Home Blog

A Dallas Restaurant Defended Its $70 Entrée. Experts Say That Was Its Second Mistake



As diners are increasingly selective about where they spend their dollars, industry experts say restaurant owners should embrace a different approach.

Prediction: $1,000 Invested in SpaceX Will Be Worth This Much by 2030


Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX -4.21%) is a popular stock that went public earlier this year. Better known as SpaceX, it’s one of Elon Musk’s companies, and it has a few business lines. It has seen success in all of them, and is growing rapidly in many. This could make it a substantially larger company by 2030, but just how big could it get?

Let’s take a look at what a $1,000 investment in SpaceX could become, as it may be a no-brainer buy at these prices.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

SpaceX has a lot of growing to do

SpaceX is divided into three segments: space, artificial intelligence (AI), and connectivity. While the space division may be what it’s best known for, it’s actually the smallest business unit by a wide margin in terms of revenue. Furthermore, it’s growing the slowest, too. While the company’s ultimate goal is to be the premier space-economy investment, SpaceX sees huge opportunities in other industries and is focusing its growth on those right now.

Its connectivity division is space-adjacent. Its primary business is Starlink, a satellite-based broadband internet service that gives users connectivity in most places on Earth. This is game-changing for many people in remote or underserved locations, and the service’s user base has expanded quickly. It’s also SpaceX’s only profitable division. I’m confident this business unit will continue to see rapid growth between now and 2030, but at some point in time, it will have attracted a majority of the potential market for its service, at which point growth will start to slow down significantly. I’m not sure if that will happen by 2030, but it will eventually.

Space Exploration Technologies Stock Quote

Space Exploration Technologies

Today’s Change

(-4.21%) $-6.88

Current Price

$156.54

Perhaps the most exciting business segment is SpaceXAI, which was previously another Musk-owned company, xAI, that he had SpaceX acquire a few months before it went public. The AI division of the company develops Grok, a popular large language model commonly deployed for use cases requiring up-to-date information. This is SpaceX’s fastest-growing segment, growing at a 213% pace in Q2. I think this is where the majority of SpaceX’s revenue growth will come from over the next few years, and while it’s currently unprofitable, I think it will eventually provide the cash flow necessary to fund SpaceX’s space endeavors.

But where does all that leave a $1,000 investment made today by 2030?

Modeling SpaceX’s growth isn’t easy

SpaceX has only been a public company since June, so modeling its growth is not an easy task. Furthermore, it’s impossible to know how xAI will perform over the next few years, as it already faces stiff competition from other AI labs. So, let’s start with the immediate future.

For 2027, Wall Street analysts estimate that SpaceX’s revenue will grow by 155% to $115 billion. If the stock didn’t move at all from today’s level, that would price it at 18 times sales. For reference, Nvidia (NVDA +0.97%) trades for 18 times sales right now. So, I’d estimate that all of SpaceX’s 2027 growth is already accounted for in the stock price.

But to project what might happen from 2028 through 2030 requires guessing whether SpaceX will actually launch data center satellites into space in commercially meaningful numbers, and do so in a way that points to that business becoming profitable. If Musk’s plan for a massive constellation of data center satellites becomes a viable business, then SpaceX stock could skyrocket from here. On the flip side, xAI could lose ground to rival AI labs, Starlink’s growth could plateau, and its space division may not achieve meaningful launch growth. If some combination of those things happens, SpaceX’s stock could retreat.

It’s hard to predict the future, and with SpaceX not having a ton of public available performance history, it’s difficult to estimate. However, I have confidence in the business segments SpaceX is involved in, so I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect SpaceX’s stock to double to $2,000 by 2030, driven by growth in at least one of its three segments.

Mortgage Rates Move Lower as Oil Prices Cool Ahead of CPI Report


Mortgage rates are a little better today, extending their move lower to three days in a row.

The bond market is open again and 10-year yields are slightly improved on the day as well.

We’re still around 5.20%, which should put the 30-year fixed mortgage around 7.45% or so.

So it’s not going to make or break your loan application, but it’s better than going even higher.

Whether it lasts is another story, with the important September CPI report due out tomorrow morning.

Oil Mostly Dictating Mortgage Rates Right Now

Oil prices were lower today after a weekend of fresh attacks and a deal with Russia.

President Trump said Russia agreed to supply more diesel to global markets, and the United States temporarily eased sanctions on Russian fuel.

On his Truth Social platform, Trump also announced a so-called “ENERGY CEASEFIRE” between Russia and Ukraine, which Moscow didn’t actually confirm.

