Home Blog

Seattle’s NBA team left a $10 million franchise behind. Now the Storm is worth $425 million



In the first eight years of the Seattle Storm’s existence, the WNBA team was the “tail” on the “dog” of its NBA counterpart, the SuperSonics, according to Storm co-owner Ginny Gilder.

Both bought in 2001 for $200 million by an ownership group led by former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, the Sonics and the Storm shared a practice facility and entertainment complex KeyArena for games. Still, the men’s team brought in the cash and was responsible for the majority of the fixed costs.

But the Sonics—Seattle’s first professional sports franchise, founded in 1966—left the city in 2008 over an arena dispute, relocating to Oklahoma City and rebranding as the Thunder. That same year, a group of local businesswomen including Gilder, formed Force 10 Hoops LLC and bought the Storm for $10 million, or just 5% of the total value of the two-team package Schultz purchased years before.

Over the next two decades, the Storm grew into a franchise with an estimated value of $425 million, among the top five of the WNBA’s 13 franchises—all of which have exploded in value amid the league’s catapulting popularity. The team tallied four championships, all with 13-time All-Star Sue Bird, who, after her 2022 retirement, joined Force 10 Hoops as a Storm’s owner in 2024.

There’s a good chance Seattle will not be a one-team basketball town for much longer. NBA Commissioner Adam Silver has said he’s focused on the return of the SuperSonics as part of the league’s expansion, with the team potentially resuming play in Seattle as early as 2028. 

The ownership of the Seattle Kraken NHL team is the parent of One Roof Sports and Entertainment, which is positioning itself as the next owner of Seattle’s revived NBA franchise.

While the Sonics were the foundation of basketball in Seattle, Gilder and the rest of the Storm’s ownership spent the last 16 years building the very basketball culture the NBA now wants to re-enter. To them, the return of the Sonics is not just an opportunity for the Storm to celebrate the transformation of women’s sports as the main act; it’s the chance to grow Seattle as a sports town, period. 

“It raises the profile of basketball even more…so that you’ll now have pro-basketball pretty much 12 months a year in Seattle,” Gilder told Fortune. “It’s the Sonics and the Storm; it’s the Storm and the Sonics. It’s bread and butter, apple pie and vanilla ice cream. They belong together.”

‘I majored in equity’

Gilder was not planning to become an entrepreneur, but she did grow up an athlete. Before she was selected to participate in the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow (an event U.S. athletes would boycott but receive Congressional Gold Medals for years later) and won silver in quadruple sculls at the 1984 games in Los Angeles, Gilder rowed at Yale, where she received her bachelor’s in history in 1979.

At 17, Gilder joined more than a dozen of her women’s crewmates in protesting Yale’s treatment of women athletes. At the time, Yale’s boathouse had no women’s locker room, and women would wait on the bus in the winter for the men’s team to shower. About 19 members of Gilder’s crew team went to athletic director Joni Barnett’s office and stripped naked, with “Title IX” scrawled on their bodies in blue felt tip pen. Yale added a women’s locker room to the boathouse the next year. 

“I got my degree in history, but I majored in equity, in access to opportunity,” Gilder said.

Though a New Yorker by birth, Gilder became a Storm fan in 2005, the year after the team won its first championship. 

“I loved what the team represented,” she said, “And I loved the opportunity to try to make something happen on a more global scale, not be satisfied with the status quo.”

Two years later, Gilder joined forces with Lisa Brummel, a 25-year Microsoft veteran; Dawn Trudeau, another early Microsoft executive; and former judge Anne Levinson, to form Force 10 Hoops. (Levinson left the group in 2010.)

Their basketball knowledge varied greatly—Gilder admitted she didn’t know what a point guard was at the time—but the group had convictions about feminism and gender parity, as well as the financial resources to make sure Seattle could retain one of its basketball franchises. They vowed to run the team like a business.

