Home Blog

Anyone Can Flip a House After Hearing This


Anyone can flip a house after hearing this episode. If you’ve got around 30 minutes and want to make a faster return on your money than rental properties, this is how you do it. And this isn’t just hype—Dave is putting this knowledge to the test, flipping his first house with the help of expert house flipper James Dainard.

James has flipped over 4,000 houses, has made more mistakes than almost any house flipper on the planet, and knows exactly what to buy, what not to buy, and how to turn an average, outdated home into a top-seller with six-figure profits. If you’re a beginner, you’re in luck—James is breaking down everything a beginner needs to know when buying, budgeting, fixing, and selling a house flip in 2026.

We’ll get into it all—why house flipping still works in 2026, the best properties to flip for beginners, the red flags to avoid (unless you’re very experienced), Dave’s actual first house flip numbers (with examples), how to protect yourself in a bad market, and what to do when costs rise faster than you anticipated.

Dave:
It’s my first time flipping a house and I cannot wait to see that sweet profit when it’s all done. But until the sale actually closes, I am a little bit nervous. But fortunately, I have one of the best house flippers around to hold my hand through the entire process. And today we’re going to share everything that anyone thinking about their first house flip needs to know. Well, of course, talk about how to find the right deals and maximize your profit, but we’ll also talk about how to spot big risks and potential mistakes before you make them, all that and more, so you can flip with confidence stick around.
Hey everyone. I’m Dave Meyer. I’m a housing market analyst and the head of real estate investing at BiggerPockets. I’ve been buying rental properties for more than 15 years, but I have never actually flipped a house until now. I am diving into a whole new realm of investing and it’s one that comes with big profits but also big risks. So today on the show, I have my on- the-market co-host, James Dainard with me. James is one of the most experienced flippers out there. He has flipped more than 4,000 homes in his investing career and he literally wrote the book on it, The House Flipping Framework. So James, you ready to help me out?

James:
I always get so excited when people take their step into flipping houses.

Dave:
You have finally converted me to the dark side. After knowing you for three or four years, I finally agreed to flip a house.

James:
Yeah. It starts with one and then all of a

Dave:
Sudden you try to get me to do two.

James:
Yeah. The first one’s free, Dave, and then you’re going to be hooked on this.

Dave:
Well, we’ll see. If it turns out well, I could see how it will be addicting, but because I’m still starting my first flip, I’m more nervous than excited right now.

James:
Well, you should be nervous. I mean, flipping is a great tool in real estate, but it’s also a very, very risky. It’s probably one of the most riskiest asset classes you can buy in real estate. So I mean, I guess the real question is, Dave, I know you like hedging against risk, so why do you want to flip house?

Dave:
There’s a couple of reasons I want to do it. The first is I want to get better at managing construction. I’m interested in flipping houses and if this first one goes well, I might do it more and more, but I’ve also been doing BERS and I’ve been renovating rental properties for 15 years now. And I admit I don’t think I’m the best at managing construction projects. So that’s my number one objective is to really learn how to work best with contractors to do things efficiently, price efficiently, and to maximize my ROI. So that’s the number one thing. The second thing is, as you know, I moved to Washington and it is super hard to buy cashflowing profitable rental properties, but I want to invest in my own backyard. And at least right now, it seems like flipping is the best way to invest in the Seattle area.

James:
It is, especially in those expensive markets because properties are expensive, they’re in high demand. And if anybody can buy them, the pricing’s not that good. What I always say is flipping gives you the best foundation for being a real estate investor across all asset classes. I mean, you see how we cash flow in Seattle. When we’re buying a rental property, it’s not turnkey. Exactly.

Dave:
Yeah.

James:
But that’s how we create the math will work when you can buy so deep. And that’s what flipping is so important about it. You can create your own returns by controlling your cost. And so it’s not just about making money, it’s about making you a Swiss Army knife investor for all different types of asset classes.

Dave:
That’s exactly why I want to do this. Maybe you’ll wear me down and I will become an addicted flipper like you are, but my objective at this point is to hopefully just build big chunks of equity that I can maybe put into other flips, but mostly use to go out and buy more rental properties, do more Burrs, that kind of thing. I am also lucky though because you have agreed to help me find my first deal as a flipper. So maybe tell us a little bit about if someone’s out there like me looking for their first flip deal and they want to do it in a responsible, risk adjusted way, what do you look for in that first deal?

James:
Yeah, you want that cream puff for your first deal.

Dave:
Oh yeah. You getting me a cupcake.

James:
And that’s what you want though. There’s so many things involved in flipping. The first thing is you got to learn how to underwrite a house. Be able to pull comparables, look at it, look at what needs to be done and create a scope of work to create value and create equity. That’s hard when you don’t know what you don’t know. One of the biggest mistakes that flippers make when they buy their first deals, they buy the cheapest thing. And like, well, it’s going to be safe because I’m buying it so low. How can this go wrong? It can go wrong.

Dave:
I mean-

James:
I think the

Dave:
Cheaper deals scare me way more.

James:
The worst deals I ever bought were the cheapest deals.

Dave:
They’re cheap for a reason usually

James:
Because

Dave:
No one wants them or there’s a lot of hair on them.

James:
Yeah. Everyone else thinks it’s a tear down and maybe it really was. That’s where I’ve had second stories fall off houses. I’ve had all sorts- Oh yeah, no. Just

Dave:
Like straight fall off.

James:
Yeah. And it was a good deal. It was cheap. I bought it sight unseen. We started a demo and all of a sudden I get a call from the contractor. The second floor just fell off. I’m like, “What do you mean it just fell off? He sends me a photo.” My second, it literally fell off.

Dave:
Did you save some money on demo at least?

James:
I’ve never framed a house so quickly after that where we just got it framed back up and yeah, we had to throw a lot more lumber than what we thought, but that’s the hard part about flipping. So you want to take steps. I have flipped a lot of homes, a lot of zombie houses, a lot of beat up, beat up properties, but I didn’t start with that. I started with a townhome or something that was simple because it was about, well, how do you purchase the property? How do you look at it to make sure it’s a good deal? But then there’s so many other steps. How do you use the right leverage for that deal? How are you going to get your funding? Then how are you going to create a budget for that property? And that’s why you want that simpler project. You don’t need a swing for the fences.

Dave:
Agreed. Yeah.

James:
You need to take your time. It’s what, base its win games, right? Bases and doubles.

Dave:
Totally. That’s the way I’m looking at it is if I can break even … Obviously I’m hoping to make money on this deal, but if I make a little bit of money, I’ll be happy if I learn a lot, which I’m very sure I’m going to learn a lot. And that’s why I think when you were convincing me to do this, you were sort of telling me more of a cosmetic flip. We talked about definitely not doing any structural stuff or major structural things for the house. What are other things that first time flippers should put in their buy box or keep out of their buy box?

