Home Blog

Senate and House seal deal on landmark housing affordability bill


House Republican leaders plan to bring the bill to an expedited vote when the chamber returns from recess on June 23, according to two people familiar with the legislative plans.

The deal was brokered by Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott (R-SC), Ranking Member Warren, House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill (R-AR), and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA).

“This bill is the result of years of work to lower costs, expand housing supply, cut red tape, protect taxpayers, and help more Americans achieve the dream of homeownership,” Scott said in a statement.

A deal struck on contested terms

To earn House support, the Senate accepted a three-year sunset on the Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) program, scaled back from its proposed seven years, and added nine community banking bills to the package.

Hill said the changes brought him on board: “I appreciate the Senate including a three-year sunset on the CDBG-DR program and adopting key House priorities including nine community banking bills and the House’s language limiting institutional investors from outcompeting American families in the housing market.”

How to do SIP? Invest Money in Mutual Funds & ETF | Step by Step Demo



“Learn how to set up a SIP (Systematic Investment Plan) with this step-by-step demo for smart, disciplined investing.”

🔗Open Free Demat Account on Lemonn:

👉 Use Referral Code: 2ydcwi

*****************************************************************

👉 Open Free Account:

*****************************************************************

– NO AMC Charges for Lifetime. Start earning Affiliate Income on Referral.

*****************************************************************

👉 👉 Algo Software:

***************************************************************

#StockMarket #MutualFund #SIP

About Pushkar Raj Thakur :

Pushkar Raj Thakur is India’s Leading Educator & Business Coach. He is a Guinness World Record Holder for the Largest Financial Investment Lesson and largest Social Media Marketing Lesson. With Millions of Followers on all major Social Media Platforms, he is known for his versatile knowledge of Financial Education, the Stock Market, Personal Mastery, Sales, Marketing, Human Psychology and Business Development.

– NISM Certified Research Analyst

– NISM Certified Mutual Fund Distributor

– IRDA Certified

Follow us on:

👉 Telegram:

👉 WhatsApp:

👉 Facebook:

👉 Instagram:

👉 YouTube:

👉 Twitter:

👉 LinkedIn:

👉 Website:

To Join Our Courses Call @ 9873 99 89 89

source

The Easiest Ways to Find Off-Market Properties in 2026 (Our Exact Playbook)


Many rookies assume the best real estate deals are already listed on the market, but what if that’s not the case? The truth is, it’s getting harder and harder to find rental properties on the MLS that actually pencil out. Thankfully, there are dozens of ways to find profitable off-market properties that can make you more money, and today, we’re sharing our exact playbook!

Welcome back to the Real Estate Rookie podcast! The term “off market” is thrown around as an easier way to buy real estate, but most rookies don’t actually know where to start. In this episode, we’re breaking down how we found, funded, and closed our very first off-market deals—as complete beginners. You’ll hear about Ashley’s 12-unit acquisition that doubled in value and Tony’s very first wholesale real estate deal that made him $30,000!

But that’s not all. Beyond driving for dollars and direct mail, we’re sharing our favorite strategies to use in 2026. With all kinds of tips for sourcing deals, structuring offers, and negotiating with sellers, there’s no reason why you can’t go out and buy your first off-market property this year!

Ashley Kehr:
MLS deals barely pencil in 2026 and every rookie keeps hearing go off market without anyone showing them the actual playbook. Today we’ll pull back the curtain on the off-market deals that built our portfolios. The list, the scripts, the introductions and the exact moments, each one almost didn’t happen. This is The Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kare.

Tony Robinson:
And I’m at Tony J. Robinson. And like Ashley said today, we’re going to travel back into time and Ash and I are going to talk about the first off-market deals that we did in our portfolios. And then we’ll also look forward to some of the off-market strategies that maybe we want to try as we continue to build our portfolio. So Ash, I’m going to interview you first. You’ll be in the hot seat and let’s talk about your first off-market deal. So take us back to the first off-market deal you ever closed. What was the strategy and how did the lead actually land in your lap?

Ashley Kehr:
So I started off buying off the MLS. I didn’t really know that off-market deals were a thing. So it was probably not until my sixth or seventh property that I bought that was actually an off-market deal. And this off-market deal came about because I was driving and driving for dollars and I saw a for sale sign on a commercial building. I called the agent that was listed on there and he ended up being the father of the person that was selling it. And he said, “My dad actually has a whole bunch of properties in this area.” I think there was like maybe 10 in total and said, “Would you be interested in looking at more properties?” And I said, “Yes.” So even though he was a commercial broker, none of these other duplexes that he was selling were actually listed on the MLS. So it was kind of through that connection that I got this off market deal by calling and asking about a commercial property.
And I did think it was weird because the broker kept asking me more questions about myself almost like he was vetting me and I’m like, “Does this guy want to sell a property or not? ” And then that’s when he kind of said, “Well, actually my dad is the owner of this property and he has a bunch more and I’d like you to look

Tony Robinson:
At them.” Dang. So okay. Well, first for Ricky’s that don’t know, what is driving for dollars? And were you actually driving $4 or were you just driving and you stumbled across this property?

Ashley Kehr:
I was just driving and always like anytime I drove back then, now I have my kids pretty trained that they do this so I can keep my eyes on the road, but I was always looking at properties as to dilapidated as what was piquing my interest, the electric meters and gas meters. Did it have two or three? Then it was probably a duplex or a triplex. So I wasn’t specifically out looking for properties, but this was in a town that I drove through often. My kids went to school in this town too.

Tony Robinson:
So Ricky’s like driving for dollars is exactly what Ashley said, where you’re just in your car and you’re looking for physical signals on a property that show maybe signs of distress. And to Ashley’s point, it could be just the overall physical, the house is in disrepair, just the physical shape of the property. It could be things like maybe it’s in decent condition, but the windows were boarded up. Maybe there’s a lot of overgrown grass and trees and there’s like the notices from the city or the county on the front door, a bunch of mail piled up outside, but just some signs that maybe this house isn’t really being taken care of to the best of its ability and that might be something you can reach out to that owner.

Ashley Kehr:
Or even just like a first sale sign in the yard, especially the more rural you get, that actually happens quite often where there’s literally just a first sale sign. Another one too is a for rent sign. Somebody’s renting out the property that maybe while it’s vacant, maybe they’re sick of turnover, maybe they had a bad experience with eviction. I’ve bought several properties where the landlord had just went through a bad eviction and that is why they are selling the property because they don’t want to deal with it anymore.

