Librarian Sues After Education Department Refuses To Count 9 Years Toward PSLF

Date:

Share post:


Key Points

  • A former Virginia law librarian sued the Department of Education in May 2026 after it denied two of her PSLF applications and never ruled on a third, filed in December 2022.
  • The Justice Department argued she had to prove most of her own job duties were public service, a test that appears in no version of the PSLF rules.
  • ED’s records show 210 eligible payments on her loans, but only 81 count because the department won’t credit her nine years at the Fairfax Bar Association.

Melissa Scheeren worked at the Fairfax Bar Association’s public law library and pro bono center from March 2008 to February 2017. She later worked for Arlington County, the Library of Congress and the University of Virginia, all government employers. She consolidated her older FFEL loans into a Direct Consolidation Loan in November 2021 using the Biden Limited PSLF Waiver, and ED now credits 210 eligible payments on that loan.

In May 2026, she sued the Department of Education and MOHELA (PDF File) arguing she was owed Public Service Loan Forgiveness when she applied in September 2022.

One of the first issues is that a 501(c)(3) nonprofit qualifies automatically. Other nonprofits, like the bar association, which is a 501(c)(6), have to show that they provide a listed public service. While Scheeren’s employment does meet this and the DOJ agrees, it appears to be one of the first holdups.

The second issue appears to be related to the limited PSLF waiver, consolidation, and payment counts. A July 2025 ED letter in the court record shows 210 eligible payments on her loans and 81 qualifying payments. Regardless of the reasons for the error, it appears she is entitled to have her loans forgiven.

Scheeren says she has paid $16,140.71 on loans that should have been discharged, and about $40,000 remains on her account. She is asking the court to reverse the denial and process the forgiveness she says she’s owed.

Save For Later

Would you like to save this?

We'll email this article to you, so you can come back to it later!

Why It Matters

The government’s defense rests on a reading of PSLF that ED itself has rejected. In an August 19, 2026 motion for summary judgment (PDF File), the Justice Department wrote that Scheeren “was required to prove that most of her employment with the FBA was in one of the enumerated fields.”

PSLF has never measured the borrower’s job. That’s why a career in public service can lead to forgiveness for any full-time worker at a qualifying employer, whatever the role.

The government’s own exhibits say the same thing. In a letter to Sen. Tim Kaine (PDF File) about Scheeren’s case, Federal Student Aid wrote that eligibility “is not about the work a borrower does but is based on who their employer is.”

DOJ filed that letter with its own motion, and it matches how Public Service Loan Forgiveness has worked since 2008.

How Did ED Handle Her PSLF Applications?

ED and MOHELA denied two applications with reasons that contradict, and the third has never been decided. She also followed the PSLF paperwork steps borrowers are told to take, including reconsideration requests, complaints and an ombudsman escalation.

.tci-pslfd{box-sizing:border-box;color:#141414;font-family:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;margin:0 0 24px 0}.tci-pslfd *{box-sizing:border-box}.tci-pslfd__box{width:100%;max-width:100%;border:2px solid #141414;border-radius:8px;background:#FFFFFF;overflow:hidden}.tci-pslfd__head{padding:14px 16px;background:#141414;color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:700;font-size:1.08em;line-height:1.3}.tci-pslfd__head span{color:#f6c061}.tci-pslfd table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:1em;line-height:1.45;margin:0;border:0}.tci-pslfd th,.tci-pslfd td{padding:11px 14px;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;border:0;border-top:1px solid #e5e0d8}.tci-pslfd th{background:#f9f7f5;color:#141414;font-weight:700;border-top:0;font-size:.85em;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.04em}.tci-pslfd th:first-child{width:20%}.tci-pslfd td:first-child{font-weight:700;color:#141414;white-space:nowrap}.tci-pslfd tr:nth-child(even) td{background:#fcfbf9}.tci-pslfd__pill{display:inline-block;padding:2px 9px;border-radius:999px;font-size:.85em;font-weight:700;white-space:nowrap;margin-right:6px}.tci-pslfd__pill–no{background:#fde2e2;color:#7f1d1d}.tci-pslfd__pill–mixed{background:#f6c061;color:#141414}.tci-pslfd__pill–work{background:#dff3e4;color:#14532d}.tci-pslfd tr.tci-pslfd__total td{background:#f6c061;color:#141414;font-weight:700}.tci-pslfd__foot{padding:10px 16px;font-size:.88em;color:#55504a;background:#f9f7f5;border-top:1px solid #e5e0d8}@media (max-width:640px){.tci-pslfd tr.tci-pslfd__total{background:#f6c061}.tci-pslfd table,.tci-pslfd tbody,.tci-pslfd tr,.tci-pslfd td{display:block;width:100%}.tci-pslfd thead{display:none}.tci-pslfd tr{border-top:1px solid #e5e0d8;padding:10px 14px}.tci-pslfd tr:first-child{border-top:0}.tci-pslfd tr:nth-child(even) td{background:transparent}.tci-pslfd tr:nth-child(even){background:#fcfbf9}.tci-pslfd td{border:0;padding:3px 0;white-space:normal}.tci-pslfd td::before{content:attr(data-label);display:block;font-size:.78em;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.04em;color:#8a8378;margin-bottom:2px}}

