Home Blog

AmEx Offers: Marriott, Spend $300 Get $150


Update 10/23/26: New round send out for $150 off $375 (I guess this expires at the end of November as well). Apparently, some people are seeing two offers on the same card which should make for quite the deal. (ht reader Mark)

The Offer

Check your AmEx Offers for the following deal:

  • Spend $300 or more on Marriott stays in US, Caribbean, Mexico & Canada and get $150 statement credit. Offer expires 11/30.
  • Others got spend $450 and get $200 credit. 

The Fine Print

  • Offer valid only at participating Marriott Bonvoy® properties in the U.S. and U.S. territories, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean.
  • Reservations must be made online at Marriott.com, through the Marriott Bonvoy® App or by calling 1-888-236-2427.
  • Excludes Marriott Vacation Club®, Marriott Grand Residence Club®, Design Hotels™, Protea Hotels®, Marriott Executive Apartments®, Homes & Villas by Marriott Bonvoy®, Vistana Signature Network and Vistana Residence Network.
  • Excludes gift card purchases, online retail purchases, hotel amenities and purchases of Marriott Bonvoy® points.
  • Qualifying purchase means a purchase at a participating Marriott Bonvoy® property made during the offer period with your enrolled American Express Card and which is in an amount totaling at least $300 USD as posted to your account, following conversion from a foreign currency, if applicable, in accordance with your Card Member Agreement. Offer only valid on room rate and room charges.
  • Offer not valid for lodging stays that are paid for before the promotion start date or after the promotion end date. 

Our Verdict

Nice savings here for hotel stays. Despite the term, this has historically worked on Marriott gift cards purchased at the front desk of Marriott hotels (though the regular checkout person might not know how to do it and a manager might have to step in). 

Hat tip to Inquisitor911ok

NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • The safest software bet isn’t always the fastest box. NVIDIA wins on compatibility; Apple quietly wins on raw inference speed.
  • AMD’s pricing only makes sense once you understand you’re buying two different products under one name, not one product at two prices.
  • The right machine depends entirely on what you’re building with, not just what fits your budget. Match the ecosystem to your workflow before you match it to a benchmark.

A local AI box isn’t there to replace the cloud for large-scale training. It exists for three specific things: keeping sensitive data off someone else’s servers, avoiding metered API costs when you’re iterating hundreds of times a day and getting a fixed, predictable machine you fully control instead of a shared, rate-limited one. Cloud GPUs still win for large training runs and burst capacity. A local box wins for prototyping, fine-tuning smaller models and running inference on data you’re not allowed to send anywhere else. That’s the tradeoff, and it decides which of these three ecosystems actually fits your work.

NVIDIA, AMD and Apple are all shipping new local AI hardware on a near-constant cycle right now. Let’s look at which machine actually makes sense for you.

NVIDIA: the safe, expensive default

The NVIDIA DGX Spark pairs 128GB of unified memory with a Grace Blackwell GB10 chip built around CUDA, which is still the deepest, most battle tested software ecosystem in AI. Existing PyTorch code, TensorRT and cuDNN pipelines run on it without modification, which is not something you can say about the other two options yet.

The advantage is that nothing needs to be rewritten or reverse engineered. If your team already builds on CUDA, this is the lowest friction way to bring that work local. The drawback is memory bandwidth: at 273 GB/s, it’s the slowest of the three when a model has to move a lot of data, and reviewers consistently find it underperforms Apple’s Mac Studio on raw token generation despite the mature software.

This fits teams already deep in the CUDA and TensorRT stack who want to prototype locally before deploying to NVIDIA cloud infrastructure without touching their code. For models, think quantized versions of Llama, Qwen and DeepSeek in the 70B to 200B range, where TensorRT-LLM optimization matters more than raw bandwidth.

AMD: one chip, two very different products

This is where things get confusing on purpose. AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 chip, marketed as “the world’s smallest AI development PC” capable of running 200-billion-parameter models locally, ships in two completely different products. Third-party mini PCs built around the same chip, like the GMKtec EVO-X2 and the Framework Desktop, sell for a fraction of AMD’s own official Ryzen AI Halo Developer Platform. Same processor, same 128GB of memory and more than double the price on the official kit.

LTT Labs, one of the more rigorous independent testing outfits, explains the gap plainly: the premium buys AMD’s curated software configurations, “AI Playbooks,” and first party support, not extra hardware. The advantage of the third party route is price. You get the same chip and memory pool for far less if you’re comfortable managing the software yourself. The advantage of AMD’s own kit is exactly that support layer, plus the promise of continued driver and playbook maintenance. The drawback, either way, is raw speed: LTT Labs found “the Apple Silicon Mac Studios outperform the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 machines,” generating tokens two to three times slower in their testing.

There’s a software catch too, specific to the operating system. ROCm, AMD’s answer to CUDA, is still meaningfully more mature on Linux than on Windows. Windows support runs through WSL and a newer compatibility layer that only recently expanded to more Ryzen hardware, while Linux has had direct, better supported access for longer. This fits budget conscious developers who want a large memory pool for training and fine tuning experiments on Linux, and don’t need NVIDIA specific tooling. On the models side, AMD has actually leaned into this: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was the first consumer processor to run OpenAI’s gpt-oss 120B, which needs around 61GB of memory at MXFP4 precision and runs at up to 30 tokens per second on the 128GB configuration.

