Home Blog

What Makes an Ideal Leveraged Buyout Candidate?



What Makes an Ideal Leveraged Buyout Candidate?

Morgan Stanley’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Posts Steady First-Month Results With Steady Inflows And No Net Outflows


Morgan Stanley’s (NYSE:MS) spot Bitcoin exchange-traded product has recorded a solid opening month, attracting nearly $194 million in net new capital while experiencing no days of net redemptions. The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (ticker: MSBT), which began trading on April 8, 2026, has rapidly gained traction as a competitive offering in the Bitcoin ETF space, supported by its institutional interest and new features.

As of early May 2026, the fund’s assets under management stood at approximately $240 million, with holdings of roughly 2,620 BTC. Data from industry trackers show positive net inflows on 17 trading days and neutral flows on the remaining sessions during this period.

This consistent performance stands out against a backdrop where some larger Bitcoin ETFs saw occasional withdrawals.

A key factor in MSBT’s appeal is its industry-low expense ratio of 0.14%, which undercuts many competitors and enhances long-term cost efficiency for investors. The fund has also generally traded at a modest premium to its net asset value in early sessions, indicating sustained buying interest from participants.

Initial demand has been notably organic. Morgan Stanley’s head of digital asset strategy, Amy Oldenburg, shared at industry events that the majority of early inflows came from self-directed clients who independently sought out the product, rather than through the firm’s advisor network.

This client-initiated activity occurred before full integration into broader wealth management platforms, reflecting genuine interest in regulated Bitcoin exposure via a trusted financial institution.

As the first major U.S. bank-affiliated manager to launch a spot Bitcoin product, Morgan Stanley brings substantial scale and expertise.

The firm oversees trillions in client assets through a network of around 16,000 financial advisors, creating significant potential for future growth as advisor adoption increases.

MSBT serves as a compliant, transparent vehicle for investors seeking Bitcoin allocation without the operational complexities of direct cryptocurrency ownership.

The ETF’s debut aligns with broader positive trends in the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF category, which has seen extended periods of net inflows in recent weeks. While the market has shown volatility, MSBT’s outflow-free record demonstrates resilience and growing investor comfort with Bitcoin as part of diversified portfolios.

Analysts interpret these early results as a positive indicator for traditional finance’s expanding role in digital assets.

The fund’s combination of competitive fees, strong brand trust, and self-directed uptake highlights opportunities for established institutions in this evolving space. As more advisors incorporate the product, MSBT could build on its foundation to achieve greater scale.

In its first month, Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin Trust has shown steady momentum and stability. This performance now seemingly validates the firm’s strategy of providing accessible, regulated access to Bitcoin for a range of clients seeking exposure in a maturing asset clas.

Have a crowdfunding offering you’d like to share? Submit an offering for consideration using our Submit a Tip form and we may share it on our site!



What Microsoft’s new research tells CFOs about the ROI of AI



Good morning. In Microsoft’s 2026 Work Trend Index, the tech giant examined who is building the skills and habits needed to succeed in an AI-powered workplace. Several findings should interest CFOs, particularly those trying to determine whether AI spending is translating into measurable business value.

For starters, Microsoft frames AI value as an operating-model issue, not simply a technology-adoption issue. The report finds that organizational factors, including culture, manager support, and talent practices, account for 67% of reported AI impact, compared with 32% attributed to individual mindset and behavior. For CFOs, that suggests AI ROI will depend on whether companies redesign workflows, incentives, and performance metrics around AI-enabled work. And finance chiefs are increasingly at the center of organizational AI strategy.

The research draws on expanded Microsoft 365 telemetry data, a survey of 20,000 AI users across 10 countries, and leadership perspectives from the 14 organizations in the Harvard Frontier Firm cohort.

The productivity findings are also notable. Microsoft reports that 66% of AI users say AI has allowed them to spend more time on high-value work, while 58% say they are producing work they could not have produced a year ago. That positions AI not only as a cost-efficiency lever, but also as a capacity-expansion tool that could reshape how companies allocate labor.

In addition, the report highlights a management challenge. Just 26% of AI users say their leadership is clearly and consistently aligned on AI strategy, and only 13% say they are rewarded for reinventing work with AI even when results are not immediate. That should matter to finance chiefs because misaligned incentives can turn AI investments into underused software rather than productivity gains.

