Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem warned that U.S. borrowing is on an unsustainable trajectory as he offered an unusually blunt assessment of American tax and spending policy, which is putting pressure on global bond yields.
Macklem warns U.S. deficits could push up Canadian borrowing costs
100% Back On YouTube Channel Memberships Up To $6
The Offer
Check your Bank Amerideals/Chase for the following offer:
- Get 100% Cashback on YouTube channel memberships up to $6
- A number of banks use the same back end for these offers. This includes: Chase, Bank of America, Regions Bank, Suntrust Bank, BBVA, BB&T, PNC, Columbia Bank, Beneficial Bank, and Christian Community CU. You can read this post for more information.
Our Verdict
Good way to support YouTube channels you enjoy without having to actually spend any money.
Hat tip to avsterbone
Why some parents are rejecting $1,000 Trump accounts for their kids
Israel Anthem doesn’t want a Trump account for his 14-month-old daughter.
“I’m not setting up one for my daughter,” the 38-year-old Nashville father told Fortune. “I’ll put $1,000 of my own money in an account before I do that.”
Nearly 70 million Trump accounts have been created through automatic enrollment, White House spokesman Matthew Middleton told Fortune, and more than $8 billion has already been deposited nationwide, according to a Treasury official. But parents still need to claim those accounts to manage them and request the $1,000 federal contribution for an eligible child. As of July, Treasury data showed more than 6.5 million families had signed up, including more than 1.5 million children eligible for the $1,000.
Employers have money riding on that step, too. By August, more than 50 companies had committed to contributing to Trump accounts for employees’ children, according to the Treasury Department, with employers including Bank of America, BlackRock, and Charles Schwab pledging to match the $1,000. For some parents, though, the money comes with a name they don’t want attached to their kid.
“I don’t want to put my daughter’s name on something attached to Trump for the rest of her life,” he said.
The program is meant to give children a cushion long before they have a paycheck of their own. Created under Trump’s 2025 tax-and-spending law, Trump accounts are a type of individual retirement account for children. A one-time $1,000 federal contribution is available to eligible U.S. citizens born between 2025 and 2028 who have valid Social Security numbers.
Parents, relatives, and employers can add money, generally subject to a combined annual limit of $5,000 during childhood. The funds go into qualifying low-cost stock index funds, giving the savings time to grow, although returns aren’t guaranteed. Withdrawals are generally restricted until the calendar year the child turns 18, when traditional IRA rules begin to apply, including potential taxes and early-withdrawal penalties.
The financial appeal hasn’t eased Anthem’s distrust, though. “I understand the logistics of it. I understand the math of it, but what I do not understand is Trump’s willingness to do something so supposedly generous.”
The White House has emphasized the program’s potential to help children build wealth. “With Trump Accounts, President Trump has secured a signature economic achievement designed to help every American child build savings and support a stronger financial future,” Middleton said.
The idea of giving children government-funded savings was around before Trump put his name on the accounts. In 2018, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey proposed giving every American newborn a $1,000 account, followed by annual government deposits of up to $2,000 depending on family income. His American Opportunity Accounts proposal, often called “baby bonds,” were aimed at narrowing wealth inequality.
Booker has since backed Trump accounts, joining Republican Sen. Ted Cruz in a letter urging Fortune 1000 CEOs to contribute. In it, the senators wrote that the accounts “ensure that every American child is an immediate shareholder in America’s largest companies.”
When free money feels personal
For parents like Anthem, though, the issue isn’t what the accounts invest in. It’s whose name is on them.
It’s a reaction that fits a broader pattern in how people think about money, according to Scott Rick, a University of Michigan marketing professor who studies financial decisions and their role in relationships. Research on mental accounting suggests that labels and earmarks shape how people feel about money and how they use it, he said.
“When money is psychologically tainted, we often avoid it,” he told Fortune. “For many, the $1,000 Trump account contribution is the fruit of a poisonous tree.”
Deciding on a child’s behalf adds another layer, Rick said. Parents are weighing what they can provide financially against the values they want to pass down, and either choice can feel like doing right by their kid.
“How could I possibly make my child an implicit Trump supporter? How could I possibly deprive my child of free money, especially in this economy? Good parents could ask both questions,” he said.
Parents who accept the money may share those objections but feel they can’t afford to pass it up, Rick said. Others find it easier to separate their feelings about Trump from the financial benefit for their child.
“Some people are just more capable of ‘separating the art from the artist,’ so to speak,” he said. “Indeed, there is some rationality to accepting the windfall here.”