Apple: the quiet winner on bandwidth

Apple’s Mac Studio comes with the M5 Max chip and up to 128GB of unified memory, or the M5 Ultra with up to 512GB. The real differentiator is memory bandwidth, and it’s worth being precise here since the two chips aren’t equal: The M5 Max reaches up to 614 GB/s, while the M5 Ultra doubles that to 1.2 TB/s. Even the lower tier beats NVIDIA and AMD’s local options at moving model data, which is why reviewers keep clocking the Mac Studio ahead of both rivals on local inference despite Apple never marketing these chips as AI accelerators first.

The advantage is that bandwidth, plus a memory ceiling (512GB on the Ultra) that lets you load models neither of the other two machines can hold without heavy quantization. The drawback is the ecosystem: Your code needs to run through Apple’s stack rather than CUDA or ROCm, which is a real cost if your team’s tooling already assumes one of those. That said, this doesn’t mean writing everything in MLX. Most people running models on a Mac just load GGUF files directly through llama.cpp’s Metal backend, Ollama or LM Studio, all of which work out of the box. MLX only matters if you’re optimizing specifically for Apple Silicon.

This fits developers who care more about inference speed and model size than ecosystem compatibility. For models, 512GB is enough to run a 70B model with zero quantization, which is a real advantage over the other two machines. It is not, however, enough for the largest open models.

The bottom line

None of these is a universal answer. If your code already runs on CUDA, NVIDIA removes the most risk. If you want the most memory for your money and you’re comfortable on Linux, AMD’s ecosystem, official kit or third party board, gets you there cheaper. If you want the fastest actual inference and don’t mind stepping outside CUDA and ROCm entirely, Apple quietly wins the benchmarks. Pick the ecosystem your workflow already depends on first. The hardware comparison only matters after that.

Key Takeaways

  • The safest software bet isn’t always the fastest box. NVIDIA wins on compatibility; Apple quietly wins on raw inference speed.
  • AMD’s pricing only makes sense once you understand you’re buying two different products under one name, not one product at two prices.
  • The right machine depends entirely on what you’re building with, not just what fits your budget. Match the ecosystem to your workflow before you match it to a benchmark.

A local AI box isn’t there to replace the cloud for large-scale training. It exists for three specific things: keeping sensitive data off someone else’s servers, avoiding metered API costs when you’re iterating hundreds of times a day and getting a fixed, predictable machine you fully control instead of a shared, rate-limited one. Cloud GPUs still win for large training runs and burst capacity. A local box wins for prototyping, fine-tuning smaller models and running inference on data you’re not allowed to send anywhere else. That’s the tradeoff, and it decides which of these three ecosystems actually fits your work.

NVIDIA, AMD and Apple are all shipping new local AI hardware on a near-constant cycle right now. Let’s look at which machine actually makes sense for you.

NVIDIA: the safe, expensive default

The NVIDIA DGX Spark pairs 128GB of unified memory with a Grace Blackwell GB10 chip built around CUDA, which is still the deepest, most battle tested software ecosystem in AI. Existing PyTorch code, TensorRT and cuDNN pipelines run on it without modification, which is not something you can say about the other two options yet.

Explaining Basic Financial Concepts YOU Should Understand



This video goes over everything basic financial concept you should understand, and explains them if you don’t. Hope you enjoy!

We are hiring editors and animators, apply here 👉

———————————————————–

Timestamps:
0:00 Taxes
1:27 Banks
2:43 Interest
4:02 Inflation
5:36 Recessions
6:49 Credit Scores
8:11 Currency
9:15 Investing
10:16 Value
11:13 Time

source

Division III Athletes Sue NCAA Over Scholarship Ban


Key Points

  • Three current and former Division III athletes filed a class action against the NCAA on October 23, 2026, arguing its athletic scholarship ban fixes the price of their labor at zero.
  • The suit targets NCAA Bylaw 15.01.3. It seeks triple damages for athletes who competed since October 21, 2022, plus an order ending the ban.
  • Nothing changes for families right now. Division III athletes still pay for school with need-based and merit aid, and the case could take years.

The legal fight over paying college athletes just reached the NCAA’s largest division. Three current and former Division III athletes sued the NCAA on October 23, 2026. They argue the ban on athletic scholarships at more than 400 schools is illegal price fixing under federal antitrust law.

The case, Printz v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2:26-cv-12448), seeks damages for athletes who competed in Division III since October 21, 2022. It also asks the court to stop the NCAA from enforcing the ban.

About 210,000 athletes compete in Division III each year, according to the NCAA (PDF File). None of them can receive an athletic scholarship today.

Save For Later

Would you like to save this?

We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

What Does The Division III Lawsuit Claim?

The lawsuit claims Division III schools have agreed not to compete on price for athletes. Its target is NCAA Division III Bylaw 15.01.3, which says a school “shall not award financial aid to any student on the basis of athletics leadership, ability, participation or performance.” Division III athletes can still receive merit aid and need-based grants on the same terms as other students.

