Home Blog

Commercial Real Estate Is Quietly Setting Up for a Decade-Long Bull Run


Dave:
We are halfway through 2026 and this felt like the right time to bring back Brian Burke for a bigger picture check-in on the housing market. He is an expert on all things real estate from single family to multifamily to larger commercial assets. We want to know how this market looks to someone who has lived through multiple cycles and who has accurately predicted a lot of the market’s twists and turns over the years. I’m Dave Meyer and today we’re talking about how Brian’s outlook has changed since the start of the year, which asset classes look more or less attractive now, what risks he thinks investors are underestimating and how he’s positioning himself for the second half of the year. This is On the Market. Let’s get to it. Brian, welcome back to On The Market. Thanks for joining us.

Brian:
Great to be here.

Dave:
I’m excited to have you. Hopefully you can help us make sense of the market and where opportunities are lying. It’s a weird year right now, 2026. What is your take on it? How are you feeling generally speaking about the direction of let’s say the residential housing market and how it’s performing and how the economic climate is sort of weighing on the housing market?

Brian:
Overall, it hasn’t been all that healthy, quite frankly. New home inventory is up dramatically. In other words, the inventory that builders are carrying on their books right now is a lot higher than it’s been in the recent past. I think transaction velocities are down. Pricing power has weakened somewhat some of that perhaps driven by affordability, some perhaps driven by interest rate and where interest rates are. And as of late, they’ve been creeping up a little bit and I think maybe that’s making some buyers nervous. So I think overall in a lot of markets, the residential market has been somewhat on the weaker side. There’s a few markets I think that would be an exception to that, but I think by and large, that’s where we are right now.

Dave:
What do you make of the fact that home prices, despite everything you just said, which I agree with, are still up 1%, 2% year over year. Do you buy that? Are concessions masking that? Or what’s really going on there?

Brian:
Again, there’s another scenario where you’ve got all these different things happening at the same time. I think what I’ve noticed here in Northern California where I live, higher end, the upper price bracket is really weak, but yet the median and lower price bracket is relatively strong. So I think there’s a little bit of bifurcation, maybe a K-shaped market where the upper end has one thing going on, the lower end has another thing going on. That kind of tends to skew the statistics a little bit. I think there is still enough buyers for the limited product that’s out there to support prices. And there’s nothing that’s really a catalyst for prices to tank. I mean, if somebody’s out there waiting like, “Hey, I want to see prices tumble 30%. Good luck.” I mean, when that happened in 08, 07, 08, and prices really tanked, there was a situation going on where no one had any equity.
A lot of people were turning negative equity, foreclosures were going through the roof and there was all kinds of chaos in the residential sector. And right now you’re not seeing that. I mean, if you look at positive equity ratios, if you look at mortgage-free homes and typical loan-to-value ratios right now, they’re all quite favorable. They’re

Dave:
Good.

Brian:
They’re really good. So I think that supports pricing. The demand, I don’t think is there to support price increases, at least at any meaningful rate. But I don’t think there’s anything to support the thesis that prices are in great jeopardy either.

Dave:
But people want drama, Brian. They want it up or down. They don’t like hearing that it’s just going to stay boring and flat, even though that is, at least in my view, the most likely thing to expect for the foreseeable future.

Brian:
But you know what? The best time to be in the market is during boring times because when things are exciting, everybody’s piling in and you can’t get anything unless you’re overpaying. So this is the time to take advantage of boringness. Don’t shun it, embrace it.

Dave:
I agree. And it feels to me that the market is becoming a little bit more predictable in that I just feel confident that it’s kind of just going to stay stuck. And that’s not a fun, sexy thing, but at least it’s a basis from which you can make decisions. At least you kind of know what’s going on and that helps with underwriting. You can understand what you have to pay for assets, what performance you can expect. And as an investor, is there much more you can ask for? Of course, we all want predictability and that we have a high degree of confidence that everything’s going to be amazing, but that’s probably not going to happen anytime soon. And hopefully people are just starting to accept that this is where we’re at and make decisions based on this information. And although you have to be disciplined and patient and find good deals that there are things out there.

Brian:
Well, what happens when there is uncertainty and there is a bunch of chaos, people are like, “Ooh, it’s too scary. It’s too risky. I can’t get in right now. I’m going to wait for prices to tank.” You get that whole scenario, right? So the predictability kind of gives you the confidence to make an entry. And I think I’m not one that’s always been gung ho, buy, buy, buy real estate. You’ve had me on this show a number of times where I’m the one that says, “Don’t even bother right now.” But if you’re a newer investor trying to buy single family home rentals as your first, second, or 10th investment, this is a really good time to be in that asset gathering stage where you’re building up a base of assets. The important thing is that you’re buying stuff that’s cash flowing and it’s good properties that are going to last a long time, not ready to fall over at the next gust win.
You’ll build a nice base of assets so that when things do get kind of crazy and out of control and prices start skyrocketing, you’ll already own them. That’s not the time to buy them and try to get in. Exactly. You already want to have them when that happens.

Dave:
That’s exactly right. I try and explain this that if you look at real home prices, not nominal, not the price you see on Zillow, but actual inflation adjusted home prices, it goes up over time, but it’s kind of a stair step. It’s not really this linear progression and no one knows when the stair’s going to go up, but you want to own it when it does because you look like a fricking genius and those increases are often pretty quick. And so to Brian’s point, you can’t do it retroactively. And for the people who are waiting around, you probably have the kind of personality where you want a year or so of data to say, “Okay, it’s been going up for a while and now we’ll get in. ” It might be over by that point. So it’s just how do you find stuff that’s good right now and it’s going to positively impact your portfolio and your financial picture and then wait to look like a genius when things go in your favor.

Brian:
Well, I mean, what happens, right? A great earnings report for a company comes out and their stock goes up 30% and the people are like, “Dang, I should have bought that when it was boring.” Yeah. And it’s like, well, too late, you missed the move. The same thing does happen in real estate. When there’s a switch that gets flipped from something, then prices have a tendency to start to run and you want to be in when it’s boring and before all that happens.

Dave:
What about this year, just broader economy or just broader investing conditions, what has surprised you in 2026?

Brian:
What surprises me the most, I think, is all of the negativity that hasn’t materialized. And what I say is everybody’s saying there’s going to be a recession, we’re going to have a debt crisis. The US is in big trouble. We’re losing our world dominance. There’s just all kinds of bad news stories in terms of just general economy. Yet at the same time, the stock market has continued to climb day after day after day and there’s really no better ballot mechanism in this country than the stock market because here every minute when the market is open, people are voting on whether they’re bullish or bearish on the future and people have been clearly voting bullish because they are buying and buying and buying. And you’ll have a couple days where there’s a setback, but then it’s right back to positive again. So it’s just interesting how there’s this dislocation between the common belief that we’re in big trouble and yet the market belief that’s kind of saying nothing bad is really happening.
So it creates in my mind some confusion because you kind of don’t really know which one’s true. Is the stock market about to crash because all the negative theories were correct or all the negative theories incorrect and they’re going to catch up to the fact that things aren’t as bad as may first appear. So that kind of ambiguity and I would say Jekyll and hideness has been probably the biggest surprise.

