Home Blog

Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount: Save Up to 50%


Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount

This article contains Amazon affiliate links.

Amazon and American Express are once again offering targeted discounts when using Membership Rewards points at checkout. These promotions can save eligible users anywhere from 10% to 50% on Amazon purchases, simply by redeeming a small amount of Amex points during checkout.

The latest round of offers is valid through June 30, 2026, though the exact discount and redemption requirement varies by account. It’s worth noting that you now need to use at least $5 or $10 worth of points to get the discount. Let’s go over the details.

How this Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount Works

To use the offer, you need to:

  1. Link an eligible American Express Membership Rewards card to your Amazon account
  2. Activate the targeted promotion
  3. Add one or more of eligible products to your shopping cart
  4. Use Membership Rewards points at checkout 
  5. Savings will show on the final order checkout page if the items in your order are eligible for the promotion

Some users are now seeing a minimum redemption requirement of either:

  • $5 worth of points (714 Membership Rewards points), or
  • $10 worth of points (1,429 Membership Rewards points)

PROMO PAGE

Offer Details

The exact discount varies by account, but common offers include:

  • 10% to 50% off eligible purchases
  • Maximum discounts ranging from $10 to $80
  • Valid through June 30, 2026

Important Terms

  • Amazon.com reserves the right to cancel or modify this offer at any time.
  • Offer applies only to the purchase where Membership Rewards points are used for at least a portion of the purchase and the promotion code is applied at checkout.
  • Offer only applies to products sold by Amazon.com (Look for “sold by Amazon Digital Services LLC” on the product detail page.) Products sold by third-party sellers or other Amazon entities will not qualify for this offer, even if “fulfilled by Amazon.com” or “Prime Eligible”.
  • Limit one promotion code per Membership Rewards eligible card.
  • Offer may not be combined with other offers.
  • Shipping charges may apply to discounted promotional items.
  • Offer does not apply to purchase of digital content.

Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount 2026

Is This a Good Deal?

These Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount offers can still provide solid value, especially for purchases you were already planning to make. Even though Membership Rewards points are generally more valuable when transferred to airline and hotel partners, redeeming a small amount of points can easily be worth it if you’re saving $40, $50, or even more on an Amazon order.

The key is to redeem only the minimum number of points required in order to trigger the discount. But if your offers requires using 1,429 Membership Rewards points, you will probably want to skip the smaller discounts.

PROMO PAGE

Guru’s Wrap-up

This Amazon Amex Membership Rewards Discount remains one of the easiest targeted offers to use. While some users are now seeing slightly higher point redemption requirements, the deals can still provide excellent savings depending on your targeted offer.

If you haven’t checked your Amazon account recently, it’s definitely worth taking a look before the promotion expires. Just make sure you activate the promotion first and use only the minimum number of Membership Rewards points that is required to get the discount.

HT: DoC

 

Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases made through this article. Using links on the site for Amazon purchases is the best way you can support the site as you normally can’t earn cash back for these purchases. But, you should still check shopping portals such as Rakuten, TopCashback, RebatesMe, ShopBack and others for possible cashback. Your support is always greatly appreciated!

Most Companies Talk About Culture. Few Actually Get It Right



Fix your culture, and your client experience follows.

Bond traders bet Fed under Warsh will hike rates this year



(Bloomberg) — Bond traders are fully pricing in an interest-rate hike by the Federal Reserve this year, a sign of conviction in the market that Chair Kevin Warsh will need to move quickly to combat inflation.

Processing Content

Traders boosted their bets for higher rates on Friday after Fed Governor Christopher Waller — among the most dovish policymakers over the past year — said that based on the inflation trend, the central bank’s next policy statement should “make it clear that a rate cut is no more likely in the future than a rate increase.”

Interest-rate swaps repriced to levels anticipating that the Fed’s target range for its benchmark rate — 3.50%-3.75% since December — will be at least 25 basis points higher by the end of 2026, the first time such an outcome has been fully priced.

Waller’s comments halted a Treasury market rally, lifting the two-year note’s yield as much as six basis points to 4.14%, the highest level since February 2025. The US dollar rose.

“Waller’s latest remarks confirm the hawkish shift at the Fed,” Evercore ISI head of economics and central bank strategy Krishna Guha said in a note. “His discussion of inflation was across the board hawkish.”

The shift gathered pace at the most recent policy meeting in April, when three voters on the Federal Open Market Committee voted against the statement announcing the decision to hold rates steady because it also signaled that that the next move still could be a rate cut.