“Women’s sports was in a very different place,” Gilder said. “And one of the things I said was, one day, we need to be able to sell our team for a profit—not because I wanted to make millions of dollars—but in America, you either have a charity or a hobby or a business.”

Unlike an NBA team, where market growth was assumed, owning a WNBA franchise required a different set of strategies, especially with no other basketball counterpart to bolster an audience or share costs.

Three more championships under Bird helped keep the team’s momentum high, and the new Climate Pledge Arena and training facility (designed by Spero Valavanis, the father of Storm CEO and president Alisha Valavanis) helped provide the team with the resources to grow. The team’s owners have said their social justice convictions struck a chord with Seattle’s sports fans.

“We’ve always believed women’s sports is valuable. And we’ve always believed you should pay to watch women’s sports,” Brummel told Fortune in 2024. “If you came to a Storm game, you’re going to pay for your seat,” she adds. “In return, we will give you an amazing experience.”

‘I cannot imagine that the Sonics will be a tail’

With an anticipated, though not guaranteed, return of the Sonics, Gilder does not see the Storm anchoring the returning franchise in the same way the old Sonics did in the WNBA team’s early days. But while the Storm has become the dog, “I cannot imagine that the Sonics will be a tail.”

“Women’s sports has grown to a place that it has its own distinctive characteristics, it has its own fan base,” Gilder said. “That’s not going to go away with the return of a very important part of Seattle’s history.”

Should the Sonics rejoin the Storm, Silver expects “multiple bidders” for the team, as well as the need to address inevitable logistical hurdles. The Storm currently share Climate Pledge Arena with the Kraken, who have majority ownership of the building.

Natalie Welch, an assistant professor of marketing at Seattle University, said that while the Storm has allowed Seattle to maintain and grow its basketball fanbase ahead of the Sonics’ possible return, the Sonics will also provide a surge of demand for the Storm.

“The Sonics are going to be a hard ticket to get for a while and not as accessible,” Welch told Fortune. “The Storm will have an opportunity to kind of capture some of that value.”

There’s risk with the astronomical growth of a sport, too. The WNBA is executing its own expansion, adding the Toronto Tempo and Portland Fire this year, with plans to add franchises in Cleveland, Detroit, and Philadelphia in 2028, 2029, and 2030, respectively.

WNBA fans often enjoy a less corporate experience than men’s basketball, Welch noted, and as the league grows and attracts more sponsors, there’s the added responsibility of keeping fans—including the Seattle faithful—top of mind.

“These even newer teams have been really interesting to see how they are walking the line of giving the hardcore fans and the longtime fans [what they want], plus trying to welcome in the new fans as well,” Welch said.

Synergy One Lending merges into American Pacific Mortgage


Synergy One Lending is merging into American Pacific Mortgage in a move the companies say makes them one of the largest retail lenders in the country. 

Processing Content

The companies announced the deal Friday, which will keep the Synergy One Lending brand as a division of the Northern California-based APM. The combination is expected to increase combined production to around $14 billion a year. 

Terms of the deal were undisclosed, although the move is one of the larger deals between industry players so far this year. APM CEO Dustin Sheppard lauded Synergy One’s culture and leadership, and praised CEO Steve Majerus will join APM as president. Aaron Nemec will remain president at Synergy One.

Majerus, whose company has scooped up smaller lenders in recent years, hinted at the acquisition strategy reverberating across every sector of the mortgage space today. 

“Scale is becoming essential to win and gives us the ability to invest aggressively in pricing, products, AI, technology, marketing, and customer acquisition,” he said in a press release Friday.

Synergy One has 540 employees across 65 branches in 49 states, according to Friday’s announcement. The San Diego-based company debuted a homebuilder division last year and acquired Mann Mortgage and Draper & Kramer branches in 2024

APM has a massive footprint, with over 1,700 sponsored mortgage loan originators and 403 branches nationwide, according to Consumer Nationwide Multistate Licensing System records. The company also onboarded branches and employees from various lenders in the wind down from the refinance boom. 