Parents are also taking to online forums to get advice from others in hopes of distinguishing between accepting the government contribution and investing their own money.
“Free money is free money,” one Reddit user wrote in the NewParents subreddit, adding that Trump-supporting relatives were welcome to contribute. The commenter said their own savings would go into their state’s 529 college savings account instead.
Another Reddit commenter said they planned to open an account for their son, pointing to their own experience still paying off college and postgraduate loans at nearly 40. “I see it as a benefit for my child rather than anything political,” the commenter wrote. “I wouldn’t care whose name was on the account, but that’s just me.”
Anthem has little interest in claiming his daughter’s account. Even with the financial pressures of parenthood, he said he would rather put aside his own money than accept a benefit so closely associated with a president he opposes.
“We’ll find money other ways,” he said.
The New American Housing Crisis Has Landed
Go to for a better way to stay informed. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access to world-wide coverage through my link.
Mortgage rates near 7%, sellers outnumbering buyers by a record amount, builders slashing prices, yet home prices are higher than a year ago for the 38th straight month?
The help for homebuyers was supposed to make homes more affordable. It just raised prices instead.
In this video, I’ll break down:
• How higher mortgage rates ended up pushing home prices up, not down.
• Why a brand-new house now costs about $25,000 less than a used one.
• Why builders cutting home prices is starting to end.
• What rising mortgage rates does to the housing market.
• Why the government’s help keeps landing in the seller’s pocket.
👉 I post everyday here:
All illustrations, visuals, and animations in this video are original and hand-drawn by a freelance artist.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this video and on this channel (collectively, the “Content”) is for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or investment strategy. Investing involves risk and you must do your own research. Nothing in the Content should be interpreted as creating a fiduciary relationship, financial advisory relationship, or client relationship of any kind. The host, the channel, and all affiliated entities expressly disclaim any and all liability for any direct or consequential loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of, reliance upon, or interpretation of the Content. By viewing or interacting with the Content, you acknowledge and agree to these terms and release the host and all related parties from any and all claims related to your reliance on the information provided.
source
Dollar General Lawsuit: FTC And 20 States Allege Checkout Overcharges
Key Points
- The FTC and 20 states sued Dollar General on October 26, 2026, alleging its stores charged more at the register than shelf tags, ads and the app showed.
- The complaint cites 29,265 “Did Not Honor Marked Price” complaints since 2023, plus state price inspections that found errors in at least 12 states.
- Dollar General says it will fight the case. Shoppers can protect themselves by checking receipts before they leave the store.
The Federal Trade Commission and 20 states sued Dollar General on October 26, 2026, over what they call years of deceptive pricing. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. The 95-page complaint (PDF File) says the chain routinely charged shoppers more at the register than its shelf tags, price stickers and ads showed. It follows the FTC’s July move to send $2.7 million in refunds to Handy gig workers over misleading pay claims.
Dollar General has betrayed the trust of millions of American consumers and imposed significant financial harm on communities and consumers who are already struggling to make their paychecks last.” — Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection
Dollar General said it will defend this litigation vigorously. In a statement reported by News 9, it said FTC staff demanded a payment “orders of magnitude larger” than any realistic estimate of overcharges. Regulators have brought similar deceptive-practice cases against financial companies, including the CFPB’s lawsuit against Capital One over its savings rates. A court, not the FTC, will decide whether the claims hold up.
Why It Matters
Dollar General’s core shoppers have little room in their budgets for overcharges. Households earning $35,000 or less produce 60% of the company’s revenue, according to the complaint. About 80% of its stores sit in towns of 20,000 people or fewer. For families budgeting every grocery dollar, a few cents per item adds up.
Wisconsin’s inspection data puts a number on it. Inspectors there found that 9% of the 7,344 Dollar General products they scanned in 2023 rang up higher than the posted price, by an average of 17%. Using those rates, a $50 weekly basket would run about $0.77 high per trip, or roughly $40 a year. A family could put that toward getting one month ahead on bills.
What The Complaint Alleges
The complaint describes overcharging as a systemic, years-long problem that Dollar General knew about and didn’t fix. For shoppers, each overcharge works like a hidden junk fee added at the register. The main allegations:
- Customer complaints: At least 29,265 complaints logged as “Did Not Honor Marked Price” from January 2023 through March 2026, from all 48 states where the chain operates.
- Prior settlements: Seven settlements with six states since 2019, topping $6 million in payments.
- Store staffing: Thinly staffed stores often lacked time to print and hang new shelf labels, and employees in many cases didn’t correct prices at the counter.