The dissenters favored a statement that didn’t mention the possibility of a cut. That was the course that Waller — who dissented from two Fed decisions to hold rates steady in the past year in favor of cutting them — backed in his speech.

Short-term interest rate markets fully pricing in a Fed rate increase is a complete turnaround from earlier this year, when President Donald Trump’s selection of Warsh — who was sworn in as the 17th Fed chair in a White House ceremony Friday — inspired Wall Street to bet on at least two quarter-point rate cuts in 2026. Traders began re-calibrating those wagers after the US and Israel attacked Iran in late February.

The resulting effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted Middle East oil exports, causing gasoline prices to surge. That has led to higher actual and expected inflation rates which, feeding through to other parts of the economy, could force a response from central banks. Sharp increases in energy and food prices in April drove a 3.8% year-on-year increase in the US consumer price index, the biggest since 2023.

Inflation Expectations

In the months leading up to his nomination, Warsh had criticized the Fed for not lowering rates enough and pointed to longer-term dynamics in the economy — namely an expected boom in productivity growth connected to artificial intelligence — that might justify cuts.

But he hasn’t aired his policy views in many weeks. During his confirmation hearing on April 21, lawmakers failed to press him for his near-term views on interest rates. While Trump at the swearing-in ceremony said Warsh should act independently, repeating a comment made earlier this week, as recently as last month he said he’d be disappointed if Warsh didn’t lower rates immediately upon taking the job.

The Fed’s next scheduled monetary policy announcement is on June 17, when policymakers are expected to hold rates steady. Minutes of the Fed’s April meeting released this week showed a majority of officials said the central bank would likely need to consider raising rates if inflation continued to run persistently above their 2% target.

What Bloomberg Strategists Say …

“As a leading proponent of rate reductions in the past, the fact that Waller is further distancing himself from cuts will be taken as a signal the central bank is giving up its dovish bias amid deepening concern about inflation.”

—Tatiana Darie, Macro Strategist Markets Live

Concurrently with Waller’s comments, a consumer sentiment survey by the University of Michigan showed that inflation expectations mounted in May. While they remain short of their 2025 highs, respondents’ expectations for inflation over the coming year and over the next five to 10 years increased more than anticipated, to 4.8% and 3.9% respectively.

Gains Erased

Treasury yields were near session lows just before Waller spoke, with the five- to 30-year tenors the lowest in a week. Signs that Iran and the US are close to a peace agreement provided a catalyst for investors to lock in yields near multiyear highs.

The US 30-year rate rose to 5.20% this week for the first time since 2007. It retreated to 5.06% Friday. UK, German and Japanese 30-year yields also reached multiyear highs.

While previous indications that a lasting agreement was imminent haven’t panned out, the potential for developments over the US three-day holiday weekend was a factor. US bond trading had an early close at 2 p.m. New York time, and Treasury futures contracts settled at 1 p.m., two hours earlier than normal.

“While the two sides appear to be a meaningful distance apart in their respective demands, the fact that there is an ongoing dialogue offers some solace,” said Ian Lyngen, head of US interest-rate strategy at BMO Capital Markets in New York. “There is significant event risk in the Middle East as we head into the long weekend.”

–With assistance from Edward Bolingbroke and Michael MacKenzie.

(Adds context in sixth and seventh paragraphs and updates yield levels.)

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com



Education Department Sends SAVE Borrowers a “Courtesy” Warning Before July 1 Formal Notices Begin


The U.S. Department of Education has started emailing borrowers enrolled in the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan a second round of reminders (which we’re dubbing as “courtesy” notices) ahead of the formal transition emails set to start July 1, 2026.

Why it matters: Around 7 million borrowers are still sitting in SAVE forbearance after a federal court order killed the plan. Once a borrower’s servicer sends the official notice, a 90-day clock starts to pick a new repayment plan or the servicer will move the borrower into one automatically (likely the Standard Plan). Borrowers who still don’t resume payments will being the path towards default. 

What The Notice Said

Here’s what the notice said to borrowers:

Our records show that you’re enrolled in the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan. As a reminder, a court order ended the SAVE Plan. You must select a new repayment plan, or your student loan servicer will move you into a different repayment plan.

In the coming months, your loan servicer will contact you about your specific deadline to choose a different repayment plan. Once you hear from your loan servicer, you’ll have 90 days to choose another repayment plan. This gives you time to select the plan that works best for you.

Our newest repayment plans—the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) and Tiered Standard Plan—will be available starting on July 1, 2026. Visit StudentAid.gov/bigupdates to learn more about these new repayment plans and other changes to the federal student aid programs.