James:
Yeah. The number one is layout changes. It doesn’t matter what the condition of the house is. It’s how many spaces you have to create. When we’re flipping a house, we can buy this house and it’s in certain condition. It could be a two bed, one bath house. If your highest comp to create the most amount of value is a four bed, three bath, that means you’re going to have to move a lot of the home around to create that space or create new space. That’s the thing you want to avoid as a new flipper because you don’t know what you don’t know and it’s hard to control those costs. That requires a lot of framing. Even if the house is in really good shape, if you have to create those spaces, you still have to rewire it, you still have to re-plummet. Everything has to get done.
So that’s what we want to avoid on the first one. Also, don’t buy the dilapidated home that is melting away. Now that’s something that gets … I get excited when I say- So leave

Dave:
Those for

James:
You. You don’t need to buy that deal. And so you want to create standard processes as you do your first flip. When you’re doing a cosmetic and maybe you have to add a bathroom or open a kitchen wall, those are the two items that are a litle bit more of the unknown, but you can control your flooring costs, you can control your doors and your trim. The cosmetics are things that you can easily control if you start going over budget. It’s really easy to go online and find a floor for a dollar less per square foot. It’s harder to find an electrician that will be 20% less than your lowest bid. And so start with the easy stuff. Don’t reconfigure the house and then don’t buy the dilapidated old homes that need all the mechanicals. That’s what you want to work into. But if you can systemize the cosmetic first, then you go into the mechanicals.

Dave:
And I assume buying cosmetic, most of the time your margin is going to be a little bit thinner though, right? Because there’s going to be more demand for those kind of homes. But there’s also less risk, right?

James:
Less risk and less time in the deal. Time kills deals. One of the biggest things, I think, mistakes that people look at when you’re flipping a house is like, well, the margin’s a little low. I always look at annualized return. How much money can I put into a house? What can I make? And then I look at how many times can I do that in a year? Many times, even if you’re making just a base hit, but you can do that two or three times in a year, you will actually do better than the big, big fixer. And so look at what your return is. You buy a really good house, good location, not that bad of shape. You’re going to have a slimmer margin, but there’s less risk. And so that’s okay.

Dave:
Totally.

James:
Because the simpler projects, better for the new flipper.

Dave:
I think it’s the same thing with rental properties. If you were just getting started investing in real estate, at least for me, you were going to take on a borrower or rental property, I’d say probably go buy in a B class neighborhood. You’re not going to get the best deal. You’re not going to overpay for something in A class that’s probably not going to cash flow, but just go out there and hit a double and learn as much as you can and move on.

James:
Yeah. Don’t buy weird. Buy something clean that needs minor changes. That’s why we started with this one, Dave. We don’t want to go knee deep into a big, big project. And we’ve done, me and you have done some projects where you’ve not been running the whole project before. Yeah, you don’t let me near those. As you

Dave:
Shouldn’t. Yeah.

James:
No, because you’ve been taking steps to get into a flip and you’re like, all right, well, I want to watch the bigger project. Watch the process. Watch all the things that even if I flipped a lot of houses, mistakes happen. Things happen and you go, oh, okay, how do I deal with this mistake? And so just baby steps, but once you get in the flipping, it can change everything for you as an investor.

Dave:
All right. So I want to tell everyone about the deal that you found and ask you a little bit more about flipping in the current market environment that we’re in, but we got to take a quick break. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m here with James Dayner talking about my first flip. James, you helped me find a deal in the Seattle area that fits all the criteria that we were just talking about. Something that’s manageable, low risk, hopefully quick deal that I can get in and out of. Tell everyone about the deal that you found.

James:
This is a perfect first house. Besides, it’s a little expensive.

Dave:
It’s more than a little expensive.

James:
It’s definitely more than the last bar you bought. Yeah,

Dave:
For sure. All

James:
Right. The reason I like this is great location. When we’re flipping, the way for us to get in and out of a project is if you buy where everyone wants to live and you have the right product, it’s very sellable even when the market’s slowing down. The next best reason is we can do carpet angels in this house, Dave.

Dave:
Yes.

James:
Very rarely- You can

Dave:
Just live in this house. It’s nice.

James:
It is moving data ready. And when you’re buying in a more expensive market, that is the benefit in Seattle and some of these other areas like San Francisco, even Denver, can be expensive. Because the cost of construction is so much for the consumer, you can buy some clean homes, put in the right finishes and really, really increase the property. And so this house is perfect for the first time flipper. It’s built in the late ’70s. So it’s got good mechanicals, like the plumbing made out of copper. The wiring, not old. The light switches are kind of where they need to be.

Dave:
They’re fine.

James:
The roof’s

Dave:
Good.

James:
Roof’s good. Windows have been updated. The mechanicals of the house is a very well kept home. It just was out of date.

Dave:
Yeah. It just looks like grandma’s house.

James:
Yeah. And the issue with the house is the layouts are just not modernized. It’s got a closed off kitchen, little bit smaller primary bedroom and those are things we’re going to have to fix, but they’re minor changes. So that’s why I liked that part. But you had good mechanicals. It’s in a great location where product that everyone wants to buy. Right now, the market’s a little risky. Dave’s getting into flipping right now when things are compressing and they’re hard to sell. I

Dave:
Don’t know why I’m doing it.

James:
Because that’s kind of the best time to jump into something. When everybody else is terrified,

Dave:
There’s truth to that.

James:
It leaves more opportunities. I wouldn’t be able to buy this house for this price in this condition a year ago.

Dave:
Yeah, for sure. No way.

James:
It would’ve got multiple bids and probably sold for 1.3 to 14. We got you this house for 1,190. And so the reason I liked it for you as your first flip is also low risk. We knew the as-is value is 1.35 million walking in. So the day you walked in, you had some equity on it. Mechanicals are good so we don’t have to rearrange a lot of things. The layout bedrooms and bathrooms are where they need to be.

Dave:
Yeah. I mean, all we’re doing is, but we got the bathroom a little bit in the primary and opening up the kitchen from a structural perspective.

James:
And the slider.

Dave:
The slider. I love

James:
The slider. Yes. The slider in the basement, we got to get access out there. We still got to create those spaces. But yeah, everything’s kind of where it needs to be. It just needs to be modernized and improved slightly. So that’s why it’s a good first deal.

Dave:
Yeah. I like this as the next step for me because no individual element of the project I haven’t done before. Like what we’re framing in the primary, I’ve done projects like that. Opening up a kitchen, I’ve done projects like that. I haven’t done the slider exactly, but I’ve done some things similar to that. So all those things I’ve done, I’ve just never done it under time pressure.That’s sort of the big

James:
Difference

Dave:
For me. With rental properties, it’s less sensitive to how long it takes, but I took it’s a $1.2 million property. It’s very expensive or have hard money loan on it. So it’s costing me eight, $9,000 a month
Just to hold onto this thing. So I feel comfortable with the construction part of it, but trying to do this really, really quickly so we can get it back on the market is the piece that’s new, but that’s the exciting part.That’s why this feels good to me is I know I can handle the individual elements and I’m challenging myself in one way instead of trying a ton of new things all at once. So obviously this deal is very expensive. If you live anywhere near Seattle or California, you will understand that this is what things cost. But for a lot of people out there probably don’t have the capital to pull down something like this, but before you said people shouldn’t be buying the cheapest deal. So what do you recommend for new flippers who want to get into this and do what you’re saying, not take on a really big project, but maybe don’t have the capital to buy something that’s in a little bit better condition?
How do you navigate that?