- FTC store checks: FTC investigators found mislabeled prices in Dollar General stores in 2026.
- Plaintiff states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin.
- Failed inspections: Under a federal procedure 33 states follow, a store fails when more than 2% of sampled items carry the wrong price. Results from 12 states are below.
| State | Period | What Inspectors Found |
|---|---|---|
| Kansas | Jan. 2023–Mar. 2026 | Failed over 39% of inspections |
| Louisiana | Jan. 2023–Apr. 2026 | Failed 144 audits, $176,850 in fines |
| New Mexico | Jan.–Apr. 2026 | Failed 53% of 73 inspections |
| Iowa | Jan. 2023–June 2024 | Failed all 8 inspections |
| Arkansas | Jan. 2023–Apr. 2026 | Failed at least 20.1% of 392 inspections |
| Kentucky | 2023 | Failed 23.97% of 242 inspections |
| Ohio (Columbus) | Jan. 2023–Mar. 2026 | Failed more than 45% of inspections |
| Utah | Jan. 2023–Apr. 2026 | Failed more than 45% of inspections |
| Missouri | 18 months ending 2023 | Failed 92 of 147 inspections |
| Wisconsin | 2023 | 9% of 7,344 items overcharged, by 17% on average |
| Tennessee | Jan.–Mar. 2026 | Failed more than 10%, up from 5% in 2025 |
| North Carolina | June 2023–Nov. 2025 | 399 pricing errors in 28 inspections |
The shopper examples show how quickly a sale falls apart at checkout. One customer expected to pay about $37.61 for sodas and chips after advertised deals and a $5 app coupon. Dollar General charged her $50.72, about 35% more than she planned. A miss that size can wreck a weekly grocery budget on a fixed income.
Why The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Claim Matters
The case also invokes the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a law that bars using false statements to obtain a customer’s financial information. The FTC argues the false prices led shoppers to hand over debit card and credit card details at checkout. That claim matters for refunds, since the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that the FTC can’t win money for consumers under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. The complaint asks the court to order refunds under Section 19 for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley violations.
What Can Shoppers Do About Overcharges?
Check your receipt before you leave the store, and ask for the posted price on the spot. Past settlements require Dollar General to post lowest-price signs in Colorado and Pennsylvania. A New York settlement in October 2026 added the same rule for that state’s stores. Paying with a credit card adds a backstop, since debit cards generally carry fewer consumer protections than credit cards.
- In the aisle: Snap a photo of shelf tags, sale signs or app deals for anything you’re buying on promotion.
- At the register: Watch the screen as items scan, and speak up if a number looks wrong.
- Before you leave: Compare the receipt to your photos while you’re still in the store.
- If the store refuses: Report it to your state attorney general or weights and measures office, and file a report at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
How This Connects
Regulators have spent the past few years chasing small charges that add up across millions of customers. The Federal Reserve fined Green Dot $44 million over prepaid card fees and practices it called unfair and deceptive. Overdraft fees averaged about $25 in 2024, and the Senate voted to overturn the CFPB’s $5 overdraft cap last year. Dollar General’s case brings the same fight to the checkout lane.
What’s Next
Dollar General will answer the complaint in federal court, and the company has said it remains open to settlement talks. Shoppers shouldn’t count on quick checks. New York’s settlement paid its $1.875 million penalty as donated food and goods for the Foodlink food bank, with nothing paid to customers. Hang on to receipts until the case resolves. They also help with price adjustments on past purchases at other retailers.
Editor: Colin Graves
The post Dollar General Lawsuit: FTC And 20 States Allege Checkout Overcharges appeared first on The College Investor.
As Americans turn against data centers, Brazil offers tax breaks and cheap power to attract them
With communities across the U.S. rebuffing data centers, there’s growing political pressure to curtail their construction. But thousands of miles away, South America’s biggest country is already a top AI market and making the buildout easier.
Brazilians send 215 million messages to ChatGPT messages per day, according to OpenAI, making the country the chatbot maker’s third biggest market for weekly users after the U.S. and India.
Google said it plans to double its cloud infrastructure there by 2030 in response to growing demand, and even signed a sponsorship deal with the Brazilian Football Confederation in March to integrate Gemini across the country’s men’s, women’s, and youth national teams.
Other tech giants are investing too. Amazon Web Services has spent more than $3.8 billion on data center infrastructure there since 2011 and pledged another $1.8 billion through 2034, while Microsoft committed $2.7 billion to cloud and AI infrastructure over three years.