Dave:
That’s a good way of summarizing. I feel it. Half the time I’m like, “I should sell all my stock.” And then the next day I’m like, “I should probably invest more in the stock market.” It’s so confusing, but the stock market is a vote specifically on the growth and the future of corporate performance and earnings. And it does feel like the negative sentiment is more on a personal finance level. I don’t know how to reconcile those two things, but I guess both can be true and maybe they are related to each other and one causes the other. I don’t really know, but I’m just speculating here that corporate profits are super high, but people are not doing well in their personal financial situation. So both things theoretically can be true, but it is hard to read as an analyst or an investor what that actually means for the general direction of the economy and investing conditions.

Brian:
Well, you say that individual finances may be in peril. However, it is the individuals that support corporate profits through their spending and daily activity. So if people aren’t traveling and staying in hotels and buying products and goods and services, then those corporate profits aren’t doing well. So really it does somehow trickle down to where people may feel like or say that they aren’t doing so well, yet they’re spending money like things are just fine and that’s translating into corporate profits that are doing pretty well. And you look at corporate, corporations are really just a legal structure of a group of people. I mean, that’s really what… There’s workers and they’re doing things for a common purpose. And if the corporations are not doing well, then the workers won’t be doing well either because they’re going to get laid off and pay cuts and all that other stuff.
So it’s true. Both things can be true, but are they? It’s a little bit harder to sort that out.

Dave:
I agree with you. It does feel like every day someone’s making a claim that some shoe is about to drop and it doesn’t drop, or at least it hasn’t. And I’ve had pessimistic thoughts for sure about the stock market in particular, but I’m surprised by it. It continues to exceed my expectation. So that one has caught me by surprise as well. This is great stuff with Brian, but we got to take a quick break to hear from our sponsors. We’ll be right back Welcome back to On The Market. I’m here with Brian Burke going over the state of the market, let’s get back to it. What do you think is maybe not getting enough attention right now? Are there any good or bad stories that you think aren’t making into the media that investors should be thinking about more?

Brian:
Well, the media’s pretty good at trying to find bad news, that’s for sure.

Dave:
That is for damn sure, yes.

Brian:
That I think is their specialty. So if there’s even a hint of something – It’s basically the business model. Yeah, it is the business model. So if something’s even a little bit bad, they probably picked up on it, made it seem even worse than it is. So I don’t know if there’s any bad news that they’re missing out on. Maybe there’s some good news that they’re missing out on, and maybe we just talked a little bit about some of that.

Dave:
Yeah,

Brian:
That’s true. But I think if there’s anything that’s still kind of bad that’s going on out there, and we’ve talked about this before, is there’s some sectors of commercial real estate that’s been in trouble for a while. Apartments is on, office is another, just as really good examples of some asset classes that have been on the struggle bus here for the last few years That’s still going on, although I don’t think it’s ignored. I think it’s been well covered, but that’s still underway and there hasn’t really been a complete end in sight just yet.

Dave:
So how do you assess that market?Because we talked about the residential market. You’ve come on, you’ve had some very good rhymes and I will encourage you to repeat your rhymes because I like them, but are you sticking with your, I think it was fixed in 26, heaven in 27 assessment of multifamily

Brian:
Yeah, I’m sticking with it although we may even see a litle bit of a delay. So a couple of years ago is when I came up with these, it was to combat the Survive Tell 25 mantra and I said end the dive in 25, meaning that prices first before they could go up, first had to stop coming down. Maybe that kind of happened. I said it’d be fixed in 26, which meant that this year would be the year when things kind of got sorted out and figured out. Did it happen? It’s starting to, but I don’t know. It’s taking longer than even I thought and people thought I was the pessimist and then it was buyer heaven in 27 thinking like in 2027 there’s going to be all kinds of deals out there that we can vacuum up and it’s going to be a great time to be a buyer.
And maybe I’ll still prove right on that. But I said if you wait until 28, it’ll be too late, maybe not. Maybe 28’s going to be okay. I don’t know. I might have to come up with some new sayings.

Dave:
Well, maybe 28’s going to be great because that rhymes at least.

Brian:
There you go. 28 is great.

Dave:
Yeah, things are great in 28.

Brian:
Buyers are great in 28. I

Dave:
Always ask you this question because it confuses me. I thought we would see distress in multifamily and asset sales sooner than this. I thought 25, at least this year from what I hear from you and other GPs and operators, still not really happening. There’s not some amazing deal flow all of a sudden coming into the market. Is it still what’s happening that lenders are not coming down hard and they’re kicking the can down the road or is there something else going on?

Brian:
Look, if there’s a fender bender in the parking lot, as soon as the two cars collide, everybody jumps out of the vehicle and starts yelling at each other and exchanges information and moves on, right? But in a serious collision, what we had was we had a massive pile up in the middle of a four-way intersection where all the lights were green. Rent growth was green, occupancy was green, interest rates were green. I mean, all the lights were green, everybody piled up in the middle of the intersection. The harder the impact, the more likely it is that the victims are going to be trapped in the vehicle. It’s going to take specialized equipment and knowledge to extricate these people and it’s going to take a long time to get them out and get them put in the ambulance and cart it off to the hospital. And that’s what happened here.
This was a bad crash and it takes a long time for all these things to kind of start working their way through more so than if it’s just a minor incident. I think that is a big part of it. Another part of it is that lenders were just kind of in this self-preservation mode. Some owners thought, “Oh, look, lenders are working with us. They’re giving us extra time.” Well, no, really what lenders are doing is they’re covering their own problems and they don’t want to foreclose on the property and now they’ve got this thing on their books when it’s negative cashflow and it’s worth only half the loan amount and all that stuff. No, they’d much rather have you manage it for them for free thinking you’re still the owner.

Dave:
Right. Yeah. And they could take it anytime.

Brian:
Yeah. And they can take it anytime they want. And then as soon as the value comes back and they’re like, “Oh, we can sell this for the loan amount.” They’re like, “Great, now’s the time. Let’s pull the trigger.”

Dave:
Thanks

Brian:
For

Dave:
Managing

Brian:
It. All they’re doing is they’re just waiting for things to get better enough where they can fire you as the manager foreclose on the property and then they can sell it and get their money back. That’s all that’s happening.

Dave:
And so that’s when you think the deals will come because the lender for the most part does not really care that the value recovers to anything more than the loan balance, right?

Brian:
And even that, maybe they’ll even take a small loss. Yes, that’s correct. They don’t care about the owner’s equity or the investors or anybody else. They

Dave:
Do not.