Tony Robinson:
So Ash, after you dial this broker who becomes the son of the investor, what property did you actually get? What did you pay for, if you remember? And what do you think that property would’ve been worth had you bought it on the MLS?

Ashley Kehr:
So they had, I think it was like 10 properties and I didn’t buy all of them. First of all, I didn’t know how I was going to buy these properties, but I ended up buying, let’s see, it was one, two, three, three duplexes from them and one six unit building. So the six unit building, it was like all on one parcel, but it was actually three duplexes on one parcel together in the same address. So technically a six unit, but they were separated as duplexes. So altogether it was six duplexes that I ended up purchasing. And this is where I found bigger pockets because I was Googling figuring out how to pay for this and how to make it work. And the first thing I did was on one of my rental properties, I went and got a commercial line of credit and I could use that to purchase the three extra duplexes that weren’t part of the six unit.
Then I asked for seller financing and the seller owned all of these properties free and clear. So we ended up doing seller financing for 12 months. I think it was interest only at like 3%. This was in 2018 we ended up closing on it. And so it was just seller financing interest only for 12 months and that would give me time to do some updates to the property and then go and refinance with a bank. And then the other ones, I used my commercial line of credit and I paid cash for those and one was $20,000, one was $22,000 and the other one was $52,000. And then the six unit was 152,000.

Tony Robinson:
So a lot of numbers here. What do you think the entire portfolio was worth compared to what you actually picked it up for? Just like ballpark, if you remember.

Ashley Kehr:
I don’t remember then. Part of the reasoning some of the duplexes were 20 and one was 52 is because of his ownership interest where I said, “This is what I’m willing to pay as a total.” And he’s the one that actually went and broke it down per property. And part of this was because the one duplex he put his 52,000 he owned himself and the other ones that were like 20,000 he owned with a family member. So he wanted more being allocated to himself of what he owned. But there wasn’t a ton that I had to do for the six unit property and I ended up going and getting it when I refinanced it appraised for more than enough to pay him off and we actually got our money back for our rehab too.
Had zero money into the six unit after a year. And then also the duplex that he had put as 52,000, I ended up going and refinancing that and getting a loan on it to take my cash back out and I can’t remember offhand, but it appraised for more than what I had paid for it at the time. But the duplex actually right now I’m selling that up property and then the two smaller ones I had unloaded in like 2021 when the market was going crazy and one of them I sold for like 60,000 and the other one I think I sold for, I think it was like 55,000, but they both had doubled in value even more plus I did some stuff to them, but nothing crazy. Probably no more than 10 grand was put into each of these duplexes. So I got really lucky.
I bought at the right time and I sold them at the right

Tony Robinson:
Time. Yeah. Well, Ashley, let me ask because there was a little bit of happenstance and maybe just like good timing in the way that you found this deal to where this broker just happened to be the son of this other investor who was ready to unload several properties. But if there was something that a Ricky, if they had to copy maybe one thing from your story, what’s like the lowest skill, highest leverage move they can make?

Ashley Kehr:
Getting in front of the seller and figuring out their motivation for selling. So I got to meet the seller. I walked to the properties with him. I learned how he had to own these properties for like some of the properties his parents had even owned. They had been in his life a long time and a lot of them were also pretty dilapidated where he didn’t seem to have any interest in keeping up on them anymore. So I think a real low hanging fruit and low lift and no experience is something you can do is like find out the seller’s motivations, their intention, things like that. Then the second thing was I made multiple offers. So my offer wasn’t just seller financing. It was, I can go to the bank, I’ve been pre-approved for the bank, here’s my offer, which is going to be lower getting bank financing or here’s my seller financing option.
If you do seller financing, I can pay more and this is what it would look like. So then that’s what actually what I did. I went and I met them at a restaurant and I handed them my two offers and I said, “Here they are, please look them over. Let me know if you have any questions.” And we were probably there for like 10 minutes, but I would say those are two things that any rookie could do is talk with the seller, get as much information as you can and submit multiple offers with different creative financing.

Tony Robinson:
Yeah. Well, Ash, I mean, it’s got to be one of the better off market deals I’ve seen when you look at the overall ROI of this one chance meeting with this one broker, right? I mean, you got an appreciating asset, you got properties that doubled in dollar, you got cashflow. There was a lot of good things working from this one deal and it’s all because you went off market.

Ashley Kehr:
Two years later, they had two more properties left they needed to sell and I actually ended up buying the four unit they had for $20,000, which then I think we dumped, I don’t remember all in it was around like 100,000 after we did all the rehab and renovations to it and it appraised for $220,000.

Tony Robinson:
Oh my goodness. I love that. So

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah, it was

Tony Robinson:
A good- It blows my mind when you talk about that. Those don’t

Ashley Kehr:
Happen to me anymore.

Tony Robinson:
I was just going to say, I know it was a few years ago, but it blows my mind when you talk about buying a four unit for $20,000.

Ashley Kehr:
But also too, I think that I also was way more motivated. A rookie investor has way more energy, more time because you have less properties, you’re not spread out managing your current portfolio. But I had several properties then, but not anything near where I had now. But I do look back and I think I used to accomplish so much. I really do think that. And I think that part of it is like I’ve gotten lazy and I’ve gotten to start to enjoy. I mean, I would stay up till 3:00 AM working, analyzing deals, doing lease renewals, all this stuff. I hustled and hustled, but I think that was also why I found those deals is because I was always in acquisition mode, which can be a detriment because I let the operations kind of fall apart and had to pick up pieces- You have to rebuild those.
… systems and processes in place. But I definitely think that it wasn’t just the market, it wasn’t the timing. I was really motivated. I really wanted to become debt free. I really wanted financial security and I think that’s a big part of it is I really had the drive then. So it wasn’t just luck of the market or like that’s what prices were. You can still find good deals. I was just always looking and always analyzing. All

Tony Robinson:
Right. Well, Ash walk us through her first deal and coming up after the break, I’m going to answer those same five questions that I just asked Ash so you can get a sense of what my first off market deal looks like. So we’ll cover that right after a quick word from today’s sales sponsors.

Ashley Kehr:
Okay. Welcome back. It is now Tony’s turn to answer the same five questions. So Tony, take us back to that first off market deal that you closed.