Local demand, rather than American companies moving operations abroad, has driven much of Latin America’s data center growth. But Carlos Barrera, CEO of Atlas Renewable Energy, thinks that could change.
“We do see the region as actually an attractive release valve for some of the U.S. capacity constraints that you see now,” he said.
With a population of almost 214 million people spread out across an area larger than the contiguous 48 U.S. states, Brazil makes sense as a country for hyperscalers to court.
Its electricity supply is also a major draw and costs less than half what it does in the U.S. According to a report from its Ministry of Mines and Energy, the country generates nearly 87% of it from renewable sources, and its rapid growth of wind and solar power has also led to a surplus.
“U.S. backlash isn’t pushing hyperscalers out of the country so much as pushing them toward wherever power shows up first,” James Mercer, a principal at data center advisory firm Metro Colo Advisory, told Fortune.
But Brazil’s cheap electricity could also become more expensive. Barrera said Brazil will need more transmission lines to connect large data centers to the grid, and government officials are split on whether electric bills will go up or not.
Another obstacle to Brazil’s AI growth is the tax code. High federal import taxes made building big data centers more expensive compared to other countries in the region.
To fix that, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed a law on Sept. 15 cutting taxes on qualifying data center equipment. This contrasts with some U.S. lawmakers proposing taxing data centers’ electricity use and output.
“If Brazil wanted to be a player in the data center space, it had to do this tax law change,” Christopher Torto, the CEO of Latin America’s largest data center and connectivity service provider Ascenty, told Fortune.
Data sovereignty
Lula’s government hopes that the tax break, by bringing more computing capacity into the country, will help Brazilian businesses develop AI products and rely less on foreign services. Currently 60% of Brazilian digital data is processed abroad, according to the country’s Ministry of Development.
Under the legislation, called REDATA, companies must offer at least 10% of their qualifying computing services to Brazilian customers and invest 2% of the value of the tax-benefitted equipment in Brazilian research and development.
“It’s to improve the data sovereignty of Brazil, so we won’t rely so much on foreign services, especially in a time with Trump,” Ana Carolina de Assis Nunes, a Brazilian anthropologist and data center researcher at nonprofit policy institute Data & Society, told Fortune.
Nunes pointed out Brazil wants to depend less on foreign technology but is giving tax breaks to the same companies that dominate the industry
Torto admitted Brazil is unlikely to develop its own Google or Microsoft. Still, having local data centers in the country could improve latency and keep more data in the country.
“It’s not just the model or the data center themselves; it’s everything that goes around them that will be really the larger investment long term,” he said.
Potential for backlash
While Brazil hasn’t seen the same scale of backlash to data centers as the U.S., some resistance has emerged. Days before REDATA became law, Brazilian federal prosecutors went to court over a TikTok-linked data center project. They wanted an environmental impact study and consultation with the Indigenous Anacé people prior to the data center becoming operational.
Nunes said opposition to data centers in Brazil isn’t as politically united as in the U.S., where they’ve drawn criticism from the left and the right. She said foreign investment still carries prestige in parts of Brazil, especially for people who see it as a chance to join the global economy.
“For people who are so marginalized and pushed away from global systems, it’s just like ‘oh, Google is coming here, that’s great,’” she said.
Growing up in Goiânia, in central Brazil, Nunes lived near a Unilever factory that made tomato paste. She recalled how proud her mom was of the connection to a global company, even as others worried about the factory’s use of local resources.
“It felt like we were part of something big because we lived close to that company,” Nunes said.
I Bonds: An Inflation-Adjusted Savings Option That Protects Your Principal [2026.10 Update: 1.40% Fixed Rate, 5.51% Composite Rate]
[2026.10 Update] Starting November 1, 2026, the new fixed rate is 1.40%, and the inflation component is 4.08% on an annualized basis. Together, they produce a composite annual rate of 5.51% for the first six months on newly purchased I Bonds. The inflation component is nothing extraordinary, but the fixed rate, modest as it may look, is the highest in twenty years! Once you buy, that fixed rate stays with your bond for up to 30 years, while the inflation component adjusts with inflation. This makes I Bonds worth considering again. See the “Recent Rate History” section below or this page for historical rates.
In recent years, U.S. inflation has been elevated, while rates on ordinary savings accounts have struggled to keep pace. That has been frustrating for people who would rather avoid the risks of investing in stocks or real estate. As official inflation readings rise, however, a previously unremarkable, relatively obscure product can become particularly attractive: U.S. Treasury Series I Savings Bonds, commonly known as I Bonds.