Brian:
No, they don’t work for you. They are responsible to their investors and making sure that their investors get their money back. They don’t care about your investors or you. No. So as soon as those values come back, they’re going to pull the trigger out. Now, when you say that’s when the deals will be there, yeah, okay, I think that that’s true, but the question is, is where do those deals go? And people tend to think like, oh, all of a sudden there’s going to be all these REO listings on the market and I can just go sweep up all this stuff and it’s going to be great. A lot of this stuff is, I don’t want to say backdoor dealing or whatever because it’s not underhanded or anything like that, but a lot of these are insider transactions where a lender that’s got, “Look, we’ve got 50 troubled loans out there.
We’re going to sell this whole package of 50 loans to so – and-so REIT or so – and-so private equity.” They’ll come in, they’ll figure all this stuff out and take over and take over management and then they’ll be selling them as non-distressed assets one at a time later on. There will be some opportunities for investors to get their hands on some of this stuff. Back in 2009 and 10, I bought several apartment complexes REOs from banks and those deals do come up, but a lot of them never make it that far to where they’re listed by brokers on the open market.

Dave:
That’s from all the operators I talk to what everyone’s saying. There’s no deals on the market right now. The few people who are transacting recently have said, “I just got a great deal. I got it for 40, 50 cents on the dollar because a lender called me and they need to dispo this quickly and I’m the person with capital who they know can pull it off.” And that’s how deals are being done right now. And that has made me think as an investor because I own residential real estate. I also do a lot of syndication in what’s called LP investing, limited partner. I invest with other people who are operating deals. You’ve probably heard this as a syndication, basically pooling money with other investors. And it’s made me think that syndications are going to be a very good way to invest for someone like me in the next few years because I don’t have those relationships.
I don’t know the lenders. I don’t know the broker who’s going to get tasked with dispositioning these things, but I want access to those deals. So I’m curious if you think that’s a… I haven’t seen good deals yet, but if you think that that is a good way for people like me and for the audience here listening to this to get a part of what I do feel like is going to be considerable opportunity in the multifamily space

Brian:
Yeah, without question. I mean, part of the thing is if you’re an individual investor and you’re going to buy one property, you’re not going to get that one property that’s out there that’s like that super smoke and screaming deal from the bank that needs to sell right away, right? Yeah. You’re going to get the one that gets picked over by everybody else that nobody wanted and then comes out to the open market, is made available to anybody that will pay the price. That’s a whole different thing. The access through syndicates that you’re talking about is really that relationship based buying and there’s truth to what you’re speaking, but it really depends on what sponsor you’re investing with and does that sponsor have those relationships because there’s a lot of people out there that’ll be peddling real estate investment opportunities that were just the highest bidder at the last quote unquote auction when brokers took it to market.
And that’s not really the deal you’re looking for. You’re looking for the one that was bought through that relationship that you just described.

Dave:
Right. I’ve continued to invest in syndications despite all the negative things being said about syndications in general in the media right now. But the ones I’ve bought bought into are relationship business where people are picking these up at 40 or 50 cents on a dollar because there was a fire or there was something and no one wanted to deal with it. And the deals are actually really good. They’re not happening at scale like people were doing in 2009, 2010 where there was probably better deal flow, but they’re still out there and I think there’s going to be more. But I wanted to get your take, Brian, about the negative sentiment around syndications because there’s been a lot of high profile deals that have blown up frankly across the whole industry. And to me, it’s created this narrative that syndications are the problem, which makes no sense.
A syndication is just a deal structure. It’s not the problem. The problem is either the deal or the operator and you could argue that a deal being bad is the operator’s fault. But to me, I worry that our industry is going to shy away and people are going to be like, “Oh, syndications are bad. They’re really risky.” When really it was just bad deals bought at bad times or am I missing something there?

Brian:
No, you’re right. In fact, I recently updated the hands-off investor, I think about a year and a half ago or whatever and added to one of the chapters speaking to syndicate failures. And I talked in there about there’s really three different failure modes that I found to be common in syndicates. And the three failure modes are market failures, sponsor failures, and structural failures. Market failures means the market just went bad and it affected everyone. And it doesn’t matter if you’re a syndicate owner or bought the property on your own. You can go buy an apartment complex and the market can turn against you and your rents are declining and then you have unexpected repairs and all kinds of things happen. Next thing you know, the property’s negatively cash flowing. I remember this happened back in 2009. I used to joke that half the units were empty and the other half weren’t paying and it was almost like that.
Yeah, it was great and it didn’t start out that way, but that’s what the market gave us back then. So it was really difficult and it doesn’t matter if you’re a syndicate investor, a syndicate sponsor, an individual owner, it doesn’t matter. It affects everybody in the same way. So that’s not a fault of syndication. And we’ve definitely seen a market failure here as we’ve witnessed prices declining 40 to 50%. We’ve noticed year over year negative rent growth. We’ve noticed increasing vacancies, increasing concessions, challenges with just demographic story, population growth tapering off, all of the things, right, not a fault of syndicates. The other two failure modes, both you can attribute to problems with syndicates and that’s sponsor failures and structural failures. Sponsor failure is things like partnership disputes and breakups, just lack of experience, lack of track record. Some of it is things that investors may have been able to find and detect and avoid going into the investment so they could have maybe invested in something different and not been subjected to the sponsor failure.
And other things are things that no one could have predicted that could happen like death of a sponsor could be something like that, right? And then the third failure mode is a structural failure and a structural failure are things like the wrong financing was used like short-term loans that have a three-year maturity, high leverage – Hear that a lot these

Dave:
Days.

Brian:
Yeah. A lot of those. Yeah. High leverage is another one. Paying too high a purchase price is another one. Those are classic examples of structural failures. And what tends to happen oftentimes, especially with syndicates, is that a market failure simply exposes the other two things. That’s

Dave:
Right.

Brian:
Yes. So you had a sponsor failure from the beginning where you had an inexperienced sponsor with lack of track record and you had a structural failure from the beginning, meaning you had short-term debt that was going to mature in like two or three years and it was too high a leverage and they paid too high a price. All those things were there. If the market went absolutely perfectly, they might have been able to execute their plan and sell before anything went wrong and made everybody a profit and made themselves look brilliant. And that happened dozens and dozens and hundreds of times –

Dave:
Yes, it does.

Brian:
From 2011 all the way to 2021. But if the market goes bad, now all of a sudden all that stuff is exposed. Their lack of experience, they don’t know how to navigate the market failure. Their lack of track record, again, they don’t know how to navigate. Their short-term loan comes due at the middle of the trough of pricing so they have to sell at the bottom. Their high leverage caused them to go into negative cash flow. So all of those other failures become exposed and the whole thing implodes in a very public way. And that’s what we’re seeing happening out there. And it’s not necessarily syndicates only, but it is syndicates partially. And this just comes right back down to making sure you’re selecting your syndicate investments carefully investing with the right syndicators and the right deals that are structured the right way.