According to the most recently available Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, APM originated over $7.3 billion in loan volume in 2024, while Synergy One originated just over $2 billion over the same period. 

More mergers and acquisitions

Home loan companies aren’t showing signs of slowing the rapid pace of dealmaking of last year, as prospects for the next boom market remain relatively muted. The activity isn’t limited to shops scooping up competitors, as lenders, servicers and vendors have undertaken a variety of acquisitions this year.

None of the deals this year have shaken up the industry like Rocket Cos.’ spending spree last year, but a high-profile battle for Two Harbors and its Roundpoint servicing business persists. While massive retail lender CrossCountry’s offer is favored by the company’s board of directors, wholesale leader United Wholesale Mortgage is vying to keep afloat its original agreement, suggesting Friday it would further enhance its bid.



15% Award Discount at New and Revamped IHG Hotels


Save 15% on Points Bookings at New IHG Hotels

IHG has a running promotion for its newest hotels and resorts around the world. You can save 15% on award stays at hotels that have usually opened or reopened within the last six months. Check out the details below. 

Offer Details

This promotion for a 15% discount on Reward Nights booked at newly opened IHG hotels is available only to IHG One Rewards members who book within several months.

The offer applies to the hotels listed on this webpage and is available to members only when booking through an official IHG online reservations site. The Offer is for a 15% discount off the number of points needed to book a stay using points only. If using Points & Cash, the 15% discount will be applied to only the cash portion of each available option. You will see the 15% discount on the participating hotel’s booking page.

For members with a qualifying Chase IHG Rewards credit card, the Offer is not available to use along with the “Fourth Reward Night Free” cardmember benefit when booking a stay of four (4) or more consecutive Reward Nights. The Offer is available for eligible cardmembers booking three (3) or fewer consecutive Reward Nights.

Expiration dates for this promotion vary by property. You need to book and stay by one of these dates:

  • August 31, 2026 
  • September 30, 2026
  • October 31, 2026 
  • November 31, 2026 

Important Terms

  • This new hotel Reward Night discount offer for a 15% discount on Reward Nights booked at newly opened and recently renovated IHG® hotels (the “Offer”) is available only to IHG One Rewards members who book by the stay date indicated in the communications only shared by official IHG communication channels.
  • Offer is for a 15% discount off the number of points to book a stay using points only.
  • You will see the 15% discount at time of booking on the participating hotel’s booking page.
  • For members with a qualifying Chase IHG Rewards credit card, the Offer is not available to use along with the “Fourth Reward Night Free” cardmember benefit when booking a stay of four (4) or more consecutive Reward Nights.
  • The Offer is available for eligible cardmembers booking three (3) or fewer consecutive Reward Nights. 

Guru’s Wrap-up

You don’t need to register to get this IHG discount for awards at new and revamped hotels. Just head to the promotion page and book one of the eligible properties for three nights or less.

This discount is valid when you book reward nights with IHG One Rewards points or Cash + Points nights. There are more than 70 properties available all around the world.

How To Invest For Teenagers In India? Investing Ideas For Beginners



How to invest for teenagers and beginners is explained in this video. Learn about stock market investment for teens, ideas for beginners and things you must know before investing in the share market. This video does not recommend any stocks or financial advice. Watch till the end to know the pros and cons, investment 101 for beginners and strategies that can be helpful as a young investor in the share market.

00:00 Introduction
01:20 Double Down Theory
02:40 50 20 20 10 Rule
04:05 Step 1
04:55 Step 2
06:00 Step 3
06:20 Step 4
06:40 Mistake 1
06:55 Mistake 2
07:07 Mistake 3
07:57 Investment Option 1
08:05 Investment Option 2
08:20 Investment Option 3
08:44 7 Days Actions Plan

Join this channel to get access to perks:

More videos for you –
Stock Market for Beginners –

#investmentforbeginners

source

When good money goes bad: the question SpaceX and OpenAI investors aren’t asking



When Sam Altman was president of Y Combinator, he advised founders: stay close enough to profitability that you could get there before your next funding round if you had to. As he told the Wall Street Journal in 2014, keeping “profitability in grasp” was a key lesson.