James:
So one thing right now, market’s a little riskier, things are slower. That creates more opportunities. Those opportunities for a new flipper, even though the market’s riskier, there’s more available inventory to negotiate. When the market changes, we’ve been able to secure a lot cleaner houses on better buys because there’s just less demand overall. And so the cheap stuff we want to stay away from are the really, really old ones. And so as a new flipper, I always tell people, don’t buy anything. I think when we talked, I was like, don’t buy. We want to stay 1960s or newer. Better layouts, better mechanicals. That’s our hard rule. And when you’re new flipping, you got to create your own buy box. This is what I’m good at. This is the contractor I have. You’re partnered with your brother-in-law, Greg on this one. He has construction background, but not like a heavy, heavy studs down flip.
No.

Dave:
He’s commercial construction, not doing this kind of stuff.

James:
No. And so he’s going to learn his trades. And I always say, buy what your resources have. Now, if Greg, your brother-in-law was an experienced home contractor and done big projects, your buy box might’ve expanded out.

Dave:
That’s fair. Yep.

James:
It’s not always about price in location. It’s about what resources do you have and just stay away from the old stuff. Everyone getting new flipping, you don’t need to buy the oldest thing. The oldest thing will give you the most amount of problems.

Dave:
So you’d rather see a new investor go to a cheaper market and buy the buy box you’re describing 1960s or newer than stay in downtown Seattle, which could have really high upside, but then you’d be buying something from 1910 or something and that just brings on too much risk.

James:
Yeah. And people get that in their brain all the time. I want to buy a flip in this area. And I’m like, why? Well, because I’m close to it. I like that neighborhood. I like the schools. Fair. Yeah. Those are all valid points. You have no business buying in this neighborhood though because the homes are old and you don’t know what you’re doing. We want to go here. The most important thing is flipping is buy what your resources can do.

Dave:
That makes a lot of sense.

James:
I’ll go anywhere. I have really good contractors in Nebraska and they’re really good at turning condos and I can get deals on the … I will flip in Nebraska. That’s how you control the cost because your core team, the fundamental of flipping is to improve the value with the strategic rehab plan. The middle part’s the most important part of flipping. The money’s not made on the buy. It’s made on the plan and the resources you have and new you can be way more fluid. So go where you are capable of, not the location that’s in your brain.

Dave:
That’s great advice. And I think it just speaks to the fact this same thing with rental properties. It really is just math. For you, you are just targeting a return, a specific amount of return, a specific risk reward profile, and you’re willing to do that almost anywhere if the math makes sense rather than sort of being somewhat emotional about it and just falling in love with a specific property or location.

James:
I’ll go anywhere, anywhere. People always think we do these massive homes and we do, but one of the best deals I ever did this year was an hour north out of Seattle. It was a mobile home. It was not sexy and I had to go there zero times. My contractor knew how to get in and out real quick and we ended up doing … We paid 290,000 for it. We put 100 in, it was big project and mobile home and we sold it for six.

Dave:
Wow.

James:
So just buy what your resources can do. That’s the most important thing.

Dave:
Oh, that’s great advice. So especially for new flippers, just trying to take on something that is reasonable and responsible for you and that you are confident that you can pull off with the time and the money that you have to contribute to the project. I am feeling pretty good about the construction. I feel pretty good about the plan. The market is what worries me right now because we are seeing in Seattle and in most places in the country, days on market are going up.

James:
It’s

Dave:
Not as hot of a market as it used to be. So is it still a good market to be flipping in?

James:
Yeah, the market, it goes up and down and it transitions. And that’s the risky part about flipping. Timing is everything in this business. Whether you buy the right rental property, it appreciates, rents go up. It’s just what is it? We’re so tied to the economy that you don’t know what could happen at any time and that’s why it’s really, really risky. It is very normal what’s going on right now and I’m just used to it. What wasn’t normal for me was like 2008 when we were at Flippini. And then we would look at a house and it was going to be worth 10%, 15% less than the day we bought it. And so that was hard. We were trying to time it on the way down. Where it hurts in this business is when you get stuck in the middle. I have right now nine houses for sale of my own.
I ran a proforma when I bought those properties. I thought I would have them for a certain amount of time. Market time, all my comps might’ve been five days during that time, now they’re 45. And so the extra cost, the more time in a deal will slow down. And so it does come with a certain amount of risk, but that doesn’t mean it’s not solvable. You just have to do the underwriting upfront. Your house that you bought a year ago, we would’ve ran the performa at a four-month buy and hold. Renovate it in eight weeks, get on market. We’ll sell it in the first week, close in 30 days. We’ll be in and out of this deal in four. Now when we looked at the proforma, we ran it at six months. We had an extra two months of time. Also, when it transitions, you don’t want to go to the high end of the comps.
So when we looked at this, we thought the value was 1.6 million.

Dave:
Yeah, that’s the performa.

James:
The performa is 1.6. Our comps are 1.625 and 1.7 when you bought it. We didn’t go to the high end of the comps. And so that’s the important part. You can’t get deal goggles. I can buy this thing. How do I mitigate risk? If market’s slow or not, as long as I buy it right and I look at and have the right expectations upfront, that’s how it becomes a lot safer.

Dave:
So it sounds like really what you have to do is the same thing I recommend to people about rental property investing right now is just extremely conservative underwriting. And when you’re buying a rental property these days, I often caution people to really put low expectations for appreciation, low expectations for rental growth, high expectations for property tax growth. You need to account for all of those things. You don’t know if they’re going to happen, but you need to sort of assume … For me, not the worst, but I assume a pretty negative scenario going forward, not because I necessarily think that’s going to happen, but I want to protect myself in case that does happen. And if things kind of keep going like there, which is kind of flat-ish, then you’re going to be fine and you actually might do better than your performa. Is that sort of how you would approach it?

James:
Yeah, it’s a high risk, so you want to be conservative right now. Don’t go to the high end of everything and build in the worst case scenario. On this deal, the reason I liked it for you, because this is a lot of pressure for me, Dave.

Dave:
Yeah. Oh, I know. That’s why I’m airing this to make sure this deal goes well.

James:
Yeah, this deal better go well or I’m going to have to retire. No, I’ll just get you a better deal next time. But then also make sure that you have a very sellable product. That’s where people get jammed up on. They’re missing an amenity. They’re on a busier road. There’s negative impact properties right now in a slow market you want to stay away from. And this house had all the things that the buyer and the demographic wanted, two car garage, big backyard, right bedrooms, right bathrooms, right layout, right location. That’s sellable even in a slow market.