If you don’t want to wait until July 1, 2026, you can choose a different repayment plan that fits your needs and goals now. Since our first email about the SAVE Plan ending, hundreds of thousands of borrowers have applied for a different plan.

If you are not enrolled in the SAVE Plan, did not submit an application for the SAVE Plan, already applied for a new repayment plan, or no longer have a balance on your federal student loans, you do not need to take any action.

Between the lines: It appears that the Department of Education is positioning this round of outreach as a soft warning before the formal 90-day countdown begins in July. Borrowers who wait until their servicer’s official notice arrives will have less time to compare options like IBR, RAP, and the new Tiered Standard Plan. Some borrowers may be blocked from plan like PAYE if they wait.

What to watch: July 1, 2026 is a big date: it’s the start of the official transition notices going out, and also when the two new repayment plans become available. Deadlines will stagger across borrower cohorts through the rest of 2026, with most borrowers expected to be back in active repayment by the end of September 2026. Our sources at the loan servicers have said that while the notices will be staggered, it’s likely that timeline will be “compressed”. 

How this connects: The College Investor has tracked the SAVE transition since the court order ended the program. Our prior reporting on the SAVE forbearance ending lays out the 7 million borrower population, and our coverage of the 90-day auto-enrollment risk explains why borrowers shouldn’t ignore the courtesy email. 

For readers weighing new repayment plan options, RAP and IBR will be the two most likely options. Borrowers should use a Student Loan Calculator and compare their choices now.

Bottom line: The courtesy email isn’t a deadline but it’s the likely one of the last warnings before the official deadline starts. Borrowers who pick a new plan now will have more control than those who wait for the formal notice.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb74″].tcb-post-list #post-79015 [data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb7a”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CollegeInvestor_1280x720_How_To_Use_A_529_Plan_For_Student_Loan_Repayment-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

How The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) Works: Payments, Eligibility, And Forgiveness

How The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) Works: Payments, Eligibility, And Forgiveness
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb74″].tcb-post-list #post-76955 [data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb7a”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Education-Secretary-Linda-McMahon-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

$180 Billion in Student Loans Are Now in Default, New Federal Data Shows

$180 Billion in Student Loans Are Now in Default, New Federal Data Shows
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb74″].tcb-post-list #post-18398 [data-css=”tve-u-19e50b0cb7a”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Nvidia-Headquaters-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Student Loan Repayment Assistance: Employers Offering SLRA

Student Loan Repayment Assistance: Employers Offering SLRA

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Education Department Sends SAVE Borrowers a “Courtesy” Warning Before July 1 Formal Notices Begin appeared first on The College Investor.

Cerebras vs. Nvidia: Which AI Stock Is the Smarter Buy Right Now?


The dust is just settling on Cerebras(CBRS 8.90%) impressive initial public offering (IPO), in which the stock price soared 68% on its first day of trading. If there were any lingering doubts about investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, they’ve certainly been put to rest.

Cerebras’ large-wafer technology claims to be a game changer in AI processing, potentially more efficient than Nvidia‘s (NVDA 1.86%). While the jury is still out on its long-term impact on its rivals, Cerebras’ blockbuster IPO proved investors have high hopes.

So, with a new AI infrastructure play in town, should investors skip Nvidia stock for Cerebras right now? Here’s what investors should know.

Image source: Getty Images.

The case for betting Nvidia remains the center of the AI hardware universe

Before you cast Nvidia aside for a shiny, new stock, it’s important to take a quick look at why Nvidia has become the most valuable company in the world.

First, it dominates the graphics processing unit (GPU) market, thanks to its near-ubiquity in AI data centers. The latest data shows that Nvidia holds a phenomenal 86% of the AI data center market by revenue. Its competitors can only dream of that level of dominance.

Second, it’s still investing in new tech to keep itself at the top. Nvidia recently released its new Vera Rubin AI platform, which it says delivers 10x higher inference throughput per megawatt than its Blackwell processor platform at just one-tenth the token cost. And CEO Jensen Huang said recently demand for Vera Rubin and Blackwell will lead to $1 trillion in orders through next year.

Nvidia is benefiting right now from the investments it made in superior processors years ago. And companies are still clamoring for its tech, as Huang’s estimates suggest. With tech leaders including Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Amazon, Microsoft, and others on track to spend hundreds of billions of dollars this year alone in data center investments, Nvidia’s growth likely hasn’t peaked.