Governance is another relevant theme. Microsoft says the number of active agents in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem grew 15-fold year over year, and 18-fold among large enterprises. As agents take on more, they also generate valuable signals: what worked, what failed, where outcomes drifted, according to the report. CFOs will likely want assurance that, as agents proliferate, companies have strong controls over identities, permissions, policy enforcement, lifecycle management, monitoring, and auditability.

Microsoft highlights productivity gains and organizational change, but there isn’t a focus on tying AI adoption to margin improvement, cost reduction, or payback periods. For CFOs evaluating large AI investments, that gap underscores that measuring AI’s financial impact at scale remains a work in progress.
 
Sheryl Estrada
sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

Leaderboard

Vitor Roque was promoted to EVP and CFO of BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) (NYSE: BDX), a global medical technology company, effective May 7. Roque has served as interim CFO since December 2025. With more than 25 years at BD, Roque has held senior finance and operations roles across the company, most recently as senior vice president of finance and corporate financial planning and analysis.

Youssef Annali was appointed CFO of ICAT Logistics, a specialized logistics company. Annali brings more than two decades of senior finance leadership across global logistics and supply chain businesses. Annali joins ICAT from OIA Global, where he served as CFO for four years. Before OIA, he spent 11 years at CEVA Logistics, rising to CFO and EVP of finance for North America. Earlier in his career, he served in senior finance roles at Abbott, KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Big Deal

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday that the U.S. labor market added 115,000 jobs in April, which beat economist expectations. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.3%. Job gains occurred in health care, transportation and warehousing, and retail trade. However, federal government employment continued to decline.

Meanwhile, the “information sector”—where the BLS counts tech, telecom, data processing, and media jobs—lost another 13,000 jobs in April, while finance shed 11,000, Fortune reported. The monthly average this year has been about 9,000 jobs lost in information, and 12,000 in financial activities. 

Going deeper

In a new episode of Fortune 500: Titans and Disruptors of IndustryFortune’s Editor-in-Chief Alyson Shontell sat down with Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon to learn how he leads and what the next primary device after the smartphone could be. 

Many major smart device manufacturers use Qualcomm’s technology, ranging from physical chips in our phones to the 4G, 5G, and soon, 6G networks that connect them. But in the lightning-fast tech industry, what’s cutting-edge today can become obsolete tomorrow. Amon is prepared to bet the farm to stay ahead. 

Overheard

“The U.S. is currently suffering from a barbell economy, where growth is concentrated in capital-intensive AI at the top and low-wage services at the bottom. The middle, where the bulk of professional women sit, is being hollowed out.”

Katica Roy, the CEO and founder of Denver-based Pipeline, a SaaS company, writes in a Fortune opinion piece titled “America is shorting one of its best assets as the $38 trillion national debt runs out of control.”

Redesigning Your Marketing Organization for the Agentic Age


Organizations that move early will define how marketing operates in the coming era and capture compounding returns.

Chase Business Checking Bonus for Existing Customers: Earn $50 with Zelle


Chase Business Checking Zelle Bonus

🔄️ Update: The offer seems to be available for everyone at this link with promo code HA2276922C9FVY6R. (HT: DoC)

Chase has a new targeted offer for business owners looking to pick up an easy bonus. Eligible customers can earn $50 for using Zelle. The offer was sent out via email but you may also find it in your accounts.

Offer Details

This is a targeted promotion, so you will need to check your email or Chase mobile app to see if you are eligible. Here is the breakdown of how to trigger the $50 bonus:

  • Requirement: Complete 15 or more qualifying Zelle® transactions.
  • Minimum Amount: Each transaction must be for $5.00 or more.
  • Reward: Receive a $50 bonus deposited into your account.
  • Eligible Transactions: These include sending money to vendors, contractors, or other business-related recipients, as well as receiving payments from customers.
  • Timeline: Most targeted versions of this offer require the transactions to be completed within 60 days of receiving the invitation.

Guru’s Wrap-Up

If you are a Chase Business Checking customer, it is worth a quick search in your inbox for “Chase” and “Zelle” to see if you can take advantage of this. An easy $50 for transactions you might already be making is a solid win. Just keep in mind that since this is a targeted offer, it won’t work for everyone. 

Just keep in mind that even if you weren’t officially targeted, a quick message to customer service might be all it takes to get enrolled in this offer.