Dave:
100%. That’s so well said. I really encourage people who are interested in this kind of investing to read Brian’s book, not just saying this because you’re here, Brian, partially, but I do recommend this book to everyone when people ask it to me. I’ve read it multiple times. I sent Brian pictures of my handwriting scribbling in it before I made my first syndication investment, read it many times, but you really just do learn to understand that it is a bigger deal, but it’s still on you to do your due diligence. It is not the problem of a syndication. It is you who didn’t understand that the operator didn’t have enough experience. I don’t take the blame totally off inexperienced operators who do have these structural problems. They should do better. But also don’t get discouraged by syndications because you see high profile, big name people not succeeding at this because if you underwrote those deals correctly, you probably would’ve seen some of those structural issues with those deals ahead of time.
Brian’s a great resource for learning how to actually do that underwriting correctly.

Brian:
And you really want to choose to invest with someone that’s really bringing some value to the relationship. Do they have relationships you don’t have? Do they have access to deal flow you don’t have? Do they have skills, knowledge, and experience that you don’t have? All of those things are very, very important. If all they’re doing is just going out and being the highest bidder of all the listed properties that are on the listed for sale, maybe they’re not adding as much value. If they’ve got no experience, this is their first deal, what are they really bringing to the table? So it’s really a selection failure and it’s sponsors who are growing before they really should.

Dave:
Exactly. And that is something you can avoid if you take time learning how to do this well. We have a whole resource for this called PassivePockets. You can check out the podcast, PassivePockets or Passivepockets.com. It’s a whole resource and community around this type of investing. You should absolutely check it out. It’s extremely valuable. I vet deals and talk to people on the forums there about deals and it’s great because syndication investing has kind of been a black box for a really long time. It’s like who you know, but using tools like the passive pockets community allow you to sort of discuss deals more openly, learn about people’s track records where that kind of stuff normally was in the dark. All right everyone, Brian is obviously on a roll right now, but we do have to take a quick break, stick with us. We’ll be right back Welcome back to On The Market.
I’m Dave Meyer and today I’m talking to Brian Burke and getting his take on the broader real estate climate. Let’s get back into our conversation. Now, Brian, you had mentioned we might see better deal flow, not necessarily on market, but might see transaction volume pickup or even syndication deal flow get better when values recover. What’s that going to take? Because that’s a tall order.

Brian:
Well, if you’re talking about apartments and you know A commercial real estate in general, I think what that’s going to take is it’s going to take more rental demand. When you think about single family homes and what stimulates single family home transactions, it’s people buying houses. Well, what stimulates values in commercial real estate and in multifamily specifically is people renting units. And so what you need to see is increases in occupancy rates, decreases in concessions, which is like two weeks free rent for a new move in, that kind of stuff. You want to secreases in that. That eventually will end up leading to rent growth. So another big one, less construction. Right now there’s massive new construction of apartment units. When there’s less construction, there’s less units to compete with each of those renters. So you see a decline in construction. Eventually that translates into an increase in rent growth.
Increase in rent growth means that the income stream generated by that property is growing. When the income stream grows, the property is worth more because really what buyers of income property are buying isn’t really the real estate. I mean, technically, yeah, you’re getting a deed to the real estate, but what you’re buying is the income stream. And when that income stream gets bigger, it becomes worth more. And so that really it all bakes down all the way back to the consumer and them renting units and paying more for them because there’s more demand and less supply.

Dave:
And is that going to happen anytime soon? You think occupant… I mean, it’s obviously regional.

Brian:
Define soon.

Dave:
Well, let’s call it, how about 27?

Brian:
Yeah, maybe 27. The construction deliveries are tapering slightly. They’re not tapering as much as people expected them to have tapered. And a large reason for that is that projects are taking longer to get to completion than a lot of the builders had predicted. So

Dave:
It’s just

Brian:
Dragging

Dave:
Out.

Brian:
Yeah, it’s just dragging out. It’s just taking a long time to get these projects built. So as these things get built, deliveries are tapering slightly, but what has tapered significantly our new construction starts That’s already begun to taper. Another thing that we’re seeing tapering is the architectural billing index. I saw it. This is an index where it ties back to architectural billings for multifamily properties. That’s the design phase which comes before the permitting phase even. So that’s really an advanced look on construction and deliveries and that’s declined some. So all of those things are pointing to less new apartment deliveries, maybe 2027, probably 2028 and 2029. And then you get into the opposite problem where like by 2030, there’s been so little building that now there’s a shortage again. And then you get rent growth and all those things happen.

Dave:
So it could be a while. So I think that’s the takeaway for me at least, is that the windows might not even be open yet, but when it opens, it will hopefully be open for a while.This isn’t necessarily going to be a blip where you have to act quickly to get into the market.

Brian:
I think there’s no rush. I mean, first of all, we don’t even know if we hit the bottom yet. So wait until there’s evidence that we have. Wait until you’re getting positive rent growth and declining concessions to see that the signal for the bottom is firmly in play. And then the next thing to consider is this. This is the third time in the last 50 years that we’ve had a double digit correction in commercial real estate. The last time was in the great financial collapse 2009 and the time before that was in the 1980s after the tax law changes went into effect. And both of those times where there was a double digit correction in commercial real estate prices, there was a bull run that lasted more than a decade. And so if your typical hold time of a multifamily syndication is three to five years, let’s say, or maybe even five to seven years, you don’t have to buy right at the bottom.
In order to ride that bull run, you could get in after the bottom is firmly in place. You’ve got this nice decade long bull run ahead of us. I think that’s what’s going to happen is we’re going to have a decade or longer bull run that’ll happen once it gets a foothold. And so there’s plenty of time to get in and invest and participate in the upside. You don’t have to rush. You don’t have to time the bottom. You don’t have to be the first guy in. It’s okay to be a week late. And I’d say it’s probably even okay to be a day late and that’s better than being a week early.

Dave:
And just to bring this back to the beginning of our conversation where we almost said the opposite thing about residential, the difference here being that residential prices haven’t gone down. And so it’s a very different scenario when you have assets in commercial that are down so much and have stayed down the upside just gets bigger and bigger over that time. Residential doesn’t have that right now, which is why you have to be very disciplined about what you buy and trying to find cash flow and doing all the things that we talk about regularly on the show. But I think you’re dead on with commercial real estate. You know more about this than I do, but I assess this the same way. I look around the economy right now and think about where do I want to put my money? I’ve told you my fears about the stock market.
I still invest pretty heavily in the stock market, don’t get me wrong. And although I have an itchy finger, I’ve held off on pulling the trigger on selling anything, thankfully for doing that. I look at residential. I still like buying residential for a lot of reasons. I think there’s still great risk adjusted returns. I think for long-term investing, it makes so much sense. But where the value going to come over the next decade or so, find something better than commercial. I don’t really see any other asset class that has had this big of a hit that to me feels like is inevitably going to recover. It is hard to imagine commercial real estate value staying this low. And I think that it screams opportunity to me.