Dave:
Yeah. You don’t want to cut costs and make a worse house because you’re in a not good market. And in a lot of ways, you want to almost make a better house. You need your house to check every single box because buyers are going to have more options and then you want to make it that yours is easily the best product on the market so that when they go and tour three or four or five houses in a day or in a weekend, yours is the best one.

James:
Sometimes you want to lean into it. 2008 when we were flipping, nobody wanted to spend money flipping a house. These were very basic shops. We used to do a couple little things though that would separate us from the rest of the inventory. And this is when there’d be six months inventory in the market, nine months of inventory and we’d somehow be the magical house that got plucked out. It was fancy back then. People laugh now, but we would throw really nice tile in the kitchen backsplash. And it was like, whoa, you got full tile backsplash. Or we were doing stainless steel appliances. It was like these little differences that made the buyer go, “I want that one.”

Dave:
Right. And people think that’s going to cut into your margin, but not necessarily. Because if that means you have 30 days on market instead of 90 days on market, you’re saving a lot of money in holding costs that probably at least makes up for those upgrades on the appliances or the backsplash or whatever.

James:
And I’m frugal with things. I’ll cut costs, but when you got to lean into it, you got to lean into it. And that’s why it’s really important. When you’re a first-time flipper, you got to surround yourself with the right team. This is a huge mistake people make. They go, “Well, I just need to go meet a bunch of wholesalers. I need to meet a bunch of brokers.” You need that dependable team. You need a really good lender that can fund your deal. You need a contractor that can implement that process, but you also need a broker to keep you up to date with real-time market updates. So you got to have a broker that can not just send you comps, go, “Hey, I think this is what you should be doing.” Pay attention to those comps, follow your broker’s opinion because the broker can help you vet the deal, look at it, but then give you advice on how to maximize that sale price when they go to sell it.
I see a lot of people make that mistake. They go find the discount broker because they’re saving money. Well, the guy’s doing it for 1% and that could be beneficial.

Dave:
Not if they don’t know what they’re doing. If they

James:
Don’t know what they’re doing. Not that they

Dave:
Can’t sell the house quickly.

James:
If they give you bad advice and they tell you to go, they don’t give you an update that, “Hey, someone just spent $100,000 more because they have a slider out to their backyard, probably want to invest that slider.” And so just hire the right team around you as a flipper. You need the right support because all sorts of other things are going to go off in this. Permits, neighbors, construction issues, contractor issues. You need that net to catch you and to help you work through those items.

Dave:
That’s great advice. I think this is something I’ve just learned in the last couple of weeks that you need to really … The whole game is figuring out where to spend money. It’s like you have a budget, there’s some things that you can save money on, some you have to go a little bit over on and that’s what’s kind of fun about it. It just feels like sort of like a puzzle that you’re constantly trying to maneuver and move around. And I really have been enjoying the problem solving part of it, but I’m also lucky because Greg does all the construction management for me.

James:
And I’ve enjoyed working with Greg because he’s frugal in his own way.

Dave:
Oh yeah.

James:
And I was thinking commercial contractor, he’s going to spend all this money. I’m going to have to watch him, but he’s like, “I think I can get this for this. ” And I’m like, “Hey, I can get you this floor for this price.” And he’s like, “Oh, really? ” And so it’s like because I don’t own the house, but we’re helping with the house because we’re the broker by even putting me and his brains together, we’ve saved thousands of dollars off the construction. Oh, sure.

Dave:
Absolutely.

James:
But that’s what you want, because flipping can be lonely.

Dave:
Oh yeah.

James:
If you’re in this house by yourself and it starts snowballing, you’re like, “I’m the guy that’s not getting this done, or I’m the gal not getting this done. So just have the right team around you.

Dave:
” We’ll talk more about flipping in the very weird market that we’re in right after this quick break. Stick with us. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. James and I are here talking about my first flip and how to navigate the tricky, somewhat confusing market that we’re in. One more question for you. We’ve been on the topic of controlling costs. How are you handling changes in material costs? Because we’re seeing tariffs over the course of the last year impact everything from lumber prices, cabinet prices, construction trucks, which sort of trickles into the services side of the industry. How are you personally mitigating the risk of price increases even over the course of the hold of a single project?

James:
That’s a tough thing. We had to get really good at this during the pandemic too, because there was a shortage on things and the pricing got out of control. You have to pause and go, “Okay, can we lean into this? ” And if you start going over budget, do you just go for a different plan and upgrade the house a little bit more if you have some comparables that will support that plan? So sometimes it’s going, “Okay, well, we had this, like your house, a more basic plan had a little bit of creep going on. ” All of a sudden we are three to 4% over budget for some unexpected and then we were looking at the comps and we go, “Well, we can just upgrade another 5% cost and go for this price.” So you got to look at, can you lean into it and switch your plan up?
But a lot of times you just got to go, “Okay, well, what can I go find cheaper?” And you always want to focus on the cosmetics. The way to get your cost down if you start getting creeped is you got to make multiple phone calls. We get more bids now than we did a year ago. It’s like, all right, we’re going to get five roof bids, five electrical bids, five plumbing bids, and we’ll just call, call, call. But some of this stuff, you can always find a deal. Tariff’s aside. Okay, appliances go up. Okay. I can go to a clearance center. I can mix match my appliances. I can probably shave $1,000 off. You can always find, I was talking to Greg, I’m like, “Hey, these floors are only three bucks and we had a 350 allowance.” So that’s picking up $3,000 in cost across your budget.
And so when you go into your first flip, always put in, I said, set allowances. What do you want to put in the property? You need to put yourself on an allowance so you don’t spend anymore. That’s our ceiling cap. But it also allows you to be more flexible. As a new investor, that’s how you control because it’s very tangible for anybody going, “Okay, my floors are four bucks. If I can get it for three, that’s a dollar cheaper.” So in these times, pad your budgets, throw a contingency on and then have a little bit bigger material allowances because you’re more flexible on those than you are rewiring a house.

Dave:
Right. Well, so you’re saying though, you want to stick to that allowance and budget, but you want flexibility about the actual product that you do. So you

James:
Say

Dave:
It’s 350, maybe on your spec sheet when you’re specing it out, you have some floor that you really like and then all of a sudden it goes up to four bucks. You got to stick to the 350 and sort of adjust what material you put into the house because you sort of set that unless you’re going to upgrade the whole plan and go for a higher price point.

James:
Yeah. You either got to switch your plan, upgrade the house to a new value or the floors you really love, you can’t love them anymore. Go find something else. Yeah,

Dave:
Exactly. So you need to be a litle bit flexible there. All right. Well, this has been a great conversation. You’ve helped me obviously so much in the last couple of weeks. I’m looking forward to finishing this thing out. Any last advice for people like me who are sort of curious about flipping, not fully sold, want to dip their toe into it? Any last words of wisdom?