Tony Robinson:
Yeah. So my first off market deal was actually a wholesale deal, meaning I actually wholesaled this deal to someone else. So this was like early 2021 and this was shortly after I went full-time into real estate. And as we were trying to build our acquisition engine, I said, “Well, hey, why don’t we try and go off market?” I’d never done it before, but it’s worth a shot. So we had the market that we were focused on and we actually bought, I want to say it was maybe postcards or letters through PropStream. We did the lowest effort way to get started. We pulled the list through PropStream. It was like absentee owners. I think we might’ve added an equity filter. I don’t quite remember the list. It was definitely absentee owners. And then we just chose one of the cheaper postcard options from PropStream and we sent them off.
And I’ve joked about this before on the podcast, but literally the very first call that we got from those postcards was the deal that we ended up closing on, which is totally not realistic for anyone. Usually you need to mail for months and months and months before you get an actual deal. But for us, it was the literal first person that called from the postcards was the deal we ended up closing on. But it was a very, very kind of worn down and beat up property. At the time it was probably the worst property I’d ever seen personally in my life, but we get there and it was like an older guy. The property had been in the family for a while, but it was just kind of like their getaway house for the weekend, but it was in very, very poor condition.
There was no running water anywhere on the property. There wasn’t even a septic tank. There was lines that came out from the property, but they just went out into the dirt. There was no septic tank, just like a very, very rough property, but he just wanted to get rid of it. And he would actually go out there and he would just park his camper van on the lot and he would just go inside the house for whatever reason, but he was mostly sleeping inside of his camper, but just using the lot that was there. But he was ready to give it up. He wanted some cash. So we go out there, we walked the property and man, I was trying to look it up to see if I could find the numbers, but because it was so early in my investing career, my organization wasn’t all that great, but we ended up talking this guy down and I want to say that we had it under contract for maybe 120, somewhere in that ballpark, but because it was such a heavy renovation, we didn’t want to do it ourselves so we knew we had to wholesale.
So once we got the property under contract, that’s when we kind of pivoted to say, “Okay, what can we actually do to disposition this property?”

Ashley Kehr:
So with this property, did you disclose that you were going to wholesale it? Let’s break down, I guess, the steps if somebody else finds a property like this where they don’t want to take on the rehab but they want to wholesale it. How do you work that out with the seller and how did you work it in this situation?

Tony Robinson:
Yeah, we told them, we were honest like, “Hey, we’re investors. We might rehab this ourself or we might bring it to a different partner of ours who will end up doing the rehab for us.” So we kind of framed it that way just to give us some flexibility because we really weren’t sure what we were going to do because it was my first time doing this. I’m like learn it as we’re going. But when the person called and he was like, maybe it might’ve been like in the 60s, but when he called the first things we tried to figure out was what you alluded to earlier, Ash, just like, “Hey, what are their motivations?” And I specifically remember when we started trying to go off market, when I watched Brent Daniels and he’s like talk to people, TP on YouTube. So if you look up TTP and he had these four motivations, he’s like, “If you ask these questions, that’s a really good starting point for any off market transaction.” But it was the condition of the property, gosh, I can’t even remember what all four of them are now, the four pillars.
It was like condition, motivation, price and timing, I think were the four things. He was like, “Try and get all four of those things when you have that conversation.” That’s what I did. I just tried to get all that information from him and that’s how we understood what his motivation was, but that’s how we structured that conversation. We tried to get all four of those things and then we told him, “Hey, it might be us, it might be one of our partners, but we’ll need a little bit of access between now and closing to make sure we can get inspections and things like that done.” So that was the approach that we took.

Ashley Kehr:
Now, how did you end up finding a buyer for this deal? Did you have a list of investors lined up or how did you go and solicit someone?

Tony Robinson:
Absolutely not. We did not have a big network at that time. I mean, gosh, I think this was maybe four months into me even being the host of this podcast. My network isn’t what it is. You weren’t popular. I wasn’t really known at that point. Luckily, I actually did have a few friends who were just local who were in real estate and I just kind of reached out to some of them. I said, “Hey, look, I found this deal any chance you would be interested.” I reached out to other investors who I saw had flipped other properties in that market. There was a property I’d actually walked a few months before that was renovated beautifully and I just found out who that owner was and I reached out to him and he sent some folks out. So just trying to hustle to find anyone that I could.
Knowing what I know now, instead of trying to go find my own in buyer, I probably would’ve first went to other wholesalers in those markets because they’ve got an infinitely larger reach than me trying to reach out to individual investors. And even if I’m potentially giving up a good percentage of that deal, the fact that I would have a much wider net, maybe the overall assignment fee would’ve been larger. But anyway, that’s what I did. And I had a friend who was also in real estate and she was actually flipping.That was her full-time thing. Er and her husband were flipping properties. I presented the sal to them and they had the resources, the experience, had done a lot of these heavy renovations already and for them they walked, they’re like, “Yeah, this is exactly what we want. ” Whereas me, I was like, “Oh my God, this is way too much.” So we ended up assigning that deal to them.

Ashley Kehr:
And when you say assign that deal for them, what does that mean?

Tony Robinson:
Yeah. So in the world of real estate wholesaling, the way that wholesaling works, guys, is that basically you as the wholesaler are doing all of the work to find motivated sellers who have properties that are below market value.That is the entire purpose of a wholesaler is to do those two things. Once you find someone who’s willing to sell, you are basically getting the contract rights to their property and then you have the ability to either close in that property yourself using that contract you have in place, or you can assign that contract to someone else. And the way that wholesalers make money is that they charge an assignment fee to the end buyer for giving them the rights to purchase that property. So that’s what we say when we mean assignment is you’re just taking the contract that you signed with the seller and you’re reassigning it to someone else and they’re paying you for the ability to buy that contract from you.

Ashley Kehr:
Now what ended up with this deal? What did you end up making off of it and did you ever keep in touch with the deal and kind of follow it along? Did they sell it or what did they end up doing with it?

Tony Robinson:
Yeah. So I found one of my settlement statements and it looks like it was my … Because I think I ended up doing a double closing. When you close on a wholesale transaction, sometimes you can just do one transaction, but because I was so early, I didn’t really understand that. And the escrow company and title company I was working with, they didn’t really understand wholesaling. So I actually did two separate transactions where I closed on the property and then immediately afterwards I had to do a second closing.

Ashley Kehr:
So you closed to buy it and then you immediately closed to sell it afterwards.