Even so, it was perhaps enough to avoid another increase in energy prices, especially given the escalation over the weekend between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis.

Oil is still above $105 per barrel and somewhat close to recent highs. And could easily hit new highs if things take a turn for the worse in the Middle East.

In other words, we got some relief but it’s very much flimsy at best.

It feels more like we’re getting a “break” from more increases than we are a full reversal.

Are We Seeing a Shift From Stocks to Safe Haven Bonds?

While the story is mostly about oil right now, there’s also a sense that a flight to safety might be materializing.

It’s when investors flee the stock market and park their money in bonds instead as a way of de-risking.

We haven’t seen it in a long time because the stock market keeps moving higher, propelled by AI build out and a chip frenzy.

But at a certain point, bonds will begin to look attractive, and perhaps we’re starting to see that a little bit.

Especially if tech valuations feel a bit too rich and there’s risk of losses there instead of additional gains.

It’s one way to get mortgage rate relief without job losses and pain on Main Street, but it does mean people would feel less of the wealth effect.

That could harm home sales if prospective buyers don’t feel as rich with their portfolios no longer at all-time highs.

CPI Tomorrow Can Make or Break This Lower Mortgage Rate Trend

While I’m a tad hesitant to say mortgage rates are in a downtrend, they have strung together a few winning days in a row.

And that’s saying something because they haven’t been able to do that for months.

It’s been up, up, up since early August.

But if we get a favorable CPI report tomorrow, mortgage rates could rally even more and perhaps get back closer to 7.375% or even 7.25%.

If they can inch closer to 7% again, there might be some real momentum to get quotes back in the high-6s.

That could even be painted as a win for President Trump headed into the midterms.

Despite promising to deliver the 3% rates again, a 6-handle 30-year fixed would seem like a victory after seeing high-7s and the threat of 8% again.

But that remains to be seen and the data still needs to cooperate. If it does, you also get a Fed that has vowed to be patient despite warning of additional hikes in the future.

Read on: Compare different mortgage rates fast with my mortgage rate calculator.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

Best Crypto exchange in India 🔥



Looking for the best crypto exchange in India? 🇮🇳 In this short video, I’ll show you which platforms are most reliable, safe, and beginner-friendly for crypto trading in 2025. Whether you’re a new trader or experienced investor, choosing the right exchange is the first step toward success in crypto.

source

Bank Of America To Pay $1.2 Billion, Including Record $750 Million OCC Penalty


The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency fined Bank of America $750 million on October 13, 2026, for failures in its anti-money laundering program. It’s the largest civil money penalty in OCC history, and it hits the bank behind millions of everyday Bank of America savings and checking accounts.

The OCC penalty is one part of a larger Treasury action. FinCEN, the Treasury unit that recently ordered banks to report student aid fraud, assessed a $1.2 billion penalty that credits the OCC’s $750 million. The Office of Foreign Assets Control added an $11.6 million settlement over 475 apparent sanctions violations, according to the Associated Press.

According to a statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, “Financial institutions are on the front lines of protecting our economic and national security. When a bank of this size fails to meet its anti-money laundering and sanctions obligations, the consequences extend far beyond its own walls, exposing the entire U.S. financial system to significant illicit finance risks.“

Why It Matters

Bank of America is the second-largest bank in the U.S., with about 3,500 branches and 15,000 ATMs, according to the OCC consent order. The OCC’s previous record was the $450 million penalty against TD Bank in October 2024.

The money comes from the bank’s revenues, not customer accounts. The OCC says the penalty goes to the U.S. Treasury, and deposits stay protected by FDIC insurance up to $250,000 per depositor, per bank, per ownership category.

Why The Massive Penalties

Here’s why Bank of America is facing such massive fines:

  • The bank failed to properly monitor trillions of dollars in transactions since at least 2019, leading to missed and late suspicious activity reports involving billions of dollars.
  • From 2019 to 2023, management received reports showing the bank skipped suspicious activity reports on roughly 18% to 44% of potentially suspicious activity, depending on the year.
  • Its backlog of cases waiting for investigator review peaked at nearly 200,000 in 2024.
  • OCC examiners sampled the bank’s $102 billion credit card portfolio and flagged 10 accounts. That review led to reports on hundreds of millions of dollars in suspicious transactions.
  • About 33,300 outgoing wires totaling roughly $1 billion went out with inaccurate sender information between November 2021 and October 2024.

“The bank’s poor response to its BSA deficiencies is unacceptable,” Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould said. “Financial crime compliance is serious, and we are responsible for getting it right,” Bank of America said in a statement.

