Home Blog

Best Order of Operations For Saving For Retirement


Looking to start saving and investing? What account or order of accounts should you use first? Your 401k? IRA? HSA?

I’m a big fan of methods and orders of operations for doing things. I think that it is essential to have a set plan for executing tasks, especially long term tasks like saving for retirement. But what’s the best way to go about funding retirement? What is the proper order to save?

Remember back in elementary school the order of operations for math – “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally”?  I always found that useful – parenthesis, exponents, multiplication/division, addition/subtraction.  

Its rules and order that make things easy to remember, just like PEMDAS from elementary school.

So, what is the best order of operations for saving for retirement? Let me break it down for you, and show you the exact strategy I’m using as well.

Table of Contents

The Order Of Operations For Saving
Step 1 – Save in Your 401k (Up To The Match)
Step 2 – Save The Max In Your IRA
Step 3 – Continue To Max Your 401k Contributions
Step 4 – Max Your HSA
Step 5 – Side Hustle And Do A SEP IRA
Step 6 – Save in a Standard Brokerage Account
Step 7 – Be Smart About Social Security
Conclusion

The Order Of Operations For Saving

Let’s start with a chart breaking down the best order of operations for saving for retirement.

Best Order Of Operations To Save For Retirement Infographic | Source: The College Investor

Step 1 – Save in Your 401k (Up To The Match)

The first step in saving for retirement is to take advantage of your for 401k or 403b, up to your employer match. These are great plans that every eligible person needs to participate in, and when your employer matches your contributions, it’s free money! Funding your retirement in a 401k is a great way to save because it gives you a tax savings when you contribute, your investments grow tax deferred, and in many places, your company matches your contribution up to a certain percentage.

If your company matches your contribution, and you don’t contribute, you’re leaving free money on the table, which is crazy! It’s essentially giving up a percentage of your pay!

Plus, saving for retirement in a 401k is easy. All you have to do is sign up. Check out more of the best 401k moves you can make as well.

Step 2 – Save The Max In Your IRA

If you’ve invested in your 401k to at least to get your company match, it’s time to start looking for what comes next for funding retirement savings.  The next step in the order of operations for funding retirement is your IRA.  There are a lot of resources out there to help you decide if a Roth IRA or Traditional IRA is better, but regardless of which you choose, investing in an IRA is a great way to save for retirement after you’ve maxed your 401k.

There are a lot of IRA misconceptions, but you should know the following – you can invest up to $7,500 per year (in 2026), and if you’re older than 50, you get a catch-up contribution of $1,000 extra.  All of the money in your IRA grows tax free.  Depending on the type of IRA, you may not even have to pay taxes on your withdraws (that’s a Roth IRA for you).  All of these features make investing in an IRA Step 2 in the Order of Operations for Funding Retirement.

Make sure you check out the IRA Contribution And Income Limits here.

Check the best places to open an IRA here.

2026 IRA Contribution Limits | Source: The College Investor

Step 3 – Continue To Max Your 401k Contributions

If you’ve already maxed out your IRA contributions, it’s time to look at maxing you your 401k contributions. Remember to check out our guide on how to maximize your retirement contributions. In 2026, you can contribute $24,500 into your 401k pre-tax, and you can have a total contribution to your 401k (employee + employer contributions) of $72,000.

If your employer allows after-tax, non-Roth contributions, and you can afford it, you might consider maxing this out so that you can potentially take advantage of the Mega Backdoor Roth IRA.

Make sure you understand the 401k Contribution Limits here.

2026 401k Contribution Limits | Source: The College Investor

Step 4 – Max Your HSA

If you are in a high-deductible health plan, and you are eligible for a health savings account (HSA), you’d better be taking advantage of it to the max. I consider the HSA to be the secret IRA nobody is talking about, because it offers triple-tax benefits, and is simply an awesome way to save.

Plus, many employers offer matching contributions into an HSA, and many times the health insurance attached to the HSA is cheaper than other options offered.

The only reason that the HSA is #4 on this list is because many people simply don’t qualify for it. However, if you do qualify for it, I’d move it to #2 – right behind taking advantage of your employer’s match.

Make sure you check out the HSA contribution limits here.

2026 HSA Contribution Limits | Source: The College Investor

Step 5 – Side Hustle And Do A SEP IRA

If you’re a side hustler, or have any type of freelance income, you should consider doing a SEP IRA. This is another way to save pre-tax money in a retirement account, and lower your total tax bill from your side hustling income activities.