“The NCAA has engaged in an ongoing conspiracy to fix the price of Division III athletic labor at zero by prohibiting every member of Division III, the NCAA’s largest division at more than 400 schools, from offering a single penny of athletic scholarship,” the complaint states.

Jackson Hale, the first named plaintiff, is a senior defensive back at Pacific Lutheran University. Connor Printz played basketball from 2020 to 2024 at Claremont McKenna College, which ranks among the most expensive colleges in the country. Chris Jennings swam and played lacrosse at the University of Lynchburg from 2019 to 2023.

Lynchburg reached a negotiated resolution with the NCAA in January over $155,325 in improper aid to athletes in 2022-23. The suit doesn’t say whether Jennings received any of that money. Division III rules let schools give athletes merit scholarships only on the same terms as other students.

Why Connor Printz Says The Ban Cost Him

Printz says the ban pushed him off the team. He quit basketball early in the 2023-24 season to focus on his social media business, and he took out substantial student loans to cover nearly $80,000 in tuition, room and board that year.

“With even just a meaningful partial scholarship, Printz would have continued playing through his senior season because his basketball labor would have served to cover a part of the cost of his education,” the complaint states.

The irony sits at the center of the case. Printz says he earned up to $50,000 in endorsement deals with Reebok, Clif Bar and other brands while playing, and Hale also received NIL money. Under current rules, a brand can pay a Division III athlete, but the athlete’s own school can’t put a dollar toward tuition for playing.

How Does This Case Connect To NIL And The House Settlement?

The case is built on the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in NCAA v. Alston. The unanimous decision held that NCAA limits on athlete benefits face ordinary antitrust review. That ruling opened the door to NIL deals and, later, the House settlement that lets Division I schools pay athletes directly.

The money in college sports has been growing ever since. College Sports Commission data shows schools paid 34,915 athletes about $1.77 billion in the first year of revenue sharing. That works out to about $50,700 each.

The cap was $20.5 million per school for 2025-26, and the Senate voted 77-22 in September to write it into federal law through the Protect College Sports Act.

.tci-athpay{border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;overflow:hidden;font-family:inherit;color:#141414;margin:24px 0;background:#fff} .tci-athpay-head{background:#141414;color:#fff;padding:14px 18px;font-size:18px;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3} .tci-athpay-head span{color:#f6c061} .tci-athpay table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px} .tci-athpay th{background:#f9f7f5;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.04em;color:#55504a;text-align:left;padding:10px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8} .tci-athpay td{padding:11px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;vertical-align:top} .tci-athpay tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#fcfbf9} .tci-athpay td:first-child{font-weight:700} .tci-athpay .pill{display:inline-block;padding:2px 9px;border-radius:999px;font-size:12px;font-weight:700;margin-right:6px} .tci-athpay .yes{background:#dff3e4;color:#14532d} .tci-athpay .no{background:#fde2e2;color:#7f1d1d} .tci-athpay .mixed{background:#f6c061;color:#141414} .tci-athpay-foot{background:#f9f7f5;color:#8a8378;font-size:12px;padding:10px 14px} @media (max-width:640px){ .tci-athpay thead{display:none} .tci-athpay tr{display:block;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e0d8;padding:8px 0} .tci-athpay td{display:block;border:none;padding:6px 14px} .tci-athpay td:not(:first-child)::before{content:attr(data-label);display:block;font-size:11px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.04em;color:#8a8378;margin-bottom:2px} }

How College Athletes Get Paid By NCAA Division In 2026
Division Athletic Scholarships Direct Pay From School NIL Deals
Division I Yes YesOpted-in schools, $20.5M cap in 2025-26 Yes
Division II PartialOften split across a roster No Yes
Division III NoBanned by Bylaw 15.01.3 No Yes
Source: NCAA, College Sports Commission. The College Investor.

The plaintiffs argue Division III can’t keep a zero-dollar rule while the rest of college sports pays. “The Division III prohibition on athletic aid is undeniably a multi-conference agreement in Alston’s own taxonomy,” the complaint states. The case also lands in the Ninth Circuit, which handled both O’Bannon and Alston. That same court circuit is who allowed schools to pay athletes millions directly.

The NCAA has history on its side too. A federal court in Indiana dismissed similar Division III claims in Rock v. NCAA in 2013, finding the scholarship ban presumptively pro-competitive. However, that ruling came eight years before Alston and before any athlete could legally sign an endorsement deal.

What This Means For Families Paying For Division III

Nothing changes for current recruits or this year’s financial aid offers. Division III schools still build packages from need-based grants and institutional merit awards, and many Division III schools are private colleges that discount tuition heavily.

Mark Kantrowitz’s analysis of 2015-16 federal data found 36% of students at private nonprofit colleges received merit-only institutional grants, averaging $12,060.

If the plaintiffs win, Division III schools would be allowed to offer athletic aid, but not required to. Schools would have to fund that aid from budgets that already typically lose money, and federal auditors found 94% of Division I programs spent more than they earned in 2023-24.

A court could also award damages to former athletes if a class is certified, though that outcome is years away.

What Happens Next In Printz V. NCAA?

