two decades, the latest milestone in a bruising global bond selloff driven by booming capital investment and soaring energy prices that are exacerbating inflation.
Processing Content
The yield, which serves as a benchmark for borrowing costs across the globe, rose as much as five basis points to 5.04% on Tuesday, the highest since 2007, before wrapping up the New York session at 5.00%. The jump came after oil prices jumped anew on concern that crude supplies could be
The bond slump raises the stakes ahead of the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate decision on Wednesday, when investors expect officials to raise short-term borrowing costs for the first time since 2023. If they don’t hike, or if Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh is noncommittal about additional increases, traders may demand even higher yields on long-term bonds to safeguard their investments against the risk that inflation will remain elevated.
“It would be very difficult for the Fed to leave rates unchanged this week without eroding its inflation-fighting credibility,” said Vail Hartman, a strategist at BMO Capital Markets. “The market is vulnerable to not only an unexpected hold, but also a dovish hike that entails a more patient takeaway from the dot-plot or press conference.”
Bond yields have been rising globally since the U.S. and Israel launched an assault on Iran in late February, disrupting the supply of Middle Eastern oil and gas. That’s on top of other factors such as massive corporate borrowing to fund artificial intelligence spending, which is both flooding markets with debt and pumping stimulus into an already resilient U.S. economy.
It also comes as the amount of debt governments issue continues to rise, both to refinance maturing bonds and to fund deficit spending. Central banks are no longer hoovering up government bonds as part of their quantitative easing programs, and demand from other traditional buyers is cooling — resulting in a greater reliance on more price-sensitive investors.
“The scope for long-end yields to fall is somewhat limited given that we don’t see signs of weakness in the real economy and supply/dynamics in the Treasury market are very different relative to 2007,” Phoebe White, head of U.S. rates strategy at UBS Group AG, said via email. “Structural demand for U.S. Treasuries, particularly among foreign official investors, is materially weaker.”
Alex Wroblewski/Bloomberg
A Bloomberg gauge of returns on Treasuries has declined around 1% since the start of the month, and is down 1.6% this year. Around a third of fund managers
The drop in U.S. government bonds is part of a broader global move that’s seen Germany’s 10-year yield rise to the highest since 2009, while Australia’s equivalent rate touched a 15-year high. Bonds in Japan also retreated Tuesday.
An auction of 20-year Treasury bonds at 1 p.m. New York time drew the highest yield in data going back to 2020, when the U.S. reintroduced it. Demand fell short of expectations despite the lofty yield.
In the U.S., the rise in the 10-year rate is particularly important because it serves as a baseline to price other loans such as mortgages. That makes its rise a headache for President Donald Trump ahead of midterm elections, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having previously said that lowering 10-year yields was a
Tuesday’s selloff is the latest assault by bond bears on the 5% level, a closely watched threshold. Such round numbers are often seized on as key pivot points that can catalyze decisions by investors and policymakers.
Some speculate that investors in other asset classes will be tempted to lock in roughly 5% annualized returns for the next decade, potentially diverting cash away from the stock market.
“Through 5%, it starts to get worrisome for risk assets,” said Jesse Marre, a senior portfolio manager at Hilbert Group.
The worry for bondholders is that there aren’t enough dip buyers to quell the jump in rates, perhaps because energy prices keep rising or should the Fed disappoint. In that scenario, the cost of borrowing for the US government — and by extension anyone seeking U.S. dollars — could enter a trading range not seen in a generation.
“Could things get even more sinister? Yes, where a break above 5% on the 10-year yield does nothing more than bring 6% into focus,” said Padhraic Garvey, head of research for the Americas at ING Groep NV. “Such a journey from 5% to 6% would be a far tougher one for the wider market to stomach.”
Quantum Stocks That Could 10X Before 2030!
TSXV: SCAN | OTCQB: LDDFF
You missed #Nvidia when it was under $10 — don’t make the same mistake with quantum computing. This video breaks down the top quantum stocks driving the next trillion-dollar revolution and why early investors are positioning now. From #MSFT and #Amazon’s early moves to emerging leaders like #IonQ, these companies are building the foundation for the future of computing, AI, and cybersecurity.