Tony Robinson:
Exactly. Yeah. So it was like, I don’t know, five minutes within each other, those two transactions happened. But actually, I think it was 48 hours because they had to actually let it close or something. But regardless, I actually found the settlement statement when we sold. So we actually bought it for, because I remember the assignment fee was 30 grand. So I believe we bought it for 30,000 and then we assigned it for 120. So we had a 30K spread on that deal. And I actually saw the finished product because again, they were friends of mine. So they posted about this property and they did. I was blown away. I was like, “This is the property that I gave you, you did all that with this. ” So it was a beautiful property. I actually don’t know if they still have it. I believe they were turned into a short term run, so I don’t know if they kept it or if they sold it, but I saw the finished product and I was like blown.
My mind was blown that it was the same deal.

Ashley Kehr:
Well, Tony, thank you for sharing your off market deal. We have to take a quick break, but we’re going to put each other on the spot. One off market strategy neither of us have run yet, but we want to test it out in 2026, so stick around. Okay, welcome back. We just spent the last half hour breaking down what’s already worked for us to get off market deals, but now I want to know what we are going to bet on next. So Tony, let’s start with you. For 2026, what is one way you are going to find an off market deal?

Tony Robinson:
There are a couple of things that I think I really want to experiment with and Ashley and I were talking before this episode about the flip that I have that’s just been kind of like kicking my butt. As we think about maybe doing more, one of the things that I, because I did buy that on market. So for me, it’s like, man, I got to go back to off market and what does that look like? I’ve actually built up a lot of experience over the last, I don’t know, maybe three or four years running paid advertising. So if you guys follow me, you’ve probably seen ads of mine for the free things that I give away and there’s a certain skillset behind that. And while I’ve applied it in our brand building business, I haven’t necessarily applied it a lot in our real estate business.
So for me, just running local Meta ads on Facebook and Instagram and targeting folks who might be willing and able or in a position where they want to get rid of some of their properties and leveraging everything I’ve learned there to see like, “Hey, how well does this supply for maybe people that want to sell their homes?” I think the tricky part though with paid ads is that it’s very, very easy to spend a lot of money and get very little result back. So just having a very, I think, solid process for testing that is going to be important because I mean, gosh, I don’t know the numbers off the top of my head, but I’d assume that to get a good solid lead that’s probably interested in selling their home, like a truly qualified potential seller, it’s probably got to be a couple hundred bucks at least.
So if you think about that, just to get a good quality lead in front of you, you got to spend a couple hundred bucks and then how many of those really qualified leads do you need before you can actually get enough conversations to close on a deal? I mean, I don’t know, I’d assume it’s a few thousand bucks to actually get a closed transaction. So that is one of the strategies I’m really excited about that I want to test, but it’s just making sure I have the right funnel, the systems, the people in place to actually absorb all of these leads as are coming in.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. So I guess mine’s not as far as marketing or outreach, I guess, idea I have. But one way that I would like to make a list of people that I want to actually go after, and I guess I haven’t thought of how yet, but I think direct to mail, I’d stick to that. But I would like to go after people who have an assumable loan. So looking at people who have FHA, VA, there’s a property I was looking at now and the people bought it in 2021, I think. So they probably have a pretty good interest rate on it and it’s actually listed for sale on the MLS, but I went into PropStream and it gives you kind of like an estimate of what they can pull off county records and stuff as far as what their mortgage balance was when they bought it.
So how much they financed for, what the term was, how many payments. So usually 360 payments spread out over 30 years and then what the interest rate is. And then it gives you an estimate as in if they paid the payments exactly what they’re supposed to be and every payment they needed to, this is estimated what the loan balance would be. So going through and kind of like looking at would it be an option? So I have to do more research to find out other types of loans that may be assumable. I know USDA loan is assumable, but it has to be a primary residence, but we’re coming up, we got one more year left on my live and flip. So if I’m going to sell it, I could turn it into a rental now. I’ve hit the one year mark, but if I want to sell it for the tax-free gains, I need to hit the two-year mark.
So I think going after assumable loans, pulling a list, there’s also a couple websites too that actually have that data for you. And I know we talked about it one, it’s with rome.com. Yeah, withrome.com is one of them and it doesn’t have listings in all states, but you can go on there and it’ll actually tell you which properties have an assumable loan that would qualify. So I guess I should break down real quick what an assumable loan is. It’s basically someone has a loan on their property and in the mortgage agreement it states that someone else can take over that loan with the same terms, but they have to be approved. So if Tony wants to buy my property and he wants to take over my existing loan, so all the terms would stay the same, the payment, the interest, the number of payments left, the balance, that would stay the same.
He has to be vetted by the bank and approved by the bank, which I have heard from some people that have done this, that it does take some time and there’s a longer process to get done, but you have to be approved and then any extra, so say I’m buying the property for 200,000, they currently have a loan balance of 125,000, that means I have to come up with 75,000 to pay that difference for them to pay that to buy the house. So obviously that depends on how much is equity, what you’re buying it for. I’ve seen on this website houses that basically they’re trying to sell for what they owe on it and you’d probably have to pay like $2,000 on it. So it could be a good way to have a low down payment on a property, but you also don’t want to get into a property where you’re going to be underwater and over it leveraged on.
So that’s an assumable loan. I was talking to someone about this the other day and they seem to be confused about this and subject to thinking that it was the same thing, but it’s completely different. Subject two, you’re taking over the deed of the property. So in both circumstances, you are becoming owner of the property. In subject two, you are just taking over the loan payments where the loan still stays in the seller’s name where an assumable the seller’s name is being taken off of the current mortgage and you are being put on. So those are the two big differences. So to break it down shortly in layman’s terms, sumable, you have the bank’s permission subject to you do not.

Tony Robinson:
Yeah. And it feels like assumable is almost easier. But even Ashley, we interviewed Alex Reeves and she assumed a VA loan, which was like mind blowing to me. I didn’t even know that not being a VA that you could do that, but she found, because you talked about the gap between what you’re buying it for and what the current loan balance is and if there’s a gap there where you’ve got to figure out how to bridge that gap and she actually found another lender who was willing to give her a second lien position to cover that gap for her. So she basically had no significant cash out of pocket to take this deal down. So what a creative solution You’re assuming a really low interest mortgage from a seller, you’re bringing in a second. So your blended rate obviously becomes a litle bit higher, but the majority of your mortgage is on this lower 3% interest rate.
And then maybe you’ve got 100 grand or so that’s at whatever today’s rates are at 6%. So your blended rate is still relatively low compared to what folks are getting today. So man, I actually do love the assumable loan approach as well.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah. So I guess my advice or idea isn’t exactly how to target or solicit off market deals, but more of what kind of off market deals I would go after. Well, thank you guys so much for listening to Real Estate. Rookie, I’m Ashley. He’s Tony, and we’ll see you guys on the next episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Luigi Mangione seeks ‘extreme emotional disturbance’ defense in CEO killing case