The NCAA’s next move is its formal response to the court filing, which we likely won’t see for weeks or months.

A motion to dismiss is the stage where the Rock claims failed, so the first ruling will show whether Alston changed the math. The plaintiffs want triple damages under the Clayton Act, which could make this case worth billions if all Division III athletes are involved. That compares with the $1.77 billion Division I schools paid athletes in a full year of revenue sharing.

It’s important to remember that court cases like this typically take years to resolve. The House v. NCAA case took just about 5 years, and it ended in a settlement agreement, not a trial. If Pritz follows the same path, athletes may not see any resolution until around 2031.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Division III Athletes Sue NCAA Over Scholarship Ban appeared first on The College Investor.

‘Zombie’ loan investors settle NY charges of alleged unlawful collections



More than two dozen affiliates of the asset manager Shelving Rock paid a fine to settle claims brought by New York state that the companies violated state laws by trying to collect missed payments on old mortgages long after the statute of limitations ended. The state is the latest to address a nationwide rash of foreclosures and questionable debt collection practices tied to “zombie” loans, mortgages taken out before the 2008 housing market collapse that lay dormant for years.

Processing Content

Attorney General Letitia James said her office had secured more than $480,000 in penalties and restitution from the group of debt buyers, which had purchased more than 3,000 of the old mortgages in New York beginning in 2019, according to a statement released Friday. 

READ MORE: Is title insurance ripe for disruption?

An attorney representing the companies declined to comment. As part of the settlement, the companies neither admitted nor denied the state’s findings.

In seeking to collect missed payments on these debts, the companies filed more than 140 foreclosure lawsuits and sought principal and interest going as far back as 12 years, according to the settlement. New York law prohibits lenders from collecting past-due loan payments after six years.

“No New Yorker should face losing their home to a predatory company demanding mortgage payments that have long since expired,” James said in the statement. “I will not tolerate illegal schemes that put New Yorkers’ homes at risk, and my office will ensure that everyone who was cheated by these companies gets their money back.”

Investors were generating windfall profits by reviving old second loans. Many of these debts were taken out in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, when it was common for borrowers to finance their homes with two loans. After housing prices tanked and borrowers stopped paying on the debts, many of these mortgages became all but worthless. Banks and other lenders eventually sold them for pennies on the dollar to investors.

READ MORE: New York looks to strengthen deed theft lawsBills introduced to untangle tangled titles

As home prices recovered, these debt buyers realized it could be lucrative to collect on these long-forgotten loans. Borrowers were often blindsided by demands to repay principal and years of back interest. Some of these homeowners had successfully modified their primary mortgages in the intervening years and were unaware that they still owed money on the second loans, which had often been transferred to opaque trusts and LLCs. 

Hiring a lawyer was often a reliable way to beat back illegal demands, Bloomberg found, but many borrowers lacked the resources to do so. As a result, some homeowners agreed to repay amounts that may have exceeded state and federal limits. Other people lost their homes to foreclosure. 

More than 600,000 of these zombie mortgages still potentially pose a threat to homeowners across the US, according to an estimate that Bloomberg constructed from property records.

James named five companies in her statement: BCMB1 Trust, First Age LLC, NS194 LLC, Second Start LLC and Southern MBA Trust. All are linked to Connecticut-based Shelving Rock, or its late chief executive officer, Stephen Lamando, according to corporate records and legal filings, Bloomberg reported last year. Lamando, who died in 2023, was a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. alum with a background in mortgage markets.

In addition to paying penalties and restitution, the companies named in the settlement can no longer seek to collect expired debt payments and have to alter their demands in existing foreclosure cases, according to the attorney general’s statement.

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had been investigating at least three companies pursuing zombie second mortgages, but that effort stalled amid broader cuts at the agency during the second Trump administration, Bloomberg reported. A spokesperson for the White House who handles inquiries for the CFPB said last year that the work hadn’t been abandoned, but the agency has yet to take any public enforcement actions related to zombie loans.

That has left states to pursue the issue on their own. Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell reached a settlement related to zombie loans two years ago. And legislators in California, Ohio and Maryland have proposed or passed legislation to limit some collection practices related to the old second mortgages.



Gen Z is treating the midterms like a market event. Boomers are treating them like weather



Gen Z investors are scrambling to protect their portfolios from political uncertainty as the midterms approach, but their anxiety could end up costing them.

A whopping 72% of Gen Z investors said they had already made changes to their retirement savings or investment portfolios in anticipation of the November elections, according to a survey from the Nationwide Retirement Institute. That’s far more than the 17% of Baby Boomers who reported doing the same.

But the gap isn’t a stampede for the exits. About as many Gen Z investors added money to take advantage of current conditions as moved into safer investments, according to the survey. The first generation to grow up with free trades on their phones is treating the election as a market event. 

Boomers’ decision to wait it out may be less about hard-won wisdom than about where they are in life. Most boomers are drawing down their savings or close to it, so a portfolio “change” for them usually means selling. They’re also more likely to already have an adviser — 43% do, according to Northwestern Mutual — and for shares held in taxable accounts, holding until death lets heirs skip the capital-gains bill entirely.