HT: DoC

How To Invest in ETFs for Beginners (starting with $5,000)



How To Invest in ETFs for Beginners (starting with $5,000)

If you’ve ever had money sitting in a savings account and thought — I should probably be doing something with this — this video is for you.
Maybe you’ve asked yourself: Is $5,000 even enough to start? Do I need more before it’s worth it? What if I invest and the market crashes tomorrow? What if I pick the wrong ETF and lose everything? What if I’m already too late?

If you liked this video and would like to see more videos like this, we would be happy to welcome you as a subscriber. Thank you very much

👇 subscribe here 👇

👉 👈
👉 👈

Thank you for watching this video:

#etf #investing #etfinvesting

In this channel, John explores a wide variety of money topics. Join the journey and experience the different money and investment aspects. Let’s go 🏁💯

source

Mortgage Rates Are Lower Today, But Should They Be?


There was yet another twist in the ongoing conflict in the Middle East today.

Renewed hope of a deal after President Trump said, “Great Progress has been made toward a Complete and Final Agreement with Representatives of Iran.”

That was yesterday afternoon though, and his latest Truth Social post carried a much different tone.

In it, he said, “If they don’t agree [to terms], the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.”

Simply put, it sounds like hopes of an end to the war are once again super tenuous at best.

As such, the drop in mortgage rates today might not be warranted nor lasting.

Mortgage Rates Drop on Possible End to the War

If you’re wondering why mortgage rates are lower today, it’s because there were new whispers about an end to the war.

Sound familiar? Probably. Because this isn’t the first time it’s happened, only to be a head fake at best.

So what happened this time, Well, the “White House believes it’s getting close to an agreement with Iran,” per a so-called exclusive from Axios.

Of course, in the same exclusive article, they said “it may be hard to forge consensus across the different factions.”

And that “U.S. officials remain skeptical that even an initial deal will be reached.”

In other words, it sounds like more of the same back and forth rhetoric we’ve been hearing for weeks if not months now.

And it’s always flanked by new threats to ratchet things up even higher if a deal isn’t reached.

So for the bond market to rally today on lower oil prices, all tied to a potentially flimsy report seems questionable at best.

Yes, I want resolution like everyone else, but to think we wake up one day and all is agreed to while threats are being hurled seems silly.

So if you’re watching mortgage rates closely, perhaps take today as a gift, but be warned they could easily turn higher again.

Jobs Comes In Hotter Than Expected Too!

The other head-scratcher here is that the ADP jobs report released today came in above expectations.

A total of 109,000 new jobs were created in April, well above the median forecast of 84,000 jobs and nearly double the 61,000 from a month earlier.

In addition, it was the biggest monthly gain for jobs in 15 months, signaling strength in the labor market.

If we assume labor is holding up better than expected and inflation is rising again, in part due to the war in Iran and oil prices, that would put a lot of upward pressure on mortgage rates.

While I’m not totally convinced on the strength of the labor market, another hot jobs report on Friday would surely push mortgage rates higher.

And really any strength there right now coupled with renewed inflation concerns should realistically push mortgage rates higher.

So again, take the win today if you’re locking a mortgage rate, but be super cautious if you’re thinking rates might get better and are floating your rate.

Things can change fast and for me at least, there’s still more upward pressure than downward pressure.

Sure, rates could ease more, but there appears to be more room to run higher than lower right now. And rates are always quick to rise and slow to fall!

Keep going: Use my mortgage rate calculator to quickly compare rates an .125% or .25% apart.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Should You Ever Buy a Rental Property with Negative Cash Flow? (Rookie Reply)


Everyone keeps saying we’re in a “buyer’s market,” but if that’s true, where are all the real estate deals? It’s easy to get discouraged after hearing “no” after “no,” but in today’s episode, we’re sharing the secrets to landing off-market properties and overlooked rentals on the MLS!

Welcome to another Rookie Reply! Struggling to find real estate deals at the right price? Ashley and Tony will show you how to modify your approach and get your next rental property under contract much faster. Next, should you self-manage or hire a property manager? Each strategy has its pros and cons, but the right one for you depends on a few factors that we’ll get into!

Finally, is it ever a good idea to buy a rental property that will give you negative cash flow? Most people don’t get into real estate investing to lose money each month, but we’ll show you a scenario in which taking a modest loss today could pay off long-term!

Ashley Kehr:
What if you’ve been doing all the right things to find deals such as driving for dollars, cold calling, but you’re still coming up empty? We’re going to tell you exactly what to try next.