Luigi Mangione seeks ‘extreme emotional disturbance’ defense in CEO killing case

Waterdrop (WDH) Q1 2026 Earnings Transcript


Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Tuesday, June 16, 2026 at 8 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • Chief Executive Officer — Peng Shen
  • Insurance Business Head — Wei Ran
  • Healthcare and Crowdfunding Business Head — Xu Xiaoying

TAKEAWAYS

  • Total Revenue — ¥1.24 billion, up 64.8% year over year, with insurance-related income contributing ¥1.15 billion at 74.1% year-over-year growth.
  • Net Profit Attributable to Ordinary Shareholders — ¥98.4 million, down 9.1% year over year, reflecting a divergent trend from operating profit.
  • Operating Profit — ¥79.95 million, representing a 5.3% year-over-year increase.
  • Insurance Business Operating Margin — 13.3% for the period, with a 2 percentage point sequential improvement due to proactive channel optimization.
  • Sales and Marketing Expenses — ¥541 million, significantly higher than ¥172 million in the prior year period, attributed to escalated marketing and traffic investment.
  • Cash and Equivalents — Approximately ¥2.88 billion as of March 31, 2026, providing ample liquidity.
  • Capital Return — Cumulative share repurchases and dividends since IPO totaled approximately $170 million as of May 2026; the fifth cash dividend of $10.8 million was completed in early May.
  • AI and Digital Transformation — Filed 75 LLM-related patent applications, including 9 international, and began applying new AI technologies to insurance operations such as intelligent customer service and claims.
  • User Growth — The insurance segment drove total revenue growth via public domain user targeting and AI-driven channel efficiency.
  • Product Development — Disability insurance products delivered ¥89 million FIP, while pre-existing condition product FIP grew 24.3% year over year.
  • AI User-Facing Applications — Contributed an incremental 17.7% in premiums sequentially from Q4 2025, with over one million service interactions per month now handled by AI agents.
  • Healthcare and Medical Crowdfunding — The Waterdrop Medical Profiling Platform reported 3.75 million cumulative patients aided and a total of ¥73.5 billion in cumulative donations by March 2026.
  • Clinical Trial Platform — 15,500 cumulative patient enrollments and 53% year-over-year growth in newly signed projects in Q1.
  • Operating Costs and Expense Growth — Total operating costs and expenses were ¥1.16 billion, up 71.5% year over year, with operating costs up 30.1% and notable increases in referral, message service, and personnel costs.
  • 2026 Outlook — Management targets approximately 40% top-line growth for 2026, with operating profit scale expected to remain broadly stable as marketing investment rises.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]

RISKS

  • Xu Xiaoying stated, “the net profit attributable to all investor shareholders was approximately 98.4 million, down 9.1% year over year,” signaling that rising expenditures have outpaced profit growth despite revenue expansion.
  • Sales and marketing expenses increased by RMB 369 million year over year, which “Mainly because we progressively scale up traffic investment over the past year and reinforced workforce momentum.”

SUMMARY

Waterdrop (WDH +2.34%) delivered rapid top-line growth, driven primarily by insurance-related income and strategic AI deployment. New data indicates record cumulative platform engagement and a sharp increase in marketing and operating expenses. Management’s guidance for 2026 emphasizes aggressive marketing to support continued expansion, with profitability forecasted to remain steady despite rising costs.

  • Peng Shen said, “For 2026, we are targeting approximately 40% top-line growth with operating profit scale is expected to remain broadly stable,” highlighting a priority on volume over immediate earnings growth.
  • Capital returns remain a consistent corporate strategy, as evidenced by ongoing share repurchases and the fifth consecutive dividend since IPO.
  • AI-native initiatives contributed tangible efficiency gains, with automation now managing over one million user interactions monthly and supporting internal productivity accelerations.
  • Healthcare and clinical trial verticals show expanding reach, reflected in key partnerships, patent grants, and material growth in newly signed projects.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • FIP: First year insurance premium; a core metric in insurance distribution reflecting premium income from newly written policies.
  • LLM: Large Language Model; advanced AI model type used for natural language processing and automation tasks.
  • CRO: Contract Research Organization; firms that provide outsourced research services for the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries.
  • Shuidi Hulian: A branded insurance product line or platform focused on cancer-specific insurance solutions within Waterdrop’s portfolio.
  • WeCom: Tencent’s corporate communication and office collaboration platform, used by Waterdrop for customer and consultant interactions.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Peng Shen: Dear investors and analysts, thank you for joining Waterdrop’s first quarter 206 earnings conference call. In the first quarter, we continued our last year’s growth momentum with total revenue of 1.24 billion yuan at 64.8% year-on-year, and net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of more than 98 million yuan. Since the first quarter of 2022, we have maintained a gap-proof visibility for 17 consecutive quarters. By second, our insurance business continues its user acquisition strategy with insurance-related income at 74.1% year-over-year. As these capabilities have been validated, we sharpened our focus on user experience while continuing to optimize our traffic channels and user-targeting efficiency.

The Khorfani distance remains stable, having raised the medical cost for a cumulative 3.75 million patients by the end of the Q1. And our digital clinical trial solution business is the standard enrollment growth, with more than 15,500 patients enrolled to date. On the technology front, we are accelerating our shift toward an AI-native company. As of March 31, 2006, we had filed 75 LLM-related patent applications, including nine international ones and were recently granted two more national invention patents in intelligence, semantic understanding, and the multimodal recognition. These technologies will be progressively applied to the insurance scenario, such as intelligent customer service and claims, improving service quality and efficiency.

On capital returns, we continue to share our growth with our shareholders. In early May, we completed our fifth cash dividend since our IPO, totaling approximately $10.8 million. Our share repurchase program also continued steadily. By the end of May 2006, we had repurchased approximately $61.8 million ADF in open market for about $120 million. As of the end of May 2006, cumulated cash dividends and share repurchases since ICO had totaled approximately $170 million. Meanwhile, we remain committed to giving back to society. At the end of the Q1, the Waterdrop Charity platform had partnered with 119 public charitable organizations and launched over 15,500 charity programs.

Looking ahead, we aim to seize industry opportunities and make growth our top priority this year. Building on our proven user-targeting capabilities, we will increase marketing investment further. For 2026, we are targeting approximately 40% top-line growth with operating profit scale is expected to remain broadly stable. We expect this current investment to allow greater profit potential in the coming years, and the user-based extension will further support the company’s long-term development. And that covers our overall performance in Q1. Next, I will walk through each of those business segments in detail.