My late Harvard colleague Clayton Christensen would have recognized immediately some of the hallmarks of good money thinking: keep costs low, test whether real customers will pay real prices, don’t let your cost structure outrun your revenue model. 

OpenAI’s S-1 reportedly projects $14 billion in losses for 2026 alone. Profitability is not expected until 2030 at the earliest. A few years ago, Altman told investors that once OpenAI built artificial general intelligence, they would ask it to figure out how to generate a return. He was at least partly joking. The framework suggests he shouldn’t have been.

OpenAI is not even first to the door. Anthropic, the lab founded by its own defectors, confidentially filed this week at a near $1 trillion valuation. 

The question none of these roadshows will answer is the one that actually matters: does this company have a viable path to profitability it could activate if it needed to?

Good Money, Bad Money

Christensen and his collaborator Michael Raynor developed the “Good Money/Bad Money” theory for exactly this scenario.

The framework’s insight is simple: it’s not whose money you take that shapes a company’s strategy — it’s the expectations attached to it. For a new-growth venture, the best kind of money is “patient for growth but impatient for profit.” Such capital forces founders to test quickly whether actual customers will pay good prices for a real product. It keeps costs low enough to preserve strategic flexibility. And it shields the venture from unexpected shifts in the funding environment.

So-called bad money is the opposite. Capital that is impatient for growth but patient for profit sounds generous because it ostensibly gives you runway. But there is an insidious quality. When investors demand rapid growth, a venture gets channeled toward the largest, most obvious markets — precisely those where deep-pocketed incumbents also want to invest. As costs ramp up in anticipation of revenues, the cost structure begins to dictate strategy, making the small, unglamorous opportunities that might actually work seem unattractive. Scaling a losing formula doesn’t fix it. It magnifies the losses.

Going public at a $1 trillion valuation is, almost by definition, accepting money that must be impatient for growth. Enormous expectations are already priced in. The pressure to grow faster, enter newer and bigger markets, and justify the number never lets up.

When I teach the framework in my MBA class, reactions are weird. Sometimes, students think it’s the course’s most compelling idea; other times they despise it. I puzzled over their reactions for years until I realized that they seemed to track the capital-market environment almost perfectly. When money was abundant and cheap, students hated the theory. But when money was scarce and expensive, they loved it. The theory didn’t change — the world around it did. That’s kind of the point of the theory.

The Ponzi Scheme of Ambition

Watch how the total addressable market narrative expands. SpaceX started as a rocket company in 2002. Then it added Starlink satellite internet in 2019. Then, after merging with xAI earlier this year, it became a rocket-internet-and-AI company. Now the S-1 describes orbital AI compute satellites by 2028. Each new layer of ambition justifies a higher valuation, but the economics have not yet caught up with the narrative. The analyst Anand Sanwal memorably described this pattern as a “Ponzi scheme of ambition”: a growth company that hasn’t yet dominated its first market keeps painting ever grander pictures of new ones to keep the capital flowing and the valuation rising. Every S-1 has a risk factors section. Almost nobody reads it until it’s too late.

The theory acknowledges that a “get big fast” strategy can make sense — for example, when real network effects and switching costs create true winner-take-all dynamics. But those conditions arise far less often than founders and their backers claim.

The Altman Problem

Amazon is the counterexample everyone reaches for — the growth-prioritizing company that famously refused to turn a profit and still won. But Amazon, maybe not on day one but certainly early on, had a viable profit formula inside the business. It simply chose to prioritize growth. Not every company burning cash has profitability in grasp. The question is whether it could get there if it had to.