Tony Robinson:
And once you do land that first property, you’ll have to answer one of the most debated questions in real estate. Do you self-manage or do you hand it off to a property manager?

Ashley Kehr:
Plus, can a property that doesn’t cash flow actually be a smart investment? We’re breaking down all three of those questions today on Rookie Reply. This is The Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kerr.

Tony Robinson:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson. And with that, let’s get into our first question of the day. So today’s first question comes from the BiggerPockets Forums and it says, “We just recently sold our house and finished our first deal. We’ve been looking for deals and haven’t had much luck cold calling or driving for dollars. We’re getting into the end of the year and heading into what feels like more of a buyer’s market. Any other strategies that have worked for finding off market deals? We keep coming up short and are not sure if we’re missing something or we just need to be more patient. This is great.
I think first let me say, we’ve interviewed Henry Washington, Dominique Gunderson, James Daynard. I’m trying to think of other folks that we’ve interviewed who do a lot of off-market transactions. And they’ve all kind of said a very similar thing that as the real estate market has shifted as interest rates have gone up, the volume of good deals has gone down and they’re saying yes less often than they were maybe three years ago. So maybe it’s not necessarily a bad thing that some of these deals aren’t working out because all of those experience flippers that I just mentioned, they’re all super surprised sometimes at what some of these deals do end up going for because they’re like, how is anyone going to make money on that? So I think the fact that you are saying no shows a certain level of constraint that maybe a lot of other rookies don’t have.
Now that said, what are some other strategies that we can leverage? I think first, before we even talk about other strategies, let’s just talk about the two that you’ve done. You said cold calling and driving for dollars. I think my first question is, have you actually maximized both of those strategies? If you’re a cold calling, how many actual cold calls have you made? Is it 100 cold calls or is it 10,000? Driving for dollars, have you spent four hours doing this or 400 hours doing this? And I think for a lot of people with the right obviously execution, but if we just increase our volume in a lot of ways that can solve a lot of our issues, we just do more. That’ll solve it. So I think the first thing that I would ask is, have you really optimized? Have you gotten the volume there?
And then the second piece is, okay, well, what does your actual execution look like? Cold calling, for example. If you’re cold calling homeowners and let’s say the volume is there, well now let’s talk about what does your script look like? How are you opening up that conversation? Are you saying, “Hey, this is Tony. I want to give you a really low offer on your house. Are you open to that? ” Of course you’re going to hang up the phone on you. But if you’re like, “Hey, this is Tony. Hey, I know this is super out of the blue, but I was looking at your property on 123 Main Street.” I’m just curious, do you still have that or what are your plans for that? “Oh, I get these calls all day. What do you want? “”Well, hey, hey, I’m just curious. Are you even interested in maybe entertaining an offer on that property?” “Well, what’s your best offer?
“Well, hey, I probably have to ask you a few questions before I can really give you an honest answer about what I think the property’s worth. I’m really just trying to understand if you’re even open to having a conversation. So what does the actual scripting look like as you’re having those cold calls? And so I think first volume. Do you have the requisite amount of volume for each one of these strategies? And then if you do have the volume, are you actually spending the time to increase your efficiency within each of those? And I would probably focus on that first before I go out and start doing a whole bunch of other ways to try and drum some additional off market deals.

Ashley Kehr:
I actually think there could be a lot of success just on the MLS right now. In a lot of markets, it is really, really a buyer’s market out there. Houses are sitting, sitting, sitting, low price reductions. I looked at this house the other day that it’s been sitting on the market for six months and I think it was originally listed at 600,000 and they’ve already dropped the price to 465,000. Over six months, that’s a huge reduction in price. So I think on the MLS, there’s tons of opportunity depending on certain markets. I was just in Ponta Gorda, Florida and in that market it is buyer’s market galore. Properties are not selling, people are getting them discounted. I actually have a great uncle there that just purchased a property there and he got it for $200,000 off of the asking price that they had and he was their top offer.
They got other lower offers even than that. So I think in some markets there really is a lot of opportunity to not even have to do off market deals. The next thing is how you had said, you keep coming upshore and you need to just be more patient. Tony hit the nail on the head is like, you need to be consistent in making sure that you’re following up and that you’re consistently going and finding deals. But I think making connections with real estate agents, whether that’s cold calling the agents and say,” Hey, I’m an investor in the area. This is what I’m looking for. “Going on bigger pockets and going to Agentfinder, connecting with agents in that market and maybe you’ll get some pocket listings or maybe they already have some listings that they know that are coming up or they have a property that’s been sitting but they know that their seller would take less on the property.
They just don’t want to do the price reduction. So I think there is a lot of opportunity still using agents for on market deals. All