#QuantumStocks #Investing #Microsoft #Amazon #Google #IonQ #Nvidia
📬 FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Updates and insights on the economy and investments with invest-X BWB Insights:
👉 TOOLS & GEAR I USE
– 😍 Awesome Dividend & Portfolio Tracker:
– 💹RESEARCH: Seeking Alpha :
– 📊FORECASTING: Analyst forecasts & Research:
– 🎥 My Equipment:
📺 OTHER VIDEOS YOU’LL ENJOY!
💰 Our Top 10 Stocks to Set It & Forget It! →
📈 Top 5 AI Stocks Blowing Up and Cheap! →
🚨 The ONLY Quantum Stock I’m Buying! →
00:00 – Intro
01:36 – Quantum Trinity
02:15 – Infrastructure Stocks
02:24 – NVDA
03:49 – MSFT
04:28 – GOOGL
05:06 – AMZN
06:16 – IBM
09:53 – Pure Plays
10:13 – IONQ
11:45 – RGTI
13:03 – QBTS
14:22 – Penny Dreamers
14:47 – Quantum Computing
15:33 – LAES
16:33 – Aquit
17:12 – Mcloud
18:20 – ETF Options
20:04 – Investment Breakout
21:45 – Baseline vs Quantum Foundation Layer
22:14 – Pure Play Projections
23:11 – $25 Invested
23:31 – Penny Stock Dreams
24:23 – $5 Invested
24:53 – Recap of Investment Projections
LET’S CONNECT:
– Instagram:
– LinkedIn:
– Business Inquiries: ateambwb@gmail.com
DISCLAIMER: Links on this page may be affiliate links which have no cost to you, but I may earn a commission for anyone that signs up or makes a purchase from those sites.
A portion of this video was disseminated on behalf of Liberty Defense, and was funded by Gold Standard Media LLC and/or affiliates. For our full disclaimer, please visit:
All opinions expressed by Brian are solely provided as content. Do not treat any opinion by Brian as gospel that needs to be recreated. Brian is not a fiduciary or financial advisor. All financial topics are for illustration where the outcomes are not guaranteed or expected. There exists real risks in all forms of investment, so do your homework and make your own decisions.
source
This Is Better Than the 1% Rule (New Real Estate Rule)
Dave:
This is the new 1% rule for real estate investors. For decades, investors use the 1% rule to pick markets and properties. If a house’s rent was more than 1% of the purchase price, it would probably cash flow. But today, 1% rule deals are almost impossible to find in most places. And that rule was created when interest rates and insurance payments and property taxes were much lower. Recently, I’ve been using a new different metric, the rent to payment ratio. It’s rent divided by your full mortgage payment, including principal, interest, taxes, and insurance. And in my own deal analysis, it’s been a much more reliable predictor of cashflow in 2026. So today I’m going deep on this 1% rule 2.0, what it does and doesn’t reveal about a property, the sweet spot ratio I’d target instead of just chasing the highest number and the full ranking of the top rent to payment markets across the US.
This is the new cashflow math you need to know.
What’s up everyone? I’m Dave Meyer, chief investment officer at BiggerPockets. And today I’m going full data nerd on you guys with a new investing metric, the rent to payment ratio. Now, if you’re investing back in the 2010s or even a couple of years ago, you may have heard of a rent to price ratio or you may have heard of the 1% rule as a rule of thumb for measuring cash flow. That rule of thumb is exactly what it sounded like. You would compare one month of rent to the purchase price of a property. And if it was at or near 1%, your deal was probably going to cash flow. If it was higher than 1%, you were probably getting a great cash flowing deal. And it was a really useful metric for a really long time. During the 2010s when interest rates were lower and taxes were lower and insurance was lower, it worked really well, but it has become a little bit outdated.