Wei Ran: Hello everyone, this is Wei Ran. Let me walk you through the progress of the insurance business. In the first quarter, insurance-related income reached $1.15 billion at 74.1% year-over-year, with operating profit of $115 million. The operating margin of Q1 is 13.3%. The year-over-year top-line growth mainly reflects a continuation of our last year user acquisition strategy. In the first quarter, we continue to step up public domain user targeting and increase our investment in traffic and AI, driving significant premium growth. On a quarter-over-quarter basis, while the income declined, our insurance operating margin rose by 2 percentage points. This was mainly because we proactively cut some lower ROI channels during this quarter.

At the same time, we are actively expanding into other high-quality traffic channels while running our mature ones with refined operations, enhancing our traffic infrastructure, and optimizing our model to drive continued improvement in ROI. On the supply side, we are committed to giving users more diverse product offerings, which continue to earn user recognition. During this quarter, FIP from our pre-existing condition products about 24.3% year-over-year, and the disability insurance products contribute $89 million in FIP. At the product level, we continue to iterate. For example, we upgraded our inclusive cancer worry-free medical insurance service, extending the coverage for out-of-the-hospital prescriptions and related medical devices, as well as the as well as a range of advanced cancer therapies.

We also recently launched the Shuidi Hulian focused cancer-specified GV products with a singular health discloser and a lower the bar to lifelong cancer protection. And on the service side, we took multiple steps to improve the customer experience. We launched a dedicated customer complaint hotline make it easier for users to raise concerns and we also connect the payment channels with our customer service system, expanding frontline operations and enable faster refund processing. And for elderly customers, we simplified procedures for the children acting on their behalf and introduced a faster track service channel. Together, this initiative upgraded our access balance service capability.

We also continued to apply our LLM capabilities and AI tools to streamline the workflow and improve operating efficiency. The user-facing AI applications contributed approximately 87 them in incremental premiums in Q1 at 17.7% sequentially. Through real-time support on our mini-programs, WeChat, phone calls, and WECOM, including our AI Pro insurance and AI medical insurance experts, WECOM AI, and other tools. For our frontline consultants, Kui Yi Zuo AI had handled more than 10,000 underwriting inquiries to date. In late March, we began internal beta testing of the cloud copilot on CRM and WECOM, bringing together our product knowledge base, the Creedo AI, and the other two agent tools.

So our consultants can get instant answers on products, underwriting, and other common questions with lots of switching between the systems and documents. Cloud Copilot also supports the self, the easy review, top track replay and refinement, and performance analysis. And after self-service, our AI user service agent now in regular operation supports more than 1 million service interactions per month. And the AI service quality Copilot continue to deliver efficiency of more than twice in a manual-only basis through this baseline. On the AI infrastructure side, our low-cost platform, Waterdrop Digital AI, now offers more than 30 purpose-fueled agents, each tailored to a specific scenario for our internal team and external clients in all the user-facing work.

So, that concludes our insurance business update for the first quarter.

Xu Xiaoying: Thank you, Yuan. This is Xu Xiaoying. And now, next, I will walk you through our first quarter performance on our card bonding and the healthcare business. As of the end of March 2016, approximately 494 million people had cumulatively donated a total of $73.5 billion to 3.75 million patients through the Waterdrop Medical Profiling Platform. This quarter, we pursued two priorities for Waterdrop Medical Profiling. The AI capability viewing and better service in linguistic diverse regions. For AI review, we complete an quarterly upgrade involving towards an AI-assisted model without compromising risk control quality.

Our RISC model can structure the content materially quickly and applies the preset rules for preliminary screening, short-term intake and the first-class review and treat our RISC specialists for complex cases. Secondly, we improve the service for patients in linguistically diverse communities, including areas where a minority language widely spoken and this quarter we systematically refined our service workflows and adapted the review standard to their real needs. We added a minority language specialist to work alongside our existing campaign consultants on upfront consultation and the document guidance and the dispute resolution and reducing the communication cost that caused by language barriers.

In addition we set up a dedicated service team in which the translator and the risk control specialist can track each case end-to-end and promptly resolve the bottlenecks, ensuring a strict risk control compliance while respecting local culture sensitivity. Turning to our healthcare business, we sustain a high quality growth this quarter, broaden LLN application across the core business scenarios. We partnered with 243 pharmaceutical companies and CROs and initiated services for 128 new programs. Our e-fund platform’s single-quarter patron enrollment rose 16% year-over-year, and the newly-signed project in this quarter increased 53%, reflecting the wider partnership coverage and the deeper client engagement.

As of the end of the first quarter of 2006, the platform had cumulatively enrolled over 15,500 patients. In January 2006, our intelligent drug patient matching technology secured a national invention patent, which is the first of this kind in China. This quarter, we focused on building up our upstream data structuring capability and connecting it with the matching in game. Across part of our service workflow, the platform has now established a standardized pipeline from the data structuring to intelligent product matching, promptly generating suitability recommendation against the trial protocol.

Supported by these AI capabilities, we continue to build our case library, medical case library, and complex indications in rare cancers with a more balanced mix across therapeutic areas, strengthening the foundation for sustainable mid-term to long-term growth. And that covers our core funding and the healthcare businesses. I will now get through our financial headlines for the first quarter of 2016. Before I go into details, please be reminded that all numbers quoted here will be in Renminbi, and please refer to our earnings relist to pull detailed information on our financial performance on both year-over-year and quarter-by-quarter basis, respectively. In the first quarter of 2006, Waterdrop’s total revenue reached $1.24 billion, up 64.8% year-over-year, sustaining rapid growth.

In fact, second, the insurance related income contributed approximately 1.15 billion at 74.1% year-over-year, while the non-insurance business together accounted for about 7.8% of total revenue, with corresponding services of approximately 60.73 million, and digital clinical trial solution income of approximately 24.2 million. And the cost, our total operating cost and expenses for this first quarter were approximately 1.16 billion at about 71.5% year-over-year. Operating costs for this quarter reached 487 million at 30.1% year-over-year driven by our business extension. Cost of referral and services increased by about $53.9 million, while short-message service costs and the personal costs arose by $38.9 million and $17.3 million, respectively.