Tony Robinson:
Right guys, coming up, one of the most debated questions we get from Ricky is, should you self-manage your first rental or hire a property manager from day one? We’ll give you our honest take right after this. All right guys, welcome back. So our second question also from the BiggerPockets Forum says,” I’m about to close on my first investment property and cannot decide if I should hire a property management company or self-manage. I have a full-time job and I’m not sure how much time this will actually take. The upfront costs and monthly fee for property management seems steep to me, especially on the first deal. What have other people done and what do you wish you had known before making this decision? “Ash, you’ve got a lot of experience in the traditional long-term rental side on management, so I’ll defer to you on this one, but just my quick two cents is that number one, with the just sheer volume of management tools that exist today, a lot of the kind of grunt of what used to make people hate property management has been solved in a lot of ways by all of the technology that exists today.
Even as someone who’s working a full-time job, managing a traditional long-term rental is probably a pretty straightforward task.
I know a lot of folks who manage multiple short-term rentals while still working a full-time job, which is significantly a larger time burden than a traditional long-term rental, but a lot of it does come down to, do you have the right software tools, automation? Do you have the right systems and processes in place to deal with a lot of those things? But then the other piece too is just like, I think desire. If the idea of you actually managing your own portfolio makes you just want to pull your hair out, then maybe don’t do it because you’re just never going to be as good as someone who can actually, and maybe not enjoy, but can get through that process with les pain. So is it possible? Yes, absolutely. I think so. I think the bigger question comes down to you as an individual. Is it something you can see yourself actually doing at a high level or is it something you’ll actually hate that might make you enjoy real estate investing even less?
So those are the first few things for me, but Ashley, I’m curious what your take is.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. So I started out self-managing where I was doing everything and then I went to building out a property management company and then hiring some people. Then I outsourced the property management and then I went back to building out a property management company where I was more removed and had somebody else doing everything. And then I went back to self-managing. So I could say I’ve done it all. The worst is when you are self-managing and doing it all and have no help and have no systems or processes or have no software. And that’s how I started out was it was I used QuickBooks and that was it. The only way for someone to submit a maintenance request was to contact me directly and it was awful. I wanted to rip my hair out. I cried all the time, but I really think that you can find a happy medium.
So if there are parts that you want to take on, do your research as to what’s actually involved in that. So if you are going to be managing the property and say you think that you would like to enjoy leasing out the apartment and showing people the apartment, okay, that means you’re also going through applications, you’re also setting up the showings, you’re also screening tenants, you’re putting the lease agreement together, you’re meeting them to give them the key, do their move-in inspection. When they move out, you’re doing a move-out inspection, you’re refunding their security deposit, things like that. So make sure you understand everything that the job entails. Also, look at your property. Do you have a property that you know it’s a little bit older, there’s probably repairs and maintenance that are going to come up or is this a brand new build where maybe it’s under warranty or there’s not a lot that’s going to happen that will definitely make your life easier the less maintenance you have to respond to and coordinate.
I do think if you have one property work full-time at W2, you can kind of set that expectation with your tenant. You could tell somebody when they move into this property, or even at showings and say, “Hey, I just want you to know I work a full-time job. I am available from this hour to this hour.” So just when you set that expectation before they even rent and you have it right into the lease agreement, you are agreeing to rent this apartment knowing that I am only available from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM on weekdays. On weekends, feel free to contact me when you’re not working. So I think that if you set boundaries or set the expectation that you’re not going to be available twenty four seven or you have property management software in place like Rent Ready or Turbo Tenant where you can go ahead and submit the maintenance requests.
I prefer being self-managing because you have more control over the property. You are going to care about it more than your property management company, but you also have to make sure that you are going to make time for it and you’re going to actually follow through with getting things done that needs to be done for the property. But there’s so much software and automation that a lot of it can be automated and a lot of it can be done remote where you can be on vacation, you can be at your job, you don’t have to be sitting at a desk to actually manage your properties at all. You can do it from your phone.