Across all generations, 40% of investors have made changes ahead of the election on Nov. 3, which will determine which party controls either chamber of Congress. 

Mark Hackett, the chief market strategist for Nationwide’s Investment Management Group, told Fortune that younger investors aren’t necessarily more fearful than older generations. Instead, they are changing the way they interact with financial markets as well as how they react to the massive amounts of financial information and trading tools at their fingertips.

“Younger investors came of age in an environment where investing is highly mobile, social and increasingly real-time, so adjusting a portfolio can feel less like a major decision and more like an ongoing process with almost no friction between a headline, an investing app and a potential portfolio adjustment,” Hackett said.

That accessibility can be both good and bad. While younger investors have unprecedented access to financial information, it also means they have more opportunities to make impulsive decisions based on breaking news instead of a company’s financials or an analysis of economic conditions.

“The question, therefore, is less about risk tolerance or volatility, and more about whether greater access to information is improving decision-making or simply increasing the temptation to trade,” Hackett said. “The latter can be fatal for portfolio longevity.”

“For younger investors, frequent portfolio changes can interrupt the power of compounding over decades,” he said.

Staying invested

The survey, conducted between late August and early September, included 2,029 American investors with at least $10,000 in investable assets and 538 financial advisers and financial professionals.

Despite the potential for turbulence caused by the midterms, the financial advisers surveyed recommend staying the course. More than half said maintaining an existing investment strategy is generally the best approach during an election year. 

The market’s previous performance helps explain their advice.

Since 1950 the S&P 500 has consistently risen in the 12 months following midterm elections and has returned gains of 15% on average, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management. While the past doesn’t predict future performance, selling in times of uncertainty can be a gamble.

Hackett said he recommends investors maintain a diversified portfolio and rebalance their investments only periodically depending on their desired risk exposure.

That doesn’t mean investors should never make changes. Hackett said adjusting investments to reflect personal financial goals, changes in risk tolerance, or shifting income needs are good reasons to make changes. Still, they should exercise caution, he added.

“Investors should be careful not to mistake a source of uncertainty for a source of lasting impairment to long-term returns,” he said.

New Albertsons forU™ American Express® Card, Earn Up to 5% on Groeries


New Albertsons forU™ American Express® Card

Albertsons Companies, American Express and Imprint today announced the launch of the Albertsons forU™ American Express® Card, giving customers more ways to earn rewards on their everyday purchases. Available now, the new credit card lets customers earn rewards on groceries at more than 2,200 Albertsons Cos. stores, as well as on gas, dining, utilities and more, with access to American Express Network benefits. 

Each Albertsons Cos. store has its own unique card design, including Albertsons, Safeway, Jewel-Osco, Vons, ACME, Shaw’s, Star Market, Tom Thumb, Randalls, Haggen, United Supermarkets and Pavilions. Credit cards can be used at any Albertsons Cos. store and everywhere American Express Cards are accepted.

The Albertsons forU American Express Card benefits include:

  • Albertsons Cos. Rewards: Earn 5% back on online and app purchases from Albertsons Cos. stores, including pickup and delivery, plus 3% back on in-store and pharmacy transactions, including prescriptions, immunizations and eligible over-the-counter health products.1
  • Everyday Rewards: Earn 3% back on gas, dining, streaming services and utilities, and 1% back on all other eligible purchases.1
  • Welcome Offer: Earn a $50 statement credit after spending $1,000 on net purchases outside of Albertsons Cos. stores within the first 90 days of account opening.2
  • No Annual Fee: Cardholders can enjoy all the credit card benefits with no annual fee.3
  • American Express Network Benefits: Access Amex Offers for shopping, dining, travel and more, and Amex Experiences™ including ticket presales for select sports, music and theater events plus perks at some of the world’s most iconic venues.4
  • Reward Redemption: Rewards automatically applied as a statement credit each billing cycle.

America’s Scariest Job Isn’t Mortician or Ghost Hunter. It’s a Role That Pays Below the Median



A new ranking puts animal control officers ahead of paramedics and emergency physicians for exposure to bites, contaminants, and other on-the-job risks.

Best Crypto Trading Broker 2026 | Sabse Best Crypto Exchange Kaun Hai? | Best Trading App For Crypto



Cryptocurrency me trading karne ke liye sabse achha broker | which broker is best for crypto trading | which app is best for crypto trading

Delta Exchange 👇

Coindcx 👇

Instagram 👇

Telegram 👇

my keywords
Best Crypto Broker 2026
Best Crypto Exchange for Beginners
Lowest Trading Fees
Crypto Trading Tips
Spot vs Futures Trading
Safe Crypto Exchange
safe Crypto trading app in India

————————————————————————

Disclaimer:

Cryptocurrency trading is highly volatile and carries significant risk. The use of high leverage can lead to substantial losses, potentially wiping out your entire account. Before engaging in any trading or investment activities, we strongly recommend consulting a qualified financial advisor.

I am not responsible for any financial losses or gains that may occur. This video is intended for educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial advice or an endorsement to engage in cryptocurrency trading.

source

Ran the Numbers but Nothing Cash Flows? What to Do Next (Rookie Reply)


So you ran the numbers and the cash flow shows negative? You don’t have to give up on rentals. With a few smarter assumptions, the right strategy, or the right market, you can turn “this will never work” into a deal that actually pays you!