With a SEP IRA, you can contribute 25% of your earnings, or $72,000, whichever is lower. 

Note: You can substitute a Solo 401k here if you are good about balancing contribution limits with an employer plan. A SEP IRA is usually easier for side hustlers with a 401k they max at their day job.

Step 6 – Save in a Standard Brokerage Account

After you’ve invested in both your IRA and 401k, you may not know what to do next.  The best thing you can do after maxing out all the “traditional” retirement accounts is to just invest in a standard brokerage.  This type of account has no special tax breaks for saving for retirement, but it comes in as Step 5 in our order of operations for funding retirement because it is important to invest versus just saving.

The key is to protect against inflation from eating your returns as you fund your retirement.  If you just save the remainder in a savings account, you don’t grow your money or keep up with inflation.  While saving is important, it is more important to grow your money over the long run by investing.

Check out our list of the best brokerage accounts here.

Step 7 – Be Smart About Social Security

Step 7 in the Order of Operations for Saving For Retirement is Social Security.  As I’ve mentioned before, Social Security isn’t going anywhere, even for young workers.   However, one thing that young workers should plan for is that the benefits will be less, and the retirement age will be much higher.  I wouldn’t be surprised if today’s college graduates have a Social Security retirement age of 70 or even 75 before they can take benefits.  The reason is that people are just living longer.

As such, you have to be smart about your Social Security benefits, even at a young age.  The reason is that there are many factors that may, or may not, allow you to get benefits.

For example, if you work for a State or Local government, your organization may choose to opt-out of Social Security in lieu of their own retirement program.  This could be beneficial to you (as the program may be better) or it could be worse.  The bottom line is that you need to be smart about it and know what benefits you’ll be eligible for.

Conclusion

So, if you follow this plan to maximize your pre-tax retirement savings, you’ll be following the best order for funding retirement.  If you don’t have an option available to you (i.e. your employer doesn’t offer a 401k), then just skip to the next step in the order of operations, just like PEMDAS above.

What’s your thought on the right order of operations for funding retirement?

Editor: Clint Proctor

Reviewed by: Chris Muller

The post Best Order of Operations For Saving For Retirement appeared first on The College Investor.

Tencent Music now has 20M+ ‘Super VIP’ subscribers. Here’s what that means for China’s largest music streamer.


MBW Explains is a series in which we dig behind the headlines, via data and context, to improve your understanding of key stories. Only MBW+ subscribers have unlimited access to these articles. MBW Explains is supported by Reservoir.


Higher-priced ‘super premium’ music streaming tiers remain one of the biggest revenue opportunities in the music industry.

UMG Chairman and CEO Sir Lucian Grainge said in his 2026 new year memo that UMG will work with DSP partners on “enhanced premium tiers for superfans,” and on UMG’s Q4 earnings call earlier this month referenced “premium tiers being developed by the traditional DSPs” as part of a broader superfan ecosystem.

Spotify experimented with Premium price segmentation last November when it launched a higher-priced ‘Premium Platinum’ tier in five emerging streaming economies – but the industry continues to watch for the arrival of a fully-fledged super premium offering in western markets.

Over in China, the concept has already proven successful, and is scaling fast

Tencent Music Entertainment‘s (TME) ‘Super VIP’ tier has just hit a major new milestone.

TME published its Q4 and full-year 2025 results today (March 17), revealing that its SVIP subscribers surpassed 20 million by year-end – up from the 15 million the company reported at the end of Q2, and just 10 million in Q3 2024.

That growth trajectory – doubling in barely over a year – tells us something important about the appetite for higher-priced music streaming, and offers a real-world blueprint for what higher-priced streaming tiers could deliver.

Here’s what the numbers show…


1. SVIP penetration is accelerating – even as the wider user base shrinks

TME’s SVIP tier now represents approximately 15.7% of the company’s 127.4 million total paying music subscribers.



That’s up from around 12% at the end of Q2 2025, and just 8% as recently as September 2024.

What makes this particularly striking is the context in which it’s happening.

TME’s total music monthly active users (MAUs) actually fell 5.0% YoY to 528 million in Q4 – a continuation of a long-running decline from a peak of over 650 million.

The broader user base is contracting. But the paying user base isn’t.