Brian:
There is opportunity. And again, if there’s a nice long bull run, that’s an opportunity you want to capture. And there’s also a lot of different types of commercial real estate and a lot of different types of residential real estate, and you got to consider that as well. We started buying senior housing a year ago and right now MetLife Investment Management just came out with a report showing senior housing is the number one asset class across all types of commercial real estate. Why? Because it’s on its whole own different cycle and it’s got this whole different demographic story than other types of real estate and that’s filtering and trickling down into things like mobile home parks where that’s kind of another play on senior housing because they tend to have a high senior demographic in mobile home parks. There’s things like data centers if you can figure out how to invest in them.
There’s industrial. There’s some types of commercial real estate right now that are absolutely on fire. I mean, the senior housing sector right now is absolutely a blaze and it’s a great place to invest at times when some other asset classes are not. And I think kind of the comparison between commercial and residential has to also dial back to the story that there usually are different goals and objectives at play when you compare these two types of asset classes. And people who are buying single family homes as rentals tend to be newer in their real estate investment career. They’re trying to build a base of assets. They’re trying to use leverage and BUR method and all these other different things to try to build wealth, whereas a lot of investors in commercial real estate are people who are trying to preserve wealth and get a return from the wealth that they already have.
And that requires a different set of rules when you’re playing. So it’s okay in my mind to be able to encourage people to say, “This is a great time to buy single family homes. It’s a great time to buy small apartment complexes that you’re going to hold onto for 10 or 20 years, but maybe it’s not the best time to invest in a large 200 unit multifamily syndication.” Those things can be true at the same time because it relates to two different investors with two different goals.

Dave:
And both can work in one portfolio too. It doesn’t necessarily have to be either or I look at myself, I try and balance them, right? Take some bigger swings, have some that are safe, some are cashflow, some are appreciation or equity plays. That’s what you get to later in your investing career. Obviously early, you have to be a little bit more focused, but it does not have to be either or you can build a portfolio with a sort of balanced composition among all of these different asset classes.

Brian:
That’s right. Smart portfolio construction. You’ve got different buckets of capital for different purposes with different goals in mind. Any smart investor should have that. I do. I have single family homes, duplexes, fourplexes, stocks, investments in startup companies, multifamily, senior housing, a wide spectrum of different things because you want to have all this exposure and diversification and eliminate single points of failure where you’re not just all in only one thing. That’s how a successful portfolio gets constructed and wealth is truly built and preserved.

Dave:
Well, what a perfect way to end this episode, Brian. Thank you so much for being here. We always appreciate having you. This was a lot of fun.

Brian:
Fun as always. Thanks for having me.

Dave:
And thank you all so much for watching this episode of On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. He’s Brian Burke. We’ll see you all next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

DashPass Members: Get 25% Off $100 DoorDash Gift Card on 7/8 Only



Get 25% Off $100 DoorDash Gift Card

DoorDash has announced a one day promotion for Dashpass members, offering a 25% discount on DoorDash gift cards.

  • Eligible DashPass members receive 25% off purchase of a digital DoorDash gift card.
  • Maximum discount of $25.
  • Offer valid 7/8/26 only, starting at 9am EDT, until redemption limit of 55,000 has been reached.
  • OFFER LINK

Important Terms

  • Discount will be automatically applied at checkout.
  • Discount limited to one (1) digital DoorDash gift card per customer.
  • Must have a valid DoorDash account. Only available to select DashPass users as indicated in their account. 

The post DashPass Members: Get 25% Off $100 DoorDash Gift Card on 7/8 Only appeared first on Danny the Deal Guru.

Waller says forward guidance still valuable despite Warsh shift


The two officials agree on the limits of forward guidance but diverge on how far the retreat should go, a distinction that carries direct consequences for mortgage professionals watching every Fed signal for clues about rate direction.

“I continue to believe that forward guidance can be a valuable tool that has, at times, significantly strengthened policymaking and will continue to be useful,” Waller said.

When the Fed first steered investors toward coming rate hikes in the fall of 2021, market interest rates began rising before the central bank took any formal action. “When it works, forward guidance can change economic conditions more quickly than adjusting the policy rate alone,” he said.

Where the two officials converge

Waller did not dispute that guidance can go wrong. He pointed to 2020 and 2021, when the Fed’s commitment to near-zero rates effectively locked policymakers out of acting sooner — contributing to a delay in raising the federal funds rate until March 2022, even as inflation surged well past the 2% target and unemployment fell rapidly.

“If it is not flexible enough, it can hinder policy transmission. And, in some cases, it’s best not to use it at all,” he said.

Why is Cloudflare stock climbing today?




Why is Cloudflare stock climbing today?

OPEC+ to pump more oil as market fears shift from shortage to glut 


OPEC+ has agreed to raise oil production by a further 188,000 barrels per day from August, marking the fifth consecutive monthly increase in output quotas as the group continues to unwind its earlier production cuts. 

That brings the total increase in output quotas to around 940,000 barrels a day since the war began. 

The move comes as oil prices continue to ease amid Gulf states ramping up production and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz calming fears of major supply disruptions.  

Brent crude is now trading around $72 per barrel, down from its April peak of $126 per barrel and close to pre-conflict levels. 

Saudi Arabia, the world’s top exporter, shipped an average of 6.3 million barrels a day last week, restoring flows to almost 90% of February’s pre-war levels. 

Meanwhile, UAE oil exports have now overtaken pre-war levels, according to data compiled by energy intelligence company Kpler. 

The country, which formally exited OPEC+ on May 1, shipped 3.94 million barrels a day of crude and condensate in June.  

In addition to ramping up its production since leaving OPEC+, Kpler senior oil analyst Johannes Raubal said the UAE has also been drawing down crude inventories, further enhancing export volumes. 

But the surge in supply is beginning to raise concerns. Analysts at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs warned last week that the market could be heading for a glut next year if producers continue pumping without consideration of demand. 

China, the world’s largest oil importer, remains one of the biggest question marks.  

The Middle East typically accounts for around half of China’s crude oil imports, but shipments declined in April to their lowest level in almost a decade, according to Kpler data. 

Despite cutting imports by roughly 5 million barrels a day compared with pre-war levels, it has yet to significantly increase its buying. 

Meanwhile, more than 60 million barrels of oil that were effectively stranded when the war broke out have now been released onto the market, following the signing of the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding, Bloomberg reported last week. 

It noted that UAE oil is traveling as far afield as the U.S. and is even being offered to buyers in Hawaii. 

Melissa Hancock
melissa.hancock@fortune.com

Get in touch: Reply to this email with feedback or contact me directly at the address above.

Mubadala shifts $25 billion credit portfolio to Capital Arm

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign fund, Mubadala Investment Company, has transferred its $25 billion credit portfolio to its alternative asset management arm, Mubadala Capital, opening the door to third-party capital investors. 

Mubadala Capital will assume management of the credit portfolio, giving pension funds, insurers, and wealthy investors access to the platform for the first time.  

The portfolio spans direct lending, real estate and infrastructure debt, secondaries, net asset value financing, technology private credit, and Asia-focused private credit. 

In addition, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign fund has committed $4.7 billion to help grow the business. 

Mubadala Capital currently manages, advises, and administers more than $600 billion in assets and has offices in Abu Dhabi, New York, London, San Francisco, and Rio de Janeiro.  