James:
I think you don’t have to buy your first flip. You can work into it. Right now, I’ve explored some other markets. I don’t have the same skillset and resources. I have experience like Newport Beach. I got this big flip going on right now. I didn’t have the contractor, I didn’t have the resources. So I partnered with someone on that project because they can run the job site, they know the cities, they know the permits, they know the trades, they will control the cost. He will probably get this budget done for about 400 grand less than I could do it right now.

Dave:
400 Grand.

James:
It’s a big budget. It’s 1.6 million. So it’s a different thing, right? It’s what? It’s the most expensive property, but I did that because I wanted to reduce my risk. Now, do I think I could figure it out? I can, but it’s going to take time. It’s going to take effort. It’s going to cause stress. So you can partner with someone first, watch the process going on, and then take your step into a cosmetic. You don’t have to rush into this.

Dave:
Yeah,

James:
Totally

Dave:
Agree.

James:
Just find the people doing it that have been doing it for a while because we’ve gone through all different types of market cycles. We felt different types of pains, different types of wins. Learn that way you can still make money and then branch off baby steps. Don’t jump in too deep on any heavy construction project. Burs, flips. They can eat you alive and eat your numbers alive.

Dave:
For sure. This is the kind of market, whether, like you said, burrs, flips, rental properties, whatever. It’s a time to be patient right now. Not patient in finding deals, but also just not rushing to try and make massive returns on your first deal or jumping into a project that you’re not equipped to handle. Just be patient and disciplined about your approach and trust that if you do this responsibly over a consistent amount of time, you’re going to be successful in this industry.

James:
You’re going to run into some rock walls at some point. It’s frustrating. Can you learn from them? Can you systemize around it? Learn from your mistakes. I make mistakes on every house. I have to learn around those. That’s

Dave:
Good to hear because you’ve done a lot.

James:
I’ve made the most mistakes probably in the nation flipping houses.

Dave:
And you say it proudly. I’m

James:
Probably the worst flipper in the room if we’re going by mistakes, right?

Dave:
That’s true. I haven’t made any

James:
Yet. Yeah. You got a perfect scorecard right now. Mine is very battled. And that’s the thing, you guys, it’s just learning. You don’t know what you don’t know. You don’t know what’s the sidehouse is, but have the right team around you, you can always get through those problems. And so don’t get frustrated. I’m excited not for you just to make some money on this flip. I’m excited to see what kind of multifamily deal you take down in a year.

Dave:
Yeah, exactly.

James:
That’s what I’m most excited for.

Dave:
Yeah, for sure. Well, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with the entire BiggerPockets community today. Thank you so much for holding my hand on this first flip. We’ll, of course, update everyone as this project progresses and tell you how it winds up.

James:
Yeah. And hopefully I don’t look bad. The press is real.

Dave:
Greg and I are going to work very hard to make this look good. And for everyone listening, if you want to learn how to flip from James, obviously you can hear him here on BiggerPockets, but also check out his TV show on A&E Million Dollar Zombie Flip.

James:
Well, and you got to make a special guest experience.

Dave:
I’m also going to be on it this season, so come check it out.

James:
Yeah. You guys not only talking about flipping the house, you got to watch us.

Dave:
Yeah, you can actually see the house I’m going to be flipping.

James:
That’s why the pressure’s extra for me.

Dave:
Yeah, because it’s going on TV for both of us.

James:
Yeah. TV, podcast world.

Dave:
Yeah, definitely better go well, but I have confidence that it’s going to. Well, thanks so much, man. And thank you so much for listening to this episode of the BiggerPockets Podcast. We’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

‘We’re All Mean Girls at This Company’: Inside the Explosive Workplace Allegations Against Alex Cooper and Matt Kaplan



The husband-and-wife founders of Unwell claim to be champions of Gen Z feminists and young adults. But Vanity Fair reports they run roughshod over a workplace marred by ‘fear, anxiety, and paranoia.’

Kudos: Make A Purchase On Brevo & Earn $100


The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Kudos is offering up to $100 on Brevo

Our Verdict

You get $5 on account creation and $100 cash back when you become a new paying client. You can find more about Kudos by clicking here. If this tracks properly seems to be an easy money maker but YMMV. Cheapest subscription is $9/month. 

Hat tip to reader someguy

Nexstar CEO: big tech swallowed local newspapers. Local TV could be next



For decades, outdated rules and regulations have constrained the ability of local television broadcasters — the providers of local news, the most trusted information available to Americans — to compete, grow, and invest in their own future. During that same time, a handful of Big Tech platforms have amassed unprecedented economic power, each one dwarfing all of traditional media and dramatically reshaping how Americans consume news and information.

Companies like Google/YouTube, TikTok, Amazon, Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, and Netflix now reach virtually every screen in every home and every device in every pocket. Their scale is staggering. Today, YouTube accounts for one-eighth of all television viewing in the United States. One in four young adults report getting their news from TikTok. The advertising numbers are just as stark: according to S&P Global/Kagan, YouTube alone billed more in video advertising last year than all of broadcast television combined. In 2026, one Wall Street analyst predicts that just five digital entities — Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and TikTok — will control 65% of the advertising market, worth $260 billion. 

These companies are not built to prioritize fact-based journalism or civic discourse. Their business model rewards clicks, not accuracy or accountability. While their content competes with trusted, fact-based journalism in the commercial marketplace, it does not serve the same critical purpose in the marketplace of ideas that is so vital to the proper functioning of our democracy. That makes the threat these companies pose to local broadcasters and local news very real and very urgent. 

If all of this sounds somewhat familiar, it should. Local newspapers were once indispensable — deeply rooted in their communities and widely trusted. Then, with the rise of online news and advertising, their economics began to unravel. New competitors emerged with a scale and reach local publishers simply couldn’t match. The consequences were severe. Thousands of newspapers closed. Many others were hollowed out. According to the Medill Local News Initiative, in the last 20 years nearly 270,000 jobs at local newspapers have been lost. Today, communities are lucky if there is a single paper left. When regulatory relief finally came for newspapers, the economics had already collapsed — a warning local broadcast cannot afford to ignore. 

Local broadcast television now faces a similar inflection point. I have spent the past 30 years of my life building one of the country’s leading local television companies, Nexstar Media Group. I founded the company in 1996 with one television station in Scranton, Pennsylvania, located in the back of a converted Kresge’s department store. Today, with TEGNA under the Nexstar umbrella, we provide local news and programming to more than 130 communities across the country and employ more than 18,000 people, nearly 9,000 of whom are journalists.

Americans consistently rank local newscasts as their most trusted source of information. Across Nexstar stations, we produce more than 300,000 hours of local news and programming each year. And in an era of rampant misinformation and growing polarization, local journalists provide a critical counterweight — offering verified facts and a forum for civic engagement. Sustaining that mission in today’s environment requires scale — which is exactly why Nexstar pursued the acquisition of TEGNA.

This transaction is vital to the future of local television and local journalism. Without the ability to grow, local broadcasters will struggle to compete for audiences, attract advertising, and invest in the journalism that is vital to our communities. With it, we can expand our reach and preserve something no algorithm can replicate: trusted local news. Even combined, Nexstar and TEGNA represent just 15% of the more than 1700 full-power stations across the country and have no presence in 20% of the country. 