TME’s total number of paying music users grew 5.3% YoY to 127.4 million in Q4, while monthly ARPPU (average revenue from each paying user) climbed 7.2% YoY to RMB 11.9 (around USD $1.70).

In other words: TME is losing casual listeners but converting and monetising the ones who stay at an ever-higher rate.

SVIP is a key engine behind that monetization story.

TME’s SVIP subscribers pay approximately RMB 40 (USD $5.72) per month, compared to the standard RMB 8 (USD $1.14) subscription – roughly five times the revenue per user.

When you consider that these 20 million subscribers represent less than 16% of TME’s paying base but are generating five times the ARPU, the economic weight of the tier becomes clear.

2. What’s driving SVIP adoption?

TME attributed the SVIP milestone to “deepened collaborations with music labels, artists and the rollout of new, high-valued benefits.”

According to TME, premium sound quality – including Dolby Atmos support and advanced audio technologies – remains a key SVIP draw. That should be noted by anyone tracking the Spotify lossless/super-premium debate: in the one major market where HD audio is gated behind a higher-priced tier, it’s working.

But audio quality is only part of the picture. In Q4, TME appointed brand ambassadors for its SVIP program – including Ryan Ding, Ju Jingyi, and Karry Wang for QQ Music, and Liu Yuning for Kugou Music (pictured below) – and launched prioritized ticketing packages for flagship events including QQ Music’s Top Music Night 2026 and the annual gala of Melody Journey 2. Both, the company said, resulted in “effective SVIP adoption.”



Other SVIP benefits such as premium audio effects, personalized avatar outfits and feature-related perks also contributed to acquisition and retention, TME said.

The company has also leaned heavily into what it calls “artist-centric privileges” more broadly: exclusive and timed-exclusive digital album releases, priority access to concert tickets for in-demand shows, and collectible ‘star card’ series tied to popular artists.

TME CEO Ross Liang framed the milestone in the context of a broader strategic shift: “Driven by differentiated, expansive content privileges and immersive experiences, our SVIP user base surpassed 20 million, with ARPPU continuing to trend upward. Our newly launched ad-supported subscription plan is gaining initial progress and will, over time, allow us to broaden user access and attract new audiences.”

That last point is notable: TME is now operating a three-tier model – ad-supported, standard, and SVIP – similar to what Spotify is piloting with its Lite/Standard/Platinum structure in India and elsewhere.


3. The subscription revenue picture

TME’s music subscription revenues reached RMB 4.56 billion (USD $653 million) in Q4, representing 13.2% YoY growth. That was a deceleration from the 17.2% posted in Q3 and 17.1% in Q2 – though still robust.

For the full year, music subscription revenue hit RMB 17.66 billion (USD $2.53 billion), up 16.0% YoY from RMB 15.23 billion in 2024.



Total online music services revenue (which includes advertising, artist-related merchandise, and offline performances alongside subscriptions) grew 21.7% YoY to RMB 7.10 billion (USD $1.02 billion) in Q4. Music subscriptions accounted for around 64% of that total; the remainder was driven by what the company described as “robust” growth in offline performances and concert-related revenue.

For the full year, online music services revenue reached RMB 26.73 billion (USD $3.82 billion), up 22.9% YoY – making it the dominant driver of TME’s overall business. Music operations now account for 82% of total company revenues, up from around 77% a year ago, as the firm’s legacy ‘social entertainment’ division (karaoke and live-streaming tipping) continues to decline.


Note: RMB to USD conversion for Q4/FY 2025 carried out at the exchange rate as of December 31, 2025, as provided by TME.


Reservoir (Nasdaq: RSVR) is a publicly traded, global independent music company with operations across music publishing, recorded music, and artist management. Music Business Worldwide

Bank of Canada likely to stay on hold as oil scrambles the outlook




The Bank of Canada is likely to hold interest rates steady as policymakers weigh the inflation risk of higher oil prices against a string of weak economic numbers.

Robinhood Lists Venture Fund For Retail Investors


Investing in private securities has become very popular. To meet this demand, Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has listed its first publicly traded venture capital fund that invests solely in private companies.

Typically, promising private firms first raise capital from individual investors and venture capital firms. Starting at a Seed round, if the company continues to execute on its stated mission, funding can continue through multiple rounds. Eventually, a company may decide to list its shares on an exchange and become a public firm, but today, due to excessive regulation and cost, firms typically strive to remain private for as long as possible.

Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) started trading this week and currently holds a market capitalization of $312 million.

RVI aims to invest in a concentrated portfolio of 10 or more private companies deemed “best-in-class” growing companies at the frontiers of their respective industries. RVI may use leverage to boost returns.

Some of the sectors considered include Fintech, artificial intelligence (AI), Defense/Aerospace, Tech, and more.

RVI does not anticipate distributing regular dividends but expects to distribute any capital gains earned by the fund to shareholders. Shareholders can expect to receive a 1099 at the end of each year.

While a growing number of platforms provide access to individual investments in private firms, some investors may find a diversified, managed portfolio more suitable. Each individual investor must do their own due diligence to determine the risk they are willing to shoulder.

 

 

 

Have a crowdfunding offering you’d like to share? Submit an offering for consideration using our Submit a Tip form and we may share it on our site!



McDonald’s newest $3 value menu is sounding an alarm about America’s K-shaped economy



McDonald’s is rolling out its cheapest value menu in years, a move that could speak more to the state of the American economy than it does fast food.

Even as sales rose for the quarter, executives at the world’s largest burger chain acknowledged in its February earnings call the fast food environment, which has pulled back in recent quarters, would “remain challenging” in 2026. Despite the company’s own progress attracting lower-income customer in the company’s fourth quarter, this tier of consumers, who have been dealing with stubborn inflation for years, are broadly pulling back on spending.

To address this issue, CEO Chris Kempczinski said during the company’s latest earnings call the restaurant chain would double down on its commitment to value and deeper discounts.

“McDonald’s is not going to get beat on value and affordability,” Kempczinski said during the call last month.

As part of the company’s latest effort to reach these consumers, McDonald’s is reportedly launching a new value menu in April with items like a 4-piece Chicken McNuggets or Sausage Biscuit priced at $3 or less. It is also revealing a $4 breakfast bundle that includes a McMuffin, hash brown, and a coffee, among other options, The Wall Street Journal reported. The new $3 menu will replace the McValue platform it launched in January 2025 that offered customers the choice of adding a second item to their full-priced order for just $1 more. 

McDonald’s did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

McDonald’s move to value meals matches the K-shaped economy

McDonald’s newest value menu fits squarely into the trend of the K-shaped economy. While high-income people have fared well during the multi-year-stock bull run of the past few years, lower-income people have been hit by higher prices and stagnating wages. The same is happening at McDonald’s, according to Kempczinski. While high-income customer traffic is stable, the CEO warned, “lower-income consumers are particularly sensitive to value and affordability.”

McDonald’s is not the only restaurant chain looking to target these lower-income customers: Wendy’s, Burger King, and Taco Bell have all rolled out aggressive value promotions over the past year, to reach a shrinking pool of budget-conscious diners who have grown increasingly selective. 

To win over these picky consumers, Mark Wasilefsky, head of restaurant and franchise finance at TD Bank, told Fortune chains are increasingly looking for a way to provide value to consumers.

“Lower-priced options, when chosen carefully, priced at an acceptable level, and marketed aggressively, create perceived value and can generate a long-term customer,” he said.

McDonald’s value meals signal a bigger economic problem 

While Kempczinski last month touted the company’s affordability moves as part of the company getting back to its roots, some worry the new $3 menu could be indicative of broader economic problems to come.

A post by prediction market Kalshi mentioning the $3 menu racked up more than 4 million views on X, with many users jumping on the news to declare an economic downturn is near. One user who quoted the Kalshi post on X got 2.6 million views for the declaration: “Oh it’s a RECESSION recession.”

McDonald’s is betting a $3 meal will bring lower-income customers back, and yet, that may be difficult when Americans are increasingly betting that the future could hold more economic pain.

A Pew Research survey last month found 72% of people rate economic conditions as fair or poor, and nearly 40% believe conditions will be worse a year from now, compared to 31% who think they will improve. 

This pressure, Wasilefsky argues, has made value perception that much more important for chains seeking lower-income consumers, or at least those with the financial flexibility to slash prices without gutting margins.

“For those brands who can afford to do so, this is an excellent time to convince existing customers and new customers of your brand’s value and its right to have a share of your shrinking wallet,” he said.

Financial Advisors React to Financial Advice on YouTube!