Product Overview
- Principal protection: Series I Savings Bonds are a special type of bond issued by the U.S. Treasury. Although they do not carry FDIC insurance like bank deposits, the risk of a U.S. Treasury default is roughly comparable to the risk of the FDIC system collapsing. In practical terms, they can be considered a principal-protected investment.
- How the interest rate is calculated: The rate consists of two components: a fixed rate and an inflation rate. The composite rate is calculated as follows:
Composite rate = [fixed rate + (2 x semiannual inflation rate) + (fixed rate x semiannual inflation rate)]
- A few notes on the rate calculation: Your fixed rate is determined when you buy the bond and remains unchanged for its entire 30-year life. The inflation rate varies with inflation data. Interest is compounded semiannually. New fixed rates and inflation rates are announced every six months, on May 1 and November 1. Note that these are the announcement dates: an existing I Bond’s inflation rate changes every six months from its issue date, rather than on the announcement date. One additional point: the inflation rate can be negative during deflation, but the composite rate has a floor of 0% and cannot be negative.
- Current rate: See the “Recent Rate History” section below.
- Purchase limit: The limit is tied to your Social Security Number (SSN). You can buy up to $10,000 per SSN per calendar year. The limit resets on January 1 each year.
- Holding period: I Bonds have a 30-year life, but you can cash them in at any time after holding them for one year. If you cash them in before five years, you forfeit the last three months of interest.
- How to buy: Individuals buy directly through TreasuryDirect. No brokerage or retirement account is required. This also explains why you rarely hear banks or retirement plan providers promote I Bonds: they cannot earn management, advisory, or transaction fees from them.
- I Bonds cannot be traded on the secondary market.
- You can defer tax on the interest until redemption.
- Interest is subject to federal income tax but is exempt from state and local income taxes.
For more information, see the official TreasuryDirect pages:
Recent Rate History
How to Buy Series I Savings Bonds
Purchase I Bonds through the official TreasuryDirect website:
The website looks like it came straight out of the 1990s, but it is a government website, after all. If this is your first time using it, you will need to open an account.

You will be asked to provide various personal details during registration. Most fields are straightforward, but one deserves a quick explanation: if you are opening an individual account, enter your SSN in the “Taxpayer Identification Number” field.
Some people may receive an error saying that their identity could not be verified. We discuss this situation in a separate section below. To avoid verification delays that could prevent you from buying I Bonds before December 31, we strongly recommend opening your TreasuryDirect account first, even if you have not yet decided whether to buy.
Once your TreasuryDirect account is ready, sign in and select the “BuyDirect” tab. You can purchase I Bonds using the option circled in red below:

How to Cash In (Redeem) Series I Savings Bonds
The process is simple, although the website makes it harder to find than it should be. Select “ManageDirect,” then “Redeem securities,” as shown below:

Who Can Buy Series I Savings Bonds?
You must have an SSN. In addition, you must meet one of the following conditions:
- United States citizen, whether you live in the U.S. or abroad
- or United States resident
- or Civilian employee of the United States, no matter where you live
As for how “United States resident” is defined, my understanding is that a Resident Alien (RA) should qualify, while a Non-Resident Alien (NRA) probably would not.

Children with an SSN are also eligible, and parents can buy I Bonds for them.
Corporations and trusts with an Employer Identification Number (EIN) are also eligible to purchase I Bonds, although we will not go into those arrangements here.
What If TreasuryDirect Cannot Verify Your Identity?
Some applicants may run into an identity verification issue when opening a TreasuryDirect account. The error message reads:
Thanks again for opening a TreasuryDirect account. We are having difficulty verifying the information you provided when opening your account. For your protection, please complete the Account Authorization form https://www.treasurydirect.gov/pdf/rs/acctauth.pdf and mail it to Treasury Retail Securities Site, P.O. Box 7015, Minneapolis, MN 55480-7015. A hold has been placed on your account that will prevent you from accessing your account. After we receive and approve the Account Authorization form, the hold on your account will be removed. When you log into your account, check the Investor InBox section of your Treasury Direct account for an important message.
In this situation, follow the instructions on the form and visit a bank to have a manager certify your signature. A few points from the form’s instructions deserve emphasis:
- You must sign in the bank manager’s presence. Do not sign the form ahead of time.
- You need to complete this at a bank or credit union, rather than with a notary. Many bank employees are unfamiliar with the requirement and may assume you are asking for notarization. Make it clear that you need a bank manager rather than a notary.