How This Connects

Regulators have stepped up action against consumer-facing money platforms. The College Investor has covered Cash App’s $175 million order over fraud concerns and New York’s lawsuit against Zelle over $1 billion in alleged fraud. Both cases involved fraud moving through payment apps, while this one centers on a bank failing to flag suspicious money for investigators.

This has also been coming at a time as the U.S. government has been cracking down on waste and fraud across the board. We’re seeing it in banking, but also in financial aid and student loan disbursements.

What’s Next

Bank of America will take a $1.2 billion non-tax-deductible charge in its third-quarter results. The bank remains under its December 2024 cease-and-desist order, and the OCC kept the right to add penalties if the violations continue.

Customers who want out can follow our steps on how to switch banks.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Bank Of America To Pay $1.2 Billion, Including Record $750 Million OCC Penalty appeared first on The College Investor.

CLARITY Act Supporter Argues That SEC, CFTC Crypto Rules Fall Short Without Legislation


House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill has argued that recent efforts by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to craft digital-asset rules fall short of the lasting framework only Congress can deliver.

After the Senate blocked the CLARITY Act, Hill credited the agencies with stepping in but insisted their actions cannot replace a statutory solution.

The CLARITY Act, which Hill helped advance as a primary sponsor, aimed to establish clear market-structure rules for most cryptocurrency activity in the United States.

It would have drawn firmer lines between the SEC’s and CFTC’s jurisdictions over digital assets and digital commodities.

The House had previously passed related legislation with bipartisan support, but the Senate failed to advance the measure in a 49-50 procedural vote in mid-September 2026.

It required 60 votes to move forward, leaving the bill stalled and prompting immediate regulatory responses.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins and CFTC Chairman Michael Selig both indicated their agencies would proceed under existing statutory authority.

Within days, the SEC introduced an innovation exemption allowing certain tokenized stock trading under temporary relief, and it proposed updates to custody rules for investment advisers and funds handling crypto assets.

The CFTC submitted market rulemaking proposals for White House review and outlined steps toward bringing crypto trading platforms under federal oversight.

These steps sought to address questions about permissible activities, custody, and platform regulation that the legislation was designed to settle.Hill acknowledged the progress.

He noted that Atkins and Selig have used their regulatory powers and exemptive relief to give practical definition to digital assets and digital commodities, helping create a functional system for this form of finance in the United States.

Yet he was direct about the limits: in his judgment, these regulatory policies fall short of what is required, which is a legislative solution.

He pointed to his earlier work on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act in the prior Congress as further evidence of the need for statute.

According to Hill, the core distinction is durability.

Exemptions, guidance, and even formal agency rules can be challenged in court, revised or withdrawn by a future administration, or limited by questions of statutory authority.

A law passed by Congress, by contrast, would set durable jurisdictional boundaries and obligations that the agencies would then implement.

Without that permanent change, the framework remains vulnerable to shifts in regulatory priorities.

Hill has argued that only such legislation can secure lasting certainty and keep the United States leading in digital assets and blockchain technology.

His stance pushes back against a view that has gained traction in parts of the industry since the Senate vote: that market participants can achieve much of what they need by working with regulators rather than waiting on Congress.

Hill has continued to hope the CLARITY Act can be revived during the post-election lame-duck session, when a narrow window of Senate session days remains before the next Congress. It’s uncertain whether they can resolve the disagreements that blocked the bill in that period, but the agencies are already moving ahead with their own initiatives in the meantime.



Sam’s Club CEO Latriece Watkins feels most powerful watching the people she’s invested in succeed



Sam’s Club CEO Latriece Watkins has a career resume that most workers would gawk at, working her way up from an intern at Walmart all the way to leader of one of America’s biggest grocery retailers.

But it isn’t the executive titles or career milestones that makes her feel powerful: The greatest source of power comes from watching the peers she’s helped ultimately succeed.

“When I feel most powerful is when I see the people I’ve invested in make moves,” Watkins told Most Powerful Women Editor Emma Hinchliffe onstage at Fortune’s annual MPW Summit in Santa Barbara, Calif., on Tuesday. “When I see them get promoted, I see all of their faces running across memory from very early in my career, or very early in their careers, to where they’ve moved now.”

Solely focusing on one’s own career could leave opportunities for greater impact on the table, according to the Fortune 500 executive. Watkins has made many strides in her own career, becoming the first woman and person of color to serve as Walmart’s chief merchant back in 2023—one of the most influential roles in retail. And in helping others along her three-decade career at the $890 billion parent company (Walmart), she’s leveraged a symbiotic strategy with her peers so that everyone succeeds. 