Altman once cared about the difference. The S-1 can’t answer whether OpenAI has a 

viable path to profitability it could activate under pressure. Neither can the roadshow.

My students are a constant lesson to me that the theory doesn’t change. The world around it does. Right now, money feels abundant. It won’t forever.

“The Good Money/Bad Money framework was developed by Clayton Christensen and Michael Raynor in The Innovator’s Solution.”

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

House Spending Bill Would Eliminate Subsidized Student Loans To Pay For Pell


The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies released its fiscal year 2027 spending bill (PDF File), and it pays for a Pell Grant increase by permanently ending subsidized federal student loans.

The bill cuts the U.S. Department of Education’s budget by 10%, or roughly $8 billion, with deep reductions to K-12 programs, Federal Work Study, and education research. It is the first step in a long appropriations process, but the headline tradeoff is clear: students gain a small Pell bump and lose one of the most affordable loans available to them.

Would you like to save this?

We’ll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

By The Numbers

  • $7,445: new maximum Pell Grant award, a $50 increase
  • $15 billion+:  mandatory spending added to close the Pell shortfall
  • $16 billion: projected 10-year savings from eliminating subsidized loans, redirected entirely to Pell
  • $6,000: average increase in student debt per borrower from losing the subsidy, per a National College Attainment Network (NCAN) analysis
  • 84%: share of Pell recipients who take out student loans, compared with under half of non-Pell students

What The Proposed Changes Look Like

Subsidized loans go to undergraduates with demonstrated financial need, and the government covers the interest while the student is in school. Under the bill, no new subsidized loans would be issued after July 1, 2027. There’s a grandfathering clause where students already borrowing would keep their eligibility through the end of their program.

In place of subsidized loans, undergraduates could borrow the same amount in unsubsidized loans — but interest would accrue from day one, adding thousands in cost over the life of the loan. The bill also cuts Federal Work-Study by 26% to $908 million and the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) by 40% to $546 million.

Michele Zampini, Associate Vice President for Federal Policy & Advocacy at TICAS, warned the math doesn’t favor low-income students: “Eliminating subsidized loans, which go to undergraduate students with high financial need, could increase overall college costs for these students by thousands of dollars.

How This Connects

The proposal revives an idea from last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill debate that didn’t make the final law. But the broader trend is already locked in. The reconciliation bill enacted in 2025 cut more than $300 billion from federal student loans over a decade, and a wave of changes takes effect July 1, 2026: including a new $257,500 lifetime borrowing limit, annual and lifetime caps on Parent PLUS loans, loan proration for part-time students, and the end of Grad PLUS loans.

Eliminating subsidized loans on top of those changes would potentially push more students toward private student loans, where rates are higher and protections are weaker, or prevent them from borrowing for college at all. For families weighing how to pay for college, the affordability gap that subsidized loans were designed to fill is shrinking fast.

It’s important to remember that this is a subcommittee proposal, not law. It must clear the full Appropriations Committee, the House floor, the Senate, before anything reaches the president.

Expect the subsidized loan provision to be a flashpoint as negotiations continue.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories:

@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf2″].tcb-post-list #post-22108 [data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf8″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/What_Are_Private_Non-Profit_Student_Loan_Providers_1280x720-150×150.jpeg”) !important;}}

10 Best Private Student Loan Lenders For College

10 Best Private Student Loan Lenders For College
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf2″].tcb-post-list #post-76739 [data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf8″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/JP-Morgan-150×150.jpeg”) !important;}}

College Tuition Up 914% Since 1983, J.P. Morgan Reports

College Tuition Up 914% Since 1983, J.P. Morgan Reports
@media (min-width: 300px){[data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf2″].tcb-post-list #post-46488 [data-css=”tve-u-19e94800bf8″]{background-image: url(“https://thecollegeinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Federal_vs._Private_Student_Loans_1280x720-150×150.png”) !important;}}

Federal vs. Private Student Loans: Which Is Better?