The alternative is dire. A future where Americans rely on algorithm-driven feeds, viral content, and AI-generated summaries for information. A future where local voices are diminished or disappear altogether. A future where fewer institutions are dedicated to reporting facts, holding power to account, and fostering informed civic dialogue. No one wants their news from a chatbot or a rage-optimized social feed. And Americans deserve more than a shrinking set of national outlets that do not reflect the diversity of their communities. This deal offers us all a chance to preserve real news options for future generations of Americans.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

The Best Investment Strategies by Monthly Income in Europe: €1K, €2K, €4K+



👉🏼 Check out my step-by-step training on ETF & index investing from Europe:

📩 Get investing insights for European investors in your inbox – join 70’000+ newsletter readers:

All the content on this channel is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Any examples of investments, investment firms, or strategies are provided purely for illustrative purposes and are not endorsements. This content does not take into account your personal financial situation or risk profile. Investing involves risk, and you should do your own research or consult a licensed financial advisor before making any decisions.

Always watch out for scammers in the comments. Any recommendation of a specific financial advisor or expert is almost certainly a scam. Any profit claims that sound too good to be true are likely a scam. I will never ask you to message me privately. I will never recommend you use a specific investment platform or buy a particular investment.

I only offer educational courses via my website indexmasterclass.com (use the links above).

source

Warsh walks into a divided Fed as a ‘bare-knuckle fight’ begins for monetary policy


Nicolas Jabko (pictured top), a political science professor at Johns Hopkins University, said the challenge Warsh faces is not just political. The committee itself may not be on his side.

“He needs to basically sway the entire committee his way if he wants to lower interest rates,” Jabko told Mortgage Professional America. “And he may have a lot of trouble doing that because of the new inflationary pressures. The rising prices and inflation have just spiked once again.”

Warsh is ‘pigeonholed’

Jabko said Warsh’s reputation at the Fed was built during the 2010s, when he was among a minority of board governors who pushed back against the full scope of quantitative easing and ultimately resigned over it. That is where the hawk label comes from.

Warsh has been pushing for an overhaul of how the central bank thinks about and views data, which could help support future rate easing. In his confirmation hearing, he argued that the arrival of artificial intelligence will generate a supply shock significant enough to justify lower rates. Jabko said most economists are not yet convinced.

“He’s been taking the position that with the arrival of AI, you don’t really need to have a tight monetary strategy, because this arrival of AI will actually create a supply shock,” Jabko said. “It will basically increase the productivity of the American economy, and therefore, the Fed should lower interest rates. This is debated amongst economists. I think most economists are very skeptical of Warsh’s new argument.”

UC Humanities And Social Science Faculty Join STEM Push To Restore The SAT


University of California faculty from the humanities, social sciences, arts, business, law, and education have published their own open letter backing their STEM colleagues’ push to restore standardized testing and they’re going further, calling for both the math and the verbal reasoning sections of the SAT/ACT to return to undergraduate admissions.

The new letter explicitly endorses the earlier letter from more than 600 UC math and STEM faculty, then broadens the argument: it’s not just calculus students who are showing up underprepared. Reading, writing, and quantitative reasoning gaps are surfacing across non-STEM fields, too.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

When the original STEM letter landed, it was easy to frame the readiness debate as a math problem. This letter makes it clear that new college students are under-prepared across the board. By bringing in faculty from across the social sciences and humanities, the campaign now spans nearly the entire university and it shifts the ask from a STEM-only math requirement to a full restoration of the SAT/ACT, verbal section included.

That matters because UC’s test-blind policy currently applies to every campus and every major. These faculty argue that requiring all programs to ignore test scores is no longer defensible “in an era of K-12 grade inflation and the growing use of AI in admissions essays.

What The Faculty Argue

The non-STEM faculty lean on UC’s own research — the Academic Senate’s Standardized Testing Task Force report, which found that test scores predict college grades and graduation rates. They point to Table 6 of that report, which shows reading and writing scores predict performance across fields, “especially in the social sciences and humanities,” and that SAT-math predicts grades in social science classes even after controlling for high school GPA and verbal scores.

A few of their core points:

  • AI makes essays a weaker signal. As AI tools improve, the letter argues, it’s “more important than ever” for students to read, reason, and build arguments on their own, and harder to measure that through application essays.
  • Equity cuts both ways. No admissions criterion is free of social background, the faculty note. Extracurricular counts and essay writing style are “strongly associated with social class,” while test scores can surface “talented students from underrepresented ethnicities and economically disadvantaged families and under-resourced schools.”
  • Math reaches beyond STEM. Statistics and quantitative reasoning run through the social sciences and applied fields, and even analytic philosophy. Students weak in algebra struggle in statistics, which ripples across disciplines.

The Timeline

The faculty frame the timing as urgent. Test-blind admissions are already locked in for the Fall 2026 and Fall 2027 entering classes. If UC doesn’t reverse course “in the next month or two,” Fall 2028 will be admitted test-blind as well and inaction through the 2026–2027 academic year would lock in Fall 2029, too. That’s three to four more years of what the faculty call a “failed experiment.”

What The Letter Says

Here’s the full text of the open letter from UC non-STEM faculty:

Dear Academic Senate leadership, UC Regents, UCOP, University of California colleagues, and the people of California,

We are University of California faculty from the social sciences, humanities, arts, business, law, education, and other non-STEM fields. We are writing to endorse our STEM colleagues’ earlier open letter regarding the math component of SAT/ACT and argue for also using the verbal reasoning component of SAT/ACT in undergraduate admissions.

We first want to thank our mathematics colleagues for explaining the harmful impact that a test-blind admissions policy has had on math and other STEM education at the University of California. Some of us did not sign the mathematics letter because it was framed as a statement from STEM faculty, but we agree with its conclusions. As a complement to their focus on STEM preparation, we would like to highlight concerns from our own fields.

While our STEM colleagues understandably focused on problems caused by the absence of SAT/ACT-math in undergraduate admissions, we emphasize that University of California undergraduate admissions would also benefit from considering the SAT reading and writing section or the ACT English and reading sections. As carefully documented in Section III and the various appendices of the Academic Senate’s Standardized Testing Task Force report, standardized test scores predict important outcomes like college grades and graduation rates. For example, Table 6 of the report shows that reading and writing scores predict performance across fields, especially in the social sciences and humanities. As artificial intelligence becomes more capable, it is arguably more important than ever for students to be able to think through and compose sound arguments on their own, to comprehend the texts they read, and to recognize weaknesses in the arguments of those texts. The growing use of AI also makes essays a less reliable indicator of these abilities. Without foundational literacy, students face difficulties across university disciplines. Eliminating the metrics that diagnose these preparation gaps imposed significant barriers for underprepared students and their instructors alike.