Nvidia Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-1.86%) $-4.09

Current Price

$215.42

The case for catching Cerebras’ rising star

Having said all that, disruption is the name of the game in tech. New, innovative companies come along all the time and try to unseat the dominant ones. They’re not always successful, but when they are, investors can win big.

No one knows if Cerebras will become the next leading AI processor company, but it’s sure as heck trying. The company’s flagship product is its Wafer Scale Engine 3 (WSE-3), which is essentially a very large semiconductor that acts as one big chip, instead of hundreds of smaller ones.

Cerebras says the bigger silicon wafer gives it an advantage over Nvidia’s B200 package (which contains two processors), achieving 250 times more on-chip memory, and 2,625 times more memory bandwidth.

Speed and efficiency are the name of the game for AI right now, and some leading artificial intelligence companies are already buying into Cerebras’ claims. OpenAI signed a $20 billion deal with Cerebras for a multiyear compute capacity agreement, securing up to 750 megawatts of specialized AI infrastructure power and giving OpenAI a potential 11% equity stake in the chipmaker. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was also an early investor in Cerebras.

Clearly, Cerebras is on to something with its tech. Faster AI and big tie-ins with leading artificial intelligence companies shouldn’t be dismissed.

Cerebras Systems Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-8.90%) $-25.08

Current Price

$256.78

Verdict: Stick with Nvidia for now, but add Cerebras to your watch list

This might not be the outcome you wanted, but Nvidia is still the smarter AI play right now. What’s the reason? I’ve got four.

As in, Nvidia has more than 4 times Cerebras’ annual revenue. Nvidia had $216 billion in sales in its most recently completed year, compared to just $500 million for Cerebras. Oh, and Nvidia had about $117 billion in non-GAAP (adjusted) net income for the full fiscal year, compared to Cerebras’ non-GAAP net loss of $75 million in 2025.

In short, Nvidia generates far more revenue, is much more profitable, and is the reigning GPU market leader. Cerebras may have good tech, but as an investment right now, it’s still a very risky bet.

I understand why you might be getting hyped up about Cerebras and the idea of it unseating Nvidia in the AI semiconductor space. By all means, keep an eye on Cerebras. But if you’re buying an AI stock today, Nvidia should be your pick.

[Targeted] Target Circle 360: $10 Rewards for Every $100 Spent (Limit 5)


Update 5/22/26: Available again for Memorial Day weekend.

Update 12/28/25: Deal is back again (ht Courtney)

Update 10/4/25: Now live, requires target circle 360 (non trial). 

The Offer

Direct link to offer

  • Target Circle is offering $10 Rewards for Every $100 Spent, up to 5x

Our Verdict 

Might be useful to some people. Reports are that third party gift card purchases would typically count toward your spend.

Why Your Marketing Feels Broken (It’s Not the Tactics)


I’ve given this diagnosis so many times it has a name: Random Acts of Marketing.SEO aimed at one audience. Paid ads targeting another. The website describes the business differently than the founder does in a sales call. The content sounds like it came from a different company than the pitch deck. Everything is technically running. Nothing is working together.

This is the most common condition in small business marketing. And it’s almost never caused by lack of effort or thin budgets. It’s caused by the absence of a strategic foundation the tactics can actually build on.

What founders mistake for strategy

Most founders with a tactics problem think they have a strategy. They almost never do.

What they have is a list of tactics they’re running, opinions about each one, and a history of what did and didn’t work. That’s not a strategy. A strategy is a coherent answer to three questions:

Who exactly are we for? What do we do that the alternatives don’t? What’s the one sentence that ties those two things together?

Without those answers, the tactics underneath can’t compound. They just take turns failing.

Strategy First: the three pieces

The strategic foundation has three parts. All three have to exist. Any one of them alone isn’t enough.

The ideal client

A persona isn’t an ideal client. A demographic isn’t an ideal client. “Small business owners between 35 and 55 who value quality” is a description, not a strategy.

An ideal client is a specific type of customer, in a specific situation, whose problem you’re uniquely positioned to solve better than the real alternatives they’re actually considering.

Here’s what specificity looks like in practice: a home services company whose ideal client is “owners of 20-plus-year-old homes in zip codes where houses sell for over $800,000, who’ve lived there more than 3 years and are thinking about aging in place.” That’s a strategy. Every downstream decision, where they advertise, what their photos show, how they price, what they stop offering, can align to that specific person.

The riches are in the niches. That was true when I wrote the original Duct Tape Marketing. It’s more true now. In a market where AI makes it trivially easy to produce generic content for generic audiences, the only marketing that gets through is the marketing clearly made for someone specific.