“The contributions we make are more than we could individually do,” she continued. “So power for me is the names of all the people that I can say who [have] benefited from my contributions, and I’ve benefited from being able to either contribute or get feedback from them.”

Watkins said that despite being in the top role, business leaders will always need people—and finding the best way to shepherd them can be a challenge for busy executives. In her eight months as CEO, the 51-year-old has found that understanding the power of workers and delivering clarity are required in leadership. Employees will be looking to the top boss for transparency and a clear vision. To get that clarity, Watkins recommends setting aside time to think things through.

“People look to you for clarity, which means you have to be clear. You don’t think out loud,” she said. “When you’re the leader, people want to know what you think, and if you haven’t cleared it up for yourself and you’re thinking out loud, you’ll confuse them.”

“So take the time—make the time—to create clarity for yourself,” Watkins continued. “It’s one of the hardest things to find this time for yourself. But it’s required, because you can’t get clarity without it.”

GOP billionaire behind history’s biggest political gift could be sued over a Chicago rat infestation



Chicago officials are weighing legal action against Barre Seid, the 94-year-old industrialist behind the largest known political advocacy donation in U.S. history, over claims that workers he hires to scatter nuts in Lincoln Park are fueling a rat infestation.

Ald. Timmy Knudsen told Axios he is pushing the Chicago Park District to sue Seid for damage to the park, while Park District officials told the publication they are still weighing their options.

In an Aug. 25 letter to Seid, Knudsen called the matter a final warning and said city staff had received photos and video documenting Seid or his staff putting out food daily for squirrels and other wildlife, according to WGN. The letter said the feeding created a public health hazard because it drew in not only squirrels but also pigeons and rats. Knudsen cited repeated violations of a city code provision barring the buildup of garbage or food that could feed or shelter rats, according to Block Club Chicago, and gave Seid 15 days to stop.

While the city has issued citations, it allegedly did little to end the feeding of Chicago’s wildlife. The letter states that Streets and Sanitation has inspected the property multiple times over several years and issued multiple warnings and citations, and that the violations continued despite the fines being paid. Seid paid all fines and tickets without contesting them, Axios reported.

“Typically, when you ticket somebody, it stops their bad behavior,” Knudsen told WGN. He said the feeding has increased since the city began ticketing. Neither Knudsen nor Seid responded to Fortune’s requests for comment.

Shells from Brazil nuts, hazelnuts, peanuts and walnuts were seen at the base of trees near rat burrows in the park, Axios reported. Knudsen told the publication the burrows have grown where the nuts are left, and that Green City Market vendors have seen rats while setting up. Meanwhile, city documents say taxpayers could end up paying for repairs.

According to neighbors and Knudsen, Seid and his wife, Barbara, have hired people for years to carry bags of nuts through the neighborhood and the park to feed squirrels, Block Club reported. Knudsen said the workers have been distributing nuts in the park, two or three blocks from the Seids’ home, since early spring.

Chicago has ranked first on Orkin’s list of America’s rattiest cities every year since the list began, ten straight years as of 2024.

Who is Barre Seid?

Seid made his fortune as the owner of Tripp Lite, a Chicago maker of surge protectors and power equipment. ProPublica reported that he transferred the company to a dark money group run by conservative legal activist Leonard Leo, created in April 2020. It was then sold to Eaton in March 2021 for $1.65 billion, according to the company’s SEC filing, and thanks to that structure, tax experts told ProPublica Seid was able to avoid as much as $400 million in taxes.

As Tripp Lite grew, Seid wrote checks to the Republican National Committee, ProPublica reported, and a longtime adviser described him as the Heartland Institute’s major patron, a Chicago-area think tank that disputes mainstream climate science. Tax records obtained by ProPublica show at least $775 million in donations to nonprofits between 1996 and 2018, almost all of it anonymous.

In one email obtained by ProPublica and The Lever, Seid described himself as prone to “anonymity paranoia.” He sometimes used a fake name, Ebert or Elbert Howell, which Tripp Lite staff gave to salesmen and business registries as the CEO’s name, according to his testimony in a federal lawsuit.

Chicago has ranked first on Orkin’s list of America’s rattiest cities every year since the list began, ten straight years as of 2024.

MPC urges Ottawa to move ahead with CRA income verification




The association renewed its call for a secure income verification tool and backed expanded mortgage funding capacity and insurance eligibility for properties with up to eight units.

Flex Elite Credit Card Review (New Card, Waitlist Now Open)