Jump start your journey with our FREE financial resources:

Reach your goals faster with our products:

Subscribe on YouTube for early access and go beyond the podcast:

Connect with us on social media for more content:

Take the relationship to the next level and become a client:

Bring confidence to your wealth building with simplified strategies from The Money Guy. Learn how to apply financial tactics that go beyond common sense and help you reach your money goals faster. Make your assets do the heavy lifting so you can quit worrying and start living a more fulfilled life.

source

Forget the 1%. These CEOs Are in the 0.001% — and the Numbers Will Make Your Head Spin


It is one thing to be well-paid; it is quite another to earn more in a single afternoon than a dedicated professional earns in a lifetime.

For the average American, a “good” salary might be enough to cover a mortgage and a few nice vacations. But for a select group of C-suite executives, the scale of compensation has shifted into a realm that feels entirely disconnected from the reality of the workforce.

These are not just stories of high earners. They are examples of a compensation culture in which the numbers have become so large that they are almost impossible to visualize, often reaching into the hundreds of millions for a single year of work. This trend highlights a widening CEO-to-worker pay ratio that continues to spark debate across the country.

1. Elon Musk and the trillion-dollar milestone

Estimated $87 billion annually (target ceiling)

In late 2025, Tesla shareholders approved a landmark pay package for Elon Musk. While the headline figure of nearly $1 trillion represents a potential 10-year maximum ceiling, the board currently values the plan closer to $87 billion based on current stock prices.

To unlock the full amount, Musk must grow Tesla’s market cap to an astronomical $8.5 trillion and meet radical goals in robotics and autonomous driving.

In the absolute maximum scenario where every goal is achieved, Musk’s daily earnings would average over $240 million. Even though he draws $0 in base salary, these performance-based stock awards create a level of potential wealth that remains historically singular.

2. Hock Tan and the AI windfall

Estimated $205 million annually

Broadcom CEO Hock Tan saw his compensation jump to over $205 million in the 2025 fiscal year. This was a massive increase from the $2.6 million he received previously, driven by a pay structure now heavily aligned with the company’s artificial intelligence ambitions.

When you break down that $205 million, Tan earned roughly $560,000 per day, including weekends. This shift underscores how significantly AI-related growth is driving executive wealth, even while his base salary remained stable at $1.2 million.

3. Brad Jacobs and the building products boom

Estimated $189 million annually

Brad Jacobs, the CEO of QXO, recently drew attention with a compensation package valued at roughly $189.6 million. Jacobs is a serial entrepreneur who has built multiple billion-dollar companies, and his new venture into building product distribution has already yielded a massive personal payday.

At this rate, Jacobs brings in about $15.8 million per month. Over 99% of this figure is tied to equity, meaning his fortune is inseparable from the company’s stock performance. For the average American, earning hundreds of millions for leading a construction distributor is a stark reminder of the value placed on leadership.

4. Peter Gassner and the cloud software surge

Estimated $172 million annually

Veeva Systems CEO Peter Gassner saw his compensation climb to $172.4 million in fiscal 2025, as disclosed in SEC filings. This was a dramatic rise from previous years, fueled almost entirely by a stock option grant that vests through 2030.

Gassner’s compensation comes to roughly $82,000 per hour based on a standard workweek. At this income level, the daily rate for an executive exceeds the annual salary of most high-level surgeons or corporate attorneys.

5. Patrick Smith and the public safety premium

Estimated $164 million annually

As the head of Axon Enterprise — the company known for Tasers and body cameras — Patrick Smith realized a package worth $164.5 million. This figure, disclosed in 2025 proxy filings, reflects the realized value of long-term performance awards from the 2024 cycle that vest based on aggressive market cap and operational goals.

His annual earnings average out to $3.1 million per week. Smith’s earnings reflect a common corporate strategy in which “locked” shares vest over several years, effectively turning the CEO into one of the company’s most significant shareholders.

6. Sridhar Ramaswamy and the data transition

Estimated $101 million annually

At Snowflake, CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy was awarded a compensation package worth $101.3 million in the 2025 fiscal year. Much like that of his peers, over 98% of this wealth is tied to stock and option awards rather than a monthly paycheck.

This equates to about $276,000 every single day. For the average tech worker — who might earn that much in a very successful year — seeing an individual collect a $101 million payday underscores how the rewards at the top have drifted away from any recognizable standard of professional compensation.