Federal vs. Private Student Loans: Which Is Better?

Editor: Colin Graves

The post House Spending Bill Would Eliminate Subsidized Student Loans To Pay For Pell appeared first on The College Investor.

US attacks Iranian sites after Iran launches drones, in latest Gulf flare-up




US attacks Iranian sites after Iran launches drones, in latest Gulf flare-up

Chase Offers: 15% Back At Lowe’s ($50 Maximum Purchase)


The Offer

  • Some people are seeing a nice offer among their Chase Offers:
    • Get 15% back at Lowe’s, up to $50 cash back

The Fine Print

  • Valid until July 2, 2026

Our Verdict

Great offer with a nice maximum as well. 

Hat tip to reader Rudy

Mortgage Rates Now Face a Triple Threat


The conflict in Iran was arguably bad enough for mortgage rates.

It sent them from the best levels since mid-2022 right back toward the high 6s again.

To make matters worse, we’ve gotten a series of hot jobs reports too, including today’s BLS report beat.

But that’s not all; a third threat is convexity hedging, where investors sell more Treasuries to hedge the rise in bond yields.

Taken together, there are now three forces putting upward pressure on mortgage rates.

Mortgage Rate Threat #1: The Iran Conflict

This is probably the biggest issue at the moment and the reason we no longer have a sub-6% 30-year fixed mortgage rate.

We had one as recently as March 1st, but then an unexpected conflict erupted and the Strait of Hormuz shut down.

Long story short, oil prices surged higher as a result and inflation fears were renewed, right after we seemed to finally beat it.

That pushed 10-year bond yields higher, a bellwether for 30-year fixed mortgage rates.

In the process, the 30-year fixed climbed from around 5.875% all the way to 6.75%, before easing somewhat recently.

But there’s a decent chance it could re-test those levels and move even higher if conditions don’t improve soon.

And last I checked, there doesn’t seem to be much of a resolution happening in the Middle East.

Mortgage Rate Threat #2: A Hot Labor Market

The next issue for mortgage rates is hot labor. We’ve seen a series of jobs beats lately, whether it was the ADP report on Wednesday or today’s monthly jobs report for May.

The BLS said 172,000 jobs were created last month, a huge beat over the 80,000 expected by forecasters.

Simply put, the labor market has proven to be resilient, despite many expecting weak jobs numbers to continue.

We had a series of cold jobs reports late last year, but it seems the labor market has firmed up since.

All else equal, this puts upward pressure on bonds yields and mortgage rates, as seen in the 10-year bond yield chart above.

Or at least doesn’t help mortgage rates drop due to any implied weakness in that department.

If it continues, it fuels inflation concerns, especially when combined with high oil (and gas) prices.

Mortgage Rate Threat #3: Convexity Hedging

The third and final issue mortgage rates face at the moment is a thing called “convexity hedging.”

It’s a strategy where investors sell Treasuries when yields rise, which can amplify the move higher.

So bonds sell off even more than they normally would, leading to even higher bond yields.

Because bond yields and mortgage rates move in relative lockstep, it puts additional upward pressure on interest rates.

In the process, the higher mortgage rates act as a deterrent to refinance, leading to longer duration on associated mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

By selling Treasuries, these investors can reduce their interest rate risk and rebalance their portfolios.

But more selling of these bonds means yields go up more than expected, resulting in higher mortgage rates.

To summarize, we’ve now got three headwinds for mortgage rates, including the war (higher oil prices), hot labor (adds to inflation concerns), and exaggerated Treasury selloff due to higher bond yields.

All of these forces have the potential to push the 30-year fixed back to 7% or higher, but so far mortgage rates have taken it all in stride. It could be a lot worse.