We recognize concerns about equity and access. However, no admissions criterion is uncorrelated with social background. Notably, the number of extracurricular activities that college applicants report and the writing style of essays are strongly associated with social class. Standardized testing can provide critical information about academic preparation and help identify talented students from underrepresented ethnicities and economically disadvantaged families and under-resourced schools whose potential may not be fully reflected elsewhere in their applications, including cases where school resources or grading standards vary widely.

The absence of SAT/ACT-math is felt well beyond STEM education. Many social sciences and applied fields, as well as some humanities fields, rely heavily on statistics and quantitative reasoning. Students without a solid grounding in algebra struggle in statistics, which affects learning across fields. Even some non-quantitative fields (e.g., analytic philosophy) require students to use forms of reasoning closely related to mathematical thinking. Not surprisingly, Table 6 of the Senate task force report shows that SAT-math predicts grades in social science classes, and to a certain extent in humanities classes, even after controlling for high school GPA and the verbal reasoning component of the SAT.

We support restoring the use of both the verbal and math aspects of SAT/ACT to undergraduate admissions. As our colleagues’ letter noted, SAT/ACT-math will benefit STEM education and we add that social sciences, humanities, and other fields will also benefit from the use of standardized testing in admissions, including the reading and writing components of the tests. Reasonable people can debate how much weight SAT/ACT should carry relative to other parts of applications and policies may vary by campus and degree program. However, it is unreasonable to require all undergraduate degree programs at all campuses to be test-blind in an era of K-12 grade inflation and the growing use of AI in admissions essays.

As faculty, we are best positioned to see the consequences of six years of test-blind admissions. It is also our decision to make under the principles of shared governance. These principles were respected when UCOP requested that the Academic Senate investigate the role of testing in admissions policy. The Senate Testing Task Force’s report called for the continued use of SAT/ACT in admissions and this was endorsed by the systemwide Assembly of the Academic Senate in a unanimous 51-to-0 vote. A month later, the UC Regents considered the Task Force’s research, but ultimately voted against the Academic Senate’s recommendation and discontinued the use of the SAT/ACT in undergraduate admissions.

The lead time in implementing a return to a sensible admissions policy makes it urgent to begin that correction soon. Test-blind admissions are already locked in for Fall 2026 and Fall 2027 entering classes. If the University of California does not reverse course in the next month or two, the Fall 2028 entering class will be admitted on a test-blind basis with all the problems that implies. If the University of California does not change policy in the 2026-2027 academic year, this will lock in test-blind policy for the Fall 2029 entering class as well. This leaves at least three to four more years of a system where underprepared students are accepted only to struggle with their academic goals, while qualified California students with high potential from diverse backgrounds may be squeezed out of the UC system and left with no choice but to attend alternative public segments, go out of state, or turn to private institutions instead. California families deserve an admissions process that considers all available evidence of academic preparation.

Therefore, we call for the UC Academic Senate and the UC Regents to give up the failed experiment of the last six years and return to including both the math and the verbal reasoning components of SAT/ACT as part of undergraduate admissions.

Sign the Open Letter from UC Social Sciences, Humanities, Arts, Business, Law, Education, and other non-STEM Faculty.

How This Connects

The College Investor reported in High GPAs And Test-Optional Mask Poor Math Skills At College that test-optional admissions combined with grade inflation has produced incoming students whose transcripts overstate their real ability — a mismatch that often only surfaces after enrollment, when remediation costs time, tuition, and degree-completion odds. We also covered the original STEM faculty letter demanding the SAT return for STEM majors. With most elite peers already requiring scores again (including all Ivy League colleges after Columbia reversed track this last week), UC is one of the last major holdouts and now the pressure is coming from inside nearly every department.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5df7″].tcb-post-list #post-81420 [data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5dfd”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/UC-Berkeley-Sign-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

UC Faculty Demand SAT Return For STEM Majors After 30x Spike In Students Below High School Math

UC Faculty Demand SAT Return For STEM Majors After 30x Spike In Students Below High School Math
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5df7″].tcb-post-list #post-68506 [data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5dfd”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/UCSD-Library-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

High GPAs And Test Optional Mask Poor Math Skills At College

High GPAs And Test Optional Mask Poor Math Skills At College
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5df7″].tcb-post-list #post-70467 [data-css=”tve-u-19ec42e5dfd”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/College-Graduation-Rates-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

U.S. Six-Year College Graduation Rate Stays at 61%

U.S. Six-Year College Graduation Rate Stays at 61%

The post UC Humanities And Social Science Faculty Join STEM Push To Restore The SAT appeared first on The College Investor.

Trump at 80 works to project strength as political woes mount



President Donald Trump is trying to project brute strength as he turns 80, but mounting political problems at home and abroad are tarnishing his self-styled image as an all-powerful leader. 

Trump will celebrate becoming an octogenarian as he hosts an extravagant, $60 million Ultimate Fighting Championship showcase on the White House South Lawn Sunday night. 

He has made a habit of attending high-profile sporting events, including the NBA Finals in New York earlier this week. And he’s announced he will headline a rally on the National Mall to mark the US’s 250th birthday. 

It’s an all-out effort to inject himself into nearly every corner of American culture. But political spectacle, and overseeing the body blows of mixed martial-arts fighters, can’t hide that Trump’s political capital is declining. He is struggling to end an unpopular war with Iran, some fellow Republicans have begun to resist his ideas and polls show his support outside his devoted base is waning.

In public, Trump has expressed nothing but confidence. But privately, he has become increasingly frustrated, according to a person close to the White House, who requested anonymity to discuss internal dynamics.

Some of Trump’s public appearances have instead revealed the depth of the public’s antipathy toward him. The crowd inside Madison Square Garden resoundingly booed Trump at the NBA Finals game when he was shown on the arena’s big screen, though he reported hearing “mostly cheers.” He announced his 250th anniversary rally plan only after musical acts pulled out of scheduled performances, citing the political nature of the celebrations.

On top of that, as only the second US president to turn 80 in office, he is facing questions about his age and abilities. 

“There’s a feeling when you hear someone is 80 that they are incapacitated,” presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said. “President Trump is trying to show himself to the manosphere as being fit as a fiddle, golfing regularly. And he wants to associate himself with things like wrestling and race cars and the Knicks game to show he is out and about and at full capacity.” 

The dynamic is playing out months ahead of the November midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress. If Democrats reclaim one or both chambers, it could erode Trump’s power in Washington even further. Republicans outside the White House are worried about the president’s polling and substantial midterm losses, according to the person.

The White House has publicly brushed aside that narrative and has boasted that Trump remains a kingmaker within the GOP. Allies have pointed to two sitting senators who lost their primaries after Trump endorsed their opponents.

On a few occasions, however, Trump has let his frustration show. He expressed regret for endorsing a candidate for governor in Iowa who lost the Republican primary. He blamed his political advisers, telling reporters Thursday that he would have supported the other candidate “had I been given the proper information.”