7. Nikesh Arora and the cybersecurity boom

Estimated $99 million annually

Nikesh Arora of Palo Alto Networks took home nearly $99.7 million in total compensation for the 2025 fiscal year. While he has previously earned more in certain vesting cycles, his current package remains at the top of the cybersecurity sector.

Arora essentially earned $1.9 million per week to lead the firm. While his base salary is a “modest” $1 million, the stock awards that make up the vast majority of his pay mean his wealth grows in lockstep with the company’s market valuation.

8. Satya Nadella and the AI frontier

Estimated $96 million annually

Microsoft’s Satya Nadella saw his compensation reach $96.4 million in fiscal 2025. Under his leadership, Microsoft has become a dominant force in artificial intelligence, which has sent the company’s valuation into the trillions.

Nadella effectively earns $1.8 million per week. While he is widely considered one of the most effective CEOs in the world, the scale of his paycheck remains an outlier, representing a level of wealth accumulation that is virtually impossible to achieve through traditional labor.

9. Lawrence Culp and the GE Aerospace split

Estimated $45 million annually

GE Aerospace CEO Lawrence Culp was awarded roughly $45.6 million in 2025. While lower than some of his previous “retention” bonuses, it remains a massive sum.

Culp’s earnings break down to roughly $870,000 per week. For workers whose benefits are adjusted during corporate restructurings, a $45 million reward for the man leading the split can be a difficult pill to swallow.

10. Brian Niccol and the coffee sign-on

Estimated $31 million annually

When Brian Niccol was tapped to lead the latest Starbucks strategy shift, his 2025 fiscal compensation was reported at $31 million. This followed a massive initial 2024 “sign-on” grant valued at $96 million to lure him from Chipotle.

Even at the $31 million level, Niccol’s compensation averages out to $85,000 per day. The pay ratio remains jarring, with Niccol earning thousands of times more than the median Starbucks employee.

What does this mean for Americans?

What happens when the people running the economy inhabit a completely different financial reality from the people working in it? We may be finding out.

These ten pay packages are not mere anomalies. They are a preview of where executive compensation is heading — and nothing on the horizon suggests the trajectory is changing.

If the gap between executive wealth and everyday financial security has you thinking about your own retirement, Anthem Gold Group helps investors with $10,000 or more protect what they’ve built with physical precious metals.

The Housing Markets Where Section 8 Properties and Affordable Homes Are Scarce


Does the idea of a never-ending stream of potential renters, many of them with guaranteed payments, lining up to apply for your vacant apartments sound appealing? Then you might want to consider renting to lower-income tenants.

Before you rush to judgment, it’s worth taking a broad look at the current rental market. America’s affordable rental crunch means that the biggest segment of the population that needs housing is the one that can least afford it. For landlords willing to serve this growing demographic, a golden opportunity awaits—as long as it is approached correctly.

A National Shortage That Isn’t Going Away

If real estate is about supply and demand, there is an almost bottomless demand at the lower financial end of the market. The United States is short about 7.2 million affordable rental homes for extremely low renters, defined as those at or below the poverty line or 30% of the area median income, according to the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s (NLIHC) “The Gap” report. That translates to only 35 affordable and available units for every 100 extremely low-income renter households nationwide.

The report shows that roughly 11 million households fall into this category, with some states having more than others. However, as Renee Willis, president and CEO of the NLIHC, said in the report, “The findings from ‘The Gap’ show that no state or major metropolitan area has an adequate supply of affordable and available homes for extremely low-income renters.” She added that only about one in four households that need assistance actually receive it.

Western and Sunbelt States Are the Most Affordable Housing-Challenged

According to a Newsweek map based on NLIHC data, Western and Sunbelt states such as Nevada, Arizona, Florida, and Texas rank among the most challenged. The report shows that seniors, those with low-wage jobs, and people with disabilities are often forced to compete with higher-income tenants for modest-priced rentals.

Focusing on Texas, a recent report from the Texas Tribune finds that Dallas—often celebrated for its burgeoning jobs and middle-class population—was short about 46,000 rental homes for families making 50% of the area’s median income as of 2023.

“We have a serious shortage of affordable rental units for very low-income households,” said Ashley Flores, the Dallas-based housing chief for nonprofit Child Poverty Action Lab, who coauthored its new report.