Colin Robertson
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)

From Suno’s $5.4B valuation to Bill Ackman’s exit from Universal Music… it’s MBW’s weekly round-up


Welcome to Music Business Worldwide’s Weekly Round-up – where we make sure you caught the five biggest stories to hit our headlines over the past seven days. MBW’s Round-up is exclusively supported by BMI, a global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music.


This week, Universal Music Group spent around $290 million buying back stock directly from Bill Ackman‘s Pershing Square, as the fund exited its position in the company.

Meanwhile, AI music firm Suno raised over $400 million, pushing its valuation to $5.4 billion.

Elsewhere, Garth Brooks was reported to be seeking up to $2 billion for his music catalog.

Also this week, Live Nation took a majority stake in Argentina’s Dale Play Live, while Sunita Kaur was named President, Asia, for Universal Music Publishing Group.

Here are some of the biggest headlines from the past few days…


1. UMG SPENDS $290M BUYING BACK STOCK FROM BILL ACKMAN’S PERSHING SQUARE, AMID FUND’S EXIT FROM MUSIC COMPANY

Universal Music Group has bought back EUR €250 million of its own stock directly from Bill Ackman‘s Pershing Square.

The figure translates to about USD $290 million at current exchange rates. UMG repurchased 14,156,285 of its ordinary shares at €17.66 each, the company said on Thursday (June 4).

The purchase formed part of the disposition of the entire remaining UMG position held by various Pershing Square funds… (MBW)


2. SUNO RAISES OVER $400 MILLION, PUSHING VALUATION TO $5.4 BILLION

Suno has raised over $400 million in Series D funding at a $5.4 billion post-money valuation. The round was led by Bond Capital, alongside IVP, Forerunner, Union Square Ventures, Alkeon, and Quiet, with participation from existing investors Matrix, Lightspeed, Menlo Ventures, and Schroders Capital.

The AI music company announced the round on Wednesday (June 3). CEO and co-founder Mikey Shulman wrote in a blog post that “as with our previous funding rounds, we’re thrilled to have participation from some of the best artists, producers, songwriters, and people from across the music industry.”… (MBW)


3. GARTH BROOKS SEEKING UP TO $2BN FOR HIS MUSIC CATALOG (REPORT)

Garth Brooks is considering selling his music catalog and is seeking around $2 billion for the rights to his songs and recordings.

That is according to the Wall Street Journal, which reported that the country star has been weighing a transaction for a few years, citing people familiar with the matter.

A deal at that price would rank among the largest ever struck for an individual artist or group’s catalog.

He has reportedly told potential investors that he believes the value of his music rights could fall anywhere from the high $1 billion range to more than $2 billion, according to people familiar with the matter cited by the newspaper… (MBW)


4. LIVE NATION ACQUIRES MAJORITY STAKE IN ARGENTINA’S DALE PLAY LIVE

Live Nation is set to acquire a majority stake in Dale Play Live, the concert promotion arm of Argentine entertainment company Dale Play.

Live Nation said the partnership will support the development of Latin and regional artists and expand Spanish-language music in Argentina. Dale Play Founder and CEO Federico Lauria will continue leading the company’s creative and strategic direction, Live Nation said in a statement on Monday (June 1).

The acquisition deepens a relationship Live Nation and Dale Play established earlier this year… (MBW)


5. SUNITA KAUR NAMED PRESIDENT, ASIA, FOR UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP

Sunita Kaur has been appointed President, Asia, for Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG).

The news was announced on Monday (June 1) by UMPG Chairman & CEO Jody Gerson, to whom Kaur reports.

According to the announcement, based in Singapore, Kaur will oversee the company’s operations across the continent, and is tasked with “driving sustainable growth, strengthening UMPG’s presence in key markets, and helping to shape a more connected, inclusive, and forward-looking music ecosystem…” (MBW)


Partner message: MBW’s Weekly Round-up is supported by BMI, the global leader in performing rights management, dedicated to supporting songwriters, composers and publishers and championing the value of music. Find out more about BMI hereMusic Business Worldwide