Welcome back to another Rookie Reply! Today’s first rookie has analyzed three to four dozen small multifamily properties. Even at 20% below asking, almost none of them cash flow on day one. We narrow it down to three possibilities: are you being too conservative with your expenses, is the 1% rule out of reach in your market, or is it time to pivot? We show you how to stress-test your vacancy, maintenance, and CapEx numbers, and walk through the real fix.

If the numbers don’t work, don’t force them. There’s a better path to your first deal!

Ashley:
Today’s rookie reply is about knowing your constraints before you buy. Sometimes a deal looks bad because your assumptions are wrong. Other times your assumptions are right and the deal really does not work.

Tony:
We also have a TN visa holder who wants to invest without crossing legal lines and a rookie with limited capital, wondering when to bring in a lawyer, a CPA, and a property manager.

Ashley:
This is the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kare.

Tony:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson. And with that, let’s get into today’s first question. And so this question comes from Lee in the BiggerPockets Forums, and Lee says, “I’m looking at buying long-term buy and hold rentals in Northwestern Montana, and I’m fortunate enough to be about an hour’s drive from a college town in a tourist-driven market, one to my south, one to my north. Over the last couple of months, I’ve run BiggerPockets calculator analyses on three or four dozen small multifamily properties at list price, and then rerun them with progressively more aggressive offers, 5% off, 10% off, sometimes 20% below asking price, and almost none of them cash flow on day one. I want to make sure I’m not the problem before I conclude the market is the problem. Here’s one representative deal so you can see exactly what I’m working with. The property is an $860,000 duplex.
It rents for $4,700 a month with existing tenants, 25% down, 7.1 interest rate on a 30-year conventional note. Insurance is about 300 bucks per month. Taxes at 360, vacancy assuming 8%, maintenance at 10%, CapEx at 10%, and then there’s no HOA. At list price, the monthly cash flow is a negative $1,115, which is obviously not what we want. If I get the seller to take 10% off, cashflow goes to negative $687. If I want to get into the disrespectful offer or Hail Mary at a 635 offer, then I get to a cash flow basically breaking even, so negative 18 bucks per month. That’s the only scenario in my whole pipeline where the deal cash flows on day one and it requires the seller to cut $225,000 off their asking price. Every other property I’ve modeled tells the same story. Rents in this market are roughly 3,000 to 5,000 on multifamily properties priced between 650 and 900.
The 1% rule is a fantasy here. Most properties land between 0.5 to 0.8. So are my assumptions off? The eight, 10 and 10 for vacancy maintenance and CapEx feels standard, but my realtor tells me many investors run leaner. Am I being too conservative? Are my expectations off? Is day one positive cash flow at 25% down just not a realistic ask in 2026? Am I looking at the wrong deals? Should I be hunting for midterm rental, short term rental, house hack, conversions, things like that? Is the market just wrong for me right now? So these are all good questions, right? So I think for Lee, you hit the nail on the head. I think my initial reaction is that this isn’t necessarily a real estate investing doesn’t work problem. This is you might just live in a higher cost of living area. You’re saying the duplexes are going for eight, almost $900,000.
You got to command some pretty high rents in order for that to work. So if I’m you, there’s probably one or two things I’m doing. Either A, I’m moving to a different market because again, 20,000 cities in the United States, there are definitely markets across the country where we can get cashflow positive on day one. So can we move to a different market where it’s just simply easier to do that? Or to your other point, can we pivot our strategy in this existing market to then make the deal actually work in a way that produces cash flow? So instead of traditional long-term buy and hold rentals, to your point, can you do maybe renting by the room? Can you do a furnished midterm rental instead? Is there another strategy that you can layer on while staying in that market? But I think where rookie investors sometimes get themselves stuck or kind of fall into this feeling of like, man, real estate investing doesn’t work, it’s when they try and pair their goals with the wrong market.
The market simply doesn’t support what their goals are. You got to establish your goals and then identify if the market actually supports it. So that’s what comes to mind first for me, Ash, is either pick a new market or pick a new strategy within the existing market. What about you?