The Problems With Section 8

Although there is a deep need for affordable housing, there is a chronic shortage of tenants approved for Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8). A New York Times article found that these vouchers are too scarce in major American cities where they are most needed. In Orlando, for example, there are roughly 200,000 rent-burdened households (those paying over 30% of their household income in housing costs) but only 7,401 available Section 8 vouchers.

More recently, the Trump administration proposed imposing a two-year time limit on rental assistance, which could affect as many as 1.4 million households, exempting the elderly and those with disabilities.

Many landlords choose to avoid Section 8 housing altogether because they feel it is too much of an administrative nightmare, requires excessive inspections, involves chasing tenants for their share of the rent, and soaring rents make it easier to get top dollar from regular tenants without the hassle of dealing with the government.

Each county has its own rules for affordable housing, and many have programs beyond Section 8 that can also offer qualified tenants steady, market-rate rents.

How Landlords Can Turn The Affordable Housing Shortage Into Cash Flow

A recent Business Insider story detailed the story of Ted and Jamie Gerber, who own 28 rental units across 15 commercial and residential properties in Florida. “We always rent at or below market rates,” said Ted Gerber. “Our tenants value the fact that they’re renting slightly below market rate, so they’re going to want to take care of the place. They’re getting a deal, and we’re still making money from it all.”

Another investor, Washington-based Dion McNeeley, interviewed for the same article, uses a similar strategy.

“Happy tenants don’t trash the place, and they don’t move, and tenant turnover is one of the most expensive things a landlord has to deal with,” McNeeley said. “I’m making tens of thousands of dollars more in the last few years than I would have if I raised the rent to the area average and then dealt with a bunch of turnover.”

A BiggerPockets article outlined some of the essentials for renting to low-income tenants:

  • Accept it for what it is: Homes in lower-income neighborhoods generally won’t appreciate at the same rates as other areas unless they are hit by a wave of gentrification.
  • Anticipate high potential cash flow, but be realistic: On paper, your cash flow can be extremely high, especially if you are not heavily leveraged, but management-wise, these types of properties can be quite labor-intensive.
  • Work with a responsive management company experienced in this type of rental: Unless you want your passive income plan to turn into a full-time job and have to deal with tenant calls, outsource management to a responsive management company well-versed in this type of rental.
  • Patience is key: Many landlords steer clear of low-income rentals because of the labor-intensive management and the types of tenants they attract. Clearly, beyond meticulous screening, having a thick skin and playing the long game are key. Some years, you might not generate much cash flow due to repairs and turnover, but eventually equity and rents will increase.

Final Thoughts

Stable tenants with stable jobs in stable neighborhoods are an ideal scenario for most landlords. However, due to the U.S. housing crisis, a much larger pool of rentals and tenants lies within the less-glamorous affordable rental segment. 

Having owned multiple low-income units in the past, I can attest that they can be challenging—which is putting it mildly. However, experience has been a great teacher, and these are some of the lessons I’ve learned.

You cannot be too leveraged. 

BRRRRing your way to success with low-income rentals is fraught with risk. Other investors I have known who have succeeded in low-income areas have bought rentals in auctions for cash, used their credit cards to fix them up, paid off the debt, and used the cash flow to service the repairs while keeping a full-time job. Eventually, rents increased, and the areas turned around. It was a conservative long-term strategy.

Screen meticulously.

Landlords are often so desperate to fill units that they will let anyone in, especially if they have a Section 8 voucher. Vouchers or not, comprehensive tenant screening is a must, which is why an experienced outside management company is important.

Older tenants or those with disabilities tend to be more stable. 

I once had a three-unit rental where, unbeknownst to me, all the tenants were drug dealers—even the single mom with a baby. One day, I found out that my building was completely vacant due to a DEA drug bust. Older folks usually know better than that.

Have a slush fund ready for repairs. 

Even with good screening, you will still encounter your fair share of repairs. This is why buying with cash or minimal leverage and having a slush fund and a reliable, affordable contractor are essential. 

One of the biggest dangers with low-income rentals is actually expecting to get the same cash flow in reality as you worked out on paper. Things often go wrong, and making your rental work means having enough cash to cover repairs and absorb vacancies.

Competing LLMs Were Asked to Pick Stocks. Their Choices Revealed AI’s Limitations.


New research underscores the risks of relying on the tools without questioning what they may not know.

IHG One Rewards Premier Business Credit Card Review (2026.3 Update: 200k Offer)