The move complements Abu Dhabi’s broader strategy of expanding its role as a manager of institutional and private capital. 

ADGM, the international financial center of Abu Dhabi, recorded a 57% increase in Assets Under Management (AUM) in the first quarter of this year, as dozens of top-tier global hedge funds and private equity firms launched local offices.  

With the U.S. private credit market in turmoil—a record $19 billion of redemption requests hit 16 U.S. direct-lending funds in the first quarter—the Gulf’s relatively nascent industry represents a bright spot for growth. 

U.S. VCs back Gulf’s $30 million AI critical infrastructure bet

Big-ticket AI deals have become a regular fixture in the Gulf in recent months. 

But last week’s news that 1001, a Gulf tech startup building AI systems for critical infrastructure, had raised $30 million in funding, stood out. 

Prior to the Iran war, the Gulf’s AI strategy was largely centered on boosting productivity and accelerating economic diversification beyond oil. 

But the war has brought the importance of operational resilience and national security into sharper focus, and 1001’s strategic ambitions signal a new phase of development for the region’s AI industry. 

Rather than replacing existing systems, 1001 overlays them with a live operational model that analyzes data, predicts problems and recommends—or automates—the best course of action before issues escalate. Because the technology is built, owned and governed locally, organizations retain control of critical infrastructure rather than relying on overseas providers. 

The company is targeting sectors including aviation, ports and logistics, energy, manufacturing, and industrials as it positions itself to benefit from government mandates promoting AI adoption.  

As 1001’s founder and CEO, Bilal Abu-Ghazaleh, put it: “Business leaders here don’t just want pilots. They want sovereign systems that deliver measurable results and make thousands of real-time decisions they can trust.” 

The timing of the funding round is significant. In the UAE alone, daily cyberattack attempts surged from roughly 200,000 to between 500,000 and 700,000 during periods of intensified conflict earlier this year. 

The need for improved operational resilience has become an urgent national security priority, as I explore in my latest piece here. 

The 1001 deal is also notable for underscoring continued international confidence in the Gulf’s AI ecosystem despite the attacks on its infrastructure earlier this year.  

The Series A funding round was led by U.S. VC firm Lux Capital, alongside dedicated U.S. equity growth investors Hanabi and 9Yards Capital, with participation from global angel investors, Saudi sovereign-backed Sanabil and regional investors. 

The new funding will help 1001 expand across the GCC, grow its engineering team and build on a talent base that already includes graduates from Yale, Stanford and Carnegie Mellon. 

Saudi Arabia deepens China ties as U.S. relations sour

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan met with high-ranking Chinese officials in Beijing last week to discuss boosting economic and investment ties, amid Riyadh’s deteriorating relations with Washington.  

During his two-day visit, bin Farhan held meetings with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, as well as Chinese vice president Han Zheng, to discuss regional security, de-escalation efforts and expanding economic co-operation, particularly in energy, technology, industry, and supply chains. 

China already ranks as Saudi Arabia’s largest trading partner. 

Bilateral trade between the two countries has grown substantially since they established a comprehensive strategic partnership a decade ago, rising from $42 billion in 2016 to $107.5 billion in 2024, according to China’s Foreign Ministry.  

The rapid growth reflects China’s robust demand for Saudi crude oil and petrochemical products, as well as the kingdom’s imports of Chinese machinery, electronics, and transport equipment.  

China remains the single largest buyer of Saudi crude oil. In 2025, it bought an average of 1.4 million barrels per day from the Gulf nation, equivalent to roughly 14% of China’s total crude oil imports for the year, according to data from China’s General Administration of Customs. 

The FT reported on Monday that China has stepped up its oil purchases from Middle Eastern producers in recent days, with deep discounts offered by Saudi Aramco seen as likely to boost its buying. 

It marks a significant development given Beijing’s notable absence from purchasing oil since the start of the Iran war.  

As Saudi’s top oil customer, the pace of its renewed buying will be an important factor in the kingdom’s economic trajectory.

The Big Number

The 3 things we enjoyed reading this week

  • The Iran war has wreaked havoc across large swathes of the aviation and logistics industries. Businesses cannot control geopolitical shocks or fuel price swings, but DHL Express CEO Mike Parra says they can manage the complexity they create through using contingency planning, flexibility, and resilience, as he explained to my colleague in this fascinating interview last week. 
  • David Senra turned his obsession with studying great entrepreneurs into the podcast series Founders. Despite an initially limited audience, it’s now become essential listening for many top CEOs, including Jeff Bezos, Michael Delland Coinbase CEO Brian ArmstrongBrad Jacobs, the serial entrepreneur behind eight billion-dollar companies, says that one episode of Founders drove $750 million in listener investments. 
  • Many ingredients considered “exotic” or recent additions to American cuisine—including tamarind, rose water, and saffron—were already staples in the kitchens of America’s wealthy during the country’s founding era. Drawing on historical records, this insightful piece shows that figures such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin regularly consumed imported foods and spices. Jefferson even hosted an iftar dinner for a Tunisian diplomat in 1806. 

I invested £150 every month in Trading 212 Stocks & Shares ISA (My 5-Month Return)



👉 The channel community link can be found here:

💷 What happens if you invest £150 every month into a Trading 212 Stocks & Shares ISA? In this video, I share the 5-month update of my investing experiment, where I’ve been consistently putting money into the S&P 500 since April 2025. 📈

You’ll see exactly how much I’ve invested so far, what my portfolio is worth today, and the lessons I’ve learned along the way. Whether you’re just starting out with investing or already building your ISA, this video gives you a realistic look at what steady, monthly investing can achieve.

👉 SUBSCRIBE for more UK investing experiments, portfolio updates, and simple personal finance tips.

——————————————————
*DISCLAIMER: When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results. This information is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Pies & Autoinvest is an execution only service, following your own investment decisions. Not investment advice or portfolio management.

source

[Targeted] AmEx Offer: Cathay Pacific, Spend $1,000+ & Receive $150 Statement Credit


Update 7/6/26: Deal is back through 8/16/26. This time it’s $1,000/$150. (ht RTW34)

Update 11/9/23: Deal is back through 12/31/23

The Offer

No direct link, targeted offer

  • Get a one-time $175 statement credit by using your enrolled eligible Card to make one or more purchases online at cathaypacific.com or via Cathay Pacific Airways App by 12/31/22

The Fine Print

  • Offer valid on one or more transactions.
  • Offer valid for purchases made directly with Cathay Pacific Airways through U.S. cathaypacific.com or via Cathay Pacific Airways App.
  • Offer valid only for purchases where Cathay Pacific Airways is the merchant of record.
  • Flight must originate from US, purchase must be made through US Website or US version of merchant mobile app, and transaction must be in USD.
  • Excludes the following: (i) purchases in-person at the airport, lounges, and Cathay Shop online, (ii) purchases on-board flights for food, beverage, and WiFi, (iii) standalone hotel bookings and car rentals, (iv) purchases through third parties or affiliated agents, and (v) charges for pet fees, port service fees and animal hold fees, (vi) duty-free pre-flight orders, Marco Polo Club Service Center, air ticket reissuance, flight Insurance, revalidating an air ticket issued by another airline and Asiamiles.com.
  • Valid until 12/31/22

Our Verdict

Nice deal for anybody that has upcoming travel plans with Cathay Pacific, probably not a big enough discount to change booking behavior though.