Ashley:
Yeah, I think your idea, and I didn’t even think of this as you were reading the question, but maybe changing the strategy of the property. I’ll give you an example. I had a property that I listed as a long-term rental for $1,000 per month, and we really didn’t get that much interest on it. So this was about two years ago and I decided to pivot that property to a short-term rental. So to rent that property, I listed it at a thousand, but it wasn’t really renting. We had some interest, but nobody acted on it and then we took it down and we pivoted to a short-term rental. And so really the market rent was probably less than a thousand since it wasn’t getting rented right away. But now last month, I just looked it up, we did $3,200 in revenue for that property as a short-term rental.
That is a huge difference from a thousand dollars. And now that property covers way more than the mortgage payment on the property. So I think that is the first thing I would look into is if there’s different ways to change the strategy on this property, rent by the room, midterm rental, short-term rental, all of these different things. That’s the first thing I would do is getting creative. And then the next thing I would do is look at your variable expenses. So I see for the maintenance, you put 10% of reserves that you are saving, and maybe that is a little too conservative. I’d be interested to know what is the age of this home? If this is an older home that hasn’t had the electric, the plumbing or anything updated in a long time, then you are spot on with the 10%. But if it is a property that is newer, was built pretty recently or was completely gutted and remodeled, then you probably don’t need 10% and you can bring that down a little bit.
So there are a little bit of ways you can manipulate those variable expenses, but you still want to be conservative. I would never ever go less than 5%, unless maybe you’re getting a home warranty on a brand new build and the home warranty is for the next three years and maybe I would knock it down to 3%. But I think that you do have a little room and maybe the maintenance to bring that down to less than 10%. Then also for the vacancy, you have 8%, which is pretty middle of the road. I like to go from five to 10%. So looking at your market, what is the vacancy rate? Is there a ton available and things aren’t renting? Are things renting good? But I would probably stay with 8%. Now your CapEx, your capital expenders that you have that as 10% of rent. Again, look at this home.
Was there a new roof put on last year? Was the HVAC installed two years ago? Is the hot water tank brand new? How many capital expenditures do you expect over the next five to 10 years that you’ll need to have this money for? So maybe those are things that you could look at that you are being a little bit more conservative, but I would also rather, especially your very first deal, for you to be more conservative than to end up realizing you didn’t account for as much as what ended up happening. Coming up, can you own US rentals while working here on a TN visa? We will separate passive ownership from active work and talk about the professional advice you need before buying. We’ll be right back.
Okay. So these numbers show why a clear investment constraint can save you from a bad deal. Our next rookie has a different constraint. He wants to buy long-term rentals in Austin while making sure the investment does not conflict with his TN status. So his question is, “Hey everyone, I’m currently living and working in Austin, Texas on a TN visa and looking to start analyzing and purchasing long-term rental properties throughout the Austin metro area. I’m curious if anyone here has personally owned long-term rentals in the US while simultaneously maintaining TN status. How has the experience been? Particularly when it comes to financing property management and making sure you stay within the rules of your TN status. If you’ve done this yourself or know someone who has, I’d love to hear about your experience and any advice you have. Thanks.” So I think my first initial reaction is going to go to Claude and I am going to put in my information and what I’m trying to do, what my TN status is, what I want to do with real estate, where I’m currently living, as much as information as I can and I’m going to put it into Claude and I’m going to see what kind of feedback I get.
The second thing is going to be talking to an immigration attorney who actually has worked with someone and real estate ownership. So if it is possible, they understand the process of how to do that. So I’m going to ask them, first of all, is it possible? Second of all, what is the process of buying real estate? And then third, how many people have they actually taken from start to finish where they’ve had the visa and they’ve helped them close on their first rental property or real estate property in the US? That would be my process. First, go to AI, get generic general information first, and then I’m going to actually go and do a call with an immigration attorney. A lot of the attorneys either do a free consult or you pay a couple hundred bucks to do a consult with them. And usually when I’ve done this before for different random things, you actually get quite a bit of information just during that consult and then you can decide whether to move forward or not.
But that couple hundred bucks you may have to pay for the consult, well worth it to get the correct and accurate information.