Sales and marketing expenses reached $541 million, a significant increase from $172 million in the same period last year. Mainly because we progressively scale up traffic investment over the past year and reinforced workforce momentum. Marketing expenses for third-quarter traffic channels rose by approximately $361 million year-over-year. General and administrative expenses were $71.7 million, down 4.3% year-over-year mainly due to the lower professional services this quarter. and development expenses were about 62.7 million, an 11.5% year-over-year increase, currently due to an approximately 6.7 million right in cloud and the technology and the technical services. For the third quarter, operating profit was around 79.95 million, a modest year-over-year increase of 5.3%.

However, affected by the net operating action in this quarter, the net profit attributable to all investor shareholders was approximately 98.4 million, down 9.1% year-over-year. As of the end of March 2026, the company maintained an anvil cash reserve with cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and other cash positions totaled about approximately $2.88 billion.

And on the capital return since our IPO through May 1st, 2026, we accumulated a repurchase total of approximately $61.8 million for about 120 million U.S. dollars and it recently completed a tax dividend over approximately $10.8 million.Overall, the growth momentum of our core business agreement is strong and in the first quarter, Waterdrop delivered 64.8% year-over-year revenue growth and by stepping up the investment in traffic and AI, continues to strengthen our long-term competitiveness.

Operator: And ladies and gentlemen, with that, we will conclude today’s conference call. We do thank you for joining. Have a good time.

UK Entrepreneurs Continue To Face Significant Financial Management Challenges, Report Reveals


A new Xero study highlights a significant gap in the United Kingdom’s approach to nurturing its next wave of business founders. While many young people dream of launching their own ventures, insufficient financial knowledge and resources are holding them back, creating a sense of exclusion from entrepreneurial opportunities.

Conducted by Xero, the global small business platform, the research surveyed 1,000 students aged 16 to 21 in full-time education during mid-May 2026.

The results paint a picture of high enthusiasm tempered by practical obstacles. Nearly three-quarters (72%) expressed interest in entrepreneurship, yet more than half (51%) cited insufficient funding as a primary barrier.

Close behind were low self-assurance (49%) and inadequate financial expertise (37%).

As a result, 61% of respondents viewed starting a business as something accessible only to individuals with existing wealth or influential networks.

Financial independence ranks as the top attraction for 61% of these students.

However, broader economic uncertainties overshadow this drive.

Two-thirds (67%) consider launching a company too hazardous amid today’s conditions, while one-third (33%) express personal financial worries.

This comes at a time when youth unemployment has climbed to 16.2%—its highest level in more than a decade—prompting only 20% of young adults to pursue conventional employment routes.

Many see self-employment as a necessary alternative, but they lack the tools to pursue it confidently.

The survey underscores that deficiencies in financial literacy pose a bigger challenge than gaps in general business abilities.

Thirty-seven percent flagged a shortage of money management skills—such as handling cash flow and taxes—compared to just 23% who mentioned weaknesses in areas like sales or marketing. This foundational shortfall leaves many feeling unprepared to turn ideas into viable operations.

Young people have clear ideas about the kind of assistance that could bridge these gaps.

More than a quarter (26%) called for stronger financial education within school curricula.

Others emphasized the value of hands-on business experiences (34%) and training with modern digital platforms (27%).

In the meantime, many are seeking informal guidance: 42% consult parents or relatives, 28% look to social media channels such as TikTok, and 23% rely on artificial intelligence tools for advice.

Kate Hayward, UK Managing Director at Xero, voiced concern over the situation. She noted that society is failing to equip ambitious young individuals with essential business finance capabilities, despite their eagerness to create independent opportunities.

Hayward stressed the need for systemic changes, praising initiatives like The Maple Review—an independent, government-supported effort by Small Business Britain.

The review advocates a “Business Skills Guarantee” to provide every student with practical entrepreneurial training, role models, and pathways before they finish education.

Kate Perry, who founded Chase Canines at age 21, shared her experiences.

She described the steep learning curve of managing multiple responsibilities, noting that basic school budgeting lessons fell short when it came to handling taxes and other real-world demands.

Greater early exposure to financial management, she believes, would make entrepreneurship seem far more attainable and boost starting confidence.

As the UK grapples with economic pressures, addressing these educational shortcomings could unlock significant potential. Without targeted support, a generation brimming with drive risks remaining sidelined, limiting innovation and growth. Industry professionals now urge policymakers and educators to prioritize financial and business skills training to better enable UK based entrepreneurs.



Is PenguPace Legit? My Honest Review


PenguPace is a “walk-to-earn” mobile app created by Scrambly.

It tracks your daily steps and rewards you with points that can be redeemed for gift cards and other rewards. The app also includes game offers and other ways to make money online.

How it works

PenguPace is pretty simple:

  1. Download the app and create an account.
  2. Allow step tracking (through your phone’s fitness tracker).
  3. Walk as usual – to school, work, the store, or while exercising.
  4. Convert your steps into points inside the app. The more steps you take, the more points you earn.
  5. Complete bonus activities if you want higher earnings. These include mobile game offers, app downloads, financial offers, and referral bonuses. These typically pay much more than walking alone.
  6. Redeem points for rewards such as PayPal cash, gift cards, prepaid Visa cards, or bank transfers. Cash-outs start at around $1.

A realistic expectation is that the walking part earns only a small amount. Most users who earn meaningful rewards do so from the offers and games, while the step rewards are more of a bonus for being active.

If you’re considering it as a side hustle, I’d view it as a “get paid a little for steps” app rather than a serious income source.

How Much Can You Make

If you’re looking at just the walking rewards, the earning potential is quite low.

A realistic estimate based on user reports is:

  • 5,000–10,000 steps per day: a few cents per day
  • 10,000–15,000+ steps per day: perhaps $1–$3 per month from walking alone
  • Very active users: maybe a few dollars per month if they consistently hit higher step milestones and maintain streaks.

Where PenguPace becomes more interesting is its GPT (get-paid-to) offers:

  • Mobile games can pay anywhere from a few dollars to $50+ depending on the offer.
  • Banking, fintech, and shopping offers can pay even more.
  • Some users report earning $10+ within their first week, but most of that comes from offers rather than steps.

For comparison:

Activity Typical Earnings
Walking only $1–$5/month
Casual offers + walking $10–$50/month
Aggressive offer completion $50–$200+/month

The biggest advantage is the $1 minimum cashout, so you don’t have to wait months to redeem rewards.

For someone already using apps like Swagbucks, Freecash, or KashKick, I’d view PenguPace as a bonus app for steps with additional GPT offers, not as a standalone income source. The steps are the icing on the cake; the offers are where most of the money comes from.