Differentiation

Two mistakes come up constantly. Claiming differentiation that isn’t actually different (quality, service, experience: every business claims these). And describing differentiation against the wrong competitor.

Your customer is rarely choosing between you and the obvious direct competitor. They’re choosing between you and doing nothing, a different category of solution, or doing it themselves. Your differentiation has to land against that actual set of alternatives.

Differentiation is also a commitment. If you claim to be the firm that does the deepest strategic work before any execution, you can’t also take an emergency project on Monday and deliver by Friday. The claim requires you to turn down certain work. That’s the real test: does your differentiation require you to say no to something?

The core message

One sentence. In the customer’s language. Describes who you’re for and why they’re in the right place.

It has to pass 3 tests. Clear (a smart 12-year-old should understand who you serve and what you do). Different (it can’t be lifted and pasted onto a competitor’s site without anyone noticing). Credible (the customer believes it).

Clever is a tagline. The core message is clear. They can be the same thing. They usually aren’t.

The Marketing Hourglass

Strategy First also gives you the diagnostic lens you’ll use for everything that comes next: the Marketing Hourglass.

Most people were taught to think about the customer journey as a funnel. Leads in the top, customers out the bottom. It’s useful for a narrow slice of the work and dangerously incomplete for the whole picture.

Real growth for small businesses happens inside an hourglass, because the most valuable customer activity happens after the sale. The 7 stages: Know, Like, Trust, Try, Buy, Repeat, Refer. The hourglass widens again after Buy. That’s the part most small businesses ignore, and it’s where the highest-value growth actually lives.

The diagnostic is simple: find the stage where things are leaking and fix it before you build anything new on top.

One thing to do this week

Write your core message. One sentence. Customer’s language. Run it through the 3 tests: clear, different, credible.

If it can’t pass all three, that’s the strategy work. Everything else waits until it does.


This is step two of a seven-step system I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full framework is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

Three Risks of Relying on the S&P 500 in Retirement Planning


The analysis is based on rolling monthly 15-year windows from 1965 to 2025 and could be improved in future research using moment-match parametric Monte Carlo simulations or bootstrapping from observed returns.

Future research could also incorporate longer time horizons, multi-factor portfolios, additional asset classes, dynamic withdrawal policies, and regime-based risk management techniques.

Distributions were set as a percentage of the portfolio as opposed to a hard initial dollar amount, both practical and behaviorally driven. However, there are many other acceptable and commonly used ways to take distributions, like the most common 4% starting amount, then linearly adjusted for inflation (CPI). Future research could investigate how various portfolio designs affect the different withdrawal methods.


Appendix & Citations

Data Source: Compustat.

Calculation: Hartford Equity Modeling Platform.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy in U.S. City Average [CPILFESL], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPILFESL, January 9, 2026.


Style Definitions:

Top 500 Value: US top 500 stocks top 30% based on composite value as defined by multiple equally weighted valuation metrics to arrive at an aggregated valuation metric. Valuation metrics include: P/E, EBITDA/EV, operating cash flow/EV, revenue/EV, and B/P Yield (used only in financials and real estate as a replacement to EBITDA/EV), then cap weighted.

Top 500 Low Volatility: US Top 500 Stocks top 30% based on a composite volatility score defined by multiple equality weighted volatility metrics to arrive at an aggregated volatility metric. Volatility metrics include three-year weekly beta and six-month daily standard deviation, then cap weighted.

Top 500 Low Volatility VMQ: US Top 500 Stocks top 50% based on a composite volatility score defined by multiple equality weighted volatility metrics to arrive at an aggregated volatility metric. Volatility metrics include three-year weekly beta and six-month daily standard deviation, then cap weighted. Then top 50% based on combined score of 50% value, 30% momentum and 20% quality. Combined scores for financial and real estate sector companies are assigned weightings of 65% Value and 35% Momentum. Composite value as defined by multiple equally weighted valuation metrics to arrive at an aggregated valuation metric. Valuation metrics include: P/E, EBITDA/EV, operating cash flow/EV, revenue/EV, and B/P Yield (used only in financials and real estate as a replacement to EBITDA/EV), then cap weighted. Composite momentum equally weights Last 12 ex-1 monthly returns and last 6 ex-1 monthly returns to arrive at an aggregated momentum metric. Composite quality uses gross profitability to total assets.

Top 500 Growth: US top 500 stocks top 30% based on five years sales growth, then cap weighted.

Top 500 Cap Weighted: US Top 500 stocks, cap weighted.

Top 500 Equal Weighted: US Top 500 stocks, equal weighted.