Tony:
Yeah, I love that. Going to an attorney for sure. And obviously guys like Ash and I, neither one of us are visa holders, so we’re just saying what we’d do if we were in that situation. In addition to talking to an attorney, I’d maybe try and also find someone with the same visa status who has successfully purchased a rental property. If there’s anyone else that you work with who’s on a similar visa status and just get their experience. Okay, what did you learn as you went through this process? What are some of the gotchas that you didn’t think about before, but that are very clear to you now that you should have thought about beforehand? But I think getting someone else’s firsthand experience would be incredibly useful. And then the final thing I do is I’d probably also go talk to some lenders to try and understand what loan products are available to me.
Again, I’m not sure about the TN visa specifically, but maybe there could be some sort of restrictions on the type of products that a lender can actually give you. So I’d want clarity on that. Am I paying a premium on interest rate? Am I maybe limited on the amount of down payment that I can put down or getting that number lower per se? So I go talk to a few lenders and explain your visa situation, your visa status, and let them point you in the right direction on, “Hey, here are some options that you might want to consider.” So I think if you tackle all of those, you’re getting firsthand experience from other folks who’ve done this before, you’re talking to an attorney, you’re talking to a lender, those are probably the core team of people you’ll need to have clarity on what the right next steps are for your specific situation.
And the last piece, let’s talk about it from the management side. Let’s say that you do have to maybe leave the country, you’re going back home wherever it may be.
How do you do that remotely? And guys, I chuckle because for me, it’s like whether my property is 90 minutes away is my closest property or halfway across the country is my furthest property, our processes and systems for managing them are basically the same. There isn’t anything special that I do for the 3000 mile away property that I don’t also do for the property that’s 90 minutes away. I still have a really, really solid team. I still have all of my tools and software in place. I’m still managing it the same way. It doesn’t matter how close it is. So I don’t necessarily think that from a management perspective, even if you have to travel to a different country, different continent even, that you won’t be able to effectively manage your property wherever you are. It’s just all the foundational things. Good team, good systems, good processes, good tools, good software, and you can take it anywhere.
After the break, a rookie with limited capital is wondering how to assemble a lawyer, a CPA, a lender, and a property manager before buying anything. And we’ll explain what build your team really means at this stage.
All right guys, our final question is about a phrase that rookies hear all the time, build your team. Aurelio wants to know how that works when capital is limited and there is not a deal under contract yet. So here’s Aurelio’s question, “How do I go about getting a lawyer, property manager, CPA, et cetera, if my capital is limited? How does that actually work?” And Aurelio is reading through one of the BiggerPockets of books on getting your ducks in a row. So here’s my take guys on building your team. I think there are certain people that you need to engage at different parts of the process or depending on what your situation and what your challenges and what your goals are. I’ll give you an example from the short-term rental industry because a lot of folks kind of face the same thing where it’s actually their CPA that recommends they buy a short-term rental and it’s because they need to do that as a tax mitigation strategy.
So it’s your CPA who’s initially saying, “Hey, you should think about buying an Airbnb,” so that they become the first person on your team. Let’s say that isn’t the case. Maybe you’re not buying for that reason and your initial goal is, “Hey, I want to build some additional cash flow streams.” Well, then maybe the first person you need is an agent who can take you around town and give you all the ins and outs and help educate you on the best parts of town to buy and where to avoid. If you are really, really focused on flipping houses, well, maybe you need to go find a general contractor in your market first to understand, “Hey, what’s it actually going to cost for me to repair these types of properties?” So I think depending on what your goals are, depending on what your strategy is, that sometimes can dictate who the first person is on your team that you need to go build.
But I will oftentimes caution against… I get some rookie investors who are like, “Tony, I just spent $30,000 setting up this really elaborate entity structure for all of my rentals and I’ve got this trust that owns this trust and there’s this thing in Wyoming and I’ve got this thing over here, this offshore thing.” And it’s like, “Okay, well, how many properties do you own?” “Oh, nothing yet. I haven’t bought anything yet, but the structure’s there. And I feel like that’s kind of putting the cart before the horse. So for me, bringing in the expensive attorneys, bringing the expensive CPAs, I think I try and pull those levers as needed when it’s right in the sequence, like when you have a deal and not necessarily something you need to do on day one.

Ashley:
If you’re in a state like mine, like New York State, to actually close on a property, you need an attorney. So when you are going through the process of offering and then you go under contract, one of the immediate questions or answers that you have to put onto the contract is who is your attorney that’s representing you? So in a state like mine, it does make sense to have a lawyer in advance. So if you’ve literally used a lawyer for anything, my first initial reaction would be to call them and ask if they do real estate transactions. If not, if they can refer you to someone that does. And then it would just be a simple phone call, a simple email is to, “Hi, I was referred by so-and-so. I am planning on purchasing a property and I need an attorney to actually do the real estate transaction.
Can you let me know what your fees are and what the process is?” Or something like that. My real estate attorney charge or my attorney charges pretty much a flat rate every time for their work and then add in all the expenses that incur, like survey, things like that, depending. But I would at least have an attorney lined up to actually do the transaction for you. As far as a CPA, I would have somebody that’s maybe not at Walmart and has a little desk that’s at the checkout aisle where you can go in and get your taxes done. I would definitely have somebody who can advise you on your taxes and the tax advantages of real estate when you do purchase your property. So if you’re purchasing your property towards the end of the year, I would make sure you have that CPA, that accountant in place before the end of the year because you’re purchasing that property in that year and you want to make sure that you’re taking advantage of everything before the year end and doing everything correctly, even more importantly as far as reporting, especially if you have no idea about taxes at all or in general, having a CPA lined up that can help you with that.
And a lot of these things, you’re not charged until you actually use them. So just planning ahead because a lot of CPAs, like the CPA that Tony and I use for tax planning, Tony also uses her for his tax returns. I tried to get in last year and she’s like, “No, sorry, you’re too late. We’re full. You have to keep working with who you’re working with.” So if you want a really good person, sometimes it’s not as easy as just calling like, “Hey, can you help me right now? There is some time and some process to actually get into working with the companies too.” And then a property manager, if you intend to use a property manager, I would start looking now and start interviewing them, calling, finding out what their fees are, what their processes are for a maintenance request. You want to make sure the property manager is not only just great to you as the owner, but will also be great to your tenants and it’s just going to create a better relationship and relieve a lot of headaches for you yourself.
But I would do phone calls. I would at least have a little Rolodex of people that when you are ready to get that first deal, you already know who is going to be your first call to get lined up instead of having to… When you’re acquiring your first deal, there’s a ton of work you have to do on your own, get through the inspection, do the due diligence, get your financing set up. The last thing you want to be doing is conducting interviews with property managers to see who can hire. So as much as you can, do these phone calls and interviews ahead of time. Well, thank you guys so much for joining us today. And remember, if the numbers do not work, do not force them. Define legal boundaries and build relationships before buying services. Your first deal should fit your real financial, legal, and operational life.
The best plan is the one you can explain, afford, and execute without depending on a future rescue. I’m Ashley, he’s Tony, and we’ll see you guys in the next episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].