Tony Robinson:
Ashley, let me just ask one final question there. As someone who’s maybe doing this for the first time, and I’ve heard various investors say different things, but some folks are like still always underwrite with property management there just in case there comes a day when you want to step away from it. We actually did not take that approach in our short-term rental portfolio where we knew that we were going to build out management in- house and to this day we still do, but that was like a strategic decision for us. What’s your take on the long-term rental side?

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah, I think that you definitely should. If you are going to build out a property management company, you’re going to want to pay the company and bake that in. So I would still 100% put that into your numbers because worst case scenario, you don’t actually need to do it. Someone in your family could get sick, you could move out of the country. Some areas near me have, especially on the short-term rental side, some of the towns, you have to have a contact person located in that area. You cannot manage your own property in that area. It has to be a local number, a local address of someone who is managing and maintaining your property. So if you were to move out of that town and you could no longer be that point of contact, you would need to pay somebody else to be that point of contact.
I think it doesn’t hurt to bake things in. If it is really, really killing your deal and you’re like, “This would work if I didn’t have that property management fee,” then I need you to take it out, but put a plan in place that you’re going to know that your insurance and property taxes are going to increase X amount per year, but you’re also going to be super diligent about increasing your rent and say, “I know that it’s for three years I have to manage this property, but after that, my cash flow will be more because I have increased the rents. My mortgage payment has stayed the same. My insurance and property taxes has not increased as much as I have increased the rent and now I have more of a buffer three years from now to go ahead and implement property management software. So you could do it that way, but I would make sure that you have a … It’s not a long runway of like, oh, I have to manage this property for 10 years, then I’ll be able to afford the property management, but also consider that maybe breakeven wouldn’t be the worst case scenario if you’re getting the tax benefits doing a cost seg, just normal depreciation on the property and things like that and appreciation also on the property.
We have one more question after the break and this one might challenge how you think about cashflow, especially if you’re investing in an expensive market, so don’t go anywhere.

Tony Robinson:
All right guys, welcome back. So our last question today is one that constantly comes from investors in more expensive markets and it might be the most controversial thing we talk about on Ricky Reply. So the question says, after hearing lots of episodes about negative cashflow, I’ve got a question. I’m currently living in my primary residence and planning to purchase an investment property that is going to be negative cash flow. It’s in the Bay Area of Northern California, a very expensive market, but I am of the opinion that as long as the rent on the investment property is at least going to be greater than my current primary residence mortgage, it can still be considered as a positive cashflow investment. The investment property is going to be in a much better location than my primary. I might be totally wrong on my thinking. What am I missing?
Well, first, I guess this is a somewhat creative way to think about real estate and let me know if you’re reading this the same way, Ash, but he’s basically saying that the rent on the investment property is higher than the mortgage on his current primary. So if you compare those two things that it’s still like a net positive.That’s how I’m interpreting it. And I guess while that might be true, I don’t know if I would necessarily compare those two in that way because even if your investment property is generating a rent amount that’s higher than the mortgage on your primary, the rental property still has a mortgage itself. I guess if you’re maybe paying all in cash for this thing and there’s no mortgage on the rental, then maybe we can compare those two. But assuming that you have some sort of mortgage on the investment property, it’s still producing negative cash flow.
So I would separate the primary residence math from the investment property math though what I think where maybe there is a case for negative cash flow is the reason that you’re actually choosing to invest in real estate. Bay Area of Northern California, if history kind of is any indication, you’ll probably continue to see relatively strong appreciation in that market. And if that is the case, well, maybe in 10 years from now, even if you’re spending a hundred bucks a month or a couple hundred bucks a month to cover whatever negative cashflow there is, if you’re spending 2,500 bucks a year, do that over 10 years, maybe you’ve invested an additional 25K into this deal, but let’s say that your appreciation has grown by $250,000 or $500,000 in that same timeframe. Does it make sense mathematically to give up that 25K to get 500K in appreciation?
Maybe. So I think maybe that’s the math that I would focus on is the negative cashflow compared to the other benefits, the appreciation, any tax benefits, things of that sort. And then I think the final piece is maybe is there a different strategy that you can layer on to actually make this deal work from an appreciation standpoint but also work from a cashflow perspective? Instead of it being a traditional long-term rental, can you do something like co-living where you’ve got multiple people renting out the space? Can you do maybe a midterm rental where you’re renting out to professionals coming into the Bay Area? We just interviewed someone who does assisted living facilities. Can you do that? We’ve interviewed folks who’ve done sober living houses. Can you do that? Or just are there other strategies that you can maybe layer on so you still get the property in a great part of California, but you also get some positive cash flow?