I personally haven’t used rent to price ratios in my own underwriting and analysis for a while because I don’t think it actually tells me that much anymore. First and foremost, it’s really hard to find 1% rule deals right now. And it can be really discouraging using a benchmark from a different era when cashflow was easier to find in today’s market because you’re probably missing good deals and good opportunities using an outdated metric. The other thing is that sometimes now when you use rent to price ratio, you might find a deal that looks really good by rent to price, but if it’s in an area that has super high property taxes or super high insurance, it might not actually cash flow and you could actually be getting a false positive because of an outdated metric. So instead, I created a new metric. It is a slight variation on a debt service coverage ratio.
If you’re familiar with that or if you’ve used a DSCR loan before, this will be very familiar to you. I didn’t make this up out of thin air. But what I did was pull together a bunch of different data sources that don’t normally talk to each other to create this new metric. What it is, is the rent to payment ratio. So instead of comparing rent to the purchase price of a property, what I’m doing is comparing the rent to what you’re actually paying to your mortgage company each and every month. This is also known as your debt service. That’s why it’s similar to a debt service coverage ratio. Your full debt service includes your principal that’s paying down your mortgage, interest, that’s the profit that goes to the bank, your taxes, super important in this new era of real estate because taxes have gone up a lot and insurance also really important in this new era of real estate.
That has gone up a lot, particularly in some markets that are prone to natural disasters. By doing this, you’re better incorporating the expenses that investors are facing on a day-to-day basis. Instead of just saying that the purchase price of a property is indicative of what your expenses are going to be, this actually measures the majority of your expenses, but it is not a substitute for underwriting your deal. Once you’ve looked at these deals and thought, okay, this one has at least the benchmark level of cash flow that I am looking for, that’s when you go put it in the BiggerPockets calculator, do the full analysis, understand how this deal is going to add to your portfolio, how it’s going to move you towards financial freedom over time. You can’t substitute that stuff. You got to do it. But by using this rent to payment ratio, you’re going to be able to look through markets and deals so much quicker.
So if you want to calculate this for yourself, it’s actually quite easy. All you need to know is one month of rent and your total mortgage payment. So if you’re looking at a deal, just estimate the rent, estimate what the mortgage payment’s going to be, divide the rent by the mortgage payment, and you got it. The higher the number, the better cash flow potential it’s going to have. And actually we’ll talk about this in a minute, but 1% is actually a pretty good benchmark similar to the rent to price ratio for this new metric. If you are getting a 1% rent to payment ratio or better, you’re going to cash flow, but you do not need to get 1%. I want you to know that. We’ll talk about different tiers, but I’ll just give you a little bit of a preview. If you’re at like 0.7, 0.75 or above, you’re probably going to have cash flow potential.
You still have to go analyze the deals to figure out what it’s going to be, but 1% is not a hard and fast cutoff rule, but if you’re close to 1%, you should feel pretty good about that market or about that deal. So calculating it for yourself on an individual deal, super easy. You’re just taking two numbers and dividing them. Calculating it on a market level is just a little bit trickier because you need to know the average taxes and average insurance. I was able to gather the top 54 biggest markets in the country. I figured out all this information for you and I will share that with you in just a minute and you can download it for free on the BiggerPockets website as well. All right, so hopefully this all makes sense and you’re bought in on this new rule of thumb. I’m clearly stoked about it.
I’ve been using it and think it works really well. I’m going to show you the market rankings and I’m actually going to just walk you through how to use this with a real deal, but we do have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back.
Today we are talking about the new 1% rule for real estate investors. Instead of using the outdated rent to price ratio, we’re going to be talking about and using the rent to payment ratio where you compare one month of rent to your mortgage payment rather than comparing rent to the purchase price of the property. We are going to talk about how to use this when analyzing a deal. It’s super easy, but I’m going to show you and walk you through some actual real live deals in just a minute. But first, I want to show you this spreadsheet that ranks some of the top markets in the country by this new ratio that I created. So what I did was I actually went out and gathered data from a bunch of different sources, but I used Zillow data for home values. I know people get all up in arms about zestimates and zestimates on any individual property can vary a lot, I admit that.