One Borrower’s PSLF Record 2008–2026
Date What Happened Outcome
Mar. 2008–Feb. 2017 Works full-time at the Fairfax Bar Association’s public law library and pro bono center 108 PaymentsMade during these years, by her count. ED counts none of them.
Apr. 2018–Present Works full-time for government employers: Arlington County, the Library of Congress and the University of Virginia 81 PaymentsCredited by ED as of July 2026
June 2019 Reaches her 120th qualifying payment, by her count 120 PaymentsEligible for forgiveness if the bar association years count
Nov. 4, 2021 Consolidates older FFEL loans into a Direct Consolidation Loan during the Limited PSLF Waiver 210 EligibleED later credits 210 eligible payments on the new loan
Sept. 2, 2022 Files PSLF Application 1 with the association’s bylaws DeniedOct. 24, 2022, calling the nonprofit “a for-profit organization”
Oct. 24, 2022 Files PSLF Application 2 with bylaws and public website materials DeniedOct. 27, 2023, saying it “does not provide a public service”
Dec. 12, 2022 Files PSLF Application 3, adding articles of incorporation and a letter from the executive director Never DecidedStill open
July 13, 2023 Files Reconsideration Request 1 DeniedFive days later
Nov. 13, 2023 Files Reconsideration Request 2 with certified corporate records DeniedMarch 27, 2024, with the same one-line reason
Jan. 30, 2024 Files a complaint with the Department of Education ClosedFeb. 27, 2025, with a general form letter
May 13, 2026 Sues ED and MOHELA in federal court PendingBefore Judge Christopher Cooper
Where She Stands 81 qualifying payments credited, 189 if the bar association years count 120 needed for forgiveness
Source: Scheeren v. Department of Education court filings. The College Investor.

MOHELA was ED’s dedicated PSLF servicer from July 2022 to July 2024. In its July 2026 answer (PDF File), MOHELA denied that it made the decision to deny her application. The servicer also faces an AFT lawsuit over its PSLF processing.

Why Doesn’t DOJ’s Argument Match The PSLF Rules?

DOJ’s argument relies on a rule that took effect after Scheeren applied, and it misreads that rule. The provision it quotes comes from ED’s 2022 final rule (PDF File), which took effect July 1, 2023. The rule in force when she applied covered any private nonprofit providing a listed service, such as public library services. Those categories still decide which nonprofit jobs count toward PSLF.

The 2023 rule’s majority test applies to the employer, which must devote a majority of its full-time staff to qualifying work. The same rulemaking says PSLF eligibility has always turned on “whether the borrower works for a qualifying employer, not their specific job.” ED tried to narrow employer eligibility again in 2025, and a federal judge struck down that rule in June 2026.

The filings also concede the facts that decide the case under the earlier rule. DOJ’s brief acknowledges the bar association is a nonprofit. ED’s declarant, Nikki Harris Bowman, wrote in her declaration (PDF File) that operating a public law library “meets the criteria” of the regulation. The brief even describes the denial as resting on “an incorrect finding,” though it still argues the PSLF denial should stand.

Scheeren’s attorney, Austin Hinkle of Public Goods Practice, called the declaration an after-the-fact rationale in a September 9 opposition and cross-motion (PDF File). On LinkedIn, he wrote that ED “apparently just made up some new interpretation of a decades old law for this case.” He says DOJ’s reply “conceded that it was entirely wrong about the law” but still asked to win and hasn’t discharged her PSLF-eligible loans. That reply is sealed, and The College Investor has not reviewed it.

What Should Borrowers At Non-501(c)(3) Nonprofits Know?

A nonprofit outside 501(c)(3), such as a bar association, can still be a qualifying PSLF employer. Under the current rule, it must devote a majority of its full-time staff to a listed public service and can’t be a labor union or partisan political group. The test looks at the employer, so a librarian and an accountant there earn PSLF credit the same way.

If ED rejects your employer, its letter to Sen. Kaine says reconsideration isn’t the fix. You submit a new PSLF form through the PSLF Help Tool and upload proof, such as bylaws. Keep copies of every form and denial letter, since Scheeren’s saved records became the administrative record ED certified in court.

How This Connects

ED’s broader efforts to limit PSLF employers haven’t held up in court. The department appealed the rulings against its 2025 employer rule in August, but then dropped appeals in October.

The PSLF process is also currently mired in a technical glitch that has left borrowers unable to see their most current PSLF qualifying counts since July of 2026.

Long waits are common too. ED reported 86,520 PSLF Buyback applications pending at the end of January 2026, a backlog that would take about three years to clear at January’s pace. Scheeren’s third application has waited nearly four years without any decision.

While buyback and “normal” PSLF are two different processes, these delays are frustrating for borrowers expecting loan forgiveness.

What’s Next

Judge Christopher Cooper now has to decide on whether ED followed its own PSLF employer rules. Scheeren’s proposed order (PDF File) asks him to vacate the denials and declare the bar association a qualifying employer. It would also give ED 30 days to process her loan forgiveness, with any discharge effective as of November 2021.

DOJ has offered a stay so ED can review more documents, and Scheeren asked the court to decline it.

We’re also tracking court filings on student loan processing delays for signs ED is clearing older PSLF forms.

Editor: Colin Graves

The post Librarian Sues After Education Department Refuses To Count 9 Years Toward PSLF appeared first on The College Investor.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

Delta Just Replaced the Best Way to Get Customer Service With an AI Chatbot

Its latest push to get travelers to use its app is rubbing some Delta Air Lines customers...

Financial Literacy In 63 Minutes

Head to to get started for free with Brilliant's interactive lessons with 20% off an annual membership. Want...

Prediction: This Will Be SpaceX’s Stock Price in 3 Years

Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX -2.25%) was a stock that many were skeptical of when it went public....

15% Off With Promo Code TREAT15

The Offer Direct link to offer JetBlue is offering 15% off with promo code TREAT15 Book by 10/28/26 Travel dates: 11/02/26...