View more Amex offers here & if you have any questions about American Express offers then read this post.

How Employers Can Contribute $2,500 To Trump Accounts


Key Points

  • Businesses can contribute up to $2,500 per employee per year to Trump Accounts for employees or their dependent children. 
  • The contribution is a deductible business expense and is excluded from the employee’s taxable income under new IRC Section 128.
  • For business owners who pay themselves W-2 wages (such as S corporation owners) the provision may allow the business to fund their own children’s accounts with pre-tax dollars, but the contribution must run through a written Trump Account Contribution Program (TACP) that meets nondiscrimination and notice rules.

Employer contributions to Trump Accounts become legal on July 4, 2026 — one year to the day after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act created the new children’s savings accounts. For small business owners, the launch opens a question worth real money: can your business fund your own kids’ accounts with pre-tax dollars?

The answer appears to be yes for many owners, but the mechanics matter. The tax break runs through new Internal Revenue Code Section 128, which lets an employer contribute up to $2,500 per year to the Trump Account of an employee or an employee’s dependent without the amount counting as taxable income to the employee.

For a solopreneur who is also an employee of their own company, that can mean a business deduction on one side and no income tax on the other — a combination that is hard to find elsewhere in the code.

But the provision comes with paperwork requirements, contribution caps, and several unresolved questions the IRS has not yet answered. Here is what the rules require, where the opportunity sits for owner-operators, and the mistakes that could undo the benefit.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

How The Employer Contribution Works

Trump Accounts, created under Tax Code Section 530A, are a special type of traditional IRA for children under 18 who have a Social Security number. A parent or guardian opens the account by filing Form 4547 or using the government’s online application at trumpaccounts.gov, and the funds must be invested in low-cost mutual funds or ETFs that track the S&P 500 or another index made up primarily of U.S. equities. Money cannot be withdrawn until January 1 of the year the child turns 18, at which point the account converts to standard traditional IRA treatment.

Total contributions from all sources are capped at $5,000 per year, indexed for inflation after 2027, according to IRS guidance in Notice 2025-68. Children born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028 also receive a one-time $1,000 federal pilot program contribution, which does not count against the cap.

The employer piece sits inside that framework. Under Section 128, an employer may contribute up to $2,500 per year (also indexed after 2027) to the Trump Account of an employee or the employee’s dependent.

Two details matter here:

  1. The $2,500 limit applies per employee, not per child, so an employee with three kids still tops out at $2,500 in total employer money.
  2. The employer contribution counts against the $5,000 aggregate cap per child, so a family planning to contribute on its own needs to coordinate the two.

The contribution is excluded from the employee’s gross income and, according to an analysis by Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office, is a deductible business expense for the employer. Draft IRS forms show the amounts reported on the W-2 in Box 12 under new code “TA.”

What Businesses Must Do To Qualify

The income exclusion only applies if contributions are made under a Trump Account Contribution Program (TACP) — a separate written plan the statute requires to exist for the exclusive benefit of employees. Section 128 borrows most of its program rules from the dependent care assistance program (DCAP) requirements under Section 129(d), including:

Nondiscrimination. The program cannot favor highly compensated employees or their dependents in eligibility or benefits. If you have a team, you cannot quietly set up a program that covers only your own children.

Notice. Employees must receive reasonable notification that the program exists and what its terms are.

Annual statements. By January 31 each year, employees must receive a written statement showing what the employer contributed for the prior year.

One notable difference from DCAPs: Section 128 cross-references paragraphs (2), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of Section 129(d), but not paragraph (4) — the rule that limits owners holding more than 5% of a business to 25% of total DCAP benefits.

That owner-concentration test is what makes dependent care FSAs nearly useless for owner-heavy small businesses (like solopreneurs). Its absence from Section 128 is a meaningful opening for small firms, though benefits attorneys at Verrill note that regulations addressing nondiscrimination testing are still coming, and the proposed regulations issued in March 2026 reserved the employer-program sections for future guidance.

There is also good news on the compliance front. On June 17, 2026, the Department of Labor issued Technical Release 2026-02, taking the position that Trump Accounts and TACPs generally are not ERISA pension plans when they benefit employees’ dependents.

Programs that contribute to a teenage employee’s own account can also avoid ERISA, provided participation is voluntary, the employer stays out of investment decisions, and the employer does not hold the program out as an employee benefit plan.

Mistakes To Avoid

A few mistakes could turn the benefit into a problem. Do not contribute before July 4, 2026 — earlier contributions are not permitted.

Do not skip the written plan document, the employee notice, or the January 31 statement. Without a qualifying TACP, the exclusion does not apply. 

Do not exceed the caps: over-contributions to IRAs generally trigger a 6% excise tax, and the $2,500 employer amount counts toward the child’s $5,000 total. If both parents’ employers offer contributions, know that the IRS has not yet clarified how the limits coordinate, so proceed carefully. 

Do not assume payroll tax treatment – guidance to date addresses the income tax exclusion, and employers should confirm FICA handling with their payroll provider or CPA. 

And remember the back end: employer contributions come out as ordinary income when the child eventually withdraws them, which makes the account a tax-deferral play, not a Roth. One way around this is to eventually convert the Trump account to a Roth IRA, but that also takes planning.

What This Means For Small Business Owners And Their Families

For small business owners that are corporations (like S-Corp businesses), this could be a new possible way to save for your family tax-deferred.

An S corp owner who pays themselves a salary is an employee of the corporation, which means the business can adopt a TACP and contribute $2,500 per year toward the owner’s dependent children — deductible to the business, income-tax-free to the owner. With no other employees, there is no one the program could discriminate against, similar to the logic behind solo 401(k) plans. Owners should still document the written plan and confirm the approach with a tax professional, since the IRS has not issued final nondiscrimination rules.

Sole proprietors and partners without W-2 wages are in murkier territory. The DCAP statute explicitly treats self-employed individuals as employees for program purposes while Section 128 contains no parallel provision. Until the IRS says otherwise, an unincorporated solopreneur should not assume they can pay themselves an “employer” contribution.

A few other angles worth knowing. A business that employs the owner’s spouse as a bona fide employee could contribute toward the couple’s children as the spouse’s dependents. And a business that legitimately employs the owner’s teenager can contribute up to $2,500 directly to that teen employee’s own Trump Account, though not through salary reduction under a cafeteria plan, which is only permitted for contributions to a dependent’s account.