But actually when you aggregate zestimates and look at a whole county or a whole city level, it’s pretty accurate. I’ve looked into this, it is pretty accurate. We’re also doing the same thing with rents. So when you aggregate the data, it’s pretty accurate. I know if your property’s estimate is off, I’ve seen that many times or your neighbor’s is off, I get it. That definitely does happen. But this data for our purposes here, I do think is reliable. We also, I just found a bunch of different tax sources and aggregated those and insurance costs as well. Keep in mind, these are averages. They are not going to be the same for every single property, but what I found is that there are sort of like 10, I would say, elite level cash flow cities in the country right now. These are cities where the average deal has a rent to payment ratio of 1% or above.
Those cities, if you’re in one of these 10 cities, it is going to be much easier for you to find cash flow than any other city. Now keep in mind, other cities will cash flow. A lot of these other cities on this list will cash flow, but these ones are going to be the easiest. So those 10 are, I’m going to start with number 10 and I’ll just count down. So this is the 10th best is Milwaukee. That’s at 0.99. I’m rounded up to 1%, 0.99. Then we have Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Baltimore, Maryland, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, St. Louis, Missouri, Hartford, Connecticut, Birmingham, Alabama, Memphis, Tennessee, Cleveland, Ohio, and Detroit, Michigan. Now you’ll probably notice a pattern here. Eight out of 10 here are in the Midwest and all 10 of them are relatively inexpensive markets. The most expensive market on this list with the highest median home value is Philadelphia at 248,000.
That is well below the national average, which is about 440 right now. But the other markets like Milwaukee’s at 195, Pittsburgh’s at 198, Cleveland 135, and Detroit really stands alone at $72,000. So if you’re in any of these markets, cashflow is going to be easier to find than any other markets in the country. Now you still have to go out and find the right deals, but if you are an investor wondering where to invest, this is such a good way to create a short list. You shouldn’t use this to pick the whole market, but if you say cashflow is a priority to me, the first 10 or 20 on this list is where I would start my further research. And we’ve talked a lot on the show about how to do more research into a market because you can’t just use cashflow. You need to figure out are there good economic prospects?
What are the appreciation is going to be? What’s happening with population? You still have to do all of that, but if I were a cashflow focused investor, I’d take the first 10 or 15 here and then figure out which of them has the best blend of other metrics that are in line with my long-term strategy. So for me, I’m not a pure cash flow investor. So what I would be looking for is what’s a good hybrid market? I want a market that is going to appreciate and I’m willing to sacrifice cash flow for some of that appreciation. So when I’m just eyeballing this list, I would say places like Hartford, Connecticut stand out to me. Philadelphia is a good market. Indianapolis, Columbus, Ohio, those are still below 1% during the top 15 or so, but still really good markets with strong fundamentals, exciting things happening and do offer good cashflow.
Now, if you’re looking at this on YouTube, you’ll see that I’ve ranked the markets green, yellow, red. And if you’re listening on audio, I’ll just let you know. The top 10, the ones I named to you, those are green. Those are kind of like the elite level cashflow markets. Then I brought in another 19 markets are in yellow and those are going to be solid cash flow markets. You could probably still find cashflow in any of these markets with the exception of New York. New York just has some unique idiosyncrasies here where it’s on this list, but I don’t think you could probably find cashflow there. But all the other ones here, maybe not Minneapolis, but a lot of them, you will be able to find cashflow on these deals because two things here. First and foremost, 1% rule is not dogma. It is not the be-all end-all.
It is just telling you how likely it is you are to find cash flow. The second thing to remember here is these are averages. So if you’re looking at a city like Buffalo, New York, I’m just picking one random, it has a rent to payment ratio of 0.89. That means that’s the average of all of the deals. So as an investor, you better not be looking for average deals, right? If it’s at 0.89, that means by rule, just the math, half of the deals in that market are better than 0.89. And so your job as the investor is to go out and find that deal that is better than 0.89. That is a really good way to use this metric. Even if you’re in some of these lower markets, I think Dallas is a great example. It’s actually in my third tier by rent to payment ratio at 0.74.