- Mail the completed form to the address specified in the instructions.
Based on personal experience, most bank employees have no idea what this form is. Ask them to read its instructions carefully, and emphasize that you need a bank manager rather than a notary. If someone at the counter says the bank cannot handle it, do not let that put you off: every bank can do this, so ask to speak with the manager. It appears that only one person at a branch may be authorized to use the required stamp, so you may need to find the branch manager to get it done.
After mailing the completed form, you may need to wait about two weeks before you can use your account. This is another reason to open your account early.
Summary
U.S. Treasury Series I Savings Bonds are a relatively niche savings option. They were not especially attractive in the past, but when inflation runs high, their rates can stand out and provide some protection against inflation. The $10,000 annual purchase limit per person is relatively small, but if you have spare cash and would rather avoid investing in stocks or real estate, I Bonds are worth considering.
If you like this post, don’t forget to give it a 5 star rating!
Binance to resume withdrawals after recovering bulk of $6 billion in stolen funds

Binance to resume withdrawals after recovering bulk of $6 billion in stolen funds
CCM’s VantageScore test saves $2,500; rivals lock FICO deals
- Key Insight: Find out why some major mortgage lenders are signing on for FICO’s bundled pricing and how much another prominent player says VantageScore has been saving them on certain loans.
- Expert Quote: “A 740 classic FICO isn’t necessarily the same risk as a 740 VantageScore loan.” — Sandra Thompson, former director, Federal Housing Finance Agency
Overview bullets generated by AI with editorial review.
Some lenders have signed up for FICO’s bundle while another one has found savings in government-sponsored enterprises’ unified loan pricing for VantageScore 4.0, highlighting new drivers for how the industry is making choices around credit metrics.
Fairway, Movement and Rate reported Friday that they have committed to
Processing Content
“This demonstrates how additional flexibility can translate into meaningful benefits for our customers,” Brian Clark, director of product and pricing at CCM, said in a press release, while noting that it’s part of broader moves to fully use government-related market options to this end.
CCM also is removing a 80% loan-to-value ratio cap it has had as an overlay for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, allowing some borrowers to exceed this, and also giving borrowers broader access to Department of Veterans Affairs-guaranteed loans.
Meanwhile, Rocket Mortgage also has found VS4 offers some advantages in a five-month test of 1.4 million customers, CEO Jay Bray said at
“We saw higher approval. We saw customers being able to save money, and so we made the choice to move in that direction for certain pieces of our portfolio,” he told listeners to the conference, which HFS broadcast online.
Lenders sees a need for both score providers for now
VS4 has become more competitive in the GSEs’ market since their oversight agency unified the pricing for loans based on it with FICO’s longtime industry standard, removing a previous adjustment, but so far lenders are still reporting a need for both credit metrics.
“Since VantageScore 4.0 isn’t accepted across all programs yet, this approach gives loan officers more flexibility,” CCM said in its emailed statement.
Executives from Fairway, Rate and Movement all also issued statements that show a persistent need for FICO scores in a press release.
“We will continue to evaluate FICO Scores in our wide range of eligible loan products and programs,” Stacey Sprain, senior vice president of credit and vendor support at Fairway Home Mortgage, said in one such statement.
VantageScore 4.0 and a newer FICO 10T score slated for later enterprise adoption both differ from the latter’s traditional credit metric for mortgages in that they both incorporate more data such as borrower payments over time as opposed to a snapshot of the borrower’s obligations.
While CrossCountry has reported some early savings related to current GSE loan pricing with no differentiation for FICO classic and VS4 scores, former Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Sandra Thompson said this week she had some concerns about it.
Ex-officials’ take on current loan pricing for scores
“The most important aspect of credit modernization is getting the risk pricing of the loans done correctly,” Thompson said. “A 740 classic FICO isn’t necessarily the same risk as a 740 VantageScore loan,” she said during the Housing Finance Strategies conference.
Scores the GSEs use in loan pricing have broad impacts for them and their counterparties that Thompson said should be given more consideration before treating them in a unified manner.

“Capital is absolutely going to be impacted. The mortgage insurers are looking at these numbers as well,” Thompson said.
Both she and her fellow HFS conference panelist Alanna McCargo, who previously served as president of Ginnie Mae and then later of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, called for more data around such implications.
“I just think we need to be very careful as this rolls out,” McCargo said.
Why Traders Are Moving to Crypto ?
#cryptotrading #trading #stockmarket #intradaytrading #optionstrading
source