For hiring, the benefit also works as a recruiting tool: a $2,500 pre-tax family benefit can stand out for small employers competing for parents in the workforce.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef718″].tcb-post-list #post-50153 [data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef71e”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/529_Plan_vs._Brokerage_Account_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

529 Plan vs. Trump Accounts vs. Brokerage Account For Children Investing

529 Plan vs. Trump Accounts vs. Brokerage Account For Children Investing
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef718″].tcb-post-list #post-77790 [data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef71e”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Trump_And_Your_Student_Loans_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

Trump Accounts Are Also Called 530A Accounts — Here’s Why That Matters

Trump Accounts Are Also Called 530A Accounts — Here’s Why That Matters
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef718″].tcb-post-list #post-76333 [data-css=”tve-u-19f2aeef71e”]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25023746695388-1-150×150.jpg”) !important;}}

Trump Accounts: Rules, Limits, Use Cases and Eligibility

Trump Accounts: Rules, Limits, Use Cases and Eligibility

Editor: Colin Graves

The post How Employers Can Contribute $2,500 To Trump Accounts appeared first on The College Investor.

Light Week for Economic Data Means Flat Mortgage Rates Likely


There isn’t much on the economic calendar this week, meaning mortgage rates will likely print flat.

This differs from last week, when we managed to pack a ton of labor data into a holiday-shortened week.

The good news (for mortgage rates) is the labor market showed signs of weakness, though the reports weren’t ice cold.

Still, it might be enough to keep the Federal Reserve from hiking again, which would be a positive for mortgage rates going forward.

If the Middle East situation continues in the right direction, it could all point to a low-6% or even sub-6% 30-year fixed again. But not overnight.

How Do We Get Lower Mortgage Rates Again?

It seems like everything is going right, at least with regard to favorable news and data to push mortgage rates lower.

Yet they remain quite elevated relative to levels seen this spring when the popular 30-year fixed was below 6% for the first time since 2022.

If you recall, 2022 was the last stellar year for mortgage rates, which began that year in the low 3s before quickly shooting higher as QE ended and inflation fears set in.

We’ve made a lot of progress since mortgage rates appeared to peak at 8% in late 2023, but then hit a roadblock when the unexpected Iranian conflict broke out this spring.

Since that time, mortgage lenders seem to be pricing defensively, and rightfully so.

We saw the cost of a barrel of oil skyrocket to over $125 thanks to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, before finally calming down after a peace deal was announced.

We now have oil prices back at pre-war levels, which is great news for the economy.

But the 30-year fixed is nowhere close to its pre-war level, when it hit that 3.5-year low just below 6%.

Is it just a matter of time? And if so, how much time?

Elevator Up, Stairs Down for Mortgage Rates

Unfortunately, it takes time to recover after mortgage rates rise. And it never happens overnight.

Even if all the signs point to a recovery, mortgage lenders are never quick to just slash their rates.

Instead, they take a measured approach to ensure they don’t get caught out by another unexpected event.

The last thing they want is to be on the wrong side of a trade, so lowering rates too fast, only to see another conflict break out, or another jump in oil prices, keeps them cautious.

And let’s be honest. It wouldn’t be shocking if there was another twist in the tale.

There was a report of a British cargo ship getting attacked in the Red Sea over the weekend.

In addition, navigating the freshly reopened Strait of Hormuz isn’t business as usual, with “substantial” risk remaining and mines reportedly in the center of the key waterway.

So to expect mortgage rates to just fall back to those sweet levels in a matter of weeks is perhaps a bit too optimistic.

We Need More Signs of Stability in Middle East and Wider Economy

Instead, those hoping for lower mortgage rates should be patient and root for the same trends we’ve seen over the past couple weeks to hold.

That is, continued peace in the Middle East and improved shipping flows in the region. And the lower inflation readings that come with it.

Along with tepid or cool labor data readings to give the Fed a reason NOT to raise rates again.

Mortgage rates take cues from the Fed, though the federal funds rate is a short-term rate (overnight rate in fact) and the 30-year fixed is well, a 30-year rate.

But Fed rate expectations still play a role and if MBS investors and banks/lenders see hikes becoming less of a threat, mortgage rates can continue to drift back toward the low-6s and possibly beyond.

Just don’t expect it to happen overnight. It might take a while.

Read on: Compare interest rates and payments fast with my new mortgage rate calculator.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

CVC Capital Partners to acquire majority stake in DistroKid


CVC Capital Partners has agreed to acquire a majority stake in DistroKid, the independent music distribution platform.

The private markets investment firm will make the investment via its CVC Capital Partners IX fund, DistroKid confirmed on Monday (July 6).

Insight Partners, a longtime DistroKid backer, will retain a “significant minority stake” in the company, according to an announcement.

Phil Bauer will continue to lead DistroKid as President, alongside the company’s existing leadership team.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions. Terms were not disclosed.

MBW revealed in January that DistroKid was exploring a sale, with a price of around $2 billion under discussion at the time.

In music circles, CVC is best known for its 2024 investment in Superstruct Entertainment, the live events group it backs alongside KKR.

Superstruct operates more than 80 festivals across Europe and Australia, among them Wacken Open Air and Sónar.

CVC‘s wider entertainment and sports investments have included Stage Entertainment, Formula One and Spain’s LaLiga.

The private markets firm manages approximately €209 billion in assets across private equity, secondaries, credit and infrastructure, according to the firm.

“We’ve been incredibly impressed by what Phil and the entire DistroKid team have built,” said Sebastian Künne, a Partner at CVC Capital Partners.

“DistroKid has earned the trust of millions of artists by staying focused on what they need most. We look forward to partnering with Phil and his team, drawing on our experience across music, entertainment and consumer subscription businesses to help DistroKid support the next generation of artists around the world.”

“DistroKid has transformed how independent artists share their music with the world,” said Deven Parekh, Managing Director at Insight Partners.

“We’re proud of our partnership with Phil and the DistroKid team and are excited to continue supporting the company alongside CVC.”

Founded in 2013 by Philip Kaplan, DistroKid has expanded beyond distribution to offer independent musicians tools including video distribution, instant mastering, direct-to-fan experiences and on-demand merchandise.

The New York-based company claims to handle 30% to 40% of new music releases globally, and says its platform is used by more than 2 million artists.

DistroKid charges artists a flat subscription fee and lets them keep 100% of their royalties.

The company was valued at $1.3 billion following an investment from Insight Partners in August 2021.

Insight Partners, which is retaining its minority stake, has continued to expand across the independent distribution sector.

In January, the firm acquired Berlin-based distributor Zebralution from German collecting society GEMA, as GEMA exited digital distribution.

Kaplan transitioned from DistroKid’s CEO to Chairman in January 2024.

Bauer, previously DistroKid’s Chief Operating Officer, then took over day-to-day leadership as President.

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and The Raine Group served as financial advisors to DistroKid. MBW reported the duo were handling its sale process in January.

In 2025, DistroKid launched Direct, a platform for artists to sell merchandise straight to fans.

The service builds on Bandzoogle, the direct-to-fan company DistroKid acquired in 2023, and marked its push beyond audio and video distribution.Music Business Worldwide