It’s not terrible. That’s still pretty good, but Dallas is a great market. So can you go out and find a deal in Dallas at 0.9? I bet you can because half the deals in that city are going to be above 0.74. And so just knowing that 0.74 is the average and that average is kind of low, your goal should be to say, “Hey, how much can I beat that average by? How much can I beat 0.74 by?” And you can do this in almost every market. Now I’m not going to say every market cash flows like when you get down to the bottom of this list, San Jose, California, Austin, Texas, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, these markets are probably not going to cashflow. They just aren’t. It’s really, really challenging. Now, I want to just call out a couple of things here. As we’re looking at the bottom here, there are some markets here that used to be great cash flow markets.
I’m looking at Houston here that for a long time had a good cash flow rate or Oklahoma City, for example, which had pretty strong cash flow. I want to just show you in Oklahoma City where the average rent is $1,130, the average insurance per month is $814. So this is why the rent to payment ratio is important is because if you’re just comparing the rent to the home value in Oklahoma City, you’re missing the most important variable here for investors, which is that your insurance is going to take up about 75% of your monthly rent, just the insurance. You see similar things in Denver, right? Denver has super high insurance. Houston has really high insurance. Houston has the double whammy of high insurance and high taxes. If you put the average taxes and insurance for Houston together, it’s 1,100 bucks. Meanwhile, your rent is under 1,700.
So just looking at this in Houston, on average, you can see your monthly payment is significantly more than your rent. There’s no way you’re going to get cash flow unless you get a screaming deal. And obviously, I should have said this earlier, but these are for on-market deals, so they’re as is. So if you’re doing a heavy renovation and a burr, you can reconsider this, right? The way you would do that is by evaluating the future rent that you’re going to get once you renovate the property by your future payment, once you refinance. That’s how I would look at it. Future rent, future payment, calculate your rent to payment ratio that way. One other thing I want to call out is on the total opposite end of the spectrum, these markets, Detroit, which really stands alone in terms of its rent to payment ratio. It’s at two.
That’s really high. The average payment in Detroit right now is $642, where the average rent is nearly $1,300. That’s amazing. So if you’re looking for pure cash flow, Detroit stands alone. But Detroit, similar to Cleveland and to Memphis and to Birmingham, certainly these first four markets at least, there are trade-offs in these markets. They may not appreciate in the same way that other markets do. Now, a lot of them have been growing in recent years, but in this new great stall era, I do personally expect a reversion to the mean for a lot of these high flying cities. That doesn’t mean they’re necessarily going to turn negative, although some of them could turn modestly negative. It’s just important that you understand the fundamentals. Detroit is recovering as a city, but as an example, its population has really declined since the financial crisis. And so there is an oversupply of homes.
There might be high vacancy rates. This is why you can’t just take this metric and use it to evaluate everything. If you really want cash flow, look at Detroit, but make sure you’re buying in a good pocket of Detroit where there’s going to be strong rental demand and home values are going to go up. You can do that. That absolutely exists in Detroit. I’ve been looking at deals there. That definitely works. That works in Cleveland, but don’t just assume because it’s the highest rent to payment ratio that it’s automatically a good buy. So that’s how you use this at a market level. Again, you use it by comparing to one another the relative availability of cash flow. And then two, once you pick market, knowing what the average is and then using that to set a baseline for what your deals are going to be.
They’re going to have to beat that level. That’s how you use it at a market level, but it’s also really valuable at a property level. And to show you how to do that, I’m just going to actually pull up a listing. But before we do that, we have to take one more quick break. We’ll be right back.