The president continues to make superlative statements about his health and negotiating abilities. On social media Trump recently posted a photo of himself with the headline: “President Trump ages in reverse!” So far he has spent little time publicly reflecting on the milestone. Asked by a reporter what he wishes for his birthday, he replied, “Peace for the world.”

Meanwhile, Trump advisers have aggressively pushed back against questions about Trump’s health after his recent physical examination. They have countered talk about his tendency to close his eyes during events by posting on social media pictures of reporters with their eyes closed. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung recently took to social media on a Saturday night to declare that Trump “It’s 9:30 PM on a Saturday night and President Trump is still in the Oval Office working hard for the American people.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that the UFC event is nothing more than a pastime for Trump, saying “he is a sports guy.” 

“The president naturally projects strength every day by leading the strongest country in the history of the world,” she said in a statement.

Intentional or not, the fight setup symbolizes Trump’s control over the White House. A massive venue — dubbed “the Claw” — has been constructed on the South Lawn soaring nearly 100 feet up, higher than the building itself, with seating for 4,300 guests. The event’s infrastructure totals 380,000 tons, according to organizers. ESPN reported earlier on the logistics.

So far, Trump’s alpha-male roadshow has largely focused on topics other than the economic impact of the war in Iran. When asked about those concerns, Trump has insisted oil prices will drop if a pending deal is signed in coming days. His public comments to reporters have heavily focused on his Washington renovation projects, such as the resealing of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Oftentimes, pocketbook issues seem like an afterthought. 

Asked Wednesday about new data that showed inflation was at a three-year high, Trump told reporters, “I love the inflation,” comments he later told the New York Post were taken out of context. 

Earlier in the week, he was glib when he and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin were asked if they would attend the next NBA Finals game in San Antonio. Zeldin said the White House was busy with “important stuff.” 

To that, Trump added: “Like a war.” 

The president’s approval rating has dropped consistently for months, forcing Republicans running in midterm elections to battle heavy headwinds with unhappy voters. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 35% of adults approve of Trump’s performance, compared with 63% who disapprove. Polling shows persistent concern about prices and the cost of living. 

“In his second term, the older he gets, the lower his job rating goes. It’s the reverse Benjamin Button,” said Democratic pollster Jeff Horwitt of Hart Research. “He may be trying to project strength, Americans see weakness and that he’s not delivering on what he promised — lowering costs and ending military conflicts.” 

Trump has nonetheless made clear he is doing things his way and has surrounded himself with a team that supports his every whim. That stands in contrast with his first term, when at times advisers sought to talk him out of drastic actions. He will try to keep flexing his muscles moving forward even if Democrats prevail in November, Brinkley said. 

“Trump’s not going to allow himself to be perceived as a lame duck,” he said.

Trump has said he knows he cannot run for a third term — although he has continued to tease the possibility. He has escaped some questions about his age as a result, compared with President Joe Biden who was dogged with concerns about his advancing years, especially after he attempted to seek another term after turning 80.

Trump’s overall approach to his birthday is vastly different than that with past presidential celebrations, which have ranged from quiet family gatherings or celebrity-studded fundraisers. 

Biden marked his 80th privately. Bill Clinton turned 50 while in office and had a giant fundraiser party at Radio City Music Hall, with performances by Bon Jovi and Aretha Franklin. When Ronald Reagan turned 70, his wife Nancy surprised him with a party in the East Room that was attended by Frank Sinatra and other Hollywood friends. 

And of course at John F. Kennedy’s 45th birthday party fundraiser at Madison Square Garden, Marilyn Monroe famously serenaded him with “Happy Birthday.”

How to Link Chase Business and Personal Credit Cards


Linking Chase Business and Personal Credit Cards

One of the advantages of Chase Ultimate Rewards is that you can combine points you earn from multiple credit cards. That includes personal and business Chase cards. You can also combine points with family members, but that got just a bit harder recently.

So for example you can earn 5X at office supply stores using your Chase Ink Business Cash card and then redeem for travel with Points Boost with your Chase Sapphire Preferred or Chase Sapphire Reserve for example.

So how can you combine your Chase Ultimate Rewards? The easiest option it to have all your cards under one login. To do that, you need to add your personal login to your business one.

Why Link Chase Business and Personal Credit Cards?

Before going into the steps of how to do it, here are some reason on why you should do it:

  • You can easily combine all your Chase Ultimate Rewards points under one account.
  • It’s just easier to manage all your cards if you have them under one login.
  • You can quickly see all Chase Offers that are available on each credit card

How to Link

Here’s how to link your business and personal Chase credit cards under one login:

  1. Log in to your Chase Business account (this will be your login for all cards going forward)
  2. Click the “person icon” near top right corner
  3. Choose “Profile & settings”
  4. On the left side menu, under “Account settings”, choose “Manage linked accounts”
  5. Click “Show my accounts”
  6. You will see a list of all Chase Personal and Business accounts for your SSN which you can link to your primary Business account
  7. Click “Link relationship” and then click again “Link relationship” to confirm

There are some things to keep in mind:

  • You have to add personal card account to your business login, it doesn’t work the other way around
  • If you want to unlink account, you need to call in (800-242-7338)
  • To link for transfers to other household members, you need to call or send a secure message online

Can Rivian Beat Tesla in the Long Term?


They’re finally here. Deliveries of the much-anticipated Rivian (RIVN +7.85%) R2 fleet have begun, and so begins an extraordinarily important chapter for the electric vehicle (EV) maker. The R2 isn’t just another model. With a starting price of less than $47,000, it’s Rivian’s push into the mainstream through a more affordable option.

Today’s Change

(7.85%) $1.22

Current Price

$16.76

The company’s ability to challenge Tesla‘s (TSLA +1.65%) dominance really hinges on the success and reception of the R2. Rivian’s previous models are luxury-oriented, with price tags starting at over $70,000. They are highly rated by drivers, but because of their price point, they are out of reach for most.

It hasn’t been an easy year for EV makers. The federal EV tax credit was eliminated, and demand for EVs has subsided in the U.S. Several legacy automakers have also downsized or canceled EV-related plans. While the environment is challenging for Rivian, there is an opportunity to reinvigorate the EV market and capture additional market share, especially from dominant rival Tesla.

The Rivian logo on a yellow backdrop.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Rivian’s business model is divided into two segments: automotive and software and services. The automotive division is still posting heavy losses, but software and services are profitable. Rivian’s total revenue for the first quarter of 2026 reached $1.38 billion, an 11% increase from the year prior. The company’s stock has decreased by about 20% in 2026 as of this writing.

Tesla still dominates Rivian in terms of market share. Combined, Tesla and China’s BYD account for about 25% of all EVs worldwide. Rivian has a very long way to go to overtake Tesla in the U.S. and then compete globally, but the first step is through the success and growing popularity of the affordable R2.

If this fleet is a hit among mainstream drivers in the U.S., it’ll help Rivian gain important ground in the U.S. I wouldn’t count on Tesla being dethroned for several more years, however.

Catie Hogan has positions in Rivian Automotive. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.