Privacy Concerns With PenguPace

Like most walk-to-earn and GPT (get-paid-to) apps, PenguPace collects user data in exchange for providing rewards. According to its Google Play data safety disclosures, the app may collect:

  • Location data
  • Personal information
  • Device identifiers
  • Activity-related data (such as steps and app usage)

It also states that some data may be shared with third parties and that device identifiers may be shared with advertising partners. Data is encrypted in transit, and users can request deletion of their data.

What does this mean in practice?

The biggest privacy concern isn’t usually your step count—it’s the combination of:

  • Location data
  • Advertising IDs
  • Device information

These can be used by advertising networks to build a profile of your interests and behavior. Advertising IDs are designed to track users across multiple apps and services.

How to reduce privacy risks

If you decide to use PenguPace:

  • Only grant permissions that are necessary.
  • Set location access to “While using the app” if possible.
  • Periodically reset your phone’s advertising ID.
  • Review the app’s permissions every few months.
  • Request data deletion if you stop using the app.

My take

For a typical user, PenguPace doesn’t appear unusually invasive compared with many other free rewards apps. The tradeoff is the same as with apps like Swagbucks, Freecash, and similar GPT platforms: you’re exchanging some personal data and attention for rewards.

If you’re comfortable with that tradeoff, it’s probably fine. If you’re highly privacy-conscious, you’ll likely want to limit permissions or skip these types of apps altogether.

Is PenguPace Legit?

Yes, PenguPace is legitimate, meaning it is a real app that pays users and is not an obvious scam.

It was created by the team behind Scrambly, has hundreds of thousands of downloads, and many users report successfully cashing out rewards. The app offers payouts starting at just $1 through gift cards, PayPal, and other reward options.

That said, “legit” doesn’t necessarily mean “worth it.”

What I Like

  • Low $1 cashout threshold.
  • Walking rewards are passive once the app is set up.
  • Multiple ways to earn, including games and offers.
  • Some reviewers have shown payment proof and successful withdrawals.

Common Complaints

  • Walking rewards alone are very small.
  • Some users report step-tracking issues and syncing problems.
  • Several users say the app pushes game offers and other tasks if you want meaningful earnings.
  • A few users have reported technical problems redeeming rewards.

Verdict

If your question is “Will PenguPace actually pay me?”, the answer is yes.

If your question is “Can I make decent money just by walking?”, the answer is no. Most users will earn only a few cents per day from steps. The bigger rewards come from completing offers, playing games, or trying partner services.

I’d classify it as a legitimate “beer money” app—good for a few extra dollars here and there, but not a serious side hustle.

The music industry is closing in on a billion global subscribers – with Spotify out in front


The number of music streaming subscribers globally reached 921.6 million at the end of 2025, nearing the 1 billion mark.

That is according to Midia Research, whose latest Music Subscriber Market Shares report estimates that the global subscriber count grew 10.1% YoY in 2025.

Spotify remained the largest music subscription service worldwide, holding a 31.4% share of global subscribers, according to Midia.

The 921.6 million total was up from 837.3 million a year earlier, and has nearly doubled from the 472.2 million that Midia counted at the end of 2020.

The 1 billion milestone is “now firmly in sight,” Midia said in a blog post published Monday (June 15), even as subscriber growth slowed from a year earlier.

Spotify‘s own figures put its global Premium Subscriber base at 290 million paying users at the end of 2025, up 10% year-over-year.

The company added 27 million net paying subscribers across 2025, having finished 2024 on 263 million.

Spotify‘s subscriber base has since grown to 293 million in Q1 2026.

YouTube Music was the fastest-growing global music service in percentage terms for the second year running, Midia said, ending 2025 with net additions only narrowly behind Spotify’s.

Midia put YouTube Music‘s share of global subscribers at 12.4% in 2025, up from 7.9% at the end of 2020.

“The big success story of 2025 is YouTube Music, which based on current trends is on track to overtake Apple Music and Tencent in global subscribers in 2026.”

Perry Gresham, Midia 

“The big success story of 2025 is YouTube Music, which based on current trends is on track to overtake Apple Music and Tencent in global subscribers in 2026,” said Perry Gresham, Head of Data at Midia Research.

Asia Pacific and Latin America have been vital to YouTube‘s growth.

“Market leader Spotify had the highest net subscriber additions of any DSP, strong in Latin America but also maintaining growth in Europe, contributing 85% of net additional European subscribers in 2025.”

YouTube Music overtook Spotify to become the No.1 music service in MENA, Midia said, while Spotify held its lead in the Americas and Europe.

YouTube Music is “picking up the pace” in the markets Midia sees as driving most future subscription growth, the firm said.

Tencent Music Entertainment was the second-largest service globally with a 13.8% share, ahead of Apple Music on 12.6%, according to Midia.



Apple Music‘s share has fallen from 18.4% at the end of 2020, when it ranked second behind Spotify.

Amazon Music followed in fifth place with an 8.5% share, according to Midia.

Apple Music, Amazon Music and Tencent Music all lost global share over the year, according to Midia.

Midia’s count includes standalone YouTube Music subscriptions and YouTube Premium subscribers who access the music platform, a narrower measure than YouTube‘s own headline numbers.

YouTube last reported 125 million YouTube Music and Premium subscribers globally, including trials, in March 2025.

For the fifth straight year, Latin America, Asia Pacific and the Rest of World together accounted for more than 70% of global subscriber growth, Midia said.

Latin America reached a record peak for net additions, while growth in Asia Pacific is slowing, according to the research firm.

Subscriber growth continued to outpace major-label streaming revenue, which rose 8.3%, though Midia said the gap between the two narrowed in 2025.

Tencent Music Entertainment grew its annual revenue 15.8% despite a fall in net subscriber additions, Midia added.

When TME reported its full-year 2025 results in March, it revealed that its Super VIP tier had surpassed 20 million subscribers, up from 15 million at the end of Q2 2025 and 10 million in Q3 2024.

At that time, the company reported total paying music subscribers of 127.4 million as of Q4 2025.Music Business Worldwide

Managing Money Wrong in Two Different Ways—Same Result #shorts #finance #truth



Watch as this discussion explores the complexities of personal finance, highlighting why understanding budgeting is crucial. This video emphasizes the significant impact of money management and how it can influence debt, offering insights into how to manage money. It’s a compelling look at financial literacy. 💪

source

May home sales down 5.1% from year earlier, but CREA says momentum building




The Canadian Real Estate Association says home sales in May were down compared with a year ago, but there was “meaningful upward momentum” month-over-month for the first time this year.