Before the break, we talked about how to calculate this and how to use it at a market level, but I’m just going to show you how to use it at a property level. And to do that, I am going to look for a property in Memphis. I just use my list and instead of using Detroit because it’s kind of an outlier, I just picked another one of the high up markets that have a strong rent to payment ratio. And I’m going to just pick the first one here on our list on Zillow. I’m just going through Zillow. I just searched for multifamily here. And we found a property on Harbord Avenue. It is listed at $340,000. It’s a six bed, two bath built in 1927, a little bit older, but it is 3,200 square feet and actually looks nice. The bricks had some tuck pointing, so there’s some work done there.
The roof is in pretty good shape, but it’s got some charm. It’s a nice house. Seems like it’s in a decent neighborhood for sure. What I would do if I were looking at this deal is first and foremost, I always look at the pictures just to see is this place reasonable? And I actually like what I’m seeing here. We got hardwood floors, we have fresh paint. The kitchen definitely needs an updating, which I like personally. I think that’s great. That’s a sign of a cosmetic rehab opportunity. Yard needs a little bit of work, but it’s not bad. There’s a nice fence. It’s a good property. So what I would do in this scenario is just quickly calculate the rent to payment ratio. And lucky for us, if we look at this duplex, they have listed the actual leases, so we don’t even need to estimate the rent here.
What we know here is that our rent is going to be 1,255 for the lower and 1,385 for the upper unit. And what we get there is 2,640. So this property is pulling in 2,640. So already in my head, I’m asking myself, is my monthly payment on this mortgage going to be more or less than 2,640? Let’s find out. To do that, I’m just going to pull up the BiggerPockets mortgage calculator and figure out what our payment is going to be. So I’m going to just assume that we’re paying full price for this. So my loan amount, if I’m putting out 25% as an investor, is going to be $255,000. I’m going to do a 30-year fixed. Interest rate’s probably around seven right now. Our annual taxes, they’re pretty high, are $9,800. And on the listing, the insurance is estimated at $1,350 a year. So I’m going to just hit calculate my monthly mortgage payment.
And what we got here is $2,625. So this is darn close to a 1% rule deal. Pretty good, right? Because what we found is that our monthly payment is $2,625. Our monthly rent is $2,640. And if you do 2,640 divided by 2,625, it’s basically 1.01%. So we got a 1% rule here in Memphis, but remember in Memphis, our average deal was going to be 1.17. And so while this deal probably will cash flow, it is probably not the best cashflow opportunity we can find in Memphis because we know that on average, the ratio is a bit higher. Now, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy this deal because when I look at this deal, I’m like, can I fix this thing up, put 20 grand into it and bring our rents from 2,640 up to 2,800 or 2,900? If so, might be worth buying this deal.
But if I’m looking for a turnkey kind of investment where I just put tenants in, because this place is nice enough, you could just put tenants in, this probably isn’t the best pure cashflow opportunity. So the way I would look at this and use this ratio is instead I would look for another deal. So let’s just see if we can find another one. Let’s look at this duplex instead. This is a six bed, three bath. It’s cheaper. So it’s about $300,000. The kitchens are a little bit older, but it’s still in decent shape. You could definitely rent this out today. The kitchens I would put a little bit of money on if it were me, but you could rent this right now. Now these are big units. They’re three bed, two bath. And so I’m going to assume that I can get 2,500 bucks in rent for this.
And so we’re taking out a smaller loan at 2.25, and then our annual taxes are going to be cheaper at around 7,000. Our insurance, I’m just going to assume is going to be the same. And now we’re getting 2,192. So this is a better cash flowing deal. So 2,500 divided by 2,192, what do we got? Now we have 1.14. This is closer to the average for the area. So this is a deal I would consider personally. I think this is a better cash flowing opportunity. I think there’s a better upside on this deal personally for a cosmetic rehab because if you just look at it, we could maybe drive the rents up to 2,800 on this by fixing it up. It’s a nice property, but just needs some work inside. And the other thing I like about this is this one’s been sitting on Zillow for 55 days.