Ashley Kehr:
I think the way that you should be looking at it is instead of the, as in like, oh, this is covering my primary, is if you are looking at it that way, that means that your, let’s say your primary residence is, and this is California, so I know it’s probably more than this, but let’s say your primary residence is $2,000 a month and your investment property is 3,000 and your tenant is going to be paying 2,000. That means that your tenant is paying $2,000 to live in a property that is probably worth more if it has a $3,000 mortgage on it. While you are living in a property, let’s just say it’s not as good of a property because it’s not as much, but you’re going to be now paying $3,000 to live in a lesser property, let’s say. So that’s how I actually saw it when you said that is your tenant is getting the better house and paying less than you and you’re getting the lesser house and having to pay more than your tenant.
So the way I would look at it, like Tony said as to some of the other benefits of actually holding onto this property and the way my brain would wrap around this is, okay, you have your primary, you’re paying your mortgage. Let’s say you have the investment property, your tenant is paying 2,000, you’re paying a thousand, that’s $12,000 a year. Can you offset that with saving in taxes? So if you were able to do your cost seg, you were able to just what the standard depreciation would be, would you be able to offset that by keeping more of your tax dollars in your pocket each year that you’re actually getting that $12,000 back or maybe even more instead of having to pay taxes on the property or taxes on your income, that’s how I would actually look into it and compare it more. And that’s where tax planning is so important and can be key in helping you figure out if that is worth it or not.
Well, thank you guys so much for joining us today on this episode of Real Estate Rookie. This has been a rookie reply. I’m Ashley, he’s Tony, and we’ll see you guys on the next episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

56 Million Americans Don’t Have a Workplace Retirement Plan. Trump’s New Executive Order Targets That Gap


Saving money isn’t easy, particularly if your budget is tight. Not only does it require living below your means, but it also requires delayed gratification and thinking long-term. Most humans aren’t great at any of those things. U.S. President Donald Trump wants to highlight a subtle policy shift meant to incentivize people to get into the savings habit. It could be a big deal.

A credit vs a match

According to a recent Presidential executive order, “Tens of millions of Americans lack access to employer-sponsored retirement plans.” The number is pegged at roughly 56 million, according to the Pew Charitable Trust. The list includes independent contractors and those who are self-employed, among others.

Image source: Getty Images.

There is already an incentive in place to help such people save, but it is structured as a tax credit. There are income limits, but the basic model is that a person who saves in an eligible tax-advantaged retirement account can get up to a $1,000 credit. The credit is worth 50% of the amount saved up to $2,000. That’s great, but there’s a small incentive problem. You have to put in $2,000 and wait until tax time to get the $1,000 credit, which reduces the taxes you owe. It isn’t well used, with the government noting that only “5.7% of taxpayers claimed the credit, and the average credit was $191.”

A Saver’s Match has been created to “largely replace” the Saver’s Credit. The difference is subtle, but important. Instead of getting a tax credit, or money off their taxes, those who save will effectively receive free money in the form of a match. The match is up 50% of contributions of up to $2,000, subject to income limitations. That’s the same $1,000, but the positioning is very different.

Generally speaking, people like getting things they perceive as free, as evidenced by the prevalence and success of buy-one-get-one (BOGO) free or half-off offers in the retail and fast food sectors. The hope is that this will incentivize people to save in tax-advantaged accounts, such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs).

Trump wants to tell you all about the match

The other big step here is the President’s executive order to create a website called TrumpIRA.gov. This site is designed to highlight the match and make it easier for savers to find financial companies that offer retirement accounts that will be eligible for that match. According to the order, “It is the policy of the United States to promote high-quality, low-cost individual retirement accounts.”

All in, this isn’t really a “Trump” IRA. It is just a convenient website that provides valuable information about IRAs and the new matching program. If you use the portal, you’ll likely end up with an account from a well-known financial institution.

But the big story is that you could qualify for some free government money if you take the time to visit. And whatever they end up calling the website in the long term, just getting started with an IRA (match or not) could be an important step for many would-be savers.

Tesla Once Again Recalls Its RWD Cybertrucks—All 173 of ‘Em



The latest of 11 recalls offers a free fix of the defect that could cause the discontinued Cybertruck’s wheels to fall off.