So I’m probably going to get this below what they’re asking at 295, right? Let’s just assume we get a little bit of a discount. We get it at 280. If we do that and update our payment, now we’re at 2076. If we divide 2,500 by 2076, now we’re at a 1.2. So even if you don’t do the renovation, if you just buy this at a little bit of a discount, 15 grand off after sitting for 55 days, you buy this thing at a discount, now you’re getting a 1.2. Now that’s above the average. Now you’d go do the renovation, that’s a really good opportunity. So of course I would have to do more due diligence and do a full analysis on the BiggerPockets calculators to understand if this is the kind of deal that I want to buy. But just in those five minutes I just showed you, that first deal I thought was going to be good.
I looked at it and I was like, this is going to be a good deal. And it was, it probably would cashflow, but two minutes later, I found another deal that has better cashflow opportunity. Still going to do analysis on the second one, but it allows me to say, I’m better off spending my time digging into that second deal than I am the first one. That’s what rules of thumb are for. They’re not the absolute be all end all of any analysis. They’re used to help you save time and to eliminate deals that are clearly not going to work and to spend your time on the deals that have a high potential of penciling out. So go out and do this for yourself. Hopefully you can see how useful this is. We will put a link to the spreadsheet for the markets below and then go out and calculate this on deals on Zillow, Redfin, Realtor, whatever you use.
Go check out some deals and see if it works. Go see where the best rent to payment ratios are in your market or compare between two different markets and see which one have a better cashflow perspective. Once you’ve done that, go really work hard to estimate your rents, estimate your expenses, put all of that into the BiggerPockets calculator. You just go to biggerpockets.com/calculator, go calculate the deal, see what the cash on cash return is going to be, what your annualized return over time is going to be. You still got to make great offers. You got to do the work, but this rule of thumb I think will help you streamline your deal flow and your analysis so much. It’s been helping me a lot and hopefully this completely free tool that you can use can help you find your next deal as well. Before we go though, I do just want to reiterate, although higher rent to payment ratio does indicate better cash flow potential, the higher the number does not mean that is a better deal.
You heard me just talking through those two deals. Some deals are going to have better opportunity for value add. They’re going to be in a better neighborhood. They’re going to have better demand. So you need to think about that. And I actually think oftentimes if the rent to payment ratio is too high, that’s actually a red flag because there’s something wrong with that property. If it is priced really inefficiently, sometimes it happens where some people just price properties poorly. I’ve been the beneficiary of that several times in my career. It sometimes happens, but it’s a red flag too. It’s something you need to investigate. I think in this kind of market, if you can find a deal that’s in the 0.8 to 1.1 ratio, that’s probably going to be pretty good. That’s after you do a renovation. So the deal you might buy might not pencil, but if you’re going to do a cosmetic rehab or you’re going to do a rehab and drive up the rents, if you can get in that 0.8 to 1.1, you’re probably going to find a good deal.
Again, it’s a rule of thumb. It’s not going to work for every single time. This is just a means of filtering deals, and I’d love to hear how it works for you. Like I said, it’s been working for me, but let me know in the comments if this new ratio, this new rule of thumb, this new 1% rule is something you’re going to be using in your own investing. I would love to hear how you’re using it. Share it with the BiggerPockets community. That’s our episode for today. Thank you so much for watching this episode of the BiggerPockets Podcast. We’ll see you next time.
Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].
Execution-Led Adaptability Is the New Supply Chain Advantage
Skip to content
Amazon Kindle Unlimited: 3 Months Free
The Offer
Amazon Kindle Unlimited subscription three months free (affiliate links here and below)
- Get three months of Amazon Kindle Unlimited for free.
- For the fourth month and onward you’ll be charged the regular $11.99/month unless you cancel.
Offer valid through October 8, 2026.
Our Verdict
Check to make sure the offer is correct before signing up; I believe this deal is only working for Prime members. And set up a reminder to cancel before the fourth charge if you don’t want to keep it. You might be able to cancel immediately after signup and still keep the 3 months paid membership.
This is another lead up deal to the Prime Day Big Deal Days event (10/6/26 – 10/7/26).
